Shirleyopy personal page - To The Moon

Shirleyopy

Shirleyopy

No personal profile

100Follow

15Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-10-26

Is HK Land (H78) a good dividend stock buy with PB of 0.21 and yield of 7.1%?

01-12

[Smile] [Miser] [Cool] [Smile] [What] [Cool]

2022-06-30

[Facepalm]

NIO: Questions And Challenges To The Grizzly Short-Seller Report

2023-06-17

Tiger tiger tiger game

2022-12-21

Buy

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-03-23

Is she going into the wood?

Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought

2022-06-17

Fearing moment

US STOCKS-Wall Street Plunges As Recession Fears Grow

2022-07-26

Shopping time

After-Hours Movers: Walmart Sinks on Warning, Sending Other Retail Stocks Lower As Well

2022-04-03

[Miser]

Tiger Chart | 11 S&P500 Sectors Mixed in Q1: Energy Sector Was the Top Winner Rising 34.26%

2022-08-03

[Smile] [Smile]

SolarEdge Technologies Stock Falls 13% after Hours as Q2 Revenue Misses Estimates

2022-06-17

[Smile]

After-Hours Stock Movers: Adobe Falls on Lower Guidance; U.S. Steel Rises on Higher Guidance

2022-03-31

[Miser] [Smile]

Visa: Promising Returns From All Directions

2022-11-25

$SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ Two green candles

2022-11-23

$Amazon.com(AMZN)$ All MA in down trend and will need some catalyst to turn the tide

2022-09-16

Show time

Elon Musk Accuses Twitter of Security Lapses in Court Filing

2022-06-11

[Cry] [Cry]

Wall Street Suffers Biggest Weekly Loss Since January After Hot CPI Data

2022-05-30

[Smile]

GameStop, Salesforce, Netflix, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week

2022-04-19

[Happy] [Happy]

ACC Soared Nearly 13% in Morning Trading on Sale to Blackstone

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":4089933742744210,"uuid":"4089933742744210","gmtCreate":1626831771497,"gmtModify":1706620742820,"name":"Shirleyopy","pinyin":"shirleyopy","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":15,"headSize":100,"tweetSize":221,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.04.17","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.32%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":262085987811592,"gmtCreate":1705020693197,"gmtModify":1705020695866,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Miser] [Cool] [Smile] [What] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262085987811592","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":67,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261704041746448,"gmtCreate":1704903100997,"gmtModify":1704903105932,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Happy] [Happy] [Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261704041746448","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":76,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261356411514952,"gmtCreate":1704818180625,"gmtModify":1704818184736,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261356411514952","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":261008434999496,"gmtCreate":1704733124974,"gmtModify":1704733128896,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Miser] [Smile] [Miser] [Smile] [Miser] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/261008434999496","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":84,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260767881093192,"gmtCreate":1704674496441,"gmtModify":1704674501124,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Happy] [Miser] [Smile] [Happy] [Miser] [Miser] [Happy] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260767881093192","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":43,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":260511108387048,"gmtCreate":1704611832807,"gmtModify":1704611837257,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Happy] [Happy] [Happy] [Happy] [Happy] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/260511108387048","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":259950738821304,"gmtCreate":1704475019176,"gmtModify":1704475023265,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Cool] [Miser] [Cool] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/259950738821304","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":157,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":259592367296808,"gmtCreate":1704387407226,"gmtModify":1704387412080,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/259592367296808","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":57,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":259237708988488,"gmtCreate":1704303029593,"gmtModify":1704303033326,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/259237708988488","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":120,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":258905783754816,"gmtCreate":1704243304558,"gmtModify":1704243308082,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Miser] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/258905783754816","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":111,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":258536662130744,"gmtCreate":1704153336186,"gmtModify":1704153340258,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/258536662130744","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":65,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":258112343773232,"gmtCreate":1704049699899,"gmtModify":1704049704153,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/258112343773232","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":59,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":257009150697544,"gmtCreate":1703780270084,"gmtModify":1703780274464,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile] [Happy] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Happy] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/257009150697544","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":256662560026688,"gmtCreate":1703695642514,"gmtModify":1703695646880,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;[Great]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Great] [Great] [Great] [Great] [Great]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/256662560026688","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":78,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":256486255185976,"gmtCreate":1703637991264,"gmtModify":1703637995715,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/256486255185976","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":78,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":256060435538184,"gmtCreate":1703548903435,"gmtModify":1703548907619,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [What] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/256060435538184","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":255485070225664,"gmtCreate":1703387980297,"gmtModify":1703387984221,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/255485070225664","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":18,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":255105384243432,"gmtCreate":1703295093765,"gmtModify":1703295099033,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/255105384243432","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":62,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":255105277018312,"gmtCreate":1703295067318,"gmtModify":1703295070362,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Repost","listText":"Repost","text":"Repost","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/255105277018312","repostId":"248312805347464","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":248312805347464,"gmtCreate":1701660745864,"gmtModify":1703059991513,"author":{"id":"3527667667103859","authorId":"3527667667103859","name":"TigerEvents","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/61ed9b39c6cbcdce6372edc1c0b48a2d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"🐅🌟 TIGER TYCOON CHALLENGE IS ON! 🌟🐅","htmlText":"Hey Tycoons! 🎩💼 Ready to embark on the adventure of a lifetime? Introducing the Tiger Tycoon Challenge – where fortunes are made, and USD 888 worth of prizes await the boldest players! 🏰🌈🎯 Objective: Build your empire, score big points, and unlock fabulous rewards!💰 Gold Rush: Grab those shiny gold coins every time you pass by it! Cha-ching! 💰💵🏠 Construct &amp; Conquer: Step on an empty tile to construct a building to gain points! 🏰🏆 Prizes Galore: Hit the prize tile to claim your treasure – it could be anything! 🎁✨🔄 Lucky Draw: Land on the draw tile and brace yourself! You might move forward, backward, or even unlock a secret power! 🔄🔮🚀 Airdrop Alert: Keep your eyes on the sky! Periodically, the Tiger Tycoon map will rain down special rewards like stocks, vouchers, and more. Fastest finge","listText":"Hey Tycoons! 🎩💼 Ready to embark on the adventure of a lifetime? Introducing the Tiger Tycoon Challenge – where fortunes are made, and USD 888 worth of prizes await the boldest players! 🏰🌈🎯 Objective: Build your empire, score big points, and unlock fabulous rewards!💰 Gold Rush: Grab those shiny gold coins every time you pass by it! Cha-ching! 💰💵🏠 Construct &amp; Conquer: Step on an empty tile to construct a building to gain points! 🏰🏆 Prizes Galore: Hit the prize tile to claim your treasure – it could be anything! 🎁✨🔄 Lucky Draw: Land on the draw tile and brace yourself! You might move forward, backward, or even unlock a secret power! 🔄🔮🚀 Airdrop Alert: Keep your eyes on the sky! Periodically, the Tiger Tycoon map will rain down special rewards like stocks, vouchers, and more. Fastest finge","text":"Hey Tycoons! 🎩💼 Ready to embark on the adventure of a lifetime? Introducing the Tiger Tycoon Challenge – where fortunes are made, and USD 888 worth of prizes await the boldest players! 🏰🌈🎯 Objective: Build your empire, score big points, and unlock fabulous rewards!💰 Gold Rush: Grab those shiny gold coins every time you pass by it! Cha-ching! 💰💵🏠 Construct & Conquer: Step on an empty tile to construct a building to gain points! 🏰🏆 Prizes Galore: Hit the prize tile to claim your treasure – it could be anything! 🎁✨🔄 Lucky Draw: Land on the draw tile and brace yourself! You might move forward, backward, or even unlock a secret power! 🔄🔮🚀 Airdrop Alert: Keep your eyes on the sky! Periodically, the Tiger Tycoon map will rain down special rewards like stocks, vouchers, and more. Fastest finge","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/248312805347464","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":20,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":254433016045784,"gmtCreate":1703154210599,"gmtModify":1703154552035,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"Tiger Tycoon","htmlText":"Find out more here: <a href=\"https://www.heytigers.com/activity/market/2024/tiger-tycoon?adcode=20231208151108&amp;actionID=c1a68ecae5b103620e26b2492ee8c471&amp;skin=2&amp;os=iOS&amp;account_id=50590810&amp;utm_source=invite&amp;utm_campaign=20231208151108&amp;utm_medium=tiger_community&amp;platform=iOS&amp;shareID=7fbba9a2f82e03c08360725c16bc1756&amp;invite=IJX1M2&amp;lang=en_US#/\">Tiger Tycoon</a> Get ready to WIN up to $888!","listText":"Find out more here: <a href=\"https://www.heytigers.com/activity/market/2024/tiger-tycoon?adcode=20231208151108&amp;actionID=c1a68ecae5b103620e26b2492ee8c471&amp;skin=2&amp;os=iOS&amp;account_id=50590810&amp;utm_source=invite&amp;utm_campaign=20231208151108&amp;utm_medium=tiger_community&amp;platform=iOS&amp;shareID=7fbba9a2f82e03c08360725c16bc1756&amp;invite=IJX1M2&amp;lang=en_US#/\">Tiger Tycoon</a> Get ready to WIN up to $888!","text":"Find out more here: Tiger Tycoon Get ready to WIN up to $888!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/254433016045784","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":74,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":234318652297472,"gmtCreate":1698251300852,"gmtModify":1698251304926,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is HK Land (H78) a good dividend stock buy with PB of 0.21 and yield of 7.1%?","listText":"Is HK Land (H78) a good dividend stock buy with PB of 0.21 and yield of 7.1%?","text":"Is HK Land (H78) a good dividend stock buy with PB of 0.21 and yield of 7.1%?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/234318652297472","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":293,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":262085987811592,"gmtCreate":1705020693197,"gmtModify":1705020695866,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;[What]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Miser] [Cool] [Smile] [What] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/262085987811592","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":67,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9045998584,"gmtCreate":1656549597048,"gmtModify":1676535851069,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;","listText":"[Facepalm]&nbsp;","text":"[Facepalm]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9045998584","repostId":"1121505043","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121505043","pubTimestamp":1656561665,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1121505043?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-06-30 12:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO: Questions And Challenges To The Grizzly Short-Seller Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121505043","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryShort-seller Grizzly Research has released a report outlining findings of alleged fraud by NIO on Tuesday evening.The report attempted to outline how NIO, through an unconsolidated entity, is f","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Short-seller Grizzly Research has released a report outlining findings of alleged fraud by NIO on Tuesday evening.</li><li>The report attempted to outline how NIO, through an unconsolidated entity, is falsely inflating revenue and net income pertaining to its BaaS business.</li><li>The report also accused CEO Bin Li of association with fraudulent activities in the past. The information was largely used as support for Grizzly&#39;s claims of financial manipulation at NIO.</li><li>However, we believe some of the information reported by Grizzly have been exaggerated to support its short bias against NIO. We also question the validity of some of the quantified impacts that Grizzly is claiming against NIO&#39;s BaaS operations.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/346379c1e5a1a4087e614ef0b8a18caa\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Drew Angerer/Getty Images News</span></p><p>Grizzly Research (&#34;Grizzly&#34;) has released a short-seller report on NIO (NYSE:NIO) Tuesday morning, citing the Chinese electric vehicle (“EV”) company has engaged in the exaggeration of revenue and profitability via aggressive accounting methods and fraudulent means. In addition to outlining the allegedmeasures NIO has taken to falsely inflate its top- and bottom-line since 2020, Grizzly has also gathered extensive research in an attempt to character-assassinate NIO CEO Bin Li in order to “dot the i’s and cross the t’s” in its argument that the three core elements of fraud – opportunity, incentive and rationalization – exist in this situation for the EV maker.</p><p>While some of the findings raised in the short-seller report may raise questions that only NIO management can answer, there are also questionable and groundless arguments made by Grizzly that could significantly mislead and deceive existing and potential investors in the EV stock. The following analysis will focus on an overview of the short-seller’s core claim against NIO – namely, false inflation of revenue and net income via aggressive accounting and potentially fraudulent means – and provide a walkthrough of questions / challenges we have over the validity of some of those claims.</p><p><b>Accounting Crash Course: NIO’s BaaS Revenue Recognition Method</b></p><p>Through publicly disclosed information within NIO’s audited annual report, Grizzly had identified that NIO is frontloading and inflating revenue recognition pertaining to its battery-as-a-service (“BaaS”) sales via an unconsolidated related party.</p><p>In 2020, NIO, alongside an external consortium of investors that consist of EV battery maker CATL, Hubei Science Technology Investment Group, and a subsidiary of Fuotai Junan International Holdings Limited, have together created the joint venture “Wuhan Weineng Battery Asset Co., Ltd.,” (“Weineng”). Weineng was established in 2020, the same time when NIO’s battery lending service BaaS was introduced.</p><p>Under BaaS, NIO customers are eligible for a one-time discount of up to RMB 128,000 ($19,133) on the vehicle purchase if they opt for the battery lending subscription program instead of buying the battery with the vehicle upfront. This strategy has been an effective mean in fuelling the adoption of NIO EVs in China, especially with additional government subsidies for purchases that are compatible with battery swapping technology. All sales and costs pertaining to BaaS are managed by Weineng.</p><p>Now, the Weineng joint venture, in which NIO holds a 19.8% equity interest in, has been accounted for as an “equity-accounted investment” on the EV maker’s financial statements, given the definition of control under GAAP-based accounting has not been met (further discussed in later sections). Under GAAP-based accounting for related party transactions, “intragroup related party transactions and outstanding balances are eliminated, except for those between an investment entity and its subsidiaries measured at fair value through profit or loss, in the preparation of consolidated financial statements of the group”:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b533b2a1e657134b3b33f231c2b11f74\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"292\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>GAAP Rules on Related Party Disclosures (IAS)</span></p><p>Based on NIO’s disclosures within its audited annual report on its revenue recognition method pertaining to BaaS sales, the EV maker sells its battery packs to Weineng on a “back-to-back” basis when a vehicle is sold to a customer subscribed to BaaS:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d726db76c4884663e28c157208e5cd77\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"150\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>NIO Revenue Recognition Policy on BaaS Sales (NIO 2021 20F)</span></p><p>In compliance with GAAP-based accounting for revenue recognition, a sale is reported to the income statement when a performance obligation is satisfied. Under NIO’s affiliation with Weineng, NIO sells Weineng a battery pack when a customer buys a vehicle with BaaS subscription. The performance obligation here is that NIO needs to provide a battery pack to Weineng, and once this is satisfied, NIO is permitted to recognize revenue on the battery sale based on a pre-contracted transaction price for the performance obligation. For NIO, the battery sold would have been previously considered as inventory. Following the recognition of the battery sale, NIO would have also recorded cost of sales pertaining to removing the battery from its inventory balance on the balance sheet:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2203faf29e5b271342335935df358d86\" tg-width=\"389\" tg-height=\"208\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Journal Entries for Battery Sales Business Model (Author)</span></p><p>In Weineng’s case, however, its performance obligation to customers is the provision of battery lending services on a monthly or annual basis, depending on the subscription option. As such, Weineng can only recognize monthly / annual BaaS revenue over time when it satisfies its battery lending obligation to customers. Weineng would also have to record depreciation costs over the useful life of its batteries, which are considered property, plant and equipment used in facilitating its service business:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4bf30456c1ff78b902edfa34d719f150\" tg-width=\"598\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Journal Entries for BaaS Business Model (Author)</span></p><p>This arrangement essentially allows NIO to recognize 100% of revenues pertaining to the battery pack sold to Weineng upfront upon selling a vehicle booked on BaaS on a one-for-one basis, instead of recognizing BaaS revenue and related depreciation costs on the batteries used in the BaaS business over time. The disclosed BaaS revenue recognition method for NIO also infers that the number of battery packs sold to Weineng should be equivalent to the number of BaaS subscribers as of period-end. BaaS revenues and related costs of sales (e.g. depreciation costs on batteries) recognized over time are instead in the books of Weineng, in which NIO accounts for on its balance sheet as an equity-accounted investment.</p><p>Because Weineng is an equity-accounted investment and not a consolidated entity in which NIO controls under the definition set out by GAAP-based accounting, NIO is not required to perform intragroup eliminations pertaining to the related party transaction. Instead, it is required to disclose the relationship, as well as the related amounts if material. This information is disclosed in NIO’s 2021 20 Funder “Note 26. Related Party Balances and Transactions”. Revenue and income generated by Weineng are accounted for in NIO’s financial statements as “share of (loss) / income of equity investees” pro-rated for its non-controlling interest.</p><p><b>Grizzly’s Core Short Thesis</b></p><p>Grizzly alleges the move is a fraudulent measure taken by NIO to “exaggerate revenue and profitability”. The short-seller has accused NIO of using the accounting “loophole” to frontload battery revenues pertaining to BaaS that should have been recognized over a course of about seven years (i.e. battery discount on BaaS vehicle purchase, divided by annual BaaS subscription fee).</p><p>In addition to frontloading revenue recognition on BaaS sales, Grizzly has also identified a discrepancy between the number of active BaaS subscribers and battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021. Grizzly found thatWeineng had ownership of 40,053 battery packs as of September 30, 2021, but only had 19,000 active BaaS subscribers during the period, which is inconsistent with NIO’s claims that it only records battery sales to Weineng on a back-to-back basis with BaaS vehicle sales. Grizzly has attributed the discrepancy as NIO’s way of artificially inflating revenues by selling more battery packs to Weineng than it needs to fulfil BaaS performance obligations.</p><p>In order to support its claim that NIO is defrauding investors via the unconsolidated related party, Grizzly has also gathered additional research in an attempt to support the three key elements of the fraudulent triangle:</p><p><b>Opportunity:</b>As mentioned in the accounting overview section, the ownership structure between NIO and Weineng is accounted for as an equity-accounted investment, which allows NIO to bypass related party transaction eliminations on its financial statements. This accordingly provides an opportunity for NIO to artificially inflate its revenues at the group level by recording sales to the equity-accounted subsidiary, without the need to back it out at period end. Under GAAP-based accounting rules on related party transactions, NIO is required to disclose material details to the relationship, in which it has complied with.</p><p>The organizational structure also provides NIO an ability to recognize BaaS revenues upfront, instead of over an extended period of time given the difference in performance obligation it owes toWeinengcompared to thoseWeineng owes to BaaS subscribers. Grizzly also claims the method has allowed NIO to bypass depreciation costs on battery assets to the tune of RMB 336 million per year.</p><p><b>Incentive:</b>Grizzly has gone through extensive measures to dig up evidence to support NIO has a valid incentive for exaggerating its revenue and profitability. Citing an agreement between NIO and a state-backed consortium which has invested in a wholly-owned subsidiary “NIO China”, which requires NIO to redeem the investment upon failure in meeting pre-established performance metrics, such as achieving revenues of RMB 120 billion by 2024. However, the publicly disclosed information per NIO’s regulatory filings does not specify whether the RMB 120 billion revenue performance metric is required on an annual basis or on a cumulative basis between the time at which the agreement was forged with the state-backed investment consortium and 2024.</p><p>Grizzly has also inferred incentive for NIO to exaggerate its top- and bottom-line as a mean to pretty its valuation prospects, and attract investors from the public market.</p><p><b>Rationalization:</b>The short-seller report lacks support for how NIO tried to rationalize the alleged fraudulent reporting behaviour. However, Grizzly has proceeded to gather evidence to bolster its claim of why the likelihood of fraud at NIO is high. These include findings about NIO CEO Li’s past association with personnel that have been previously linked to high-profile fraudulent financial reporting cases like Luckin Coffee(OTCPK:LKNCY). Grizzly has also alluded to questionable behaviour by NIO CEO Li, such as pledging a NIO-affiliated subsidiary, “NIO User Trust”, in which Li personally controls to UBS AG without directly addressing the matter to shareholders. While these findings may warrant clarification from management, there is insufficient ground to warrant a fraudulent sentence to the company.</p><p>NIO management has also refuted Grizzly’s claims, saying allegations outlined in the report are “without merit and contains numerous errors, unsupported speculations and misleading conclusions and interpretations”, and has committed to bolstering public disclosures going forward to protect shareholders’ interests. Nowhere has the company tried to outright rationalize fraudulent reporting.</p><p><b>Challenging Grizzly’s Conclusion on “Control” Established by NIO Over Weineng</b></p><p>In addition to character assassination on Li to support its claims for fraudulent reporting behaviour at NIO, Grizzly has also attempted to conclude NIO’s control over Weineng. As mentioned in earlier sections, if NIO effectively “controls” Weineng, it would have to consolidate the investment and eliminate any earnings recorded via related party transactions.</p><p>First, Grizzly has identified “conflicting disclosure” between NIO’s claim that it has “significant influence” over Weineng in one place, and NIO’s claim that it only has “limited control over the business operations” ofWeinengin another place within a same regulatory filing. However, the words “significant influence” and “control” used within NIO’s regulatory filings are defined differently under GAAP-based accounting rules from general definitions of power that everyday investors are familiar with.</p><p>Significant influence is defined as “the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee without the power to control or jointly control those policies” under GAAP-based accounting. Significantly influence is typically established when an “entity holds, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of voting power of the investee”. NIO’s 19.8% equity interest in Weineng is sufficient to presume its “significant influence” over the investment:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/505c64f7bc18c02131dd830e5f2a5462\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>GAAP Rules on Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (IAS)</span></p><p>Pointing to our earlier reference to the definition of control established in GAAP-based accounting, the acquiring party only establishes “control” over the acquired party if it demonstrates three primary elements:</p><p>1. “<b>Power</b>” over the acquired entity, which is defined under GAAP as a substantive right exercised by an acquirer over the acquiree for non-protective benefits (e.g. exercising rights without the need for breach of contract or majority investor support). Based on publicly disclosed information in NIO’s regulatory filings, it only holds one of nine board seats on Weineng. There is also no mention of voting agreements that would pass on majority board and/or owner voting rights to NIO. With one of nine board seats, and a 19.8% equity interest, NIO does not exhibit power over Weineng to establish control.</p><p>2. Exposure to<i>variable returns</i>from the acquiree based on the acquirer’s involvement. NIO does not generate additional fees from Weineng based on Weineng’s performance. NIO is only exposed to Weineng’s earnings through its equity-accounted share of the investment.</p><p>As for the acquirer’s involvement in interfering with returns generated from the acquiree, Grizzly has pointed to the installation of two existing NIO executives to Weineng in management roles that include “Legal Representative and Chairman” and “General Manager and Director”. However, considering NIO’s significant influence over Weineng as defined under GAAP rules explained earlier, it is not unusual for the two parties to share employees or for NIO to “participate in the financial and operating policy decisions” of Weineng through the two shared employees. As such, NIO can account for its investment inWeinengas an equity-accounted investment, as long as “control” is not established even if it has installed employees at Weineng. Based on NIO’s failure to meet criterion 1 “power”, it already fails to establish control under GAAP rules over Weineng based on the existing ownership and voting structure disclosed in regulatory filings.</p><p>Grizzly has also alluded to the installation of two NIO executives in the daily operations of Weineng as a “major conflict of interest”. However, the auditor’s report per NIO’s audited 2021 20F states that “the company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in<i>Internal Control – Integrated Framework</i>(2013) issued by the COSO”. The COSO framework requires that internal controls address segregation of duty requirements to ensure fair presentation of financial information without material misstatements whether due to error or fraud. As such, it is reasonable to believe that segregation of duty controls in place pertaining to the two executives’ roles in both NIO and Weineng have been tested as effective as of the reporting date.</p><p>3. The acquiring party is a<i>principal</i>in the transaction, and not an agent. Under GAAP-based accounting, an agent is “primarily engaged to act on behalf and for the benefit of another party…[and] does not control an investee when it exercises decision-making rights delegated to it”. In determining whether NIO is an agent over Weineng, the i) scope of NIO’s decision-making authority over Weineng, ii) the rights held by other investors in Weineng, iii) the remuneration in which NIO is entitled to in its affiliation with Weineng, and iv) NIO’s exposure to variability of returns from its interest in Weineng must be considered:</p><ul><li>Based on the foregoing analysis, we know that NIO’s sole decision-making authority over Weineng is limited given it only holds 19.8% equity interest with one in nine board seats in the joint venture. The two NIO executives installed in the daily operations of Weineng also do not exhibit characteristics of sole control over the joint ventures’ business.</li><li>The remainder of the investment consortium over Weineng holds the remaining eight of nine board seats, and 80.2% equity interest in the joint venture. There have also been no mention of signed-over voting rights by the investment consortium to NIO in publicly disclosed information that would give NIO control over Weineng.</li><li>In addition to battery sales, NIO is also entitled to service revenue earned from Weineng through service agreements. NIO earns revenue for providing “battery packmonitoring, maintenance, upgrade, replacement, IT system support, etc.” to Weineng via monthly service charges. As of the reporting year ended December 31, 2021, service revenues pertaining to the service agreements between NIO and Weineng were immaterial according to disclosures in “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, section<i>(r) Revenue recognition</i>in the 2021 20F.</li><li>As discussed in the control assessment under criterion 2, NIO’s exposure to variability of returns in its investment in Weineng is insufficient to establish control under GAAP-based accounting.</li></ul><p><b>Challenging Grizzly’s Quantification of NIO’s Alleged Revenue and Profit Inflation</b></p><p>Grizzly believes NIO has inflated revenue and net income by “about 10% and 95%, respectively”, via its affiliation with Weineng. Grizzly’s calculations, as well as our skepticism, is outlined as follows:</p><p><b>1. Frontloaded Revenue via Battery Sales to Weineng</b></p><p><b>Grizzly’s accusation.</b>As discussed in the foregoing analysis, Grizzly identified that NIO has been recognizing battery revenues pertaining to BaaS upfront via its affiliation with Weineng. Instead of recognizing BaaS revenues over time when the service performance obligation is satisfied, NIO is able to recognize 100% of battery revenues sold to customers via BaaS subscriptions through the Weineng JV. Grizzly claims that this arrangement effectively allows NIO to pull forward seven years of BaaS revenue upfront.</p><p><b>Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.</b>Considering vehicle purchase discounts ranging RMB 70,000 (70/75 kWh battery pack) to RMB 128,000 (100 kWh battery pack) upon buyer’s subscription to BaaS, Grizzly has taken the lower end of the range (i.e. RMB 70,000) as the proxy for battery pack revenues. Based on annual BaaS subscription fees at RMB 11,760 (RMB 980/mo.) for the 70 kWh battery pack, which yields a vehicle discount of RMB 70,000 with subscription to BaaS, Grizzly has assumed a BaaS revenue recognition timeline of about seven years (i.e. RMB 70,000 discount, divided by RMB 11,760 annual BaaS subscription fee, adjusted for inflation) – we consider this a reasonable assumption.</p><p>Now, as of September 30, 2021, a public regulatory filing by Weineng disclosed that it had 19,000 active BaaS subscribers. 18% of its subscription base were subscribed to the RMB 1,480/mo. 100 kWh battery pack, and 82% were subscribed to the RMB 980/mo. 70/75 kWh battery pack at the time.</p><p>Grizzly’s calculation of inflated revenues and income pertaining to NIO’s sale of 19,000 BaaS-related batteries to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 is as follows:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21e7d58b24ac2bde6344b4206ef9be8e\" tg-width=\"592\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Grizzly&#39;s Computation of Inflated Revenue and Income Pertaining to Pulled Forward BaaS Sales (Grizzly Research)</span></p><p>As of the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had generated RMB 2,796 million in revenues from the sale of batteries to Weineng (full year 2021 revenues generated from Weineng: RMB 4,138 million, 11% of total NIO 2021 revenue). Based on 19,000 active BaaS subscribers, and ownership of 40,053 battery packs owned as reported by Weineng as of September 30, 2021, Grizzly estimates that only 47% of the RMB 2,796 million in revenues generated from the sale of goods to Weineng are related to “real” BaaS sales. Essentially, Grizzly claims only RMB 1,326 million of RMB 2,796 million in sales of goods to Weineng recognized on NIO’s income statement in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 are related to real BaaS battery sales.</p><p>The RMB 1,326 million pertaining to 19,000 battery packs sold to Weineng for the number of active BaaS subscribers at the time is effectively the “upfront” revenue recognized by NIO, which should have been recognized over a course of seven years instead based on the estimated performance obligation timeline discussed in earlier sections. Without Weineng, NIO would have instead had to recognize BaaS revenues related to the 19,000 subscribers over time, which is equivalent to RMB 179 million in the nine month period ending September 30, 2021. This essentially means NIO had allegedly pulled forward RMB 1,147 million in revenues related to BaaS sales in the nine months ending September 30, 2021.</p><p>In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had reported total revenue of RMB 26,236 million and net losses of RMB 1,874 million. The RMB 1,147 million in pulled forward BaaS revenues represents 4% of total revenues recognized over the nine-month reporting period.</p><p>To generate the “adjusted” net income that NIO would have reported had Weineng never existed, Grizzly had removed RMB 1,147 million in pulled forward revenues pertaining to BaaS sales directly from actual reported net losses of RMB 1,874 million. This accordingly yields adjusted net losses of RMB 3,021 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2021 at NIO, or a variance of 61%.</p><p><b>Issue with Grizzly’s claim.</b>In Grizzly’s calculation of adjusted net losses had BaaS revenue never been pulled forward at NIO via its affiliation with Weineng, the short-seller did not add back costs of sales that NIO would have recognized when it sold the battery packs to Weineng and recorded the related revenue.</p><p>While profit margins on NIO’s battery pack sales to Weineng are not disclosed, Grizzly had used 20% as a proxy, which is “consistent with the margin of an entire vehicle [considering] batteries are a cost center for all vehicles”. Using the 20% profit margin proxy on 19,000 battery pack sales to Weineng totalling RMB 1,326 million in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, NIO would have recorded related cost of sales of RMB 1,060.9 million (i.e. 0.8% cost of revenues x RMB 1,326 million battery revenues recorded on the sale of 19,000 units to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021).</p><p>When Grizzly removed/pulled forward BaaS revenues of RMB 1,147 million from NIO’s actual net losses of RMB 1,874 million reported in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, Grizzly should have also added back related cost of sales totalling RMB 917.6 million in determining the adjusted net income reported.</p><p><b>Livy’s revised calculation of quantified impacts.</b></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/324a74d6eeeb60a4bd2da9251d4d6ed8\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"416\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Livy&#39;s Computation of Revenue and Income Variances Pertaining to NIO&#39;s Alleged Frontloading of BaaS Sales (Author)</span></p><p>The above revised net income adjustment backs out alleged pulled forward BaaS revenues by NIO through its affiliation with Weineng from actual net losses reported by NIO in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. The orange-highlighted cells represent the incremental cost of sales pertaining to pulled forward BaaS revenues that should have been added back to adjusted net income in order to represent a fair representation of NIO’s adjusted net losses for the nine months ending September 30, 2021 if Weineng never existed and the EV maker had to recognize BaaS revenues over time. This adjustment accordingly reduces the variance of 61% from Grizzly’s calculation of adjusted net losses, to 12% – a material difference that, like Grizzly is accusing NIO of doing, misleads investors on the matter discussed.</p><p><b>2. Revenues from Oversupplied Batteries to Weineng</b></p><p><b>Grizzly’s accusation.</b>Based on NIO’s revenue recognition method on BaaS sales, the number of battery packs sold to Weineng should be equivalent to the number of vehicle buyers that have subscribed to BaaS at the time of purchase. Based on 19,000 active BaaS subscribers reported by Weineng as of September 30, 2021, it is easy to assume that NIO should have only sold 19,000 battery packs to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 as well to comply with the EV maker’s revenue recognition method on BaaS sales outlined in its 2021 20F.</p><p>However, Weineng had reported ownership of 40,053 battery packs as of September 30, 2021, which exceeds its active subscriber base of 19,000 by 21,053 units. As such, Grizzly has accused NIO of intentionally overselling battery packs to Weineng to inflate revenues.</p><p>While the discrepancy is indeed a question for management, Grizzly had cited that there is no need for Weineng to hold that many additional battery packs, even for operational purposes. Grizzly had gone on to explain its field work done at NIO Power Swap stations to verify that there is no difference between BaaS battery packs owned by Weineng and battery packs used in swap stations owned by NIO. However, we believe the additional field work is a moot point, considering NIO Power Swap operations are not related to Weineng. Weineng only facilitates NIO’s BaaS battery lending business, and nothing else – Grizzly did not even have to go out of its way to check on NIO’s Power Swap stations and hold conversations with sales staff at NIO’s car centers.</p><p><b>Livy’s response.</b>While the number of battery packs owned by Weineng should essentially be equivalent to the number of active BaaS subscribers, there is a possibility that a total of 40,053 NIO vehicle sales between 2020 when BaaS was established and September 30, 2021 had subscribed to BaaS. Perhaps, as of reporting date on September 30, 2021, there were 21,053 BaaS subscribers that have halted monthly subscriptions, which is not surprising given the third quarter is not a typical driving season, and there is a possibility that these NIO vehicle owners did not need to use their vehicles during the period.</p><p>Grizzly has also supported its claim that NIO oversupplied battery packs to Weineng to intentionally inflate revenues by saying that Weineng has no storage facility to store its 21,053 excess battery packs as of September 30, 2021. However, we do not find this surprising, as BaaS subscribers that have halted monthly subscriptions might be holding onto the emptied battery packs on consignment or have returned them to a NIO servicing center where NIO has held onto these Weineng-owned battery packs on consignment. The lack of battery pack storage facility owned by Weineng does not conclude that its ownership of the excess battery packs is fraudulent and made up.</p><p>There can be many reasons why a discrepancy exists between the number of active BaaS subscribers and battery packs owned by Weineng at the end of a reporting period. The above are just two assumptions that could invalidate Grizzly’s accusation (which is also an assumption). The real answer to the discrepancy can only be explained by NIO and Weineng management.</p><p><b>Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.</b>In determining the inflated revenue and earnings specific to the allegedly oversupplied battery packs from NIO to Weineng, Grizzly had performed the following calculations:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2497da8272eec2b6020c07b7ee06b1f\" tg-width=\"580\" tg-height=\"420\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Grizzly&#39;s Computation of Revenue and Net Income Variances Pertaining to Oversupplied Batteries (Grizzly Research)</span></p><p>In deriving the inflated revenues related to the allegedly oversupplied battery packs, Grizzly had determined the percentage of battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021 that were in excess to its active subscriber base as 53% (i.e. 21,053 excess battery packs, divided by 40,053 battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021). The percentage was applied to total revenue recognized by NIO pertaining to the sale of battery packs to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, resulting in oversold battery revenues of RMB 1,470 million (i.e. 53% oversold batteries x RMB 2,796 million in related party revenues from Weineng recorded by NIO for the nine months ending September 30, 2021).</p><p>In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had reported total revenue of RMB 26,236 million and net losses of RMB 1,874 million. The RMB 1,470 million in oversold battery revenue represents 6% of total NIO revenues recognized over the nine-month reporting period.</p><p>Considering Grizzly’s 20% profit margin assumption on battery pack sales as discussed in earlier sections, the oversold battery packs to Weineng would have generated net income of RMB 294 million in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. As such, backing out RMB 294 million in overstated profits back to NIO’s actual reported net losses of RMB 1,874 million in the nine-month period ending September 30, 2021 would have yield adjusted net losses of RMB 2,168 million, representing a variance of 16%.</p><p>We have no issues with this calculation performed by Grizzly, other than concerns over the short-seller’s claims that these 20,053 battery packs were intentionally “oversold” by NIO to Weineng to artificially boost revenues.</p><p><b>3. Shifting Depreciation Costs</b></p><p><b>Grizzly’s Accusations.</b>Grizzly has accused NIO of indirectly shifting depreciation costs on the battery packs sold to Weineng, saving the EV maker north of RMB 336 million in depreciation expense on an annual basis.</p><p>Specifically, Grizzly has assumed a 20% profit margin on NIO’s battery sales totalling RMB 2,796 million generated from Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This represents battery assets valued at a cost basis of RMB 2.25 billion (i.e. 80% cost x RMB 2,796 in battery sales to Weineng, adjusted for minor rounding differences) removed from the EV maker’s balance sheet over the same period.</p><p>Based on the five to eight years useful life attributable to equipment, including battery packs, used in NIO’s Power Swap business as disclosed in its 2021 20F, Grizzly has assumed an annual depreciation rate of about 15% on the battery packs sold to Weineng and removed from NIO’s balance sheet in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This is consistent with the assumed BaaS revenue recognition timeline of about seven years as discussed in earlier sections. As such, Grizzly has accused NIO of avoiding depreciation costs of RMB 336 million (i.e. 15% battery depreciation rate x RMB 2,796 million in battery pack sales to Weineng) in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. The short-seller has also alluded to the RMB 336 million as a proxy for annual depreciation costs that NIO has avoided via its arrangement with Weineng.</p><p><b>Issue with Grizzly’s claim.</b>There are two folds to this situation:</p><p><b>1. BaaS Business Model:</b>Under the BaaS business model, the battery packs are considered equipment used in facilitating a service business. As such, the related battery packs would be subjected to depreciation over its useful life. In NIO’s case, if Weineng never existed and the EV maker consolidates its BaaS business, NIO would have had to recognized BaaS revenues pertaining to the 19,000 battery packs that Grizzly has attributed to the BaaS business over seven years, and accordingly record depreciation costs on these battery packs as well over their useful lives of about seven years. As mentioned in earlier sections, the related journal entries under the BaaS business model is as follows:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e89611dda7a7e83881997628fe7aae3\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"187\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Journal Entries for BaaS Business Model (Author)</span></p><p><b>2. Battery Sales Business Model:</b>in the current situation where NIO has sold the battery packs to Weineng, the battery packs are considered inventory to NIO. There is no depreciation costs related to inventory under GAAP-based accounting. Instead, NIO needs to record the costs of this inventory when they are removed from its balance sheet once the sale is recognized. As mentioned in earlier sections, the related journal entries under the battery sale business model is as follows:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2203faf29e5b271342335935df358d86\" tg-width=\"389\" tg-height=\"208\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Journal Entries for Battery Sales Business Model (Author)</span></p><p>Now, in NIO’s current actual situation, it is engaged in a battery sales business model under its performance obligation to Weineng, while Weineng is engaged in a BaaS business model under its performance obligation to BaaS subscribers.</p><p>As discussed in our first challenge to Grizzly’s calculations pertaining to pulled forward revenue on BaaS battery sales to Weineng, NIO would have recorded costs of sales pertaining to the sold battery inventory when it recognized the related revenues. And this cost of sales number, based on a 20% profit margin assumption consistent with that used by Grizzly, would have accounted for the costs of battery inventory removed from NIO’s balance sheet upon completion of the sale to Weineng. This is consistent with Grizzly’s own calculation pertaining to profit margins on the battery packs that it alleges NIO had oversupplied to Weineng, which is inclusive of cost of sales related to written off inventory incurred by NIO upon recognition of related revenues.</p><p>If NIO was engaged in the BaaS business model itself, without the intervention of Weineng, it would have recognized depreciation at a rate of 15% per year on the battery packs. However, under the upfront sale of related battery packs to Weineng, NIO would have recorded related cost of sales at an upfront rate of 80% as well. So basically, instead of recording revenues and depreciation costs on battery packs over time, NIO essentially recorded revenues and battery inventory costs upfront under its current arrangement with Weineng.</p><p><b>Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.</b>Grizzly’s accusation that NIO has overstated revenues and earnings by 10% and 95%, respectively, through its affiliation with Weineng is calculated as follows:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96f972c8d488406cd690b0672265e62b\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"498\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Grizzly&#39;s Computation of Total Revenue and Income Inflation (Grizzly Research)</span></p><p>As discussed in earlier sections, NIO’s pulled forward BaaS revenues and inflated battery sales revenues via its affiliation with Weineng represent 4% and 6% of its total revenues, respectively, recognized in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This represents the 10% in inflated NIO revenues as Grizzly has outlined in the above calculation.</p><p><b>Livy’s revised calculation of quantified impacts.</b>While we have yet to reconcile the RMB 1,777 million in total inflated net income that Grizzly has accused NIO of recognizing (please let us know in comments if you know), we believe the 95% variance identified by Grizzly is not a fair presentation of the quantified impact of its core short thesis.</p><p>Our calculation of the quantified impact pertaining to Grizzly’s accusations that NIO has inflated revenue and earnings through (1) pulling forward BaaS sales, and (2) oversupplying batteries to Weineng, is as follows:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ffe9833bb562f66e5365e077d7741d4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Livy&#39;s Computation of Alleged Overstatements Related to Alleged Frontloading of BaaS Revenue (Author)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/230a54833c34b3a9920a03524c28e960\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"361\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Livy&#39;s Computation of Alleged Overstatements Pertaining to Alleged Overselling of Battery Supplies (Author)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccf9a3a0482b46cee102e66d5137113f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"220\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Livy&#39;s Computation of Alleged Revenue Overstatement (Author)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c7ec5a61d7fd491aec81d9a48a92020\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"188\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Livy&#39;s Computation of Alleged Overstatement in Net Income (Author)</span></p><p>Under Grizzly’s accusations of inflated revenue and earnings by NIO through its affiliation with Weineng, if found valid (which we remain skeptical of), NIO would have overstated net losses in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 by 28% instead of the 95% that Grizzly alleges – a material difference that again misleads investors on the estimated quantified impact pertaining to the accusations claimed by the short-seller. The net income variance of RMB 523 million ($78 million) found in our calculation is also immaterial (&lt; 1%) based on NIO’s market value of $58.38 billion as of September 30, 2021 and NIO’s market value of approximately $35 billion today.</p><p><b>Final Thoughts</b></p><p>As discussed in the introduction of this analysis, Grizzly had also touched on things like NIO CEO Li’s association with fraudulent personnel, the pledge of NIO User Trust to UBS AG, and conflict of interests to further support its argument that NIO is engaged in fraudulent financial reporting. However, these are groundless allegations that have yet to be substantiated to infer Li is committing fraud via NIO’s operations. While investors should always exercise professional skepticism on publicly disclosed information in regulatory filings when making investment decisions, the same skepticism should also be placed on external claims – such as those by the short-seller, commentary by external sources, and/or even commentary herein – especially if they argue that correlation = causation (e.g. Grizzly’s method in inferring that fraud at NIO is substantiated given “dirt” it has dug up on Li’s past).</p><p>While we agree that there are some good takeaways from the short-seller report that may require further clarification from management, it is important to recognize and acknowledge that a lot of it might also be misleading – or in the words of Grizzly, “exaggerated”. This is also consistent with NIO’s stock performance during Tuesday and Wednesday’s session following release of the short-seller report. The stock has largely moved in consistency with the ongoing market rout, and broad-based selloff across the EV sector, with no extreme deviation due to the negative headline from Grizzly, which indicates that market participants, especially significant shareholders in NIO, are still digesting the latest external allegations.</p><p>At the end of the day, NIO remains one of the most viable EV businesses in the emerging sector, with continued demand for its vehicles to support further growth over the long-run. Unlike some of the upstarts in the increasingly competitive EV landscape that have been accused of fraud, such as Nikola (NKLA), Lordstown Motors (RIDE), and Faraday Future (FFIE), NIO already operates a global business with a substantiated vehicle order book to support the bulk of its top- and bottom-line expansion, which continues to support its positive valuation prospects ahead.</p><p>This article was written by Livy Investment Research</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO: Questions And Challenges To The Grizzly Short-Seller Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO: Questions And Challenges To The Grizzly Short-Seller Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-30 12:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521053-nio-questions-and-challenges-to-the-grizzly-short-seller-report?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A2><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryShort-seller Grizzly Research has released a report outlining findings of alleged fraud by NIO on Tuesday evening.The report attempted to outline how NIO, through an unconsolidated entity, is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521053-nio-questions-and-challenges-to-the-grizzly-short-seller-report?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09866":"蔚来-SW","NIO":"蔚来","NIO.SI":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521053-nio-questions-and-challenges-to-the-grizzly-short-seller-report?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1121505043","content_text":"SummaryShort-seller Grizzly Research has released a report outlining findings of alleged fraud by NIO on Tuesday evening.The report attempted to outline how NIO, through an unconsolidated entity, is falsely inflating revenue and net income pertaining to its BaaS business.The report also accused CEO Bin Li of association with fraudulent activities in the past. The information was largely used as support for Grizzly's claims of financial manipulation at NIO.However, we believe some of the information reported by Grizzly have been exaggerated to support its short bias against NIO. We also question the validity of some of the quantified impacts that Grizzly is claiming against NIO's BaaS operations.Drew Angerer/Getty Images NewsGrizzly Research (\"Grizzly\") has released a short-seller report on NIO (NYSE:NIO) Tuesday morning, citing the Chinese electric vehicle (“EV”) company has engaged in the exaggeration of revenue and profitability via aggressive accounting methods and fraudulent means. In addition to outlining the allegedmeasures NIO has taken to falsely inflate its top- and bottom-line since 2020, Grizzly has also gathered extensive research in an attempt to character-assassinate NIO CEO Bin Li in order to “dot the i’s and cross the t’s” in its argument that the three core elements of fraud – opportunity, incentive and rationalization – exist in this situation for the EV maker.While some of the findings raised in the short-seller report may raise questions that only NIO management can answer, there are also questionable and groundless arguments made by Grizzly that could significantly mislead and deceive existing and potential investors in the EV stock. The following analysis will focus on an overview of the short-seller’s core claim against NIO – namely, false inflation of revenue and net income via aggressive accounting and potentially fraudulent means – and provide a walkthrough of questions / challenges we have over the validity of some of those claims.Accounting Crash Course: NIO’s BaaS Revenue Recognition MethodThrough publicly disclosed information within NIO’s audited annual report, Grizzly had identified that NIO is frontloading and inflating revenue recognition pertaining to its battery-as-a-service (“BaaS”) sales via an unconsolidated related party.In 2020, NIO, alongside an external consortium of investors that consist of EV battery maker CATL, Hubei Science Technology Investment Group, and a subsidiary of Fuotai Junan International Holdings Limited, have together created the joint venture “Wuhan Weineng Battery Asset Co., Ltd.,” (“Weineng”). Weineng was established in 2020, the same time when NIO’s battery lending service BaaS was introduced.Under BaaS, NIO customers are eligible for a one-time discount of up to RMB 128,000 ($19,133) on the vehicle purchase if they opt for the battery lending subscription program instead of buying the battery with the vehicle upfront. This strategy has been an effective mean in fuelling the adoption of NIO EVs in China, especially with additional government subsidies for purchases that are compatible with battery swapping technology. All sales and costs pertaining to BaaS are managed by Weineng.Now, the Weineng joint venture, in which NIO holds a 19.8% equity interest in, has been accounted for as an “equity-accounted investment” on the EV maker’s financial statements, given the definition of control under GAAP-based accounting has not been met (further discussed in later sections). Under GAAP-based accounting for related party transactions, “intragroup related party transactions and outstanding balances are eliminated, except for those between an investment entity and its subsidiaries measured at fair value through profit or loss, in the preparation of consolidated financial statements of the group”:GAAP Rules on Related Party Disclosures (IAS)Based on NIO’s disclosures within its audited annual report on its revenue recognition method pertaining to BaaS sales, the EV maker sells its battery packs to Weineng on a “back-to-back” basis when a vehicle is sold to a customer subscribed to BaaS:NIO Revenue Recognition Policy on BaaS Sales (NIO 2021 20F)In compliance with GAAP-based accounting for revenue recognition, a sale is reported to the income statement when a performance obligation is satisfied. Under NIO’s affiliation with Weineng, NIO sells Weineng a battery pack when a customer buys a vehicle with BaaS subscription. The performance obligation here is that NIO needs to provide a battery pack to Weineng, and once this is satisfied, NIO is permitted to recognize revenue on the battery sale based on a pre-contracted transaction price for the performance obligation. For NIO, the battery sold would have been previously considered as inventory. Following the recognition of the battery sale, NIO would have also recorded cost of sales pertaining to removing the battery from its inventory balance on the balance sheet:Journal Entries for Battery Sales Business Model (Author)In Weineng’s case, however, its performance obligation to customers is the provision of battery lending services on a monthly or annual basis, depending on the subscription option. As such, Weineng can only recognize monthly / annual BaaS revenue over time when it satisfies its battery lending obligation to customers. Weineng would also have to record depreciation costs over the useful life of its batteries, which are considered property, plant and equipment used in facilitating its service business:Journal Entries for BaaS Business Model (Author)This arrangement essentially allows NIO to recognize 100% of revenues pertaining to the battery pack sold to Weineng upfront upon selling a vehicle booked on BaaS on a one-for-one basis, instead of recognizing BaaS revenue and related depreciation costs on the batteries used in the BaaS business over time. The disclosed BaaS revenue recognition method for NIO also infers that the number of battery packs sold to Weineng should be equivalent to the number of BaaS subscribers as of period-end. BaaS revenues and related costs of sales (e.g. depreciation costs on batteries) recognized over time are instead in the books of Weineng, in which NIO accounts for on its balance sheet as an equity-accounted investment.Because Weineng is an equity-accounted investment and not a consolidated entity in which NIO controls under the definition set out by GAAP-based accounting, NIO is not required to perform intragroup eliminations pertaining to the related party transaction. Instead, it is required to disclose the relationship, as well as the related amounts if material. This information is disclosed in NIO’s 2021 20 Funder “Note 26. Related Party Balances and Transactions”. Revenue and income generated by Weineng are accounted for in NIO’s financial statements as “share of (loss) / income of equity investees” pro-rated for its non-controlling interest.Grizzly’s Core Short ThesisGrizzly alleges the move is a fraudulent measure taken by NIO to “exaggerate revenue and profitability”. The short-seller has accused NIO of using the accounting “loophole” to frontload battery revenues pertaining to BaaS that should have been recognized over a course of about seven years (i.e. battery discount on BaaS vehicle purchase, divided by annual BaaS subscription fee).In addition to frontloading revenue recognition on BaaS sales, Grizzly has also identified a discrepancy between the number of active BaaS subscribers and battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021. Grizzly found thatWeineng had ownership of 40,053 battery packs as of September 30, 2021, but only had 19,000 active BaaS subscribers during the period, which is inconsistent with NIO’s claims that it only records battery sales to Weineng on a back-to-back basis with BaaS vehicle sales. Grizzly has attributed the discrepancy as NIO’s way of artificially inflating revenues by selling more battery packs to Weineng than it needs to fulfil BaaS performance obligations.In order to support its claim that NIO is defrauding investors via the unconsolidated related party, Grizzly has also gathered additional research in an attempt to support the three key elements of the fraudulent triangle:Opportunity:As mentioned in the accounting overview section, the ownership structure between NIO and Weineng is accounted for as an equity-accounted investment, which allows NIO to bypass related party transaction eliminations on its financial statements. This accordingly provides an opportunity for NIO to artificially inflate its revenues at the group level by recording sales to the equity-accounted subsidiary, without the need to back it out at period end. Under GAAP-based accounting rules on related party transactions, NIO is required to disclose material details to the relationship, in which it has complied with.The organizational structure also provides NIO an ability to recognize BaaS revenues upfront, instead of over an extended period of time given the difference in performance obligation it owes toWeinengcompared to thoseWeineng owes to BaaS subscribers. Grizzly also claims the method has allowed NIO to bypass depreciation costs on battery assets to the tune of RMB 336 million per year.Incentive:Grizzly has gone through extensive measures to dig up evidence to support NIO has a valid incentive for exaggerating its revenue and profitability. Citing an agreement between NIO and a state-backed consortium which has invested in a wholly-owned subsidiary “NIO China”, which requires NIO to redeem the investment upon failure in meeting pre-established performance metrics, such as achieving revenues of RMB 120 billion by 2024. However, the publicly disclosed information per NIO’s regulatory filings does not specify whether the RMB 120 billion revenue performance metric is required on an annual basis or on a cumulative basis between the time at which the agreement was forged with the state-backed investment consortium and 2024.Grizzly has also inferred incentive for NIO to exaggerate its top- and bottom-line as a mean to pretty its valuation prospects, and attract investors from the public market.Rationalization:The short-seller report lacks support for how NIO tried to rationalize the alleged fraudulent reporting behaviour. However, Grizzly has proceeded to gather evidence to bolster its claim of why the likelihood of fraud at NIO is high. These include findings about NIO CEO Li’s past association with personnel that have been previously linked to high-profile fraudulent financial reporting cases like Luckin Coffee(OTCPK:LKNCY). Grizzly has also alluded to questionable behaviour by NIO CEO Li, such as pledging a NIO-affiliated subsidiary, “NIO User Trust”, in which Li personally controls to UBS AG without directly addressing the matter to shareholders. While these findings may warrant clarification from management, there is insufficient ground to warrant a fraudulent sentence to the company.NIO management has also refuted Grizzly’s claims, saying allegations outlined in the report are “without merit and contains numerous errors, unsupported speculations and misleading conclusions and interpretations”, and has committed to bolstering public disclosures going forward to protect shareholders’ interests. Nowhere has the company tried to outright rationalize fraudulent reporting.Challenging Grizzly’s Conclusion on “Control” Established by NIO Over WeinengIn addition to character assassination on Li to support its claims for fraudulent reporting behaviour at NIO, Grizzly has also attempted to conclude NIO’s control over Weineng. As mentioned in earlier sections, if NIO effectively “controls” Weineng, it would have to consolidate the investment and eliminate any earnings recorded via related party transactions.First, Grizzly has identified “conflicting disclosure” between NIO’s claim that it has “significant influence” over Weineng in one place, and NIO’s claim that it only has “limited control over the business operations” ofWeinengin another place within a same regulatory filing. However, the words “significant influence” and “control” used within NIO’s regulatory filings are defined differently under GAAP-based accounting rules from general definitions of power that everyday investors are familiar with.Significant influence is defined as “the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee without the power to control or jointly control those policies” under GAAP-based accounting. Significantly influence is typically established when an “entity holds, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of voting power of the investee”. NIO’s 19.8% equity interest in Weineng is sufficient to presume its “significant influence” over the investment:GAAP Rules on Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (IAS)Pointing to our earlier reference to the definition of control established in GAAP-based accounting, the acquiring party only establishes “control” over the acquired party if it demonstrates three primary elements:1. “Power” over the acquired entity, which is defined under GAAP as a substantive right exercised by an acquirer over the acquiree for non-protective benefits (e.g. exercising rights without the need for breach of contract or majority investor support). Based on publicly disclosed information in NIO’s regulatory filings, it only holds one of nine board seats on Weineng. There is also no mention of voting agreements that would pass on majority board and/or owner voting rights to NIO. With one of nine board seats, and a 19.8% equity interest, NIO does not exhibit power over Weineng to establish control.2. Exposure tovariable returnsfrom the acquiree based on the acquirer’s involvement. NIO does not generate additional fees from Weineng based on Weineng’s performance. NIO is only exposed to Weineng’s earnings through its equity-accounted share of the investment.As for the acquirer’s involvement in interfering with returns generated from the acquiree, Grizzly has pointed to the installation of two existing NIO executives to Weineng in management roles that include “Legal Representative and Chairman” and “General Manager and Director”. However, considering NIO’s significant influence over Weineng as defined under GAAP rules explained earlier, it is not unusual for the two parties to share employees or for NIO to “participate in the financial and operating policy decisions” of Weineng through the two shared employees. As such, NIO can account for its investment inWeinengas an equity-accounted investment, as long as “control” is not established even if it has installed employees at Weineng. Based on NIO’s failure to meet criterion 1 “power”, it already fails to establish control under GAAP rules over Weineng based on the existing ownership and voting structure disclosed in regulatory filings.Grizzly has also alluded to the installation of two NIO executives in the daily operations of Weineng as a “major conflict of interest”. However, the auditor’s report per NIO’s audited 2021 20F states that “the company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the COSO”. The COSO framework requires that internal controls address segregation of duty requirements to ensure fair presentation of financial information without material misstatements whether due to error or fraud. As such, it is reasonable to believe that segregation of duty controls in place pertaining to the two executives’ roles in both NIO and Weineng have been tested as effective as of the reporting date.3. The acquiring party is aprincipalin the transaction, and not an agent. Under GAAP-based accounting, an agent is “primarily engaged to act on behalf and for the benefit of another party…[and] does not control an investee when it exercises decision-making rights delegated to it”. In determining whether NIO is an agent over Weineng, the i) scope of NIO’s decision-making authority over Weineng, ii) the rights held by other investors in Weineng, iii) the remuneration in which NIO is entitled to in its affiliation with Weineng, and iv) NIO’s exposure to variability of returns from its interest in Weineng must be considered:Based on the foregoing analysis, we know that NIO’s sole decision-making authority over Weineng is limited given it only holds 19.8% equity interest with one in nine board seats in the joint venture. The two NIO executives installed in the daily operations of Weineng also do not exhibit characteristics of sole control over the joint ventures’ business.The remainder of the investment consortium over Weineng holds the remaining eight of nine board seats, and 80.2% equity interest in the joint venture. There have also been no mention of signed-over voting rights by the investment consortium to NIO in publicly disclosed information that would give NIO control over Weineng.In addition to battery sales, NIO is also entitled to service revenue earned from Weineng through service agreements. NIO earns revenue for providing “battery packmonitoring, maintenance, upgrade, replacement, IT system support, etc.” to Weineng via monthly service charges. As of the reporting year ended December 31, 2021, service revenues pertaining to the service agreements between NIO and Weineng were immaterial according to disclosures in “Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, section(r) Revenue recognitionin the 2021 20F.As discussed in the control assessment under criterion 2, NIO’s exposure to variability of returns in its investment in Weineng is insufficient to establish control under GAAP-based accounting.Challenging Grizzly’s Quantification of NIO’s Alleged Revenue and Profit InflationGrizzly believes NIO has inflated revenue and net income by “about 10% and 95%, respectively”, via its affiliation with Weineng. Grizzly’s calculations, as well as our skepticism, is outlined as follows:1. Frontloaded Revenue via Battery Sales to WeinengGrizzly’s accusation.As discussed in the foregoing analysis, Grizzly identified that NIO has been recognizing battery revenues pertaining to BaaS upfront via its affiliation with Weineng. Instead of recognizing BaaS revenues over time when the service performance obligation is satisfied, NIO is able to recognize 100% of battery revenues sold to customers via BaaS subscriptions through the Weineng JV. Grizzly claims that this arrangement effectively allows NIO to pull forward seven years of BaaS revenue upfront.Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.Considering vehicle purchase discounts ranging RMB 70,000 (70/75 kWh battery pack) to RMB 128,000 (100 kWh battery pack) upon buyer’s subscription to BaaS, Grizzly has taken the lower end of the range (i.e. RMB 70,000) as the proxy for battery pack revenues. Based on annual BaaS subscription fees at RMB 11,760 (RMB 980/mo.) for the 70 kWh battery pack, which yields a vehicle discount of RMB 70,000 with subscription to BaaS, Grizzly has assumed a BaaS revenue recognition timeline of about seven years (i.e. RMB 70,000 discount, divided by RMB 11,760 annual BaaS subscription fee, adjusted for inflation) – we consider this a reasonable assumption.Now, as of September 30, 2021, a public regulatory filing by Weineng disclosed that it had 19,000 active BaaS subscribers. 18% of its subscription base were subscribed to the RMB 1,480/mo. 100 kWh battery pack, and 82% were subscribed to the RMB 980/mo. 70/75 kWh battery pack at the time.Grizzly’s calculation of inflated revenues and income pertaining to NIO’s sale of 19,000 BaaS-related batteries to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 is as follows:Grizzly's Computation of Inflated Revenue and Income Pertaining to Pulled Forward BaaS Sales (Grizzly Research)As of the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had generated RMB 2,796 million in revenues from the sale of batteries to Weineng (full year 2021 revenues generated from Weineng: RMB 4,138 million, 11% of total NIO 2021 revenue). Based on 19,000 active BaaS subscribers, and ownership of 40,053 battery packs owned as reported by Weineng as of September 30, 2021, Grizzly estimates that only 47% of the RMB 2,796 million in revenues generated from the sale of goods to Weineng are related to “real” BaaS sales. Essentially, Grizzly claims only RMB 1,326 million of RMB 2,796 million in sales of goods to Weineng recognized on NIO’s income statement in the nine months ended September 30, 2021 are related to real BaaS battery sales.The RMB 1,326 million pertaining to 19,000 battery packs sold to Weineng for the number of active BaaS subscribers at the time is effectively the “upfront” revenue recognized by NIO, which should have been recognized over a course of seven years instead based on the estimated performance obligation timeline discussed in earlier sections. Without Weineng, NIO would have instead had to recognize BaaS revenues related to the 19,000 subscribers over time, which is equivalent to RMB 179 million in the nine month period ending September 30, 2021. This essentially means NIO had allegedly pulled forward RMB 1,147 million in revenues related to BaaS sales in the nine months ending September 30, 2021.In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had reported total revenue of RMB 26,236 million and net losses of RMB 1,874 million. The RMB 1,147 million in pulled forward BaaS revenues represents 4% of total revenues recognized over the nine-month reporting period.To generate the “adjusted” net income that NIO would have reported had Weineng never existed, Grizzly had removed RMB 1,147 million in pulled forward revenues pertaining to BaaS sales directly from actual reported net losses of RMB 1,874 million. This accordingly yields adjusted net losses of RMB 3,021 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2021 at NIO, or a variance of 61%.Issue with Grizzly’s claim.In Grizzly’s calculation of adjusted net losses had BaaS revenue never been pulled forward at NIO via its affiliation with Weineng, the short-seller did not add back costs of sales that NIO would have recognized when it sold the battery packs to Weineng and recorded the related revenue.While profit margins on NIO’s battery pack sales to Weineng are not disclosed, Grizzly had used 20% as a proxy, which is “consistent with the margin of an entire vehicle [considering] batteries are a cost center for all vehicles”. Using the 20% profit margin proxy on 19,000 battery pack sales to Weineng totalling RMB 1,326 million in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, NIO would have recorded related cost of sales of RMB 1,060.9 million (i.e. 0.8% cost of revenues x RMB 1,326 million battery revenues recorded on the sale of 19,000 units to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021).When Grizzly removed/pulled forward BaaS revenues of RMB 1,147 million from NIO’s actual net losses of RMB 1,874 million reported in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, Grizzly should have also added back related cost of sales totalling RMB 917.6 million in determining the adjusted net income reported.Livy’s revised calculation of quantified impacts.Livy's Computation of Revenue and Income Variances Pertaining to NIO's Alleged Frontloading of BaaS Sales (Author)The above revised net income adjustment backs out alleged pulled forward BaaS revenues by NIO through its affiliation with Weineng from actual net losses reported by NIO in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. The orange-highlighted cells represent the incremental cost of sales pertaining to pulled forward BaaS revenues that should have been added back to adjusted net income in order to represent a fair representation of NIO’s adjusted net losses for the nine months ending September 30, 2021 if Weineng never existed and the EV maker had to recognize BaaS revenues over time. This adjustment accordingly reduces the variance of 61% from Grizzly’s calculation of adjusted net losses, to 12% – a material difference that, like Grizzly is accusing NIO of doing, misleads investors on the matter discussed.2. Revenues from Oversupplied Batteries to WeinengGrizzly’s accusation.Based on NIO’s revenue recognition method on BaaS sales, the number of battery packs sold to Weineng should be equivalent to the number of vehicle buyers that have subscribed to BaaS at the time of purchase. Based on 19,000 active BaaS subscribers reported by Weineng as of September 30, 2021, it is easy to assume that NIO should have only sold 19,000 battery packs to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 as well to comply with the EV maker’s revenue recognition method on BaaS sales outlined in its 2021 20F.However, Weineng had reported ownership of 40,053 battery packs as of September 30, 2021, which exceeds its active subscriber base of 19,000 by 21,053 units. As such, Grizzly has accused NIO of intentionally overselling battery packs to Weineng to inflate revenues.While the discrepancy is indeed a question for management, Grizzly had cited that there is no need for Weineng to hold that many additional battery packs, even for operational purposes. Grizzly had gone on to explain its field work done at NIO Power Swap stations to verify that there is no difference between BaaS battery packs owned by Weineng and battery packs used in swap stations owned by NIO. However, we believe the additional field work is a moot point, considering NIO Power Swap operations are not related to Weineng. Weineng only facilitates NIO’s BaaS battery lending business, and nothing else – Grizzly did not even have to go out of its way to check on NIO’s Power Swap stations and hold conversations with sales staff at NIO’s car centers.Livy’s response.While the number of battery packs owned by Weineng should essentially be equivalent to the number of active BaaS subscribers, there is a possibility that a total of 40,053 NIO vehicle sales between 2020 when BaaS was established and September 30, 2021 had subscribed to BaaS. Perhaps, as of reporting date on September 30, 2021, there were 21,053 BaaS subscribers that have halted monthly subscriptions, which is not surprising given the third quarter is not a typical driving season, and there is a possibility that these NIO vehicle owners did not need to use their vehicles during the period.Grizzly has also supported its claim that NIO oversupplied battery packs to Weineng to intentionally inflate revenues by saying that Weineng has no storage facility to store its 21,053 excess battery packs as of September 30, 2021. However, we do not find this surprising, as BaaS subscribers that have halted monthly subscriptions might be holding onto the emptied battery packs on consignment or have returned them to a NIO servicing center where NIO has held onto these Weineng-owned battery packs on consignment. The lack of battery pack storage facility owned by Weineng does not conclude that its ownership of the excess battery packs is fraudulent and made up.There can be many reasons why a discrepancy exists between the number of active BaaS subscribers and battery packs owned by Weineng at the end of a reporting period. The above are just two assumptions that could invalidate Grizzly’s accusation (which is also an assumption). The real answer to the discrepancy can only be explained by NIO and Weineng management.Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.In determining the inflated revenue and earnings specific to the allegedly oversupplied battery packs from NIO to Weineng, Grizzly had performed the following calculations:Grizzly's Computation of Revenue and Net Income Variances Pertaining to Oversupplied Batteries (Grizzly Research)In deriving the inflated revenues related to the allegedly oversupplied battery packs, Grizzly had determined the percentage of battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021 that were in excess to its active subscriber base as 53% (i.e. 21,053 excess battery packs, divided by 40,053 battery packs owned by Weineng as of September 30, 2021). The percentage was applied to total revenue recognized by NIO pertaining to the sale of battery packs to Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021, resulting in oversold battery revenues of RMB 1,470 million (i.e. 53% oversold batteries x RMB 2,796 million in related party revenues from Weineng recorded by NIO for the nine months ending September 30, 2021).In the nine months ended September 30, 2021, NIO had reported total revenue of RMB 26,236 million and net losses of RMB 1,874 million. The RMB 1,470 million in oversold battery revenue represents 6% of total NIO revenues recognized over the nine-month reporting period.Considering Grizzly’s 20% profit margin assumption on battery pack sales as discussed in earlier sections, the oversold battery packs to Weineng would have generated net income of RMB 294 million in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. As such, backing out RMB 294 million in overstated profits back to NIO’s actual reported net losses of RMB 1,874 million in the nine-month period ending September 30, 2021 would have yield adjusted net losses of RMB 2,168 million, representing a variance of 16%.We have no issues with this calculation performed by Grizzly, other than concerns over the short-seller’s claims that these 20,053 battery packs were intentionally “oversold” by NIO to Weineng to artificially boost revenues.3. Shifting Depreciation CostsGrizzly’s Accusations.Grizzly has accused NIO of indirectly shifting depreciation costs on the battery packs sold to Weineng, saving the EV maker north of RMB 336 million in depreciation expense on an annual basis.Specifically, Grizzly has assumed a 20% profit margin on NIO’s battery sales totalling RMB 2,796 million generated from Weineng in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This represents battery assets valued at a cost basis of RMB 2.25 billion (i.e. 80% cost x RMB 2,796 in battery sales to Weineng, adjusted for minor rounding differences) removed from the EV maker’s balance sheet over the same period.Based on the five to eight years useful life attributable to equipment, including battery packs, used in NIO’s Power Swap business as disclosed in its 2021 20F, Grizzly has assumed an annual depreciation rate of about 15% on the battery packs sold to Weineng and removed from NIO’s balance sheet in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This is consistent with the assumed BaaS revenue recognition timeline of about seven years as discussed in earlier sections. As such, Grizzly has accused NIO of avoiding depreciation costs of RMB 336 million (i.e. 15% battery depreciation rate x RMB 2,796 million in battery pack sales to Weineng) in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. The short-seller has also alluded to the RMB 336 million as a proxy for annual depreciation costs that NIO has avoided via its arrangement with Weineng.Issue with Grizzly’s claim.There are two folds to this situation:1. BaaS Business Model:Under the BaaS business model, the battery packs are considered equipment used in facilitating a service business. As such, the related battery packs would be subjected to depreciation over its useful life. In NIO’s case, if Weineng never existed and the EV maker consolidates its BaaS business, NIO would have had to recognized BaaS revenues pertaining to the 19,000 battery packs that Grizzly has attributed to the BaaS business over seven years, and accordingly record depreciation costs on these battery packs as well over their useful lives of about seven years. As mentioned in earlier sections, the related journal entries under the BaaS business model is as follows:Journal Entries for BaaS Business Model (Author)2. Battery Sales Business Model:in the current situation where NIO has sold the battery packs to Weineng, the battery packs are considered inventory to NIO. There is no depreciation costs related to inventory under GAAP-based accounting. Instead, NIO needs to record the costs of this inventory when they are removed from its balance sheet once the sale is recognized. As mentioned in earlier sections, the related journal entries under the battery sale business model is as follows:Journal Entries for Battery Sales Business Model (Author)Now, in NIO’s current actual situation, it is engaged in a battery sales business model under its performance obligation to Weineng, while Weineng is engaged in a BaaS business model under its performance obligation to BaaS subscribers.As discussed in our first challenge to Grizzly’s calculations pertaining to pulled forward revenue on BaaS battery sales to Weineng, NIO would have recorded costs of sales pertaining to the sold battery inventory when it recognized the related revenues. And this cost of sales number, based on a 20% profit margin assumption consistent with that used by Grizzly, would have accounted for the costs of battery inventory removed from NIO’s balance sheet upon completion of the sale to Weineng. This is consistent with Grizzly’s own calculation pertaining to profit margins on the battery packs that it alleges NIO had oversupplied to Weineng, which is inclusive of cost of sales related to written off inventory incurred by NIO upon recognition of related revenues.If NIO was engaged in the BaaS business model itself, without the intervention of Weineng, it would have recognized depreciation at a rate of 15% per year on the battery packs. However, under the upfront sale of related battery packs to Weineng, NIO would have recorded related cost of sales at an upfront rate of 80% as well. So basically, instead of recording revenues and depreciation costs on battery packs over time, NIO essentially recorded revenues and battery inventory costs upfront under its current arrangement with Weineng.Grizzly’s calculation of quantified impacts.Grizzly’s accusation that NIO has overstated revenues and earnings by 10% and 95%, respectively, through its affiliation with Weineng is calculated as follows:Grizzly's Computation of Total Revenue and Income Inflation (Grizzly Research)As discussed in earlier sections, NIO’s pulled forward BaaS revenues and inflated battery sales revenues via its affiliation with Weineng represent 4% and 6% of its total revenues, respectively, recognized in the nine months ending September 30, 2021. This represents the 10% in inflated NIO revenues as Grizzly has outlined in the above calculation.Livy’s revised calculation of quantified impacts.While we have yet to reconcile the RMB 1,777 million in total inflated net income that Grizzly has accused NIO of recognizing (please let us know in comments if you know), we believe the 95% variance identified by Grizzly is not a fair presentation of the quantified impact of its core short thesis.Our calculation of the quantified impact pertaining to Grizzly’s accusations that NIO has inflated revenue and earnings through (1) pulling forward BaaS sales, and (2) oversupplying batteries to Weineng, is as follows:Livy's Computation of Alleged Overstatements Related to Alleged Frontloading of BaaS Revenue (Author)Livy's Computation of Alleged Overstatements Pertaining to Alleged Overselling of Battery Supplies (Author)Livy's Computation of Alleged Revenue Overstatement (Author)Livy's Computation of Alleged Overstatement in Net Income (Author)Under Grizzly’s accusations of inflated revenue and earnings by NIO through its affiliation with Weineng, if found valid (which we remain skeptical of), NIO would have overstated net losses in the nine months ending September 30, 2021 by 28% instead of the 95% that Grizzly alleges – a material difference that again misleads investors on the estimated quantified impact pertaining to the accusations claimed by the short-seller. The net income variance of RMB 523 million ($78 million) found in our calculation is also immaterial (< 1%) based on NIO’s market value of $58.38 billion as of September 30, 2021 and NIO’s market value of approximately $35 billion today.Final ThoughtsAs discussed in the introduction of this analysis, Grizzly had also touched on things like NIO CEO Li’s association with fraudulent personnel, the pledge of NIO User Trust to UBS AG, and conflict of interests to further support its argument that NIO is engaged in fraudulent financial reporting. However, these are groundless allegations that have yet to be substantiated to infer Li is committing fraud via NIO’s operations. While investors should always exercise professional skepticism on publicly disclosed information in regulatory filings when making investment decisions, the same skepticism should also be placed on external claims – such as those by the short-seller, commentary by external sources, and/or even commentary herein – especially if they argue that correlation = causation (e.g. Grizzly’s method in inferring that fraud at NIO is substantiated given “dirt” it has dug up on Li’s past).While we agree that there are some good takeaways from the short-seller report that may require further clarification from management, it is important to recognize and acknowledge that a lot of it might also be misleading – or in the words of Grizzly, “exaggerated”. This is also consistent with NIO’s stock performance during Tuesday and Wednesday’s session following release of the short-seller report. The stock has largely moved in consistency with the ongoing market rout, and broad-based selloff across the EV sector, with no extreme deviation due to the negative headline from Grizzly, which indicates that market participants, especially significant shareholders in NIO, are still digesting the latest external allegations.At the end of the day, NIO remains one of the most viable EV businesses in the emerging sector, with continued demand for its vehicles to support further growth over the long-run. Unlike some of the upstarts in the increasingly competitive EV landscape that have been accused of fraud, such as Nikola (NKLA), Lordstown Motors (RIDE), and Faraday Future (FFIE), NIO already operates a global business with a substantiated vehicle order book to support the bulk of its top- and bottom-line expansion, which continues to support its positive valuation prospects ahead.This article was written by Livy Investment Research","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":10,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188260676665608,"gmtCreate":1686987812181,"gmtModify":1686987815708,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tiger tiger tiger game","listText":"Tiger tiger tiger game","text":"Tiger tiger tiger game","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":2,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/188260676665608","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926759578,"gmtCreate":1671637104495,"gmtModify":1676538568075,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy","listText":"Buy","text":"Buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926759578","repostId":"2292535524","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9037369472,"gmtCreate":1648032452643,"gmtModify":1676534294997,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is she&nbsp;going into the wood?","listText":"Is she&nbsp;going into the wood?","text":"Is she going into the wood?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9037369472","repostId":"2221037062","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2221037062","pubTimestamp":1648049400,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2221037062?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-23 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2221037062","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"There are always stocks to buy if you're Ark Invest's ace stock picker.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFF\">Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETF</a>s) stood pat on her buying urges. She lightened a few positions last week, but she failed to execute a buy order in any of the final three trading days of last week.</p><p>The streak ended on Monday. <b>Shopify</b>, <b>Twilio</b>, and <b>Adaptive Biotechnologies</b> are the three stocks that Ark Invest bought. What does Wood see in these three fast-growing companies? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Shopify</h2><p>It&#39;s been a rough few months for Shopify investors. The fast-growing e-commerce specialist has seen its stock plunge more than 60% since peaking in November. Shopify stock came back to life with last week&#39;s market rally in growth stocks, but a 12% slide on Monday to kick off this new trading week shows that shareholders are still looking to take profits following sharp upticks.</p><p>Revenue growth is slowing at Shopify. Its top line surged 86% in 2020, slowing to a 57% pace in 2021. Growth has decelerated sharply the last three quarters. Shopify itself was vague about its guidance, but analysts are holding out for a 31% increase in 2022. Shopify continues to stand out for its ability to arm merchants of all sizes with the tools to establish an online presence that plays nice with most popular e-commerce and social media platforms.</p><h2>Twilio</h2><p>There is a lot to like about Twilio, the undisputed leader of in-app communication solutions. Twilio&#39;s cloud-based tools help many of the most popular apps be more effective by providing two-way communication with users -- for everything from service notifications to verification -- without having to leave an app.</p><p>It&#39;s growing briskly. Revenue rose 61% in 2021, including a 54% year-over-year uptick for its latest quarter. Acquisitions have helped pad Twilio&#39;s growth over the years. Organic revenue rose a more modest 44% clip last year if you back out the bump in political election season revenue from late 2020, but the appeal of the platform remains strong. Retention rates are still healthy, and Twilio continues to successfully expand its offerings.</p><h2>Adaptive Biotechnologies</h2><p>It&#39;s been a rough year for Adaptive Biotechnologies. Its CFO resigned in January, and earlier this month the biotech upstart announced that it would be laying off 12% of its staff. The reorganization is part of Adaptive narrowing the focus of its immune system genetic sequencing technology to key in on minimal residual disease and immune medicine.</p><p>The stock has been cut by more than half so far in 2022, and it&#39;s down 82% since peaking 14 months ago. The technology is promising, and Adaptive Biotechnologies is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the stocks that Wood was buying earlier last week before she took a three-day break from purchases. Analysts don&#39;t see the company turning a profit for several more years, but that&#39;s not necessarily a deal breaker for biotech stocks as long as they have the liquidity in place to hold out for a medical breakthrough.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-23 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADPT":"Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp","TWLO":"Twilio Inc","SHOP":"Shopify Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2221037062","content_text":"Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETFs) stood pat on her buying urges. She lightened a few positions last week, but she failed to execute a buy order in any of the final three trading days of last week.The streak ended on Monday. Shopify, Twilio, and Adaptive Biotechnologies are the three stocks that Ark Invest bought. What does Wood see in these three fast-growing companies? Let's take a closer look.ShopifyIt's been a rough few months for Shopify investors. The fast-growing e-commerce specialist has seen its stock plunge more than 60% since peaking in November. Shopify stock came back to life with last week's market rally in growth stocks, but a 12% slide on Monday to kick off this new trading week shows that shareholders are still looking to take profits following sharp upticks.Revenue growth is slowing at Shopify. Its top line surged 86% in 2020, slowing to a 57% pace in 2021. Growth has decelerated sharply the last three quarters. Shopify itself was vague about its guidance, but analysts are holding out for a 31% increase in 2022. Shopify continues to stand out for its ability to arm merchants of all sizes with the tools to establish an online presence that plays nice with most popular e-commerce and social media platforms.TwilioThere is a lot to like about Twilio, the undisputed leader of in-app communication solutions. Twilio's cloud-based tools help many of the most popular apps be more effective by providing two-way communication with users -- for everything from service notifications to verification -- without having to leave an app.It's growing briskly. Revenue rose 61% in 2021, including a 54% year-over-year uptick for its latest quarter. Acquisitions have helped pad Twilio's growth over the years. Organic revenue rose a more modest 44% clip last year if you back out the bump in political election season revenue from late 2020, but the appeal of the platform remains strong. Retention rates are still healthy, and Twilio continues to successfully expand its offerings.Adaptive BiotechnologiesIt's been a rough year for Adaptive Biotechnologies. Its CFO resigned in January, and earlier this month the biotech upstart announced that it would be laying off 12% of its staff. The reorganization is part of Adaptive narrowing the focus of its immune system genetic sequencing technology to key in on minimal residual disease and immune medicine.The stock has been cut by more than half so far in 2022, and it's down 82% since peaking 14 months ago. The technology is promising, and Adaptive Biotechnologies is one of the stocks that Wood was buying earlier last week before she took a three-day break from purchases. Analysts don't see the company turning a profit for several more years, but that's not necessarily a deal breaker for biotech stocks as long as they have the liquidity in place to hold out for a medical breakthrough.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":157,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9054799938,"gmtCreate":1655426304524,"gmtModify":1676535636273,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fearing moment","listText":"Fearing moment","text":"Fearing moment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9054799938","repostId":"2244158148","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2244158148","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1655410891,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2244158148?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-06-17 04:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Plunges As Recession Fears Grow","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2244158148","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - U.S. stock indexes closed sharply lower on Thursday in a broad sell-off as recession fea","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. stock indexes closed sharply lower on Thursday in a broad sell-off as recession fears grew following moves by central banks around the globe to stamp out rising inflation after the Federal Reserve&#39;s largest rate hike since 1994.</p><p>The benchmark S&amp;P 500 suffered its sixth decline in seven sessions. Stocks had rallied on Wednesday as the Fed delivered an aggressive 75 basis point rate hike, as expected, to help the index snap its longest daily losing streak since early January.</p><p>But rate hikes by Switzerland and Britain on Thursday reignited fears that attempts by central banks to curb inflation could lead to sharply slower growth worldwide or a recession.</p><p>&#34;That is what people reassessing today – what is the probability of a potential recession and will corporate profits come in where analysts estimates are or will those get taken down,&#34; said Tom Hainlin, global investment strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management&#39;s Ascent Private Wealth Group in Minneapolis.</p><p>&#34;The Swiss came out and surprised everybody today and said we are less worried about the strength of our currency and more worried about inflation.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 741.46 points, or 2.42%, to 29,927.07, the S&amp;P 500 lost 123.22 points, or 3.25%, to 3,666.77 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 453.06 points, or 4.08%, to 10,646.10.</p><p>Each of the 11 major S&amp;P sectors were lower, although the defensive consumer staples was outperforming the broader market as names like WalMart, General Mills</p><p>and Procter &amp; Gamble were among the few advancers as only 14 S&amp;P 500 components finished higher for the session.</p><p>Growth stocks were hit hard with the S&amp;P growth index down 3.75% while the Nasdaq Composite saw its fifth decline of 4% or more since the start of May.</p><p>Hopes the Fed could engineer a soft economic landing are fading and Wells Fargo analysts now see a greater than 50% chance of a recession. Other banks that have warned of rising recession risks include Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley.</p><p>The benchmark index has slumped about 23% year-to-date and recently confirmed a bear market began on Jan. 3, while the Dow Industrials was on the cusp of confirming its own bear market.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, rose to slightly below the one-month high of 35.05 touched earlier this week. Many analysts are looking for the VIX to reach around 40 as one of the signals that selling pressure may be reaching its apex.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.98 billion shares, compared with the 12.16 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 7.58-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.48-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 99 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded seven new highs and 779 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Plunges As Recession Fears Grow</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Plunges As Recession Fears Grow\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-17 04:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. stock indexes closed sharply lower on Thursday in a broad sell-off as recession fears grew following moves by central banks around the globe to stamp out rising inflation after the Federal Reserve&#39;s largest rate hike since 1994.</p><p>The benchmark S&amp;P 500 suffered its sixth decline in seven sessions. Stocks had rallied on Wednesday as the Fed delivered an aggressive 75 basis point rate hike, as expected, to help the index snap its longest daily losing streak since early January.</p><p>But rate hikes by Switzerland and Britain on Thursday reignited fears that attempts by central banks to curb inflation could lead to sharply slower growth worldwide or a recession.</p><p>&#34;That is what people reassessing today – what is the probability of a potential recession and will corporate profits come in where analysts estimates are or will those get taken down,&#34; said Tom Hainlin, global investment strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management&#39;s Ascent Private Wealth Group in Minneapolis.</p><p>&#34;The Swiss came out and surprised everybody today and said we are less worried about the strength of our currency and more worried about inflation.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 741.46 points, or 2.42%, to 29,927.07, the S&amp;P 500 lost 123.22 points, or 3.25%, to 3,666.77 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 453.06 points, or 4.08%, to 10,646.10.</p><p>Each of the 11 major S&amp;P sectors were lower, although the defensive consumer staples was outperforming the broader market as names like WalMart, General Mills</p><p>and Procter &amp; Gamble were among the few advancers as only 14 S&amp;P 500 components finished higher for the session.</p><p>Growth stocks were hit hard with the S&amp;P growth index down 3.75% while the Nasdaq Composite saw its fifth decline of 4% or more since the start of May.</p><p>Hopes the Fed could engineer a soft economic landing are fading and Wells Fargo analysts now see a greater than 50% chance of a recession. Other banks that have warned of rising recession risks include Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley.</p><p>The benchmark index has slumped about 23% year-to-date and recently confirmed a bear market began on Jan. 3, while the Dow Industrials was on the cusp of confirming its own bear market.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, rose to slightly below the one-month high of 35.05 touched earlier this week. Many analysts are looking for the VIX to reach around 40 as one of the signals that selling pressure may be reaching its apex.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.98 billion shares, compared with the 12.16 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 7.58-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.48-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 99 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded seven new highs and 779 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2244158148","content_text":"(Reuters) - U.S. stock indexes closed sharply lower on Thursday in a broad sell-off as recession fears grew following moves by central banks around the globe to stamp out rising inflation after the Federal Reserve's largest rate hike since 1994.The benchmark S&P 500 suffered its sixth decline in seven sessions. Stocks had rallied on Wednesday as the Fed delivered an aggressive 75 basis point rate hike, as expected, to help the index snap its longest daily losing streak since early January.But rate hikes by Switzerland and Britain on Thursday reignited fears that attempts by central banks to curb inflation could lead to sharply slower growth worldwide or a recession.\"That is what people reassessing today – what is the probability of a potential recession and will corporate profits come in where analysts estimates are or will those get taken down,\" said Tom Hainlin, global investment strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management's Ascent Private Wealth Group in Minneapolis.\"The Swiss came out and surprised everybody today and said we are less worried about the strength of our currency and more worried about inflation.\"The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 741.46 points, or 2.42%, to 29,927.07, the S&P 500 lost 123.22 points, or 3.25%, to 3,666.77 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 453.06 points, or 4.08%, to 10,646.10.Each of the 11 major S&P sectors were lower, although the defensive consumer staples was outperforming the broader market as names like WalMart, General Millsand Procter & Gamble were among the few advancers as only 14 S&P 500 components finished higher for the session.Growth stocks were hit hard with the S&P growth index down 3.75% while the Nasdaq Composite saw its fifth decline of 4% or more since the start of May.Hopes the Fed could engineer a soft economic landing are fading and Wells Fargo analysts now see a greater than 50% chance of a recession. Other banks that have warned of rising recession risks include Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley.The benchmark index has slumped about 23% year-to-date and recently confirmed a bear market began on Jan. 3, while the Dow Industrials was on the cusp of confirming its own bear market.The CBOE volatility index, also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, rose to slightly below the one-month high of 35.05 touched earlier this week. Many analysts are looking for the VIX to reach around 40 as one of the signals that selling pressure may be reaching its apex.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.98 billion shares, compared with the 12.16 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 7.58-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.48-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 99 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded seven new highs and 779 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":40,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9909060449,"gmtCreate":1658792605381,"gmtModify":1676536207019,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shopping time&nbsp;","listText":"Shopping time&nbsp;","text":"Shopping time","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9909060449","repostId":"2254786621","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2254786621","pubTimestamp":1658791928,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2254786621?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-07-26 07:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Movers: Walmart Sinks on Warning, Sending Other Retail Stocks Lower As Well","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2254786621","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Aaron's (NYSE: AAN) 25.8% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.79, $0.15 better than the analyst estimate of $0.64. Revenue for the quarter came in at $610.4 million versus the consen","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>After-Hours Stock Movers:</b></p><p>Aaron&#39;s (NYSE: AAN) 25.8% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.79, $0.15 better than the analyst estimate of $0.64. Revenue for the quarter came in at $610.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $607.87 million. Aaron&#39;s sees FY2022 EPS of $1.75-$2.15, versus the consensus of $2.68. Aaron&#39;s sees FY2022 revenue of $2.19-2.27 billion, versus the consensus of $2.34 billion.</p><p>Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) 10% LOWER; cut its Q2 and full 2023-year guidance primarily due to pricing actions aimed to improve inventory levels at Walmart and Sam’s Club in the U.S. and mix of sales.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHLX\">Shell Midstream Partners</a>, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX) 8.9% HIGHER; Shell USA, Inc. and Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX) today announced they have executed a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the &#34;Merger Agreement,&#34; and the transactions contemplated thereby, collectively, the &#34;Transaction&#34;) pursuant to which Shell USA will acquire all of the common units representing limited partner interests in SHLX held by the public (the &#34;Public Common Units&#34;) at $15.85 per Public Common Unit in cash for a total value of approximately $1.96 billion. A subsidiary of Shell USA currently owns 269,457,304 SHLX common units, or approximately 68.5% of SHLX common units.</p><p>F5 Networks (NASDAQ: FFIV) 7.1% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $2.57, $0.33 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $674 million versus the consensus estimate of $668.36 million. F5 Networks sees Q4 2022 EPS of $2.45-$2.57, versus the consensus of $2.28. F5 Networks sees Q4 2022 revenue of $680-700 million, versus the consensus of $689.4 million.</p><p>Target Corporation (NYSE: TGT) 4.9% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Macy&#39;s, Inc. (NYSE: M) 4.1% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Kohl&#39;s Corporation (NYSE: KSS) 3.9% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR) 3.8% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) 3.6% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIVE\">Five Below</a>, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVE) 3.6% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ: CDNS) 3.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $1.08, $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of $0.96. Revenue for the quarter came in at $858 million versus the consensus estimate of $834.51 million. Cadence Design Systems sees Q3 2022 EPS of $0.94-$0.98, versus the consensus of $0.93. Cadence Design Systems sees Q3 2022 revenue of $860-880 million, versus the consensus of $847.8 million. Cadence Design Systems sees FY2022 EPS of $4.06-$4.12, versus the consensus of $3.93. Cadence Design Systems sees FY2022 revenue of $3.47-3.51 million, versus the consensus of $3.41 million.</p><p>Dollar General (NYSE: DG) 3.1% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) 3% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Lowe&#39;s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) 2.5% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROST) 2% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>The Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE: HD) 2% LOWER; falls after Walmart&#39;s warning.</p><p>Whirlpool (NYSE: WHR) 1.6% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $5.97, $0.70 better than the analyst estimate of $5.27. Revenue for the quarter came in at $5.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $5.23 billion. Whirlpool sees FY2022 EPS of $22.00-$24.00, versus the consensus of $23.91. Whirlpool sees FY2022 revenue of $20.7 billion, versus the consensus of $21.84 billion.</p><h1></h1><h1></h1><h1></h1><h1></h1><h1></h1><h1></h1></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Movers: Walmart Sinks on Warning, Sending Other Retail Stocks Lower As Well</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Movers: Walmart Sinks on Warning, Sending Other Retail Stocks Lower As Well\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-26 07:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20363861><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Aaron's (NYSE: AAN) 25.8% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.79, $0.15 better than the analyst estimate of $0.64. Revenue for the quarter came in at $610.4 million versus the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20363861\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SHLX":"Shell Midstream Partners","FFIV":"F5 Inc","TGT":"塔吉特","WHR":"惠而浦","AMZN":"亚马逊","LOW":"劳氏","FIVE":"Five Below","CDNS":"铿腾电子","WMT":"沃尔玛","DLTR":"美元树公司","ROST":"罗斯百货有限公司","COST":"好市多","DG":"美国达乐公司","AAN":"The Aaron's Company, Inc.","KSS":"柯尔百货","HD":"家得宝"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20363861","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2254786621","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Aaron's (NYSE: AAN) 25.8% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.79, $0.15 better than the analyst estimate of $0.64. Revenue for the quarter came in at $610.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $607.87 million. Aaron's sees FY2022 EPS of $1.75-$2.15, versus the consensus of $2.68. Aaron's sees FY2022 revenue of $2.19-2.27 billion, versus the consensus of $2.34 billion.Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) 10% LOWER; cut its Q2 and full 2023-year guidance primarily due to pricing actions aimed to improve inventory levels at Walmart and Sam’s Club in the U.S. and mix of sales.Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX) 8.9% HIGHER; Shell USA, Inc. and Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SHLX) today announced they have executed a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the \"Merger Agreement,\" and the transactions contemplated thereby, collectively, the \"Transaction\") pursuant to which Shell USA will acquire all of the common units representing limited partner interests in SHLX held by the public (the \"Public Common Units\") at $15.85 per Public Common Unit in cash for a total value of approximately $1.96 billion. A subsidiary of Shell USA currently owns 269,457,304 SHLX common units, or approximately 68.5% of SHLX common units.F5 Networks (NASDAQ: FFIV) 7.1% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $2.57, $0.33 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $674 million versus the consensus estimate of $668.36 million. F5 Networks sees Q4 2022 EPS of $2.45-$2.57, versus the consensus of $2.28. F5 Networks sees Q4 2022 revenue of $680-700 million, versus the consensus of $689.4 million.Target Corporation (NYSE: TGT) 4.9% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Macy's, Inc. (NYSE: M) 4.1% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Kohl's Corporation (NYSE: KSS) 3.9% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ: DLTR) 3.8% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) 3.6% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Five Below, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVE) 3.6% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ: CDNS) 3.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $1.08, $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of $0.96. Revenue for the quarter came in at $858 million versus the consensus estimate of $834.51 million. Cadence Design Systems sees Q3 2022 EPS of $0.94-$0.98, versus the consensus of $0.93. Cadence Design Systems sees Q3 2022 revenue of $860-880 million, versus the consensus of $847.8 million. Cadence Design Systems sees FY2022 EPS of $4.06-$4.12, versus the consensus of $3.93. Cadence Design Systems sees FY2022 revenue of $3.47-3.51 million, versus the consensus of $3.41 million.Dollar General (NYSE: DG) 3.1% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) 3% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW) 2.5% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROST) 2% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.The Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE: HD) 2% LOWER; falls after Walmart's warning.Whirlpool (NYSE: WHR) 1.6% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $5.97, $0.70 better than the analyst estimate of $5.27. Revenue for the quarter came in at $5.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $5.23 billion. Whirlpool sees FY2022 EPS of $22.00-$24.00, versus the consensus of $23.91. Whirlpool sees FY2022 revenue of $20.7 billion, versus the consensus of $21.84 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":37,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018920823,"gmtCreate":1648958787543,"gmtModify":1676534428794,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018920823","repostId":"1127760867","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127760867","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648799662,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1127760867?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-04-01 15:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tiger Chart | 11 S&P500 Sectors Mixed in Q1: Energy Sector Was the Top Winner Rising 34.26%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127760867","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"11 S&P500 sectors mixed in Q1 2022. Energy sector was the top winner with a 34.26% gain while the co","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>11 S&amp;P500 sectors mixed in Q1 2022. Energy sector was the top winner with a 34.26% gain while the consumer defensive sector was the biggest loser with a 13.03% decline.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6da06d04683904e8da04582fbebb73\" tg-width=\"1656\" tg-height=\"1815\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Chart | 11 S&P500 Sectors Mixed in Q1: Energy Sector Was the Top Winner Rising 34.26%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Chart | 11 S&P500 Sectors Mixed in Q1: Energy Sector Was the Top Winner Rising 34.26%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-01 15:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>11 S&amp;P500 sectors mixed in Q1 2022. Energy sector was the top winner with a 34.26% gain while the consumer defensive sector was the biggest loser with a 13.03% decline.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6da06d04683904e8da04582fbebb73\" tg-width=\"1656\" tg-height=\"1815\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127760867","content_text":"11 S&P500 sectors mixed in Q1 2022. Energy sector was the top winner with a 34.26% gain while the consumer defensive sector was the biggest loser with a 13.03% decline.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":141,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9906394045,"gmtCreate":1659485298789,"gmtModify":1705980806467,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9906394045","repostId":"2256460076","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2256460076","pubTimestamp":1659484895,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2256460076?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-08-03 08:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SolarEdge Technologies Stock Falls 13% after Hours as Q2 Revenue Misses Estimates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2256460076","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Shares of SolarEdge Technologies (NASDAQ:SEDG) slumped 12.92% to $318.2 after hours on Tuesday, as Q","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/487ff4f08ad92b1325019d4061493afe\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Shares of SolarEdge Technologies (NASDAQ:SEDG) slumped 12.92% to $318.2 after hours on Tuesday, as Q2 revenue missed estimates despite being a quarterly record for the company.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11a448b6085872eff97abfb568a42849\" tg-width=\"819\" tg-height=\"822\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>It is worth noting that SEDG stock had gained more than 23% over the last four days, helped by strong results from peer <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENPH\">Enphase Energy</a> (ENPH) and a surprise deal between Senator Joe Manchin and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer which backed spending for energy and climate change.</p><p>SEDG reported Q2 GAAP EPS of $0.95 which beat estimates by $0.02. However, Q2 revenue of $727.8M, despite growing 51.6% Y/Y and coming in at an all-time high for the company, missed expectations by $1.89M.</p><p>“The growing demand for energy in general and clean energy in particular continued to drive top line growth this quarter resulting in record revenues in Europe and the United States,” said SEDG CEO Zvi Lando in the earnings report.</p><p>Revenues from the company&#39;s solar segment grew 13% Y/Y to a record $687.6M.</p><p>SolarEdge (SEDG) also provided outlook for Q3. It sees revenue to range from $810M to $840M vs. consensus revenue estimate of $820.90M.</p><p>SEDG stock has added 30.2% YTD.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SolarEdge Technologies Stock Falls 13% after Hours as Q2 Revenue Misses Estimates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSolarEdge Technologies Stock Falls 13% after Hours as Q2 Revenue Misses Estimates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-03 08:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3865379-solaredge-technologies-stock-falls-13-after-hours-as-q2-revenue-misses-estimates><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares of SolarEdge Technologies (NASDAQ:SEDG) slumped 12.92% to $318.2 after hours on Tuesday, as Q2 revenue missed estimates despite being a quarterly record for the company.It is worth noting that ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3865379-solaredge-technologies-stock-falls-13-after-hours-as-q2-revenue-misses-estimates\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SEDG":"SolarEdge Technologies, Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3865379-solaredge-technologies-stock-falls-13-after-hours-as-q2-revenue-misses-estimates","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2256460076","content_text":"Shares of SolarEdge Technologies (NASDAQ:SEDG) slumped 12.92% to $318.2 after hours on Tuesday, as Q2 revenue missed estimates despite being a quarterly record for the company.It is worth noting that SEDG stock had gained more than 23% over the last four days, helped by strong results from peer Enphase Energy (ENPH) and a surprise deal between Senator Joe Manchin and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer which backed spending for energy and climate change.SEDG reported Q2 GAAP EPS of $0.95 which beat estimates by $0.02. However, Q2 revenue of $727.8M, despite growing 51.6% Y/Y and coming in at an all-time high for the company, missed expectations by $1.89M.“The growing demand for energy in general and clean energy in particular continued to drive top line growth this quarter resulting in record revenues in Europe and the United States,” said SEDG CEO Zvi Lando in the earnings report.Revenues from the company's solar segment grew 13% Y/Y to a record $687.6M.SolarEdge (SEDG) also provided outlook for Q3. It sees revenue to range from $810M to $840M vs. consensus revenue estimate of $820.90M.SEDG stock has added 30.2% YTD.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":47,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9054790579,"gmtCreate":1655426286191,"gmtModify":1676535636272,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9054790579","repostId":"2244607159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2244607159","pubTimestamp":1655422063,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2244607159?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-06-17 07:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers: Adobe Falls on Lower Guidance; U.S. Steel Rises on Higher Guidance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2244607159","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Rhythm Pharmaceuticals 14% LOWER; Confirmed the FDA has approved the Compan","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>After-Hours Stock Movers:</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RYTM\">Rhythm Pharmaceuticals</a> 14% LOWER; Confirmed the FDA has approved the Company’s supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for IMCIVREE® (setmelanotide), a melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonist, for patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). Also, the FDA issued a complete response letter for the sNDA for setmelanotide in Alström syndrome.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CO\">Global Cord Blood Corporation</a> 11% HIGHER; announce that Cellenkos, Inc. recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared its Investigational New Drug application to initiate a Phase 1b, open-label study of CK0804 as an add on therapy to ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis who experience a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/X\">United States Steel Corporation</a> 6% HIGHER; adjusted EBITDA expected to be approximately $1.6 billion, representing a new all-time best Q2 performance. Adjusted EPS is expected to range from $3.83 to $3.88, versus the consensus of $3.20.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe Systems</a> 4% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $3.35, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $3.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $4.39 billion versus the consensus estimate of $4.34 billion. Adobe Systems sees Q3 2022 EPS of $3.33, versus the consensus of $3.40. Adobe Systems sees Q3 2022 revenue of $4.43 billion, versus the consensus of $4.51 billion. Adobe Systems sees FY2022 EPS of $13.50, versus the consensus of $13.66. Adobe Systems sees FY2022 revenue of $17.65 billion, versus the consensus of $17.85 billion</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVTX\">LAVA Therapeutics N.V.</a> 3% HIGHER; hosted a clinical update call focused on encouraging initial Phase 1/2a clinical data for LAVA-051 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients following poster presentations at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting held June 3-7, 2022, and the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2022 Congress, held June 9-12, 2022.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRGP\">Targa Resources Corp</a>. 3% HIGHER; Agreed to acquire Lucid Energy Delaware, LLC from Riverstone Holdings LLC and Goldman Sachs Asset Management for $3.55 billion in cash.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BHC\">Bausch Health Companies Inc</a>. (NYSE: BHC) 2% HIGHER; Suspending IPO of Solta Medical.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OAS\">Oasis Petroleum</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: OAS) 1% HIGHER; announced today that its Board of Directors has, subject to certain conditions, declared a special dividend of $15.00 per share of Oasis common stock in connection with the Whiting Petroleum merger.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers: Adobe Falls on Lower Guidance; U.S. Steel Rises on Higher Guidance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers: Adobe Falls on Lower Guidance; U.S. Steel Rises on Higher Guidance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-17 07:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20225684><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Rhythm Pharmaceuticals 14% LOWER; Confirmed the FDA has approved the Company’s supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for IMCIVREE® (setmelanotide), a melanocortin-4 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20225684\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","X":"美国钢铁","BK4581":"高盛持仓","ADBE":"Adobe","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4023":"应用软件","RYTM":"Rhythm Pharmaceuticals Inc.","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4520":"美国基建股"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20225684","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2244607159","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Rhythm Pharmaceuticals 14% LOWER; Confirmed the FDA has approved the Company’s supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for IMCIVREE® (setmelanotide), a melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonist, for patients with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). Also, the FDA issued a complete response letter for the sNDA for setmelanotide in Alström syndrome.Global Cord Blood Corporation 11% HIGHER; announce that Cellenkos, Inc. recently announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared its Investigational New Drug application to initiate a Phase 1b, open-label study of CK0804 as an add on therapy to ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis who experience a suboptimal response to ruxolitinib.United States Steel Corporation 6% HIGHER; adjusted EBITDA expected to be approximately $1.6 billion, representing a new all-time best Q2 performance. Adjusted EPS is expected to range from $3.83 to $3.88, versus the consensus of $3.20.Adobe Systems 4% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $3.35, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $3.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $4.39 billion versus the consensus estimate of $4.34 billion. Adobe Systems sees Q3 2022 EPS of $3.33, versus the consensus of $3.40. Adobe Systems sees Q3 2022 revenue of $4.43 billion, versus the consensus of $4.51 billion. Adobe Systems sees FY2022 EPS of $13.50, versus the consensus of $13.66. Adobe Systems sees FY2022 revenue of $17.65 billion, versus the consensus of $17.85 billionLAVA Therapeutics N.V. 3% HIGHER; hosted a clinical update call focused on encouraging initial Phase 1/2a clinical data for LAVA-051 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients following poster presentations at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting held June 3-7, 2022, and the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2022 Congress, held June 9-12, 2022.Targa Resources Corp. 3% HIGHER; Agreed to acquire Lucid Energy Delaware, LLC from Riverstone Holdings LLC and Goldman Sachs Asset Management for $3.55 billion in cash.Bausch Health Companies Inc. (NYSE: BHC) 2% HIGHER; Suspending IPO of Solta Medical.Oasis Petroleum Inc. (NASDAQ: OAS) 1% HIGHER; announced today that its Board of Directors has, subject to certain conditions, declared a special dividend of $15.00 per share of Oasis common stock in connection with the Whiting Petroleum merger.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013621667,"gmtCreate":1648723481492,"gmtModify":1676534386137,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013621667","repostId":"2223358413","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2223358413","pubTimestamp":1648720868,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2223358413?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-31 18:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Visa: Promising Returns From All Directions","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2223358413","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryVisa has proven over a long period of time to be a solid business in every aspect.Given its c","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Visa has proven over a long period of time to be a solid business in every aspect.</li><li>Given its commitment to dividend growth, shares can offer extraordinary dividend yields, even in the double digits, if you hold them for long enough.</li><li>I walk through a specific forecast to show what kind of cash flows Visa can deliver to investors in the long run.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d6776e2ff0081c88a1f9a8aced19d58\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>bymuratdeniz/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p>This article starts with an overview of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>’s (NYSE:V) valuation and strategic situation, and then it goes through a more specific forecast of growth, profitability, and dividends, to show what kind of dividend return an investor can obtain in the long term.</p><p>Visa is the world’s largest digital payment service provider, with a market capitalization of $463bn and a 2021 revenue of over $24bn. In the latest quarter, ending in December ’21, revenues grew year-on-year by 24%. The company appears overvalued in terms of its sales, with a price to sales ratio of 19, 5 times the sector median.</p><p>The valuation is not as expensive if we look at earnings. Thanks to its huge profitability, with a net income margin of 52%, nine times the sector median. That is why the price-to-earnings ratio is only 30% higher than the sector median, at 37.80 (GAAP TTM).</p><p>If we look at other factors which contribute to a valuation, we can speak primarily of growth and stability. Visa’s growth score is similar to the sector median if we look at revenue and earnings, but we should remember that we are talking about the largest company in its sector with a long track record. In fact, if we compare it to its peers, we find similar valuations. Mastercard (MA), for example, the most comparable peer, has the same valuation score. Mastercard is slightly better on revenue growth and Visa is a little better on profitability and cash flow growth.</p><p>Visa’s growth score is far superior to the sector median in terms of cash flow. Levered free cash flow, for example, is growing at a rate of 48%, nearly three times the sector median. This suggests that Visa has achieved a relatively low need of funds for its operations, which allows for superior dividend distribution power and helps with keeping a stronger balance sheet.</p><p><b>The Business</b></p><p>One might have been concerned earlier this century that Visa could face heavy obstacles, given the fast-changing technological environment brought about by the worldwide mainstream adoption of the internet. Payment through digital devices rather than credit cards, and later, digital currencies, threatened to render traditional financial intermediation services such as Visa obsolete, from a pessimistic perspective.</p><p>The reality, however, is that the company has maintained a strong strategic position in both those areas and has managed to deliver consistent and high growth over the years. Payments through mobile devices continue to be made with Visa cards, as well as payments from crypto wallets. Visa has also declared a focus on new flows of payments and value-added services as part of its strategy, showing that it maintains the same growth mindset.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9fccf47e0be3d568b4e4ad303f41d623\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"555\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Visa Investor Relations</span></p><p><b>Growth</b></p><p>I have already discussed Visa’s growth strategy for the last years and its sustainability. Now I am going to explore the revenue trend in numbers and what we can extrapolate from it going forward. Taking yearly revenues from 2013 to 2021, I have made two trendlines, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> including the last two years, 2020 and 2021, in blue, and the other including only until 2019, in orange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/674435178e5f6b99e112aac51d56027d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"382\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Author’s work. Millions of USD</span></p><p>Both trendlines are exponential, which means they express a constant growth rate. The orange trendline describes a yearly growth rate of 9.45% and the blue one a yearly growth rate of 8.10%. I think the likeliest scenario is a transition back to the orange line, but either case promises a long-term growth close to the double digits.</p><p><b>Profitability</b></p><p>Moving on to profitability, I am going to keep things simple and plot the GAAP Net Income figure as a percentage of revenues for the last 10 years:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ab7ab29e78604379b49e30df8ec83fb\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"372\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Author’s work</span></p><p>As you can see, although the margin has grown a lot over the years, it has not done so in a consistent way. There have been two main jumps, one in 2013 and one between 2016 and 2018. Because profitability increase is limited by nature, I am going to err on the side of caution and assume for calculations that it has reached its limit at the 58% level reached in 2021.</p><p><b>Dividend</b></p><p>After having established what I think is a reasonable expectation for Visa’s earnings going forward, there are two more things to consider as we move on to dividends. One is the conversion of earnings to dividends without weakening the balance sheet, and this depends on cash generation. Since cash flow is strong and growing faster than earnings, I am assuming that there will be no problem growing dividends by at least as much as revenue, with some margin to grow them faster for a limited time, as we have seen in the last years.</p><p>The other thing to consider is that Visa not only hands out dividends but also buys back shares each year. If we look at the following chart, you can see approximately what pattern the reduction in the number of shares has followed.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/424b1abb00093b1a7886f1b0e38e3b53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"370\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Author’s work. Millions of shares</span></p><p>The trendline above estimates a decrease in the number of shares by 2.18% each year. With a dividend payout ratio of 22% and a strong cash flow relative to earnings, there should be no problem continuing along this path without taking a toll on the balance sheet, unless shares get too expensive, which is not something anyone with a long position should be too worried about.</p><p>Visa’s dividends have had extraordinary growth over the last years (18% CAGR over the last five years and 23% over the last ten), although it is true that the rate has been decreasing. There are two basic ways that dividends can increase at a higher rate than the company is growing. One is to increase profitability, and the other is to increase the payout ratio. Naturally, both of these are limited. Ultimately, a sustainable indefinite dividend growth rate will be limited to a sustainable indefinite revenue growth rate. As I have explained above, I estimate this rate to be somewhere between 8% and 9.5%.</p><p>The following table shows how the dividend yield would evolve, after accounting for an average inflation rate of 2%, for an investor who purchased shares today at $225 if the dividend per share grew at an annual rate of 10.5%. This 10.5% is the result of accounting for the lower range of my long-term sustainable growth estimate (8.1%) and my estimated rate of decrease in the number of shares of (2.18%).</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Dividend per Share</p></td><td><p>Yield</p></td><td><p>Discounted yield</p></td><td><p>Discounted yield after reinvestment*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>$ 1.50</p></td><td><p>0.67%</p></td><td><p>0.67%</p></td><td><p>0.67%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2027</p></td><td><p>$ 2.47</p></td><td><p>1.10%</p></td><td><p>1.00%</p></td><td><p>1.03%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2032</p></td><td><p>$ 4.08</p></td><td><p>1.81%</p></td><td><p>1.49%</p></td><td><p>1.58%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2037</p></td><td><p>$ 6.73</p></td><td><p>2.99%</p></td><td><p>2.22%</p></td><td><p>2.42%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2042</p></td><td><p>$ 11.11</p></td><td><p>4.94%</p></td><td><p>3.32%</p></td><td><p>3.72%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2047</p></td><td><p>$ 18.33</p></td><td><p>8.15%</p></td><td><p>4.96%</p></td><td><p>5.71%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2052</p></td><td><p>$ 30.23</p></td><td><p>13.44%</p></td><td><p>7.42%</p></td><td><p>8.76%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2054</p></td><td><p>$ 36.94</p></td><td><p>16.42%</p></td><td><p>8.71%</p></td><td><p>10.39%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Author’s work. All figures are forecasted. *Assuming all dividends are reinvested in shares which appreciate at a 10.53% yearly rate.</p><p>This is a speculation that goes many years into the future, and things could change along the way, but I believe that none of the criteria used in the forecasts are particularly optimistic, and it can give you an idea of what kind of yield the company can offer you just through dividends in the distant future.</p><p><b>Takeaway</b></p><p>In conclusion, I don’t think Visa is overvalued. While I don’t see the price skyrocketing, it is a household brand with a solid balance sheet, with sustainable growth, and very profitable. It is highly likely to increase in price well above inflation over long periods of time.</p><p>Looking at the long term and taking a more safety-oriented perspective, Visa can also become a high-yield dividend investment, depending on when you plan to start cashing in. Price increases will likely keep dividend yields low, but if held over a long period of time, I believe this stock will provide high yield, making it suitable for retirement-focused investments.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Visa: Promising Returns From All Directions</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVisa: Promising Returns From All Directions\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-31 18:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498857-visa-stock-promising-returns-from-all-directions><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryVisa has proven over a long period of time to be a solid business in every aspect.Given its commitment to dividend growth, shares can offer extraordinary dividend yields, even in the double ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498857-visa-stock-promising-returns-from-all-directions\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4106":"数据处理与外包服务","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","V":"Visa","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498857-visa-stock-promising-returns-from-all-directions","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2223358413","content_text":"SummaryVisa has proven over a long period of time to be a solid business in every aspect.Given its commitment to dividend growth, shares can offer extraordinary dividend yields, even in the double digits, if you hold them for long enough.I walk through a specific forecast to show what kind of cash flows Visa can deliver to investors in the long run.bymuratdeniz/E+ via Getty ImagesThis article starts with an overview of Visa’s (NYSE:V) valuation and strategic situation, and then it goes through a more specific forecast of growth, profitability, and dividends, to show what kind of dividend return an investor can obtain in the long term.Visa is the world’s largest digital payment service provider, with a market capitalization of $463bn and a 2021 revenue of over $24bn. In the latest quarter, ending in December ’21, revenues grew year-on-year by 24%. The company appears overvalued in terms of its sales, with a price to sales ratio of 19, 5 times the sector median.The valuation is not as expensive if we look at earnings. Thanks to its huge profitability, with a net income margin of 52%, nine times the sector median. That is why the price-to-earnings ratio is only 30% higher than the sector median, at 37.80 (GAAP TTM).If we look at other factors which contribute to a valuation, we can speak primarily of growth and stability. Visa’s growth score is similar to the sector median if we look at revenue and earnings, but we should remember that we are talking about the largest company in its sector with a long track record. In fact, if we compare it to its peers, we find similar valuations. Mastercard (MA), for example, the most comparable peer, has the same valuation score. Mastercard is slightly better on revenue growth and Visa is a little better on profitability and cash flow growth.Visa’s growth score is far superior to the sector median in terms of cash flow. Levered free cash flow, for example, is growing at a rate of 48%, nearly three times the sector median. This suggests that Visa has achieved a relatively low need of funds for its operations, which allows for superior dividend distribution power and helps with keeping a stronger balance sheet.The BusinessOne might have been concerned earlier this century that Visa could face heavy obstacles, given the fast-changing technological environment brought about by the worldwide mainstream adoption of the internet. Payment through digital devices rather than credit cards, and later, digital currencies, threatened to render traditional financial intermediation services such as Visa obsolete, from a pessimistic perspective.The reality, however, is that the company has maintained a strong strategic position in both those areas and has managed to deliver consistent and high growth over the years. Payments through mobile devices continue to be made with Visa cards, as well as payments from crypto wallets. Visa has also declared a focus on new flows of payments and value-added services as part of its strategy, showing that it maintains the same growth mindset.Visa Investor RelationsGrowthI have already discussed Visa’s growth strategy for the last years and its sustainability. Now I am going to explore the revenue trend in numbers and what we can extrapolate from it going forward. Taking yearly revenues from 2013 to 2021, I have made two trendlines, one including the last two years, 2020 and 2021, in blue, and the other including only until 2019, in orange.Author’s work. Millions of USDBoth trendlines are exponential, which means they express a constant growth rate. The orange trendline describes a yearly growth rate of 9.45% and the blue one a yearly growth rate of 8.10%. I think the likeliest scenario is a transition back to the orange line, but either case promises a long-term growth close to the double digits.ProfitabilityMoving on to profitability, I am going to keep things simple and plot the GAAP Net Income figure as a percentage of revenues for the last 10 years:Author’s workAs you can see, although the margin has grown a lot over the years, it has not done so in a consistent way. There have been two main jumps, one in 2013 and one between 2016 and 2018. Because profitability increase is limited by nature, I am going to err on the side of caution and assume for calculations that it has reached its limit at the 58% level reached in 2021.DividendAfter having established what I think is a reasonable expectation for Visa’s earnings going forward, there are two more things to consider as we move on to dividends. One is the conversion of earnings to dividends without weakening the balance sheet, and this depends on cash generation. Since cash flow is strong and growing faster than earnings, I am assuming that there will be no problem growing dividends by at least as much as revenue, with some margin to grow them faster for a limited time, as we have seen in the last years.The other thing to consider is that Visa not only hands out dividends but also buys back shares each year. If we look at the following chart, you can see approximately what pattern the reduction in the number of shares has followed.Author’s work. Millions of sharesThe trendline above estimates a decrease in the number of shares by 2.18% each year. With a dividend payout ratio of 22% and a strong cash flow relative to earnings, there should be no problem continuing along this path without taking a toll on the balance sheet, unless shares get too expensive, which is not something anyone with a long position should be too worried about.Visa’s dividends have had extraordinary growth over the last years (18% CAGR over the last five years and 23% over the last ten), although it is true that the rate has been decreasing. There are two basic ways that dividends can increase at a higher rate than the company is growing. One is to increase profitability, and the other is to increase the payout ratio. Naturally, both of these are limited. Ultimately, a sustainable indefinite dividend growth rate will be limited to a sustainable indefinite revenue growth rate. As I have explained above, I estimate this rate to be somewhere between 8% and 9.5%.The following table shows how the dividend yield would evolve, after accounting for an average inflation rate of 2%, for an investor who purchased shares today at $225 if the dividend per share grew at an annual rate of 10.5%. This 10.5% is the result of accounting for the lower range of my long-term sustainable growth estimate (8.1%) and my estimated rate of decrease in the number of shares of (2.18%).YearDividend per ShareYieldDiscounted yieldDiscounted yield after reinvestment*2022$ 1.500.67%0.67%0.67%2027$ 2.471.10%1.00%1.03%2032$ 4.081.81%1.49%1.58%2037$ 6.732.99%2.22%2.42%2042$ 11.114.94%3.32%3.72%2047$ 18.338.15%4.96%5.71%2052$ 30.2313.44%7.42%8.76%2054$ 36.9416.42%8.71%10.39%Source: Author’s work. All figures are forecasted. *Assuming all dividends are reinvested in shares which appreciate at a 10.53% yearly rate.This is a speculation that goes many years into the future, and things could change along the way, but I believe that none of the criteria used in the forecasts are particularly optimistic, and it can give you an idea of what kind of yield the company can offer you just through dividends in the distant future.TakeawayIn conclusion, I don’t think Visa is overvalued. While I don’t see the price skyrocketing, it is a household brand with a solid balance sheet, with sustainable growth, and very profitable. It is highly likely to increase in price well above inflation over long periods of time.Looking at the long term and taking a more safety-oriented perspective, Visa can also become a high-yield dividend investment, depending on when you plan to start cashing in. Price increases will likely keep dividend yields low, but if held over a long period of time, I believe this stock will provide high yield, making it suitable for retirement-focused investments.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":250,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9966098853,"gmtCreate":1669340863073,"gmtModify":1676538185515,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Two green candles","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Two green candles","text":"$SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ Two green candles","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9966098853","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":150,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968185127,"gmtCreate":1669161700770,"gmtModify":1676538159584,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>All MA in down trend and will need some catalyst to turn the tide&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>All MA in down trend and will need some catalyst to turn the tide&nbsp;","text":"$Amazon.com(AMZN)$ All MA in down trend and will need some catalyst to turn the tide","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968185127","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9934400105,"gmtCreate":1663287135607,"gmtModify":1676537243176,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Show time","listText":"Show time","text":"Show time","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9934400105","repostId":"2267631910","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2267631910","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1663285317,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2267631910?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-16 07:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Accuses Twitter of Security Lapses in Court Filing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2267631910","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk accused Twitter Inc of fraud by concealing serious flaws in the so","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk accused Twitter Inc of fraud by concealing serious flaws in the social media company&#39;s data security, which the entrepreneur said should allow him to end his $44 billion deal for the company, according to a Thursday court filing.</p><p>Musk, the world&#39;s richest person, amended his previously filed lawsuit by adopting allegations by a Twitter whistleblower, who told Congress on Tuesday of meddling on the influential social media platform by foreign agents.</p><p>The chief executive of electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc also alleged that Twitter hid from him that it was not complying with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding user data.</p><p>&#34;Needless to say, the newest revelations make undeniably clear that the Musk Parties have the full right to walk away from the Merger Agreement -- for numerous independently sufficient reasons,&#34; said the amended countersuit.</p><p>Musk said the claims by the whistleblower, former head of Twitter security Peiter &#34;Mudge&#34; Zatko, amounted to fraud and breach of contract by Twitter.</p><p>Musk has asked a Delaware judge to find that he was not obligated to close the deal while Twitter wants the judge to order Musk to buy the company for $54.20 per share. A five-day trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 17.</p><p>Twitter has said it conducted an internal investigation of Zatko&#39;s allegations and determined they lacked merit. The company has said Zatko was fired for poor performance.</p><p>Twitter&#39;s lawyers have said in court that the whistleblower claims that Musk folded into his case were either not grounds for terminating the deal agreement or failed to meet the standard for fraud.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Accuses Twitter of Security Lapses in Court Filing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Accuses Twitter of Security Lapses in Court Filing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-16 07:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk accused Twitter Inc of fraud by concealing serious flaws in the social media company&#39;s data security, which the entrepreneur said should allow him to end his $44 billion deal for the company, according to a Thursday court filing.</p><p>Musk, the world&#39;s richest person, amended his previously filed lawsuit by adopting allegations by a Twitter whistleblower, who told Congress on Tuesday of meddling on the influential social media platform by foreign agents.</p><p>The chief executive of electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc also alleged that Twitter hid from him that it was not complying with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding user data.</p><p>&#34;Needless to say, the newest revelations make undeniably clear that the Musk Parties have the full right to walk away from the Merger Agreement -- for numerous independently sufficient reasons,&#34; said the amended countersuit.</p><p>Musk said the claims by the whistleblower, former head of Twitter security Peiter &#34;Mudge&#34; Zatko, amounted to fraud and breach of contract by Twitter.</p><p>Musk has asked a Delaware judge to find that he was not obligated to close the deal while Twitter wants the judge to order Musk to buy the company for $54.20 per share. A five-day trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 17.</p><p>Twitter has said it conducted an internal investigation of Zatko&#39;s allegations and determined they lacked merit. The company has said Zatko was fired for poor performance.</p><p>Twitter&#39;s lawyers have said in court that the whistleblower claims that Musk folded into his case were either not grounds for terminating the deal agreement or failed to meet the standard for fraud.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","TWTR":"Twitter"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2267631910","content_text":"(Reuters) - Billionaire Elon Musk accused Twitter Inc of fraud by concealing serious flaws in the social media company's data security, which the entrepreneur said should allow him to end his $44 billion deal for the company, according to a Thursday court filing.Musk, the world's richest person, amended his previously filed lawsuit by adopting allegations by a Twitter whistleblower, who told Congress on Tuesday of meddling on the influential social media platform by foreign agents.The chief executive of electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc also alleged that Twitter hid from him that it was not complying with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission regarding user data.\"Needless to say, the newest revelations make undeniably clear that the Musk Parties have the full right to walk away from the Merger Agreement -- for numerous independently sufficient reasons,\" said the amended countersuit.Musk said the claims by the whistleblower, former head of Twitter security Peiter \"Mudge\" Zatko, amounted to fraud and breach of contract by Twitter.Musk has asked a Delaware judge to find that he was not obligated to close the deal while Twitter wants the judge to order Musk to buy the company for $54.20 per share. A five-day trial is scheduled to begin Oct. 17.Twitter has said it conducted an internal investigation of Zatko's allegations and determined they lacked merit. The company has said Zatko was fired for poor performance.Twitter's lawyers have said in court that the whistleblower claims that Musk folded into his case were either not grounds for terminating the deal agreement or failed to meet the standard for fraud.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058793033,"gmtCreate":1654903103022,"gmtModify":1676535529203,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry] [Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058793033","repostId":"1108712122","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108712122","pubTimestamp":1654902743,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1108712122?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-06-11 07:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Suffers Biggest Weekly Loss Since January After Hot CPI Data","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108712122","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"U.S. stocks posted their biggest weekly percentage declines since January and ended sharply lower on","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks posted their biggest weekly percentage declines since January and ended sharply lower on the day Friday as a steeper-than-expected rise in U.S. consumer prices in May fueled fears of more aggressive interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve.</p><p>Tech and growth stocks, whose valuations rely more heavily on future cash flows, led the decline. Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc drove losses in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Following the inflation report, two-year Treasury yields, which are highly sensitive to rate hikes, spiked to 3.057%, the highest since June 2008. Benchmark 10-year yields reached 3.178%, the highest since May 9.</p><p>The U.S. Labor Department&#39;s report showed the consumer price index (CPI) increased 1.0% last month after gaining 0.3% in April. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the monthly CPI picking up 0.7%.</p><p>Year-on-year, CPI surged 8.6%, its biggest gain since 1981 and following an 8.3% jump in May.</p><p>Stocks have been volatile this year, and recent selling has largely been tied to worries over inflation, rising interest rates and the likelihood of a recession.</p><p>&#34;Today&#39;s report should extinguish any pretense that a &#39;pause&#39; in rate hikes will likely be appropriate by the end of summer, as the Fed is clearly still behind the eight ball on bringing inflation under control,&#34; said Jason Pride, chief investment officer for private wealth at Glenmede in Philadelphia.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 880 points, or 2.73%, to 31,392.79; the S&amp;P 500 lost 116.96 points, or 2.91%, to 3,900.86; and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 414.20 points, or 3.52%, to 11,340.02.</p><p>The major indexes registered their biggest weekly percentage drops since the week ended Jan. 21, with the Dow down 4.58%, the S&amp;P 500 down 5.06% and the Nasdaq down 5.60% for the week.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is now down 18.2% for the year so far.</p><p>On Friday, the S&amp;P 500 growth index took a 3.7% hit, while the value index fell 2.2%.</p><p>The inflation report was published ahead of an anticipated second 50 basis points rate hike from the Fed on Wednesday. A further half-percentage-point is priced in for July, with a strong chance of a similar move in September.</p><p>One worry is that an aggressive push higher on rates by the Fed could send the economy into recession.</p><p>Among the day&#39;s losers, Netflix Inc slid 5.1% after Goldman downgraded the streaming video giant&#39;s stock to &#34;sell&#34; from &#34;neutral&#34; due to a possibly weaker macro environment.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 5.70-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.05-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 44 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 17 new highs and 326 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.62 billion shares, compared with the 11.88 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Suffers Biggest Weekly Loss Since January After Hot CPI Data</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Suffers Biggest Weekly Loss Since January After Hot CPI Data\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 07:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/ETFs/Wall+Street+suffers+biggest+weekly+loss+since+January+after+hot+CPI+data/20199959.html><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. stocks posted their biggest weekly percentage declines since January and ended sharply lower on the day Friday as a steeper-than-expected rise in U.S. consumer prices in May fueled fears of more ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/ETFs/Wall+Street+suffers+biggest+weekly+loss+since+January+after+hot+CPI+data/20199959.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/ETFs/Wall+Street+suffers+biggest+weekly+loss+since+January+after+hot+CPI+data/20199959.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108712122","content_text":"U.S. stocks posted their biggest weekly percentage declines since January and ended sharply lower on the day Friday as a steeper-than-expected rise in U.S. consumer prices in May fueled fears of more aggressive interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve.Tech and growth stocks, whose valuations rely more heavily on future cash flows, led the decline. Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc drove losses in the S&P 500.Following the inflation report, two-year Treasury yields, which are highly sensitive to rate hikes, spiked to 3.057%, the highest since June 2008. Benchmark 10-year yields reached 3.178%, the highest since May 9.The U.S. Labor Department's report showed the consumer price index (CPI) increased 1.0% last month after gaining 0.3% in April. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the monthly CPI picking up 0.7%.Year-on-year, CPI surged 8.6%, its biggest gain since 1981 and following an 8.3% jump in May.Stocks have been volatile this year, and recent selling has largely been tied to worries over inflation, rising interest rates and the likelihood of a recession.\"Today's report should extinguish any pretense that a 'pause' in rate hikes will likely be appropriate by the end of summer, as the Fed is clearly still behind the eight ball on bringing inflation under control,\" said Jason Pride, chief investment officer for private wealth at Glenmede in Philadelphia.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 880 points, or 2.73%, to 31,392.79; the S&P 500 lost 116.96 points, or 2.91%, to 3,900.86; and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 414.20 points, or 3.52%, to 11,340.02.The major indexes registered their biggest weekly percentage drops since the week ended Jan. 21, with the Dow down 4.58%, the S&P 500 down 5.06% and the Nasdaq down 5.60% for the week.The S&P 500 is now down 18.2% for the year so far.On Friday, the S&P 500 growth index took a 3.7% hit, while the value index fell 2.2%.The inflation report was published ahead of an anticipated second 50 basis points rate hike from the Fed on Wednesday. A further half-percentage-point is priced in for July, with a strong chance of a similar move in September.One worry is that an aggressive push higher on rates by the Fed could send the economy into recession.Among the day's losers, Netflix Inc slid 5.1% after Goldman downgraded the streaming video giant's stock to \"sell\" from \"neutral\" due to a possibly weaker macro environment.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 5.70-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.05-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 44 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 17 new highs and 326 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.62 billion shares, compared with the 11.88 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":28,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9024626070,"gmtCreate":1653869050690,"gmtModify":1676535353066,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9024626070","repostId":"2239733199","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2239733199","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1653865624,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2239733199?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-05-30 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop, Salesforce, Netflix, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2239733199","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"By Nicholas Jasinski \n\n\n     U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed Monday for Memorial Day. A h","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nBy Nicholas Jasinski \n</pre>\n<p>\n     U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed Monday for Memorial Day. A handful of major companies report later this week, with the economic-data highlight being jobs Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     HP and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a>.com will report on Tuesday, followed by Chewy, GameStop, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise on Wednesday. CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta will be Thursday's earnings highlights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     There are also several annual shareholders meetings scheduled for this week, including Alphabet, Comcast, and Walmart on Wednesday and Netflix, Nvidia, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a> Holdings on Thursday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     It will be a busier week for economic data. Friday will bring the jobs report for May from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economists' average forecast is for a gain of 317,500 nonfarm payrolls and for an unemployment rate of 3.5%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Other data out this week will include the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index for May on Tuesday, followed by the ISM's Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May on Wednesday. The Services PMI for May will be out on Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday 5/30 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Equity and fixed-income markets are closed in observance of Memorial Day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tuesday 5/31 \n</p>\n<p>\n     HP Inc. and Salesforce.com announce earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Chicago Business Barometer for May. Consensus estimate is for a 56.8 reading, slightly higher than April's 56.4. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Conference Board releases its Consumer Confidence Index for May. Economists forecast a 4.7% month-over-month decline to 102. That would be the lowest figure for the index since February 2021. Retail spending has remained robust, even as consumer confidence has waned. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Wednesday 6/1 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Chewy, GameStop, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, and PVH release quarterly results. \n</p>\n<p>\n     AmerisourceBergen, LKQ, and Paccar hold investor meetings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Alphabet, Comcast, NXP Semiconductors, and Walmart host their annual shareholder meetings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Expectations are for 11.4 million job openings on the last business day of April, slightly fewer than the 11.55 million in March, which was a record. The labor market remains very tight, but more and more companies have recently announced layoffs or hiring freezes. Both Amazon.com and Walmart recently said that they were overstaffed. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The ISM releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Consensus estimate is for a 54.8 reading, roughly even with the April figure, which was lowest since September 2020. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Thursday 6/2 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Cooper Cos., CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta hold conference calls to discuss earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Netflix, Nvidia, and PayPal Holdings have their annual meeting of shareholders. \n</p>\n<p>\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for May. Private-sector employment is expected to have increased by 350,000 jobs after a gain of 247,000 in April. The private sector has added 1.1 million net jobs since the start of the pandemic, according to ADP. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Friday 6/3 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for May. The economy is expected to add 317,500 nonfarm jobs, after a gain of 428,000 in April. The unemployment rate is seen edging down from 3.6% to 3.5%, which would match a half-century low. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Cigna hosts its 2022 investor day in New York. The company will update its financial outlook at the meeting. \n</p>\n<p>\n     ISM releases its Services Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Economists forecast a 56 reading, about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> point less than the April figure. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  May 31, 2022 08:33 ET (12:33 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop, Salesforce, Netflix, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop, Salesforce, Netflix, Alphabet, Nvidia, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-30 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nBy Nicholas Jasinski \n</pre>\n<p>\n     U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed Monday for Memorial Day. A handful of major companies report later this week, with the economic-data highlight being jobs Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     HP and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a>.com will report on Tuesday, followed by Chewy, GameStop, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise on Wednesday. CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta will be Thursday's earnings highlights. \n</p>\n<p>\n     There are also several annual shareholders meetings scheduled for this week, including Alphabet, Comcast, and Walmart on Wednesday and Netflix, Nvidia, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a> Holdings on Thursday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     It will be a busier week for economic data. Friday will bring the jobs report for May from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economists' average forecast is for a gain of 317,500 nonfarm payrolls and for an unemployment rate of 3.5%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Other data out this week will include the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index for May on Tuesday, followed by the ISM's Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May on Wednesday. The Services PMI for May will be out on Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday 5/30 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Equity and fixed-income markets are closed in observance of Memorial Day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tuesday 5/31 \n</p>\n<p>\n     HP Inc. and Salesforce.com announce earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Chicago Business Barometer for May. Consensus estimate is for a 56.8 reading, slightly higher than April's 56.4. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Conference Board releases its Consumer Confidence Index for May. Economists forecast a 4.7% month-over-month decline to 102. That would be the lowest figure for the index since February 2021. Retail spending has remained robust, even as consumer confidence has waned. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Wednesday 6/1 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Chewy, GameStop, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, and PVH release quarterly results. \n</p>\n<p>\n     AmerisourceBergen, LKQ, and Paccar hold investor meetings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Alphabet, Comcast, NXP Semiconductors, and Walmart host their annual shareholder meetings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Expectations are for 11.4 million job openings on the last business day of April, slightly fewer than the 11.55 million in March, which was a record. The labor market remains very tight, but more and more companies have recently announced layoffs or hiring freezes. Both Amazon.com and Walmart recently said that they were overstaffed. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The ISM releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Consensus estimate is for a 54.8 reading, roughly even with the April figure, which was lowest since September 2020. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Thursday 6/2 \n</p>\n<p>\n     Cooper Cos., CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta hold conference calls to discuss earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Netflix, Nvidia, and PayPal Holdings have their annual meeting of shareholders. \n</p>\n<p>\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for May. Private-sector employment is expected to have increased by 350,000 jobs after a gain of 247,000 in April. The private sector has added 1.1 million net jobs since the start of the pandemic, according to ADP. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Friday 6/3 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for May. The economy is expected to add 317,500 nonfarm jobs, after a gain of 428,000 in April. The unemployment rate is seen edging down from 3.6% to 3.5%, which would match a half-century low. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Cigna hosts its 2022 investor day in New York. The company will update its financial outlook at the meeting. \n</p>\n<p>\n     ISM releases its Services Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Economists forecast a 56 reading, about <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> point less than the April figure. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  May 31, 2022 08:33 ET (12:33 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HRL":"荷美尔","LULU":"lululemon athletica","NVDA":"英伟达","HPE":"慧与科技","PCAR":"帕卡","NFLX":"奈飞","GME":"游戏驿站","ISBC":"投资者银行"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2239733199","content_text":"By Nicholas Jasinski \n\n\n     U.S. stock and bond markets will be closed Monday for Memorial Day. A handful of major companies report later this week, with the economic-data highlight being jobs Friday. \n\n\n     HP and Salesforce.com will report on Tuesday, followed by Chewy, GameStop, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise on Wednesday. CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta will be Thursday's earnings highlights. \n\n\n     There are also several annual shareholders meetings scheduled for this week, including Alphabet, Comcast, and Walmart on Wednesday and Netflix, Nvidia, and PayPal Holdings on Thursday. \n\n\n     It will be a busier week for economic data. Friday will bring the jobs report for May from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economists' average forecast is for a gain of 317,500 nonfarm payrolls and for an unemployment rate of 3.5%. \n\n\n     Other data out this week will include the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index for May on Tuesday, followed by the ISM's Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May on Wednesday. The Services PMI for May will be out on Friday. \n\n\n     Monday 5/30 \n\n\n     Equity and fixed-income markets are closed in observance of Memorial Day. \n\n\n     Tuesday 5/31 \n\n\n     HP Inc. and Salesforce.com announce earnings. \n\n\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Chicago Business Barometer for May. Consensus estimate is for a 56.8 reading, slightly higher than April's 56.4. \n\n\n     The Conference Board releases its Consumer Confidence Index for May. Economists forecast a 4.7% month-over-month decline to 102. That would be the lowest figure for the index since February 2021. Retail spending has remained robust, even as consumer confidence has waned. \n\n\n     Wednesday 6/1 \n\n\n     Chewy, GameStop, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, and PVH release quarterly results. \n\n\n     AmerisourceBergen, LKQ, and Paccar hold investor meetings. \n\n\n     Alphabet, Comcast, NXP Semiconductors, and Walmart host their annual shareholder meetings. \n\n\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Expectations are for 11.4 million job openings on the last business day of April, slightly fewer than the 11.55 million in March, which was a record. The labor market remains very tight, but more and more companies have recently announced layoffs or hiring freezes. Both Amazon.com and Walmart recently said that they were overstaffed. \n\n\n     The ISM releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Consensus estimate is for a 54.8 reading, roughly even with the April figure, which was lowest since September 2020. \n\n\n     Thursday 6/2 \n\n\n     Cooper Cos., CrowdStrike Holdings, Hormel Foods, Lululemon Athletica, and Okta hold conference calls to discuss earnings. \n\n\n     Netflix, Nvidia, and PayPal Holdings have their annual meeting of shareholders. \n\n\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for May. Private-sector employment is expected to have increased by 350,000 jobs after a gain of 247,000 in April. The private sector has added 1.1 million net jobs since the start of the pandemic, according to ADP. \n\n\n     Friday 6/3 \n\n\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for May. The economy is expected to add 317,500 nonfarm jobs, after a gain of 428,000 in April. The unemployment rate is seen edging down from 3.6% to 3.5%, which would match a half-century low. \n\n\n     Cigna hosts its 2022 investor day in New York. The company will update its financial outlook at the meeting. \n\n\n     ISM releases its Services Purchasing Managers' Index for May. Economists forecast a 56 reading, about one point less than the April figure. \n\n\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  May 31, 2022 08:33 ET (12:33 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":31,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088467707,"gmtCreate":1650377045565,"gmtModify":1676534708644,"author":{"id":"4089933742744210","authorId":"4089933742744210","name":"Shirleyopy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/73e101c6494f34a5e8b0d14bb618758d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Happy]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"[Happy] [Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088467707","repostId":"1119825752","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119825752","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1650376693,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1119825752?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-04-19 21:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ACC Soared Nearly 13% in Morning Trading on Sale to Blackstone ","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119825752","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"ACC soared nearly 13% in morning trading on sale to Blackstone. Blackstone Inc. agreed to buy studen","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>ACC soared nearly 13% in morning trading on sale to Blackstone.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/571af5f9c3e35a721851c8e5fc778327\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"565\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/> Blackstone Inc. agreed to buy student-housing owner American Campus Communities Inc.in a deal valuing the company at about $12.8 billion, including debt, a bet that rents will continue to rise as more college students return to campus.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ACC Soared Nearly 13% in Morning Trading on Sale to Blackstone </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nACC Soared Nearly 13% in Morning Trading on Sale to Blackstone \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-19 21:58</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>ACC soared nearly 13% in morning trading on sale to Blackstone.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/571af5f9c3e35a721851c8e5fc778327\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"565\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/> Blackstone Inc. agreed to buy student-housing owner American Campus Communities Inc.in a deal valuing the company at about $12.8 billion, including debt, a bet that rents will continue to rise as more college students return to campus.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119825752","content_text":"ACC soared nearly 13% in morning trading on sale to Blackstone. Blackstone Inc. agreed to buy student-housing owner American Campus Communities Inc.in a deal valuing the company at about $12.8 billion, including debt, a bet that rents will continue to rise as more college students return to campus.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":291,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}