+Follow
Mcdully
No personal profile
2
Follow
0
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
Mcdully
11-11 15:00
Share your opinion about this news…
Looking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3582682676764622","uuid":"3582682676764622","gmtCreate":1619590242739,"gmtModify":1619590242739,"name":"Mcdully","pinyin":"mcdully","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":2,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-4","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Tiger Star","description":"Join the tiger community for 2000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.10.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":628152587834032,"gmtCreate":1794380411422,"gmtModify":1794382479359,"author":{"id":"3582682676764622","authorId":"3582682676764622","name":"Mcdully","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582682676764622","authorIdStr":"3582682676764622"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/628152587834032","repostId":"2682344095","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2682344095","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1794378600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2682344095?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-11-11 14:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Looking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2682344095","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Don’t read too much into the SOX’s recent wild swings, as they are technically meaningless until the chip-sector tracker reaches these ‘lines in the sand’.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The zone in question for the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SOX\">PHLX Semiconductor Index</a> is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.</p><p>The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.</p><p>But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.</p><p>The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ebd354f0c37f060d7ce558c689ea8ed3\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"435\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Some people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>’s stock following its latest selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d4a1209c5d0362ce457c275ae95e52c\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"436\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p>Keep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Looking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLooking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-11-11 14:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The zone in question for the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SOX\">PHLX Semiconductor Index</a> is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.</p><p>The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.</p><p>But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.</p><p>The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ebd354f0c37f060d7ce558c689ea8ed3\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"435\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Some people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>’s stock following its latest selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d4a1209c5d0362ce457c275ae95e52c\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"436\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p>Keep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNPE":"Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF","SKUU":"2倍做多海力士ETF-GraniteShares","MU":"美光科技","FDTX":"Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF","AMDC":"Corgi AMD 2x Daily ETF","3NVD.UK":"LS 3X NVIDIA","NULC":"Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF","TYLG":"GLOBAL X INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COVERED CALL & GROWTH ETF","AMDD":"1倍做空AMD ETF-Direxion","INT":"2倍做多INTC ETF-Corgi","TTEQ":"T. Rowe Price Technology ETF","AMDG":"2倍做多AMD ETF- Leverage Shares","SNVD.UK":"LS -1X NVIDIA","AMDL":"2倍做多AMD ETF-GraniteShares","NVD2.UK":"2X NVIDIA ETP","VT":"世界全股市ETF-Vanguard","NVD3.UK":"LS 3X NVIDIA","NVDS.UK":"LS -1X NVIDIA","ROM":"ProShares Ultra Technology","ANV":"GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF","INTW":"2倍做多INTC ETF-GraniteShares","MUZ":"2倍做空MU ETF-Defiance","AMDW":"Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF","MUYY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOSTMU ETF","LFGY":"YieldMax Crypto Industry and Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF","TTXU":"Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF","AMDY":"AMD期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","IETC":"iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF","MUU":"2倍做多MU ETF-Direxion","EFIV":"SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF","GAMR":"Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF","THMR":"THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF","INYY":"YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF","TRFK":"PACER DATA AND DIGITAL REVOLUTION ETF","USXF":"iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF","CNEQ":"Alger Concentrated Equity ETF","AMD":"美国超微公司","AGOX":"Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF","TEK":"iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF","NVD":"2倍做空NVDA ETF-GraniteShares","SOX":"费城半导体指数","NVDB":"ProShares Ultra NVDA ETF","SOXL":"三倍做多半导体ETF-Direxion Daily","ILDR":"First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF","NVDD":"1倍做空NVDA ETF-Direxion","HYNX":"2倍做多海力士ETF-T-REX","WISE":"THEMES GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ETF","NVDG":"2倍做多NVDA ETF- Leverage Shares","NVDL":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-GraniteShares","SOXS":"三倍做空半导体ETF-Direxion Daily","NVDQ":"2倍做空NVDA ETF-T-Rex","NVDS":"1.5倍做空NVDA ETF-Tradr","NVDO":"2倍上限加速NVDA ETF-Leverage Shares","NVDU":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-Direxion","NVDW":"NVDA周配息ETF-Roundhill","LINT":"Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF","NVDX":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-T-Rex","NVDY":"NVDA期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","NVDA":"英伟达","AMUU":"2倍做多AMD ETF-Direxion","MIC":"2倍做多MU ETF-Corgi","SHOC":"Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF","NVII":"Rex NVDA Growth & Income ETF","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF","SK":"2倍做多海力士ETF-Corgi","AMYY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF","MULL":"2倍做多MU ETF-GraniteShares","SKDD":"2倍做空海力士ETF-GraniteShares","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","SKHA":"Tradr 2X Long SK hynix Daily ETF","IXN":"iShares Trust S&P Global Informa","MUG":"Leverage Shares 2X Long MU Daily ETF","SKHL":"Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF","SKHN":"Tradr 2X Short SK hynix Daily ETF","MUD":"1倍做空MU ETF-Direxion","SKHQ":"2x Short SK Hynix Daily ETF","INTC":"英特尔","VGT":"信息技术ETF-Vanguard","SKHU":"2倍做多海力士-ProShares","METV":"Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF","DIPS":"做空NVDA期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","DAMD":"2倍做空AMD ETF-Defiance","SKHX":"2倍做多海力士ETF-Leverage Shares","SKHY":"SK海力士","SKHZ":"1倍做空海力士ETF-Leverage Shares","07709":"南方东英SK海力士每日杠杆最多 (2x) 产品","AIFD":"TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF","CHPX":"Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF","ABFL":"ABACUS FCF LEADERS ETF"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2682344095","content_text":"A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.The zone in question for the PHLX Semiconductor Index is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.Photo: FactSet, MarketWatchSome people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of Nvidia’s stock following its latest selloff.The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.Photo: FactSet, MarketWatchKeep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SNPE":0.6,"NVDQ":0.6,"NVDO":0.6,"ANV":0.6,"NVD":0.6,"NVDA":2.1,"EFIV":0.6,"IETC":0.6,"MUZ":0.6,"SNVD.UK":0.6,"INTW":0.6,"NVDS":0.6,"AMD":2,"AGOX":0.6,"NVDB":0.6,"SHOC":0.6,"NVDG":0.6,"LINT":0.6,"AMDL":0.6,"ARTY":0.6,"ILDR":0.6,"NVDL":0.6,"NVDD":0.6,"NVDX":0.6,"TRFK":0.6,"NVD3.UK":0.6,"HYNX":0.6,"SOXS":2,"MUD":0.6,"NVDS.UK":0.6,"MUG":0.6,"SKHL":0.6,"ABFL":0.6,"NULC":0.6,"DIPS":0.6,"AIFD":0.6,"NVDU":0.6,"USXF":0.6,"SOX":2,"DAMD":0.6,"AMUU":0.6,"MU":2,"SK":0.6,"TTXU":0.6,"METV":0.6,"INT":0.6,"MULL":0.6,"NVD2.UK":0.6,"3NVD.UK":0.6,"INTC":2,"CNEQ":0.6,"AMYY":0.6,"MUU":0.6,"VT":0.6,"SKDD":0.6,"MIC":0.6,"SKHY":2,"FDTX":0.6,"AMDY":0.6,"CHAT":0.6,"NVII":0.6,"SOXL":2,"SKHQ":0.6,"THMR":0.6,"TTEQ":0.6,"SKHZ":0.6,"MUYY":0.6,"TYLG":0.6,"WISE":0.6,"ROM":0.6,"07709":0.6,"CHPX":0.6,"SKHU":0.6,"SKHN":0.6,"AMDD":0.6,"NVDY":0.6,"TEK":0.6,"INYY":0.6,"AMDC":0.6,"SKUU":0.6,"AMDW":0.6,"AMDG":0.6,"VGT":0.6,"GAMR":0.6,"LFGY":0.6,"SKHA":0.6,"SKHX":0.6,"IXN":0.6,"NVDW":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":628152587834032,"gmtCreate":1794380411422,"gmtModify":1794382479359,"author":{"id":"3582682676764622","authorId":"3582682676764622","name":"Mcdully","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582682676764622","idStr":"3582682676764622"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/628152587834032","repostId":"2682344095","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2682344095","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1794378600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2682344095?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-11-11 14:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Looking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2682344095","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Don’t read too much into the SOX’s recent wild swings, as they are technically meaningless until the chip-sector tracker reaches these ‘lines in the sand’.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The zone in question for the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SOX\">PHLX Semiconductor Index</a> is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.</p><p>The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.</p><p>But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.</p><p>The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ebd354f0c37f060d7ce558c689ea8ed3\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"435\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Some people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>’s stock following its latest selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d4a1209c5d0362ce457c275ae95e52c\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"436\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p>Keep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Looking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLooking to Buy the Dip in Chip Stocks? Here’s How to Avoid Buying Too Soon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-11-11 14:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The zone in question for the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SOX\">PHLX Semiconductor Index</a> is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.</p><p>The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.</p><p>But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.</p><p>The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ebd354f0c37f060d7ce558c689ea8ed3\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"435\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Some people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>’s stock following its latest selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d4a1209c5d0362ce457c275ae95e52c\" alt=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" title=\"Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"436\"/><span>Photo: FactSet, MarketWatch</span></p><p>Keep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNPE":"Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF","SKUU":"2倍做多海力士ETF-GraniteShares","MU":"美光科技","FDTX":"Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF","AMDC":"Corgi AMD 2x Daily ETF","3NVD.UK":"LS 3X NVIDIA","NULC":"Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF","TYLG":"GLOBAL X INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COVERED CALL & GROWTH ETF","AMDD":"1倍做空AMD ETF-Direxion","INT":"2倍做多INTC ETF-Corgi","TTEQ":"T. Rowe Price Technology ETF","AMDG":"2倍做多AMD ETF- Leverage Shares","SNVD.UK":"LS -1X NVIDIA","AMDL":"2倍做多AMD ETF-GraniteShares","NVD2.UK":"2X NVIDIA ETP","VT":"世界全股市ETF-Vanguard","NVD3.UK":"LS 3X NVIDIA","NVDS.UK":"LS -1X NVIDIA","ROM":"ProShares Ultra Technology","ANV":"GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF","INTW":"2倍做多INTC ETF-GraniteShares","MUZ":"2倍做空MU ETF-Defiance","AMDW":"Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF","MUYY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOSTMU ETF","LFGY":"YieldMax Crypto Industry and Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF","TTXU":"Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF","AMDY":"AMD期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","IETC":"iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF","MUU":"2倍做多MU ETF-Direxion","EFIV":"SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF","GAMR":"Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF","THMR":"THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF","INYY":"YieldMax INTC Option Income Strategy ETF","TRFK":"PACER DATA AND DIGITAL REVOLUTION ETF","USXF":"iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF","CNEQ":"Alger Concentrated Equity ETF","AMD":"美国超微公司","AGOX":"Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF","TEK":"iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF","NVD":"2倍做空NVDA ETF-GraniteShares","SOX":"费城半导体指数","NVDB":"ProShares Ultra NVDA ETF","SOXL":"三倍做多半导体ETF-Direxion Daily","ILDR":"First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF","NVDD":"1倍做空NVDA ETF-Direxion","HYNX":"2倍做多海力士ETF-T-REX","WISE":"THEMES GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ETF","NVDG":"2倍做多NVDA ETF- Leverage Shares","NVDL":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-GraniteShares","SOXS":"三倍做空半导体ETF-Direxion Daily","NVDQ":"2倍做空NVDA ETF-T-Rex","NVDS":"1.5倍做空NVDA ETF-Tradr","NVDO":"2倍上限加速NVDA ETF-Leverage Shares","NVDU":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-Direxion","NVDW":"NVDA周配息ETF-Roundhill","LINT":"Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF","NVDX":"2倍做多NVDA ETF-T-Rex","NVDY":"NVDA期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","NVDA":"英伟达","AMUU":"2倍做多AMD ETF-Direxion","MIC":"2倍做多MU ETF-Corgi","SHOC":"Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF","NVII":"Rex NVDA Growth & Income ETF","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF","SK":"2倍做多海力士ETF-Corgi","AMYY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF","MULL":"2倍做多MU ETF-GraniteShares","SKDD":"2倍做空海力士ETF-GraniteShares","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","SKHA":"Tradr 2X Long SK hynix Daily ETF","IXN":"iShares Trust S&P Global Informa","MUG":"Leverage Shares 2X Long MU Daily ETF","SKHL":"Direxion Daily SK Hynix Bull 2X ETF","SKHN":"Tradr 2X Short SK hynix Daily ETF","MUD":"1倍做空MU ETF-Direxion","SKHQ":"2x Short SK Hynix Daily ETF","INTC":"英特尔","VGT":"信息技术ETF-Vanguard","SKHU":"2倍做多海力士-ProShares","METV":"Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF","DIPS":"做空NVDA期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","DAMD":"2倍做空AMD ETF-Defiance","SKHX":"2倍做多海力士ETF-Leverage Shares","SKHY":"SK海力士","SKHZ":"1倍做空海力士ETF-Leverage Shares","07709":"南方东英SK海力士每日杠杆最多 (2x) 产品","AIFD":"TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF","CHPX":"Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF","ABFL":"ABACUS FCF LEADERS ETF"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2682344095","content_text":"A key chip-sector tracker has entered a neutral zone — and until it breaks out, investors should view any of its moves, even violent ones, as just noise.The zone in question for the PHLX Semiconductor Index is bookended by two important battlegrounds: one covering a six-month era of strength that ended in October, and the other marking a two-month period that ended in early April in which sellers had control.The SOX index tumbled 12.2% in one day last week, then soared 11.3% over the next two days. On Tuesday, it whipsawed between a gain of as much 1.6% and a loss of 2.6%, before closing down 0.4% at 9,998.33.But all of that volatility did nothing to change the outlook on the charts. Basically, unless the SOX reaches the extremes of the neutral zone, investors would be better off just sitting on their hands — or risk getting duped into buying near the high, or suckered into selling near the low.The likely high would be the area between about 10,500 and 11,000, which marks the bottom of what BTIG technical analyst Jonathan Krinsky called “six months of overhead supply.” Any purchases made during that time “are now firmly underwater,” he said, which makes the area “unlikely to be overcome anytime soon.”And the potential bottom would be around 8,000 to 8,500, which was the top of the resistance zone that ended with the breakout rally in early April.The rally the took the SOX from the breakout to the “overhead supply” zone was rapid enough to see relatively low levels of activity — at least not enough to leave a lasting memory. And that’s likely the reason for all the volatility in the neutral zone.Photo: FactSet, MarketWatchSome people scoff at trading strategies derived from numbers on a chart, but charts are just visual representations of market activity. It’s not so much technical, but rather analysis of investor behavior at certain levels. Craig Johnson, chief market technician at Piper Sandler, said it’s about fear and greed, because there’s real money involved in those numbers.“They are mental lines in the sand, where people have made actual gains and losses,” Johnson said in phone interview with MarketWatch. “That’s why they matter.”The reason an area which was once strong resistance morphs into support when revisited, and why prior support becomes resistance, is because people who are losing money after selling and buying at those respective levels are more likely to do the opposite if given the chance. In turn, those who made money buying and selling at the same respective levels would likely try it again.One can apply this type of behavioral analysis to a chart of Nvidia’s stock following its latest selloff.The summer pullback in the stock had stopped at the top of the spring trading range. After that support broke in the past week, the next so-called line in the sand is marked by lows seen in September 2025 and March 2026. But the next potential key support zone would be $142 to $152, which was the top of the July 2024 to June 2025 congestion area.Photo: FactSet, MarketWatchKeep in mind the upper resistance zone and lower support zone aren’t necessarily meant to mark a long-term top or bottom, but they could provide what people on Wall Street refer to as “tradable” tops and bottoms. That means they are temporary, or that they lead to moves that are big enough to make it worthwhile for traders to risk selling or buying.Rather than pick an exact point in the upper and lower zones to sell or buy, many on Wall Street prefer to “leg into a position,” which is the strategy of entering a position in small pieces at a time, at different prices, rather than placing one big sell or buy order at a specific price.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SNPE":0.6,"NVDQ":0.6,"NVDO":0.6,"ANV":0.6,"NVD":0.6,"NVDA":2.1,"EFIV":0.6,"IETC":0.6,"MUZ":0.6,"SNVD.UK":0.6,"INTW":0.6,"NVDS":0.6,"AMD":2,"AGOX":0.6,"NVDB":0.6,"SHOC":0.6,"NVDG":0.6,"LINT":0.6,"AMDL":0.6,"ARTY":0.6,"ILDR":0.6,"NVDL":0.6,"NVDD":0.6,"NVDX":0.6,"TRFK":0.6,"NVD3.UK":0.6,"HYNX":0.6,"SOXS":2,"MUD":0.6,"NVDS.UK":0.6,"MUG":0.6,"SKHL":0.6,"ABFL":0.6,"NULC":0.6,"DIPS":0.6,"AIFD":0.6,"NVDU":0.6,"USXF":0.6,"SOX":2,"DAMD":0.6,"AMUU":0.6,"MU":2,"SK":0.6,"TTXU":0.6,"METV":0.6,"INT":0.6,"MULL":0.6,"NVD2.UK":0.6,"3NVD.UK":0.6,"INTC":2,"CNEQ":0.6,"AMYY":0.6,"MUU":0.6,"VT":0.6,"SKDD":0.6,"MIC":0.6,"SKHY":2,"FDTX":0.6,"AMDY":0.6,"CHAT":0.6,"NVII":0.6,"SOXL":2,"SKHQ":0.6,"THMR":0.6,"TTEQ":0.6,"SKHZ":0.6,"MUYY":0.6,"TYLG":0.6,"WISE":0.6,"ROM":0.6,"07709":0.6,"CHPX":0.6,"SKHU":0.6,"SKHN":0.6,"AMDD":0.6,"NVDY":0.6,"TEK":0.6,"INYY":0.6,"AMDC":0.6,"SKUU":0.6,"AMDW":0.6,"AMDG":0.6,"VGT":0.6,"GAMR":0.6,"LFGY":0.6,"SKHA":0.6,"SKHX":0.6,"IXN":0.6,"NVDW":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}