+Follow
haruharu
No personal profile
3
Follow
0
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
haruharu
2021-07-21
?
Sorry, the original content has been removed
haruharu
2021-07-21
?
What is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4089951304751690","uuid":"4089951304751690","gmtCreate":1626848262366,"gmtModify":1704447503070,"name":"haruharu","pinyin":"haruharu","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":2,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.09.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":176046061,"gmtCreate":1626849366953,"gmtModify":1703479246178,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176046061","repostId":"1198728322","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":868,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176048541,"gmtCreate":1626849339383,"gmtModify":1703479245512,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4089951304751690","idStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176048541","repostId":"1146283458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146283458","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626849210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146283458?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:33","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146283458","media":" 张忆东策略世界","summary":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了","content":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds recently fell to the 1.1%-1.2% range. We believe:</b></p><p><b>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</b></p><p>Admittedly, starting last week, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook and boosting the decline in US long-term interest rates, but this is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates.</p><p></li></ul><b>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yield fell sharply, the decline in the 2-year short-term yield was relatively moderate.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves. The increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, due to debt ceiling constraints, the Ministry of Finance's bond issuance pace slowed significantly in July. From July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates.</p><p></li><li>Fourth, the Federal Reserve's bond purchases are not a market activity. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices under the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. As of the latest disclosure on July 14, based on debt ceiling constraints, a balance of up to $207.5 billion remains to be spent.</p><p></li></ul><b>Fourth, the Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but it will not repeat the surge in February and March. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will raise $805 billion in bonds from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current scaled-down bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the US Treasury's bond issuance plan will be concentrated in August and September. Coupled with the increase in market expectations for the Fed's Taper in August and September, there will be pressure for a rebound in US long-term interest rates at that time.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; Risks of great power competition</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</p><p>Are the recent pandemic variables the core variables driving the decline in long-term US Treasury yields? No. Admittedly, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again last week, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook. While this has contributed to the decline in US long-term interest rates, it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in countries such as the UK and Russia rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines. The mortality rate shown by the average number of deaths in 7 days / the average number of newly confirmed cases in 7 days 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which shows that resistance to severe illness has shown the effect of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates. The 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 10 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%. From July 7 to July 19, the 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 11 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell sharply by 29 basis points from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</p><p>Some interpreters believe that the recent decline in US Treasury yields is due to the Treasury Department's TGA spending releasing liquidity and returning it to the US Treasury market. We disagree.</p><p>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but the decline in short-term interest rates is not obvious. If it was caused by the TGA \"flood release,\" then the allocation demand driven by ample liquidity will primarily focus on short-term interest rates. In fact, during the period of sharp decline in long-term interest rates, the decline in 2-year short-term interest rates was relatively moderate. Between July 1 and July 19, the yield on 2-year US Treasury bonds fell by only 4 basis points from 0.25% to 2.21%. Furthermore, from a high-frequency perspective, long-term interest rates often outpace short-term interest rates in their decline.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves, and the increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve. Between 0407 and 0714, the TGA account decreased by $297.4 billion; During the same period, bank reserves actually decreased by $29.9 billion, while we saw a significant increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decrease and increase in the use of TGA accounts and ON RRP indicate that the Treasury Department's liquidity is flowing back to the Federal Reserve, while bank reserves have not increased, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</p><p>Due to debt ceiling constraints, the Treasury Department's pace of bond issuance slowed significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve maintained a monthly bond-buying pace of $120 billion (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), which may be the core reason for lowering long-term US Treasury yields in July. Looking ahead to the remainder of July, the TGA account will still have a surplus, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US long-term interest rates will continue to hover at low levels.</p><p>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, with the increase in U.S. Treasury Bond accounting for 52% of the net issuance that year. Currently, the proportion of foreign ownership of U.S. Treasury Bond has decreased from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. Treasury Bond further increased to 24%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, the net issuance of Treasury Bond by the Ministry of Finance has turned negative since July. As of the latest period from July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates. For example, from April to June this year, the Federal Reserve added $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion, and $96.2 billion to its monthly holdings. Between July 1 and July 4, the Federal Reserve added $39.2 billion to its Treasury Bond holdings.</p><p>Fourth, from a micro-trading perspective, the Fed's bond purchases are not a market behavior. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. According to the U.S. Treasury Department's financing plan disclosed on May 3, the TGA account is expected to be reduced to $450 billion by July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. However, as of the latest disclosure on July 14, the Treasury Department's TGA account still had $657.5 billion, with a balance of $207.5 billion to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>IV. The Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but a repeat of the surge in February and March is unlikely. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</p><p>Given that the Treasury Department will issue bonds intensively in August and September to raise funds, coupled with expectations of Taper at that time, US Treasury yields may face pressure for a temporary rebound in August and September.</p><p>First, according to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current reduced bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the U.S. Treasury Department's subsequent bond issuance plans will be concentrated in August and September, thereby putting pressure on a rebound in U.S. long-term interest rates.</p><p>Secondly, the US CPI in June exceeded expectations, inflation may remain high in July, the economic slowdown will not be significant, and with the decline in the savings rate, the US unemployment rate may improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectations for the Fed's Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. US Treasury yields will remain low and fluctuate. This is an inevitable choice for the US to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the US's reliance on debt-driven economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American Dream\" to \"win economic competition\" against the backdrop of great power rivalry.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk Warning</p><p>Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; The risks of great power competition.</p>","source":"zydcl","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\"> 张忆东策略世界</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 14:33</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds recently fell to the 1.1%-1.2% range. We believe:</b></p><p><b>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</b></p><p>Admittedly, starting last week, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook and boosting the decline in US long-term interest rates, but this is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates.</p><p></li></ul><b>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yield fell sharply, the decline in the 2-year short-term yield was relatively moderate.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves. The increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, due to debt ceiling constraints, the Ministry of Finance's bond issuance pace slowed significantly in July. From July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates.</p><p></li><li>Fourth, the Federal Reserve's bond purchases are not a market activity. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices under the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. As of the latest disclosure on July 14, based on debt ceiling constraints, a balance of up to $207.5 billion remains to be spent.</p><p></li></ul><b>Fourth, the Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but it will not repeat the surge in February and March. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will raise $805 billion in bonds from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current scaled-down bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the US Treasury's bond issuance plan will be concentrated in August and September. Coupled with the increase in market expectations for the Fed's Taper in August and September, there will be pressure for a rebound in US long-term interest rates at that time.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; Risks of great power competition</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</p><p>Are the recent pandemic variables the core variables driving the decline in long-term US Treasury yields? No. Admittedly, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again last week, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook. While this has contributed to the decline in US long-term interest rates, it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in countries such as the UK and Russia rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines. The mortality rate shown by the average number of deaths in 7 days / the average number of newly confirmed cases in 7 days 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which shows that resistance to severe illness has shown the effect of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates. The 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 10 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%. From July 7 to July 19, the 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 11 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell sharply by 29 basis points from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</p><p>Some interpreters believe that the recent decline in US Treasury yields is due to the Treasury Department's TGA spending releasing liquidity and returning it to the US Treasury market. We disagree.</p><p>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but the decline in short-term interest rates is not obvious. If it was caused by the TGA \"flood release,\" then the allocation demand driven by ample liquidity will primarily focus on short-term interest rates. In fact, during the period of sharp decline in long-term interest rates, the decline in 2-year short-term interest rates was relatively moderate. Between July 1 and July 19, the yield on 2-year US Treasury bonds fell by only 4 basis points from 0.25% to 2.21%. Furthermore, from a high-frequency perspective, long-term interest rates often outpace short-term interest rates in their decline.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves, and the increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve. Between 0407 and 0714, the TGA account decreased by $297.4 billion; During the same period, bank reserves actually decreased by $29.9 billion, while we saw a significant increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decrease and increase in the use of TGA accounts and ON RRP indicate that the Treasury Department's liquidity is flowing back to the Federal Reserve, while bank reserves have not increased, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</p><p>Due to debt ceiling constraints, the Treasury Department's pace of bond issuance slowed significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve maintained a monthly bond-buying pace of $120 billion (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), which may be the core reason for lowering long-term US Treasury yields in July. Looking ahead to the remainder of July, the TGA account will still have a surplus, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US long-term interest rates will continue to hover at low levels.</p><p>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, with the increase in U.S. Treasury Bond accounting for 52% of the net issuance that year. Currently, the proportion of foreign ownership of U.S. Treasury Bond has decreased from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. Treasury Bond further increased to 24%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, the net issuance of Treasury Bond by the Ministry of Finance has turned negative since July. As of the latest period from July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates. For example, from April to June this year, the Federal Reserve added $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion, and $96.2 billion to its monthly holdings. Between July 1 and July 4, the Federal Reserve added $39.2 billion to its Treasury Bond holdings.</p><p>Fourth, from a micro-trading perspective, the Fed's bond purchases are not a market behavior. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. According to the U.S. Treasury Department's financing plan disclosed on May 3, the TGA account is expected to be reduced to $450 billion by July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. However, as of the latest disclosure on July 14, the Treasury Department's TGA account still had $657.5 billion, with a balance of $207.5 billion to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>IV. The Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but a repeat of the surge in February and March is unlikely. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</p><p>Given that the Treasury Department will issue bonds intensively in August and September to raise funds, coupled with expectations of Taper at that time, US Treasury yields may face pressure for a temporary rebound in August and September.</p><p>First, according to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current reduced bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the U.S. Treasury Department's subsequent bond issuance plans will be concentrated in August and September, thereby putting pressure on a rebound in U.S. long-term interest rates.</p><p>Secondly, the US CPI in June exceeded expectations, inflation may remain high in July, the economic slowdown will not be significant, and with the decline in the savings rate, the US unemployment rate may improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectations for the Fed's Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. US Treasury yields will remain low and fluctuate. This is an inevitable choice for the US to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the US's reliance on debt-driven economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American Dream\" to \"win economic competition\" against the backdrop of great power rivalry.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk Warning</p><p>Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; The risks of great power competition.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA\"> 张忆东策略世界</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8fca69a364eb1ccaf6e9078f1721480","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146283458","content_text":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，对美长端利率下行形成助推，但其并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数自6月便已开始发酵；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势；\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是在10年期美债利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和；\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。\n其次，基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债节奏明显放缓。0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。\n第四，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位；截至最新披露7月14日，基于债务上限约束，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态。\n\n根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，叠加8-9月市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升，从而届时美国长端利率存在反弹的压力。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。\n\n风险提示：全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险\n正文\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n近期疫情变数是美债长端收益率下行的核心变量吗？不是。诚然，上周开始美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，其对美长端利率下行有助推，但并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数发酵已久。早在6月份，英国、俄罗斯等国的新增确诊病例数便再度大幅走高；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势。7日死亡病例数均值/2周前的7日新增确诊病例数均值所显示的死亡率自从2021年以来持续下降，这说明了对重症的抵御显示了疫苗的作用。\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降10bp至2.24%，从0707-0719期间，10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降11bp至2.24%，而同时期10年期美债名义利率从1.48%大幅下降29bp至1.19%。\n\n\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n有解读认为，近期美债收益率下行是财政部TGA支出释放流动性，回流美债市场导致。我们持不同意见。\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是短端利率下行并不明显。如果是TGA“泄洪”导致的，那么因为流动性充裕所驱动的配置需求首先聚焦短端利率。事实上，在长端利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和，在0701-0719期间，2年期美债收益从0.25%仅下行4bp至2.21%。并且，如果从高频视角下，长端利率很多情况下是领先短端利率下行的。\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储。在0407-0714期间，TGA账户下降了2974亿美元；同时期，银行储备金反而减少了299亿美元，同时期，我们看到O/N RRP用量的大幅走高。因此TGA账户和ON RRP用量的一降一升，显示的是财政部流动性回流美联储，银行准备金并未增加，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债步伐明显放缓，而联储依旧维持每个月1200亿规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS）的购债节奏，或是压低7月份美债长端利率的核心原因。展望7月剩下的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部发债需求将继续低迷，美长端利率将继续维持低位徘徊。\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。2020年美国政府净发行了4.54万亿美元的国债，美国国债增量占当年净发行量的52%。当下，外资持有美国国债的比重由2015年底的47%下降至2020年底的34%。截至2021年6月30日，联储持有占美国国债规模占比进一步升高至24%。\n\n其次，7月至今财政部国债净发行额转负。截至最新从0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。比如今年4-6月联储对应当月新增持有为725亿美元，724亿美元，962亿美元。在0701至0704期间，联储新增持有国债规模为392亿美元。\n第四，从微观交易角度，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位。根据5月3日披露美国财政部融资计划，预计在债务上限到期日7月31日将TGA账户下降至4500亿美元。但是截至最新披露7月14日，财政部TGA账户还有6575亿美元，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态\n基于财政部将会在8-9月密集发债融资，以及叠加届时的Taper预期，美债收益率在8-9月或存在阶段性反弹的压力。\n首先，根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，从而带来美国长端利率反弹的压力。\n其次，6月份美国CPI超预期，7月份通胀或仍会高位徘徊，经济回落不明显，且随着储蓄率回落，美国失业率或有望小幅改善，所以，8、9月份债券市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。美债收益率将维持低位震荡，这是美国实践MMT（现代货币理论）的必然选择，是美国依赖债务扩张型经济刺激之路的必然结果，是大国博弈背景下编造“赢得经济竞争”的新“美国梦”的前提条件。\n\n五、风险提示\n全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1272,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":176046061,"gmtCreate":1626849366953,"gmtModify":1703479246178,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089951304751690","authorIdStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176046061","repostId":"1198728322","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198728322","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626848907,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1198728322?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:28","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What happened when Bezos \"took to the skies\" and Virgin Galactic suffered a sharp decline?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198728322","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球","content":"<p>The good news from Blue Origin is clearly for<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20 local time, the world's richest man, an American...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos flew approximately 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in his company's Blue Origin launch vehicle before safely returning to Earth. This launch marks Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight and marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plummeted on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% at one point during the session, before narrowing the decline to 1.14% at the close. On July 11, Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson, 70, successfully returned from an orbit 85.9 kilometers high aboard SpaceShip 2, becoming the first founder of a commercial space company to go into space, nine days earlier than Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What is the connection between these two events?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, Amazon's former CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin completed its first manned flight. This put pressure on Virgin Galactic stocks on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration, launching its space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market—there are 1.5 million millionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 to buy a space ticket, which is not out of reach for them, while there are about 20 million millionaires worldwide. Although this market is large, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to take a share of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, in his speech after the successful flight on July 20 local time, Bezos said that the demand in the space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has already sold nearly $100 million worth of future passenger tickets.\" Bezos also stated that Blue Origin will conduct two more manned flight missions this year.</p><p>Is the sharp drop in Virgin Galactic stock reasonable?</p><p>Maybe not. Even with the remaining 10 million customers, divided by the six passengers that the Virgin Galactic Space Shuttle can carry at a time, it means that Virgin Galactic still has a lot of potential business in the future, and many flights before consumer demand is exhausted.</p><p>Nevertheless, investors need to realize that after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight, there is another boot that has not been dropped. In just one or three years, we may see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new interstellar spacecraft—a spacecraft that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space. Transporting 100 tourists at a time; All this at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic could match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>However, competition may not be a significant factor compared to the stock's recent rise.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stocks have been hot recently, but rising stocks will eventually fall. Investors bid for stocks in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's successful space trip has passed, stock buyers have paused, awaiting the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a possible date to start normal commercial operations can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to begin scheduled flights around the end of this year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert recently said he believes early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy shares as buy with a price target of $48. This is up from $35 before the spaceflight in July, when the stock price was close to $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness of Virgin Galactic is the announcement of the sale of shares. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes the shares of existing shareholders. There are more sellers than buyers—even if the seller is the company itself—which always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% year-to-date, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What happened when Bezos \"took to the skies\" and Virgin Galactic suffered a sharp decline?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat happened when Bezos \"took to the skies\" and Virgin Galactic suffered a sharp decline?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-21 14:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The good news from Blue Origin is clearly for<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCE\">Virgin Galactic</a>That's bad news. On the morning of July 20 local time, the world's richest man, an American...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Company founder Jeff Bezos flew approximately 107 kilometers over the Texas desert in his company's Blue Origin launch vehicle before safely returning to Earth. This launch marks Blue Origin's first manned spaceflight and marks another step in the race to build a space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f0247cd617893985205da44466925e5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In contrast, shares of space tourism company Virgin Galactic plummeted on Tuesday, falling nearly 9% at one point during the session, before narrowing the decline to 1.14% at the close. On July 11, Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson, 70, successfully returned from an orbit 85.9 kilometers high aboard SpaceShip 2, becoming the first founder of a commercial space company to go into space, nine days earlier than Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb4d314424b805eb05fbce1786d3affb\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What is the connection between these two events?</p><p>Simply put, Virgin Galactic is no longer the only successful space tourism franchise. Nine days after Virgin Galactic successfully sent founder De Branson into space, Amazon's former CEO Jeff Bezos's space company Blue Origin completed its first manned flight. This put pressure on Virgin Galactic stocks on Tuesday.</p><p>Nine days ago, Virgin Galactic took the lead in achieving the first \"full commercial launch\" authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration, launching its space tourism business.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58e6ae9546cf10d525c768e975e14cf7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Virgin Galactic is targeting a huge space tourism market—there are 1.5 million millionaires in the United States alone, 6 million millionaires who might want to spend $250,000 to buy a space ticket, which is not out of reach for them, while there are about 20 million millionaires worldwide. Although this market is large, it has now been cut in half because Virgin Galactic will have to take a share of Blue Origin. According to foreign media reports, in his speech after the successful flight on July 20 local time, Bezos said that the demand in the space tourism market is very high, and \"Blue Origin has already sold nearly $100 million worth of future passenger tickets.\" Bezos also stated that Blue Origin will conduct two more manned flight missions this year.</p><p>Is the sharp drop in Virgin Galactic stock reasonable?</p><p>Maybe not. Even with the remaining 10 million customers, divided by the six passengers that the Virgin Galactic Space Shuttle can carry at a time, it means that Virgin Galactic still has a lot of potential business in the future, and many flights before consumer demand is exhausted.</p><p>Nevertheless, investors need to realize that after Blue Origin's successful spaceflight, there is another boot that has not been dropped. In just one or three years, we may see SpaceX enter the space tourism race with its new interstellar spacecraft—a spacecraft that can actually reach, stay in, and travel through space. Transporting 100 tourists at a time; All this at a price that neither Blue Origin nor Virgin Galactic could match. This is the real crisis in Virgin Galactic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35ad74a3df40a3ddbe37438033c7bd57\" tg-width=\"3000\" tg-height=\"2005\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>However, competition may not be a significant factor compared to the stock's recent rise.</p><p>Virgin Galactic stocks have been hot recently, but rising stocks will eventually fall. Investors bid for stocks in anticipation of good news. Now that the good news of Branson's successful space trip has passed, stock buyers have paused, awaiting the next major announcement or event.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3412e9662e9b3da05900f93a227e5f86\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Another flight test or a possible date to start normal commercial operations can be a catalyst. Wall Street expects Virgin Galactic to begin scheduled flights around the end of this year. Canaccord analyst Ken Herbert recently said he believes early 2022 is more likely.</p><p>Herbert rates Galaxy shares as buy with a price target of $48. This is up from $35 before the spaceflight in July, when the stock price was close to $50.</p><p>Another reason for the weakness of Virgin Galactic is the announcement of the sale of shares. Virgin Galactic said on July 12 that it would raise up to $500 million through the sale of new shares. More stock dilutes the shares of existing shareholders. There are more sellers than buyers—even if the seller is the company itself—which always causes the stock price to fall.</p><p>Virgin Galactic is still up about 35% year-to-date, better than the S&P 500's 15% gain.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3d3a3c8cb374234f20ed2a295e3781c","relate_stocks":{"SPCE":"维珍银河","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198728322","content_text":"蓝色起源的好消息显然对维珍银河来说是个坏消息。\n\n当地时间7月20日上午，世界首富、美国亚马逊公司创始人杰夫·贝索斯乘坐其公司蓝色起源的运载火箭在美国德克萨斯沙漠上空翱翔约107 公里，并安全返回地球。这次发射为蓝色起源公司首次载人太空飞行，标志着在打造太空旅游业务的竞争中又迈出了一步。\n\n与之相对的是，周二太空旅游公司维珍银河股价出现暴跌，盘中一度跌近9%，收盘时跌幅缩窄至1.14％。此前7月11日，维珍银河创始人、70岁的理查德·布兰森搭乘太空船二号成功从85.9公里高的轨道返回，成为首位登上太空的商业航天企业创始人，比蓝色起源创始人贝佐斯早9天。\n\n这两件事存在怎样的关联？\n简单来说，维珍银河不再是唯一一家成功的太空旅游特许经营公司。在维珍银河成功将创始人德布兰森送入太空九天后，亚马逊前首席执行官杰夫贝索斯的太空公司蓝色起源完成了首次载人飞行。这对周二的维珍银河股票造成压力。\n九天前，维珍银河率先实现美国联邦航空局授权的第一次“全面商业发射”，开启了太空旅游业务。\n\n维珍银河瞄准的是一个巨大的太空旅游市场——仅在美国就有150万千万富翁，600万百万富翁，他们可能想花25万美元购买一张太空票，对他们来说，并非遥不可及，而全世界大概有2000万百万富翁。尽管这个市场很大，但现在它已经被削减了一半，因为维珍银河将不得不分蓝色起源一杯羹。据外媒报道，贝索斯当地时间7月20日成功飞行后的演讲中称，太空旅游市场需求非常高，“蓝色起源已经售出了价值近1亿美元的未来客运机票”。贝索斯还称，蓝色起源今年还将再执行两次载人飞行任务。\n那维珍银河股票大跌是否合理？\n也许不是。即使是剩下1000万客户，除以维珍银河航天飞机每次可搭载的6名乘客，也意味着维珍银河公司未来还有很多潜在的业务，在耗尽消费者需求之前，还有很多航班。\n尽管如此，投资者需要意识到，蓝色起源成功太空飞行之后，还有一只靴子没有落下。在短短的一年或三年内，我们可能看到SpaceX带着它的新型星际飞船进入太空旅游竞赛——一艘能够真正到达、停留在太空中并穿越太空的飞船；一次运送100名游客；以蓝色起源和维珍银河都无法企及的价格完成这一切。这才是维珍银河真正的危机。\n\n但与该股最近的上涨相比，竞争可能不是一个重要因素。\n维珍银河股票最近一直火爆，但上涨的股票最终会下跌。投资者因预期好消息而竞购股票。既然布兰森太空旅行成功的好消息已经过去，股票买家已经暂停，等待下一个重大公告或事件。\n\n另一次飞行试验或可能开始正常商业运行的日期，都可以成为催化剂。华尔街预计维珍银河将在今年年底左右开始进行定期航班。Canaccord分析师肯·赫伯特（Ken Herbert）最近表示，他认为2022年初的可能性更大。\n赫伯特将银河公司股票评级为买入，目标价为48美元。这比7月太空飞行前的35美元有所上升，当时该股的股价接近50美元。\n维珍银河走弱的另一个原因是宣布出售股票。维珍银河7月12日表示，将通过出售新股筹集至多5亿美元。更多的股票稀释了现有股东的股份。卖家比买家多——即使卖方是公司本身——总是导致股价下跌。\n维珍银河今年以来仍上涨约35%，好于标普500指数的15%涨幅。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPCE":0.9,"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":868,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176048541,"gmtCreate":1626849339383,"gmtModify":1703479245512,"author":{"id":"4089951304751690","authorId":"4089951304751690","name":"haruharu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4089951304751690","authorIdStr":"4089951304751690"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176048541","repostId":"1146283458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146283458","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626849210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146283458?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:33","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146283458","media":" 张忆东策略世界","summary":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了","content":"<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds recently fell to the 1.1%-1.2% range. We believe:</b></p><p><b>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</b></p><p>Admittedly, starting last week, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook and boosting the decline in US long-term interest rates, but this is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates.</p><p></li></ul><b>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yield fell sharply, the decline in the 2-year short-term yield was relatively moderate.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves. The increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, due to debt ceiling constraints, the Ministry of Finance's bond issuance pace slowed significantly in July. From July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates.</p><p></li><li>Fourth, the Federal Reserve's bond purchases are not a market activity. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices under the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. As of the latest disclosure on July 14, based on debt ceiling constraints, a balance of up to $207.5 billion remains to be spent.</p><p></li></ul><b>Fourth, the Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but it will not repeat the surge in February and March. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will raise $805 billion in bonds from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current scaled-down bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the US Treasury's bond issuance plan will be concentrated in August and September. Coupled with the increase in market expectations for the Fed's Taper in August and September, there will be pressure for a rebound in US long-term interest rates at that time.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; Risks of great power competition</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</p><p>Are the recent pandemic variables the core variables driving the decline in long-term US Treasury yields? No. Admittedly, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again last week, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook. While this has contributed to the decline in US long-term interest rates, it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in countries such as the UK and Russia rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines. The mortality rate shown by the average number of deaths in 7 days / the average number of newly confirmed cases in 7 days 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which shows that resistance to severe illness has shown the effect of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates. The 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 10 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%. From July 7 to July 19, the 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 11 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell sharply by 29 basis points from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</p><p>Some interpreters believe that the recent decline in US Treasury yields is due to the Treasury Department's TGA spending releasing liquidity and returning it to the US Treasury market. We disagree.</p><p>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but the decline in short-term interest rates is not obvious. If it was caused by the TGA \"flood release,\" then the allocation demand driven by ample liquidity will primarily focus on short-term interest rates. In fact, during the period of sharp decline in long-term interest rates, the decline in 2-year short-term interest rates was relatively moderate. Between July 1 and July 19, the yield on 2-year US Treasury bonds fell by only 4 basis points from 0.25% to 2.21%. Furthermore, from a high-frequency perspective, long-term interest rates often outpace short-term interest rates in their decline.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves, and the increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve. Between 0407 and 0714, the TGA account decreased by $297.4 billion; During the same period, bank reserves actually decreased by $29.9 billion, while we saw a significant increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decrease and increase in the use of TGA accounts and ON RRP indicate that the Treasury Department's liquidity is flowing back to the Federal Reserve, while bank reserves have not increased, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</p><p>Due to debt ceiling constraints, the Treasury Department's pace of bond issuance slowed significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve maintained a monthly bond-buying pace of $120 billion (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), which may be the core reason for lowering long-term US Treasury yields in July. Looking ahead to the remainder of July, the TGA account will still have a surplus, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US long-term interest rates will continue to hover at low levels.</p><p>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, with the increase in U.S. Treasury Bond accounting for 52% of the net issuance that year. Currently, the proportion of foreign ownership of U.S. Treasury Bond has decreased from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. Treasury Bond further increased to 24%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, the net issuance of Treasury Bond by the Ministry of Finance has turned negative since July. As of the latest period from July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates. For example, from April to June this year, the Federal Reserve added $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion, and $96.2 billion to its monthly holdings. Between July 1 and July 4, the Federal Reserve added $39.2 billion to its Treasury Bond holdings.</p><p>Fourth, from a micro-trading perspective, the Fed's bond purchases are not a market behavior. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. According to the U.S. Treasury Department's financing plan disclosed on May 3, the TGA account is expected to be reduced to $450 billion by July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. However, as of the latest disclosure on July 14, the Treasury Department's TGA account still had $657.5 billion, with a balance of $207.5 billion to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>IV. The Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but a repeat of the surge in February and March is unlikely. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</p><p>Given that the Treasury Department will issue bonds intensively in August and September to raise funds, coupled with expectations of Taper at that time, US Treasury yields may face pressure for a temporary rebound in August and September.</p><p>First, according to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current reduced bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the U.S. Treasury Department's subsequent bond issuance plans will be concentrated in August and September, thereby putting pressure on a rebound in U.S. long-term interest rates.</p><p>Secondly, the US CPI in June exceeded expectations, inflation may remain high in July, the economic slowdown will not be significant, and with the decline in the savings rate, the US unemployment rate may improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectations for the Fed's Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. US Treasury yields will remain low and fluctuate. This is an inevitable choice for the US to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the US's reliance on debt-driven economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American Dream\" to \"win economic competition\" against the backdrop of great power rivalry.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk Warning</p><p>Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; The risks of great power competition.</p>","source":"zydcl","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat is the real reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\"> 张忆东策略世界</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 14:33</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Abstract</b></p><p><b>Introduction: The yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds recently fell to the 1.1%-1.2% range. We believe:</b></p><p><b>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</b></p><p>Admittedly, starting last week, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook and boosting the decline in US long-term interest rates, but this is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting since June;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines;</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates.</p><p></li></ul><b>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but during the period when the 10-year US Treasury yield fell sharply, the decline in the 2-year short-term yield was relatively moderate.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves. The increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p></li></ul><b>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</b></p><p><ul><li>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields.</p><p></li><li>Secondly, due to debt ceiling constraints, the Ministry of Finance's bond issuance pace slowed significantly in July. From July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p></li><li>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates.</p><p></li><li>Fourth, the Federal Reserve's bond purchases are not a market activity. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices under the same scale.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. As of the latest disclosure on July 14, based on debt ceiling constraints, a balance of up to $207.5 billion remains to be spent.</p><p></li></ul><b>Fourth, the Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but it will not repeat the surge in February and March. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</b></p><p><ul><li>According to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will raise $805 billion in bonds from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current scaled-down bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the US Treasury's bond issuance plan will be concentrated in August and September. Coupled with the increase in market expectations for the Fed's Taper in August and September, there will be pressure for a rebound in US long-term interest rates at that time.</p><p></li><li>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p></li><li>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt.</p><p></li></ul><b>Risk warning: Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; Risks of great power competition</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p>I. Recent pandemic variables are not the core reason for the sharp decline in US long-term interest rates.</p><p>Are the recent pandemic variables the core variables driving the decline in long-term US Treasury yields? No. Admittedly, the number of new confirmed cases in the United States exceeded 40,000 again last week, exacerbating market concerns about the economic outlook. While this has contributed to the decline in US long-term interest rates, it is not the core reason.</p><p><ul><li>First, the variables of the epidemic caused by the Delta virus variant have been fermenting for a long time. As early as June, the number of newly confirmed cases in countries such as the UK and Russia rose sharply again;</p><p></li><li>Secondly, taking the UK as an example, although the Delta virus variant has led to a rise in the number of newly confirmed cases, it has not changed the downward trend in the COVID-19 fatality rate brought about by vaccines. The mortality rate shown by the average number of deaths in 7 days / the average number of newly confirmed cases in 7 days 2 weeks ago has continued to decline since 2021, which shows that resistance to severe illness has shown the effect of vaccines.</p><p></li><li>Third, since July, while long-term interest rates have fallen sharply, the decline in inflation expectations has been relatively moderate, indicating that economic outlook factors are not the core dominant factor in the decline in long-term interest rates. The 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 10 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%. From July 7 to July 19, the 10-year inflation expectation fell by only 11 basis points from 2.35% to 2.24%, while the nominal yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds fell sharply by 29 basis points from 1.48% to 1.19% during the same period.</p><p></li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/185d62da04d9a7f2268a7b887bb2e661\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69821188ad7f6718dcbd40093826c07a\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"519\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>II. The explanation for the \"flooding\" of TGA accounts into the bond market, which lowered interest rates, is questionable.</p><p>Some interpreters believe that the recent decline in US Treasury yields is due to the Treasury Department's TGA spending releasing liquidity and returning it to the US Treasury market. We disagree.</p><p>First, short-term interest rates are more significantly affected by liquidity, but the decline in short-term interest rates is not obvious. If it was caused by the TGA \"flood release,\" then the allocation demand driven by ample liquidity will primarily focus on short-term interest rates. In fact, during the period of sharp decline in long-term interest rates, the decline in 2-year short-term interest rates was relatively moderate. Between July 1 and July 19, the yield on 2-year US Treasury bonds fell by only 4 basis points from 0.25% to 2.21%. Furthermore, from a high-frequency perspective, long-term interest rates often outpace short-term interest rates in their decline.</p><p>Secondly, after April, the Treasury Department's TGA \"flood release\" did not lead to an increase in bank reserves, and the increase in O/N RRP usage indicates that funds are flowing back to the Federal Reserve. Between 0407 and 0714, the TGA account decreased by $297.4 billion; During the same period, bank reserves actually decreased by $29.9 billion, while we saw a significant increase in O/N RRP usage. Therefore, the decrease and increase in the use of TGA accounts and ON RRP indicate that the Treasury Department's liquidity is flowing back to the Federal Reserve, while bank reserves have not increased, and the transmission to the US Treasury market is not direct.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3e7e28b1bd11250edea7bc5b843510\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Third, due to debt ceiling constraints, the pace of Treasury bond issuance slowed significantly in July. The Federal Reserve may be the main force in lowering long-term US interest rates, and US Treasury yields are expected to remain low for the remainder of July.</p><p>Due to debt ceiling constraints, the Treasury Department's pace of bond issuance slowed significantly in July, while the Federal Reserve maintained a monthly bond-buying pace of $120 billion (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), which may be the core reason for lowering long-term US Treasury yields in July. Looking ahead to the remainder of July, the TGA account will still have a surplus, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US long-term interest rates will continue to hover at low levels.</p><p>First, as we mentioned in \"The Mystery of US Treasury Bonds\" on March 18, 2021, the structure of US Treasury holders has undergone a qualitative change. Practicing MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), the Federal Reserve is the main buyer of newly issued US Treasury bonds, which makes the Treasury Department's bond issuance pace an important variable affecting US Treasury yields. In 2020, the U.S. government issued a net $4.54 trillion in Treasury Bond, with the increase in U.S. Treasury Bond accounting for 52% of the net issuance that year. Currently, the proportion of foreign ownership of U.S. Treasury Bond has decreased from 47% at the end of 2015 to 34% at the end of 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. Treasury Bond further increased to 24%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce12a31c1aa3b901bc1ca327e15376b5\" tg-width=\"883\" tg-height=\"571\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>Secondly, the net issuance of Treasury Bond by the Ministry of Finance has turned negative since July. As of the latest period from July 1st to July 16th, the Treasury's net outflow was -$6.4 billion; From April to June this year, the net monthly issuance of US Treasury Bond was $42 billion, $24 billion, and $330 billion, respectively.</p><p>Third, at the same time, the Federal Reserve continues to purchase Treasury Bond at a rate of approximately $20 billion per month (approximately $80 billion in Treasury Bond + $40 billion in MBS), thus continuously and continuously buying bonds to lower long-term interest rates. For example, from April to June this year, the Federal Reserve added $72.5 billion, $72.4 billion, and $96.2 billion to its monthly holdings. Between July 1 and July 4, the Federal Reserve added $39.2 billion to its Treasury Bond holdings.</p><p>Fourth, from a micro-trading perspective, the Fed's bond purchases are not a market behavior. Therefore, compared to allocation institutions, its purchase of US Treasury bonds regardless of cost has a more significant impact on US Treasury bond prices on the same scale.</p><p>Finally, it is expected that there will still be a surplus in the TGA account for the rest of July, the Treasury's demand for bond issuance will remain weak, and US Treasury yields will remain low. According to the U.S. Treasury Department's financing plan disclosed on May 3, the TGA account is expected to be reduced to $450 billion by July 31, the debt ceiling maturity date. However, as of the latest disclosure on July 14, the Treasury Department's TGA account still had $657.5 billion, with a balance of $207.5 billion to be spent.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a6a2990771c8a9070cdabcbeca18f47\" tg-width=\"876\" tg-height=\"506\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>IV. The Treasury's intensive bond issuance in August and September may put rebound pressure on US long-term interest rates, but a repeat of the surge in February and March is unlikely. Low US interest rates will be the norm in the medium to long term.</p><p>Given that the Treasury Department will issue bonds intensively in August and September to raise funds, coupled with expectations of Taper at that time, US Treasury yields may face pressure for a temporary rebound in August and September.</p><p>First, according to the third-quarter financing plan, the U.S. Treasury Department will issue bonds to raise $805 billion from July to September, double the amount in the second quarter. Furthermore, the current reduced bipartisan infrastructure agreement may increase the Treasury's actual financing needs. Based on this, it is estimated that the U.S. Treasury Department's subsequent bond issuance plans will be concentrated in August and September, thereby putting pressure on a rebound in U.S. long-term interest rates.</p><p>Secondly, the US CPI in June exceeded expectations, inflation may remain high in July, the economic slowdown will not be significant, and with the decline in the savings rate, the US unemployment rate may improve slightly. Therefore, the bond market's expectations for the Fed's Taper will also increase in August and September.</p><p>However, considering that the peak of this round of US economic growth and inflationary momentum is likely to occur in the second quarter, low US interest rates will remain low in the medium to long term, and the second half of the year will not see a repeat of the surge in February and March.</p><p>Finally, it should be emphasized once again that in the context of the great power rivalry between the United States, maintaining low interest rates and stimulating economic growth in the medium to long term will be the only way for the United States to get out of the quagmire of high debt. US Treasury yields will remain low and fluctuate. This is an inevitable choice for the US to practice MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), an inevitable result of the US's reliance on debt-driven economic stimulus, and a prerequisite for fabricating a new \"American Dream\" to \"win economic competition\" against the backdrop of great power rivalry.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5c84bd8f5c84ba1756f2447f601fbab\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p>V. Risk Warning</p><p>Global economic growth slows down; Monetary policy easing in China and the US fell short of expectations; The risks of great power competition.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA\"> 张忆东策略世界</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8fca69a364eb1ccaf6e9078f1721480","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XoB95_kyeOt28iAV8ER8wA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146283458","content_text":"摘要\n引言：近期10年期美债收益率一度下探至1.1%-1.2%区间，我们认为：\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n诚然，上周开始，美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，对美长端利率下行形成助推，但其并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数自6月便已开始发酵；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势；\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是在10年期美债利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和；\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。\n其次，基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债节奏明显放缓。0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。\n第四，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位；截至最新披露7月14日，基于债务上限约束，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态。\n\n根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，叠加8-9月市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升，从而届时美国长端利率存在反弹的压力。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。\n\n风险提示：全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险\n正文\n一、近期疫情变数并非美长端利率大幅下行的核心原因\n近期疫情变数是美债长端收益率下行的核心变量吗？不是。诚然，上周开始美国出现单日新增确诊病例数再次超过4万例的情况，加重了市场对经济前景的担忧，其对美长端利率下行有助推，但并非核心原因。\n\n首先，Delta病毒变种所引发的疫情变数发酵已久。早在6月份，英国、俄罗斯等国的新增确诊病例数便再度大幅走高；\n其次，以英国为例，虽然Delta病毒变种导致了新增确诊病例数走高，但是其未改变疫苗带来的新冠致死率下降的趋势。7日死亡病例数均值/2周前的7日新增确诊病例数均值所显示的死亡率自从2021年以来持续下降，这说明了对重症的抵御显示了疫苗的作用。\n第三，7月以来，长端利率大幅下行的同时，通胀预期下行相对较为温和，这显示出经济前景因素并非长端利率下行的核心主导因素。10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降10bp至2.24%，从0707-0719期间，10年期通胀预期仅从2.35%仅下降11bp至2.24%，而同时期10年期美债名义利率从1.48%大幅下降29bp至1.19%。\n\n\n\n二、TGA账户“泄洪”流入债市拉低利率的解释存疑\n有解读认为，近期美债收益率下行是财政部TGA支出释放流动性，回流美债市场导致。我们持不同意见。\n首先，短端利率受流动性影响更为显著，但是短端利率下行并不明显。如果是TGA“泄洪”导致的，那么因为流动性充裕所驱动的配置需求首先聚焦短端利率。事实上，在长端利率大幅下行的时间段，2年期短端利率下行的幅度比较温和，在0701-0719期间，2年期美债收益从0.25%仅下行4bp至2.21%。并且，如果从高频视角下，长端利率很多情况下是领先短端利率下行的。\n其次， 4月以后，财政部TGA“泄洪”并未带动银行储备金增加，O/N RRP用量走高显示资金回流美联储。在0407-0714期间，TGA账户下降了2974亿美元；同时期，银行储备金反而减少了299亿美元，同时期，我们看到O/N RRP用量的大幅走高。因此TGA账户和ON RRP用量的一降一升，显示的是财政部流动性回流美联储，银行准备金并未增加，对美债市场的传导并不直接。\n\n三、由于债务上限约束，7月财政部发债节奏明显放缓，联储或是压低美长端利率的主要力量，预计7月剩下的时间美债收益率继续维持低位\n基于债务上限约束，财政部7月的发债步伐明显放缓，而联储依旧维持每个月1200亿规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS）的购债节奏，或是压低7月份美债长端利率的核心原因。展望7月剩下的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部发债需求将继续低迷，美长端利率将继续维持低位徘徊。\n首先，正如我们在20210318《美债之谜》里提到的，美债的持有者结构发生了质变。践行MMT（现代货币理论），美联储为新增美债的主要购买方，这使得财政部的发债节奏成为影响美债收益率的重要变量。2020年美国政府净发行了4.54万亿美元的国债，美国国债增量占当年净发行量的52%。当下，外资持有美国国债的比重由2015年底的47%下降至2020年底的34%。截至2021年6月30日，联储持有占美国国债规模占比进一步升高至24%。\n\n其次，7月至今财政部国债净发行额转负。截至最新从0701至0716期间财政部净发型额为-64亿美元；而今年4-6月，美国国债月度净发行分别为420亿美元，240亿美元，3300亿美元。\n第三，与此同时，联储依旧按照每个月1200亿美元购债规模（约800亿美元国债+400亿美元MBS），分摊到每个星期约200亿美元购买国债的步伐，不间断、持续地买债压低长端利率。比如今年4-6月联储对应当月新增持有为725亿美元，724亿美元，962亿美元。在0701至0704期间，联储新增持有国债规模为392亿美元。\n第四，从微观交易角度，联储购债并非市场行为，因此相比于配置机构而言，其不计成本地购入美债，在同等规模下，对于美债价格影响也更显著。\n最后，预计7月接下来的时间，TGA账户“余粮”依旧过剩，财政部的发债需求将继续维持低迷，美债收益率继续维持低位。根据5月3日披露美国财政部融资计划，预计在债务上限到期日7月31日将TGA账户下降至4500亿美元。但是截至最新披露7月14日，财政部TGA账户还有6575亿美元，高达2075亿美元的余额有待支出。\n\n四、8-9月财政部密集发债或给美长端利率带来反弹压力，但不会重演2、3月式飙升，中长期美国低利率将是常态\n基于财政部将会在8-9月密集发债融资，以及叠加届时的Taper预期，美债收益率在8-9月或存在阶段性反弹的压力。\n首先，根据3季度融资计划，美国财政部将在7月至9月发债融资8050亿美元，是2季度的两倍，并且当下两党缩减版的基建协议达成，还可能增加财政部实际融资需求。据此推算，后续美国财政部的发债计划将会集中在8月和9月，从而带来美国长端利率反弹的压力。\n其次，6月份美国CPI超预期，7月份通胀或仍会高位徘徊，经济回落不明显，且随着储蓄率回落，美国失业率或有望小幅改善，所以，8、9月份债券市场对于联储Taper的预期也会有所提升。\n但是考虑到这一轮美国经济增长和通胀动能的峰值很可能在二季度，所以，中长期美国低利率将保持，下半年不会重演2、3月式飙升。\n最后，再次强调美国大国博弈背景下，中长期保持低利率、刺激经济增长将是美国走出高债务泥潭的必由之路。美债收益率将维持低位震荡，这是美国实践MMT（现代货币理论）的必然选择，是美国依赖债务扩张型经济刺激之路的必然结果，是大国博弈背景下编造“赢得经济竞争”的新“美国梦”的前提条件。\n\n五、风险提示\n全球经济增速下行；中、美货币政策宽松不达预期；大国博弈风险。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1272,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
