JlY personal page - To The Moon

JlY

JlY

No personal profile

30Follow

6Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-12-20

Ok

Elon Musk Is a Genius Market Timer. That’s Bad News for Tesla Stock

2022-12-20

Ok

3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street

2022-12-20

Okok

Apple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son

2022-01-03

[Strong] [Strong]

4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday

2021-12-30

Hi

Semiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading

2021-12-29

Hi

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-12-28

Great

S&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer

2021-12-27

[Strong]

Got $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030

2021-12-27

Time to buy!

2021-12-27

[Strong]

Why It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart

2021-12-25

👍

What are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?

2021-12-23

Time to buy Apple!

2021-12-23

👍

Apple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says

2021-12-22

Time to buy Apple now?

2021-07-15

Wow

A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase

2021-07-15

Great!!!

Citigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans

2021-07-15

Gosh!

India bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row

2021-07-11

Maybe

Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?

2021-07-11

$Coca-Cola(KO)$Up up up!

2021-07-04

Maybe

Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4087667102961480","uuid":"4087667102961480","gmtCreate":1624564039908,"gmtModify":1625382983905,"name":"JlY","pinyin":"jly","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":30,"tweetSize":21,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.03.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":"60.90%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9926853144,"gmtCreate":1671516215089,"gmtModify":1676538549155,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926853144","repostId":"2292487749","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2292487749","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1671498036,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2292487749?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-20 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Is a Genius Market Timer. That’s Bad News for Tesla Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2292487749","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Last Wednesday, we finally got the announcement:Elon Musk had sold another $3.6 billion of Tesla (NA","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Last Wednesday, we finally got the announcement:</p><p><i>Elon Musk had sold another $3.6 billion of </i><i><b>Tesla</b></i><i> (NASDAQ:</i><i><b>TSLA</b></i><i>) stock earlier in the week.</i> (SEC filings tend to lag several days behind transactions).</p><p>Such a sale had been months in the making. Not only did Mr. Musk likely overpay for his Twitter acquisition. A series of unforced errors has turned the social media company into a cash-burning furnace. The world’s formerly richest person has now sold $22.6 billion Tesla stock since April… And <i>still</i> has around $3.1 billion in miscellaneous liabilities, according to the <i>Bloomberg Billionaires Index</i>.</p><p><i>Let that sink in. </i></p><p>Yet, the big headlines also obscure a non-laughing matter: Mr. Musk chose to <b>sell</b> his Tesla shares outright rather than use them as loan collateral as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> allegedly floated.</p><p>And that’s a big difference.</p><p><b>If past is prologue, Elon Musk is signaling to get out of TSLA stock now</b>.</p><h2>The Genius of Market Timing</h2><p>CEOs and other executives routinely trade shares of their own companies. It’s a strategy that typically leads to a 15% outperformance and is the basis of my <b>Insider Track strategy</b>. $200,000 invested at that rate would be worth almost $15 million only 20 years later. Plenty to retire on, and enough to buy a cheap social media site of your own.</p><p>The strategy is also entirely legal for the executives <i>and</i> those who mirror their trades. As long as executives 1) avoid trading during “blackout” periods immediately preceding earnings releases and 2) report their transactions to the SEC in a timely manner, they can use their personal knowledge of the business to profit as they please. Investors like you and me can use these SEC filings to mimic these gains with surprisingly little slippage.</p><p>Some individuals take these SEC-granted freedoms to extremes. A 2021 report by the Wall Street Journal found dozens of federal judges who traded stocks of litigants during cases. One such judge bought thousands of dollars of <b>Medtronic</b> (NYSE:<b>MDT</b>) while overseeing a lawsuit involving a potentially defective Medtronic graft implanted into a 12-year-old boy. The case was dismissed, and shares of the medical device firm rose by double digits.</p><p>Others simply follow along. I’ve also used the strategy to identify big winners like <b>Longeveron</b> (NASDAQ:<b>LGVN</b>) — a company that returned almost 1,000% in three months on a “surprise” FDA authorization. Some gold miners have also done quite well after “discovering” new veins after insider purchasing.</p><p>And that brings us to Elon Musk, a genius stock market timer.</p><h2>How to Earn Millions Without Really Trying</h2><p>In 2017, Elon Musk began scooping up large chunks of Tesla’s beaten-down shares. The electric vehicle maker was on track to lose $2.2 billion that year and liquidity was becoming a concern.</p><p>Within three months of his $35 million purchase (these were the old days before he was worth hundreds of billions), Mr. Musk would announce that he had reached a blockbuster deal to refinance his firm. Tesla would raise $1.8 billion in bonds, and rising shares would award Mr. Musk a windfall profit.</p><p>Tesla’s CEO would use a similar strategy in 2018 after buying $25 million more in shares… and then announcing plans to take the company private. Another series of well-timed buys in May 2019 and February 2020 would rise between 206% and 235%. These were some of the most profitable trades tracked by TipRanks.</p><p>In late 2021, however, Mr. Musk’s tack began to change. Rather than <i>buy</i> stock, he began to sell.</p><p>And he sold a great deal.</p><p>At that point, I had already turned bearish about Tesla eleven months earlier. “It’s time to take profits on Tesla,” I wrote in January of that year. “Bullish dreamers have turned Tesla stock into an outright fantasy.”</p><p>Mr. Musk’s timing was even better than mine. Had investors waited until November to sell, they would have earned an extra 40% on the way up for their troubles. A C-suite role — it turns out — makes people excellent at trading stocks of their companies. And Elon Musk has routinely (and gleefully) profited from his position.</p><h2>Sale Vs. Loan: Musk Now a TSLA Stock Bear</h2><p>That’s why Mr. Musk’s latest share sales should concern even the most rabid Tesla fan. Sales in 2021 and 2022 typically preceded bad news about Chinese demand… or release date delays… or becoming a CEO of a giant social media firm. He hasn’t been wrong before.</p><p>In October, he warned by tweet that a recession could continue “until the spring of ’24.” Sales in China — which accounts for 50% of revenue — are noticeably slowing down. And as I wrote in my 2021 note (which is still true today), Tesla’s high valuation “means its earnings potential will take years to catch up to its share price.”</p><p>As 2023 approaches, the car firm is still worth almost $500 billion, 10 times greater than <b>Ford</b> (NYSE:<b><u>F</u></b>). And even if it <i>does </i>meet its aggressive cash flow targets for 2023, shares are still priced at over 30X that figure.</p><p>The matter is made worse because Mr. Musk had a choice <i>not</i> to sell shares. Tesla’s proxy rules allow him to pledge shares of his company as collateral for loans, allowing him to raise cash without liquidating a single shred of equity. Closed-door negotiations also suggest that Morgan Stanley offered to provide margin loans for Mr. Musk.</p><p>He decided to sell anyway.</p><p>Of course, both Mr. Musk and I could be wrong about taking profits on Tesla shares today. Demand for electric vehicles is only going up, and Tesla remains a favored brand among the high-end players. And no person — not even Mr. Musk — can beat the market every time.</p><p>But for those who like betting “odds on,” consider Mr. Musk’s massive share sales a warning that it’s time to take profits on TSLA stock.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Is a Genius Market Timer. That’s Bad News for Tesla Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Is a Genius Market Timer. That’s Bad News for Tesla Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-20 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/12/elon-musk-is-a-genius-market-timer-thats-bad-news-for-tesla-tsla-stock/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Last Wednesday, we finally got the announcement:Elon Musk had sold another $3.6 billion of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock earlier in the week. (SEC filings tend to lag several days behind transactions)....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/12/elon-musk-is-a-genius-market-timer-thats-bad-news-for-tesla-tsla-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/12/elon-musk-is-a-genius-market-timer-thats-bad-news-for-tesla-tsla-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2292487749","content_text":"Last Wednesday, we finally got the announcement:Elon Musk had sold another $3.6 billion of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock earlier in the week. (SEC filings tend to lag several days behind transactions).Such a sale had been months in the making. Not only did Mr. Musk likely overpay for his Twitter acquisition. A series of unforced errors has turned the social media company into a cash-burning furnace. The world’s formerly richest person has now sold $22.6 billion Tesla stock since April… And still has around $3.1 billion in miscellaneous liabilities, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.Let that sink in. Yet, the big headlines also obscure a non-laughing matter: Mr. Musk chose to sell his Tesla shares outright rather than use them as loan collateral as Morgan Stanley allegedly floated.And that’s a big difference.If past is prologue, Elon Musk is signaling to get out of TSLA stock now.The Genius of Market TimingCEOs and other executives routinely trade shares of their own companies. It’s a strategy that typically leads to a 15% outperformance and is the basis of my Insider Track strategy. $200,000 invested at that rate would be worth almost $15 million only 20 years later. Plenty to retire on, and enough to buy a cheap social media site of your own.The strategy is also entirely legal for the executives and those who mirror their trades. As long as executives 1) avoid trading during “blackout” periods immediately preceding earnings releases and 2) report their transactions to the SEC in a timely manner, they can use their personal knowledge of the business to profit as they please. Investors like you and me can use these SEC filings to mimic these gains with surprisingly little slippage.Some individuals take these SEC-granted freedoms to extremes. A 2021 report by the Wall Street Journal found dozens of federal judges who traded stocks of litigants during cases. One such judge bought thousands of dollars of Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) while overseeing a lawsuit involving a potentially defective Medtronic graft implanted into a 12-year-old boy. The case was dismissed, and shares of the medical device firm rose by double digits.Others simply follow along. I’ve also used the strategy to identify big winners like Longeveron (NASDAQ:LGVN) — a company that returned almost 1,000% in three months on a “surprise” FDA authorization. Some gold miners have also done quite well after “discovering” new veins after insider purchasing.And that brings us to Elon Musk, a genius stock market timer.How to Earn Millions Without Really TryingIn 2017, Elon Musk began scooping up large chunks of Tesla’s beaten-down shares. The electric vehicle maker was on track to lose $2.2 billion that year and liquidity was becoming a concern.Within three months of his $35 million purchase (these were the old days before he was worth hundreds of billions), Mr. Musk would announce that he had reached a blockbuster deal to refinance his firm. Tesla would raise $1.8 billion in bonds, and rising shares would award Mr. Musk a windfall profit.Tesla’s CEO would use a similar strategy in 2018 after buying $25 million more in shares… and then announcing plans to take the company private. Another series of well-timed buys in May 2019 and February 2020 would rise between 206% and 235%. These were some of the most profitable trades tracked by TipRanks.In late 2021, however, Mr. Musk’s tack began to change. Rather than buy stock, he began to sell.And he sold a great deal.At that point, I had already turned bearish about Tesla eleven months earlier. “It’s time to take profits on Tesla,” I wrote in January of that year. “Bullish dreamers have turned Tesla stock into an outright fantasy.”Mr. Musk’s timing was even better than mine. Had investors waited until November to sell, they would have earned an extra 40% on the way up for their troubles. A C-suite role — it turns out — makes people excellent at trading stocks of their companies. And Elon Musk has routinely (and gleefully) profited from his position.Sale Vs. Loan: Musk Now a TSLA Stock BearThat’s why Mr. Musk’s latest share sales should concern even the most rabid Tesla fan. Sales in 2021 and 2022 typically preceded bad news about Chinese demand… or release date delays… or becoming a CEO of a giant social media firm. He hasn’t been wrong before.In October, he warned by tweet that a recession could continue “until the spring of ’24.” Sales in China — which accounts for 50% of revenue — are noticeably slowing down. And as I wrote in my 2021 note (which is still true today), Tesla’s high valuation “means its earnings potential will take years to catch up to its share price.”As 2023 approaches, the car firm is still worth almost $500 billion, 10 times greater than Ford (NYSE:F). And even if it does meet its aggressive cash flow targets for 2023, shares are still priced at over 30X that figure.The matter is made worse because Mr. Musk had a choice not to sell shares. Tesla’s proxy rules allow him to pledge shares of his company as collateral for loans, allowing him to raise cash without liquidating a single shred of equity. Closed-door negotiations also suggest that Morgan Stanley offered to provide margin loans for Mr. Musk.He decided to sell anyway.Of course, both Mr. Musk and I could be wrong about taking profits on Tesla shares today. Demand for electric vehicles is only going up, and Tesla remains a favored brand among the high-end players. And no person — not even Mr. Musk — can beat the market every time.But for those who like betting “odds on,” consider Mr. Musk’s massive share sales a warning that it’s time to take profits on TSLA stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":397,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926853011,"gmtCreate":1671516186934,"gmtModify":1676538549148,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926853011","repostId":"2292823759","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2292823759","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1671508653,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2292823759?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-20 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2292823759","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"If analysts are right, better days could be on the way for these beaten-down stocks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he&#39;s frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> still hasn&#39;t been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the same level they were at the beginning of the year.</p><p>Though, if analysts are right, the Oracle of Omaha just might be able to continue his market-beating ways in 2023. According to Wall Street, these three Buffett stocks could soar by 39% to 83% next year.</p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></h2><p>Buffett himself likely didn&#39;t make the call to buy <b>Snowflake</b> for Berkshire&#39;s portfolio. One of his two investment managers -- Todd Combs or Ted Weschler -- probably led the charge. However, Buffett clearly went along for the ride. And it&#39;s been a wild one so far.</p><p>Berkshire quickly made close to $800 million after Snowflake&#39;s initial public offering (IPO) in 2020. The tech stock, though, has crashed nearly 60% so far this year, making it one of Buffett&#39;s biggest losers.</p><p>However, Wall Street remains bullish about Snowflake. The consensus price target for the stock represents an upside potential of 39%. In November, 28 of the 41 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv rated Snowflake as either a buy or a strong buy, with only one recommending investors sell the stock.</p><p>Buffett and his team seem to be content to wait on a rebound. So far, Berkshire hasn&#39;t sold a single share of Snowflake.</p><h2>2. Amazon</h2><p>There&#39;s no question that Buffett is a brilliant investor. But he has called himself an &#34;idiot&#34; for not buying shares of <b>Amazon</b> sooner. Berkshire&#39;s younger investment managers helped remedy the mistake, initiating a position in the e-commerce and cloud-hosting giant in 2019.</p><p>Over time, Berkshire added significantly to its stake in Amazon. Even with this increase, the stock still represents only 0.3% of the conglomerate&#39;s total portfolio. That&#39;s been a good thing in 2022, with Amazon&#39;s shares falling nearly 50%.</p><p>Wall Street believes a big rebound could be on the way next year. The consensus price target for the stock is close to 60% above the current share price. Of the 47 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv in December, 43 view Amazon as either a buy or a strong buy.</p><p>Amazon hasn&#39;t traveled this much below its previous high in more than a decade. So why isn&#39;t Buffett buying the stock hand over fist? Probably the main reason is that he thinks other alternatives offer even more attractive valuations.</p><h2>3. Nu Holdings</h2><p>Buffett isn&#39;t heavily invested outside of the U.S. However, <b>Nu Holdings</b> is one of the seven international stocks in his Berkshire portfolio. Berkshire first invested in the Brazilian fintech company in 2021.</p><p>Nu Holdings is neck-and-neck with Snowflake as Berkshire&#39;s worst-performing stock of 2022. Its shares have plunged nearly 60% year to date.</p><p>However, Wall Street thinks Nu&#39;s troubles should only be temporary. The average price target for the fintech stock is a whopping 83% higher than the current share price.</p><p>However, there&#39;s more dissent among analysts with Nu than for Amazon and Snowflake. Although 10 of the 17 analysts surveyed in November by Refinitiv rated Nu as a buy or strong buy, four recommended holding the stock, and three gave it an &#34;underperform&#34; rating.</p><p>Buffett and his investment managers appear to align more with the Nu Holdings bulls. Berkshire hasn&#39;t sold any of its stake in Nu this year as the stock was tanking.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-20 11:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he's frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, Berkshire Hathaway still hasn't been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4524":"宅经济概念","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","NU":"Nu Holdings Ltd.","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4176":"多领域控股","BK4116":"互联网服务与基础架构","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2292823759","content_text":"Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he's frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, Berkshire Hathaway still hasn't been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the same level they were at the beginning of the year.Though, if analysts are right, the Oracle of Omaha just might be able to continue his market-beating ways in 2023. According to Wall Street, these three Buffett stocks could soar by 39% to 83% next year.1. SnowflakeBuffett himself likely didn't make the call to buy Snowflake for Berkshire's portfolio. One of his two investment managers -- Todd Combs or Ted Weschler -- probably led the charge. However, Buffett clearly went along for the ride. And it's been a wild one so far.Berkshire quickly made close to $800 million after Snowflake's initial public offering (IPO) in 2020. The tech stock, though, has crashed nearly 60% so far this year, making it one of Buffett's biggest losers.However, Wall Street remains bullish about Snowflake. The consensus price target for the stock represents an upside potential of 39%. In November, 28 of the 41 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv rated Snowflake as either a buy or a strong buy, with only one recommending investors sell the stock.Buffett and his team seem to be content to wait on a rebound. So far, Berkshire hasn't sold a single share of Snowflake.2. AmazonThere's no question that Buffett is a brilliant investor. But he has called himself an \"idiot\" for not buying shares of Amazon sooner. Berkshire's younger investment managers helped remedy the mistake, initiating a position in the e-commerce and cloud-hosting giant in 2019.Over time, Berkshire added significantly to its stake in Amazon. Even with this increase, the stock still represents only 0.3% of the conglomerate's total portfolio. That's been a good thing in 2022, with Amazon's shares falling nearly 50%.Wall Street believes a big rebound could be on the way next year. The consensus price target for the stock is close to 60% above the current share price. Of the 47 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv in December, 43 view Amazon as either a buy or a strong buy.Amazon hasn't traveled this much below its previous high in more than a decade. So why isn't Buffett buying the stock hand over fist? Probably the main reason is that he thinks other alternatives offer even more attractive valuations.3. Nu HoldingsBuffett isn't heavily invested outside of the U.S. However, Nu Holdings is one of the seven international stocks in his Berkshire portfolio. Berkshire first invested in the Brazilian fintech company in 2021.Nu Holdings is neck-and-neck with Snowflake as Berkshire's worst-performing stock of 2022. Its shares have plunged nearly 60% year to date.However, Wall Street thinks Nu's troubles should only be temporary. The average price target for the fintech stock is a whopping 83% higher than the current share price.However, there's more dissent among analysts with Nu than for Amazon and Snowflake. Although 10 of the 17 analysts surveyed in November by Refinitiv rated Nu as a buy or strong buy, four recommended holding the stock, and three gave it an \"underperform\" rating.Buffett and his investment managers appear to align more with the Nu Holdings bulls. Berkshire hasn't sold any of its stake in Nu this year as the stock was tanking.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926859589,"gmtCreate":1671516164042,"gmtModify":1676538549138,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926859589","repostId":"2292879080","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2292879080","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1671515998,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2292879080?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-20 13:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2292879080","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gift","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Thesis</h2><p>Depending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job is made easier. We (wife, son, and myself) all agreed on a few extra shares of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) into his Uniform Transfers To Minors (“UTMA”) account (in addition to a pair of Nike shoes, of course).</p><p>Thanks to the recent market volatilities, AAPL is now for sale at 21.7x forward P/E ratio (or about 22x P/E) as seen below. It is not only near the bottom level in about 3 years (as you can see from the following chart) but also near what I call the no-brainer level for high-quality compounders like AAPL, as explained in my earlier article, because:</p><blockquote><i>To me, any P/E near 20x is very attractive for a stock with ROCE (return on capital employed) near 100% like AAPL. At about 100% ROCE, a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (i.e., before inflation adjustments). And a ~20x P/E would </i><i><b>at least provide</b></i><i> 5% of earnings yield </i><i><b>in AAPL’s case</b></i><i>, leading to a total return in the double digits. </i></blockquote><p>In the remainder of this article, I will elaborate on two details (both highlighted above) that many readers asked about: A) why I said a 20x P/E ratio provides “at least” 5% of earnings yield; and B) why I mentioned “in AAPL’s case” also. Shouldn’t a 20x P/E ratio ALWAYS provide a 5% earnings yield (because 1/20 = 5%)?</p><p>The answer lies in the difference between accounting earnings and owners&#39; earnings. For most businesses, accounting earnings and owners&#39; earnings are different, and the discrepancy can be quite large. As a result, the true owners&#39; earnings yield can be very different from the inverse of the P/E ratio (which is often based on accounting earnings). And next, we will see that in AAPL’s case, the accounting EPS underestimates its owners&#39; earnings. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ec887906d387f378d7a098b2ba15e1ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"414\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>AAPL and our UTMA</h2><p>Let’s first take a look at quick look at our holdings in our UTMA account. The general information about the UTMA account has been detailed in our blog article here. Key motivations in our case included: the tax advantages, seed funds for our kid, and also an account to seek long-term growth. Our current holdings are shown below (first chart below) together with their performances (second chart below). A few notes:</p><blockquote><ol><li><i>For performance tracing purposes, I used the prices on July 11, 2022 (the date I first published this portfolio) on SA as the entry price. So, it&#39;s easier for readers to verify and track its performance. </i></li><li><i>Our actual portfolio size is substantially smaller. The $100k starting size used here is just to simplify the math. </i></li></ol></blockquote><p>As seen, AAPL currently represents about 15% of our total assets in this account. It suffered a price loss of 6.9% since July 11. As seen in the second chart, the UTMA account has always outperformed the S&amp;P 500 index (approximated by the SPY ETF) despite (probably because of) the concentrated holding of 6 stocks. The account is leading the market by a margin of 3.3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5880dd68179bd4b3ad8c9740ec986d40\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d606d4ab0beb63c0831d667d56c780d1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>AAPL’s account EPS underestimates its owners’ earning</h2><p>Now, let’s examine AAPL’s owner earnings (“OE”) more closely and see why it is higher than its accounting EPS. And the final results are summarized in the table below. As seen, at the price as of this writing ($134.5), AAPL’s accounting EPS for 2022 is about $6.11 and $6.25 for FY1, resulting in a P/E of 22x and FW P/E of 21.5x. Note my FW EPS projection is a bit higher than SA’s, hence the FW P/E of 21.5x is slightly lower than the 21.7x provided by SA above. However, in terms of OE, the P/E is only 18.7x and 18.4x on an FW basis. And if you further adjust the cash position on its ledger, the P/E further shrank to 18.4x for 2022 and 18.0x on an FW basis, hence providing more than 5% of owners earning yield as aforementioned. An 18x P/E translates into an annual owner-earning yield of 5.55%.</p><p>The key difference between the OE and the accounting EPS lies in the CAPEX expenses. The CAPEX includes both the maintenance CAPEX (which is a cost and should be subtracted) and the growth CAPEX (which is not a cost and shouldn’t be deducted).</p><p>My analysis shown in the table below is a delineation of AAPL’s maintenance CAPEX and growth CAPEX using Bruce Greenwald’s method. More details of this method can be found in our earlier article or in Greenwald’s (Value Investing). In the end, AAPL’s OE is about $7.18 per share for 2022 and $7.33 for FY1, both higher than its accounting EPS.</p><p>Note that the so-called FCF/EPS ratio provides a shortcut in many cases. You can often tell if the OE is larger or smaller than the accounting EPS by simply calculating the FCF/EPS ratio. In Apple&#39;s case, as you can see, the FCF/EPS ratio is 113%, higher than 100%. And bear in mind that the FCF already underestimates the true OE, because, in the calculation of the FCF, ALL the CAPEX is deducted. So, in the end, the EPS must underestimate its true OE even more than the FCF.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f3acc919777d0e2f735bafb73fdfaef0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"322\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>Total expected returns</h2><p>To recap, at its current price, its P/E on OE basis is around 18x, translating into an owner-earning yield (“OEY”) of ~5.5% as aforementioned. As detailed in my earlier articles, the ROCE (return on capital employed) of AAPL is on average 100% in recent years. As a result, even a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (100% ROCE * 5% reinvestment rate = 5% organic growth rate).</p><p>Combining the OEY and growth, the total return is expected to be earlier in the double digits, far exceeding that of the overall market. The S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at ~20x P/E ratio, resulting in an OEY of about 5%. And its ROCE is ~20% or so. Thus, assuming the same 5% reinvestment rate, its growth rate would be about 1%, resulting in a total return of ~6% only.</p><p>If the reinvestment rate is higher than 5% (e.g., due to acquisition opportunities or new initiatives), the outperformance from AAPL over the general market would be even more dramatic, again as illustrated in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12f83b07d46a76cda27f01477e278bf6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"420\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>Risks and final thoughts</h2><p>There are both upside and downside risks to my above analysis. My analysis is more focused on the AMOUNT of the earnings and neglected the QUALITY of the earnings. When the quality of the earnings is adjusted, the investment is even more appealing. The company has displayed remarkable resilience in the face of the difficult operating backdrop. Meanwhile, its services-related revenues should continue to advance, making its income even more diversified and recurring. Of course, for downside risks, the company is facing many macroeconomic and operational uncertainties. The uncertainties include the drag from foreign exchange rates, supply constraints, and the fluid COVID situation. Its bottom line is facing some pressure due to rising costs, as well as COVID-19-related lockdowns in China, a key end market, and also a production site for AAPL.</p><p>Altogether, AAPL is now in a no-brainer zone for me. Any P/E ratio below 20x with AAPL’s ROCE is very likely to generate double-digit annual returns in the long term combining the earnings yield and the growth rate. In AAPL’s case, its accounting EPS underestimates its owners&#39; earnings substantially. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface. To wit, in terms of OE, AAPL’s current FW P/E is 18.4x. After adjusting the cash position, the P/E becomes 18.0x only, translating into an OE yield of 5.5%. In terms of growth, a 5% reinvestment rate would provide 5% organic growth rates and lead to a total return exceeding 10% per annum.</p><p>Merry Christmas!</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha_fund","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-20 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2292879080","content_text":"ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job is made easier. We (wife, son, and myself) all agreed on a few extra shares of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) into his Uniform Transfers To Minors (“UTMA”) account (in addition to a pair of Nike shoes, of course).Thanks to the recent market volatilities, AAPL is now for sale at 21.7x forward P/E ratio (or about 22x P/E) as seen below. It is not only near the bottom level in about 3 years (as you can see from the following chart) but also near what I call the no-brainer level for high-quality compounders like AAPL, as explained in my earlier article, because:To me, any P/E near 20x is very attractive for a stock with ROCE (return on capital employed) near 100% like AAPL. At about 100% ROCE, a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (i.e., before inflation adjustments). And a ~20x P/E would at least provide 5% of earnings yield in AAPL’s case, leading to a total return in the double digits. In the remainder of this article, I will elaborate on two details (both highlighted above) that many readers asked about: A) why I said a 20x P/E ratio provides “at least” 5% of earnings yield; and B) why I mentioned “in AAPL’s case” also. Shouldn’t a 20x P/E ratio ALWAYS provide a 5% earnings yield (because 1/20 = 5%)?The answer lies in the difference between accounting earnings and owners' earnings. For most businesses, accounting earnings and owners' earnings are different, and the discrepancy can be quite large. As a result, the true owners' earnings yield can be very different from the inverse of the P/E ratio (which is often based on accounting earnings). And next, we will see that in AAPL’s case, the accounting EPS underestimates its owners' earnings. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface.Source: Seeking Alpha dataAAPL and our UTMALet’s first take a look at quick look at our holdings in our UTMA account. The general information about the UTMA account has been detailed in our blog article here. Key motivations in our case included: the tax advantages, seed funds for our kid, and also an account to seek long-term growth. Our current holdings are shown below (first chart below) together with their performances (second chart below). A few notes:For performance tracing purposes, I used the prices on July 11, 2022 (the date I first published this portfolio) on SA as the entry price. So, it's easier for readers to verify and track its performance. Our actual portfolio size is substantially smaller. The $100k starting size used here is just to simplify the math. As seen, AAPL currently represents about 15% of our total assets in this account. It suffered a price loss of 6.9% since July 11. As seen in the second chart, the UTMA account has always outperformed the S&P 500 index (approximated by the SPY ETF) despite (probably because of) the concentrated holding of 6 stocks. The account is leading the market by a margin of 3.3%.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataSource: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataAAPL’s account EPS underestimates its owners’ earningNow, let’s examine AAPL’s owner earnings (“OE”) more closely and see why it is higher than its accounting EPS. And the final results are summarized in the table below. As seen, at the price as of this writing ($134.5), AAPL’s accounting EPS for 2022 is about $6.11 and $6.25 for FY1, resulting in a P/E of 22x and FW P/E of 21.5x. Note my FW EPS projection is a bit higher than SA’s, hence the FW P/E of 21.5x is slightly lower than the 21.7x provided by SA above. However, in terms of OE, the P/E is only 18.7x and 18.4x on an FW basis. And if you further adjust the cash position on its ledger, the P/E further shrank to 18.4x for 2022 and 18.0x on an FW basis, hence providing more than 5% of owners earning yield as aforementioned. An 18x P/E translates into an annual owner-earning yield of 5.55%.The key difference between the OE and the accounting EPS lies in the CAPEX expenses. The CAPEX includes both the maintenance CAPEX (which is a cost and should be subtracted) and the growth CAPEX (which is not a cost and shouldn’t be deducted).My analysis shown in the table below is a delineation of AAPL’s maintenance CAPEX and growth CAPEX using Bruce Greenwald’s method. More details of this method can be found in our earlier article or in Greenwald’s (Value Investing). In the end, AAPL’s OE is about $7.18 per share for 2022 and $7.33 for FY1, both higher than its accounting EPS.Note that the so-called FCF/EPS ratio provides a shortcut in many cases. You can often tell if the OE is larger or smaller than the accounting EPS by simply calculating the FCF/EPS ratio. In Apple's case, as you can see, the FCF/EPS ratio is 113%, higher than 100%. And bear in mind that the FCF already underestimates the true OE, because, in the calculation of the FCF, ALL the CAPEX is deducted. So, in the end, the EPS must underestimate its true OE even more than the FCF.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataTotal expected returnsTo recap, at its current price, its P/E on OE basis is around 18x, translating into an owner-earning yield (“OEY”) of ~5.5% as aforementioned. As detailed in my earlier articles, the ROCE (return on capital employed) of AAPL is on average 100% in recent years. As a result, even a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (100% ROCE * 5% reinvestment rate = 5% organic growth rate).Combining the OEY and growth, the total return is expected to be earlier in the double digits, far exceeding that of the overall market. The S&P 500 is currently trading at ~20x P/E ratio, resulting in an OEY of about 5%. And its ROCE is ~20% or so. Thus, assuming the same 5% reinvestment rate, its growth rate would be about 1%, resulting in a total return of ~6% only.If the reinvestment rate is higher than 5% (e.g., due to acquisition opportunities or new initiatives), the outperformance from AAPL over the general market would be even more dramatic, again as illustrated in the chart below.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataRisks and final thoughtsThere are both upside and downside risks to my above analysis. My analysis is more focused on the AMOUNT of the earnings and neglected the QUALITY of the earnings. When the quality of the earnings is adjusted, the investment is even more appealing. The company has displayed remarkable resilience in the face of the difficult operating backdrop. Meanwhile, its services-related revenues should continue to advance, making its income even more diversified and recurring. Of course, for downside risks, the company is facing many macroeconomic and operational uncertainties. The uncertainties include the drag from foreign exchange rates, supply constraints, and the fluid COVID situation. Its bottom line is facing some pressure due to rising costs, as well as COVID-19-related lockdowns in China, a key end market, and also a production site for AAPL.Altogether, AAPL is now in a no-brainer zone for me. Any P/E ratio below 20x with AAPL’s ROCE is very likely to generate double-digit annual returns in the long term combining the earnings yield and the growth rate. In AAPL’s case, its accounting EPS underestimates its owners' earnings substantially. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface. To wit, in terms of OE, AAPL’s current FW P/E is 18.4x. After adjusting the cash position, the P/E becomes 18.0x only, translating into an OE yield of 5.5%. In terms of growth, a 5% reinvestment rate would provide 5% organic growth rates and lead to a total return exceeding 10% per annum.Merry Christmas!","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":225,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001916639,"gmtCreate":1641139549932,"gmtModify":1676533575493,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong] [Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001916639","repostId":"1150283067","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150283067","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1640962811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150283067?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150283067","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. X","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-31 23:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STZ":"星座品牌","XERS":"Xeris制药","SYNA":"Synaptics Incorporated"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150283067","content_text":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.HC Wainwright & Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009763102,"gmtCreate":1640795695049,"gmtModify":1676533542531,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009763102","repostId":"1149988860","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149988860","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640792807,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149988860?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-29 23:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Semiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149988860","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AM","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4d9932e27e7be43b2a47e9900754cd6\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Semiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSemiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-29 23:46</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4d9932e27e7be43b2a47e9900754cd6\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","NVDA":"英伟达","MU":"美光科技"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149988860","content_text":"Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009732076,"gmtCreate":1640790396510,"gmtModify":1676533541877,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009732076","repostId":"698204164","repostType":1,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009642215,"gmtCreate":1640662406847,"gmtModify":1676533532720,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great&nbsp;","listText":"Great&nbsp;","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009642215","repostId":"1127544468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127544468","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1640646504,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127544468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-28 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127544468","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 27  - The S&P 500 indexended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&P 500 retailing indexa boost.Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S","content":"<p>Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.</p>\n<p>U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&amp;P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed 0.57%. Cruise operators <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> Holdings, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGLD\">Royal</a> Caribbean(RCL.N)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a> Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"</p>\n<p>All 11 main S&amp;P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&amp;P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp(MSFT.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc(AAPL.O)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> Platform(FB.O).</p>\n<p>Main U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&amp;P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-28 07:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.</p>\n<p>U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&amp;P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed 0.57%. Cruise operators <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> Holdings, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGLD\">Royal</a> Caribbean(RCL.N)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a> Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"</p>\n<p>All 11 main S&amp;P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&amp;P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp(MSFT.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc(AAPL.O)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> Platform(FB.O).</p>\n<p>Main U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&amp;P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127544468","content_text":"Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.\nU.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.\nTravel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.\nThe S&P 1500 airlines index shed 0.57%. Cruise operators Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Royal Caribbean(RCL.N)and Carnival Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&P 500.\n\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in New York.\n\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be one of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"\nAll 11 main S&P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.\nThe S&P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.\nThe Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), Microsoft Corp(MSFT.O), Apple Inc(AAPL.O)and Meta Platform(FB.O).\nMain U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":712,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009153496,"gmtCreate":1640577145817,"gmtModify":1676533527049,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009153496","repostId":"2194380177","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2194380177","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1640574456,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2194380177?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-27 11:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Got $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2194380177","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The trick is simply letting time do the heavy lifting.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Amazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.</li>\n <li>The electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. But now we're in the EV era.</li>\n <li>Nvidia may be viewed as a video gaming play, but its biggest growth will come on higher-impact fronts.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Got patience? More to the point, are you willing and able to leave an investment alone for years on end and let time (and compounding) do its thing? If so, good. You'll probably end up richer than your more active investing peers. That's because the urge to extract a little more profit often means trading away gains (ironically enough.)</p>\n<p>With that as the backdrop, here's a look at three stocks that could -- and arguably should -- easily double their current values by 2030. It should come as no surprise that each of them is tech-driven, which lends itself to rapid adaptation to ever-evolving marketplaces.</p>\n<h2>1. Tesla</h2>\n<p>Shares of iconic EV maker<b> Tesla</b> are already overextended by almost any measure. Up 44% for the past year and higher to the tune of 1,100% for the past two years, the current price near $938 is markedly above analysts' consensus target of $860 per share. That price also values the stock at a whopping 114 times next year's projected per-share earnings of $8.22. Never even mind the fact that this red-hot stock has something of a penchant for big pullbacks.</p>\n<p>Largely lost in any discussion of Tesla, however, is that what the company's been doing for the past nine years is setting the stage for what's to take shape over the coming nine years. That's complete and overwhelming support for the premise of electric vehicles.</p>\n<p>Take, for instance, Mordor Intelligence's long-term outlook for worldwide spending on EV charging stations. The company estimates that last year's $5 billion worth of investment in EV chargers will swell to nearly $39 billion in 2026. That's an annualized growth rate of 44%, facilitating new demand for otherwise difficult-to-utilize battery-powered cars. In this vein, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the global count of actively used electric light-duty vehicles will swell from around 1 million now to 672 million by 2050.</p>\n<p>Tesla won't win all of the new EV business, to be clear. But, its name is nearly synonymous with electric vehicles, and as the market leader, it's positioned to remain the top dog. There's enough growth potential in the cards that the stock will likely easily grow into its currently rich valuation.</p>\n<h2>2. Nvidia</h2>\n<p>You may know<b> Nvidia</b>&nbsp;as a video gaming hardware company, and it still does that very well to be sure. Recent research from John Peddie indicates that as of the end of the third quarter, Nvidia accounts for 80% of the video gaming market's purchase of discrete (removable/upgradable) graphics processors, extending its long-standing dominance within this particular market.</p>\n<p>What most investors may not realize is how well the company is penetrating higher-growth arenas. Namely, data centers, and the artificial intelligence (AI) hardware market in particular. Of last quarter's $7.1 billion worth of revenue, $2.9 billion of it came from sales made to data center operators, rivaling gaming sales of $3.2 billion. In some recent quarters, data center revenue has even exceeded video gaming-oriented sales, and certainly has outpaced gaming revenue over the past couple of years.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7bd71944abb3328cdd7d5abb64c3c1b0\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p>Look for more of the same, too. Technology market research company Technavio estimates that worldwide data center spending will swell by 21% per year through 2025, growing by more than $500 billion during that period.</p>\n<p>That's good news for Nvidia, made even better by the fact that investments in AI capabilities will lead this charge. Another technology market research organization called IDC estimates that spending on AI will expand at an annual pace of 24% through 2025 when it reaches $200 billion.&nbsp;It <i>all</i> plays right into Nvidia's hand. See, Nvidia's DGX systems were built from the ground up to serve as the basis for a variety of AI applications. The fact that Nvidia's tech powers nearly 70% of the world's supercomputers speaks volumes about just how important the company is to the AI evolution.</p>\n<h2>3. Amazon</h2>\n<p>Finally, add <b>Amazon</b> to your list of stocks that are apt to double in value between now and 2030.</p>\n<p>Yes, it's an obvious choice; it's almost a cliche choice. Amazon is not only one of the world's most recognized brands, it's also one of the world's biggest companies, made so by its dominance within the e-commerce market. eMarketer estimates the company controls 40% of the U.S. online spending market, while its next-nearest competitor -- <b>Walmart</b> -- controls considerably less at 7%. Amazon is crushing it for a reason, and that's why this stock has hammered out an incredible 1,700% gain over the past 10 years.</p>\n<p>If you think Amazon can't grow just as much again for the same time frame, though, think again. Data collected by the U.S. Federal Reserve indicates that only 12% of retail commerce within the country is done online, leaving the company plenty of opportunity to build its online shopping customer base. Amazon isn't quite the same force in overseas markets as it is in North America, but it's getting there.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, Amazon's cloud computing business continues to explode. Last quarter, Amazon Web Services (or AWS) saw year-over-year top-line growth of 39%, accelerating revenue growth through the first three quarters of the year. AWS' operating income is growing just as firmly, suggesting the company's still got lots of pricing power on this front.</p>\n<p>Given how consumers' need for lots of items delivered quickly and businesses' need for digital infrastructure will never fade, Amazon is right where investors should want it to be for the long haul.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Got $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGot $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-27 11:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Key Points\n\nAmazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.\nThe electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2194380177","content_text":"Key Points\n\nAmazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.\nThe electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. But now we're in the EV era.\nNvidia may be viewed as a video gaming play, but its biggest growth will come on higher-impact fronts.\n\nGot patience? More to the point, are you willing and able to leave an investment alone for years on end and let time (and compounding) do its thing? If so, good. You'll probably end up richer than your more active investing peers. That's because the urge to extract a little more profit often means trading away gains (ironically enough.)\nWith that as the backdrop, here's a look at three stocks that could -- and arguably should -- easily double their current values by 2030. It should come as no surprise that each of them is tech-driven, which lends itself to rapid adaptation to ever-evolving marketplaces.\n1. Tesla\nShares of iconic EV maker Tesla are already overextended by almost any measure. Up 44% for the past year and higher to the tune of 1,100% for the past two years, the current price near $938 is markedly above analysts' consensus target of $860 per share. That price also values the stock at a whopping 114 times next year's projected per-share earnings of $8.22. Never even mind the fact that this red-hot stock has something of a penchant for big pullbacks.\nLargely lost in any discussion of Tesla, however, is that what the company's been doing for the past nine years is setting the stage for what's to take shape over the coming nine years. That's complete and overwhelming support for the premise of electric vehicles.\nTake, for instance, Mordor Intelligence's long-term outlook for worldwide spending on EV charging stations. The company estimates that last year's $5 billion worth of investment in EV chargers will swell to nearly $39 billion in 2026. That's an annualized growth rate of 44%, facilitating new demand for otherwise difficult-to-utilize battery-powered cars. In this vein, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the global count of actively used electric light-duty vehicles will swell from around 1 million now to 672 million by 2050.\nTesla won't win all of the new EV business, to be clear. But, its name is nearly synonymous with electric vehicles, and as the market leader, it's positioned to remain the top dog. There's enough growth potential in the cards that the stock will likely easily grow into its currently rich valuation.\n2. Nvidia\nYou may know Nvidia as a video gaming hardware company, and it still does that very well to be sure. Recent research from John Peddie indicates that as of the end of the third quarter, Nvidia accounts for 80% of the video gaming market's purchase of discrete (removable/upgradable) graphics processors, extending its long-standing dominance within this particular market.\nWhat most investors may not realize is how well the company is penetrating higher-growth arenas. Namely, data centers, and the artificial intelligence (AI) hardware market in particular. Of last quarter's $7.1 billion worth of revenue, $2.9 billion of it came from sales made to data center operators, rivaling gaming sales of $3.2 billion. In some recent quarters, data center revenue has even exceeded video gaming-oriented sales, and certainly has outpaced gaming revenue over the past couple of years.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nLook for more of the same, too. Technology market research company Technavio estimates that worldwide data center spending will swell by 21% per year through 2025, growing by more than $500 billion during that period.\nThat's good news for Nvidia, made even better by the fact that investments in AI capabilities will lead this charge. Another technology market research organization called IDC estimates that spending on AI will expand at an annual pace of 24% through 2025 when it reaches $200 billion. It all plays right into Nvidia's hand. See, Nvidia's DGX systems were built from the ground up to serve as the basis for a variety of AI applications. The fact that Nvidia's tech powers nearly 70% of the world's supercomputers speaks volumes about just how important the company is to the AI evolution.\n3. Amazon\nFinally, add Amazon to your list of stocks that are apt to double in value between now and 2030.\nYes, it's an obvious choice; it's almost a cliche choice. Amazon is not only one of the world's most recognized brands, it's also one of the world's biggest companies, made so by its dominance within the e-commerce market. eMarketer estimates the company controls 40% of the U.S. online spending market, while its next-nearest competitor -- Walmart -- controls considerably less at 7%. Amazon is crushing it for a reason, and that's why this stock has hammered out an incredible 1,700% gain over the past 10 years.\nIf you think Amazon can't grow just as much again for the same time frame, though, think again. Data collected by the U.S. Federal Reserve indicates that only 12% of retail commerce within the country is done online, leaving the company plenty of opportunity to build its online shopping customer base. Amazon isn't quite the same force in overseas markets as it is in North America, but it's getting there.\nIn the meantime, Amazon's cloud computing business continues to explode. Last quarter, Amazon Web Services (or AWS) saw year-over-year top-line growth of 39%, accelerating revenue growth through the first three quarters of the year. AWS' operating income is growing just as firmly, suggesting the company's still got lots of pricing power on this front.\nGiven how consumers' need for lots of items delivered quickly and businesses' need for digital infrastructure will never fade, Amazon is right where investors should want it to be for the long haul.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":753,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009373616,"gmtCreate":1640535553765,"gmtModify":1676533524894,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy!","listText":"Time to buy!","text":"Time to buy!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009373616","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009373872,"gmtCreate":1640535529323,"gmtModify":1676533524887,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009373872","repostId":"1123414772","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123414772","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640483546,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123414772?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-26 09:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123414772","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much","content":"<p><b>Upstart (UPST)</b>as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by the firm is flawless, with speed and accuracy being the name of the game.</p>\n<p>However, as an investor, it’s critical to remind yourself that you’re investing in a stock and not only the company’s concept, which means that we need to determine whether its potential is priced-in or not.</p>\n<p>Next year’s market climate will be much different than it’s been the past 2-years. I, for one, expect a more price-efficient market, which means that investors will need to start distinguishing good companies from undervalued stock prices if they’re to realize gains.</p>\n<p>UPST stock could be a prime example of how a good company doesn’t always translate into a good stock.</p>\n<p>UPST stock Won’t Benefit From the Cyclical Trade</p>\n<p>Most of you would’ve heard about the rate hike buzz by now and how that will stimulate banking stocks. The theory behind this is that if the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the debt market will be more lucrative to originators as the spreads they’d be able to charge on loans will increase.</p>\n<p>Upstart won’t necessarily benefit from this climate as it’s considered a hybrid between an advertising platform and a brokerage rather than a lender. This means that its revenue will actually decrease with higher rates because the transactional volume will likely taper off slightly as soon as rates rise.</p>\n<p>Further to the above, Upstart is a growth stock rather than a value play. Rising interest rates in 2022 could be detrimental to growth stocks as it tends to flatline their exponential earnings growth curve.</p>\n<p>Upstart’s revenue and EBITDA surged over the past year, coming in at187.56% and 447.28%respectively; these figures will likely diminish over the coming year, and I can’t help but think that the stock’s recent drawdown has been the market’s way of pricing in the expected decline in growth for next year.</p>\n<p>A final matter to mention regarding cyclicality isJ.P. Morgan’s recent neutral rating on the stock, with analyst James Faucette using a similar argument to mine in claiming that the stock’s growth has been priced in for now. Faucette thinks that Upstart’s relationship with its investors has enabled it to perform well in 2021, but the current market climate won’t allow that to sustain itself.</p>\n<p>Valuation &amp; Momentum</p>\n<p>Let’s start with the latter to provide context to the valuation argument. Upstart’s relative strength index (RSI) is below30, indicating that the stock has been oversold, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a “buy the dip opportunity.”</p>\n<p>For this to really be a buy low, sell high opportunity, we’d need to see an uptick in volume and a sign that the stock’s going to breach its moving averages; as of now UPST stock possesses neither of these attributes, and I believe that it’s due to a valuation issue.</p>\n<p>Here’s the big valuation problem; by comparing Upstart stock to its sector peers, it can be observed through price-sales and price-cash flow premiums of3.47x and 4.46xthat investors have gotten ahead of themselves. Adding to this is the argument that the stock could be the victim of a cyclical downturn, meaning that these ratios could play a key role in investor sell-offs moving forward.</p>\n<p>What now for UPST stock?</p>\n<p>A few investors are likely to buy into the recent dip, but I don’t think it will prevent a further downward trajectory. UPST stock has a massive valuation issue induced by over-optimism from investors during a pent-up broader market.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, the market’s set for a cyclical swing as monetary policy changes are en route, and Upstart stock’s characteristics mean that it could be a victim of such policies instead of being a beneficiary.</p>\n<p>The bottom line is that the stock isn’t worth the risk right now.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-26 09:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123414772","content_text":"Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by the firm is flawless, with speed and accuracy being the name of the game.\nHowever, as an investor, it’s critical to remind yourself that you’re investing in a stock and not only the company’s concept, which means that we need to determine whether its potential is priced-in or not.\nNext year’s market climate will be much different than it’s been the past 2-years. I, for one, expect a more price-efficient market, which means that investors will need to start distinguishing good companies from undervalued stock prices if they’re to realize gains.\nUPST stock could be a prime example of how a good company doesn’t always translate into a good stock.\nUPST stock Won’t Benefit From the Cyclical Trade\nMost of you would’ve heard about the rate hike buzz by now and how that will stimulate banking stocks. The theory behind this is that if the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the debt market will be more lucrative to originators as the spreads they’d be able to charge on loans will increase.\nUpstart won’t necessarily benefit from this climate as it’s considered a hybrid between an advertising platform and a brokerage rather than a lender. This means that its revenue will actually decrease with higher rates because the transactional volume will likely taper off slightly as soon as rates rise.\nFurther to the above, Upstart is a growth stock rather than a value play. Rising interest rates in 2022 could be detrimental to growth stocks as it tends to flatline their exponential earnings growth curve.\nUpstart’s revenue and EBITDA surged over the past year, coming in at187.56% and 447.28%respectively; these figures will likely diminish over the coming year, and I can’t help but think that the stock’s recent drawdown has been the market’s way of pricing in the expected decline in growth for next year.\nA final matter to mention regarding cyclicality isJ.P. Morgan’s recent neutral rating on the stock, with analyst James Faucette using a similar argument to mine in claiming that the stock’s growth has been priced in for now. Faucette thinks that Upstart’s relationship with its investors has enabled it to perform well in 2021, but the current market climate won’t allow that to sustain itself.\nValuation & Momentum\nLet’s start with the latter to provide context to the valuation argument. Upstart’s relative strength index (RSI) is below30, indicating that the stock has been oversold, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a “buy the dip opportunity.”\nFor this to really be a buy low, sell high opportunity, we’d need to see an uptick in volume and a sign that the stock’s going to breach its moving averages; as of now UPST stock possesses neither of these attributes, and I believe that it’s due to a valuation issue.\nHere’s the big valuation problem; by comparing Upstart stock to its sector peers, it can be observed through price-sales and price-cash flow premiums of3.47x and 4.46xthat investors have gotten ahead of themselves. Adding to this is the argument that the stock could be the victim of a cyclical downturn, meaning that these ratios could play a key role in investor sell-offs moving forward.\nWhat now for UPST stock?\nA few investors are likely to buy into the recent dip, but I don’t think it will prevent a further downward trajectory. UPST stock has a massive valuation issue induced by over-optimism from investors during a pent-up broader market.\nFurthermore, the market’s set for a cyclical swing as monetary policy changes are en route, and Upstart stock’s characteristics mean that it could be a victim of such policies instead of being a beneficiary.\nThe bottom line is that the stock isn’t worth the risk right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009902015,"gmtCreate":1640405224640,"gmtModify":1676533519873,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009902015","repostId":"1156159690","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156159690","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640335867,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156159690?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-24 16:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156159690","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.So, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Bla","content":"<p>As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.</p>\n<p>So, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Black Swan\"--or, High-Impact-Low-Probability [HILP]--predictions for 2022. Kulkarni said these ideas \"have a very low likelihood of occurrence, but we wouldn't assign a zero probability\" chance of then happening.</p>\n<p>The \"HILP\" predictions Kulkarni has for 2022 include \"consumers [will] return to brick and mortar stores and millennials and Gen Z start watching TV.\" Kulkarni said this could result from Covid-19 vaccinations reaching mass-population levels and reaching an end to the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Kulkarni said Facebook's(NASDAQ:FB)<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> could launch its own cryptocurrency that could start displacing several traditional fiat currencies, and that mega cap tech companies will manage to not pay any fines to U.S. or European regulators regarding legal cases currently in the works.</p>\n<p>\"We have stopped counting the number of lawsuits facing Big Tech,\" Kulkarni said. \"However, there is fairly limited consensus in the ideas or bills presented to date, and Congress has been focused on the pandemic and infrastructure bill for 2021.</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Kulkarni's other Black Swan predictions are:</li>\n <li>SPAC IPOs will outperform traditional IPOs and direct stock listings.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">Uber</a>(NYSE:UBER)launches its own robotaxi service in several U.S. cities.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>(NYSE:TWTR)and Pinterest(NYSE:PINS)are acquired and are no longer independent public companies.</li>\n <li>DoorDash(NYSE:DASH)acquires Instacart for between $40B-50B and spurs a new round of grocery delivery wars.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>(NASDAQ:AAPL)reaches $10B in annual revenue run rate from advertising due to changes in its iOS ad policies.</li>\n <li>Google's(NASDAQ:GOOG)YouTube get in position to go public.</li>\n <li>Snap(NYSE:SNAP)and TikTok (BDNCE) look to capitalize on their younger audiences by acquiring movie or gaming studios so they can boost their original video content offerings.</li>\n <li>As a \"bonus\" prediction, Kulkarni forecasts that as the pandemic ends, more people will go back to working out at gyms and neighborhood parks, and this will result in difficulty in forecasting sales for the likes of Peloton(NASDAQ:PTON). The home-exercise technology company also had its sails trimmed on Thursday when analysts at Citi cut their price target on Peloton's (PTON) stock to $38 a share on expectations of higher expenses and&nbsp;falling demand for Peloton (PTON) products next year.</li>\n</ul>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-24 16:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.\nSo, it should come as...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","DASH":"DoorDash, Inc.","PTON":"Peloton Interactive, Inc.","SNAP":"Snap Inc","AAPL":"苹果","PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1156159690","content_text":"As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.\nSo, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Black Swan\"--or, High-Impact-Low-Probability [HILP]--predictions for 2022. Kulkarni said these ideas \"have a very low likelihood of occurrence, but we wouldn't assign a zero probability\" chance of then happening.\nThe \"HILP\" predictions Kulkarni has for 2022 include \"consumers [will] return to brick and mortar stores and millennials and Gen Z start watching TV.\" Kulkarni said this could result from Covid-19 vaccinations reaching mass-population levels and reaching an end to the pandemic.\nKulkarni said Facebook's(NASDAQ:FB)Meta could launch its own cryptocurrency that could start displacing several traditional fiat currencies, and that mega cap tech companies will manage to not pay any fines to U.S. or European regulators regarding legal cases currently in the works.\n\"We have stopped counting the number of lawsuits facing Big Tech,\" Kulkarni said. \"However, there is fairly limited consensus in the ideas or bills presented to date, and Congress has been focused on the pandemic and infrastructure bill for 2021.\n\nKulkarni's other Black Swan predictions are:\nSPAC IPOs will outperform traditional IPOs and direct stock listings.\nUber(NYSE:UBER)launches its own robotaxi service in several U.S. cities.\nTwitter(NYSE:TWTR)and Pinterest(NYSE:PINS)are acquired and are no longer independent public companies.\nDoorDash(NYSE:DASH)acquires Instacart for between $40B-50B and spurs a new round of grocery delivery wars.\nApple(NASDAQ:AAPL)reaches $10B in annual revenue run rate from advertising due to changes in its iOS ad policies.\nGoogle's(NASDAQ:GOOG)YouTube get in position to go public.\nSnap(NYSE:SNAP)and TikTok (BDNCE) look to capitalize on their younger audiences by acquiring movie or gaming studios so they can boost their original video content offerings.\nAs a \"bonus\" prediction, Kulkarni forecasts that as the pandemic ends, more people will go back to working out at gyms and neighborhood parks, and this will result in difficulty in forecasting sales for the likes of Peloton(NASDAQ:PTON). The home-exercise technology company also had its sails trimmed on Thursday when analysts at Citi cut their price target on Peloton's (PTON) stock to $38 a share on expectations of higher expenses and falling demand for Peloton (PTON) products next year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":458,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000297387,"gmtCreate":1640190648965,"gmtModify":1676533506089,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy Apple!","listText":"Time to buy Apple!","text":"Time to buy Apple!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000297387","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000295126,"gmtCreate":1640190289748,"gmtModify":1676533506066,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000295126","repostId":"1122126959","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122126959","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640186098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1122126959?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-22 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122126959","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analys","content":"<p>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"</p>\n<p>Citing a \"handful\" of data points that the firm has seen over the past month, Huberty notes that the supply of semi-related components are improving and iPhone builds in the December quarter are \"stable\" at 82 million units. In addition, Apple (AAPL) is seeing improved supply for power management integrated circuits and world-facing camera modules, all of which suggests that iPhone builds in December are likely to be flat or slightly down month-over-month, compared to a significant month-over-month decline in previous years.</p>\n<p>Additionally, Huberty notes that lead times for Apple's (AAPL) high-end iPhone 13 models, the Pro and Pro Max are at 2 days as of December 21, down from 20 days a month ago.</p>\n<p>'[W]hile some investors may view this lead time contraction as a sign of slowing demand, we'd note that major end markets like China are posting iPhone shipment growth of +46% [year-over-year] [quarter-to-date] through the end of November,\" Huberty wrote.</p>\n<p>\"While we don't have enough data to definitively say that iPhone will exit the December quarter in supply/demand balance, we do believe that iPhone production is surprising to the upside, which supports our 7% above consensus December quarter iPhone revenue forecast.\"</p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) shares have&nbsp;gained more than 33% year-to-date.</p>\n<p>Huberty added that she is keeping an eye on Apple (AAPL) retail stores that are closing as a result of increasing COVID-19 cases in North America.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Apple (AAPL) was upgraded at Moody's, as the credit-ratings agency&nbsp;cited the tech giant's \"exceptional liquidity\" and earnings power.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-22 23:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1122126959","content_text":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"\nCiting a \"handful\" of data points that the firm has seen over the past month, Huberty notes that the supply of semi-related components are improving and iPhone builds in the December quarter are \"stable\" at 82 million units. In addition, Apple (AAPL) is seeing improved supply for power management integrated circuits and world-facing camera modules, all of which suggests that iPhone builds in December are likely to be flat or slightly down month-over-month, compared to a significant month-over-month decline in previous years.\nAdditionally, Huberty notes that lead times for Apple's (AAPL) high-end iPhone 13 models, the Pro and Pro Max are at 2 days as of December 21, down from 20 days a month ago.\n'[W]hile some investors may view this lead time contraction as a sign of slowing demand, we'd note that major end markets like China are posting iPhone shipment growth of +46% [year-over-year] [quarter-to-date] through the end of November,\" Huberty wrote.\n\"While we don't have enough data to definitively say that iPhone will exit the December quarter in supply/demand balance, we do believe that iPhone production is surprising to the upside, which supports our 7% above consensus December quarter iPhone revenue forecast.\"\nApple (AAPL) shares have gained more than 33% year-to-date.\nHuberty added that she is keeping an eye on Apple (AAPL) retail stores that are closing as a result of increasing COVID-19 cases in North America.\nOn Tuesday, Apple (AAPL) was upgraded at Moody's, as the credit-ratings agency cited the tech giant's \"exceptional liquidity\" and earnings power.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000671581,"gmtCreate":1640183373931,"gmtModify":1676533505391,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy Apple now?","listText":"Time to buy Apple now?","text":"Time to buy Apple now?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000671581","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":93,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144681897,"gmtCreate":1626279792219,"gmtModify":1703757117790,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144681897","repostId":"2151517189","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2151517189","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626278940,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151517189?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 00:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151517189","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"MW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims t","content":"<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Mark DeCambre \n</p>\n<p>\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n</p>\n<p>\n  That is the feeling that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&amp;P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-15 00:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Mark DeCambre \n</p>\n<p>\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n</p>\n<p>\n  That is the feeling that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&amp;P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CME":"芝加哥商品交易所","GS":"高盛","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151517189","content_text":"MW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n\n\n  By Mark DeCambre \n\n\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n\n\n  That is the feeling that one might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n\n\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be one of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n\n\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n\n\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n\n\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n\n\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n\n\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n\n\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n\n\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n\n\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n\n\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n\n\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144683308,"gmtCreate":1626279727204,"gmtModify":1703757115970,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great!!!","listText":"Great!!!","text":"Great!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144683308","repostId":"1165924722","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165924722","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626264464,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165924722?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-14 20:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Citigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165924722","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Citigroupposted second-quarter results.\nHere's how the bank did:\nEarnings: $2.85 a share. The estima","content":"<p>Citigroupposted second-quarter results.</p>\n<p>Here's how the bank did:</p>\n<p>Earnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.</p>\n<p>Revenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.</p>\n<p>What changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?</p>\n<p>Fraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.</p>\n<p>Now, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.</p>\n<p>Like the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup&nbsp;rises&nbsp;0.4&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Citigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCitigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-14 20:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Citigroupposted second-quarter results.</p>\n<p>Here's how the bank did:</p>\n<p>Earnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.</p>\n<p>Revenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.</p>\n<p>What changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?</p>\n<p>Fraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.</p>\n<p>Now, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.</p>\n<p>Like the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup&nbsp;rises&nbsp;0.4&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"C":"花旗"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165924722","content_text":"Citigroupposted second-quarter results.\nHere's how the bank did:\nEarnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.\nRevenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.\nWhat changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?\nFraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.\nNow, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.\nLike the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.\nShares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.\nOn Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.\nShares of Citigroup rises 0.4 in premarket.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":72,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144680628,"gmtCreate":1626279603364,"gmtModify":1703757112997,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gosh!","listText":"Gosh!","text":"Gosh!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144680628","repostId":"2151511237","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151511237","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626273009,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151511237?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-14 22:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"India bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151511237","media":"Reuters","summary":"MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Masterc","content":"<p>MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.</p>\n<p>In a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".</p>\n<p>\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.</p>\n<p>Mastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.</p>\n<p>The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.</p>\n<p>The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express</a> and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.</p>\n<p>The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.</p>\n<p>The order comes as companies such as Mastercard and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>India bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIndia bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-14 22:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.</p>\n<p>In a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".</p>\n<p>\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.</p>\n<p>Mastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.</p>\n<p>The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.</p>\n<p>The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express</a> and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.</p>\n<p>The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.</p>\n<p>The order comes as companies such as Mastercard and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MA":"万事达","DFS":"发现金融","AXP":"美国运通","V":"Visa"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151511237","content_text":"MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.\nIn a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".\n\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.\nMastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.\nThe RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.\nThe move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American Express and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.\nThe RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.\nThe order comes as companies such as Mastercard and Visa also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":120,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148219686,"gmtCreate":1625977553845,"gmtModify":1703751551058,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maybe","listText":"Maybe","text":"Maybe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148219686","repostId":"2150463301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2150463301","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625971562,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2150463301?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2150463301","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this tween-oriented gaming platform be the next tech giant?","content":"<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. <b>Apple</b>&nbsp;and <b>Amazon</b> crossed that milestone in 2018, <b>Microsoft</b>&nbsp;followed suit in 2019, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>&nbsp;joined the club earlier this year.</p>\n<p>Many other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of those stocks be <b>Roblox</b>, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F632887%2Fshowcase_filmstrip_1920x1080.png&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Roblox.</span></p>\n<h2>How much is Roblox worth today?</h2>\n<p>Roblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.</p>\n<p>No pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. <b>Activision Blizzard </b>and <b>Electronic Arts</b>, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. <b>Unity</b>, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.</p>\n<p>If we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"596\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"176\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"189\"><p>P/S Ratio (Current FY)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"187\"><p>P/S Ratio (Next FY)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Roblox (NYSE:RBLX)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>20</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>16</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>8</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>7</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>6</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>5</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Unity (NYSE:U)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>30</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>23</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.</p>\n<h2>But is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?</h2>\n<p>However, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.</p>\n<p>Roblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.</p>\n<p>Roblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.</p>\n<p>The bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.</p>\n<p>The bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.</p>\n<p>Roblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.</p>\n<p>The bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.</p>\n<h2>Why Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030</h2>\n<p>Even if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.</p>\n<p>If Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.</p>\n<p>But that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RBLX":"Roblox Corporation"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2150463301","content_text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this year.\nMany other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could one of those stocks be Roblox, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?\nImage source: Roblox.\nHow much is Roblox worth today?\nRoblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.\nNo pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. Unity, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.\nIf we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nP/S Ratio (Current FY)\nP/S Ratio (Next FY)\n\n\nRoblox (NYSE:RBLX)\n20\n16\n\n\nActivision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)\n8\n7\n\n\nElectronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)\n6\n5\n\n\nUnity (NYSE:U)\n30\n23\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.\nBut is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?\nHowever, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.\nRoblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.\nRoblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.\nThe bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.\nThe bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.\nRoblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.\nThe bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.\nWhy Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030\nEven if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.\nIf Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.\nBut that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":135,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148210759,"gmtCreate":1625977478771,"gmtModify":1703751550572,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">$Coca-Cola(KO)$</a>Up up up!","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">$Coca-Cola(KO)$</a>Up up up!","text":"$Coca-Cola(KO)$Up up up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148210759","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":47,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155342953,"gmtCreate":1625380532372,"gmtModify":1703741082016,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maybe&nbsp;","listText":"Maybe&nbsp;","text":"Maybe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/155342953","repostId":"2148807114","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148807114","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1625367960,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148807114?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-04 11:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148807114","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberatta","content":"<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-04 11:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148807114","content_text":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.\nThe only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.\nJim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.\nRead more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government\n\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.\nPresident Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.\n\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.\nShe added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior one to the government and a substandard one to the private sector.\n\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.\nFollowing last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.\nHe pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.\n\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.\nCybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.\n\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"\nCSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.\nSee also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks\n\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"\nLewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.\n\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.\n\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":47,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9009153496,"gmtCreate":1640577145817,"gmtModify":1676533527049,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009153496","repostId":"2194380177","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2194380177","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1640574456,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2194380177?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-27 11:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Got $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2194380177","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The trick is simply letting time do the heavy lifting.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Amazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.</li>\n <li>The electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. But now we're in the EV era.</li>\n <li>Nvidia may be viewed as a video gaming play, but its biggest growth will come on higher-impact fronts.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Got patience? More to the point, are you willing and able to leave an investment alone for years on end and let time (and compounding) do its thing? If so, good. You'll probably end up richer than your more active investing peers. That's because the urge to extract a little more profit often means trading away gains (ironically enough.)</p>\n<p>With that as the backdrop, here's a look at three stocks that could -- and arguably should -- easily double their current values by 2030. It should come as no surprise that each of them is tech-driven, which lends itself to rapid adaptation to ever-evolving marketplaces.</p>\n<h2>1. Tesla</h2>\n<p>Shares of iconic EV maker<b> Tesla</b> are already overextended by almost any measure. Up 44% for the past year and higher to the tune of 1,100% for the past two years, the current price near $938 is markedly above analysts' consensus target of $860 per share. That price also values the stock at a whopping 114 times next year's projected per-share earnings of $8.22. Never even mind the fact that this red-hot stock has something of a penchant for big pullbacks.</p>\n<p>Largely lost in any discussion of Tesla, however, is that what the company's been doing for the past nine years is setting the stage for what's to take shape over the coming nine years. That's complete and overwhelming support for the premise of electric vehicles.</p>\n<p>Take, for instance, Mordor Intelligence's long-term outlook for worldwide spending on EV charging stations. The company estimates that last year's $5 billion worth of investment in EV chargers will swell to nearly $39 billion in 2026. That's an annualized growth rate of 44%, facilitating new demand for otherwise difficult-to-utilize battery-powered cars. In this vein, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the global count of actively used electric light-duty vehicles will swell from around 1 million now to 672 million by 2050.</p>\n<p>Tesla won't win all of the new EV business, to be clear. But, its name is nearly synonymous with electric vehicles, and as the market leader, it's positioned to remain the top dog. There's enough growth potential in the cards that the stock will likely easily grow into its currently rich valuation.</p>\n<h2>2. Nvidia</h2>\n<p>You may know<b> Nvidia</b>&nbsp;as a video gaming hardware company, and it still does that very well to be sure. Recent research from John Peddie indicates that as of the end of the third quarter, Nvidia accounts for 80% of the video gaming market's purchase of discrete (removable/upgradable) graphics processors, extending its long-standing dominance within this particular market.</p>\n<p>What most investors may not realize is how well the company is penetrating higher-growth arenas. Namely, data centers, and the artificial intelligence (AI) hardware market in particular. Of last quarter's $7.1 billion worth of revenue, $2.9 billion of it came from sales made to data center operators, rivaling gaming sales of $3.2 billion. In some recent quarters, data center revenue has even exceeded video gaming-oriented sales, and certainly has outpaced gaming revenue over the past couple of years.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7bd71944abb3328cdd7d5abb64c3c1b0\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p>Look for more of the same, too. Technology market research company Technavio estimates that worldwide data center spending will swell by 21% per year through 2025, growing by more than $500 billion during that period.</p>\n<p>That's good news for Nvidia, made even better by the fact that investments in AI capabilities will lead this charge. Another technology market research organization called IDC estimates that spending on AI will expand at an annual pace of 24% through 2025 when it reaches $200 billion.&nbsp;It <i>all</i> plays right into Nvidia's hand. See, Nvidia's DGX systems were built from the ground up to serve as the basis for a variety of AI applications. The fact that Nvidia's tech powers nearly 70% of the world's supercomputers speaks volumes about just how important the company is to the AI evolution.</p>\n<h2>3. Amazon</h2>\n<p>Finally, add <b>Amazon</b> to your list of stocks that are apt to double in value between now and 2030.</p>\n<p>Yes, it's an obvious choice; it's almost a cliche choice. Amazon is not only one of the world's most recognized brands, it's also one of the world's biggest companies, made so by its dominance within the e-commerce market. eMarketer estimates the company controls 40% of the U.S. online spending market, while its next-nearest competitor -- <b>Walmart</b> -- controls considerably less at 7%. Amazon is crushing it for a reason, and that's why this stock has hammered out an incredible 1,700% gain over the past 10 years.</p>\n<p>If you think Amazon can't grow just as much again for the same time frame, though, think again. Data collected by the U.S. Federal Reserve indicates that only 12% of retail commerce within the country is done online, leaving the company plenty of opportunity to build its online shopping customer base. Amazon isn't quite the same force in overseas markets as it is in North America, but it's getting there.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, Amazon's cloud computing business continues to explode. Last quarter, Amazon Web Services (or AWS) saw year-over-year top-line growth of 39%, accelerating revenue growth through the first three quarters of the year. AWS' operating income is growing just as firmly, suggesting the company's still got lots of pricing power on this front.</p>\n<p>Given how consumers' need for lots of items delivered quickly and businesses' need for digital infrastructure will never fade, Amazon is right where investors should want it to be for the long haul.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Got $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGot $3,000? These 3 Stocks Could Double Your Money by 2030\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-27 11:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Key Points\n\nAmazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.\nThe electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/26/got-3000-these-3-stocks-could-double-your-money-by/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2194380177","content_text":"Key Points\n\nAmazon has only scratched the surface of its potential reach within its most important market.\nThe electric vehicle industry was ready for the world before the phenomenon truly caught on. But now we're in the EV era.\nNvidia may be viewed as a video gaming play, but its biggest growth will come on higher-impact fronts.\n\nGot patience? More to the point, are you willing and able to leave an investment alone for years on end and let time (and compounding) do its thing? If so, good. You'll probably end up richer than your more active investing peers. That's because the urge to extract a little more profit often means trading away gains (ironically enough.)\nWith that as the backdrop, here's a look at three stocks that could -- and arguably should -- easily double their current values by 2030. It should come as no surprise that each of them is tech-driven, which lends itself to rapid adaptation to ever-evolving marketplaces.\n1. Tesla\nShares of iconic EV maker Tesla are already overextended by almost any measure. Up 44% for the past year and higher to the tune of 1,100% for the past two years, the current price near $938 is markedly above analysts' consensus target of $860 per share. That price also values the stock at a whopping 114 times next year's projected per-share earnings of $8.22. Never even mind the fact that this red-hot stock has something of a penchant for big pullbacks.\nLargely lost in any discussion of Tesla, however, is that what the company's been doing for the past nine years is setting the stage for what's to take shape over the coming nine years. That's complete and overwhelming support for the premise of electric vehicles.\nTake, for instance, Mordor Intelligence's long-term outlook for worldwide spending on EV charging stations. The company estimates that last year's $5 billion worth of investment in EV chargers will swell to nearly $39 billion in 2026. That's an annualized growth rate of 44%, facilitating new demand for otherwise difficult-to-utilize battery-powered cars. In this vein, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that the global count of actively used electric light-duty vehicles will swell from around 1 million now to 672 million by 2050.\nTesla won't win all of the new EV business, to be clear. But, its name is nearly synonymous with electric vehicles, and as the market leader, it's positioned to remain the top dog. There's enough growth potential in the cards that the stock will likely easily grow into its currently rich valuation.\n2. Nvidia\nYou may know Nvidia as a video gaming hardware company, and it still does that very well to be sure. Recent research from John Peddie indicates that as of the end of the third quarter, Nvidia accounts for 80% of the video gaming market's purchase of discrete (removable/upgradable) graphics processors, extending its long-standing dominance within this particular market.\nWhat most investors may not realize is how well the company is penetrating higher-growth arenas. Namely, data centers, and the artificial intelligence (AI) hardware market in particular. Of last quarter's $7.1 billion worth of revenue, $2.9 billion of it came from sales made to data center operators, rivaling gaming sales of $3.2 billion. In some recent quarters, data center revenue has even exceeded video gaming-oriented sales, and certainly has outpaced gaming revenue over the past couple of years.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nLook for more of the same, too. Technology market research company Technavio estimates that worldwide data center spending will swell by 21% per year through 2025, growing by more than $500 billion during that period.\nThat's good news for Nvidia, made even better by the fact that investments in AI capabilities will lead this charge. Another technology market research organization called IDC estimates that spending on AI will expand at an annual pace of 24% through 2025 when it reaches $200 billion. It all plays right into Nvidia's hand. See, Nvidia's DGX systems were built from the ground up to serve as the basis for a variety of AI applications. The fact that Nvidia's tech powers nearly 70% of the world's supercomputers speaks volumes about just how important the company is to the AI evolution.\n3. Amazon\nFinally, add Amazon to your list of stocks that are apt to double in value between now and 2030.\nYes, it's an obvious choice; it's almost a cliche choice. Amazon is not only one of the world's most recognized brands, it's also one of the world's biggest companies, made so by its dominance within the e-commerce market. eMarketer estimates the company controls 40% of the U.S. online spending market, while its next-nearest competitor -- Walmart -- controls considerably less at 7%. Amazon is crushing it for a reason, and that's why this stock has hammered out an incredible 1,700% gain over the past 10 years.\nIf you think Amazon can't grow just as much again for the same time frame, though, think again. Data collected by the U.S. Federal Reserve indicates that only 12% of retail commerce within the country is done online, leaving the company plenty of opportunity to build its online shopping customer base. Amazon isn't quite the same force in overseas markets as it is in North America, but it's getting there.\nIn the meantime, Amazon's cloud computing business continues to explode. Last quarter, Amazon Web Services (or AWS) saw year-over-year top-line growth of 39%, accelerating revenue growth through the first three quarters of the year. AWS' operating income is growing just as firmly, suggesting the company's still got lots of pricing power on this front.\nGiven how consumers' need for lots of items delivered quickly and businesses' need for digital infrastructure will never fade, Amazon is right where investors should want it to be for the long haul.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":753,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926859589,"gmtCreate":1671516164042,"gmtModify":1676538549138,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926859589","repostId":"2292879080","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2292879080","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1671515998,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2292879080?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-20 13:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2292879080","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gift","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Thesis</h2><p>Depending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job is made easier. We (wife, son, and myself) all agreed on a few extra shares of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) into his Uniform Transfers To Minors (“UTMA”) account (in addition to a pair of Nike shoes, of course).</p><p>Thanks to the recent market volatilities, AAPL is now for sale at 21.7x forward P/E ratio (or about 22x P/E) as seen below. It is not only near the bottom level in about 3 years (as you can see from the following chart) but also near what I call the no-brainer level for high-quality compounders like AAPL, as explained in my earlier article, because:</p><blockquote><i>To me, any P/E near 20x is very attractive for a stock with ROCE (return on capital employed) near 100% like AAPL. At about 100% ROCE, a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (i.e., before inflation adjustments). And a ~20x P/E would </i><i><b>at least provide</b></i><i> 5% of earnings yield </i><i><b>in AAPL’s case</b></i><i>, leading to a total return in the double digits. </i></blockquote><p>In the remainder of this article, I will elaborate on two details (both highlighted above) that many readers asked about: A) why I said a 20x P/E ratio provides “at least” 5% of earnings yield; and B) why I mentioned “in AAPL’s case” also. Shouldn’t a 20x P/E ratio ALWAYS provide a 5% earnings yield (because 1/20 = 5%)?</p><p>The answer lies in the difference between accounting earnings and owners&#39; earnings. For most businesses, accounting earnings and owners&#39; earnings are different, and the discrepancy can be quite large. As a result, the true owners&#39; earnings yield can be very different from the inverse of the P/E ratio (which is often based on accounting earnings). And next, we will see that in AAPL’s case, the accounting EPS underestimates its owners&#39; earnings. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ec887906d387f378d7a098b2ba15e1ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"414\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>AAPL and our UTMA</h2><p>Let’s first take a look at quick look at our holdings in our UTMA account. The general information about the UTMA account has been detailed in our blog article here. Key motivations in our case included: the tax advantages, seed funds for our kid, and also an account to seek long-term growth. Our current holdings are shown below (first chart below) together with their performances (second chart below). A few notes:</p><blockquote><ol><li><i>For performance tracing purposes, I used the prices on July 11, 2022 (the date I first published this portfolio) on SA as the entry price. So, it&#39;s easier for readers to verify and track its performance. </i></li><li><i>Our actual portfolio size is substantially smaller. The $100k starting size used here is just to simplify the math. </i></li></ol></blockquote><p>As seen, AAPL currently represents about 15% of our total assets in this account. It suffered a price loss of 6.9% since July 11. As seen in the second chart, the UTMA account has always outperformed the S&amp;P 500 index (approximated by the SPY ETF) despite (probably because of) the concentrated holding of 6 stocks. The account is leading the market by a margin of 3.3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5880dd68179bd4b3ad8c9740ec986d40\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d606d4ab0beb63c0831d667d56c780d1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>AAPL’s account EPS underestimates its owners’ earning</h2><p>Now, let’s examine AAPL’s owner earnings (“OE”) more closely and see why it is higher than its accounting EPS. And the final results are summarized in the table below. As seen, at the price as of this writing ($134.5), AAPL’s accounting EPS for 2022 is about $6.11 and $6.25 for FY1, resulting in a P/E of 22x and FW P/E of 21.5x. Note my FW EPS projection is a bit higher than SA’s, hence the FW P/E of 21.5x is slightly lower than the 21.7x provided by SA above. However, in terms of OE, the P/E is only 18.7x and 18.4x on an FW basis. And if you further adjust the cash position on its ledger, the P/E further shrank to 18.4x for 2022 and 18.0x on an FW basis, hence providing more than 5% of owners earning yield as aforementioned. An 18x P/E translates into an annual owner-earning yield of 5.55%.</p><p>The key difference between the OE and the accounting EPS lies in the CAPEX expenses. The CAPEX includes both the maintenance CAPEX (which is a cost and should be subtracted) and the growth CAPEX (which is not a cost and shouldn’t be deducted).</p><p>My analysis shown in the table below is a delineation of AAPL’s maintenance CAPEX and growth CAPEX using Bruce Greenwald’s method. More details of this method can be found in our earlier article or in Greenwald’s (Value Investing). In the end, AAPL’s OE is about $7.18 per share for 2022 and $7.33 for FY1, both higher than its accounting EPS.</p><p>Note that the so-called FCF/EPS ratio provides a shortcut in many cases. You can often tell if the OE is larger or smaller than the accounting EPS by simply calculating the FCF/EPS ratio. In Apple&#39;s case, as you can see, the FCF/EPS ratio is 113%, higher than 100%. And bear in mind that the FCF already underestimates the true OE, because, in the calculation of the FCF, ALL the CAPEX is deducted. So, in the end, the EPS must underestimate its true OE even more than the FCF.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f3acc919777d0e2f735bafb73fdfaef0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"322\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>Total expected returns</h2><p>To recap, at its current price, its P/E on OE basis is around 18x, translating into an owner-earning yield (“OEY”) of ~5.5% as aforementioned. As detailed in my earlier articles, the ROCE (return on capital employed) of AAPL is on average 100% in recent years. As a result, even a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (100% ROCE * 5% reinvestment rate = 5% organic growth rate).</p><p>Combining the OEY and growth, the total return is expected to be earlier in the double digits, far exceeding that of the overall market. The S&amp;P 500 is currently trading at ~20x P/E ratio, resulting in an OEY of about 5%. And its ROCE is ~20% or so. Thus, assuming the same 5% reinvestment rate, its growth rate would be about 1%, resulting in a total return of ~6% only.</p><p>If the reinvestment rate is higher than 5% (e.g., due to acquisition opportunities or new initiatives), the outperformance from AAPL over the general market would be even more dramatic, again as illustrated in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12f83b07d46a76cda27f01477e278bf6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"420\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha data</p><h2>Risks and final thoughts</h2><p>There are both upside and downside risks to my above analysis. My analysis is more focused on the AMOUNT of the earnings and neglected the QUALITY of the earnings. When the quality of the earnings is adjusted, the investment is even more appealing. The company has displayed remarkable resilience in the face of the difficult operating backdrop. Meanwhile, its services-related revenues should continue to advance, making its income even more diversified and recurring. Of course, for downside risks, the company is facing many macroeconomic and operational uncertainties. The uncertainties include the drag from foreign exchange rates, supply constraints, and the fluid COVID situation. Its bottom line is facing some pressure due to rising costs, as well as COVID-19-related lockdowns in China, a key end market, and also a production site for AAPL.</p><p>Altogether, AAPL is now in a no-brainer zone for me. Any P/E ratio below 20x with AAPL’s ROCE is very likely to generate double-digit annual returns in the long term combining the earnings yield and the growth rate. In AAPL’s case, its accounting EPS underestimates its owners&#39; earnings substantially. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface. To wit, in terms of OE, AAPL’s current FW P/E is 18.4x. After adjusting the cash position, the P/E becomes 18.0x only, translating into an OE yield of 5.5%. In terms of growth, a 5% reinvestment rate would provide 5% organic growth rates and lead to a total return exceeding 10% per annum.</p><p>Merry Christmas!</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha_fund","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: The Perfect Christmas Gift For Our Son\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-20 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4565317-apple-the-perfect-christmas-gift-for-our-son","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2292879080","content_text":"ThesisDepending on your love (or the lack of) for shopping, searching for the perfect Christmas gifts can range from an enjoyable relaxation to a source of agony. In our son’s case this year, our job is made easier. We (wife, son, and myself) all agreed on a few extra shares of Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) into his Uniform Transfers To Minors (“UTMA”) account (in addition to a pair of Nike shoes, of course).Thanks to the recent market volatilities, AAPL is now for sale at 21.7x forward P/E ratio (or about 22x P/E) as seen below. It is not only near the bottom level in about 3 years (as you can see from the following chart) but also near what I call the no-brainer level for high-quality compounders like AAPL, as explained in my earlier article, because:To me, any P/E near 20x is very attractive for a stock with ROCE (return on capital employed) near 100% like AAPL. At about 100% ROCE, a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (i.e., before inflation adjustments). And a ~20x P/E would at least provide 5% of earnings yield in AAPL’s case, leading to a total return in the double digits. In the remainder of this article, I will elaborate on two details (both highlighted above) that many readers asked about: A) why I said a 20x P/E ratio provides “at least” 5% of earnings yield; and B) why I mentioned “in AAPL’s case” also. Shouldn’t a 20x P/E ratio ALWAYS provide a 5% earnings yield (because 1/20 = 5%)?The answer lies in the difference between accounting earnings and owners' earnings. For most businesses, accounting earnings and owners' earnings are different, and the discrepancy can be quite large. As a result, the true owners' earnings yield can be very different from the inverse of the P/E ratio (which is often based on accounting earnings). And next, we will see that in AAPL’s case, the accounting EPS underestimates its owners' earnings. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface.Source: Seeking Alpha dataAAPL and our UTMALet’s first take a look at quick look at our holdings in our UTMA account. The general information about the UTMA account has been detailed in our blog article here. Key motivations in our case included: the tax advantages, seed funds for our kid, and also an account to seek long-term growth. Our current holdings are shown below (first chart below) together with their performances (second chart below). A few notes:For performance tracing purposes, I used the prices on July 11, 2022 (the date I first published this portfolio) on SA as the entry price. So, it's easier for readers to verify and track its performance. Our actual portfolio size is substantially smaller. The $100k starting size used here is just to simplify the math. As seen, AAPL currently represents about 15% of our total assets in this account. It suffered a price loss of 6.9% since July 11. As seen in the second chart, the UTMA account has always outperformed the S&P 500 index (approximated by the SPY ETF) despite (probably because of) the concentrated holding of 6 stocks. The account is leading the market by a margin of 3.3%.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataSource: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataAAPL’s account EPS underestimates its owners’ earningNow, let’s examine AAPL’s owner earnings (“OE”) more closely and see why it is higher than its accounting EPS. And the final results are summarized in the table below. As seen, at the price as of this writing ($134.5), AAPL’s accounting EPS for 2022 is about $6.11 and $6.25 for FY1, resulting in a P/E of 22x and FW P/E of 21.5x. Note my FW EPS projection is a bit higher than SA’s, hence the FW P/E of 21.5x is slightly lower than the 21.7x provided by SA above. However, in terms of OE, the P/E is only 18.7x and 18.4x on an FW basis. And if you further adjust the cash position on its ledger, the P/E further shrank to 18.4x for 2022 and 18.0x on an FW basis, hence providing more than 5% of owners earning yield as aforementioned. An 18x P/E translates into an annual owner-earning yield of 5.55%.The key difference between the OE and the accounting EPS lies in the CAPEX expenses. The CAPEX includes both the maintenance CAPEX (which is a cost and should be subtracted) and the growth CAPEX (which is not a cost and shouldn’t be deducted).My analysis shown in the table below is a delineation of AAPL’s maintenance CAPEX and growth CAPEX using Bruce Greenwald’s method. More details of this method can be found in our earlier article or in Greenwald’s (Value Investing). In the end, AAPL’s OE is about $7.18 per share for 2022 and $7.33 for FY1, both higher than its accounting EPS.Note that the so-called FCF/EPS ratio provides a shortcut in many cases. You can often tell if the OE is larger or smaller than the accounting EPS by simply calculating the FCF/EPS ratio. In Apple's case, as you can see, the FCF/EPS ratio is 113%, higher than 100%. And bear in mind that the FCF already underestimates the true OE, because, in the calculation of the FCF, ALL the CAPEX is deducted. So, in the end, the EPS must underestimate its true OE even more than the FCF.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataTotal expected returnsTo recap, at its current price, its P/E on OE basis is around 18x, translating into an owner-earning yield (“OEY”) of ~5.5% as aforementioned. As detailed in my earlier articles, the ROCE (return on capital employed) of AAPL is on average 100% in recent years. As a result, even a 5% investment rate would provide 5% organic real growth rates (100% ROCE * 5% reinvestment rate = 5% organic growth rate).Combining the OEY and growth, the total return is expected to be earlier in the double digits, far exceeding that of the overall market. The S&P 500 is currently trading at ~20x P/E ratio, resulting in an OEY of about 5%. And its ROCE is ~20% or so. Thus, assuming the same 5% reinvestment rate, its growth rate would be about 1%, resulting in a total return of ~6% only.If the reinvestment rate is higher than 5% (e.g., due to acquisition opportunities or new initiatives), the outperformance from AAPL over the general market would be even more dramatic, again as illustrated in the chart below.Source: Author based on Seeking Alpha dataRisks and final thoughtsThere are both upside and downside risks to my above analysis. My analysis is more focused on the AMOUNT of the earnings and neglected the QUALITY of the earnings. When the quality of the earnings is adjusted, the investment is even more appealing. The company has displayed remarkable resilience in the face of the difficult operating backdrop. Meanwhile, its services-related revenues should continue to advance, making its income even more diversified and recurring. Of course, for downside risks, the company is facing many macroeconomic and operational uncertainties. The uncertainties include the drag from foreign exchange rates, supply constraints, and the fluid COVID situation. Its bottom line is facing some pressure due to rising costs, as well as COVID-19-related lockdowns in China, a key end market, and also a production site for AAPL.Altogether, AAPL is now in a no-brainer zone for me. Any P/E ratio below 20x with AAPL’s ROCE is very likely to generate double-digit annual returns in the long term combining the earnings yield and the growth rate. In AAPL’s case, its accounting EPS underestimates its owners' earnings substantially. And hence, its true earning yield is better than what’s on the surface. To wit, in terms of OE, AAPL’s current FW P/E is 18.4x. After adjusting the cash position, the P/E becomes 18.0x only, translating into an OE yield of 5.5%. In terms of growth, a 5% reinvestment rate would provide 5% organic growth rates and lead to a total return exceeding 10% per annum.Merry Christmas!","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":225,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009763102,"gmtCreate":1640795695049,"gmtModify":1676533542531,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009763102","repostId":"1149988860","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149988860","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640792807,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149988860?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-29 23:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Semiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149988860","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AM","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4d9932e27e7be43b2a47e9900754cd6\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Semiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSemiconductor Stocks Mixed in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-29 23:46</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4d9932e27e7be43b2a47e9900754cd6\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","NVDA":"英伟达","MU":"美光科技"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149988860","content_text":"Semiconductor stocks mixed in morning trading.Micron Technology jumped nearly 3% while Nvidia and AMD fell more than 2%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926853011,"gmtCreate":1671516186934,"gmtModify":1676538549148,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926853011","repostId":"2292823759","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2292823759","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1671508653,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2292823759?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-20 11:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2292823759","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"If analysts are right, better days could be on the way for these beaten-down stocks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he&#39;s frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> still hasn&#39;t been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the same level they were at the beginning of the year.</p><p>Though, if analysts are right, the Oracle of Omaha just might be able to continue his market-beating ways in 2023. According to Wall Street, these three Buffett stocks could soar by 39% to 83% next year.</p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></h2><p>Buffett himself likely didn&#39;t make the call to buy <b>Snowflake</b> for Berkshire&#39;s portfolio. One of his two investment managers -- Todd Combs or Ted Weschler -- probably led the charge. However, Buffett clearly went along for the ride. And it&#39;s been a wild one so far.</p><p>Berkshire quickly made close to $800 million after Snowflake&#39;s initial public offering (IPO) in 2020. The tech stock, though, has crashed nearly 60% so far this year, making it one of Buffett&#39;s biggest losers.</p><p>However, Wall Street remains bullish about Snowflake. The consensus price target for the stock represents an upside potential of 39%. In November, 28 of the 41 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv rated Snowflake as either a buy or a strong buy, with only one recommending investors sell the stock.</p><p>Buffett and his team seem to be content to wait on a rebound. So far, Berkshire hasn&#39;t sold a single share of Snowflake.</p><h2>2. Amazon</h2><p>There&#39;s no question that Buffett is a brilliant investor. But he has called himself an &#34;idiot&#34; for not buying shares of <b>Amazon</b> sooner. Berkshire&#39;s younger investment managers helped remedy the mistake, initiating a position in the e-commerce and cloud-hosting giant in 2019.</p><p>Over time, Berkshire added significantly to its stake in Amazon. Even with this increase, the stock still represents only 0.3% of the conglomerate&#39;s total portfolio. That&#39;s been a good thing in 2022, with Amazon&#39;s shares falling nearly 50%.</p><p>Wall Street believes a big rebound could be on the way next year. The consensus price target for the stock is close to 60% above the current share price. Of the 47 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv in December, 43 view Amazon as either a buy or a strong buy.</p><p>Amazon hasn&#39;t traveled this much below its previous high in more than a decade. So why isn&#39;t Buffett buying the stock hand over fist? Probably the main reason is that he thinks other alternatives offer even more attractive valuations.</p><h2>3. Nu Holdings</h2><p>Buffett isn&#39;t heavily invested outside of the U.S. However, <b>Nu Holdings</b> is one of the seven international stocks in his Berkshire portfolio. Berkshire first invested in the Brazilian fintech company in 2021.</p><p>Nu Holdings is neck-and-neck with Snowflake as Berkshire&#39;s worst-performing stock of 2022. Its shares have plunged nearly 60% year to date.</p><p>However, Wall Street thinks Nu&#39;s troubles should only be temporary. The average price target for the fintech stock is a whopping 83% higher than the current share price.</p><p>However, there&#39;s more dissent among analysts with Nu than for Amazon and Snowflake. Although 10 of the 17 analysts surveyed in November by Refinitiv rated Nu as a buy or strong buy, four recommended holding the stock, and three gave it an &#34;underperform&#34; rating.</p><p>Buffett and his investment managers appear to align more with the Nu Holdings bulls. Berkshire hasn&#39;t sold any of its stake in Nu this year as the stock was tanking.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Warren Buffett Stocks That Could Soar 39% to 83% in 2023, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-20 11:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he's frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, Berkshire Hathaway still hasn't been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4524":"宅经济概念","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","NU":"Nu Holdings Ltd.","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4176":"多领域控股","BK4116":"互联网服务与基础架构","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/19/warren-buffett-stocks-soar-2023-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2292823759","content_text":"Warren Buffett is doing in 2022 what he's frequently done throughout his career -- beating the market. However, Berkshire Hathaway still hasn't been much of a winner, with its shares at nearly the same level they were at the beginning of the year.Though, if analysts are right, the Oracle of Omaha just might be able to continue his market-beating ways in 2023. According to Wall Street, these three Buffett stocks could soar by 39% to 83% next year.1. SnowflakeBuffett himself likely didn't make the call to buy Snowflake for Berkshire's portfolio. One of his two investment managers -- Todd Combs or Ted Weschler -- probably led the charge. However, Buffett clearly went along for the ride. And it's been a wild one so far.Berkshire quickly made close to $800 million after Snowflake's initial public offering (IPO) in 2020. The tech stock, though, has crashed nearly 60% so far this year, making it one of Buffett's biggest losers.However, Wall Street remains bullish about Snowflake. The consensus price target for the stock represents an upside potential of 39%. In November, 28 of the 41 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv rated Snowflake as either a buy or a strong buy, with only one recommending investors sell the stock.Buffett and his team seem to be content to wait on a rebound. So far, Berkshire hasn't sold a single share of Snowflake.2. AmazonThere's no question that Buffett is a brilliant investor. But he has called himself an \"idiot\" for not buying shares of Amazon sooner. Berkshire's younger investment managers helped remedy the mistake, initiating a position in the e-commerce and cloud-hosting giant in 2019.Over time, Berkshire added significantly to its stake in Amazon. Even with this increase, the stock still represents only 0.3% of the conglomerate's total portfolio. That's been a good thing in 2022, with Amazon's shares falling nearly 50%.Wall Street believes a big rebound could be on the way next year. The consensus price target for the stock is close to 60% above the current share price. Of the 47 analysts surveyed by Refinitiv in December, 43 view Amazon as either a buy or a strong buy.Amazon hasn't traveled this much below its previous high in more than a decade. So why isn't Buffett buying the stock hand over fist? Probably the main reason is that he thinks other alternatives offer even more attractive valuations.3. Nu HoldingsBuffett isn't heavily invested outside of the U.S. However, Nu Holdings is one of the seven international stocks in his Berkshire portfolio. Berkshire first invested in the Brazilian fintech company in 2021.Nu Holdings is neck-and-neck with Snowflake as Berkshire's worst-performing stock of 2022. Its shares have plunged nearly 60% year to date.However, Wall Street thinks Nu's troubles should only be temporary. The average price target for the fintech stock is a whopping 83% higher than the current share price.However, there's more dissent among analysts with Nu than for Amazon and Snowflake. Although 10 of the 17 analysts surveyed in November by Refinitiv rated Nu as a buy or strong buy, four recommended holding the stock, and three gave it an \"underperform\" rating.Buffett and his investment managers appear to align more with the Nu Holdings bulls. Berkshire hasn't sold any of its stake in Nu this year as the stock was tanking.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009642215,"gmtCreate":1640662406847,"gmtModify":1676533532720,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great&nbsp;","listText":"Great&nbsp;","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009642215","repostId":"1127544468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127544468","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1640646504,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127544468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-28 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127544468","media":"Reuters","summary":"Dec 27  - The S&P 500 indexended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&P 500 retailing indexa boost.Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S","content":"<p>Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.</p>\n<p>U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&amp;P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed 0.57%. Cruise operators <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> Holdings, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGLD\">Royal</a> Caribbean(RCL.N)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a> Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"</p>\n<p>All 11 main S&amp;P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&amp;P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp(MSFT.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc(AAPL.O)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> Platform(FB.O).</p>\n<p>Main U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&amp;P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 closes at record high on retail sales cheer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-28 07:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.</p>\n<p>U.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&amp;P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.</p>\n<p>Travel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 airlines index&nbsp;shed 0.57%. Cruise operators <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NCLH\">Norwegian Cruise Line</a> Holdings, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGLD\">Royal</a> Caribbean(RCL.N)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCL\">Carnival</a> Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p>\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"</p>\n<p>All 11 main S&amp;P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&amp;P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp(MSFT.O), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc(AAPL.O)and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> Platform(FB.O).</p>\n<p>Main U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&amp;P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127544468","content_text":"Dec 27 (Reuters) - The S&P 500 index(.SPX)ended at a record high on Monday, its fourth straight session of gains, as strong U.S. retail sales underscored economic strength and eased worries from Omicron-driven flight cancellations that hit travel stocks.\nU.S. retail sales increased 8.5% year-over-year this holiday season, powered by an ecommerce boom, according to a Mastercard Inc report, giving the S&P 500 retailing index(.SPXRT)a boost.\nTravel-related stocks, typically sensitive to coronavirus news, declined after U.S. airlines canceled about 800 more flights on Monday after nixing thousands during the Christmas weekend, as Omicron cases soared.\nThe S&P 1500 airlines index shed 0.57%. Cruise operators Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Royal Caribbean(RCL.N)and Carnival Corp(CCL.N)fell 2.55%, 1.35% and 1.18% respectively, among the biggest decliners on the benchmark S&P 500.\n\"The market is in this interesting place where we have a strong consumer, with spending up 8% year over year. Personal consumption makes up 70% of our GDP, and that remains flush,\" said Sylvia Jablonski Kampaktsis, chief investment officer and co-founder at Defiance ETFs in New York.\n\"Omicron reminds us that we still exist in this corona ecosystem. And it'll probably be one of many things that we will continue talking about with this virus but the doomsday COVID scenario of 2020 feels like it's far behind us.\"\nAll 11 main S&P 500 sector indexes advanced, with energy(.SPNY)and tech(.SPLRCT)leading percentage gains.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 351.82 points, or 0.98%, to 36,302.38, the S&P 500(.SPX)gained 65.4 points, or 1.38%, to 4,791.19 and the Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)added 217.89 points, or 1.39%, to 15,871.26.\nThe S&P 500 has climbed 4.9% during its recent run of gains, its biggest percentage gain over a four-day period since early November 2020.\nThe Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)got a boost from megacap companies, including Tesla Inc(TSLA.O), Microsoft Corp(MSFT.O), Apple Inc(AAPL.O)and Meta Platform(FB.O).\nMain U.S. stock indexes are on track for a third straight yearly gain, with the benchmark S&P 500(.SPX)poised for its best three-year performance since 1999.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 7.76 billion shares, compared with the 11.74 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.29-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.09-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 58 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 101 new highs and 145 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":712,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148219686,"gmtCreate":1625977553845,"gmtModify":1703751551058,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maybe","listText":"Maybe","text":"Maybe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148219686","repostId":"2150463301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2150463301","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625971562,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2150463301?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2150463301","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this tween-oriented gaming platform be the next tech giant?","content":"<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. <b>Apple</b>&nbsp;and <b>Amazon</b> crossed that milestone in 2018, <b>Microsoft</b>&nbsp;followed suit in 2019, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a></b>&nbsp;joined the club earlier this year.</p>\n<p>Many other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of those stocks be <b>Roblox</b>, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F632887%2Fshowcase_filmstrip_1920x1080.png&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\"><span>Image source: Roblox.</span></p>\n<h2>How much is Roblox worth today?</h2>\n<p>Roblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.</p>\n<p>No pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. <b>Activision Blizzard </b>and <b>Electronic Arts</b>, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. <b>Unity</b>, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.</p>\n<p>If we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"596\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"176\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"189\"><p>P/S Ratio (Current FY)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"187\"><p>P/S Ratio (Next FY)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Roblox (NYSE:RBLX)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>20</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>16</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>8</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>7</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>6</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>5</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"176\"><p>Unity (NYSE:U)</p></td>\n   <td width=\"189\"><p>30</p></td>\n   <td width=\"187\"><p>23</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.</p>\n<h2>But is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?</h2>\n<p>However, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.</p>\n<p>Roblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.</p>\n<p>Roblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.</p>\n<p>The bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.</p>\n<p>The bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.</p>\n<p>Roblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.</p>\n<p>The bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.</p>\n<h2>Why Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030</h2>\n<p>Even if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.</p>\n<p>If Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.</p>\n<p>But that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Roblox Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RBLX":"Roblox Corporation"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/10/will-roblox-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2030/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2150463301","content_text":"Only a handful of tech companies have ever become $1 trillion companies. Apple and Amazon crossed that milestone in 2018, Microsoft followed suit in 2019, and Facebook joined the club earlier this year.\nMany other tech stocks could join that elite group within the next decade -- and investors who hop on board today could reap massive multibagger gains. Could one of those stocks be Roblox, the gaming company which gained millions of new users during the pandemic?\nImage source: Roblox.\nHow much is Roblox worth today?\nRoblox went public via a direct listing this March with a reference price of $45. The stock opened at $64.50, and currently trades in the high $80s -- which gives it a market capitalization of nearly $50 billion. For Roblox to become a $1 trillion company by 2030, the stock would need to rise about 20 times.\nNo pure-play video game company has crossed the $1 trillion mark yet. Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts, two of the world's largest video game publishers, are currently worth about $70 billion and $40 billion, respectively. Unity, which indirectly competes against Roblox in the game engine and development space, is worth roughly $30 billion.\nIf we compare these four companies' price-to-sales ratios, we'll notice the market is paying a much higher premium for game creation engines like Roblox and Unity than traditional video game publishers.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nP/S Ratio (Current FY)\nP/S Ratio (Next FY)\n\n\nRoblox (NYSE:RBLX)\n20\n16\n\n\nActivision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI)\n8\n7\n\n\nElectronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA)\n6\n5\n\n\nUnity (NYSE:U)\n30\n23\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 7. FY = fiscal year.\nBut is Roblox a fad or a new content platform?\nHowever, there are some key differences between Roblox and Unity.\nRoblox is a platform that enables younger users, many of whom don't have any coding experience, to build simple block-based games and share them with other players. Unity is an advanced game development engine that powers over half of the world's mobile, PC, and console games.\nRoblox encourages users to monetize their games with an in-app currency called Robux within its walled garden. Unity offers developers more flexible tools for integrating in-app ads, in-app purchases, and other features into their games.\nThe bulls claim Roblox's self-sustaining cycle of content creation, self-promotion, and monetization will fuel its long-term growth. The bears will point out that half of the platform's daily active users (DAUs) are under the age of 13, and they might eventually grow out of Roblox's simple experiences or graduate to a more advanced game development engine like Unity.\nThe bulls will point to Roblox's growth rates. Between the first quarters of 2018 and 2021, Roblox's DAUs more than quadrupled from 10.3 million to 42.1 million, its total hours engaged surged from 2.1 billion to 9.7 billion, and its average bookings per DAU jumped from $11.62 to $15.48.\nRoblox's revenue rose 56% in 2019, soared 82% in 2020, and analysts expect 167% growth this year. But next year, they expect its revenue to rise just 26% after the pandemic ends and more students return to school.\nThe bears will point out Roblox isn't profitable, and it probably can't achieve profitability without reducing its exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Robux for developers. However, doing so could alienate its developers and throttle the platform's output of new content.\nWhy Roblox probably can't hit $1 trillion by 2030\nEven if Roblox maintains a premium price-to-sales ratio of 20 through 2030, it would need to generate $50 billion in annual sales to hit the $1 trillion mark. Roblox generated just $933 million in revenues in 2020, so it would need to generate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 50% to hit $50 billion by 2030.\nIf Roblox's valuations cool off, as they'll likely do over the years, it will need to generate an ever higher CAGR to become a $1 trillion company. By comparison, Amazon grew its revenues at a CAGR of 27.4% over the past decade -- and it currently trades at just four times this year's sales. Therefore, it seems highly unlikely Roblox will become a $1 trillion company within the next decade.\nBut that doesn't mean Roblox won't generate multibagger gains over the next decade. It could remain popular long after the pandemic passes, attract a new generation of younger users, and launch more powerful tools for advanced users. As it continues to expand, economies of scale should kick in and strengthen its earnings growth. Therefore, Roblox could still have plenty of room to run -- just don't expect it to join the 12-zero club anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":135,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009373872,"gmtCreate":1640535529323,"gmtModify":1676533524887,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009373872","repostId":"1123414772","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123414772","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640483546,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123414772?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-26 09:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123414772","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much","content":"<p><b>Upstart (UPST)</b>as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by the firm is flawless, with speed and accuracy being the name of the game.</p>\n<p>However, as an investor, it’s critical to remind yourself that you’re investing in a stock and not only the company’s concept, which means that we need to determine whether its potential is priced-in or not.</p>\n<p>Next year’s market climate will be much different than it’s been the past 2-years. I, for one, expect a more price-efficient market, which means that investors will need to start distinguishing good companies from undervalued stock prices if they’re to realize gains.</p>\n<p>UPST stock could be a prime example of how a good company doesn’t always translate into a good stock.</p>\n<p>UPST stock Won’t Benefit From the Cyclical Trade</p>\n<p>Most of you would’ve heard about the rate hike buzz by now and how that will stimulate banking stocks. The theory behind this is that if the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the debt market will be more lucrative to originators as the spreads they’d be able to charge on loans will increase.</p>\n<p>Upstart won’t necessarily benefit from this climate as it’s considered a hybrid between an advertising platform and a brokerage rather than a lender. This means that its revenue will actually decrease with higher rates because the transactional volume will likely taper off slightly as soon as rates rise.</p>\n<p>Further to the above, Upstart is a growth stock rather than a value play. Rising interest rates in 2022 could be detrimental to growth stocks as it tends to flatline their exponential earnings growth curve.</p>\n<p>Upstart’s revenue and EBITDA surged over the past year, coming in at187.56% and 447.28%respectively; these figures will likely diminish over the coming year, and I can’t help but think that the stock’s recent drawdown has been the market’s way of pricing in the expected decline in growth for next year.</p>\n<p>A final matter to mention regarding cyclicality isJ.P. Morgan’s recent neutral rating on the stock, with analyst James Faucette using a similar argument to mine in claiming that the stock’s growth has been priced in for now. Faucette thinks that Upstart’s relationship with its investors has enabled it to perform well in 2021, but the current market climate won’t allow that to sustain itself.</p>\n<p>Valuation &amp; Momentum</p>\n<p>Let’s start with the latter to provide context to the valuation argument. Upstart’s relative strength index (RSI) is below30, indicating that the stock has been oversold, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a “buy the dip opportunity.”</p>\n<p>For this to really be a buy low, sell high opportunity, we’d need to see an uptick in volume and a sign that the stock’s going to breach its moving averages; as of now UPST stock possesses neither of these attributes, and I believe that it’s due to a valuation issue.</p>\n<p>Here’s the big valuation problem; by comparing Upstart stock to its sector peers, it can be observed through price-sales and price-cash flow premiums of3.47x and 4.46xthat investors have gotten ahead of themselves. Adding to this is the argument that the stock could be the victim of a cyclical downturn, meaning that these ratios could play a key role in investor sell-offs moving forward.</p>\n<p>What now for UPST stock?</p>\n<p>A few investors are likely to buy into the recent dip, but I don’t think it will prevent a further downward trajectory. UPST stock has a massive valuation issue induced by over-optimism from investors during a pent-up broader market.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, the market’s set for a cyclical swing as monetary policy changes are en route, and Upstart stock’s characteristics mean that it could be a victim of such policies instead of being a beneficiary.</p>\n<p>The bottom line is that the stock isn’t worth the risk right now.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy It’s Not the Time to Buy the Dip on Upstart\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-26 09:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/upst-stock-upstart-why-its-not-the-time-to-buy-the-dip/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123414772","content_text":"Upstart (UPST)as a concept is extraordinary in my eyes because it assigns credit ratings with a much more forward-looking approach than traditional loan facilitators do. Furthermore, the AI used by the firm is flawless, with speed and accuracy being the name of the game.\nHowever, as an investor, it’s critical to remind yourself that you’re investing in a stock and not only the company’s concept, which means that we need to determine whether its potential is priced-in or not.\nNext year’s market climate will be much different than it’s been the past 2-years. I, for one, expect a more price-efficient market, which means that investors will need to start distinguishing good companies from undervalued stock prices if they’re to realize gains.\nUPST stock could be a prime example of how a good company doesn’t always translate into a good stock.\nUPST stock Won’t Benefit From the Cyclical Trade\nMost of you would’ve heard about the rate hike buzz by now and how that will stimulate banking stocks. The theory behind this is that if the U.S. Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the debt market will be more lucrative to originators as the spreads they’d be able to charge on loans will increase.\nUpstart won’t necessarily benefit from this climate as it’s considered a hybrid between an advertising platform and a brokerage rather than a lender. This means that its revenue will actually decrease with higher rates because the transactional volume will likely taper off slightly as soon as rates rise.\nFurther to the above, Upstart is a growth stock rather than a value play. Rising interest rates in 2022 could be detrimental to growth stocks as it tends to flatline their exponential earnings growth curve.\nUpstart’s revenue and EBITDA surged over the past year, coming in at187.56% and 447.28%respectively; these figures will likely diminish over the coming year, and I can’t help but think that the stock’s recent drawdown has been the market’s way of pricing in the expected decline in growth for next year.\nA final matter to mention regarding cyclicality isJ.P. Morgan’s recent neutral rating on the stock, with analyst James Faucette using a similar argument to mine in claiming that the stock’s growth has been priced in for now. Faucette thinks that Upstart’s relationship with its investors has enabled it to perform well in 2021, but the current market climate won’t allow that to sustain itself.\nValuation & Momentum\nLet’s start with the latter to provide context to the valuation argument. Upstart’s relative strength index (RSI) is below30, indicating that the stock has been oversold, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a “buy the dip opportunity.”\nFor this to really be a buy low, sell high opportunity, we’d need to see an uptick in volume and a sign that the stock’s going to breach its moving averages; as of now UPST stock possesses neither of these attributes, and I believe that it’s due to a valuation issue.\nHere’s the big valuation problem; by comparing Upstart stock to its sector peers, it can be observed through price-sales and price-cash flow premiums of3.47x and 4.46xthat investors have gotten ahead of themselves. Adding to this is the argument that the stock could be the victim of a cyclical downturn, meaning that these ratios could play a key role in investor sell-offs moving forward.\nWhat now for UPST stock?\nA few investors are likely to buy into the recent dip, but I don’t think it will prevent a further downward trajectory. UPST stock has a massive valuation issue induced by over-optimism from investors during a pent-up broader market.\nFurthermore, the market’s set for a cyclical swing as monetary policy changes are en route, and Upstart stock’s characteristics mean that it could be a victim of such policies instead of being a beneficiary.\nThe bottom line is that the stock isn’t worth the risk right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009902015,"gmtCreate":1640405224640,"gmtModify":1676533519873,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009902015","repostId":"1156159690","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156159690","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640335867,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156159690?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-24 16:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156159690","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.So, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Bla","content":"<p>As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.</p>\n<p>So, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Black Swan\"--or, High-Impact-Low-Probability [HILP]--predictions for 2022. Kulkarni said these ideas \"have a very low likelihood of occurrence, but we wouldn't assign a zero probability\" chance of then happening.</p>\n<p>The \"HILP\" predictions Kulkarni has for 2022 include \"consumers [will] return to brick and mortar stores and millennials and Gen Z start watching TV.\" Kulkarni said this could result from Covid-19 vaccinations reaching mass-population levels and reaching an end to the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Kulkarni said Facebook's(NASDAQ:FB)<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CASH\">Meta</a> could launch its own cryptocurrency that could start displacing several traditional fiat currencies, and that mega cap tech companies will manage to not pay any fines to U.S. or European regulators regarding legal cases currently in the works.</p>\n<p>\"We have stopped counting the number of lawsuits facing Big Tech,\" Kulkarni said. \"However, there is fairly limited consensus in the ideas or bills presented to date, and Congress has been focused on the pandemic and infrastructure bill for 2021.</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Kulkarni's other Black Swan predictions are:</li>\n <li>SPAC IPOs will outperform traditional IPOs and direct stock listings.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">Uber</a>(NYSE:UBER)launches its own robotaxi service in several U.S. cities.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>(NYSE:TWTR)and Pinterest(NYSE:PINS)are acquired and are no longer independent public companies.</li>\n <li>DoorDash(NYSE:DASH)acquires Instacart for between $40B-50B and spurs a new round of grocery delivery wars.</li>\n <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>(NASDAQ:AAPL)reaches $10B in annual revenue run rate from advertising due to changes in its iOS ad policies.</li>\n <li>Google's(NASDAQ:GOOG)YouTube get in position to go public.</li>\n <li>Snap(NYSE:SNAP)and TikTok (BDNCE) look to capitalize on their younger audiences by acquiring movie or gaming studios so they can boost their original video content offerings.</li>\n <li>As a \"bonus\" prediction, Kulkarni forecasts that as the pandemic ends, more people will go back to working out at gyms and neighborhood parks, and this will result in difficulty in forecasting sales for the likes of Peloton(NASDAQ:PTON). The home-exercise technology company also had its sails trimmed on Thursday when analysts at Citi cut their price target on Peloton's (PTON) stock to $38 a share on expectations of higher expenses and&nbsp;falling demand for Peloton (PTON) products next year.</li>\n</ul>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat are MKM Partners 'Black Swan' Internet predictions for 2022?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-24 16:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.\nSo, it should come as...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","DASH":"DoorDash, Inc.","PTON":"Peloton Interactive, Inc.","SNAP":"Snap Inc","AAPL":"苹果","PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783065-mkm-black-swan-look-at-internet-stocks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1156159690","content_text":"As the year comes to a close, Wall Street analysts are practically falling over themselves with almost daily serious predictions aboutwhat to expect from the tech sector in 2022.\nSo, it should come as no surprise that, like many analysts, MKM Partners managing director Rohit Kulkarni came out with a list of 10 things that could shape the Internet industry next year. However, instead of diving into matters such as revenue growth rates and price-to-earnings ratios, Kulkarni released a slate of \"Black Swan\"--or, High-Impact-Low-Probability [HILP]--predictions for 2022. Kulkarni said these ideas \"have a very low likelihood of occurrence, but we wouldn't assign a zero probability\" chance of then happening.\nThe \"HILP\" predictions Kulkarni has for 2022 include \"consumers [will] return to brick and mortar stores and millennials and Gen Z start watching TV.\" Kulkarni said this could result from Covid-19 vaccinations reaching mass-population levels and reaching an end to the pandemic.\nKulkarni said Facebook's(NASDAQ:FB)Meta could launch its own cryptocurrency that could start displacing several traditional fiat currencies, and that mega cap tech companies will manage to not pay any fines to U.S. or European regulators regarding legal cases currently in the works.\n\"We have stopped counting the number of lawsuits facing Big Tech,\" Kulkarni said. \"However, there is fairly limited consensus in the ideas or bills presented to date, and Congress has been focused on the pandemic and infrastructure bill for 2021.\n\nKulkarni's other Black Swan predictions are:\nSPAC IPOs will outperform traditional IPOs and direct stock listings.\nUber(NYSE:UBER)launches its own robotaxi service in several U.S. cities.\nTwitter(NYSE:TWTR)and Pinterest(NYSE:PINS)are acquired and are no longer independent public companies.\nDoorDash(NYSE:DASH)acquires Instacart for between $40B-50B and spurs a new round of grocery delivery wars.\nApple(NASDAQ:AAPL)reaches $10B in annual revenue run rate from advertising due to changes in its iOS ad policies.\nGoogle's(NASDAQ:GOOG)YouTube get in position to go public.\nSnap(NYSE:SNAP)and TikTok (BDNCE) look to capitalize on their younger audiences by acquiring movie or gaming studios so they can boost their original video content offerings.\nAs a \"bonus\" prediction, Kulkarni forecasts that as the pandemic ends, more people will go back to working out at gyms and neighborhood parks, and this will result in difficulty in forecasting sales for the likes of Peloton(NASDAQ:PTON). The home-exercise technology company also had its sails trimmed on Thursday when analysts at Citi cut their price target on Peloton's (PTON) stock to $38 a share on expectations of higher expenses and falling demand for Peloton (PTON) products next year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":458,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144681897,"gmtCreate":1626279792219,"gmtModify":1703757117790,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144681897","repostId":"2151517189","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2151517189","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626278940,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151517189?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 00:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151517189","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"MW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims t","content":"<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Mark DeCambre \n</p>\n<p>\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n</p>\n<p>\n  That is the feeling that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&amp;P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-15 00:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Mark DeCambre \n</p>\n<p>\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n</p>\n<p>\n  That is the feeling that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n</p>\n<p>\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&amp;P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CME":"芝加哥商品交易所","GS":"高盛","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151517189","content_text":"MW A 29-year old crypto billionaire has Goldman, CME Group in his crosshairs as his exchanges aims to surpass Coinbase\n\n\n  By Mark DeCambre \n\n\n  Should Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon be quaking in his boots? \n\n\n  That is the feeling that one might glean from Sam Bankman-Fried as he explains, in an interview with the Financial Times  may be future acquisition targets for his relatively upstart crypto exchange FTX. \n\n\n  Bankman-Fried told the FT, in a recent interview, that his exchange, considered by some to be one of the fastest-growing digital platforms , the No. 1 and 2 largest cryto platforms in the world. \n\n\n  Then...watch out Goldman and CME. \n\n\n  \"If we are the biggest exchange, [buying Goldman Sachs and CME] is not out of the question at all,\" Bankman-Fried was quoted by the FT saying. \n\n\n  If Bankman-Fried comes off as superbly ambitious, it is, perhaps, for a good reason. \n\n\n  The 29-year old, who is a U.S. citizen but resides in Hong Kong, is reportedly a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who boasts a net worth of $8.7 billion, according to Forbes.  Forbes says that majority of his wealth is derived from his stake in FTX, which he launched a few years ago, as well as crypto token ownership, like bitcoin  and Ether  on the Ethereum blockchain, for example. He also launched Alameda Research, the quantitative crypto trading firm he founded in 2017, which looks after $2.5 billion. \n\n\n  Bankman-Fried is aiming for a valuation of $20 billion for FTX, in his most recent funding round, according to the FT . \n\n\n  Even still, Goldman's value is $127 billion, while CME Group's is $75 billion, as of Wednesday midday trade. \n\n\n  Coinbase, meanwhile, has a market capitalization of about $50 billion, if Bankman-Fried would consider lowering his sights. Coinbase went public back in April but has seen a tough road as a publicly traded company thus far. \n\n\n  Coinbase shares are down 28% over the past three months, performing better than bitcoin, which is down 48% over the same period. However, traditional assets are faring far better than their turbulent crypto counterparts in recent months, by comparison. \n\n\n  The Dow Jones Industrial Average  is looking at a gain of more than 3% in the three-month period, the S&P 500 index  and Nasdaq Composite  indexes are both up nearly 6% over the same period. \n\n\n  -Mark DeCambre; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  July 14, 2021 12:09 ET (16:09 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155342953,"gmtCreate":1625380532372,"gmtModify":1703741082016,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maybe&nbsp;","listText":"Maybe&nbsp;","text":"Maybe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/155342953","repostId":"2148807114","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148807114","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1625367960,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148807114?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-04 11:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148807114","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberatta","content":"<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-04 11:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148807114","content_text":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.\nThe only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.\nJim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.\nRead more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government\n\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.\nPresident Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.\n\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.\nShe added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior one to the government and a substandard one to the private sector.\n\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.\nFollowing last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.\nHe pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.\n\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.\nCybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.\n\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"\nCSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.\nSee also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks\n\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"\nLewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.\n\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.\n\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":47,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155341433,"gmtCreate":1625380429122,"gmtModify":1703741078779,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"[Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/155341433","repostId":"1165340887","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165340887","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625257396,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165340887?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-03 04:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stocks sweep to fresh highs after strong jobs report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165340887","media":"yahoo","summary":"Stocks rose Friday to record levels as investors digested a key print on the U.S. labor market recovery, which pointed to a faster pace of payroll gains than expected.The S&P 500 set another record high, kicking off the first sessions of the third quarter on a high note. The blue-chip index logged a seventh straight day of gains in its longest winning streak since August 2020. The Nasdaq also hit all-time intraday and closing highs, and the Dow gained to set its first record high since May 7. Sh","content":"<p>Stocks rose Friday to record levels as investors digested a key print on the U.S. labor market recovery, which pointed to a faster pace of payroll gains than expected.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 set another record high, kicking off the first sessions of the third quarter on a high note. The blue-chip index logged a seventh straight day of gains in its longest winning streak since August 2020. The Nasdaq also hit all-time intraday and closing highs, and the Dow gained to set its first record high since May 7. Shares of Tesla (TSLA) fluctuated before ending slightly higher after the electric car-maker's second-quarter deliveries hit a new record but still missed analysts' estimates, based on Bloomberg consensus data.</p>\n<p>Investorsconsidered the U.S. Labor Department's June jobs report, the central economic data point that came out this week. The print showed a stronger-than-anticipated acceleration in hiring, with non-farm payrolls rising by 850,000 for a sixth straight monthly gain. The unemployment rate, however, unexpectedly ticked up slightly to 5.9%.</p>\n<p>\"This is the 'Goldilocks report' that the market was looking for today. You had a nice print here of 850,000 jobs being added, wage pressure remaining — I wouldn't call them necessarily contained — but surprising here on the downside versus consensus estimates. So this is telling us right now that economic growth is continuing to accelerate here, the jobs market is continuing to heal,\" Emily Roland, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management, told Yahoo Finance. \"We're making progress here in terms of what the Fed has set out to do, which is in order to get unemployment get down, they're going to let inflation run a little bit hot here. Not too hot, not too cold — this is just what the market wants.\"</p>\n<p>Heading into the report, equities have been buoyed by a slew of strong economic data earlier this week, especially on the labor market.Private payrolls rose by a better-than-expected 692,000 in June,according to ADP, andweekly initial jobless claims improved more than expectedto the lowest level since March 2020. Still, other reports underscored the still-prevalent labor supply challenges impacting companies across industries, with the scarcity capping what has otherwise been a robust economic rebound.</p>\n<p>\"It's really the labor market supply that's putting the brake on hiring right now,\" Luke Tilley, chief economist for Wilmington Trust, told Yahoo Finance. \"But we're pretty optimistic, the market is pretty optimistic, and we think that's a big part of what's driving these indexes higher.\"</p>\n<p>Friday's jobs report will also give markets a suggestion as to the timing of the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy move. For now, the Fed has kept in place both of its key crisis-era policies, or quantitative easing and a near-zero benchmark interest rate. However, an especially strong jobs report and faster-than-expected print on wage growth could justify an earlier-than-currently-telegraphed shift by the central bank.</p>\n<p>“For the first time in years, I’m actually worried about a too hot number causing some kind of volatility or pullback in stocks. That’s because the Fed has signaled they are looking to taper QE,\" Tom Essaye, Sevens Report Research founder,told Yahoo Finance. \"And if we get a really, really strong jobs number and a hot wage number, then markets are going to start to say gee, are they going to taper QE maybe before November, or are they going to taper it more intensely than we thought and in a market that's frankly been very calm and a little bit complacent, that could cause volatility.\"</p>\n<p>Still, the Fed has suggested it would not react rashly to single reports, and has given itself leeway to adjust the timeline of its monetary policy pivots as more data comes in.</p>\n<p>\"I think everyone's counting on the Fed continuing really for the foreseeable future. So I don't see any big changes there coming before 2023,\" Octavio Marenzi, CEO and founder of Opimas,told Yahoo Finance.\"And even then the Fed has hedged its bets very significantly — they've basically said we might in 2023 raise interest rates twice, but then again we might not. So I think the smart money is betting things are going to keep on going, they're going to carry on with a very accommodative monetary policy.\"</p>\n<p>Even with the recent strength for stocks, market strategists say that uncertainty about the future of the Fed’s asset purchases and the upcoming earnings season could keep stocks from making major gains in the near term.</p>\n<p>“The market is still very much concerned about the Fed’s reaction function,” said Max Gokhman, head of asset allocation at Pacific Life Fund Advisors, adding that he thought there was still a lot of slack in the labor market.</p>\n<p>4:01 p.m. ET: Stocks close higher, S&amp;P 500 posts longest winning streak since August 2020</p>\n<p>Here's where markets closed out on Friday:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><p><b>S&amp;P 500 (^GSPC)</b>: +32.51 (+0.75%) to 4,352.45</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Dow (^DJI)</b>: +154.4 (+0.45%) to 34,787.93</p></li>\n <li><p><b>Nasdaq (^IXIC)</b>: +116.95 (+0.81%) to 14,639.33</p></li>\n</ul>","source":"lsy1584348713084","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stocks sweep to fresh highs after strong jobs report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stocks sweep to fresh highs after strong jobs report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-03 04:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-july-2-2021-221546079-221120965.html><strong>yahoo</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stocks rose Friday to record levels as investors digested a key print on the U.S. labor market recovery, which pointed to a faster pace of payroll gains than expected.\nThe S&P 500 set another record ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-july-2-2021-221546079-221120965.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-july-2-2021-221546079-221120965.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165340887","content_text":"Stocks rose Friday to record levels as investors digested a key print on the U.S. labor market recovery, which pointed to a faster pace of payroll gains than expected.\nThe S&P 500 set another record high, kicking off the first sessions of the third quarter on a high note. The blue-chip index logged a seventh straight day of gains in its longest winning streak since August 2020. The Nasdaq also hit all-time intraday and closing highs, and the Dow gained to set its first record high since May 7. Shares of Tesla (TSLA) fluctuated before ending slightly higher after the electric car-maker's second-quarter deliveries hit a new record but still missed analysts' estimates, based on Bloomberg consensus data.\nInvestorsconsidered the U.S. Labor Department's June jobs report, the central economic data point that came out this week. The print showed a stronger-than-anticipated acceleration in hiring, with non-farm payrolls rising by 850,000 for a sixth straight monthly gain. The unemployment rate, however, unexpectedly ticked up slightly to 5.9%.\n\"This is the 'Goldilocks report' that the market was looking for today. You had a nice print here of 850,000 jobs being added, wage pressure remaining — I wouldn't call them necessarily contained — but surprising here on the downside versus consensus estimates. So this is telling us right now that economic growth is continuing to accelerate here, the jobs market is continuing to heal,\" Emily Roland, co-chief investment strategist at John Hancock Investment Management, told Yahoo Finance. \"We're making progress here in terms of what the Fed has set out to do, which is in order to get unemployment get down, they're going to let inflation run a little bit hot here. Not too hot, not too cold — this is just what the market wants.\"\nHeading into the report, equities have been buoyed by a slew of strong economic data earlier this week, especially on the labor market.Private payrolls rose by a better-than-expected 692,000 in June,according to ADP, andweekly initial jobless claims improved more than expectedto the lowest level since March 2020. Still, other reports underscored the still-prevalent labor supply challenges impacting companies across industries, with the scarcity capping what has otherwise been a robust economic rebound.\n\"It's really the labor market supply that's putting the brake on hiring right now,\" Luke Tilley, chief economist for Wilmington Trust, told Yahoo Finance. \"But we're pretty optimistic, the market is pretty optimistic, and we think that's a big part of what's driving these indexes higher.\"\nFriday's jobs report will also give markets a suggestion as to the timing of the Federal Reserve's next monetary policy move. For now, the Fed has kept in place both of its key crisis-era policies, or quantitative easing and a near-zero benchmark interest rate. However, an especially strong jobs report and faster-than-expected print on wage growth could justify an earlier-than-currently-telegraphed shift by the central bank.\n“For the first time in years, I’m actually worried about a too hot number causing some kind of volatility or pullback in stocks. That’s because the Fed has signaled they are looking to taper QE,\" Tom Essaye, Sevens Report Research founder,told Yahoo Finance. \"And if we get a really, really strong jobs number and a hot wage number, then markets are going to start to say gee, are they going to taper QE maybe before November, or are they going to taper it more intensely than we thought and in a market that's frankly been very calm and a little bit complacent, that could cause volatility.\"\nStill, the Fed has suggested it would not react rashly to single reports, and has given itself leeway to adjust the timeline of its monetary policy pivots as more data comes in.\n\"I think everyone's counting on the Fed continuing really for the foreseeable future. So I don't see any big changes there coming before 2023,\" Octavio Marenzi, CEO and founder of Opimas,told Yahoo Finance.\"And even then the Fed has hedged its bets very significantly — they've basically said we might in 2023 raise interest rates twice, but then again we might not. So I think the smart money is betting things are going to keep on going, they're going to carry on with a very accommodative monetary policy.\"\nEven with the recent strength for stocks, market strategists say that uncertainty about the future of the Fed’s asset purchases and the upcoming earnings season could keep stocks from making major gains in the near term.\n“The market is still very much concerned about the Fed’s reaction function,” said Max Gokhman, head of asset allocation at Pacific Life Fund Advisors, adding that he thought there was still a lot of slack in the labor market.\n4:01 p.m. ET: Stocks close higher, S&P 500 posts longest winning streak since August 2020\nHere's where markets closed out on Friday:\n\nS&P 500 (^GSPC): +32.51 (+0.75%) to 4,352.45\nDow (^DJI): +154.4 (+0.45%) to 34,787.93\nNasdaq (^IXIC): +116.95 (+0.81%) to 14,639.33","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926853144,"gmtCreate":1671516215089,"gmtModify":1676538549155,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926853144","repostId":"2292487749","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":397,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001916639,"gmtCreate":1641139549932,"gmtModify":1676533575493,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong] [Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001916639","repostId":"1150283067","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150283067","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1640962811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150283067?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-31 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150283067","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. X","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Biggest Price Target Changes For Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-31 23:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STZ":"星座品牌","XERS":"Xeris制药","SYNA":"Synaptics Incorporated"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150283067","content_text":"SVB Leerink boosted the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $6 to $8. Xeris Biopharma shares rose 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Rosenblatt lifted Synaptics Incorporated SYNA +0.75%  price target from $290 to $345. Synaptics shares fell 1.6% to close at $287.70 on Thursday.HC Wainwright & Co. raised the price target on Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. XERS +24.21% from $4.25 to $5.4. Xeris Biopharma shares gained 18.9% to $2.89 in pre-market trading.Barclays raised Constellation Brands, Inc. STZ +0.19% price target from $268 to $271. Constellation shares fell 0.2% to $249.00 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009732076,"gmtCreate":1640790396510,"gmtModify":1676533541877,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009732076","repostId":"698204164","repostType":1,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009373616,"gmtCreate":1640535553765,"gmtModify":1676533524894,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy!","listText":"Time to buy!","text":"Time to buy!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009373616","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000297387,"gmtCreate":1640190648965,"gmtModify":1676533506089,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy Apple!","listText":"Time to buy Apple!","text":"Time to buy Apple!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000297387","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000295126,"gmtCreate":1640190289748,"gmtModify":1676533506066,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000295126","repostId":"1122126959","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122126959","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640186098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1122126959?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-22 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122126959","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analys","content":"<p>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"</p>\n<p>Citing a \"handful\" of data points that the firm has seen over the past month, Huberty notes that the supply of semi-related components are improving and iPhone builds in the December quarter are \"stable\" at 82 million units. In addition, Apple (AAPL) is seeing improved supply for power management integrated circuits and world-facing camera modules, all of which suggests that iPhone builds in December are likely to be flat or slightly down month-over-month, compared to a significant month-over-month decline in previous years.</p>\n<p>Additionally, Huberty notes that lead times for Apple's (AAPL) high-end iPhone 13 models, the Pro and Pro Max are at 2 days as of December 21, down from 20 days a month ago.</p>\n<p>'[W]hile some investors may view this lead time contraction as a sign of slowing demand, we'd note that major end markets like China are posting iPhone shipment growth of +46% [year-over-year] [quarter-to-date] through the end of November,\" Huberty wrote.</p>\n<p>\"While we don't have enough data to definitively say that iPhone will exit the December quarter in supply/demand balance, we do believe that iPhone production is surprising to the upside, which supports our 7% above consensus December quarter iPhone revenue forecast.\"</p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) shares have&nbsp;gained more than 33% year-to-date.</p>\n<p>Huberty added that she is keeping an eye on Apple (AAPL) retail stores that are closing as a result of increasing COVID-19 cases in North America.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, Apple (AAPL) was upgraded at Moody's, as the credit-ratings agency&nbsp;cited the tech giant's \"exceptional liquidity\" and earnings power.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple iPhone production may surprise to upside, Morgan Stanley says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-22 23:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3782708-apple-iphone-production-may-surprise-to-upside-morgan-stanley-says","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1122126959","content_text":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)iPhone production could surprise to the upside this quarter, Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty wrote in a note to clients, as lead times are declining to \"more normalized levels.\"\nCiting a \"handful\" of data points that the firm has seen over the past month, Huberty notes that the supply of semi-related components are improving and iPhone builds in the December quarter are \"stable\" at 82 million units. In addition, Apple (AAPL) is seeing improved supply for power management integrated circuits and world-facing camera modules, all of which suggests that iPhone builds in December are likely to be flat or slightly down month-over-month, compared to a significant month-over-month decline in previous years.\nAdditionally, Huberty notes that lead times for Apple's (AAPL) high-end iPhone 13 models, the Pro and Pro Max are at 2 days as of December 21, down from 20 days a month ago.\n'[W]hile some investors may view this lead time contraction as a sign of slowing demand, we'd note that major end markets like China are posting iPhone shipment growth of +46% [year-over-year] [quarter-to-date] through the end of November,\" Huberty wrote.\n\"While we don't have enough data to definitively say that iPhone will exit the December quarter in supply/demand balance, we do believe that iPhone production is surprising to the upside, which supports our 7% above consensus December quarter iPhone revenue forecast.\"\nApple (AAPL) shares have gained more than 33% year-to-date.\nHuberty added that she is keeping an eye on Apple (AAPL) retail stores that are closing as a result of increasing COVID-19 cases in North America.\nOn Tuesday, Apple (AAPL) was upgraded at Moody's, as the credit-ratings agency cited the tech giant's \"exceptional liquidity\" and earnings power.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000671581,"gmtCreate":1640183373931,"gmtModify":1676533505391,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy Apple now?","listText":"Time to buy Apple now?","text":"Time to buy Apple now?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000671581","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":93,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144683308,"gmtCreate":1626279727204,"gmtModify":1703757115970,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great!!!","listText":"Great!!!","text":"Great!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144683308","repostId":"1165924722","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165924722","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626264464,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165924722?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-14 20:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Citigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165924722","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Citigroupposted second-quarter results.\nHere's how the bank did:\nEarnings: $2.85 a share. The estima","content":"<p>Citigroupposted second-quarter results.</p>\n<p>Here's how the bank did:</p>\n<p>Earnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.</p>\n<p>Revenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.</p>\n<p>What changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?</p>\n<p>Fraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.</p>\n<p>Now, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.</p>\n<p>Like the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup&nbsp;rises&nbsp;0.4&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Citigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCitigroup beats analysts’ estimates for profit, helped by $1.1 billion boost from loans\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-14 20:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Citigroupposted second-quarter results.</p>\n<p>Here's how the bank did:</p>\n<p>Earnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.</p>\n<p>Revenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.</p>\n<p>What changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?</p>\n<p>Fraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.</p>\n<p>Now, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.</p>\n<p>Like the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.</p>\n<p>Shares of Citigroup&nbsp;rises&nbsp;0.4&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"C":"花旗"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165924722","content_text":"Citigroupposted second-quarter results.\nHere's how the bank did:\nEarnings: $2.85 a share. The estimate of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv was $1.96 a share.\nRevenue: $17.47 billion. The estimate was $17.2 billion.\nWhat changes doesJane Fraserhave in store for Citigroup?\nFraser, who officially became CEO in February,announcedin April that Citigroup was exiting retail operations in 13 countries outside the U.S. to improve returns.\nNow, analysts wonder what else Fraser has planned for her strategic revamp of Citigroup, the third biggest U.S. bank by assets.\nLike the rest of the industry, Citigroup is expected to release some of the money it had previously set aside for anticipated defaults tied to the coronavirus pandemic. The firm may also benefit from strong Wall Street advisory activity in the quarter.\nShares of Citigroup have climbed 11% this year, compared with the 26% advance of the KBW Bank Index.\nOn Tuesday,JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman Sachs each posted results that beat expectations, helped by strong revenue from Wall Street advisory activities.\nShares of Citigroup rises 0.4 in premarket.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":72,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144680628,"gmtCreate":1626279603364,"gmtModify":1703757112997,"author":{"id":"4087667102961480","authorId":"4087667102961480","name":"JlY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fdb199ace5a788692e8aa4e13147241","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087667102961480","authorIdStr":"4087667102961480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gosh!","listText":"Gosh!","text":"Gosh!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144680628","repostId":"2151511237","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151511237","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626273009,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151511237?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-14 22:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"India bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151511237","media":"Reuters","summary":"MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Masterc","content":"<p>MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.</p>\n<p>In a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".</p>\n<p>\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.</p>\n<p>Mastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.</p>\n<p>The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.</p>\n<p>The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express</a> and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.</p>\n<p>The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.</p>\n<p>The order comes as companies such as Mastercard and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>India bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIndia bans Mastercard from issuing new cards in data storage row\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-14 22:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.</p>\n<p>In a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".</p>\n<p>\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.</p>\n<p>Mastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.</p>\n<p>The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.</p>\n<p>The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express</a> and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.</p>\n<p>The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.</p>\n<p>The order comes as companies such as Mastercard and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MA":"万事达","DFS":"发现金融","AXP":"美国运通","V":"Visa"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151511237","content_text":"MUMBAI, July 14 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Wednesday indefinitely barred Mastercard Inc from issuing new debit, credit or prepaid cards to domestic customers for violating data storage rules, dealing a blow to the U.S. company in a key market.\nIn a notification, the RBI said Mastercard had not complied with data storage rules from 2018 that require foreign card networks to store Indian payments data locally so the regulator can have \"unfettered supervisory access\".\n\"Notwithstanding lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions,\" the RBI said.\nMastercard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The ban takes effect on July 22.\nThe RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.\nThe move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American Express and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services , from issuing new cards due to similar violations.\nThe RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from U.S. companies who said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.\nThe order comes as companies such as Mastercard and Visa also face growing competition from domestic payments network Rupay, which has been promoted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":120,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}