DYDFC personal page - To The Moon

DYDFC

DYDFC

No personal profile

61Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-08-01

F

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-31

F

Here’s your to-do list before the stock market’s next dive

2021-07-30

F

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-29

F

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-28

F

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-27

F

My Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings

2021-07-26

F

HK-listed AK Medical eyes worst day in over 3-1/2 yrs on weak outlook

2021-07-25

F

Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?

2021-07-23

F

Blackstone Earnings Rise as Growth Strategy Boosts Portfolio

2021-07-22

F

The pandemic-induced recession ended more than a year ago -- but the U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet

2021-07-21

Liked and shared commented

The DOW rose more than 1%, IBM gained over 4%

2021-07-20

F

$10,000 Invested in These Growth Stocks Could Make You a Fortune Over the Next 10 Years

2021-07-18

F

'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says

2021-07-16

F

Visa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny

2021-07-15

Wow

Treasury yields slip as Powell says inflation will dwindle

2021-07-15

F

U.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved

2021-07-12

Continue to hodl and to the moon

2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years

2021-07-12

High risk

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-12

F

Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?

2021-07-11

F

5 Things to Know About Virgin Galactic and the First Passenger Flight to Space

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3578574228106809","uuid":"3578574228106809","gmtCreate":1615480203992,"gmtModify":1623409190704,"name":"DYDFC","pinyin":"dydfc","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":61,"tweetSize":25,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":802227623,"gmtCreate":1627783805662,"gmtModify":1703495781829,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802227623","repostId":"1149124606","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802310887,"gmtCreate":1627717148249,"gmtModify":1703495166239,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802310887","repostId":"1127411624","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127411624","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627715622,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127411624?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 15:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s your to-do list before the stock market’s next dive","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127411624","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"After hibernating for months, the stock-market bears came out of their caves on July 19. That day, t","content":"<p>After hibernating for months, the stock-market bears came out of their caves on July 19. That day, the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,-0.42%tumbled 725 points or 2.1%. The bears hit a home run — at least for a day.</p>\n<p>As usual, everyone wanted to know why the market fell, and the analysts had prepared answers, from COVID-19’s Delta variant to the Consumer Price Index to overbought technical indicators.</p>\n<p>The truth is that nobody knows. People have multiple reasons for selling, so it’s ridiculous to blame one event. That said, a big contributor to the decline was automatic, computer-generated selling. Once large market participants, especially algos, started selling, there was a mad rush out of the door. No one wanted to be the last one out, so retail traders and institutions sold in a panic, which got more intense as the day went on.</p>\n<p>Technical indicators contributed as well: The weekly relative strength indicator (RSI) has been remarkably accurate in warning of a market reversal. Once RSI goes over 70 and stays there, buyers beware.&nbsp; After the July 26 market close, the RSI of the S&amp;P 500SPX,-0.54%stood at 71.36 on the weekly chart — an extremely overbought reading. Does this mean that the index is going to plunge tomorrow? No one knows. But RSI is giving a clue that the U.S. market is in the danger zone.</p>\n<p><b>The bad news bears can’t catch a break</b></p>\n<p>Before the bears could say, “I told you so,” the next day, July 20, the 700-plus point Dow selloff was erased by a 550-point Dow rally. The bulls forgot about the selloff and returned to celebrating, and gulping glass after glass of their favorite drink, “bull-ade.” Once again, the storm passed, but this time a little fear creeped into the bulls’ psyche. Before, the only fear was the fear of missing out on the next rally. Now, many investors realize the market can actually go down.</p>\n<p><b>What to do now</b></p>\n<p>The next time the market plunges and you’re experiencing a variety of emotions, the following guide might help:</p>\n<p><b>1. If you’re panicked</b>: Don’t do something; sit there. Do not buy, do not sell, just sit tight. In fact, turn off the computer or other devices. Don’t fret over how much paper money you lost that day. Exercise, walk, run, swim, ride a bike. Your goal is to reduce emotions so you can get a good night’s sleep. When the market stabilizes, reevaluate what you own. Do not make any big financial decisions on days like this.</p>\n<p><b>2. If you’re afraid</b>: Take it easy. The selloff will end eventually. There is no reason to panic. Again, reevaluate what you own when the market comes to its senses.</p>\n<p><b>3. If you’re unaffected:</b>Still, check your portfolio to make sure you are properly diversified. While it’s find to not care if the market falls, be sure you are hedged for a worst-case scenario. One day there will be a bear market that will last months or years. Be prepared.</p>\n<p><b>What specific actions should you take?</b></p>\n<p>Now that you’ve taken care of your emotional health, there are other financial decisions you can make. Let’s take a look atsome strategies and tacticsthat may help:</p>\n<ol>\n <li>Sell if the stocks or indexes you own fall below their 200-day moving averages. Note: The major indexes such as the Standard &amp; Poor’s 500SPX,-0.54%have not fallen below (and stayed below) their 200-day averages for a decade. When they do eventually, that is a clear sell signal.</li>\n <li>Create a long-term investment plan and follow it no matter what happens in the short term.</li>\n <li>Dollar-cost average into index funds.</li>\n <li>Diversify. This is the key to success in the stock market and in life. If you own only stocks, consider bonds, but talk to a financial professional (not your neighbor) before taking this step.</li>\n <li>Buy the big dips. This strategy still works. If you had bought the dip on July 19, you would have cleaned up on July 20. One day this strategy won’t work, but that day hasn’t come yet.</li>\n <li>Sell covered-call options. This is still an excellent way to generate extra income. This strategy is also ideal for disposing of unwanted stocks, and getting paid for it.</li>\n</ol>\n<p><b>Plan for the next correction or bear market</b></p>\n<p>After a 13-year bull market, the clock is ticking for U.S. stocks. While the bulls scored another victory this time, one day the market won’t reverse direction and will begin a steep correction, or worse yet, a bear market. That’s when you will be glad that you have a plan and an investment script to follow on the worst days.</p>\n<p>Know what you own, sell to the “sleep-well” point and diversify into a variety of financial products including cash and bonds. This way, when the market plunges again, you won’t make knee-jerk emotional decisions or suffer an anxiety attack.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s your to-do list before the stock market’s next dive</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s your to-do list before the stock market’s next dive\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 15:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-your-to-do-list-before-the-stock-markets-next-dive-11627360870?mod=article_inline><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After hibernating for months, the stock-market bears came out of their caves on July 19. That day, the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,-0.42%tumbled 725 points or 2.1%. The bears hit a home run — at ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-your-to-do-list-before-the-stock-markets-next-dive-11627360870?mod=article_inline\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-your-to-do-list-before-the-stock-markets-next-dive-11627360870?mod=article_inline","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127411624","content_text":"After hibernating for months, the stock-market bears came out of their caves on July 19. That day, the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,-0.42%tumbled 725 points or 2.1%. The bears hit a home run — at least for a day.\nAs usual, everyone wanted to know why the market fell, and the analysts had prepared answers, from COVID-19’s Delta variant to the Consumer Price Index to overbought technical indicators.\nThe truth is that nobody knows. People have multiple reasons for selling, so it’s ridiculous to blame one event. That said, a big contributor to the decline was automatic, computer-generated selling. Once large market participants, especially algos, started selling, there was a mad rush out of the door. No one wanted to be the last one out, so retail traders and institutions sold in a panic, which got more intense as the day went on.\nTechnical indicators contributed as well: The weekly relative strength indicator (RSI) has been remarkably accurate in warning of a market reversal. Once RSI goes over 70 and stays there, buyers beware.  After the July 26 market close, the RSI of the S&P 500SPX,-0.54%stood at 71.36 on the weekly chart — an extremely overbought reading. Does this mean that the index is going to plunge tomorrow? No one knows. But RSI is giving a clue that the U.S. market is in the danger zone.\nThe bad news bears can’t catch a break\nBefore the bears could say, “I told you so,” the next day, July 20, the 700-plus point Dow selloff was erased by a 550-point Dow rally. The bulls forgot about the selloff and returned to celebrating, and gulping glass after glass of their favorite drink, “bull-ade.” Once again, the storm passed, but this time a little fear creeped into the bulls’ psyche. Before, the only fear was the fear of missing out on the next rally. Now, many investors realize the market can actually go down.\nWhat to do now\nThe next time the market plunges and you’re experiencing a variety of emotions, the following guide might help:\n1. If you’re panicked: Don’t do something; sit there. Do not buy, do not sell, just sit tight. In fact, turn off the computer or other devices. Don’t fret over how much paper money you lost that day. Exercise, walk, run, swim, ride a bike. Your goal is to reduce emotions so you can get a good night’s sleep. When the market stabilizes, reevaluate what you own. Do not make any big financial decisions on days like this.\n2. If you’re afraid: Take it easy. The selloff will end eventually. There is no reason to panic. Again, reevaluate what you own when the market comes to its senses.\n3. If you’re unaffected:Still, check your portfolio to make sure you are properly diversified. While it’s find to not care if the market falls, be sure you are hedged for a worst-case scenario. One day there will be a bear market that will last months or years. Be prepared.\nWhat specific actions should you take?\nNow that you’ve taken care of your emotional health, there are other financial decisions you can make. Let’s take a look atsome strategies and tacticsthat may help:\n\nSell if the stocks or indexes you own fall below their 200-day moving averages. Note: The major indexes such as the Standard & Poor’s 500SPX,-0.54%have not fallen below (and stayed below) their 200-day averages for a decade. When they do eventually, that is a clear sell signal.\nCreate a long-term investment plan and follow it no matter what happens in the short term.\nDollar-cost average into index funds.\nDiversify. This is the key to success in the stock market and in life. If you own only stocks, consider bonds, but talk to a financial professional (not your neighbor) before taking this step.\nBuy the big dips. This strategy still works. If you had bought the dip on July 19, you would have cleaned up on July 20. One day this strategy won’t work, but that day hasn’t come yet.\nSell covered-call options. This is still an excellent way to generate extra income. This strategy is also ideal for disposing of unwanted stocks, and getting paid for it.\n\nPlan for the next correction or bear market\nAfter a 13-year bull market, the clock is ticking for U.S. stocks. While the bulls scored another victory this time, one day the market won’t reverse direction and will begin a steep correction, or worse yet, a bear market. That’s when you will be glad that you have a plan and an investment script to follow on the worst days.\nKnow what you own, sell to the “sleep-well” point and diversify into a variety of financial products including cash and bonds. This way, when the market plunges again, you won’t make knee-jerk emotional decisions or suffer an anxiety attack.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":582,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808439381,"gmtCreate":1627605165043,"gmtModify":1703493139894,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808439381","repostId":"1131907757","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":464,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801878129,"gmtCreate":1627512816861,"gmtModify":1703491246284,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801878129","repostId":"1148922985","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803145428,"gmtCreate":1627429742064,"gmtModify":1703489663752,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803145428","repostId":"1165178450","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809048119,"gmtCreate":1627341929031,"gmtModify":1703487808066,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809048119","repostId":"1117559759","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117559759","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627311202,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117559759?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-26 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"My Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117559759","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Nvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.</li>\n <li>Nvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to strong gaming revenue momentum.</li>\n <li>Nvidia’s commentary on China’s cryptocurrency crackdown and how it affects CMP sales will allow for a better modeling of revenues going forward.</li>\n <li>Split or no split, Nvidia has 28% upside.</li>\n <li>I lay out my post-split plan to buy Nvidia at certain key levels.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4a1c53ba379b52dcd7584cb55a0b11a\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1053\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>David Becker/Getty Images News</span></p>\n<p>Nvidia (NVDA) executed a 4:1 stock split last week Tuesday. While stock splits don’t change a firm’s valuation, Nvidia may initiate a new upleg as earnings next month are likely going to be impressive. My stock price target for Nvidia, adjusted for the stock split, is $250. Nvidia also faces a couple of tests and you should watch out for these key levels before buying.</p>\n<p><b>Nvidia’s stock split</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia’s&nbsp;4:1 stock split&nbsp;has made the stock look cheaper but the fundamentals or the valuation of the firm have not changed. If you bought 100 shares of Nvidia at $800 pre-split, you now own 400 shares with a cost base of $200… the total value of an investment position is unaffected by Nvidia’s stock split, in both cases it is $80,000.</p>\n<p>Companies execute stock splits to make their shares look more affordable and increase liquidity in the market. Nvidia, post-split, has the same market value as before, $485B, only the number of shares outstanding has increased by the factor of four. While there is no evidence that stock splits produce higher returns post-split, the fact that the stock, at least on paper, looks more affordable could lead to increased buying of Nvidia. My stock price target before the split was $1,000 (Nvidia: A $1,000 Stock Price Is Not As Crazy As It Sounds), which calculates to an adjusted stock price target of $250 post-split (28% upside).</p>\n<p><b>What's in store for Nvidia next month?</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia is set to open its books for the second quarter on August 18, 2021 and the semiconductor firm is likely going to report impressive revenue growth for Q2’22. Nvidia's total Q1'22 revenues got an&nbsp;84% bump&nbsp;year-over-year and increased at a 13%-rate Q/Q. Nvidia’s gaming revenues increased at an average annual rate of 22% since FY 2017 while its data center revenues soared 86% annually over the same time period, predominantly because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition in 2020 which considerably expanded Nvidia’s presence in the high performance and data center computing markets.</p>\n<p>Nvidia gets the bulk of its revenues from gaming and data centers. Gaming center revenues increased 11% Q/Q to $2.76B in Q1’22 and revenues will likely have grown at a similar rate in Q2’22 due to strength in the gaming market and accelerating customer uptake of the GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU. The RTX 30 Series has been industry-defining by making \"ray tracing\" the new standard for game developers. Ray tracing is a graphics rendering method that allows for the realistic modeling of light effects in computer games. Strong sales in GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU sales could result in a 10-12% Q/Q revenue bump for Q2'22.</p>\n<p>Data centers, which generate the second biggest pile of revenues for Nvidia, saw growth slowing down in Q1'22 and I am looking forward to hearing an update from Nvidia's management about the prospects for the data center business for the rest of the year. I expect Nvidia to report mid-single-digit revenue growth in data centers for Q2'22 and, hopefully, an update about the Arm acquisition.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84bb9f6f3dbca0c67e817a34367aec0a\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"620\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source:Nvidia)</span></p>\n<p>What will be interesting to see in next month’s earnings report is how the Chinese cryptocurrency crackdown is impacting Nvidia’s cryptocurrency mining processor/CMP business for the rest of the year, which Nvidia is building from scratch. Soaring cryptocurrency prices in the first quarter have led to a surge in demand for CMPs, a business that is set to contribute up to $1.5B in revenues in FY 2022 (my current estimates are for ‘low-case’ CMP revenues of $1.0B and ‘high-case’ revenues of $1.5B). CMP revenues are included in Nvidia’s “OEM &amp; Other” revenues and based on firm guidance are projected to be $400M in Q2’22.</p>\n<p>Revenues unrelated to gaming and data centers for Q2’22 - Professional Visualization, Auto, and OEM/Other - are likely going to exceed $1.0B and could reach up to $1.2B depending on how strong demand for CMPs was in Q2’22. Since reduced mining difficulty as a result of falling cryptocurrency prices has made mining more profitable, Nvidia should head into the second half of the year with some CMP revenue tailwinds providing support.</p>\n<p>What I am really looking forward to in Nvidia’s Q2 report are Nvidia’s margins. Gross margins - a key figure for semiconductor firms - have trended up strongly, in part because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition which has made a positive contribution to segment performance. I believe Nvidia can grow its gross margins (non-GAAP) to 70% by the start of next year, largely because of continued momentum in the gaming business which gives Nvidia significant pricing power. Nvidia’s guidance for Q2’22 non-GAAP margins was 66.5 percent, plus or minus 50 basis points and actual margins will likely come in at the top of guidance.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de5873a468c24b27b0d713a6ea87bb15\" tg-width=\"1269\" tg-height=\"484\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Nvidia)</span></p>\n<p><b>How I am playing Nvidia post-split</b></p>\n<p>First of all, I am buying the post-split dips (if there are any!). The price of a stock may run-up before a stock split and drop afterwards as traders take profits. This may or may not be the case here. Nvidia’s closing market price on Friday was $195, equivalent to a $780 pre-split price, and the pre-split high of $835 (equivalent to a post-split price of $209) is in striking distance... it only takes a 7% increase in Nvidia's price from here to make new highs.</p>\n<p>Second, I am taking a close look at Nvidia’s 50-day and 200-day moving averages to determine critical support levels. I am ready to buy every dip below a key support level as Nvidia’s upcoming earnings report could be enough of a catalyst to push Nvidia to new highs. The first support level is just below $179 (50-day moving average) which is also where the stock bottomed before the last reversal. If Nvidia's stock dips below $180 before earnings, I am ready to buy just at this level. If the 50-day moving average breaks, the next key support level is $147 (200-day moving average), a level I don't believe Nvidia's stock will fall down to. But if that's the case, then Nvidia would be considered a 'Strong Buy' just below $147.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9fb926c9a11e4347aa2edda6d667850e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"450\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Nvidia is not cheap... and that’s for a reason. Estimates call for 50% Y/Y revenues growth this year and Nvidia might even see an acceleration in its top line growth next year. Nvidia trades at a P-E ratio of 45 which may be considered low given the revenue growth Nvidia offers...</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1f8abb27427dd6dd83b3d2871eec59\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p><b>Other considerations/risks</b></p>\n<p>The market tends to reward good performance and because of a 5-year stretch of impressive business results, Nvidia trades at a high earnings multiplier factor. Nvidia’s outperformance relative to the S&amp;P 500 can continue under the condition that revenue growth doesn’t slow.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd43492fdb8928db4f32cc35dd5a154c\" tg-width=\"1267\" tg-height=\"727\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Tradingview)</span></p>\n<p>High valuations for growth stocks are normal, but they also come with some risks. If Nvidia’s revenue growth slows and gross margins flatten out or decline, Nvidia may be ripe for a revaluation in which case the risk profile skews to the downside. Declining gross margins, next to a slowdown in revenue growth, are the two biggest risks for Nvidia's stock. A rejection of Nvidia's Arm acquisition and an outright ban of cryptocurrencies are other risks to watch out for. Given the rising rate of institutional adoption outside China, the risk of a crypto ban is quite low.</p>\n<p><b>Final thoughts</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia experiences broad-based strength in its businesses and should see moderate to strong revenue growth in each segment for Q2'22, led by gaming and GeForce RTX GPU sales. Gross margins are going to see a Q/Q improve based on gaming market strength and guidance for Q3’22 could put Nvidia’s non-GAAP gross margin very close to 70%. Key support levels to watch out for and buy the dip are $179 and $147.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>My Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMy Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-26 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.\nNvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117559759","content_text":"Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.\nNvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to strong gaming revenue momentum.\nNvidia’s commentary on China’s cryptocurrency crackdown and how it affects CMP sales will allow for a better modeling of revenues going forward.\nSplit or no split, Nvidia has 28% upside.\nI lay out my post-split plan to buy Nvidia at certain key levels.\n\nDavid Becker/Getty Images News\nNvidia (NVDA) executed a 4:1 stock split last week Tuesday. While stock splits don’t change a firm’s valuation, Nvidia may initiate a new upleg as earnings next month are likely going to be impressive. My stock price target for Nvidia, adjusted for the stock split, is $250. Nvidia also faces a couple of tests and you should watch out for these key levels before buying.\nNvidia’s stock split\nNvidia’s 4:1 stock split has made the stock look cheaper but the fundamentals or the valuation of the firm have not changed. If you bought 100 shares of Nvidia at $800 pre-split, you now own 400 shares with a cost base of $200… the total value of an investment position is unaffected by Nvidia’s stock split, in both cases it is $80,000.\nCompanies execute stock splits to make their shares look more affordable and increase liquidity in the market. Nvidia, post-split, has the same market value as before, $485B, only the number of shares outstanding has increased by the factor of four. While there is no evidence that stock splits produce higher returns post-split, the fact that the stock, at least on paper, looks more affordable could lead to increased buying of Nvidia. My stock price target before the split was $1,000 (Nvidia: A $1,000 Stock Price Is Not As Crazy As It Sounds), which calculates to an adjusted stock price target of $250 post-split (28% upside).\nWhat's in store for Nvidia next month?\nNvidia is set to open its books for the second quarter on August 18, 2021 and the semiconductor firm is likely going to report impressive revenue growth for Q2’22. Nvidia's total Q1'22 revenues got an 84% bump year-over-year and increased at a 13%-rate Q/Q. Nvidia’s gaming revenues increased at an average annual rate of 22% since FY 2017 while its data center revenues soared 86% annually over the same time period, predominantly because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition in 2020 which considerably expanded Nvidia’s presence in the high performance and data center computing markets.\nNvidia gets the bulk of its revenues from gaming and data centers. Gaming center revenues increased 11% Q/Q to $2.76B in Q1’22 and revenues will likely have grown at a similar rate in Q2’22 due to strength in the gaming market and accelerating customer uptake of the GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU. The RTX 30 Series has been industry-defining by making \"ray tracing\" the new standard for game developers. Ray tracing is a graphics rendering method that allows for the realistic modeling of light effects in computer games. Strong sales in GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU sales could result in a 10-12% Q/Q revenue bump for Q2'22.\nData centers, which generate the second biggest pile of revenues for Nvidia, saw growth slowing down in Q1'22 and I am looking forward to hearing an update from Nvidia's management about the prospects for the data center business for the rest of the year. I expect Nvidia to report mid-single-digit revenue growth in data centers for Q2'22 and, hopefully, an update about the Arm acquisition.\n(Source:Nvidia)\nWhat will be interesting to see in next month’s earnings report is how the Chinese cryptocurrency crackdown is impacting Nvidia’s cryptocurrency mining processor/CMP business for the rest of the year, which Nvidia is building from scratch. Soaring cryptocurrency prices in the first quarter have led to a surge in demand for CMPs, a business that is set to contribute up to $1.5B in revenues in FY 2022 (my current estimates are for ‘low-case’ CMP revenues of $1.0B and ‘high-case’ revenues of $1.5B). CMP revenues are included in Nvidia’s “OEM & Other” revenues and based on firm guidance are projected to be $400M in Q2’22.\nRevenues unrelated to gaming and data centers for Q2’22 - Professional Visualization, Auto, and OEM/Other - are likely going to exceed $1.0B and could reach up to $1.2B depending on how strong demand for CMPs was in Q2’22. Since reduced mining difficulty as a result of falling cryptocurrency prices has made mining more profitable, Nvidia should head into the second half of the year with some CMP revenue tailwinds providing support.\nWhat I am really looking forward to in Nvidia’s Q2 report are Nvidia’s margins. Gross margins - a key figure for semiconductor firms - have trended up strongly, in part because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition which has made a positive contribution to segment performance. I believe Nvidia can grow its gross margins (non-GAAP) to 70% by the start of next year, largely because of continued momentum in the gaming business which gives Nvidia significant pricing power. Nvidia’s guidance for Q2’22 non-GAAP margins was 66.5 percent, plus or minus 50 basis points and actual margins will likely come in at the top of guidance.\n(Source: Nvidia)\nHow I am playing Nvidia post-split\nFirst of all, I am buying the post-split dips (if there are any!). The price of a stock may run-up before a stock split and drop afterwards as traders take profits. This may or may not be the case here. Nvidia’s closing market price on Friday was $195, equivalent to a $780 pre-split price, and the pre-split high of $835 (equivalent to a post-split price of $209) is in striking distance... it only takes a 7% increase in Nvidia's price from here to make new highs.\nSecond, I am taking a close look at Nvidia’s 50-day and 200-day moving averages to determine critical support levels. I am ready to buy every dip below a key support level as Nvidia’s upcoming earnings report could be enough of a catalyst to push Nvidia to new highs. The first support level is just below $179 (50-day moving average) which is also where the stock bottomed before the last reversal. If Nvidia's stock dips below $180 before earnings, I am ready to buy just at this level. If the 50-day moving average breaks, the next key support level is $147 (200-day moving average), a level I don't believe Nvidia's stock will fall down to. But if that's the case, then Nvidia would be considered a 'Strong Buy' just below $147.\nData by YCharts\nNvidia is not cheap... and that’s for a reason. Estimates call for 50% Y/Y revenues growth this year and Nvidia might even see an acceleration in its top line growth next year. Nvidia trades at a P-E ratio of 45 which may be considered low given the revenue growth Nvidia offers...\nData by YCharts\nOther considerations/risks\nThe market tends to reward good performance and because of a 5-year stretch of impressive business results, Nvidia trades at a high earnings multiplier factor. Nvidia’s outperformance relative to the S&P 500 can continue under the condition that revenue growth doesn’t slow.\n(Source: Tradingview)\nHigh valuations for growth stocks are normal, but they also come with some risks. If Nvidia’s revenue growth slows and gross margins flatten out or decline, Nvidia may be ripe for a revaluation in which case the risk profile skews to the downside. Declining gross margins, next to a slowdown in revenue growth, are the two biggest risks for Nvidia's stock. A rejection of Nvidia's Arm acquisition and an outright ban of cryptocurrencies are other risks to watch out for. Given the rising rate of institutional adoption outside China, the risk of a crypto ban is quite low.\nFinal thoughts\nNvidia experiences broad-based strength in its businesses and should see moderate to strong revenue growth in each segment for Q2'22, led by gaming and GeForce RTX GPU sales. Gross margins are going to see a Q/Q improve based on gaming market strength and guidance for Q3’22 could put Nvidia’s non-GAAP gross margin very close to 70%. Key support levels to watch out for and buy the dip are $179 and $147.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800374389,"gmtCreate":1627283068041,"gmtModify":1703486671610,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800374389","repostId":"2154531659","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154531659","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627273921,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154531659?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-26 12:32","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"HK-listed AK Medical eyes worst day in over 3-1/2 yrs on weak outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154531659","media":"Reuters","summary":"** Shares of orthopedic implants developer AK Medical Holdings Ltd drop 23.3% to HK10.20, on course ","content":"<p>** Shares of orthopedic implants developer AK Medical Holdings Ltd drop 23.3% to HK10.20, on course for worst day since listing in Dec 2017</p>\n<p>** Stock falls to the lowest since April 21; the sixth-biggest pct decliner on the Hong Kong bourse</p>\n<p>** Beijing-based co expects net profit for six months ended in June to fall 35% y/y, with rev down 10%, as customers reduce stocking co's products on uncertain price trends and as marketing expenses rise</p>\n<p>** Hang Seng Commerce &amp; Industry Index drops 4.2% and the healthcare index dives 7.5%</p>\n<p>** The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index falls 3.7% to the lowest since Oct. 5, 2020, and the benchmark index declines 2.9% to the lowest since Dec. 29.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>HK-listed AK Medical eyes worst day in over 3-1/2 yrs on weak outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHK-listed AK Medical eyes worst day in over 3-1/2 yrs on weak outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-26 12:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>** Shares of orthopedic implants developer AK Medical Holdings Ltd drop 23.3% to HK10.20, on course for worst day since listing in Dec 2017</p>\n<p>** Stock falls to the lowest since April 21; the sixth-biggest pct decliner on the Hong Kong bourse</p>\n<p>** Beijing-based co expects net profit for six months ended in June to fall 35% y/y, with rev down 10%, as customers reduce stocking co's products on uncertain price trends and as marketing expenses rise</p>\n<p>** Hang Seng Commerce &amp; Industry Index drops 4.2% and the healthcare index dives 7.5%</p>\n<p>** The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index falls 3.7% to the lowest since Oct. 5, 2020, and the benchmark index declines 2.9% to the lowest since Dec. 29.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01789":"爱康医疗"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154531659","content_text":"** Shares of orthopedic implants developer AK Medical Holdings Ltd drop 23.3% to HK10.20, on course for worst day since listing in Dec 2017\n** Stock falls to the lowest since April 21; the sixth-biggest pct decliner on the Hong Kong bourse\n** Beijing-based co expects net profit for six months ended in June to fall 35% y/y, with rev down 10%, as customers reduce stocking co's products on uncertain price trends and as marketing expenses rise\n** Hang Seng Commerce & Industry Index drops 4.2% and the healthcare index dives 7.5%\n** The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index falls 3.7% to the lowest since Oct. 5, 2020, and the benchmark index declines 2.9% to the lowest since Dec. 29.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177150008,"gmtCreate":1627188755404,"gmtModify":1703485334767,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177150008","repostId":"2153936352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153936352","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627180340,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153936352?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-25 10:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153936352","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could the ambitious fintech company overtake the market leader?","content":"<p><b>Square</b> (NYSE:SQ) and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a></b> (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a> </b>(NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.</p>\n<p>Square is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3384d45efb17ed54b398c7dbcc043fb\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2><b>Wild ambitions vs. stable growth</b></h2>\n<p>Square and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.</p>\n<p>But Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added <b>Bitcoin</b> (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.</p>\n<p>PayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.</p>\n<h2>Which company is growing faster?</h2>\n<p>Between 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"600\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"118\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"213\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"225\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>Square</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>110.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>14.1%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>PayPal</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>20.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>21.5%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 22.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.</p>\n<p>Cathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.</p>\n<p>PayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.</p>\n<p>PayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and <i>more than double</i> its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.</p>\n<h2>Will Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?</h2>\n<p>In a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.</p>\n<p>If Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.</p>\n<p>Therefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-25 10:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQ":"Block","PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153936352","content_text":"Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.\nSquare is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nWild ambitions vs. stable growth\nSquare and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.\nBut Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.\nPayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.\nWhich company is growing faster?\nBetween 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nEstimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)\nEstimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)\n\n\nSquare\n110.6%\n14.1%\n\n\nPayPal\n20.6%\n21.5%\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 22.\nAnalysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.\nCathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.\nPayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.\nPayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and more than double its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.\nWill Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?\nIn a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.\nIf Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.\nTherefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175089630,"gmtCreate":1626998491120,"gmtModify":1703482031917,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175089630","repostId":"1151614377","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151614377","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626959882,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151614377?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-22 21:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blackstone Earnings Rise as Growth Strategy Boosts Portfolio","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151614377","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"The private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion.\n\nBlackstone GroupInc.’sBX","content":"<blockquote>\n The private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Blackstone GroupInc.’sBX1.88%earnings jumped in the second quarter, propelled by record appreciation in the value of its investments.</p>\n<p>The private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion, or $1.82 a share, it said Thursday. That compares with a profit of $568.3 million, or 81 cents a share, a year earlier.</p>\n<p>The value of Blackstone’s private-equity portfolio climbed by 13.8% in the latest period, exceeding the roughly 8% gain for the S&amp;P 500. Combined fund appreciation across its various business lines was the highest in the history of the firm.</p>\n<p>Aiding the strong performance was Blackstone’s recent emphasis on putting money into fast-growing companies. Initial public offerings of outsourcing companyTaskUsInc.and Indian electric-vehicle components manufacturerSona BLW Precision ForgingsLtd.pushed up the firm’s private-equity portfolio, while sales of last-mile logistics properties in the U.S. and Australia helped boost its real-estate holdings.</p>\n<blockquote>\n ‘The pivot into good neighborhoods has really paid off.’— Jonathan Gray, Blackstone\n</blockquote>\n<p>Blackstone President Jonathan Gray has encouraged the firm’s business heads tothink more thematicallyabout investing, identifying global trends and finding ways to put money to work in areas that would benefit from them. Among these are logistics, software, digital payments and life sciences, areas of the economy that are experiencing outsize growth.</p>\n<p>“The pivot into good neighborhoods has really paid off,” Mr. Gray said in an interview.</p>\n<p>Blackstone’s distributable earnings, or the amount of cash that could be returned to shareholders, came in at $1.07 billion, or 82 cents a share, in the quarter. That compares with $548 million, or 43 cents a share, a year earlier.</p>\n<p>The firm said it would pay a dividend of 70 cents a share for the quarter, versus 37 cents in the second quarter of 2020.</p>\n<p>Blackstone invested $23.8 billion during the second quarter and committed to an additional $28.5 billion, another record. Among its commitments was a June agreement to partner with rivals Carlyle Group Inc. and Hellman &amp; Friedman LLC in adeal for Medline Industries Inc.that values the medical-equipment supplier at more than $30 billion and represents the largest leveraged buyout since the financial crisis.</p>\n<p>Blackstone’s infrastructure business and nontraded real-estate investment trustalso struck a deal to acquiredata-center operator QTS Realty Trust Inc. for $6.7 billion.</p>\n<p>The firm had inflows of $37.3 billion in the quarter, with much of that coming from its credit business and its giant Core+ real-estate strategy.</p>\n<p>Assets under management rose 21% over the prior year to $684 billion. So-called perpetual capital, which generates a steady stream of locked-in fees because it doesn’t need to be returned to investors as quickly, climbed 55% year-over-year to $169.5 billion.</p>\n<p>That figure is set to rise, thanks in part to a sweeping partnership Blackstone announced last week with insurance companyAmerican International GroupInc.The investment firm will manage a portion of AIG’s assets and will pay$2.2 billion for a 9.9% stakein its life-insurance and retirement-services unit. The deal is set to push Blackstone’s insurance assets under management to about $150 billion by the end of 2021.</p>\n<p>“It really encapsulates the evolution of our business,” Mr. Gray said of the AIG arrangement.</p>\n<p>A decade of low interest rates and strong performance has prompted the firm to venture beyond its traditional focus on investing institutional money, he said.</p>\n<p>The combined market opportunity in insurance and retail is worth significantly more, he said.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blackstone Earnings Rise as Growth Strategy Boosts Portfolio</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlackstone Earnings Rise as Growth Strategy Boosts Portfolio\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-22 21:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-earnings-rise-as-growth-strategy-boosts-portfolio-11626951596?mod=hp_lead_pos4><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion.\n\nBlackstone GroupInc.’sBX1.88%earnings jumped in the second quarter, propelled by record appreciation in the value of its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-earnings-rise-as-growth-strategy-boosts-portfolio-11626951596?mod=hp_lead_pos4\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/blackstone-earnings-rise-as-growth-strategy-boosts-portfolio-11626951596?mod=hp_lead_pos4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151614377","content_text":"The private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion.\n\nBlackstone GroupInc.’sBX1.88%earnings jumped in the second quarter, propelled by record appreciation in the value of its investments.\nThe private-equity firm posted second-quarter net income of $1.31 billion, or $1.82 a share, it said Thursday. That compares with a profit of $568.3 million, or 81 cents a share, a year earlier.\nThe value of Blackstone’s private-equity portfolio climbed by 13.8% in the latest period, exceeding the roughly 8% gain for the S&P 500. Combined fund appreciation across its various business lines was the highest in the history of the firm.\nAiding the strong performance was Blackstone’s recent emphasis on putting money into fast-growing companies. Initial public offerings of outsourcing companyTaskUsInc.and Indian electric-vehicle components manufacturerSona BLW Precision ForgingsLtd.pushed up the firm’s private-equity portfolio, while sales of last-mile logistics properties in the U.S. and Australia helped boost its real-estate holdings.\n\n ‘The pivot into good neighborhoods has really paid off.’— Jonathan Gray, Blackstone\n\nBlackstone President Jonathan Gray has encouraged the firm’s business heads tothink more thematicallyabout investing, identifying global trends and finding ways to put money to work in areas that would benefit from them. Among these are logistics, software, digital payments and life sciences, areas of the economy that are experiencing outsize growth.\n“The pivot into good neighborhoods has really paid off,” Mr. Gray said in an interview.\nBlackstone’s distributable earnings, or the amount of cash that could be returned to shareholders, came in at $1.07 billion, or 82 cents a share, in the quarter. That compares with $548 million, or 43 cents a share, a year earlier.\nThe firm said it would pay a dividend of 70 cents a share for the quarter, versus 37 cents in the second quarter of 2020.\nBlackstone invested $23.8 billion during the second quarter and committed to an additional $28.5 billion, another record. Among its commitments was a June agreement to partner with rivals Carlyle Group Inc. and Hellman & Friedman LLC in adeal for Medline Industries Inc.that values the medical-equipment supplier at more than $30 billion and represents the largest leveraged buyout since the financial crisis.\nBlackstone’s infrastructure business and nontraded real-estate investment trustalso struck a deal to acquiredata-center operator QTS Realty Trust Inc. for $6.7 billion.\nThe firm had inflows of $37.3 billion in the quarter, with much of that coming from its credit business and its giant Core+ real-estate strategy.\nAssets under management rose 21% over the prior year to $684 billion. So-called perpetual capital, which generates a steady stream of locked-in fees because it doesn’t need to be returned to investors as quickly, climbed 55% year-over-year to $169.5 billion.\nThat figure is set to rise, thanks in part to a sweeping partnership Blackstone announced last week with insurance companyAmerican International GroupInc.The investment firm will manage a portion of AIG’s assets and will pay$2.2 billion for a 9.9% stakein its life-insurance and retirement-services unit. The deal is set to push Blackstone’s insurance assets under management to about $150 billion by the end of 2021.\n“It really encapsulates the evolution of our business,” Mr. Gray said of the AIG arrangement.\nA decade of low interest rates and strong performance has prompted the firm to venture beyond its traditional focus on investing institutional money, he said.\nThe combined market opportunity in insurance and retail is worth significantly more, he said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176765918,"gmtCreate":1626916706434,"gmtModify":1703480491022,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176765918","repostId":"2153062824","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153062824","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626912660,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153062824?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-22 08:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The pandemic-induced recession ended more than a year ago -- but the U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153062824","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The recession caused by the pandemic was the shortest in U.S. history\nIn May 2020, some 21 million A","content":"<p>The recession caused by the pandemic was the shortest in U.S. history</p>\n<p>In May 2020, some 21 million Americans were unemployed -- down from 23 million in April 2020. More than 25 million U.S. households indicated they often or sometimes didn't have enough food to eat over the course of the first week in May 2020, according to data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.</p>\n<p>Painful as it was for those Americans, it wasn't shocking considering the U.S. was in the midst of a recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic -- or was it?</p>\n<p>Turns out the recession which began last February ended just two months later-- making it the shortest economic downturn in U.S. history, the National Bureau of Economic Research's Business Cycle Dating Committee announced on Monday.</p>\n<p>In baseball terms, the economy was taken off the \"injured list\" in May. But was the economy completely healed and ready to go to bat?</p>\n<p>In short, no.</p>\n<p>\"In determining that a trough occurred in April 2020, the committee did not conclude that the economy has returned to operating at normal capacity,\" eight economists on the committee said in a statement published Monday.</p>\n<p>They explained that the recession concluded in April 2020 because that's when the economy reached its lowest point in terms of jobs and output.</p>\n<p>\"The economy started getting less bad after April 2020,\" Jason Furman, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors under the Obama administration, tweeted on Monday. \"It was, and in many respects is, still well below where it should be.\"</p>\n<p>Some 9.3 million Americans remain unemployed, according to the June unemployment report published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Some 4 million people have been unemployed for more than 27 weeks -- that's 2.9 million more people than there were in February.</p>\n<p>Some 7.5 million Americans aren't working in order to take care of a child who isn't attending school or daycare in person, the Census Bureau data collected from June 23 through July 5 indicates.</p>\n<p>Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting and advisory firm Grant Thornton, challenged the Business Cycle Dating Committee's conclusion.</p>\n<p>She tweeted the following on Monday:</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell told U.S. senators that the economic recovery \"remains uneven and far from complete.\"</p>\n<p>\"The economic downturn has not fallen equally on all Americans, and those least able to shoulder the burden have been hardest hit,\" Powell said during testimony he gave on February 23. \"The job losses were heavily concentrated on public-facing, service-sector jobs. Those tend to be more skewed towards lower-paid, and in many cases, minorities and women.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The pandemic-induced recession ended more than a year ago -- but the U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe pandemic-induced recession ended more than a year ago -- but the U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-22 08:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The recession caused by the pandemic was the shortest in U.S. history</p>\n<p>In May 2020, some 21 million Americans were unemployed -- down from 23 million in April 2020. More than 25 million U.S. households indicated they often or sometimes didn't have enough food to eat over the course of the first week in May 2020, according to data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.</p>\n<p>Painful as it was for those Americans, it wasn't shocking considering the U.S. was in the midst of a recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic -- or was it?</p>\n<p>Turns out the recession which began last February ended just two months later-- making it the shortest economic downturn in U.S. history, the National Bureau of Economic Research's Business Cycle Dating Committee announced on Monday.</p>\n<p>In baseball terms, the economy was taken off the \"injured list\" in May. But was the economy completely healed and ready to go to bat?</p>\n<p>In short, no.</p>\n<p>\"In determining that a trough occurred in April 2020, the committee did not conclude that the economy has returned to operating at normal capacity,\" eight economists on the committee said in a statement published Monday.</p>\n<p>They explained that the recession concluded in April 2020 because that's when the economy reached its lowest point in terms of jobs and output.</p>\n<p>\"The economy started getting less bad after April 2020,\" Jason Furman, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors under the Obama administration, tweeted on Monday. \"It was, and in many respects is, still well below where it should be.\"</p>\n<p>Some 9.3 million Americans remain unemployed, according to the June unemployment report published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Some 4 million people have been unemployed for more than 27 weeks -- that's 2.9 million more people than there were in February.</p>\n<p>Some 7.5 million Americans aren't working in order to take care of a child who isn't attending school or daycare in person, the Census Bureau data collected from June 23 through July 5 indicates.</p>\n<p>Diane Swonk, chief economist at accounting and advisory firm Grant Thornton, challenged the Business Cycle Dating Committee's conclusion.</p>\n<p>She tweeted the following on Monday:</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell told U.S. senators that the economic recovery \"remains uneven and far from complete.\"</p>\n<p>\"The economic downturn has not fallen equally on all Americans, and those least able to shoulder the burden have been hardest hit,\" Powell said during testimony he gave on February 23. \"The job losses were heavily concentrated on public-facing, service-sector jobs. Those tend to be more skewed towards lower-paid, and in many cases, minorities and women.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153062824","content_text":"The recession caused by the pandemic was the shortest in U.S. history\nIn May 2020, some 21 million Americans were unemployed -- down from 23 million in April 2020. More than 25 million U.S. households indicated they often or sometimes didn't have enough food to eat over the course of the first week in May 2020, according to data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.\nPainful as it was for those Americans, it wasn't shocking considering the U.S. was in the midst of a recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic -- or was it?\nTurns out the recession which began last February ended just two months later-- making it the shortest economic downturn in U.S. history, the National Bureau of Economic Research's Business Cycle Dating Committee announced on Monday.\nIn baseball terms, the economy was taken off the \"injured list\" in May. But was the economy completely healed and ready to go to bat?\nIn short, no.\n\"In determining that a trough occurred in April 2020, the committee did not conclude that the economy has returned to operating at normal capacity,\" eight economists on the committee said in a statement published Monday.\nThey explained that the recession concluded in April 2020 because that's when the economy reached its lowest point in terms of jobs and output.\n\"The economy started getting less bad after April 2020,\" Jason Furman, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors under the Obama administration, tweeted on Monday. \"It was, and in many respects is, still well below where it should be.\"\nSome 9.3 million Americans remain unemployed, according to the June unemployment report published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Some 4 million people have been unemployed for more than 27 weeks -- that's 2.9 million more people than there were in February.\nSome 7.5 million Americans aren't working in order to take care of a child who isn't attending school or daycare in person, the Census Bureau data collected from June 23 through July 5 indicates.\nDiane Swonk, chief economist at accounting and advisory firm Grant Thornton, challenged the Business Cycle Dating Committee's conclusion.\nShe tweeted the following on Monday:\nEarlier this year, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell told U.S. senators that the economic recovery \"remains uneven and far from complete.\"\n\"The economic downturn has not fallen equally on all Americans, and those least able to shoulder the burden have been hardest hit,\" Powell said during testimony he gave on February 23. \"The job losses were heavily concentrated on public-facing, service-sector jobs. Those tend to be more skewed towards lower-paid, and in many cases, minorities and women.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":397,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178613771,"gmtCreate":1626815666793,"gmtModify":1703765590619,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked and shared commented","listText":"Liked and shared commented","text":"Liked and shared commented","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/178613771","repostId":"1138312795","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138312795","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626789951,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138312795?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-20 22:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The DOW rose more than 1%, IBM gained over 4%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138312795","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(July 20)&nbsp;The DOW rose more than 1%.&nbsp;$IBM($IBM(IBM)$)$ gained over 4%,IBM quarterly revenue beats on cloud strength.&nbsp;Apple,&nbsp;Boeing&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;more than 1%.","content":"<p>(July 20)&nbsp;The DOW rose more than 1%.&nbsp;$IBM(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>)$ gained over 4%,IBM quarterly revenue beats on cloud strength.&nbsp;Apple,&nbsp;Boeing&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;more than 1%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc8f499a846f2fa479bd3d28563ee70d\" tg-width=\"958\" tg-height=\"917\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The DOW rose more than 1%, IBM gained over 4%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe DOW rose more than 1%, IBM gained over 4%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-20 22:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(July 20)&nbsp;The DOW rose more than 1%.&nbsp;$IBM(<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>)$ gained over 4%,IBM quarterly revenue beats on cloud strength.&nbsp;Apple,&nbsp;Boeing&nbsp;jumped&nbsp;more than 1%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc8f499a846f2fa479bd3d28563ee70d\" tg-width=\"958\" tg-height=\"917\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IBM":"IBM"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138312795","content_text":"(July 20) The DOW rose more than 1%. $IBM(IBM)$ gained over 4%,IBM quarterly revenue beats on cloud strength. Apple, Boeing jumped more than 1%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171868451,"gmtCreate":1626737493673,"gmtModify":1703764068575,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171868451","repostId":"2152483637","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152483637","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1626707880,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2152483637?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-19 23:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"$10,000 Invested in These Growth Stocks Could Make You a Fortune Over the Next 10 Years","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152483637","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"All three of them are well-positioned for tremendous growth.","content":"<blockquote>\n All three of them are well-positioned for tremendous growth.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Key <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PCOM\">Points</a></b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>One stock should profit from the popularity of gaming and the increased adoption of artificial intelligence.</li>\n <li>Another stock is set to grow as it expands into new markets.</li>\n <li>The smallest of the three stocks offers a game-changing approach to diagnosing skin cancer.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>All you need is three ingredients to cook up sizzling stock returns. Those ingredients are a sufficient upfront amount of cash to invest, the right stocks to buy, and a long enough period of time.</p>\n<p>You might have noticed there are some vague words included in those ingredients, though: sufficient, right, long enough. How much upfront cash is sufficient? What are the \"right\" stocks to buy? How long is long enough to hold those stocks?</p>\n<p>The correct answers to those questions can vary. Some stocks don't require as big of an upfront investment or as lengthy of a holding period to generate tremendous returns as others do.</p>\n<p>However, I'll take a stab at answering all three questions in a way that is specific instead of vague. I think that $10,000 invested in these growth stocks could make you a fortune over the next 10 years.</p>\n<p>Image source: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTY\">Getty</a> Images.</p>\n<h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> </h3>\n<p>If you had invested $10,000 in&nbsp;<b>Nvidia</b> (NASDAQ:NVDA) a decade ago and held onto your shares, your investment would now be worth over $500,000. Will the stock deliver that kind of return over the next 10 years? Almost certainly not. However, I think that Nvidia will still be a huge winner for a long time to come.</p>\n<p>To be sure, there could be considerable volatility along the way. A cryptocurrency crash could pull down Nvidia's share price. It's happened in the past. The stock could also fall when the supply of chips catches up with demand.</p>\n<p>But over the long term, there are multiple tailwinds that work to Nvidia's advantage. One is the massive popularity of gaming with frequent upgrade cycles that drive demand for the company's latest graphics processing units. Another is the increased use of artificial intelligence in applications, which creates an expanding market for Nvidia as well.</p>\n<p>My view is that self-driving car technology will become a much larger opportunity for Nvidia over the next few years. I also expect that the proliferation of devices connected to the internet via 5G networks will also be a key growth driver for the company.</p>\n<p>Nvidia's market cap currently stands at close to $470 billion. I think the company can more than double its size over the next decade.</p>\n<h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ETSY\">Etsy</a></h3>\n<p>You couldn't have invested any amount in<b>Etsy</b> (NASDAQ:ETSY) 10 years ago. The e-commerce company didn't list its shares on a public exchange until 2015. Since then, the stock has soared more than 500%. And Etsy has just begun to tap its potential.</p>\n<p>The company operates the go-to platform for buying unique hand-crafted products. Thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, Etsy attracted lots of new customers. It also realized that its total addressable market was much bigger than it previously thought. Etsy CEO Josh Silverman put it this way: \"The size of Etsy's addressable market starts with a T not with a B.\"</p>\n<p>Etsy continues to enhance the product experience for customers to drive higher sales, including using strategic discounts and improving its search capabilities. It has also made a couple of acquisitions recently that give the company a presence in Latin America and in the fashion resale market.</p>\n<p>The company's market cap is less than $24 billion despite Etsy's tremendous growth. Although the stock trades at nearly 65 times expected earnings, I think that Etsy is actually cheap in light of its huge growth opportunity.</p>\n<h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DMTK\">DermTech, Inc.</a> </h3>\n<p><b>DermTech</b> (NASDAQ:DMTK) is by far the smallest of these three growth stocks with its market cap below $1 billion. Unlike Nvidia and Etsy, the company isn't profitable yet. And DermTech hasn't delivered nearly as impressive gains. However, I believe that it could potentially make investors the most money over the next 10 years of the three stocks on the list.</p>\n<p>Great companies address big problems in a new way. That's exactly what DermTech is doing. It's trying to revolutionize how skin cancer is detected. The current approach requires visual inspection and surgical biopsy. DermTech uses non-invasive genomic testing. Adhesive patches are applied to the skin and then sent to a lab for analysis. No cutting is required.</p>\n<p>DermTech's skin genomics tests are 17 less likely to miss a diagnosis of melanoma than the current biopsy approach. And the cost of DermTech's method is significantly lower as well.</p>\n<p>The total annual market opportunity for DermTech including all types of skin cancer is around $10 billion. DermTech already has two products on the market for melanoma and continues to develop new products that will enable it to target other types of skin cancer. The company is still only in its early innings, but I expect that DermTech will be a big winner over the long term.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>$10,000 Invested in These Growth Stocks Could Make You a Fortune Over the Next 10 Years</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n$10,000 Invested in These Growth Stocks Could Make You a Fortune Over the Next 10 Years\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-19 23:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/10000-invested-in-these-growth-stocks-could-make-y/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>All three of them are well-positioned for tremendous growth.\n\nKey Points\n\nOne stock should profit from the popularity of gaming and the increased adoption of artificial intelligence.\nAnother stock is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/10000-invested-in-these-growth-stocks-could-make-y/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ETSY":"Etsy, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/10000-invested-in-these-growth-stocks-could-make-y/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2152483637","content_text":"All three of them are well-positioned for tremendous growth.\n\nKey Points\n\nOne stock should profit from the popularity of gaming and the increased adoption of artificial intelligence.\nAnother stock is set to grow as it expands into new markets.\nThe smallest of the three stocks offers a game-changing approach to diagnosing skin cancer.\n\nAll you need is three ingredients to cook up sizzling stock returns. Those ingredients are a sufficient upfront amount of cash to invest, the right stocks to buy, and a long enough period of time.\nYou might have noticed there are some vague words included in those ingredients, though: sufficient, right, long enough. How much upfront cash is sufficient? What are the \"right\" stocks to buy? How long is long enough to hold those stocks?\nThe correct answers to those questions can vary. Some stocks don't require as big of an upfront investment or as lengthy of a holding period to generate tremendous returns as others do.\nHowever, I'll take a stab at answering all three questions in a way that is specific instead of vague. I think that $10,000 invested in these growth stocks could make you a fortune over the next 10 years.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nNVIDIA Corp \nIf you had invested $10,000 in Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) a decade ago and held onto your shares, your investment would now be worth over $500,000. Will the stock deliver that kind of return over the next 10 years? Almost certainly not. However, I think that Nvidia will still be a huge winner for a long time to come.\nTo be sure, there could be considerable volatility along the way. A cryptocurrency crash could pull down Nvidia's share price. It's happened in the past. The stock could also fall when the supply of chips catches up with demand.\nBut over the long term, there are multiple tailwinds that work to Nvidia's advantage. One is the massive popularity of gaming with frequent upgrade cycles that drive demand for the company's latest graphics processing units. Another is the increased use of artificial intelligence in applications, which creates an expanding market for Nvidia as well.\nMy view is that self-driving car technology will become a much larger opportunity for Nvidia over the next few years. I also expect that the proliferation of devices connected to the internet via 5G networks will also be a key growth driver for the company.\nNvidia's market cap currently stands at close to $470 billion. I think the company can more than double its size over the next decade.\nEtsy\nYou couldn't have invested any amount inEtsy (NASDAQ:ETSY) 10 years ago. The e-commerce company didn't list its shares on a public exchange until 2015. Since then, the stock has soared more than 500%. And Etsy has just begun to tap its potential.\nThe company operates the go-to platform for buying unique hand-crafted products. Thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, Etsy attracted lots of new customers. It also realized that its total addressable market was much bigger than it previously thought. Etsy CEO Josh Silverman put it this way: \"The size of Etsy's addressable market starts with a T not with a B.\"\nEtsy continues to enhance the product experience for customers to drive higher sales, including using strategic discounts and improving its search capabilities. It has also made a couple of acquisitions recently that give the company a presence in Latin America and in the fashion resale market.\nThe company's market cap is less than $24 billion despite Etsy's tremendous growth. Although the stock trades at nearly 65 times expected earnings, I think that Etsy is actually cheap in light of its huge growth opportunity.\nDermTech, Inc. \nDermTech (NASDAQ:DMTK) is by far the smallest of these three growth stocks with its market cap below $1 billion. Unlike Nvidia and Etsy, the company isn't profitable yet. And DermTech hasn't delivered nearly as impressive gains. However, I believe that it could potentially make investors the most money over the next 10 years of the three stocks on the list.\nGreat companies address big problems in a new way. That's exactly what DermTech is doing. It's trying to revolutionize how skin cancer is detected. The current approach requires visual inspection and surgical biopsy. DermTech uses non-invasive genomic testing. Adhesive patches are applied to the skin and then sent to a lab for analysis. No cutting is required.\nDermTech's skin genomics tests are 17 less likely to miss a diagnosis of melanoma than the current biopsy approach. And the cost of DermTech's method is significantly lower as well.\nThe total annual market opportunity for DermTech including all types of skin cancer is around $10 billion. DermTech already has two products on the market for melanoma and continues to develop new products that will enable it to target other types of skin cancer. The company is still only in its early innings, but I expect that DermTech will be a big winner over the long term.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179522287,"gmtCreate":1626566307749,"gmtModify":1703761697527,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179522287","repostId":"1159574501","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159574501","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626484131,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159574501?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-17 09:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159574501","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took ","content":"<p>Social media meme stocks&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>(NYSE:GME) and&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in Friday afternoon trading.</p>\n<p>DataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas said this week&nbsp;there is an ominous sign the&nbsp;meme stock phenomenon may be dying a slow death.</p>\n<p><b>Retail Trading Boom:</b>DataTrek has been periodically tracking the boom in retail traders triggered during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 by monitoring U.S. Google search volume for the keywords “invest” and “buy stock.” Colas said these basic search terms are a broad way to gauge marginal retail investor interest in the stock market.</p>\n<p>The image below shows how search volume for those key phrases has changed since the beginning of 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9930646712b9790171cccf12a873f757\" tg-width=\"1199\" tg-height=\"560\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Colas said the search volume data clearly indicates the retail stock trading fad is completely over at this point, a “very bad omen” for AMC and GameStop. In fact, Google search volume is now back down to where it was before the pandemic started in early 2020.</p>\n<p>In addition, search volumes are now down 75% from their peak levels during the initial short squeezes in AMC and GameStop back in January 2021.</p>\n<p>Colas said meme stocks like AMC need new retail stock traders to join in the buying to support their stock prices else they could be headed for more volatility like they have experienced this week.</p>\n<p>“Bubbles need fresh money, or they deflate. Quickly,” Colas wrote. “Every craze needs new adherents (i.e., not just the same crowd) to keep it relevant, and the Google chart shows those are in increasingly short supply.”</p>\n<p><b>PMP Weighs In:</b>Benzinga&nbsp;PreMarket Prep co-host Dennis Dick said&nbsp;a good story can carry a stock a long way, and some stocks can even become so hot that they become temporarily disconnected from the company’s underlying fundamentals.</p>\n<p>“We have seen that in a number of meme stocks this year. Story can drive price in the short run but stocks almost always return back to their fundamental value in the long run,” Dick said.</p>\n<p>The type of disconnect between share price and underlying value that AMC and GameStop have experienced in 2021 is certainly nothing new. Canadian cannabis stock&nbsp;<b>Tilray Inc</b>(NASDAQ:TLRY) experienced a similar disconnect back in 2018 when a retail stock mania sent the stock skyrocketing up to $300. Today, Tilray is trading back down at around $13.90.</p>\n<p>“As the stock price begins to fall, momentum traders who have been chasing the hot story will begin to exit. But if the stock trades at an extreme valuation, there may be very few traders willing to buy. This is what we are starting to see in many meme stocks today,” Dick said.</p>\n<p><b>Benzinga's Take:</b>If the story begins to get hot again, the stock prices of overvalued story stocks can always recover once again. But without any underlying fundamentals to support the valuation, these types of stocks need a constant stream of new buyers and an increasingly bullish story to generate fresh enthusiasm.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-17 09:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","TLRY":"Tilray Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159574501","content_text":"Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in Friday afternoon trading.\nDataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas said this week there is an ominous sign the meme stock phenomenon may be dying a slow death.\nRetail Trading Boom:DataTrek has been periodically tracking the boom in retail traders triggered during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 by monitoring U.S. Google search volume for the keywords “invest” and “buy stock.” Colas said these basic search terms are a broad way to gauge marginal retail investor interest in the stock market.\nThe image below shows how search volume for those key phrases has changed since the beginning of 2020.\n\nColas said the search volume data clearly indicates the retail stock trading fad is completely over at this point, a “very bad omen” for AMC and GameStop. In fact, Google search volume is now back down to where it was before the pandemic started in early 2020.\nIn addition, search volumes are now down 75% from their peak levels during the initial short squeezes in AMC and GameStop back in January 2021.\nColas said meme stocks like AMC need new retail stock traders to join in the buying to support their stock prices else they could be headed for more volatility like they have experienced this week.\n“Bubbles need fresh money, or they deflate. Quickly,” Colas wrote. “Every craze needs new adherents (i.e., not just the same crowd) to keep it relevant, and the Google chart shows those are in increasingly short supply.”\nPMP Weighs In:Benzinga PreMarket Prep co-host Dennis Dick said a good story can carry a stock a long way, and some stocks can even become so hot that they become temporarily disconnected from the company’s underlying fundamentals.\n“We have seen that in a number of meme stocks this year. Story can drive price in the short run but stocks almost always return back to their fundamental value in the long run,” Dick said.\nThe type of disconnect between share price and underlying value that AMC and GameStop have experienced in 2021 is certainly nothing new. Canadian cannabis stock Tilray Inc(NASDAQ:TLRY) experienced a similar disconnect back in 2018 when a retail stock mania sent the stock skyrocketing up to $300. Today, Tilray is trading back down at around $13.90.\n“As the stock price begins to fall, momentum traders who have been chasing the hot story will begin to exit. But if the stock trades at an extreme valuation, there may be very few traders willing to buy. This is what we are starting to see in many meme stocks today,” Dick said.\nBenzinga's Take:If the story begins to get hot again, the stock prices of overvalued story stocks can always recover once again. But without any underlying fundamentals to support the valuation, these types of stocks need a constant stream of new buyers and an increasingly bullish story to generate fresh enthusiasm.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":79,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170362733,"gmtCreate":1626405482122,"gmtModify":1703759541197,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170362733","repostId":"1178506488","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178506488","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626404639,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178506488?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 11:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Visa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178506488","media":"Benzinga","summary":"While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's t","content":"<p>While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance,&nbsp;<b>Mastercard Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:MA) and&nbsp;<b>Visa Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;According to a Thursday Financial Times&nbsp;report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.</p>\n<p>Similarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”</p>\n<p>Earlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.</p>\n<p>Still, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.</p>\n<p>Binance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.</p>\n<p>Namely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.</p>\n<p>The U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Visa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVisa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 11:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance,&nbsp;<b>Mastercard Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:MA) and&nbsp;<b>Visa Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;According to a Thursday Financial Times&nbsp;report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.</p>\n<p>Similarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”</p>\n<p>Earlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.</p>\n<p>Still, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.</p>\n<p>Binance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.</p>\n<p>Namely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.</p>\n<p>The U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MA":"万事达","V":"Visa"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178506488","content_text":"While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance, Mastercard Inc. (NYSE:MA) and Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.\nWhat Happened: According to a Thursday Financial Times report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.\nSimilarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”\nEarlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.\nStill, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.\nBinance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.\nNamely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.\nThe U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144269980,"gmtCreate":1626301205440,"gmtModify":1703757270551,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144269980","repostId":"2151548948","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151548948","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626293640,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151548948?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 04:14","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Treasury yields slip as Powell says inflation will dwindle","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151548948","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"10-year Treasury yield at around 1.36%.\n\nYields on U.S. government debt slipped on Wednesday as inve","content":"<blockquote>\n 10-year Treasury yield at around 1.36%.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Yields on U.S. government debt slipped on Wednesday as investors digested the first of two days of congressional testimony from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who reiterated the view that the recent strength in inflation is due to temporary supply issues as the economy recovers from the pandemic. Investors also digested a reading of the June producer-price index, which jumped to the highest annual level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the highest readings since the early 1980s.</p>\n<p>How Treasurys are performing</p>\n<p>Fixed-income drivers</p>\n<p>Data on Tuesday showed U.S. consumer price inflation rising further , putting Powell's testimony over the next two days in greater focus.</p>\n<p>However, the Fed chairman, in prepared remarks any direct link between the Fed's purchases of mortgage bonds and a spike in home prices.</p>\n<p>Powell's comments came as a reading of the producer price index on Wednesday jumped 1% last month, far exceeding estimates by economists polled by The Wall Street Journal who had forecast a 0.6% increase.</p>\n<p>The pace of wholesale inflation over the past 12 months rose to 7.3% from 6.6% in May. That is the highest level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the highest readings since the early 1980s.</p>\n<p>The Fed has insisted for months that price rises caused by widespread shortages will eventually ease once the U.S. and global economies return to normal after the pandemic. Powell, in his testimony in front of the House Financial Services Committee, said \"very high\" recent inflation readings appear to be coming from goods and services directly tied to the reopening of the U.S. economy.</p>\n<p>However, the chairman said that \"we are monitoring the situation very carefully\" and the Fed remains committed to price stability. If policymakers see inflation remaining high for a period of time and beginning to uproot expectations, \"we would absolutely change our policy as appropriate,\" he said.</p>\n<p>The Fed is holding its policy interest rates in a range between 0% and 0.25% and buying $120 billion of Treasurys and mortgage-backed bonds each month to keep interest rates low.</p>\n<p>Powell's remarks suggest that the central bank is in no rush to remove monetary accommodation, but he noted that discussions among Fed members are under way. Meanwhile, the Fed's Beige Book report released Wednesday found that a \"robust\" U.S. economy is strengthening, but also grappling with big shortages and higher inflation.</p>\n<p>Minutes of the Fed's June meeting show that officials had a lengthy discussion about when to slow down, or taper, the asset purchases. That is the likely first step in backing away from its easy money policy stance and investors will be looking for Powell to provide any clues on those plans.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly told CNBC that a tapering of bond purchases could begin late this year or early next, and that she's convinced the recent spate of inflation will prove to be short-lived.</p>\n<p>Fixed-income investors on Wednesday are also keeping an eye on a Senate Democrat budget agreement , which envisions spending $3.5 trillion over the coming decade, paving the way for their drive to pour federal resources into climate change, healthcare, and family-service programs sought by President Joe Biden.</p>\n<p>What strategists, traders, and others say</p>\n<p>\"We read Fed Chair Powell's prepared remarks for congressional testimony today as leaning against the possibility of an earlier tapering decision in September,\" said Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI.</p>\n<p>Still, \"we do not see him as abandoning this hawkish option,'\" Guha wrote in a note to clients.</p>\n<p>Robert Ostrowski, chief investment officer of global fixed income at Federated Hermes, says that the firm's analysts aren't hearing much evidence of a shift in inflation psychology, even if they have noticed shifts in actual cost inflation.</p>\n<p>\"We've already reached peak/transitory inflation and the hullaballoo over rising prices is overdone,\" Ostrowski wrote in an emailed note. Like many, \"our fixed-income team is scratching its collective head over the behavior of long yields\" -- which doesn't fit with \"an economy growing at its fastest pace in 40 years, core inflation that's rising the most in a decade, and a fiscal backdrop that's racking up record trillion-dollar-plus deficits,\" Ostrowski said.</p>\n<p>In the firm's model portfolios, \"we are maintaining duration well short of benchmark and positioning for a steepening yield curve, albeit at a more moderate pace than where we stood in the second quarter.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Treasury yields slip as Powell says inflation will dwindle</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTreasury yields slip as Powell says inflation will dwindle\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-15 04:14</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n 10-year Treasury yield at around 1.36%.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Yields on U.S. government debt slipped on Wednesday as investors digested the first of two days of congressional testimony from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who reiterated the view that the recent strength in inflation is due to temporary supply issues as the economy recovers from the pandemic. Investors also digested a reading of the June producer-price index, which jumped to the highest annual level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the highest readings since the early 1980s.</p>\n<p>How Treasurys are performing</p>\n<p>Fixed-income drivers</p>\n<p>Data on Tuesday showed U.S. consumer price inflation rising further , putting Powell's testimony over the next two days in greater focus.</p>\n<p>However, the Fed chairman, in prepared remarks any direct link between the Fed's purchases of mortgage bonds and a spike in home prices.</p>\n<p>Powell's comments came as a reading of the producer price index on Wednesday jumped 1% last month, far exceeding estimates by economists polled by The Wall Street Journal who had forecast a 0.6% increase.</p>\n<p>The pace of wholesale inflation over the past 12 months rose to 7.3% from 6.6% in May. That is the highest level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the highest readings since the early 1980s.</p>\n<p>The Fed has insisted for months that price rises caused by widespread shortages will eventually ease once the U.S. and global economies return to normal after the pandemic. Powell, in his testimony in front of the House Financial Services Committee, said \"very high\" recent inflation readings appear to be coming from goods and services directly tied to the reopening of the U.S. economy.</p>\n<p>However, the chairman said that \"we are monitoring the situation very carefully\" and the Fed remains committed to price stability. If policymakers see inflation remaining high for a period of time and beginning to uproot expectations, \"we would absolutely change our policy as appropriate,\" he said.</p>\n<p>The Fed is holding its policy interest rates in a range between 0% and 0.25% and buying $120 billion of Treasurys and mortgage-backed bonds each month to keep interest rates low.</p>\n<p>Powell's remarks suggest that the central bank is in no rush to remove monetary accommodation, but he noted that discussions among Fed members are under way. Meanwhile, the Fed's Beige Book report released Wednesday found that a \"robust\" U.S. economy is strengthening, but also grappling with big shortages and higher inflation.</p>\n<p>Minutes of the Fed's June meeting show that officials had a lengthy discussion about when to slow down, or taper, the asset purchases. That is the likely first step in backing away from its easy money policy stance and investors will be looking for Powell to provide any clues on those plans.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly told CNBC that a tapering of bond purchases could begin late this year or early next, and that she's convinced the recent spate of inflation will prove to be short-lived.</p>\n<p>Fixed-income investors on Wednesday are also keeping an eye on a Senate Democrat budget agreement , which envisions spending $3.5 trillion over the coming decade, paving the way for their drive to pour federal resources into climate change, healthcare, and family-service programs sought by President Joe Biden.</p>\n<p>What strategists, traders, and others say</p>\n<p>\"We read Fed Chair Powell's prepared remarks for congressional testimony today as leaning against the possibility of an earlier tapering decision in September,\" said Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI.</p>\n<p>Still, \"we do not see him as abandoning this hawkish option,'\" Guha wrote in a note to clients.</p>\n<p>Robert Ostrowski, chief investment officer of global fixed income at Federated Hermes, says that the firm's analysts aren't hearing much evidence of a shift in inflation psychology, even if they have noticed shifts in actual cost inflation.</p>\n<p>\"We've already reached peak/transitory inflation and the hullaballoo over rising prices is overdone,\" Ostrowski wrote in an emailed note. Like many, \"our fixed-income team is scratching its collective head over the behavior of long yields\" -- which doesn't fit with \"an economy growing at its fastest pace in 40 years, core inflation that's rising the most in a decade, and a fiscal backdrop that's racking up record trillion-dollar-plus deficits,\" Ostrowski said.</p>\n<p>In the firm's model portfolios, \"we are maintaining duration well short of benchmark and positioning for a steepening yield curve, albeit at a more moderate pace than where we stood in the second quarter.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151548948","content_text":"10-year Treasury yield at around 1.36%.\n\nYields on U.S. government debt slipped on Wednesday as investors digested the first of two days of congressional testimony from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who reiterated the view that the recent strength in inflation is due to temporary supply issues as the economy recovers from the pandemic. Investors also digested a reading of the June producer-price index, which jumped to the highest annual level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely one of the highest readings since the early 1980s.\nHow Treasurys are performing\nFixed-income drivers\nData on Tuesday showed U.S. consumer price inflation rising further , putting Powell's testimony over the next two days in greater focus.\nHowever, the Fed chairman, in prepared remarks any direct link between the Fed's purchases of mortgage bonds and a spike in home prices.\nPowell's comments came as a reading of the producer price index on Wednesday jumped 1% last month, far exceeding estimates by economists polled by The Wall Street Journal who had forecast a 0.6% increase.\nThe pace of wholesale inflation over the past 12 months rose to 7.3% from 6.6% in May. That is the highest level since the index was overhauled in 2010, and likely one of the highest readings since the early 1980s.\nThe Fed has insisted for months that price rises caused by widespread shortages will eventually ease once the U.S. and global economies return to normal after the pandemic. Powell, in his testimony in front of the House Financial Services Committee, said \"very high\" recent inflation readings appear to be coming from goods and services directly tied to the reopening of the U.S. economy.\nHowever, the chairman said that \"we are monitoring the situation very carefully\" and the Fed remains committed to price stability. If policymakers see inflation remaining high for a period of time and beginning to uproot expectations, \"we would absolutely change our policy as appropriate,\" he said.\nThe Fed is holding its policy interest rates in a range between 0% and 0.25% and buying $120 billion of Treasurys and mortgage-backed bonds each month to keep interest rates low.\nPowell's remarks suggest that the central bank is in no rush to remove monetary accommodation, but he noted that discussions among Fed members are under way. Meanwhile, the Fed's Beige Book report released Wednesday found that a \"robust\" U.S. economy is strengthening, but also grappling with big shortages and higher inflation.\nMinutes of the Fed's June meeting show that officials had a lengthy discussion about when to slow down, or taper, the asset purchases. That is the likely first step in backing away from its easy money policy stance and investors will be looking for Powell to provide any clues on those plans.\nOn Tuesday, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly told CNBC that a tapering of bond purchases could begin late this year or early next, and that she's convinced the recent spate of inflation will prove to be short-lived.\nFixed-income investors on Wednesday are also keeping an eye on a Senate Democrat budget agreement , which envisions spending $3.5 trillion over the coming decade, paving the way for their drive to pour federal resources into climate change, healthcare, and family-service programs sought by President Joe Biden.\nWhat strategists, traders, and others say\n\"We read Fed Chair Powell's prepared remarks for congressional testimony today as leaning against the possibility of an earlier tapering decision in September,\" said Krishna Guha of Evercore ISI.\nStill, \"we do not see him as abandoning this hawkish option,'\" Guha wrote in a note to clients.\nRobert Ostrowski, chief investment officer of global fixed income at Federated Hermes, says that the firm's analysts aren't hearing much evidence of a shift in inflation psychology, even if they have noticed shifts in actual cost inflation.\n\"We've already reached peak/transitory inflation and the hullaballoo over rising prices is overdone,\" Ostrowski wrote in an emailed note. Like many, \"our fixed-income team is scratching its collective head over the behavior of long yields\" -- which doesn't fit with \"an economy growing at its fastest pace in 40 years, core inflation that's rising the most in a decade, and a fiscal backdrop that's racking up record trillion-dollar-plus deficits,\" Ostrowski said.\nIn the firm's model portfolios, \"we are maintaining duration well short of benchmark and positioning for a steepening yield curve, albeit at a more moderate pace than where we stood in the second quarter.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144287414,"gmtCreate":1626301140538,"gmtModify":1703757268918,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144287414","repostId":"2151543698","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151543698","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626299615,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151543698?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 05:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151543698","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk'","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.</p>\n<p>An FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"</p>\n<p>A May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.</p>\n<p>Based on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"</p>\n<p>SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.</p>\n<p>SpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.</p>\n<p>But the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"</p>\n<p>The FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.</p>\n<p>The FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.</p>\n<p>On June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"</p>\n<p>FAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-15 05:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.</p>\n<p>An FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"</p>\n<p>A May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.</p>\n<p>Based on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"</p>\n<p>SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.</p>\n<p>SpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.</p>\n<p>But the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"</p>\n<p>The FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.</p>\n<p>The FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.</p>\n<p>On June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"</p>\n<p>FAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151543698","content_text":"WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.\nAn FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"\nA May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on one of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.\nBased on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"\nSpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.\nSpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.\nBut the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"\nThe FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.\nThe FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.\nOn June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"\nEarlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"\nFAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.\n(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":223,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146031015,"gmtCreate":1626042538037,"gmtModify":1703752089479,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Continue to hodl and to the moon&nbsp;","listText":"Continue to hodl and to the moon&nbsp;","text":"Continue to hodl and to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146031015","repostId":"1196440758","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196440758","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625967335,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196440758?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196440758","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Both of these companies grew revenue by triple-digit rates in their most recent quarters. More importantly, their futures look bright.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Growth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.</li>\n <li>Stay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates were high before the pandemic, too.</li>\n <li>Both of these fast-growing tech businesses are already profitable.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>There's an interesting dilemma when it comes to picking stocks investors can likely hold for years or even decades. On the one hand, investors looking to hold shares for the long haul can stick with stable and established companies that have been around for decades and will likely continue succeeding for the foreseeable future -- companies like&nbsp;<b>Waste Management</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>. The downside to this approach, however, is that investors may miss out on the potential outperformance that could come from fast-growing companies over the long haul.</p>\n<p>The issue with buying&nbsp;growth stocks, however, is that it's extremely difficult to gauge how long their rapid top-line growth rates can persist. Further, these companies' stock prices could perform very poorly if the growth prospects already baked into the stock price don't pan out. In other words, there's arguably more risk when it comes to betting on growth stocks for the next decade than there is for stable and established companies with decades of success behind them.</p>\n<p>So if an&nbsp;investor&nbsp;wants to buy growth stocks with a high chance of exceeding expectations over the next 10 years, they better have some pretty good reasons to believe these companies can do exactly that.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/257045ef62f724806bce2b35390a5e4f\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1500\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p>Here are two growth stocks that have a shot at not only living up to high expectations over the next 10 years but possibly even exceeding them:<b>Zoom Video Communications</b>(NASDAQ:ZM)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Peloton Interactive</b>(NASDAQ:PTON).</p>\n<p><b>Zoom and Peloton were already thriving before the pandemic</b></p>\n<p>At first glance, investors may conclude that Zoom is nothing more than a pandemic stock. They may argue that the company's success was predicated almost entirely on the fact that much of the world was in lockdown in 2020 and going into 2021.</p>\n<p>It's true that Zoom benefited significantly from the rise of virtual work in 2020. After all, revenue for the company's fiscal 2021 (a fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2021) skyrocketed 326% year over year. But investors should note that the trend of using video to collaborate virtually was already extremely strong before the pandemic; fiscal 2020 revenue rose 88% year over year. Growth at the time was particularly strong from large customers. Zoom's customers contributing more than $100,000 of trailing-12-month revenue increased 86% year over year in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.</p>\n<p>The same goes for Peloton. The company certainly benefited from the pandemic, but revenue during the quarter ending Dec. 31, 2019 was growing at a year-over-year rate of 77%, with connected fitness subscribers increasing 96% year over year.</p>\n<p><b>Continued momentum</b></p>\n<p>The underlying catalysts driving Zoom and Peloton are both still alive and well. Strong growth persists at both companies.</p>\n<p>Despite facing extremely tough comparisons in the year-ago quarter, from when both companies were benefiting from soaring demand amid lockdowns, Zoom's and Peloton's revenue in their most recently reported quarters grew 191% and 141% year over year, respectively.</p>\n<p>Looking ahead, Zoom notably guided for fiscal 2022 revenue of nearly $4 billion, up from fiscal 2021 revenue of about $2.7 billion.</p>\n<p>Boding well for Peloton's continued momentum, management said in its most recent quarterly update that its monthly average workouts per connected fitness subscription rose to an all-time high, showing how the company's products are still yielding high engagement even as the economy reopens.</p>\n<p><b>Healthy profits</b></p>\n<p>Finally, another factor that makes these companies unique from many other growth stocks is that they are already very profitable. Zoom generated $873 million of net income on $3.3 billion of trailing-12-month sales, and Peloton served up $213 million of net income from $3.7 billion in revenue.</p>\n<p>Substantial profits give these companies an edge when it comes to reinvesting in growth opportunities ahead of them and spending on efforts to enhance their competitive positioning and first-mover advantages in their respective industries.</p>\n<p>While there's no guarantee these two stocks will beat the market over the next 10 years, their recent momentum -- before, during, and after the worst part of the pandemic -- suggests they likely have a promising future.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Key Points\n\nGrowth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.\nStay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZM":"Zoom","PTON":"Peloton Interactive, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196440758","content_text":"Key Points\n\nGrowth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.\nStay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates were high before the pandemic, too.\nBoth of these fast-growing tech businesses are already profitable.\n\nThere's an interesting dilemma when it comes to picking stocks investors can likely hold for years or even decades. On the one hand, investors looking to hold shares for the long haul can stick with stable and established companies that have been around for decades and will likely continue succeeding for the foreseeable future -- companies like Waste Management and Berkshire Hathaway. The downside to this approach, however, is that investors may miss out on the potential outperformance that could come from fast-growing companies over the long haul.\nThe issue with buying growth stocks, however, is that it's extremely difficult to gauge how long their rapid top-line growth rates can persist. Further, these companies' stock prices could perform very poorly if the growth prospects already baked into the stock price don't pan out. In other words, there's arguably more risk when it comes to betting on growth stocks for the next decade than there is for stable and established companies with decades of success behind them.\nSo if an investor wants to buy growth stocks with a high chance of exceeding expectations over the next 10 years, they better have some pretty good reasons to believe these companies can do exactly that.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nHere are two growth stocks that have a shot at not only living up to high expectations over the next 10 years but possibly even exceeding them:Zoom Video Communications(NASDAQ:ZM) and Peloton Interactive(NASDAQ:PTON).\nZoom and Peloton were already thriving before the pandemic\nAt first glance, investors may conclude that Zoom is nothing more than a pandemic stock. They may argue that the company's success was predicated almost entirely on the fact that much of the world was in lockdown in 2020 and going into 2021.\nIt's true that Zoom benefited significantly from the rise of virtual work in 2020. After all, revenue for the company's fiscal 2021 (a fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2021) skyrocketed 326% year over year. But investors should note that the trend of using video to collaborate virtually was already extremely strong before the pandemic; fiscal 2020 revenue rose 88% year over year. Growth at the time was particularly strong from large customers. Zoom's customers contributing more than $100,000 of trailing-12-month revenue increased 86% year over year in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.\nThe same goes for Peloton. The company certainly benefited from the pandemic, but revenue during the quarter ending Dec. 31, 2019 was growing at a year-over-year rate of 77%, with connected fitness subscribers increasing 96% year over year.\nContinued momentum\nThe underlying catalysts driving Zoom and Peloton are both still alive and well. Strong growth persists at both companies.\nDespite facing extremely tough comparisons in the year-ago quarter, from when both companies were benefiting from soaring demand amid lockdowns, Zoom's and Peloton's revenue in their most recently reported quarters grew 191% and 141% year over year, respectively.\nLooking ahead, Zoom notably guided for fiscal 2022 revenue of nearly $4 billion, up from fiscal 2021 revenue of about $2.7 billion.\nBoding well for Peloton's continued momentum, management said in its most recent quarterly update that its monthly average workouts per connected fitness subscription rose to an all-time high, showing how the company's products are still yielding high engagement even as the economy reopens.\nHealthy profits\nFinally, another factor that makes these companies unique from many other growth stocks is that they are already very profitable. Zoom generated $873 million of net income on $3.3 billion of trailing-12-month sales, and Peloton served up $213 million of net income from $3.7 billion in revenue.\nSubstantial profits give these companies an edge when it comes to reinvesting in growth opportunities ahead of them and spending on efforts to enhance their competitive positioning and first-mover advantages in their respective industries.\nWhile there's no guarantee these two stocks will beat the market over the next 10 years, their recent momentum -- before, during, and after the worst part of the pandemic -- suggests they likely have a promising future.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":215,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146033612,"gmtCreate":1626042492136,"gmtModify":1703752088504,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"High risk&nbsp;","listText":"High risk&nbsp;","text":"High risk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146033612","repostId":"1113530069","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":211,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146030507,"gmtCreate":1626042320109,"gmtModify":1703752085903,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146030507","repostId":"2150463301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2150463301","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625971562,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2150463301?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2150463301","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this tween-oriented gaming platform be the next tech giant?","content":"<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. <b>Apple</b>&nbsp;and <b>Amazon</b> crossed that milestone in 2018, <b>Microsoft</b>&nbsp;followed suit in 2019, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>&nbsp;joined the club earlier this year.</p>\n<p>Many other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of those stocks be <b>Roblox</b>, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F632887%2Fshowcase_filmstrip_1920x1080.png&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Roblox.</span></p>\n<h2>How much is Roblox worth today?</h2>\n<p>Roblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.</p>\n<p>No pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. <b>Activision Blizzard </b>and <b>Electronic Arts</b>, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. <b>Unity</b>, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.</p>\n<p>If we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"596\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"176\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"189\"><p>P/S Ratio (Current FY)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"187\"><p>P/S Ratio (Next FY)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Roblox (NYSE:RBLX)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>20</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>16</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>8</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>7</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>6</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>5</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Unity (NYSE:U)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>30</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>23</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.</p>\n<h2>But is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?</h2>\n<p>However, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.</p>\n<p>Roblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.</p>\n<p>Roblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.</p>\n<p>The bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.</p>\n<p>The bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.</p>\n<p>Roblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.</p>\n<p>The bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.</p>\n<h2>Why Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030</h2>\n<p>Even if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.</p>\n<p>If Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.</p>\n<p>But that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RBLX":"Roblox Corporation"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2150463301","content_text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this year.\nMany other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could one of those stocks be Roblox, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?\nImage source: Roblox.\nHow much is Roblox worth today?\nRoblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.\nNo pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. Unity, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.\nIf we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nP/S Ratio (Current FY)\nP/S Ratio (Next FY)\n\n\nRoblox (NYSE:RBLX)\n20\n16\n\n\nActivision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)\n8\n7\n\n\nElectronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)\n6\n5\n\n\nUnity (NYSE:U)\n30\n23\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.\nBut is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?\nHowever, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.\nRoblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.\nRoblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.\nThe bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.\nThe bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.\nRoblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.\nThe bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.\nWhy Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030\nEven if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.\nIf Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.\nBut that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":263,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"content":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this","text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this","html":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148132003,"gmtCreate":1625958188802,"gmtModify":1703751118658,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148132003","repostId":"1159307278","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159307278","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625873648,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159307278?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-10 07:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Things to Know About Virgin Galactic and the First Passenger Flight to Space","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159307278","media":"Barrons","summary":"Richard Branson’s planned flight to space on Sunday could be a monumental moment for the fledgling s","content":"<p>Richard Branson’s planned flight to space on Sunday could be a monumental moment for the&nbsp;fledgling space tourism industry.</p>\n<p>So long as there are no issues or delays, the flight will take the 70-year-old founder of&nbsp;Virgin Galactic(ticker: SPCE), company mission specialists, and pilots, on the first passenger trip to space, beating Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin passenger flight by more than a week.</p>\n<p>Here’s what to watch for Sunday, along with some recent history.</p>\n<p><b>When Will the Virgin Galactic Space Flight Take Off?</b></p>\n<p>The Virgin Galactic Unity 22 spaceflight is expected to launch from Virgin’s spaceport in New Mexico around 9 a.m. eastern time. The launch can be streamed live on the&nbsp;company’s website&nbsp;and on&nbsp;Barron’s&nbsp;below.</p>\n<p><b>How High Up in Space Will Passenger Go?</b></p>\n<p>Galactic’s VSS Unity spacecraft will hit speeds of about Mach 3, or three times the speed of sound, and rise to about 300,000 feet, or 57 miles. That’s about 10 times as high as many commercial flights but still considered the edge of space. The suborbital flight will not pass the so-called Karman line, which is what scientists use to define the boundary of outer space. That line is about 62 miles up.</p>\n<p>Blue Origin plans to take its passengers past the Karman line on its flight.</p>\n<p><b>How Much Did Passengers Pay for the Trip?</b></p>\n<p>Nothing. While this flight could be another step forward for space tourism, the expected crew members are Galactic employees and Branson. Joining the company’s founder on board will be two pilots; Beth Moses, chief astronaut instructor; Colin Bennett, lead operations engineer; and Sirisha Bandla, vice president of government affairs and research operations.</p>\n<p>Still, Branson is no stranger to publicity. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert believes&nbsp;it’s possible&nbsp;that Galactic could surprise viewers by bringing a paying customer on board with Branson. That would generate additional buzz for the company.</p>\n<p>A move like that would best space-tourism competitor Blue Origin in another way. Bezos is expected to take the first paying passenger to space on his flight later this month. That seat was auctioned off for&nbsp;$28 million.</p>\n<p>A ticket on a future Virgin Galactic flight will run&nbsp;about $250,000.</p>\n<p><b>What Does the Flight Mean for Investors?</b></p>\n<p>The continuation of flight tests brings Galactic one step closer to full commercialization, which means sales and, hopefully, earnings down the road.</p>\n<p>Once fully operational, each Galactic spaceship is expected to make roughly 36 flights a year. Most Galactic spaceships have about six seats for sale. At full capacity, that’s about $54 million per spaceship a year.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect Galactic to do about $3 million in 2021 sales, growing to $51 million in 2022 and $555 million by 2025. Earnings and cash flow are expected to turn positive around 2024.</p>\n<p>The flight and associated news coverage also represent publicity for the company.</p>\n<p><b>How Will Virgin Galactic Stock Benefit?</b></p>\n<p>A successful test flight is a clear positive for Galactic, but it might not be so for its stock. The news of the flight and the potential benefits are, for the most part, already priced into shares of Virgin Galactic.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4113576958bcf043e56e1c92578d0cc\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\"></p>\n<p>The stock is up roughly 120% year to date and up more than 200% over the past 12 months, giving the start-up a market capitalization of around $11 billion.</p>\n<p>Investors shouldn’t be disappointed if the stock doesn’t gain on Monday following a successful flight. The ultimate value of the company will be determined down the road.</p>\n<p>Analysts loved the stock when it was cheaper. Back in September, all analysts covering Galactic rated shares Buy. Theaverage Buy-ratingratio for&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;stocks is about 55%.</p>\n<p>Shares were $25 in September. Now, only 30% of analysts rate shares Buy as the stock has rocketed north of $50 a share.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Things to Know About Virgin Galactic and the First Passenger Flight to Space</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Things to Know About Virgin Galactic and the First Passenger Flight to Space\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-10 07:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/virgin-galactic-richard-branson-space-flight-51625848364?mod=hp_LEAD_4><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Richard Branson’s planned flight to space on Sunday could be a monumental moment for the fledgling space tourism industry.\nSo long as there are no issues or delays, the flight will take the 70-year-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/virgin-galactic-richard-branson-space-flight-51625848364?mod=hp_LEAD_4\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPCE":"维珍银河"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/virgin-galactic-richard-branson-space-flight-51625848364?mod=hp_LEAD_4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159307278","content_text":"Richard Branson’s planned flight to space on Sunday could be a monumental moment for the fledgling space tourism industry.\nSo long as there are no issues or delays, the flight will take the 70-year-old founder of Virgin Galactic(ticker: SPCE), company mission specialists, and pilots, on the first passenger trip to space, beating Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin passenger flight by more than a week.\nHere’s what to watch for Sunday, along with some recent history.\nWhen Will the Virgin Galactic Space Flight Take Off?\nThe Virgin Galactic Unity 22 spaceflight is expected to launch from Virgin’s spaceport in New Mexico around 9 a.m. eastern time. The launch can be streamed live on the company’s website and on Barron’s below.\nHow High Up in Space Will Passenger Go?\nGalactic’s VSS Unity spacecraft will hit speeds of about Mach 3, or three times the speed of sound, and rise to about 300,000 feet, or 57 miles. That’s about 10 times as high as many commercial flights but still considered the edge of space. The suborbital flight will not pass the so-called Karman line, which is what scientists use to define the boundary of outer space. That line is about 62 miles up.\nBlue Origin plans to take its passengers past the Karman line on its flight.\nHow Much Did Passengers Pay for the Trip?\nNothing. While this flight could be another step forward for space tourism, the expected crew members are Galactic employees and Branson. Joining the company’s founder on board will be two pilots; Beth Moses, chief astronaut instructor; Colin Bennett, lead operations engineer; and Sirisha Bandla, vice president of government affairs and research operations.\nStill, Branson is no stranger to publicity. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert believes it’s possible that Galactic could surprise viewers by bringing a paying customer on board with Branson. That would generate additional buzz for the company.\nA move like that would best space-tourism competitor Blue Origin in another way. Bezos is expected to take the first paying passenger to space on his flight later this month. That seat was auctioned off for $28 million.\nA ticket on a future Virgin Galactic flight will run about $250,000.\nWhat Does the Flight Mean for Investors?\nThe continuation of flight tests brings Galactic one step closer to full commercialization, which means sales and, hopefully, earnings down the road.\nOnce fully operational, each Galactic spaceship is expected to make roughly 36 flights a year. Most Galactic spaceships have about six seats for sale. At full capacity, that’s about $54 million per spaceship a year.\nAnalysts expect Galactic to do about $3 million in 2021 sales, growing to $51 million in 2022 and $555 million by 2025. Earnings and cash flow are expected to turn positive around 2024.\nThe flight and associated news coverage also represent publicity for the company.\nHow Will Virgin Galactic Stock Benefit?\nA successful test flight is a clear positive for Galactic, but it might not be so for its stock. The news of the flight and the potential benefits are, for the most part, already priced into shares of Virgin Galactic.\n\nThe stock is up roughly 120% year to date and up more than 200% over the past 12 months, giving the start-up a market capitalization of around $11 billion.\nInvestors shouldn’t be disappointed if the stock doesn’t gain on Monday following a successful flight. The ultimate value of the company will be determined down the road.\nAnalysts loved the stock when it was cheaper. Back in September, all analysts covering Galactic rated shares Buy. Theaverage Buy-ratingratio for S&P 500 stocks is about 55%.\nShares were $25 in September. Now, only 30% of analysts rate shares Buy as the stock has rocketed north of $50 a share.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":170362733,"gmtCreate":1626405482122,"gmtModify":1703759541197,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170362733","repostId":"1178506488","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178506488","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626404639,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178506488?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 11:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Visa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178506488","media":"Benzinga","summary":"While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's t","content":"<p>While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance,&nbsp;<b>Mastercard Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:MA) and&nbsp;<b>Visa Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;According to a Thursday Financial Times&nbsp;report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.</p>\n<p>Similarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”</p>\n<p>Earlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.</p>\n<p>Still, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.</p>\n<p>Binance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.</p>\n<p>Namely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.</p>\n<p>The U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Visa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVisa And Mastercard Stand By Binance Amid Exchange's Regulatory Scrutiny\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 11:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance,&nbsp;<b>Mastercard Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:MA) and&nbsp;<b>Visa Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;According to a Thursday Financial Times&nbsp;report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.</p>\n<p>Similarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”</p>\n<p>Earlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.</p>\n<p>Still, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.</p>\n<p>Binance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.</p>\n<p>Namely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.</p>\n<p>The U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MA":"万事达","V":"Visa"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178506488","content_text":"While two of the biggest U.K. banks, Barclays and Santander, have stopped working with the world's top cryptocurrency exchange Binance, Mastercard Inc. (NYSE:MA) and Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) have decided to continue working with the firm.\nWhat Happened: According to a Thursday Financial Times report, Visa told the news outlet that it is “aware of the recent FCA statement regarding Binance” and that it has been in communication with the exchange to monitor the situation as it develops.\nSimilarly, Mastercard said that it was continuing \"to monitor this situation, including how the exchanges fulfill their regulatory requirements.”\nEarlier, Visa has partnered with Binance to offers a Visa-branded debit card allowing crypto spending to customers located in a big chunk of Europe.\nStill, the exchange does not issue the cards directly itself. Instead, it relies on its partner Contis, a Visa partner with an e-money license from Lithuania’s central bank.\nBinance relies on many payment partners to connect with the traditional financial system, including Checkout.com and Clear Junction — both of which are a part of major payment channels themselves. Some of those partners started cutting ties with the exchange as it finds itself in the midst of greater and greater regulatory scrutiny.\nNamely, Clear Junction provided Binance with access to the European payment network SEPA, but on Monday, it announced that it would “no longer be facilitating payments” for the firm.\nThe U.K. payments firm BCB Group also broken up ties with Binance earlier this year. As of Wednesday, customers could not withdraw or deposit euros and sterling through neither U.K. Binance payment partner Faster Payments nor SEPA. Binance said it was \"working as quickly as we can to make payment services available\" to the users.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146030507,"gmtCreate":1626042320109,"gmtModify":1703752085903,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146030507","repostId":"2150463301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2150463301","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625971562,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2150463301?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2150463301","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this tween-oriented gaming platform be the next tech giant?","content":"<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. <b>Apple</b>&nbsp;and <b>Amazon</b> crossed that milestone in 2018, <b>Microsoft</b>&nbsp;followed suit in 2019, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>&nbsp;joined the club earlier this year.</p>\n<p>Many other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of those stocks be <b>Roblox</b>, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F632887%2Fshowcase_filmstrip_1920x1080.png&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Roblox.</span></p>\n<h2>How much is Roblox worth today?</h2>\n<p>Roblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.</p>\n<p>No pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. <b>Activision Blizzard </b>and <b>Electronic Arts</b>, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. <b>Unity</b>, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.</p>\n<p>If we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"596\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"176\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"189\"><p>P/S Ratio (Current FY)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"187\"><p>P/S Ratio (Next FY)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Roblox (NYSE:RBLX)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>20</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>16</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>8</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>7</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>6</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>5</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Unity (NYSE:U)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>30</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>23</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.</p>\n<h2>But is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?</h2>\n<p>However, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.</p>\n<p>Roblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.</p>\n<p>Roblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.</p>\n<p>The bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.</p>\n<p>The bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.</p>\n<p>Roblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.</p>\n<p>The bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.</p>\n<h2>Why Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030</h2>\n<p>Even if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.</p>\n<p>If Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.</p>\n<p>But that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RBLX":"Roblox Corporation"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2150463301","content_text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this year.\nMany other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could one of those stocks be Roblox, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?\nImage source: Roblox.\nHow much is Roblox worth today?\nRoblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.\nNo pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. Unity, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.\nIf we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nP/S Ratio (Current FY)\nP/S Ratio (Next FY)\n\n\nRoblox (NYSE:RBLX)\n20\n16\n\n\nActivision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)\n8\n7\n\n\nElectronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)\n6\n5\n\n\nUnity (NYSE:U)\n30\n23\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.\nBut is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?\nHowever, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.\nRoblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.\nRoblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.\nThe bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.\nThe bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.\nRoblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.\nThe bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.\nWhy Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030\nEven if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.\nIf Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.\nBut that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":263,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"content":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this","text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this","html":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144287414,"gmtCreate":1626301140538,"gmtModify":1703757268918,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144287414","repostId":"2151543698","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151543698","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626299615,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151543698?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 05:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151543698","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk'","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.</p>\n<p>An FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"</p>\n<p>A May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.</p>\n<p>Based on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"</p>\n<p>SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.</p>\n<p>SpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.</p>\n<p>But the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"</p>\n<p>The FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.</p>\n<p>The FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.</p>\n<p>On June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"</p>\n<p>FAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. warns SpaceX its new Texas launch site tower not yet approved\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-15 05:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.</p>\n<p>An FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"</p>\n<p>A May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.</p>\n<p>Based on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"</p>\n<p>SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.</p>\n<p>SpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.</p>\n<p>But the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"</p>\n<p>The FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.</p>\n<p>The FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.</p>\n<p>On June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"</p>\n<p>FAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151543698","content_text":"WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned Elon Musk's space company SpaceX that its environmental review of a new tower at its Boca Chica launch site in Texas is incomplete and the agency could order SpaceX to take down the tower.\nAn FAA spokesman said on Wednesday that the agency's environmental review underway of SpaceX’s proposed rocket assembly \"integration tower\" is \"underway,\" and added that \"the company is building the tower at its own risk.\"\nA May 6 letter from the FAA to SpaceX seen by Reuters said recent construction activity on one of the two proposed towers \"may complicate the ongoing environmental review process for the Starship/Super Heavy Launch Vehicle Program.\" The FAA letter said the tower could be as high as 480 feet.\nBased on the environmental review, the FAA could order SpaceX to take down the tower. \"It is possible that changes would have to be made at the launch site, including to the integration towers to mitigate significant impacts,\" the May 6 letter said, adding the FAA learned of the tower's construction \"based on publicly available video footage.\"\nSpaceX did not respond to a request for comment but Musk has repeatedly criticized the FAA and the U.S. regulatory system.\nSpaceX told the FAA in May that it did not believe the review was necessary because it only intends to use the \"integration tower for production, research, and development purposes and not for FAA-licensed or -permitted launches,\" the FAA said.\nBut the agency said description in documents \"indicates otherwise.\"\nThe FAA cited a SpaceX document that the towers would be used to integrate the Starship/Super Heavy launch vehicle. \"Super Heavy would be mated to the launch mount, followed by Starship mated to Super Heavy,\" the FAA letter said quoting SpaceX's May 5 submission.\nThe FAA and Musk have clashed on several occasions.\nOn June 29, Musk lamented the delay of the launch of Transporter-2 mission in Florida. He tweeted \"an aircraft entered the ‘keep out zone’, which is unreasonably gigantic. There is simply no way that humanity can become a spacefaring civilization without major regulatory reform.\"\nEarlier this year, the FAA said SpaceX's December launch of Starship SN8 violated its license requirements. Effective March 12, the FAA began requiring an agency safety inspector at all SpaceX launches to \"ensure compliance with federal regulations to protect public safety.\"\nFAA Administrator Steve Dickson spoke with Musk on March 12 for 30 minutes to stress \"the FAA’s role in protecting public safety by ensuring regulatory compliance. He made it clear that the FAA expected SpaceX to develop and foster a robust safety culture that stresses adherence to FAA rules,\" the agency said in April.\n(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":223,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146031015,"gmtCreate":1626042538037,"gmtModify":1703752089479,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Continue to hodl and to the moon&nbsp;","listText":"Continue to hodl and to the moon&nbsp;","text":"Continue to hodl and to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146031015","repostId":"1196440758","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196440758","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625967335,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196440758?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196440758","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Both of these companies grew revenue by triple-digit rates in their most recent quarters. More importantly, their futures look bright.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Growth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.</li>\n <li>Stay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates were high before the pandemic, too.</li>\n <li>Both of these fast-growing tech businesses are already profitable.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>There's an interesting dilemma when it comes to picking stocks investors can likely hold for years or even decades. On the one hand, investors looking to hold shares for the long haul can stick with stable and established companies that have been around for decades and will likely continue succeeding for the foreseeable future -- companies like&nbsp;<b>Waste Management</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>. The downside to this approach, however, is that investors may miss out on the potential outperformance that could come from fast-growing companies over the long haul.</p>\n<p>The issue with buying&nbsp;growth stocks, however, is that it's extremely difficult to gauge how long their rapid top-line growth rates can persist. Further, these companies' stock prices could perform very poorly if the growth prospects already baked into the stock price don't pan out. In other words, there's arguably more risk when it comes to betting on growth stocks for the next decade than there is for stable and established companies with decades of success behind them.</p>\n<p>So if an&nbsp;investor&nbsp;wants to buy growth stocks with a high chance of exceeding expectations over the next 10 years, they better have some pretty good reasons to believe these companies can do exactly that.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/257045ef62f724806bce2b35390a5e4f\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1500\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p>Here are two growth stocks that have a shot at not only living up to high expectations over the next 10 years but possibly even exceeding them:<b>Zoom Video Communications</b>(NASDAQ:ZM)&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Peloton Interactive</b>(NASDAQ:PTON).</p>\n<p><b>Zoom and Peloton were already thriving before the pandemic</b></p>\n<p>At first glance, investors may conclude that Zoom is nothing more than a pandemic stock. They may argue that the company's success was predicated almost entirely on the fact that much of the world was in lockdown in 2020 and going into 2021.</p>\n<p>It's true that Zoom benefited significantly from the rise of virtual work in 2020. After all, revenue for the company's fiscal 2021 (a fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2021) skyrocketed 326% year over year. But investors should note that the trend of using video to collaborate virtually was already extremely strong before the pandemic; fiscal 2020 revenue rose 88% year over year. Growth at the time was particularly strong from large customers. Zoom's customers contributing more than $100,000 of trailing-12-month revenue increased 86% year over year in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.</p>\n<p>The same goes for Peloton. The company certainly benefited from the pandemic, but revenue during the quarter ending Dec. 31, 2019 was growing at a year-over-year rate of 77%, with connected fitness subscribers increasing 96% year over year.</p>\n<p><b>Continued momentum</b></p>\n<p>The underlying catalysts driving Zoom and Peloton are both still alive and well. Strong growth persists at both companies.</p>\n<p>Despite facing extremely tough comparisons in the year-ago quarter, from when both companies were benefiting from soaring demand amid lockdowns, Zoom's and Peloton's revenue in their most recently reported quarters grew 191% and 141% year over year, respectively.</p>\n<p>Looking ahead, Zoom notably guided for fiscal 2022 revenue of nearly $4 billion, up from fiscal 2021 revenue of about $2.7 billion.</p>\n<p>Boding well for Peloton's continued momentum, management said in its most recent quarterly update that its monthly average workouts per connected fitness subscription rose to an all-time high, showing how the company's products are still yielding high engagement even as the economy reopens.</p>\n<p><b>Healthy profits</b></p>\n<p>Finally, another factor that makes these companies unique from many other growth stocks is that they are already very profitable. Zoom generated $873 million of net income on $3.3 billion of trailing-12-month sales, and Peloton served up $213 million of net income from $3.7 billion in revenue.</p>\n<p>Substantial profits give these companies an edge when it comes to reinvesting in growth opportunities ahead of them and spending on efforts to enhance their competitive positioning and first-mover advantages in their respective industries.</p>\n<p>While there's no guarantee these two stocks will beat the market over the next 10 years, their recent momentum -- before, during, and after the worst part of the pandemic -- suggests they likely have a promising future.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Growth Stocks for the Next 10 Years\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Key Points\n\nGrowth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.\nStay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZM":"Zoom","PTON":"Peloton Interactive, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/2-growth-stocks-for-the-next-10-years/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196440758","content_text":"Key Points\n\nGrowth stocks may be riskier than stable and established companies, but carefully selected ones may be worth it.\nStay-at-home trends have helped these companies, but their growth rates were high before the pandemic, too.\nBoth of these fast-growing tech businesses are already profitable.\n\nThere's an interesting dilemma when it comes to picking stocks investors can likely hold for years or even decades. On the one hand, investors looking to hold shares for the long haul can stick with stable and established companies that have been around for decades and will likely continue succeeding for the foreseeable future -- companies like Waste Management and Berkshire Hathaway. The downside to this approach, however, is that investors may miss out on the potential outperformance that could come from fast-growing companies over the long haul.\nThe issue with buying growth stocks, however, is that it's extremely difficult to gauge how long their rapid top-line growth rates can persist. Further, these companies' stock prices could perform very poorly if the growth prospects already baked into the stock price don't pan out. In other words, there's arguably more risk when it comes to betting on growth stocks for the next decade than there is for stable and established companies with decades of success behind them.\nSo if an investor wants to buy growth stocks with a high chance of exceeding expectations over the next 10 years, they better have some pretty good reasons to believe these companies can do exactly that.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nHere are two growth stocks that have a shot at not only living up to high expectations over the next 10 years but possibly even exceeding them:Zoom Video Communications(NASDAQ:ZM) and Peloton Interactive(NASDAQ:PTON).\nZoom and Peloton were already thriving before the pandemic\nAt first glance, investors may conclude that Zoom is nothing more than a pandemic stock. They may argue that the company's success was predicated almost entirely on the fact that much of the world was in lockdown in 2020 and going into 2021.\nIt's true that Zoom benefited significantly from the rise of virtual work in 2020. After all, revenue for the company's fiscal 2021 (a fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2021) skyrocketed 326% year over year. But investors should note that the trend of using video to collaborate virtually was already extremely strong before the pandemic; fiscal 2020 revenue rose 88% year over year. Growth at the time was particularly strong from large customers. Zoom's customers contributing more than $100,000 of trailing-12-month revenue increased 86% year over year in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.\nThe same goes for Peloton. The company certainly benefited from the pandemic, but revenue during the quarter ending Dec. 31, 2019 was growing at a year-over-year rate of 77%, with connected fitness subscribers increasing 96% year over year.\nContinued momentum\nThe underlying catalysts driving Zoom and Peloton are both still alive and well. Strong growth persists at both companies.\nDespite facing extremely tough comparisons in the year-ago quarter, from when both companies were benefiting from soaring demand amid lockdowns, Zoom's and Peloton's revenue in their most recently reported quarters grew 191% and 141% year over year, respectively.\nLooking ahead, Zoom notably guided for fiscal 2022 revenue of nearly $4 billion, up from fiscal 2021 revenue of about $2.7 billion.\nBoding well for Peloton's continued momentum, management said in its most recent quarterly update that its monthly average workouts per connected fitness subscription rose to an all-time high, showing how the company's products are still yielding high engagement even as the economy reopens.\nHealthy profits\nFinally, another factor that makes these companies unique from many other growth stocks is that they are already very profitable. Zoom generated $873 million of net income on $3.3 billion of trailing-12-month sales, and Peloton served up $213 million of net income from $3.7 billion in revenue.\nSubstantial profits give these companies an edge when it comes to reinvesting in growth opportunities ahead of them and spending on efforts to enhance their competitive positioning and first-mover advantages in their respective industries.\nWhile there's no guarantee these two stocks will beat the market over the next 10 years, their recent momentum -- before, during, and after the worst part of the pandemic -- suggests they likely have a promising future.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":215,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143210381,"gmtCreate":1625795563843,"gmtModify":1703748691848,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/143210381","repostId":"1164584412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164584412","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625792481,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1164584412?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-09 09:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Melvin Can’t Shake Reddit Attack With 46% Loss in First Half","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164584412","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Hedge fund is said to have gained about 1% last month\nFounder Plotkin has said he would adjust his s","content":"<ul>\n <li>Hedge fund is said to have gained about 1% last month</li>\n <li>Founder Plotkin has said he would adjust his shorting strategy</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Gabe Plotkin’s Melvin Capital Management ended the first half of 2021 down 46% as the hedge fund struggled to bounce back from a vicious attack by Reddit traders on its short positions.</p>\n<p>The firm, which plunged 53% in January as its bearish bets on companies includingGameStop Corp.andAMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.were besieged by a retail-driven buying spree, was up about 1% in June, according to people familiar with the matter. After initially posting astrong reboundof 22% in February, Plotkin has lost momentum in recent months.</p>\n<p>Some hedge fund observers question whether Plotkin -- who has changed the way he makes short bets in the wake of the fiasco -- can still produce blockbuster returns without taking aggressive positions against companies. In Melvin’s first year of trading, 70% of the fund’s profits came from his bearish wagers.</p>\n<p>Read more:RedditCrowd Bludgeons Melvin Capital in Warning to Industry</p>\n<p>“I don’t think investors like myself want to be susceptible to these type of dynamics,” Plotkin testified during a House Financial Services Committeehearing, referring to the astronomical level of short interest in GameStop stock that preceded the volatility.</p>\n<p>Sponsored ContentIntelligent Automation Can Add Value Throughout OrganizationsBusiness Reporter</p>\n<p>Bloomberg has reported that his firm, which managed $11 billion as of June 1, is also taking smaller-sized positions to limit exposure to single companies. Plotkin also told his team of data scientists to scour social media and message boards to look for shares that retail investors are rallying around.</p>\n<p>A spokesman for the firm declined to comment.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Melvin Can’t Shake Reddit Attack With 46% Loss in First Half</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMelvin Can’t Shake Reddit Attack With 46% Loss in First Half\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-09 09:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/melvin-can-t-shake-reddit-attack-with-46-loss-in-first-half?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Hedge fund is said to have gained about 1% last month\nFounder Plotkin has said he would adjust his shorting strategy\n\nGabe Plotkin’s Melvin Capital Management ended the first half of 2021 down 46% as ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/melvin-can-t-shake-reddit-attack-with-46-loss-in-first-half?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FBNC":"第一万能金控","FNLC":"第一万通金控","FFBC":"第一金融银行股份","THFF":"First Financial Corporation Indi"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/melvin-can-t-shake-reddit-attack-with-46-loss-in-first-half?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164584412","content_text":"Hedge fund is said to have gained about 1% last month\nFounder Plotkin has said he would adjust his shorting strategy\n\nGabe Plotkin’s Melvin Capital Management ended the first half of 2021 down 46% as the hedge fund struggled to bounce back from a vicious attack by Reddit traders on its short positions.\nThe firm, which plunged 53% in January as its bearish bets on companies includingGameStop Corp.andAMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.were besieged by a retail-driven buying spree, was up about 1% in June, according to people familiar with the matter. After initially posting astrong reboundof 22% in February, Plotkin has lost momentum in recent months.\nSome hedge fund observers question whether Plotkin -- who has changed the way he makes short bets in the wake of the fiasco -- can still produce blockbuster returns without taking aggressive positions against companies. In Melvin’s first year of trading, 70% of the fund’s profits came from his bearish wagers.\nRead more:RedditCrowd Bludgeons Melvin Capital in Warning to Industry\n“I don’t think investors like myself want to be susceptible to these type of dynamics,” Plotkin testified during a House Financial Services Committeehearing, referring to the astronomical level of short interest in GameStop stock that preceded the volatility.\nSponsored ContentIntelligent Automation Can Add Value Throughout OrganizationsBusiness Reporter\nBloomberg has reported that his firm, which managed $11 billion as of June 1, is also taking smaller-sized positions to limit exposure to single companies. Plotkin also told his team of data scientists to scour social media and message boards to look for shares that retail investors are rallying around.\nA spokesman for the firm declined to comment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":108,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":149123637,"gmtCreate":1625710163129,"gmtModify":1703746857897,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/149123637","repostId":"1176865752","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176865752","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625700715,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1176865752?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-08 07:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: WD-40, Camping World, KeyCorp & more","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176865752","media":"CNBC","summary":"Check out the stocks that are making the biggest moves after the bell on Wednesday:. $WD-40$ Company— Shares of WD-40 popped more than 10% in extended trading after the company improved its full-year revenue forecast. It now expects sales between $475 million and $490 million for the fiscal year thanks to strong performance in its third quarter.Camping World Holdings— The nation’s largest retailer of recreational vehicles said Wednesday afternoon that it has an investment in Los Angeles-based Ha","content":"<div>\n<p>Check out the stocks that are making the biggest moves after the bell on Wednesday:\nWD-40 Company— Shares of WD-40 popped more than 10% in extended trading after the company improved its full-year ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/07/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-after-hours-wd-40-camping-world-keycorp-more.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: WD-40, Camping World, KeyCorp & more</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks making the biggest moves after hours: WD-40, Camping World, KeyCorp & more\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-08 07:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/07/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-after-hours-wd-40-camping-world-keycorp-more.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Check out the stocks that are making the biggest moves after the bell on Wednesday:\nWD-40 Company— Shares of WD-40 popped more than 10% in extended trading after the company improved its full-year ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/07/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-after-hours-wd-40-camping-world-keycorp-more.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WDFC":"WD-40"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/07/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-after-hours-wd-40-camping-world-keycorp-more.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1176865752","content_text":"Check out the stocks that are making the biggest moves after the bell on Wednesday:\nWD-40 Company— Shares of WD-40 popped more than 10% in extended trading after the company improved its full-year revenue forecast. It now expects sales between $475 million and $490 million for the fiscal year thanks to strong performance in its third quarter.\nGAN Limited— The online gambling company's stock rose about 16% after the publishing preliminary results for its second quarter of 2021. GAN said it currently expects second-quarter sales somewhere between $34 million and $35 million as \"higher-than-expected revenue more than offset strategic investments in talent and technology.\"\nCamping World Holdings— The nation’s largest retailer of recreational vehicles said Wednesday afternoon that it has an investment in Los Angeles-based Happier Camper. Happier Camper developed a patented modular van conversion system, known as Adaptiv, for vans that allows customers to customize the location of appliances within the van. Camping World Holdings stock gained 0.7% in after-hours trading.\nKeyCorp— KeyCorp added 2.1% after it announced a cash dividend of 18.5 cents per share on the corporation’s outstanding common shares for the third quarter. The dividend will be paid out on Sept. 15 to those who held the company’s equity at the end of August.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":23,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803145428,"gmtCreate":1627429742064,"gmtModify":1703489663752,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803145428","repostId":"1165178450","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165178450","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627399581,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165178450?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Plug Power Could Generate 7x Returns Over The Next Decade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165178450","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPLUG is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European market","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>PLUG is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European markets.</li>\n <li>The company boasts advanced technology and strong growth momentum.</li>\n <li>We outline the company's path to growing from a $15 billion market cap to a $100 billion market cap over the next decade.</li>\n <li>That said, PLUG still faces significant risks to its thesis that investors should keep in mind.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/06bea0bef6d6ac8eab14c3fceb2cccae\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>JONGHO SHIN/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Plug Power (PLUG) is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European markets. The company boasts advanced technology and strong growth momentum which should propel it to significant appreciation over the long term. In this article we outline the company's path to growing from a $15 billion market cap to a $100 billion market cap (nearly 7x returns) over the next decade.</p>\n<p><b>#1. Addressable Market Potential</b></p>\n<p>With the&nbsp;massive tailwinds&nbsp;for green energy and ESG investing at the moment, the hydrogen fuel cell market is likely to enjoy strong growth momentum for many years to come.</p>\n<p>First and foremost, the Biden administration has executed an aggressive about-face from the previous administration in its disposition towards clean energy and fossil fuels. Between executive orders and rejoining the Paris Climate Accords, the U.S. Government is increasingly incentivizing green energy investment and consumption. The European Union and China are also increasingly headed in this direction.</p>\n<p>Second, the ESG investing movement has taken off to where it now accounts for an astonishing&nbsp;one-third of total assets under management&nbsp;in the United States. Given that so much capital is attracted to environmentally friendly investments, companies across the board - including in the hydrocarbon sector - are increasingly adopting policies that appeal to the environmentally-conscious investor.</p>\n<p>Third, the disruption and transformation of the automotive industry to reduce emissions is driving strong demand for new fuel technologies.</p>\n<p>Finally - largely due to the heavy investment and market demand - green technologies such as hydrogen fuel cells are&nbsp;seeing costs decline dramatically, making them increasingly competitive on the marketplace.</p>\n<p>All of this should lead to continued strong growth in the sector. In fact, U.S. Hydrogen demand is&nbsp;expected&nbsp;to be 17 million metric tons per year by 2030 and 63 million metric tons by 2050, which is pretty substantial growth from the 10 million metric tons consumed in the U.S. last year. Globally, the hydrogen generation industry is&nbsp;expected&nbsp;to reach $201 billion by 2025 and should continue to grow rapidly in the decades to follow similar to how it is expected to grow in the U.S.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0541b1fd23777a900f3e1a1102206d7b\" tg-width=\"824\" tg-height=\"514\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p><b>#2. Market Share Drivers</b></p>\n<p>We believe that PLUG has a strong chance at capturing a sizable portion of this massive addressable market for the following reasons.</p>\n<p>First and foremost, it has advanced technology and early mover advantages in the space. It owns numerous hydrogen energy systems including proton exchange membrane fuel cells, hybrid batteries, hydrogen storage, hydrogen dispensing, and fuel processing. Its flagship product is the electric vehicle focused GenDrive system that is complemented by their GenFuel and GenCare systems.</p>\n<p>Second of all, it has a foothold in both North America and Europe which means that it has significantly more growth potential than if it was solely focused on a single continent. In fact, North America and Europe are likely to be the leaders in Hydrogen adaptation for the foreseeable future, so PLUG is well-positioned to capture a significant portion of the global market share.</p>\n<p>Third, PLUG has strong growth momentum right now and is winning business from some of the biggest companies in the world, including Amazon (AMZN), Walmart (WMT), Home Depot (HD), and General Motors (GM) either currently using their products or expected to become customers in the near future. As a result, we expect the 76% year-over-year revenue growth in its most recent&nbsp;quarterly report&nbsp;(128% year-over-year growth in their fuel cell systems and related infrastructure segment) to be sustainable for the foreseeable future.</p>\n<p>In fact,analysts expect&nbsp;revenue to grow by 57% in 2022, which should push the company to EBITDA profitability.</p>\n<p><b>#3. Valuation</b></p>\n<p>While PLUG certainly operates in a hot industry and has numerous drivers that should enable it to capture significant market share, the company is also not cheap as it is currently running a loss.</p>\n<p>On the other hand, its EV/revenue figure is not outlandish given their growth runway as PLUG currently trades at 29.8x expected 2021 sales and 21x expected 2022 sales.</p>\n<p>In fact, with a product gross margin of 38% that expanded by a whopping 600 basis points in PLUG's most recent earnings release, its profitability potential is significant. Overall, PLUG's gross margin is expected to be a fairly weak 9.71% in 2021, but is expected to nearly double in 2022 to 18.93%. This is also a massive increase from 2017 when the gross margin was a mere 1.2%. The EBITDA margin is also expected to be a somewhat respectable 10.7% in 2022 as well.</p>\n<p>If PLUG can continue to leverage its strong technology and massive expected economies of scale in the coming years, we think it is reasonable for it to push gross margins to 30% and net margins to 20% by 2032. Meanwhile, if it can capture even just 3% of global hydrogen market share by 2032 and the global market reaches roughly $390 billion by then (it is expected to exceed $200 billion by 2025 and will likely be growing by around 10% per year at least for the foreseeable future), PLUG should be generating $11.7 billion in revenues by 2032. That would assume a 31.9% revenue CAGR between 2022 and 2032, which we also believe is quite reasonable given its aforementioned growth momentum and competitive strengths.</p>\n<p>At a 20% net margin, that would put its net earnings at over $2.3 billion in 2032, which would require a 42.7x price to earnings multiple to warrant a $100 billion market cap. Is this a reasonable multiple? It depends a lot on interest rates, but, given that the current S&amp;P 500 (SPY) multiple is ~31x and PLUG's growth rate and growth runway will likely still be vastly superior to where the S&amp;P 500's is today, it certainly does not seem too far-fetched to us.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/02cad870534d53e0544cd0389c837b1d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p><b>#4. Risks</b></p>\n<p>If this model pans out how we think it could, PLUG is a very attractive buy on the latest pullback.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e86493a3f4fcb61e8bec0de36f0f9b7\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Of course, it assumes that PLUG will be able to overcome several risks, so investors should keep in mind that it remains a very speculative investment at this point.</p>\n<p>First and foremost, it will demand that PLUG can maintain highly competitive technology in a space that is almost certain to grow increasingly competitive in the years to come.</p>\n<p>Additionally, PLUG will need to balance investing in recruiting the best talent in the industry to sustain and increase its technological edge with investing in effective marketing while also avoiding diluting shareholders or running up a big debt burden. Given that it is not yet free cash flow positive, this could prove challenging in the short term. That said, their nearly $4.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents on hand should enable it to reach free cash flow positivity without stressing its balance sheet.</p>\n<p>Third, hydrogen power has not been without its critics over the years, most notably Tesla's (TSLA) founder and CEO Elon Musk. The wildly popular and visionary entrepreneur&nbsp;argued&nbsp;that using hydrogen to store energy can never be as efficient as storing electricity in a battery. In fact, he has gone so far as to say that using hydrogen fuel cells (which he calls \"fool cells\") to power vehicles is \"mind-bogglingly stupid.\" Obviously many individuals and corporations disagree with Musk's assessment and he has a clear incentive to try to discredit the technology, but this should still be viewed as a significant risk to keep an eye on. If hydrogen were to fall out of favor, it would significantly reduce the upside for PLUG and could even lead to permanent impairments from current levels if severe enough.</p>\n<p><b>Investor Takeaway</b></p>\n<p>PLUG is a competitively positioned company in a rapidly-growing industry. Not only that, but the industry's growth runway looks promising for many decades to come. With advanced technology, early mover advantages, and a foothold on the two most fertile continents for Hydrogen technology, PLUG should be able to generate strong revenue growth for a long time to come.</p>\n<p>Given our assumptions outlined in this article, we think that PLUG could very possibly achieve a $100 billion market cap in about a decade. This would represent a 667% total return (20.9% CAGR) over that span assuming no further share dilution.</p>\n<p>That said, PLUG is also far from a conservative sleep well at night stock and investors should keep in mind that its current valuation assumes significant future growth and an ability to scale into profitability. It also assumes that it will retain a strong technological moat which will enable it to increase gross margins over time.</p>\n<p>Overall, we rate PLUG a speculative buy at this point.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Plug Power Could Generate 7x Returns Over The Next Decade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Plug Power Could Generate 7x Returns Over The Next Decade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 23:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441600-plug-power-could-generate-7x-returns-over-the-next-decade><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nPLUG is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European markets.\nThe company boasts advanced technology and strong growth momentum.\nWe outline the company's path ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441600-plug-power-could-generate-7x-returns-over-the-next-decade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLUG":"普拉格能源"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441600-plug-power-could-generate-7x-returns-over-the-next-decade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165178450","content_text":"Summary\n\nPLUG is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European markets.\nThe company boasts advanced technology and strong growth momentum.\nWe outline the company's path to growing from a $15 billion market cap to a $100 billion market cap over the next decade.\nThat said, PLUG still faces significant risks to its thesis that investors should keep in mind.\n\nJONGHO SHIN/iStock via Getty Images\nPlug Power (PLUG) is a leading hydrogen fuel cell turnkey provider in North American and European markets. The company boasts advanced technology and strong growth momentum which should propel it to significant appreciation over the long term. In this article we outline the company's path to growing from a $15 billion market cap to a $100 billion market cap (nearly 7x returns) over the next decade.\n#1. Addressable Market Potential\nWith the massive tailwinds for green energy and ESG investing at the moment, the hydrogen fuel cell market is likely to enjoy strong growth momentum for many years to come.\nFirst and foremost, the Biden administration has executed an aggressive about-face from the previous administration in its disposition towards clean energy and fossil fuels. Between executive orders and rejoining the Paris Climate Accords, the U.S. Government is increasingly incentivizing green energy investment and consumption. The European Union and China are also increasingly headed in this direction.\nSecond, the ESG investing movement has taken off to where it now accounts for an astonishing one-third of total assets under management in the United States. Given that so much capital is attracted to environmentally friendly investments, companies across the board - including in the hydrocarbon sector - are increasingly adopting policies that appeal to the environmentally-conscious investor.\nThird, the disruption and transformation of the automotive industry to reduce emissions is driving strong demand for new fuel technologies.\nFinally - largely due to the heavy investment and market demand - green technologies such as hydrogen fuel cells are seeing costs decline dramatically, making them increasingly competitive on the marketplace.\nAll of this should lead to continued strong growth in the sector. In fact, U.S. Hydrogen demand is expected to be 17 million metric tons per year by 2030 and 63 million metric tons by 2050, which is pretty substantial growth from the 10 million metric tons consumed in the U.S. last year. Globally, the hydrogen generation industry is expected to reach $201 billion by 2025 and should continue to grow rapidly in the decades to follow similar to how it is expected to grow in the U.S.\n\n#2. Market Share Drivers\nWe believe that PLUG has a strong chance at capturing a sizable portion of this massive addressable market for the following reasons.\nFirst and foremost, it has advanced technology and early mover advantages in the space. It owns numerous hydrogen energy systems including proton exchange membrane fuel cells, hybrid batteries, hydrogen storage, hydrogen dispensing, and fuel processing. Its flagship product is the electric vehicle focused GenDrive system that is complemented by their GenFuel and GenCare systems.\nSecond of all, it has a foothold in both North America and Europe which means that it has significantly more growth potential than if it was solely focused on a single continent. In fact, North America and Europe are likely to be the leaders in Hydrogen adaptation for the foreseeable future, so PLUG is well-positioned to capture a significant portion of the global market share.\nThird, PLUG has strong growth momentum right now and is winning business from some of the biggest companies in the world, including Amazon (AMZN), Walmart (WMT), Home Depot (HD), and General Motors (GM) either currently using their products or expected to become customers in the near future. As a result, we expect the 76% year-over-year revenue growth in its most recent quarterly report (128% year-over-year growth in their fuel cell systems and related infrastructure segment) to be sustainable for the foreseeable future.\nIn fact,analysts expect revenue to grow by 57% in 2022, which should push the company to EBITDA profitability.\n#3. Valuation\nWhile PLUG certainly operates in a hot industry and has numerous drivers that should enable it to capture significant market share, the company is also not cheap as it is currently running a loss.\nOn the other hand, its EV/revenue figure is not outlandish given their growth runway as PLUG currently trades at 29.8x expected 2021 sales and 21x expected 2022 sales.\nIn fact, with a product gross margin of 38% that expanded by a whopping 600 basis points in PLUG's most recent earnings release, its profitability potential is significant. Overall, PLUG's gross margin is expected to be a fairly weak 9.71% in 2021, but is expected to nearly double in 2022 to 18.93%. This is also a massive increase from 2017 when the gross margin was a mere 1.2%. The EBITDA margin is also expected to be a somewhat respectable 10.7% in 2022 as well.\nIf PLUG can continue to leverage its strong technology and massive expected economies of scale in the coming years, we think it is reasonable for it to push gross margins to 30% and net margins to 20% by 2032. Meanwhile, if it can capture even just 3% of global hydrogen market share by 2032 and the global market reaches roughly $390 billion by then (it is expected to exceed $200 billion by 2025 and will likely be growing by around 10% per year at least for the foreseeable future), PLUG should be generating $11.7 billion in revenues by 2032. That would assume a 31.9% revenue CAGR between 2022 and 2032, which we also believe is quite reasonable given its aforementioned growth momentum and competitive strengths.\nAt a 20% net margin, that would put its net earnings at over $2.3 billion in 2032, which would require a 42.7x price to earnings multiple to warrant a $100 billion market cap. Is this a reasonable multiple? It depends a lot on interest rates, but, given that the current S&P 500 (SPY) multiple is ~31x and PLUG's growth rate and growth runway will likely still be vastly superior to where the S&P 500's is today, it certainly does not seem too far-fetched to us.\nData by YCharts\n#4. Risks\nIf this model pans out how we think it could, PLUG is a very attractive buy on the latest pullback.\nData by YCharts\nOf course, it assumes that PLUG will be able to overcome several risks, so investors should keep in mind that it remains a very speculative investment at this point.\nFirst and foremost, it will demand that PLUG can maintain highly competitive technology in a space that is almost certain to grow increasingly competitive in the years to come.\nAdditionally, PLUG will need to balance investing in recruiting the best talent in the industry to sustain and increase its technological edge with investing in effective marketing while also avoiding diluting shareholders or running up a big debt burden. Given that it is not yet free cash flow positive, this could prove challenging in the short term. That said, their nearly $4.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents on hand should enable it to reach free cash flow positivity without stressing its balance sheet.\nThird, hydrogen power has not been without its critics over the years, most notably Tesla's (TSLA) founder and CEO Elon Musk. The wildly popular and visionary entrepreneur argued that using hydrogen to store energy can never be as efficient as storing electricity in a battery. In fact, he has gone so far as to say that using hydrogen fuel cells (which he calls \"fool cells\") to power vehicles is \"mind-bogglingly stupid.\" Obviously many individuals and corporations disagree with Musk's assessment and he has a clear incentive to try to discredit the technology, but this should still be viewed as a significant risk to keep an eye on. If hydrogen were to fall out of favor, it would significantly reduce the upside for PLUG and could even lead to permanent impairments from current levels if severe enough.\nInvestor Takeaway\nPLUG is a competitively positioned company in a rapidly-growing industry. Not only that, but the industry's growth runway looks promising for many decades to come. With advanced technology, early mover advantages, and a foothold on the two most fertile continents for Hydrogen technology, PLUG should be able to generate strong revenue growth for a long time to come.\nGiven our assumptions outlined in this article, we think that PLUG could very possibly achieve a $100 billion market cap in about a decade. This would represent a 667% total return (20.9% CAGR) over that span assuming no further share dilution.\nThat said, PLUG is also far from a conservative sleep well at night stock and investors should keep in mind that its current valuation assumes significant future growth and an ability to scale into profitability. It also assumes that it will retain a strong technological moat which will enable it to increase gross margins over time.\nOverall, we rate PLUG a speculative buy at this point.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178613771,"gmtCreate":1626815666793,"gmtModify":1703765590619,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Liked and shared commented","listText":"Liked and shared commented","text":"Liked and shared commented","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/178613771","repostId":"1138312795","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146033612,"gmtCreate":1626042492136,"gmtModify":1703752088504,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"High risk&nbsp;","listText":"High risk&nbsp;","text":"High risk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146033612","repostId":"1113530069","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113530069","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625965241,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113530069?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla CEO Elon Musk goes to trial Monday to defend $2.6 billion SolarCity acquisition","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113530069","media":"CNBC","summary":"Tesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday to defend his role in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity in 2016.Shareholders have sued Musk alleging that the deal amounted to a SolarCity bailout that enriched Musk and his family more than it did Tesla, among other things.If shareholders win their case, Musk may have to pay upwards of $2 billion from his considerable personal wealth.Tesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday, and the stakes are high — if he loses he could h","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nTesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday to defend his role in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity in 2016.\nShareholders have sued Musk alleging that the deal amounted ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/tesla-ceo-musk-goes-to-trial-monday-on-2point6-billion-solarcity-deal.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla CEO Elon Musk goes to trial Monday to defend $2.6 billion SolarCity acquisition</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla CEO Elon Musk goes to trial Monday to defend $2.6 billion SolarCity acquisition\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/tesla-ceo-musk-goes-to-trial-monday-on-2point6-billion-solarcity-deal.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nTesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday to defend his role in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity in 2016.\nShareholders have sued Musk alleging that the deal amounted ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/tesla-ceo-musk-goes-to-trial-monday-on-2point6-billion-solarcity-deal.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/tesla-ceo-musk-goes-to-trial-monday-on-2point6-billion-solarcity-deal.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1113530069","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nTesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday to defend his role in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity in 2016.\nShareholders have sued Musk alleging that the deal amounted to a SolarCity bailout that enriched Musk and his family more than it did Tesla, among other things.\nIf shareholders win their case, Musk may have to pay upwards of $2 billion from his considerable personal wealth.\n\nTesla CEO Elon Musk is expected in court on Monday, and the stakes are high — if he loses he could have to pay upwards of $2 billion from his considerable personal wealth.\nMusk will be the first witness in a trial to defend his role in Tesla’s $2.6 billion acquisition of SolarCity. Shareholders have sued Musk and members of the Tesla board, alleging that the 2016 deal amounted to a SolarCity bailout.\nThey also allege that it unfairly enriched the Musk family, who were among the largest shareholders, and that Musk and others failed to disclose all pertinent details and breached their fiduciary responsibilities. Musk has insisted he was “fully recused” from negotiations over the deal.\nLast year, the board members named in the suit settled with the Tesla shareholders for $60 million with no admission of wrongdoing. Musk, the second-richest person in the world, was the only defendant who chose to take the fight to court.\nThere’s no jury to persuade in this matter. His fate will be determined by the Delaware Chancery Court’s judge, Vice-Chancellor Joseph Slights III.\nDays in court\nMusk has had his share of legal problems beyond SolarCity.\nFor example, the SEC sued him in 2018 for fraud, with Musk and Tesla settling, paying $20 million each. The charges came after Musk tweeted about taking Tesla private for $420 a share, a move that sent Tesla’s stock price soaring. Musk had to temporarily relinquish his chairman role at Tesla as one of the terms of the settlement.\nIn a separate case, he emerged victorious after caving expert Vernon Unsworth said Musk had defamed him when the Tesla CEO called him a “pedo guy” on twitter. His attorneys argued that “pedo guy” was heated rhetoric and not meant as statement of fact.\nTesla and Musk are facing many other lawsuits, including one over Musk’s unprecedented CEO compensation package, and a number of federal probes according to the company’s own financial filings.\nIn the SolarCity case, the judge will have to decide whether Musk was a conflicted controlling shareholder who met the “entire fairness” standard in his handling of the SolarCity acquisition.\nIn other words, was Musk acting in Tesla shareholders’ best interest? And did Musk tell shareholders everything they deserved to know?\nKnown as a shareholder derivative action, this kind of lawsuit is filed by investors on behalf of a corporation, rather than the individuals or funds themselves. If the plaintiffs win, proceeds may go to Tesla and not to the stakeholders who brought the suit.\nCompany connections\nAccording to a filing with the chancery court, Musk owned 22.1% of Tesla common stock at the time of the deal, and 21.9% of SolarCity. SolarCity was a troubled asset that was bleeding cash in the capital-intensive market of residential solar deployment.\nMusk’s attorneys are expected to argue that the SolarCity deal hasn’t harmed shareholders at all and that they voted overwhelmingly to approve the acquisition. After all, Tesla shares have skyrocketed from a closing price of $43.92 on June 21, 2016 — when Tesla announced it would bid for SolarCity — to a closing price of $656.95 on July 9, 2021 (Friday) after a five-for-one stock split last year.\nThe company is also part of the S&P 500 now, and reports profits regularly.\nSolarCity was founded and run by Musk’s cousins, Lyndon and Peter Rive, but backed by Musk who served as chairman of the board. Meanwhile, he also was CEO of Tesla, as well as the company’s chairman.\nThat wasn’t his only potential conflict. SpaceX, Musk’s aerospace venture, had invested $255 million in SolarCity bonds from March 2015 to March 2016. Four members of Tesla’s board directly or indirectly owned SolarCity stock at the time the acquisition was under consideration. And some Tesla board members also held shares in SpaceX and were on its board.\nHow he pitched it\nTo Musk and many of his supporters, the acquisition of SolarCity in 2016 represented a natural combination of his companies and a way for Tesla to pursue its environmental mission with a broader array of products. Homeowners would be able to finance and install solar rooftop panels from the same company that provided their electric vehicle, home charging station and backup battery for energy storage.\nTesla had already launched an energy division in late 2015, with a home battery dubbed the Powerwall and other big batteries for use by businesses and utilities.\nBy June 2016, Musk said Tesla would bid $2.8 billion to buy SolarCity. “I don’t think this creates additional financial risk for Tesla,” he said at that time, and called a merger “blindingly obvious.” But Tesla investors were skeptical, with the stock price plunging more than 10% on the announcement.\nIn July 2016, Musk presented his vision of Tesla as an automotive innovator and renewable energy titan in his famous “Master Plan Part Deux.”\nAs CNBC previously reported, unsealed court documents, including emails between Musk and SolarCity execs, would later reveal that he knew SolarCity was facing a “liquidity crisis” even as Tesla pursued the acquisition.\n“Three things need to happen to change investor sentiment: SolarCity solving its liquidity crisis, an LOI with Panasonic to address solar cell production risk, and a joint product demo,” Musk wrote to SolarCity execs in September that year. “Should be able to do all those before the shareholder vote.”\nIn October 2018, Tesla and SolarCity jointly announced a combined solar roof and battery pack. Musk showed off what looked like a solar panel, miniaturized and sleek enough to be mistaken for high-end roofing materials, at the Hollywood set of Desperate Housewives.\nAfter the deal\nThe hype event did help him to turn investor sentiment. In November, the deal was approved in a vote by 85% of shareholders. But after it closed, Tesla’s SolarCity business would falter.\nThrough the years, the company repeatedly delayed mass manufacturing its Solarglass roof tiles. The ones Musk presented as a production-ready prototype in 2016 were actually a non-functional design prototype.\nWalmart sued Tesla after fires broke out on panels the company had installed atop their facilities. A former Tesla Energy employee filed a whistleblower complaint to federal agencies about the fire risks of Tesla’s solar rooftops. And Panasonic exited from the Buffalo plant that Tesla took over, once it was clear Tesla was not going to manufacture its solar roof tiles there.\nWhile the Tesla solar roof tiles have not taken off, the company’s energy storage products are on a tear, as demand for lower-cost electricity from renewable sources picks up worldwide.\nIn the trial starting Monday in Wilmington, Delaware, Musk will be represented by attorneys with Ross Aronstam & Moritz (David E. Ross, Garrett B. Moritz and Benjamin Z. Grossberg). The trial is expected to run until July 23, 2021, unless the entities seek a settlement before it’s done.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":211,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":149120094,"gmtCreate":1625710040018,"gmtModify":1703746853800,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/149120094","repostId":"1133690658","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1133690658","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625704206,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1133690658?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-08 08:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Dozens of U.S. states sue Google over Play Store's 'extravagant commission'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133690658","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON/OAKLAND, Calif., July 7 (Reuters) - Thirty-seven U.S. state and district attorneys genera","content":"<p>WASHINGTON/OAKLAND, Calif., July 7 (Reuters) - Thirty-seven U.S. state and district attorneys general sued <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc's(GOOGL.O)Google on Wednesday, alleging that the search and advertising giant violates antitrust law in running its app store for Android phones.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of a series that has been filed against Google in the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBNK\">United</a> States, follows complaints from app developers about the management of its Play Store.</p>\n<p>Google did not have immediate comment on the new litigation.</p>\n<p>Google requires that some apps use the company's payment tools and give Google as much as 30% of digital goods sales.</p>\n<p>\"To collect and maintain this extravagant commission, Google has employed anticompetitive tactics to diminish and disincentivize competition in Android app distribution,\" the lawsuit stated.</p>\n<p>\"Google has not only targeted potentially competing app stores, but also has ensured that app developers themselves have no reasonable choice but to distribute their apps through the Google Play Store,\" it added.</p>\n<p>Google said last September it would ramp up enforcement of its policies, drawing criticism from app makers. Google's Play Store is far more widely used than similar products from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc(AMZN.O), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd(005930.KS), Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [RIC:RIC:HWT.UL] and others.</p>\n<p>The new lawsuit drew praise from Meghan DiMuzio, executive director for the Coalition for App Fairness, which represents companies including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MTCH\">Match</a> Group Inc(MTCH.O)and Spotify Technology SA(SPOT.N)that oppose some of the Play Store rules.</p>\n<p>\"Anti-competitive policies stifle innovation, inhibit consumer freedom, inflate costs, and limit transparent communication between developers and their customers,\" DiMuzio said.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc's(AAPL.O)App Store for iPhones and iPads imposes similar restrictions to Play Store. Google does enable consumers to avoid the Play Store, but critics say it is not practical to do so.</p>\n<p>Both companies have drawn legal scrutiny.</p>\n<p>Video game maker Epic Games Inc sued Google and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> separately in federal court in California last year over app store policies. Proposed classes of developers and consumers have joined the cases. A judge's decision in the Apple fight is expected in the coming weeks, and a hearing on Google's effort to dismiss the case against it is scheduled for July 22.</p>\n<p>The states' lawsuit is headed by a group including attorneys general of Utah, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>, North <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CARO\">Carolina</a> and Tennessee, and joined by others including California and the District of Columbia.</p>\n<p>Google already faces a federal antitrust lawsuit brought by the Justice Department last year and related lawsuits from two separate groups of attorneys general. One is led by Texas and focused on advertising while the other targets Google's alleged efforts to extend its dominance in search to newer markets, like voice assistants.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dozens of U.S. states sue Google over Play Store's 'extravagant commission'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDozens of U.S. states sue Google over Play Store's 'extravagant commission'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-08 08:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/technology/dozens-us-states-sue-google-alleging-antitrust-violations-2021-07-07/><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>WASHINGTON/OAKLAND, Calif., July 7 (Reuters) - Thirty-seven U.S. state and district attorneys general sued Alphabet Inc's(GOOGL.O)Google on Wednesday, alleging that the search and advertising giant ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/technology/dozens-us-states-sue-google-alleging-antitrust-violations-2021-07-07/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","09086":"华夏纳指-U","03086":"华夏纳指","GOOG":"谷歌","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/technology/dozens-us-states-sue-google-alleging-antitrust-violations-2021-07-07/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133690658","content_text":"WASHINGTON/OAKLAND, Calif., July 7 (Reuters) - Thirty-seven U.S. state and district attorneys general sued Alphabet Inc's(GOOGL.O)Google on Wednesday, alleging that the search and advertising giant violates antitrust law in running its app store for Android phones.\nThe lawsuit, one of a series that has been filed against Google in the United States, follows complaints from app developers about the management of its Play Store.\nGoogle did not have immediate comment on the new litigation.\nGoogle requires that some apps use the company's payment tools and give Google as much as 30% of digital goods sales.\n\"To collect and maintain this extravagant commission, Google has employed anticompetitive tactics to diminish and disincentivize competition in Android app distribution,\" the lawsuit stated.\n\"Google has not only targeted potentially competing app stores, but also has ensured that app developers themselves have no reasonable choice but to distribute their apps through the Google Play Store,\" it added.\nGoogle said last September it would ramp up enforcement of its policies, drawing criticism from app makers. Google's Play Store is far more widely used than similar products from Amazon.com Inc(AMZN.O), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd(005930.KS), Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [RIC:RIC:HWT.UL] and others.\nThe new lawsuit drew praise from Meghan DiMuzio, executive director for the Coalition for App Fairness, which represents companies including Match Group Inc(MTCH.O)and Spotify Technology SA(SPOT.N)that oppose some of the Play Store rules.\n\"Anti-competitive policies stifle innovation, inhibit consumer freedom, inflate costs, and limit transparent communication between developers and their customers,\" DiMuzio said.\nApple Inc's(AAPL.O)App Store for iPhones and iPads imposes similar restrictions to Play Store. Google does enable consumers to avoid the Play Store, but critics say it is not practical to do so.\nBoth companies have drawn legal scrutiny.\nVideo game maker Epic Games Inc sued Google and Apple separately in federal court in California last year over app store policies. Proposed classes of developers and consumers have joined the cases. A judge's decision in the Apple fight is expected in the coming weeks, and a hearing on Google's effort to dismiss the case against it is scheduled for July 22.\nThe states' lawsuit is headed by a group including attorneys general of Utah, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee, and joined by others including California and the District of Columbia.\nGoogle already faces a federal antitrust lawsuit brought by the Justice Department last year and related lawsuits from two separate groups of attorneys general. One is led by Texas and focused on advertising while the other targets Google's alleged efforts to extend its dominance in search to newer markets, like voice assistants.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":62,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802227623,"gmtCreate":1627783805662,"gmtModify":1703495781829,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802227623","repostId":"1149124606","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149124606","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627687005,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149124606?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Dole Drops in Trading Debut After Shrunken $400 Million IPO","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149124606","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Dole Plc, the world’s largest produce company, fell 9.4% in its trading debut after d","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Dole Plc, the world’s largest produce company, fell 9.4% in its trading debut after delaying and downsizing its U.S. initial public offering to raise $400 million.</p>\n<p>Share’s of Dublin-based Dole, which sold at the bottom of a lowered range for $16 in the IPO, opened trading Friday at $15 and closed at $14.50 in New York trading, giving the company a market value of $1.35 billion.</p>\n<p>The firm’s return to the market for its third run as a public company was a bumpy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>. Dole initially offered 26 million shares for $20 to $23 and planned to go public on Tuesday. It put off the share sale to Thursday, changing the terms to offer 30.3 million shares for $16 to $17. It ended up selling only 25 million shares.</p>\n<p>Chief Executive Officer Rory Byrne chalked up the twists and turns of the week partly to a surge of listings. He said the company’s objectives of the listing weren’t short term and, with a diverse business and the iconic Dole brand, it’s positioned well for growth and to attract investors.</p>\n<p>“When we took on the IPO, we couldn’t anticipate there would be 23 this week,” he said in an interview. “The timing was what it was, the valuation is what it is.”</p>\n<p>Dole’s listing was the sixth-biggest of the week on U.S. exchanges, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Robinhood Markets Inc., the biggest of those with a $2.1 billion offering, fell in its debut Thursday. At least three other companies postponed share sales that had been set for this week.</p>\n<p>Dole was formed from the combination of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Dole Food Co. and Ireland’s Total Produce, a transaction that was completed in February. Trading of Total Produce’s shares in Dublin and London is ending with the U.S. listing, according to the company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.</p>\n<p>The combined company had $58 million in net income on revenue of $2.3 billion in the first quarter of this year, according to its filings. Dole plans to use the IPO proceeds to pay some of the cost of that transaction, as well as to reduce debt and for general corporate purposes.</p>\n<p>David H. Murdock took Dole private for the first time in 2003 after rescuing it from bankruptcy. He re-listed the company in 2009 before taking it private again in 2013 as chairman, chief executive officer and the biggest shareholder. Dole filed in 2017 to again go public but withdrew its application the following year.</p>\n<p>The offering was led by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Davy Group. Dole is trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOLE.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dole Drops in Trading Debut After Shrunken $400 Million IPO</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDole Drops in Trading Debut After Shrunken $400 Million IPO\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 07:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dole-drops-debut-400-million-185740982.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Dole Plc, the world’s largest produce company, fell 9.4% in its trading debut after delaying and downsizing its U.S. initial public offering to raise $400 million.\nShare’s of Dublin-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dole-drops-debut-400-million-185740982.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DOLE":"都乐食品"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dole-drops-debut-400-million-185740982.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149124606","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Dole Plc, the world’s largest produce company, fell 9.4% in its trading debut after delaying and downsizing its U.S. initial public offering to raise $400 million.\nShare’s of Dublin-based Dole, which sold at the bottom of a lowered range for $16 in the IPO, opened trading Friday at $15 and closed at $14.50 in New York trading, giving the company a market value of $1.35 billion.\nThe firm’s return to the market for its third run as a public company was a bumpy one. Dole initially offered 26 million shares for $20 to $23 and planned to go public on Tuesday. It put off the share sale to Thursday, changing the terms to offer 30.3 million shares for $16 to $17. It ended up selling only 25 million shares.\nChief Executive Officer Rory Byrne chalked up the twists and turns of the week partly to a surge of listings. He said the company’s objectives of the listing weren’t short term and, with a diverse business and the iconic Dole brand, it’s positioned well for growth and to attract investors.\n“When we took on the IPO, we couldn’t anticipate there would be 23 this week,” he said in an interview. “The timing was what it was, the valuation is what it is.”\nDole’s listing was the sixth-biggest of the week on U.S. exchanges, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Robinhood Markets Inc., the biggest of those with a $2.1 billion offering, fell in its debut Thursday. At least three other companies postponed share sales that had been set for this week.\nDole was formed from the combination of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Dole Food Co. and Ireland’s Total Produce, a transaction that was completed in February. Trading of Total Produce’s shares in Dublin and London is ending with the U.S. listing, according to the company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.\nThe combined company had $58 million in net income on revenue of $2.3 billion in the first quarter of this year, according to its filings. Dole plans to use the IPO proceeds to pay some of the cost of that transaction, as well as to reduce debt and for general corporate purposes.\nDavid H. Murdock took Dole private for the first time in 2003 after rescuing it from bankruptcy. He re-listed the company in 2009 before taking it private again in 2013 as chairman, chief executive officer and the biggest shareholder. Dole filed in 2017 to again go public but withdrew its application the following year.\nThe offering was led by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Davy Group. Dole is trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOLE.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801878129,"gmtCreate":1627512816861,"gmtModify":1703491246284,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801878129","repostId":"1148922985","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179522287,"gmtCreate":1626566307749,"gmtModify":1703761697527,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179522287","repostId":"1159574501","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159574501","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626484131,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159574501?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-17 09:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159574501","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took ","content":"<p>Social media meme stocks&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>(NYSE:GME) and&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in Friday afternoon trading.</p>\n<p>DataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas said this week&nbsp;there is an ominous sign the&nbsp;meme stock phenomenon may be dying a slow death.</p>\n<p><b>Retail Trading Boom:</b>DataTrek has been periodically tracking the boom in retail traders triggered during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 by monitoring U.S. Google search volume for the keywords “invest” and “buy stock.” Colas said these basic search terms are a broad way to gauge marginal retail investor interest in the stock market.</p>\n<p>The image below shows how search volume for those key phrases has changed since the beginning of 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9930646712b9790171cccf12a873f757\" tg-width=\"1199\" tg-height=\"560\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Colas said the search volume data clearly indicates the retail stock trading fad is completely over at this point, a “very bad omen” for AMC and GameStop. In fact, Google search volume is now back down to where it was before the pandemic started in early 2020.</p>\n<p>In addition, search volumes are now down 75% from their peak levels during the initial short squeezes in AMC and GameStop back in January 2021.</p>\n<p>Colas said meme stocks like AMC need new retail stock traders to join in the buying to support their stock prices else they could be headed for more volatility like they have experienced this week.</p>\n<p>“Bubbles need fresh money, or they deflate. Quickly,” Colas wrote. “Every craze needs new adherents (i.e., not just the same crowd) to keep it relevant, and the Google chart shows those are in increasingly short supply.”</p>\n<p><b>PMP Weighs In:</b>Benzinga&nbsp;PreMarket Prep co-host Dennis Dick said&nbsp;a good story can carry a stock a long way, and some stocks can even become so hot that they become temporarily disconnected from the company’s underlying fundamentals.</p>\n<p>“We have seen that in a number of meme stocks this year. Story can drive price in the short run but stocks almost always return back to their fundamental value in the long run,” Dick said.</p>\n<p>The type of disconnect between share price and underlying value that AMC and GameStop have experienced in 2021 is certainly nothing new. Canadian cannabis stock&nbsp;<b>Tilray Inc</b>(NASDAQ:TLRY) experienced a similar disconnect back in 2018 when a retail stock mania sent the stock skyrocketing up to $300. Today, Tilray is trading back down at around $13.90.</p>\n<p>“As the stock price begins to fall, momentum traders who have been chasing the hot story will begin to exit. But if the stock trades at an extreme valuation, there may be very few traders willing to buy. This is what we are starting to see in many meme stocks today,” Dick said.</p>\n<p><b>Benzinga's Take:</b>If the story begins to get hot again, the stock prices of overvalued story stocks can always recover once again. But without any underlying fundamentals to support the valuation, these types of stocks need a constant stream of new buyers and an increasingly bullish story to generate fresh enthusiasm.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Bad Omen' For Meme Stocks And The Retail Trading Boom? Here's What The Data Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-17 09:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","TLRY":"Tilray Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/07/22023662/bad-omen-for-meme-stocks-and-the-retail-trading-boom-heres-what-the-data-says","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159574501","content_text":"Social media meme stocks GameStop Corp.(NYSE:GME) and AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(NYSE:AMC) took a beating this week, with GameStop on track to finish the week down 9% and AMC set to lose 20.9% in Friday afternoon trading.\nDataTrek Research co-founder Nicholas Colas said this week there is an ominous sign the meme stock phenomenon may be dying a slow death.\nRetail Trading Boom:DataTrek has been periodically tracking the boom in retail traders triggered during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 by monitoring U.S. Google search volume for the keywords “invest” and “buy stock.” Colas said these basic search terms are a broad way to gauge marginal retail investor interest in the stock market.\nThe image below shows how search volume for those key phrases has changed since the beginning of 2020.\n\nColas said the search volume data clearly indicates the retail stock trading fad is completely over at this point, a “very bad omen” for AMC and GameStop. In fact, Google search volume is now back down to where it was before the pandemic started in early 2020.\nIn addition, search volumes are now down 75% from their peak levels during the initial short squeezes in AMC and GameStop back in January 2021.\nColas said meme stocks like AMC need new retail stock traders to join in the buying to support their stock prices else they could be headed for more volatility like they have experienced this week.\n“Bubbles need fresh money, or they deflate. Quickly,” Colas wrote. “Every craze needs new adherents (i.e., not just the same crowd) to keep it relevant, and the Google chart shows those are in increasingly short supply.”\nPMP Weighs In:Benzinga PreMarket Prep co-host Dennis Dick said a good story can carry a stock a long way, and some stocks can even become so hot that they become temporarily disconnected from the company’s underlying fundamentals.\n“We have seen that in a number of meme stocks this year. Story can drive price in the short run but stocks almost always return back to their fundamental value in the long run,” Dick said.\nThe type of disconnect between share price and underlying value that AMC and GameStop have experienced in 2021 is certainly nothing new. Canadian cannabis stock Tilray Inc(NASDAQ:TLRY) experienced a similar disconnect back in 2018 when a retail stock mania sent the stock skyrocketing up to $300. Today, Tilray is trading back down at around $13.90.\n“As the stock price begins to fall, momentum traders who have been chasing the hot story will begin to exit. But if the stock trades at an extreme valuation, there may be very few traders willing to buy. This is what we are starting to see in many meme stocks today,” Dick said.\nBenzinga's Take:If the story begins to get hot again, the stock prices of overvalued story stocks can always recover once again. But without any underlying fundamentals to support the valuation, these types of stocks need a constant stream of new buyers and an increasingly bullish story to generate fresh enthusiasm.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":79,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141290409,"gmtCreate":1625873578701,"gmtModify":1703750104561,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/141290409","repostId":"1103507901","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103507901","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625841943,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1103507901?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-09 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk’s China Battery Partner Is Now Richer Than Jack Ma","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103507901","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Zeng Yuqun, the founder of the world’s biggest electric-vehicle battery maker, has overtakenJack Mai","content":"<p>Zeng Yuqun, the founder of the world’s biggest electric-vehicle battery maker, has overtakenJack Main the wealth rankings, a symbolic moment in the rise of China’s green billionaires.</p>\n<p>Zeng’s net worth has jumped to $49.5 billion, according to theBloomberg Billionaires Index, as shares ofContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.surged this year. That exceeds Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. co-founder Ma’s wealth of $48.1 billion and makes Zeng one of the five richest people in Asia for the first time.</p>\n<p>It’s the latest sign of how a new generation of tycoons in China is amassing vast fortunes in the clean-energy boom. Investors havepushed upstocks such as CATL, a key supplier to Tesla Inc., as the country leads the market for electric-vehicle sales and pursues an ambitious policy of reaching carbon neutrality in 2060.</p>\n<p>“The billionaire ranking used to be dominated by real estate tycoons and later tech entrepreneurs, and now we are seeing more from the new energy sector,” said Hao Gao, director of Tsinghua University’s NIFR Global Family Business Research Center. “As the industry leader for electric-vehicle batteries, CATL will benefit most from the carbon emission goal.”</p>\n<p>A spokeswoman for CATL declined to comment on Zeng’s net worth.</p>\n<p>Zeng, 53, who hails from a hillside village in Fujian province in southeast China, built CATL into a battery juggernaut in less than a decade, creating the largest global producer of rechargeable cells for plug-in vehicles.</p>\n<p>Global electric-vehicle battery sales more thandoubledin the first five months of this year from a year earlier, with CATL accounting for 31.2% of the market, the largest share, according to an SNE Research report. New-energy vehicle retail sales in Chinarose9.8% in 2020 to 1.11 million units, according to the China Passenger Car Association.</p>\n<p>BloombergNEFexpectsthe company’s global sales growth to continue, benefiting from economies of scale, a cost-competitive upstream supply chain and an established client base.</p>\n<p>CATL’s stock has surged more than 20-fold since the company went public in Shenzhen in 2018. It’s up 55% this year alone as demand for EVs increases, countries work to reduce carbon emissions and costs tumble. Shares fell 2.4% on Friday.</p>\n<p>CATL trades at more than 100 times estimated earnings, compared with about 13 times for competitorPanasonic Corp.</p>\n<p>In addition to Tesla, CATL counts BMW AG and Volkswagen AG among its customers. In an interview last year, Zengsaidhe and Tesla Chief Executive OfficerElon Musktext about technology, Covid-19 and Musk’s main interest: cheaper batteries and cars.</p>\n<p>Zeng, who earned a doctorate in condensed matter physics from the Chinese Academy of Science in Beijing, isn’t the only billionaire who’s benefiting from the surge in CATL’s stock.Huang Shilin, a vice chairman of the company, is worth more than $21 billion, whileLi Ping, who’s also a vice chairman, has an $8.5 billion fortune.</p>\n<p>As Zeng’s star rises, Ma’s has been on the wane. The value of Ma’s fintech arm Ant Group Co. hasplummetedsince the former English teacher openly pushed back against Beijing, prompting Chinese authorities to quash the company’s plans for a huge initial public offering. Ma, 56, has all but dropped from public view, and has lost $2.5 billion in wealth this year.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk’s China Battery Partner Is Now Richer Than Jack Ma</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk’s China Battery Partner Is Now Richer Than Jack Ma\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-09 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/elon-musk-s-battery-partner-in-china-is-now-richer-than-jack-ma><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Zeng Yuqun, the founder of the world’s biggest electric-vehicle battery maker, has overtakenJack Main the wealth rankings, a symbolic moment in the rise of China’s green billionaires.\nZeng’s net worth...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/elon-musk-s-battery-partner-in-china-is-now-richer-than-jack-ma\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"300750":"宁德时代"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-08/elon-musk-s-battery-partner-in-china-is-now-richer-than-jack-ma","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103507901","content_text":"Zeng Yuqun, the founder of the world’s biggest electric-vehicle battery maker, has overtakenJack Main the wealth rankings, a symbolic moment in the rise of China’s green billionaires.\nZeng’s net worth has jumped to $49.5 billion, according to theBloomberg Billionaires Index, as shares ofContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.surged this year. That exceeds Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. co-founder Ma’s wealth of $48.1 billion and makes Zeng one of the five richest people in Asia for the first time.\nIt’s the latest sign of how a new generation of tycoons in China is amassing vast fortunes in the clean-energy boom. Investors havepushed upstocks such as CATL, a key supplier to Tesla Inc., as the country leads the market for electric-vehicle sales and pursues an ambitious policy of reaching carbon neutrality in 2060.\n“The billionaire ranking used to be dominated by real estate tycoons and later tech entrepreneurs, and now we are seeing more from the new energy sector,” said Hao Gao, director of Tsinghua University’s NIFR Global Family Business Research Center. “As the industry leader for electric-vehicle batteries, CATL will benefit most from the carbon emission goal.”\nA spokeswoman for CATL declined to comment on Zeng’s net worth.\nZeng, 53, who hails from a hillside village in Fujian province in southeast China, built CATL into a battery juggernaut in less than a decade, creating the largest global producer of rechargeable cells for plug-in vehicles.\nGlobal electric-vehicle battery sales more thandoubledin the first five months of this year from a year earlier, with CATL accounting for 31.2% of the market, the largest share, according to an SNE Research report. New-energy vehicle retail sales in Chinarose9.8% in 2020 to 1.11 million units, according to the China Passenger Car Association.\nBloombergNEFexpectsthe company’s global sales growth to continue, benefiting from economies of scale, a cost-competitive upstream supply chain and an established client base.\nCATL’s stock has surged more than 20-fold since the company went public in Shenzhen in 2018. It’s up 55% this year alone as demand for EVs increases, countries work to reduce carbon emissions and costs tumble. Shares fell 2.4% on Friday.\nCATL trades at more than 100 times estimated earnings, compared with about 13 times for competitorPanasonic Corp.\nIn addition to Tesla, CATL counts BMW AG and Volkswagen AG among its customers. In an interview last year, Zengsaidhe and Tesla Chief Executive OfficerElon Musktext about technology, Covid-19 and Musk’s main interest: cheaper batteries and cars.\nZeng, who earned a doctorate in condensed matter physics from the Chinese Academy of Science in Beijing, isn’t the only billionaire who’s benefiting from the surge in CATL’s stock.Huang Shilin, a vice chairman of the company, is worth more than $21 billion, whileLi Ping, who’s also a vice chairman, has an $8.5 billion fortune.\nAs Zeng’s star rises, Ma’s has been on the wane. The value of Ma’s fintech arm Ant Group Co. hasplummetedsince the former English teacher openly pushed back against Beijing, prompting Chinese authorities to quash the company’s plans for a huge initial public offering. Ma, 56, has all but dropped from public view, and has lost $2.5 billion in wealth this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143237657,"gmtCreate":1625795524179,"gmtModify":1703748691685,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/143237657","repostId":"2150032590","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2150032590","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1625791261,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2150032590?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-09 08:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toyota halting contributions to U.S. lawmakers who opposed Biden certification","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2150032590","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday its political action committee wil","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday its political action committee will halt donations to U.S. lawmakers that voted against U.S. President Joe Biden's election certification in January.</p>\n<p>The largest Japanese automaker has come under harsh criticism for donations to some lawmakers who voted against the certification of Biden's win in some states.</p>\n<p>\"We are actively listening to our stakeholders and, at this time, have decided to stop contributing to those members of Congress who contested the certification of certain states in the 2020 election,\" the company said.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toyota halting contributions to U.S. lawmakers who opposed Biden certification</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToyota halting contributions to U.S. lawmakers who opposed Biden certification\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-09 08:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday its political action committee will halt donations to U.S. lawmakers that voted against U.S. President Joe Biden's election certification in January.</p>\n<p>The largest Japanese automaker has come under harsh criticism for donations to some lawmakers who voted against the certification of Biden's win in some states.</p>\n<p>\"We are actively listening to our stakeholders and, at this time, have decided to stop contributing to those members of Congress who contested the certification of certain states in the 2020 election,\" the company said.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","03160":"华夏日股对冲"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2150032590","content_text":"WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp said on Thursday its political action committee will halt donations to U.S. lawmakers that voted against U.S. President Joe Biden's election certification in January.\nThe largest Japanese automaker has come under harsh criticism for donations to some lawmakers who voted against the certification of Biden's win in some states.\n\"We are actively listening to our stakeholders and, at this time, have decided to stop contributing to those members of Congress who contested the certification of certain states in the 2020 election,\" the company said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":28,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808439381,"gmtCreate":1627605165043,"gmtModify":1703493139894,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808439381","repostId":"1131907757","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":464,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809048119,"gmtCreate":1627341929031,"gmtModify":1703487808066,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809048119","repostId":"1117559759","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117559759","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627311202,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117559759?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-26 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"My Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117559759","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Nvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.</li>\n <li>Nvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to strong gaming revenue momentum.</li>\n <li>Nvidia’s commentary on China’s cryptocurrency crackdown and how it affects CMP sales will allow for a better modeling of revenues going forward.</li>\n <li>Split or no split, Nvidia has 28% upside.</li>\n <li>I lay out my post-split plan to buy Nvidia at certain key levels.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4a1c53ba379b52dcd7584cb55a0b11a\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1053\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>David Becker/Getty Images News</span></p>\n<p>Nvidia (NVDA) executed a 4:1 stock split last week Tuesday. While stock splits don’t change a firm’s valuation, Nvidia may initiate a new upleg as earnings next month are likely going to be impressive. My stock price target for Nvidia, adjusted for the stock split, is $250. Nvidia also faces a couple of tests and you should watch out for these key levels before buying.</p>\n<p><b>Nvidia’s stock split</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia’s&nbsp;4:1 stock split&nbsp;has made the stock look cheaper but the fundamentals or the valuation of the firm have not changed. If you bought 100 shares of Nvidia at $800 pre-split, you now own 400 shares with a cost base of $200… the total value of an investment position is unaffected by Nvidia’s stock split, in both cases it is $80,000.</p>\n<p>Companies execute stock splits to make their shares look more affordable and increase liquidity in the market. Nvidia, post-split, has the same market value as before, $485B, only the number of shares outstanding has increased by the factor of four. While there is no evidence that stock splits produce higher returns post-split, the fact that the stock, at least on paper, looks more affordable could lead to increased buying of Nvidia. My stock price target before the split was $1,000 (Nvidia: A $1,000 Stock Price Is Not As Crazy As It Sounds), which calculates to an adjusted stock price target of $250 post-split (28% upside).</p>\n<p><b>What's in store for Nvidia next month?</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia is set to open its books for the second quarter on August 18, 2021 and the semiconductor firm is likely going to report impressive revenue growth for Q2’22. Nvidia's total Q1'22 revenues got an&nbsp;84% bump&nbsp;year-over-year and increased at a 13%-rate Q/Q. Nvidia’s gaming revenues increased at an average annual rate of 22% since FY 2017 while its data center revenues soared 86% annually over the same time period, predominantly because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition in 2020 which considerably expanded Nvidia’s presence in the high performance and data center computing markets.</p>\n<p>Nvidia gets the bulk of its revenues from gaming and data centers. Gaming center revenues increased 11% Q/Q to $2.76B in Q1’22 and revenues will likely have grown at a similar rate in Q2’22 due to strength in the gaming market and accelerating customer uptake of the GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU. The RTX 30 Series has been industry-defining by making \"ray tracing\" the new standard for game developers. Ray tracing is a graphics rendering method that allows for the realistic modeling of light effects in computer games. Strong sales in GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU sales could result in a 10-12% Q/Q revenue bump for Q2'22.</p>\n<p>Data centers, which generate the second biggest pile of revenues for Nvidia, saw growth slowing down in Q1'22 and I am looking forward to hearing an update from Nvidia's management about the prospects for the data center business for the rest of the year. I expect Nvidia to report mid-single-digit revenue growth in data centers for Q2'22 and, hopefully, an update about the Arm acquisition.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84bb9f6f3dbca0c67e817a34367aec0a\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"620\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source:Nvidia)</span></p>\n<p>What will be interesting to see in next month’s earnings report is how the Chinese cryptocurrency crackdown is impacting Nvidia’s cryptocurrency mining processor/CMP business for the rest of the year, which Nvidia is building from scratch. Soaring cryptocurrency prices in the first quarter have led to a surge in demand for CMPs, a business that is set to contribute up to $1.5B in revenues in FY 2022 (my current estimates are for ‘low-case’ CMP revenues of $1.0B and ‘high-case’ revenues of $1.5B). CMP revenues are included in Nvidia’s “OEM &amp; Other” revenues and based on firm guidance are projected to be $400M in Q2’22.</p>\n<p>Revenues unrelated to gaming and data centers for Q2’22 - Professional Visualization, Auto, and OEM/Other - are likely going to exceed $1.0B and could reach up to $1.2B depending on how strong demand for CMPs was in Q2’22. Since reduced mining difficulty as a result of falling cryptocurrency prices has made mining more profitable, Nvidia should head into the second half of the year with some CMP revenue tailwinds providing support.</p>\n<p>What I am really looking forward to in Nvidia’s Q2 report are Nvidia’s margins. Gross margins - a key figure for semiconductor firms - have trended up strongly, in part because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition which has made a positive contribution to segment performance. I believe Nvidia can grow its gross margins (non-GAAP) to 70% by the start of next year, largely because of continued momentum in the gaming business which gives Nvidia significant pricing power. Nvidia’s guidance for Q2’22 non-GAAP margins was 66.5 percent, plus or minus 50 basis points and actual margins will likely come in at the top of guidance.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de5873a468c24b27b0d713a6ea87bb15\" tg-width=\"1269\" tg-height=\"484\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Nvidia)</span></p>\n<p><b>How I am playing Nvidia post-split</b></p>\n<p>First of all, I am buying the post-split dips (if there are any!). The price of a stock may run-up before a stock split and drop afterwards as traders take profits. This may or may not be the case here. Nvidia’s closing market price on Friday was $195, equivalent to a $780 pre-split price, and the pre-split high of $835 (equivalent to a post-split price of $209) is in striking distance... it only takes a 7% increase in Nvidia's price from here to make new highs.</p>\n<p>Second, I am taking a close look at Nvidia’s 50-day and 200-day moving averages to determine critical support levels. I am ready to buy every dip below a key support level as Nvidia’s upcoming earnings report could be enough of a catalyst to push Nvidia to new highs. The first support level is just below $179 (50-day moving average) which is also where the stock bottomed before the last reversal. If Nvidia's stock dips below $180 before earnings, I am ready to buy just at this level. If the 50-day moving average breaks, the next key support level is $147 (200-day moving average), a level I don't believe Nvidia's stock will fall down to. But if that's the case, then Nvidia would be considered a 'Strong Buy' just below $147.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9fb926c9a11e4347aa2edda6d667850e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"450\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Nvidia is not cheap... and that’s for a reason. Estimates call for 50% Y/Y revenues growth this year and Nvidia might even see an acceleration in its top line growth next year. Nvidia trades at a P-E ratio of 45 which may be considered low given the revenue growth Nvidia offers...</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd1f8abb27427dd6dd83b3d2871eec59\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p><b>Other considerations/risks</b></p>\n<p>The market tends to reward good performance and because of a 5-year stretch of impressive business results, Nvidia trades at a high earnings multiplier factor. Nvidia’s outperformance relative to the S&amp;P 500 can continue under the condition that revenue growth doesn’t slow.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd43492fdb8928db4f32cc35dd5a154c\" tg-width=\"1267\" tg-height=\"727\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Tradingview)</span></p>\n<p>High valuations for growth stocks are normal, but they also come with some risks. If Nvidia’s revenue growth slows and gross margins flatten out or decline, Nvidia may be ripe for a revaluation in which case the risk profile skews to the downside. Declining gross margins, next to a slowdown in revenue growth, are the two biggest risks for Nvidia's stock. A rejection of Nvidia's Arm acquisition and an outright ban of cryptocurrencies are other risks to watch out for. Given the rising rate of institutional adoption outside China, the risk of a crypto ban is quite low.</p>\n<p><b>Final thoughts</b></p>\n<p>Nvidia experiences broad-based strength in its businesses and should see moderate to strong revenue growth in each segment for Q2'22, led by gaming and GeForce RTX GPU sales. Gross margins are going to see a Q/Q improve based on gaming market strength and guidance for Q3’22 could put Nvidia’s non-GAAP gross margin very close to 70%. Key support levels to watch out for and buy the dip are $179 and $147.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>My Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMy Nvidia Post-Split Investment Plan: Buying Every Dip Before Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-26 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.\nNvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441260-nvidia-stock-nvda-post-split-investment-plan-buying-every-dip-before-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117559759","content_text":"Summary\n\nNvidia is poised to post impressive revenue growth and gross margins next month as GeForce RTX GPU sales likely boomed.\nNvidia’s gross margins (non-GAAP) may grow to 70% by next year due to strong gaming revenue momentum.\nNvidia’s commentary on China’s cryptocurrency crackdown and how it affects CMP sales will allow for a better modeling of revenues going forward.\nSplit or no split, Nvidia has 28% upside.\nI lay out my post-split plan to buy Nvidia at certain key levels.\n\nDavid Becker/Getty Images News\nNvidia (NVDA) executed a 4:1 stock split last week Tuesday. While stock splits don’t change a firm’s valuation, Nvidia may initiate a new upleg as earnings next month are likely going to be impressive. My stock price target for Nvidia, adjusted for the stock split, is $250. Nvidia also faces a couple of tests and you should watch out for these key levels before buying.\nNvidia’s stock split\nNvidia’s 4:1 stock split has made the stock look cheaper but the fundamentals or the valuation of the firm have not changed. If you bought 100 shares of Nvidia at $800 pre-split, you now own 400 shares with a cost base of $200… the total value of an investment position is unaffected by Nvidia’s stock split, in both cases it is $80,000.\nCompanies execute stock splits to make their shares look more affordable and increase liquidity in the market. Nvidia, post-split, has the same market value as before, $485B, only the number of shares outstanding has increased by the factor of four. While there is no evidence that stock splits produce higher returns post-split, the fact that the stock, at least on paper, looks more affordable could lead to increased buying of Nvidia. My stock price target before the split was $1,000 (Nvidia: A $1,000 Stock Price Is Not As Crazy As It Sounds), which calculates to an adjusted stock price target of $250 post-split (28% upside).\nWhat's in store for Nvidia next month?\nNvidia is set to open its books for the second quarter on August 18, 2021 and the semiconductor firm is likely going to report impressive revenue growth for Q2’22. Nvidia's total Q1'22 revenues got an 84% bump year-over-year and increased at a 13%-rate Q/Q. Nvidia’s gaming revenues increased at an average annual rate of 22% since FY 2017 while its data center revenues soared 86% annually over the same time period, predominantly because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition in 2020 which considerably expanded Nvidia’s presence in the high performance and data center computing markets.\nNvidia gets the bulk of its revenues from gaming and data centers. Gaming center revenues increased 11% Q/Q to $2.76B in Q1’22 and revenues will likely have grown at a similar rate in Q2’22 due to strength in the gaming market and accelerating customer uptake of the GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU. The RTX 30 Series has been industry-defining by making \"ray tracing\" the new standard for game developers. Ray tracing is a graphics rendering method that allows for the realistic modeling of light effects in computer games. Strong sales in GeForce RTX 30 Series GPU sales could result in a 10-12% Q/Q revenue bump for Q2'22.\nData centers, which generate the second biggest pile of revenues for Nvidia, saw growth slowing down in Q1'22 and I am looking forward to hearing an update from Nvidia's management about the prospects for the data center business for the rest of the year. I expect Nvidia to report mid-single-digit revenue growth in data centers for Q2'22 and, hopefully, an update about the Arm acquisition.\n(Source:Nvidia)\nWhat will be interesting to see in next month’s earnings report is how the Chinese cryptocurrency crackdown is impacting Nvidia’s cryptocurrency mining processor/CMP business for the rest of the year, which Nvidia is building from scratch. Soaring cryptocurrency prices in the first quarter have led to a surge in demand for CMPs, a business that is set to contribute up to $1.5B in revenues in FY 2022 (my current estimates are for ‘low-case’ CMP revenues of $1.0B and ‘high-case’ revenues of $1.5B). CMP revenues are included in Nvidia’s “OEM & Other” revenues and based on firm guidance are projected to be $400M in Q2’22.\nRevenues unrelated to gaming and data centers for Q2’22 - Professional Visualization, Auto, and OEM/Other - are likely going to exceed $1.0B and could reach up to $1.2B depending on how strong demand for CMPs was in Q2’22. Since reduced mining difficulty as a result of falling cryptocurrency prices has made mining more profitable, Nvidia should head into the second half of the year with some CMP revenue tailwinds providing support.\nWhat I am really looking forward to in Nvidia’s Q2 report are Nvidia’s margins. Gross margins - a key figure for semiconductor firms - have trended up strongly, in part because of Nvidia’s Mellanox acquisition which has made a positive contribution to segment performance. I believe Nvidia can grow its gross margins (non-GAAP) to 70% by the start of next year, largely because of continued momentum in the gaming business which gives Nvidia significant pricing power. Nvidia’s guidance for Q2’22 non-GAAP margins was 66.5 percent, plus or minus 50 basis points and actual margins will likely come in at the top of guidance.\n(Source: Nvidia)\nHow I am playing Nvidia post-split\nFirst of all, I am buying the post-split dips (if there are any!). The price of a stock may run-up before a stock split and drop afterwards as traders take profits. This may or may not be the case here. Nvidia’s closing market price on Friday was $195, equivalent to a $780 pre-split price, and the pre-split high of $835 (equivalent to a post-split price of $209) is in striking distance... it only takes a 7% increase in Nvidia's price from here to make new highs.\nSecond, I am taking a close look at Nvidia’s 50-day and 200-day moving averages to determine critical support levels. I am ready to buy every dip below a key support level as Nvidia’s upcoming earnings report could be enough of a catalyst to push Nvidia to new highs. The first support level is just below $179 (50-day moving average) which is also where the stock bottomed before the last reversal. If Nvidia's stock dips below $180 before earnings, I am ready to buy just at this level. If the 50-day moving average breaks, the next key support level is $147 (200-day moving average), a level I don't believe Nvidia's stock will fall down to. But if that's the case, then Nvidia would be considered a 'Strong Buy' just below $147.\nData by YCharts\nNvidia is not cheap... and that’s for a reason. Estimates call for 50% Y/Y revenues growth this year and Nvidia might even see an acceleration in its top line growth next year. Nvidia trades at a P-E ratio of 45 which may be considered low given the revenue growth Nvidia offers...\nData by YCharts\nOther considerations/risks\nThe market tends to reward good performance and because of a 5-year stretch of impressive business results, Nvidia trades at a high earnings multiplier factor. Nvidia’s outperformance relative to the S&P 500 can continue under the condition that revenue growth doesn’t slow.\n(Source: Tradingview)\nHigh valuations for growth stocks are normal, but they also come with some risks. If Nvidia’s revenue growth slows and gross margins flatten out or decline, Nvidia may be ripe for a revaluation in which case the risk profile skews to the downside. Declining gross margins, next to a slowdown in revenue growth, are the two biggest risks for Nvidia's stock. A rejection of Nvidia's Arm acquisition and an outright ban of cryptocurrencies are other risks to watch out for. Given the rising rate of institutional adoption outside China, the risk of a crypto ban is quite low.\nFinal thoughts\nNvidia experiences broad-based strength in its businesses and should see moderate to strong revenue growth in each segment for Q2'22, led by gaming and GeForce RTX GPU sales. Gross margins are going to see a Q/Q improve based on gaming market strength and guidance for Q3’22 could put Nvidia’s non-GAAP gross margin very close to 70%. Key support levels to watch out for and buy the dip are $179 and $147.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":513,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800374389,"gmtCreate":1627283068041,"gmtModify":1703486671610,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800374389","repostId":"2154531659","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":377,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177150008,"gmtCreate":1627188755404,"gmtModify":1703485334767,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177150008","repostId":"2153936352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153936352","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627180340,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153936352?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-25 10:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153936352","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could the ambitious fintech company overtake the market leader?","content":"<p><b>Square</b> (NYSE:SQ) and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a></b> (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a> </b>(NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.</p>\n<p>Square is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3384d45efb17ed54b398c7dbcc043fb\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2><b>Wild ambitions vs. stable growth</b></h2>\n<p>Square and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.</p>\n<p>But Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added <b>Bitcoin</b> (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.</p>\n<p>PayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.</p>\n<h2>Which company is growing faster?</h2>\n<p>Between 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"600\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"118\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"213\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"225\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>Square</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>110.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>14.1%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>PayPal</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>20.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>21.5%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 22.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.</p>\n<p>Cathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.</p>\n<p>PayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.</p>\n<p>PayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and <i>more than double</i> its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.</p>\n<h2>Will Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?</h2>\n<p>In a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.</p>\n<p>If Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.</p>\n<p>Therefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-25 10:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQ":"Block","PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153936352","content_text":"Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.\nSquare is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nWild ambitions vs. stable growth\nSquare and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.\nBut Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.\nPayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.\nWhich company is growing faster?\nBetween 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nEstimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)\nEstimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)\n\n\nSquare\n110.6%\n14.1%\n\n\nPayPal\n20.6%\n21.5%\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 22.\nAnalysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.\nCathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.\nPayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.\nPayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and more than double its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.\nWill Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?\nIn a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.\nIf Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.\nTherefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175089630,"gmtCreate":1626998491120,"gmtModify":1703482031917,"author":{"id":"3578574228106809","authorId":"3578574228106809","name":"DYDFC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/886091e1ab80cf468e97e847ef0f3f9d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3578574228106809","authorIdStr":"3578574228106809"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"F","listText":"F","text":"F","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175089630","repostId":"1151614377","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}