jt1994 personal page - To The Moon

jt1994

jt1994

No personal profile

36Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-04-06

Like and comment pls

FOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week

2021-04-12

Like and comment

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-22

Wow

Cathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet

2021-04-05

Wow

9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising

2021-05-05

[Miser]

2021-04-05

Wow

Amazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter

2021-04-05

Wow

9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3580396500800332","uuid":"3580396500800332","gmtCreate":1617302601528,"gmtModify":1617612921130,"name":"jt1994","pinyin":"jt1994","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":36,"tweetSize":15,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.30","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":102604648,"gmtCreate":1620202428884,"gmtModify":1704340122892,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102604648","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":439,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376968434,"gmtCreate":1619080998728,"gmtModify":1704719336796,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376968434","repostId":"1183538956","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183538956","pubTimestamp":1619080634,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183538956?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 16:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183538956","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investm","content":"<p>Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as some claim.</p>\n<p>The argument is that Bitcoin mining could encourage investment in solar energy systems, enabling renewables to fulfill a higher percentage of demand from the energy grid at a constant cost of electricity,according to a post&nbsp;from ARK research director Brett Winton, who credited Yassine Elmandjra and Sam Korus as co-authors. With the largest cryptocurrency in the mix, energy providers could play the arbitrage between electricity prices and Bitcoin prices, as well as sell surplus solar -- and supply almost all grid power demands without lowering profitability, they said.</p>\n<p>“All else equal, with Bitcoin mining, we believe renewable energy should be able to provision a large percentage of any locality’s power economically,” the post said. “As a follow-on effect, cost declines associated with scaling renewables could accelerate, leaving them even more economically competitive at equilibrium.”</p>\n<blockquote>\n In a research collaboration with&nbsp;$SQ,@yassineARK,@wintonARK, and&nbsp;@skorusARKdebunk the myth that#Bitcoinmining is damaging the environment. Instead, as crypto mining, energy storage, and AI technologies converge, the adoption of renewable energy is likely to accelerate!\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n — Cathie Wood&nbsp;April 22, 2021\n</blockquote>\n<p>Still, the assertions in the research run counter to much of what’s been suggested by others. Citigroup Inc. recently said Bitcoin’s power consumption has jumped&nbsp;66-fold&nbsp;since 2015, and BCA Research Inc. said environmental concerns were likely to erode the token’s value&nbsp;over time.</p>\n<p>ARK has invested actively in cryptocurrency-related stocks, the latest being&nbsp;via purchases&nbsp;of Coinbase Global Inc. shares after it listed on the Nasdaq. And Wood said in a panel discussion that Bitcoin’s market value could go&nbsp;much higher&nbsp;than $1 trillion, a milestone it reached just recently. Square Inc., which Wood cited in a Twitter post as collaborating on the research, has been buying Bitcoin and says crypto is a&nbsp;growing part of its business&nbsp;through the use of its Cash App for Bitcoin transactions.</p>\n<p>Critics “assert that the computation required to secure Bitcoin, even if necessary, is environmentally damaging and ruining the planet,” the ARK research said. “We believe that the opposite is true: a world with Bitcoin is a world that, at equilibrium, generates more electricity from renewable carbon-free sources.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-22 16:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust","SQ":"Block","ARKF":"ARK Fintech Innovation ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183538956","content_text":"Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as some claim.\nThe argument is that Bitcoin mining could encourage investment in solar energy systems, enabling renewables to fulfill a higher percentage of demand from the energy grid at a constant cost of electricity,according to a post from ARK research director Brett Winton, who credited Yassine Elmandjra and Sam Korus as co-authors. With the largest cryptocurrency in the mix, energy providers could play the arbitrage between electricity prices and Bitcoin prices, as well as sell surplus solar -- and supply almost all grid power demands without lowering profitability, they said.\n“All else equal, with Bitcoin mining, we believe renewable energy should be able to provision a large percentage of any locality’s power economically,” the post said. “As a follow-on effect, cost declines associated with scaling renewables could accelerate, leaving them even more economically competitive at equilibrium.”\n\n In a research collaboration with $SQ,@yassineARK,@wintonARK, and @skorusARKdebunk the myth that#Bitcoinmining is damaging the environment. Instead, as crypto mining, energy storage, and AI technologies converge, the adoption of renewable energy is likely to accelerate!\n\n\n — Cathie Wood April 22, 2021\n\nStill, the assertions in the research run counter to much of what’s been suggested by others. Citigroup Inc. recently said Bitcoin’s power consumption has jumped 66-fold since 2015, and BCA Research Inc. said environmental concerns were likely to erode the token’s value over time.\nARK has invested actively in cryptocurrency-related stocks, the latest being via purchases of Coinbase Global Inc. shares after it listed on the Nasdaq. And Wood said in a panel discussion that Bitcoin’s market value could go much higher than $1 trillion, a milestone it reached just recently. Square Inc., which Wood cited in a Twitter post as collaborating on the research, has been buying Bitcoin and says crypto is a growing part of its business through the use of its Cash App for Bitcoin transactions.\nCritics “assert that the computation required to secure Bitcoin, even if necessary, is environmentally damaging and ruining the planet,” the ARK research said. “We believe that the opposite is true: a world with Bitcoin is a world that, at equilibrium, generates more electricity from renewable carbon-free sources.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":272,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":342186146,"gmtCreate":1618190877785,"gmtModify":1704707265834,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/342186146","repostId":"2126037524","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":328,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343314903,"gmtCreate":1617676773802,"gmtModify":1704701675931,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343314903","repostId":"2125757547","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2125757547","pubTimestamp":1617610742,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2125757547?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2125757547","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of ","content":"<p>Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell on deck. Relatively few new economic data reports or corporate earnings results are scheduled for release.</p><p>The FOMC's meeting minutes, due out Wednesday afternoon, will elucidate members' thinking from their March meeting. At the conclusion of that meeting, the central bank's median forecast for economic growth was sharply upwardly revised, reflecting improving growth trends as the trajectory of new COVID-19 infections improved and vaccinations broadened out. The central bank said it expects real GDP to grow 6.5% this year, versus the 4.2% rate it anticipated in December. The Fed also said it sees the unemployment rate improving to 4.5% by year-end before returning to its pre-pandemic level of 3.5% by 2023.</p><p>Despite these improving projections, the Fed still telegraphed that interest rates would likely remain on hold at current near-zero levels through 2023, with the central bank maintaining its ultra-accommodative monetary policy posturing despite a quicker-than-previously-expected economic recovery. Market participants have been wary of this message, with the Fed suggesting a stubborn tilt toward easy monetary policy even in the face of rising inflation. The Fed's latest forecast showed the median member believed core inflation would rise to 2.4% this year, hitting and exceeding the Fed's 2% target two years earlier than previously anticipated.</p><p>Fed Chair Powell said in his mid-March press conference that inflation would need to be \"on track to exceed 2% moderately for some time\" in order for the Fed to consider its inflation goal met and allow for liftoff on rates. However, that assertion has left some room for interpretation by market participants, leading many to speculate the Fed may be pushed to adjust policy sooner than it has recently telegraphed.</p><h2>'Forecast disagreement'</h2><h2></h2><p>According to a recent survey from Deustche Bank, \"The current gap between the market and the Fed is mostly about forecast disagreement. In particular, survey respondents expect that core PCE in the 2.2%-2.3% range in 2022 and 2023 will beget a more hawkish Fed response,\" Deutsche Bank economist Matthew Luzzetti wrote in a note. \"While we learned at the FOMC meeting that 2.1% core PCE [personal consumption expenditures] inflation is not sufficiently high to trigger liftoff, it is still unclear whether inflation rates in the 2.2%-2.3% range — as expected by our survey and market pricing — would be high enough to get the Fed to tighten. This ambiguity is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> drawback of the Fed's flexible average inflation targeting (FAIT) approach which leaves key parameters undefined.\"</p><p>\"If the Fed were to clearly signal that core PCE inflation in the 2.2%-2.3% range for a year or two is consistent with their view of FAIT and would not trigger a tightening of monetary policy, they could impact market pricing,\" he added. \"Conversely, if the FOMC believes they would raise rates in response to these inflation realizations, then the market is currently pricing an appropriate reaction function and it will take some time for a verdict on whether the Fed or market is correct about the persistence of this inflation shock.\"</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e00f01f2ead30a11c8273f332b00d3da\" tg-width=\"6000\" tg-height=\"4000\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference after a Federal Open Market Committee meeting on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. Chairman Powell announced that the Federal Reserve will not be adjusting interest rates. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)Samuel Corum via Getty Images</span></p><p>But while the jury appears to be out among market participants when it comes to the timing of the next rate hike, many agree that the first step toward tightening by the Federal Reserve will likely occur in their crisis-era asset purchase program. Fed Chair Powell said that the central bank would be looking for \"substantial further progress\" — and specifically \"actual progress\" in the data and not \"forecast progress\" — toward the Fed's employment and inflation goals before considering tapering.</p><p>Still, with the latest batch of March economic data exceeding estimates, the Fed may soon begin offering up firmer guidance around its plan for tapering the $120 billion per-month asset purchase program, which was first put into place at the start of the pandemic last year.</p><p>\"Financial conditions should remain quite accommodative for a while, and in our view risks an overshoot,\" Rich Rieder, BlackRock chief investment officer, said in a note. \"We think that the Fed should be able to taper asset purchases sooner than many expect and perhaps by the end of the year, or early next year, which suggests to us that communicating its plan could come as early as the June meeting.\"</p><p>While the forthcoming meeting minutes will not take into account FOMC members' appraisal of the latest batch of economic data, it will offer market participants a sense of whether some members were inclined to look past the first signs of a faster-than-expected economic recovery in dictating the direction of monetary policy.</p><p>That said, Fed Chair Powell's public remarks this coming Thursday will offer a more timely view of the central bank's policy thinking. Powell will be speaking at an International Monetary Fund panel on the global economy Thursday afternoon.</p><p>The discussion will come about a week after the Labor Department's March jobs report, which showed a much better than expected gain of 916,000 non-farm payrolls and a dip in the unemployment rate to 6.0%. Plus, last week's Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing purchasing managers' index unexpectedly jumped to a 37-year high, with some survey participants already citing a rise in commodity prices and a supply and demand mismatch that could exacerbate upward price pressures. Market participants will eye Powell's address to see whether or not these prints shift the needle in the Fed's monetary policy projections.</p><p>\"We expect that as the data come in, the volatility in Fed views will become more pronounced over coming months,\" RBC Capital Markets economists wrote in a note last week.</p><h2>Economic calendar</h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday: </b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a> U.S. Services PMI, March Final (60.2 expected, 60.0 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, March Final (59.1 in prior print); ISM Services Index, March (58.7 expected, 55.3 in February); Factory Orders, February (-0.5% expected, 2.6% in January); Durable Goods Orders, February Final (-1.1% expected, -1.1% in prior print); Durable Goods Orders excluding transportation, February final (-0.9% expected, -0.9% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, February final (-0.8% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods shipments excluding aircraft, February final (-1.0% in prior print)</p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> JOLTS Job Openings, February (6.944 million expected, 6.917 million in prior print)</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 2 (-2.2% during prior week); Trade Balance, February (-$70.5 billion expected, -$68.2 billion in January); Consumer credit, February ($2.800 billion expected, -$1.315 billion in January) FOMC Meeting Minutes, March Meeting</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Initial jobless claims, week ended April 3 (690,000 expected, 719,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended March 27 (3.794 million during prior week)</p></li><li><p><b>Friday:</b> Producer Price Index, month-over-month, March (0.5% expected, 0.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, March (0.2% expected, 0.2% in February); Producer Price Index, year-over-year, March (3.8% expected, 2.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy year-over-year, March (2.7% expected, 2.5% in February); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, February final (0.5% expected, 0.5% in prior print)</p></li></ul><h2>Earnings calendar</h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday: </b>N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday:</b> N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday:</b> Constellation Brands (STZ) before market open</p></li><li><p><b>Friday: </b>N/A</p></li></ul>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2125757547","content_text":"Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell on deck. Relatively few new economic data reports or corporate earnings results are scheduled for release.The FOMC's meeting minutes, due out Wednesday afternoon, will elucidate members' thinking from their March meeting. At the conclusion of that meeting, the central bank's median forecast for economic growth was sharply upwardly revised, reflecting improving growth trends as the trajectory of new COVID-19 infections improved and vaccinations broadened out. The central bank said it expects real GDP to grow 6.5% this year, versus the 4.2% rate it anticipated in December. The Fed also said it sees the unemployment rate improving to 4.5% by year-end before returning to its pre-pandemic level of 3.5% by 2023.Despite these improving projections, the Fed still telegraphed that interest rates would likely remain on hold at current near-zero levels through 2023, with the central bank maintaining its ultra-accommodative monetary policy posturing despite a quicker-than-previously-expected economic recovery. Market participants have been wary of this message, with the Fed suggesting a stubborn tilt toward easy monetary policy even in the face of rising inflation. The Fed's latest forecast showed the median member believed core inflation would rise to 2.4% this year, hitting and exceeding the Fed's 2% target two years earlier than previously anticipated.Fed Chair Powell said in his mid-March press conference that inflation would need to be \"on track to exceed 2% moderately for some time\" in order for the Fed to consider its inflation goal met and allow for liftoff on rates. However, that assertion has left some room for interpretation by market participants, leading many to speculate the Fed may be pushed to adjust policy sooner than it has recently telegraphed.'Forecast disagreement'According to a recent survey from Deustche Bank, \"The current gap between the market and the Fed is mostly about forecast disagreement. In particular, survey respondents expect that core PCE in the 2.2%-2.3% range in 2022 and 2023 will beget a more hawkish Fed response,\" Deutsche Bank economist Matthew Luzzetti wrote in a note. \"While we learned at the FOMC meeting that 2.1% core PCE [personal consumption expenditures] inflation is not sufficiently high to trigger liftoff, it is still unclear whether inflation rates in the 2.2%-2.3% range — as expected by our survey and market pricing — would be high enough to get the Fed to tighten. This ambiguity is one drawback of the Fed's flexible average inflation targeting (FAIT) approach which leaves key parameters undefined.\"\"If the Fed were to clearly signal that core PCE inflation in the 2.2%-2.3% range for a year or two is consistent with their view of FAIT and would not trigger a tightening of monetary policy, they could impact market pricing,\" he added. \"Conversely, if the FOMC believes they would raise rates in response to these inflation realizations, then the market is currently pricing an appropriate reaction function and it will take some time for a verdict on whether the Fed or market is correct about the persistence of this inflation shock.\"WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference after a Federal Open Market Committee meeting on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. Chairman Powell announced that the Federal Reserve will not be adjusting interest rates. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)Samuel Corum via Getty ImagesBut while the jury appears to be out among market participants when it comes to the timing of the next rate hike, many agree that the first step toward tightening by the Federal Reserve will likely occur in their crisis-era asset purchase program. Fed Chair Powell said that the central bank would be looking for \"substantial further progress\" — and specifically \"actual progress\" in the data and not \"forecast progress\" — toward the Fed's employment and inflation goals before considering tapering.Still, with the latest batch of March economic data exceeding estimates, the Fed may soon begin offering up firmer guidance around its plan for tapering the $120 billion per-month asset purchase program, which was first put into place at the start of the pandemic last year.\"Financial conditions should remain quite accommodative for a while, and in our view risks an overshoot,\" Rich Rieder, BlackRock chief investment officer, said in a note. \"We think that the Fed should be able to taper asset purchases sooner than many expect and perhaps by the end of the year, or early next year, which suggests to us that communicating its plan could come as early as the June meeting.\"While the forthcoming meeting minutes will not take into account FOMC members' appraisal of the latest batch of economic data, it will offer market participants a sense of whether some members were inclined to look past the first signs of a faster-than-expected economic recovery in dictating the direction of monetary policy.That said, Fed Chair Powell's public remarks this coming Thursday will offer a more timely view of the central bank's policy thinking. Powell will be speaking at an International Monetary Fund panel on the global economy Thursday afternoon.The discussion will come about a week after the Labor Department's March jobs report, which showed a much better than expected gain of 916,000 non-farm payrolls and a dip in the unemployment rate to 6.0%. Plus, last week's Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing purchasing managers' index unexpectedly jumped to a 37-year high, with some survey participants already citing a rise in commodity prices and a supply and demand mismatch that could exacerbate upward price pressures. Market participants will eye Powell's address to see whether or not these prints shift the needle in the Fed's monetary policy projections.\"We expect that as the data come in, the volatility in Fed views will become more pronounced over coming months,\" RBC Capital Markets economists wrote in a note last week.Economic calendarMonday: Markit U.S. Services PMI, March Final (60.2 expected, 60.0 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, March Final (59.1 in prior print); ISM Services Index, March (58.7 expected, 55.3 in February); Factory Orders, February (-0.5% expected, 2.6% in January); Durable Goods Orders, February Final (-1.1% expected, -1.1% in prior print); Durable Goods Orders excluding transportation, February final (-0.9% expected, -0.9% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, February final (-0.8% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods shipments excluding aircraft, February final (-1.0% in prior print)Tuesday: JOLTS Job Openings, February (6.944 million expected, 6.917 million in prior print)Wednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 2 (-2.2% during prior week); Trade Balance, February (-$70.5 billion expected, -$68.2 billion in January); Consumer credit, February ($2.800 billion expected, -$1.315 billion in January) FOMC Meeting Minutes, March MeetingThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended April 3 (690,000 expected, 719,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended March 27 (3.794 million during prior week)Friday: Producer Price Index, month-over-month, March (0.5% expected, 0.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, March (0.2% expected, 0.2% in February); Producer Price Index, year-over-year, March (3.8% expected, 2.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy year-over-year, March (2.7% expected, 2.5% in February); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, February final (0.5% expected, 0.5% in prior print)Earnings calendarMonday: N/ATuesday: N/AWednesday: N/AThursday: Constellation Brands (STZ) before market openFriday: N/A","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":614,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349299110,"gmtCreate":1617613029630,"gmtModify":1704700824891,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349299110","repostId":"1138932914","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138932914","pubTimestamp":1617607569,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138932914?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 15:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138932914","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The App","content":"<p>Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant.</p>\n<p>As the first quarter of 2021 reaches the end, Amazon investors lick their wounds. Shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant had a rough three-month period of performance, ending the quarter down 5% year-to-date while the S&amp;P 500 marched higher.</p>\n<p>Although the Apple Maven is mostly concerned with the Cupertino company and its investors, today we turn the focus of attention to the third most valuable company in the US: Amazon.</p>\n<p><b>Not a great start to 2021</b></p>\n<p>In the past decade, on average, Amazon stock produced a bit over 6% of returns in the first quarter – which is comparable to its peer Apple’s track record. By comparison, therefore, AMZN’s performance has been quite disappointing so far this year.</p>\n<p>On the risk side, Amazon shares faced volatility of 27% in annualized terms, a number that was very much in line with the ten-year average. The maximum drawdown in the quarter was 13%, and it happened over a one-month period between early February and early March.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b65c423dbcee83a3ffa17dcf97221393\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"288\"><span>Figure 1: Average Monthly Return, Seasonality AMZN Stock since 2011</span></p>\n<p>Compared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.</p>\n<p>Compared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.</p>\n<p><b>Ebbs and flows</b></p>\n<p>Driving Amazon stock up and down since the start of the year were a few macro-level and company-specific factors. Below are Amazon’s best and worst days of performance that help to explain the stock’s journey through this challenging first quarter.</p>\n<p>Going up:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Amazon’s best days in the quarter happened late in January through the first of February,right around the company’s earnings day. January 20 topped the charts, with gains of 4.6%. It is hard to put a finger on what exactly caused Amazon and virtually all its direct peers to skyrocket ahead of Big Tech earnings week, other than enthusiasm for the upcoming results.</li>\n <li>The eve of Amazon’s earnings day, February 1, was the stock’s second best in the first quarter. A couple of Wall Street pre-earnings reports had come out, and most sounded bullish. Early February, however, also marked the peak for Amazon stock in 2021, and shares have been down 10% ever since.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Going down:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>The worst trading session for Amazon happened on March 18, when the stock lost 3.4%. The culprit seems to have been&nbsp;yet another leg higher in yields, supported by expectations for higher inflation and the reopening of the US economy. Other Big Tech stocks also took a hit that same day.</li>\n <li>The correction in Amazon stock from the early February peak picked up speed in late February and early March. During these couple of weeks, Amazon experienced four days of losses beyond 2%. To blame are likely the relentless rise in interest rates and some profit taking from a successful Big Tech earnings season.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 15:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138932914","content_text":"Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant.\nAs the first quarter of 2021 reaches the end, Amazon investors lick their wounds. Shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant had a rough three-month period of performance, ending the quarter down 5% year-to-date while the S&P 500 marched higher.\nAlthough the Apple Maven is mostly concerned with the Cupertino company and its investors, today we turn the focus of attention to the third most valuable company in the US: Amazon.\nNot a great start to 2021\nIn the past decade, on average, Amazon stock produced a bit over 6% of returns in the first quarter – which is comparable to its peer Apple’s track record. By comparison, therefore, AMZN’s performance has been quite disappointing so far this year.\nOn the risk side, Amazon shares faced volatility of 27% in annualized terms, a number that was very much in line with the ten-year average. The maximum drawdown in the quarter was 13%, and it happened over a one-month period between early February and early March.\nFigure 1: Average Monthly Return, Seasonality AMZN Stock since 2011\nCompared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.\nCompared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.\nEbbs and flows\nDriving Amazon stock up and down since the start of the year were a few macro-level and company-specific factors. Below are Amazon’s best and worst days of performance that help to explain the stock’s journey through this challenging first quarter.\nGoing up:\n\nAmazon’s best days in the quarter happened late in January through the first of February,right around the company’s earnings day. January 20 topped the charts, with gains of 4.6%. It is hard to put a finger on what exactly caused Amazon and virtually all its direct peers to skyrocket ahead of Big Tech earnings week, other than enthusiasm for the upcoming results.\nThe eve of Amazon’s earnings day, February 1, was the stock’s second best in the first quarter. A couple of Wall Street pre-earnings reports had come out, and most sounded bullish. Early February, however, also marked the peak for Amazon stock in 2021, and shares have been down 10% ever since.\n\nGoing down:\n\nThe worst trading session for Amazon happened on March 18, when the stock lost 3.4%. The culprit seems to have been yet another leg higher in yields, supported by expectations for higher inflation and the reopening of the US economy. Other Big Tech stocks also took a hit that same day.\nThe correction in Amazon stock from the early February peak picked up speed in late February and early March. During these couple of weeks, Amazon experienced four days of losses beyond 2%. To blame are likely the relentless rise in interest rates and some profit taking from a successful Big Tech earnings season.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349207089,"gmtCreate":1617612764841,"gmtModify":1704700821479,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349207089","repostId":"1186754751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186754751","pubTimestamp":1617611806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186754751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186754751","media":"Barrons","summary":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every sto","content":"<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.</p><p>While the majority of S&amp;P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.</p><p>Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.</p><p>Among the nearly 100 S&amp;P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.</p><p>To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,<i>Barron’s</i>took those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.</p><p>Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.</p><p><b>Left Behind</b></p><p>These fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/354b69e346e0d3878e95ee2a83301ccf\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"781\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Chip maker&nbsp;Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but&nbsp;still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could&nbsp;benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.</p><p>Vertex Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;(VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;wrote in March that&nbsp;Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment&nbsp;and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CHTR":"特许通讯","ARTX":"阿罗特克","LDOS":"Leidos Holdings Inc","ALXN":"亚力兄制药","GPN":"环汇有限公司","DVA":"达维塔保健","QCOM":"高通","DPZ":"达美乐比萨"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186754751","content_text":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.Among the nearly 100 S&P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,Barron’stook those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.Left BehindThese fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.Chip maker Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,Barron’s wrote in March that Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":509,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349202744,"gmtCreate":1617612602788,"gmtModify":1704700818561,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580396500800332","authorIdStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349202744","repostId":"1186754751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186754751","pubTimestamp":1617611806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186754751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186754751","media":"Barrons","summary":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every sto","content":"<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.</p><p>While the majority of S&amp;P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.</p><p>Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.</p><p>Among the nearly 100 S&amp;P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.</p><p>To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,<i>Barron’s</i>took those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.</p><p>Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.</p><p><b>Left Behind</b></p><p>These fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/354b69e346e0d3878e95ee2a83301ccf\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"781\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Chip maker&nbsp;Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but&nbsp;still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could&nbsp;benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.</p><p>Vertex Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;(VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;wrote in March that&nbsp;Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment&nbsp;and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CHTR":"特许通讯","ARTX":"阿罗特克","LDOS":"Leidos Holdings Inc","ALXN":"亚力兄制药","GPN":"环汇有限公司","DVA":"达维塔保健","QCOM":"高通","DPZ":"达美乐比萨"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186754751","content_text":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.Among the nearly 100 S&P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,Barron’stook those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.Left BehindThese fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.Chip maker Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,Barron’s wrote in March that Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":343314903,"gmtCreate":1617676773802,"gmtModify":1704701675931,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343314903","repostId":"2125757547","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2125757547","pubTimestamp":1617610742,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2125757547?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2125757547","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of ","content":"<p>Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell on deck. Relatively few new economic data reports or corporate earnings results are scheduled for release.</p><p>The FOMC's meeting minutes, due out Wednesday afternoon, will elucidate members' thinking from their March meeting. At the conclusion of that meeting, the central bank's median forecast for economic growth was sharply upwardly revised, reflecting improving growth trends as the trajectory of new COVID-19 infections improved and vaccinations broadened out. The central bank said it expects real GDP to grow 6.5% this year, versus the 4.2% rate it anticipated in December. The Fed also said it sees the unemployment rate improving to 4.5% by year-end before returning to its pre-pandemic level of 3.5% by 2023.</p><p>Despite these improving projections, the Fed still telegraphed that interest rates would likely remain on hold at current near-zero levels through 2023, with the central bank maintaining its ultra-accommodative monetary policy posturing despite a quicker-than-previously-expected economic recovery. Market participants have been wary of this message, with the Fed suggesting a stubborn tilt toward easy monetary policy even in the face of rising inflation. The Fed's latest forecast showed the median member believed core inflation would rise to 2.4% this year, hitting and exceeding the Fed's 2% target two years earlier than previously anticipated.</p><p>Fed Chair Powell said in his mid-March press conference that inflation would need to be \"on track to exceed 2% moderately for some time\" in order for the Fed to consider its inflation goal met and allow for liftoff on rates. However, that assertion has left some room for interpretation by market participants, leading many to speculate the Fed may be pushed to adjust policy sooner than it has recently telegraphed.</p><h2>'Forecast disagreement'</h2><h2></h2><p>According to a recent survey from Deustche Bank, \"The current gap between the market and the Fed is mostly about forecast disagreement. In particular, survey respondents expect that core PCE in the 2.2%-2.3% range in 2022 and 2023 will beget a more hawkish Fed response,\" Deutsche Bank economist Matthew Luzzetti wrote in a note. \"While we learned at the FOMC meeting that 2.1% core PCE [personal consumption expenditures] inflation is not sufficiently high to trigger liftoff, it is still unclear whether inflation rates in the 2.2%-2.3% range — as expected by our survey and market pricing — would be high enough to get the Fed to tighten. This ambiguity is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> drawback of the Fed's flexible average inflation targeting (FAIT) approach which leaves key parameters undefined.\"</p><p>\"If the Fed were to clearly signal that core PCE inflation in the 2.2%-2.3% range for a year or two is consistent with their view of FAIT and would not trigger a tightening of monetary policy, they could impact market pricing,\" he added. \"Conversely, if the FOMC believes they would raise rates in response to these inflation realizations, then the market is currently pricing an appropriate reaction function and it will take some time for a verdict on whether the Fed or market is correct about the persistence of this inflation shock.\"</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e00f01f2ead30a11c8273f332b00d3da\" tg-width=\"6000\" tg-height=\"4000\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference after a Federal Open Market Committee meeting on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. Chairman Powell announced that the Federal Reserve will not be adjusting interest rates. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)Samuel Corum via Getty Images</span></p><p>But while the jury appears to be out among market participants when it comes to the timing of the next rate hike, many agree that the first step toward tightening by the Federal Reserve will likely occur in their crisis-era asset purchase program. Fed Chair Powell said that the central bank would be looking for \"substantial further progress\" — and specifically \"actual progress\" in the data and not \"forecast progress\" — toward the Fed's employment and inflation goals before considering tapering.</p><p>Still, with the latest batch of March economic data exceeding estimates, the Fed may soon begin offering up firmer guidance around its plan for tapering the $120 billion per-month asset purchase program, which was first put into place at the start of the pandemic last year.</p><p>\"Financial conditions should remain quite accommodative for a while, and in our view risks an overshoot,\" Rich Rieder, BlackRock chief investment officer, said in a note. \"We think that the Fed should be able to taper asset purchases sooner than many expect and perhaps by the end of the year, or early next year, which suggests to us that communicating its plan could come as early as the June meeting.\"</p><p>While the forthcoming meeting minutes will not take into account FOMC members' appraisal of the latest batch of economic data, it will offer market participants a sense of whether some members were inclined to look past the first signs of a faster-than-expected economic recovery in dictating the direction of monetary policy.</p><p>That said, Fed Chair Powell's public remarks this coming Thursday will offer a more timely view of the central bank's policy thinking. Powell will be speaking at an International Monetary Fund panel on the global economy Thursday afternoon.</p><p>The discussion will come about a week after the Labor Department's March jobs report, which showed a much better than expected gain of 916,000 non-farm payrolls and a dip in the unemployment rate to 6.0%. Plus, last week's Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing purchasing managers' index unexpectedly jumped to a 37-year high, with some survey participants already citing a rise in commodity prices and a supply and demand mismatch that could exacerbate upward price pressures. Market participants will eye Powell's address to see whether or not these prints shift the needle in the Fed's monetary policy projections.</p><p>\"We expect that as the data come in, the volatility in Fed views will become more pronounced over coming months,\" RBC Capital Markets economists wrote in a note last week.</p><h2>Economic calendar</h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday: </b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a> U.S. Services PMI, March Final (60.2 expected, 60.0 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, March Final (59.1 in prior print); ISM Services Index, March (58.7 expected, 55.3 in February); Factory Orders, February (-0.5% expected, 2.6% in January); Durable Goods Orders, February Final (-1.1% expected, -1.1% in prior print); Durable Goods Orders excluding transportation, February final (-0.9% expected, -0.9% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, February final (-0.8% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods shipments excluding aircraft, February final (-1.0% in prior print)</p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> JOLTS Job Openings, February (6.944 million expected, 6.917 million in prior print)</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 2 (-2.2% during prior week); Trade Balance, February (-$70.5 billion expected, -$68.2 billion in January); Consumer credit, February ($2.800 billion expected, -$1.315 billion in January) FOMC Meeting Minutes, March Meeting</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Initial jobless claims, week ended April 3 (690,000 expected, 719,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended March 27 (3.794 million during prior week)</p></li><li><p><b>Friday:</b> Producer Price Index, month-over-month, March (0.5% expected, 0.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, March (0.2% expected, 0.2% in February); Producer Price Index, year-over-year, March (3.8% expected, 2.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy year-over-year, March (2.7% expected, 2.5% in February); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, February final (0.5% expected, 0.5% in prior print)</p></li></ul><h2>Earnings calendar</h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday: </b>N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday:</b> N/A</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday:</b> Constellation Brands (STZ) before market open</p></li><li><p><b>Friday: </b>N/A</p></li></ul>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFOMC meeting minutes, Powell speaks: What to know this week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fomc-meeting-minutes-powell-speaks-what-to-know-in-the-week-ahead-154814153.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2125757547","content_text":"Traders returning from the long holiday weekend will turn their attention to more commentary out of the Federal Reserve, with the Federal Open Market Committee's latest meeting minutes and a speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell on deck. Relatively few new economic data reports or corporate earnings results are scheduled for release.The FOMC's meeting minutes, due out Wednesday afternoon, will elucidate members' thinking from their March meeting. At the conclusion of that meeting, the central bank's median forecast for economic growth was sharply upwardly revised, reflecting improving growth trends as the trajectory of new COVID-19 infections improved and vaccinations broadened out. The central bank said it expects real GDP to grow 6.5% this year, versus the 4.2% rate it anticipated in December. The Fed also said it sees the unemployment rate improving to 4.5% by year-end before returning to its pre-pandemic level of 3.5% by 2023.Despite these improving projections, the Fed still telegraphed that interest rates would likely remain on hold at current near-zero levels through 2023, with the central bank maintaining its ultra-accommodative monetary policy posturing despite a quicker-than-previously-expected economic recovery. Market participants have been wary of this message, with the Fed suggesting a stubborn tilt toward easy monetary policy even in the face of rising inflation. The Fed's latest forecast showed the median member believed core inflation would rise to 2.4% this year, hitting and exceeding the Fed's 2% target two years earlier than previously anticipated.Fed Chair Powell said in his mid-March press conference that inflation would need to be \"on track to exceed 2% moderately for some time\" in order for the Fed to consider its inflation goal met and allow for liftoff on rates. However, that assertion has left some room for interpretation by market participants, leading many to speculate the Fed may be pushed to adjust policy sooner than it has recently telegraphed.'Forecast disagreement'According to a recent survey from Deustche Bank, \"The current gap between the market and the Fed is mostly about forecast disagreement. In particular, survey respondents expect that core PCE in the 2.2%-2.3% range in 2022 and 2023 will beget a more hawkish Fed response,\" Deutsche Bank economist Matthew Luzzetti wrote in a note. \"While we learned at the FOMC meeting that 2.1% core PCE [personal consumption expenditures] inflation is not sufficiently high to trigger liftoff, it is still unclear whether inflation rates in the 2.2%-2.3% range — as expected by our survey and market pricing — would be high enough to get the Fed to tighten. This ambiguity is one drawback of the Fed's flexible average inflation targeting (FAIT) approach which leaves key parameters undefined.\"\"If the Fed were to clearly signal that core PCE inflation in the 2.2%-2.3% range for a year or two is consistent with their view of FAIT and would not trigger a tightening of monetary policy, they could impact market pricing,\" he added. \"Conversely, if the FOMC believes they would raise rates in response to these inflation realizations, then the market is currently pricing an appropriate reaction function and it will take some time for a verdict on whether the Fed or market is correct about the persistence of this inflation shock.\"WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference after a Federal Open Market Committee meeting on January 29, 2020 in Washington, DC. Chairman Powell announced that the Federal Reserve will not be adjusting interest rates. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)Samuel Corum via Getty ImagesBut while the jury appears to be out among market participants when it comes to the timing of the next rate hike, many agree that the first step toward tightening by the Federal Reserve will likely occur in their crisis-era asset purchase program. Fed Chair Powell said that the central bank would be looking for \"substantial further progress\" — and specifically \"actual progress\" in the data and not \"forecast progress\" — toward the Fed's employment and inflation goals before considering tapering.Still, with the latest batch of March economic data exceeding estimates, the Fed may soon begin offering up firmer guidance around its plan for tapering the $120 billion per-month asset purchase program, which was first put into place at the start of the pandemic last year.\"Financial conditions should remain quite accommodative for a while, and in our view risks an overshoot,\" Rich Rieder, BlackRock chief investment officer, said in a note. \"We think that the Fed should be able to taper asset purchases sooner than many expect and perhaps by the end of the year, or early next year, which suggests to us that communicating its plan could come as early as the June meeting.\"While the forthcoming meeting minutes will not take into account FOMC members' appraisal of the latest batch of economic data, it will offer market participants a sense of whether some members were inclined to look past the first signs of a faster-than-expected economic recovery in dictating the direction of monetary policy.That said, Fed Chair Powell's public remarks this coming Thursday will offer a more timely view of the central bank's policy thinking. Powell will be speaking at an International Monetary Fund panel on the global economy Thursday afternoon.The discussion will come about a week after the Labor Department's March jobs report, which showed a much better than expected gain of 916,000 non-farm payrolls and a dip in the unemployment rate to 6.0%. Plus, last week's Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing purchasing managers' index unexpectedly jumped to a 37-year high, with some survey participants already citing a rise in commodity prices and a supply and demand mismatch that could exacerbate upward price pressures. Market participants will eye Powell's address to see whether or not these prints shift the needle in the Fed's monetary policy projections.\"We expect that as the data come in, the volatility in Fed views will become more pronounced over coming months,\" RBC Capital Markets economists wrote in a note last week.Economic calendarMonday: Markit U.S. Services PMI, March Final (60.2 expected, 60.0 in prior print); Markit U.S. Composite PMI, March Final (59.1 in prior print); ISM Services Index, March (58.7 expected, 55.3 in February); Factory Orders, February (-0.5% expected, 2.6% in January); Durable Goods Orders, February Final (-1.1% expected, -1.1% in prior print); Durable Goods Orders excluding transportation, February final (-0.9% expected, -0.9% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods orders excluding aircraft, February final (-0.8% in prior print); Non-defense capital goods shipments excluding aircraft, February final (-1.0% in prior print)Tuesday: JOLTS Job Openings, February (6.944 million expected, 6.917 million in prior print)Wednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 2 (-2.2% during prior week); Trade Balance, February (-$70.5 billion expected, -$68.2 billion in January); Consumer credit, February ($2.800 billion expected, -$1.315 billion in January) FOMC Meeting Minutes, March MeetingThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended April 3 (690,000 expected, 719,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended March 27 (3.794 million during prior week)Friday: Producer Price Index, month-over-month, March (0.5% expected, 0.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy, month-over-month, March (0.2% expected, 0.2% in February); Producer Price Index, year-over-year, March (3.8% expected, 2.5% in February); Producer Price Index excluding food and energy year-over-year, March (2.7% expected, 2.5% in February); Wholesale inventories, month-over-month, February final (0.5% expected, 0.5% in prior print)Earnings calendarMonday: N/ATuesday: N/AWednesday: N/AThursday: Constellation Brands (STZ) before market openFriday: N/A","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":614,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":342186146,"gmtCreate":1618190877785,"gmtModify":1704707265834,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/342186146","repostId":"2126037524","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":328,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376968434,"gmtCreate":1619080998728,"gmtModify":1704719336796,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376968434","repostId":"1183538956","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183538956","pubTimestamp":1619080634,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183538956?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 16:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183538956","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investm","content":"<p>Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as some claim.</p>\n<p>The argument is that Bitcoin mining could encourage investment in solar energy systems, enabling renewables to fulfill a higher percentage of demand from the energy grid at a constant cost of electricity,according to a post&nbsp;from ARK research director Brett Winton, who credited Yassine Elmandjra and Sam Korus as co-authors. With the largest cryptocurrency in the mix, energy providers could play the arbitrage between electricity prices and Bitcoin prices, as well as sell surplus solar -- and supply almost all grid power demands without lowering profitability, they said.</p>\n<p>“All else equal, with Bitcoin mining, we believe renewable energy should be able to provision a large percentage of any locality’s power economically,” the post said. “As a follow-on effect, cost declines associated with scaling renewables could accelerate, leaving them even more economically competitive at equilibrium.”</p>\n<blockquote>\n In a research collaboration with&nbsp;$SQ,@yassineARK,@wintonARK, and&nbsp;@skorusARKdebunk the myth that#Bitcoinmining is damaging the environment. Instead, as crypto mining, energy storage, and AI technologies converge, the adoption of renewable energy is likely to accelerate!\n</blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n — Cathie Wood&nbsp;April 22, 2021\n</blockquote>\n<p>Still, the assertions in the research run counter to much of what’s been suggested by others. Citigroup Inc. recently said Bitcoin’s power consumption has jumped&nbsp;66-fold&nbsp;since 2015, and BCA Research Inc. said environmental concerns were likely to erode the token’s value&nbsp;over time.</p>\n<p>ARK has invested actively in cryptocurrency-related stocks, the latest being&nbsp;via purchases&nbsp;of Coinbase Global Inc. shares after it listed on the Nasdaq. And Wood said in a panel discussion that Bitcoin’s market value could go&nbsp;much higher&nbsp;than $1 trillion, a milestone it reached just recently. Square Inc., which Wood cited in a Twitter post as collaborating on the research, has been buying Bitcoin and says crypto is a&nbsp;growing part of its business&nbsp;through the use of its Cash App for Bitcoin transactions.</p>\n<p>Critics “assert that the computation required to secure Bitcoin, even if necessary, is environmentally damaging and ruining the planet,” the ARK research said. “We believe that the opposite is true: a world with Bitcoin is a world that, at equilibrium, generates more electricity from renewable carbon-free sources.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood’s ARK Says Bitcoin Mining Is Good for the Planet\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-22 16:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust","SQ":"Block","ARKF":"ARK Fintech Innovation ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-22/cathie-wood-s-ark-says-bitcoin-mining-is-good-for-the-planet?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183538956","content_text":"Bitcoin mining is often decried as a highly energy-intensive activity. But Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management LLC has done some new research that maintains it isn’t as environmentally damaging as some claim.\nThe argument is that Bitcoin mining could encourage investment in solar energy systems, enabling renewables to fulfill a higher percentage of demand from the energy grid at a constant cost of electricity,according to a post from ARK research director Brett Winton, who credited Yassine Elmandjra and Sam Korus as co-authors. With the largest cryptocurrency in the mix, energy providers could play the arbitrage between electricity prices and Bitcoin prices, as well as sell surplus solar -- and supply almost all grid power demands without lowering profitability, they said.\n“All else equal, with Bitcoin mining, we believe renewable energy should be able to provision a large percentage of any locality’s power economically,” the post said. “As a follow-on effect, cost declines associated with scaling renewables could accelerate, leaving them even more economically competitive at equilibrium.”\n\n In a research collaboration with $SQ,@yassineARK,@wintonARK, and @skorusARKdebunk the myth that#Bitcoinmining is damaging the environment. Instead, as crypto mining, energy storage, and AI technologies converge, the adoption of renewable energy is likely to accelerate!\n\n\n — Cathie Wood April 22, 2021\n\nStill, the assertions in the research run counter to much of what’s been suggested by others. Citigroup Inc. recently said Bitcoin’s power consumption has jumped 66-fold since 2015, and BCA Research Inc. said environmental concerns were likely to erode the token’s value over time.\nARK has invested actively in cryptocurrency-related stocks, the latest being via purchases of Coinbase Global Inc. shares after it listed on the Nasdaq. And Wood said in a panel discussion that Bitcoin’s market value could go much higher than $1 trillion, a milestone it reached just recently. Square Inc., which Wood cited in a Twitter post as collaborating on the research, has been buying Bitcoin and says crypto is a growing part of its business through the use of its Cash App for Bitcoin transactions.\nCritics “assert that the computation required to secure Bitcoin, even if necessary, is environmentally damaging and ruining the planet,” the ARK research said. “We believe that the opposite is true: a world with Bitcoin is a world that, at equilibrium, generates more electricity from renewable carbon-free sources.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":272,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349207089,"gmtCreate":1617612764841,"gmtModify":1704700821479,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349207089","repostId":"1186754751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186754751","pubTimestamp":1617611806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186754751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186754751","media":"Barrons","summary":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every sto","content":"<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.</p><p>While the majority of S&amp;P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.</p><p>Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.</p><p>Among the nearly 100 S&amp;P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.</p><p>To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,<i>Barron’s</i>took those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.</p><p>Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.</p><p><b>Left Behind</b></p><p>These fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/354b69e346e0d3878e95ee2a83301ccf\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"781\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Chip maker&nbsp;Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but&nbsp;still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could&nbsp;benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.</p><p>Vertex Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;(VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;wrote in March that&nbsp;Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment&nbsp;and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CHTR":"特许通讯","ARTX":"阿罗特克","LDOS":"Leidos Holdings Inc","ALXN":"亚力兄制药","GPN":"环汇有限公司","DVA":"达维塔保健","QCOM":"高通","DPZ":"达美乐比萨"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186754751","content_text":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.Among the nearly 100 S&P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,Barron’stook those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.Left BehindThese fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.Chip maker Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,Barron’s wrote in March that Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":509,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":102604648,"gmtCreate":1620202428884,"gmtModify":1704340122892,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102604648","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":439,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349299110,"gmtCreate":1617613029630,"gmtModify":1704700824891,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349299110","repostId":"1138932914","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138932914","pubTimestamp":1617607569,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138932914?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 15:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138932914","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The App","content":"<p>Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant.</p>\n<p>As the first quarter of 2021 reaches the end, Amazon investors lick their wounds. Shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant had a rough three-month period of performance, ending the quarter down 5% year-to-date while the S&amp;P 500 marched higher.</p>\n<p>Although the Apple Maven is mostly concerned with the Cupertino company and its investors, today we turn the focus of attention to the third most valuable company in the US: Amazon.</p>\n<p><b>Not a great start to 2021</b></p>\n<p>In the past decade, on average, Amazon stock produced a bit over 6% of returns in the first quarter – which is comparable to its peer Apple’s track record. By comparison, therefore, AMZN’s performance has been quite disappointing so far this year.</p>\n<p>On the risk side, Amazon shares faced volatility of 27% in annualized terms, a number that was very much in line with the ten-year average. The maximum drawdown in the quarter was 13%, and it happened over a one-month period between early February and early March.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b65c423dbcee83a3ffa17dcf97221393\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"288\"><span>Figure 1: Average Monthly Return, Seasonality AMZN Stock since 2011</span></p>\n<p>Compared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.</p>\n<p>Compared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.</p>\n<p><b>Ebbs and flows</b></p>\n<p>Driving Amazon stock up and down since the start of the year were a few macro-level and company-specific factors. Below are Amazon’s best and worst days of performance that help to explain the stock’s journey through this challenging first quarter.</p>\n<p>Going up:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Amazon’s best days in the quarter happened late in January through the first of February,right around the company’s earnings day. January 20 topped the charts, with gains of 4.6%. It is hard to put a finger on what exactly caused Amazon and virtually all its direct peers to skyrocket ahead of Big Tech earnings week, other than enthusiasm for the upcoming results.</li>\n <li>The eve of Amazon’s earnings day, February 1, was the stock’s second best in the first quarter. A couple of Wall Street pre-earnings reports had come out, and most sounded bullish. Early February, however, also marked the peak for Amazon stock in 2021, and shares have been down 10% ever since.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Going down:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>The worst trading session for Amazon happened on March 18, when the stock lost 3.4%. The culprit seems to have been&nbsp;yet another leg higher in yields, supported by expectations for higher inflation and the reopening of the US economy. Other Big Tech stocks also took a hit that same day.</li>\n <li>The correction in Amazon stock from the early February peak picked up speed in late February and early March. During these couple of weeks, Amazon experienced four days of losses beyond 2%. To blame are likely the relentless rise in interest rates and some profit taking from a successful Big Tech earnings season.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Stock: A Bumpy Road In The First Quarter\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 15:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/amazon-stock-a-bumpy-road-in-the-first-quarter","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138932914","content_text":"Dragged by profit taking and rising yields, Amazon stock had a dismal first quarter of 2021. The Apple Maven reviews the key drivers of underperformance in the shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant.\nAs the first quarter of 2021 reaches the end, Amazon investors lick their wounds. Shares of the e-commerce and cloud giant had a rough three-month period of performance, ending the quarter down 5% year-to-date while the S&P 500 marched higher.\nAlthough the Apple Maven is mostly concerned with the Cupertino company and its investors, today we turn the focus of attention to the third most valuable company in the US: Amazon.\nNot a great start to 2021\nIn the past decade, on average, Amazon stock produced a bit over 6% of returns in the first quarter – which is comparable to its peer Apple’s track record. By comparison, therefore, AMZN’s performance has been quite disappointing so far this year.\nOn the risk side, Amazon shares faced volatility of 27% in annualized terms, a number that was very much in line with the ten-year average. The maximum drawdown in the quarter was 13%, and it happened over a one-month period between early February and early March.\nFigure 1: Average Monthly Return, Seasonality AMZN Stock since 2011\nCompared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.\nCompared to the broad market, Amazon stock trailed by just about 10 percentage points. Against the more relevant Nasdaq index, the underperformance was a bit less noticeable: 7 percentage points. Amazon failed to top the returns of any of its key peer and benchmarks, from the tech and consumer discretionary sectors to the FAAMG group of Big Tech stocks.\nEbbs and flows\nDriving Amazon stock up and down since the start of the year were a few macro-level and company-specific factors. Below are Amazon’s best and worst days of performance that help to explain the stock’s journey through this challenging first quarter.\nGoing up:\n\nAmazon’s best days in the quarter happened late in January through the first of February,right around the company’s earnings day. January 20 topped the charts, with gains of 4.6%. It is hard to put a finger on what exactly caused Amazon and virtually all its direct peers to skyrocket ahead of Big Tech earnings week, other than enthusiasm for the upcoming results.\nThe eve of Amazon’s earnings day, February 1, was the stock’s second best in the first quarter. A couple of Wall Street pre-earnings reports had come out, and most sounded bullish. Early February, however, also marked the peak for Amazon stock in 2021, and shares have been down 10% ever since.\n\nGoing down:\n\nThe worst trading session for Amazon happened on March 18, when the stock lost 3.4%. The culprit seems to have been yet another leg higher in yields, supported by expectations for higher inflation and the reopening of the US economy. Other Big Tech stocks also took a hit that same day.\nThe correction in Amazon stock from the early February peak picked up speed in late February and early March. During these couple of weeks, Amazon experienced four days of losses beyond 2%. To blame are likely the relentless rise in interest rates and some profit taking from a successful Big Tech earnings season.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":349202744,"gmtCreate":1617612602788,"gmtModify":1704700818561,"author":{"id":"3580396500800332","authorId":"3580396500800332","name":"jt1994","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/256e9b9c026559d0a27973154fbb345d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3580396500800332","idStr":"3580396500800332"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349202744","repostId":"1186754751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186754751","pubTimestamp":1617611806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186754751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-05 16:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186754751","media":"Barrons","summary":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every sto","content":"<p>The S&amp;P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.</p><p>While the majority of S&amp;P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.</p><p>Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.</p><p>Among the nearly 100 S&amp;P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.</p><p>To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,<i>Barron’s</i>took those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.</p><p>Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.</p><p><b>Left Behind</b></p><p>These fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/354b69e346e0d3878e95ee2a83301ccf\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"781\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Chip maker&nbsp;Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but&nbsp;still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could&nbsp;benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.</p><p>Vertex Pharmaceuticals&nbsp;(VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;wrote in March that&nbsp;Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment&nbsp;and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 Beaten-Down Stocks That Look Promising\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-05 16:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CHTR":"特许通讯","ARTX":"阿罗特克","LDOS":"Leidos Holdings Inc","ALXN":"亚力兄制药","GPN":"环汇有限公司","DVA":"达维塔保健","QCOM":"高通","DPZ":"达美乐比萨"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/9-beaten-down-stocks-that-look-promising-51617404656?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186754751","content_text":"The S&P 500 closed at a record on Thursday, soaring above 4000 for the first time. But not every stock has shared in those gains so far this year.While the majority of S&P 500 stocks are positive for the year, about one in five have declined in the first quarter of 2021. Some are down for fundamental reasons, while others seem to be suffering from the market’s momentum shift from growth stocks to cyclical and value names.Once the headwind wanes, however, names that have been left behind are likely to catch up as their earnings estimates remain strong. In some cases, analysts have adjusted their expectations higher this year. That presents a good opportunity to snap up shares of fundamentally solid companies at discount prices.Among the nearly 100 S&P 500 companies whose shares are in negative territory year to date, about half are expected to post 2021 earnings per share that are at least 20% higher than fiscal 2019 earnings. Among those, about 30 are expected to see that strength sustain into 2022, meaning their 2022 earnings are expected to grow at least another 10% from 2021 levels.To find stocks whose earnings potential may not be reflected in share prices,Barron’stook those 30 names and removed any stocks that traded at more than 30 times 2021 earnings estimates. That left us with nine names.Even better, analysts have raised their 2021 and 2022 earnings estimates for all of the stocks since the end of last year, meaning Wall Street is turning more bullish on them. These discounted names are mostly growth stocks across healthcare, tech, telecommunication, and consumer sectors.Left BehindThese fundamentally solid stocks are in negative territory for 2021 but look well-positioned to catch up.Chip maker Qualcomm(ticker: QCOM), for example, has seen its stock tumble nearly 10% year to date. Investors appear unimpressed by the company’s first-quarter revenue, which was 62% higher than a year ago but still missed analysts’ expectations. In the longer term, the company–known for chips that power smartphone processors–could benefit from the world’s transition to 5G networksand the Biden administration’s proposed infrastructure spending.Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VTRX) shares are another example where a recent pullback due to negative events may have gone too far. In mid-October, the biotech company canceled the development of a once-promising drug after trial results disappointed. Its stock has plunged 23% since and is down 10% year to date. Despite the flop of that one drug,Barron’s wrote in March that Vertex remains a powerhouse in cystic fibrosis treatment and is developing a promising pipeline beyond that.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}