HamChop personal page - To The Moon

HamChop

HamChop

No personal profile

75Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-09-13

Fly

Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited

2021-09-10

Wow

XPeng Motors will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15

2021-08-27

Thanks

Marvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat

2021-08-27

Oh no ?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-27

Ok

These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months

2021-08-27

Thanks1

These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months

2021-08-27

Wow

Shares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High

2021-08-26

Like pls

If You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now

2021-08-26

Like

S&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4091111175155330","uuid":"4091111175155330","gmtCreate":1628008723087,"gmtModify":1628163225583,"name":"HamChop","pinyin":"hamchop","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":75,"tweetSize":9,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":888529142,"gmtCreate":1631509326986,"gmtModify":1676530561558,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fly","listText":"Fly","text":"Fly","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888529142","repostId":"1147045390","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147045390","pubTimestamp":1631321547,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147045390?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-11 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147045390","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple  to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30%","content":"<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.</p>\n<p>In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.</p>\n<p>Data from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.</p>\n<p>SensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.</p>\n<p>Gene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.</p>\n<p>Munster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.</p>\n<p>“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.</p>\n<p>Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told&nbsp;<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.</p>\n<p>The ruling is more a positive for companies like&nbsp;Spotify Technology&nbsp;and&nbsp;Match Group&nbsp;than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97&nbsp;on&nbsp;Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and&nbsp;4.2%, respectively.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Apple’s Risk Is Limited\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-11 08:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147045390","content_text":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.\nIn a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.\nData from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.\nSensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.\nGene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.\nMunster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.\n“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.\nWedbush analyst Dan Ives told Barron’s he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.\nThe ruling is more a positive for companies like Spotify Technology and Match Group than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97 on Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and 4.2%, respectively.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":199,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":883563853,"gmtCreate":1631255947572,"gmtModify":1676530510529,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/883563853","repostId":"1135243175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1135243175","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1631255277,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1135243175?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-10 14:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng Motors will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1135243175","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"XPeng Motors today announced that it will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15.","content":"<p>XPeng Motors&nbsp;today announced&nbsp;that&nbsp;it&nbsp;will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafab1adb0784cdec7422b798dd7c381\" tg-width=\"690\" tg-height=\"1494\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng Motors will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng Motors will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-10 14:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>XPeng Motors&nbsp;today announced&nbsp;that&nbsp;it&nbsp;will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafab1adb0784cdec7422b798dd7c381\" tg-width=\"690\" tg-height=\"1494\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车","09868":"小鹏汽车-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1135243175","content_text":"XPeng Motors today announced that it will hold XPeng P5 super press conference on September 15.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819999707,"gmtCreate":1630025679809,"gmtModify":1676530202689,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819999707","repostId":"2162016937","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162016937","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1630022580,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162016937?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Marvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162016937","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip ma","content":"<p>Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.</p>\n<p>Marvell <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVL\">$(MRVL)$</a> shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.</p>\n<p>Marvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.</p>\n<p>Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.</p>\n<p>\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPHI\">Inphi</a> businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"</p>\n<p>Marvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.</p>\n<p>Over the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Marvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMarvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-27 08:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.</p>\n<p>Marvell <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVL\">$(MRVL)$</a> shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.</p>\n<p>Marvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.</p>\n<p>Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.</p>\n<p>\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPHI\">Inphi</a> businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"</p>\n<p>Marvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.</p>\n<p>Over the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRVL":"迈威尔科技"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162016937","content_text":"Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.\nMarvell $(MRVL)$ shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.\nMarvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.\nMeanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.\nAdjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.\nRevenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.\n\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired Inphi businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"\nMarvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.\nOver the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":262,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819999660,"gmtCreate":1630025660451,"gmtModify":1676530202681,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no ?","listText":"Oh no ?","text":"Oh no ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819999660","repostId":"2162847016","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810797702,"gmtCreate":1630011567406,"gmtModify":1676530197882,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810797702","repostId":"2162018921","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162018921","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1629993272,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162018921?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 23:54","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162018921","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at a","content":"<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-26 23:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","VRTX":"福泰制药","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","ATVI":"动视暴雪","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","NEM":"纽曼矿业",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","MU":"美光科技","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162018921","content_text":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.\nFirst, consider how well the S&P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.\nIf we even out the numbers, the S&P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.\nStocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors\nThrough Aug. 25, 58 of the S&P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nShare \"buy\" ratings\nClosing price -- Aug. 25\nConsensus price target\nImplied 12-month upside potential\nForward P/E\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc. MU\n-2%\n85%\n$74.04\n$117.79\n59%\n7.0\n\n\nLas Vegas Sands Corp. LVS\n-27%\n63%\n$43.24\n$64.38\n49%\n44.7\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc. ATVI\n-13%\n91%\n$80.81\n$116.04\n44%\n21.1\n\n\nGlobal Payments Inc. GPN\n-23%\n81%\n$165.25\n$228.69\n38%\n18.6\n\n\nIncyte Corp. INCY\n-13%\n60%\n$75.76\n$102.47\n35%\n32.2\n\n\nNOV Inc. NOV\n-3%\n59%\n$13.26\n$17.58\n33%\nN/A\n\n\n$Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO\n-23%\n70%\n$160.66\n$212.87\n32%\n34.2\n\n\nFMC Corp. FMC\n-18%\n75%\n$92.90\n$122.89\n32%\n12.8\n\n\nVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. VRTX\n-15%\n78%\n$201.33\n$262.14\n30%\n16.2\n\n\nNewmont Corp. NEM\n-3%\n71%\n$56.91\n$73.57\n29%\n16.3\n\n\nLamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW\n-15%\n78%\n$66.09\n$85.43\n29%\n26.5\n\n\nQualcomm Inc. QCOM\n-5%\n64%\n$143.87\n$184.15\n28%\n15.9\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc. FIS\n-8%\n69%\n$130.01\n$165.93\n28%\n18.3\n\n\nPenn National Gaming Inc. PENN\n-7%\n67%\n$79.92\n$101.50\n27%\n26.3\n\n\nBaxter International Inc. BAX\n-7%\n53%\n$73.80\n$92.56\n25%\n19.5\n\n\nV.F. Corp. VFC\n-9%\n68%\n$77.06\n$96.59\n25%\n23.1\n\n\nZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. ZBH\n-2%\n79%\n$150.39\n$187.58\n25%\n18.1\n\n\nConstellation Brands Inc. Class A STZ\n-1%\n71%\n$214.98\n$265.86\n24%\n20.6\n\n\nWynn Resorts Ltd. WYNN\n-11%\n54%\n$100.84\n$123.45\n22%\nN/A\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc. EA\n-1%\n72%\n$141.86\n$172.75\n22%\n20.4\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYou can click on the tickers for more about each company.\nThe list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.\nMarket-cap weighting is less important this year\nThe S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.\nThe SPDR S&P 500 ETF $(SPY.AU)$ tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nTotal return -- 2020\nTotal return -- 2019\nTotal return -- 3 Years\nTotal return -- 5 Years\n% of SPY portfolio\n\n\nApple Inc. AAPL\n12.3%\n82%\n89%\n183.4%\n488.3%\n6.2%\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp MSFT.\n36.7%\n43%\n58%\n188.9%\n461.1%\n6.0%\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc. AMZN\n1.3%\n76%\n23%\n73.1%\n334.5%\n3.7%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\n34.9%\n33%\n57%\n110.9%\n197.4%\n2.3%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL\n62.1%\n31%\n28%\n129.8%\n259.1%\n2.2%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class C GOOG\n63.2%\n31%\n29%\n134.2%\n271.6%\n2.1%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$ and especially Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$ have underperformed the index this year.\nThis brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF $(RSP)$ has outperformed SPY and the S&P 500:\nThe weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.\nThe equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:\n\n\n\nFund or index\nAverage return -- 3 years\nAverage return -- 5 years\nAverage return -- 10 years\nAverage return -- 15 years\nAverage return -- 17 years\n\n\nInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP\n15.7%\n15.2%\n15.7%\n10.8%\n11.0%\n\n\nSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY\n18.1%\n17.8%\n16.7%\n10.8%\n10.7%\n\n\nS&P 500 SPX\n18.2%\n17.9%\n16.9%\n10.9%\n10.8%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":383,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810457045,"gmtCreate":1629995992987,"gmtModify":1676530196921,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks1","listText":"Thanks1","text":"Thanks1","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810457045","repostId":"2162018921","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162018921","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1629993272,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162018921?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 23:54","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162018921","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at a","content":"<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-26 23:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","VRTX":"福泰制药","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","ATVI":"动视暴雪","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","NEM":"纽曼矿业",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","MU":"美光科技","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162018921","content_text":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.\nFirst, consider how well the S&P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.\nIf we even out the numbers, the S&P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.\nStocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors\nThrough Aug. 25, 58 of the S&P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nShare \"buy\" ratings\nClosing price -- Aug. 25\nConsensus price target\nImplied 12-month upside potential\nForward P/E\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc. MU\n-2%\n85%\n$74.04\n$117.79\n59%\n7.0\n\n\nLas Vegas Sands Corp. LVS\n-27%\n63%\n$43.24\n$64.38\n49%\n44.7\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc. ATVI\n-13%\n91%\n$80.81\n$116.04\n44%\n21.1\n\n\nGlobal Payments Inc. GPN\n-23%\n81%\n$165.25\n$228.69\n38%\n18.6\n\n\nIncyte Corp. INCY\n-13%\n60%\n$75.76\n$102.47\n35%\n32.2\n\n\nNOV Inc. NOV\n-3%\n59%\n$13.26\n$17.58\n33%\nN/A\n\n\n$Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO\n-23%\n70%\n$160.66\n$212.87\n32%\n34.2\n\n\nFMC Corp. FMC\n-18%\n75%\n$92.90\n$122.89\n32%\n12.8\n\n\nVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. VRTX\n-15%\n78%\n$201.33\n$262.14\n30%\n16.2\n\n\nNewmont Corp. NEM\n-3%\n71%\n$56.91\n$73.57\n29%\n16.3\n\n\nLamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW\n-15%\n78%\n$66.09\n$85.43\n29%\n26.5\n\n\nQualcomm Inc. QCOM\n-5%\n64%\n$143.87\n$184.15\n28%\n15.9\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc. FIS\n-8%\n69%\n$130.01\n$165.93\n28%\n18.3\n\n\nPenn National Gaming Inc. PENN\n-7%\n67%\n$79.92\n$101.50\n27%\n26.3\n\n\nBaxter International Inc. BAX\n-7%\n53%\n$73.80\n$92.56\n25%\n19.5\n\n\nV.F. Corp. VFC\n-9%\n68%\n$77.06\n$96.59\n25%\n23.1\n\n\nZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. ZBH\n-2%\n79%\n$150.39\n$187.58\n25%\n18.1\n\n\nConstellation Brands Inc. Class A STZ\n-1%\n71%\n$214.98\n$265.86\n24%\n20.6\n\n\nWynn Resorts Ltd. WYNN\n-11%\n54%\n$100.84\n$123.45\n22%\nN/A\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc. EA\n-1%\n72%\n$141.86\n$172.75\n22%\n20.4\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYou can click on the tickers for more about each company.\nThe list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.\nMarket-cap weighting is less important this year\nThe S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.\nThe SPDR S&P 500 ETF $(SPY.AU)$ tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nTotal return -- 2020\nTotal return -- 2019\nTotal return -- 3 Years\nTotal return -- 5 Years\n% of SPY portfolio\n\n\nApple Inc. AAPL\n12.3%\n82%\n89%\n183.4%\n488.3%\n6.2%\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp MSFT.\n36.7%\n43%\n58%\n188.9%\n461.1%\n6.0%\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc. AMZN\n1.3%\n76%\n23%\n73.1%\n334.5%\n3.7%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\n34.9%\n33%\n57%\n110.9%\n197.4%\n2.3%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL\n62.1%\n31%\n28%\n129.8%\n259.1%\n2.2%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class C GOOG\n63.2%\n31%\n29%\n134.2%\n271.6%\n2.1%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$ and especially Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$ have underperformed the index this year.\nThis brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF $(RSP)$ has outperformed SPY and the S&P 500:\nThe weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.\nThe equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:\n\n\n\nFund or index\nAverage return -- 3 years\nAverage return -- 5 years\nAverage return -- 10 years\nAverage return -- 15 years\nAverage return -- 17 years\n\n\nInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP\n15.7%\n15.2%\n15.7%\n10.8%\n11.0%\n\n\nSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY\n18.1%\n17.8%\n16.7%\n10.8%\n10.7%\n\n\nS&P 500 SPX\n18.2%\n17.9%\n16.9%\n10.9%\n10.8%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810454576,"gmtCreate":1629995970695,"gmtModify":1676530196921,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810454576","repostId":"2162701820","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162701820","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629994691,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162701820?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 00:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162701820","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Shares of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65.","content":"<p>Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.</p>\n<p><b>Morgan Stanley</b> (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.</p>\n<p>In the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-27 00:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.</p>\n<p><b>Morgan Stanley</b> (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.</p>\n<p>In the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162701820","content_text":"Shares of Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.\nMorgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.\nMorgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.\nIn the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":289,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810024018,"gmtCreate":1629935980435,"gmtModify":1676530175238,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810024018","repostId":"2162051601","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162051601","pubTimestamp":1629899747,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162051601?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-25 21:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162051601","media":"Zacks","summary":"For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact ","content":"<p>For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and industries.</p>\n<p>Another thing that can drive investing is the fear of missing out, or FOMO. This particularly applies to tech giants and popular consumer-facing stocks.</p>\n<p>What if you'd invested in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> (TSLA) ten years ago? It may not have been easy to hold on to TSLA for all that time, but if you did, how much would your investment be worth today?</p>\n<p><b>Tesla's Business In-Depth</b></p>\n<p>With that in mind, let's take a look at Tesla's main business drivers.</p>\n<p>Over the years, EV maker Tesla has evolved into a dynamic technology innovator. It has transformed the EV market much the same way as Amazon changed the retail landscape and Netflix revolutionized entertainment. Tesla is the market leader in battery-powered electric car sales in the United States, owning around 60% of market share. In fact, the company’s flagship Model 3 accounts for about half of the U.S. EV market. Tesla, which has managed to garner the reputation of a gold standard over the years, is now a far bigger entity that what it started off since its IPO in 2010, with a market capitalization almost double the combined value of top two U.S. auto giants General Motors and Ford.</p>\n<p>Over the years, Tesla has shifted from developing niche products for affluent buyers to making more affordable EVs for the masses. The firm’s three-pronged business model approach of direct sales, servicing, and charging its EVs sets it apart from other carmakers. Tesla, which is touted as the clean energy revolutionary automaker, is much more than just a car manufacturer. The firm also makes different kinds of technology like self driving software, charging stations and battery development, et al. The technology titan has also made inroads into solar and energy storage business.</p>\n<p>Tesla operates under two segments: Automotive and Energy Generation &amp; Storage. While Automotive and Energy Generation/Storage operations accounted for 86.4% and 6.3% of the total sales in 2020, respectively, revenues from Services and Others constituted the rest.</p>\n<p>Presently, the company produces and sells three fully electric vehicles: The Model S sedan, the Model X sport utility vehicle (“SUV”) and the Model 3 sedan. Tesla’s equally impressive future product lineup includes Cybertruck, Semi truck and Roadster. The firm manufactures its vehicles primarily at facilities located in Fremont, California, Lathrop, California, Tilburg, Netherlands. Tesla’s first, second and third Gigafactory are located in Nevada, New York and Shanghai, respectively. While production in these three factories are going on a full swing, production from Tesla's 4th and 5th&nbsp; Gigafactory in Berlin and Austin, respectively, is expected to begin this year.</p>\n<p><b>Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>Anyone can invest, but building a successful investment portfolio requires research, patience, and a little bit of risk. So, if you had invested in Tesla ten years ago, you're likely feeling pretty good about your investment today.</p>\n<p>According to our calculations, a $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $148,405.95, or a 14,740.59% gain, as of August 25, 2021. Investors should keep in mind that this return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 rose 280.96% and the price of gold increased -2.15% over the same time frame in comparison.</p>\n<p>Analysts are anticipating more upside for TSLA.</p>\n<p>Tesla hit a milestone in second-quarter 2021, with quarterly profits topping $1 billion for the first time. Riding on robust Model 3/Y demand, the electric vehicle (EV) behemoth achieved record production and deliveries despite chip crunch. Construction of Berlin and Texas gigafactories are well on track, with production expected to commence this year. While Tesla’s high range vehicles, superior technology and software edge bode well, it is far from immune to the global microchip deficit, which is likely to weigh on the firm’s near-term prospects. Massive capex owing to capacity investments in gigafactories and the development of battery tech might strain near-term financials. Waning margins for Model S/X, and delays in Semi and Cybertruck launch act as spoilsports. Thus, investors are recommended to wait for a better entry point.</p>\n<p>Shares have gained 9.88% over the past four weeks and there have been 9 higher earnings estimate revisions for fiscal 2021 compared to none lower. The consensus estimate has moved up as well.</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-25 21:55 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html><strong>Zacks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2162051601","content_text":"For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and industries.\nAnother thing that can drive investing is the fear of missing out, or FOMO. This particularly applies to tech giants and popular consumer-facing stocks.\nWhat if you'd invested in Tesla Motors (TSLA) ten years ago? It may not have been easy to hold on to TSLA for all that time, but if you did, how much would your investment be worth today?\nTesla's Business In-Depth\nWith that in mind, let's take a look at Tesla's main business drivers.\nOver the years, EV maker Tesla has evolved into a dynamic technology innovator. It has transformed the EV market much the same way as Amazon changed the retail landscape and Netflix revolutionized entertainment. Tesla is the market leader in battery-powered electric car sales in the United States, owning around 60% of market share. In fact, the company’s flagship Model 3 accounts for about half of the U.S. EV market. Tesla, which has managed to garner the reputation of a gold standard over the years, is now a far bigger entity that what it started off since its IPO in 2010, with a market capitalization almost double the combined value of top two U.S. auto giants General Motors and Ford.\nOver the years, Tesla has shifted from developing niche products for affluent buyers to making more affordable EVs for the masses. The firm’s three-pronged business model approach of direct sales, servicing, and charging its EVs sets it apart from other carmakers. Tesla, which is touted as the clean energy revolutionary automaker, is much more than just a car manufacturer. The firm also makes different kinds of technology like self driving software, charging stations and battery development, et al. The technology titan has also made inroads into solar and energy storage business.\nTesla operates under two segments: Automotive and Energy Generation & Storage. While Automotive and Energy Generation/Storage operations accounted for 86.4% and 6.3% of the total sales in 2020, respectively, revenues from Services and Others constituted the rest.\nPresently, the company produces and sells three fully electric vehicles: The Model S sedan, the Model X sport utility vehicle (“SUV”) and the Model 3 sedan. Tesla’s equally impressive future product lineup includes Cybertruck, Semi truck and Roadster. The firm manufactures its vehicles primarily at facilities located in Fremont, California, Lathrop, California, Tilburg, Netherlands. Tesla’s first, second and third Gigafactory are located in Nevada, New York and Shanghai, respectively. While production in these three factories are going on a full swing, production from Tesla's 4th and 5th  Gigafactory in Berlin and Austin, respectively, is expected to begin this year.\nBottom Line\nAnyone can invest, but building a successful investment portfolio requires research, patience, and a little bit of risk. So, if you had invested in Tesla ten years ago, you're likely feeling pretty good about your investment today.\nAccording to our calculations, a $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $148,405.95, or a 14,740.59% gain, as of August 25, 2021. Investors should keep in mind that this return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.\nThe S&P 500 rose 280.96% and the price of gold increased -2.15% over the same time frame in comparison.\nAnalysts are anticipating more upside for TSLA.\nTesla hit a milestone in second-quarter 2021, with quarterly profits topping $1 billion for the first time. Riding on robust Model 3/Y demand, the electric vehicle (EV) behemoth achieved record production and deliveries despite chip crunch. Construction of Berlin and Texas gigafactories are well on track, with production expected to commence this year. While Tesla’s high range vehicles, superior technology and software edge bode well, it is far from immune to the global microchip deficit, which is likely to weigh on the firm’s near-term prospects. Massive capex owing to capacity investments in gigafactories and the development of battery tech might strain near-term financials. Waning margins for Model S/X, and delays in Semi and Cybertruck launch act as spoilsports. Thus, investors are recommended to wait for a better entry point.\nShares have gained 9.88% over the past four weeks and there have been 9 higher earnings estimate revisions for fiscal 2021 compared to none lower. The consensus estimate has moved up as well.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810025893,"gmtCreate":1629935933312,"gmtModify":1676530175223,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810025893","repostId":"1197778368","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197778368","pubTimestamp":1629932731,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197778368?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 07:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197778368","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials he","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming Jackson Hole Symposium for assurances that Federal Reserve’s timeline for policy tightening remains intact.</p>\n<p>With few negative catalysts to sour the risk-on sentiment, all three major U.S. indexes ended the session modestly higher.</p>\n<p>“Positive news on vaccination approvals, and expectations that the Fed won’t shock markets at Jackson Hole, are helping to keep equity prices higher,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, who added “it’s a very quiet market as many investors are sitting on the beach this week.”</p>\n<p>Rising U.S. Treasury yields boosted rate sensitive financials, and sectors that stand to gain most from economic revival - smallcaps, chips and transports - were outperforming the broader market.</p>\n<p>Days after the Food and Drug Administration gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, companies and institutions are moving toward either mandated inoculation, or penalization for those who forego the shot.</p>\n<p>The Pentagon and Delta Air Lines are the latest to enact such measures, with Ford Motor Co and others potentially following suit.</p>\n<p>For an interactive graphic on global vaccine deployment and new infection rates, click here.</p>\n<p>The session marked the S&amp;P 500’s 51st record high close so far this year.</p>\n<p>Analysts polled by Reuters, however, see the stock market staying rangebound for the remainder of 2021, with the S&amp;P 500 ending the year little changed as the pandemic recovery, along with corporate earnings growth, lose steam.</p>\n<p>“Following a long run, equity indexes have cooled off as the next engine of growth is unclear,” Carter at Lenox Wealth Advisors added. “Fiscal and monetary stimulus may have lost their oomph to push markets higher still.”</p>\n<p>Tame economic data, including flat new orders for core capital goods, reinforced the notion that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to hint at a shortened timeline for policy tightening at the virtual Jackson Hole Symposium, due to get underway on Friday.</p>\n<p>“(The) expectation is that Fed won’t scare markets, and will announce only a cautious tapering,” Carter said.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39.24 points, or 0.11%, to 35,405.5, the S&amp;P 500 gained 9.96 points, or 0.22%, to 4,496.19 and the Nasdaq Composite added 22.06 points, or 0.15%, to 15,041.86.</p>\n<p>Financials were the clear winners among 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, gaining more than 1%. Healthcare stocks suffered the largest percentage decline.</p>\n<p>Chipmakers Nvidia Corp and Applied Materials rose 1.9% and 1.2%, respectively, and along with mega-cap growth stocks Alphabet Inc, Tesla Inc and Facebook Inc, provided the biggest boost to the Nasdaq.</p>\n<p>Nordstrom Inc tumbled 17.6% after the department store operator posted a 6% decline in quarterly revenue from pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p>Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc announced a special dividend and raised its annual sales and profit forecast, sending its shares surging 13.3%.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.49-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.31-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 63 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 125 new highs and 33 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.29 billion shares, compared with the 9.00 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-26 07:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","JWN":"诺德斯特龙",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NVDA":"英伟达",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197778368","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming Jackson Hole Symposium for assurances that Federal Reserve’s timeline for policy tightening remains intact.\nWith few negative catalysts to sour the risk-on sentiment, all three major U.S. indexes ended the session modestly higher.\n“Positive news on vaccination approvals, and expectations that the Fed won’t shock markets at Jackson Hole, are helping to keep equity prices higher,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, who added “it’s a very quiet market as many investors are sitting on the beach this week.”\nRising U.S. Treasury yields boosted rate sensitive financials, and sectors that stand to gain most from economic revival - smallcaps, chips and transports - were outperforming the broader market.\nDays after the Food and Drug Administration gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, companies and institutions are moving toward either mandated inoculation, or penalization for those who forego the shot.\nThe Pentagon and Delta Air Lines are the latest to enact such measures, with Ford Motor Co and others potentially following suit.\nFor an interactive graphic on global vaccine deployment and new infection rates, click here.\nThe session marked the S&P 500’s 51st record high close so far this year.\nAnalysts polled by Reuters, however, see the stock market staying rangebound for the remainder of 2021, with the S&P 500 ending the year little changed as the pandemic recovery, along with corporate earnings growth, lose steam.\n“Following a long run, equity indexes have cooled off as the next engine of growth is unclear,” Carter at Lenox Wealth Advisors added. “Fiscal and monetary stimulus may have lost their oomph to push markets higher still.”\nTame economic data, including flat new orders for core capital goods, reinforced the notion that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to hint at a shortened timeline for policy tightening at the virtual Jackson Hole Symposium, due to get underway on Friday.\n“(The) expectation is that Fed won’t scare markets, and will announce only a cautious tapering,” Carter said.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39.24 points, or 0.11%, to 35,405.5, the S&P 500 gained 9.96 points, or 0.22%, to 4,496.19 and the Nasdaq Composite added 22.06 points, or 0.15%, to 15,041.86.\nFinancials were the clear winners among 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, gaining more than 1%. Healthcare stocks suffered the largest percentage decline.\nChipmakers Nvidia Corp and Applied Materials rose 1.9% and 1.2%, respectively, and along with mega-cap growth stocks Alphabet Inc, Tesla Inc and Facebook Inc, provided the biggest boost to the Nasdaq.\nNordstrom Inc tumbled 17.6% after the department store operator posted a 6% decline in quarterly revenue from pre-pandemic levels.\nDick’s Sporting Goods Inc announced a special dividend and raised its annual sales and profit forecast, sending its shares surging 13.3%.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.49-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.31-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 63 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 125 new highs and 33 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.29 billion shares, compared with the 9.00 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":468,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":810025893,"gmtCreate":1629935933312,"gmtModify":1676530175223,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810025893","repostId":"1197778368","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197778368","pubTimestamp":1629932731,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197778368?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 07:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197778368","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials he","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming Jackson Hole Symposium for assurances that Federal Reserve’s timeline for policy tightening remains intact.</p>\n<p>With few negative catalysts to sour the risk-on sentiment, all three major U.S. indexes ended the session modestly higher.</p>\n<p>“Positive news on vaccination approvals, and expectations that the Fed won’t shock markets at Jackson Hole, are helping to keep equity prices higher,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, who added “it’s a very quiet market as many investors are sitting on the beach this week.”</p>\n<p>Rising U.S. Treasury yields boosted rate sensitive financials, and sectors that stand to gain most from economic revival - smallcaps, chips and transports - were outperforming the broader market.</p>\n<p>Days after the Food and Drug Administration gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, companies and institutions are moving toward either mandated inoculation, or penalization for those who forego the shot.</p>\n<p>The Pentagon and Delta Air Lines are the latest to enact such measures, with Ford Motor Co and others potentially following suit.</p>\n<p>For an interactive graphic on global vaccine deployment and new infection rates, click here.</p>\n<p>The session marked the S&amp;P 500’s 51st record high close so far this year.</p>\n<p>Analysts polled by Reuters, however, see the stock market staying rangebound for the remainder of 2021, with the S&amp;P 500 ending the year little changed as the pandemic recovery, along with corporate earnings growth, lose steam.</p>\n<p>“Following a long run, equity indexes have cooled off as the next engine of growth is unclear,” Carter at Lenox Wealth Advisors added. “Fiscal and monetary stimulus may have lost their oomph to push markets higher still.”</p>\n<p>Tame economic data, including flat new orders for core capital goods, reinforced the notion that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to hint at a shortened timeline for policy tightening at the virtual Jackson Hole Symposium, due to get underway on Friday.</p>\n<p>“(The) expectation is that Fed won’t scare markets, and will announce only a cautious tapering,” Carter said.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39.24 points, or 0.11%, to 35,405.5, the S&amp;P 500 gained 9.96 points, or 0.22%, to 4,496.19 and the Nasdaq Composite added 22.06 points, or 0.15%, to 15,041.86.</p>\n<p>Financials were the clear winners among 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, gaining more than 1%. Healthcare stocks suffered the largest percentage decline.</p>\n<p>Chipmakers Nvidia Corp and Applied Materials rose 1.9% and 1.2%, respectively, and along with mega-cap growth stocks Alphabet Inc, Tesla Inc and Facebook Inc, provided the biggest boost to the Nasdaq.</p>\n<p>Nordstrom Inc tumbled 17.6% after the department store operator posted a 6% decline in quarterly revenue from pre-pandemic levels.</p>\n<p>Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc announced a special dividend and raised its annual sales and profit forecast, sending its shares surging 13.3%.</p>\n<p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.49-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.31-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 63 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 125 new highs and 33 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.29 billion shares, compared with the 9.00 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500, Nasdaq notch all-time closing highs ahead of Jackson Hole\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-26 07:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","JWN":"诺德斯特龙",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NVDA":"英伟达",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/sp-500-nasdaq-notch-all-time-closing-highs-ahead-of-jackson-hole-idUSKBN2FQ0Y4","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197778368","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street gained ground again on Wednesday, with chipmakers and financials helping to push the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq to record closing highs as investors look to the upcoming Jackson Hole Symposium for assurances that Federal Reserve’s timeline for policy tightening remains intact.\nWith few negative catalysts to sour the risk-on sentiment, all three major U.S. indexes ended the session modestly higher.\n“Positive news on vaccination approvals, and expectations that the Fed won’t shock markets at Jackson Hole, are helping to keep equity prices higher,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, who added “it’s a very quiet market as many investors are sitting on the beach this week.”\nRising U.S. Treasury yields boosted rate sensitive financials, and sectors that stand to gain most from economic revival - smallcaps, chips and transports - were outperforming the broader market.\nDays after the Food and Drug Administration gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, companies and institutions are moving toward either mandated inoculation, or penalization for those who forego the shot.\nThe Pentagon and Delta Air Lines are the latest to enact such measures, with Ford Motor Co and others potentially following suit.\nFor an interactive graphic on global vaccine deployment and new infection rates, click here.\nThe session marked the S&P 500’s 51st record high close so far this year.\nAnalysts polled by Reuters, however, see the stock market staying rangebound for the remainder of 2021, with the S&P 500 ending the year little changed as the pandemic recovery, along with corporate earnings growth, lose steam.\n“Following a long run, equity indexes have cooled off as the next engine of growth is unclear,” Carter at Lenox Wealth Advisors added. “Fiscal and monetary stimulus may have lost their oomph to push markets higher still.”\nTame economic data, including flat new orders for core capital goods, reinforced the notion that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to hint at a shortened timeline for policy tightening at the virtual Jackson Hole Symposium, due to get underway on Friday.\n“(The) expectation is that Fed won’t scare markets, and will announce only a cautious tapering,” Carter said.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39.24 points, or 0.11%, to 35,405.5, the S&P 500 gained 9.96 points, or 0.22%, to 4,496.19 and the Nasdaq Composite added 22.06 points, or 0.15%, to 15,041.86.\nFinancials were the clear winners among 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, gaining more than 1%. Healthcare stocks suffered the largest percentage decline.\nChipmakers Nvidia Corp and Applied Materials rose 1.9% and 1.2%, respectively, and along with mega-cap growth stocks Alphabet Inc, Tesla Inc and Facebook Inc, provided the biggest boost to the Nasdaq.\nNordstrom Inc tumbled 17.6% after the department store operator posted a 6% decline in quarterly revenue from pre-pandemic levels.\nDick’s Sporting Goods Inc announced a special dividend and raised its annual sales and profit forecast, sending its shares surging 13.3%.\nAdvancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.49-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.31-to-1 ratio favored advancers.\nThe S&P 500 posted 63 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 125 new highs and 33 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.29 billion shares, compared with the 9.00 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":468,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819999660,"gmtCreate":1630025660451,"gmtModify":1676530202681,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no ?","listText":"Oh no ?","text":"Oh no ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819999660","repostId":"2162847016","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162847016","pubTimestamp":1630008724,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162847016?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 04:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street loses ground, snapping rally on Afghanistan, Fed concerns","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162847016","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Thursday, ending a streak of all-time closi","content":"<p>NEW YORK, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Thursday, ending a streak of all-time closing highs on concerns over developments in Afghanistan, while fears of a potential shift in U.S. Federal Reserve policy prompted a broad but shallow sell-off the day before the Jackson Hole Symposium.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session in the red, with the S&amp;P and the Nasdaq notching their first down day in six.</p>\n<p>The sell-off firmed after hawkish commentary from Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan and a blast outside the Kabul airport in Afghanistan helped strengthen the risk-off sentiment.</p>\n<p>Kaplan, who is not currently a voting member of the Federal Open Markets Committee, said he believes the progress of economic recovery warrants tapering of the Fed's asset purchases to commence in October or shortly thereafter.</p>\n<p>Kaplan's remarks followed earlier comments from the St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, who said that the central bank is \"coalescing\" around a plan to begin tapering process.</p>\n<p>\"(Kaplan’s statements) caused a little confusion about the taper timeline, but in my opinion the equity markets are focused on geopolitical issues,\" said Megan Horneman, director of portfolio strategy at Verdence Capital Advisors in Hunt Valley, Maryland. \"There’s a flight to safety during geopolitical tensions.\"</p>\n<p>\"I am surprised the market the market hasn’t fallen more, given the fear that it could take focus away from (U.S. President Joe Biden's) domestic agenda,\" Horneman added.</p>\n<p>The economy grew at a slightly faster pace than originally reported in the second quarter, fully recovering its losses from the most abrupt downturn in U.S. history, according to the Commerce Department. But jobless claims, though still on a downward trajectory, ticked higher last week.</p>\n<p>The data did little to move the needle with respect to expectations that the Fed is unlikely tip its hand regarding the taper timeline when Chairman Jerome Powell unmutes and delivers his speech at Friday's virtual Jackson Hole Symposium.</p>\n<p>\"We’re going to see a lot of market participants analyze every word (Powell) uses, but at the end of the day, they will begin tapering,\" Horneman said. \"I’m more concerned about the speed at which they taper. What are they going to start with? That will give us a clearer indication as whether they’re getting more hawkish.\"</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 192.38 points, or 0.54%, to 35,213.12, the S&amp;P 500 lost 26.19 points, or 0.58%, to 4,470 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 96.05 points, or 0.64%, to 14,945.81.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, all but real estate ended the session lower, with energy stocks suffering the steepest percentage loss.</p>\n<p>Discount retailers Dollar General Corp and Dollar Tree Inc slid 3.8% and 12.1%, respectively, after warning higher transportation costs will hurt their bottom lines.</p>\n<p>Coty Inc jumped 14.7% after the cosmetics firm said it expects to post full-year sales growth for the first time in three years.</p>\n<p>Salesforce.com Inc hiked its earnings forecast as the shift to a hybrid work model is expected to fuel strong demand. Its shares advanced 2.7%.</p>\n<p>NetApp Inc jumped 4.7% as brokerages raised their price targets in the wake of the cloud computing firm's better-than-expected 2022 earnings outlook.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.99-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.83-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 31 new 52-week highs and two new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 82 new highs and 39 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.27 billion shares, compared with the 8.96 billion average over the last 20 trading days. (Reporting by Stephen Culp; Additional reporting by Devik Jain in Bengaluru Editing by Marguerita Choy)</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street loses ground, snapping rally on Afghanistan, Fed concerns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street loses ground, snapping rally on Afghanistan, Fed concerns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-27 04:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-loses-201204459.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Thursday, ending a streak of all-time closing highs on concerns over developments in Afghanistan, while fears of a potential shift in U.S. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-loses-201204459.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEX":"标普100","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","COMP":"Compass, Inc."},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-loses-201204459.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2162847016","content_text":"NEW YORK, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Thursday, ending a streak of all-time closing highs on concerns over developments in Afghanistan, while fears of a potential shift in U.S. Federal Reserve policy prompted a broad but shallow sell-off the day before the Jackson Hole Symposium.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session in the red, with the S&P and the Nasdaq notching their first down day in six.\nThe sell-off firmed after hawkish commentary from Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan and a blast outside the Kabul airport in Afghanistan helped strengthen the risk-off sentiment.\nKaplan, who is not currently a voting member of the Federal Open Markets Committee, said he believes the progress of economic recovery warrants tapering of the Fed's asset purchases to commence in October or shortly thereafter.\nKaplan's remarks followed earlier comments from the St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, who said that the central bank is \"coalescing\" around a plan to begin tapering process.\n\"(Kaplan’s statements) caused a little confusion about the taper timeline, but in my opinion the equity markets are focused on geopolitical issues,\" said Megan Horneman, director of portfolio strategy at Verdence Capital Advisors in Hunt Valley, Maryland. \"There’s a flight to safety during geopolitical tensions.\"\n\"I am surprised the market the market hasn’t fallen more, given the fear that it could take focus away from (U.S. President Joe Biden's) domestic agenda,\" Horneman added.\nThe economy grew at a slightly faster pace than originally reported in the second quarter, fully recovering its losses from the most abrupt downturn in U.S. history, according to the Commerce Department. But jobless claims, though still on a downward trajectory, ticked higher last week.\nThe data did little to move the needle with respect to expectations that the Fed is unlikely tip its hand regarding the taper timeline when Chairman Jerome Powell unmutes and delivers his speech at Friday's virtual Jackson Hole Symposium.\n\"We’re going to see a lot of market participants analyze every word (Powell) uses, but at the end of the day, they will begin tapering,\" Horneman said. \"I’m more concerned about the speed at which they taper. What are they going to start with? That will give us a clearer indication as whether they’re getting more hawkish.\"\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 192.38 points, or 0.54%, to 35,213.12, the S&P 500 lost 26.19 points, or 0.58%, to 4,470 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 96.05 points, or 0.64%, to 14,945.81.\nOf the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, all but real estate ended the session lower, with energy stocks suffering the steepest percentage loss.\nDiscount retailers Dollar General Corp and Dollar Tree Inc slid 3.8% and 12.1%, respectively, after warning higher transportation costs will hurt their bottom lines.\nCoty Inc jumped 14.7% after the cosmetics firm said it expects to post full-year sales growth for the first time in three years.\nSalesforce.com Inc hiked its earnings forecast as the shift to a hybrid work model is expected to fuel strong demand. Its shares advanced 2.7%.\nNetApp Inc jumped 4.7% as brokerages raised their price targets in the wake of the cloud computing firm's better-than-expected 2022 earnings outlook.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.99-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.83-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 31 new 52-week highs and two new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 82 new highs and 39 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.27 billion shares, compared with the 8.96 billion average over the last 20 trading days. (Reporting by Stephen Culp; Additional reporting by Devik Jain in Bengaluru Editing by Marguerita Choy)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810797702,"gmtCreate":1630011567406,"gmtModify":1676530197882,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810797702","repostId":"2162018921","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162018921","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1629993272,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162018921?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 23:54","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162018921","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at a","content":"<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-26 23:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","VRTX":"福泰制药","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","ATVI":"动视暴雪","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","NEM":"纽曼矿业",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","MU":"美光科技","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162018921","content_text":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.\nFirst, consider how well the S&P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.\nIf we even out the numbers, the S&P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.\nStocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors\nThrough Aug. 25, 58 of the S&P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nShare \"buy\" ratings\nClosing price -- Aug. 25\nConsensus price target\nImplied 12-month upside potential\nForward P/E\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc. MU\n-2%\n85%\n$74.04\n$117.79\n59%\n7.0\n\n\nLas Vegas Sands Corp. LVS\n-27%\n63%\n$43.24\n$64.38\n49%\n44.7\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc. ATVI\n-13%\n91%\n$80.81\n$116.04\n44%\n21.1\n\n\nGlobal Payments Inc. GPN\n-23%\n81%\n$165.25\n$228.69\n38%\n18.6\n\n\nIncyte Corp. INCY\n-13%\n60%\n$75.76\n$102.47\n35%\n32.2\n\n\nNOV Inc. NOV\n-3%\n59%\n$13.26\n$17.58\n33%\nN/A\n\n\n$Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO\n-23%\n70%\n$160.66\n$212.87\n32%\n34.2\n\n\nFMC Corp. FMC\n-18%\n75%\n$92.90\n$122.89\n32%\n12.8\n\n\nVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. VRTX\n-15%\n78%\n$201.33\n$262.14\n30%\n16.2\n\n\nNewmont Corp. NEM\n-3%\n71%\n$56.91\n$73.57\n29%\n16.3\n\n\nLamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW\n-15%\n78%\n$66.09\n$85.43\n29%\n26.5\n\n\nQualcomm Inc. QCOM\n-5%\n64%\n$143.87\n$184.15\n28%\n15.9\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc. FIS\n-8%\n69%\n$130.01\n$165.93\n28%\n18.3\n\n\nPenn National Gaming Inc. PENN\n-7%\n67%\n$79.92\n$101.50\n27%\n26.3\n\n\nBaxter International Inc. BAX\n-7%\n53%\n$73.80\n$92.56\n25%\n19.5\n\n\nV.F. Corp. VFC\n-9%\n68%\n$77.06\n$96.59\n25%\n23.1\n\n\nZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. ZBH\n-2%\n79%\n$150.39\n$187.58\n25%\n18.1\n\n\nConstellation Brands Inc. Class A STZ\n-1%\n71%\n$214.98\n$265.86\n24%\n20.6\n\n\nWynn Resorts Ltd. WYNN\n-11%\n54%\n$100.84\n$123.45\n22%\nN/A\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc. EA\n-1%\n72%\n$141.86\n$172.75\n22%\n20.4\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYou can click on the tickers for more about each company.\nThe list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.\nMarket-cap weighting is less important this year\nThe S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.\nThe SPDR S&P 500 ETF $(SPY.AU)$ tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nTotal return -- 2020\nTotal return -- 2019\nTotal return -- 3 Years\nTotal return -- 5 Years\n% of SPY portfolio\n\n\nApple Inc. AAPL\n12.3%\n82%\n89%\n183.4%\n488.3%\n6.2%\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp MSFT.\n36.7%\n43%\n58%\n188.9%\n461.1%\n6.0%\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc. AMZN\n1.3%\n76%\n23%\n73.1%\n334.5%\n3.7%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\n34.9%\n33%\n57%\n110.9%\n197.4%\n2.3%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL\n62.1%\n31%\n28%\n129.8%\n259.1%\n2.2%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class C GOOG\n63.2%\n31%\n29%\n134.2%\n271.6%\n2.1%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$ and especially Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$ have underperformed the index this year.\nThis brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF $(RSP)$ has outperformed SPY and the S&P 500:\nThe weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.\nThe equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:\n\n\n\nFund or index\nAverage return -- 3 years\nAverage return -- 5 years\nAverage return -- 10 years\nAverage return -- 15 years\nAverage return -- 17 years\n\n\nInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP\n15.7%\n15.2%\n15.7%\n10.8%\n11.0%\n\n\nSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY\n18.1%\n17.8%\n16.7%\n10.8%\n10.7%\n\n\nS&P 500 SPX\n18.2%\n17.9%\n16.9%\n10.9%\n10.8%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":383,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":883563853,"gmtCreate":1631255947572,"gmtModify":1676530510529,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/883563853","repostId":"1135243175","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819999707,"gmtCreate":1630025679809,"gmtModify":1676530202689,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819999707","repostId":"2162016937","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162016937","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1630022580,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162016937?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Marvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162016937","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip ma","content":"<p>Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.</p>\n<p>Marvell <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVL\">$(MRVL)$</a> shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.</p>\n<p>Marvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.</p>\n<p>Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.</p>\n<p>\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPHI\">Inphi</a> businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"</p>\n<p>Marvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.</p>\n<p>Over the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Marvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMarvell Technology stock slides as outlook overshadows earnings beat\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-27 08:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.</p>\n<p>Marvell <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVL\">$(MRVL)$</a> shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.</p>\n<p>Marvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.</p>\n<p>Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.</p>\n<p>\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPHI\">Inphi</a> businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"</p>\n<p>Marvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.</p>\n<p>Over the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRVL":"迈威尔科技"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162016937","content_text":"Marvell Technology Group Ltd. shares fell in the extended session Thursday after part of the chip maker's outlook range fell below the Wall Street consensus amid a global chip shortage.\nMarvell $(MRVL)$ shares fell 4% after hours, following a 0.1% rise in the regular session to close at $63.24.\nMarvell forecast adjusted third-quarter earnings of 35 cents to 41 cents a share on revenue of $1.11 billion to $1.18 billion. Analysts expect 37 cents a share on revenue of $1.13 billion.\nMeanwhile, the company reported a fiscal second-quarter loss of $276.4 million, or 34 cents a share, compared with a loss of $88.2 million, or 13 cents a share, in the year-ago period.\nAdjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 34 cents a share, compared with 21 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.\nRevenue rose to $1.08 billion from $727.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast earnings of 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.07 billion.\n\"I am pleased that stand-alone Marvell and the acquired Inphi businesses both contributed to our strong year-over-year revenue growth,\" said Matt Murphy, Marvell's chief executive, in a statement. \"We expect year-over-year revenue growth will accelerate in the third quarter, led by substantial contributions from the cloud data-center market. In addition, we expect our 5G business to continue to grow with strong sequential revenue growth in the third quarter, and a significant step-up projected in the fourth quarter.\"\nMarvell announced its intention to acquire Inphi Corp. last October, and closed the deal in April.\nOver the past 12 months, Marvell shares have surged 78%, compared with a 50% gain by the PHLX Semiconductor Index , a 29% rise by the S&P 500 index , and a 28% gain by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index .","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":262,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810457045,"gmtCreate":1629995992987,"gmtModify":1676530196921,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks1","listText":"Thanks1","text":"Thanks1","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810457045","repostId":"2162018921","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162018921","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1629993272,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162018921?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 23:54","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162018921","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at a","content":"<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 20 'left behind' stocks among the S&P 500 are expected to rise up to 59% over 12 months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-26 23:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&amp;P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a>, consider how well the S&amp;P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.</p>\n<p>If we even out the numbers, the S&amp;P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.</p>\n<p>Stocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors</p>\n<p>Through Aug. 25, 58 of the S&amp;P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSS\">Total</a> return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Share \"buy\" ratings</td>\n   <td>Closing price -- Aug. 25</td>\n   <td>Consensus price target</td>\n   <td>Implied 12-month upside potential</td>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FORD\">Forward</a> P/E</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">Micron Technology</a> Inc. MU</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>$74.04</td>\n   <td>$117.79</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LVS\">Las Vegas Sands</a> Corp. LVS</td>\n   <td>-27%</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>$43.24</td>\n   <td>$64.38</td>\n   <td>49%</td>\n   <td>44.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a> Inc. ATVI</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>$80.81</td>\n   <td>$116.04</td>\n   <td>44%</td>\n   <td>21.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GPN\">Global Payments</a> Inc. GPN</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>$165.25</td>\n   <td>$228.69</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>18.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INCY\">Incyte</a> Corp. INCY</td>\n   <td>-13%</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>$75.76</td>\n   <td>$102.47</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>32.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc. NOV</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>$13.26</td>\n   <td>$17.58</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>$Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>$160.66</td>\n   <td>$212.87</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>34.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FMC\">FMC Corp.</a> FMC</td>\n   <td>-18%</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>$92.90</td>\n   <td>$122.89</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>12.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VRTX\">Vertex Pharmaceuticals</a> Inc. VRTX</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$201.33</td>\n   <td>$262.14</td>\n   <td>30%</td>\n   <td>16.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Newmont Corp. NEM</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$56.91</td>\n   <td>$73.57</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>16.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW</td>\n   <td>-15%</td>\n   <td>78%</td>\n   <td>$66.09</td>\n   <td>$85.43</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>26.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> Inc. QCOM</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>64%</td>\n   <td>$143.87</td>\n   <td>$184.15</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>15.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FIS\">Fidelity National Information</a> Services Inc. FIS</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>69%</td>\n   <td>$130.01</td>\n   <td>$165.93</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PENN\">Penn National Gaming</a> Inc. PENN</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>$79.92</td>\n   <td>$101.50</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>26.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAX\">Baxter</a> International Inc. BAX</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>$73.80</td>\n   <td>$92.56</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>19.5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>V.F. Corp. VFC</td>\n   <td>-9%</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>$77.06</td>\n   <td>$96.59</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZBH\">Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc</a>. ZBH</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>$150.39</td>\n   <td>$187.58</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>18.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STZ\">Constellation Brands Inc</a>. Class A STZ</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>$214.98</td>\n   <td>$265.86</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>20.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WYNN\">Wynn</a> Resorts Ltd. WYNN</td>\n   <td>-11%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>$100.84</td>\n   <td>$123.45</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EA\">Electronic Arts</a> Inc. EA</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>72%</td>\n   <td>$141.86</td>\n   <td>$172.75</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>You can click on the tickers for more about each company.</p>\n<p>The list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.</p>\n<p>Market-cap weighting is less important this year</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.</p>\n<p>The SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY.AU\">$(SPY.AU)$</a> tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Company</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2021</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2020</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 2019</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 3 Years</td>\n   <td>Total return -- 5 Years</td>\n   <td>% of SPY portfolio</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc. AAPL</td>\n   <td>12.3%</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>183.4%</td>\n   <td>488.3%</td>\n   <td>6.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> Corp MSFT.</td>\n   <td>36.7%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>188.9%</td>\n   <td>461.1%</td>\n   <td>6.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Inc. AMZN</td>\n   <td>1.3%</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>73.1%</td>\n   <td>334.5%</td>\n   <td>3.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>34.9%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>110.9%</td>\n   <td>197.4%</td>\n   <td>2.3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> Inc. Class A GOOGL</td>\n   <td>62.1%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>129.8%</td>\n   <td>259.1%</td>\n   <td>2.2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG</td>\n   <td>63.2%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>134.2%</td>\n   <td>271.6%</td>\n   <td>2.1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>A very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> and especially Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> have underperformed the index this year.</p>\n<p>This brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RSP\">$(RSP)$</a> has outperformed SPY and the S&amp;P 500:</p>\n<p>The weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&amp;P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.</p>\n<p>The equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&amp;P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fund or index</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 3 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 5 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 10 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 15 years</td>\n   <td>Average return -- 17 years</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>15.2%</td>\n   <td>15.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>11.0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust SPY</td>\n   <td>18.1%</td>\n   <td>17.8%</td>\n   <td>16.7%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n   <td>10.7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500 SPX</td>\n   <td>18.2%</td>\n   <td>17.9%</td>\n   <td>16.9%</td>\n   <td>10.9%</td>\n   <td>10.8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Source: FactSet</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>RSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","VRTX":"福泰制药","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","ATVI":"动视暴雪","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","NEM":"纽曼矿业",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","MU":"美光科技","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162018921","content_text":"Some surprises among the small number of stocks that are down for 2021\nThe S&P 500 index closed at another all-time high on Wednesday, its 51st record this year. Success has been widespread, with 250 of the S&P 500 outperforming the index as a whole. But there are always some stocks left behind, including the list of highly regarded names below.\nFirst, consider how well the S&P 500 has been performing. It was up 20.8% for 2021 through Aug. 25, with dividends reinvested. That follows returns of 32.5% in 2020 and 31.5% in 2019. The index has returned 88.1% since the end of 2018. All performance figures in this article include reinvested dividends.\nIf we even out the numbers, the S&P 500 has returned 65% for three years, 128% for five years and 375% for 10 years, underlining the case for stocks as the ideal asset class for most long-term investors. Performance slips if we go out 15 years to cover the 2008 financial crisis, with a return of 367%.\nStocks left behind in 2021 that may have great potential for investors\nThrough Aug. 25, 58 of the S&P 500 components were down for 2021. Among those stocks, 33 have majority \"buy\" ratings among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 that the analysts expect to perform the best over the next 12 months, along with their forward price-to-earnings ratios:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nShare \"buy\" ratings\nClosing price -- Aug. 25\nConsensus price target\nImplied 12-month upside potential\nForward P/E\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc. MU\n-2%\n85%\n$74.04\n$117.79\n59%\n7.0\n\n\nLas Vegas Sands Corp. LVS\n-27%\n63%\n$43.24\n$64.38\n49%\n44.7\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc. ATVI\n-13%\n91%\n$80.81\n$116.04\n44%\n21.1\n\n\nGlobal Payments Inc. GPN\n-23%\n81%\n$165.25\n$228.69\n38%\n18.6\n\n\nIncyte Corp. INCY\n-13%\n60%\n$75.76\n$102.47\n35%\n32.2\n\n\nNOV Inc. NOV\n-3%\n59%\n$13.26\n$17.58\n33%\nN/A\n\n\n$Take-Two Interactive Software(TTWO)$ Inc. TTWO\n-23%\n70%\n$160.66\n$212.87\n32%\n34.2\n\n\nFMC Corp. FMC\n-18%\n75%\n$92.90\n$122.89\n32%\n12.8\n\n\nVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. VRTX\n-15%\n78%\n$201.33\n$262.14\n30%\n16.2\n\n\nNewmont Corp. NEM\n-3%\n71%\n$56.91\n$73.57\n29%\n16.3\n\n\nLamb Weston Holdings Inc. LW\n-15%\n78%\n$66.09\n$85.43\n29%\n26.5\n\n\nQualcomm Inc. QCOM\n-5%\n64%\n$143.87\n$184.15\n28%\n15.9\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc. FIS\n-8%\n69%\n$130.01\n$165.93\n28%\n18.3\n\n\nPenn National Gaming Inc. PENN\n-7%\n67%\n$79.92\n$101.50\n27%\n26.3\n\n\nBaxter International Inc. BAX\n-7%\n53%\n$73.80\n$92.56\n25%\n19.5\n\n\nV.F. Corp. VFC\n-9%\n68%\n$77.06\n$96.59\n25%\n23.1\n\n\nZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. ZBH\n-2%\n79%\n$150.39\n$187.58\n25%\n18.1\n\n\nConstellation Brands Inc. Class A STZ\n-1%\n71%\n$214.98\n$265.86\n24%\n20.6\n\n\nWynn Resorts Ltd. WYNN\n-11%\n54%\n$100.84\n$123.45\n22%\nN/A\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc. EA\n-1%\n72%\n$141.86\n$172.75\n22%\n20.4\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nYou can click on the tickers for more about each company.\nThe list is meant to provide information -- it is not investment advice. Here's some advice: If you see any stock of interest here, do your own research to form your own opinion about the company's strategy and its long-term prospects.\nMarket-cap weighting is less important this year\nThe S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization, which means its performance can be dominated by the largest stocks in the index.\nThe SPDR S&P 500 ETF $(SPY.AU)$ tracks the benchmark index by holding shares of all 500 companies and charging nominal annual fees totaling 0.09% of assets. Its five largest holdings (including two common-share classes for Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL)) make up 22.6% of the portfolio. Here's how they have performed:\n\n\n\nCompany\nTotal return -- 2021\nTotal return -- 2020\nTotal return -- 2019\nTotal return -- 3 Years\nTotal return -- 5 Years\n% of SPY portfolio\n\n\nApple Inc. AAPL\n12.3%\n82%\n89%\n183.4%\n488.3%\n6.2%\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp MSFT.\n36.7%\n43%\n58%\n188.9%\n461.1%\n6.0%\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc. AMZN\n1.3%\n76%\n23%\n73.1%\n334.5%\n3.7%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\n34.9%\n33%\n57%\n110.9%\n197.4%\n2.3%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL\n62.1%\n31%\n28%\n129.8%\n259.1%\n2.2%\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class C GOOG\n63.2%\n31%\n29%\n134.2%\n271.6%\n2.1%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA very good 2021 so far, but you can see that Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$ and especially Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$ have underperformed the index this year.\nThis brings up another fascinating development related to cap-weighting that underscores how widespread good stock performance has been during 2021. This year, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF $(RSP)$ has outperformed SPY and the S&P 500:\nThe weighted forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is 21.1, according to FactSet. For comparison, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a forward P/E is 18.4.\nThe equal-weighted approach is, arguably, less risky than the cap-weighted approach, because an investor avoids such a large concentration in a handful of stocks. But during the S&P 500's strong run in recent years, the equal-weighted portfolio has underperformed the index. Here are average annual returns for various periods:\n\n\n\nFund or index\nAverage return -- 3 years\nAverage return -- 5 years\nAverage return -- 10 years\nAverage return -- 15 years\nAverage return -- 17 years\n\n\nInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP\n15.7%\n15.2%\n15.7%\n10.8%\n11.0%\n\n\nSPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY\n18.1%\n17.8%\n16.7%\n10.8%\n10.7%\n\n\nS&P 500 SPX\n18.2%\n17.9%\n16.9%\n10.9%\n10.8%\n\n\nSource: FactSet\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRSP was established in August 2003, so the longest period for the average returns shown above is 17 years. For that period, the equal-weighed has approach performed best, while it has underperformed the cap-weighted index in all the more recent periods. Click here for Mark Hulbert's analysis of the weighted vs. unweighted approaches going back to 1970.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810454576,"gmtCreate":1629995970695,"gmtModify":1676530196921,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810454576","repostId":"2162701820","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162701820","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629994691,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162701820?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 00:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162701820","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Shares of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65.","content":"<p>Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.</p>\n<p><b>Morgan Stanley</b> (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.</p>\n<p>In the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShares Of Morgan Stanley (MS) Exceed 52-Week High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-27 00:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.</p>\n<p><b>Morgan Stanley</b> (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.</p>\n<p>In the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2162701820","content_text":"Shares of Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) traded at a new 52-week high today of $105.65. This new high was reached on below-average trading volume as 2.4 million shares traded hands, while the average 30-day volume is approximately 8.9 million shares.\nMorgan Stanley is a global investment bank whose history, through its legacy firms, can be traced back to 1924. The company has institutional securities, wealth management, and investment management segments. The company had about $4 trillion of client assets as well as nearly 70,000 employees at the end of 2020. Approximately 40% of the company’s net revenue is from its institutional securities business, with the remainder coming from wealth and investment management. The company derives about 30% of its total revenue outside the Americas.\nMorgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) is currently priced 14.2% above its average consensus analyst price target of $89.29.\nIn the past 52 weeks, Morgan Stanley's share prices are bracketed by a low of $45.86 and a high of $105.65 and is now at $104.02, 127% above that low price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":289,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":888529142,"gmtCreate":1631509326986,"gmtModify":1676530561558,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fly","listText":"Fly","text":"Fly","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888529142","repostId":"1147045390","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147045390","pubTimestamp":1631321547,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147045390?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-11 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147045390","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple  to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30%","content":"<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.</p>\n<p>In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.</p>\n<p>Data from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.</p>\n<p>SensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.</p>\n<p>Gene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.</p>\n<p>Munster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.</p>\n<p>“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.</p>\n<p>Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told&nbsp;<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.</p>\n<p>The ruling is more a positive for companies like&nbsp;Spotify Technology&nbsp;and&nbsp;Match Group&nbsp;than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97&nbsp;on&nbsp;Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and&nbsp;4.2%, respectively.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Apple’s Risk Is Limited\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-11 08:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147045390","content_text":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.\nIn a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.\nData from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.\nSensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.\nGene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.\nMunster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.\n“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.\nWedbush analyst Dan Ives told Barron’s he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.\nThe ruling is more a positive for companies like Spotify Technology and Match Group than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97 on Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and 4.2%, respectively.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":199,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810024018,"gmtCreate":1629935980435,"gmtModify":1676530175238,"author":{"id":"4091111175155330","authorId":"4091111175155330","name":"HamChop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70bfdfd3aa16919c2cf5bf8daff15e88","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4091111175155330","authorIdStr":"4091111175155330"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810024018","repostId":"2162051601","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2162051601","pubTimestamp":1629899747,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2162051601?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-25 21:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2162051601","media":"Zacks","summary":"For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact ","content":"<p>For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and industries.</p>\n<p>Another thing that can drive investing is the fear of missing out, or FOMO. This particularly applies to tech giants and popular consumer-facing stocks.</p>\n<p>What if you'd invested in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> (TSLA) ten years ago? It may not have been easy to hold on to TSLA for all that time, but if you did, how much would your investment be worth today?</p>\n<p><b>Tesla's Business In-Depth</b></p>\n<p>With that in mind, let's take a look at Tesla's main business drivers.</p>\n<p>Over the years, EV maker Tesla has evolved into a dynamic technology innovator. It has transformed the EV market much the same way as Amazon changed the retail landscape and Netflix revolutionized entertainment. Tesla is the market leader in battery-powered electric car sales in the United States, owning around 60% of market share. In fact, the company’s flagship Model 3 accounts for about half of the U.S. EV market. Tesla, which has managed to garner the reputation of a gold standard over the years, is now a far bigger entity that what it started off since its IPO in 2010, with a market capitalization almost double the combined value of top two U.S. auto giants General Motors and Ford.</p>\n<p>Over the years, Tesla has shifted from developing niche products for affluent buyers to making more affordable EVs for the masses. The firm’s three-pronged business model approach of direct sales, servicing, and charging its EVs sets it apart from other carmakers. Tesla, which is touted as the clean energy revolutionary automaker, is much more than just a car manufacturer. The firm also makes different kinds of technology like self driving software, charging stations and battery development, et al. The technology titan has also made inroads into solar and energy storage business.</p>\n<p>Tesla operates under two segments: Automotive and Energy Generation &amp; Storage. While Automotive and Energy Generation/Storage operations accounted for 86.4% and 6.3% of the total sales in 2020, respectively, revenues from Services and Others constituted the rest.</p>\n<p>Presently, the company produces and sells three fully electric vehicles: The Model S sedan, the Model X sport utility vehicle (“SUV”) and the Model 3 sedan. Tesla’s equally impressive future product lineup includes Cybertruck, Semi truck and Roadster. The firm manufactures its vehicles primarily at facilities located in Fremont, California, Lathrop, California, Tilburg, Netherlands. Tesla’s first, second and third Gigafactory are located in Nevada, New York and Shanghai, respectively. While production in these three factories are going on a full swing, production from Tesla's 4th and 5th&nbsp; Gigafactory in Berlin and Austin, respectively, is expected to begin this year.</p>\n<p><b>Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>Anyone can invest, but building a successful investment portfolio requires research, patience, and a little bit of risk. So, if you had invested in Tesla ten years ago, you're likely feeling pretty good about your investment today.</p>\n<p>According to our calculations, a $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $148,405.95, or a 14,740.59% gain, as of August 25, 2021. Investors should keep in mind that this return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 rose 280.96% and the price of gold increased -2.15% over the same time frame in comparison.</p>\n<p>Analysts are anticipating more upside for TSLA.</p>\n<p>Tesla hit a milestone in second-quarter 2021, with quarterly profits topping $1 billion for the first time. Riding on robust Model 3/Y demand, the electric vehicle (EV) behemoth achieved record production and deliveries despite chip crunch. Construction of Berlin and Texas gigafactories are well on track, with production expected to commence this year. While Tesla’s high range vehicles, superior technology and software edge bode well, it is far from immune to the global microchip deficit, which is likely to weigh on the firm’s near-term prospects. Massive capex owing to capacity investments in gigafactories and the development of battery tech might strain near-term financials. Waning margins for Model S/X, and delays in Semi and Cybertruck launch act as spoilsports. Thus, investors are recommended to wait for a better entry point.</p>\n<p>Shares have gained 9.88% over the past four weeks and there have been 9 higher earnings estimate revisions for fiscal 2021 compared to none lower. The consensus estimate has moved up as well.</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf You Invested $1000 in Tesla a Decade Ago, This is How Much It'd Be Worth Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-25 21:55 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html><strong>Zacks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/invested-1000-tesla-decade-ago-123012234.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2162051601","content_text":"For most investors, how much a stock's price changes over time is important. Not only can it impact your investment portfolio, but it can also help you compare investment results across sectors and industries.\nAnother thing that can drive investing is the fear of missing out, or FOMO. This particularly applies to tech giants and popular consumer-facing stocks.\nWhat if you'd invested in Tesla Motors (TSLA) ten years ago? It may not have been easy to hold on to TSLA for all that time, but if you did, how much would your investment be worth today?\nTesla's Business In-Depth\nWith that in mind, let's take a look at Tesla's main business drivers.\nOver the years, EV maker Tesla has evolved into a dynamic technology innovator. It has transformed the EV market much the same way as Amazon changed the retail landscape and Netflix revolutionized entertainment. Tesla is the market leader in battery-powered electric car sales in the United States, owning around 60% of market share. In fact, the company’s flagship Model 3 accounts for about half of the U.S. EV market. Tesla, which has managed to garner the reputation of a gold standard over the years, is now a far bigger entity that what it started off since its IPO in 2010, with a market capitalization almost double the combined value of top two U.S. auto giants General Motors and Ford.\nOver the years, Tesla has shifted from developing niche products for affluent buyers to making more affordable EVs for the masses. The firm’s three-pronged business model approach of direct sales, servicing, and charging its EVs sets it apart from other carmakers. Tesla, which is touted as the clean energy revolutionary automaker, is much more than just a car manufacturer. The firm also makes different kinds of technology like self driving software, charging stations and battery development, et al. The technology titan has also made inroads into solar and energy storage business.\nTesla operates under two segments: Automotive and Energy Generation & Storage. While Automotive and Energy Generation/Storage operations accounted for 86.4% and 6.3% of the total sales in 2020, respectively, revenues from Services and Others constituted the rest.\nPresently, the company produces and sells three fully electric vehicles: The Model S sedan, the Model X sport utility vehicle (“SUV”) and the Model 3 sedan. Tesla’s equally impressive future product lineup includes Cybertruck, Semi truck and Roadster. The firm manufactures its vehicles primarily at facilities located in Fremont, California, Lathrop, California, Tilburg, Netherlands. Tesla’s first, second and third Gigafactory are located in Nevada, New York and Shanghai, respectively. While production in these three factories are going on a full swing, production from Tesla's 4th and 5th  Gigafactory in Berlin and Austin, respectively, is expected to begin this year.\nBottom Line\nAnyone can invest, but building a successful investment portfolio requires research, patience, and a little bit of risk. So, if you had invested in Tesla ten years ago, you're likely feeling pretty good about your investment today.\nAccording to our calculations, a $1000 investment made in August 2011 would be worth $148,405.95, or a 14,740.59% gain, as of August 25, 2021. Investors should keep in mind that this return excludes dividends but includes price appreciation.\nThe S&P 500 rose 280.96% and the price of gold increased -2.15% over the same time frame in comparison.\nAnalysts are anticipating more upside for TSLA.\nTesla hit a milestone in second-quarter 2021, with quarterly profits topping $1 billion for the first time. Riding on robust Model 3/Y demand, the electric vehicle (EV) behemoth achieved record production and deliveries despite chip crunch. Construction of Berlin and Texas gigafactories are well on track, with production expected to commence this year. While Tesla’s high range vehicles, superior technology and software edge bode well, it is far from immune to the global microchip deficit, which is likely to weigh on the firm’s near-term prospects. Massive capex owing to capacity investments in gigafactories and the development of battery tech might strain near-term financials. Waning margins for Model S/X, and delays in Semi and Cybertruck launch act as spoilsports. Thus, investors are recommended to wait for a better entry point.\nShares have gained 9.88% over the past four weeks and there have been 9 higher earnings estimate revisions for fiscal 2021 compared to none lower. The consensus estimate has moved up as well.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}