+Follow
haruharu
No personal profile
3
Follow
0
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
haruharu
2021-07-21
?
Bezos "went to heaven", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?
haruharu
2021-07-21
?
What is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4089951304751690","uuid":"4089951304751690","gmtCreate":1626848262366,"gmtModify":1704447503070,"name":"haruharu","pinyin":"haruharu","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":2,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":3,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.09.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":176046061,"gmtCreate":1626849366953,"gmtModify":1703479246178,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176046061","repostId":"1198728322","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198728322","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626848907,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1198728322?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:28","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Bezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198728322","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球","content":"<p>Blue Origin's good news is clearly very important to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20th, local time, the world's richest man, the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos soared about 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in the United States on a launch vehicle from his company Blue Origin and safely returned to Earth. The launch, Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight, marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>By contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plunged on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% during the session before narrowing their decline to 1.14% at the close. Previously, on July 11th, 70-year-old Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Galactic, successfully returned from an orbit of 85.9 kilometers on Spacecraft II, becoming the first founder of a commercial space enterprise to board space, nine days before Bezos, founder of Blue Origin.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>How are these two things related?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, former Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin has completed its first crewed flight. That weighed on Virgin Galactic stock on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the FAA, kicking off the space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market-there are 1.5 million multimillionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 on a space ticket, for them, not out of reach, and there are probably 20 million millionaires all over the world. As big as this market is, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to get a piece of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, Bezos said in his speech after a successful flight on July 20th, local time, that the demand for space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has sold future passenger tickets worth nearly $100 million\". Bezos also said that Blue Origin will fly two more manned missions this year.</p><p>Is it reasonable for Virgin Galactic stock to fall sharply?</p><p>Maybe not. Even the 10 million customers left, divided by the six passengers the Virgin Galactic space shuttle can carry at a time, means there's plenty of potential business ahead for Virgin Galactic, with plenty of flights before it runs out of consumer demand.</p><p>Still, investors need to realize that there is one boot that hasn't fallen after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight. In just one or three years, we could see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new Starship — one that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space; Carrying 100 tourists at a time; Done it all at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic can match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>But competition may not be an important factor compared to the stock's recent gains.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stock has been hot lately, but stocks that rise eventually fall. Investors are bidding for shares in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's space travel success is behind us, stock buyers have paused and awaited the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a date when normal commercial operations may begin, can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to start scheduled flights around the end of the year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert said recently that he thinks early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy Inc stock a buy with a price target of $48. That's up from $35 before the July spaceflight, when the stock was trading at nearly $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness in Virgin Galactic was the announcement of a stock sale. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes existing shareholders' shares. More sellers than buyers — even if the seller is the company itself — always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% this year, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-21 14:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blue Origin's good news is clearly very important to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20th, local time, the world's richest man, the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos soared about 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in the United States on a launch vehicle from his company Blue Origin and safely returned to Earth. The launch, Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight, marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>By contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plunged on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% during the session before narrowing their decline to 1.14% at the close. Previously, on July 11th, 70-year-old Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Galactic, successfully returned from an orbit of 85.9 kilometers on Spacecraft II, becoming the first founder of a commercial space enterprise to board space, nine days before Bezos, founder of Blue Origin.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>How are these two things related?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, former Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin has completed its first crewed flight. That weighed on Virgin Galactic stock on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the FAA, kicking off the space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market-there are 1.5 million multimillionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 on a space ticket, for them, not out of reach, and there are probably 20 million millionaires all over the world. As big as this market is, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to get a piece of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, Bezos said in his speech after a successful flight on July 20th, local time, that the demand for space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has sold future passenger tickets worth nearly $100 million\". Bezos also said that Blue Origin will fly two more manned missions this year.</p><p>Is it reasonable for Virgin Galactic stock to fall sharply?</p><p>Maybe not. Even the 10 million customers left, divided by the six passengers the Virgin Galactic space shuttle can carry at a time, means there's plenty of potential business ahead for Virgin Galactic, with plenty of flights before it runs out of consumer demand.</p><p>Still, investors need to realize that there is one boot that hasn't fallen after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight. In just one or three years, we could see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new Starship — one that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space; Carrying 100 tourists at a time; Done it all at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic can match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>But competition may not be an important factor compared to the stock's recent gains.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stock has been hot lately, but stocks that rise eventually fall. Investors are bidding for shares in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's space travel success is behind us, stock buyers have paused and awaited the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a date when normal commercial operations may begin, can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to start scheduled flights around the end of the year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert said recently that he thinks early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy Inc stock a buy with a price target of $48. That's up from $35 before the July spaceflight, when the stock was trading at nearly $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness in Virgin Galactic was the announcement of a stock sale. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes existing shareholders' shares. More sellers than buyers — even if the seller is the company itself — always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% this year, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3d3a3c8cb374234f20ed2a295e3781c","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","SPCE":"维珍银河"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198728322","content_text":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球。这次发射为蓝色起源公司首次载人太空飞行，标志着在打造太空旅游业务的竞争中又迈出了一步。\n\n与之相对的是，周二太空旅游公司维珍银河股价出现暴跌，盘中一度跌近9%，收盘时跌幅缩窄至1.14％。此前7月11日，维珍银河创始人、70岁的理查德·布兰森搭乘太空船二号成功从85.9公里高的轨道返回，成为首位登上太空的商业航天企业创始人，比蓝色起源创始人贝佐斯早9天。\n\n这两件事存在怎样的关联？\n简单来说，维珍银河不再是唯一一家成功的太空旅游特许经营公司。在维珍银河成功将创始人德布兰森送入太空九天后，亚马逊前首席执行官杰夫贝索斯的太空公司蓝色起源完成了首次载人飞行。这对周二的维珍银河股票造成压力。\n九天前，维珍银河率先实现美国联邦航空局授权的第一次“全面商业发射”，开启了太空旅游业务。\n\n维珍银河瞄准的是一个巨大的太空旅游市场——仅在美国就有150万千万富翁，600万百万富翁，他们可能想花25万美元购买一张太空票，对他们来说，并非遥不可及，而全世界大概有2000万百万富翁。尽管这个市场很大，但现在它已经被削减了一半，因为维珍银河将不得不分蓝色起源一杯羹。据外媒报道，贝索斯当地时间7月20日成功飞行后的演讲中称，太空旅游市场需求非常高，“蓝色起源已经售出了价值近1亿美元的未来客运机票”。贝索斯还称，蓝色起源今年还将再执行两次载人飞行任务。\n那维珍银河股票大跌是否合理？\n也许不是。即使是剩下1000万客户，除以维珍银河航天飞机每次可搭载的6名乘客，也意味着维珍银河公司未来还有很多潜在的业务，在耗尽消费者需求之前，还有很多航班。\n尽管如此，投资者需要意识到，蓝色起源成功太空飞行之后，还有一只靴子没有落下。在短短的一年或三年内，我们可能看到SpaceX带着它的新型星际飞船进入太空旅游竞赛——一艘能够真正到达、停留在太空中并穿越太空的飞船；一次运送100名游客；以蓝色起源和维珍银河都无法企及的价格完成这一切。这才是维珍银河真正的危机。\n\n但与该股最近的上涨相比，竞争可能不是一个重要因素。\n维珍银河股票最近一直火爆，但上涨的股票最终会下跌。投资者因预期好消息而竞购股票。既然布兰森太空旅行成功的好消息已经过去，股票买家已经暂停，等待下一个重大公告或事件。\n\n另一次飞行试验或可能开始正常商业运行的日期，都可以成为催化剂。华尔街预计维珍银河将在今年年底左右开始进行定期航班。Canaccord分析师肯·赫伯特（Ken Herbert）最近表示，他认为2022年初的可能性更大。\n赫伯特将银河公司股票评级为买入，目标价为48美元。这比7月太空飞行前的35美元有所上升，当时该股的股价接近50美元。\n维珍银河走弱的另一个原因是宣布出售股票。维珍银河7月12日表示，将通过出售新股筹集至多5亿美元。更多的股票稀释了现有股东的股份。卖家比买家多——即使卖方是公司本身——总是导致股价下跌。\n维珍银河今年以来仍上涨约35%，好于标普500指数的15%涨幅。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9,"SPCE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176048541,"gmtCreate":1626849339383,"gmtModify":1703479245512,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176048541","repostId":"1146283458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146283458","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626849210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146283458?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:33","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146283458","media":" 张忆东策略世界","summary":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了","content":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: Recently, the yield of 10-year U.S. bonds once dropped to the range of 1.1%-1.2%. We think:</b></p><p><b>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</b></p><p>It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day has once again exceeded 40,000, which has aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects and boosted the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to an increase in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend.</p><p></li></ul><b>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yields drops sharply, the 2-year short-term interest rate drops moderately;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve, which was not directly transmitted to the US debt market.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance in July slowed down significantly. Treasury net hairstyles for the period 0701 to 0716 were-$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate.</p><p></li><li>Fourthly, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institution, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to remain sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to remain low; As of the latest disclosure July 14, a balance of up to $207.5 billion is pending spending based on debt ceiling constraints.</p><p></li></ul><b>4. From August to September, the intensive issuance of bonds by the Ministry of Finance may bring rebound pressure to the long-term interest rate in the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. At present, the infrastructure agreement of the two parties has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the subsequent bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, and the market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase from August to September, so that there will be pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: global economic growth is declining; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</p><p>Is the recent epidemic variable the core variable of the downward trend of the long-term yield of U.S. debt? Not. It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day once again exceeded 40,000, which aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects, which helped the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it was not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in Britain, Russia and other countries rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a higher number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines. The mortality rate indicated by the average number of 7-day deaths/the average number of 7-day newly confirmed cases from 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which illustrates that resistance to severe illness shows the role of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend. The 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 10bp from 2.35% to 2.24%. From 0707-0719, the 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 11bp from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal interest rate of 10-year U.S. bonds dropped sharply by 29bp from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</p><p>It is interpreted that the recent decline in U.S. bond yields is caused by the release of liquidity by the Treasury's TGA expenditure and the return of the U.S. bond market. We disagree.</p><p>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but the downward trend of short-term interest rate is not obvious. If it is caused by TGA's \"flood discharge\", then the allocation demand driven by abundant liquidity focuses on the short-end interest rate first. In fact, during the period when the long-term interest rate dropped sharply, the two-year short-term interest rate dropped moderately. During the period 0701-0719, the yield of the two-year U.S. bond only dropped by 4bp from 0.25% to 2.21%. Moreover, from the perspective of high frequency, the long-end interest rate is leading the short-end interest rate in many cases.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve. During 0407-0714, TGA accounts fell by $297.4 billion; In the same period, bank reserves instead decreased by $29.9 billion, and in the same period, we saw a sharp increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decline and rise of the usage of TGA account and ON RRP shows that the liquidity of the Treasury has returned to the Federal Reserve, and the bank reserves have not increased, so the transmission to the US debt market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</p><p>Based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve still maintained the bond purchase rhythm of 120 billion dollars (about 80 billion dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion dollars MBS) per month, or the core reason for lowering the long-term interest rate of U.S. debt in July. Looking forward to the rest of July, there is still a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the demand for bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the long-term interest rate in the United States will continue to hover at a low level.</p><p>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, and the incremental U.S. Treasury Bond accounted for 52% of the net issuance that year. At present, the proportion of foreign investment in U.S. Treasury Bond has dropped from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Fed's holdings have further increased to 24% of the size of the U.S. Treasury Bond.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, since July, the net issuance of Treasury Bond of the Ministry of Finance has turned negative. Treasury net hairstyles were-6.4 billion as of the latest period from 0701 to 0716; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate. For example, from April to June this year, the Fed's new holdings in that month were $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion and $96.2 billion. Between 0701 and 0704, the Fed's new holdings of Treasury Bond were $39.2 billion.</p><p>Fourthly, from the perspective of micro-transactions, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institutions, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to be low. According to the May 3 disclosure of the U.S. Treasury Department financing plan, it is expected to lower the TGA account to $450 billion on July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. But as of the latest disclosure July 14, there is $657.5 billion left in the Treasury TGA account, with a whopping $207.5 billion in balance to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>4. The intensive bond issuance by the Treasury Department from August to September may bring rebound pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term</p><p>Based on the intensive bond issuance financing by the Ministry of Finance in August-September, and the superimposed Taper expectation at that time, there may be pressure for the yield of U.S. bonds to rebound in stages in August-September.</p><p>First of all, according to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. Moreover, the current bipartisan reduced version of the infrastructure agreement has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the follow-up bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, which will bring pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p>Secondly, the CPI in the United States exceeded expectations in June, inflation may still hover at a high level in July, and the economic decline is not obvious. Moreover, with the decline of the savings rate, the unemployment rate in the United States may be expected to improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. The yield of U.S. bonds will remain low and fluctuate, which is an inevitable choice for the United States to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the United States' dependence on debt expansion economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American dream\" of \"winning economic competition\" under the background of big-power games.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk warning</p><p>The global economic growth rate declined; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk.</p>","source":"zydcl","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\"> 张忆东策略世界</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 14:33</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: Recently, the yield of 10-year U.S. bonds once dropped to the range of 1.1%-1.2%. We think:</b></p><p><b>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</b></p><p>It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day has once again exceeded 40,000, which has aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects and boosted the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to an increase in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend.</p><p></li></ul><b>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yields drops sharply, the 2-year short-term interest rate drops moderately;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve, which was not directly transmitted to the US debt market.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance in July slowed down significantly. Treasury net hairstyles for the period 0701 to 0716 were-$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate.</p><p></li><li>Fourthly, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institution, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to remain sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to remain low; As of the latest disclosure July 14, a balance of up to $207.5 billion is pending spending based on debt ceiling constraints.</p><p></li></ul><b>4. From August to September, the intensive issuance of bonds by the Ministry of Finance may bring rebound pressure to the long-term interest rate in the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. At present, the infrastructure agreement of the two parties has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the subsequent bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, and the market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase from August to September, so that there will be pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: global economic growth is declining; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</p><p>Is the recent epidemic variable the core variable of the downward trend of the long-term yield of U.S. debt? Not. It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day once again exceeded 40,000, which aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects, which helped the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it was not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in Britain, Russia and other countries rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a higher number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines. The mortality rate indicated by the average number of 7-day deaths/the average number of 7-day newly confirmed cases from 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which illustrates that resistance to severe illness shows the role of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend. The 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 10bp from 2.35% to 2.24%. From 0707-0719, the 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 11bp from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal interest rate of 10-year U.S. bonds dropped sharply by 29bp from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</p><p>It is interpreted that the recent decline in U.S. bond yields is caused by the release of liquidity by the Treasury's TGA expenditure and the return of the U.S. bond market. We disagree.</p><p>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but the downward trend of short-term interest rate is not obvious. If it is caused by TGA's \"flood discharge\", then the allocation demand driven by abundant liquidity focuses on the short-end interest rate first. In fact, during the period when the long-term interest rate dropped sharply, the two-year short-term interest rate dropped moderately. During the period 0701-0719, the yield of the two-year U.S. bond only dropped by 4bp from 0.25% to 2.21%. Moreover, from the perspective of high frequency, the long-end interest rate is leading the short-end interest rate in many cases.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve. During 0407-0714, TGA accounts fell by $297.4 billion; In the same period, bank reserves instead decreased by $29.9 billion, and in the same period, we saw a sharp increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decline and rise of the usage of TGA account and ON RRP shows that the liquidity of the Treasury has returned to the Federal Reserve, and the bank reserves have not increased, so the transmission to the US debt market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</p><p>Based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve still maintained the bond purchase rhythm of 120 billion dollars (about 80 billion dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion dollars MBS) per month, or the core reason for lowering the long-term interest rate of U.S. debt in July. Looking forward to the rest of July, there is still a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the demand for bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the long-term interest rate in the United States will continue to hover at a low level.</p><p>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, and the incremental U.S. Treasury Bond accounted for 52% of the net issuance that year. At present, the proportion of foreign investment in U.S. Treasury Bond has dropped from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Fed's holdings have further increased to 24% of the size of the U.S. Treasury Bond.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, since July, the net issuance of Treasury Bond of the Ministry of Finance has turned negative. Treasury net hairstyles were-6.4 billion as of the latest period from 0701 to 0716; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate. For example, from April to June this year, the Fed's new holdings in that month were $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion and $96.2 billion. Between 0701 and 0704, the Fed's new holdings of Treasury Bond were $39.2 billion.</p><p>Fourthly, from the perspective of micro-transactions, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institutions, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to be low. According to the May 3 disclosure of the U.S. Treasury Department financing plan, it is expected to lower the TGA account to $450 billion on July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. But as of the latest disclosure July 14, there is $657.5 billion left in the Treasury TGA account, with a whopping $207.5 billion in balance to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>4. The intensive bond issuance by the Treasury Department from August to September may bring rebound pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term</p><p>Based on the intensive bond issuance financing by the Ministry of Finance in August-September, and the superimposed Taper expectation at that time, there may be pressure for the yield of U.S. bonds to rebound in stages in August-September.</p><p>First of all, according to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. Moreover, the current bipartisan reduced version of the infrastructure agreement has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the follow-up bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, which will bring pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p>Secondly, the CPI in the United States exceeded expectations in June, inflation may still hover at a high level in July, and the economic decline is not obvious. Moreover, with the decline of the savings rate, the unemployment rate in the United States may be expected to improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. The yield of U.S. bonds will remain low and fluctuate, which is an inevitable choice for the United States to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the United States' dependence on debt expansion economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American dream\" of \"winning economic competition\" under the background of big-power games.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk warning</p><p>The global economic growth rate declined; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA\"> 张忆东策略世界</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8fca69a364eb1ccaf6e9078f1721480","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146283458","content_text":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，对美长端利率下行形成助推，但其并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数自6月便已开始发酵；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势；\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是在10年期美债利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和；\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。\n其次，基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债节奏明显放缓。0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。\n第四，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位；截至最新披露7月14日，基于债务上限约束，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态。\n\n根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，叠加8-9月市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升，从而届时美国长端利率存在反弹的压力。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。\n\n风险提示：全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险\n正文\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n近期疫情变数是美债长端收益率下行的核心变量吗？不是。诚然，上周开始美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，其对美长端利率下行有助推，但并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数发酵已久。早在6月份，英国、俄罗斯等国的新增确诊病例数便再度大幅走高；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势。7日死亡病例数均值/2周前的7日新增确诊病例数均值所显示的死亡率自从2021年以来持续下降，这说明了对重症的抵御显示了疫苗的作用。\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降10bp至2.24%，从0707-0719期间，10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降11bp至2.24%，而同时期10年期美债名义利率从1.48%大幅下降29bp至1.19%。\n\n\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n有解读认为，近期美债收益率下行是财政部TGA支出释放流动性，回流美债市场导致。我们持不同意见。\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是短端利率下行并不明显。如果是TGA“泄洪”导致的，那么因为流动性充裕所驱动的配置需求首先聚焦短端利率。事实上，在长端利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和，在0701-0719期间，2年期美债收益从0.25%仅下行4bp至2.21%。并且，如果从高频视角下，长端利率很多情况下是领先短端利率下行的。\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储。在0407-0714期间，TGA账户下降了2974亿美元；同时期，银行储备金反而减少了299亿美元，同时期，我们看到O/N RRP用量的大幅走高。因此TGA账户和ON RRP用量的一降一升，显示的是财政部流动性回流美联储，银行准备金并未增加，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债步伐明显放缓，而联储依旧维持每个月1200亿规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS）的购债节奏，或是压低7月份美债长端利率的核心原因。展望7月剩下的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部发债需求将继续低迷，美长端利率将继续维持低位徘徊。\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。2020年美国政府净发行了4.54万亿美元的国债，美国国债增量占当年净发行量的52%。当下，外资持有美国国债的比重由2015年底的47%下降至2020年底的34%。截至2021年6月30日，联储持有占美国国债规模占比进一步升高至24%。\n\n其次，7月至今财政部国债净发行额转负。截至最新从0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。比如今年4-6月联储对应当月新增持有为725亿美元，724亿美元，962亿美元。在0701至0704期间，联储新增持有国债规模为392亿美元。\n第四，从微观交易角度，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位。根据5月3日披露美国财政部融资计划，预计在债务上限到期日7月31日将TGA账户下降至4500亿美元。但是截至最新披露7月14日，财政部TGA账户还有6575亿美元，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态\n基于财政部将会在8-9月密集发债融资，以及叠加届时的Taper预期，美债收益率在8-9月或存在阶段性反弹的压力。\n首先，根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，从而带来美国长端利率反弹的压力。\n其次，6月份美国CPI超预期，7月份通胀或仍会高位徘徊，经济回落不明显，且随着储蓄率回落，美国失业率或有望小幅改善，所以，8、9月份债券市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。美债收益率将维持低位震荡，这是美国实践MMT（现代货币理论）的必然选择，是美国依赖债务扩张型经济刺激之路的必然结果，是大国博弈背景下编造“赢得经济竞争”的新“美国梦”的前提条件。\n\n五、风险提示\n全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":648,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":176046061,"gmtCreate":1626849366953,"gmtModify":1703479246178,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176046061","repostId":"1198728322","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198728322","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626848907,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1198728322?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:28","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Bezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198728322","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球","content":"<p>Blue Origin's good news is clearly very important to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20th, local time, the world's richest man, the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos soared about 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in the United States on a launch vehicle from his company Blue Origin and safely returned to Earth. The launch, Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight, marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>By contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plunged on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% during the session before narrowing their decline to 1.14% at the close. Previously, on July 11th, 70-year-old Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Galactic, successfully returned from an orbit of 85.9 kilometers on Spacecraft II, becoming the first founder of a commercial space enterprise to board space, nine days before Bezos, founder of Blue Origin.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>How are these two things related?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, former Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin has completed its first crewed flight. That weighed on Virgin Galactic stock on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the FAA, kicking off the space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market-there are 1.5 million multimillionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 on a space ticket, for them, not out of reach, and there are probably 20 million millionaires all over the world. As big as this market is, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to get a piece of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, Bezos said in his speech after a successful flight on July 20th, local time, that the demand for space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has sold future passenger tickets worth nearly $100 million\". Bezos also said that Blue Origin will fly two more manned missions this year.</p><p>Is it reasonable for Virgin Galactic stock to fall sharply?</p><p>Maybe not. Even the 10 million customers left, divided by the six passengers the Virgin Galactic space shuttle can carry at a time, means there's plenty of potential business ahead for Virgin Galactic, with plenty of flights before it runs out of consumer demand.</p><p>Still, investors need to realize that there is one boot that hasn't fallen after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight. In just one or three years, we could see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new Starship — one that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space; Carrying 100 tourists at a time; Done it all at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic can match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>But competition may not be an important factor compared to the stock's recent gains.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stock has been hot lately, but stocks that rise eventually fall. Investors are bidding for shares in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's space travel success is behind us, stock buyers have paused and awaited the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a date when normal commercial operations may begin, can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to start scheduled flights around the end of the year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert said recently that he thinks early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy Inc stock a buy with a price target of $48. That's up from $35 before the July spaceflight, when the stock was trading at nearly $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness in Virgin Galactic was the announcement of a stock sale. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes existing shareholders' shares. More sellers than buyers — even if the seller is the company itself — always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% this year, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBezos \"went to heaven\", and Virgin Galactic once fell heavily. What's going on?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-21 14:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Blue Origin's good news is clearly very important to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20th, local time, the world's richest man, the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos soared about 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in the United States on a launch vehicle from his company Blue Origin and safely returned to Earth. The launch, Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight, marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>By contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plunged on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% during the session before narrowing their decline to 1.14% at the close. Previously, on July 11th, 70-year-old Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Galactic, successfully returned from an orbit of 85.9 kilometers on Spacecraft II, becoming the first founder of a commercial space enterprise to board space, nine days before Bezos, founder of Blue Origin.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>How are these two things related?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, former Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin has completed its first crewed flight. That weighed on Virgin Galactic stock on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the FAA, kicking off the space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market-there are 1.5 million multimillionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 on a space ticket, for them, not out of reach, and there are probably 20 million millionaires all over the world. As big as this market is, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to get a piece of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, Bezos said in his speech after a successful flight on July 20th, local time, that the demand for space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has sold future passenger tickets worth nearly $100 million\". Bezos also said that Blue Origin will fly two more manned missions this year.</p><p>Is it reasonable for Virgin Galactic stock to fall sharply?</p><p>Maybe not. Even the 10 million customers left, divided by the six passengers the Virgin Galactic space shuttle can carry at a time, means there's plenty of potential business ahead for Virgin Galactic, with plenty of flights before it runs out of consumer demand.</p><p>Still, investors need to realize that there is one boot that hasn't fallen after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight. In just one or three years, we could see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new Starship — one that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space; Carrying 100 tourists at a time; Done it all at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic can match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>But competition may not be an important factor compared to the stock's recent gains.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stock has been hot lately, but stocks that rise eventually fall. Investors are bidding for shares in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's space travel success is behind us, stock buyers have paused and awaited the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a date when normal commercial operations may begin, can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to start scheduled flights around the end of the year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert said recently that he thinks early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy Inc stock a buy with a price target of $48. That's up from $35 before the July spaceflight, when the stock was trading at nearly $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness in Virgin Galactic was the announcement of a stock sale. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes existing shareholders' shares. More sellers than buyers — even if the seller is the company itself — always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% this year, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3d3a3c8cb374234f20ed2a295e3781c","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","SPCE":"维珍银河"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198728322","content_text":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球。这次发射为蓝色起源公司首次载人太空飞行，标志着在打造太空旅游业务的竞争中又迈出了一步。\n\n与之相对的是，周二太空旅游公司维珍银河股价出现暴跌，盘中一度跌近9%，收盘时跌幅缩窄至1.14％。此前7月11日，维珍银河创始人、70岁的理查德·布兰森搭乘太空船二号成功从85.9公里高的轨道返回，成为首位登上太空的商业航天企业创始人，比蓝色起源创始人贝佐斯早9天。\n\n这两件事存在怎样的关联？\n简单来说，维珍银河不再是唯一一家成功的太空旅游特许经营公司。在维珍银河成功将创始人德布兰森送入太空九天后，亚马逊前首席执行官杰夫贝索斯的太空公司蓝色起源完成了首次载人飞行。这对周二的维珍银河股票造成压力。\n九天前，维珍银河率先实现美国联邦航空局授权的第一次“全面商业发射”，开启了太空旅游业务。\n\n维珍银河瞄准的是一个巨大的太空旅游市场——仅在美国就有150万千万富翁，600万百万富翁，他们可能想花25万美元购买一张太空票，对他们来说，并非遥不可及，而全世界大概有2000万百万富翁。尽管这个市场很大，但现在它已经被削减了一半，因为维珍银河将不得不分蓝色起源一杯羹。据外媒报道，贝索斯当地时间7月20日成功飞行后的演讲中称，太空旅游市场需求非常高，“蓝色起源已经售出了价值近1亿美元的未来客运机票”。贝索斯还称，蓝色起源今年还将再执行两次载人飞行任务。\n那维珍银河股票大跌是否合理？\n也许不是。即使是剩下1000万客户，除以维珍银河航天飞机每次可搭载的6名乘客，也意味着维珍银河公司未来还有很多潜在的业务，在耗尽消费者需求之前，还有很多航班。\n尽管如此，投资者需要意识到，蓝色起源成功太空飞行之后，还有一只靴子没有落下。在短短的一年或三年内，我们可能看到SpaceX带着它的新型星际飞船进入太空旅游竞赛——一艘能够真正到达、停留在太空中并穿越太空的飞船；一次运送100名游客；以蓝色起源和维珍银河都无法企及的价格完成这一切。这才是维珍银河真正的危机。\n\n但与该股最近的上涨相比，竞争可能不是一个重要因素。\n维珍银河股票最近一直火爆，但上涨的股票最终会下跌。投资者因预期好消息而竞购股票。既然布兰森太空旅行成功的好消息已经过去，股票买家已经暂停，等待下一个重大公告或事件。\n\n另一次飞行试验或可能开始正常商业运行的日期，都可以成为催化剂。华尔街预计维珍银河将在今年年底左右开始进行定期航班。Canaccord分析师肯·赫伯特（Ken Herbert）最近表示，他认为2022年初的可能性更大。\n赫伯特将银河公司股票评级为买入，目标价为48美元。这比7月太空飞行前的35美元有所上升，当时该股的股价接近50美元。\n维珍银河走弱的另一个原因是宣布出售股票。维珍银河7月12日表示，将通过出售新股筹集至多5亿美元。更多的股票稀释了现有股东的股份。卖家比买家多——即使卖方是公司本身——总是导致股价下跌。\n维珍银河今年以来仍上涨约35%，好于标普500指数的15%涨幅。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9,"SPCE":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176048541,"gmtCreate":1626849339383,"gmtModify":1703479245512,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176048541","repostId":"1146283458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146283458","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626849210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146283458?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:33","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146283458","media":" 张忆东策略世界","summary":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了","content":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: Recently, the yield of 10-year U.S. bonds once dropped to the range of 1.1%-1.2%. We think:</b></p><p><b>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</b></p><p>It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day has once again exceeded 40,000, which has aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects and boosted the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to an increase in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend.</p><p></li></ul><b>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yields drops sharply, the 2-year short-term interest rate drops moderately;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve, which was not directly transmitted to the US debt market.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance in July slowed down significantly. Treasury net hairstyles for the period 0701 to 0716 were-$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate.</p><p></li><li>Fourthly, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institution, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to remain sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to remain low; As of the latest disclosure July 14, a balance of up to $207.5 billion is pending spending based on debt ceiling constraints.</p><p></li></ul><b>4. From August to September, the intensive issuance of bonds by the Ministry of Finance may bring rebound pressure to the long-term interest rate in the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. At present, the infrastructure agreement of the two parties has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the subsequent bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, and the market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase from August to September, so that there will be pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: global economic growth is declining; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</p><p>Is the recent epidemic variable the core variable of the downward trend of the long-term yield of U.S. debt? Not. It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day once again exceeded 40,000, which aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects, which helped the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it was not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in Britain, Russia and other countries rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a higher number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines. The mortality rate indicated by the average number of 7-day deaths/the average number of 7-day newly confirmed cases from 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which illustrates that resistance to severe illness shows the role of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend. The 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 10bp from 2.35% to 2.24%. From 0707-0719, the 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 11bp from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal interest rate of 10-year U.S. bonds dropped sharply by 29bp from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</p><p>It is interpreted that the recent decline in U.S. bond yields is caused by the release of liquidity by the Treasury's TGA expenditure and the return of the U.S. bond market. We disagree.</p><p>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but the downward trend of short-term interest rate is not obvious. If it is caused by TGA's \"flood discharge\", then the allocation demand driven by abundant liquidity focuses on the short-end interest rate first. In fact, during the period when the long-term interest rate dropped sharply, the two-year short-term interest rate dropped moderately. During the period 0701-0719, the yield of the two-year U.S. bond only dropped by 4bp from 0.25% to 2.21%. Moreover, from the perspective of high frequency, the long-end interest rate is leading the short-end interest rate in many cases.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve. During 0407-0714, TGA accounts fell by $297.4 billion; In the same period, bank reserves instead decreased by $29.9 billion, and in the same period, we saw a sharp increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decline and rise of the usage of TGA account and ON RRP shows that the liquidity of the Treasury has returned to the Federal Reserve, and the bank reserves have not increased, so the transmission to the US debt market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</p><p>Based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve still maintained the bond purchase rhythm of 120 billion dollars (about 80 billion dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion dollars MBS) per month, or the core reason for lowering the long-term interest rate of U.S. debt in July. Looking forward to the rest of July, there is still a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the demand for bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the long-term interest rate in the United States will continue to hover at a low level.</p><p>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, and the incremental U.S. Treasury Bond accounted for 52% of the net issuance that year. At present, the proportion of foreign investment in U.S. Treasury Bond has dropped from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Fed's holdings have further increased to 24% of the size of the U.S. Treasury Bond.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, since July, the net issuance of Treasury Bond of the Ministry of Finance has turned negative. Treasury net hairstyles were-6.4 billion as of the latest period from 0701 to 0716; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate. For example, from April to June this year, the Fed's new holdings in that month were $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion and $96.2 billion. Between 0701 and 0704, the Fed's new holdings of Treasury Bond were $39.2 billion.</p><p>Fourthly, from the perspective of micro-transactions, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institutions, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to be low. According to the May 3 disclosure of the U.S. Treasury Department financing plan, it is expected to lower the TGA account to $450 billion on July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. But as of the latest disclosure July 14, there is $657.5 billion left in the Treasury TGA account, with a whopping $207.5 billion in balance to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>4. The intensive bond issuance by the Treasury Department from August to September may bring rebound pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term</p><p>Based on the intensive bond issuance financing by the Ministry of Finance in August-September, and the superimposed Taper expectation at that time, there may be pressure for the yield of U.S. bonds to rebound in stages in August-September.</p><p>First of all, according to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. Moreover, the current bipartisan reduced version of the infrastructure agreement has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the follow-up bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, which will bring pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p>Secondly, the CPI in the United States exceeded expectations in June, inflation may still hover at a high level in July, and the economic decline is not obvious. Moreover, with the decline of the savings rate, the unemployment rate in the United States may be expected to improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. The yield of U.S. bonds will remain low and fluctuate, which is an inevitable choice for the United States to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the United States' dependence on debt expansion economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American dream\" of \"winning economic competition\" under the background of big-power games.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk warning</p><p>The global economic growth rate declined; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk.</p>","source":"zydcl","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat is the real reason for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\"> 张忆东策略世界</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 14:33</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: Recently, the yield of 10-year U.S. bonds once dropped to the range of 1.1%-1.2%. We think:</b></p><p><b>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</b></p><p>It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day has once again exceeded 40,000, which has aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects and boosted the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to an increase in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend.</p><p></li></ul><b>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yields drops sharply, the 2-year short-term interest rate drops moderately;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve, which was not directly transmitted to the US debt market.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</b></p><p><ul><li>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance in July slowed down significantly. Treasury net hairstyles for the period 0701 to 0716 were-$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate.</p><p></li><li>Fourthly, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institution, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to remain sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to remain low; As of the latest disclosure July 14, a balance of up to $207.5 billion is pending spending based on debt ceiling constraints.</p><p></li></ul><b>4. From August to September, the intensive issuance of bonds by the Ministry of Finance may bring rebound pressure to the long-term interest rate in the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. At present, the infrastructure agreement of the two parties has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the subsequent bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, and the market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase from August to September, so that there will be pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: global economic growth is declining; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>1. Recent epidemic variables are not the core reasons for the sharp decline in long-term interest rates in the United States</p><p>Is the recent epidemic variable the core variable of the downward trend of the long-term yield of U.S. debt? Not. It is true that since last week, the number of newly confirmed cases in the United States in a single day once again exceeded 40,000, which aggravated the market's worries about the economic prospects, which helped the downward trend of long-term interest rates in the United States, but it was not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First of all, the epidemic variables caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in Britain, Russia and other countries rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a higher number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend of COVID-19 fatality rate brought by vaccines. The mortality rate indicated by the average number of 7-day deaths/the average number of 7-day newly confirmed cases from 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which illustrates that resistance to severe illness shows the role of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while the long-term interest rate has dropped sharply, the downward trend of inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, which shows that the economic outlook is not the core dominant factor of the long-term interest rate downward trend. The 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 10bp from 2.35% to 2.24%. From 0707-0719, the 10-year inflation expectation only dropped by 11bp from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal interest rate of 10-year U.S. bonds dropped sharply by 29bp from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Second, the explanation of TGA account \"flood discharge\" into the bond market to lower interest rates is doubtful</p><p>It is interpreted that the recent decline in U.S. bond yields is caused by the release of liquidity by the Treasury's TGA expenditure and the return of the U.S. bond market. We disagree.</p><p>First of all, the short-term interest rate is more significantly affected by liquidity, but the downward trend of short-term interest rate is not obvious. If it is caused by TGA's \"flood discharge\", then the allocation demand driven by abundant liquidity focuses on the short-end interest rate first. In fact, during the period when the long-term interest rate dropped sharply, the two-year short-term interest rate dropped moderately. During the period 0701-0719, the yield of the two-year U.S. bond only dropped by 4bp from 0.25% to 2.21%. Moreover, from the perspective of high frequency, the long-end interest rate is leading the short-end interest rate in many cases.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the \"flood discharge\" of the Treasury TGA did not drive the increase of bank reserves, and the higher usage of O/N RRP showed that funds returned to the Federal Reserve. During 0407-0714, TGA accounts fell by $297.4 billion; In the same period, bank reserves instead decreased by $29.9 billion, and in the same period, we saw a sharp increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decline and rise of the usage of TGA account and ON RRP shows that the liquidity of the Treasury has returned to the Federal Reserve, and the bank reserves have not increased, so the transmission to the US debt market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to the constraint of the debt ceiling, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, and the Federal Reserve may be the main force to lower the long-term interest rate of the United States. It is expected that the yield of U.S. bonds will remain low for the rest of July</p><p>Based on the debt ceiling constraint, the pace of bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance slowed down significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve still maintained the bond purchase rhythm of 120 billion dollars (about 80 billion dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion dollars MBS) per month, or the core reason for lowering the long-term interest rate of U.S. debt in July. Looking forward to the rest of July, there is still a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the demand for bond issuance by the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the long-term interest rate in the United States will continue to hover at a low level.</p><p>First of all, as we mentioned in 20210318 \"The Mystery of U.S. Debt\", the holder structure of U.S. debt has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of new U.S. bonds, which makes the Treasury's bond issuance rhythm an important variable affecting the yield of U.S. bonds. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, and the incremental U.S. Treasury Bond accounted for 52% of the net issuance that year. At present, the proportion of foreign investment in U.S. Treasury Bond has dropped from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Fed's holdings have further increased to 24% of the size of the U.S. Treasury Bond.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, since July, the net issuance of Treasury Bond of the Ministry of Finance has turned negative. Treasury net hairstyles were-6.4 billion as of the latest period from 0701 to 0716; From April to June this year, the monthly net issuance of Treasury Bond in the United States was $42 billion, $24 billion and $330 billion respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, according to the monthly bond purchase scale of 120 billion US dollars (about 80 billion US dollars Treasury Bond +40 billion US dollars MBS), the Federal Reserve is still allocated to the pace of about 20 billion US dollars per week to buy Treasury Bond, and it continuously buys bonds to lower the long-term interest rate. For example, from April to June this year, the Fed's new holdings in that month were $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion and $96.2 billion. Between 0701 and 0704, the Fed's new holdings of Treasury Bond were $39.2 billion.</p><p>Fourthly, from the perspective of micro-transactions, the Fed's bond purchase is not a market behavior. Therefore, compared with the allocation institutions, its purchase of U.S. bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on the price of U.S. bonds on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that in the next time of July, there will still be a surplus of \"surplus grain\" in TGA account, the bond issuance demand of the Ministry of Finance will continue to be sluggish, and the yield of U.S. bonds will continue to be low. According to the May 3 disclosure of the U.S. Treasury Department financing plan, it is expected to lower the TGA account to $450 billion on July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. But as of the latest disclosure July 14, there is $657.5 billion left in the Treasury TGA account, with a whopping $207.5 billion in balance to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>4. The intensive bond issuance by the Treasury Department from August to September may bring rebound pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States, but it will not repeat the soaring in February and March. Low interest rates in the United States will be the norm in the medium and long term</p><p>Based on the intensive bond issuance financing by the Ministry of Finance in August-September, and the superimposed Taper expectation at that time, there may be pressure for the yield of U.S. bonds to rebound in stages in August-September.</p><p>First of all, according to the financing plan for the third quarter, the U.S. Treasury will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, twice that of the second quarter. Moreover, the current bipartisan reduced version of the infrastructure agreement has been reached, which may also increase the actual financing demand of the Treasury. According to this calculation, the follow-up bond issuance plan of the U.S. Treasury Department will be concentrated in August and September, which will bring pressure on the long-term interest rate of the United States to rebound.</p><p>Secondly, the CPI in the United States exceeded expectations in June, inflation may still hover at a high level in July, and the economic decline is not obvious. Moreover, with the decline of the savings rate, the unemployment rate in the United States may be expected to improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectation for the Fed Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of U.S. economic growth and inflation momentum is likely to be in the second quarter, the low interest rate in the United States will remain in the medium and long term, and the soaring in February and March will not be repeated in the second half of the year.</p><p>Finally, it is emphasized again that under the background of the great power game in the United States, keeping low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium and long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. The yield of U.S. bonds will remain low and fluctuate, which is an inevitable choice for the United States to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the United States' dependence on debt expansion economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American dream\" of \"winning economic competition\" under the background of big-power games.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk warning</p><p>The global economic growth rate declined; The easing of monetary policy in China and the United States fell short of expectations; Great Power Game Risk.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA\"> 张忆东策略世界</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8fca69a364eb1ccaf6e9078f1721480","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146283458","content_text":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，对美长端利率下行形成助推，但其并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数自6月便已开始发酵；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势；\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是在10年期美债利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和；\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。\n其次，基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债节奏明显放缓。0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。\n第四，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位；截至最新披露7月14日，基于债务上限约束，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态。\n\n根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，叠加8-9月市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升，从而届时美国长端利率存在反弹的压力。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。\n\n风险提示：全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险\n正文\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n近期疫情变数是美债长端收益率下行的核心变量吗？不是。诚然，上周开始美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，其对美长端利率下行有助推，但并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数发酵已久。早在6月份，英国、俄罗斯等国的新增确诊病例数便再度大幅走高；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势。7日死亡病例数均值/2周前的7日新增确诊病例数均值所显示的死亡率自从2021年以来持续下降，这说明了对重症的抵御显示了疫苗的作用。\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降10bp至2.24%，从0707-0719期间，10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降11bp至2.24%，而同时期10年期美债名义利率从1.48%大幅下降29bp至1.19%。\n\n\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n有解读认为，近期美债收益率下行是财政部TGA支出释放流动性，回流美债市场导致。我们持不同意见。\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是短端利率下行并不明显。如果是TGA“泄洪”导致的，那么因为流动性充裕所驱动的配置需求首先聚焦短端利率。事实上，在长端利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和，在0701-0719期间，2年期美债收益从0.25%仅下行4bp至2.21%。并且，如果从高频视角下，长端利率很多情况下是领先短端利率下行的。\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储。在0407-0714期间，TGA账户下降了2974亿美元；同时期，银行储备金反而减少了299亿美元，同时期，我们看到O/N RRP用量的大幅走高。因此TGA账户和ON RRP用量的一降一升，显示的是财政部流动性回流美联储，银行准备金并未增加，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债步伐明显放缓，而联储依旧维持每个月1200亿规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS）的购债节奏，或是压低7月份美债长端利率的核心原因。展望7月剩下的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部发债需求将继续低迷，美长端利率将继续维持低位徘徊。\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。2020年美国政府净发行了4.54万亿美元的国债，美国国债增量占当年净发行量的52%。当下，外资持有美国国债的比重由2015年底的47%下降至2020年底的34%。截至2021年6月30日，联储持有占美国国债规模占比进一步升高至24%。\n\n其次，7月至今财政部国债净发行额转负。截至最新从0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。比如今年4-6月联储对应当月新增持有为725亿美元，724亿美元，962亿美元。在0701至0704期间，联储新增持有国债规模为392亿美元。\n第四，从微观交易角度，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位。根据5月3日披露美国财政部融资计划，预计在债务上限到期日7月31日将TGA账户下降至4500亿美元。但是截至最新披露7月14日，财政部TGA账户还有6575亿美元，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态\n基于财政部将会在8-9月密集发债融资，以及叠加届时的Taper预期，美债收益率在8-9月或存在阶段性反弹的压力。\n首先，根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，从而带来美国长端利率反弹的压力。\n其次，6月份美国CPI超预期，7月份通胀或仍会高位徘徊，经济回落不明显，且随着储蓄率回落，美国失业率或有望小幅改善，所以，8、9月份债券市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。美债收益率将维持低位震荡，这是美国实践MMT（现代货币理论）的必然选择，是美国依赖债务扩张型经济刺激之路的必然结果，是大国博弈背景下编造“赢得经济竞争”的新“美国梦”的前提条件。\n\n五、风险提示\n全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":648,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
