GoodLuck0102 personal page - To The Moon

GoodLuck0102

GoodLuck0102

No personal profile

318Follow

7Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2024-11-19

$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$

2024-11-19

$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$

2021-08-04

good

Chinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings "lay guns"! Jump or get in?

2021-07-21

good

Value investment is not equal to low valuation investment, and the traditional cycle theory has failed

2021-09-02

?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-24

good

Apple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip

2021-07-19

good

[Movement] Recovering today's lost ground, Wei Xiaoli stopped falling and rebounded

2021-08-04

good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-17

?

Apple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing

2021-08-16

?

Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3585964302651088","uuid":"3585964302651088","gmtCreate":1622870278133,"gmtModify":1626141371601,"name":"GoodLuck0102","pinyin":"goodluck0102","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":7,"headSize":318,"tweetSize":61,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.07.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.13","exceedPercentage":"60.99%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":1,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":372588534292776,"gmtCreate":1731973116942,"gmtModify":1731973120274,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e51ea8e0a54571a45bd94ce4ebc0a411","width":"1086","height":"1713"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372588534292776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2646,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372588093075608,"gmtCreate":1731973084105,"gmtModify":1731973087874,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/141f306354941e876f5b635b5b105d09","width":"1086","height":"1713"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372588093075608","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812302796,"gmtCreate":1630550346215,"gmtModify":1676530337684,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/812302796","repostId":"2164147758","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2164147758","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1630546619,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2164147758?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-02 09:36","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Major Apple Concessions! Allow some programs to bypass the App Store for payments","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2164147758","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"苹果将允许“阅读器”应用程序添加一个应用内链接，以便用户跳转到外部网站进行注册并支付费用，这一变化适用于杂志、报纸、书籍、音频、音乐和视频等应用程序，将于明年年初在全球范围内实施。","content":"<p>Just now,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>A major concession to allow some App users to bypass Apple's App Store and make payments on external websites means that many developers will no longer have to pay Apple up to 30 percent in App Store commissions.</p><p>On Thursday (September 2), Apple released a statement on its official website saying that the Apple App Store will be updated,<b>This update will allow developers of \"Reader\" apps to add an in-app link for users to jump to external websites to sign up for services and pay for them.</b></p><p>The announcement is part of a settlement agreement between Apple and the Japan Fair Trade Commission. Apple said the change will be implemented worldwide early next year.</p><p>In its statement, Apple said:</p><p>To ensure a secure and seamless user experience, App Store guidelines require developers to sell digital services and subscription services using Apple's in-app payment system. Since developers of reading apps do not offer in-app digital goods and services, Apple agreed to the JFTC to allow developers of those apps to share a link jump to their website to help users set up and manage their own accounts. The change applies to apps such as magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, and video, according to Apple's definition of a \"reader\" app.</p><p>Apple has always charged developers a commission of up to 30% on each transaction, and forced the use of an internal payment system to collect a portion of the transaction fee.<b>Globally, Apple's total revenue last fiscal year was $274.5 billion, including $53.8 billion in revenue from its services business, which includes the app store.</b></p><p><h2>The \"Apple Tax\" War</h2><b>In recent years, Apple's high commission has caused many controversies and been \"protested\" all over the world.</b></p><p>Epic Games, the developer of the once popular Fortnite game around the world, set up its own in-game payment system last year in an attempt to bypass Apple's payment platform, which fired the first shot of the \"Apple Tax\" war. Spotify, Tinder's parent Match Group and several others have all said in recent years that tech giants shouldn't have a monopoly on payment systems.</p><p>On Tuesday, South Korea's National Assembly passed a bill banning Apple from<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The operation of such App stores forces App developers to use their designated payment systems, and 180 of the lawmakers in attendance voted in favor of it (188 total).</p><p>The bill would make South Korea the first country to impose restrictions on Google and Apple's payment policies. The law also gives the Korean government the power to mediate disputes over payments, cancellations and refunds in the app marketplace. Companies that violate the rules could be fined up to 3% of their revenue in South Korea by the Communications Commission, South Korea's regulator.</p><p><b>In the face of increasing anti-trust regulatory pressure, Apple is also constantly making concessions.</b></p><p>Earlier this year, Apple officially launched the App Store program for small businesses and individual developers. Under the new plan, the App Store commission for developers with less than $1 million in annual revenue is reduced to 15% from the previous 30%.</p><p>On August 27, Apple announced on its official website that it will make several improvements to the App Store as part of a preliminary settlement agreement by U.S. developers against its class-action lawsuit. Improvements include that developers can introduce users to their purchase options outside of the App Store.</p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Major Apple Concessions! Allow some programs to bypass the App Store for payments</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMajor Apple Concessions! Allow some programs to bypass the App Store for payments\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-02 09:36</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Just now,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>A major concession to allow some App users to bypass Apple's App Store and make payments on external websites means that many developers will no longer have to pay Apple up to 30 percent in App Store commissions.</p><p>On Thursday (September 2), Apple released a statement on its official website saying that the Apple App Store will be updated,<b>This update will allow developers of \"Reader\" apps to add an in-app link for users to jump to external websites to sign up for services and pay for them.</b></p><p>The announcement is part of a settlement agreement between Apple and the Japan Fair Trade Commission. Apple said the change will be implemented worldwide early next year.</p><p>In its statement, Apple said:</p><p>To ensure a secure and seamless user experience, App Store guidelines require developers to sell digital services and subscription services using Apple's in-app payment system. Since developers of reading apps do not offer in-app digital goods and services, Apple agreed to the JFTC to allow developers of those apps to share a link jump to their website to help users set up and manage their own accounts. The change applies to apps such as magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, and video, according to Apple's definition of a \"reader\" app.</p><p>Apple has always charged developers a commission of up to 30% on each transaction, and forced the use of an internal payment system to collect a portion of the transaction fee.<b>Globally, Apple's total revenue last fiscal year was $274.5 billion, including $53.8 billion in revenue from its services business, which includes the app store.</b></p><p><h2>The \"Apple Tax\" War</h2><b>In recent years, Apple's high commission has caused many controversies and been \"protested\" all over the world.</b></p><p>Epic Games, the developer of the once popular Fortnite game around the world, set up its own in-game payment system last year in an attempt to bypass Apple's payment platform, which fired the first shot of the \"Apple Tax\" war. Spotify, Tinder's parent Match Group and several others have all said in recent years that tech giants shouldn't have a monopoly on payment systems.</p><p>On Tuesday, South Korea's National Assembly passed a bill banning Apple from<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The operation of such App stores forces App developers to use their designated payment systems, and 180 of the lawmakers in attendance voted in favor of it (188 total).</p><p>The bill would make South Korea the first country to impose restrictions on Google and Apple's payment policies. The law also gives the Korean government the power to mediate disputes over payments, cancellations and refunds in the app marketplace. Companies that violate the rules could be fined up to 3% of their revenue in South Korea by the Communications Commission, South Korea's regulator.</p><p><b>In the face of increasing anti-trust regulatory pressure, Apple is also constantly making concessions.</b></p><p>Earlier this year, Apple officially launched the App Store program for small businesses and individual developers. Under the new plan, the App Store commission for developers with less than $1 million in annual revenue is reduced to 15% from the previous 30%.</p><p>On August 27, Apple announced on its official website that it will make several improvements to the App Store as part of a preliminary settlement agreement by U.S. developers against its class-action lawsuit. Improvements include that developers can introduce users to their purchase options outside of the App Store.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3639472\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d2a986280a0d0ac6d75b62fd1fec8874","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3639472","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2164147758","content_text":"刚刚，苹果作出重大让步，允许部分应用程序用户绕过苹果应用商店（App Store），到外部网站进行支付，这意味着许多开发者将不再需要向苹果支付高达30%的应用商店佣金。\n周四（9月2日），苹果在其官方网站发布声明称，苹果应用商店将进行更新，这一更新将允许“阅读器”应用程序的开发者添加一个应用内链接，以便用户跳转到外部网站进行注册服务并支付费用。\n这一声明是苹果与日本公平贸易委员会(Japan Fair Trade Commission)达成和解协议的一部分。苹果表示，这一变化将于明年年初在全球范围内实施。\n苹果在声明中表示：\n\n 为了确保安全无缝的用户体验，App Store的指导方针要求开发者使用苹果的应用内支付系统销售数字服务和订阅服务。由于阅读应用的开发者不提供应用内的数字商品和服务，苹果同意JFTC允许这些应用的开发者分享一个链接跳转到他们的网站，以帮助用户设置和管理自己的账户。\n\n根据苹果对“阅读器”应用的定义，这一变化适用于杂志、报纸、书籍、音频、音乐和视频等应用程序。\n一直以来，苹果向开发者在每笔交易中收取高达30%佣金，并且强制使用内部支付系统，以收取一部分交易费。在全球范围内，苹果上一财年总营收为2745亿美元，其中包括应用商店在内的服务业务收入为538亿美元。\n“苹果税”大战\n近年来，苹果高昂抽佣引发众多争议，在全球范围内遭到“抗议”。\n一度风靡全球的《堡垒之夜》游戏的开发商Epic Games，去年建立了自己的游戏内的支付系统，试图绕过苹果支付平台，这打响了“苹果税”大战第一枪。Spotify、Tinder的母公司Match Group和其他几家公司近年来都表示，科技巨头不应该垄断支付系统。\n本周二，韩国国会通过了一项法案，禁止苹果与谷歌这类App商店的运营强制App开发者使用他们指定的支付系统，与会的立法者中有180人（共188人）投票赞成。\n该法案将使韩国成为第一个对谷歌和苹果的支付政策实施限制的国家。该法律还赋予韩国政府调解应用市场中有关支付、取消和退款纠纷的权力。违反规定的公司可能会被韩国监管机构通信委员会处以高达在韩国收入3%的罚款。\n面对日益增大的反垄断监管压力，苹果也在不断作出让步。\n今年初，苹果正式推出App Store小型企业和个体开发者计划。根据新计划，年营收少于100万美元的开发者App Store佣金从之前的30%降至15%。\n8月27日，苹果在其官方网站宣布，将对App Store进行多项改进，作为美国开发者对其集体诉讼初步和解协议的一部分。改进包括开发者可以向用户介绍他们在 App Store之外的购买选项。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834804939,"gmtCreate":1629786355821,"gmtModify":1676530130621,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/834804939","repostId":"2161709897","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2161709897","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629781974,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2161709897?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-24 13:12","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Apple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161709897","media":"轻舟","summary":"苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm，拥有银黑金配色。新款iPad mini将在苹果秋季发布会与网友见面，你期待吗？","content":"<p><html><body><div><div itemprop=\"articleBody\"><div><div><div></div></div></div><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>An aluminum model drawing of the iPad mini 6, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel, looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4, has been exposed.</p><p>It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, USB-C interface, size 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm, and has silver, black and gold color scheme.</p><p>The new iPad mini will meet netizens at Apple's autumn launch conference, are you looking forward to it?</p><p><div zpv-events-inview=\"article-cont-bottom-viewport\"></div><div><span itemprop=\"url\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"indexUrl\">news.zol.com.cn</span><span itemprop=\"isOriginal\">true</span><span itemprop=\"author\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000931\">Zhongguancun</a>Online</span><span itemprop=\"isBasedOnUrl\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"genre\">report</span><span itemprop=\"wordCount\">343</span><span itemprop=\"description\">The aluminum model drawing of Apple's iPad mini 6 has been exposed, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel that looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4. It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with an 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, and uses USB-C interface, with a size of...</span></div></div></div></body></html></p>","source":"zol_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">轻舟</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-24 13:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><body><div><div itemprop=\"articleBody\"><div><div><div></div></div></div><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>An aluminum model drawing of the iPad mini 6, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel, looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4, has been exposed.</p><p>It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, USB-C interface, size 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm, and has silver, black and gold color scheme.</p><p>The new iPad mini will meet netizens at Apple's autumn launch conference, are you looking forward to it?</p><p><div zpv-events-inview=\"article-cont-bottom-viewport\"></div><div><span itemprop=\"url\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"indexUrl\">news.zol.com.cn</span><span itemprop=\"isOriginal\">true</span><span itemprop=\"author\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000931\">Zhongguancun</a>Online</span><span itemprop=\"isBasedOnUrl\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"genre\">report</span><span itemprop=\"wordCount\">343</span><span itemprop=\"description\">The aluminum model drawing of Apple's iPad mini 6 has been exposed, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel that looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4. It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with an 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, and uses USB-C interface, with a size of...</span></div></div></div></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\">轻舟</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38b14d4c1528b585f44d427c7a09d860","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161709897","content_text":"苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm，拥有银黑金配色。新款iPad mini将在苹果秋季发布会与网友见面，你期待吗？\n\nhttps://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\nnews.zol.com.cn\ntrue\n中关村在线\nhttps://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\nreport\n343\n苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":1,"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2866,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839249417,"gmtCreate":1629163330139,"gmtModify":1676529949678,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/839249417","repostId":"2160275638","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2160275638","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629158400,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2160275638?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-17 08:00","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Apple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160275638","media":"界面新闻","summary":"虽然对亲自下场造车的态度扭扭捏捏，但苹果公司目前正在研发自动驾驶类相关技术早已不是秘密。日前，苹果公司又发布了一项新专利，这项专利称为“朋友钥匙共享”，它基本上描述了一种与他人共享苹果车的方法。数字钥匙的概念将使苹果公司能够提供这种“朋友钥匙共享”系统，正如该公司在专利中所描述的那样，它应该允许其他人在不披露任何机密信息和暴露关键数据的情况下驾驶你的汽车。","content":"<p><div>Although the attitude towards building a car in person is twisty, it is no secret that Apple is currently developing autonomous driving-related technologies. While the Cupertino-based tech giant hasn't said anything about it, the company's countless patents filed in the automotive space are certainly increasing the truth of the matter. A few days ago, Apple released a new patent called \"Friend Key Sharing,\" which basically describes a way to share an Apple car with others. It's easy to guess that the whole thing doesn't involve traditional physical car keys,...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">界面新闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-17 08:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Although the attitude towards building a car in person is twisty, it is no secret that Apple is currently developing autonomous driving-related technologies. While the Cupertino-based tech giant hasn't said anything about it, the company's countless patents filed in the automotive space are certainly increasing the truth of the matter. A few days ago, Apple released a new patent called \"Friend Key Sharing,\" which basically describes a way to share an Apple car with others. It's easy to guess that the whole thing doesn't involve traditional physical car keys,...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">界面新闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ddd65df9928c608cb63c03990d41f6c2","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2160275638","content_text":"虽然对亲自下场造车的态度扭扭捏捏，但苹果公司目前正在研发自动驾驶类相关技术早已不是秘密。虽然这家位于库比蒂诺的科技巨头没有说任何关于它的事情，但该公司在汽车领域申请的无数专利无疑是在不断增加这件事的真实性。日前，苹果公司又发布了一项新专利，这项专利称为“朋友钥匙共享（Friend Key Sharing）”，它基本上描述了一种与他人共享苹果车的方法。很容易猜到，整个事情并不涉及传统的实体汽车钥匙，因为在苹果的世界里，汽车钥匙已经是“昨天的事情”了。一部iPhone就是你所需要的全部硬件，而苹果汽车很有可能全面采用数字车钥匙，这个位于库比蒂诺的科技巨头已经在与宝马等合作伙伴推进这一概念。数字钥匙的概念将使苹果公司能够提供这种“朋友钥匙共享”系统，正如该公司在专利中所描述的那样，它应该允许其他人在不披露任何机密信息和暴露关键数据的情况下驾驶你的汽车。苹果公司描述道：“如果访问是由实物钥匙或钥匙扣控制的，业主必须将钥匙/钥匙扣实际交付给个人，然后必须在个人访问结束后实际取回钥匙/钥匙扣。”当然，鉴于该公司希望为其客户提供充分便利，苹果不会出现这种情况。“如果访问是由秘密数据控制的，所有者必须将秘密数据传达给个人。如果通信不安全，第三方可以观察到秘密数据。此外，在个人完成访问后，必须改变秘密数据”iPhone制造商进一步补充说。因此，使用密码并与他人分享也不是苹果的选择。相反，该公司发明了一个基于令牌的系统，由另一个设备提供动力，然后用安全的方法（iPhone上的App）与另一个人分享。这个令牌类似于一个一次性的访问代码，所以在他们使用汽车后，它会自动过期，不再提供对车辆的访问。当然，重要的是要记住整个事情目前仍是一项专利，但如果这种能力最终在苹果汽车2025年准备就绪时上线，也不要太惊讶。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3625,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830573574,"gmtCreate":1629085489198,"gmtModify":1676529924957,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/830573574","repostId":"2159246901","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2159246901","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629081660,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2159246901?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-16 10:41","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159246901","media":"虎嗅","summary":"海地地震已致1297人死亡：苹果CEO库克表态将捐款援助。8月14日20时29分，加勒比海北部岛国海地发生7.3级地震，震源深度10千米。当地官员确认，截止15日，此次地震已经造成1297人死亡，超5700人受伤。在最严重的三个地区，有13785间房屋受损，13694间房屋毁坏。对于此次灾难，苹果CEO库克出面表示对遇难者表示同情，将捐款以帮助社区救援和恢复工作。","content":"<p><html><body><article>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>CEO Cook stated that he would donate money to aid.</p><p>At 20: 29 on August 14th, a 7.3-magnitude earthquake occurred in Haiti, an island country in the northern Caribbean Sea, with a focal depth of 10 kilometers. Local officials confirmed that by the 15th, the earthquake had killed 1,297 people and injured more than 5,700. In the three worst areas, 13,785 homes were damaged and 13,694 destroyed.</p><p>For this disaster, Apple CEO Cook came forward to express sympathy for the victims and will donate money to help the community rescue and recovery efforts.</p><p></article></body></html></p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHaiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">虎嗅</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-16 10:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><body><article>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>CEO Cook stated that he would donate money to aid.</p><p>At 20: 29 on August 14th, a 7.3-magnitude earthquake occurred in Haiti, an island country in the northern Caribbean Sea, with a focal depth of 10 kilometers. Local officials confirmed that by the 15th, the earthquake had killed 1,297 people and injured more than 5,700. In the three worst areas, 13,785 homes were damaged and 13,694 destroyed.</p><p>For this disaster, Apple CEO Cook came forward to express sympathy for the victims and will donate money to help the community rescue and recovery efforts.</p><p></article></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210816104112788b63fe&s=b\">虎嗅</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28fdf96529f17262c1abf4a746dcc817","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210816104112788b63fe&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2159246901","content_text":"海地地震已致1297人死亡：苹果CEO库克表态将捐款援助。8月14日20时29分，加勒比海北部岛国海地发生7.3级地震，震源深度10千米。当地官员确认，截止15日，此次地震已经造成1297人死亡，超5700人受伤。在最严重的三个地区，有13785间房屋受损，13694间房屋毁坏。对于此次灾难，苹果CEO库克出面表示对遇难者表示同情，将捐款以帮助社区救援和恢复工作。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3657,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890485655,"gmtCreate":1628128527777,"gmtModify":1703501734120,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/890485655","repostId":"2157857964","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157857964","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628117704,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157857964?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 06:55","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Roku turns profit year-over-year in second quarter, shares fall nearly 9% after hours","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157857964","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"8月4日美股盘后，Roku公布2021年第二季度业绩。财报显示，Q2净营收6.45亿美元，同比增长81%，上年同期为3.56亿美元;净利润为7346.7万美元，上年同期净亏损为4314.8万美元。Roku预计第三季度净营收6.75亿美元至6.85亿美元，毛利润3.15亿美元至3.25亿美元，净利润为亏损300万美元至盈利700万美元，调整后的息税前利润为6000万美元至7000万美元。截至发稿，Roku盘后大跌8.64%，报384.02美元。","content":"<p>Roku after U.S. stocks on Wednesday, Aug. 4 EST<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ROKU\">$ (ROKU) $</a>Announced second quarter 2021 results. According to the financial report, Q2 net revenue was US$645 million, a year-on-year increase of 81%, compared with US$356 million in the same period of last year; Net income was $73.467 million, compared to a net loss of $43.148 million in the same period last year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62ad95db04d1933cf5d940a86acdd4f5\" tg-width=\"752\" tg-height=\"655\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Basic earnings per share of $0.55, compared with a loss of $0.35 in the same period last year; Diluted earnings per share were $0.52, compared to a loss of $0.35 in the prior-year quarter.</p><p>By business, the revenue of platform business was US$532 million, a year-on-year increase of 117%; Revenue from the player business was $113 million, up 1% year-on-year.</p><p>The number of active users was 55.1 million, a year-on-year increase of 28%; Streaming time was 17.4 billion hours, up 19% year-on-year; Average revenue per user (ARPU) was $36.46, up 46% year over year.</p><p>Roku expects third-quarter net revenue of $675 million to $685 million, gross income of $315 million to $325 million, net income of a loss of $3 million to a profit of $7 million, and adjusted EBIT of $60 million to $70 million.</p><p>As of press time, Roku plunged 8.41% after hours to $384.99.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dff1ce7723b1be1a8ebea486bf15c96\" tg-width=\"711\" tg-height=\"527\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Roku turns profit year-over-year in second quarter, shares fall nearly 9% after hours</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRoku turns profit year-over-year in second quarter, shares fall nearly 9% after hours\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-05 06:55</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Roku after U.S. stocks on Wednesday, Aug. 4 EST<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ROKU\">$ (ROKU) $</a>Announced second quarter 2021 results. According to the financial report, Q2 net revenue was US$645 million, a year-on-year increase of 81%, compared with US$356 million in the same period of last year; Net income was $73.467 million, compared to a net loss of $43.148 million in the same period last year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62ad95db04d1933cf5d940a86acdd4f5\" tg-width=\"752\" tg-height=\"655\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Basic earnings per share of $0.55, compared with a loss of $0.35 in the same period last year; Diluted earnings per share were $0.52, compared to a loss of $0.35 in the prior-year quarter.</p><p>By business, the revenue of platform business was US$532 million, a year-on-year increase of 117%; Revenue from the player business was $113 million, up 1% year-on-year.</p><p>The number of active users was 55.1 million, a year-on-year increase of 28%; Streaming time was 17.4 billion hours, up 19% year-on-year; Average revenue per user (ARPU) was $36.46, up 46% year over year.</p><p>Roku expects third-quarter net revenue of $675 million to $685 million, gross income of $315 million to $325 million, net income of a loss of $3 million to a profit of $7 million, and adjusted EBIT of $60 million to $70 million.</p><p>As of press time, Roku plunged 8.41% after hours to $384.99.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dff1ce7723b1be1a8ebea486bf15c96\" tg-width=\"711\" tg-height=\"527\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd680cd945fd32917c8ece66ec685e5f","relate_stocks":{"ROKU":"Roku Inc"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157857964","content_text":"美东时间8月4日周三美股盘后，Roku$(ROKU)$公布2021年第二季度业绩。财报显示，Q2净营收6.45亿美元，同比增长81%，上年同期为3.56亿美元;净利润为7346.7万美元，上年同期净亏损为4314.8万美元。基本每股收益0.55美元，上年同期为亏损0.35美元;摊薄后每股收益0.52美元，上年同期为亏损0.35美元。\n按业务划分，平台业务营收5.32亿美元，同比增长117%;播放器业务营收1.13亿美元，同比增长1%。\n活跃用户数为5510万，同比增长28%;流媒体播放时长为174亿小时，同比增长19%;每用户平均营收(ARPU)为36.46美元，同比增长46%。\nRoku预计第三季度净营收6.75亿美元至6.85亿美元，毛利润3.15亿美元至3.25亿美元，净利润为亏损300万美元至盈利700万美元，调整后的息税前利润为6000万美元至7000万美元。\n截至发稿，Roku盘后大跌8.41%，报384.99美元。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ROKU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3691,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807596099,"gmtCreate":1628042262411,"gmtModify":1703500109407,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807596099","repostId":"1163360313","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807593398,"gmtCreate":1628042117214,"gmtModify":1703500105679,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807593398","repostId":"1161395470","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161395470","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628041950,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161395470?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-04 09:52","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Chinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161395470","media":"中国证券报","summary":"8月3日，游戏股跳水给中概互联带来一记重拳。截至港股收盘，腾讯控股报446.00港元，跌6.11%；网易报145.90港元，跌7.77%；哔哩哔哩报646.5港元，跌3.44%。截至美股收盘，腾讯AD","content":"<p><div>On August 3rd, the diving of game stocks brought a heavy punch to China Internet. As of the close of Hong Kong stocks, Tencent Holdings reported HK$ 446.00, down 6.11%; Netease reported HK$ 145.90, down 7.77%; Bilibili reported HK$646.5, down 3.44%. As of the close of U.S. stocks, Tencent ADR fell 7.32%, Tencent Music fell 3.03%, Netease fell 11.41%, and Bilibili fell 7.06%. Zhang Kun, Xie Zhiyu and many other well-known fund managers have invested in this field, and a considerable number of funds have been affected. When Chinese stocks were impacted, a considerable number of investors took the opportunity...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"zgzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 09:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>On August 3rd, the diving of game stocks brought a heavy punch to China Internet. As of the close of Hong Kong stocks, Tencent Holdings reported HK$ 446.00, down 6.11%; Netease reported HK$ 145.90, down 7.77%; Bilibili reported HK$646.5, down 3.44%. As of the close of U.S. stocks, Tencent ADR fell 7.32%, Tencent Music fell 3.03%, Netease fell 11.41%, and Bilibili fell 7.06%. Zhang Kun, Xie Zhiyu and many other well-known fund managers have invested in this field, and a considerable number of funds have been affected. When Chinese stocks were impacted, a considerable number of investors took the opportunity...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">中国证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7eaa2c45cf70f617f2a492ecb0fcce5f","relate_stocks":{"00700":"腾讯控股","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR","TTTN":"老虎中美互联网巨头ETF","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161395470","content_text":"8月3日，游戏股跳水给中概互联带来一记重拳。截至港股收盘，腾讯控股报446.00港元，跌6.11%；网易报145.90港元，跌7.77%；哔哩哔哩报646.5港元，跌3.44%。截至美股收盘，腾讯ADR跌7.32%，腾讯音乐跌3.03%，网易跌11.41%，哔哩哔哩跌7.06%。\n张坤、谢治宇等多位知名基金经理投资了该领域，此外还有相当数量的基金被波及。\n中概股受冲击之际，却有相当数量的投资人趁机上车，积极布局。以中概互联网ETF为例，截至8月3日，该基金的规模已较今年1月底增加超100亿元。此外，也有不少投资者选择易方达中证海外中国互联网50ETF联接基金抄底，该基金二季度规模也大涨30亿元以上。\n相关基金“大地震”\n8月3日，持有游戏相关的中概股基金“大地震”。以腾讯控股为例，截至6月底，全市场76家基金公司旗下的506只基金重仓了腾讯控股，规模合计1.64万亿元。从持股数看，二季度末公募基金持有该股数高达1.98亿股，占腾讯控股流通股比例的2.07%。\n同期，共有219只基金增持了腾讯控股。从持股数量看，易方达蓝筹精选是所有基金中持有腾讯控股股票数量最多的基金。截至6月底，该基金共持有腾讯控股1810万股，较一季度增持了200万股。谢治宇管理的兴全合宜持有399.32万股。此外，冯波管理的易方达研究精选、曲扬管理的前海开源沪港深蓝筹、李耀柱管理的广发沪港深新起点、王宗合管理的鹏华匠心精选等基金都持有相当数量的腾讯控股。\n值得注意的是，虽然游戏板块表现不尽如人意，但从公募基金的动作来看，部分基金仍呈增持态势。\n不过，也有基金经理已开始对重仓股做出调整。8月2日，三七互娱在董事会通过股份回购案之后，公布了此次回购前的重要股东持股情况。在前十大流通股东当中，兴全基金旗下三只基金分列八、九、十位，分别是兴全合润、兴全商业模式和兴全合宜。\n陷入窘境\n事实上，自今年农历春节以来，中概互联ETF便陷入了窘境。该指数从今年2月18日高点以来，被一路血洗。从股价表现来看，仅二季度，中概互联就有5只个股跌幅超过25%，其中快手科技和贝壳集团的跌幅超过50%。\n\n来源：Wind\n不过，自春节长假结束以来，中概股持续下跌，但获得了超百亿元资金的持续涌入。Wind数据显示，2月中概互联网ETF获净申购4.2亿份，3月获净申购3.27亿份，4月获净申购8.31亿份，5月获净申购24.83亿份，6月获净申购28.52亿份。截至7月28日，不到一个月时间，7月中概互联网ETF已获净申购30.84亿份。\n万家基金经理刘宏达认为，主要原因还是部分公司估值过高，透支了一段时间的涨幅。阶段性调整是因为预期过高，但港股长期趋势不会改变，在调整之后，港股将迎来长期配置时点。\n能否跌出“黄金坑”？\n值得注意的是，港股科技股近期走势可谓一波三折，以互联网为主的科技股出现较大回调，这也令市场怀疑港股是否将一蹶不振。\n不过，上投摩根投资总监杜猛认为，港股科技股下半年仍会有表现机会。“我们对港股互联网公司未来蛮有信心的，虽然短期政策使得市场情绪承压，但从长期看，互联网行业仍有很强的成长弹性。”\n江勇提出，在恐慌情绪宣泄过后，港股投资时机也将明显体现。对于目前的港股市场而言，估值水平已大幅降低，个股尤其是成长股价格已足够便宜，交易拥挤的情况也明显缓解，因此就目前来看，港股市场相较于A股市场会更具有吸引力。此外，近期多家中概公司在海外上市受阻，并且纷纷转向A股或港股双重上市和回归二次上市，港股桥头堡的地位将得以巩固，这对于港股市场来说也是一大利好信息。\n站在当下时点，刘宏达对未来市场充满信心。他判断，从3年维度看，港股市场长期向上，短期的调整反而是布局机会，许多标的可能在二三季度回调至合理区间。这次抗疫充分显现了中国的制度以及经济优势，中国市场会成为全球资本配置的大方向。更多符合中国经济发展方向的新经济公司来港股上市，会带动境内外更多资本涌入港股市场。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QNETCN":0.9,"00700":0.9,"TCEHY":0.9,"TTTN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4109,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805518549,"gmtCreate":1627891502081,"gmtModify":1703497287401,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"gd","listText":"gd","text":"gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/805518549","repostId":"2156247193","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3441,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805513155,"gmtCreate":1627891373277,"gmtModify":1703497283944,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/805513155","repostId":"1154823024","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1522,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802731853,"gmtCreate":1627804995072,"gmtModify":1703496128355,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;good","listText":"&nbsp;good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802731853","repostId":"1118959005","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1774,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802481385,"gmtCreate":1627795451247,"gmtModify":1703496018908,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"gd","listText":"gd","text":"gd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802481385","repostId":"1184546610","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802381967,"gmtCreate":1627718677059,"gmtModify":1703495184535,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802381967","repostId":"2155501101","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155501101","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627694763,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155501101?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 09:26","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Funding Source of Trillion New Infrastructure Plan in the United States Becomes a Difficult Problem","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155501101","media":"华夏时报","summary":"关于美国万亿基建计划资金来源的分歧，是影响美国国会达成一致协议的重要阻碍。而关于加大加密货币交易征税用于筹集部分万亿基建计划却迅速在两党达成一致意见。\n7月28日晚间，美国国会经过数周的谈判后，参议院","content":"<p><div>Disagreements over the sources of funding for the trillion-dollar infrastructure plan in the United States are an important obstacle to reaching a unanimous agreement in the United States Congress. However, the plan to increase taxes on cryptocurrency transactions to raise some trillions of infrastructure has quickly reached a bipartisan agreement. On the evening of July 28th, after weeks of negotiations in the U.S. Congress, the Senate's procedural vote on the U.S. trillion-dollar infrastructure plan was released, with 67 votes in favor and 32 votes against, including 17 Republicans and 50 Democrats who voted in favor. After the bill is passed by the Senate, which is mainly controlled by Republicans, it is then considered by the House, which is mainly controlled by Democrats, and the vote results...</p><p><a href=\"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2021-07-31/doc-ikqcfncc0051184.shtml\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"sina_symbol","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Funding Source of Trillion New Infrastructure Plan in the United States Becomes a Difficult Problem</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFunding Source of Trillion New Infrastructure Plan in the United States Becomes a Difficult Problem\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华夏时报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 09:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Disagreements over the sources of funding for the trillion-dollar infrastructure plan in the United States are an important obstacle to reaching a unanimous agreement in the United States Congress. However, the plan to increase taxes on cryptocurrency transactions to raise some trillions of infrastructure has quickly reached a bipartisan agreement. On the evening of July 28th, after weeks of negotiations in the U.S. Congress, the Senate's procedural vote on the U.S. trillion-dollar infrastructure plan was released, with 67 votes in favor and 32 votes against, including 17 Republicans and 50 Democrats who voted in favor. After the bill is passed by the Senate, which is mainly controlled by Republicans, it is then considered by the House, which is mainly controlled by Democrats, and the vote results...</p><p><a href=\"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2021-07-31/doc-ikqcfncc0051184.shtml\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2021-07-31/doc-ikqcfncc0051184.shtml\">华夏时报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab1815ec48bd4c5f20d5928cc3337253","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2021-07-31/doc-ikqcfncc0051184.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155501101","content_text":"关于美国万亿基建计划资金来源的分歧，是影响美国国会达成一致协议的重要阻碍。而关于加大加密货币交易征税用于筹集部分万亿基建计划却迅速在两党达成一致意见。\n7月28日晚间，美国国会经过数周的谈判后，参议院关于美国万亿基建计划的程序性投票结果出炉，67票赞成32票反对，其中投出赞成票的包括17名共和党人和50名民主党人。主要由共和党人控制的参议院通过法案后，再通过主要由民主党控制的众议院审议，投票结果通过后，才能由拜登签字最终通过法案。\n尽管关于法案的细节大部分已经达成一致，但是还有小部分目前还未完全确定。而其中关于万亿基建法案中建设资金的来源一直是法案讨论的重点。对于白宫提议的通过提高税率覆盖基建投资，共和党方面始终持反对意见。\n对此，美国参议院两党一致通过了一份关于基础设施的补充提案，提出要通过向加密货币交易征税，筹集280亿美元的基建资金，包括券商、交易平台（包括中心化与去中心化的交易平台）在内的数字资产交易经纪人必须通过修改后的信息报告制度向美国国税局提交税收申报，主要针对超过1万美元的交易。截至发文，比特币报价38806美元，以太坊报价2348美元，依据现价，大约0.3个比特币与4个以太坊的交易就需要提交税收申报表进行缴税。\n不少加密行业人士对此表达了不满，诸如华盛顿行业组织区块链协会负责人Kristin Smith、共和党参议员Cynthia Lummis、加密税务公司CoinTracker的税务策略主管Shehan Chandrasekera等人。\n俄明州共和党参议员 Cynthia Lummis 对此表示：“加密货币市场是非常复杂的领域，很容易出现问题，需要成立专门委员会来研究加密货币税收问题，而不是迫切地起草。”\n加密税务公司CoinTracker的税务策略主管Shehan Chandrasekera甚至指出，新申报要求执行起来相当困难，立法者试图将传统股票和证券领域的做法放在加密货币领域很难行得通。他强调：“在投资加密货币的过程中，大多数人会将资产保存在硬钱包中，这与传统金融领域完全不同。”\n不过，今年5月份美国也提及了类似的关于加密货币征税的提案，美国财政部提交的关于税收执法建议的报告中就曾提到，对加密资产需采取额外措施，以减少将收入转移出新信息报告制度的机会，超过1万美元的现金交易已经受到报告要求的约束。\n在此之前，美国也曾多次提出要对加密货币交易进行征税，2020年11月，美国国税局（IRS）发布的1040号“美国个人所得税申报表”草案的指导说明中也曾规定，如果纳税人免费收到任何加密货币，包括空投或硬分叉等途径，则必须在加密相关问题中勾选“是”选项。2014年，美国税务局IRS就发布了第一版关于加密货币纳税的指南，2019年IRS对其进行了适度的修改。根据现有的政策，持有者每次交易加密货币都要缴纳资本利得税。\n本报记者统计，目前在美国的加密货币交易需要交税的情况，一是通过挖矿获得的加密货币被算作普通收入范围，需要缴纳其他收入税；另外将加密货币兑换为法币、将加密货币兑换成其他加密货币、使用加密货币购买商品或服务以及通过空投或者奖励免费获得加密货币等行为。美国加密货币的持有者必须记录自己的交易活动和收益/损失，填写和提交Form8949向国税局登记。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BTCmain":0.9,"XBTmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1456,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803226906,"gmtCreate":1627443042305,"gmtModify":1703490066930,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"yes","listText":"yes","text":"yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803226906","repostId":"2154194398","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154194398","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627437972,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154194398?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-28 10:06","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Why do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154194398","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"尽管科技股周二拖累美股结束了连涨势头，不过苹果、微软和谷歌母公司三大科技公司财报没有让市场失望，收入和盈利均大幅上升，超过了市场本已十分乐观的预期。\n受益于看好美股科技巨头的财报表现，在周二之前纳指已","content":"<p>Although technology stocks dragged U.S. stocks on Tuesday to end their winning streak,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The financial reports of the parent company's three major technology companies did not disappoint the market, with both revenues and earnings rising sharply, exceeding the market's already optimistic expectations.</p><p>Benefiting from the financial performance of US technology giants, the Nasdaq had risen for five consecutive days before Tuesday, and hit 14,863.65 points on Monday, setting a new intraday record.</p><p>Apple: Beat Estimates on Nearly All Metrics Quarterly Profit Nears Doubling iPhone Sales Surge 50%</p><p>Apple released its third quarter report for fiscal year 2021 (that is, the second quarter results of natural year 2021) after the U.S. stock market bell on Tuesday, July 27th.<b>Although the year-over-year growth rate was slightly lower than the previous quarter, Apple far exceeded Wall Street targets in almost all metrics.</b></p><p>Stimulated by service sales and iPhone sales, Apple's total revenue for the quarter increased by 36% year-on-year to $81.4 billion, the highest in the same period in history; Profits nearly doubled, up 93% year-on-year to $21.7 billion.</p><p>Specifically, the iPhone revenue in the quarter was USD 39.57 billion, a year-on-year surge of nearly 50%; The revenue of the service business was US$17.49 billion, a record high for two consecutive quarters and a year-on-year increase of 33%.</p><p>By region, Apple's major geographical market segments achieved double-digit percentage growth, with Greater China increasing by more than 58% and Americas revenue increasing by nearly 33% year-on-year.</p><p>Regarding last quarter's performance, Apple's chief financial officer Luca Maestri said in an interview with the Financial Times that Apple's performance in the quarter was \"very, very strong\" overall. Among them, active equipment installations set new records across all geographic market segments.</p><p>In addition, Apple warned in the last fiscal quarter that supply chain problems may cause insufficient supply of iPad and Mac products. However, the final situation shows that the impact ended up being less than $3 billion.</p><p>Microsoft: Record Revenue in the Quarter, Azure Cloud Platform Hits Fastest Growth in Five Quarters</p><p>Also announced on the same day was Microsoft's quarterly earnings report. Similarly,<b>The tech giant, with a market capitalization of more than $2 trillion, has far exceeded market expectations on all metrics.</b></p><p>Driven by a large number of new businesses in the fields of cloud computing, LinkedIn advertising and business applications, Microsoft's revenue in the quarter increased by more than 21% year-on-year to 46.2 billion USD, a record high, which also represents that Microsoft's total revenue exceeded 40 billion USD for three consecutive quarters; Net income was $16.5 billion, up 47% year over year.</p><p>In terms of margins, Microsoft's gross margin improved nearly 2 percentage points to 69.7%, beating estimates by nearly 1 percentage point, and drove earnings per share to jump 48% to $2.17.</p><p>In terms of business, the fast-growing Azure cloud platform is Microsoft's main engine. Azure revenue grew 51% in the quarter, the fastest pace in five quarters.</p><p>Google parent Alphabet: Net income 10% higher than analysts' expectations Ad revenue grew twice as fast as last quarter</p><p>In addition to the above two companies, Alphabet also reported its latest earnings report on the same day, and the company's earnings and revenue were above market expectations as ad sales surged.</p><p>The outbreak of COVID last year sent global ad spending plummeting, which also hit Alphabet hard. However, with the reopening of the economy, as Wall Street expected, Alphabet's operating income in the quarter rose by 62% year-on-year to $61.88 billion, and its net profit reached $18.53 billion, about 10% higher than analysts' expectations.</p><p>In terms of business, the revenue of the main business advertising was USD 50.444 billion in the quarter, easily exceeding analysts' expectations; It grew by nearly 69% year-on-year, more than double the rate of growth in the first quarter. Among them, YouTube's advertising revenue increased significantly to $7 billion, a year-on-year increase of more than 80%.</p><p>On top of that, Alphabet's cloud business also grew significantly, benefiting from working from home, with revenue rising nearly 54% year-over-year to $4.63 billion in the quarter, which also beat analysts' expectations.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>: Net profit exceeded $1 billion for the first time, reaching a new high, up nearly 1,0000% year-on-year</p><p>Also gaining market focus this week is Tesla's earnings report announced after the market bell on Monday. Tesla, the world's largest automaker and electric vehicle giant by market capitalization, not only did its quarterly revenue beat expectations, but its net profit hit a new high.</p><p>The financial report released after the U.S. stock market on July 27th showed that Tesla was $11.96 billion, a year-on-year increase of 98%, higher than analysts' expectation of $11.36 billion, and exceeded the $10 billion mark for three consecutive quarters.</p><p>Tesla's net profit under GAAP for the quarter was $1.14 billion, which was the first time in the company's history that it exceeded the $1 billion mark, a year-on-year increase of nearly 1,000%. This was also the eighth consecutive quarter of positive profit.</p><p>Wall Street News previously pointed out in the article that it is worth noting that Tesla still expects vehicle deliveries to achieve an average annual growth rate of 50% within a few years. Bloomberg said that this represents that Tesla delivery guidance this year may be higher than market expectations.</p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-28 10:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Although technology stocks dragged U.S. stocks on Tuesday to end their winning streak,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The financial reports of the parent company's three major technology companies did not disappoint the market, with both revenues and earnings rising sharply, exceeding the market's already optimistic expectations.</p><p>Benefiting from the financial performance of US technology giants, the Nasdaq had risen for five consecutive days before Tuesday, and hit 14,863.65 points on Monday, setting a new intraday record.</p><p>Apple: Beat Estimates on Nearly All Metrics Quarterly Profit Nears Doubling iPhone Sales Surge 50%</p><p>Apple released its third quarter report for fiscal year 2021 (that is, the second quarter results of natural year 2021) after the U.S. stock market bell on Tuesday, July 27th.<b>Although the year-over-year growth rate was slightly lower than the previous quarter, Apple far exceeded Wall Street targets in almost all metrics.</b></p><p>Stimulated by service sales and iPhone sales, Apple's total revenue for the quarter increased by 36% year-on-year to $81.4 billion, the highest in the same period in history; Profits nearly doubled, up 93% year-on-year to $21.7 billion.</p><p>Specifically, the iPhone revenue in the quarter was USD 39.57 billion, a year-on-year surge of nearly 50%; The revenue of the service business was US$17.49 billion, a record high for two consecutive quarters and a year-on-year increase of 33%.</p><p>By region, Apple's major geographical market segments achieved double-digit percentage growth, with Greater China increasing by more than 58% and Americas revenue increasing by nearly 33% year-on-year.</p><p>Regarding last quarter's performance, Apple's chief financial officer Luca Maestri said in an interview with the Financial Times that Apple's performance in the quarter was \"very, very strong\" overall. Among them, active equipment installations set new records across all geographic market segments.</p><p>In addition, Apple warned in the last fiscal quarter that supply chain problems may cause insufficient supply of iPad and Mac products. However, the final situation shows that the impact ended up being less than $3 billion.</p><p>Microsoft: Record Revenue in the Quarter, Azure Cloud Platform Hits Fastest Growth in Five Quarters</p><p>Also announced on the same day was Microsoft's quarterly earnings report. Similarly,<b>The tech giant, with a market capitalization of more than $2 trillion, has far exceeded market expectations on all metrics.</b></p><p>Driven by a large number of new businesses in the fields of cloud computing, LinkedIn advertising and business applications, Microsoft's revenue in the quarter increased by more than 21% year-on-year to 46.2 billion USD, a record high, which also represents that Microsoft's total revenue exceeded 40 billion USD for three consecutive quarters; Net income was $16.5 billion, up 47% year over year.</p><p>In terms of margins, Microsoft's gross margin improved nearly 2 percentage points to 69.7%, beating estimates by nearly 1 percentage point, and drove earnings per share to jump 48% to $2.17.</p><p>In terms of business, the fast-growing Azure cloud platform is Microsoft's main engine. Azure revenue grew 51% in the quarter, the fastest pace in five quarters.</p><p>Google parent Alphabet: Net income 10% higher than analysts' expectations Ad revenue grew twice as fast as last quarter</p><p>In addition to the above two companies, Alphabet also reported its latest earnings report on the same day, and the company's earnings and revenue were above market expectations as ad sales surged.</p><p>The outbreak of COVID last year sent global ad spending plummeting, which also hit Alphabet hard. However, with the reopening of the economy, as Wall Street expected, Alphabet's operating income in the quarter rose by 62% year-on-year to $61.88 billion, and its net profit reached $18.53 billion, about 10% higher than analysts' expectations.</p><p>In terms of business, the revenue of the main business advertising was USD 50.444 billion in the quarter, easily exceeding analysts' expectations; It grew by nearly 69% year-on-year, more than double the rate of growth in the first quarter. Among them, YouTube's advertising revenue increased significantly to $7 billion, a year-on-year increase of more than 80%.</p><p>On top of that, Alphabet's cloud business also grew significantly, benefiting from working from home, with revenue rising nearly 54% year-over-year to $4.63 billion in the quarter, which also beat analysts' expectations.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>: Net profit exceeded $1 billion for the first time, reaching a new high, up nearly 1,0000% year-on-year</p><p>Also gaining market focus this week is Tesla's earnings report announced after the market bell on Monday. Tesla, the world's largest automaker and electric vehicle giant by market capitalization, not only did its quarterly revenue beat expectations, but its net profit hit a new high.</p><p>The financial report released after the U.S. stock market on July 27th showed that Tesla was $11.96 billion, a year-on-year increase of 98%, higher than analysts' expectation of $11.36 billion, and exceeded the $10 billion mark for three consecutive quarters.</p><p>Tesla's net profit under GAAP for the quarter was $1.14 billion, which was the first time in the company's history that it exceeded the $1 billion mark, a year-on-year increase of nearly 1,000%. This was also the eighth consecutive quarter of positive profit.</p><p>Wall Street News previously pointed out in the article that it is worth noting that Tesla still expects vehicle deliveries to achieve an average annual growth rate of 50% within a few years. Bloomberg said that this represents that Tesla delivery guidance this year may be higher than market expectations.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636490\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1cb237e736a4e03c939622e7b71e8e7","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","GOOGL":"谷歌A","MSFT":"微软","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636490","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154194398","content_text":"尽管科技股周二拖累美股结束了连涨势头，不过苹果、微软和谷歌母公司三大科技公司财报没有让市场失望，收入和盈利均大幅上升，超过了市场本已十分乐观的预期。\n受益于看好美股科技巨头的财报表现，在周二之前纳指已经连涨五日，并在周一盘中触及14863.65点，刷新盘中纪录。\n苹果：几乎所有指标均超预期 季度利润接近翻倍 iPhone销量激增50%\n苹果公司在7月27日周二美股盘后发布2021财年三季报（即2021自然年第二季度业绩）。尽管同比增速略低于上季度，但是苹果在几乎所有指标上都远超华尔街目标。\n在服务销售和iPhone销量的刺激下，苹果当季总营收同比增长36%至814亿美元，创历史同期最高；利润更是几乎翻了一倍，同比增长93%至217亿美元。\n具体来看，当季iPhone营收395.7亿美元，同比激增近50%；服务业务营收174.9亿美元，连续两个季度历史新高，同比增33%。\n按地区来看，苹果各大地理市场分区均实现双位数百分比涨幅，大中华区增超58%，美洲市场收入同比增近33%。\n对于上季度的表现，苹果首席财务官Luca Maestri在接受英国金融时报采访时表示，该季度苹果的表现在整体上“非常、非常强劲”。其中，活跃设备装机量在所有地理市场分区都创下了新纪录。\n另外，苹果曾在上一财季警告，供应链问题恐将使iPad和Mac产品出现供应不足问题。不过最终的情况显示，这一影响最终不足30亿美元。\n微软：当季营收创历史新高Azure云平台创五个季度最快增速\n同天公布的还有微软的季度财报，同样的，这家市值超过2万亿美元的科技巨头在各项指标上都远超市场预期。\n在云计算、LinkedIn广告和商业应用领域的大批量新业务推动下，微软当季营收同比增长超21%至462亿美元，创历史新高，这也代表微软总营收连续三个季度突破400亿美元；净利润为165亿美元，同比增47%。\n利润率方面，微软毛利率提高了近2个百分点至69.7%，比预期高出近1个百分点，并推动每股盈利跃升48%至2.17美元。\n分业务来看，快速增长的Azure云平台是微软的主要引擎。当季Azure收入增长了51%，创下5个季度以来的最快增速。\n谷歌母公司Alphabet：净利润高出分析师预期10% 广告收入增速是上季度两倍\n除了以上两家之外，Alphabet也在同一天公布了最新财报，随着广告销售的激增，公司盈利和收入均高于市场预期。\n去年新冠疫情的爆发令全球广告支出大幅下滑，这也给Alphabet带了沉重的打击。不过随着经济的重新开放，正如华尔街预期的那样，Alphabet当季营业收入同比大增62%至618.8亿美元，净利润更是达到185.3亿美元，比分析师预期的高出约10%。\n分业务来看，主营业务广告的收入当季为504.44亿美元，轻松超越分析师预期；同比增长近69%，同比增速是一季度的两倍多。其中YouTube广告收入大幅增长，达到70亿美元，同比增长逾80%。\n除此之外，受益于居家办公，Alphabet的云业务也大幅增长，当季收入同比增长近54%至46.3亿美元，同样超过分析师预期。\n特斯拉：净利润首超10亿美元创新高 同比增长近1000%\n本周获得市场聚焦的还有周一盘后公布的特斯拉财报。作为全球市值最大的汽车制造商、电动汽车巨头，特斯拉不仅季度营收好于预期，净利润更是创下新高.\n7月27日美股盘后公布的财报显示，特斯拉119.6亿美元，同比增长98%，高于分析师预期的113.6亿美元，连续三个季度超过100亿美元大关。\n当季GAAP项下特斯拉净利润为11.4亿美元，是公司史上首次超过10亿美元大关，同比增长近1000%，这也是连续第八个季度实现正盈利。\n华尔街见闻此前在文章中指出，值得注意的是，特斯拉仍预期汽车交付量在几年内实现50%的年均增长率。彭博社称，这代表今年特斯拉交付指引可能高于市场预期。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803221752,"gmtCreate":1627442988076,"gmtModify":1703490065273,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"yes","listText":"yes","text":"yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803221752","repostId":"2154194398","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154194398","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627437972,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154194398?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-28 10:06","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Why do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154194398","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"尽管科技股周二拖累美股结束了连涨势头，不过苹果、微软和谷歌母公司三大科技公司财报没有让市场失望，收入和盈利均大幅上升，超过了市场本已十分乐观的预期。\n受益于看好美股科技巨头的财报表现，在周二之前纳指已","content":"<p>Although technology stocks dragged U.S. stocks on Tuesday to end their winning streak,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The financial reports of the parent company's three major technology companies did not disappoint the market, with both revenues and earnings rising sharply, exceeding the market's already optimistic expectations.</p><p>Benefiting from the financial performance of US technology giants, the Nasdaq had risen for five consecutive days before Tuesday, and hit 14,863.65 points on Monday, setting a new intraday record.</p><p>Apple: Beat Estimates on Nearly All Metrics Quarterly Profit Nears Doubling iPhone Sales Surge 50%</p><p>Apple released its third quarter report for fiscal year 2021 (that is, the second quarter results of natural year 2021) after the U.S. stock market bell on Tuesday, July 27th.<b>Although the year-over-year growth rate was slightly lower than the previous quarter, Apple far exceeded Wall Street targets in almost all metrics.</b></p><p>Stimulated by service sales and iPhone sales, Apple's total revenue for the quarter increased by 36% year-on-year to $81.4 billion, the highest in the same period in history; Profits nearly doubled, up 93% year-on-year to $21.7 billion.</p><p>Specifically, the iPhone revenue in the quarter was USD 39.57 billion, a year-on-year surge of nearly 50%; The revenue of the service business was US$17.49 billion, a record high for two consecutive quarters and a year-on-year increase of 33%.</p><p>By region, Apple's major geographical market segments achieved double-digit percentage growth, with Greater China increasing by more than 58% and Americas revenue increasing by nearly 33% year-on-year.</p><p>Regarding last quarter's performance, Apple's chief financial officer Luca Maestri said in an interview with the Financial Times that Apple's performance in the quarter was \"very, very strong\" overall. Among them, active equipment installations set new records across all geographic market segments.</p><p>In addition, Apple warned in the last fiscal quarter that supply chain problems may cause insufficient supply of iPad and Mac products. However, the final situation shows that the impact ended up being less than $3 billion.</p><p>Microsoft: Record Revenue in the Quarter, Azure Cloud Platform Hits Fastest Growth in Five Quarters</p><p>Also announced on the same day was Microsoft's quarterly earnings report. Similarly,<b>The tech giant, with a market capitalization of more than $2 trillion, has far exceeded market expectations on all metrics.</b></p><p>Driven by a large number of new businesses in the fields of cloud computing, LinkedIn advertising and business applications, Microsoft's revenue in the quarter increased by more than 21% year-on-year to 46.2 billion USD, a record high, which also represents that Microsoft's total revenue exceeded 40 billion USD for three consecutive quarters; Net income was $16.5 billion, up 47% year over year.</p><p>In terms of margins, Microsoft's gross margin improved nearly 2 percentage points to 69.7%, beating estimates by nearly 1 percentage point, and drove earnings per share to jump 48% to $2.17.</p><p>In terms of business, the fast-growing Azure cloud platform is Microsoft's main engine. Azure revenue grew 51% in the quarter, the fastest pace in five quarters.</p><p>Google parent Alphabet: Net income 10% higher than analysts' expectations Ad revenue grew twice as fast as last quarter</p><p>In addition to the above two companies, Alphabet also reported its latest earnings report on the same day, and the company's earnings and revenue were above market expectations as ad sales surged.</p><p>The outbreak of COVID last year sent global ad spending plummeting, which also hit Alphabet hard. However, with the reopening of the economy, as Wall Street expected, Alphabet's operating income in the quarter rose by 62% year-on-year to $61.88 billion, and its net profit reached $18.53 billion, about 10% higher than analysts' expectations.</p><p>In terms of business, the revenue of the main business advertising was USD 50.444 billion in the quarter, easily exceeding analysts' expectations; It grew by nearly 69% year-on-year, more than double the rate of growth in the first quarter. Among them, YouTube's advertising revenue increased significantly to $7 billion, a year-on-year increase of more than 80%.</p><p>On top of that, Alphabet's cloud business also grew significantly, benefiting from working from home, with revenue rising nearly 54% year-over-year to $4.63 billion in the quarter, which also beat analysts' expectations.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>: Net profit exceeded $1 billion for the first time, reaching a new high, up nearly 1,0000% year-on-year</p><p>Also gaining market focus this week is Tesla's earnings report announced after the market bell on Monday. Tesla, the world's largest automaker and electric vehicle giant by market capitalization, not only did its quarterly revenue beat expectations, but its net profit hit a new high.</p><p>The financial report released after the U.S. stock market on July 27th showed that Tesla was $11.96 billion, a year-on-year increase of 98%, higher than analysts' expectation of $11.36 billion, and exceeded the $10 billion mark for three consecutive quarters.</p><p>Tesla's net profit under GAAP for the quarter was $1.14 billion, which was the first time in the company's history that it exceeded the $1 billion mark, a year-on-year increase of nearly 1,000%. This was also the eighth consecutive quarter of positive profit.</p><p>Wall Street News previously pointed out in the article that it is worth noting that Tesla still expects vehicle deliveries to achieve an average annual growth rate of 50% within a few years. Bloomberg said that this represents that Tesla delivery guidance this year may be higher than market expectations.</p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy do U.S. stocks hold big technology? Giants' earnings report exceeds expectations\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-28 10:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Although technology stocks dragged U.S. stocks on Tuesday to end their winning streak,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The financial reports of the parent company's three major technology companies did not disappoint the market, with both revenues and earnings rising sharply, exceeding the market's already optimistic expectations.</p><p>Benefiting from the financial performance of US technology giants, the Nasdaq had risen for five consecutive days before Tuesday, and hit 14,863.65 points on Monday, setting a new intraday record.</p><p>Apple: Beat Estimates on Nearly All Metrics Quarterly Profit Nears Doubling iPhone Sales Surge 50%</p><p>Apple released its third quarter report for fiscal year 2021 (that is, the second quarter results of natural year 2021) after the U.S. stock market bell on Tuesday, July 27th.<b>Although the year-over-year growth rate was slightly lower than the previous quarter, Apple far exceeded Wall Street targets in almost all metrics.</b></p><p>Stimulated by service sales and iPhone sales, Apple's total revenue for the quarter increased by 36% year-on-year to $81.4 billion, the highest in the same period in history; Profits nearly doubled, up 93% year-on-year to $21.7 billion.</p><p>Specifically, the iPhone revenue in the quarter was USD 39.57 billion, a year-on-year surge of nearly 50%; The revenue of the service business was US$17.49 billion, a record high for two consecutive quarters and a year-on-year increase of 33%.</p><p>By region, Apple's major geographical market segments achieved double-digit percentage growth, with Greater China increasing by more than 58% and Americas revenue increasing by nearly 33% year-on-year.</p><p>Regarding last quarter's performance, Apple's chief financial officer Luca Maestri said in an interview with the Financial Times that Apple's performance in the quarter was \"very, very strong\" overall. Among them, active equipment installations set new records across all geographic market segments.</p><p>In addition, Apple warned in the last fiscal quarter that supply chain problems may cause insufficient supply of iPad and Mac products. However, the final situation shows that the impact ended up being less than $3 billion.</p><p>Microsoft: Record Revenue in the Quarter, Azure Cloud Platform Hits Fastest Growth in Five Quarters</p><p>Also announced on the same day was Microsoft's quarterly earnings report. Similarly,<b>The tech giant, with a market capitalization of more than $2 trillion, has far exceeded market expectations on all metrics.</b></p><p>Driven by a large number of new businesses in the fields of cloud computing, LinkedIn advertising and business applications, Microsoft's revenue in the quarter increased by more than 21% year-on-year to 46.2 billion USD, a record high, which also represents that Microsoft's total revenue exceeded 40 billion USD for three consecutive quarters; Net income was $16.5 billion, up 47% year over year.</p><p>In terms of margins, Microsoft's gross margin improved nearly 2 percentage points to 69.7%, beating estimates by nearly 1 percentage point, and drove earnings per share to jump 48% to $2.17.</p><p>In terms of business, the fast-growing Azure cloud platform is Microsoft's main engine. Azure revenue grew 51% in the quarter, the fastest pace in five quarters.</p><p>Google parent Alphabet: Net income 10% higher than analysts' expectations Ad revenue grew twice as fast as last quarter</p><p>In addition to the above two companies, Alphabet also reported its latest earnings report on the same day, and the company's earnings and revenue were above market expectations as ad sales surged.</p><p>The outbreak of COVID last year sent global ad spending plummeting, which also hit Alphabet hard. However, with the reopening of the economy, as Wall Street expected, Alphabet's operating income in the quarter rose by 62% year-on-year to $61.88 billion, and its net profit reached $18.53 billion, about 10% higher than analysts' expectations.</p><p>In terms of business, the revenue of the main business advertising was USD 50.444 billion in the quarter, easily exceeding analysts' expectations; It grew by nearly 69% year-on-year, more than double the rate of growth in the first quarter. Among them, YouTube's advertising revenue increased significantly to $7 billion, a year-on-year increase of more than 80%.</p><p>On top of that, Alphabet's cloud business also grew significantly, benefiting from working from home, with revenue rising nearly 54% year-over-year to $4.63 billion in the quarter, which also beat analysts' expectations.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>: Net profit exceeded $1 billion for the first time, reaching a new high, up nearly 1,0000% year-on-year</p><p>Also gaining market focus this week is Tesla's earnings report announced after the market bell on Monday. Tesla, the world's largest automaker and electric vehicle giant by market capitalization, not only did its quarterly revenue beat expectations, but its net profit hit a new high.</p><p>The financial report released after the U.S. stock market on July 27th showed that Tesla was $11.96 billion, a year-on-year increase of 98%, higher than analysts' expectation of $11.36 billion, and exceeded the $10 billion mark for three consecutive quarters.</p><p>Tesla's net profit under GAAP for the quarter was $1.14 billion, which was the first time in the company's history that it exceeded the $1 billion mark, a year-on-year increase of nearly 1,000%. This was also the eighth consecutive quarter of positive profit.</p><p>Wall Street News previously pointed out in the article that it is worth noting that Tesla still expects vehicle deliveries to achieve an average annual growth rate of 50% within a few years. Bloomberg said that this represents that Tesla delivery guidance this year may be higher than market expectations.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636490\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1cb237e736a4e03c939622e7b71e8e7","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","GOOGL":"谷歌A","MSFT":"微软","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636490","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154194398","content_text":"尽管科技股周二拖累美股结束了连涨势头，不过苹果、微软和谷歌母公司三大科技公司财报没有让市场失望，收入和盈利均大幅上升，超过了市场本已十分乐观的预期。\n受益于看好美股科技巨头的财报表现，在周二之前纳指已经连涨五日，并在周一盘中触及14863.65点，刷新盘中纪录。\n苹果：几乎所有指标均超预期 季度利润接近翻倍 iPhone销量激增50%\n苹果公司在7月27日周二美股盘后发布2021财年三季报（即2021自然年第二季度业绩）。尽管同比增速略低于上季度，但是苹果在几乎所有指标上都远超华尔街目标。\n在服务销售和iPhone销量的刺激下，苹果当季总营收同比增长36%至814亿美元，创历史同期最高；利润更是几乎翻了一倍，同比增长93%至217亿美元。\n具体来看，当季iPhone营收395.7亿美元，同比激增近50%；服务业务营收174.9亿美元，连续两个季度历史新高，同比增33%。\n按地区来看，苹果各大地理市场分区均实现双位数百分比涨幅，大中华区增超58%，美洲市场收入同比增近33%。\n对于上季度的表现，苹果首席财务官Luca Maestri在接受英国金融时报采访时表示，该季度苹果的表现在整体上“非常、非常强劲”。其中，活跃设备装机量在所有地理市场分区都创下了新纪录。\n另外，苹果曾在上一财季警告，供应链问题恐将使iPad和Mac产品出现供应不足问题。不过最终的情况显示，这一影响最终不足30亿美元。\n微软：当季营收创历史新高Azure云平台创五个季度最快增速\n同天公布的还有微软的季度财报，同样的，这家市值超过2万亿美元的科技巨头在各项指标上都远超市场预期。\n在云计算、LinkedIn广告和商业应用领域的大批量新业务推动下，微软当季营收同比增长超21%至462亿美元，创历史新高，这也代表微软总营收连续三个季度突破400亿美元；净利润为165亿美元，同比增47%。\n利润率方面，微软毛利率提高了近2个百分点至69.7%，比预期高出近1个百分点，并推动每股盈利跃升48%至2.17美元。\n分业务来看，快速增长的Azure云平台是微软的主要引擎。当季Azure收入增长了51%，创下5个季度以来的最快增速。\n谷歌母公司Alphabet：净利润高出分析师预期10% 广告收入增速是上季度两倍\n除了以上两家之外，Alphabet也在同一天公布了最新财报，随着广告销售的激增，公司盈利和收入均高于市场预期。\n去年新冠疫情的爆发令全球广告支出大幅下滑，这也给Alphabet带了沉重的打击。不过随着经济的重新开放，正如华尔街预期的那样，Alphabet当季营业收入同比大增62%至618.8亿美元，净利润更是达到185.3亿美元，比分析师预期的高出约10%。\n分业务来看，主营业务广告的收入当季为504.44亿美元，轻松超越分析师预期；同比增长近69%，同比增速是一季度的两倍多。其中YouTube广告收入大幅增长，达到70亿美元，同比增长逾80%。\n除此之外，受益于居家办公，Alphabet的云业务也大幅增长，当季收入同比增长近54%至46.3亿美元，同样超过分析师预期。\n特斯拉：净利润首超10亿美元创新高 同比增长近1000%\n本周获得市场聚焦的还有周一盘后公布的特斯拉财报。作为全球市值最大的汽车制造商、电动汽车巨头，特斯拉不仅季度营收好于预期，净利润更是创下新高.\n7月27日美股盘后公布的财报显示，特斯拉119.6亿美元，同比增长98%，高于分析师预期的113.6亿美元，连续三个季度超过100亿美元大关。\n当季GAAP项下特斯拉净利润为11.4亿美元，是公司史上首次超过10亿美元大关，同比增长近1000%，这也是连续第八个季度实现正盈利。\n华尔街见闻此前在文章中指出，值得注意的是，特斯拉仍预期汽车交付量在几年内实现50%的年均增长率。彭博社称，这代表今年特斯拉交付指引可能高于市场预期。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1585,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800315912,"gmtCreate":1627277821936,"gmtModify":1703486580721,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800315912","repostId":"1143674346","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1249,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177210753,"gmtCreate":1627221990872,"gmtModify":1703485713817,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"h.....","listText":"h.....","text":"h.....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177210753","repostId":"2154939392","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":174857333,"gmtCreate":1627092222722,"gmtModify":1703484078051,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174857333","repostId":"1147892180","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1366,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175326654,"gmtCreate":1627008373778,"gmtModify":1703482351176,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3585964302651088","idStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175326654","repostId":"2153760339","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153760339","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626989507,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153760339?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-23 05:31","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Snap's second-quarter revenue doubles, shares rise more than 16% after hours","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153760339","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"新浪科技讯 北京时间7月23日凌晨消息，“阅后即焚”通信应用Snapchat母公司Snap今天发布了2021财年第二季度财报，当日，Snap股价在纽约证券交易所的常规交易中下跌0.42美元，报收于62.97美元，跌幅为0.66%。在随后的盘后交易中，Snap股价涨超16%。\n\n\n\n\n财报显示，Snap2021财年第二季度营收为9.821亿美元，与去年同期的4.542亿美元相比增长116%；净亏损为1.517亿美元，与去年同期的净亏损3.260亿美元相比收窄53%。","content":"<p>After the U.S. stock market closed on Thursday, 22nd EST, Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, a \"burn after reading\" communication application, released its financial report for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. The financial report showed that Snap's revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2021 was US$982.1 million, an increase of 116% compared with US$454.2 million in the same period last year; Net loss of $151.7 million narrowed 53% from a net loss of $326.0 million in the same period last year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ca11c77ce7016b10fd7a192001261e0\" tg-width=\"1055\" tg-height=\"267\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Performance highlights:</p><p><ul><li>Revenue for the second quarter of 2021 was $982 million, up 116% year over year.</li><li>Net loss of $151.7 million in 2021 narrowed 53% compared to net loss of $326.0 million in the same period last year.</li><li>Adjusted EBITD for the second quarter of 2021 was $117 million, up 223% year-over-year,.</li><li>Operating cash flow for the second quarter of 2021 was (101) million compared to (67) million in the year-ago quarter.</li><li>Free cash flow in the second quarter of 2021 was (116) million compared to (82) million in the prior-year quarter.</li><li>Common shares outstanding plus stock-based awards totalled 1.681 billion as of June 30, 2021, compared to 1.616 billion a year ago.</li></ul>CEO Evan Spiegel said: \"Our second-quarter results reflect the broad strength of our business as both our revenue and daily active users grew at the highest pace in the past four years.\"\"We are pleased with the progress our team has made in the development of our augmented reality platform, and we are also energized by the many opportunities to grow our community and business around the world.\"</p><p>On the same day, Snap's share price fell by $0.42 in regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange to close at $62.97, a decrease of 0.66%. In subsequent after-hours trading, Snap shares rose more than 16%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21aea98efb27a4411815156585467225\" tg-width=\"695\" tg-height=\"528\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Snap's second-quarter revenue doubles, shares rise more than 16% after hours</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSnap's second-quarter revenue doubles, shares rise more than 16% after hours\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-23 05:31</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After the U.S. stock market closed on Thursday, 22nd EST, Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, a \"burn after reading\" communication application, released its financial report for the second quarter of fiscal year 2021. The financial report showed that Snap's revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2021 was US$982.1 million, an increase of 116% compared with US$454.2 million in the same period last year; Net loss of $151.7 million narrowed 53% from a net loss of $326.0 million in the same period last year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ca11c77ce7016b10fd7a192001261e0\" tg-width=\"1055\" tg-height=\"267\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Performance highlights:</p><p><ul><li>Revenue for the second quarter of 2021 was $982 million, up 116% year over year.</li><li>Net loss of $151.7 million in 2021 narrowed 53% compared to net loss of $326.0 million in the same period last year.</li><li>Adjusted EBITD for the second quarter of 2021 was $117 million, up 223% year-over-year,.</li><li>Operating cash flow for the second quarter of 2021 was (101) million compared to (67) million in the year-ago quarter.</li><li>Free cash flow in the second quarter of 2021 was (116) million compared to (82) million in the prior-year quarter.</li><li>Common shares outstanding plus stock-based awards totalled 1.681 billion as of June 30, 2021, compared to 1.616 billion a year ago.</li></ul>CEO Evan Spiegel said: \"Our second-quarter results reflect the broad strength of our business as both our revenue and daily active users grew at the highest pace in the past four years.\"\"We are pleased with the progress our team has made in the development of our augmented reality platform, and we are also energized by the many opportunities to grow our community and business around the world.\"</p><p>On the same day, Snap's share price fell by $0.42 in regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange to close at $62.97, a decrease of 0.66%. In subsequent after-hours trading, Snap shares rose more than 16%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21aea98efb27a4411815156585467225\" tg-width=\"695\" tg-height=\"528\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08e57c6bbb57e0fa86f513a934e5e3ba","relate_stocks":{"SNAP":"Snap Inc"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153760339","content_text":"美东时间22日周四美股盘后，“阅后即焚”通信应用Snapchat母公司Snap发布了2021财年第二季度财报，财报显示，Snap2021财年第二季度营收为9.821亿美元，与去年同期的4.542亿美元相比增长116%；净亏损为1.517亿美元，与去年同期的净亏损3.260亿美元相比收窄53%。业绩亮点：\n\n2021 年第二季度的营收为9.82 亿美元，同比增长116% 。\n2021 年净亏损为1.517亿美元，与去年同期的净亏损3.260亿美元相比收窄53%。\n2021 年第二季度调整后的 EBITD为 1.17 亿美元，同比增长 223%，。\n2021 年第二季度的经营现金流为 (1.01) 亿美元，而去年同期为 (6,700) 万美元。\n2021 年第二季度的自由现金流为 (1.16) 亿美元，而去年同期为 (8,200) 万美元。\n截至 2021 年 6 月 30 日，流通在外的普通股加上基于股票奖励的股份总数为 16.81 亿，而一年前为 16.16 亿。\n\n首席执行官埃文·斯皮格尔 (Evan Spiegel) 表示：“我们的第二季度业绩反映了我们业务的广泛实力，因为我们的收入和日活跃用户均以过去四年来的最高速度增长。”“我们对我们的团队在增强现实平台的开发方面取得的进展感到高兴，我们也为在世界各地发展我们的社区和业务的许多机会而充满活力。”\n当日，Snap股价在纽约证券交易所的常规交易中下跌0.42美元，报收于62.97美元，跌幅为0.66%。在随后的盘后交易中，Snap股价涨超16%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SNAP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":372588534292776,"gmtCreate":1731973116942,"gmtModify":1731973120274,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e51ea8e0a54571a45bd94ce4ebc0a411","width":"1086","height":"1713"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372588534292776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2646,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372588093075608,"gmtCreate":1731973084105,"gmtModify":1731973087874,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GRAB\">$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$Grab Holdings(GRAB)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/141f306354941e876f5b635b5b105d09","width":"1086","height":"1713"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372588093075608","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807593398,"gmtCreate":1628042117214,"gmtModify":1703500105679,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807593398","repostId":"1161395470","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161395470","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628041950,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161395470?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-04 09:52","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Chinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161395470","media":"中国证券报","summary":"8月3日，游戏股跳水给中概互联带来一记重拳。截至港股收盘，腾讯控股报446.00港元，跌6.11%；网易报145.90港元，跌7.77%；哔哩哔哩报646.5港元，跌3.44%。截至美股收盘，腾讯AD","content":"<p><div>On August 3rd, the diving of game stocks brought a heavy punch to China Internet. As of the close of Hong Kong stocks, Tencent Holdings reported HK$ 446.00, down 6.11%; Netease reported HK$ 145.90, down 7.77%; Bilibili reported HK$646.5, down 3.44%. As of the close of U.S. stocks, Tencent ADR fell 7.32%, Tencent Music fell 3.03%, Netease fell 11.41%, and Bilibili fell 7.06%. Zhang Kun, Xie Zhiyu and many other well-known fund managers have invested in this field, and a considerable number of funds have been affected. When Chinese stocks were impacted, a considerable number of investors took the opportunity...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"zgzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChinese game stocks plummeted, and many public offerings \"lay guns\"! Jump or get in?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 09:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>On August 3rd, the diving of game stocks brought a heavy punch to China Internet. As of the close of Hong Kong stocks, Tencent Holdings reported HK$ 446.00, down 6.11%; Netease reported HK$ 145.90, down 7.77%; Bilibili reported HK$646.5, down 3.44%. As of the close of U.S. stocks, Tencent ADR fell 7.32%, Tencent Music fell 3.03%, Netease fell 11.41%, and Bilibili fell 7.06%. Zhang Kun, Xie Zhiyu and many other well-known fund managers have invested in this field, and a considerable number of funds have been affected. When Chinese stocks were impacted, a considerable number of investors took the opportunity...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ\">中国证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7eaa2c45cf70f617f2a492ecb0fcce5f","relate_stocks":{"00700":"腾讯控股","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR","TTTN":"老虎中美互联网巨头ETF","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/mIGASuul0V49T1QxvxZ5LQ","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161395470","content_text":"8月3日，游戏股跳水给中概互联带来一记重拳。截至港股收盘，腾讯控股报446.00港元，跌6.11%；网易报145.90港元，跌7.77%；哔哩哔哩报646.5港元，跌3.44%。截至美股收盘，腾讯ADR跌7.32%，腾讯音乐跌3.03%，网易跌11.41%，哔哩哔哩跌7.06%。\n张坤、谢治宇等多位知名基金经理投资了该领域，此外还有相当数量的基金被波及。\n中概股受冲击之际，却有相当数量的投资人趁机上车，积极布局。以中概互联网ETF为例，截至8月3日，该基金的规模已较今年1月底增加超100亿元。此外，也有不少投资者选择易方达中证海外中国互联网50ETF联接基金抄底，该基金二季度规模也大涨30亿元以上。\n相关基金“大地震”\n8月3日，持有游戏相关的中概股基金“大地震”。以腾讯控股为例，截至6月底，全市场76家基金公司旗下的506只基金重仓了腾讯控股，规模合计1.64万亿元。从持股数看，二季度末公募基金持有该股数高达1.98亿股，占腾讯控股流通股比例的2.07%。\n同期，共有219只基金增持了腾讯控股。从持股数量看，易方达蓝筹精选是所有基金中持有腾讯控股股票数量最多的基金。截至6月底，该基金共持有腾讯控股1810万股，较一季度增持了200万股。谢治宇管理的兴全合宜持有399.32万股。此外，冯波管理的易方达研究精选、曲扬管理的前海开源沪港深蓝筹、李耀柱管理的广发沪港深新起点、王宗合管理的鹏华匠心精选等基金都持有相当数量的腾讯控股。\n值得注意的是，虽然游戏板块表现不尽如人意，但从公募基金的动作来看，部分基金仍呈增持态势。\n不过，也有基金经理已开始对重仓股做出调整。8月2日，三七互娱在董事会通过股份回购案之后，公布了此次回购前的重要股东持股情况。在前十大流通股东当中，兴全基金旗下三只基金分列八、九、十位，分别是兴全合润、兴全商业模式和兴全合宜。\n陷入窘境\n事实上，自今年农历春节以来，中概互联ETF便陷入了窘境。该指数从今年2月18日高点以来，被一路血洗。从股价表现来看，仅二季度，中概互联就有5只个股跌幅超过25%，其中快手科技和贝壳集团的跌幅超过50%。\n\n来源：Wind\n不过，自春节长假结束以来，中概股持续下跌，但获得了超百亿元资金的持续涌入。Wind数据显示，2月中概互联网ETF获净申购4.2亿份，3月获净申购3.27亿份，4月获净申购8.31亿份，5月获净申购24.83亿份，6月获净申购28.52亿份。截至7月28日，不到一个月时间，7月中概互联网ETF已获净申购30.84亿份。\n万家基金经理刘宏达认为，主要原因还是部分公司估值过高，透支了一段时间的涨幅。阶段性调整是因为预期过高，但港股长期趋势不会改变，在调整之后，港股将迎来长期配置时点。\n能否跌出“黄金坑”？\n值得注意的是，港股科技股近期走势可谓一波三折，以互联网为主的科技股出现较大回调，这也令市场怀疑港股是否将一蹶不振。\n不过，上投摩根投资总监杜猛认为，港股科技股下半年仍会有表现机会。“我们对港股互联网公司未来蛮有信心的，虽然短期政策使得市场情绪承压，但从长期看，互联网行业仍有很强的成长弹性。”\n江勇提出，在恐慌情绪宣泄过后，港股投资时机也将明显体现。对于目前的港股市场而言，估值水平已大幅降低，个股尤其是成长股价格已足够便宜，交易拥挤的情况也明显缓解，因此就目前来看，港股市场相较于A股市场会更具有吸引力。此外，近期多家中概公司在海外上市受阻，并且纷纷转向A股或港股双重上市和回归二次上市，港股桥头堡的地位将得以巩固，这对于港股市场来说也是一大利好信息。\n站在当下时点，刘宏达对未来市场充满信心。他判断，从3年维度看，港股市场长期向上，短期的调整反而是布局机会，许多标的可能在二三季度回调至合理区间。这次抗疫充分显现了中国的制度以及经济优势，中国市场会成为全球资本配置的大方向。更多符合中国经济发展方向的新经济公司来港股上市，会带动境内外更多资本涌入港股市场。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QNETCN":0.9,"00700":0.9,"TCEHY":0.9,"TTTN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4109,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176308069,"gmtCreate":1626858748751,"gmtModify":1703479416409,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176308069","repostId":"1127726705","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127726705","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626837888,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127726705?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 11:24","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Value investment is not equal to low valuation investment, and the traditional cycle theory has failed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127726705","media":"追寻价值之路","summary":"估值从来都不是决定行情走势的充分条件。","content":"<p>Author: Yan Xiang, Guosen Securities</p><p>In the face of the new situation, new situation and new problems in China's stock market in recent years, we are constantly reflecting on some old investment frameworks and ideas. This paper discusses the ideas of four aspects, including value investment is not equal to low valuation investment, the traditional economic cycle framework analysis of stock market has failed, from exceeding expectation investment to industrial trend investment, and getting rid of the shackles of mean regression thinking. These are the summary of our thoughts on the investment framework concept and the problems encountered in our research work in recent years.</p><p>1. Value investment is not equal to low valuation investment</p><p>The first and most important thing to reflect on is value investing. Almost all stock market investors will agree with value investment, but what is value investment? There are huge differences between benevolent and wise.</p><p><b>Conventional wisdom tends to equate value investing with low valuation style</b></p><p>The most traditional value investment concept is particularly easy to equate value investment with low valuation investment, thus forming the so-called two-school investment styles in which \"value\" and \"growth\" are opposed. In the A-share market, we often see some indexes with \"value\" as their investment style, such as the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index. The compilation rules of indexes all take undervaluation as the main reference factor. In fact, what is embarrassing is that in recent years, the \"value investors\" who have performed well in the A-share market are often \"growth styles\".</p><p>The idea of value investment with undervaluation as its core originates from Graham's idea of margin of safety, that is, when the stock price is greatly lower than its intrinsic value, the margin of safety appears, and it should be bought at this time, while when the stock price exceeds its intrinsic value, it should be sold. Graham's concept of margin of safety has become the basic benchmark for many low-valued investors in the future. Graham's investment philosophy, born after the stock market crash in 1929 (the first edition of Securities Analysis was published in 1934), puts investment safety first.</p><p>To understand value investment as a low valuation style, in essence, it is more important to pay more attention to \"whether the stock price is significantly lower than the intrinsic value\", while to reduce the weight of \"the long-term dynamic change of intrinsic value in the future\". This investment concept is more game thinking and less logical thinking.</p><p>(Note: According to the compilation method issued by the index compilation company, the value factors referred to by the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index include four variables, namely: Dividend return (D/P), net assets per share to price ratio (B/P), net cash flow per share to price ratio (CF/P) and earnings per share to price ratio (E/P). After standardized Z-score treatment for these four variables to exclude the influence of extreme values, the mean Z-values of the four variables are calculated, and the 332 and 250 stocks with the highest mean values are selected and weighted to obtain the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index respectively.)</p><p><b>Valuation is never a sufficient condition to determine the trend of the market</b></p><p>Judging from the historical experience of domestic and foreign stock markets, valuation has never been a sufficient condition to determine the trend of the stock market. In other words, it will not fall because the valuation is high, nor will it rise because the valuation is low. Simply relying on valuation high and low transactions is actually denying the effectiveness of the market.</p><p>In most cases, valuation is more like an option. It does not change the trend of the stock price, but only affects the magnitude of subsequent changes. If the valuation is at a low level when the fundamentals are reversed upward, then the subsequent upside will be relatively large. On the contrary, when the top valuation is high, if the fundamentals are reversed downward, the stock price will drop relatively large. However, no matter the top or the bottom, valuation itself will not be the factor that determines the turning point of stock price. What determines the turning point of stock price is the fundamental boom cycle. (For more discussion, please refer to: \"Market Thinking Essay No.32: Can Trees Grow to the Sky? Talk about the Valuation Ceiling\")</p><p>Therefore, we can see that in a bull market, the valuation will be higher if it is high, and in a bear market, the valuation can be lower if it is low. If we draw the stock price index and valuation on a picture and look at them together, we will find that the stock price index and valuation are completely synchronized at the top and bottom, and the valuation is the stock price and the stock price is the valuation. At this time, from an operational point of view, it is not guiding to judge the stock price by the valuation level. Moreover, once the valuation breaks through the original upper or lower limit, it is difficult to have a benchmark to measure how high or low the valuation is.</p><p>Regarding valuation, another much discussed issue is \"the effectiveness of low valuation strategy\". Due to the different profit growth attributes of the industry sectors themselves, the low-valuation sectors are mainly concentrated in pro-cyclical sectors such as finance, real estate, cycle and optional consumption, while the high-valuation sectors are mainly concentrated in counter-cyclical sectors such as medicine, essential consumption and TMT. Therefore, from the perspective of market performance, under general circumstances, the low valuation strategy is effective in the upward economic period, and the low valuation index can outperform the market as a whole. However, in the downward economic period, the low valuation strategy fails, and the low valuation index will underperform the market as a whole (see the figure below). This kind of market characteristic still reflects an essential problem, that is, the fundamental profit cycle rather than the valuation level determines the market trend. (For more discussion, see: \"Market Thinking Essay 42: Failed Low Valuation Strategy\")</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d056a54d9244c4c70ca7e2be3053144\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Of course, thinking that value investment is not equal to low valuation investment is definitely not to advocate high valuation investment style, but to say that we believe that value investment is mainly to invest in \"the rise of the intrinsic value of the enterprise\" rather than \"earning the spread between the share price and the intrinsic value\", which may be the main difference between the two.</p><p>Second, the traditional economic cycle theory has failed</p><p>The second thinking paradigm to be revised is the traditional economic cycle analysis framework. In recent years, we have seen that, first, the correlation between the performance of the stock market and the macroeconomy is getting weaker and weaker, especially the structural market of popular sectors in the market, which has almost nothing to do with the economic growth and inflation in the traditional macro; Second, the analysis frameworks of various \"clocks\" and \"electric fans\" are failing one after another.</p><p><b>Traditional framework failed to analyze stock market one after another</b></p><p>The variables of traditional macroeconomic analysis mainly include: economic growth indicators (GDP, industrial added value, fixed asset investment (including infrastructure investment, real estate investment, manufacturing investment, etc.), import and export, PMI, etc.), inflation indicators (CPI, PPI, etc.), and financial indicators (M1, M2, loans, social financing, etc.). These economic indicators generally represent aggregate demand for nominal economic growth.</p><p>The change in China's economy since 2012 is that the nominal economic growth rate has decreased and the volatility has decreased. In particular, the volatility of nominal economic growth has decreased, which makes the importance of the aforementioned macroeconomic indicators begin to decline continuously. At first, it was GDP, which probably didn't fluctuate since 2012, then there was no fluctuation in the indicator of industrial added value after 2015, and then there was basically no fluctuation in M2 after 2017.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71c71163e34f9ae9d11525039c565c17\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"629\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>These analysis paradigms based on the change of nominal economic growth rate and aggregate demand are reflected in various analysis frameworks of \"clock\" and \"electric fan\". It was the first Merrill Lynch clock, and then evolved into various models. Generally, the framework of this kind of \"clock\" and \"electric fan\" models is the same: first, several (N) macroeconomic variables are determined, and then each variable is divided into several (M) states, so that N^M macroeconomic \"scenarios\" can be defined; Then, in each \"scenario\", do historical data statistics, and get the performance of major asset prices in each \"scenario\", as well as the historical average of the overall and structural market performance of the stock market.</p><p>For example, if you choose two macro variables and determine two states (good and bad), then you can divide a total of four macro-economic \"scenarios\". If three macroeconomic variables are selected and three states (good, medium and poor) are determined, a total of 27 macroeconomic \"scenarios\" will be divided. Because only four quadrants can be displayed on the two-dimensional plane, the general model generally adopts the architecture of 2×2 four \"scenarios\". For example, Merrill Lynch has always been this 2×2 four \"scenario\" model, selecting two macro variables (economic growth and inflation) and dividing two states (upward and downward).</p><p>As the volatility of macroeconomic indicators decreases, the effectiveness of investment analysis frameworks based on these indicators is generally decreasing.</p><p>As for the Kitchen cycle, Jugra cycle, and Campo cycle, they are even more uninteresting. As we discussed in detail in our previous report, Goodbye to the Economic Cycle, these are pre-World War II ideas that are not found in mainstream macro textbooks. These academic views before World War II were very simple knowledge and understanding of economic cycles by human beings at that time. With the huge amount of statistical law research on these traditional \"economic cycles\" carried out by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) from the postwar to the 1960s, these were basically all falsified.</p><p>(Readers who are really interested in this piece can read NBER's series of research monographs on the economic cycle: Measuring Business Cycles (1946), Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions (1950), Business Cycle Indicators, Volume 1 & 2 (1961), Cyclical Fluctuations in the Exports of the United States Since 1879 (1967), Indicators of Business Expansions and Contractions (1967), The Business Cycle in a Changing World (1969), Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting (1983)</p><p><b>Essential change is a radical change in the driving force of corporate profitability</b></p><p>The reason why the correlation between the overall trend of the stock market and the macroeconomy is getting weaker and weaker, and the structural market in the stock market is becoming more and more difficult to grasp from the macroeconomy \"from top to bottom\" is that the core driving force of the profit growth of listed companies has changed, from aggregate demand to supply side. I think this is the core factor that determines the characteristics of the A-share market in recent years.</p><p>The starting point of the traditional top-down investment analysis framework is the nominal growth rate of the economy (because the revenue and profits of listed companies are also nominal numbers, the nominal economic growth rate is more important than the actual economic growth rate). We look for investment opportunities in the stock market according to the periodic reciprocating law of nominal economic growth rate.</p><p>The logic is roughly as follows: when the nominal economic growth rate is up, the overall profit cycle of listed companies is up. At this time, we look at the market, and then choose the procyclical sector with the greatest profit elasticity, including cycle, finance, optional consumption, etc. As the economy gradually overheats, policies begin to tighten, and the nominal economic growth rate begins to decline. At this time, the overall profit cycle of listed companies will also decline, so we will be bearish on the broader market, and then choose counter-cyclical sectors, consumption, medicine, public utilities, etc. as defense.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe22744ab64aab499582308280af1a5a\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"603\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Figure: The traditional top-down investment framework is failing</p><p>The biggest logical premise of this set of framework methodology is that demand change is the biggest variable affecting the profit elasticity of enterprises, so the fluctuation of nominal economic growth rate leads to economic cycle and plate rotation. After the volatility of nominal economic growth disappears, the biggest variable that determines the profit of listed companies is not aggregate demand, but a series of supply-side variables, including:</p><p>Increased concentration: With the increase of industrial concentration in traditional industries, the profit margin of leading enterprises continues to increase.</p><p>Consumption upgrading: Residents' consumption tends to be more and more quality and personalized, and the proportion of services is constantly increasing.</p><p>Scientific and technological innovation: generating new products and new supplies from bottom up.</p><p>In recent years, the leading sectors or big bull stocks in the A-share market have basically followed these logics. The core point is that it is the above-mentioned supply-side changes, not the total demand changes, that determine the profit of enterprises (not the logic that residents' income growth rate is high, so they consume more). However, concentration increase, consumption upgrading and technological innovation seem to have little correlation with traditional macroeconomic indicators (economic growth, inflation, monetary policy, etc.).</p><p><b>Consumer stocks over the past five years are the best evidence</b></p><p>Since 2016, in the past five years or so, the A-share consumption sector has performed very well, which I think should be undoubted.</p><p>This round of consumer stock market is definitely not a \"defensive\" attribute. It is impossible for defense to defend for so long and have sustained excess returns. This round of consumer stock market is an authentic \"offensive\" attribute, and the profitability of the sector continues to improve (ROE continues to improve), which is the main driving force of the market. At the same time, the stock price and valuation of the core target are reaching new highs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e549206abb83d23a64c936a7fa757f39\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"632\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>But the problem is that in the past five years or so, the ROE of A-share consumer sector has increased, and it is completely invisible in the macro data. Almost all consumption-related indicators in the macro data, including the growth rate of total retail sales of social consumer goods, the growth rate of urban and rural residents' income and the growth rate of urban and rural residents' expenditure, are all downward. Therefore, at this time, if we conduct top-down research and analysis, we think that the growth rate of consumption in China's economy may decline further in the future. Is it meaningful to invest in consumer stocks?</p><p>Therefore, in the previous report, I once jokingly said that if we start completely from the top-down macro research, we will definitely be able to perfectly steal the consumer stock market since 2016 (see: Market Thinking Essay No. 27: Talking about the pain points of top-down research from the consumer stock market in the past five years). You can find 10,000 macro reasons to explain why the profitability of listed consumer goods companies has not declined in the process of declining macro consumption growth, but you can't find a macro curve that can fit well to explain why the ROE of consumer stocks is upward.</p><p>In the consumer stock market, the core change of the failure of macro analysis is that the driving force of profit growth of listed companies has changed. It is not that residents' income has increased by 20%, so the total consumption has also increased by 20%. This is the logic of aggregate demand. The current situation is that residents' income has only increased by 10%, but residents have spent more money in some fields. According to the professional statement of economics, the demand-income elasticity of this part of products is greater than 1, which is the logic of a new structure.</p><p>In recent years, the liquor stock market is not that there are more people drinking, nor that people drinking more, but that the price of liquor is constantly rising. Then, looking back, we look for the investment logic of consumer stocks, not the logic of increasing total demand because of the increase of residents' income growth rate, but the varieties that consumers may spend more.</p><p>With the continuous development of economy, the fluctuation of nominal economic growth rate in all countries and regions generally decreases, which is a global universal law. In 2019, China's per capita GDP reached USD 10,000 for the first time. It is estimated that by 2035, China's per capita GDP will exceed USD 20,000, entering the ranks of high-income countries. The next 15 years from now will be a new stage of economic development for China's economy to move from USD 10,000 to USD 20,000 per capita GDP. In the new stage of economic development, it is very unlikely that the nominal economic growth rate will fluctuate sharply. Western countries generally entered this stage after 1982, so we can see that after the 1980s, there was actually little analysis of American investment opportunities from the traditional macroeconomy.</p><p>3. Investment from exceeding expectations to industrial trends</p><p><b>Exceeding expectations, the logic is not clear and the operation is not easy</b></p><p>In secondary market investment and research analysis, many people like to ask the question, where is your opinion different from the consensus expectation of the market, or where is it beyond expectation. The person asking the question may want to grasp the core information in the shortest time, but this question is very difficult to answer. The difficulty lies not in his own opinion, but in the fact that the consensus expectation of the market is often really unclear.</p><p>Exceptional thinking paradigm, short-term profit performance is higher or lower than expected, and economic data is higher or lower than expected, which is more of a game thinking. And whether it exceeds expectations or not, it will often be unclear. Even if it can be clear, there will be great difficulties in practice. What should I do if the quarterly profit exceeds expectations? The investment logic beyond expectations is too short-term and gaming.</p><p><b>Trend Investors in the Boom Cycle</b></p><p>Beyond expectations, what can be better grasped is the investment logic of industrial trends. The stock market reflects the changes of industrial trends, and this context is very clear. Further, we believe that this thinking framework can be summarized as: trend investors in the boom cycle. Whether it is A-share market or overseas market, investors are actually looking for the most prosperous industry sector at that time at any point in time.</p><p>Guosen Strategy Research prefers to use return on net assets (ROE) to measure the boom cycle of industry sectors. Of course, there can be different measurement methods, such as profit growth rate (YOY), the relationship between ROE and YOY, such as the relationship between average cost and marginal cost in Principles of Economics. When the marginal cost exceeds the average cost, the average cost will go up further. Theoretically, without considering dividends, if the YOY of the enterprise is higher than the ROE in the next year, the ROE will go further upward; If YOY is lower than ROE, then ROE will go down; If the company pays 100% dividends, then as long as the profit growth rate is 0%, the ROE will remain the same for the next year.</p><p>The advantage of using ROE to measure the boom cycle of industry sectors is that the curve trend of ROE is smoother and more obvious than that of YOY. The disadvantage is that ROE is a relatively lagging indicator, and the indicator itself is not a sensitive leading indicator.</p><p>Taking ROE as a measure of the boom cycle of industry sectors, we can divide industry sectors into three types:</p><p>The first case, the sector with an upward ROE trend.</p><p>This is a typical sector with an upward boom cycle, and it is the first variety in investment. Because the ROE is upward, the valuation should also be upward in theory. In this case, it must be money for both performance and valuation. Historically speaking, such sectors basically have both absolute and excess returns, and the leading sectors generally appear here.</p><p>In the history of A shares, this is the case in the steel sector from 2001 to 2004, the banking sector from 2005 to 2007, the home appliance sector from 2006 to 2010, the GEM technology sector from 2013 to 2015, the consumption sector from 2016 to 2020, and the new energy and new energy vehicle sectors from 2020 to the present. In this case, it can be said that the valuation is basically ignored, because since the ROE has not peaked, the valuation top cannot be judged, and the inflection point of ROE is the inflection point of the market in most cases.</p><p>Moreover, in this case, it is difficult to find the correspondence between ROE and valuation in absolute numbers, and it is more the correspondence between the trend inflection point. Take the liquor industry as an example. In 2012, the ROE at the apex of the boom cycle was higher than now. As early as 2019, the valuation of many liquor companies had already broken through the level at the highest point of the market in 2012. After breaking through the upper limit, it is very difficult to discuss how high the absolute value is.</p><p>There is a very classic case of the offensive market of the upward trend of ROE, that is, the GEM market of the A-share market from 2013 to 2015. At that time, under the background of \"reform cattle\" and \"buffalo\", many views believed that the market was completely speculation, but in fact, there were fundamental reasons. We can clearly see that from 2013 to mid-2016, the ROE of GEM continued to rise, while the ROE of the corresponding main board continued to decline (see the figure below), which was the main driving force leading to that big market.</p><p>There are two characteristics in this market that I think need special attention: First, although the ROE of GEM was upward from 2013 to mid-2016, the absolute value of ROE never exceeded that of the main board, and the actual performance of the A-share market clearly illustrates an important conclusion, that is, the market is pricing the trend of ROE rather than the absolute value.</p><p>Second, in the upward process of ROE, after the \"two stock market crashes\" in 2015 and the \"two fuses\" in 2016, all GEM companies rebounded. Until the second half of 2016, with the turning point of the profit boom cycle of GEM companies, the market style was completely switched. This market characteristic is very similar to the market adjustment in February 2021. In the upward boom cycle of the ROE of the sector, after the overall market adjustment, it is still the upward sectors of these boom cycles that can rise.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63a72a7f1f3a05bb1f689112fdd7c23f\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"612\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>In the second case, the ROE is basically flat.</p><p>This kind of variety basically belongs to fixed-income assets, which can make money from performance, but can't make money from valuation. Because you can only earn money from performance, the investment of such assets depends on the valuation, because the ROE is basically flat, and the valuation center is generally unchanged. If the valuation is high when buying, it will reduce the future rate of return. On the contrary, if the valuation is low when buying, it will increase the future rate of return.</p><p>Typical cases of this type of sector are the American essential consumer sector since 1995 and the A-share banking sector since 2014. The essential consumer sector in the United States (including Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Colgate, etc.) has had a high ROE as a whole since 1995, almost 1.7 times that of the S&P 500 Index, but the profit trend has not gone up. The stock price of the essential consumer sector has absolute returns but no excess returns at all. (For more analysis, see: Sino-US Industry Comparison Series: Historical Trajectory of Excess Returns on Consumer Staples)</p><p>The banking sector of A shares is also very typical. The former banking sector was also a growth sector. From 2005 to 2007, the ROE continued to rise. At that time, it was said that the banking sector was an \"eternal growth sector\", because no matter what industry growth will eventually benefit banks, so the PB of the banking sector at that time was almost equivalent to the PE of the current banking sector. Since 2014, the overall valuation of A-share banking sector has been at the bottom, but ROE is still falling, although the annual decline is limited. In this case, we can calculate it like this. Assuming that the bank's ROE is 11%, if the valuation remains unchanged, the expected rate of return of holding it for one year is 11%, but the problem is that the valuation will change, because PB will also decrease when the ROE declines. In this way, considering the conversion of valuation, the expected rate of return of one year may only be about 6% to 8%.</p><p>So this goes back to an important basic question. If there is no opportunity for the ROE of a sector to rise in trend, then the investment opportunities generated by low valuation are all trading opportunities, and the time is relatively short and the range is relatively limited. Only when the ROE of the plate can bottom out and rise, will the plate have a trend opportunity.</p><p>The third scenario is a plate whose ROE continues to decline.</p><p>In this case, the industry belongs to a recession industry sector, which should be resolutely avoided, because the ROE continues to decline, and the valuation continues to decline. It is difficult to say where the valuation is low. The cyclical stock sector in the A-share market from 2012 to 2015 is such a case. In this case, the investment doesn't actually look at the valuation. Looking at the valuation investment often falls into the \"value trap\". You think the valuation is already very low, but in fact it will hit a new low, because the bottom of the profit has not been seen yet.</p><p>In this framework, we also have a clear definition of \"growth stocks\" and \"value stocks\". We believe that the so-called \"growth stocks\" are the industry sectors with an upward ROE trend, that is, earning money from performance and valuation. The so-called \"value stock\" means that the absolute level of ROE remains stable, and the profit has not accelerated upward. In this case, only the money of performance is earned, but not the money of valuation.</p><p><b>Domestic demand, science and technology, green, clear direction</b></p><p>So, where is the industrial trend of A-share investment in the future? The 14th Five-Year Plan and the outline of long-term goals for 2035 have clearly described the future development direction. To sum up, we believe that for the stock market, the opportunities are mainly concentrated in the six words \"domestic demand, science and technology and green\", which determine the main trend of China's economic policy and the main investment line of China's capital market in the next five years.</p><p>In terms of domestic demand, the 14th Five-Year Plan emphasized the need to form a strong domestic market and build a new development pattern. It is necessary to adhere to the strategic basis of expanding domestic demand, speed up the cultivation of a complete domestic demand system, organically combine the implementation of the strategy of expanding domestic demand with deepening supply-side structural reform, and lead and create new demand with innovation-driven and high-quality supply, thus improving people's quality of life and raising the level of social construction. As far as investment opportunities are concerned, we believe that the core opportunities are enterprises that can innovate products and create new demand with new supply.</p><p>In terms of science and technology, the 14th Five-Year Plan proposes to adhere to the core position of innovation in China's overall modernization drive, and regard scientific and technological self-reliance as the strategic support of national development. In the future, the country will aim at cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, quantum information, integrated circuits, life and health, brain science, biological breeding, aerospace science and technology, deep earth and deep sea, and implement a number of forward-looking and strategic national major science and technology projects. The investment opportunities here are mainly in the cutting-edge technology of independent innovation, as well as the transformation and upgrading of all walks of life with digitalization.</p><p>In terms of green, China is currently undergoing a new energy revolution. China has formally put forward a \"road map\" to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. \"Carbon peak in 2030\" and \"carbon neutrality in 2060\" will become the key tasks during the 14th Five-Year Plan period. Clean energy industry will be the main direction of China's energy development, and the growth rate of clean energy such as wind energy, solar energy, biomass, hydropower, nuclear power and natural gas will continue to lead. Clean energy has become the growth point of the new economy, and the new energy and new energy vehicle industry chain will undoubtedly be the main track of market investment in the next few years.</p><p>In the past few years, the performance of the A-share market has shown obvious structural differentiation characteristics. Emerging industries such as semiconductors, new energy vehicles, new energy, medical services and consumption have achieved huge gains, while traditional industries such as banking, real estate, construction, traditional energy and cycle have achieved huge gains, although their valuation is already very low, but their share price performance is very general and some even fall. This differentiation reflects the trend of profit change of listed companies under the background of economic transformation. With the continuous deepening of economic transformation and upgrading, the new and old kinetic energy of the current economy is accelerating the transformation, and we believe that this differentiation of the stock market will continue.</p><p>4. Get rid of the shackles of mean regression thinking</p><p>Mean regression is a way of thinking often used in daily research. Now it seems that mean regression thinking has often become an ideological constraint. Here, I will briefly talk about the following two questions.</p><p><b>Valuation Upper and Lower Bounds PE/PB Band Issues</b></p><p>The lower limit of the valuation upper limit and the PE/PB Band problem are a typical mean regression thinking. Similar extensions also include the upper and lower bounds of ERP (equity risk premium, that is, P/E PE minus risk-free interest rate). These kinds of problems are all the same methodology of thinking mode, that is, when the valuation reaches the upper limit, it is thought that the valuation will fall back, and at this time, the investment advice of selling should be given; When the valuation reaches the lower limit, it is thought that the valuation will rise, and at this time, the investment advice of buying should be given.</p><p>In the research report \"Market Thinking Essay No.32: Can Trees Grow to the Sky and Talk about the Valuation Ceiling\" in February 2020, I discussed the upper and lower limits of valuation in detail. In my personal opinion, from the lower limit of valuation, it may only be possible to trigger the occurrence of a lower limit of valuation if the two conditions of relatively stable profit and cost-effective Dividend rate compared with bond interest rate are met. Otherwise, it is difficult to say what kind of constraints or mechanisms will exist to maintain such a lower limit of valuation. However, there are actually very few companies and sectors in the whole stock market that can meet the two conditions of stable earnings and high Dividend. Therefore, for the vast majority of sectors and companies, the lower limit of valuation is difficult to establish or has actual constraints.</p><p>As for the upper limit of valuation, that is, whether there is a ceiling in valuation, from historical experience, this ceiling has never existed. The valuation high position of each bull market can be different. More importantly, with the development of the times, many situations that were considered impossible in textbooks and financial models have happened. First, zero interest rate and negative interest rate appeared in many countries after the financial crisis in 2008. Second, many excellent companies showed strong profit growth, and there was a situation of g> r, that is, the growth rate g of numerator profit in the valuation model should be continuously higher than the growth rate of denominator r. The emergence of these two phenomena will lead to an extremely embarrassing result for all valuation models, that is, in theory, the valuation will be infinite. In this case, it is even more difficult to judge where the upper limit of valuation is.</p><p>This is the actual situation. From the beginning of 2020 to the present, we can find that, on the one hand, the valuation of emerging industries represented by new energy, semiconductors, pharmaceutical consumption, etc. is constantly reaching record highs, whether it is the valuation differentiation between sectors or the valuation differentiation within sectors. On the other hand, represented by real estate, the valuation of some traditional industries, whether absolute or relative, is hitting new lows. In other words, under the current market situation, the upper and lower limits of valuation and PE/PB Band have been broken in many cases, and the idea of mean regression can no longer be used.</p><p><b>Whether it is necessary to frequently judge plate rotation</b></p><p>For the research of stock investment strategy, judging plate rotation is a very important job, and it can even be said that it is more important than judging the general trend. In the judgment of plate rotation, the thinking mode of mean regression often appears. Typical ideas include \"the high valuation leads the plate to rise more, the water flows to the lower place, and the low valuation stagflation plate should get up\", \"There are only three things, consumer stocks have been rising for three years, and it should not work this year\", \"the bottom of the big financial sector has been lying at the bottom for so long, so it should get up whatever happens\", \"the economic recovery in the first half of the year is optimistic about pro-cyclical, and the economic decline in the second half of the year is optimistic about counter-cyclical\", etc. These are the ideas that often appear in our daily research work, and they all have a strong mean regression color in essence.</p><p>First of all, I want to discuss a question here, what is the reason why the plate will rotate? I think the market can be divided into two types, one is \"trend market opportunity\" and the other is \"trading market opportunity\". The so-called \"trend market opportunity\", I think, is mainly the market driven by the fundamental profit cycle, that is, the market opportunity brought by the upward trend of ROE mentioned above. This kind of market generally lasts for a long time and has a large market range. The so-called \"trading market opportunity\", I think, is mainly caused by market trading factors, such as oversold rebound valuation repair, etc. Such markets may often come suddenly, but the duration is short and the market range is average. In recent years, the brokerage stock market that we often see sometimes suddenly breaks out and lasts for one to two weeks, which I think is a typical \"trading market opportunity\".</p><p>From the judgment of plate rotation, it is naturally best if you can grasp both the \"trend market opportunity\" and the \"trading market opportunity\". But we know that this is basically impossible in reality, and no one can grasp every segment of the market. Especially for \"trading market opportunities\", due to the characteristics of its market duration and amplitude, it is actually very difficult to judge and grasp. To bet on oversold rebound or valuation repair, it is often waiting for the rabbit. Therefore, what can be studied hard is more about the judgment of \"trend market opportunities\".</p><p>As mentioned earlier, after the economic transformation, the core driving force of the profitability of listed companies has become supply-side variables, such as the increase of concentration, the production of new products by technological innovation, the aging of the population, the widening gap between the rich and the poor and so on. These supply-side variables, compared with the changes in aggregate demand (changes in GDP, CPI, PPI, M2 and other indicators), are all trend slow variables. Therefore, once the trend is formed, the upward or downward profit cycle will take a very long time, and the resulting excess return time of the sector will also be very long. This is completely different from the profit cycle generated by the change of aggregate demand. The profit cycle generated by the change of aggregate demand may generally be 1 to 2 years, which is relatively short. Therefore, we can see that the excess return trend of procyclical sector often rotates back and forth.</p><p>Therefore, if these slow variables drive the profit cycle of listed companies in the future and become the norm, then the profit cycle and excess return time of the sectors may be longer, and the rotation between sectors will be significantly reduced. It is easy to self-defeat to frequently judge plate rotation with mean regression thinking.</p><p>Outlook: New Structures, New Opportunities</p><p>The above are some systematic summaries and reflections on the strategic framework and investment philosophy of stock investment in the past few years.</p><p>Guosen Securities believes that the golden years of China's capital market have arrived. At present, the old and new kinetic energy of China's economy has been transformed. In the future, there will be new opportunities in the stock market in the new economic structure.</p><p>And our strategic framework and investment philosophy are also changing from old to new, and they are changing faster and faster. We have always adhered to the ideals and beliefs of value investing.</p><p>We believe that value investing:</p><p>It is a logical thinking, not a game thinking;</p><p>It is to grasp the industrial trend, not to judge whether it exceeds expectations in the short term;</p><p>It is to invest in the rising intrinsic value of the enterprise, not to earn the spread between the stock price and the intrinsic value.</p>","source":"zxjzzl","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Value investment is not equal to low valuation investment, and the traditional cycle theory has failed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nValue investment is not equal to low valuation investment, and the traditional cycle theory has failed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">追寻价值之路</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 11:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Author: Yan Xiang, Guosen Securities</p><p>In the face of the new situation, new situation and new problems in China's stock market in recent years, we are constantly reflecting on some old investment frameworks and ideas. This paper discusses the ideas of four aspects, including value investment is not equal to low valuation investment, the traditional economic cycle framework analysis of stock market has failed, from exceeding expectation investment to industrial trend investment, and getting rid of the shackles of mean regression thinking. These are the summary of our thoughts on the investment framework concept and the problems encountered in our research work in recent years.</p><p>1. Value investment is not equal to low valuation investment</p><p>The first and most important thing to reflect on is value investing. Almost all stock market investors will agree with value investment, but what is value investment? There are huge differences between benevolent and wise.</p><p><b>Conventional wisdom tends to equate value investing with low valuation style</b></p><p>The most traditional value investment concept is particularly easy to equate value investment with low valuation investment, thus forming the so-called two-school investment styles in which \"value\" and \"growth\" are opposed. In the A-share market, we often see some indexes with \"value\" as their investment style, such as the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index. The compilation rules of indexes all take undervaluation as the main reference factor. In fact, what is embarrassing is that in recent years, the \"value investors\" who have performed well in the A-share market are often \"growth styles\".</p><p>The idea of value investment with undervaluation as its core originates from Graham's idea of margin of safety, that is, when the stock price is greatly lower than its intrinsic value, the margin of safety appears, and it should be bought at this time, while when the stock price exceeds its intrinsic value, it should be sold. Graham's concept of margin of safety has become the basic benchmark for many low-valued investors in the future. Graham's investment philosophy, born after the stock market crash in 1929 (the first edition of Securities Analysis was published in 1934), puts investment safety first.</p><p>To understand value investment as a low valuation style, in essence, it is more important to pay more attention to \"whether the stock price is significantly lower than the intrinsic value\", while to reduce the weight of \"the long-term dynamic change of intrinsic value in the future\". This investment concept is more game thinking and less logical thinking.</p><p>(Note: According to the compilation method issued by the index compilation company, the value factors referred to by the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index include four variables, namely: Dividend return (D/P), net assets per share to price ratio (B/P), net cash flow per share to price ratio (CF/P) and earnings per share to price ratio (E/P). After standardized Z-score treatment for these four variables to exclude the influence of extreme values, the mean Z-values of the four variables are calculated, and the 332 and 250 stocks with the highest mean values are selected and weighted to obtain the National Securities Value Index and CSI 800 Value Index respectively.)</p><p><b>Valuation is never a sufficient condition to determine the trend of the market</b></p><p>Judging from the historical experience of domestic and foreign stock markets, valuation has never been a sufficient condition to determine the trend of the stock market. In other words, it will not fall because the valuation is high, nor will it rise because the valuation is low. Simply relying on valuation high and low transactions is actually denying the effectiveness of the market.</p><p>In most cases, valuation is more like an option. It does not change the trend of the stock price, but only affects the magnitude of subsequent changes. If the valuation is at a low level when the fundamentals are reversed upward, then the subsequent upside will be relatively large. On the contrary, when the top valuation is high, if the fundamentals are reversed downward, the stock price will drop relatively large. However, no matter the top or the bottom, valuation itself will not be the factor that determines the turning point of stock price. What determines the turning point of stock price is the fundamental boom cycle. (For more discussion, please refer to: \"Market Thinking Essay No.32: Can Trees Grow to the Sky? Talk about the Valuation Ceiling\")</p><p>Therefore, we can see that in a bull market, the valuation will be higher if it is high, and in a bear market, the valuation can be lower if it is low. If we draw the stock price index and valuation on a picture and look at them together, we will find that the stock price index and valuation are completely synchronized at the top and bottom, and the valuation is the stock price and the stock price is the valuation. At this time, from an operational point of view, it is not guiding to judge the stock price by the valuation level. Moreover, once the valuation breaks through the original upper or lower limit, it is difficult to have a benchmark to measure how high or low the valuation is.</p><p>Regarding valuation, another much discussed issue is \"the effectiveness of low valuation strategy\". Due to the different profit growth attributes of the industry sectors themselves, the low-valuation sectors are mainly concentrated in pro-cyclical sectors such as finance, real estate, cycle and optional consumption, while the high-valuation sectors are mainly concentrated in counter-cyclical sectors such as medicine, essential consumption and TMT. Therefore, from the perspective of market performance, under general circumstances, the low valuation strategy is effective in the upward economic period, and the low valuation index can outperform the market as a whole. However, in the downward economic period, the low valuation strategy fails, and the low valuation index will underperform the market as a whole (see the figure below). This kind of market characteristic still reflects an essential problem, that is, the fundamental profit cycle rather than the valuation level determines the market trend. (For more discussion, see: \"Market Thinking Essay 42: Failed Low Valuation Strategy\")</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d056a54d9244c4c70ca7e2be3053144\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Of course, thinking that value investment is not equal to low valuation investment is definitely not to advocate high valuation investment style, but to say that we believe that value investment is mainly to invest in \"the rise of the intrinsic value of the enterprise\" rather than \"earning the spread between the share price and the intrinsic value\", which may be the main difference between the two.</p><p>Second, the traditional economic cycle theory has failed</p><p>The second thinking paradigm to be revised is the traditional economic cycle analysis framework. In recent years, we have seen that, first, the correlation between the performance of the stock market and the macroeconomy is getting weaker and weaker, especially the structural market of popular sectors in the market, which has almost nothing to do with the economic growth and inflation in the traditional macro; Second, the analysis frameworks of various \"clocks\" and \"electric fans\" are failing one after another.</p><p><b>Traditional framework failed to analyze stock market one after another</b></p><p>The variables of traditional macroeconomic analysis mainly include: economic growth indicators (GDP, industrial added value, fixed asset investment (including infrastructure investment, real estate investment, manufacturing investment, etc.), import and export, PMI, etc.), inflation indicators (CPI, PPI, etc.), and financial indicators (M1, M2, loans, social financing, etc.). These economic indicators generally represent aggregate demand for nominal economic growth.</p><p>The change in China's economy since 2012 is that the nominal economic growth rate has decreased and the volatility has decreased. In particular, the volatility of nominal economic growth has decreased, which makes the importance of the aforementioned macroeconomic indicators begin to decline continuously. At first, it was GDP, which probably didn't fluctuate since 2012, then there was no fluctuation in the indicator of industrial added value after 2015, and then there was basically no fluctuation in M2 after 2017.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71c71163e34f9ae9d11525039c565c17\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"629\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>These analysis paradigms based on the change of nominal economic growth rate and aggregate demand are reflected in various analysis frameworks of \"clock\" and \"electric fan\". It was the first Merrill Lynch clock, and then evolved into various models. Generally, the framework of this kind of \"clock\" and \"electric fan\" models is the same: first, several (N) macroeconomic variables are determined, and then each variable is divided into several (M) states, so that N^M macroeconomic \"scenarios\" can be defined; Then, in each \"scenario\", do historical data statistics, and get the performance of major asset prices in each \"scenario\", as well as the historical average of the overall and structural market performance of the stock market.</p><p>For example, if you choose two macro variables and determine two states (good and bad), then you can divide a total of four macro-economic \"scenarios\". If three macroeconomic variables are selected and three states (good, medium and poor) are determined, a total of 27 macroeconomic \"scenarios\" will be divided. Because only four quadrants can be displayed on the two-dimensional plane, the general model generally adopts the architecture of 2×2 four \"scenarios\". For example, Merrill Lynch has always been this 2×2 four \"scenario\" model, selecting two macro variables (economic growth and inflation) and dividing two states (upward and downward).</p><p>As the volatility of macroeconomic indicators decreases, the effectiveness of investment analysis frameworks based on these indicators is generally decreasing.</p><p>As for the Kitchen cycle, Jugra cycle, and Campo cycle, they are even more uninteresting. As we discussed in detail in our previous report, Goodbye to the Economic Cycle, these are pre-World War II ideas that are not found in mainstream macro textbooks. These academic views before World War II were very simple knowledge and understanding of economic cycles by human beings at that time. With the huge amount of statistical law research on these traditional \"economic cycles\" carried out by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) from the postwar to the 1960s, these were basically all falsified.</p><p>(Readers who are really interested in this piece can read NBER's series of research monographs on the economic cycle: Measuring Business Cycles (1946), Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions (1950), Business Cycle Indicators, Volume 1 & 2 (1961), Cyclical Fluctuations in the Exports of the United States Since 1879 (1967), Indicators of Business Expansions and Contractions (1967), The Business Cycle in a Changing World (1969), Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting (1983)</p><p><b>Essential change is a radical change in the driving force of corporate profitability</b></p><p>The reason why the correlation between the overall trend of the stock market and the macroeconomy is getting weaker and weaker, and the structural market in the stock market is becoming more and more difficult to grasp from the macroeconomy \"from top to bottom\" is that the core driving force of the profit growth of listed companies has changed, from aggregate demand to supply side. I think this is the core factor that determines the characteristics of the A-share market in recent years.</p><p>The starting point of the traditional top-down investment analysis framework is the nominal growth rate of the economy (because the revenue and profits of listed companies are also nominal numbers, the nominal economic growth rate is more important than the actual economic growth rate). We look for investment opportunities in the stock market according to the periodic reciprocating law of nominal economic growth rate.</p><p>The logic is roughly as follows: when the nominal economic growth rate is up, the overall profit cycle of listed companies is up. At this time, we look at the market, and then choose the procyclical sector with the greatest profit elasticity, including cycle, finance, optional consumption, etc. As the economy gradually overheats, policies begin to tighten, and the nominal economic growth rate begins to decline. At this time, the overall profit cycle of listed companies will also decline, so we will be bearish on the broader market, and then choose counter-cyclical sectors, consumption, medicine, public utilities, etc. as defense.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe22744ab64aab499582308280af1a5a\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"603\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Figure: The traditional top-down investment framework is failing</p><p>The biggest logical premise of this set of framework methodology is that demand change is the biggest variable affecting the profit elasticity of enterprises, so the fluctuation of nominal economic growth rate leads to economic cycle and plate rotation. After the volatility of nominal economic growth disappears, the biggest variable that determines the profit of listed companies is not aggregate demand, but a series of supply-side variables, including:</p><p>Increased concentration: With the increase of industrial concentration in traditional industries, the profit margin of leading enterprises continues to increase.</p><p>Consumption upgrading: Residents' consumption tends to be more and more quality and personalized, and the proportion of services is constantly increasing.</p><p>Scientific and technological innovation: generating new products and new supplies from bottom up.</p><p>In recent years, the leading sectors or big bull stocks in the A-share market have basically followed these logics. The core point is that it is the above-mentioned supply-side changes, not the total demand changes, that determine the profit of enterprises (not the logic that residents' income growth rate is high, so they consume more). However, concentration increase, consumption upgrading and technological innovation seem to have little correlation with traditional macroeconomic indicators (economic growth, inflation, monetary policy, etc.).</p><p><b>Consumer stocks over the past five years are the best evidence</b></p><p>Since 2016, in the past five years or so, the A-share consumption sector has performed very well, which I think should be undoubted.</p><p>This round of consumer stock market is definitely not a \"defensive\" attribute. It is impossible for defense to defend for so long and have sustained excess returns. This round of consumer stock market is an authentic \"offensive\" attribute, and the profitability of the sector continues to improve (ROE continues to improve), which is the main driving force of the market. At the same time, the stock price and valuation of the core target are reaching new highs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e549206abb83d23a64c936a7fa757f39\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"632\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>But the problem is that in the past five years or so, the ROE of A-share consumer sector has increased, and it is completely invisible in the macro data. Almost all consumption-related indicators in the macro data, including the growth rate of total retail sales of social consumer goods, the growth rate of urban and rural residents' income and the growth rate of urban and rural residents' expenditure, are all downward. Therefore, at this time, if we conduct top-down research and analysis, we think that the growth rate of consumption in China's economy may decline further in the future. Is it meaningful to invest in consumer stocks?</p><p>Therefore, in the previous report, I once jokingly said that if we start completely from the top-down macro research, we will definitely be able to perfectly steal the consumer stock market since 2016 (see: Market Thinking Essay No. 27: Talking about the pain points of top-down research from the consumer stock market in the past five years). You can find 10,000 macro reasons to explain why the profitability of listed consumer goods companies has not declined in the process of declining macro consumption growth, but you can't find a macro curve that can fit well to explain why the ROE of consumer stocks is upward.</p><p>In the consumer stock market, the core change of the failure of macro analysis is that the driving force of profit growth of listed companies has changed. It is not that residents' income has increased by 20%, so the total consumption has also increased by 20%. This is the logic of aggregate demand. The current situation is that residents' income has only increased by 10%, but residents have spent more money in some fields. According to the professional statement of economics, the demand-income elasticity of this part of products is greater than 1, which is the logic of a new structure.</p><p>In recent years, the liquor stock market is not that there are more people drinking, nor that people drinking more, but that the price of liquor is constantly rising. Then, looking back, we look for the investment logic of consumer stocks, not the logic of increasing total demand because of the increase of residents' income growth rate, but the varieties that consumers may spend more.</p><p>With the continuous development of economy, the fluctuation of nominal economic growth rate in all countries and regions generally decreases, which is a global universal law. In 2019, China's per capita GDP reached USD 10,000 for the first time. It is estimated that by 2035, China's per capita GDP will exceed USD 20,000, entering the ranks of high-income countries. The next 15 years from now will be a new stage of economic development for China's economy to move from USD 10,000 to USD 20,000 per capita GDP. In the new stage of economic development, it is very unlikely that the nominal economic growth rate will fluctuate sharply. Western countries generally entered this stage after 1982, so we can see that after the 1980s, there was actually little analysis of American investment opportunities from the traditional macroeconomy.</p><p>3. Investment from exceeding expectations to industrial trends</p><p><b>Exceeding expectations, the logic is not clear and the operation is not easy</b></p><p>In secondary market investment and research analysis, many people like to ask the question, where is your opinion different from the consensus expectation of the market, or where is it beyond expectation. The person asking the question may want to grasp the core information in the shortest time, but this question is very difficult to answer. The difficulty lies not in his own opinion, but in the fact that the consensus expectation of the market is often really unclear.</p><p>Exceptional thinking paradigm, short-term profit performance is higher or lower than expected, and economic data is higher or lower than expected, which is more of a game thinking. And whether it exceeds expectations or not, it will often be unclear. Even if it can be clear, there will be great difficulties in practice. What should I do if the quarterly profit exceeds expectations? The investment logic beyond expectations is too short-term and gaming.</p><p><b>Trend Investors in the Boom Cycle</b></p><p>Beyond expectations, what can be better grasped is the investment logic of industrial trends. The stock market reflects the changes of industrial trends, and this context is very clear. Further, we believe that this thinking framework can be summarized as: trend investors in the boom cycle. Whether it is A-share market or overseas market, investors are actually looking for the most prosperous industry sector at that time at any point in time.</p><p>Guosen Strategy Research prefers to use return on net assets (ROE) to measure the boom cycle of industry sectors. Of course, there can be different measurement methods, such as profit growth rate (YOY), the relationship between ROE and YOY, such as the relationship between average cost and marginal cost in Principles of Economics. When the marginal cost exceeds the average cost, the average cost will go up further. Theoretically, without considering dividends, if the YOY of the enterprise is higher than the ROE in the next year, the ROE will go further upward; If YOY is lower than ROE, then ROE will go down; If the company pays 100% dividends, then as long as the profit growth rate is 0%, the ROE will remain the same for the next year.</p><p>The advantage of using ROE to measure the boom cycle of industry sectors is that the curve trend of ROE is smoother and more obvious than that of YOY. The disadvantage is that ROE is a relatively lagging indicator, and the indicator itself is not a sensitive leading indicator.</p><p>Taking ROE as a measure of the boom cycle of industry sectors, we can divide industry sectors into three types:</p><p>The first case, the sector with an upward ROE trend.</p><p>This is a typical sector with an upward boom cycle, and it is the first variety in investment. Because the ROE is upward, the valuation should also be upward in theory. In this case, it must be money for both performance and valuation. Historically speaking, such sectors basically have both absolute and excess returns, and the leading sectors generally appear here.</p><p>In the history of A shares, this is the case in the steel sector from 2001 to 2004, the banking sector from 2005 to 2007, the home appliance sector from 2006 to 2010, the GEM technology sector from 2013 to 2015, the consumption sector from 2016 to 2020, and the new energy and new energy vehicle sectors from 2020 to the present. In this case, it can be said that the valuation is basically ignored, because since the ROE has not peaked, the valuation top cannot be judged, and the inflection point of ROE is the inflection point of the market in most cases.</p><p>Moreover, in this case, it is difficult to find the correspondence between ROE and valuation in absolute numbers, and it is more the correspondence between the trend inflection point. Take the liquor industry as an example. In 2012, the ROE at the apex of the boom cycle was higher than now. As early as 2019, the valuation of many liquor companies had already broken through the level at the highest point of the market in 2012. After breaking through the upper limit, it is very difficult to discuss how high the absolute value is.</p><p>There is a very classic case of the offensive market of the upward trend of ROE, that is, the GEM market of the A-share market from 2013 to 2015. At that time, under the background of \"reform cattle\" and \"buffalo\", many views believed that the market was completely speculation, but in fact, there were fundamental reasons. We can clearly see that from 2013 to mid-2016, the ROE of GEM continued to rise, while the ROE of the corresponding main board continued to decline (see the figure below), which was the main driving force leading to that big market.</p><p>There are two characteristics in this market that I think need special attention: First, although the ROE of GEM was upward from 2013 to mid-2016, the absolute value of ROE never exceeded that of the main board, and the actual performance of the A-share market clearly illustrates an important conclusion, that is, the market is pricing the trend of ROE rather than the absolute value.</p><p>Second, in the upward process of ROE, after the \"two stock market crashes\" in 2015 and the \"two fuses\" in 2016, all GEM companies rebounded. Until the second half of 2016, with the turning point of the profit boom cycle of GEM companies, the market style was completely switched. This market characteristic is very similar to the market adjustment in February 2021. In the upward boom cycle of the ROE of the sector, after the overall market adjustment, it is still the upward sectors of these boom cycles that can rise.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63a72a7f1f3a05bb1f689112fdd7c23f\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"612\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>In the second case, the ROE is basically flat.</p><p>This kind of variety basically belongs to fixed-income assets, which can make money from performance, but can't make money from valuation. Because you can only earn money from performance, the investment of such assets depends on the valuation, because the ROE is basically flat, and the valuation center is generally unchanged. If the valuation is high when buying, it will reduce the future rate of return. On the contrary, if the valuation is low when buying, it will increase the future rate of return.</p><p>Typical cases of this type of sector are the American essential consumer sector since 1995 and the A-share banking sector since 2014. The essential consumer sector in the United States (including Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, Colgate, etc.) has had a high ROE as a whole since 1995, almost 1.7 times that of the S&P 500 Index, but the profit trend has not gone up. The stock price of the essential consumer sector has absolute returns but no excess returns at all. (For more analysis, see: Sino-US Industry Comparison Series: Historical Trajectory of Excess Returns on Consumer Staples)</p><p>The banking sector of A shares is also very typical. The former banking sector was also a growth sector. From 2005 to 2007, the ROE continued to rise. At that time, it was said that the banking sector was an \"eternal growth sector\", because no matter what industry growth will eventually benefit banks, so the PB of the banking sector at that time was almost equivalent to the PE of the current banking sector. Since 2014, the overall valuation of A-share banking sector has been at the bottom, but ROE is still falling, although the annual decline is limited. In this case, we can calculate it like this. Assuming that the bank's ROE is 11%, if the valuation remains unchanged, the expected rate of return of holding it for one year is 11%, but the problem is that the valuation will change, because PB will also decrease when the ROE declines. In this way, considering the conversion of valuation, the expected rate of return of one year may only be about 6% to 8%.</p><p>So this goes back to an important basic question. If there is no opportunity for the ROE of a sector to rise in trend, then the investment opportunities generated by low valuation are all trading opportunities, and the time is relatively short and the range is relatively limited. Only when the ROE of the plate can bottom out and rise, will the plate have a trend opportunity.</p><p>The third scenario is a plate whose ROE continues to decline.</p><p>In this case, the industry belongs to a recession industry sector, which should be resolutely avoided, because the ROE continues to decline, and the valuation continues to decline. It is difficult to say where the valuation is low. The cyclical stock sector in the A-share market from 2012 to 2015 is such a case. In this case, the investment doesn't actually look at the valuation. Looking at the valuation investment often falls into the \"value trap\". You think the valuation is already very low, but in fact it will hit a new low, because the bottom of the profit has not been seen yet.</p><p>In this framework, we also have a clear definition of \"growth stocks\" and \"value stocks\". We believe that the so-called \"growth stocks\" are the industry sectors with an upward ROE trend, that is, earning money from performance and valuation. The so-called \"value stock\" means that the absolute level of ROE remains stable, and the profit has not accelerated upward. In this case, only the money of performance is earned, but not the money of valuation.</p><p><b>Domestic demand, science and technology, green, clear direction</b></p><p>So, where is the industrial trend of A-share investment in the future? The 14th Five-Year Plan and the outline of long-term goals for 2035 have clearly described the future development direction. To sum up, we believe that for the stock market, the opportunities are mainly concentrated in the six words \"domestic demand, science and technology and green\", which determine the main trend of China's economic policy and the main investment line of China's capital market in the next five years.</p><p>In terms of domestic demand, the 14th Five-Year Plan emphasized the need to form a strong domestic market and build a new development pattern. It is necessary to adhere to the strategic basis of expanding domestic demand, speed up the cultivation of a complete domestic demand system, organically combine the implementation of the strategy of expanding domestic demand with deepening supply-side structural reform, and lead and create new demand with innovation-driven and high-quality supply, thus improving people's quality of life and raising the level of social construction. As far as investment opportunities are concerned, we believe that the core opportunities are enterprises that can innovate products and create new demand with new supply.</p><p>In terms of science and technology, the 14th Five-Year Plan proposes to adhere to the core position of innovation in China's overall modernization drive, and regard scientific and technological self-reliance as the strategic support of national development. In the future, the country will aim at cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, quantum information, integrated circuits, life and health, brain science, biological breeding, aerospace science and technology, deep earth and deep sea, and implement a number of forward-looking and strategic national major science and technology projects. The investment opportunities here are mainly in the cutting-edge technology of independent innovation, as well as the transformation and upgrading of all walks of life with digitalization.</p><p>In terms of green, China is currently undergoing a new energy revolution. China has formally put forward a \"road map\" to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. \"Carbon peak in 2030\" and \"carbon neutrality in 2060\" will become the key tasks during the 14th Five-Year Plan period. Clean energy industry will be the main direction of China's energy development, and the growth rate of clean energy such as wind energy, solar energy, biomass, hydropower, nuclear power and natural gas will continue to lead. Clean energy has become the growth point of the new economy, and the new energy and new energy vehicle industry chain will undoubtedly be the main track of market investment in the next few years.</p><p>In the past few years, the performance of the A-share market has shown obvious structural differentiation characteristics. Emerging industries such as semiconductors, new energy vehicles, new energy, medical services and consumption have achieved huge gains, while traditional industries such as banking, real estate, construction, traditional energy and cycle have achieved huge gains, although their valuation is already very low, but their share price performance is very general and some even fall. This differentiation reflects the trend of profit change of listed companies under the background of economic transformation. With the continuous deepening of economic transformation and upgrading, the new and old kinetic energy of the current economy is accelerating the transformation, and we believe that this differentiation of the stock market will continue.</p><p>4. Get rid of the shackles of mean regression thinking</p><p>Mean regression is a way of thinking often used in daily research. Now it seems that mean regression thinking has often become an ideological constraint. Here, I will briefly talk about the following two questions.</p><p><b>Valuation Upper and Lower Bounds PE/PB Band Issues</b></p><p>The lower limit of the valuation upper limit and the PE/PB Band problem are a typical mean regression thinking. Similar extensions also include the upper and lower bounds of ERP (equity risk premium, that is, P/E PE minus risk-free interest rate). These kinds of problems are all the same methodology of thinking mode, that is, when the valuation reaches the upper limit, it is thought that the valuation will fall back, and at this time, the investment advice of selling should be given; When the valuation reaches the lower limit, it is thought that the valuation will rise, and at this time, the investment advice of buying should be given.</p><p>In the research report \"Market Thinking Essay No.32: Can Trees Grow to the Sky and Talk about the Valuation Ceiling\" in February 2020, I discussed the upper and lower limits of valuation in detail. In my personal opinion, from the lower limit of valuation, it may only be possible to trigger the occurrence of a lower limit of valuation if the two conditions of relatively stable profit and cost-effective Dividend rate compared with bond interest rate are met. Otherwise, it is difficult to say what kind of constraints or mechanisms will exist to maintain such a lower limit of valuation. However, there are actually very few companies and sectors in the whole stock market that can meet the two conditions of stable earnings and high Dividend. Therefore, for the vast majority of sectors and companies, the lower limit of valuation is difficult to establish or has actual constraints.</p><p>As for the upper limit of valuation, that is, whether there is a ceiling in valuation, from historical experience, this ceiling has never existed. The valuation high position of each bull market can be different. More importantly, with the development of the times, many situations that were considered impossible in textbooks and financial models have happened. First, zero interest rate and negative interest rate appeared in many countries after the financial crisis in 2008. Second, many excellent companies showed strong profit growth, and there was a situation of g> r, that is, the growth rate g of numerator profit in the valuation model should be continuously higher than the growth rate of denominator r. The emergence of these two phenomena will lead to an extremely embarrassing result for all valuation models, that is, in theory, the valuation will be infinite. In this case, it is even more difficult to judge where the upper limit of valuation is.</p><p>This is the actual situation. From the beginning of 2020 to the present, we can find that, on the one hand, the valuation of emerging industries represented by new energy, semiconductors, pharmaceutical consumption, etc. is constantly reaching record highs, whether it is the valuation differentiation between sectors or the valuation differentiation within sectors. On the other hand, represented by real estate, the valuation of some traditional industries, whether absolute or relative, is hitting new lows. In other words, under the current market situation, the upper and lower limits of valuation and PE/PB Band have been broken in many cases, and the idea of mean regression can no longer be used.</p><p><b>Whether it is necessary to frequently judge plate rotation</b></p><p>For the research of stock investment strategy, judging plate rotation is a very important job, and it can even be said that it is more important than judging the general trend. In the judgment of plate rotation, the thinking mode of mean regression often appears. Typical ideas include \"the high valuation leads the plate to rise more, the water flows to the lower place, and the low valuation stagflation plate should get up\", \"There are only three things, consumer stocks have been rising for three years, and it should not work this year\", \"the bottom of the big financial sector has been lying at the bottom for so long, so it should get up whatever happens\", \"the economic recovery in the first half of the year is optimistic about pro-cyclical, and the economic decline in the second half of the year is optimistic about counter-cyclical\", etc. These are the ideas that often appear in our daily research work, and they all have a strong mean regression color in essence.</p><p>First of all, I want to discuss a question here, what is the reason why the plate will rotate? I think the market can be divided into two types, one is \"trend market opportunity\" and the other is \"trading market opportunity\". The so-called \"trend market opportunity\", I think, is mainly the market driven by the fundamental profit cycle, that is, the market opportunity brought by the upward trend of ROE mentioned above. This kind of market generally lasts for a long time and has a large market range. The so-called \"trading market opportunity\", I think, is mainly caused by market trading factors, such as oversold rebound valuation repair, etc. Such markets may often come suddenly, but the duration is short and the market range is average. In recent years, the brokerage stock market that we often see sometimes suddenly breaks out and lasts for one to two weeks, which I think is a typical \"trading market opportunity\".</p><p>From the judgment of plate rotation, it is naturally best if you can grasp both the \"trend market opportunity\" and the \"trading market opportunity\". But we know that this is basically impossible in reality, and no one can grasp every segment of the market. Especially for \"trading market opportunities\", due to the characteristics of its market duration and amplitude, it is actually very difficult to judge and grasp. To bet on oversold rebound or valuation repair, it is often waiting for the rabbit. Therefore, what can be studied hard is more about the judgment of \"trend market opportunities\".</p><p>As mentioned earlier, after the economic transformation, the core driving force of the profitability of listed companies has become supply-side variables, such as the increase of concentration, the production of new products by technological innovation, the aging of the population, the widening gap between the rich and the poor and so on. These supply-side variables, compared with the changes in aggregate demand (changes in GDP, CPI, PPI, M2 and other indicators), are all trend slow variables. Therefore, once the trend is formed, the upward or downward profit cycle will take a very long time, and the resulting excess return time of the sector will also be very long. This is completely different from the profit cycle generated by the change of aggregate demand. The profit cycle generated by the change of aggregate demand may generally be 1 to 2 years, which is relatively short. Therefore, we can see that the excess return trend of procyclical sector often rotates back and forth.</p><p>Therefore, if these slow variables drive the profit cycle of listed companies in the future and become the norm, then the profit cycle and excess return time of the sectors may be longer, and the rotation between sectors will be significantly reduced. It is easy to self-defeat to frequently judge plate rotation with mean regression thinking.</p><p>Outlook: New Structures, New Opportunities</p><p>The above are some systematic summaries and reflections on the strategic framework and investment philosophy of stock investment in the past few years.</p><p>Guosen Securities believes that the golden years of China's capital market have arrived. At present, the old and new kinetic energy of China's economy has been transformed. In the future, there will be new opportunities in the stock market in the new economic structure.</p><p>And our strategic framework and investment philosophy are also changing from old to new, and they are changing faster and faster. We have always adhered to the ideals and beliefs of value investing.</p><p>We believe that value investing:</p><p>It is a logical thinking, not a game thinking;</p><p>It is to grasp the industrial trend, not to judge whether it exceeds expectations in the short term;</p><p>It is to invest in the rising intrinsic value of the enterprise, not to earn the spread between the stock price and the intrinsic value.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzU0MjAwOTA2MQ==&mid=2247502300&idx=1&sn=f6b8230d028f21dec67d1d80e51f11a5&chksm=fb23ba56cc54334066b36bfdcf5a8b1c883efb896ecfb52e8841c59f7da32cdeafc1ff829a9f&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=07211xnU5xlji6Ijny8EODue&sharer_sharetime=1626828171780&sharer_shareid=fbf3e6a28882bb91c07a361d6d431142#rd\">追寻价值之路</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a00745cd781f91ef6ef359064c639fbb","relate_stocks":{"000001.SH":"上证指数"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzU0MjAwOTA2MQ==&mid=2247502300&idx=1&sn=f6b8230d028f21dec67d1d80e51f11a5&chksm=fb23ba56cc54334066b36bfdcf5a8b1c883efb896ecfb52e8841c59f7da32cdeafc1ff829a9f&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=07211xnU5xlji6Ijny8EODue&sharer_sharetime=1626828171780&sharer_shareid=fbf3e6a28882bb91c07a361d6d431142#rd","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127726705","content_text":"作者：国信证券燕翔\n面对近几年中国股市出现的新情况、新形势、新问题，我们在不断地对一些旧有的投资框架和理念进行反思。本文讨论了四个方面的想法，包括价值投资不等于低估值投资、传统经济周期框架分析股市已经失效、从超预期投资到产业趋势投资、摆脱均值回归思维的束缚。这些是对我们最近几年的投资框架理念以及研究工作中碰到问题的思考总结。\n一、价值投资不等于低估值投资\n第一个需要反思的，也是最重要的，就是价值投资。几乎所有股票市场投资者，都会认同价值投资，但究竟什么是价值投资，仁者见仁智者见智分歧巨大。\n传统观点容易把价值投资等同于低估值风格\n最传统的一派价值投资理念，特别容易把价值投资等同于低估值投资，从而形成所谓的“价值”与“成长”对立的两派投资风格。A股市场中我们经常看到的一些以“价值”为投资风格的指数，比如国证价值指数、中证800价值指数等，指数的编制法则均以低估值为主要参考因素。而实际上比较尴尬的是，最近几年A股市场中业绩表现较好的“价值投资者”，往往又都是“成长风格”。\n以低估值为核心的价值投资理念，起源是格雷厄姆的安全边际思想，即当股票价格大大低于其内在价值时，安全边际出现，此时应该买入，而当股价超过内在价值时应该卖出。格雷厄姆的安全边际理念，成为了以后很多低估值价值投资者的基本标尺。格雷厄姆的投资理念诞生于1929年股灾之后（《证券分析》第一版于1934年出版），将投资安全性放在第一位。\n将价值投资理解为低估值风格，本质上还是将“股票价格是否大幅低于内在价值”看得更重一些，而对“内在价值未来的长期动态变化”权重降低一些，这种投资理念偏博弈思维多点而逻辑思维少点。\n（注：根据指数编制公司发布的编制方式来看，国证价值指数和中证800价值指数参考的价值因子包含4个变量，分别是：股息收益率（D/P），每股净资产与价格比率（B/P），每股净现金流与价格比率（CF/P）、每股收益与价格比率（E/P）。对这4个变量进行标准化Z分处理排除极值影响后，计算4个变量的Z值均值，选取均值最高的332只和250只股票加权后计算分别得出国证价值指数和中证800价值指数。）\n估值从来都不是决定行情走势的充分条件\n从国内外股市的历史经验来看，估值历来都不是决定股市行情走势的充分条件，换言之，不会因为估值高了就一定会跌，也不会因为估值低了就一定会涨，单纯依靠估值高低交易实际上是在否定市场的有效性。\n多数情况下估值更像是一个期权，它不会改变股价的走势，只会影响后续变化的幅度。如果基本面向上反转时，估值处在低位，那么后续的上涨空间会比较大，反之在顶部估值较高时，如果基本面向下反转，股价跌幅也会比较大。但无论顶部还是底部，估值本身不会成为决定股价拐点的因素，决定股价拐点的是基本面的景气周期。（更多讨论可以参见：《市场思考随笔之三十二：树能不能长到天上去，谈估值天花板》）\n所以我们看到，牛市时估值高了还会再高，熊市时估值低了还能再低。如果我们把股价指数和估值画在一张图上放一起看，就会发现顶部和底部时，股价指数和估值都是完全同步的，估值就是股价、股价就是估值，此时从操作上讲，用估值高低去判断股价是没有指导意义的。而且一旦估值突破了原有的上限或者下限，估值究竟多高算高多低算低，就很难再有基准去衡量了。\n关于估值，另一个讨论较多的问题就是“低估值策略有效性”。由于行业板块本身盈利增长属性不同，低估值板块主要集中在金融、地产、周期、可选消费等顺周期板块，而高估值板块主要集中在医药、必需消费、TMT等逆周期板块。所以从市场表现来看，一般情况下在经济上行期中低估值策略是有效的，低估值指数能够跑赢市场整体，而在经济下行期中，低估值策略失效，低估值指数会跑输市场整体（参见下图）。这种行情特点依然反映着一个本质问题，即是基本面盈利周期而非估值高低决定了行情走势。（更多讨论可以参见：《市场思考随笔之四十二：失效的低估值策略》）\n\n当然，认为价值投资不等于低估值投资，绝对不是去提倡高估值投资风格，而是说我们认为，价值投资主要是去投资“企业内在价值的上升”，而不是“赚取股价低于内在价值的价差”，这可能是两者的主要区别。\n二、传统经济周期理论已经失效\n第二个有待修正的思维范式，是传统的经济周期分析框架。这几年我们看到，一是股票市场的表现与宏观经济关联度越来越弱，特别是市场热门板块的结构性行情，与传统宏观中的经济增长通货膨胀几乎毫无关系；二是各种“时钟”、“电风扇”类的分析框架在陆续失效。\n传统框架对股市分析陆续失效\n传统宏观经济分析的变量主要包括：经济增长指标（GDP、工业增加值、固定资产投资（包括基建投资、房地产投资、制造业投资等）、进出口、PMI等）、通货膨胀指标（CPI、PPI等）、金融指标（M1、M2、贷款、社融等）。这些经济指标总体上都代表了名义经济增长的总需求。\n中国经济2012年以后出现的变化是，名义经济增长增速降低波动降低。特别是名义经济增长的波动降低，使得前述宏观经济指标的重要性开始不断下降。最开始是GDP，大概从2012年以后开始没什么波动了，然后是2015年以后工业增加值这个指标也没有什么波动了，再然后是2017年以后M2基本也没有什么波动了。\n\n这些基于名义经济增速和总需求变化的分析范式，体现在各种“时钟”、“电风扇”类的分析框架。最早是美林时钟，随后演化拓展出各种模型。这类“时钟”、“电风扇”模型总体上框架是一样的：首先，确定几个（N个）宏观经济变量，然后每个变量划分几种（M种）状态，这样就可以定义出N^M种宏观经济“情景”；随后再在每一种“情景”中，做历史数据规律统计，得到每一个“情景”中大类资产价格的表现，以及股市整体和结构性行情表现的历史均值。\n比如说如果选择2个宏观变量，确定2种状态（好和坏），那么就一共可以划分出4种宏观经济“情景”。如果选择3个宏观变量，确定3种状态（好、中、差），那么就一共会划分出27种宏观经济“情景”。由于二维平面上只能够展示四个象限，所以一般的模型普遍采取2×2四种“情景”的架构。比如美林始终就是这种2×2四种“情景”模型，选择了两个宏观变量（经济增长和通货膨胀），划分了两种状态（上行和下行）。\n而随着一个个宏观经济指标波动性的降低，基于这些指标所产生的投资分析框架有效性普遍都在不断降低。\n至于基钦周期、朱格拉周期、康波周期这些，就更没有意思了。我们在之前的报告《别了，经济周期》中详细讨论过，这些都是二战前的观点产物，在主流的宏观教科书上是统统没有的。这些二战前的学术观点，是当时人类对于经济周期非常朴素的认识和理解，随着战后到60年代美国国家经济研究局（NBER）对这些传统“经济周期”进行了巨量的统计规律研究，这些基本上被统统证伪了。\n（实在对这块感兴趣的读者可以去看NBER关于经济周期的系列研究专著：《Measuring Business Cycles》（1946）、《Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions》（1950）、《Business Cycle Indicators, Volume 1&2》（1961）、《Cyclical Fluctuations in the Exports of the United States Since 1879》（1967）、《Indicators of Business Expansions and Contractions》（1967）、《The Business Cycle in a Changing World》（1969）、《Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting》（1983））\n本质变化是企业盈利驱动力彻底改变\n之所以股票市场整体走势与宏观经济关联度越来越弱，股票市场中的结构性行情越来越难以从宏观经济中“自上而下”地去把握，根本上的原因，在于上市公司盈利增长的核心驱动力发生了变化，从总需求变成了供给端变化，我认为这个是决定最近几年A股市场行情特征的最核心因素。\n传统自上而下的投资分析框架的起始点，是经济的名义增速（因为上市公司的营收和利润也都是名义数，所以名义经济增速比实际经济增速更加重要），我们根据经济名义增速的周期往复规律去寻找股票市场的投资机会。\n其逻辑大致是这样的：名义经济增速向上时，上市公司整体盈利周期向上，此时我们看多市场，然后选择盈利弹性最大的顺周期板块，包括周期、金融、可选消费等。随着经济逐步过热，政策开始收紧，名义经济增速开始向下，此时上市公司整体的盈利周期也会向下，所以我们会看空大盘，然后板块上选择逆周期板块，消费、医药、公用事业等作为防守。\n\n图：传统自上而下投资框架在失效\n这套框架方法论的最大逻辑前提假设，在于需求变化是影响企业盈利弹性的最大变量，因此名义经济增速的波动，产生经济周期和板块轮动。名义经济增速的波动性没有了之后，决定上市公司盈利的最大变量就不是总需求了，而变成了一系列供给侧的变量，包括：\n集中度提升：传统行业随着产业集中度的提升，龙头企业利润率不断提升。\n消费升级：居民消费越来越趋向于品质化和个性化，服务性占比不断提高。\n科技创新：自下而上产生新产品新供给。\n这几年A股市场的领涨板块或者说大牛股，基本都是遵循着这几条逻辑走出来的，核心一点：决定企业盈利的是上述供给端变化，而不是总需求变化（并不是居民收入增速高了所以消费多了的逻辑）。而集中度提升、消费升级、科技创新，这些变量与传统宏观经济指标（经济增长、通货膨胀、货币政策等），似乎关联度都不大。\n过去五年消费股行情是最好的佐证\n从2016年起至今，过去五年多时间里，A股消费板块有非常出色的表现，这点我想应该是毋庸置疑的。\n这一轮的消费股行情，绝对不是“防守”属性的，防守不可能防守这么长时间有持续超额收益。这一轮的消费股行情是地地道道的“进攻”属性，板块的盈利能力持续提高（ROE持续提升），是行情的主要驱动力，而与此同时核心标的的股价和估值都在创新高。\n\n可问题就是，过去五年多时间里，A股消费板块的ROE提高，在宏观数据中完全看不到无影无踪。宏观数据中几乎所有与消费有关的指标，包括社会消费品零售总额增速、城乡居民收入增速、城乡居民支出增速，统统都是往下的。所以，这个时候，如果再自上而下进行研究分析，认为未来中国经济中消费的增速可能还会进一步往下，对消费股投资，有意义吗？\n因此，在之前的报告中，我曾经开玩笑地说过，如果完全从自上而下的宏观研究出发，一定可以完美踏空2016年以来的消费股行情（参见：《市场思考随笔之二十七：从近五年消费股行情谈自上而下研究的痛点》）。你可以找到一万条宏观的理由去解释为什么在宏观消费增速下行的过程中，消费品上市公司的盈利能力没有往下，但是你找不到一条宏观曲线，能够很好地去拟合去解释消费股的ROE为什么是向上的。\n消费股行情中，宏观分析之所以失效，核心的变化就是前面说的上市公司盈利增长的驱动力变了。不是说居民收入增长了20%，所以消费总量也增长了20%，这是总需求的逻辑。现在的情况是，居民收入只增长了10%，但是居民在某些领域消费的钱更多了，按照经济学的专业说法，就是这部分产品的需求收入弹性大于1，这是一个新结构的逻辑。\n最近几年的白酒股行情，不是喝酒的人多了，也不是喝酒的人酒量大了，而是酒价在不断提高。那么再往后看，我们去找消费股的投资逻辑，也不是去找因为居民收入增速提高而总需求增加的逻辑，依然是去找消费者可能支出比例提高的品种。\n随着经济的不断发展，各国和地区普遍都会出现名义经济增速波动不断降低的情况，这是一个全球性的普遍规律。2019年中国人均GDP首次达到1万美元，预计到2035年我国人均GDP超过2万美元，迈入高收入国家行列，从现在算起往后的15年，是中国经济从人均GDP一万美元向两万美元进军的经济发展新阶段。在经济发展新阶段中，再要名义经济增速大幅波动，可能性非常小。西方国家大体在1982年以后进入这个阶段，所以我们看到80年代以后，实际上很少有从传统宏观经济去找美国投资机会的分析。\n三、从超预期到产业趋势投资\n超预期逻辑说不清也不好操作\n二级市场投资和研究分析中，很多人喜欢问这样一个问题，你们的观点与市场一致预期不同的地方在哪里，或者说超预期的地方在哪里。提问的人可能是想在最短的时间内掌握核心信息，但这个问题却非常难回答，难点不在于自身的观点，而在于市场一致预期很多时候真的说不清楚。\n超预期的思维范式，短期的盈利业绩高于或者低于预期，经济数据高于或者低于预期，更多的属于一种博弈性的思维。且不论是否超预期很多时候会说不清楚，就算能说清楚，实践操作中也会有很大的困难，季报盈利超预期了，股价高开后怎么办？超预期的投资逻辑过于短期和博弈了。\n景气周期的趋势投资者\n超预期之外，更能够把握的是产业趋势的投资逻辑，股票市场行情反应产业趋势变化，这个脉络非常清晰。更进一步地，我们认为，这个思考框架可以归纳为：景气周期的趋势投资者。无论是A股市场还是海外市场，投资者在任何一个时间点实际上都是在寻找当时市场最景气的行业板块。\n国信策略研究比较喜欢使用净资产收益率（ROE）来度量行业板块的景气周期。当然完全也可以有不同的度量方式，比如用盈利增速（YOY），ROE和YOY的关系，好比《经济学原理》中平均成本与边际成本的关系，当边际成本超过平均成本时，平均成本会进一步向上。从理论上来说，在不考虑分红的情况下，如果下一年企业的YOY高于ROE，则ROE会进一步向上；如果YOY低于ROE，则ROE会向下；如果企业100%分红，那么只要盈利增速是0%，ROE下一年也保持不变。\n用ROE度量行业板块景气周期的好处，是ROE的曲线走势相比YOY更加平滑，趋势性更明显，缺点是ROE是一个相对滞后的指标，指标本身不是一个敏感的领先指标。\n以ROE作为行业板块景气周期的度量指标，我们可以把行业板块分为三种类型：\n第一种情况，ROE趋势向上的板块。\n这是典型的景气周期向上的板块，是投资中的首先品种。因为ROE是向上的，所以理论上估值也应该向上，这种情况下，一定是既赚业绩的钱，也赚估值的钱。历史来看，这类板块基本都是既有绝对收益又有超额收益的，领涨板块也一般都在此出现。\nA股历史上，2001年到2004年的钢铁板块、2005年到2007年的银行板块、2006年到2010年的家电板块、2013年到2015年的创业板科技板块、2016年到2020年的消费板块、2020年至今的新能源和新能源车板块，都是这种情况。这种情况下，可以说基本上是不看估值的，因为既然ROE没有见顶，估值顶也无从判断，ROE的拐点多数情况下就是行情的拐点。\n而且这种情况下，ROE和估值之间也很难找到绝对数的对应关系，更多的是趋势拐点的对应关系。以白酒行业为例，2012年行情景气周期顶点时的ROE比现在更高，而早在2019年时很多白酒公司的估值就已经突破了2012年行情最高点时的水平，突破上限后，再去讨论绝对值多高算高就很困难了。\nROE趋势向上板块的进攻性行情，有一个非常经典的案例，就是2013年到2015年A股市场的创业板行情。在当时“改革牛”、“水牛”的背景下，很多观点认为市场完全是炒作，实际上是有基本面原因的。我们可以清晰的看到，从2013年开始到2016年年中，创业板的ROE是持续向上的，而与此对应主板的ROE是不断下降的（参见下图），这是导致那波大行情的主要驱动力。\n这段行情中有两个特征我觉得需要特别注意：第一，虽然从2013年到2016年中，创业板的ROE是向上的，但是ROE的绝对值始终没有超过过主板，而A股市场的实际表现则明确无疑地说明了一个重要结论，就是市场是对ROE的趋势而非绝对值在进行定价。\n第二，就是在ROE上行过程中，2015年“两次股灾”和2016年“两次熔断”之后，反弹的都是创业板公司，一直到2016年下半年开始，随着创业板公司盈利景气周期的拐点出现，市场风格才彻底切换。这个行情特征跟2021年今年2月份市场调整的情况非常相似，在板块ROE向上景气周期上行中，市场整体调整之后，能够起来的依然是这些景气周期上行的板块。\n\n第二种情况，ROE基本走平的板块。\n这种品种基本上属于类固收资产，能赚业绩的钱，赚不了估值的钱。因为只能赚业绩的钱，所以对于这类资产的投资，是要看估值的，因为ROE基本走平估值中枢总体上是不变的，买入时估值高了就会降低未来收益率，反之买入时估值低则会提高未来收益率。\n这类板块比较典型的案例是1995年以来的美国必需消费板块以及2014年以来的A股银行板块。美国的必需消费板块（包括可口可乐、保洁、高露洁这些），1995年以来整体上ROE很高，差不多是标普500指数的1.7倍，但盈利趋势并未向上，必需消费板块股价有绝对收益但完全没有超额收益。（更多分析可以参见：《中美行业比较系列：必需消费品超额收益的历史轨迹》）\nA股的银行板块也非常典型。曾经的银行板块也是成长板块，在2005年到2007年ROE持续向上，当时的说法是银行板块是“永恒的成长板块”，因为无论什么行业成长最终都会利好银行，所以当时银行板块的PB差不多跟现在银行板块的PE相当。2014年以后A股银行板块整体上估值一直处于底部，但ROE依然在回落虽然每年下降的幅度有限。这种情况下，我们可以这样算，假设银行的ROE是11%，如果估值不变，那么持有一年的期望收益率就是11%，但问题是估值会变啊，因为ROE在下降PB也会下降，这样一来考虑估值上的折算，一年的期望收益率可能就只有6%到8%左右了。\n所以这也就回到了一个重要的基本性问题，如果一个板块的ROE没有趋势性上升的机会，那么由于低估值产生的投资机会都是交易性机会，时间都比较短幅度也比较有限。只有哪天板块的ROE可以见底回升了，板块才会有趋势性机会。\n第三种情况，ROE持续向下的板块。\n这种情况下的行业属于衰退型行业板块，应该是要坚决回避的，因为ROE在持续下降，估值也是持续下降的，估值低在哪里是不好说的。A股市场中2012年到2015年的周期股板块，就是这样的案例。这种情况下的投资实际上也是不看估值的，看估值投资往往会掉入“价值陷阱”，你以为估值已经很低了，但实际上还会再创新低，因为盈利的底还没有看到。\n在这个框架中，我们对“成长股”和“价值股”也有很清晰的定义。我们认为，所谓“成长股”，就是ROE趋势向上的行业板块，即赚业绩的钱，也赚估值的钱。而所谓的“价值股”，就是ROE绝对水平较高保持稳定的，盈利没有加速上行，这种情况下，只赚业绩的钱不赚估值的钱。\n内需、科技、绿色，方向明确\n那么，未来A股投资的产业趋势在哪里呢？十四五规划和2035年远景目标纲要已经清晰地描绘了未来的发展方向，概括起来，我们认为对股市而言，机会主要集中在“内需、科技、绿色”六个字中，这决定了未来五年中国经济政策的主要走向以及我国资本市场的投资主线。\n内需方面，十四五规划强调要形成强大国内市场，构建新发展格局。要坚持扩大内需这个战略基点，加快培育完整内需体系，将实施扩大内需战略同深化供给侧结构性改革有机结合起来，以创新驱动、高质量供给引领和创造新需求，进而改善人民生活品质，提高社会建设水平。就投资机会而言，我们认为核心机会是能够有产品创新的企业，用新供给创造新需求。\n科技方面，“十四五”规划提出，坚持创新在我国现代化建设全局中的核心地位，把科技自立自强作为国家发展的战略支撑，未来国家将瞄准人工智能、量子信息、集成电路、生命健康、脑科学、生物育种、空天科技、深地深海等前沿领域，实施一批具有前瞻性、战略性的国家重大科技项目。这里的投资机会，主要在自主创新的前沿技术，以及用数字化对各行各业的改造升级。\n绿色方面，当前我国正在经历一场新的能源变革，我国已经正式提出了2060年前实现碳中和的“路线图”，“2030年碳达峰”和“2060年碳中和”将成为“十四五”期间的重点任务，清洁能源产业将是我国能源发展主方向，风能、太阳能、生物质、水电、核电和天然气等清洁能源增速将继续领先。清洁能源已是新经济增长点，新能源和新能源汽车产业链毫无疑问是未来几年市场投资的主要赛道。\n过去几年，A股市场表现呈现出明显的结构分化特征，半导体、新能源汽车、新能源、医疗服务、消费等新兴产业取得了巨大涨幅，而银行、地产、建筑、传统能源、周期等传统行业板块，虽然估值已经很低了，但股价表现非常一般有些甚至还是下跌的。这种分化反应的是经济转型背景下，上市公司盈利的趋势性变化。而随着经济转型升级的持续深入，目前经济的新旧动能在加速转换，我们认为这种股市的这种分化也将会持续。\n四、摆脱均值回归思维的束缚\n均值回归是日常研究中经常会用到的一种思维方式，现在看来均值回归思维很多时候也成为了一种思想上的束缚，这里我简要谈以下两个问题。\n估值上下限PE/PB Band问题\n估值上限下限以及PE/PB Band问题，是一个典型的均值回归思维，类似的延展还包括ERP（股权风险溢价，即用市盈率PE减去无风险利率）的上下限。这类问题都是同一种思维模式方法论，即当估值触及上限时，认为估值会回落，此时应该给出卖出的投资建议；而当估值触及下限时，认为估值会回升，此时应该给出买入的投资建议。\n在2020年2月的研究报告《市场思考随笔之三十二：树能不能长到天上去，谈估值天花板》中，我曾经详细讨论过估值上下限问题。我个人观点，从估值下限看，可能只有满足盈利相对稳定和股息率相比债券利率有性价比这两个条件，才能够触发估值有下限的发生。否则很难说会存在什么样的约束或者机制，来维系这样的估值下限。但能够满足盈利稳定和股息率高这两个条件的公司和板块，在整个股票市场中实际上是非常少的。因此对于绝大多数板块和公司而言，估值下限很难成立或者说有实际约束。\n对于估值上限，也就是估值是不是有天花板的问题，从历史经验来看，这个天花板从来就是不存在的。每一轮牛市的估值高点位置都是可以不一样的。而且更重要的是，随着时代的发展，很多原来教科书和财务模型中认为不可能的情况都发生了，一是零利率和负利率2008年金融危机后在很多国家出现，二是很多优秀公司表现出了极强的盈利成长性，出现了g>r的情况，即估值模型中分子盈利的增速g要持续高于分母r的增速。这两种现象的出现，会导致所有估值模型都面临一个极其尴尬的结果，就是理论上会出现估值无穷大的情况，这种个情况下就更难以判断估值的上限在哪里了。\n实际情况就是如此，从2020年初至今，我们可以发现，一方面以新能源、半导体、医药消费等为代表的新兴产业，估值在不断创历史新高，无论是板块间的估值分化还是板块内的估值分化都在创新高。另一方面，以房地产为代表，部分传统行业的估值，无论是绝对估值还是相对估值，又都在创新低。换言之，目前的市场行情下，估值上下限和PE/PB Band在很多时候都已经被突破了，均值回归的思路已经没有办法再用了。\n是否需要频繁判断板块轮动\n对于股票投资策略研究而言，判断板块轮动是非常重要的一个工作，甚至可以说比大势研判更重要。在板块轮动判断中，也经常会出现均值回归的思维模式，典型的想法包括“高估值领涨板块涨多了，水往低处流，低估值滞涨板块该起来了”、“事不过三，消费股已经涨了三年了，今年应该可能不行了”、“大金融板块底部趴了这么久，怎么着也该起来了吧”、“上半年经济复苏看好顺周期，下半年经济回落看好逆周期”等等，这些都是我们日常研究工作中经常会出现的想法，本质上都带有强烈的均值回归色彩。\n这里首先想讨论一个问题，板块会出现轮动的原因是什么？我认为行情可以分为两种，一种是“趋势性行情机会”，另一种是“交易性行情机会”。所谓“趋势性行情机会”，我认为主要是由基本面盈利周期驱动的行情，也就是前面说的ROE趋势向上带来的行情机会，这种行情一般持续时间长行情幅度大。而所谓“交易性行情机会”，我认为主要是由市场交易层面因素引起的行情，比如超跌反弹估值修复等等，这类行情往往可能突如其来，但持续时间短行情幅度也一般，最近几年中我们经常看到的券商股行情有时突然爆发然后持续一到两周，我认为就是典型的“交易性行情机会”。\n从板块轮动的研判来看，如果既能把握“趋势性行情机会”又能把握“交易性行情机会”，自然是最好。但我们知道现实中这基本是不可能的，没有人能够把握住每一段行情。特别是对于“交易性行情机会”，由于其行情持续时间和幅度的特征，实际上非常难以判断把握，去下注超跌反弹或者估值修复，很多时候都是在守株待兔。因此能够去下功夫研究的，更多的是对“趋势性行情机会”判断。\n而如前所述，经济转型之后，上市公司盈利的核心驱动力，变成了供给侧的变量，比如集中度提升、科技创新产生新产品、人口老龄化、贫富差距扩大等等。这些供给侧的变量，相比总需求变化（GDP、CPI、PPI、M2等指标的变化），都属于趋势性的慢变量。因此一旦趋势形成，盈利周期向上或者向下的时间就会非常长，由此造成的板块超额收益时间也会非常长。这跟总需求变动产生的盈利周期完全不同，总需求变化产生的盈利周期，一般可能就是1到2年，时间都比较短，所以我们看到顺周期板块的超额收益走势经常是来来回回地轮动。\n因此如果未来由这些慢变量驱动上市公司盈利周期，成为一个常态，那么板块的盈利周期和超额收益时间可能都会比较长，板块间的轮动会明显减少。用均值回归思维频繁进行板块轮动判断，反而容易弄巧成拙。\n展望：新结构、新机会\n以上是我们对于过去几年股票投资策略框架和投资理念的一些系统总结和反思。\n国信证券认为，中国资本市场的黄金岁月已经到来，当前中国经济新旧动能已经转换，未来在经济新结构中，会有股市新机会。\n而我们的策略框架和投资理念，也在新旧转换，而且越转越快。我们一直坚守价值投资的理想和信念。\n我们认为价值投资：\n是一个逻辑思维，而不是博弈思维；\n是把握产业趋势，而不是判断短期是否超预期；\n是投资企业内在价值上升，而不是赚取股价低于内在价值的价差。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"000001.SH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":789,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812302796,"gmtCreate":1630550346215,"gmtModify":1676530337684,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/812302796","repostId":"2164147758","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":834804939,"gmtCreate":1629786355821,"gmtModify":1676530130621,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/834804939","repostId":"2161709897","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2161709897","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629781974,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2161709897?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-24 13:12","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Apple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161709897","media":"轻舟","summary":"苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm，拥有银黑金配色。新款iPad mini将在苹果秋季发布会与网友见面，你期待吗？","content":"<p><html><body><div><div itemprop=\"articleBody\"><div><div><div></div></div></div><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>An aluminum model drawing of the iPad mini 6, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel, looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4, has been exposed.</p><p>It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, USB-C interface, size 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm, and has silver, black and gold color scheme.</p><p>The new iPad mini will meet netizens at Apple's autumn launch conference, are you looking forward to it?</p><p><div zpv-events-inview=\"article-cont-bottom-viewport\"></div><div><span itemprop=\"url\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"indexUrl\">news.zol.com.cn</span><span itemprop=\"isOriginal\">true</span><span itemprop=\"author\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000931\">Zhongguancun</a>Online</span><span itemprop=\"isBasedOnUrl\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"genre\">report</span><span itemprop=\"wordCount\">343</span><span itemprop=\"description\">The aluminum model drawing of Apple's iPad mini 6 has been exposed, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel that looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4. It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with an 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, and uses USB-C interface, with a size of...</span></div></div></div></body></html></p>","source":"zol_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iPad mini 6 exposed with A14 chip\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">轻舟</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-24 13:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><body><div><div itemprop=\"articleBody\"><div><div><div></div></div></div><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>An aluminum model drawing of the iPad mini 6, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel, looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4, has been exposed.</p><p>It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, USB-C interface, size 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm, and has silver, black and gold color scheme.</p><p>The new iPad mini will meet netizens at Apple's autumn launch conference, are you looking forward to it?</p><p><div zpv-events-inview=\"article-cont-bottom-viewport\"></div><div><span itemprop=\"url\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"indexUrl\">news.zol.com.cn</span><span itemprop=\"isOriginal\">true</span><span itemprop=\"author\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000931\">Zhongguancun</a>Online</span><span itemprop=\"isBasedOnUrl\">https://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html</span><span itemprop=\"genre\">report</span><span itemprop=\"wordCount\">343</span><span itemprop=\"description\">The aluminum model drawing of Apple's iPad mini 6 has been exposed, which has no physical Home button, a thinner body and a right-angled bezel that looks like a scaled-down iPad Air 4. It is reported that digital bloggers broke the news that iPad mini 6 adopts side Touch ID fingerprint recognition, is equipped with an 8.4-inch screen, dual speakers + A14+60Hz four-sided wide screen, and uses USB-C interface, with a size of...</span></div></div></div></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\">轻舟</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38b14d4c1528b585f44d427c7a09d860","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161709897","content_text":"苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为 206mm X 138mm X 6.1mm，拥有银黑金配色。新款iPad mini将在苹果秋季发布会与网友见面，你期待吗？\n\nhttps://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\nnews.zol.com.cn\ntrue\n中关村在线\nhttps://news.zol.com.cn/775/7751834.html\nreport\n343\n苹果 iPad mini 6 的铝制模型图曝光，该模型没有实体 Home 键，机身更薄，采用直角边框，看起来就像缩小版 iPad Air 4。据悉数码博主爆料，iPad mini 6 采用了侧边 Touch ID 指纹识别，搭载了 8.4 英寸屏幕，双扬声器 + A14+60Hz 四面等宽屏幕，采用 USB-C 接口，尺寸为...","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":1,"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2866,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171106913,"gmtCreate":1626709919332,"gmtModify":1703763860451,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171106913","repostId":"1159080706","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159080706","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626709038,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159080706?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-19 23:37","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"[Movement] Recovering today's lost ground, Wei Xiaoli stopped falling and rebounded","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159080706","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"7月19日，理想汽车、蔚来、小鹏汽车止跌回升，收复今日失地。\n小鹏汽车此前公布旗下搭载量产车规级激光雷达的小鹏P5的预售价格，并宣布开启预售，小鹏P5新车预售价格16-23万元，共推出6个不同续航配置","content":"<p>On July 19,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>Stop falling and recover today's lost ground.</p><p>XPeng Automobile previously announced the pre-sale price of its XPeng P5 equipped with mass-produced car-grade lidar, and announced the opening of pre-sale. The pre-sale price of XPeng P5 new car is 160,000-230,000 yuan, and a total of six versions with different endurance configurations are available to choose from, with the maximum endurance reaching 600 kilometers under NEDC conditions.</p><p>At the same time, XPeng Automobile issued an announcement to issue 12,083,300 shares at an issue price of HK$165 per share on 19 July 2021 pursuant to the partial exercise of the over-allotment option.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f72a193fe4e67d7c18a4cbdff58c6864\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>[Movement] Recovering today's lost ground, Wei Xiaoli stopped falling and rebounded</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n[Movement] Recovering today's lost ground, Wei Xiaoli stopped falling and rebounded\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-19 23:37</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On July 19,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>Stop falling and recover today's lost ground.</p><p>XPeng Automobile previously announced the pre-sale price of its XPeng P5 equipped with mass-produced car-grade lidar, and announced the opening of pre-sale. The pre-sale price of XPeng P5 new car is 160,000-230,000 yuan, and a total of six versions with different endurance configurations are available to choose from, with the maximum endurance reaching 600 kilometers under NEDC conditions.</p><p>At the same time, XPeng Automobile issued an announcement to issue 12,083,300 shares at an issue price of HK$165 per share on 19 July 2021 pursuant to the partial exercise of the over-allotment option.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f72a193fe4e67d7c18a4cbdff58c6864\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f36b37eb8e9efe8641c7be55a7da26d","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","09868":"小鹏汽车-W","NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159080706","content_text":"7月19日，理想汽车、蔚来、小鹏汽车止跌回升，收复今日失地。\n小鹏汽车此前公布旗下搭载量产车规级激光雷达的小鹏P5的预售价格，并宣布开启预售，小鹏P5新车预售价格16-23万元，共推出6个不同续航配置的版本可供选择，NEDC工况下最高续航达到600公里。\n同时，小鹏汽车发布公告，于2021年7月19日因部分行使超额配股权而发行1208.33万股，每股发行价为165港元。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"09868":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"LI":0.9,"XPEV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":717,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807596099,"gmtCreate":1628042262411,"gmtModify":1703500109407,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807596099","repostId":"1163360313","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839249417,"gmtCreate":1629163330139,"gmtModify":1676529949678,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/839249417","repostId":"2160275638","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2160275638","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629158400,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2160275638?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-17 08:00","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Apple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160275638","media":"界面新闻","summary":"虽然对亲自下场造车的态度扭扭捏捏，但苹果公司目前正在研发自动驾驶类相关技术早已不是秘密。日前，苹果公司又发布了一项新专利，这项专利称为“朋友钥匙共享”，它基本上描述了一种与他人共享苹果车的方法。数字钥匙的概念将使苹果公司能够提供这种“朋友钥匙共享”系统，正如该公司在专利中所描述的那样，它应该允许其他人在不披露任何机密信息和暴露关键数据的情况下驾驶你的汽车。","content":"<p><div>Although the attitude towards building a car in person is twisty, it is no secret that Apple is currently developing autonomous driving-related technologies. While the Cupertino-based tech giant hasn't said anything about it, the company's countless patents filed in the automotive space are certainly increasing the truth of the matter. A few days ago, Apple released a new patent called \"Friend Key Sharing,\" which basically describes a way to share an Apple car with others. It's easy to guess that the whole thing doesn't involve traditional physical car keys,...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple has issued a new car patent, this time on virtual car key sharing\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">界面新闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-17 08:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Although the attitude towards building a car in person is twisty, it is no secret that Apple is currently developing autonomous driving-related technologies. While the Cupertino-based tech giant hasn't said anything about it, the company's countless patents filed in the automotive space are certainly increasing the truth of the matter. A few days ago, Apple released a new patent called \"Friend Key Sharing,\" which basically describes a way to share an Apple car with others. It's easy to guess that the whole thing doesn't involve traditional physical car keys,...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b\">界面新闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ddd65df9928c608cb63c03990d41f6c2","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210817080114788b819f&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2160275638","content_text":"虽然对亲自下场造车的态度扭扭捏捏，但苹果公司目前正在研发自动驾驶类相关技术早已不是秘密。虽然这家位于库比蒂诺的科技巨头没有说任何关于它的事情，但该公司在汽车领域申请的无数专利无疑是在不断增加这件事的真实性。日前，苹果公司又发布了一项新专利，这项专利称为“朋友钥匙共享（Friend Key Sharing）”，它基本上描述了一种与他人共享苹果车的方法。很容易猜到，整个事情并不涉及传统的实体汽车钥匙，因为在苹果的世界里，汽车钥匙已经是“昨天的事情”了。一部iPhone就是你所需要的全部硬件，而苹果汽车很有可能全面采用数字车钥匙，这个位于库比蒂诺的科技巨头已经在与宝马等合作伙伴推进这一概念。数字钥匙的概念将使苹果公司能够提供这种“朋友钥匙共享”系统，正如该公司在专利中所描述的那样，它应该允许其他人在不披露任何机密信息和暴露关键数据的情况下驾驶你的汽车。苹果公司描述道：“如果访问是由实物钥匙或钥匙扣控制的，业主必须将钥匙/钥匙扣实际交付给个人，然后必须在个人访问结束后实际取回钥匙/钥匙扣。”当然，鉴于该公司希望为其客户提供充分便利，苹果不会出现这种情况。“如果访问是由秘密数据控制的，所有者必须将秘密数据传达给个人。如果通信不安全，第三方可以观察到秘密数据。此外，在个人完成访问后，必须改变秘密数据”iPhone制造商进一步补充说。因此，使用密码并与他人分享也不是苹果的选择。相反，该公司发明了一个基于令牌的系统，由另一个设备提供动力，然后用安全的方法（iPhone上的App）与另一个人分享。这个令牌类似于一个一次性的访问代码，所以在他们使用汽车后，它会自动过期，不再提供对车辆的访问。当然，重要的是要记住整个事情目前仍是一项专利，但如果这种能力最终在苹果汽车2025年准备就绪时上线，也不要太惊讶。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3625,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830573574,"gmtCreate":1629085489198,"gmtModify":1676529924957,"author":{"id":"3585964302651088","authorId":"3585964302651088","name":"GoodLuck0102","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/344a326f3c2ab4d67b3f22a58a26f13f","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3585964302651088","authorIdStr":"3585964302651088"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/830573574","repostId":"2159246901","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2159246901","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629081660,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2159246901?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-16 10:41","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159246901","media":"虎嗅","summary":"海地地震已致1297人死亡：苹果CEO库克表态将捐款援助。8月14日20时29分，加勒比海北部岛国海地发生7.3级地震，震源深度10千米。当地官员确认，截止15日，此次地震已经造成1297人死亡，超5700人受伤。在最严重的三个地区，有13785间房屋受损，13694间房屋毁坏。对于此次灾难，苹果CEO库克出面表示对遇难者表示同情，将捐款以帮助社区救援和恢复工作。","content":"<p><html><body><article>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>CEO Cook stated that he would donate money to aid.</p><p>At 20: 29 on August 14th, a 7.3-magnitude earthquake occurred in Haiti, an island country in the northern Caribbean Sea, with a focal depth of 10 kilometers. Local officials confirmed that by the 15th, the earthquake had killed 1,297 people and injured more than 5,700. In the three worst areas, 13,785 homes were damaged and 13,694 destroyed.</p><p>For this disaster, Apple CEO Cook came forward to express sympathy for the victims and will donate money to help the community rescue and recovery efforts.</p><p></article></body></html></p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHaiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people: Apple CEO Cook stated that he will donate aid\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">虎嗅</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-16 10:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><body><article>Haiti earthquake has killed 1,297 people:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>CEO Cook stated that he would donate money to aid.</p><p>At 20: 29 on August 14th, a 7.3-magnitude earthquake occurred in Haiti, an island country in the northern Caribbean Sea, with a focal depth of 10 kilometers. Local officials confirmed that by the 15th, the earthquake had killed 1,297 people and injured more than 5,700. In the three worst areas, 13,785 homes were damaged and 13,694 destroyed.</p><p>For this disaster, Apple CEO Cook came forward to express sympathy for the victims and will donate money to help the community rescue and recovery efforts.</p><p></article></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210816104112788b63fe&s=b\">虎嗅</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28fdf96529f17262c1abf4a746dcc817","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210816104112788b63fe&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2159246901","content_text":"海地地震已致1297人死亡：苹果CEO库克表态将捐款援助。8月14日20时29分，加勒比海北部岛国海地发生7.3级地震，震源深度10千米。当地官员确认，截止15日，此次地震已经造成1297人死亡，超5700人受伤。在最严重的三个地区，有13785间房屋受损，13694间房屋毁坏。对于此次灾难，苹果CEO库克出面表示对遇难者表示同情，将捐款以帮助社区救援和恢复工作。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3657,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}