Phillip98 personal page - To The Moon

Phillip98

Phillip98

No personal profile

0Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-07-15

I agree

Tesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'

2021-07-15

I agree

JPMorgan Strategist Warns of Dot-Com Era ‘Bull Trap’ in Ark Fund

2021-07-15

I agree

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4089458407603420","uuid":"4089458407603420","gmtCreate":1626356433361,"gmtModify":1626360565259,"name":"Phillip98","pinyin":"phillip98","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":3,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":3,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":147266562,"gmtCreate":1626359915556,"gmtModify":1703758694845,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147266562","repostId":"1117337273","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117337273","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626356441,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117337273?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 21:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop? AMC? 'Diamond Hand' Meme Trading Always Disintegrates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117337273","media":"Thestreet","summary":"Much was made of the WallStreetBets meme trading movement, where a group of social media traders ban","content":"<p>Much was made of the WallStreetBets meme trading movement, where a group of social media traders banded together in a \"Kum Ba Yah\" moment to take down the dark lords lurking inside giant hedge fund firms.</p>\n<p>The mass media latched on to the movement, portraying the Reddit traders as the Robinhoods of finance, metaphorically slinging well-aimed arrows through Wall Street’s concrete canyons, striking down the hedge fund short specialists in the process.</p>\n<p>It’s a nice story and one that’s tailor-made for today’s 240 character-driven social media movement. The fact is, as James “Rev Shark” DePorre notes in Real Money, the meme trading movement is hardly new and not nearly as efficient as the mass media has led average investors to believe.</p>\n<p>\"The business media likes to portray meme trading as something new, but this sort of trading has been part of markets from their very beginning hundreds of years ago. There will also be groups that question the conventional wisdom of the professionals that control the market. It is no surprise at all that there are small traders with limited capital who have no interest in the idea that they should hold a diversified portfolio of stocks for the long term.\"</p>\n<p>The recent surge in social media trading was caused by a perfect storm of circumstances, according to DePorre. \"The pandemic created a combination of more free time, a need for entertainment, free cash payment, and better social networking. Trading hot stocks was a great way to spend some time, and brokers like Robinhood made it extremely easy to trade small accounts money,\" noting there aren't even commissions or transaction costs to create friction and slow things down.</p>\n<p>While thememe investors were able to change the arc of stockslike GameStop&nbsp;(<b>GME</b>)&nbsp;(down 21% in the past month) and AMC Enternatinment&nbsp;(<b>AMC</b>)&nbsp;(down 30% in the past month), they haven’t had much luck elsewhere.</p>\n<p>In fact, the now-deflating meme investing movement is both understandable and predictable, DePorre writes -- it’s a product of the time, especially with the persuasion power of social media to drive the “meme themes,” he says.</p>\n<p>\"Social media is going to exist in various forms as long as there are markets. This is not some new idea that is going to create a steady flow of easy profits. It is a cutthroat business, and if you want to make money trading these stocks you must recognize that other traders are your competitors and not your friends,\" he writes.</p>\n<p>DePorre advises smart investors not to fall for the meme trading grift. He also offers some “red flags” for investors to watch out for as they engage in social media trading channels, including folks bragging about their success and the higher levels of volatility.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop? AMC? 'Diamond Hand' Meme Trading Always Disintegrates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop? AMC? 'Diamond Hand' Meme Trading Always Disintegrates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 21:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/deporre-meme-trading-always-disintegrates><strong>Thestreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Much was made of the WallStreetBets meme trading movement, where a group of social media traders banded together in a \"Kum Ba Yah\" moment to take down the dark lords lurking inside giant hedge fund ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/deporre-meme-trading-always-disintegrates\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/deporre-meme-trading-always-disintegrates","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117337273","content_text":"Much was made of the WallStreetBets meme trading movement, where a group of social media traders banded together in a \"Kum Ba Yah\" moment to take down the dark lords lurking inside giant hedge fund firms.\nThe mass media latched on to the movement, portraying the Reddit traders as the Robinhoods of finance, metaphorically slinging well-aimed arrows through Wall Street’s concrete canyons, striking down the hedge fund short specialists in the process.\nIt’s a nice story and one that’s tailor-made for today’s 240 character-driven social media movement. The fact is, as James “Rev Shark” DePorre notes in Real Money, the meme trading movement is hardly new and not nearly as efficient as the mass media has led average investors to believe.\n\"The business media likes to portray meme trading as something new, but this sort of trading has been part of markets from their very beginning hundreds of years ago. There will also be groups that question the conventional wisdom of the professionals that control the market. It is no surprise at all that there are small traders with limited capital who have no interest in the idea that they should hold a diversified portfolio of stocks for the long term.\"\nThe recent surge in social media trading was caused by a perfect storm of circumstances, according to DePorre. \"The pandemic created a combination of more free time, a need for entertainment, free cash payment, and better social networking. Trading hot stocks was a great way to spend some time, and brokers like Robinhood made it extremely easy to trade small accounts money,\" noting there aren't even commissions or transaction costs to create friction and slow things down.\nWhile thememe investors were able to change the arc of stockslike GameStop (GME) (down 21% in the past month) and AMC Enternatinment (AMC) (down 30% in the past month), they haven’t had much luck elsewhere.\nIn fact, the now-deflating meme investing movement is both understandable and predictable, DePorre writes -- it’s a product of the time, especially with the persuasion power of social media to drive the “meme themes,” he says.\n\"Social media is going to exist in various forms as long as there are markets. This is not some new idea that is going to create a steady flow of easy profits. It is a cutthroat business, and if you want to make money trading these stocks you must recognize that other traders are your competitors and not your friends,\" he writes.\nDePorre advises smart investors not to fall for the meme trading grift. He also offers some “red flags” for investors to watch out for as they engage in social media trading channels, including folks bragging about their success and the higher levels of volatility.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":301,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147268712,"gmtCreate":1626359879336,"gmtModify":1703758694038,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147268712","repostId":"1165217903","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147269389,"gmtCreate":1626359748341,"gmtModify":1703758688502,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147269389","repostId":"2151529000","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151529000","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626357540,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151529000?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 21:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151529000","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanl","content":"<p>“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) markets is a matter of “not ‘if’ but ‘when’?”.</p>\n<p>“The potential skills transferability and network adjacencies are too strong to ignore.” Jonas believes that Tesla is the “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> company that is aggressively industrializing EVs, AVs, battery storage, connected car networks and EV infrastructure.” And that the reason the company is not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative is that Elon Musk hasn’t really talked about it.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley ran a range of scenarios based on what entering the market could mean for Tesla. Morgan Stanley came up with potential preliminary outcomes on the order of $100 per Tesla share on the low-end to approximately $1,000 per Tesla share on the high end.</p>\n<p>To our knowledge, Tesla has not commented on any potential aviation-related product or service and we are not aware of any specific electric aviation-related projects that the company is pursuing as of this writing.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 21:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanley analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","MS":"摩根士丹利","MSTLW":"Morgan Stanley"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151529000","content_text":"“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanley analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) markets is a matter of “not ‘if’ but ‘when’?”.\n“The potential skills transferability and network adjacencies are too strong to ignore.” Jonas believes that Tesla is the “one company that is aggressively industrializing EVs, AVs, battery storage, connected car networks and EV infrastructure.” And that the reason the company is not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative is that Elon Musk hasn’t really talked about it.\nMorgan Stanley ran a range of scenarios based on what entering the market could mean for Tesla. Morgan Stanley came up with potential preliminary outcomes on the order of $100 per Tesla share on the low-end to approximately $1,000 per Tesla share on the high end.\nTo our knowledge, Tesla has not commented on any potential aviation-related product or service and we are not aware of any specific electric aviation-related projects that the company is pursuing as of this writing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":348,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":147269389,"gmtCreate":1626359748341,"gmtModify":1703758688502,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147269389","repostId":"2151529000","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151529000","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626357540,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151529000?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 21:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151529000","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanl","content":"<p>“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) markets is a matter of “not ‘if’ but ‘when’?”.</p>\n<p>“The potential skills transferability and network adjacencies are too strong to ignore.” Jonas believes that Tesla is the “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> company that is aggressively industrializing EVs, AVs, battery storage, connected car networks and EV infrastructure.” And that the reason the company is not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative is that Elon Musk hasn’t really talked about it.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley ran a range of scenarios based on what entering the market could mean for Tesla. Morgan Stanley came up with potential preliminary outcomes on the order of $100 per Tesla share on the low-end to approximately $1,000 per Tesla share on the high end.</p>\n<p>To our knowledge, Tesla has not commented on any potential aviation-related product or service and we are not aware of any specific electric aviation-related projects that the company is pursuing as of this writing.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla to Enter e-Aviation? Morgan Stanley Says it's Not 'If' But 'When'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 21:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanley analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","MS":"摩根士丹利","MSTLW":"Morgan Stanley"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18680522","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151529000","content_text":"“Why is Tesla not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative?” A question was put forward by Morgan Stanley analyst, Adam Jonas. Jonas believes that Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) involvement in the electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) markets is a matter of “not ‘if’ but ‘when’?”.\n“The potential skills transferability and network adjacencies are too strong to ignore.” Jonas believes that Tesla is the “one company that is aggressively industrializing EVs, AVs, battery storage, connected car networks and EV infrastructure.” And that the reason the company is not mentioned in the e-aviation narrative is that Elon Musk hasn’t really talked about it.\nMorgan Stanley ran a range of scenarios based on what entering the market could mean for Tesla. Morgan Stanley came up with potential preliminary outcomes on the order of $100 per Tesla share on the low-end to approximately $1,000 per Tesla share on the high end.\nTo our knowledge, Tesla has not commented on any potential aviation-related product or service and we are not aware of any specific electric aviation-related projects that the company is pursuing as of this writing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":348,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147268712,"gmtCreate":1626359879336,"gmtModify":1703758694038,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147268712","repostId":"1165217903","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165217903","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626357982,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165217903?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 22:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"JPMorgan Strategist Warns of Dot-Com Era ‘Bull Trap’ in Ark Fund","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165217903","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood’s flagship ETF is showing many of the bubble-like traits seen in growth-b","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood’s flagship ETF is showing many of the bubble-like traits seen in growth-based funds in 2000 and investors should consider betting against it with options, according to JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.’s Shawn Quigg.</p>\n<p>The derivatives strategist reckons a second-half increase in Treasury yields could trigger declines for the ARK Innovation exchange-traded fund (ticker ARKK), which is up about 19% since mid-May.</p>\n<p>“Enter the bull trap reversal,” Quigg wrote in a Thursday note to clients. “A looming rise in yields could be a catalyst to accelerate ARKK shares lower, in addition to the continued outperformance of large staple-tech stocks over disruptive-tech stocks, and pressing ARKK into the capitulation phase.”</p>\n<p>The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has fallen more than 40 basis points to about 1.32% from a recent peak at the end of March, helping spur the rebound for ARKK. Quigg argues that’s a technical move, set to be undone as the reopening trade reasserts itself in the rest of the year.</p>\n<p>Wood’s Ark Investment Management enjoyed a stellar start to 2021 propelled by gains in sectors such as electric vehicles, biotech and cryptocurrencies, as well as advances in stocks that benefited from the stay-at-home trade. But many of those themes faltered, and the firm’s main ETF fell more than 35% from mid-February through mid-May.</p>\n<p>JPMorgan expects cyclical and value assets to outperform amid the ongoing recovery and reopening from the pandemic. Value stocks just had their worst month versus growth counterparts in two decades, but the firm’s strategists see that as a pause in a rally that’s set to resume.</p>\n<p>Quigg recommends investors buy ARKK October $105 puts -- the strike price about 11% below the ETF’s closing level on Wednesday -- to take advantage of implied volatility that remains low even amid “the potential for shares to enter a broader capitulation phase,” he wrote.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>JPMorgan Strategist Warns of Dot-Com Era ‘Bull Trap’ in Ark Fund</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJPMorgan Strategist Warns of Dot-Com Era ‘Bull Trap’ in Ark Fund\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 22:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-strategist-warns-dot-com-130235186.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood’s flagship ETF is showing many of the bubble-like traits seen in growth-based funds in 2000 and investors should consider betting against it with options, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-strategist-warns-dot-com-130235186.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-strategist-warns-dot-com-130235186.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165217903","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood’s flagship ETF is showing many of the bubble-like traits seen in growth-based funds in 2000 and investors should consider betting against it with options, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Shawn Quigg.\nThe derivatives strategist reckons a second-half increase in Treasury yields could trigger declines for the ARK Innovation exchange-traded fund (ticker ARKK), which is up about 19% since mid-May.\n“Enter the bull trap reversal,” Quigg wrote in a Thursday note to clients. “A looming rise in yields could be a catalyst to accelerate ARKK shares lower, in addition to the continued outperformance of large staple-tech stocks over disruptive-tech stocks, and pressing ARKK into the capitulation phase.”\nThe 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has fallen more than 40 basis points to about 1.32% from a recent peak at the end of March, helping spur the rebound for ARKK. Quigg argues that’s a technical move, set to be undone as the reopening trade reasserts itself in the rest of the year.\nWood’s Ark Investment Management enjoyed a stellar start to 2021 propelled by gains in sectors such as electric vehicles, biotech and cryptocurrencies, as well as advances in stocks that benefited from the stay-at-home trade. But many of those themes faltered, and the firm’s main ETF fell more than 35% from mid-February through mid-May.\nJPMorgan expects cyclical and value assets to outperform amid the ongoing recovery and reopening from the pandemic. Value stocks just had their worst month versus growth counterparts in two decades, but the firm’s strategists see that as a pause in a rally that’s set to resume.\nQuigg recommends investors buy ARKK October $105 puts -- the strike price about 11% below the ETF’s closing level on Wednesday -- to take advantage of implied volatility that remains low even amid “the potential for shares to enter a broader capitulation phase,” he wrote.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147266562,"gmtCreate":1626359915556,"gmtModify":1703758694845,"author":{"id":"4089458407603420","authorId":"4089458407603420","name":"Phillip98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519d36c40654024032fb201fab148961","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089458407603420","authorIdStr":"4089458407603420"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I agree","listText":"I agree","text":"I agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147266562","repostId":"1117337273","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":301,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}