Landly personal page - To The Moon

Landly

Landly

No personal profile

65Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-01-09

Wow

Could Airbnb Be a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

2021-12-30

Go go Nio

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-11

Ok

3 Stocks to Avoid This Week

2022-03-30

$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$What should i do with this share 😭

2022-01-20

Good

Why This Analyst Believes SoFi Technologies Will Disrupt Legacy Consumer Finance

2021-12-23

Good

Tencent to declare interim dividend by way of distribution in specie of class a ordinary shares of JD.com

2022-07-06

Good

Tiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?

2022-06-14

Good

Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon

2022-01-14

Good

S.Korea's LG Energy Solution Plans Battery JV with Honda in U.S.

2022-01-03

Wow

Tesla delivers 308,600 vehicles in Q4, beating estimates

2022-04-30

$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$what to do with this share?

2022-04-05

Good

After-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower

2022-01-19

Good

If Insiders Treat AMC Entertainment Stock Like Hot Garbage, Why Buy It?

2021-12-28

Up to the moon

Why AMD Stock Lit Up Today

2022-06-16

Good

Elon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts

2022-06-14

Good

Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon

2022-05-26

Ok

Alibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch

2022-04-25

Good

@KevinKelly:Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back. Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices. The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.

2022-01-14

Oh no

Facebook Faces $3.2 Billion UK Class Action over Market Dominance

2022-07-06

Good

@YT Finance: Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4094121442063350","uuid":"4094121442063350","gmtCreate":1634647400011,"gmtModify":1634779059785,"name":"Landly","pinyin":"landly","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":65,"tweetSize":44,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9071594928,"gmtCreate":1657551057364,"gmtModify":1676536023962,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9071594928","repostId":"2250493079","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":299,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079002924,"gmtCreate":1657117002368,"gmtModify":1676535952195,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079002924","repostId":"9070794773","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9070794773,"gmtCreate":1657103498990,"gmtModify":1676535949754,"author":{"id":"3479274788369128","authorId":"3479274788369128","name":"YT Finance","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b6a88deab8f94c02e156d705ee928536","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3479274788369128","idStr":"3479274788369128"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"\n \n \n  Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!\n \n","listText":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","text":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ef8b549a0e4870158e00103afcd7412","width":"0","height":"0"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070794773","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"3b87912fce48407d868e3e8d7c2428b9","tweetId":"9070794773","title":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1657103494367b9a6c8a4dec7e4c14a1cd39a0db573ba.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ef8b549a0e4870158e00103afcd7412","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1657103494367b9a6c8a4dec7e4c14a1cd39a0db573ba.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9070571157,"gmtCreate":1657081051079,"gmtModify":1676535946282,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070571157","repostId":"1185859082","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185859082","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1657072832,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185859082?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-06 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185859082","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relati","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7830b975cfd79c7d60ae8df1cbdc1722\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1145\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.</p><p>“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.</p><p>Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&amp;P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.</p><p>Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.</p><p>“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-06 10:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7830b975cfd79c7d60ae8df1cbdc1722\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1145\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.</p><p>“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.</p><p>Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&amp;P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.</p><p>Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.</p><p>“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185859082","content_text":"Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":430,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9042502322,"gmtCreate":1656491659566,"gmtModify":1676535839902,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042502322","repostId":"9042274635","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9042274635,"gmtCreate":1656490487428,"gmtModify":1676535839649,"author":{"id":"3479274700653540","authorId":"3479274700653540","name":"financead","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5edd2eb060757aaff1389f44b4f12616","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3479274700653540","idStr":"3479274700653540"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Twitter has been in the news recently, but for all the wrong reasons.Fake news and political mayhem resulted in President Trump being banned from the platform.Jack Dorsey, the man who conceptualized Twitter and twice served as its CEO dramatically quit and left the company.The share price collapsed and is currently trading below its 2013 IPO price, despite a top line CAGR of 29% over that period.Elon Musk has acquired a 10% stake and is attempting a take-over. But what is really going on? Is Twitter a good investment opportunity? We’ll answer all of these questions and more.","listText":"Twitter has been in the news recently, but for all the wrong reasons.Fake news and political mayhem resulted in President Trump being banned from the platform.Jack Dorsey, the man who conceptualized Twitter and twice served as its CEO dramatically quit and left the company.The share price collapsed and is currently trading below its 2013 IPO price, despite a top line CAGR of 29% over that period.Elon Musk has acquired a 10% stake and is attempting a take-over. But what is really going on? Is Twitter a good investment opportunity? We’ll answer all of these questions and more.","text":"Twitter has been in the news recently, but for all the wrong reasons.Fake news and political mayhem resulted in President Trump being banned from the platform.Jack Dorsey, the man who conceptualized Twitter and twice served as its CEO dramatically quit and left the company.The share price collapsed and is currently trading below its 2013 IPO price, despite a top line CAGR of 29% over that period.Elon Musk has acquired a 10% stake and is attempting a take-over. But what is really going on? Is Twitter a good investment opportunity? We’ll answer all of these questions and more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042274635","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9042502060,"gmtCreate":1656491648250,"gmtModify":1676535839900,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042502060","repostId":"9042509671","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9042509671,"gmtCreate":1656490750216,"gmtModify":1676535839780,"author":{"id":"3501196737273098","authorId":"3501196737273098","name":"Tiger_comments","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/227887b200e9925968650d5db4a8bfb3","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3501196737273098","idStr":"3501196737273098"},"themes":[],"title":"Mid-year Review: Share Your Most Profitable/Worst Loss stock","htmlText":"Looking back on the first half of this hardest year, which stock made you lose money until you lost your confidence?And which stock in the adverse market is still a big bull that brought you a lot of income?For&nbsp;many Tigers, the first half of 2022 may not have been a good time.Inflation in the U.S. is at its highest level in nearly 40 years, and the Fed has had no choice but to tighten monetary policy, with the largest rate hike since 1994, and economic expectations are sluggish. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a> has fallen about 20% in the first half of the year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a> is down 28.9% and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a> is down 14.8%.&nbsp;The first half of the year for the U.S.","listText":"Looking back on the first half of this hardest year, which stock made you lose money until you lost your confidence?And which stock in the adverse market is still a big bull that brought you a lot of income?For&nbsp;many Tigers, the first half of 2022 may not have been a good time.Inflation in the U.S. is at its highest level in nearly 40 years, and the Fed has had no choice but to tighten monetary policy, with the largest rate hike since 1994, and economic expectations are sluggish. The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">$S&amp;P 500(.SPX)$</a> has fallen about 20% in the first half of the year, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.IXIC\">$NASDAQ(.IXIC)$</a> is down 28.9% and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">$DJIA(.DJI)$</a> is down 14.8%.&nbsp;The first half of the year for the U.S.","text":"Looking back on the first half of this hardest year, which stock made you lose money until you lost your confidence?And which stock in the adverse market is still a big bull that brought you a lot of income?For many Tigers, the first half of 2022 may not have been a good time.Inflation in the U.S. is at its highest level in nearly 40 years, and the Fed has had no choice but to tighten monetary policy, with the largest rate hike since 1994, and economic expectations are sluggish. The $S&P 500(.SPX)$ has fallen about 20% in the first half of the year, the $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ is down 28.9% and the $DJIA(.DJI)$ is down 14.8%. The first half of the year for the U.S.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/eb194929c73ef321d7a468f5fa89ce16","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1fc22aaefbd463fab7dfa17cd17195ac","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/448b86dd7add678f35ac8e7276809c67","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042509671","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":292,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9042506761,"gmtCreate":1656491639853,"gmtModify":1676535839898,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042506761","repostId":"9042509701","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9042509701,"gmtCreate":1656490785304,"gmtModify":1676535839804,"author":{"id":"9000000000000137","authorId":"9000000000000137","name":"EdwardHughes","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07bc9bca07cec671db72f7d6b853211d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"9000000000000137","idStr":"9000000000000137"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Musk continues to file complaints regarding the Twitter spam account issue causing fears the deal won't close at the agreed upon price.The company continues to fight back on the bot issue with the data suggesting the parties are talking about different issues.The stock has immediate 30% upside on the unlikely close of the deal, or a larger user base to support higher stock prices when the economy improves.","listText":"Musk continues to file complaints regarding the Twitter spam account issue causing fears the deal won't close at the agreed upon price.The company continues to fight back on the bot issue with the data suggesting the parties are talking about different issues.The stock has immediate 30% upside on the unlikely close of the deal, or a larger user base to support higher stock prices when the economy improves.","text":"Musk continues to file complaints regarding the Twitter spam account issue causing fears the deal won't close at the agreed upon price.The company continues to fight back on the bot issue with the data suggesting the parties are talking about different issues.The stock has immediate 30% upside on the unlikely close of the deal, or a larger user base to support higher stock prices when the economy improves.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9042509701","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9046450158,"gmtCreate":1656378999474,"gmtModify":1676535817661,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046450158","repostId":"9046466529","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9046466529,"gmtCreate":1656377809961,"gmtModify":1676535817333,"author":{"id":"4103860021943040","authorId":"4103860021943040","name":"ccy1122","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/562c0e01bcfc63800f64741051cd9dbe","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4103860021943040","idStr":"4103860021943040"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ABEV\">$Ambev SA(ABEV)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[Salute]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ABEV\">$Ambev SA(ABEV)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Victory]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Yummy]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[Salute]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[OK]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Warning]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Bless]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;[Evil]&nbsp;","text":"$Ambev SA(ABEV)$[Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Victory] [Victory] [Victory] [Yummy] [Yummy] [Yummy] [Call] [Call] [Call] [USD] [USD] [USD] [Like] [Like] [Like] [666] [666] [Salute] [OK] [OK] [OK] [Warning] [Warning] [Warning] [Bless] [Bless] [Bless] [Evil] [Evil] [Evil]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a063618294977b90be25fb9943c0e4df","width":"1080","height":"3506"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046466529","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":333,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9054338726,"gmtCreate":1655342429166,"gmtModify":1676535618132,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9054338726","repostId":"2243918739","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2243918739","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1655334438,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2243918739?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-16 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2243918739","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge's refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge&#39;s refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p><p>According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.</p><p>The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla&#39;s chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had &#34;funding secured&#34; to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.</p><p>Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.</p><p>In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch &#34;endless, boundless investigations of his speech.&#34;</p><p>Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-16 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge&#39;s refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p><p>According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.</p><p>The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla&#39;s chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had &#34;funding secured&#34; to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.</p><p>Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.</p><p>In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch &#34;endless, boundless investigations of his speech.&#34;</p><p>Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2243918739","content_text":"(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge's refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on Twitter.According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla's chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had \"funding secured\" to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch \"endless, boundless investigations of his speech.\"Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055076135,"gmtCreate":1655221362327,"gmtModify":1676535588194,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055076135","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":204,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055078437,"gmtCreate":1655221340429,"gmtModify":1676535588170,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055078437","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9059592137,"gmtCreate":1654393251129,"gmtModify":1676535440243,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059592137","repostId":"9059508109","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9059508109,"gmtCreate":1654392036164,"gmtModify":1676535439946,"author":{"id":"9000000000000462","authorId":"9000000000000462","name":"MyrnaNorth","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93d5c39d60e3b5c35cd699bf7d148556","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"9000000000000462","idStr":"9000000000000462"},"themes":[],"title":"These 3 new shocks have slammed Tesla stock!","htmlText":"Tesla<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> stock is one of the most popular and widely traded shares in the US, UK and elsewhere. But investing in Elon Musk’s electric-vehicle maker is like riding the world’s roughest roller coaster. Indeed, Tesla investors need strong stomachs to ride out this stock’s crazy volatility.Tesla stock soars and roarsSince late 2019, Tesla stock has been on a massive, explosive upward surge. At the end of 2019, the shares closed at $83.67. But during the Covid-19 crisis of 2020-21, Tesla became a leading meme stock — and buying pressure caused by millions of fans sent its shares skyward like a SpaceX rocket.On 31 December 2020, Tesla stock broke $700 for the first time, hitting an intra-day high of $718.72 before ending the year at $705.6","listText":"Tesla<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a> stock is one of the most popular and widely traded shares in the US, UK and elsewhere. But investing in Elon Musk’s electric-vehicle maker is like riding the world’s roughest roller coaster. Indeed, Tesla investors need strong stomachs to ride out this stock’s crazy volatility.Tesla stock soars and roarsSince late 2019, Tesla stock has been on a massive, explosive upward surge. At the end of 2019, the shares closed at $83.67. But during the Covid-19 crisis of 2020-21, Tesla became a leading meme stock — and buying pressure caused by millions of fans sent its shares skyward like a SpaceX rocket.On 31 December 2020, Tesla stock broke $700 for the first time, hitting an intra-day high of $718.72 before ending the year at $705.6","text":"Tesla$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ stock is one of the most popular and widely traded shares in the US, UK and elsewhere. But investing in Elon Musk’s electric-vehicle maker is like riding the world’s roughest roller coaster. Indeed, Tesla investors need strong stomachs to ride out this stock’s crazy volatility.Tesla stock soars and roarsSince late 2019, Tesla stock has been on a massive, explosive upward surge. At the end of 2019, the shares closed at $83.67. But during the Covid-19 crisis of 2020-21, Tesla became a leading meme stock — and buying pressure caused by millions of fans sent its shares skyward like a SpaceX rocket.On 31 December 2020, Tesla stock broke $700 for the first time, hitting an intra-day high of $718.72 before ending the year at $705.6","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f4fce7cec41035884a19e0c94c1bfcc8","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059508109","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":73,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9024944705,"gmtCreate":1653792799007,"gmtModify":1676535342530,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Free stock?","listText":"Free stock?","text":"Free stock?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9024944705","repostId":"9024958062","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9024958062,"gmtCreate":1653791578756,"gmtModify":1676535342187,"author":{"id":"4103860021943040","authorId":"4103860021943040","name":"ccy1122","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/562c0e01bcfc63800f64741051cd9dbe","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4103860021943040","idStr":"4103860021943040"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Applaud]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Like]&nbsp;[Applaud]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[666]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[Call]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;[USD]&nbsp;","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$[Cool] [Cool] [Cool] [Miser] [Miser] [Miser] [Like] [Like] [Applaud] [666] [666] [666] [Call] [Call] [Call] [USD] [USD] [USD]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/60e1037a0af9f41c7b4a3ce4ec182a8a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9024958062","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9025563419,"gmtCreate":1653705368231,"gmtModify":1676535330587,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025563419","repostId":"9025275618","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9025275618,"gmtCreate":1653700429733,"gmtModify":1676535329083,"author":{"id":"3479274819487659","authorId":"3479274819487659","name":"The Finance Hydra","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a242a9be28de8ea5e320d9cee36651ca","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3479274819487659","idStr":"3479274819487659"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"\n \n \n  NIO STOCK PREDICTIONS - Could we hit $44 again? Technically YES!\n \n","listText":"NIO STOCK PREDICTIONS - Could we hit $44 again? Technically YES!","text":"NIO STOCK PREDICTIONS - Could we hit $44 again? Technically YES!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b7edfece87dfccf28d53fccc88a99c1","width":"0","height":"0"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025275618","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"0987da77b1254ca5ba0d846870e53e50","tweetId":"9025275618","title":"NIO STOCK PREDICTIONS - Could we hit $44 again? Technically YES!","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/16537004252365f0b9e165e79444e35e0ca2e48488a6e.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b7edfece87dfccf28d53fccc88a99c1","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/16537004252365f0b9e165e79444e35e0ca2e48488a6e.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":83,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9022407884,"gmtCreate":1653563088748,"gmtModify":1676535304306,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9022407884","repostId":"1120869554","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120869554","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1653559601,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120869554?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-26 18:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120869554","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Wall Street expects Alibaba to report quar","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DLTR\">Dollar Tree</a> to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.</p><p>Before the opening bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DG\">Dollar General</a> is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BOX\">Box</a> reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.</p><p>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COST\">Costco</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-26 18:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DLTR\">Dollar Tree</a> to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.</p><p>Before the opening bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DG\">Dollar General</a> is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BOX\">Box</a> reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.</p><p>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COST\">Costco</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BOX":"Box Inc","DG":"美国达乐公司","COST":"好市多","NVDA":"英伟达","BABA":"阿里巴巴","DLTR":"美元树公司","DELL":"戴尔"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120869554","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Wall Street expects Alibaba to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.NVIDIA Corp reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts are expecting Dollar Tree to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.Before the opening bell, Dollar General is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.Box reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts expect Dell Technologies Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.After the markets close, Costco is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9064531469,"gmtCreate":1652340741451,"gmtModify":1676535081385,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9064531469","repostId":"9064597194","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9064597194,"gmtCreate":1652339969609,"gmtModify":1676535081285,"author":{"id":"3527667618821228","authorId":"3527667618821228","name":"MillionaireTiger","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc558bf32e48ad6ed6d057026ef55af7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667618821228","idStr":"3527667618821228"},"themes":[],"title":"ARK vs SARK: Another Way to Profit in a Downward Market","htmlText":"Every time the market takes a hit, tech stocks with high valuations bear the brunt of the decline. For&nbsp;example,&nbsp;Cathie Wood's Ark Innovation ETF is facing more setbacks, falling-- and this is over the past two days. Net lower it looks like by about 7.8% as the tech sell escalates. It seems like there is no end in sight for the downturn in Cathie Wood's flagship Ark Innovation Fund. The ETF was front and center for the sell off that we've been seeing in equity markets these past few trading sessions. The tech focused fund plunged 10% in yesterday's session alone, deepening the already sharp losses that it's seen this year that began in late 2021. The loss brings Ark down around 75% from its peak in February of last year, with all of its biggest components trading in the red year t","listText":"Every time the market takes a hit, tech stocks with high valuations bear the brunt of the decline. For&nbsp;example,&nbsp;Cathie Wood's Ark Innovation ETF is facing more setbacks, falling-- and this is over the past two days. Net lower it looks like by about 7.8% as the tech sell escalates. It seems like there is no end in sight for the downturn in Cathie Wood's flagship Ark Innovation Fund. The ETF was front and center for the sell off that we've been seeing in equity markets these past few trading sessions. The tech focused fund plunged 10% in yesterday's session alone, deepening the already sharp losses that it's seen this year that began in late 2021. The loss brings Ark down around 75% from its peak in February of last year, with all of its biggest components trading in the red year t","text":"Every time the market takes a hit, tech stocks with high valuations bear the brunt of the decline. For example, Cathie Wood's Ark Innovation ETF is facing more setbacks, falling-- and this is over the past two days. Net lower it looks like by about 7.8% as the tech sell escalates. It seems like there is no end in sight for the downturn in Cathie Wood's flagship Ark Innovation Fund. The ETF was front and center for the sell off that we've been seeing in equity markets these past few trading sessions. The tech focused fund plunged 10% in yesterday's session alone, deepening the already sharp losses that it's seen this year that began in late 2021. The loss brings Ark down around 75% from its peak in February of last year, with all of its biggest components trading in the red year t","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5909cafc80955908ef8cfd8ab48559e6","width":"1824","height":"968"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/089bea704c340d3d3c03d97efb4b78d9","width":"1840","height":"1224"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9dce3e481ed8d94665d31b318f88b146","width":"1336","height":"824"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9064597194","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":99,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069534583,"gmtCreate":1651309953336,"gmtModify":1676534888642,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>what to do with this share?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>what to do with this share?&nbsp;","text":"$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$what to do with this share?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5c1de9d77963b7940b5b6fecca9c7598","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069534583","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084404382,"gmtCreate":1650896979153,"gmtModify":1676534811356,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084404382","repostId":"9015069736","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9015069736,"gmtCreate":1649393249007,"gmtModify":1676534505176,"author":{"id":"9000000000000174","authorId":"9000000000000174","name":"KevinKelly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0965d3709fcccd732467fba87aa4ea6e","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"9000000000000174","idStr":"9000000000000174"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back.&nbsp;Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices.&nbsp;The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","listText":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back.&nbsp;Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices.&nbsp;The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","text":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back. Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices. The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015069736","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016330687,"gmtCreate":1649124383440,"gmtModify":1676534456088,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016330687","repostId":"2225824307","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2225824307","pubTimestamp":1649113853,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2225824307?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-05 07:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2225824307","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the m","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After-Hours Stock Movers:</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ANY\">Sphere 3D Corp</a>. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCUS\">Arcus Biosciences Inc.</a> (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace Investors Bancorp in the S&amp;P SmallCap 600 on Thursday, April 7</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPOF\">Xponential Fitness, Inc.</a> (NYSE: XPOF)  6% LOWER; to offer 4.5 million shares for affiliates of Snapdragon Capital Partners, owned by its Chairman Mark Grabowski.</p><p>Carnival Corporation (NYSE: CCL) 3% HIGHER; 7-day booking total from March 28 - April 3 for Carnival Cruise Line was the busiest booking week in its history.</p><p>Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE: RCL) 2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.</p><p>Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH)  2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-05 07:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.Arcus Biosciences Inc. (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4097":"系统软件","BK4142":"酒店、度假村与豪华游轮","BK4566":"资本集团","ANY":"Sphere 3D Corp","CCL":"嘉年华邮轮","BK4517":"邮轮概念","XPOF":"Xponential Fitness, Inc.","RCL":"皇家加勒比邮轮","BK4539":"次新股","RCUS":"Arcus Biosciences Inc.","BK4216":"消闲设施","BK4139":"生物科技"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2225824307","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.Arcus Biosciences Inc. (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace Investors Bancorp in the S&P SmallCap 600 on Thursday, April 7Xponential Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: XPOF)  6% LOWER; to offer 4.5 million shares for affiliates of Snapdragon Capital Partners, owned by its Chairman Mark Grabowski.Carnival Corporation (NYSE: CCL) 3% HIGHER; 7-day booking total from March 28 - April 3 for Carnival Cruise Line was the busiest booking week in its history.Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE: RCL) 2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH)  2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019548887,"gmtCreate":1648613586771,"gmtModify":1676534365318,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>What should i do with this share 😭","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>What should i do with this share 😭","text":"$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$What should i do with this share 😭","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5680924144d903704869ab3b9a3de223","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019548887","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":464,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9036599114,"gmtCreate":1647136595344,"gmtModify":1676534197347,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4094121442063350","idStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9036599114","repostId":"9038658166","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9038658166,"gmtCreate":1646823700704,"gmtModify":1676534166477,"author":{"id":"3527667668165440","authorId":"3527667668165440","name":"Capital_Insights","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cfdc66fff48bb2b9e2d328ac5eb33100","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667668165440","idStr":"3527667668165440"},"themes":[],"title":"🚀Check Top 20 Cash Dividend Stocks' Return By March 2022🔥","htmlText":"$(BLK)$, $(AVGO)$, $(PXD)$,$(CME)$ and $(EQIX)$ are top by cash dividend. Hi，Tigers The current market is under high inflation expectations, the Nasdaq has fallen into bear market territory, and the S&amp;P 500 has also entered a correction range. In such a market environment, we encourage investors to focus on inflation-resistant, fundamentally sound companies and buy stocks at low cost in an environment of relative market risk. <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/TW/9033189036\" target=\"_blank\">🚀🚀Top Investing Opportunities Under War &amp; High Inflation Market</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/TW/9036371111\" target=\"_blank\">3 Charts to Know Companies Prefer Buybacks and Dividends</a> Below are TOP 20 cash dividend companies that have released earnings and announced dividends since Q4 2021. D","listText":"$(BLK)$, $(AVGO)$, $(PXD)$,$(CME)$ and $(EQIX)$ are top by cash dividend. Hi，Tigers The current market is under high inflation expectations, the Nasdaq has fallen into bear market territory, and the S&amp;P 500 has also entered a correction range. In such a market environment, we encourage investors to focus on inflation-resistant, fundamentally sound companies and buy stocks at low cost in an environment of relative market risk. <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/TW/9033189036\" target=\"_blank\">🚀🚀Top Investing Opportunities Under War &amp; High Inflation Market</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/TW/9036371111\" target=\"_blank\">3 Charts to Know Companies Prefer Buybacks and Dividends</a> Below are TOP 20 cash dividend companies that have released earnings and announced dividends since Q4 2021. D","text":"$(BLK)$, $(AVGO)$, $(PXD)$,$(CME)$ and $(EQIX)$ are top by cash dividend. Hi，Tigers The current market is under high inflation expectations, the Nasdaq has fallen into bear market territory, and the S&P 500 has also entered a correction range. In such a market environment, we encourage investors to focus on inflation-resistant, fundamentally sound companies and buy stocks at low cost in an environment of relative market risk. 🚀🚀Top Investing Opportunities Under War & High Inflation Market 3 Charts to Know Companies Prefer Buybacks and Dividends Below are TOP 20 cash dividend companies that have released earnings and announced dividends since Q4 2021. D","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc65f46da7616fedd71d5c0acb8542fc","width":"1181","height":"659"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07dcaecdd6fba84c4430ab0837d3e237","width":"1185","height":"674"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/585cd561ef648bdb4698e5c9a9fefcee","width":"1190","height":"672"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038658166","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":403,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9006883815,"gmtCreate":1641688578854,"gmtModify":1676533639430,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9006883815","repostId":"2201249211","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2201249211","pubTimestamp":1641687618,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201249211?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-09 08:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Could Airbnb Be a Millionaire-Maker Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201249211","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The market could be significantly undervaluing this travel platform.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>It&#39;s been quite a ride for<b> Airbnb</b> (NASDAQ:ABNB) since it went public in 2020 with the shares soaring past $200 twice before crashing back down each time. The shares have clearly been hit by shifting levels of concern over the pandemic. Yet the stock is still up about 12% in the past year, and the company commands a sizable market cap of $105 billion.</p><p>Investors might have some pause to buy the stock right now since it still sells at 63 times free cash flow. Yet, the company has a leading position in the travel industry, a history of robust growth, and results are rebounding strongly with revenue up 67% year over year in the third quarter.</p><p>Plus, it&#39;s got a large and expanding addressable market and is already showing signs of building a tremendously powerful brand. So even at these high levels, Airbnb could still turn a small investment into a big <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>. Let&#39;s dive deeper.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F660048%2Ftravel-checking-in-room.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Breaking down the numbers</h2><p>If you invested $10,000 in Airbnb stock, it would need to climb 100 times in value to reach $1 million. That&#39;s too much to ask for the next 10 years, but it&#39;s not unreasonable to expect Airbnb to deliver this amount if you could hold its shares over the next 30 years. That would represent an annualized return of about 16.5%. Not many companies can grow at this rate for that long, but if Airbnb can cement itself as the top brand in travel, it could be one of the few great businesses that make early investors into millionaires.</p><p>It&#39;s certainly addressing a large market -- an estimated $3.4 trillion globally each year. Short-term stays, like business trips and weekend getaways, make up about $1.8 trillion of the market with long-term stays and other experiences representing the balance. Long-term stays are a huge growth opportunity, given the increasing interest in remote work. This is why management expects the demand for long-term stays to accelerate coming out of the pandemic.</p><p>Airbnb still has just a fraction of that addressable market, giving it plenty of room for growth. Over the past year, the company&#39;s gross booking value came to $41 billion, or just a little over 1% of the total market. Moreover, the market is going to expand. Over the past decade, excluding the blip from the pandemic, travel spending has increased about 3% to 5% annually.  If it continues to grow around 4% annually over the next 30 years, that would put Airbnb&#39;s addressable market at around $10 trillion.</p><p>Airbnb would need to capture more than a third of that opportunity to grow its gross booking value 100 times, and therefore also see a proportionate increase in revenue and profits, which is what ultimately makes a stock go up.</p><h2>Keys to future growth</h2><p>While it&#39;s nearly impossible to forecast exactly what a business will look like way out in the future, here are a few things that should build confidence in Airbnb&#39;s growth trajectory.</p><p>For one thing, it has a strong brand. Even if you have never used Airbnb, you likely know a friend or family member who has. After all, there were nearly 80 million nights and experiences booked on Airbnb in the third quarter. A strong brand will be key to capturing a sizable chunk of its addressable market.</p><p>Another good sign: management has been shifting its marketing strategy to be more brand-centric and less dependent on search engines. During the first quarter of 2021, over 90% of Airbnb&#39;s traffic came from customers seeking Airbnb directly as opposed to finding it through a marketing channel. That&#39;s a sign of growing brand awareness.</p><p>Competition is always a risk since new entrants might emerge down the road, forcing Airbnb to lower service fees to maintain demand and revenue growth. But Airbnb is already widely recognized, which is a competitive advantage. Its name has nearly become a synonym for a place to stay -- similar to how &#34;Google&#34; replaced &#34;search.&#34;</p><p>I believe Airbnb&#39;s record of growth from its humble beginnings in the co-founders&#39; San Francisco apartment in 2007, the size of the travel opportunity, and its growing brand power point to a long-term winner. I recently bought shares and plan to add further as the business grows, so count me as a believer in this stock&#39;s millionaire-making potential.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Could Airbnb Be a Millionaire-Maker Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCould Airbnb Be a Millionaire-Maker Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-09 08:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/08/could-airbnb-be-a-millionaire-maker-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's been quite a ride for Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB) since it went public in 2020 with the shares soaring past $200 twice before crashing back down each time. The shares have clearly been hit by shifting ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/08/could-airbnb-be-a-millionaire-maker-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","ABNB":"爱彼迎","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4142":"酒店、度假村与豪华游轮"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/08/could-airbnb-be-a-millionaire-maker-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201249211","content_text":"It's been quite a ride for Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB) since it went public in 2020 with the shares soaring past $200 twice before crashing back down each time. The shares have clearly been hit by shifting levels of concern over the pandemic. Yet the stock is still up about 12% in the past year, and the company commands a sizable market cap of $105 billion.Investors might have some pause to buy the stock right now since it still sells at 63 times free cash flow. Yet, the company has a leading position in the travel industry, a history of robust growth, and results are rebounding strongly with revenue up 67% year over year in the third quarter.Plus, it's got a large and expanding addressable market and is already showing signs of building a tremendously powerful brand. So even at these high levels, Airbnb could still turn a small investment into a big one. Let's dive deeper.Image source: Getty Images.Breaking down the numbersIf you invested $10,000 in Airbnb stock, it would need to climb 100 times in value to reach $1 million. That's too much to ask for the next 10 years, but it's not unreasonable to expect Airbnb to deliver this amount if you could hold its shares over the next 30 years. That would represent an annualized return of about 16.5%. Not many companies can grow at this rate for that long, but if Airbnb can cement itself as the top brand in travel, it could be one of the few great businesses that make early investors into millionaires.It's certainly addressing a large market -- an estimated $3.4 trillion globally each year. Short-term stays, like business trips and weekend getaways, make up about $1.8 trillion of the market with long-term stays and other experiences representing the balance. Long-term stays are a huge growth opportunity, given the increasing interest in remote work. This is why management expects the demand for long-term stays to accelerate coming out of the pandemic.Airbnb still has just a fraction of that addressable market, giving it plenty of room for growth. Over the past year, the company's gross booking value came to $41 billion, or just a little over 1% of the total market. Moreover, the market is going to expand. Over the past decade, excluding the blip from the pandemic, travel spending has increased about 3% to 5% annually.  If it continues to grow around 4% annually over the next 30 years, that would put Airbnb's addressable market at around $10 trillion.Airbnb would need to capture more than a third of that opportunity to grow its gross booking value 100 times, and therefore also see a proportionate increase in revenue and profits, which is what ultimately makes a stock go up.Keys to future growthWhile it's nearly impossible to forecast exactly what a business will look like way out in the future, here are a few things that should build confidence in Airbnb's growth trajectory.For one thing, it has a strong brand. Even if you have never used Airbnb, you likely know a friend or family member who has. After all, there were nearly 80 million nights and experiences booked on Airbnb in the third quarter. A strong brand will be key to capturing a sizable chunk of its addressable market.Another good sign: management has been shifting its marketing strategy to be more brand-centric and less dependent on search engines. During the first quarter of 2021, over 90% of Airbnb's traffic came from customers seeking Airbnb directly as opposed to finding it through a marketing channel. That's a sign of growing brand awareness.Competition is always a risk since new entrants might emerge down the road, forcing Airbnb to lower service fees to maintain demand and revenue growth. But Airbnb is already widely recognized, which is a competitive advantage. Its name has nearly become a synonym for a place to stay -- similar to how \"Google\" replaced \"search.\"I believe Airbnb's record of growth from its humble beginnings in the co-founders' San Francisco apartment in 2007, the size of the travel opportunity, and its growing brand power point to a long-term winner. I recently bought shares and plan to add further as the business grows, so count me as a believer in this stock's millionaire-making potential.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":332,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003961383,"gmtCreate":1640852274285,"gmtModify":1676533547980,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Go go Nio&nbsp;","listText":"Go go Nio&nbsp;","text":"Go go Nio","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003961383","repostId":"1139674064","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9071594928,"gmtCreate":1657551057364,"gmtModify":1676536023962,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9071594928","repostId":"2250493079","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2250493079","pubTimestamp":1657553267,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2250493079?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-11 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Avoid This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2250493079","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>All but one of my &#34;three stocks to avoid&#34; column last week went according to plan, but it wasn&#39;t enough. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- <b>Coinbase</b>, <b>H&amp;R <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SQ\">Block</a></b>, and <b>WD-40</b>-- finished up 23%, up 1%, and down 13%, respectively, averaging out to a 3.7% increase.</p><p>The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced a 1.9% ascent, but the investments I figured would fare rose nearly twice as much. I was wrong. But I have still been correct in 25 of the past 38 weeks.</p><p>Where do I go to next? I see <b>Conagra</b>, <b>Coinbase</b>, and <b>ExxonMobil</b> as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let&#39;s go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.</p><h2><b>Conagra</b></h2><p>There&#39;s a good chance that there&#39;s some Conagra in your kitchen. Scour your fridge or pantry, and you may find some Slim Jim beef jerky, Pam non-stick spray, Hunt&#39;s ketchup, or Log Cabin maple syrup. There are dozens of Conagra brands that are literally and figuratively household names. I&#39;m still con Conagra this week.</p><p>The brand giant reports financial results on Thursday morning. It hasn&#39;t been very impressive lately. It has failed to exceed analyst profit targets in back-to-back quarters, and Wall Street expectations have been trending lower in recent months. Being a haven for premium brands isn&#39;t a lot of fun when the economy&#39;s wobbly and folks are trading down to lower-margin store brands. Wall Street sees revenue at Conagra climbing just 3% this year as well as 2023. It&#39;s hard to get excited about this week&#39;s financial update with that backdrop.</p><h2><b>Coinbase</b></h2><p>The one stock that burned me last week was Coinbase. It soared 23%, more than offsetting the other two selections that failed to beat the market. But I&#39;m not sure the rally is sustainable. Crypto markets have bounced back, but confidence is rattled for digital currency traders. A couple of notable platforms have either frozen assets or filed for bankruptcy protection.</p><p>Recovery won&#39;t be easy, and you can be sure that the once beefy yields that folks were earning on some of these platforms aren&#39;t coming back anytime soon. Coinbase is the top dog, and it will survive the current crisis. It has a strong balance sheet, and it didn&#39;t go deep into the risk spectrum to deliver staking rewards for its users.</p><p>However, Coinbase was reeling even before lesser platforms were exposed. Retail trading volume plummeted 58% sequentially in this year&#39;s first quarter, and the second quarter that concluded last week probably isn&#39;t going to hold up much better. Crypto prices may be starting to stabilize now that stock prices are also showing some resiliency, but a lot of scorched investors are going to stay away for now.</p><h2><b>ExxonMobil</b></h2><p>Stocks were rallying last week, but one of the hottest industries of 2022 took a breather. Oil and gas stocks declined as energy costs inched lower. Will the sector rotation continue in the week ahead?</p><p>You don&#39;t want to bet against ExxonMobil over the long haul. The integrated oil major has more going for it than just the recent pain at the pump. However, sector rotation makes hot industries mortal during the shift. Did you realize that ExxonMobil&#39;s surge over the past year has dropped its once meteoric yield to just 4.1%? If stocks continue to rally it&#39;s a safe bet that ExxonMobil will be a laggard for now.</p><p>It&#39;s going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you&#39;re looking for safe stocks, you aren&#39;t likely to find them in Conagra, Coinbase, and ExxonMobil this week.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Avoid This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Avoid This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-11 23:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/11/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>All but one of my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week went according to plan, but it wasn't enough. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Coinbase, H&R Block...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/11/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAG":"康尼格拉","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","XOM":"埃克森美孚"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/11/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2250493079","content_text":"All but one of my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week went according to plan, but it wasn't enough. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Coinbase, H&R Block, and WD-40-- finished up 23%, up 1%, and down 13%, respectively, averaging out to a 3.7% increase.The S&P 500 experienced a 1.9% ascent, but the investments I figured would fare rose nearly twice as much. I was wrong. But I have still been correct in 25 of the past 38 weeks.Where do I go to next? I see Conagra, Coinbase, and ExxonMobil as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let's go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.ConagraThere's a good chance that there's some Conagra in your kitchen. Scour your fridge or pantry, and you may find some Slim Jim beef jerky, Pam non-stick spray, Hunt's ketchup, or Log Cabin maple syrup. There are dozens of Conagra brands that are literally and figuratively household names. I'm still con Conagra this week.The brand giant reports financial results on Thursday morning. It hasn't been very impressive lately. It has failed to exceed analyst profit targets in back-to-back quarters, and Wall Street expectations have been trending lower in recent months. Being a haven for premium brands isn't a lot of fun when the economy's wobbly and folks are trading down to lower-margin store brands. Wall Street sees revenue at Conagra climbing just 3% this year as well as 2023. It's hard to get excited about this week's financial update with that backdrop.CoinbaseThe one stock that burned me last week was Coinbase. It soared 23%, more than offsetting the other two selections that failed to beat the market. But I'm not sure the rally is sustainable. Crypto markets have bounced back, but confidence is rattled for digital currency traders. A couple of notable platforms have either frozen assets or filed for bankruptcy protection.Recovery won't be easy, and you can be sure that the once beefy yields that folks were earning on some of these platforms aren't coming back anytime soon. Coinbase is the top dog, and it will survive the current crisis. It has a strong balance sheet, and it didn't go deep into the risk spectrum to deliver staking rewards for its users.However, Coinbase was reeling even before lesser platforms were exposed. Retail trading volume plummeted 58% sequentially in this year's first quarter, and the second quarter that concluded last week probably isn't going to hold up much better. Crypto prices may be starting to stabilize now that stock prices are also showing some resiliency, but a lot of scorched investors are going to stay away for now.ExxonMobilStocks were rallying last week, but one of the hottest industries of 2022 took a breather. Oil and gas stocks declined as energy costs inched lower. Will the sector rotation continue in the week ahead?You don't want to bet against ExxonMobil over the long haul. The integrated oil major has more going for it than just the recent pain at the pump. However, sector rotation makes hot industries mortal during the shift. Did you realize that ExxonMobil's surge over the past year has dropped its once meteoric yield to just 4.1%? If stocks continue to rally it's a safe bet that ExxonMobil will be a laggard for now.It's going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you're looking for safe stocks, you aren't likely to find them in Conagra, Coinbase, and ExxonMobil this week.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":299,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019548887,"gmtCreate":1648613586771,"gmtModify":1676534365318,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>What should i do with this share 😭","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>What should i do with this share 😭","text":"$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$What should i do with this share 😭","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5680924144d903704869ab3b9a3de223","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019548887","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":464,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004466588,"gmtCreate":1642665808319,"gmtModify":1676533733708,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004466588","repostId":"1113156154","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113156154","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1642665221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113156154?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-20 15:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why This Analyst Believes SoFi Technologies Will Disrupt Legacy Consumer Finance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113156154","media":"Benzinga","summary":"SoFi Technologies Inc has been generating robust growth and appears poised to grow at a 28% compound","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>SoFi Technologies Inc</b> has been generating robust growth and appears poised to grow at a 28% compounded annual rate through 2026, according to Wedbush.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd7692120d5ddb46efcb61bf734527f8\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>The SoFi Technologies Analyst: David Chiaverini</b>initiated coverage of SoFi Technologies with an Outperform rating and a price target of $20.</p><p><b>The SoFi Technologies Thesis:</b>The company’s members increased to over 3 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 and revenue growth guidance of nearly $1 billion for FY2021 is strong, Chiaverini said in the note.</p><p>He expressed optimism about SoFi Technologies being able to drive member growth with its increasing brand presence.</p><p>SoFi offers comprehensive financial services, which “is a significant competitive advantage over neobank competitors who tend to focus on niche offerings,” the analyst wrote.</p><p>The company’s “streamlined product offering makes it well-positioned versus legacy consumer finance providers including traditional banks who are viewed by younger cohorts as being outdated, not fee-friendly, and have friction in the cross-selling process given business segments tend to operate in silos,” Chiaverini added.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why This Analyst Believes SoFi Technologies Will Disrupt Legacy Consumer Finance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy This Analyst Believes SoFi Technologies Will Disrupt Legacy Consumer Finance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-20 15:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><b>SoFi Technologies Inc</b> has been generating robust growth and appears poised to grow at a 28% compounded annual rate through 2026, according to Wedbush.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd7692120d5ddb46efcb61bf734527f8\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>The SoFi Technologies Analyst: David Chiaverini</b>initiated coverage of SoFi Technologies with an Outperform rating and a price target of $20.</p><p><b>The SoFi Technologies Thesis:</b>The company’s members increased to over 3 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 and revenue growth guidance of nearly $1 billion for FY2021 is strong, Chiaverini said in the note.</p><p>He expressed optimism about SoFi Technologies being able to drive member growth with its increasing brand presence.</p><p>SoFi offers comprehensive financial services, which “is a significant competitive advantage over neobank competitors who tend to focus on niche offerings,” the analyst wrote.</p><p>The company’s “streamlined product offering makes it well-positioned versus legacy consumer finance providers including traditional banks who are viewed by younger cohorts as being outdated, not fee-friendly, and have friction in the cross-selling process given business segments tend to operate in silos,” Chiaverini added.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SOFI":"SoFi Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113156154","content_text":"SoFi Technologies Inc has been generating robust growth and appears poised to grow at a 28% compounded annual rate through 2026, according to Wedbush.The SoFi Technologies Analyst: David Chiaveriniinitiated coverage of SoFi Technologies with an Outperform rating and a price target of $20.The SoFi Technologies Thesis:The company’s members increased to over 3 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 and revenue growth guidance of nearly $1 billion for FY2021 is strong, Chiaverini said in the note.He expressed optimism about SoFi Technologies being able to drive member growth with its increasing brand presence.SoFi offers comprehensive financial services, which “is a significant competitive advantage over neobank competitors who tend to focus on niche offerings,” the analyst wrote.The company’s “streamlined product offering makes it well-positioned versus legacy consumer finance providers including traditional banks who are viewed by younger cohorts as being outdated, not fee-friendly, and have friction in the cross-selling process given business segments tend to operate in silos,” Chiaverini added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":266,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000275442,"gmtCreate":1640223216507,"gmtModify":1676533509027,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000275442","repostId":"1113181515","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113181515","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1640219427,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113181515?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-23 08:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tencent to declare interim dividend by way of distribution in specie of class a ordinary shares of JD.com","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113181515","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tencent announced today that it has resolved to declare a special interim dividend in the form of a ","content":"<p>Tencent announced today&nbsp;that it has resolved to declare a special interim dividend in the form of a distribution in specie of 457,326,671 Class A ordinary shares of JD.com (assuming there is no change in the total number of issued Shares from the date of this announcement to the Record Date) indirectly held by the Company through Huang River to the Shareholders whose names appear on the register of members of the Company on the Record Date in proportion to their then respective shareholdings in the Company on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held by the Qualifying Shareholders, being rounded down to the nearest whole number of JD.com Shares.</p>\n<p>The exact total number of the JD.com Shares to be distributed by the Company is subject to such adjustments where appropriate and necessary in order to give effect to the Distribution in Specie on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on theRecord Date and such other arrangements in relation to the Distribution in Specie as set out in this announcement.</p>\n<p>Non-Qualifying Shareholders will not be entitled to receive the JD.com Shares and will instead receive cash in lieu of the JD.com Shares in respect of the Shares held by them on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on the Record Date.</p>\n<p>For determining entitlements to the Distribution in Specie, the register of members and transfer book of the Company will be closed from 24 January 2022, Monday to 25 January 2022, Tuesday, both days inclusive, during which period no transfer of Shares will be registered. In order to qualify for the Distribution in Specie, any document in respect of the transfer of Shares accompanied by the relevant share certificates must be lodged with the Company’s Hong Kong branch share registrar and transfer office, Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, at Shops 1712-1716, 17th Floor, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong for registration not later than 4:30 p.m. on 21 January 2022, Friday. The last day for dealing in Shares on the Stock Exchange with entitlements to the Distribution in Specie is expected to be 19 January 2022, Wednesday.</p>\n<p>JD.com&nbsp;also&nbsp;announced&nbsp;same things.JD.com&nbsp;is aware that Tencent Holdings Limited (“Tencent”), that currently owns indirectly approximately 17.0% of the Company’s outstanding shares, announced that it will distribute approximately 460 million Class A ordinary shares of the Company owned by Tencent to its shareholders. Immediately following the distribution, Tencent’s shareholding in the Company will be approximately 2.3%, and the shareholders of Tencent who receive shares of the Company in the distribution will become the shareholders of the Company. The Company and Tencent will continue to maintain their mutually beneficial business relationship, including their ongoing strategic partnership agreement.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tencent to declare interim dividend by way of distribution in specie of class a ordinary shares of JD.com</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTencent to declare interim dividend by way of distribution in specie of class a ordinary shares of JD.com\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-12-23 08:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tencent announced today&nbsp;that it has resolved to declare a special interim dividend in the form of a distribution in specie of 457,326,671 Class A ordinary shares of JD.com (assuming there is no change in the total number of issued Shares from the date of this announcement to the Record Date) indirectly held by the Company through Huang River to the Shareholders whose names appear on the register of members of the Company on the Record Date in proportion to their then respective shareholdings in the Company on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held by the Qualifying Shareholders, being rounded down to the nearest whole number of JD.com Shares.</p>\n<p>The exact total number of the JD.com Shares to be distributed by the Company is subject to such adjustments where appropriate and necessary in order to give effect to the Distribution in Specie on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on theRecord Date and such other arrangements in relation to the Distribution in Specie as set out in this announcement.</p>\n<p>Non-Qualifying Shareholders will not be entitled to receive the JD.com Shares and will instead receive cash in lieu of the JD.com Shares in respect of the Shares held by them on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on the Record Date.</p>\n<p>For determining entitlements to the Distribution in Specie, the register of members and transfer book of the Company will be closed from 24 January 2022, Monday to 25 January 2022, Tuesday, both days inclusive, during which period no transfer of Shares will be registered. In order to qualify for the Distribution in Specie, any document in respect of the transfer of Shares accompanied by the relevant share certificates must be lodged with the Company’s Hong Kong branch share registrar and transfer office, Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, at Shops 1712-1716, 17th Floor, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong for registration not later than 4:30 p.m. on 21 January 2022, Friday. The last day for dealing in Shares on the Stock Exchange with entitlements to the Distribution in Specie is expected to be 19 January 2022, Wednesday.</p>\n<p>JD.com&nbsp;also&nbsp;announced&nbsp;same things.JD.com&nbsp;is aware that Tencent Holdings Limited (“Tencent”), that currently owns indirectly approximately 17.0% of the Company’s outstanding shares, announced that it will distribute approximately 460 million Class A ordinary shares of the Company owned by Tencent to its shareholders. Immediately following the distribution, Tencent’s shareholding in the Company will be approximately 2.3%, and the shareholders of Tencent who receive shares of the Company in the distribution will become the shareholders of the Company. The Company and Tencent will continue to maintain their mutually beneficial business relationship, including their ongoing strategic partnership agreement.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR","09618":"京东集团-SW","00700":"腾讯控股","JD":"京东"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113181515","content_text":"Tencent announced today that it has resolved to declare a special interim dividend in the form of a distribution in specie of 457,326,671 Class A ordinary shares of JD.com (assuming there is no change in the total number of issued Shares from the date of this announcement to the Record Date) indirectly held by the Company through Huang River to the Shareholders whose names appear on the register of members of the Company on the Record Date in proportion to their then respective shareholdings in the Company on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held by the Qualifying Shareholders, being rounded down to the nearest whole number of JD.com Shares.\nThe exact total number of the JD.com Shares to be distributed by the Company is subject to such adjustments where appropriate and necessary in order to give effect to the Distribution in Specie on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on theRecord Date and such other arrangements in relation to the Distribution in Specie as set out in this announcement.\nNon-Qualifying Shareholders will not be entitled to receive the JD.com Shares and will instead receive cash in lieu of the JD.com Shares in respect of the Shares held by them on the basis of 1 Class A ordinary share of JD.com for every 21 Shares held on the Record Date.\nFor determining entitlements to the Distribution in Specie, the register of members and transfer book of the Company will be closed from 24 January 2022, Monday to 25 January 2022, Tuesday, both days inclusive, during which period no transfer of Shares will be registered. In order to qualify for the Distribution in Specie, any document in respect of the transfer of Shares accompanied by the relevant share certificates must be lodged with the Company’s Hong Kong branch share registrar and transfer office, Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, at Shops 1712-1716, 17th Floor, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen’s Road East, Wan Chai, Hong Kong for registration not later than 4:30 p.m. on 21 January 2022, Friday. The last day for dealing in Shares on the Stock Exchange with entitlements to the Distribution in Specie is expected to be 19 January 2022, Wednesday.\nJD.com also announced same things.JD.com is aware that Tencent Holdings Limited (“Tencent”), that currently owns indirectly approximately 17.0% of the Company’s outstanding shares, announced that it will distribute approximately 460 million Class A ordinary shares of the Company owned by Tencent to its shareholders. Immediately following the distribution, Tencent’s shareholding in the Company will be approximately 2.3%, and the shareholders of Tencent who receive shares of the Company in the distribution will become the shareholders of the Company. The Company and Tencent will continue to maintain their mutually beneficial business relationship, including their ongoing strategic partnership agreement.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9070571157,"gmtCreate":1657081051079,"gmtModify":1676535946282,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070571157","repostId":"1185859082","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185859082","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1657072832,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185859082?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-06 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185859082","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relati","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7830b975cfd79c7d60ae8df1cbdc1722\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1145\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.</p><p>“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.</p><p>Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&amp;P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.</p><p>Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.</p><p>“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Chart | How Will U.S. Stocks Perform in H2 of the Year After a Bad H1?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-06 10:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7830b975cfd79c7d60ae8df1cbdc1722\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1145\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.</p><p>“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.</p><p>Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&amp;P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.</p><p>Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.</p><p>“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185859082","content_text":"Worst start after Great Depression in around 100 years; Corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year.Equity sentiment, investor positioning and market internals have been bearish, resulting in the worst annual start for equities in around 100 years, with the exception of the Great Depression. Portfolios are defensively positioned for a recessionary outcome and corporate fundamentals should exhibit relative resilience for the rest of the year, despite some softness in corporate guidance.“We believe the fundamental risk-reward for equities will be improving as we enter the second half of the year, with growth-policy tradeoff likely to turn, from both sides,”said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Global Head of Equity Macro Research at J.P. Morgan.Mid-to-high single digit growth rate is expected for S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) in 2022, with J.P. Morgan estimates at $225 (vs. consensus $229.58). Growth should moderate in 2023 with negative revisions to EPS driven by slight margin compression and U.S. dollar headwinds.Equity markets typically have large drawdowns during a hiking cycle, with an average sell-off of -16% in the 13 cycles since 1954. The -25% drawdown so far in this cycle is comparable to 1986-89 cycle (-32.6%, Black Monday, recession came after three and a half years from the start of the cycle). Anything short of a recession will likely catch most investors completely wrong-footed, especially after broad correction that resulted in the average stock drawdown around 80% of the way to prior recession bottoms.“At the current juncture defensive stocks possess valuation risk while flushed out cyclicals / growth / small-caps are presenting an increasingly attractive risk/reward. Our highest conviction sector call remains energy (strong fundamentals, still attractive valuation, rising shareholder return and geopolitical/inflation hedge),”added Lakos-Bujas.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":430,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055078437,"gmtCreate":1655221340429,"gmtModify":1676535588170,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055078437","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9005085595,"gmtCreate":1642121193032,"gmtModify":1676533683356,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9005085595","repostId":"2203382791","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2203382791","pubTimestamp":1642120928,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2203382791?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-14 08:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S.Korea's LG Energy Solution Plans Battery JV with Honda in U.S.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2203382791","media":"Reuters","summary":"South Korean battery maker LG Energy Solution (LGES) plans to build a battery joint venture with Hon","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>South Korean battery maker LG Energy Solution (LGES) plans to build a battery joint venture with Honda Motor Co in the United States, South Korea&#39;s Maeil Business Newspaper said on Friday, citing an unnamed industry source.</p><p>The potential battery JV between LGES and Honda could cost as much as 4 trillion won ($3.4 billion) and have an annual production capacity of up to 40 gigawatt hours (GWh) of batteries, enough to power 600,000 electric vehicles (EVs), the newspaper reported. The report did not have details, such as the timeline of when the JV would be built and begin operations.</p><p>&#34;We are discussing various ways to cooperate with automakers, including establishing joint ventures, but nothing has been decided,&#34; LGES said in a statement.</p><p>Honda did not respond immediately to a request for comment on the report.</p><p>LGES, LG Chem Ltd&#39;s battery subsidiary, commands more than 20% of the global EV battery market and supplies Tesla Inc, General Motors Co and Volkswagen among others.</p><p>LGES, which has battery production sites in the United States, China, South Korea, Poland and Indonesia, plans to invest a total of 5.6 trillion won in North America by 2024 to secure production capacity of over 160 GWh by 2025 in the region, according to the company&#39;s filing.</p><p>That includes two new plants jointly built with GM in Ohio and Tennessee as well as a battery joint venture with Stellantis.</p><p>($1 = 1,186.11 won)</p><p></p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S.Korea's LG Energy Solution Plans Battery JV with Honda in U.S.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS.Korea's LG Energy Solution Plans Battery JV with Honda in U.S.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-14 08:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/koreas-lg-energy-solution-plans-235907363.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>South Korean battery maker LG Energy Solution (LGES) plans to build a battery joint venture with Honda Motor Co in the United States, South Korea's Maeil Business Newspaper said on Friday, citing an ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/koreas-lg-energy-solution-plans-235907363.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HMC":"本田汽车","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4099":"汽车制造商"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/koreas-lg-energy-solution-plans-235907363.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2203382791","content_text":"South Korean battery maker LG Energy Solution (LGES) plans to build a battery joint venture with Honda Motor Co in the United States, South Korea's Maeil Business Newspaper said on Friday, citing an unnamed industry source.The potential battery JV between LGES and Honda could cost as much as 4 trillion won ($3.4 billion) and have an annual production capacity of up to 40 gigawatt hours (GWh) of batteries, enough to power 600,000 electric vehicles (EVs), the newspaper reported. The report did not have details, such as the timeline of when the JV would be built and begin operations.\"We are discussing various ways to cooperate with automakers, including establishing joint ventures, but nothing has been decided,\" LGES said in a statement.Honda did not respond immediately to a request for comment on the report.LGES, LG Chem Ltd's battery subsidiary, commands more than 20% of the global EV battery market and supplies Tesla Inc, General Motors Co and Volkswagen among others.LGES, which has battery production sites in the United States, China, South Korea, Poland and Indonesia, plans to invest a total of 5.6 trillion won in North America by 2024 to secure production capacity of over 160 GWh by 2025 in the region, according to the company's filing.That includes two new plants jointly built with GM in Ohio and Tennessee as well as a battery joint venture with Stellantis.($1 = 1,186.11 won)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001353735,"gmtCreate":1641174946543,"gmtModify":1676533579211,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001353735","repostId":"2200544080","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2200544080","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641163106,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2200544080?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-03 06:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla delivers 308,600 vehicles in Q4, beating estimates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2200544080","media":"Reuters","summary":"Jan 2  - Tesla Incon Sunday reported record quarterly deliveries that far exceeded Wall Street estimates, riding out global chip shortages as it ramped up China production.It was the sixth consecutive quarter that the world's most valuable automaker posted record deliveries.Tesla, led by billionaire CEO Elon Musk, delivered 308,600 vehicles in the fourth quarter, far higher than analysts' forecasts of 263,026 vehicles.Tesla's October-December deliveries were up about 70% from a year earlier and ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Jan 2 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc on Sunday reported record quarterly deliveries that far exceeded Wall Street estimates, riding out global chip shortages as it ramped up China production.</p><p>It was the sixth consecutive quarter that the world&#39;s most valuable automaker posted record deliveries.</p><p>Tesla, led by billionaire CEO Elon Musk, delivered 308,600 vehicles in the fourth quarter, far higher than analysts&#39; forecasts of 263,026 vehicles.</p><p>Tesla&#39;s October-December deliveries were up about 70% from a year earlier and nearly 30% higher from record deliveries the preceding quarter.</p><p>&#34;Great work by Tesla team worldwide!&#34; Musk wrote on Twitter.</p><p>His electric car company ramped up production in China even though competition rose and regulatory pressure mounted following consumer complaints over product safety.</p><p>Tesla ships China-made models to Europe and some Asian countries.</p><p>On an annual basis, the automaker boosted its deliveries by 87% from a year earlier to 936,172 vehicles in 2021.</p><p>Musk said in October last year that Tesla will be able to maintain an annual growth rate of more than 50% for &#34;quite a while.&#34;</p><p><b>NEW FACTORIES</b></p><p>&#34;They have beaten all the odds,&#34; Gene Munster, managing partner at venture capital firm Loup Ventures, said on Sunday.</p><p>&#34;The first is the demand for their products is through the roof. And the second is they&#39;re doing a great job of meeting that demand,&#34; he said.</p><p>Munster said he expected Tesla&#39;s deliveries to grow to 1.3 million vehicles this year despite headwinds in production at its new factories and supply chain problems.</p><p>Tesla Chief Financial Officer Zachary Kirkhorn said in October that it was difficult to predict how quickly the company will be able to boost production at new factories in Texas and Berlin, which will use new vehicle technologies and new teams.</p><p>Tesla said in October that it aimed to build its first production cars at both facilities by the end of 2021, but it is not known whether it met that target. Tesla did not respond to a question from Reuters about the plants. Its Berlin factory had initially been scheduled to begin production last summer.</p><p>Deutsche Bank said in a report on Friday that it expected Tesla to make nearly 1.5 million vehicle deliveries this year, although chip shortages remain a risk to production.</p><p><b>&#39;SUPER CRAZY&#39; SHORTAGES</b></p><p>In 2020, automakers cut chip orders as the pandemic and lockdown measures hit demand. But Tesla never reduced its production forecast with suppliers to support its rapid growth plan, which helped it weather the chip shortage, Musk has said.</p><p>Tesla, which designs some chips in-house unlike most automakers, also reprogrammed software to use less scarce chips, according to Musk.</p><p>Musk, who previously said, &#34;2021 has been the year of super crazy supply chain shortages,&#34; said in October that he was optimistic that those issues would pass in 2022.</p><p>The strong sales came even after Tesla hiked U.S. vehicle prices sharply this year to offset higher supply chain costs.</p><p>Tesla hit over $1 trillion in market capitalization in October after rental car company Hertz said it ordered 100,000 of its vehicles. The company&#39;s shares lost some ground after Musk wrote on Twitter in November that he was considering selling 10% of his stake in Tesla.</p><p>Overall, Tesla shares gained 50% last year.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla delivers 308,600 vehicles in Q4, beating estimates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla delivers 308,600 vehicles in Q4, beating estimates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-03 06:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Jan 2 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc on Sunday reported record quarterly deliveries that far exceeded Wall Street estimates, riding out global chip shortages as it ramped up China production.</p><p>It was the sixth consecutive quarter that the world&#39;s most valuable automaker posted record deliveries.</p><p>Tesla, led by billionaire CEO Elon Musk, delivered 308,600 vehicles in the fourth quarter, far higher than analysts&#39; forecasts of 263,026 vehicles.</p><p>Tesla&#39;s October-December deliveries were up about 70% from a year earlier and nearly 30% higher from record deliveries the preceding quarter.</p><p>&#34;Great work by Tesla team worldwide!&#34; Musk wrote on Twitter.</p><p>His electric car company ramped up production in China even though competition rose and regulatory pressure mounted following consumer complaints over product safety.</p><p>Tesla ships China-made models to Europe and some Asian countries.</p><p>On an annual basis, the automaker boosted its deliveries by 87% from a year earlier to 936,172 vehicles in 2021.</p><p>Musk said in October last year that Tesla will be able to maintain an annual growth rate of more than 50% for &#34;quite a while.&#34;</p><p><b>NEW FACTORIES</b></p><p>&#34;They have beaten all the odds,&#34; Gene Munster, managing partner at venture capital firm Loup Ventures, said on Sunday.</p><p>&#34;The first is the demand for their products is through the roof. And the second is they&#39;re doing a great job of meeting that demand,&#34; he said.</p><p>Munster said he expected Tesla&#39;s deliveries to grow to 1.3 million vehicles this year despite headwinds in production at its new factories and supply chain problems.</p><p>Tesla Chief Financial Officer Zachary Kirkhorn said in October that it was difficult to predict how quickly the company will be able to boost production at new factories in Texas and Berlin, which will use new vehicle technologies and new teams.</p><p>Tesla said in October that it aimed to build its first production cars at both facilities by the end of 2021, but it is not known whether it met that target. Tesla did not respond to a question from Reuters about the plants. Its Berlin factory had initially been scheduled to begin production last summer.</p><p>Deutsche Bank said in a report on Friday that it expected Tesla to make nearly 1.5 million vehicle deliveries this year, although chip shortages remain a risk to production.</p><p><b>&#39;SUPER CRAZY&#39; SHORTAGES</b></p><p>In 2020, automakers cut chip orders as the pandemic and lockdown measures hit demand. But Tesla never reduced its production forecast with suppliers to support its rapid growth plan, which helped it weather the chip shortage, Musk has said.</p><p>Tesla, which designs some chips in-house unlike most automakers, also reprogrammed software to use less scarce chips, according to Musk.</p><p>Musk, who previously said, &#34;2021 has been the year of super crazy supply chain shortages,&#34; said in October that he was optimistic that those issues would pass in 2022.</p><p>The strong sales came even after Tesla hiked U.S. vehicle prices sharply this year to offset higher supply chain costs.</p><p>Tesla hit over $1 trillion in market capitalization in October after rental car company Hertz said it ordered 100,000 of its vehicles. The company&#39;s shares lost some ground after Musk wrote on Twitter in November that he was considering selling 10% of his stake in Tesla.</p><p>Overall, Tesla shares gained 50% last year.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4527":"明星科技股"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2200544080","content_text":"Jan 2 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc on Sunday reported record quarterly deliveries that far exceeded Wall Street estimates, riding out global chip shortages as it ramped up China production.It was the sixth consecutive quarter that the world's most valuable automaker posted record deliveries.Tesla, led by billionaire CEO Elon Musk, delivered 308,600 vehicles in the fourth quarter, far higher than analysts' forecasts of 263,026 vehicles.Tesla's October-December deliveries were up about 70% from a year earlier and nearly 30% higher from record deliveries the preceding quarter.\"Great work by Tesla team worldwide!\" Musk wrote on Twitter.His electric car company ramped up production in China even though competition rose and regulatory pressure mounted following consumer complaints over product safety.Tesla ships China-made models to Europe and some Asian countries.On an annual basis, the automaker boosted its deliveries by 87% from a year earlier to 936,172 vehicles in 2021.Musk said in October last year that Tesla will be able to maintain an annual growth rate of more than 50% for \"quite a while.\"NEW FACTORIES\"They have beaten all the odds,\" Gene Munster, managing partner at venture capital firm Loup Ventures, said on Sunday.\"The first is the demand for their products is through the roof. And the second is they're doing a great job of meeting that demand,\" he said.Munster said he expected Tesla's deliveries to grow to 1.3 million vehicles this year despite headwinds in production at its new factories and supply chain problems.Tesla Chief Financial Officer Zachary Kirkhorn said in October that it was difficult to predict how quickly the company will be able to boost production at new factories in Texas and Berlin, which will use new vehicle technologies and new teams.Tesla said in October that it aimed to build its first production cars at both facilities by the end of 2021, but it is not known whether it met that target. Tesla did not respond to a question from Reuters about the plants. Its Berlin factory had initially been scheduled to begin production last summer.Deutsche Bank said in a report on Friday that it expected Tesla to make nearly 1.5 million vehicle deliveries this year, although chip shortages remain a risk to production.'SUPER CRAZY' SHORTAGESIn 2020, automakers cut chip orders as the pandemic and lockdown measures hit demand. But Tesla never reduced its production forecast with suppliers to support its rapid growth plan, which helped it weather the chip shortage, Musk has said.Tesla, which designs some chips in-house unlike most automakers, also reprogrammed software to use less scarce chips, according to Musk.Musk, who previously said, \"2021 has been the year of super crazy supply chain shortages,\" said in October that he was optimistic that those issues would pass in 2022.The strong sales came even after Tesla hiked U.S. vehicle prices sharply this year to offset higher supply chain costs.Tesla hit over $1 trillion in market capitalization in October after rental car company Hertz said it ordered 100,000 of its vehicles. The company's shares lost some ground after Musk wrote on Twitter in November that he was considering selling 10% of his stake in Tesla.Overall, Tesla shares gained 50% last year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":522,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069534583,"gmtCreate":1651309953336,"gmtModify":1676534888642,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>what to do with this share?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/8VI.AU\">$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$</a>what to do with this share?&nbsp;","text":"$8VI Holdings Ltd(8VI.AU)$what to do with this share?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5c1de9d77963b7940b5b6fecca9c7598","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069534583","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016330687,"gmtCreate":1649124383440,"gmtModify":1676534456088,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016330687","repostId":"2225824307","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2225824307","pubTimestamp":1649113853,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2225824307?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-05 07:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2225824307","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the m","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After-Hours Stock Movers:</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ANY\">Sphere 3D Corp</a>. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RCUS\">Arcus Biosciences Inc.</a> (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace Investors Bancorp in the S&amp;P SmallCap 600 on Thursday, April 7</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPOF\">Xponential Fitness, Inc.</a> (NYSE: XPOF)  6% LOWER; to offer 4.5 million shares for affiliates of Snapdragon Capital Partners, owned by its Chairman Mark Grabowski.</p><p>Carnival Corporation (NYSE: CCL) 3% HIGHER; 7-day booking total from March 28 - April 3 for Carnival Cruise Line was the busiest booking week in its history.</p><p>Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE: RCL) 2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.</p><p>Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH)  2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers: RCUS, CCL, RCL Higher; ANY,XPOF Lower\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-05 07:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.Arcus Biosciences Inc. (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4097":"系统软件","BK4142":"酒店、度假村与豪华游轮","BK4566":"资本集团","ANY":"Sphere 3D Corp","CCL":"嘉年华邮轮","BK4517":"邮轮概念","XPOF":"Xponential Fitness, Inc.","RCL":"皇家加勒比邮轮","BK4539":"次新股","RCUS":"Arcus Biosciences Inc.","BK4216":"消闲设施","BK4139":"生物科技"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19871772","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2225824307","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Sphere 3D Corp. (Nasdaq: ANY) 28% LOWER; mutually agreed to terminate the merger with Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc.Arcus Biosciences Inc. (NYSE: RCUS) 11% HIGHER; will replace Investors Bancorp in the S&P SmallCap 600 on Thursday, April 7Xponential Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: XPOF)  6% LOWER; to offer 4.5 million shares for affiliates of Snapdragon Capital Partners, owned by its Chairman Mark Grabowski.Carnival Corporation (NYSE: CCL) 3% HIGHER; 7-day booking total from March 28 - April 3 for Carnival Cruise Line was the busiest booking week in its history.Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE: RCL) 2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NCLH)  2% HIGHER; gains on CCL bookings news.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004641138,"gmtCreate":1642596998765,"gmtModify":1676533725871,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004641138","repostId":"1129371710","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129371710","pubTimestamp":1642594960,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129371710?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-19 20:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If Insiders Treat AMC Entertainment Stock Like Hot Garbage, Why Buy It?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129371710","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"C-suite denizens have sold $10.5 million of AMC stock since 2022 kicked off","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>I’ve been fortunate with what under any other circumstance would be labeled horse manure investments. From meme trades to cryptocurrencies, certain decisions have made me look a lot smarter than I am. However, I can’t say the same about <b>AMC Entertainment</b> (NYSE:<b><u>AMC</u></b>). My position and subsequent exiting of AMC stock was pure fortuitous luck.</p><p>A few years back, I decided to place a speculative bet on shares of the now infamous cineplex operator. At the time, I reasoned that the social experience element of the box office represented an underappreciated catalyst, one that could not be duplicated with the flatscreen in your living room. Of course, I was terribly wrong — embarrassingly wrong, really.</p><p>Then came a ludicrous development that, if it weren’t true, would be hardly believable. Driven largely by a desire to make Wall Street hedge funds pay for the disaster they wreaked in 2008,retail traders apparently coordinating their efforts through social media channels deliberately took the opposite bet on AMC stock.</p><p>As you know, the subsequent short squeeze that panicked out short sellers worked like a charm.AMC stock shot straight to the moon,to the use the common parlance. It should be noted that at least part of the bullish narrative stemmed from traders looking back at AMC with nostalgia and thus wanted to protect its honor, so to speak.</p><p>Unfortunately for me, these folks didn’t want to have that nostalgic feeling back in the years leading up to the pandemic, but, whatever. The price of AMC stock jumped so much that I was able to escape my poor position (plus interest). Not only that, I left some in, just in case the lunacy had more legs.</p><p>Sadly, the ride might be coming to an end.</p><p><b>The AMC Stock Call is Coming From Inside the House</b></p><p>Because this is the internet and because we’re talking about AMC stock, there’s a shoot-the-messenger sentiment with the underlying investment. It’s something akin to someone in the audience shouting at the screen, “…don’t go in there.”</p><p>Hopefully, though, you’ll look at the facts and make the best decision possible.</p><p>Recently, some eyebrows were raised when key executives decided they had enough with the journey. As <i>Wccftech.com</i> noted:</p><blockquote>Data from the SEC lists down the share sales made by AMC’s CEO Mr. Aron Adam, its executive vice president, worldwide programming &amp; chief content officer Ms. Elizabeth Frank and its senior vice president and general counsel Mr. Kevin Connor during the first two weeks of this month. It shows that cumulatively, the three executes have sold 460,184 shares so far, in the direct market, at an average price of $22.91. This results in $10.5 million of stock sales by the insiders since 2022 kicked off.</blockquote><p>But the aforementioned transactions are not the only worrying components for AMC stock. Indeed, the story goes deeper. Throughout 2021 and throughout 2020,insiders up and down the executive spectrum have been dumping shares. If I’m reading the list correctly, you have to go back to May 2019 to find someone working there who was buying shares.</p><p>To be fair, many analysts say that insiders selling their own stock isn’t necessarily a sign that you should follow suit. Especially if the selling is done by one cog in the executive gearbox, it may be an isolated incident than anything nefarious. I can somewhat appreciate this concept.</p><p>But on balance, my opinion is that insiders exiting their own shares is not a positive development. In fact, it kinda ticks me off. Why in the name of perdition should you, an average investor, buy shares when the folks that are selling you the very idea to buy are the ones selling the most?</p><p><b>Logic Matters</b></p><p>Many years ago, I came across a YouTube comment war that featured a drop the mic moment. Some self-proclaimed investment guru was trying to sell his system to his subscribers, to which someone responded (and I’m paraphrasing here), if your system actually worked, why are you selling it?</p><p>Ouch. That’s what I call a <i>Dillahunty</i>, named after popular atheist Matt Dillahunty.The commenter was correct. If a system worked to the degree that was marketed (I forget what it was, 70% of the time, maybe), you would use that system to eventually make all the money in the world.</p><p>As Dillahunty might say, “if a deity exists, prove it.” Don’t appeal to holy books to verify the validity of themselves. Prove the case empirically.</p><p>Well, it’s the same basic logic you should apply with AMC stock. If AMC was really a wonderful investment, the insiders would hold onto it; heck, they’d buy even more shares! Because then, they would be able to buy more boats and mansions and Lambos and whatever.</p><p>But they don’t believe that, obviously. Because if they did, they would buy more instead of dumping it like hot garbage. Don’t make this angle more complicated than it needs to be.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If Insiders Treat AMC Entertainment Stock Like Hot Garbage, Why Buy It?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf Insiders Treat AMC Entertainment Stock Like Hot Garbage, Why Buy It?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-19 20:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/01/if-insiders-treat-amc-stock-like-garbage-why-buy/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>I’ve been fortunate with what under any other circumstance would be labeled horse manure investments. From meme trades to cryptocurrencies, certain decisions have made me look a lot smarter than I am....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/01/if-insiders-treat-amc-stock-like-garbage-why-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/01/if-insiders-treat-amc-stock-like-garbage-why-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129371710","content_text":"I’ve been fortunate with what under any other circumstance would be labeled horse manure investments. From meme trades to cryptocurrencies, certain decisions have made me look a lot smarter than I am. However, I can’t say the same about AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC). My position and subsequent exiting of AMC stock was pure fortuitous luck.A few years back, I decided to place a speculative bet on shares of the now infamous cineplex operator. At the time, I reasoned that the social experience element of the box office represented an underappreciated catalyst, one that could not be duplicated with the flatscreen in your living room. Of course, I was terribly wrong — embarrassingly wrong, really.Then came a ludicrous development that, if it weren’t true, would be hardly believable. Driven largely by a desire to make Wall Street hedge funds pay for the disaster they wreaked in 2008,retail traders apparently coordinating their efforts through social media channels deliberately took the opposite bet on AMC stock.As you know, the subsequent short squeeze that panicked out short sellers worked like a charm.AMC stock shot straight to the moon,to the use the common parlance. It should be noted that at least part of the bullish narrative stemmed from traders looking back at AMC with nostalgia and thus wanted to protect its honor, so to speak.Unfortunately for me, these folks didn’t want to have that nostalgic feeling back in the years leading up to the pandemic, but, whatever. The price of AMC stock jumped so much that I was able to escape my poor position (plus interest). Not only that, I left some in, just in case the lunacy had more legs.Sadly, the ride might be coming to an end.The AMC Stock Call is Coming From Inside the HouseBecause this is the internet and because we’re talking about AMC stock, there’s a shoot-the-messenger sentiment with the underlying investment. It’s something akin to someone in the audience shouting at the screen, “…don’t go in there.”Hopefully, though, you’ll look at the facts and make the best decision possible.Recently, some eyebrows were raised when key executives decided they had enough with the journey. As Wccftech.com noted:Data from the SEC lists down the share sales made by AMC’s CEO Mr. Aron Adam, its executive vice president, worldwide programming & chief content officer Ms. Elizabeth Frank and its senior vice president and general counsel Mr. Kevin Connor during the first two weeks of this month. It shows that cumulatively, the three executes have sold 460,184 shares so far, in the direct market, at an average price of $22.91. This results in $10.5 million of stock sales by the insiders since 2022 kicked off.But the aforementioned transactions are not the only worrying components for AMC stock. Indeed, the story goes deeper. Throughout 2021 and throughout 2020,insiders up and down the executive spectrum have been dumping shares. If I’m reading the list correctly, you have to go back to May 2019 to find someone working there who was buying shares.To be fair, many analysts say that insiders selling their own stock isn’t necessarily a sign that you should follow suit. Especially if the selling is done by one cog in the executive gearbox, it may be an isolated incident than anything nefarious. I can somewhat appreciate this concept.But on balance, my opinion is that insiders exiting their own shares is not a positive development. In fact, it kinda ticks me off. Why in the name of perdition should you, an average investor, buy shares when the folks that are selling you the very idea to buy are the ones selling the most?Logic MattersMany years ago, I came across a YouTube comment war that featured a drop the mic moment. Some self-proclaimed investment guru was trying to sell his system to his subscribers, to which someone responded (and I’m paraphrasing here), if your system actually worked, why are you selling it?Ouch. That’s what I call a Dillahunty, named after popular atheist Matt Dillahunty.The commenter was correct. If a system worked to the degree that was marketed (I forget what it was, 70% of the time, maybe), you would use that system to eventually make all the money in the world.As Dillahunty might say, “if a deity exists, prove it.” Don’t appeal to holy books to verify the validity of themselves. Prove the case empirically.Well, it’s the same basic logic you should apply with AMC stock. If AMC was really a wonderful investment, the insiders would hold onto it; heck, they’d buy even more shares! Because then, they would be able to buy more boats and mansions and Lambos and whatever.But they don’t believe that, obviously. Because if they did, they would buy more instead of dumping it like hot garbage. Don’t make this angle more complicated than it needs to be.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":187,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009645387,"gmtCreate":1640662556026,"gmtModify":1676533532778,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up to the moon&nbsp;","listText":"Up to the moon&nbsp;","text":"Up to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009645387","repostId":"1178753028","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178753028","pubTimestamp":1640659653,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178753028?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-28 10:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMD Stock Lit Up Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178753028","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nSemiconductor giantAdvanced Micro Devices(NASDAQ:AMD)stock is up a solid 5.7% as of 2:","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Semiconductor giant<b>Advanced Micro Devices</b>(NASDAQ:AMD)stock is up a solid 5.7% as of 2:05 p.m. ET Monday -- the first trading day after the Christmas break. Curiously, the reason that AMD stock is up today is the same thing that's been bugging semiconductor investors all year long:&nbsp;the&nbsp;global semiconductor shortage.</p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p>By now this story should be familiar to you. All year long, companies that build things that need semiconductors to run them -- which, at this point in history, means everything from PCs to cellphones to cars to kids' toys -- have struggled to get enough semiconductors to manufacture all the products that their customers want to buy.</p>\n<p>Evensemiconductor manufacturers&nbsp;are in something of a bind. On the one hand, constrained chip supplies mean semiconductor makers can charge more money for their chips -- but only if they have enough manufacturing capacity to make those chips in the first place. This is why the latest semiconductor news is such&nbsp;<i>good</i>&nbsp;news for AMD stock.</p>\n<p>As Reuters reported on Thursday, just ahead of the Christmas break, AMD was able to amend and extend its contract manufacturing agreement with<b>GlobalFoundries</b>(NASDAQ:GFS). Instead of having GlobalFoundries send it just $1.6 billion worth of silicon wafers between 2022 and 2024, AMD will buy $2.1 billion in wafers from 2022 to 2025.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>Of course, this could actually be a \"good news, bad news\" development for AMD when you think about it. On the one hand, AMD has extended its access to GlobalFoundries', er, foundries for an extra year. On the other hand, though, extending a three-year contract by one year is a 33.3% extension in time, while the number of chips AMD is buying over that longer timespan is just 31.2% more than it was scheduled to acquire over the original three-year timespan.</p>\n<p>Net-net, that works out to slightly&nbsp;<i>less</i>&nbsp;access to GlobalFoundries' manufacturing capacity in the fourth year of the contract than in the original three years. And one also has to wonder if, given the rising prices of semiconductors globally, the extra $500 million AMD will be paying for the fourth year, will buy as large a volume of chips as the company was already contracted to acquire in the first three years of the contract -- a fact Reuters didn't elaborate on.</p>\n<p>Until we&nbsp;learn more about this deal, the answer to that question will remain up in the air.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMD Stock Lit Up Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMD Stock Lit Up Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-28 10:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/27/why-amd-stock-lit-up-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nSemiconductor giantAdvanced Micro Devices(NASDAQ:AMD)stock is up a solid 5.7% as of 2:05 p.m. ET Monday -- the first trading day after the Christmas break. Curiously, the reason that AMD...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/27/why-amd-stock-lit-up-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/27/why-amd-stock-lit-up-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178753028","content_text":"What happened\nSemiconductor giantAdvanced Micro Devices(NASDAQ:AMD)stock is up a solid 5.7% as of 2:05 p.m. ET Monday -- the first trading day after the Christmas break. Curiously, the reason that AMD stock is up today is the same thing that's been bugging semiconductor investors all year long: the global semiconductor shortage.\nSo what\nBy now this story should be familiar to you. All year long, companies that build things that need semiconductors to run them -- which, at this point in history, means everything from PCs to cellphones to cars to kids' toys -- have struggled to get enough semiconductors to manufacture all the products that their customers want to buy.\nEvensemiconductor manufacturers are in something of a bind. On the one hand, constrained chip supplies mean semiconductor makers can charge more money for their chips -- but only if they have enough manufacturing capacity to make those chips in the first place. This is why the latest semiconductor news is such good news for AMD stock.\nAs Reuters reported on Thursday, just ahead of the Christmas break, AMD was able to amend and extend its contract manufacturing agreement withGlobalFoundries(NASDAQ:GFS). Instead of having GlobalFoundries send it just $1.6 billion worth of silicon wafers between 2022 and 2024, AMD will buy $2.1 billion in wafers from 2022 to 2025.\nNow what\nOf course, this could actually be a \"good news, bad news\" development for AMD when you think about it. On the one hand, AMD has extended its access to GlobalFoundries', er, foundries for an extra year. On the other hand, though, extending a three-year contract by one year is a 33.3% extension in time, while the number of chips AMD is buying over that longer timespan is just 31.2% more than it was scheduled to acquire over the original three-year timespan.\nNet-net, that works out to slightly less access to GlobalFoundries' manufacturing capacity in the fourth year of the contract than in the original three years. And one also has to wonder if, given the rising prices of semiconductors globally, the extra $500 million AMD will be paying for the fourth year, will buy as large a volume of chips as the company was already contracted to acquire in the first three years of the contract -- a fact Reuters didn't elaborate on.\nUntil we learn more about this deal, the answer to that question will remain up in the air.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9054338726,"gmtCreate":1655342429166,"gmtModify":1676535618132,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9054338726","repostId":"2243918739","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2243918739","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1655334438,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2243918739?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-16 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2243918739","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge's refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge&#39;s refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p><p>According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.</p><p>The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla&#39;s chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had &#34;funding secured&#34; to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.</p><p>Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.</p><p>In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch &#34;endless, boundless investigations of his speech.&#34;</p><p>Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Files Appeal to End SEC Decree Over Twitter Posts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-16 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge&#39;s refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p><p>According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MHC.AU\">Manhattan</a> to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.</p><p>The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla&#39;s chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had &#34;funding secured&#34; to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.</p><p>Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.</p><p>In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch &#34;endless, boundless investigations of his speech.&#34;</p><p>Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2243918739","content_text":"(Reuters) -Elon Musk on Wednesday appealed a judge's refusal to end his 2018 agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission requiring a Tesla Inc lawyer to vet some of his posts on Twitter.According to a court filing, Musk will ask the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan to overturn the April 27 decision by U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman that allowed the agreement to stand.The agreement arose from an SEC lawsuit claiming that Tesla's chief executive defrauded investors by tweeting on Aug. 7, 2018 that he had \"funding secured\" to take the electric car company private, when in reality a buyout was not close.Musk later accepted a SEC consent decree requiring a Tesla lawyer to screen tweets that might contain material information about the company.In seeking to end the consent decree and quash part of a subsequent subpoena, Musk accused the SEC of undermining his constitutional right to free speech and using the decree to launch \"endless, boundless investigations of his speech.\"Musk is trying to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055076135,"gmtCreate":1655221362327,"gmtModify":1676535588194,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055076135","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":204,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9022407884,"gmtCreate":1653563088748,"gmtModify":1676535304306,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9022407884","repostId":"1120869554","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120869554","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1653559601,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120869554?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-26 18:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120869554","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Wall Street expects Alibaba to report quar","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DLTR\">Dollar Tree</a> to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.</p><p>Before the opening bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DG\">Dollar General</a> is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BOX\">Box</a> reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.</p><p>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COST\">Costco</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba, NVIDIA, Costco and More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-26 18:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><p>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA Corp</a> reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DLTR\">Dollar Tree</a> to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.</p><p>Before the opening bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DG\">Dollar General</a> is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BOX\">Box</a> reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.</p><p>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.</p><p>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COST\">Costco</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BOX":"Box Inc","DG":"美国达乐公司","COST":"好市多","NVDA":"英伟达","BABA":"阿里巴巴","DLTR":"美元树公司","DELL":"戴尔"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120869554","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Wall Street expects Alibaba to report quarterly earnings at $1.10 per share on revenue of $29.95 billion before the opening bell. Alibaba shares fell 0.6% to $81.85 in after-hours trading.NVIDIA Corp reported better-than-expected financial results for its first quarter, but issued guidance below analyst expectations. For the second quarter, Nvidia said it sees revenue of $8.1 billion, plus or minus 2%, versus the estimate of $8.45 billion. Nvidia shares dropped 6.8% to $158.17 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts are expecting Dollar Tree to have earned $2.00 per share on revenue of $6.76 billion. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Dollar Tree shares fell 1.3% to $131.81 in after-hours trading.Before the opening bell, Dollar General is expected to report quarterly earnings at $2.32 per share on revenue of $8.70 billion. Dollar General shares slipped 0.2% to $195.00 in after-hours trading.Box reported downbeat earnings for its first quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company said it sees Q2 revenue of $244 million to $246 million and earnings of $0.27 to $0.28 per share. Box shares fell 2.7% to $25.35 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts expect Dell Technologies Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $1.40 per share on revenue of $25.12 billion after the closing bell. Dell shares dropped 4.2% to $41.50 in after-hours trading.After the markets close, Costco is projected to post quarterly earnings at $3.03 per share on revenue of $51.765 billion. Costco shares gained 0.8% to $443.50 in after-hours trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084404382,"gmtCreate":1650896979153,"gmtModify":1676534811356,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084404382","repostId":"9015069736","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9015069736,"gmtCreate":1649393249007,"gmtModify":1676534505176,"author":{"id":"9000000000000174","authorId":"9000000000000174","name":"KevinKelly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0965d3709fcccd732467fba87aa4ea6e","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"9000000000000174","authorIdStr":"9000000000000174"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back.&nbsp;Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices.&nbsp;The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","listText":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back.&nbsp;Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices.&nbsp;The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","text":"Costco stock has soared over the past several years and hasn't looked back. Now trading around $575 per share, a stock split is not out of the question. The company has previously split the stock several times at far lower prices. The stock trades at 44x forward earnings but I explain why the stock should still generate robust returns over the long term.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015069736","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9005084561,"gmtCreate":1642121287497,"gmtModify":1676533683377,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no&nbsp;","listText":"Oh no&nbsp;","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9005084561","repostId":"1159328189","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159328189","pubTimestamp":1642120574,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159328189?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-14 08:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Facebook Faces $3.2 Billion UK Class Action over Market Dominance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159328189","media":"Reuters","summary":"Social media giant Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, faces a 2.3 billion pound plus ($3.2 billi","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Social media giant Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, faces a 2.3 billion pound plus ($3.2 billion plus) class action in Britain over allegations it abused its market dominance by exploiting the personal data of 44 million users.</p><p>Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, a senior adviser to Britain&#39;s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) watchdog and a competition law academic, said she was bringing the case on behalf of people in Britain who had used Facebook between 2015 and 2019.</p><p>The lawsuit, which will be heard by London&#39;s Competition Appeal Tribubal, alleges Facebook made billions of pounds by imposing unfair terms and conditions that demanded consumers surrender valuable personal data to access the network.</p><p>Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan, the law firm representing Lovdahl Gormsen, has notified Facebook of the claim.</p><p>Facebook said people used its services because it delivered value for them and &#34;they have meaningful control of what information they share on Meta&#39;s platforms and who with.&#34;</p><p>The case comes days after Facebook lost an attempt to strike out an antitrust lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of the biggest challenges by the U.S. government against a tech company in decades as Washington attempts to tackle Big Tech&#39;s extensive market power.</p><p>&#34;In the 17 years since it was created, Facebook became the sole social network in the UK where you could be sure to connect with friends and family in one place,&#34; Lovdahl Gornsen said.</p><p>&#34;Yet, there was a dark side to Facebook; it abused its market dominance to impose unfair terms and conditions on ordinary Britons, giving it the power to exploit their personal data.&#34;</p><p>Lovdahl Gormsen alleges Facebook collected data within its platform and through mechanisms like the Facebook Pixel, allowing it to build an &#34;all-seeing picture&#34; of Internet usage and generate valuable, deep data profiles of users.</p><p>Opt-out class actions, like Lovdahl Gormsen&#39;s, bind a defined group automatically into a lawsuit unless individuals opt out.</p><p>($1 = 0.7277 pounds)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Facebook Faces $3.2 Billion UK Class Action over Market Dominance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFacebook Faces $3.2 Billion UK Class Action over Market Dominance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-14 08:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-faces-3-2-billion-000523219.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Social media giant Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, faces a 2.3 billion pound plus ($3.2 billion plus) class action in Britain over allegations it abused its market dominance by exploiting the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-faces-3-2-billion-000523219.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-faces-3-2-billion-000523219.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1159328189","content_text":"Social media giant Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, faces a 2.3 billion pound plus ($3.2 billion plus) class action in Britain over allegations it abused its market dominance by exploiting the personal data of 44 million users.Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, a senior adviser to Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) watchdog and a competition law academic, said she was bringing the case on behalf of people in Britain who had used Facebook between 2015 and 2019.The lawsuit, which will be heard by London's Competition Appeal Tribubal, alleges Facebook made billions of pounds by imposing unfair terms and conditions that demanded consumers surrender valuable personal data to access the network.Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, the law firm representing Lovdahl Gormsen, has notified Facebook of the claim.Facebook said people used its services because it delivered value for them and \"they have meaningful control of what information they share on Meta's platforms and who with.\"The case comes days after Facebook lost an attempt to strike out an antitrust lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of the biggest challenges by the U.S. government against a tech company in decades as Washington attempts to tackle Big Tech's extensive market power.\"In the 17 years since it was created, Facebook became the sole social network in the UK where you could be sure to connect with friends and family in one place,\" Lovdahl Gornsen said.\"Yet, there was a dark side to Facebook; it abused its market dominance to impose unfair terms and conditions on ordinary Britons, giving it the power to exploit their personal data.\"Lovdahl Gormsen alleges Facebook collected data within its platform and through mechanisms like the Facebook Pixel, allowing it to build an \"all-seeing picture\" of Internet usage and generate valuable, deep data profiles of users.Opt-out class actions, like Lovdahl Gormsen's, bind a defined group automatically into a lawsuit unless individuals opt out.($1 = 0.7277 pounds)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079002924,"gmtCreate":1657117002368,"gmtModify":1676535952195,"author":{"id":"4094121442063350","authorId":"4094121442063350","name":"Landly","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce065c1af1c7d5cd069f3f1e42d324ad","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094121442063350","authorIdStr":"4094121442063350"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079002924","repostId":"9070794773","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9070794773,"gmtCreate":1657103498990,"gmtModify":1676535949754,"author":{"id":"3479274788369128","authorId":"3479274788369128","name":"YT Finance","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b6a88deab8f94c02e156d705ee928536","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3479274788369128","authorIdStr":"3479274788369128"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"\n \n \n  Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!\n \n","listText":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","text":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ef8b549a0e4870158e00103afcd7412","width":"0","height":"0"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070794773","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"3b87912fce48407d868e3e8d7c2428b9","tweetId":"9070794773","title":"Discounted Stocks to BUY NOW! Best stocks to buy in July 2022 while the stock market is crashing!","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1657103494367b9a6c8a4dec7e4c14a1cd39a0db573ba.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ef8b549a0e4870158e00103afcd7412","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1657103494367b9a6c8a4dec7e4c14a1cd39a0db573ba.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}