caos personal page - To The Moon

caos

caos

No personal profile

3Follow

3Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2025-11-21

$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ Numb...

2022-11-16

ok

What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?

09-16 21:02

well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉

Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%

09-16 21:01

well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉

The Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington

06-18

sounds dangerous 😳

Retail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the "Magnificent Seven" Combined

2022-12-06

wow

US STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes

2022-10-12

ok

3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now

2022-12-05

ok

ASX Edges Higher; Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings

2022-10-19

huat

Singapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains

2022-10-15

huat

SNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4092135148477260","uuid":"4092135148477260","gmtCreate":1629033536589,"gmtModify":1706620742988,"name":"caos","pinyin":"caos","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":44,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.12.19","exceedPercentage":"93.11%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.11","exceedPercentage":"93.94%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.09.24","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.12.27","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":608458151571456,"gmtCreate":1789563738951,"gmtModify":1789564218352,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","listText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","text":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608458151571456","repostId":"1190705481","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190705481","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock News First-Time Broadcast","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock News","id":"1036600163","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a"},"pubTimestamp":1789531406,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190705481?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-16 12:03","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190705481","media":"Stock News","summary":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between...","content":"<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDigital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036600163\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-16 12:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU2360107671.USD":"BGF FINTECH \"A4\" (USD) INC","CRCO":"YIELDMAX CRCL OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","BKCH":"AdvisorShares Sabretooth ETF","ICRC":"Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B","LU1791807156.HKD":"BGF WORLD FINANCIALS \"A2\" (HKDHDG) ACC","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","IBLC":"iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF","CRCA":"Proshares Ultra CRCL","CIR":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Corgi","CRCD":"T-REX 2X Inverse CRCLDaily Target ETF","CRCL":"Circle Internet Corp.","BK4023":"应用软件","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","CCUP":"T-REX 2x Long CRCL Daily Target ETF","BLCK":"Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF","CRCG":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Leverage Shares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190705481","content_text":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as Coinbase (COIN.US), Circle, Robinhood (HOOD.US), and MicroStrategy (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRCL":1,"BKCH":1,"CRCD":1,"CCUP":1,"CRCO":1,"CRCA":1,"CIR":1,"CRCG":1,"IBLC":1,"BLCK":1,"ICRC":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":77,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":608457636376752,"gmtCreate":1789563718991,"gmtModify":1789564218223,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄.&nbsp; I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","listText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄.&nbsp; I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","text":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608457636376752","repostId":"1169256522","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169256522","kind":"video","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Tech Highlights: From Major Breakthroughs to the Robotics Industry","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tech News Roundup","id":"1048331108","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/479bca56702689a07539b030b8c9f3d2"},"pubTimestamp":1789532544,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169256522?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-16 12:22","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"The Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169256522","media":"Tech News Roundup","summary":"","content":"","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1048331108\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/479bca56702689a07539b030b8c9f3d2);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tech News Roundup </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-16 12:22</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://news-video-sg.skytigris.cn/videos/covers/1739.webp","relate_stocks":{"CRCA":"Proshares Ultra CRCL","CIR":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Corgi","CRCD":"T-REX 2X Inverse CRCLDaily Target ETF","FETH":"以太币ETF-Fidelity","BTF":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-CoinShares","COYY":"GRANITESHARES YIELDBOOST COIN ETF","BITU":"2倍做多比特币期货ETF-Proshares","CCUP":"T-REX 2x Long CRCL Daily Target ETF","FBTC":"比特币ETF-Fidelity","CRCG":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Leverage Shares","CRCO":"YIELDMAX CRCL OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","YETH":"Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF","BITX":"2倍比特币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","BITY":"Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF","BTRN":"比特币期货ETF-Global X","IBIT":"比特币ETF-iShares","DFII":"FT Cboe Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF","ETCO":"Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF","ARKB":"比特币ETF-21Shares","MNRS":"GRAYSCALE BITCOIN MINERS ETF","BRRR":"比特币ETF-CoinShares","CRCL":"Circle Internet Corp.","ETH":"低成本以太坊ETF-Grayscale","CBOA":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April","ETHA":"以太坊ETF-iShares","COIA":"ProShares Ultra Coin ETF","CBOJ":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","EZBC":"比特币ETF-Franklin","COIG":"2倍做多COIN ETF- Leverage Shares","EZET":"以太坊ETF-Franklin","ETHD":"ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF","COIW":"COIN周配息ETF-Roundhill","BAGY":"Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF","ETHE":"最大以太坊ETF-Grayscale","COIX":"Corgi COIN 2x Daily ETF","CBOO":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","COII":"REX COIN Growth& Income ETF","ETHT":"ProShares Ultra Ether ETF","CBOY":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","ETHU":"2倍以太币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","ETHV":"以太坊ETF-VanEck","EETH":"以太币期货ETF-ProShares","ETHW":"以太坊ETF-Bitwise","CONI":"2倍做空COIN ETF-GraniteShares","HODL":"比特币ETF-VanEck","CONL":"2倍做多COIN ETF-GraniteShares","CONX":"Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF","CBTA":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","CONY":"COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","CBTJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","BCCC":"Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","XBTY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF","CBTO":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","QETH":"以太坊ETF-Invesco Galaxy","CBTY":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","BETE":"等权重比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","SBIT":"2倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","CBXA":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","BETH":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","ETU":"T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF","CBXJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","TETH":"21Shares Ethereum ETF","BTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust","BPI":"Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF","BTCC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","CBXO":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","ETQ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF","MAXI":"比特币期货ETF-Simplify","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale","BTCI":"NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF","CBXY":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","BFAP":"FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April","ESK":"REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF","DEFI":"比特币期货ETF-Hashdex","BTCL":"T-REX 2X LONG BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF","FIAT":"做空COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","QBF":"Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly","ICOI":"Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF","BTCO":"比特币ETF-Invesco Galaxy","ICRC":"Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","BITB":"比特币ETF-Bitwise","YBTC":"比特币看涨期权ETF-Roundhill","BTCW":"比特币ETF-Wisdom Tree","BTCZ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF","BFJL":"FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July","COIO":"2倍上限加速COIN ETF-Leverage Shares","BITI":"1倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BITO":"比特币期货ETF-ProShares","SETH":"1倍做空以太币期货ETF-Proshares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169256522","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRCL":2,"BITY":0.6,"BAGY":0.6,"CBXJ":0.6,"CRCD":0.6,"GBTC":0.6,"EZET":0.6,"BTCC":0.6,"CONX":0.6,"ETHW":0.6,"TETH":0.6,"ETHA":0.6,"BTC":0.6,"BTCL":0.6,"BITO":0.6,"CBXO":0.6,"ICOI":0.6,"CRCO":0.6,"SETH":0.6,"COYY":0.6,"ETHE":0.6,"ETHD":0.6,"BTCZ":0.6,"BFJL":0.6,"CBOA":0.6,"ICRC":0.6,"FETH":0.6,"CONL":0.6,"ARKB":0.6,"CONY":0.6,"ETQ":0.6,"FBTC":0.6,"EZBC":0.6,"CIR":0.6,"BITU":0.6,"CBTY":0.6,"BETE":0.6,"BTCO":0.6,"ETCO":0.6,"COIX":0.6,"CBOO":0.6,"ETH":0.6,"HODL":0.6,"SBIT":0.6,"BFAP":0.6,"EETH":0.6,"BTCI":0.6,"BETH":0.6,"ETU":0.6,"FIAT":0.6,"DEFI":0.6,"BITI":0.6,"COIN":2,"CBOY":0.6,"IBIT":0.6,"CBXA":0.6,"COIA":0.6,"CBOJ":0.6,"DFII":0.6,"CONI":0.6,"ETHV":0.6,"BCCC":0.6,"MAXI":0.6,"BTRN":0.6,"CRCG":0.6,"BITB":0.6,"ESK":0.6,"ETHU":0.6,"BRRR":0.6,"BTF":0.6,"BPI":0.6,"YBTC":0.6,"CCUP":0.6,"CBTJ":0.6,"MNRS":0.6,"QBF":0.6,"CBTO":0.6,"CRCA":0.6,"CBTA":0.6,"BITX":0.6,"CBXY":0.6,"COII":0.6,"COIW":0.6,"YETH":0.6,"COIG":0.6,"QETH":0.6,"ETHT":0.6,"BTCW":0.6,"XBTY":0.6,"COIO":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":576433426915736,"gmtCreate":1781755688920,"gmtModify":1781755691744,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"sounds dangerous 😳&nbsp;","listText":"sounds dangerous 😳&nbsp;","text":"sounds dangerous 😳","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/576433426915736","repostId":"2644740729","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2644740729","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1781740800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2644740729?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-06-18 08:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Retail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2644740729","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"SpaceX has been sucking up all retail trading activity from the stock market over the past few days.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail traders poured more money into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.</p><p>But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">State Street SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust</a> and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">Invesco QQQ Trust Series</a> — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ac1f70d3f69ea8b72f7272d8ec2afe8c\" alt=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" title=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"352\"/><span>Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Retail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRetail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-06-18 08:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail traders poured more money into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.</p><p>But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">State Street SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust</a> and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">Invesco QQQ Trust Series</a> — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ac1f70d3f69ea8b72f7272d8ec2afe8c\" alt=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" title=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"352\"/><span>Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPCM":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Tradr","SPAX":"2倍做多SPACEX ETF-T-REX","SSPC":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Leverage Shares","SPCG":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Tradr","LOFF":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Direxion","BK4089":"非传统电信运营商","SPCQ":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Defiance","SPCH":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Leverage Shares","SPCX":"SPAC and New Issue ETF","SPCF":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2644740729","content_text":"Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.Retail traders poured more money into SpaceX over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including Alphabet, Amazon.com, Apple, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Nvidia and Tesla — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and the Invesco QQQ Trust Series — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: VandaThis fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPCF":0.6,"SPCQ":0.6,"SSPC":0.6,"SPCG":0.6,"SPCM":0.6,"LOFF":0.6,"SPCX":1.98,"SPCH":0.6,"SPAX":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":565933743796432,"gmtCreate":1779200524133,"gmtModify":1779200526431,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/565933743796432","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":502840900678320,"gmtCreate":1763772511850,"gmtModify":1763777764566,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> bmnr has 284mil outstanding shares according to stockanalysis.com. EPS of 13.39 and 328 mil income dont seems to tally. please enlighten me. TIA.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> bmnr has 284mil outstanding shares according to stockanalysis.com. EPS of 13.39 and 328 mil income dont seems to tally. please enlighten me. TIA.","text":"$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ bmnr has 284mil outstanding shares according to stockanalysis.com. EPS of 13.39 and 328 mil income dont seems to tally. please enlighten me. TIA.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/502840900678320","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3469,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":502593258013456,"gmtCreate":1763711942885,"gmtModify":1763711946202,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> Numb...","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> Numb...","text":"$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ Numb...","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/59e15e1bd928f6407c4deef2b42498ff","width":"895","height":"1244"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":58,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":259,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/502593258013456","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":9865,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4111926286669142","authorId":"4111926286669142","name":"koalasleepsalot","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4111926286669142","idStr":"4111926286669142"},"content":"whats the chance of recovery","text":"whats the chance of recovery","html":"whats the chance of recovery"}],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":473530063291176,"gmtCreate":1756643620521,"gmtModify":1756643624505,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"bmnr is the way to go","listText":"bmnr is the way to go","text":"bmnr is the way to go","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/473530063291176","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3632,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":462579117970272,"gmtCreate":1753940286432,"gmtModify":1754399719432,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"USD 72","listText":"USD 72","text":"USD 72","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/462579117970272","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3839,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967163052,"gmtCreate":1670285100176,"gmtModify":1676538335951,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967163052","repostId":"2289919187","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2289919187","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1670275924,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2289919187?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-06 05:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2289919187","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.</p><p>The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.</p><p>This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.</p><p>Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.</p><p>The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.</p><p>&#34;Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,&#34; said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re back to inflation-fighting mode,&#34; Drury added.</p><p>Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.</p><p>The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.</p><p>The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&amp;P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.</p><p>In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan&#39;s consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.</p><p>Energy was among the biggest S&amp;P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.</p><p>EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.</p><p>Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.</p><p>Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D&#39;Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-06 05:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.</p><p>The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.</p><p>This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.</p><p>Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.</p><p>The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.</p><p>&#34;Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,&#34; said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re back to inflation-fighting mode,&#34; Drury added.</p><p>Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.</p><p>The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.</p><p>The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&amp;P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.</p><p>In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan&#39;s consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.</p><p>Energy was among the biggest S&amp;P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.</p><p>EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.</p><p>Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.</p><p>Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D&#39;Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2289919187","content_text":"(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.\"Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,\" said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.\"We're back to inflation-fighting mode,\" Drury added.Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.Energy was among the biggest S&P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.The S&P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D'Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.6,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5436,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9964418090,"gmtCreate":1670198577410,"gmtModify":1676538317224,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9964418090","repostId":"1137572712","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137572712","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1670195875,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137572712?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-05 07:17","language":"en","title":"ASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137572712","media":"The Australian Financial Review","summary":"The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed b","content":"<div>\n<p>The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"afr_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-05 07:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm><strong>The Australian Financial Review</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XJO.AU":"标普/澳交所 200指数","XAO.AU":"标普/澳交所 普通股指数","XKO.AU":"标普/澳交所 300指数"},"source_url":"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137572712","content_text":"The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity; Fortescue rose 2.1 per cent to $20.10, BHP firmed 1.6 per cent to $46.50 and Champion Iron climbed 1.3 per cent to $6.84.Metcash edged 0.2 per cent lower to $4.22 despite lifting its interim dividend and beating earnings expectations.IGO fell 2.1 per cent to $16 after advising that a fire has impacted its Nova operation over the weekend.Splitit jumped 8.3 per cent to 19.5¢ after expanded its agreement with Google to bring its instalments solution to the Google Store in the US, Canada and Australia.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XJO.AU":0.9,"XAO.AU":0.9,"XKO.AU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963053822,"gmtCreate":1668557318266,"gmtModify":1676538074738,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963053822","repostId":"1160332041","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160332041","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1668576951,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160332041?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-16 13:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160332041","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in","content":"<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-16 13:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160332041","content_text":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the economy is possible. In my view, however, a US recession is highly likely in the next 12 to 18 months. Why don’t I share the Fed’s optimism?The projections by the Fed governors will always paint a rosy picture. They’re instructed to condition their view on an optimal monetary policy, which obviously makes better outcomes achievable. In the real world, as has been demonstrated over the past year, policy is often far from that ideal, so actual results will usually be worse than implied by the projections.In the same vein, the Fed model that underpins its staff forecast contains assumptions that contribute to more pleasant forecasts. They include that the Fed will pursue the optimal monetary policy path in the future (regardless of past errors) and that households and businesses know this.These assumptions rule out persistent monetary policy errors or the loss of confidence by households and businesses in the Fed’s commitment and ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives.The Fed also operates in a world where there’s an important political economy constraint. Admitting that a recession would be required to get inflation in check might undercut public support for a tighter monetary policy. It also could subject the Fed to criticism that might ultimately undermine its independence or cause Congress to limit its authority in the future. Sugarcoating the cost of what the Fed needs to do may be viewed as a necessary evil so it can carry out its mission successfully. But it also runs the risk of undercutting the Fed’s credibility.Why do I believe a recession is unavoidable? To start, the Fed is committed to bringing inflation down to its 2% annual rate target. Powell made it clear in his remarks at the Jackson Hole conference in August that this goal was “unconditional” and reiterated his commitment at his September news conference. Failure is an unattractive option because inflation expectations would rise, necessitating a harsher monetary policy and worse outcomes later.To bring inflation to 2%, the Federal Open Market Committee will have to push up the unemployment rate substantially. The labor market is much too tight to be consistent with a stable or declining underlying inflation rate.Judging from the relationship between unfilled job openings and the number of people who are unemployed, known as the Beveridge curve, the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation has risen considerably and could be as high as 5%, well above the current rate of 3.7%. Even if the Beveridge curve were to shift back down because labor market frictions abated, the unemployment rate would still need to rise to at least 4.5%.During the postwar period, every time the unemployment rate has risen by 0.5 percentage point or more, the US economy has fallen into recession. This empirical regularity is memorialized as the Sahm rule. The difficulty of engineering a soft landing is underscored by the fact that there are no examples of an unemployment rate rising between 0.5 and 2 percentage points from trough to peak at all. Once the unemployment rate has moved up modestly, it’s hard to stop. Thus, the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections in September in which unemployment rises to 4.4% from its recent trough of 3.5% would be unprecedented.The episodes Powell has cited of successful soft landings—in 1965-66, 1984-85, and 1993-95—don’t apply to the current set of circumstances. In those cases, the Fed tightened and that slowed the pace of economic growth and the decline in the unemployment rate, but in none of those episodes did the Fed tighten sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up. In Fed parlance, these soft landings were achieved from above, by slowing the economy to a sustainable growth rate, rather than from below, by slowing the economy sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up.Fed risk management will also increase the likelihood of recession. Powell has made it clear that the consequences of failing to bring inflation back down to 2% on a sustainable basis are unacceptable. The lesson of the 1970s is that failure would lead to unanchored inflation expectations, making the job of restoring price stability that much more difficult.In addition, the Fed’s task will be made difficult by uncertainty about whether it has done enough. How high do short-term interest rates need to go to push the unemployment rate above the rate consistent with stable inflation? How long does such an unemployment rate need to be elevated to bring inflation back down to 2%? Because, at the margin, the negative consequences of doing too little exceed the negative consequences of doing too much, this means that monetary policy will likely ultimately be kept too tight for too long. The long and variable lags between changes in the stance of monetary policy and its effect on economic activity reinforce this.Some argue—including Fed officials—that a soft landing is still possible:• As supply chain disruptions dissipate and the allocation of demand between goods and services normalizes, headline inflation will fall sharply.• Labor supply will increase as labor force participation rises.• Fed tightening can reduce the excess demand for labor without generating a large rise in unemployment.Although one can’t dismiss these points out of hand, I’m afraid they’re likely to prove insufficient to avoid a hard landing.First, even if declining goods prices cause headline inflation to fall sharply in the year ahead, that doesn’t deal with the fact that the inflation problem has broadened out, into services prices and wages.The breadth of inflationary pressures is visible in the median consumer price index calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the trimmed mean personal consumption expenditures deflator—an alternative inflation measure calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas—with increases of 7% and 4.7%, respectively, over the past year. Those numbers capture what’s happening for those goods and services in the middle of the inflation distribution.Similarly, the trend of wage inflation is well above a rate consistent with 2% inflation. For example, the employment cost index for the wages and salaries of private industry workers has gone up 5.2% over the past year, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s wage tracker index is rising at a 6.4% annual rate. Given the trend of labor productivity, wage inflation needs to be in a 3%-to-4% range to be consistent with the Fed’s 2% inflation objective.Second, on the labor supply front, the Fed is unlikely to be bailed out by a large increase in labor force participation. As labor economist Stephanie Aaronson noted in her remarks at this year’s Fed Jackson Hole conference: “The unemployment rate is the best gauge of the state of the business cycle.” Although a tight labor market can be expected to provoke a rise in labor force participation, she said, the process is a slow-moving one, playing out over several years, too slow a process to rescue the Fed.Third, the notion that the Fed’s monetary policy stringency can be oriented toward reducing the excess demand for labor without driving up unemployment materially is wishful thinking. Monetary policy can’t be targeted in such a way to reduce the demand for labor in industries where demand is excessive relative to industries where labor supply and demand is in better balance. It’s a blunt tool that affects the economy broadly through its impact on financial conditions.Although a soft landing would obviously be preferable, that ship has sailed. Today, a recession is virtually inevitable.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5526,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9960074262,"gmtCreate":1668039059156,"gmtModify":1676538001659,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"hi","listText":"hi","text":"hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9960074262","repostId":"2282956139","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4660,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987459688,"gmtCreate":1667970592444,"gmtModify":1676537992566,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"still buying more.","listText":"still buying more.","text":"still buying more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987459688","repostId":"1119565865","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1119565865","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1667970397,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119565865?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-09 13:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: -11.48% After Earnings, And My Investment Thesis Is Changing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119565865","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryMy investment thesis has changed now that Palantir Technologies Inc. is projecting its revenu","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>My investment thesis has changed now that Palantir Technologies Inc. is projecting its revenue growth in 2022 will be 23.29% rather than 30%+ in 2022.</li><li>Palantir Technologies has significantly declining margins and it is generating less cash from operations off more revenue, which is concerning.</li><li>I plan on adding to my position and dollar cost averaging, as Palantir has increased its customer base by 134 YoY and now has other positives, such as an interesting valuation.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f6cfa718e8398417ea21d2c4e2d8712\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Michael Vi</span></p><p>I was very critical of Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) after their Q2 earnings call in August, which was reflected in my article, where I went from bullish to neutral inthe blink of an eye. I indicated that I was still bullish on the company&#39;s business prospects, but was disappointed with how Alex Karp&#39;s (Palantir CEO) commentary and how he conducted himself. After listening to the conference call and reading through the presentation, press release, and Alex Karp&#39;s letter to shareholders, I believed there were many things to like, but the original thesis he outlined was changing.</p><p>Since 2022 isn&#39;t playing out according to plan, I need to take a step back and recalculate my projections. Thankfully, the Q3 conference call on 7 November went much better than Q2&#39;s, but the results weren&#39;t overwhelmingly good. For all of the powerful slides of information embedded within the presentation, the bottom line is that Palantir&#39;s revenue growth won&#39;t hit Alek Karp&#39;s projections, and their margins are being impacted. This is causing the narrative to change. PLTR could still become a great long-term investment, but in the short term, I think shareholders will need to endure unwanted volatility.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0bce4c6da47a33baf858c7b09566bba8\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"201\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Seeking Alpha</span></p><h2>The ugly part of Q3 and how it is making my projections change</h2><p>In Q2 of 2021, PLTR reinforced their long-term outlook of 30%+ revenue growth for 2021 and the next 4 years, bringing them through 2025. PLTR had projected that its 2021 Adjusted FCF (free cash flow) would exceed $300 million in 2021, which would be a 100% increase from its previous outlook. I dislike adjusted numbers and would rather look at straight FCF, which is cash from operations minus CapEx or purchases of property and equipment. In 2021, PLTR ended the year generating $1.54 billion in revenue and $321.22 million of FCF for an FCF margin of 20.83%.</p><p>I built a model based on PLTR&#39;s commentary and their 2021 FCF margin. In my model, which is below, I had PLTR&#39;s revenue grow by 30% through 2025, then drop down to 25%, 22%, 19%, 17%, and 15% from years 2026 - 2030. Based on 2021&#39;s FCF margin of 20.83%, if these revenue growth numbers were in the ballpark, PLTR would have generated $2.53 billion of FCF in 2030 from $12.16 billion of revenue. Based on a 25x FCF multiple, PLTR would have a $63.30 billion market cap; at a 35x multiple, PLTR would have an $88.62 billion market; and at a 45x multiple, PLTR would have a $113.94 billion market cap. While Q2 made me switch my view because I was worried about how PLTR would be perceived by potential customers, the future looked interesting as there was a clear roadmap to a much larger market cap into 2030 than PLTR had today. All of this ended after the Q3 2022 conference call, and I now need to build a new model.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83ae01fb83faa817f70110891f770c9b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"66\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Steven Fiorillo, Palantir, Seeking Alpha</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d239d9dac695fda355bc570b6c2ea77\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"351\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Palantir</span></p><p>I can no longer use the model I previously based my investment thesis around because PLTR&#39;s projections for revenue growth in 2022 have changed, and their margins have decreased significantly. PLTR is now guiding for $1.9 billion of revenue as its midpoint for the fiscal year of 2022. This is a YoY increase of $359.10 million, which is a 23.29% growth rate. The other issue is that PLTR&#39;s FCF margin has declined in the first 9-months of operations from 21.07% in 2021 to 7.86% in 2022. In the first 9 months of operations in 2021, PLTR generated $1.11 billion of revenue and $233.64 million of FCF for a 21.07% FCF margin. YTD over the first 9 months of 2022, PLR&#39;s revenue has increased by 25.99% YoY ($288.23 million) to $1.4 billion, but its cash from operations has declined by -$95.45 million (-39.70%), and their CapEx has increased by $28.33 million (417.60%), placing its FCF at $109.87 million. PLTR&#39;s FCF margin has declined by -13.20 percentage points to 7.86% from 21.07% YoY. As an investor, I need to readjust my investment thesis based on the new information and determine if 2022 is an anomaly or a new normal.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e3d97f8eea6c89e38d0b039fe76b44b0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"210\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Palantir</span></p><p>I built 2 models to see where PLTR&#39;s numbers could go. My original cash flow projection called for $2.53 billion of FCF from $12.16 billion of revenue in 2030 based on 2021&#39;s FCF margin, and my revenue assumptions extrapolated past the 2025 projection from PLTR. In model 1, I chalked 2022 up to an anomaly. If I keep the revenue growth rate the same from 2023-2030 and the FCF margin the same as my previous figures, PLTR will generate $10.2 billion of revenue and $2.12 billion of FCF in 2030.</p><p>In model 2, I made the assumption that PLTR&#39;s revenue growth is downhill from here, and the entire thesis needs to change. 2022 is now projected to be a 23.29% YoY revenue growth rate for PLTR, so I projected accordingly. Instead of 30% growth rates for 2023 - 2025 ,I placed them at 20%, 20%, and 18%. Then I scaled down to 16%, 14%, 12%, 10%, and 8% for years 2026 - 2030. I completely speculated on the FCF margin and placed it at 10% for 2022, and looked at a 15% FCF margin for 2030. Based on these projections, PLTR would generate $5.68 billion of revenue in 2030 and produce $852.54 million of FCF.</p><p>I don&#39;t have a crystal ball, so I don&#39;t know which model is more accurate, but 2022 isn&#39;t what PLTR had hoped for, and it&#39;s certainly not what I had hoped for. PLTR is generating less cash from operations, and its margins are declining, especially its FCF margin. As an investor, I want to see as much cash and FCF generated from operations as possible, and if its revenue is increasing, I would hope that PLTR is generating additional cash from operations. There isn&#39;t enough data yet for me to lean in either direction, and I want to see how Q4 turns out and what the first half of 2023 looks like prior to making any decisions. While I still think PLTR has a lot of potential, its numbers have deflated my investment thesis, and I am not nearly as enthusiastic as I once was.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b01bc10374ca97fc6d7dd4f131c7aa\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"147\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Steven Fiorillo, Palantir, Seeking Alpha</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c52c2f63ca61a261775c95bca20c753b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"871\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Palantir</span></p><p>The other aspect I am not thrilled about is PLTR&#39;s stock-based compensation (&#34;SBCU&#34;), but not for the reasons you may suspect. PLTR is a growth company and they are competing against Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG,GOOGL), and the rest of Silicon Valley for software engineers, in addition to every other company for quality salespeople. I would much rather have PLTR tap the equity markets and issue stock-based compensation to fuel its growth instead of tapping the debt markets. I am willing to undergo some dilution for this as many other successful companies, including Tesla (TSLA), have operated in this fashion.</p><p>The problem is that there is no clear picture of how stock-based compensation is awarded to its employees. We see the line items of where it&#39;s expensed to, but we don&#39;t know how it&#39;s distributed. In the first 9 months of operations in 2022, stock-based comp has declined -$175.91 million (-28.78%) to $435.40 million YoY, and in Q3, it declined by -$44.53 million (-24.09%) to $140.31 million YoY. While PLTR is utilizing stock-based comp less and less, operationally, PLTR isn&#39;t hitting its metrics. Revenue growth is slowing and is projected to come in at 23.29% rather than 30% YoY in 2022, and net dollar retention is stalled at 119% for 2 quarters in a row.</p><p>As a shareholder, I am fine with PLTR as a growth company utilizing stock-based compensation if it&#39;s beneficial to the bottom line. In this case, I am not seeing PLTR deliver operationally, while shareholders are diluted and employees are rewarded with additional shares.</p><h2>By the numbers, 2022 isn&#39;t what I had hoped it would be, Q3 earnings weren&#39;t entirely bad, and Palantir still has tremendous potential, but the real question is, can they capitalize?</h2><p>Businesses look toward testimonials and customer feedback to provide validation for their product or service. When it comes to enterprise software, real-world use cases and an A-list of clients are critical for future growth. Palantir has changed up its marketing strategy and put together an entire conference called FoundryCon, which was tailored to the U.S commercial market and open to shareholders, global customers, the press, and the general public. Following the opening fireside talk between Alex Karp and Mike Allen (Co-Founder of Axios), presentations from the U.S. Space Systems Command and the National Cancer Institute were delivered, in addition to remarks from companies that included Jacobs, Morgan Stanley, Apache, and Tyson Foods.</p><p>Tyson Foods CTO Scott Spradley discussed the strategic outcomes that were achieved through transforming their business and generating $200 million in savings across 20 projects. John Rickerman from Jacobs highlighted that they are on track to save $300,000 annually at one of their sites, which was a 20% savings, and they have 300 sites where the same process can be replicated at. Colonel Jennifer Krolikowski stated that 15,000 people would not have been able to be evacuated from Afghanistan without utilizing PLTR&#39;s software.</p><p>PLTR is driving efficiencies and cost benefits for the largest companies and critical government agencies. PLTR is also one of three companies, which includes Amazon (AMZN) and MSFT, that have IL6 Provisional Authorization from the DOD. PLTR&#39;s testimonials are from the largest and most respected entities, and this certainly has an impact on future clients.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/871aee443bc3808cd89c5fc1e4ba2514\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"719\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Palantir</span></p><p>Once again, Alek Karp put one of the most bullish slides in the Q3 shareholder letter rather than the Q3 presentation. Quite frankly, this slide is something many investors are probably overlooking, and it is critical for the bull thesis. On a TTM basis in Q3 2020, PLTR&#39;s new customer base declined by -29.41%, as they only generated 12 new customers vs. 17 in the year prior. PLTR wasn&#39;t a well-known company in 2020, and for those who knew of PLTR, the common perception was that they were a black box company specializing in platforms for the military-industrial complex.</p><p>PLTR didn&#39;t go public until the fall of 2020, and after they did, their new customer base exploded as more information about PLTR was circulated, and companies saw successful use cases from their industry peers. In 2021 PLTR added 49 additional new customers on a TTM basis in Q3, up 408.33% YoY, as they finished with 61 new customers. In Q3 of 2022, PLTR experienced a huge increase in new customers. PLTR&#39;s new customer base in Q3 of 2022 on a TTM basis grew by 119.67% or 73 new customers YoY to 134.</p><p>I wasn&#39;t thrilled with the net dollar retention being stuck at 119% for 2 consecutive quarters, but seeing the cohort growth in new customers, there will be plenty of chances to upsell customers and add additional functionality to their contracts. Over the last 2 years, PLTR has added 195 new customers, and while new customer growth has decelerated on a percentage basis, it has increased in size YoY. Based on the previous 2 years, PLTR could end up having 450-500 customers by this time next year. If PLTR replicates its 134 new customer growth over the next 12 months, it will put them at 471 customers.</p><p>I was very critical of PLTR&#39;s revenue growth and margins due to the level of stock-based compensation that has been issued, but there is certainly a thesis that the growth hasn&#39;t materialized from their newest customers, and 2022 is an anomaly year from a revenue and margin standpoint.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40a0de766ef9082a731f07346df7c55b\" tg-width=\"539\" tg-height=\"262\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Palantir</span></p><p>No matter how I look at it, PLTR is growing, even though revenue growth will fall short of PLTR&#39;s previous projections. Q3 revenue is up 22% YoY, and the U.S. business is still exploding, as it&#39;s up 31% YoY. In Q3 PLTR&#39;s total contract value closed at $1.3 billion, while they closed 78 deals worth a minimum of $1 million. Of these 78 deals, 32 were at least worth $5 million, and 19 exceeded $10 million. PLTR ended Q3, having closed 273 deals YTD, which is up 63% YoY from 167 in 2021, which drove its total remaining deal value up 14% YoY to $4.1 billion.</p><p>For all of the shortcomings, there are many aspects to build a bullish thesis around. I am not closing the door on PLTR as I can argue a bullish case to myself in the same fashion I can create a doom and gloom scenario. At the end of the day, PLTR has $2.4 billion of cash on the balance sheet with $0 of debt and is well capitalized for the future. PLTR doesn&#39;t have a single concern with rising rates impacting their expenses, and there is a path to profitability and large amounts of FCF in the future. The only questions are, will PLTR continue growing in a similar fashion, and will its new customer base eventually drive additional net dollar retention levels?</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>As a reformed PLTR bull, I am currently neutral on the company. I would need to see revenue get back to the 30%+ projection, margins improve, and expenses either stay in-line or decrease to get bullish again.</p><p>That being said, I am not bearish and find Palantir&#39;s current valuation interesting. I plan on adding more shares and dollar cost averaging, as I am not ready to call it a loss and put this investment in the tax-loss harvesting bucket. I need 3 more quarters of data before making a final decision on PLTR, as there is still a path to billions of FCF in 2030, but the current revenue and margin declines are certainly concerning. As PLTR&#39;s numbers have changed, so has my investment thesis, and I will anxiously be awaiting the Q4 earnings report.</p><p><i>This article is written by Steven Fiorillo for reference only. Please note the risks.</i></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: -11.48% After Earnings, And My Investment Thesis Is Changing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: -11.48% After Earnings, And My Investment Thesis Is Changing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-09 13:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554710-palantir-minus-11-48-percent-after-earnings-and-my-investment-thesis-is-changing><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMy investment thesis has changed now that Palantir Technologies Inc. is projecting its revenue growth in 2022 will be 23.29% rather than 30%+ in 2022.Palantir Technologies has significantly ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554710-palantir-minus-11-48-percent-after-earnings-and-my-investment-thesis-is-changing\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554710-palantir-minus-11-48-percent-after-earnings-and-my-investment-thesis-is-changing","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119565865","content_text":"SummaryMy investment thesis has changed now that Palantir Technologies Inc. is projecting its revenue growth in 2022 will be 23.29% rather than 30%+ in 2022.Palantir Technologies has significantly declining margins and it is generating less cash from operations off more revenue, which is concerning.I plan on adding to my position and dollar cost averaging, as Palantir has increased its customer base by 134 YoY and now has other positives, such as an interesting valuation.Michael ViI was very critical of Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) after their Q2 earnings call in August, which was reflected in my article, where I went from bullish to neutral inthe blink of an eye. I indicated that I was still bullish on the company's business prospects, but was disappointed with how Alex Karp's (Palantir CEO) commentary and how he conducted himself. After listening to the conference call and reading through the presentation, press release, and Alex Karp's letter to shareholders, I believed there were many things to like, but the original thesis he outlined was changing.Since 2022 isn't playing out according to plan, I need to take a step back and recalculate my projections. Thankfully, the Q3 conference call on 7 November went much better than Q2's, but the results weren't overwhelmingly good. For all of the powerful slides of information embedded within the presentation, the bottom line is that Palantir's revenue growth won't hit Alek Karp's projections, and their margins are being impacted. This is causing the narrative to change. PLTR could still become a great long-term investment, but in the short term, I think shareholders will need to endure unwanted volatility.Seeking AlphaThe ugly part of Q3 and how it is making my projections changeIn Q2 of 2021, PLTR reinforced their long-term outlook of 30%+ revenue growth for 2021 and the next 4 years, bringing them through 2025. PLTR had projected that its 2021 Adjusted FCF (free cash flow) would exceed $300 million in 2021, which would be a 100% increase from its previous outlook. I dislike adjusted numbers and would rather look at straight FCF, which is cash from operations minus CapEx or purchases of property and equipment. In 2021, PLTR ended the year generating $1.54 billion in revenue and $321.22 million of FCF for an FCF margin of 20.83%.I built a model based on PLTR's commentary and their 2021 FCF margin. In my model, which is below, I had PLTR's revenue grow by 30% through 2025, then drop down to 25%, 22%, 19%, 17%, and 15% from years 2026 - 2030. Based on 2021's FCF margin of 20.83%, if these revenue growth numbers were in the ballpark, PLTR would have generated $2.53 billion of FCF in 2030 from $12.16 billion of revenue. Based on a 25x FCF multiple, PLTR would have a $63.30 billion market cap; at a 35x multiple, PLTR would have an $88.62 billion market; and at a 45x multiple, PLTR would have a $113.94 billion market cap. While Q2 made me switch my view because I was worried about how PLTR would be perceived by potential customers, the future looked interesting as there was a clear roadmap to a much larger market cap into 2030 than PLTR had today. All of this ended after the Q3 2022 conference call, and I now need to build a new model.Steven Fiorillo, Palantir, Seeking AlphaPalantirI can no longer use the model I previously based my investment thesis around because PLTR's projections for revenue growth in 2022 have changed, and their margins have decreased significantly. PLTR is now guiding for $1.9 billion of revenue as its midpoint for the fiscal year of 2022. This is a YoY increase of $359.10 million, which is a 23.29% growth rate. The other issue is that PLTR's FCF margin has declined in the first 9-months of operations from 21.07% in 2021 to 7.86% in 2022. In the first 9 months of operations in 2021, PLTR generated $1.11 billion of revenue and $233.64 million of FCF for a 21.07% FCF margin. YTD over the first 9 months of 2022, PLR's revenue has increased by 25.99% YoY ($288.23 million) to $1.4 billion, but its cash from operations has declined by -$95.45 million (-39.70%), and their CapEx has increased by $28.33 million (417.60%), placing its FCF at $109.87 million. PLTR's FCF margin has declined by -13.20 percentage points to 7.86% from 21.07% YoY. As an investor, I need to readjust my investment thesis based on the new information and determine if 2022 is an anomaly or a new normal.PalantirI built 2 models to see where PLTR's numbers could go. My original cash flow projection called for $2.53 billion of FCF from $12.16 billion of revenue in 2030 based on 2021's FCF margin, and my revenue assumptions extrapolated past the 2025 projection from PLTR. In model 1, I chalked 2022 up to an anomaly. If I keep the revenue growth rate the same from 2023-2030 and the FCF margin the same as my previous figures, PLTR will generate $10.2 billion of revenue and $2.12 billion of FCF in 2030.In model 2, I made the assumption that PLTR's revenue growth is downhill from here, and the entire thesis needs to change. 2022 is now projected to be a 23.29% YoY revenue growth rate for PLTR, so I projected accordingly. Instead of 30% growth rates for 2023 - 2025 ,I placed them at 20%, 20%, and 18%. Then I scaled down to 16%, 14%, 12%, 10%, and 8% for years 2026 - 2030. I completely speculated on the FCF margin and placed it at 10% for 2022, and looked at a 15% FCF margin for 2030. Based on these projections, PLTR would generate $5.68 billion of revenue in 2030 and produce $852.54 million of FCF.I don't have a crystal ball, so I don't know which model is more accurate, but 2022 isn't what PLTR had hoped for, and it's certainly not what I had hoped for. PLTR is generating less cash from operations, and its margins are declining, especially its FCF margin. As an investor, I want to see as much cash and FCF generated from operations as possible, and if its revenue is increasing, I would hope that PLTR is generating additional cash from operations. There isn't enough data yet for me to lean in either direction, and I want to see how Q4 turns out and what the first half of 2023 looks like prior to making any decisions. While I still think PLTR has a lot of potential, its numbers have deflated my investment thesis, and I am not nearly as enthusiastic as I once was.Steven Fiorillo, Palantir, Seeking AlphaPalantirThe other aspect I am not thrilled about is PLTR's stock-based compensation (\"SBCU\"), but not for the reasons you may suspect. PLTR is a growth company and they are competing against Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG,GOOGL), and the rest of Silicon Valley for software engineers, in addition to every other company for quality salespeople. I would much rather have PLTR tap the equity markets and issue stock-based compensation to fuel its growth instead of tapping the debt markets. I am willing to undergo some dilution for this as many other successful companies, including Tesla (TSLA), have operated in this fashion.The problem is that there is no clear picture of how stock-based compensation is awarded to its employees. We see the line items of where it's expensed to, but we don't know how it's distributed. In the first 9 months of operations in 2022, stock-based comp has declined -$175.91 million (-28.78%) to $435.40 million YoY, and in Q3, it declined by -$44.53 million (-24.09%) to $140.31 million YoY. While PLTR is utilizing stock-based comp less and less, operationally, PLTR isn't hitting its metrics. Revenue growth is slowing and is projected to come in at 23.29% rather than 30% YoY in 2022, and net dollar retention is stalled at 119% for 2 quarters in a row.As a shareholder, I am fine with PLTR as a growth company utilizing stock-based compensation if it's beneficial to the bottom line. In this case, I am not seeing PLTR deliver operationally, while shareholders are diluted and employees are rewarded with additional shares.By the numbers, 2022 isn't what I had hoped it would be, Q3 earnings weren't entirely bad, and Palantir still has tremendous potential, but the real question is, can they capitalize?Businesses look toward testimonials and customer feedback to provide validation for their product or service. When it comes to enterprise software, real-world use cases and an A-list of clients are critical for future growth. Palantir has changed up its marketing strategy and put together an entire conference called FoundryCon, which was tailored to the U.S commercial market and open to shareholders, global customers, the press, and the general public. Following the opening fireside talk between Alex Karp and Mike Allen (Co-Founder of Axios), presentations from the U.S. Space Systems Command and the National Cancer Institute were delivered, in addition to remarks from companies that included Jacobs, Morgan Stanley, Apache, and Tyson Foods.Tyson Foods CTO Scott Spradley discussed the strategic outcomes that were achieved through transforming their business and generating $200 million in savings across 20 projects. John Rickerman from Jacobs highlighted that they are on track to save $300,000 annually at one of their sites, which was a 20% savings, and they have 300 sites where the same process can be replicated at. Colonel Jennifer Krolikowski stated that 15,000 people would not have been able to be evacuated from Afghanistan without utilizing PLTR's software.PLTR is driving efficiencies and cost benefits for the largest companies and critical government agencies. PLTR is also one of three companies, which includes Amazon (AMZN) and MSFT, that have IL6 Provisional Authorization from the DOD. PLTR's testimonials are from the largest and most respected entities, and this certainly has an impact on future clients.PalantirOnce again, Alek Karp put one of the most bullish slides in the Q3 shareholder letter rather than the Q3 presentation. Quite frankly, this slide is something many investors are probably overlooking, and it is critical for the bull thesis. On a TTM basis in Q3 2020, PLTR's new customer base declined by -29.41%, as they only generated 12 new customers vs. 17 in the year prior. PLTR wasn't a well-known company in 2020, and for those who knew of PLTR, the common perception was that they were a black box company specializing in platforms for the military-industrial complex.PLTR didn't go public until the fall of 2020, and after they did, their new customer base exploded as more information about PLTR was circulated, and companies saw successful use cases from their industry peers. In 2021 PLTR added 49 additional new customers on a TTM basis in Q3, up 408.33% YoY, as they finished with 61 new customers. In Q3 of 2022, PLTR experienced a huge increase in new customers. PLTR's new customer base in Q3 of 2022 on a TTM basis grew by 119.67% or 73 new customers YoY to 134.I wasn't thrilled with the net dollar retention being stuck at 119% for 2 consecutive quarters, but seeing the cohort growth in new customers, there will be plenty of chances to upsell customers and add additional functionality to their contracts. Over the last 2 years, PLTR has added 195 new customers, and while new customer growth has decelerated on a percentage basis, it has increased in size YoY. Based on the previous 2 years, PLTR could end up having 450-500 customers by this time next year. If PLTR replicates its 134 new customer growth over the next 12 months, it will put them at 471 customers.I was very critical of PLTR's revenue growth and margins due to the level of stock-based compensation that has been issued, but there is certainly a thesis that the growth hasn't materialized from their newest customers, and 2022 is an anomaly year from a revenue and margin standpoint.PalantirNo matter how I look at it, PLTR is growing, even though revenue growth will fall short of PLTR's previous projections. Q3 revenue is up 22% YoY, and the U.S. business is still exploding, as it's up 31% YoY. In Q3 PLTR's total contract value closed at $1.3 billion, while they closed 78 deals worth a minimum of $1 million. Of these 78 deals, 32 were at least worth $5 million, and 19 exceeded $10 million. PLTR ended Q3, having closed 273 deals YTD, which is up 63% YoY from 167 in 2021, which drove its total remaining deal value up 14% YoY to $4.1 billion.For all of the shortcomings, there are many aspects to build a bullish thesis around. I am not closing the door on PLTR as I can argue a bullish case to myself in the same fashion I can create a doom and gloom scenario. At the end of the day, PLTR has $2.4 billion of cash on the balance sheet with $0 of debt and is well capitalized for the future. PLTR doesn't have a single concern with rising rates impacting their expenses, and there is a path to profitability and large amounts of FCF in the future. The only questions are, will PLTR continue growing in a similar fashion, and will its new customer base eventually drive additional net dollar retention levels?ConclusionAs a reformed PLTR bull, I am currently neutral on the company. I would need to see revenue get back to the 30%+ projection, margins improve, and expenses either stay in-line or decrease to get bullish again.That being said, I am not bearish and find Palantir's current valuation interesting. I plan on adding more shares and dollar cost averaging, as I am not ready to call it a loss and put this investment in the tax-loss harvesting bucket. I need 3 more quarters of data before making a final decision on PLTR, as there is still a path to billions of FCF in 2030, but the current revenue and margin declines are certainly concerning. As PLTR's numbers have changed, so has my investment thesis, and I will anxiously be awaiting the Q4 earnings report.This article is written by Steven Fiorillo for reference only. Please note the risks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5363,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3579095725705542","authorId":"3579095725705542","name":"Louis7779","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3579095725705542","idStr":"3579095725705542"},"content":"Pls like my post thanks","text":"Pls like my post thanks","html":"Pls like my post thanks"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987069958,"gmtCreate":1667779720475,"gmtModify":1676537961169,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"huat","listText":"huat","text":"huat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987069958","repostId":"1163057400","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1163057400","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1667779473,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163057400?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-07 08:04","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stock Market Tipped To Open In The Green","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163057400","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market rebounded on Friday, one day after ending the seven-day winning streak in","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Singapore stock market rebounded on Friday, one day after ending the seven-day winning streak in which it had surged more than 170 points or 5.7 percent. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,130-point plateau and it&#39;s likely to open higher again on Monday.</p><p>The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat following stronger than expected employment data from the United States. The European and U.S. markets were solidly higher and the Asian bourses are tipped to follow suit.</p><p>The STI finished modestly higher on Friday following gains from the financials, properties and industrials.</p><p>For the day, the index advanced 27.60 points or 0.89 percent to finish at 3,130.11 after trading between 3,098.72 and 3,134.30. Volume was 1.65 billion shares worth 1.26 billion Singapore dollars. There were 347 gainers and 218 decliners.</p><p>Among the actives, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust gained 0.54 percent, while CapitaLand Investment skyrocketed 5.59 percent, City Developments rallied 1.43 percent, DBS Group and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding both increased 0.79 percent, Emperador climbed 1.05 percent, Genting Singapore added 0.62 percent, Hongkong Land spiked 2.21 percent, Keppel Corp strengthened 1.14 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust lost 0.64 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust improved 0.93 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation collected 0.75 percent, SATS sank 0.74 percent, SembCorp Industries surged 3.70 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering fell 0.30 percent, SingTel rose 0.40 percent, Thai Beverage accelerated 1.75 percent, United Overseas Bank jumped 1.36 percent, Wilmar International advanced 1.02 percent, Yangzijiang Financial and DFI Retail both soared 3.08 percent and Ascendas REIT, Comfort DelGro and Mapletree Logistics Trust were unchanged.</p><p>The lead from Wall Street is upbeat as the major averages opened sharply higher on Friday, faded midday but bounced higher again late in the session.</p><p>The Dow surged 402.02 points or 1.26 percent to finish at 32,403.22, while the NASDAQ jumped 132.35 points or 1.28 percent to close at 10,475.25 and the S&amp;P 500 climbed 50.66 points or 1.36 percent to end at 3,770.55.</p><p>For the week, the NASDAQ plummeted 5.7 percent, the S&amp;P tumbled 3.4 percent and the Dow dropped 1.4 percent.</p><p>The volatility followed the release of the Labor Department&#39;s closely watched monthly employment report for October.</p><p>The report showed non-farm payroll employment jumped by 261,000 jobs in October after surging by an upwardly revised 315,000 jobs in September.</p><p>The report generated a mixed reaction among traders, creating uncertainty about the outlook for future interest rate hikes.</p><p>Crude oil prices climbed higher Friday amid easing concerns about the outlook for energy demand. A weak dollar and fears of a ban by the European Union on Russian oil also supported crude oil prices. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for December ended higher by $4.44 or 5 percent at $92.61 a barrel.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stock Market Tipped To Open In The Green</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stock Market Tipped To Open In The Green\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-07 08:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.rttnews.com/3323610/singapore-stock-market-tipped-to-open-in-the-green.aspx?type=acom><strong>RTTNews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore stock market rebounded on Friday, one day after ending the seven-day winning streak in which it had surged more than 170 points or 5.7 percent. The Straits Times Index now rests just ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3323610/singapore-stock-market-tipped-to-open-in-the-green.aspx?type=acom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3323610/singapore-stock-market-tipped-to-open-in-the-green.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163057400","content_text":"The Singapore stock market rebounded on Friday, one day after ending the seven-day winning streak in which it had surged more than 170 points or 5.7 percent. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,130-point plateau and it's likely to open higher again on Monday.The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat following stronger than expected employment data from the United States. The European and U.S. markets were solidly higher and the Asian bourses are tipped to follow suit.The STI finished modestly higher on Friday following gains from the financials, properties and industrials.For the day, the index advanced 27.60 points or 0.89 percent to finish at 3,130.11 after trading between 3,098.72 and 3,134.30. Volume was 1.65 billion shares worth 1.26 billion Singapore dollars. There were 347 gainers and 218 decliners.Among the actives, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust gained 0.54 percent, while CapitaLand Investment skyrocketed 5.59 percent, City Developments rallied 1.43 percent, DBS Group and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding both increased 0.79 percent, Emperador climbed 1.05 percent, Genting Singapore added 0.62 percent, Hongkong Land spiked 2.21 percent, Keppel Corp strengthened 1.14 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust lost 0.64 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust improved 0.93 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation collected 0.75 percent, SATS sank 0.74 percent, SembCorp Industries surged 3.70 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering fell 0.30 percent, SingTel rose 0.40 percent, Thai Beverage accelerated 1.75 percent, United Overseas Bank jumped 1.36 percent, Wilmar International advanced 1.02 percent, Yangzijiang Financial and DFI Retail both soared 3.08 percent and Ascendas REIT, Comfort DelGro and Mapletree Logistics Trust were unchanged.The lead from Wall Street is upbeat as the major averages opened sharply higher on Friday, faded midday but bounced higher again late in the session.The Dow surged 402.02 points or 1.26 percent to finish at 32,403.22, while the NASDAQ jumped 132.35 points or 1.28 percent to close at 10,475.25 and the S&P 500 climbed 50.66 points or 1.36 percent to end at 3,770.55.For the week, the NASDAQ plummeted 5.7 percent, the S&P tumbled 3.4 percent and the Dow dropped 1.4 percent.The volatility followed the release of the Labor Department's closely watched monthly employment report for October.The report showed non-farm payroll employment jumped by 261,000 jobs in October after surging by an upwardly revised 315,000 jobs in September.The report generated a mixed reaction among traders, creating uncertainty about the outlook for future interest rate hikes.Crude oil prices climbed higher Friday amid easing concerns about the outlook for energy demand. A weak dollar and fears of a ban by the European Union on Russian oil also supported crude oil prices. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for December ended higher by $4.44 or 5 percent at $92.61 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4845,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988627178,"gmtCreate":1666745915595,"gmtModify":1676537799129,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988627178","repostId":"1199304887","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1199304887","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1666739677,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199304887?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-26 07:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alphabet Dips 6% As Q3 Revenues, Profits Miss Forecast","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199304887","media":"eeking Alpha","summary":"Alphabet stock is falling after its third-quarter results missed expectations on top and bottom line","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Alphabet stock is falling after its third-quarter results missed expectations on top and bottom lines as the company joined other techs in experiencing a currency challenge.</p><p>Revenues grew 6% to $69.09B, short of an expected $70.7B (or 8.5% year-over-year growth). That revenue would have grown 11% in constant currency, Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat noted.</p><p>Operating income and margins fell as well, to $17.14B from $21.03B, and to 25% from 32% respectively.</p><p>And net income fell to $13.9B from a year-ago $18.94B.</p><p>The results &#34;reflect healthy fundamental growth in Search and momentum in Cloud&#34; while showing the FX impact, Porat said. &#34;We&#39;re working to realign resources to fuel our highest growth priorities.&#34; Once again, though, YouTube presented a challenge to results.</p><p>Revenues by segment: Google Search and other, $39.54B (up 4.3%); YouTube ads, $7.07B (down 1.9%); Google Network, $7.87B (down 1.6%); Google other, $6.9B (up 2.1%); Google Cloud, $6.9B (up 37.6%); Other Bets, $209M (up 14.8%). The company also logged $638M in hedging gains vs. a year-ago $62M.</p><p>Traffic acquisition costs rose slightly, to $11.83B from $11.5B.</p><p>And headcount jumped to 186,779 employees from a year-ago 150,028.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alphabet Dips 6% As Q3 Revenues, Profits Miss Forecast</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlphabet Dips 6% As Q3 Revenues, Profits Miss Forecast\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-26 07:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3895079-alphabet-dips-5-as-q3-revenues-profits-miss-forecast><strong>eeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet stock is falling after its third-quarter results missed expectations on top and bottom lines as the company joined other techs in experiencing a currency challenge.Revenues grew 6% to $69.09B...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3895079-alphabet-dips-5-as-q3-revenues-profits-miss-forecast\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3895079-alphabet-dips-5-as-q3-revenues-profits-miss-forecast","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199304887","content_text":"Alphabet stock is falling after its third-quarter results missed expectations on top and bottom lines as the company joined other techs in experiencing a currency challenge.Revenues grew 6% to $69.09B, short of an expected $70.7B (or 8.5% year-over-year growth). That revenue would have grown 11% in constant currency, Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat noted.Operating income and margins fell as well, to $17.14B from $21.03B, and to 25% from 32% respectively.And net income fell to $13.9B from a year-ago $18.94B.The results \"reflect healthy fundamental growth in Search and momentum in Cloud\" while showing the FX impact, Porat said. \"We're working to realign resources to fuel our highest growth priorities.\" Once again, though, YouTube presented a challenge to results.Revenues by segment: Google Search and other, $39.54B (up 4.3%); YouTube ads, $7.07B (down 1.9%); Google Network, $7.87B (down 1.6%); Google other, $6.9B (up 2.1%); Google Cloud, $6.9B (up 37.6%); Other Bets, $209M (up 14.8%). The company also logged $638M in hedging gains vs. a year-ago $62M.Traffic acquisition costs rose slightly, to $11.83B from $11.5B.And headcount jumped to 186,779 employees from a year-ago 150,028.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3895,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9983982671,"gmtCreate":1666138347693,"gmtModify":1676537711129,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"huat","listText":"huat","text":"huat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9983982671","repostId":"1166946802","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166946802","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1666137848,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166946802?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-19 08:04","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166946802","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled mor","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,025-point plateau and it&#39;s due for additional support on Wednesday.</p><p>The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat on bargain hunting and renewed optimism over earnings. The European and U.S. markets were firmly higher and the Asian bourses are expected to open in similar fashion.</p><p>The STI finished modestly higher on Tuesday following gains from the financial shares and the property stocks.</p><p>For the day, the index improved 10.13 points or 0.34 percent to finish at 3,025.88 after trading between 3,007.94 and 3,039.06. Volume was 1.6 billion shares worth 979.6 million Singapore dollars. There were 328 gainers and 216 decliners.</p><p>Among the actives, Ascendas REIT climbed 0.76 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust advanced 0.55 percent, CapitaLand Investment rallied 0.93 percent, City Developments gained 0.27 percent, DBS Group rose 0.25 percent, Genting Singapore accelerated 1.29 percent, Hongkong Land perked 0.23 percent, Keppel Corp lost 0.60 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust sank 0.61 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust slumped 1.32 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust soared 2.03 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation jumped 0.96 percent, SembCorp Industries tumbled 2.08 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dropped 0.94 percent, SingTel strengthened 0.81 percent, Thai Beverage retreated 1.71 percent, United Overseas Bank collected 0.65 percent, Wilmar International added 0.28 percent, Yangzijiang Financial surged 2.90 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding spiked 1.75 percent and Emperador, Comfort DelGro and SATS were unchanged.</p><p>The lead from Wall Street is positive as the major averages opened higher on Tuesday, faded midday but bounced higher again heading into the close.</p><p>The Dow surged 337.98 points or 1.12 percent to finish at 30,525.80, while the NASDAQ advanced 96.60 points or 0.90 percent to end at 10,772.40 and the S&amp;P 500 climbed 42.03 points or 1.14 percent to close at 3,719.98.</p><p>The initial strength on Wall Street reflected a positive reaction to upbeat earnings news from companies like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ), which helped ease concerns about the strength of the earnings season.</p><p>In economic news, the Federal Reserve released a report showing industrial production increased by more than expected in September.</p><p>Crude oil prices fell sharply on Tuesday after a volatile session amid uncertainty about the outlook for energy demand. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for November slumped $2.64 or 3.1 percent at $82.82 a barrel.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-19 08:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom><strong>RTTNews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166946802","content_text":"The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,025-point plateau and it's due for additional support on Wednesday.The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat on bargain hunting and renewed optimism over earnings. The European and U.S. markets were firmly higher and the Asian bourses are expected to open in similar fashion.The STI finished modestly higher on Tuesday following gains from the financial shares and the property stocks.For the day, the index improved 10.13 points or 0.34 percent to finish at 3,025.88 after trading between 3,007.94 and 3,039.06. Volume was 1.6 billion shares worth 979.6 million Singapore dollars. There were 328 gainers and 216 decliners.Among the actives, Ascendas REIT climbed 0.76 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust advanced 0.55 percent, CapitaLand Investment rallied 0.93 percent, City Developments gained 0.27 percent, DBS Group rose 0.25 percent, Genting Singapore accelerated 1.29 percent, Hongkong Land perked 0.23 percent, Keppel Corp lost 0.60 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust sank 0.61 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust slumped 1.32 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust soared 2.03 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation jumped 0.96 percent, SembCorp Industries tumbled 2.08 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dropped 0.94 percent, SingTel strengthened 0.81 percent, Thai Beverage retreated 1.71 percent, United Overseas Bank collected 0.65 percent, Wilmar International added 0.28 percent, Yangzijiang Financial surged 2.90 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding spiked 1.75 percent and Emperador, Comfort DelGro and SATS were unchanged.The lead from Wall Street is positive as the major averages opened higher on Tuesday, faded midday but bounced higher again heading into the close.The Dow surged 337.98 points or 1.12 percent to finish at 30,525.80, while the NASDAQ advanced 96.60 points or 0.90 percent to end at 10,772.40 and the S&P 500 climbed 42.03 points or 1.14 percent to close at 3,719.98.The initial strength on Wall Street reflected a positive reaction to upbeat earnings news from companies like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), which helped ease concerns about the strength of the earnings season.In economic news, the Federal Reserve released a report showing industrial production increased by more than expected in September.Crude oil prices fell sharply on Tuesday after a volatile session amid uncertainty about the outlook for energy demand. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for November slumped $2.64 or 3.1 percent at $82.82 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980439316,"gmtCreate":1665794017336,"gmtModify":1676537664846,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"huat","listText":"huat","text":"huat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980439316","repostId":"1172315295","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1172315295","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1665791993,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172315295?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-15 07:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172315295","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences betwe","content":"<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-15 07:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172315295","content_text":"Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play, while the other is more of a plain vanilla cloud company. Additionally, the market despises one and embraces the other, but the consensus could be wrong.Software stocks have taken a dive like the rest of the technology industry, but that could offer buying opportunities if you know where to look. In this piece, we used TipRanks’ Comparison Tool to evaluate two software stocks. Although Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR) are both software companies, they are quite different, addressing different markets and utilizing different kinds of proprietary technology. Those differences may call for a contrarian view.Variety is the Spice of the Software SectorSoftware has had a challenging year like the rest of the tech sector, but one benefit of software stocks is that they come in a wide variety. For example, while Snowflake and Palantir are both in the data and analytics space, they utilize two different business models. Snowflake takes a traditional cloud-based approach to data warehousing, while Palantir uses its own private operating system models.These different approaches to data analysis enable Snowflake and Palantir to address different parts of the industry. Palantir doesn’t actually store data but instead enables companies to manage and analyze their own on-premises and cloud data. Its use of private operating system models offers greater customizability, and its defense specialization makes it unique among software firms.On the other hand, Snowflake’s more traditional approach allows companies to not only analyze their data but store it as well. The differences between these companies are critical when it comes to valuation.Snowflake (SNOW)In many ways, it seems like Snowflake can do no wrong where investors are concerned. Although the stock is down 55% year-to-date, it remains a darling of the software sector despite having been one of the sector’s most expensive stocks in 2020 and 2021. As a result, a Hold mindset may be appropriate due to its valuation, crowding, and other factors.Snowflake isn’t profitable yet, and it doesn’t look like it will be profitable anytime soon. It trades at a price/sales multiple of around 30x, higher than its competitor Zscaler (NASDAQ: ZS). Additionally, Snowflake is extremely crowded right now, with 59% institutional ownership. While this crowding can be a positive thing when things are good, it can turn terrible at a moment’s notice, leaving institutions competing to dump their shares.One issue with Snowflake’s business model is that it’s not subscription-based like other cloud-based models are. Customers pay for the amount of storage they use rather than a flat monthly rate, which could be a problem if or when enterprises start looking for places to cut back as their earnings tumble in a recession.This consumption-based business model also means Snowflake could be more expensive for some enterprises than they expected when signing up. For that reason, price transparency and predictability are lacking at a critical time in the business cycle.On the other hand, one thing Snowflake has going for it is that its product is cloud-agnostic, meaning it can work with multiple clouds from multiple providers. Additionally, the SaaS firm is growing rapidly, with its product revenue surging 83% year-over-year to $466.3 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2023.Total revenue also rose 83% to $497.25 million. However, Snowflake lost $222.8 million in the July 2022 quarter, an increase from the $189.7 million it lost in the July 2021 quarter.At the end of the day, the company may have a bright future, and many investors are certainly betting on that. However, in the current environment, it looks fairly valued or perhaps slightly overvalued due to its lack of profitability or visible path to profitability. Further, the significant decline in deferred revenues in the most recently completed quarter is cause for concern.What is the Price Target for SNOW stock?Snowflake has a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on 24 Buy ratings, seven Hold ratings, and one Sell rating over the last three months. At $211.25, the average price target for Snowflake implies upside potential of 38.6%.Palantir Technologies (PLTR)The general view of Palantir Technologies is the complete opposite of Snowflake’s. After careful analysis of many factors, it’s difficult to understand why the market hates this stock so much. Thus, a long-term bullish view appears appropriate due to its government contracts and low P/S ratio of about 9x.One important thing to point out about Palantir is its exposure to the defense industry through its data analytics software that’s specialized for defense and intelligence gathering. Of course, the sector hasn’t done particularly well this year, declining about 20% year-to-date based on the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index.However, the geopolitical uncertainty that includes the war in Ukraine and more calls for a more constructive view of the industry. Thus, it’s unclear why Palantir’s stock isn’t seeing support like fellow defense contractors Raytheon (NYSE: RTX), which is down only 4% year-to-date, and Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC), which is up 20%.One of Palantir’s big contract wins this year was a $229 million one-year contract with the Defense Department. In fact, that contract is an expansion of one that originally was just for the U.S. Army Research Laboratory because it now covers all branches of the military. The company will provide artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities to all branches of the U.S. military.Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) actually abandoned that contract due to a widespread protest about its technology being used for surveillance. This could be one reason the market hates Palantir Technologies so much, but from a financial standpoint, there is much to like.Palantir also announced that it had renewed a contract with the Department of Homeland Security. It also works with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement — another contract that has been controversial.Unfortunately, it has a string of earnings misses and even slashed its revenue outlook in its most recent earnings report. However, that reduction was explained by the unclear timing of the company’s government contracts, which have since been renewed and expanded.While Palantir isn’t profitable yet, its management said during an earnings call earlier this year that they expect to be profitable by 2025. In the meantime, the company has a healthy balance sheet with ~$2.4 billion in cash and equivalents versus $933.5 million in liabilities.What is the Price Target for PLTR stock?Palantir Technologies has a Hold consensus rating based on two Buys, two Holds, and four Sells assigned over the last three months. At $10.50, the average price target for Palantir Technologies implies upside potential of 30.11%.Conclusion: Hold on to Snowflake; Consider Buying PalantirAs things stand right now, the market is in love with Snowflake, at least as much as it can be while selling it off, and it views Palantir as an anathema. However, a review of the data suggests a contrarian view may be in order.Ultimately, Snowflake looks fairly valued or potentially a bit overvalued. In contrast, Palantir looks undervalued, which appears temporary, although it may take a few years for this to play out.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9,"SNOW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980603323,"gmtCreate":1665709917862,"gmtModify":1676537652603,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980603323","repostId":"1142843627","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1142843627","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1665709097,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142843627?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-14 08:58","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks to Watch: Singtel, SIA, Stamford Land","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142843627","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Friday (","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Friday (Oct 14):</p><p><b>Singtel (Z74):</b> The Singtel-owned telco on Friday (Oct 14) said that customers whose passport numbers were exposed in its recent cyberattack would not need to replace their passports.</p><p>The statement comes following discussions with the Australian government, which previously confirmed that Optus would pay for the replacements after demands from the federal government.</p><p><b>SIA (C6L):</b> Flag carrier Singapore Airlines (SIA) said that it is currently in confidential discussions with Tata Group to explore a potential transaction relating to securities of Vistara and Air India, a subsidiary of Tata.</p><p>“The discussions seek to deepen the existing partnership between SIA and Tata, and may include a potential integration of Vistara and Air India,” the company said in a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13).</p><p>SIA currently holds a 49 per cent equity interest in Tata SIA Airlines which operates Vistara, an Indian full-service airline based in New Delhi. Tata holds the remaining 51 per cent stake.</p><p><b>Stamford Land (H07):</b> Stamford Land Corporation : H07 0%expects to record a net loss for the six months ended Sep 30, 2022.</p><p>In a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13), the mainboard-listed company says the net loss is mainly attributed to foreign exchange losses and fair value loss on its investment property in London.</p><p>The profit guidance is based on a preliminary assessment of unaudited consolidated management accounts of the group for the first half of its FY2023, which has not been reviewed by the audit and risk management committee of the company.</p><p>Still, Stamford Land said that the group expects to record a gain on the previously-announced disposal of two properties in Sydney and Auckland in its unaudited consolidated management accounts in the six months ended Mar 31, 2023.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks to Watch: Singtel, SIA, Stamford Land</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks to Watch: Singtel, SIA, Stamford Land\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-14 08:58</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Friday (Oct 14):</p><p><b>Singtel (Z74):</b> The Singtel-owned telco on Friday (Oct 14) said that customers whose passport numbers were exposed in its recent cyberattack would not need to replace their passports.</p><p>The statement comes following discussions with the Australian government, which previously confirmed that Optus would pay for the replacements after demands from the federal government.</p><p><b>SIA (C6L):</b> Flag carrier Singapore Airlines (SIA) said that it is currently in confidential discussions with Tata Group to explore a potential transaction relating to securities of Vistara and Air India, a subsidiary of Tata.</p><p>“The discussions seek to deepen the existing partnership between SIA and Tata, and may include a potential integration of Vistara and Air India,” the company said in a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13).</p><p>SIA currently holds a 49 per cent equity interest in Tata SIA Airlines which operates Vistara, an Indian full-service airline based in New Delhi. Tata holds the remaining 51 per cent stake.</p><p><b>Stamford Land (H07):</b> Stamford Land Corporation : H07 0%expects to record a net loss for the six months ended Sep 30, 2022.</p><p>In a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13), the mainboard-listed company says the net loss is mainly attributed to foreign exchange losses and fair value loss on its investment property in London.</p><p>The profit guidance is based on a preliminary assessment of unaudited consolidated management accounts of the group for the first half of its FY2023, which has not been reviewed by the audit and risk management committee of the company.</p><p>Still, Stamford Land said that the group expects to record a gain on the previously-announced disposal of two properties in Sydney and Auckland in its unaudited consolidated management accounts in the six months ended Mar 31, 2023.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"Z74.SI":"新电信","C6L.SI":"新加坡航空公司","H07.SI":"史丹福置地"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142843627","content_text":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Friday (Oct 14):Singtel (Z74): The Singtel-owned telco on Friday (Oct 14) said that customers whose passport numbers were exposed in its recent cyberattack would not need to replace their passports.The statement comes following discussions with the Australian government, which previously confirmed that Optus would pay for the replacements after demands from the federal government.SIA (C6L): Flag carrier Singapore Airlines (SIA) said that it is currently in confidential discussions with Tata Group to explore a potential transaction relating to securities of Vistara and Air India, a subsidiary of Tata.“The discussions seek to deepen the existing partnership between SIA and Tata, and may include a potential integration of Vistara and Air India,” the company said in a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13).SIA currently holds a 49 per cent equity interest in Tata SIA Airlines which operates Vistara, an Indian full-service airline based in New Delhi. Tata holds the remaining 51 per cent stake.Stamford Land (H07): Stamford Land Corporation : H07 0%expects to record a net loss for the six months ended Sep 30, 2022.In a bourse filing on Thursday (Oct 13), the mainboard-listed company says the net loss is mainly attributed to foreign exchange losses and fair value loss on its investment property in London.The profit guidance is based on a preliminary assessment of unaudited consolidated management accounts of the group for the first half of its FY2023, which has not been reviewed by the audit and risk management committee of the company.Still, Stamford Land said that the group expects to record a gain on the previously-announced disposal of two properties in Sydney and Auckland in its unaudited consolidated management accounts in the six months ended Mar 31, 2023.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"Z74.SI":0.9,"H07.SI":0.9,"C6L.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3022,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9917504245,"gmtCreate":1665536334487,"gmtModify":1676537622555,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917504245","repostId":"2274573244","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2274573244","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1665525713,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2274573244?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-12 06:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2274573244","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Bear markets are the time to position yourself to make profits in the next five to 10 years.","content":"<div>\n<p>Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 06:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOGL":"谷歌A","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2274573244","content_text":"Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message you know to be more than just speculation. But I know three immutable facts about bear markets:They are hard on investors.They do eventually end.Long-term investors can benefit from them tremendously.Not convinced of that last one? Let's talk data. According to investment firm Compound Capital Advisors, the average five-year return after the worst nine-month periods for stocks is 118%. Disciplined investors who continue to buy excellent companies, or just buy the whole market, will more than double their money in five years after a bear market on average. The 10-year returns are higher still.But wait! Shouldn't we at least try to time the market? Get in at the very bottom? Not according to the data. JPMorgan Chase's wealth management firm points out that missing out on just the best 10 trading days in the last 20 years cut investors' annualized returns by nearly half. And the 10 best days tend to occur less than a month after the worst days. This makes the odds of consistently correctly timing the market incredibly tiny. Famed investor Warren Buffett can't do it -- and he doesn't try.The good news is that we don't have to time the market bottom. Building a healthy long-term portfolio in a bear market is much easier than in a raging bull market. Many stocks are on sale and likely to outperform for years once the bear goes back into hibernation. It just requires that you know where to look.Let's take a look at three such candidates.1. Alphabet stock is on the clearance rackAlphabet can be had today for its lowest price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio in 10 years (as shown below). This includes the March 2020 crash.GOOG PE Ratio data by YChartsYet the business is healthy. Sales reached $138 billion through the first half of this year on 17.5% year-over-year growth while operating income increased by 10% to $39.5 billion. Operating income hasn't increased as much as investors might like. However, the reason might surprise you.Research and development (R&D) costs have grown $3.8 billion, or 25%, so far this year. R&D has the potential to pay massive dividends down the line, which may make it an excellent investment now.Conventional wisdom says advertisers scale back budgets during a recession, hurting Alphabet's core Google advertising business. However, when advertisers are competing in a tough market with limited budgets, they will look to get the most bang for their buck. Google Search is practically a necessity for businesses, and YouTube ads are tough to beat.Plus, Google Cloud is expanding. Revenue exceeded $12 billion in the first half of 2022, growing 39% year over year. This segment faces tough competition in Amazon's Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft's Azure, but the cloud market is vast and growing. Investors are looking for this segment to begin showing profits soon.The advertising market could get tighter, but Alphabet has the clout to survive now and thrive once the market turns bullish again.2. Buy AWS and get Amazon for free?Amazon Web Services is Amazon's cash cow. The segment has a rare combination of tremendous growth and impressive profitability. Sales are up 35% through two quarters this year, putting the segment on pace for $84 billion in revenue for 2022 and likely well over $100 billion in sales next year. The segment has an operating margin of 35% this year.It's tough to find an exact comparison to this unicorn segment, although I have tried. Microsoft is a profitable software-as-a-service (SaaS) company with a price-to-sales valuation of 9, so let's start there. Using this P/S ratio as a guide, AWS could be valued near $1 trillion based on next year's estimated sales. Since Amazon's total market cap is just $1.17 trillion, the rest of its business sure looks undervalued.So perhaps we aren't getting the rest for free, but definitely on clearance -- and just in time for the holidays.Here is what comes with \"the rest\":More than 150 million Amazon Prime members in the U.S. and 200 million worldwide.38% share of the U.S. e-commerce market.A burgeoning digital advertising business that generated $7.9 billion in sales last quarter.Amazon's retail business has suffered from the aftershocks of the pandemic. Logistical headaches, labor costs, and inflation have eaten retail profits, which could continue. Couple this with a looming potential recession, and we can see why the stock is on sale. Long-term investors should keep Amazon stock on their shortlist.3. CrowdStrike's so confident it's gone on a hiring spreeMany tech companies are talking about (or even instituting) layoffs given the economic climate. But not CrowdStrike. In fact, CrowdStrike is hiring in record numbers.\"We are also executing our 2023 hiring plan and are pleased to report that we added a record number of net new hires for the second consecutive quarter,\" CFO Burt Podbere said on CrowdStrike's recent fiscal 2023 second-quarter conference call. \"Bringing on and retaining top talent is a cornerstone to supporting our product road map, future growth, and market share gains in new markets.\"Companies only hire like this if they are supremely confident in their growth. And growth is CrowdStrike's forte. The company reached $2.1 billion in annual recurring revenue last quarter, an increase of 59%. CrowdStrike's subscription customer base also soared 51% to 19,686 in the quarter. This is quite a leap from the 1,242 customers the company had in 2018.The growth comes when cybersecurity is top of mind for governments and businesses. Breaches and cybercrime cost billions of dollars, and nations use cyberattacks as warfare tactics. CrowdStrike's modular artificial intelligence-powered approach to stopping breaches is in demand. This means it can thrive even when the economy struggles. Cyberthreats don't take time off, even for recessions.CrowdStrike stock is more than 40% down from its 52-week high and sits at its lowest P/S ratio ever (excluding the March 2020 crash). The company is firing on all cylinders and looks like an attractive buy for long-term investors with a medium level of risk tolerance.Building wealth takes time, discipline, patience, and the ability to see past current headlines to capitalize on terrific values. The stocks above are excellent places to begin.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"CRWD":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1747,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914442862,"gmtCreate":1665361022256,"gmtModify":1676537591088,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914442862","repostId":"2274731302","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2274731302","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1665357993,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2274731302?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-10 07:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investors on Guard as Stocks Rally Sputters Ahead of Data Deluge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2274731302","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"S&P has dropped seven of nine times in CPI sessions this yearSemiconductor stocks head for worst ann","content":"<div>\n<p>S&P has dropped seven of nine times in CPI sessions this yearSemiconductor stocks head for worst annual loss since 2008It’s hard to blame any stock-market investor for being confused right now.The S&P...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-09/investors-on-guard-as-stocks-rally-sputters-ahead-of-data-deluge\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investors on Guard as Stocks Rally Sputters Ahead of Data Deluge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestors on Guard as Stocks Rally Sputters Ahead of Data Deluge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-10 07:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-09/investors-on-guard-as-stocks-rally-sputters-ahead-of-data-deluge><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>S&P has dropped seven of nine times in CPI sessions this yearSemiconductor stocks head for worst annual loss since 2008It’s hard to blame any stock-market investor for being confused right now.The S&P...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-09/investors-on-guard-as-stocks-rally-sputters-ahead-of-data-deluge\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-09/investors-on-guard-as-stocks-rally-sputters-ahead-of-data-deluge","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2274731302","content_text":"S&P has dropped seven of nine times in CPI sessions this yearSemiconductor stocks head for worst annual loss since 2008It’s hard to blame any stock-market investor for being confused right now.The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indexes are both coming off their best weeks in a month. But the way Friday ended, it’s hard to feel optimistic. Where the market goes from here likely lies in a batch of economic data that will arrive over the next couple of days.Traders are most closely watching the consumer price figures that are due Thursday because it will be key to determining if the Federal Reserve moves ahead with another 75 basis-point rate increase at its next meeting in early November. In fact, a further acceleration in prices could amp up the urgency to extend jumbo-sized rate hikes beyond this year.“It’s a very bewildering time right now for investors, even more so than this whole year,” said Thomas Martin, senior portfolio manager at Globalt Investments. “Sentiment is the worst it’s ever been, so we were ripe for a pop. But we still have a very tight labor market and strong wage growth that’s complicating investors’ hopes for a Fed pivot. It’s a huge week with earnings season kicking off and the inflation data will be crucial once again.”CPI is forecast to have risen 8.1% in September from a year earlier versus 8.3% in August, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy components, is projected to rise 6.5% on a year-over-year basis and fall to 0.4% month over month.What’s more, the minutes of the latest Fed policy meeting arrive on Wednesday and may provide more insight into the central bank’s aggressive efforts to fight inflation. And there’s a key measure of US producer prices is due Wednesday, followed by the University of Michigan’s monthly consumer inflation expectations on Friday.Flip FlopIt’s no secret that the market is highly sensitive to high inflation right now. Trading sessions this year when consumer inflation reports are released this have been rough, with the the S&P 500 falling seven of nine times. Many investors, have fresh memories of the last inflation print on Sept. 13, which came in hotter than expected, sending the S&P 500 down 4.3%. It was the worst CPI session since March 2020, and other than that the worst since 2011.“This year, we’ve seen this absolute obsession around the inflation number,” said Matt Maley, Miller Tabak & Co.’s chief market strategist. “The bigger worry is -- no matter the inflation report next week, investors are still going to be concerned about inflation being elevated. Most people on Wall Street are certain that we’re going to have a recession, and if the level of inflation stays steady, that won’t be good enough anymore.”Tech WreckSemiconductor stocks, in particular, could face further pressure after taking a beating Friday after disappointing earnings results from Samsung Electronics Co.The world’s largest memory chipmaker reported its first profit drop since 2019, sparking further worries about Corporate America’s earnings power and margin-shredding inflation pressures.The Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index tumbled 6.1% after Samsung’s results and Advanced Micro Devices Inc.’s preliminary third-quarter sales missed projections by more than $1 billion. The index, which is home to chip giants like Nvidia Corp., Micron Technology Inc. and AMD, has plummeted 40% in 2022.Flow ShowInvestors are rushing out of US equities, and most other risk assets, in search of safety with a recession possibly looming. Stock funds have recorded sparse inflows this year as the bear market emerged. Since the start of 2022, US equities have posted inflows in 21 of 39 weeks, or 54%. That’s down from 58% of weeks in 2021, and 48% of weeks in 2020, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1759,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":502593258013456,"gmtCreate":1763711942885,"gmtModify":1763711946202,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> Numb...","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BMNR\">$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ </a> Numb...","text":"$BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ Numb...","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/59e15e1bd928f6407c4deef2b42498ff","width":"895","height":"1244"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":58,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":259,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/502593258013456","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":9865,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4111926286669142","authorId":"4111926286669142","name":"koalasleepsalot","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4111926286669142","idStr":"4111926286669142"},"content":"whats the chance of recovery","text":"whats the chance of recovery","html":"whats the chance of recovery"}],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963053822,"gmtCreate":1668557318266,"gmtModify":1676538074738,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963053822","repostId":"1160332041","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160332041","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1668576951,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160332041?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-16 13:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160332041","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in","content":"<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-16 13:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160332041","content_text":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the economy is possible. In my view, however, a US recession is highly likely in the next 12 to 18 months. Why don’t I share the Fed’s optimism?The projections by the Fed governors will always paint a rosy picture. They’re instructed to condition their view on an optimal monetary policy, which obviously makes better outcomes achievable. In the real world, as has been demonstrated over the past year, policy is often far from that ideal, so actual results will usually be worse than implied by the projections.In the same vein, the Fed model that underpins its staff forecast contains assumptions that contribute to more pleasant forecasts. They include that the Fed will pursue the optimal monetary policy path in the future (regardless of past errors) and that households and businesses know this.These assumptions rule out persistent monetary policy errors or the loss of confidence by households and businesses in the Fed’s commitment and ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives.The Fed also operates in a world where there’s an important political economy constraint. Admitting that a recession would be required to get inflation in check might undercut public support for a tighter monetary policy. It also could subject the Fed to criticism that might ultimately undermine its independence or cause Congress to limit its authority in the future. Sugarcoating the cost of what the Fed needs to do may be viewed as a necessary evil so it can carry out its mission successfully. But it also runs the risk of undercutting the Fed’s credibility.Why do I believe a recession is unavoidable? To start, the Fed is committed to bringing inflation down to its 2% annual rate target. Powell made it clear in his remarks at the Jackson Hole conference in August that this goal was “unconditional” and reiterated his commitment at his September news conference. Failure is an unattractive option because inflation expectations would rise, necessitating a harsher monetary policy and worse outcomes later.To bring inflation to 2%, the Federal Open Market Committee will have to push up the unemployment rate substantially. The labor market is much too tight to be consistent with a stable or declining underlying inflation rate.Judging from the relationship between unfilled job openings and the number of people who are unemployed, known as the Beveridge curve, the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation has risen considerably and could be as high as 5%, well above the current rate of 3.7%. Even if the Beveridge curve were to shift back down because labor market frictions abated, the unemployment rate would still need to rise to at least 4.5%.During the postwar period, every time the unemployment rate has risen by 0.5 percentage point or more, the US economy has fallen into recession. This empirical regularity is memorialized as the Sahm rule. The difficulty of engineering a soft landing is underscored by the fact that there are no examples of an unemployment rate rising between 0.5 and 2 percentage points from trough to peak at all. Once the unemployment rate has moved up modestly, it’s hard to stop. Thus, the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections in September in which unemployment rises to 4.4% from its recent trough of 3.5% would be unprecedented.The episodes Powell has cited of successful soft landings—in 1965-66, 1984-85, and 1993-95—don’t apply to the current set of circumstances. In those cases, the Fed tightened and that slowed the pace of economic growth and the decline in the unemployment rate, but in none of those episodes did the Fed tighten sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up. In Fed parlance, these soft landings were achieved from above, by slowing the economy to a sustainable growth rate, rather than from below, by slowing the economy sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up.Fed risk management will also increase the likelihood of recession. Powell has made it clear that the consequences of failing to bring inflation back down to 2% on a sustainable basis are unacceptable. The lesson of the 1970s is that failure would lead to unanchored inflation expectations, making the job of restoring price stability that much more difficult.In addition, the Fed’s task will be made difficult by uncertainty about whether it has done enough. How high do short-term interest rates need to go to push the unemployment rate above the rate consistent with stable inflation? How long does such an unemployment rate need to be elevated to bring inflation back down to 2%? Because, at the margin, the negative consequences of doing too little exceed the negative consequences of doing too much, this means that monetary policy will likely ultimately be kept too tight for too long. The long and variable lags between changes in the stance of monetary policy and its effect on economic activity reinforce this.Some argue—including Fed officials—that a soft landing is still possible:• As supply chain disruptions dissipate and the allocation of demand between goods and services normalizes, headline inflation will fall sharply.• Labor supply will increase as labor force participation rises.• Fed tightening can reduce the excess demand for labor without generating a large rise in unemployment.Although one can’t dismiss these points out of hand, I’m afraid they’re likely to prove insufficient to avoid a hard landing.First, even if declining goods prices cause headline inflation to fall sharply in the year ahead, that doesn’t deal with the fact that the inflation problem has broadened out, into services prices and wages.The breadth of inflationary pressures is visible in the median consumer price index calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the trimmed mean personal consumption expenditures deflator—an alternative inflation measure calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas—with increases of 7% and 4.7%, respectively, over the past year. Those numbers capture what’s happening for those goods and services in the middle of the inflation distribution.Similarly, the trend of wage inflation is well above a rate consistent with 2% inflation. For example, the employment cost index for the wages and salaries of private industry workers has gone up 5.2% over the past year, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s wage tracker index is rising at a 6.4% annual rate. Given the trend of labor productivity, wage inflation needs to be in a 3%-to-4% range to be consistent with the Fed’s 2% inflation objective.Second, on the labor supply front, the Fed is unlikely to be bailed out by a large increase in labor force participation. As labor economist Stephanie Aaronson noted in her remarks at this year’s Fed Jackson Hole conference: “The unemployment rate is the best gauge of the state of the business cycle.” Although a tight labor market can be expected to provoke a rise in labor force participation, she said, the process is a slow-moving one, playing out over several years, too slow a process to rescue the Fed.Third, the notion that the Fed’s monetary policy stringency can be oriented toward reducing the excess demand for labor without driving up unemployment materially is wishful thinking. Monetary policy can’t be targeted in such a way to reduce the demand for labor in industries where demand is excessive relative to industries where labor supply and demand is in better balance. It’s a blunt tool that affects the economy broadly through its impact on financial conditions.Although a soft landing would obviously be preferable, that ship has sailed. Today, a recession is virtually inevitable.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5526,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":608458151571456,"gmtCreate":1789563738951,"gmtModify":1789564218352,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","listText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","text":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608458151571456","repostId":"1190705481","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190705481","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock News First-Time Broadcast","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock News","id":"1036600163","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a"},"pubTimestamp":1789531406,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190705481?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-16 12:03","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190705481","media":"Stock News","summary":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between...","content":"<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDigital Asset Market Structure Bill Fails 49-50 in Senate Vote, Passage Odds Plummet to 5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036600163\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-16 12:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.<br><br>Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as <b>Coinbase</b> (COIN.US), <b>Circle</b>, <b>Robinhood</b> (HOOD.US), and <b>MicroStrategy</b> (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.<br><br>The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.<br><br>The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.<br><br>Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.<br><br>On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.<br><br>For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.<br><br>This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.<br><br>For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.<br><br>For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.<br><br>Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.<br><br>This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU2360107671.USD":"BGF FINTECH \"A4\" (USD) INC","CRCO":"YIELDMAX CRCL OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","BKCH":"AdvisorShares Sabretooth ETF","ICRC":"Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B","LU1791807156.HKD":"BGF WORLD FINANCIALS \"A2\" (HKDHDG) ACC","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","IBLC":"iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF","CRCA":"Proshares Ultra CRCL","CIR":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Corgi","CRCD":"T-REX 2X Inverse CRCLDaily Target ETF","CRCL":"Circle Internet Corp.","BK4023":"应用软件","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","CCUP":"T-REX 2x Long CRCL Daily Target ETF","BLCK":"Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF","CRCG":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Leverage Shares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190705481","content_text":"A procedural vote on the CLARITY Act in the US Senate ended in a 49-50 defeat, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance. The outcome reignited the core conflict between Republicans and Democrats over crypto regulatory frameworks, with at least three Republican senators declining to support the measure despite the party holding 53 seats. This marks the second time the bill has been delayed in over a year of negotiations, as it remains stuck at this critical juncture.Market participants reacted swiftly and sharply to the news. Early on September 16 Beijing time, Bitcoin briefly dipped near the $75,000 mark, while crypto-linked stocks such as Coinbase (COIN.US), Circle, Robinhood (HOOD.US), and MicroStrategy (MSTR.US) all came under selling pressure. On the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of the bill becoming law by the end of 2026 tumbled from above 30% at the start of the week to roughly 5%. That steep drop vividly captures the market's increasingly pessimistic outlook on the legislative path forward.The failed vote not only dampened short-term sentiment but also left the industry questioning whether a 60-vote coalition can be rebuilt within the year. No clear timeline has emerged, adding to the uncertainty. The political roots of this defeat run deep, anchored in ethical impasses within the Democratic caucus. Republicans released the final text on September 14, but Democratic negotiators rejected it and submitted a counterproposal just hours before the vote. Mark Warner later explained that while disagreements over enforcement and national security were close to resolution, unresolved conflicts of interest involving public officials profiting from the crypto industry led him to vote no. Other Democrats involved in talks, including Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks, Kirsten Gillibrand, Catherine Cortez Masto, and Cory Booker, also sided against the measure.The counterproposal centered on expanding restrictions, mandating forced divestiture of certain crypto company holdings, tightening enforcement and sponsor disclosure requirements, and adding DeFi-related safeguards. However, the revised text still failed to restore the criminal safe harbor provisions for developers, miners, and validators found in the BRCA (Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act). A spokesperson for Cynthia Lummis's office, Katie Warbinton, responded that if Democrats genuinely wanted a deal, they should engage in real negotiations rather than re-submitting the same demands and calling it progress. Neither side budged before the vote, sealing the breakdown.Republicans had made notable concessions ahead of this round, primarily across four areas based on the July merged draft: ethics, stablecoin yields, DeFi and developer protections, and agricultural committee provisions. On the ethics front, President Trump accepted roughly 80% of the Thom Tillis and Ruben Gallego proposal, requiring federal elected officials, judges, and their spouses who hold significant economic interests in token issuers to divest those positions or place them in a blind trust. State attorneys general were granted limited enforcement authority for the first time, but only to sue trading platforms that list non-compliant assets, with no jurisdiction over the President himself. Previously, this power rested solely with the federal Attorney General. The provision is set to sunset in 2029, and existing holdings are not subject to forced liquidation.On stablecoin yields, payment stablecoins cannot in principle pay passive interest simply for user holding, but a new 18-month circuit breaker mechanism was included. If signs emerge of large-scale deposit outflows from community banks into stablecoins, federal regulators could step in, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent having the final say on triggering the mechanism. This was a direct response to months of banking industry lobbying, but eight groups including the American Bankers Association remain unconvinced, arguing the circuit breaker only activates after deposits have already fled.For DeFi and developer protections, decentralization was split into two scenarios. On one side, validators, node operators, and those who publish wallet software that never touch user assets receive clearer safe harbor exemptions. On the other, trading protocols that are nominally decentralized but still retain control must register with the CFTC and comply with the Bank Secrecy Act. The BRCA was simultaneously narrowed, dropping the language extending to criminal cases and leaving only banking secrecy and civil protections.This vote creates a new dividing line with profound implications for exchanges, stablecoins, and protocols. For exchanges, the real shift lies in the compliance costs of listing assets. The ethics provision grants state attorneys general the right to sue, meaning exchanges must now consider not just federal compliance red lines but also state-level enforcement risks when vetting tokens. Eighteen state attorneys general, led by Letitia James, sent a joint letter before the vote claiming the text weakens the first line of defense against fraud. Miles Jennings, head of policy at a16z crypto, argued that arrangements like customer asset segregation, qualified custody, and restrictions on affiliate conflicts of interest are precisely the mechanisms missing during FTX, making the bill essentially an effort to transplant long-standing traditional finance rules into the crypto industry. Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, cautioned that these changes mostly enhance certainty and accelerate innovation, but the bill itself is not the decisive variable shaping crypto's trajectory.For stablecoin issuers and their banking partners, the 18-month circuit breaker fails to genuinely address the banking sector's core worries, a concrete reason behind Republican defections. The American Bankers Association and seven other groups wrote to Senate leaders from both parties, arguing the circuit breaker only kicks in after mass deposit outflows have already occurred, making it no real safeguard. Republican Senator John Cornyn stated publicly before the vote that the new text may still not resolve community bank concerns, leaving him counted among potential no votes. The White House Council of Economic Advisers attempted to counter claims that stablecoin growth squeezes community bank deposits with an interactive tool, but that did not shift the stance of banking groups or lawmakers like Cornyn.For protocols, the true dividing line is whether teams are willing to relinquish control, and this line satisfies no one. Developer advocacy group Coin Center expressed disappointment over the narrowed BRCA protections, arguing that removing criminal case extensions weakens the developer safeguards previously secured. Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz cited insufficient developer protections as a reason why at least four Republican senators opposed the bill, indicating this dissatisfaction extends beyond the developer community and into the Republican base itself.Despite the bill's failure, the regulatory process has not been reset to zero. Novogratz previously warned that without progress, the US could go a long time without crypto legislation, or perhaps never, pushing more of the industry offshore. White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt also noted that once a procedural vote fails, the next opportunity is anyone's guess. However, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins made clear that the SEC will continue advancing Project Crypto-related agendas regardless of the bill's outcome, including crafting rules for crypto asset issuance, incorporating blockchain ownership ledgers into transfer agent regulations, and clarifying custody requirements for investment advisers and regulated funds. Grayscale Research head Zach Pandl pointed out that regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, token issuance, tokenized securities, and perpetual futures are already being clarified, with the GENIUS Act having established a federal framework for payment stablecoins. Bernstein cautioned that if legislative hurdles combine with tighter monetary policy signals, crypto assets and crypto-linked equities could experience significant drawdowns.This text, which Republicans called the \"last best and final\" offer, failed to secure 60 votes but leaves behind a baseline of Republican willingness to compromise, potentially serving as a starting point for future negotiations. Following multiple legislative attempts gone awry, the market once again contends with a complex landscape of regulatory uncertainty and policy gamesmanship.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRCL":1,"BKCH":1,"CRCD":1,"CCUP":1,"CRCO":1,"CRCA":1,"CIR":1,"CRCG":1,"IBLC":1,"BLCK":1,"ICRC":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":77,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":608457636376752,"gmtCreate":1789563718991,"gmtModify":1789564218223,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄.&nbsp; I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","listText":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄.&nbsp; I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉&nbsp;","text":"well, they wanted to stop Trump from profiting from crypto and yet by stopping the Clarity Act, they continue to allow Trump to do what he wants since there's no law stopping him 🙄. I guess Elizabeth Warren could actually be on Trump side 😉","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608457636376752","repostId":"1169256522","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169256522","kind":"video","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Tech Highlights: From Major Breakthroughs to the Robotics Industry","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tech News Roundup","id":"1048331108","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/479bca56702689a07539b030b8c9f3d2"},"pubTimestamp":1789532544,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169256522?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-16 12:22","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"The Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169256522","media":"Tech News Roundup","summary":"","content":"","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Crypto Bill Just Hit a Wall in Washington\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1048331108\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/479bca56702689a07539b030b8c9f3d2);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tech News Roundup </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-16 12:22</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://news-video-sg.skytigris.cn/videos/covers/1739.webp","relate_stocks":{"CRCA":"Proshares Ultra CRCL","CIR":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Corgi","CRCD":"T-REX 2X Inverse CRCLDaily Target ETF","FETH":"以太币ETF-Fidelity","BTF":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-CoinShares","COYY":"GRANITESHARES YIELDBOOST COIN ETF","BITU":"2倍做多比特币期货ETF-Proshares","CCUP":"T-REX 2x Long CRCL Daily Target ETF","FBTC":"比特币ETF-Fidelity","CRCG":"2倍做多CRCL ETF-Leverage Shares","CRCO":"YIELDMAX CRCL OPTION INCOME STRATEGY ETF","YETH":"Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF","BITX":"2倍比特币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","BITY":"Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF","BTRN":"比特币期货ETF-Global X","IBIT":"比特币ETF-iShares","DFII":"FT Cboe Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF","ETCO":"Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF","ARKB":"比特币ETF-21Shares","MNRS":"GRAYSCALE BITCOIN MINERS ETF","BRRR":"比特币ETF-CoinShares","CRCL":"Circle Internet Corp.","ETH":"低成本以太坊ETF-Grayscale","CBOA":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April","ETHA":"以太坊ETF-iShares","COIA":"ProShares Ultra Coin ETF","CBOJ":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","EZBC":"比特币ETF-Franklin","COIG":"2倍做多COIN ETF- Leverage Shares","EZET":"以太坊ETF-Franklin","ETHD":"ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF","COIW":"COIN周配息ETF-Roundhill","BAGY":"Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF","ETHE":"最大以太坊ETF-Grayscale","COIX":"Corgi COIN 2x Daily ETF","CBOO":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","COII":"REX COIN Growth& Income ETF","ETHT":"ProShares Ultra Ether ETF","CBOY":"Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","ETHU":"2倍以太币期货ETF-Volatility Shares","ETHV":"以太坊ETF-VanEck","EETH":"以太币期货ETF-ProShares","ETHW":"以太坊ETF-Bitwise","CONI":"2倍做空COIN ETF-GraniteShares","HODL":"比特币ETF-VanEck","CONL":"2倍做多COIN ETF-GraniteShares","CONX":"Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF","CBTA":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","CONY":"COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","CBTJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","BCCC":"Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","XBTY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF","CBTO":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","QETH":"以太坊ETF-Invesco Galaxy","CBTY":"Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","BETE":"等权重比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","SBIT":"2倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","CBXA":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF – April","BETH":"比特币&以太币期货ETF-ProShares","ETU":"T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF","CBXJ":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January","TETH":"21Shares Ethereum ETF","BTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust","BPI":"Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF","BTCC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF","CBXO":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October","ETQ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF","MAXI":"比特币期货ETF-Simplify","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale","BTCI":"NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF","CBXY":"Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July","BFAP":"FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April","ESK":"REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF","DEFI":"比特币期货ETF-Hashdex","BTCL":"T-REX 2X LONG BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF","FIAT":"做空COIN期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","QBF":"Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly","ICOI":"Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF","BTCO":"比特币ETF-Invesco Galaxy","ICRC":"Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","BITB":"比特币ETF-Bitwise","YBTC":"比特币看涨期权ETF-Roundhill","BTCW":"比特币ETF-Wisdom Tree","BTCZ":"T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF","BFJL":"FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July","COIO":"2倍上限加速COIN ETF-Leverage Shares","BITI":"1倍做空比特币期货ETF-Proshares","BITO":"比特币期货ETF-ProShares","SETH":"1倍做空以太币期货ETF-Proshares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169256522","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CRCL":2,"BITY":0.6,"BAGY":0.6,"CBXJ":0.6,"CRCD":0.6,"GBTC":0.6,"EZET":0.6,"BTCC":0.6,"CONX":0.6,"ETHW":0.6,"TETH":0.6,"ETHA":0.6,"BTC":0.6,"BTCL":0.6,"BITO":0.6,"CBXO":0.6,"ICOI":0.6,"CRCO":0.6,"SETH":0.6,"COYY":0.6,"ETHE":0.6,"ETHD":0.6,"BTCZ":0.6,"BFJL":0.6,"CBOA":0.6,"ICRC":0.6,"FETH":0.6,"CONL":0.6,"ARKB":0.6,"CONY":0.6,"ETQ":0.6,"FBTC":0.6,"EZBC":0.6,"CIR":0.6,"BITU":0.6,"CBTY":0.6,"BETE":0.6,"BTCO":0.6,"ETCO":0.6,"COIX":0.6,"CBOO":0.6,"ETH":0.6,"HODL":0.6,"SBIT":0.6,"BFAP":0.6,"EETH":0.6,"BTCI":0.6,"BETH":0.6,"ETU":0.6,"FIAT":0.6,"DEFI":0.6,"BITI":0.6,"COIN":2,"CBOY":0.6,"IBIT":0.6,"CBXA":0.6,"COIA":0.6,"CBOJ":0.6,"DFII":0.6,"CONI":0.6,"ETHV":0.6,"BCCC":0.6,"MAXI":0.6,"BTRN":0.6,"CRCG":0.6,"BITB":0.6,"ESK":0.6,"ETHU":0.6,"BRRR":0.6,"BTF":0.6,"BPI":0.6,"YBTC":0.6,"CCUP":0.6,"CBTJ":0.6,"MNRS":0.6,"QBF":0.6,"CBTO":0.6,"CRCA":0.6,"CBTA":0.6,"BITX":0.6,"CBXY":0.6,"COII":0.6,"COIW":0.6,"YETH":0.6,"COIG":0.6,"QETH":0.6,"ETHT":0.6,"BTCW":0.6,"XBTY":0.6,"COIO":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":576433426915736,"gmtCreate":1781755688920,"gmtModify":1781755691744,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"sounds dangerous 😳&nbsp;","listText":"sounds dangerous 😳&nbsp;","text":"sounds dangerous 😳","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/576433426915736","repostId":"2644740729","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2644740729","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1781740800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2644740729?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-06-18 08:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Retail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2644740729","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"SpaceX has been sucking up all retail trading activity from the stock market over the past few days.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail traders poured more money into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.</p><p>But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">State Street SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust</a> and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">Invesco QQQ Trust Series</a> — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ac1f70d3f69ea8b72f7272d8ec2afe8c\" alt=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" title=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"352\"/><span>Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Retail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRetail Investors Have Been Buying More SpaceX Shares Than All of the \"Magnificent Seven\" Combined\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-06-18 08:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail traders poured more money into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.</p><p>But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">State Street SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust</a> and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">Invesco QQQ Trust Series</a> — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ac1f70d3f69ea8b72f7272d8ec2afe8c\" alt=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" title=\"Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"352\"/><span>Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: Vanda</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPCM":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Tradr","SPAX":"2倍做多SPACEX ETF-T-REX","SSPC":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Leverage Shares","SPCG":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Tradr","LOFF":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Direxion","BK4089":"非传统电信运营商","SPCQ":"2倍做空SpaceX ETF-Defiance","SPCH":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-Leverage Shares","SPCX":"SPAC and New Issue ETF","SPCF":"2倍做多SpaceX ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2644740729","content_text":"Lately, SpaceX seems to be the only stock that retail investors care about.Retail traders poured more money into SpaceX over the previous three trading sessions than they did for all of the “Magnificent Seven” stocks combined, according to data from Vanda Research. Shares of the Elon Musk-controlled reusable-rocket maker were trading at $193.33 on Wednesday, up 43.2% from the $135 offer price, according to Dow Jones Market Data.The Magnificent Seven, a group of megacap tech companies — including Alphabet, Amazon.com, Apple, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Nvidia and Tesla — have been extremely popular among retail investors over the past few years. Nvidia often tops the list as retail investors’ most purchased stock, and did so as recently as last week, according to Vanda’s data.But that changed as soon as SpaceX started trading.Retail investors net bought $369.8 million worth of SpaceX stock in the first three days of trading, according to Vanda. For perspective, Vanda said that retail traders bought $88.2 million worth of Nvidia stock over those same three days. Meanwhile, they net sold shares of Tesla and Apple — two other companies that have held the title of retail’s favorite stock.Even if you combine the buying activity of all the Magnificent Seven stocks with two of the most popular index-tracking ETFs — the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and the Invesco QQQ Trust Series — it still was roughly the same as SpaceX’s.“Retail investors have bought roughly the same amount of SPCX over the last 3 sessions as they have bought NVDA, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT, META, QQQ and SPY combined. Notably, we’ve excluded TSLA and AAPL from that comparison because both have actually seen net selling,” Vanda wrote in a note.Retail investors have bought hundreds of millions of dollars worth of SpaceX stock since its IPO Photo: VandaThis fervor for SpaceX shares is noteworthy because it comes at a time when retail investors are actually a little skeptical of the market. Vanda data showed that last week saw the lowest weekly retail net buying activity for single stocks since March 2020 — even with SpaceX’s IPO.“SpaceX wasn’t a tide that lifted all boats — and retail flows into some of the other AI-linked stocks have been more subdued than maybe one would’ve expected. What we’re seeing is really a direct focus on one name, with limited spillover effects,” a Vanda spokesperson told MarketWatch.Instead, retail investors put their money into index-tracking and thematic ETFs, in order to gain broader, more diversified exposure to the stock market.Single-stock buying has picked up slightly this week compared to last week, but SpaceX is driving a lot of that activity. Retail investors who purchased SpaceX’s stock at its IPO price are likely feeling good about their decision, with shares currently up roughly 45%. However, the stock dropped almost 5% on Wednesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPCF":0.6,"SPCQ":0.6,"SSPC":0.6,"SPCG":0.6,"SPCM":0.6,"LOFF":0.6,"SPCX":1.98,"SPCH":0.6,"SPAX":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967163052,"gmtCreate":1670285100176,"gmtModify":1676538335951,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967163052","repostId":"2289919187","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2289919187","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1670275924,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2289919187?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-06 05:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2289919187","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.</p><p>The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.</p><p>This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.</p><p>Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.</p><p>The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.</p><p>&#34;Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,&#34; said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re back to inflation-fighting mode,&#34; Drury added.</p><p>Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.</p><p>The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.</p><p>The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&amp;P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.</p><p>In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan&#39;s consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.</p><p>Energy was among the biggest S&amp;P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.</p><p>EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.</p><p>Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.</p><p>Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D&#39;Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Slides As Services Data Spooks Investors About Fed Rate Hikes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-06 05:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.</p><p>The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.</p><p>This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.</p><p>Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.</p><p>The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.</p><p>&#34;Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,&#34; said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re back to inflation-fighting mode,&#34; Drury added.</p><p>Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.</p><p>The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.</p><p>The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&amp;P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.</p><p>In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan&#39;s consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.</p><p>Energy was among the biggest S&amp;P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.</p><p>EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.</p><p>Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.</p><p>Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D&#39;Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2289919187","content_text":"(Reuters) - U.S. markets ended Monday lower, as investors spooked by better-than-expected data from the services sector re-evaluated whether the Federal Reserve could hike interest rates for longer, while shares of Tesla slid on reports of a production cut in China.The electric-vehicle maker slumped 6.4% on plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% from the previous month.This weighed on the Nasdaq, where Tesla was one of the biggest fallers, pulling the tech-heavy index to its second straight decline.Broadly, indexes suffered as data showed U.S. services industry activity unexpectedly picked up in November, with employment rebounding, offering more evidence of underlying momentum in the economy.The data came on the heels of a survey last week that showed stronger-than-expected job and wage growth in November, challenging hopes that the Fed might slow the pace and intensity of its rate hikes amid recent signs of ebbing inflation.\"Today is a bit of a response to Friday, because that jobs report, showing the economy was not slowing down that much, was contrary to the message which (Chair Jerome) Powell had delivered on Wednesday afternoon,\" said Bernard Drury, CEO of Drury Capital, referencing comments made by the head of the Federal Reserve saying it was time to slow the pace of coming interest rate hikes.\"We're back to inflation-fighting mode,\" Drury added.Investors see an 89% chance that the U.S. central bank will increase interest rates by 50 basis points next week to 4.25%-4.50%, with the rates peaking at 4.984% in May 2023.The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meets on Dec. 13-14, the final meeting in a volatile year, which saw the central bank attempt to arrest a multi-decade rise in inflation with record interest rate hikes.The aggressive policy tightening has also triggered worries of an economic downturn, with JPMorgan, Citigroup and BlackRock among those that believe a recession is likely in 2023.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 482.78 points, or 1.4%, to close at 33,947.1, the S&P 500 lost 72.86 points, or 1.79%, to end on 3,998.84, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 221.56 points, or 1.93%, to finish on 11,239.94.In other economic data this week, investors will also monitor weekly jobless claims, producer prices and the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment survey for more clues on the health of the U.S. economy.Energy was among the biggest S&P sectoral losers, dropping 2.9%. It was weighed by U.S. natural gas futures slumping more than 10% on Monday, as the outlook dimmed due to forecasts for milder weather and the delayed restart of the Freeport liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plant.EQT Corp, one of the largest U.S. natural gas producers, was the steepest faller on the energy index, closing 7.2% lower.Financials were also hit hard, slipping 2.5%. Although bank profits are typically boosted by rising interest rates, they are also sensitive to concerns about bad loans or slowing loan growth amid an economic downturn.Meanwhile, apparel maker VF Corp dropped 11.2% - its largest one-day decline since March 2020 - after announcing the sudden retirement of CEO Steve Rendle. The firm, which owns names including outdoor wear brand The North Face and sneaker maker Vans, also cut its full-year sales and profit forecasts, blaming weaker-than-anticipated consumer demand.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.78 billion shares, compared with the 11.04 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.The S&P 500 posted six new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 105 new highs and 133 new lows. (Reporting by Shubham Batra, Ankika Biswas, Johann M Cherian and Devik Jain in Bengaluru and David French in New York; Editing by Anil D'Silva, Shounak Dasgupta and Lisa Shumaker)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.6,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5436,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9917504245,"gmtCreate":1665536334487,"gmtModify":1676537622555,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917504245","repostId":"2274573244","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2274573244","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1665525713,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2274573244?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-12 06:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2274573244","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Bear markets are the time to position yourself to make profits in the next five to 10 years.","content":"<div>\n<p>Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks That Are Fantastic Deals Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 06:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOGL":"谷歌A","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/11/3-stocks-that-are-fantastic-deals-right-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2274573244","content_text":"Like most investors, you're probably exhausted by the big drops and the volatility that comes from 10 months of market woes. I know I am. Scanning the headlines, it's tough to find a guiding message you know to be more than just speculation. But I know three immutable facts about bear markets:They are hard on investors.They do eventually end.Long-term investors can benefit from them tremendously.Not convinced of that last one? Let's talk data. According to investment firm Compound Capital Advisors, the average five-year return after the worst nine-month periods for stocks is 118%. Disciplined investors who continue to buy excellent companies, or just buy the whole market, will more than double their money in five years after a bear market on average. The 10-year returns are higher still.But wait! Shouldn't we at least try to time the market? Get in at the very bottom? Not according to the data. JPMorgan Chase's wealth management firm points out that missing out on just the best 10 trading days in the last 20 years cut investors' annualized returns by nearly half. And the 10 best days tend to occur less than a month after the worst days. This makes the odds of consistently correctly timing the market incredibly tiny. Famed investor Warren Buffett can't do it -- and he doesn't try.The good news is that we don't have to time the market bottom. Building a healthy long-term portfolio in a bear market is much easier than in a raging bull market. Many stocks are on sale and likely to outperform for years once the bear goes back into hibernation. It just requires that you know where to look.Let's take a look at three such candidates.1. Alphabet stock is on the clearance rackAlphabet can be had today for its lowest price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio in 10 years (as shown below). This includes the March 2020 crash.GOOG PE Ratio data by YChartsYet the business is healthy. Sales reached $138 billion through the first half of this year on 17.5% year-over-year growth while operating income increased by 10% to $39.5 billion. Operating income hasn't increased as much as investors might like. However, the reason might surprise you.Research and development (R&D) costs have grown $3.8 billion, or 25%, so far this year. R&D has the potential to pay massive dividends down the line, which may make it an excellent investment now.Conventional wisdom says advertisers scale back budgets during a recession, hurting Alphabet's core Google advertising business. However, when advertisers are competing in a tough market with limited budgets, they will look to get the most bang for their buck. Google Search is practically a necessity for businesses, and YouTube ads are tough to beat.Plus, Google Cloud is expanding. Revenue exceeded $12 billion in the first half of 2022, growing 39% year over year. This segment faces tough competition in Amazon's Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft's Azure, but the cloud market is vast and growing. Investors are looking for this segment to begin showing profits soon.The advertising market could get tighter, but Alphabet has the clout to survive now and thrive once the market turns bullish again.2. Buy AWS and get Amazon for free?Amazon Web Services is Amazon's cash cow. The segment has a rare combination of tremendous growth and impressive profitability. Sales are up 35% through two quarters this year, putting the segment on pace for $84 billion in revenue for 2022 and likely well over $100 billion in sales next year. The segment has an operating margin of 35% this year.It's tough to find an exact comparison to this unicorn segment, although I have tried. Microsoft is a profitable software-as-a-service (SaaS) company with a price-to-sales valuation of 9, so let's start there. Using this P/S ratio as a guide, AWS could be valued near $1 trillion based on next year's estimated sales. Since Amazon's total market cap is just $1.17 trillion, the rest of its business sure looks undervalued.So perhaps we aren't getting the rest for free, but definitely on clearance -- and just in time for the holidays.Here is what comes with \"the rest\":More than 150 million Amazon Prime members in the U.S. and 200 million worldwide.38% share of the U.S. e-commerce market.A burgeoning digital advertising business that generated $7.9 billion in sales last quarter.Amazon's retail business has suffered from the aftershocks of the pandemic. Logistical headaches, labor costs, and inflation have eaten retail profits, which could continue. Couple this with a looming potential recession, and we can see why the stock is on sale. Long-term investors should keep Amazon stock on their shortlist.3. CrowdStrike's so confident it's gone on a hiring spreeMany tech companies are talking about (or even instituting) layoffs given the economic climate. But not CrowdStrike. In fact, CrowdStrike is hiring in record numbers.\"We are also executing our 2023 hiring plan and are pleased to report that we added a record number of net new hires for the second consecutive quarter,\" CFO Burt Podbere said on CrowdStrike's recent fiscal 2023 second-quarter conference call. \"Bringing on and retaining top talent is a cornerstone to supporting our product road map, future growth, and market share gains in new markets.\"Companies only hire like this if they are supremely confident in their growth. And growth is CrowdStrike's forte. The company reached $2.1 billion in annual recurring revenue last quarter, an increase of 59%. CrowdStrike's subscription customer base also soared 51% to 19,686 in the quarter. This is quite a leap from the 1,242 customers the company had in 2018.The growth comes when cybersecurity is top of mind for governments and businesses. Breaches and cybercrime cost billions of dollars, and nations use cyberattacks as warfare tactics. CrowdStrike's modular artificial intelligence-powered approach to stopping breaches is in demand. This means it can thrive even when the economy struggles. Cyberthreats don't take time off, even for recessions.CrowdStrike stock is more than 40% down from its 52-week high and sits at its lowest P/S ratio ever (excluding the March 2020 crash). The company is firing on all cylinders and looks like an attractive buy for long-term investors with a medium level of risk tolerance.Building wealth takes time, discipline, patience, and the ability to see past current headlines to capitalize on terrific values. The stocks above are excellent places to begin.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"CRWD":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1747,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9964418090,"gmtCreate":1670198577410,"gmtModify":1676538317224,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9964418090","repostId":"1137572712","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137572712","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1670195875,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137572712?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-05 07:17","language":"en","title":"ASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137572712","media":"The Australian Financial Review","summary":"The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed b","content":"<div>\n<p>The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"afr_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nASX Edges Higher;  Metcash Lifts Dividend on Higher Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-05 07:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm><strong>The Australian Financial Review</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XJO.AU":"标普/澳交所 200指数","XAO.AU":"标普/澳交所 普通股指数","XKO.AU":"标普/澳交所 300指数"},"source_url":"https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/asx-advance-could-be-checked-by-rba-positioning-20221203-p5c3cm","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137572712","content_text":"The S&P/ASX 200 added 0.1 per cent, or 9.5 points, to 7311 in the opening minutes of trade, buoyed by gains across the materials sector.Higher iron ore prices have boosted miners of the bulk commodity; Fortescue rose 2.1 per cent to $20.10, BHP firmed 1.6 per cent to $46.50 and Champion Iron climbed 1.3 per cent to $6.84.Metcash edged 0.2 per cent lower to $4.22 despite lifting its interim dividend and beating earnings expectations.IGO fell 2.1 per cent to $16 after advising that a fire has impacted its Nova operation over the weekend.Splitit jumped 8.3 per cent to 19.5¢ after expanded its agreement with Google to bring its instalments solution to the Google Store in the US, Canada and Australia.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XJO.AU":0.9,"XAO.AU":0.9,"XKO.AU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9983982671,"gmtCreate":1666138347693,"gmtModify":1676537711129,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"huat","listText":"huat","text":"huat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9983982671","repostId":"1166946802","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166946802","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1666137848,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166946802?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-19 08:04","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166946802","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled mor","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,025-point plateau and it&#39;s due for additional support on Wednesday.</p><p>The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat on bargain hunting and renewed optimism over earnings. The European and U.S. markets were firmly higher and the Asian bourses are expected to open in similar fashion.</p><p>The STI finished modestly higher on Tuesday following gains from the financial shares and the property stocks.</p><p>For the day, the index improved 10.13 points or 0.34 percent to finish at 3,025.88 after trading between 3,007.94 and 3,039.06. Volume was 1.6 billion shares worth 979.6 million Singapore dollars. There were 328 gainers and 216 decliners.</p><p>Among the actives, Ascendas REIT climbed 0.76 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust advanced 0.55 percent, CapitaLand Investment rallied 0.93 percent, City Developments gained 0.27 percent, DBS Group rose 0.25 percent, Genting Singapore accelerated 1.29 percent, Hongkong Land perked 0.23 percent, Keppel Corp lost 0.60 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust sank 0.61 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust slumped 1.32 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust soared 2.03 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation jumped 0.96 percent, SembCorp Industries tumbled 2.08 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dropped 0.94 percent, SingTel strengthened 0.81 percent, Thai Beverage retreated 1.71 percent, United Overseas Bank collected 0.65 percent, Wilmar International added 0.28 percent, Yangzijiang Financial surged 2.90 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding spiked 1.75 percent and Emperador, Comfort DelGro and SATS were unchanged.</p><p>The lead from Wall Street is positive as the major averages opened higher on Tuesday, faded midday but bounced higher again heading into the close.</p><p>The Dow surged 337.98 points or 1.12 percent to finish at 30,525.80, while the NASDAQ advanced 96.60 points or 0.90 percent to end at 10,772.40 and the S&amp;P 500 climbed 42.03 points or 1.14 percent to close at 3,719.98.</p><p>The initial strength on Wall Street reflected a positive reaction to upbeat earnings news from companies like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ), which helped ease concerns about the strength of the earnings season.</p><p>In economic news, the Federal Reserve released a report showing industrial production increased by more than expected in September.</p><p>Crude oil prices fell sharply on Tuesday after a volatile session amid uncertainty about the outlook for energy demand. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for November slumped $2.64 or 3.1 percent at $82.82 a barrel.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Bourse May Add To Tuesday's Gains\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-19 08:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom><strong>RTTNews</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3317976/singapore-bourse-may-add-to-tuesday-s-gains.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166946802","content_text":"The Singapore stock market on Tuesday halted the eight-day losing streak in which it had tumbled more than 135 points or 4.4 percent to a 19-month closing low. The Straits Times Index now rests just above the 3,025-point plateau and it's due for additional support on Wednesday.The global forecast for the Asian markets is upbeat on bargain hunting and renewed optimism over earnings. The European and U.S. markets were firmly higher and the Asian bourses are expected to open in similar fashion.The STI finished modestly higher on Tuesday following gains from the financial shares and the property stocks.For the day, the index improved 10.13 points or 0.34 percent to finish at 3,025.88 after trading between 3,007.94 and 3,039.06. Volume was 1.6 billion shares worth 979.6 million Singapore dollars. There were 328 gainers and 216 decliners.Among the actives, Ascendas REIT climbed 0.76 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust advanced 0.55 percent, CapitaLand Investment rallied 0.93 percent, City Developments gained 0.27 percent, DBS Group rose 0.25 percent, Genting Singapore accelerated 1.29 percent, Hongkong Land perked 0.23 percent, Keppel Corp lost 0.60 percent, Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust sank 0.61 percent, Mapletree Industrial Trust slumped 1.32 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust soared 2.03 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation jumped 0.96 percent, SembCorp Industries tumbled 2.08 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering dropped 0.94 percent, SingTel strengthened 0.81 percent, Thai Beverage retreated 1.71 percent, United Overseas Bank collected 0.65 percent, Wilmar International added 0.28 percent, Yangzijiang Financial surged 2.90 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding spiked 1.75 percent and Emperador, Comfort DelGro and SATS were unchanged.The lead from Wall Street is positive as the major averages opened higher on Tuesday, faded midday but bounced higher again heading into the close.The Dow surged 337.98 points or 1.12 percent to finish at 30,525.80, while the NASDAQ advanced 96.60 points or 0.90 percent to end at 10,772.40 and the S&P 500 climbed 42.03 points or 1.14 percent to close at 3,719.98.The initial strength on Wall Street reflected a positive reaction to upbeat earnings news from companies like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), which helped ease concerns about the strength of the earnings season.In economic news, the Federal Reserve released a report showing industrial production increased by more than expected in September.Crude oil prices fell sharply on Tuesday after a volatile session amid uncertainty about the outlook for energy demand. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for November slumped $2.64 or 3.1 percent at $82.82 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4242,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980439316,"gmtCreate":1665794017336,"gmtModify":1676537664846,"author":{"id":"4092135148477260","authorId":"4092135148477260","name":"caos","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/39ceb9524a0e11632d05b9487dfeb0ca","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4092135148477260","idStr":"4092135148477260"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"huat","listText":"huat","text":"huat","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980439316","repostId":"1172315295","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1172315295","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1665791993,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172315295?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-15 07:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172315295","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences betwe","content":"<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSNOW vs. PLTR: A Contrarian View of These Software Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-15 07:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/snow-vs-pltr-a-contrarian-view-of-these-software-stocks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172315295","content_text":"Story HighlightsSoftware stocks come in all shapes and sizes, so understanding the differences between them is critical when trying to attach valuations. One of these software stocks is a defense play, while the other is more of a plain vanilla cloud company. Additionally, the market despises one and embraces the other, but the consensus could be wrong.Software stocks have taken a dive like the rest of the technology industry, but that could offer buying opportunities if you know where to look. In this piece, we used TipRanks’ Comparison Tool to evaluate two software stocks. Although Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (NYSE: PLTR) are both software companies, they are quite different, addressing different markets and utilizing different kinds of proprietary technology. Those differences may call for a contrarian view.Variety is the Spice of the Software SectorSoftware has had a challenging year like the rest of the tech sector, but one benefit of software stocks is that they come in a wide variety. For example, while Snowflake and Palantir are both in the data and analytics space, they utilize two different business models. Snowflake takes a traditional cloud-based approach to data warehousing, while Palantir uses its own private operating system models.These different approaches to data analysis enable Snowflake and Palantir to address different parts of the industry. Palantir doesn’t actually store data but instead enables companies to manage and analyze their own on-premises and cloud data. Its use of private operating system models offers greater customizability, and its defense specialization makes it unique among software firms.On the other hand, Snowflake’s more traditional approach allows companies to not only analyze their data but store it as well. The differences between these companies are critical when it comes to valuation.Snowflake (SNOW)In many ways, it seems like Snowflake can do no wrong where investors are concerned. Although the stock is down 55% year-to-date, it remains a darling of the software sector despite having been one of the sector’s most expensive stocks in 2020 and 2021. As a result, a Hold mindset may be appropriate due to its valuation, crowding, and other factors.Snowflake isn’t profitable yet, and it doesn’t look like it will be profitable anytime soon. It trades at a price/sales multiple of around 30x, higher than its competitor Zscaler (NASDAQ: ZS). Additionally, Snowflake is extremely crowded right now, with 59% institutional ownership. While this crowding can be a positive thing when things are good, it can turn terrible at a moment’s notice, leaving institutions competing to dump their shares.One issue with Snowflake’s business model is that it’s not subscription-based like other cloud-based models are. Customers pay for the amount of storage they use rather than a flat monthly rate, which could be a problem if or when enterprises start looking for places to cut back as their earnings tumble in a recession.This consumption-based business model also means Snowflake could be more expensive for some enterprises than they expected when signing up. For that reason, price transparency and predictability are lacking at a critical time in the business cycle.On the other hand, one thing Snowflake has going for it is that its product is cloud-agnostic, meaning it can work with multiple clouds from multiple providers. Additionally, the SaaS firm is growing rapidly, with its product revenue surging 83% year-over-year to $466.3 million in the second quarter of Fiscal 2023.Total revenue also rose 83% to $497.25 million. However, Snowflake lost $222.8 million in the July 2022 quarter, an increase from the $189.7 million it lost in the July 2021 quarter.At the end of the day, the company may have a bright future, and many investors are certainly betting on that. However, in the current environment, it looks fairly valued or perhaps slightly overvalued due to its lack of profitability or visible path to profitability. Further, the significant decline in deferred revenues in the most recently completed quarter is cause for concern.What is the Price Target for SNOW stock?Snowflake has a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on 24 Buy ratings, seven Hold ratings, and one Sell rating over the last three months. At $211.25, the average price target for Snowflake implies upside potential of 38.6%.Palantir Technologies (PLTR)The general view of Palantir Technologies is the complete opposite of Snowflake’s. After careful analysis of many factors, it’s difficult to understand why the market hates this stock so much. Thus, a long-term bullish view appears appropriate due to its government contracts and low P/S ratio of about 9x.One important thing to point out about Palantir is its exposure to the defense industry through its data analytics software that’s specialized for defense and intelligence gathering. Of course, the sector hasn’t done particularly well this year, declining about 20% year-to-date based on the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index.However, the geopolitical uncertainty that includes the war in Ukraine and more calls for a more constructive view of the industry. Thus, it’s unclear why Palantir’s stock isn’t seeing support like fellow defense contractors Raytheon (NYSE: RTX), which is down only 4% year-to-date, and Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC), which is up 20%.One of Palantir’s big contract wins this year was a $229 million one-year contract with the Defense Department. In fact, that contract is an expansion of one that originally was just for the U.S. Army Research Laboratory because it now covers all branches of the military. The company will provide artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities to all branches of the U.S. military.Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) actually abandoned that contract due to a widespread protest about its technology being used for surveillance. This could be one reason the market hates Palantir Technologies so much, but from a financial standpoint, there is much to like.Palantir also announced that it had renewed a contract with the Department of Homeland Security. It also works with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement — another contract that has been controversial.Unfortunately, it has a string of earnings misses and even slashed its revenue outlook in its most recent earnings report. However, that reduction was explained by the unclear timing of the company’s government contracts, which have since been renewed and expanded.While Palantir isn’t profitable yet, its management said during an earnings call earlier this year that they expect to be profitable by 2025. In the meantime, the company has a healthy balance sheet with ~$2.4 billion in cash and equivalents versus $933.5 million in liabilities.What is the Price Target for PLTR stock?Palantir Technologies has a Hold consensus rating based on two Buys, two Holds, and four Sells assigned over the last three months. At $10.50, the average price target for Palantir Technologies implies upside potential of 30.11%.Conclusion: Hold on to Snowflake; Consider Buying PalantirAs things stand right now, the market is in love with Snowflake, at least as much as it can be while selling it off, and it views Palantir as an anathema. However, a review of the data suggests a contrarian view may be in order.Ultimately, Snowflake looks fairly valued or potentially a bit overvalued. In contrast, Palantir looks undervalued, which appears temporary, although it may take a few years for this to play out.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9,"SNOW":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}