Harvard personal page - To The Moon

Harvard

Harvard

No personal profile

2Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-05-22

👍👍👍

Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.

2022-04-03

Nice :)

7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022

2022-02-15

Tks

Big Options Trade Hedges S&P 500 Plunge of Up to 20% by April

2022-04-15

👌

Stock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying

2022-04-02

👍👍

Solar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading

2022-04-02

😌

Why Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet

2022-04-01

Oh no

Stocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap

2022-03-31

👍👍

After-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower

2022-02-10

Oh no

Stock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction

2022-05-22

👍

Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.

2022-02-08

Nice. Thank you.

Netflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings?

2022-05-01

👍

Buffett Says Berkshire Is "Better Than the Banks"

2022-03-30

Interesting

Fed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year

2022-02-07

Cool stuff. Thanks

For Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough

2022-02-11

Oh no

Hertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4098849970602690","uuid":"4098849970602690","gmtCreate":1635746904472,"gmtModify":1644200313486,"name":"Harvard","pinyin":"harvard","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":15,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.06.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.02.28","exceedPercentage":"60.81%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9028366808,"gmtCreate":1653177371004,"gmtModify":1676535233556,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍👍","listText":"👍👍👍","text":"👍👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028366808","repostId":"1123511669","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123511669","pubTimestamp":1653096638,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123511669?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123511669","media":"Barrons","summary":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&amp;P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.</p><p>But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&amp;P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.</p><p>For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.</p><p>“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”</p><p>That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&amp;P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.</p><p>“Historically, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&amp;P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”</p><p>That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.</p><p>“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&amp;P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”</p><p>The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.</p><p>“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&amp;P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&amp;P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&amp;P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.</p><p>The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.</p><p>The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&amp;P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.</p><p>“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.</p><p>It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123511669","content_text":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.“Historically, the S&P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”The S&P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":710,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028366075,"gmtCreate":1653177347497,"gmtModify":1676535233538,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028366075","repostId":"1123511669","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123511669","pubTimestamp":1653096638,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123511669?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123511669","media":"Barrons","summary":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&amp;P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.</p><p>But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&amp;P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.</p><p>For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.</p><p>“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”</p><p>That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&amp;P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.</p><p>“Historically, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&amp;P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”</p><p>That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.</p><p>“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&amp;P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”</p><p>The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.</p><p>“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&amp;P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&amp;P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&amp;P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.</p><p>The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.</p><p>The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&amp;P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.</p><p>“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.</p><p>It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123511669","content_text":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.“Historically, the S&P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”The S&P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":333,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069749494,"gmtCreate":1651367458992,"gmtModify":1676534895198,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069749494","repostId":"1119163908","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119163908","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1651330677,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119163908?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-30 22:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119163908","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.</p><p>Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.</p><p>Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.</p><p>From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&amp;P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.</p><p>While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&amp;P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-30 22:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.</p><p>Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.</p><p>Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.</p><p>From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&amp;P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.</p><p>While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&amp;P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119163908","content_text":"Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":686,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089630836,"gmtCreate":1649986295631,"gmtModify":1676534622181,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌","listText":"👌","text":"👌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089630836","repostId":"1170859152","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170859152","pubTimestamp":1649982551,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170859152?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-15 08:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170859152","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilie","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: Shaoul</li><li>Economic activity and consumer resilience remain robust</li></ul><p>War, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of dip-buying bulls. But none of that has yet to completely break it.</p><p>While this week saw the hottest readings on inflation in four decades, it also featured conspicuous signs of resilience, including a bounce on Wednesday that pushed the S&amp;P 500 up the most since last month. Two-year Treasury yields eased in three of four sessions, while industrial stocks held firm and volatility benchmarks were unmoved.</p><p>The buoyancy is notable coming amid an escalating campaign of hawkishness by Federal Reserve speakers ahead of a policy decision on May 4. Even inflation that is exceeding earlier forecasts by “a ludicrous degree” is being taken in stride  -- mostly -- by traders, who consider it already baked into asset prices, according to fund manager Michael Shaoul.</p><p>“We were not surprised either by the data released or the market’s reaction,” Shaoul, chief executive officer at Marketfield Asset Management, said in a note. “Most investors and advisers probably feel that they have already made a very large adjustment to their expectations in recent weeks, and felt no need to react further.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d911c1bc3ed7c91bb5b5885d7fea279a\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Over the four days, the S&amp;P 500 slipped 2.1% for a second straight weekly retreat. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.8%, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3%. The CBOE Volatility Index edged up to 22.65. U.S. markets are closed Friday for a holiday.</p><p>Investors entered the week awaiting readings on inflation that marked the last big data points before the Fed’s meeting. U.S. consumer prices in March surged by the most since 1981, according to data Tuesday, reinforcing pressure on the Fed to hike rates. Stocks rallied for several hours afterward, buoyed by lower-than-forecast readings on core components that omit food and energy. Treasury two-year yields -- sensitive to monetary policy and inflation expectations -- eased sharply after the report.</p><p>Prices paid to U.S. producers, meanwhile, also climbed in March from a year ago, beating all estimates, the government said Wednesday. Stocks jumped and short-dated Treasury yields slipped again as investors clung to hopes that reading marked the peak in inflation.</p><p>“If I had told you in advance that we would receive worse-than-expected CPI and PPI readings in rapid succession, both to levels that haven’t been seen in decades, would you have predicted that rates would pull back sharply and stocks would rally?” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers LLC.</p><p>To be sure, not everyone found the news reason to rest easy. Bank of America, for its part, warned clients not to be fooled by the softer reading, calling it a “head-fake.”</p><p>“It is a mistake to focus on the traditional measure of core inflation that excludes food and energy,” economists led by Ethan Harris said in a note. “The problem with this approach is that, depending on what you pluck out, you can come up with almost any number.”</p><p>For John Lynch, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, the two primary boosters for stocks these past years -- the Fed and low consumer price inflation -- are now serving as headwinds that will eventually pressure margins and valuations.</p><p>“The persistent inflationary pressures may continue to weigh on investor sentiment,” Lynch said in a note. “We continue to favor value and cyclical sectors and suspect more active strategies will outperform passive as companies, and investors, adjust to these changes.”</p><p>Favor cyclicals is what investors did in the past week. Billions were poured into exchange-traded funds focused on semiconductor stocks as they wagered the industry will rebound from the supply-chain snags and chip shortages. Materials producers and industrial stocks led gains in the period.</p><p>Semiconductor ETFs saw roughly $1.7 billion of inflows, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Since the beginning of the year, the funds have collected $7.8 billion, about as much as the past two years combined. The influx of cash into semiconductors, a cyclical sector that typically does well when the economy is doing well, highlights the faith of investors that the industry will recover from the supply-chain turmoil exacerbated by the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c0cd2119ec7ce31f546f69e388e9773\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Other economic reports were friendlier to bulls, among them U.S. retail sales, which ticked higher in March thanks to an 8.9% jump in spending for gasoline. The data offered a glimmer of optimism that Americans are still willing to spend despite the rising prices of goods and services, even as calls for recession grow louder in the near-term. Even if one does arrive, timing an economic downturn is difficult.</p><p>“Recession is more likely than a soft landing. That doesn’t mean that imminently the market goes down,” Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab &amp; Co., said by phone. “But assuming risk of recession continues to go up and doesn’t come back down, you can at least assume there’s going to be more volatility in the market.”</p><p>At Jefferies LLC, chief economist Aneta Markowska monitors a proprietary U.S. economic activity index made of up components including restaurant bookings, retail web traffic and transit data, among others. Her gauge has risen above levels seen a month ago, and Markowska notes consumption and movement factors have made notable gains, though she says housing has weakened.</p><p>“So, although the economy appears to be treading water on the surface, there are continued signs of normalization under the hood,” she wrote in a note. “Consumer activity continues to be very resilient in the face of higher energy costs.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-15 08:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilience remain robustWar, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170859152","content_text":"Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilience remain robustWar, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of dip-buying bulls. But none of that has yet to completely break it.While this week saw the hottest readings on inflation in four decades, it also featured conspicuous signs of resilience, including a bounce on Wednesday that pushed the S&P 500 up the most since last month. Two-year Treasury yields eased in three of four sessions, while industrial stocks held firm and volatility benchmarks were unmoved.The buoyancy is notable coming amid an escalating campaign of hawkishness by Federal Reserve speakers ahead of a policy decision on May 4. Even inflation that is exceeding earlier forecasts by “a ludicrous degree” is being taken in stride  -- mostly -- by traders, who consider it already baked into asset prices, according to fund manager Michael Shaoul.“We were not surprised either by the data released or the market’s reaction,” Shaoul, chief executive officer at Marketfield Asset Management, said in a note. “Most investors and advisers probably feel that they have already made a very large adjustment to their expectations in recent weeks, and felt no need to react further.”Over the four days, the S&P 500 slipped 2.1% for a second straight weekly retreat. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.8%, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3%. The CBOE Volatility Index edged up to 22.65. U.S. markets are closed Friday for a holiday.Investors entered the week awaiting readings on inflation that marked the last big data points before the Fed’s meeting. U.S. consumer prices in March surged by the most since 1981, according to data Tuesday, reinforcing pressure on the Fed to hike rates. Stocks rallied for several hours afterward, buoyed by lower-than-forecast readings on core components that omit food and energy. Treasury two-year yields -- sensitive to monetary policy and inflation expectations -- eased sharply after the report.Prices paid to U.S. producers, meanwhile, also climbed in March from a year ago, beating all estimates, the government said Wednesday. Stocks jumped and short-dated Treasury yields slipped again as investors clung to hopes that reading marked the peak in inflation.“If I had told you in advance that we would receive worse-than-expected CPI and PPI readings in rapid succession, both to levels that haven’t been seen in decades, would you have predicted that rates would pull back sharply and stocks would rally?” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers LLC.To be sure, not everyone found the news reason to rest easy. Bank of America, for its part, warned clients not to be fooled by the softer reading, calling it a “head-fake.”“It is a mistake to focus on the traditional measure of core inflation that excludes food and energy,” economists led by Ethan Harris said in a note. “The problem with this approach is that, depending on what you pluck out, you can come up with almost any number.”For John Lynch, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, the two primary boosters for stocks these past years -- the Fed and low consumer price inflation -- are now serving as headwinds that will eventually pressure margins and valuations.“The persistent inflationary pressures may continue to weigh on investor sentiment,” Lynch said in a note. “We continue to favor value and cyclical sectors and suspect more active strategies will outperform passive as companies, and investors, adjust to these changes.”Favor cyclicals is what investors did in the past week. Billions were poured into exchange-traded funds focused on semiconductor stocks as they wagered the industry will rebound from the supply-chain snags and chip shortages. Materials producers and industrial stocks led gains in the period.Semiconductor ETFs saw roughly $1.7 billion of inflows, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Since the beginning of the year, the funds have collected $7.8 billion, about as much as the past two years combined. The influx of cash into semiconductors, a cyclical sector that typically does well when the economy is doing well, highlights the faith of investors that the industry will recover from the supply-chain turmoil exacerbated by the pandemic.Other economic reports were friendlier to bulls, among them U.S. retail sales, which ticked higher in March thanks to an 8.9% jump in spending for gasoline. The data offered a glimmer of optimism that Americans are still willing to spend despite the rising prices of goods and services, even as calls for recession grow louder in the near-term. Even if one does arrive, timing an economic downturn is difficult.“Recession is more likely than a soft landing. That doesn’t mean that imminently the market goes down,” Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab & Co., said by phone. “But assuming risk of recession continues to go up and doesn’t come back down, you can at least assume there’s going to be more volatility in the market.”At Jefferies LLC, chief economist Aneta Markowska monitors a proprietary U.S. economic activity index made of up components including restaurant bookings, retail web traffic and transit data, among others. Her gauge has risen above levels seen a month ago, and Markowska notes consumption and movement factors have made notable gains, though she says housing has weakened.“So, although the economy appears to be treading water on the surface, there are continued signs of normalization under the hood,” she wrote in a note. “Consumer activity continues to be very resilient in the face of higher energy costs.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":649,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011759669,"gmtCreate":1648942980274,"gmtModify":1676534423877,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice :)","listText":"Nice :)","text":"Nice :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011759669","repostId":"1123130739","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123130739","pubTimestamp":1648865521,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123130739?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 10:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123130739","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the to","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a>: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.</li><li>Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services businesses.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>: Runs a near-duopoly on the credit card market.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard</a>: Like Visa, operates with impressive margins and cash flow.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>: Best-of-breed tech juggernaut catering to multiple end-markets enjoying strong secular growth.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks</a>: A leader in the consumer/retail business and has a strong focus on shareholder returns.</li></ul><p>Early in my investing career, I saw something that really piqued my interest: blue-chip stocks. But not just blue-chip stocks of that era. Instead, I was after future blue chips; And thus, the Future Blue Chips idea had dawned on me.</p><p>Since then, I have been hunting tomorrow’s shining stars of today, sniffing out the best stocks I can find with strong fundamentals, solid leadership and reasonable valuations.</p><p>These are long-term, theme-oriented stocks that are relying on high-quality businesses and secular trends. Years ago — perhaps a decade — I would get people that would reach out to me and say, “Hey! These are already well-known companies. Find something new, would ya!”</p><p>Well, it’s hard to be a future blue chips stock if the company isn’t already a good one. At the time, it included many of the names you see above, minus Nvidia unfortunately. On the plus side, the rest of these companies have continued to deliver the goods. And now, we’re going to go one-by-one through them to see why.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a86b7974b7e75ab9d177dd5490282aac\" tg-width=\"1114\" tg-height=\"454\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96309d402167ac02d02467153492335a\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: TY Lim / Shutterstock.com</p><p>One of the largest apparel companies in the world is<b>Nike</b>(NYSE:<b>NKE</b>). It operates a wonderful blend between being a wholesale apparel maker and a high-end athletic retailer. By running its own locations, as well as selling to other retailers, Nike diversifies its revenue and is able to drive incremental margin growth to its bottom line.</p><p>In a nutshell, it can drive sales at its own locations, while relying on the size of other retailers to generate revenue. But Nike’s real crown jewel is its direct-to-consumer (DTC) business.</p><p>Referred to by the company as its DTC unit, this business is what allows Nike to drive significant margin expansion. It’s also what allowed the company to recover more quickly than most apparel makers and apparel retailers in the early days of the novel coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>With its DTC business, Nike can sell right to its customers. In turn, that allows it to build better analytics and improve its target marketing. It also allows it to cut out the middleman. Last quarter,overall revenue increased 4.9%year-over-year (YOY). However, its DTC business climbed 17% on a currency-neutral basis. So, clearly, that’s where the momentum is at.</p><p>Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL)<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47861f1381d07e74ccba8ded13159044\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: rvlsoft / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) is one of the best companies in the entire market, and there are three simple reasons why: Assets, growth and its balance sheet. Let’s go in that order.</p><p>The company commands a market capitalization of about $1.9 trillion, so of course, it has many assets. However, its main assets are Google.com and YouTube.com. Not only are these the two most popular websites in the world — akin to owning Boardwalk and Park Place in the game<i>Monopoly</i> — but they also boast strong growth.</p><p>That leads us to our second point. In combination with its cloud unit and other divisions, Alphabet continues to churn out impressive growth. Last quarter, revenue climbedmore than 32% YOY. This year, analysts expectsales growth of 16.7%. And for 2023, those estimates sit at 15.6%. Meanwhile, earnings growth forecasts are similar.</p><p>When it comes to free cash flow, Alphabet generated $67<i>billion</i>inFCF last year. That was up more than 55% from the prior year, while this figure grew more than 35% in each of the prior two years as well.</p><p>All of this growth is doing just one thing, which is growing the balance sheet. As of its latest quarter, Alphabet has $188 billion in current assets, almost $140 billion of which are in cash and short-term securities. The company also carries $14.8 billion in long-term debt, or a quarter of that when we exclude capitalized leases.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/364a2cb8d2afac18372e4783b1019bd1\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: WeDesing / Shutterstock.com</p><p>I refer to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple </a> as having one of the best business models in the world. It runs the razor/razor blade model, but at an incredible premium.</p><p>The razor/razor blade model is premised on the idea of getting the razor into customer’s hands — even if that means giving it away at cost (or less) — so that they will continue to buy razors from you, which is the real money maker.</p><p>Rather than give away its razors though — in this case, that’s iPhones, iPads, Macs, etc. — Apple charges a hefty premium. They mark these devices up in price to the point where they alone generate an enormous business for Apple.</p><p>So, what then is the razor blade portion of the business? Services.</p><p>Last quarter, overall revenue grew 11%, whileServicesrevenuegrew almost 24%YOY. Not only is it outpacing the company’s Products revenue in terms of growth, and overall revenue growth, but Apple’s Services unit is more than twice as profitable as its Products business. And that is the main catalyst that people need to understand.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/806d1eadbf86df2e3594da052318aa3a\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Kikinunchi / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Outside of the tech space, these next two companies have been some of the best performers over the last decade. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard</a> run what I like to call a “toll booth” on transactions.</p><p>There’s a secular trend that’s been underway for years, as consumers transition from cash and check to credit and debit. Additionally, the rise of online and digital sales has only fueled this move, as consumers obviously find it easy to shop.</p><p>Specifically, with these two businesses, investors have been quick to critique the valuation by pointing out that Visa stock trades at more than 17 times its trailing 12-month revenue. In the past, this valuation has also been an issue.Even during generous market periods, that’s a rich valuation for many growth stocks.However, in those instances, investors aren’t taking profits into account for the growth stocks, because many don’t have any. And in the case of Visa, it’s incredibly profitable.</p><p>Overall, the company sports gross profit margins of almost 80% and net profit margins of 51.6%. These metrics aren’t back to the pre-pandemic highs just yet, but they are inching in that direction now. Therefore, it makes a great option among the top blue-chip stocks to buy.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4ceebd503c5e934c82f5af4c8e4a01c\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Alexander Yakimov / Shutterstock.com</p><p>MasterCard is very similar to Visa. Like the latter, MasterCard also tends to trade at a high price-sales (P/S) ratio. While many will glance at this metric and dismiss these stocks, it’s a foolish way to evaluate them. Admittedly the valuations have crept higher, but from this standpoint, they have almost always been elevated. And yet, investors have reaped enormous rewards by staying long Visa and MasterCard.</p><p>In fact, 76% of revenue is converted into gross profit and almost <i>half</i> of revenue falls to the bottom line. In turn, MasterCard boasts a net profit margin of 46%. Of course, like Visa, these margins are not back to pre-pandemic levels; But they do continue to climb.</p><p>Collectively, the major risk to these businesses isn’t digital sales, cryptocurrencies or otherwise. It’s a recession, either globally or domestically. Lower consumer spending will be a big net negative to these stocks specifically since spending is what drives the top and bottom line.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04874462381e4ee3fb7f89da1b0d0b6f\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Hairem / Shutterstock.com</p><p>As one of the greatest companies in the market as well, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> caters to multiple end-markets that are enjoying long-term secular growth. Some of those end markets include:</p><p>Datacenter, cloud computing, supercomputing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, graphics, gaming, autonomous driving and automotive, drones, robotics, the metaverse and more.</p><p>Moreover, when you look at those markets, it’s pretty clear to see the trends. Do customers want faster computers, better graphics, and more responsive gaming and control (for drones, robotics, autonomous driving)? Do they want faster cloud-based applications and are they generating more data?</p><p>The answers to these questions all point to more demand for Nvidia’s products In turn, it’s the main reason I believe this firm will eventually command a $1 trillion market cap.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb5693448bc0842fb18328a21a9c78ed\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Grand Warszawski / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Last but not least, we have a dominant food- and drinks-based retailer with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks</a>. Aside from routinely landing among the top spots in the<i>Piper Sandler</i>teen survey, Starbucks remains a go-to “third place” for consumers of all ages.</p><p>The company may be out of its strong growth days, but Starbucks still generates impressive cash flow and growth. With that in mind, analysts expectabout 13% revenue growth this year, then a steady 8% to 9% growth ineach of the next three years.On the earnings front, analysts expect roughly 18% earnings growth this year, followed by more than 17% growth next year.</p><p>Furthermore, the recent dip in the stock has driven Starbucks’ dividend yield up above 2%.While it’s not winning many income investors over at that rate, it’s not bad for those of us with a long-term horizon that isn’t necessarily focused solely on dividend income. However, the company has made this yield a priority.</p><p>Starbucks has grown its dividend for 11 years now, with afive-year average growth rateof about 15.9%. So, clearly, it’s a focus.</p><p>Thus, as long as the world is drinking coffee, Starbucks will be a winner.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-02 10:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.Apple: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","SBUX":"星巴克","MA":"万事达","GOOGL":"谷歌A","NKE":"耐克","NVDA":"英伟达","V":"Visa","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123130739","content_text":"Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.Apple: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services businesses.Visa: Runs a near-duopoly on the credit card market.MasterCard: Like Visa, operates with impressive margins and cash flow.Nvidia: Best-of-breed tech juggernaut catering to multiple end-markets enjoying strong secular growth.Starbucks: A leader in the consumer/retail business and has a strong focus on shareholder returns.Early in my investing career, I saw something that really piqued my interest: blue-chip stocks. But not just blue-chip stocks of that era. Instead, I was after future blue chips; And thus, the Future Blue Chips idea had dawned on me.Since then, I have been hunting tomorrow’s shining stars of today, sniffing out the best stocks I can find with strong fundamentals, solid leadership and reasonable valuations.These are long-term, theme-oriented stocks that are relying on high-quality businesses and secular trends. Years ago — perhaps a decade — I would get people that would reach out to me and say, “Hey! These are already well-known companies. Find something new, would ya!”Well, it’s hard to be a future blue chips stock if the company isn’t already a good one. At the time, it included many of the names you see above, minus Nvidia unfortunately. On the plus side, the rest of these companies have continued to deliver the goods. And now, we’re going to go one-by-one through them to see why.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: NikeSource: TY Lim / Shutterstock.comOne of the largest apparel companies in the world isNike(NYSE:NKE). It operates a wonderful blend between being a wholesale apparel maker and a high-end athletic retailer. By running its own locations, as well as selling to other retailers, Nike diversifies its revenue and is able to drive incremental margin growth to its bottom line.In a nutshell, it can drive sales at its own locations, while relying on the size of other retailers to generate revenue. But Nike’s real crown jewel is its direct-to-consumer (DTC) business.Referred to by the company as its DTC unit, this business is what allows Nike to drive significant margin expansion. It’s also what allowed the company to recover more quickly than most apparel makers and apparel retailers in the early days of the novel coronavirus pandemic.With its DTC business, Nike can sell right to its customers. In turn, that allows it to build better analytics and improve its target marketing. It also allows it to cut out the middleman. Last quarter,overall revenue increased 4.9%year-over-year (YOY). However, its DTC business climbed 17% on a currency-neutral basis. So, clearly, that’s where the momentum is at.Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL)Source: rvlsoft / Shutterstock.comAlphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) is one of the best companies in the entire market, and there are three simple reasons why: Assets, growth and its balance sheet. Let’s go in that order.The company commands a market capitalization of about $1.9 trillion, so of course, it has many assets. However, its main assets are Google.com and YouTube.com. Not only are these the two most popular websites in the world — akin to owning Boardwalk and Park Place in the gameMonopoly — but they also boast strong growth.That leads us to our second point. In combination with its cloud unit and other divisions, Alphabet continues to churn out impressive growth. Last quarter, revenue climbedmore than 32% YOY. This year, analysts expectsales growth of 16.7%. And for 2023, those estimates sit at 15.6%. Meanwhile, earnings growth forecasts are similar.When it comes to free cash flow, Alphabet generated $67billioninFCF last year. That was up more than 55% from the prior year, while this figure grew more than 35% in each of the prior two years as well.All of this growth is doing just one thing, which is growing the balance sheet. As of its latest quarter, Alphabet has $188 billion in current assets, almost $140 billion of which are in cash and short-term securities. The company also carries $14.8 billion in long-term debt, or a quarter of that when we exclude capitalized leases.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: Apple Source: WeDesing / Shutterstock.comI refer to Apple  as having one of the best business models in the world. It runs the razor/razor blade model, but at an incredible premium.The razor/razor blade model is premised on the idea of getting the razor into customer’s hands — even if that means giving it away at cost (or less) — so that they will continue to buy razors from you, which is the real money maker.Rather than give away its razors though — in this case, that’s iPhones, iPads, Macs, etc. — Apple charges a hefty premium. They mark these devices up in price to the point where they alone generate an enormous business for Apple.So, what then is the razor blade portion of the business? Services.Last quarter, overall revenue grew 11%, whileServicesrevenuegrew almost 24%YOY. Not only is it outpacing the company’s Products revenue in terms of growth, and overall revenue growth, but Apple’s Services unit is more than twice as profitable as its Products business. And that is the main catalyst that people need to understand.Visa Source: Kikinunchi / Shutterstock.comOutside of the tech space, these next two companies have been some of the best performers over the last decade. Visa and MasterCard run what I like to call a “toll booth” on transactions.There’s a secular trend that’s been underway for years, as consumers transition from cash and check to credit and debit. Additionally, the rise of online and digital sales has only fueled this move, as consumers obviously find it easy to shop.Specifically, with these two businesses, investors have been quick to critique the valuation by pointing out that Visa stock trades at more than 17 times its trailing 12-month revenue. In the past, this valuation has also been an issue.Even during generous market periods, that’s a rich valuation for many growth stocks.However, in those instances, investors aren’t taking profits into account for the growth stocks, because many don’t have any. And in the case of Visa, it’s incredibly profitable.Overall, the company sports gross profit margins of almost 80% and net profit margins of 51.6%. These metrics aren’t back to the pre-pandemic highs just yet, but they are inching in that direction now. Therefore, it makes a great option among the top blue-chip stocks to buy.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: MasterCard Source: Alexander Yakimov / Shutterstock.comMasterCard is very similar to Visa. Like the latter, MasterCard also tends to trade at a high price-sales (P/S) ratio. While many will glance at this metric and dismiss these stocks, it’s a foolish way to evaluate them. Admittedly the valuations have crept higher, but from this standpoint, they have almost always been elevated. And yet, investors have reaped enormous rewards by staying long Visa and MasterCard.In fact, 76% of revenue is converted into gross profit and almost half of revenue falls to the bottom line. In turn, MasterCard boasts a net profit margin of 46%. Of course, like Visa, these margins are not back to pre-pandemic levels; But they do continue to climb.Collectively, the major risk to these businesses isn’t digital sales, cryptocurrencies or otherwise. It’s a recession, either globally or domestically. Lower consumer spending will be a big net negative to these stocks specifically since spending is what drives the top and bottom line.NvidiaSource: Hairem / Shutterstock.comAs one of the greatest companies in the market as well, Nvidia caters to multiple end-markets that are enjoying long-term secular growth. Some of those end markets include:Datacenter, cloud computing, supercomputing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, graphics, gaming, autonomous driving and automotive, drones, robotics, the metaverse and more.Moreover, when you look at those markets, it’s pretty clear to see the trends. Do customers want faster computers, better graphics, and more responsive gaming and control (for drones, robotics, autonomous driving)? Do they want faster cloud-based applications and are they generating more data?The answers to these questions all point to more demand for Nvidia’s products In turn, it’s the main reason I believe this firm will eventually command a $1 trillion market cap.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: Starbucks Source: Grand Warszawski / Shutterstock.comLast but not least, we have a dominant food- and drinks-based retailer with Starbucks. Aside from routinely landing among the top spots in thePiper Sandlerteen survey, Starbucks remains a go-to “third place” for consumers of all ages.The company may be out of its strong growth days, but Starbucks still generates impressive cash flow and growth. With that in mind, analysts expectabout 13% revenue growth this year, then a steady 8% to 9% growth ineach of the next three years.On the earnings front, analysts expect roughly 18% earnings growth this year, followed by more than 17% growth next year.Furthermore, the recent dip in the stock has driven Starbucks’ dividend yield up above 2%.While it’s not winning many income investors over at that rate, it’s not bad for those of us with a long-term horizon that isn’t necessarily focused solely on dividend income. However, the company has made this yield a priority.Starbucks has grown its dividend for 11 years now, with afive-year average growth rateof about 15.9%. So, clearly, it’s a focus.Thus, as long as the world is drinking coffee, Starbucks will be a winner.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":353,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011639854,"gmtCreate":1648860377238,"gmtModify":1676534411722,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011639854","repostId":"1196338021","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196338021","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648821865,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196338021?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 22:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Solar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196338021","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian S","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66f389ef161456c3127c23c026fe022b\" tg-width=\"413\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Solar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSolar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-01 22:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66f389ef161456c3127c23c026fe022b\" tg-width=\"413\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CSIQ":"阿特斯太阳能","DQ":"大全新能源","JKS":"晶科能源","SEDG":"SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.","NOVA":"Sunnova Energy International Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196338021","content_text":"Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":500,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011630809,"gmtCreate":1648860335099,"gmtModify":1676534411690,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"😌","listText":"😌","text":"😌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011630809","repostId":"1104213580","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104213580","pubTimestamp":1648825218,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1104213580?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104213580","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><b>Bionano</b>(<b><u>BNGO</u></b>) made solid progress with its business last year.</li><li>It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.</li><li>Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58679caedd79fca29fb59459e895b2f1\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"900\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Dennis Diatel / Shutterstock.com</span></p><p><b>Bionano Genomics</b> (NASDAQ:<b><u>BNGO</u></b>) stock has taken its shareholders on a rollercoaster ride over the past couple of years. Right now, BNGO stock trades at around the same price as it did before its massive break out to begin 2021. In turn, with this incredible performance last year and its massive potential in genomic analysis, it could be a multi-bagger in the future. Nevertheless, the stock isn’t for the faint of heart and is perhaps best suited for risk-taking investors — and here’s why.</p><p>The healthcare diagnostics firm has attracted a slew of conflicting opinions from market experts and investors. And while some believe in the long-term value of its pioneering genome analysis technology, others might see the enormous risks associated with its business.</p><p>Of course, investing in firms such as Bionano will always come with a ton of risks. However, the upside potential of its business is immense — and with a debt-free capital structure, it can turn on the afterburners with its expansion plans.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><b><u>BNGO</u></b></td><td>Bionano Genomics</td><td>$2.58</td></tr></tbody></table><p><b>Another Impressive Quarter</b></p><p>Bionano wrapped up another solid quarter after posting double-digit top-line growth in its third quarter. Its fourth-quarter sales of $6.3 million grew by 58% from the prior-year period. Moreover, they comfortably surpassed analyst estimates of $5.6 million for the quarter and the company’s preliminary projections in January. And its genome-mapping tool called Saphyr saw a 69% bump in installations last year compared to 2020.</p><p>Furthermore, for full-year 2021, the company’s sales shot up 111% from 2020 to $18 million, beating average analyst estimates of $17.3 million. Also, for 2022, the company predicts another 33% to 50% increase in sales.</p><p>However, perhaps the most exciting bit about the company is its business model, which can effectively lead to massive recurring income over time. In turn, the additional revenues can be used to develop new products and add to its competitive advantages. Saphyr can be used for various research and clinical niches, and the data output presented by the device is irreplicable, according to Bionano’s management. Therefore, Saphyr offers major competitive advantages at this time, giving it an edge over its competition.</p><p>Additionally, the company wants to build a sticky ecosystem of consumable products for its devices. In turn, preparation kits and sample chips are necessary for use with Saphyr, and these consumables will be an ongoing purchase for users. Thus, these essential tools can become a huge source of recurring revenue for Bionano in the future.</p><p><b>Shoring Up Finances</b></p><p>Bionano did well to cash in on its meme stock popularity and raise capital through issuing new shares. Its equity offerings diluted its stock by almost two-fold in 2021. But, the capital allowed the company to pay off debts and subsequently invest in its research and development (R&amp;D) efforts.</p><p>Before the pandemic, Bionano had a relatively decent balance sheet, with $17.3 million in its cash till. However, it wasn’t nearly enough to fund its lofty development plans. Hence, it was left with no option but to dilute its shareholding from 28 million shares in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 289.6 million. This represents a share dilution by tenfolds in a span of just a couple of years.</p><p>Nevertheless, it paid off $14.9 million in debt by the first half of 2021 and completed several acquisitions. Hence, Bionano had a sizeable cash balance of $24.6 million and $226 million in saleable securities after the fourth quarter. Its internal funds will come in handy in catering to its rising R&amp;D and other expenses, which widened its net loss by 76.2% in 2021.</p><p><b>Bottom Line On BNGO Stock</b></p><p>Overall, Bionano has been experiencing healthy momentum in its business in the past few quarters and has put forward highly encouraging guidance for this year. The company has immense potential to establish a leading position in genomic sequencing, assuming a more widespread adoption in the coming years.</p><p>Nevertheless, the risks are evident with the stock. Particularly, the firm’s penchant for diluting its shares is worrying for long-term investors. And given that profitability is still years away, it will continue diluting its shares further to fund future growth. Therefore, if you’re looking for a stock with healthy upside potential and could tolerate share dilution moving forward, BNGO stock could be an interesting bet for you.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-01 23:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BNGO":"Bionano Genomics"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104213580","content_text":"Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential.Source: Dennis Diatel / Shutterstock.comBionano Genomics (NASDAQ:BNGO) stock has taken its shareholders on a rollercoaster ride over the past couple of years. Right now, BNGO stock trades at around the same price as it did before its massive break out to begin 2021. In turn, with this incredible performance last year and its massive potential in genomic analysis, it could be a multi-bagger in the future. Nevertheless, the stock isn’t for the faint of heart and is perhaps best suited for risk-taking investors — and here’s why.The healthcare diagnostics firm has attracted a slew of conflicting opinions from market experts and investors. And while some believe in the long-term value of its pioneering genome analysis technology, others might see the enormous risks associated with its business.Of course, investing in firms such as Bionano will always come with a ton of risks. However, the upside potential of its business is immense — and with a debt-free capital structure, it can turn on the afterburners with its expansion plans.BNGOBionano Genomics$2.58Another Impressive QuarterBionano wrapped up another solid quarter after posting double-digit top-line growth in its third quarter. Its fourth-quarter sales of $6.3 million grew by 58% from the prior-year period. Moreover, they comfortably surpassed analyst estimates of $5.6 million for the quarter and the company’s preliminary projections in January. And its genome-mapping tool called Saphyr saw a 69% bump in installations last year compared to 2020.Furthermore, for full-year 2021, the company’s sales shot up 111% from 2020 to $18 million, beating average analyst estimates of $17.3 million. Also, for 2022, the company predicts another 33% to 50% increase in sales.However, perhaps the most exciting bit about the company is its business model, which can effectively lead to massive recurring income over time. In turn, the additional revenues can be used to develop new products and add to its competitive advantages. Saphyr can be used for various research and clinical niches, and the data output presented by the device is irreplicable, according to Bionano’s management. Therefore, Saphyr offers major competitive advantages at this time, giving it an edge over its competition.Additionally, the company wants to build a sticky ecosystem of consumable products for its devices. In turn, preparation kits and sample chips are necessary for use with Saphyr, and these consumables will be an ongoing purchase for users. Thus, these essential tools can become a huge source of recurring revenue for Bionano in the future.Shoring Up FinancesBionano did well to cash in on its meme stock popularity and raise capital through issuing new shares. Its equity offerings diluted its stock by almost two-fold in 2021. But, the capital allowed the company to pay off debts and subsequently invest in its research and development (R&D) efforts.Before the pandemic, Bionano had a relatively decent balance sheet, with $17.3 million in its cash till. However, it wasn’t nearly enough to fund its lofty development plans. Hence, it was left with no option but to dilute its shareholding from 28 million shares in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 289.6 million. This represents a share dilution by tenfolds in a span of just a couple of years.Nevertheless, it paid off $14.9 million in debt by the first half of 2021 and completed several acquisitions. Hence, Bionano had a sizeable cash balance of $24.6 million and $226 million in saleable securities after the fourth quarter. Its internal funds will come in handy in catering to its rising R&D and other expenses, which widened its net loss by 76.2% in 2021.Bottom Line On BNGO StockOverall, Bionano has been experiencing healthy momentum in its business in the past few quarters and has put forward highly encouraging guidance for this year. The company has immense potential to establish a leading position in genomic sequencing, assuming a more widespread adoption in the coming years.Nevertheless, the risks are evident with the stock. Particularly, the firm’s penchant for diluting its shares is worrying for long-term investors. And given that profitability is still years away, it will continue diluting its shares further to fund future growth. Therefore, if you’re looking for a stock with healthy upside potential and could tolerate share dilution moving forward, BNGO stock could be an interesting bet for you.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":248,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013707360,"gmtCreate":1648773232620,"gmtModify":1676534395053,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013707360","repostId":"1182000136","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1182000136","pubTimestamp":1648740552,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1182000136?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-31 23:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1182000136","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fall</li><li>Putin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not made</li></ul><p>U.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear market while Treasuries pared the worst losses in at least five decades. Oil slumped, but held above $100 a barrel in New York.</p><p>Moves in most financial markets were muted on the final day of a quarter that brought the twin threats of hawkish central banks bent on tamping down runaway inflation and the war in Ukraine. The S&amp;P 500 edged lower, taking its loss in the three months to 3.6%, the most since March 2020. The two-year Treasury yield was steady after its 150 basis-point surge that is the most since 1984. Ten-year rates slipped, narrowing the spread to shorter tenors, as investors remain on edge over the threat a restrictive Federal Reserve will cause a recession.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a411aebae77dba86342c2d808e747fa\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Stocks, sovereign bonds and corporate credit all got hammered in the year’s first months amid concerns about a growth slowdown as central banks move to tackle inflation by withdrawing stimulus. Investors who piled into commodities fared best, riding massive gains in everything from oil to nickel and wheat. Yet the increases have exacerbated price concerns and may lead to a sharper response from central banks.</p><p>“The recent rally has masked a lot of pain over the past three months,” wrote Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.</p><p>A decline Thursday would mark the S&amp;P 500’s 35th down day this year, the greatest number of first-quarter drawdowns since 1984, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p>Oil slid as the U.S. said it will release roughly a million barrels of oil a day from its reserves for six months, reversing an earlier price rebound ahead of an OPEC+ supply meeting. Meanwhile, stocks fell as U.S. inflation-adjusted spending declined last month as prices tempered demand.</p><p>Brent and West Texas Intermediate prices dropped about 4%, and European natural gas fell as Russia said it would halt gas contracts if buyers don’t pay in rubles.</p><p>“Aside from quarter-end considerations, oil is very much the center of attention,” Simon Ballard, chief economist at First Abu Dhabi Bank, wrote in a note to investors. Still, “all the usual suspects are still in play, keeping the market in check, including the specter of the Fed pursuing an aggressive path of monetary policy normalization over the coming months.”</p><p>Markets now see a strong chance the Federal Reserve will lift rates by a half point at its May meeting. The U.S. 2-year yield briefly exceeded the 10-year for the first time since 2019 on Tuesday, inverting yet another segment of the Treasury curve and reinforcing the view that Fed rate increases may cause a recession.</p><p>“This week’s brief inversion in the U.S. bond market, combined with elevated volatility on Treasury options, is a warning that the risk of U.S. recession should not be ignored,” wrote Lewis Grant, a senior portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. “U.S. bond markets are showing signs of stress. This is not mirrored in equities, where the VIX remains subdued and U.S. indexes trade above their pre-war levels. The bond market would appear to have a better handle on the potential risks.”</p><p>Some key events to watch this week:</p><ul><li>U.S. jobs report, Friday</li></ul><p>Some of the main moves in markets:</p><p><b>Stocks</b></p><ul><li>The S&amp;P 500 fell 0.1% as of 11:13 a.m. New York time</li><li>The Nasdaq 100 fell 0.2%</li><li>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.3%</li><li>The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.7%</li><li>The MSCI World index fell 0.4%</li></ul><p><b>Currencies</b></p><ul><li>The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changed</li><li>The euro fell 0.4% to $1.1116</li><li>The British pound rose 0.2% to $1.3161</li><li>The Japanese yen rose 0.3% to 121.42 per dollar</li></ul><p><b>Bonds</b></p><ul><li>The yield on 10-year Treasuries declined two basis points to 2.33%</li><li>Germany’s 10-year yield declined 10 basis points to 0.54%</li><li>Britain’s 10-year yield declined four basis points to 1.62%</li></ul><p><b>Commodities</b></p><ul><li>West Texas Intermediate crude fell 4.2% to $103.32 a barrel</li><li>Gold futures rose 0.4% to $1,946.10 an ounce</li></ul></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-31 23:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not madeU.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIA":"道琼斯ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1182000136","content_text":"S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not madeU.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear market while Treasuries pared the worst losses in at least five decades. Oil slumped, but held above $100 a barrel in New York.Moves in most financial markets were muted on the final day of a quarter that brought the twin threats of hawkish central banks bent on tamping down runaway inflation and the war in Ukraine. The S&P 500 edged lower, taking its loss in the three months to 3.6%, the most since March 2020. The two-year Treasury yield was steady after its 150 basis-point surge that is the most since 1984. Ten-year rates slipped, narrowing the spread to shorter tenors, as investors remain on edge over the threat a restrictive Federal Reserve will cause a recession.Stocks, sovereign bonds and corporate credit all got hammered in the year’s first months amid concerns about a growth slowdown as central banks move to tackle inflation by withdrawing stimulus. Investors who piled into commodities fared best, riding massive gains in everything from oil to nickel and wheat. Yet the increases have exacerbated price concerns and may lead to a sharper response from central banks.“The recent rally has masked a lot of pain over the past three months,” wrote Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.A decline Thursday would mark the S&P 500’s 35th down day this year, the greatest number of first-quarter drawdowns since 1984, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Oil slid as the U.S. said it will release roughly a million barrels of oil a day from its reserves for six months, reversing an earlier price rebound ahead of an OPEC+ supply meeting. Meanwhile, stocks fell as U.S. inflation-adjusted spending declined last month as prices tempered demand.Brent and West Texas Intermediate prices dropped about 4%, and European natural gas fell as Russia said it would halt gas contracts if buyers don’t pay in rubles.“Aside from quarter-end considerations, oil is very much the center of attention,” Simon Ballard, chief economist at First Abu Dhabi Bank, wrote in a note to investors. Still, “all the usual suspects are still in play, keeping the market in check, including the specter of the Fed pursuing an aggressive path of monetary policy normalization over the coming months.”Markets now see a strong chance the Federal Reserve will lift rates by a half point at its May meeting. The U.S. 2-year yield briefly exceeded the 10-year for the first time since 2019 on Tuesday, inverting yet another segment of the Treasury curve and reinforcing the view that Fed rate increases may cause a recession.“This week’s brief inversion in the U.S. bond market, combined with elevated volatility on Treasury options, is a warning that the risk of U.S. recession should not be ignored,” wrote Lewis Grant, a senior portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. “U.S. bond markets are showing signs of stress. This is not mirrored in equities, where the VIX remains subdued and U.S. indexes trade above their pre-war levels. The bond market would appear to have a better handle on the potential risks.”Some key events to watch this week:U.S. jobs report, FridaySome of the main moves in markets:StocksThe S&P 500 fell 0.1% as of 11:13 a.m. New York timeThe Nasdaq 100 fell 0.2%The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.3%The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.7%The MSCI World index fell 0.4%CurrenciesThe Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changedThe euro fell 0.4% to $1.1116The British pound rose 0.2% to $1.3161The Japanese yen rose 0.3% to 121.42 per dollarBondsThe yield on 10-year Treasuries declined two basis points to 2.33%Germany’s 10-year yield declined 10 basis points to 0.54%Britain’s 10-year yield declined four basis points to 1.62%CommoditiesWest Texas Intermediate crude fell 4.2% to $103.32 a barrelGold futures rose 0.4% to $1,946.10 an ounce","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":688,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013321849,"gmtCreate":1648686107807,"gmtModify":1676534378148,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013321849","repostId":"2223369103","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2223369103","pubTimestamp":1648682686,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2223369103?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-31 07:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2223369103","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the con","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After-Hours Stock Movers:</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PATH\">UiPath</a> Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $283.03 million. Looking for Q1 2023 revenue of $223-225 million, below the consensus of $243.1 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXFY\">Expensify</a>, Inc. 13% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of ($0.82), below the consensus of $0.08. Revenue for the quarter came in at $40.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $38.79 million. The company guided Q1 2022 revenue to $38.6-39.6 million, versus the consensus of $40.34 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OEG\">Orbital Energy Group</a>, Inc. 15% HIGHER; Q4 revenue rose 65% to $41 million versus the consensus estimate of $45.02 million.  It also reported a record backlog of $523.7 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MASI\">Masimo Corporation </a> 10% LOWER; sees product revenue for the first quarter between $285 million to $315 million, below the consensus of $329.7 million. They cited shortages of critical components and other supply chain issues.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRG\">PROG Holdings Inc. </a> 6% HIGHER; to replace <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FRGI\">Fiesta Restaurant Group</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI) in the S&amp;P SmallCap 600.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CORT\">Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated </a> 3% HIGHER; announced overall survival data from Phase 2 study of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, showing 33% reduction in risk of death.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFMD\">Affimed Therapeutics</a> (NASDAQ: AFMD) 2% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiates the stock with an Overweight rating and $7 price target.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCJ\">Cameco Corp</a>. (NYSE: CCJ) 1% HIGHER; BMO Capital upgraded shares to Outperform with a price target of C$42, saying the stock should continue to benefit from momentum for low carbon nuclear generation.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CDXS\">Codexis</a>, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDXS) 1% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a price target of $35.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-31 07:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PRG":"PROG Holdings, Inc.","BK4129":"建筑与工程","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","MASI":"麦斯莫医疗","BK4082":"医疗保健设备","EXFY":"Expensify","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4166":"消费信贷","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4539":"次新股","BK4023":"应用软件","PATH":"UiPath","CORT":"Corcept医疗","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4007":"制药"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2223369103","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $283.03 million. Looking for Q1 2023 revenue of $223-225 million, below the consensus of $243.1 million.Expensify, Inc. 13% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of ($0.82), below the consensus of $0.08. Revenue for the quarter came in at $40.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $38.79 million. The company guided Q1 2022 revenue to $38.6-39.6 million, versus the consensus of $40.34 million.Orbital Energy Group, Inc. 15% HIGHER; Q4 revenue rose 65% to $41 million versus the consensus estimate of $45.02 million.  It also reported a record backlog of $523.7 million.Masimo Corporation  10% LOWER; sees product revenue for the first quarter between $285 million to $315 million, below the consensus of $329.7 million. They cited shortages of critical components and other supply chain issues.PROG Holdings Inc.  6% HIGHER; to replace Fiesta Restaurant Group Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI) in the S&P SmallCap 600.Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated  3% HIGHER; announced overall survival data from Phase 2 study of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, showing 33% reduction in risk of death.Affimed Therapeutics (NASDAQ: AFMD) 2% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiates the stock with an Overweight rating and $7 price target.Cameco Corp. (NYSE: CCJ) 1% HIGHER; BMO Capital upgraded shares to Outperform with a price target of C$42, saying the stock should continue to benefit from momentum for low carbon nuclear generation.Codexis, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDXS) 1% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a price target of $35.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":574,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019291702,"gmtCreate":1648599476966,"gmtModify":1676534360905,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019291702","repostId":"1145232829","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145232829","pubTimestamp":1648567847,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145232829?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-29 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145232829","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectation","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soon</li><li>Says he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmoored</li></ul><p>Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a series of “deliberate, methodical” increases in the benchmark federal funds rate this year while reduction in the U.S. central bank’s holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities will begin soon.</p><p>“The bottom line is that generous fiscal policies, supply chain disruptions, and accommodative monetary policy have pushed inflation far higher than I -- and my colleagues on the FOMC -- are comfortable with,” Harker said Tuesday, referring to the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee. “I’m also worried that inflation expectations could become unmoored,” he added in remarks prepared for an event hosted by the Center for Financial Stability in New York.</p><p>Harker is voting as an alternative member of the FOMC in the place of the Boston Fed, which is currently without a president. Its new leader, University of Michigan economist Susan Collins, will take up the post on July 1.</p><p>Fed officials raised their benchmark lending rate off zero this month with a quarter-point increase. Since then, several policy makers have said they are open to hiking by a more aggressive half point at their May 3-4 meeting, including Chair Jerome Powell, if necessary to bring price pressures under control.</p><p>Investors have subsequently increased their bets on the pace of policy tightening, with interest-rate futures pricing in more than eight additional quarter-point increases over the remaining six policy meetings this year, implying that some will be half-point moves.</p><p>Harker implied that he was not currently in favor of front-loading rate increases, noting that he expects “a series of deliberate, methodical hikes as the year continues and the data evolve.”</p><p>He said the economy will post another above-trend growth rate of around 3% to 3.5% this year before falling back to trend of around 2% to 2.5% in the next few years. He said inflation will rise 4% this year before falling back toward the 2% target over the next two years.</p><p>U.S. central bankers have pivoted to a more aggressive posture on raising interest rates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which is putting upward pressure on food and energy costs at a time when inflation is already at a 40-year high. The Fed’s preferred price measure rose 6.1% for the 12-month period ending January, triple its 2% target.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-29 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmooredPhiladelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145232829","content_text":"Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmooredPhiladelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a series of “deliberate, methodical” increases in the benchmark federal funds rate this year while reduction in the U.S. central bank’s holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities will begin soon.“The bottom line is that generous fiscal policies, supply chain disruptions, and accommodative monetary policy have pushed inflation far higher than I -- and my colleagues on the FOMC -- are comfortable with,” Harker said Tuesday, referring to the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee. “I’m also worried that inflation expectations could become unmoored,” he added in remarks prepared for an event hosted by the Center for Financial Stability in New York.Harker is voting as an alternative member of the FOMC in the place of the Boston Fed, which is currently without a president. Its new leader, University of Michigan economist Susan Collins, will take up the post on July 1.Fed officials raised their benchmark lending rate off zero this month with a quarter-point increase. Since then, several policy makers have said they are open to hiking by a more aggressive half point at their May 3-4 meeting, including Chair Jerome Powell, if necessary to bring price pressures under control.Investors have subsequently increased their bets on the pace of policy tightening, with interest-rate futures pricing in more than eight additional quarter-point increases over the remaining six policy meetings this year, implying that some will be half-point moves.Harker implied that he was not currently in favor of front-loading rate increases, noting that he expects “a series of deliberate, methodical hikes as the year continues and the data evolve.”He said the economy will post another above-trend growth rate of around 3% to 3.5% this year before falling back to trend of around 2% to 2.5% in the next few years. He said inflation will rise 4% this year before falling back toward the 2% target over the next two years.U.S. central bankers have pivoted to a more aggressive posture on raising interest rates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which is putting upward pressure on food and energy costs at a time when inflation is already at a 40-year high. The Fed’s preferred price measure rose 6.1% for the 12-month period ending January, triple its 2% target.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":362,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095884945,"gmtCreate":1644882165374,"gmtModify":1676533970790,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tks&nbsp;","listText":"Tks&nbsp;","text":"Tks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095884945","repostId":"1170333360","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":109,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092329336,"gmtCreate":1644539934328,"gmtModify":1676533938554,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092329336","repostId":"2210515163","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210515163","pubTimestamp":1644538578,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210515163?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 08:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210515163","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrests</li><li>Car rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claims</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cadd8ffd90d667e7d67c7e879e203bca\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Photographer: Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg</span></p><p>Hertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds of car renters who say they were falsely arrested for auto theft, files thousands of related criminal complaints each year against customers, according to claims in newly released court documents.</p><p>In one four-year period, the company filed nearly 8,000 theft reports annually, advocates for the falsely arrested customers said in a federal court filing in Wilmington, Delaware Thursday. The advocates cited internal data from Hertz that a judge ordered the company to release.</p><p>A breakdown of the theft reports isn’t public, so it’s not yet possible to know how many complaints were against customers and how many were for other types of theft. Under certain circumstances, Hertz will tell police that a customer may have stolen a car. Many of those people turn out to have valid contracts and allegedly have been falsely arrested, according to the lawsuits.</p><p>Messages left for Hertz representatives weren’t immediately returned. CBS, which hired lawyers to help get the documents unsealed, previously reported Hertz said the “vast majority” of cases involve renters who were weeks or months overdue on returns and authorities are brought in only after “exhaustive attempts” to reach a customer.</p><p><b>Court Order</b></p><p>In a court hearing Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath ordered the annual theft numbers to be made public, siding with advocates for 220 people suing Hertz who argued that more details about Hertz’s internal anti-theft program should be public.</p><p>Court documents show that some of the customers who rented cars were jailed, some years after they rented and returned the cars. At least one allegedly was held at gunpoint just hours after paying for a rental.</p><p>“Hertz now admits that it reports thousands of its own customers for auto theft each year,” lawyers for the people suing said in court papers. The problem can be traced to company-wide, systemic problems, they allege.</p><p><b>Bankruptcy Claims</b></p><p>The false arrest claims often involve long-term rentals, some set up directly by the customer, others through an auto insurance company, according to court documents.</p><p>Those who claim Hertz had them wrongly arrested have filed claims in bankruptcy court demanding to be paid like other creditors of the company. Walrath oversaw Hertz’s Chapter 11 reorganization, which ended last year with a plan to pay creditors in full.</p><p>The case is Hertz Corp. 20-11218, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-11 08:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claimsPhotographer: Luke Sharrett/BloombergHertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HTZ":"赫兹租车"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210515163","content_text":"Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claimsPhotographer: Luke Sharrett/BloombergHertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds of car renters who say they were falsely arrested for auto theft, files thousands of related criminal complaints each year against customers, according to claims in newly released court documents.In one four-year period, the company filed nearly 8,000 theft reports annually, advocates for the falsely arrested customers said in a federal court filing in Wilmington, Delaware Thursday. The advocates cited internal data from Hertz that a judge ordered the company to release.A breakdown of the theft reports isn’t public, so it’s not yet possible to know how many complaints were against customers and how many were for other types of theft. Under certain circumstances, Hertz will tell police that a customer may have stolen a car. Many of those people turn out to have valid contracts and allegedly have been falsely arrested, according to the lawsuits.Messages left for Hertz representatives weren’t immediately returned. CBS, which hired lawyers to help get the documents unsealed, previously reported Hertz said the “vast majority” of cases involve renters who were weeks or months overdue on returns and authorities are brought in only after “exhaustive attempts” to reach a customer.Court OrderIn a court hearing Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath ordered the annual theft numbers to be made public, siding with advocates for 220 people suing Hertz who argued that more details about Hertz’s internal anti-theft program should be public.Court documents show that some of the customers who rented cars were jailed, some years after they rented and returned the cars. At least one allegedly was held at gunpoint just hours after paying for a rental.“Hertz now admits that it reports thousands of its own customers for auto theft each year,” lawyers for the people suing said in court papers. The problem can be traced to company-wide, systemic problems, they allege.Bankruptcy ClaimsThe false arrest claims often involve long-term rentals, some set up directly by the customer, others through an auto insurance company, according to court documents.Those who claim Hertz had them wrongly arrested have filed claims in bankruptcy court demanding to be paid like other creditors of the company. Walrath oversaw Hertz’s Chapter 11 reorganization, which ended last year with a plan to pay creditors in full.The case is Hertz Corp. 20-11218, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096448390,"gmtCreate":1644453405616,"gmtModify":1676533927996,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096448390","repostId":"1130322814","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130322814","pubTimestamp":1644451316,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1130322814?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 08:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130322814","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislation</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91c8252a279cce7f1aaaef70eb15c510\" tg-width=\"860\" tg-height=\"573\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and Amazon.com, among others.</span></p><p>WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she expected Democrats to reach consensus on restricting stock trading by members of Congress and called for new rules for federal judges, as proposals competed for bipartisan support.</p><p>“It’s complicated, but members will figure it out,” she said. “I assume they’ll have it pretty soon,” the California Democrat said, referring to the House Administration Committee tasked with reviewing the proposals. She also wanted any legislation to also require financial disclosures from the judiciary, including Supreme Court justices. “It has to be governmentwide,” she said.</p><p>Republicans have shown interest in new rules, even though some rank-and-file GOP lawmakers have balked. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) is considering backing new limits on lawmaker stock ownership, according to an aide. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), who said he holds his investments in a mutual fund and advises colleagues to do the same, said he would need to examine the issue.</p><p>The comments by Mrs. Pelosi show how quickly momentum has grown for new rules. In mid-December, she had rejected further regulations, telling reporters that “we’re a free-market economy,” in reference to lawmakers’ trades. Last month, Mrs. Pelosi shifted her position, saying “I’m OK with that,” if lawmakers wanted to tighten restrictions on trading.</p><p>The developments come amid greater scrutiny of trading by top government figures. Late last year, the Federal Reserve imposed restrictions on senior officials in a bid to address a stock-trading controversy that prompted the resignation of two reserve bank presidents. Also, a Wall Street Journal investigative series found more than 100federal judges violated federal lawby hearing lawsuits involving companies in which they reported owning stock.</p><p>That was on top of scrutiny of stock trades by lawmakers, as they attended closed-door briefings in early 2020 about the threat of the coronavirus pandemic. Investigators later closed probes without action.</p><p>The issue featured in a pair of Senate races in Georgia, where Democratic challengers criticized Republican incumbents over their trading. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D., Ga.), who won his seat in one of those races, told reporters Wednesday that “we’ve changed the conversation on this issue in Congress.”</p><p>Currently, lawmakers are barred from trading on nonpublic information derived from their position and must publicly file and disclose any financial transaction involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures and other securities within 45 days. Lawmakers and their immediate families bought $267.4 million of assets and sold $363.5 million last year, according to Capitol Trades, with both figures down from the prior year. The value of trading in stock options roughly doubled in 2021, to $25.9 million from $12.8 million a year earlier.</p><p>Administration Committee Chairman Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)—an ally of Mrs. Pelosi—has begun evaluating different bills to review the merits of different approaches, an aide said. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said he asked Democratic colleagues to unify around a single bill, calling the issue an important one for Congress to address.</p><p>One bill, led by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D., Va.) and Chip Roy (R., Texas), would require lawmakers, their spouses and dependents to put stocks, futures and derivatives into blind trusts managed by outside advisers. Another, led by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.), would ban lawmakers and senior staffers, but not spouses, from trading in stocks and other investments.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0589a1205677f198f0c8a9075cce130a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) is one of the lawmakers looking at how to regulate spouses of legislators who trade stocks.</span></p><p>Other issues to be ironed out include the treatment of capital gains, if lawmakers were forced to sell investments.</p><p>“The American public thinks that members of Congress are self-dealing, and the American public deserves to trust us more,” Ms. Spanberger said. She raised concerns that the bill could be delayed by negotiations over its scope.</p><p>“Should we be talking about the judicial branch? Should we be talking about staff?” she said. “We are the ones who are elected.”</p><p>As one gauge of the growing support, Ms. Spanberger’s measure has 46 sponsors, including more than a half-dozen Republicans. Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s has 50 sponsors, including three Republicans. In the Senate, Mr. Ossoff unveiled a companion bill to require lawmakers to put stock into blind trusts. And Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are advancing a measure to ban trades, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.</p><p>One of the issues involves how to regulate spouses who trade stocks. Several lawmakers, including Mrs. Pelosi, have spouses who regularly buy and sell investments. Mrs. Pelosi is one of the wealthiest members of Congress and for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple Inc., Salesforce.com Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.,among others.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2792879f533fffa4528ddd23f6d55f2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) is backing a measure to ban trades by members of Congress, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.</span></p><p>Several Democratic lawmakers argued that the trading by spouses must be included in any new law.</p><p>“If you were using classified information you had access to or privileged information, and you yourself weren’t trading, but your spouse was going back and forth?” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.), a sponsor of both House bills. “It just contributes to a perception that Congress can enrich themselves off these jobs.”</p><p>According to a recent poll by the Trafalgar Group and Convention of States Action, 76% of voters think members of Congress should be barred from trading stocks while in office.</p><p>Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D., Pa.), who sits on the House Administration Committee, said that she thinks it ultimately will be important to ensure that congressional spouses cannot directly trade in individual stocks.</p><p>“I suspect it is because otherwise it’s too easy to evade,” said Ms. Scanlon, who is currently signed on as a co-sponsor of Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s bill. “But obviously, there’s all the problems that you start running into, say, for example, if one spouse trades stocks for a living.”</p><p>The executive branch bars cabinet members and other government appointees from owning individual shares. However, they are allowed to put off paying capital-gains taxes on sales as long as they reinvest their gains into other holdings such as mutual funds and Treasury bonds.</p><p>Not all lawmakers are on board with the idea of further regulating trades.</p><p>“I think there’s a free market out there, and I’ve never seen any instances myself of insider trading,” said Rep. Doug Lamborn (R., Colo.). “I don’t think that’s very likely because we do so much out in the open.”</p><p>Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R., Okla.) drew a distinction between members who served on committees relevant to their stock trades and those who didn’t. He also said that investment portfolios amassed before coming to Congress were different from positions built up during service in the legislature.</p><p>“You have to have the ability to invest like anybody else would in retirement, so we’ve got to be careful about where we move with it.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 08:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130322814","content_text":"Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and Amazon.com, among others.WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she expected Democrats to reach consensus on restricting stock trading by members of Congress and called for new rules for federal judges, as proposals competed for bipartisan support.“It’s complicated, but members will figure it out,” she said. “I assume they’ll have it pretty soon,” the California Democrat said, referring to the House Administration Committee tasked with reviewing the proposals. She also wanted any legislation to also require financial disclosures from the judiciary, including Supreme Court justices. “It has to be governmentwide,” she said.Republicans have shown interest in new rules, even though some rank-and-file GOP lawmakers have balked. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) is considering backing new limits on lawmaker stock ownership, according to an aide. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), who said he holds his investments in a mutual fund and advises colleagues to do the same, said he would need to examine the issue.The comments by Mrs. Pelosi show how quickly momentum has grown for new rules. In mid-December, she had rejected further regulations, telling reporters that “we’re a free-market economy,” in reference to lawmakers’ trades. Last month, Mrs. Pelosi shifted her position, saying “I’m OK with that,” if lawmakers wanted to tighten restrictions on trading.The developments come amid greater scrutiny of trading by top government figures. Late last year, the Federal Reserve imposed restrictions on senior officials in a bid to address a stock-trading controversy that prompted the resignation of two reserve bank presidents. Also, a Wall Street Journal investigative series found more than 100federal judges violated federal lawby hearing lawsuits involving companies in which they reported owning stock.That was on top of scrutiny of stock trades by lawmakers, as they attended closed-door briefings in early 2020 about the threat of the coronavirus pandemic. Investigators later closed probes without action.The issue featured in a pair of Senate races in Georgia, where Democratic challengers criticized Republican incumbents over their trading. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D., Ga.), who won his seat in one of those races, told reporters Wednesday that “we’ve changed the conversation on this issue in Congress.”Currently, lawmakers are barred from trading on nonpublic information derived from their position and must publicly file and disclose any financial transaction involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures and other securities within 45 days. Lawmakers and their immediate families bought $267.4 million of assets and sold $363.5 million last year, according to Capitol Trades, with both figures down from the prior year. The value of trading in stock options roughly doubled in 2021, to $25.9 million from $12.8 million a year earlier.Administration Committee Chairman Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)—an ally of Mrs. Pelosi—has begun evaluating different bills to review the merits of different approaches, an aide said. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said he asked Democratic colleagues to unify around a single bill, calling the issue an important one for Congress to address.One bill, led by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D., Va.) and Chip Roy (R., Texas), would require lawmakers, their spouses and dependents to put stocks, futures and derivatives into blind trusts managed by outside advisers. Another, led by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.), would ban lawmakers and senior staffers, but not spouses, from trading in stocks and other investments.Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) is one of the lawmakers looking at how to regulate spouses of legislators who trade stocks.Other issues to be ironed out include the treatment of capital gains, if lawmakers were forced to sell investments.“The American public thinks that members of Congress are self-dealing, and the American public deserves to trust us more,” Ms. Spanberger said. She raised concerns that the bill could be delayed by negotiations over its scope.“Should we be talking about the judicial branch? Should we be talking about staff?” she said. “We are the ones who are elected.”As one gauge of the growing support, Ms. Spanberger’s measure has 46 sponsors, including more than a half-dozen Republicans. Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s has 50 sponsors, including three Republicans. In the Senate, Mr. Ossoff unveiled a companion bill to require lawmakers to put stock into blind trusts. And Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are advancing a measure to ban trades, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.One of the issues involves how to regulate spouses who trade stocks. Several lawmakers, including Mrs. Pelosi, have spouses who regularly buy and sell investments. Mrs. Pelosi is one of the wealthiest members of Congress and for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple Inc., Salesforce.com Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.,among others.Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) is backing a measure to ban trades by members of Congress, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.Several Democratic lawmakers argued that the trading by spouses must be included in any new law.“If you were using classified information you had access to or privileged information, and you yourself weren’t trading, but your spouse was going back and forth?” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.), a sponsor of both House bills. “It just contributes to a perception that Congress can enrich themselves off these jobs.”According to a recent poll by the Trafalgar Group and Convention of States Action, 76% of voters think members of Congress should be barred from trading stocks while in office.Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D., Pa.), who sits on the House Administration Committee, said that she thinks it ultimately will be important to ensure that congressional spouses cannot directly trade in individual stocks.“I suspect it is because otherwise it’s too easy to evade,” said Ms. Scanlon, who is currently signed on as a co-sponsor of Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s bill. “But obviously, there’s all the problems that you start running into, say, for example, if one spouse trades stocks for a living.”The executive branch bars cabinet members and other government appointees from owning individual shares. However, they are allowed to put off paying capital-gains taxes on sales as long as they reinvest their gains into other holdings such as mutual funds and Treasury bonds.Not all lawmakers are on board with the idea of further regulating trades.“I think there’s a free market out there, and I’ve never seen any instances myself of insider trading,” said Rep. Doug Lamborn (R., Colo.). “I don’t think that’s very likely because we do so much out in the open.”Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R., Okla.) drew a distinction between members who served on committees relevant to their stock trades and those who didn’t. He also said that investment portfolios amassed before coming to Congress were different from positions built up during service in the legislature.“You have to have the ability to invest like anybody else would in retirement, so we’ve got to be careful about where we move with it.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096918723,"gmtCreate":1644280502328,"gmtModify":1676533907548,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice. Thank you.","listText":"Nice. Thank you.","text":"Nice. Thank you.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096918723","repostId":"1142873559","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142873559","pubTimestamp":1644279607,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142873559?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-08 08:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142873559","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustr","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? </p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65f98bd10117e83090323ce1050443ed\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"487\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphoto</span></p><p>Perhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth darlings Netflix and Facebook.</p><p>Netflix was the first to flop, plunging in the wake of earnings to a new 52-week low of around $351 on Jan. 26 – its lowest level since the first half of 2020 and down about 50% from its 52-week high. It has since recovered somewhat, to around $400.</p><p>Then came Facebook parent Meta Platforms.After its own challenging earnings report, it lost a staggering $230 billion or so in market value in a single session. It, too, dropped back to early 2020 levels, though it “only” has fallen about 40% from its 52-week high. Unlike Netflix, it hasn’t had a bounce.</p><p>It’s theoretically possible to “catch a falling knife,” as the old Wall Street saying goes. But it’s also very likely you’ll get your fingers cut off if you plow cash into stocks that have fallen hard and fallen for good reason. On the other hand, both Netflix and Facebook stocks have fallen hard before … and ended up making investors a lot of money.</p><p>If you’re wondering whether this is another one of those lucrative buying opportunities, here’s a look at where these stocks are now – and which one is “less bad” than the other.</p><p>Just be warned that you’d be living dangerously.</p><p><b>Netflix</b></p><p>Shares in the streaming video were hammered in large part because of the slowing subscriber growth disclosed in its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company added just under 8.3 million worldwide subs, significantly fewer than the 8.5 million subscribers added in the fourth quarter of 2020. Even worse, Netflix offered a “borderline catastrophic” forecast of just 2.5 million subscriber adds for the current quarter – a huge drop from 3.98 million it added in its 2021 first quarter. Analysts had been hoping for 6.93 million adds – almost three times what Netflix is now forecasting. So it’s no surprise we saw such a violent reaction.</p><p>Now, it wasn’t all bad or all unexpected. Netflix added more subscribers than the 8.19 million that analysts had forecast. Earnings per share blew away expectations at $1.33 vs. forecasts of just 82 cents.</p><p>But for a long time, we’ve been talking about the threat of market saturation and competition taking a toll on Netflix’s growth metrics. Yet while the big multiples on future earnings and sales have come down a bit since the stock’s plunge, the numbers are still stunning. Look at that forward P/E of 36.9 and a forward price/sales of about 5.5. Larger media rival Walt Disney Co. is about 30.4 and 3.6 on both those metrics, by way of example.</p><p>What’s more, Disney has theatrical releases and theme parks and merchandising to fall back on. Netflix remains a one-trick pony: streaming.</p><p>The major levers it can pull here are adding new viewers or increasing subscription costs (which it did a month ago, ahead of earnings). Of course, higher costs make the service a harder sell, especially when there are so many alternatives.</p><p>It makes you wonder what, if anything, Netflix can do to right the ship.</p><p>To its credit, Netflix continues to release high-performing content such as “Don’t Look Up,” which has been widely praised.</p><p>But Wall Street remains skeptical of whether a few new good shows on the currently dominant streaming platform is enough. For a stock that has long been defined by constant growth, it could be a rough awakening for investors if Netflix instead has become a mature company that simply depends on what it already has.</p><p><b>Facebook</b></p><p>Meta Platforms is no picnic for investors either. It was slammed after a disastrous fourth-quarter earnings report sent shares tumbling more than 20% in a single day.</p><p>In simplest terms, daily active user metrics on the flagship Facebook network were the bad news. For starters, they increased just 5% from a year ago to 1.93 billion, short of targets for 1.95 billion. Plus they actually declined from last quarter.</p><p>Bullish investors may point to other details in the social media giant’s results that weren’t quite so miserable. It posted a modest beat on revenue, as measured by the consensus target of $33.4 billion for sales, thanks in part to exceeding expectations on revenue per user estimates. Longtime watchers of this stock will know that this long-term uptrend in revenue per user has largely been driving results; total users in the key North America and European Union markets have been flatlining for a while.</p><p>But before you take a flyer on Facebook, let’s get to the additional risks, which, frankly, don’t come from any hard numbers and thus may be harder to pin down.</p><p>The company is struggling to deal with users creating multiple Facebook accounts. That makes many wonder if its user numbers are artificially inflated and the disappointing numbers are in fact much, much worse.</p><p>On top of that, privacy concerns may be coming home to roost at long last. After the earnings announcement, there have been reports that something as simple as a change in iPhone privacy settings can wipe $10 billion off earnings this year.</p><p>Then there is now chatter that Meta is “threatening” to pulling out of the European Union with its flagship Facebook and Instagram platforms because of local internet privacy rules. Talk about an empty threat. Abandon one of your largest markets just like that because you don’t like changes in the law? That kind of talk won’t make regulators or legislators back down.</p><p>There is always a chance that some of these dark clouds part and the sun shines again for Meta in the months ahead. However, unlike Netflix and its series of more practical concerns, Meta has made a habit of making terrible headlines when it comes to privacy concerns and bad actors on its platform.</p><p>From documented 2016 election interference by Russia to the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal to a $5 billion fine from the FTC in 2019 over privacy violations to chronic misinformation about COVID-19 in the last year or two… this is clearly a pattern.</p><p>It is not an exaggeration to say that Meta is dealing what could be existential threats to its Facebook platform. Even employees know this, and talented engineers are reportedly demanding a “brand tax” to go work at Meta in the current environment for fear they will have a black mark on their resume.</p><p><b>So which one is ‘less bad?’</b></p><p>Netflix may not be perfect. But given the big-picture threats to Meta Platforms, I would be more inclined to grant the streaming giant the benefit of the doubt over a social-media platform that may be just one more bad headline away from obsolescence.</p><p>Both platforms are facing serious challenges to growth because of user issues. But Netflix still seems to at least be the same basic platform, albeit one that’s facing the pressures of market saturation and fierce competition.</p><p>The jury is out on whether Facebook’s current model will even survive, either from consumer backlash or regulatory intervention. That’s a much greater level of uncertainty, so on that reason alone I’d personally steer clear of Meta’s stock at all costs.</p><p>Though honestly, the safest option is to forgo both stocks altogether.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings? </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings? \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-08 08:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphotoPerhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142873559","content_text":"Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphotoPerhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth darlings Netflix and Facebook.Netflix was the first to flop, plunging in the wake of earnings to a new 52-week low of around $351 on Jan. 26 – its lowest level since the first half of 2020 and down about 50% from its 52-week high. It has since recovered somewhat, to around $400.Then came Facebook parent Meta Platforms.After its own challenging earnings report, it lost a staggering $230 billion or so in market value in a single session. It, too, dropped back to early 2020 levels, though it “only” has fallen about 40% from its 52-week high. Unlike Netflix, it hasn’t had a bounce.It’s theoretically possible to “catch a falling knife,” as the old Wall Street saying goes. But it’s also very likely you’ll get your fingers cut off if you plow cash into stocks that have fallen hard and fallen for good reason. On the other hand, both Netflix and Facebook stocks have fallen hard before … and ended up making investors a lot of money.If you’re wondering whether this is another one of those lucrative buying opportunities, here’s a look at where these stocks are now – and which one is “less bad” than the other.Just be warned that you’d be living dangerously.NetflixShares in the streaming video were hammered in large part because of the slowing subscriber growth disclosed in its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company added just under 8.3 million worldwide subs, significantly fewer than the 8.5 million subscribers added in the fourth quarter of 2020. Even worse, Netflix offered a “borderline catastrophic” forecast of just 2.5 million subscriber adds for the current quarter – a huge drop from 3.98 million it added in its 2021 first quarter. Analysts had been hoping for 6.93 million adds – almost three times what Netflix is now forecasting. So it’s no surprise we saw such a violent reaction.Now, it wasn’t all bad or all unexpected. Netflix added more subscribers than the 8.19 million that analysts had forecast. Earnings per share blew away expectations at $1.33 vs. forecasts of just 82 cents.But for a long time, we’ve been talking about the threat of market saturation and competition taking a toll on Netflix’s growth metrics. Yet while the big multiples on future earnings and sales have come down a bit since the stock’s plunge, the numbers are still stunning. Look at that forward P/E of 36.9 and a forward price/sales of about 5.5. Larger media rival Walt Disney Co. is about 30.4 and 3.6 on both those metrics, by way of example.What’s more, Disney has theatrical releases and theme parks and merchandising to fall back on. Netflix remains a one-trick pony: streaming.The major levers it can pull here are adding new viewers or increasing subscription costs (which it did a month ago, ahead of earnings). Of course, higher costs make the service a harder sell, especially when there are so many alternatives.It makes you wonder what, if anything, Netflix can do to right the ship.To its credit, Netflix continues to release high-performing content such as “Don’t Look Up,” which has been widely praised.But Wall Street remains skeptical of whether a few new good shows on the currently dominant streaming platform is enough. For a stock that has long been defined by constant growth, it could be a rough awakening for investors if Netflix instead has become a mature company that simply depends on what it already has.FacebookMeta Platforms is no picnic for investors either. It was slammed after a disastrous fourth-quarter earnings report sent shares tumbling more than 20% in a single day.In simplest terms, daily active user metrics on the flagship Facebook network were the bad news. For starters, they increased just 5% from a year ago to 1.93 billion, short of targets for 1.95 billion. Plus they actually declined from last quarter.Bullish investors may point to other details in the social media giant’s results that weren’t quite so miserable. It posted a modest beat on revenue, as measured by the consensus target of $33.4 billion for sales, thanks in part to exceeding expectations on revenue per user estimates. Longtime watchers of this stock will know that this long-term uptrend in revenue per user has largely been driving results; total users in the key North America and European Union markets have been flatlining for a while.But before you take a flyer on Facebook, let’s get to the additional risks, which, frankly, don’t come from any hard numbers and thus may be harder to pin down.The company is struggling to deal with users creating multiple Facebook accounts. That makes many wonder if its user numbers are artificially inflated and the disappointing numbers are in fact much, much worse.On top of that, privacy concerns may be coming home to roost at long last. After the earnings announcement, there have been reports that something as simple as a change in iPhone privacy settings can wipe $10 billion off earnings this year.Then there is now chatter that Meta is “threatening” to pulling out of the European Union with its flagship Facebook and Instagram platforms because of local internet privacy rules. Talk about an empty threat. Abandon one of your largest markets just like that because you don’t like changes in the law? That kind of talk won’t make regulators or legislators back down.There is always a chance that some of these dark clouds part and the sun shines again for Meta in the months ahead. However, unlike Netflix and its series of more practical concerns, Meta has made a habit of making terrible headlines when it comes to privacy concerns and bad actors on its platform.From documented 2016 election interference by Russia to the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal to a $5 billion fine from the FTC in 2019 over privacy violations to chronic misinformation about COVID-19 in the last year or two… this is clearly a pattern.It is not an exaggeration to say that Meta is dealing what could be existential threats to its Facebook platform. Even employees know this, and talented engineers are reportedly demanding a “brand tax” to go work at Meta in the current environment for fear they will have a black mark on their resume.So which one is ‘less bad?’Netflix may not be perfect. But given the big-picture threats to Meta Platforms, I would be more inclined to grant the streaming giant the benefit of the doubt over a social-media platform that may be just one more bad headline away from obsolescence.Both platforms are facing serious challenges to growth because of user issues. But Netflix still seems to at least be the same basic platform, albeit one that’s facing the pressures of market saturation and fierce competition.The jury is out on whether Facebook’s current model will even survive, either from consumer backlash or regulatory intervention. That’s a much greater level of uncertainty, so on that reason alone I’d personally steer clear of Meta’s stock at all costs.Though honestly, the safest option is to forgo both stocks altogether.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":279,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098562047,"gmtCreate":1644190768085,"gmtModify":1676533896936,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4098849970602690","authorIdStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool stuff. Thanks","listText":"Cool stuff. Thanks","text":"Cool stuff. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098562047","repostId":"1108894266","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108894266","pubTimestamp":1644024937,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108894266?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-05 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"For Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108894266","media":"Barrons","summary":"Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal resul","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market capitalization, some $250 billion. It was the largest single-day loss of corporate value in U.S. history.</p><p>And the value destruction might not be over. For Facebook, this is different than the privacy scandals and political controversies that have surrounded the company. This time, the problems are with the business itself.</p><p>Meta (ticker: FB) offered a first-quarter outlook that reveals slowing usage of its social media apps and troubling trends in advertising sales. Fixing the problems will take multiple quarters, and potentially years. Meanwhile, the repairs will have to be made as the company pivots to the metaverse, a significant gamble on an unproven technology.</p><p>By the end of a long week of tech earnings (see this week’s Tech Trader), it became clear that Meta’s problems are unique, and not part of a broader industry downturn. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) posted strong results driven by demand for advertising space on Google Search and YouTube. And on Thursday afternoon—one day after Meta’s nightmarish report—smaller rivals Snap (SNAP) and Pinterest (PINS) surprised investors with better-than-expected numbers, including Snap’s first-ever profit.</p><p>Amazon.com (AMZN) rounded out the big week of earnings with its own impressive results—including 32% growth in its advertising business. Those reports helped tech stocks snap back on Friday: The Nasdaq Composite rallied 2%, but Meta shares were flat.</p><p>The lack of buying on the dip reflects the serious issues Meta raised with its earnings. For the first quarter, the company sees revenue of $27 billion to $29 billion, up between 3% and 11% from a year ago. That would be a sharp deceleration from 48% growth a year ago. Meta said results would be affected by “headwinds” to both the number of ad impressions generated by its platforms and by pressures on ad pricing.</p><p>The forecast came as a shock to Facebook investors who have grown used to reliable growth, even amid controversy. Meta by its own admission is now dealing with multiple issues: slowing usage of the company’s core social media apps, tough earnings comparisons, decelerating spending by advertisers that are facing labor and product shortages, and intensified competition from TikTok, the short-form video app owned by China-based ByteDance.</p><p>Meta’s mention of weaker ad impressions was the real shocker. The company said its core Facebook business had one million fewer daily average users in the December quarter versus the previous three months. That has never happened before. The slowdown could reflect people spending more time out of the house after two years of severe pandemic restrictions. Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, it could be that people are simply growing a little tired of social media, and using the platforms a little less.</p><p>On its post-earnings call with investors, Meta repeatedly pointed to competition from TikTok. Meta is going after TikTok with a competitive service called Reels, which have been pushed across Facebook feeds. But it is going to take time for Facebook to catch up to TikTok’s popularity, if it ever does. Meanwhile, the issue is cutting into Meta’s revenues.</p><p>“On the impressions side, we expect continued headwinds from both increased competition for people’s time and a shift of engagement within our apps toward video surfaces like Reels, which monetize at lower rates than Feed and Stories,” the company said. In other words, competition from TikTok is forcing Facebook to push users into less profitable parts of its platform.</p><p>On ad pricing, meanwhile, Meta continues to deal with Apple’s (AAPL) adoption of tough new rules that limit advertisers’ ability to track consumer behavior on iOS devices. Those changes weren’t yet in place a year ago, so the comparison will be felt again in the first quarter. “We anticipate modestly increasing ad targeting and measurement headwinds from platform and regulatory changes,” Meta said.</p><p>The company has previously expressed confidence that it could develop workarounds for Apple’s changes, which affect ad targeting along with knowing when ads trigger purchases or other consumer behaviors. But Meta now sounds less confident about a near-term fix, saying the Apple changes will trim its revenue by $10 billion this year.</p><p>Perhaps most worrisome for Facebook is that Snap and Pinterest, rivals that in theory should be suffering a similar slowdown from Apple’s changes, didn’t report the same issues in the quarter.</p><p><b>Falling Hard</b></p><p>Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market value on Thursday. It’s the largest single-day loss of corporate value ever.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aefbd1011b68d6770961169b97d76d54\" tg-width=\"1059\" tg-height=\"492\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>To be sure, the Meta story still has investor appeal, most notably a cheap stock. After the selloff, Meta trades at a discount to the S&amp;P 500—19.3 times versus 20.3 times, respectively. Meta has also been aggressively buying back stock—$33 billion over the past two quarters. While those purchases look ill-timed, the buybacks suggest that the Meta board considers the stock cheap. That doesn’t mean it can’t get cheaper.</p><p>Meta’s risks are growing and they’re no longer just about Facebook&#39;s legacy business. The company is spending aggressively on its metaverse build out—capital spending this year is expected to be between $29 billion and $34 billion, up from $19.2 billion last year. No one really knows if the plan will work: How many people want to attend concerts, parties, and meetings in an imaginary world while wearing a virtual reality headset? The metaverse has become CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest bet—and it gives the company a quickly changing risk profile, one that looks uncomfortable even with a cheap stock.</p><p>Meta’s user base is mammoth—3.6 billion monthly active users, or close to half the Earth’s population. But growth is finally slowing, the advertising business is in trouble, regulators are circling, and the metaverse is in its infancy. For Meta, it’s a mega set of risks.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>For Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFor Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-05 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108894266","content_text":"Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market capitalization, some $250 billion. It was the largest single-day loss of corporate value in U.S. history.And the value destruction might not be over. For Facebook, this is different than the privacy scandals and political controversies that have surrounded the company. This time, the problems are with the business itself.Meta (ticker: FB) offered a first-quarter outlook that reveals slowing usage of its social media apps and troubling trends in advertising sales. Fixing the problems will take multiple quarters, and potentially years. Meanwhile, the repairs will have to be made as the company pivots to the metaverse, a significant gamble on an unproven technology.By the end of a long week of tech earnings (see this week’s Tech Trader), it became clear that Meta’s problems are unique, and not part of a broader industry downturn. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) posted strong results driven by demand for advertising space on Google Search and YouTube. And on Thursday afternoon—one day after Meta’s nightmarish report—smaller rivals Snap (SNAP) and Pinterest (PINS) surprised investors with better-than-expected numbers, including Snap’s first-ever profit.Amazon.com (AMZN) rounded out the big week of earnings with its own impressive results—including 32% growth in its advertising business. Those reports helped tech stocks snap back on Friday: The Nasdaq Composite rallied 2%, but Meta shares were flat.The lack of buying on the dip reflects the serious issues Meta raised with its earnings. For the first quarter, the company sees revenue of $27 billion to $29 billion, up between 3% and 11% from a year ago. That would be a sharp deceleration from 48% growth a year ago. Meta said results would be affected by “headwinds” to both the number of ad impressions generated by its platforms and by pressures on ad pricing.The forecast came as a shock to Facebook investors who have grown used to reliable growth, even amid controversy. Meta by its own admission is now dealing with multiple issues: slowing usage of the company’s core social media apps, tough earnings comparisons, decelerating spending by advertisers that are facing labor and product shortages, and intensified competition from TikTok, the short-form video app owned by China-based ByteDance.Meta’s mention of weaker ad impressions was the real shocker. The company said its core Facebook business had one million fewer daily average users in the December quarter versus the previous three months. That has never happened before. The slowdown could reflect people spending more time out of the house after two years of severe pandemic restrictions. Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, it could be that people are simply growing a little tired of social media, and using the platforms a little less.On its post-earnings call with investors, Meta repeatedly pointed to competition from TikTok. Meta is going after TikTok with a competitive service called Reels, which have been pushed across Facebook feeds. But it is going to take time for Facebook to catch up to TikTok’s popularity, if it ever does. Meanwhile, the issue is cutting into Meta’s revenues.“On the impressions side, we expect continued headwinds from both increased competition for people’s time and a shift of engagement within our apps toward video surfaces like Reels, which monetize at lower rates than Feed and Stories,” the company said. In other words, competition from TikTok is forcing Facebook to push users into less profitable parts of its platform.On ad pricing, meanwhile, Meta continues to deal with Apple’s (AAPL) adoption of tough new rules that limit advertisers’ ability to track consumer behavior on iOS devices. Those changes weren’t yet in place a year ago, so the comparison will be felt again in the first quarter. “We anticipate modestly increasing ad targeting and measurement headwinds from platform and regulatory changes,” Meta said.The company has previously expressed confidence that it could develop workarounds for Apple’s changes, which affect ad targeting along with knowing when ads trigger purchases or other consumer behaviors. But Meta now sounds less confident about a near-term fix, saying the Apple changes will trim its revenue by $10 billion this year.Perhaps most worrisome for Facebook is that Snap and Pinterest, rivals that in theory should be suffering a similar slowdown from Apple’s changes, didn’t report the same issues in the quarter.Falling HardFacebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market value on Thursday. It’s the largest single-day loss of corporate value ever.To be sure, the Meta story still has investor appeal, most notably a cheap stock. After the selloff, Meta trades at a discount to the S&P 500—19.3 times versus 20.3 times, respectively. Meta has also been aggressively buying back stock—$33 billion over the past two quarters. While those purchases look ill-timed, the buybacks suggest that the Meta board considers the stock cheap. That doesn’t mean it can’t get cheaper.Meta’s risks are growing and they’re no longer just about Facebook's legacy business. The company is spending aggressively on its metaverse build out—capital spending this year is expected to be between $29 billion and $34 billion, up from $19.2 billion last year. No one really knows if the plan will work: How many people want to attend concerts, parties, and meetings in an imaginary world while wearing a virtual reality headset? The metaverse has become CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest bet—and it gives the company a quickly changing risk profile, one that looks uncomfortable even with a cheap stock.Meta’s user base is mammoth—3.6 billion monthly active users, or close to half the Earth’s population. But growth is finally slowing, the advertising business is in trouble, regulators are circling, and the metaverse is in its infancy. For Meta, it’s a mega set of risks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9028366808,"gmtCreate":1653177371004,"gmtModify":1676535233556,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍👍","listText":"👍👍👍","text":"👍👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028366808","repostId":"1123511669","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123511669","pubTimestamp":1653096638,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123511669?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123511669","media":"Barrons","summary":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&amp;P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.</p><p>But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&amp;P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.</p><p>For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.</p><p>“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”</p><p>That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&amp;P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.</p><p>“Historically, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&amp;P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”</p><p>That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.</p><p>“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&amp;P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”</p><p>The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.</p><p>“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&amp;P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&amp;P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&amp;P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.</p><p>The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.</p><p>The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&amp;P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.</p><p>“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.</p><p>It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123511669","content_text":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.“Historically, the S&P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”The S&P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":710,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011759669,"gmtCreate":1648942980274,"gmtModify":1676534423877,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice :)","listText":"Nice :)","text":"Nice :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011759669","repostId":"1123130739","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123130739","pubTimestamp":1648865521,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123130739?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 10:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123130739","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the to","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a>: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.</li><li>Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services businesses.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a>: Runs a near-duopoly on the credit card market.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard</a>: Like Visa, operates with impressive margins and cash flow.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a>: Best-of-breed tech juggernaut catering to multiple end-markets enjoying strong secular growth.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks</a>: A leader in the consumer/retail business and has a strong focus on shareholder returns.</li></ul><p>Early in my investing career, I saw something that really piqued my interest: blue-chip stocks. But not just blue-chip stocks of that era. Instead, I was after future blue chips; And thus, the Future Blue Chips idea had dawned on me.</p><p>Since then, I have been hunting tomorrow’s shining stars of today, sniffing out the best stocks I can find with strong fundamentals, solid leadership and reasonable valuations.</p><p>These are long-term, theme-oriented stocks that are relying on high-quality businesses and secular trends. Years ago — perhaps a decade — I would get people that would reach out to me and say, “Hey! These are already well-known companies. Find something new, would ya!”</p><p>Well, it’s hard to be a future blue chips stock if the company isn’t already a good one. At the time, it included many of the names you see above, minus Nvidia unfortunately. On the plus side, the rest of these companies have continued to deliver the goods. And now, we’re going to go one-by-one through them to see why.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a86b7974b7e75ab9d177dd5490282aac\" tg-width=\"1114\" tg-height=\"454\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96309d402167ac02d02467153492335a\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: TY Lim / Shutterstock.com</p><p>One of the largest apparel companies in the world is<b>Nike</b>(NYSE:<b>NKE</b>). It operates a wonderful blend between being a wholesale apparel maker and a high-end athletic retailer. By running its own locations, as well as selling to other retailers, Nike diversifies its revenue and is able to drive incremental margin growth to its bottom line.</p><p>In a nutshell, it can drive sales at its own locations, while relying on the size of other retailers to generate revenue. But Nike’s real crown jewel is its direct-to-consumer (DTC) business.</p><p>Referred to by the company as its DTC unit, this business is what allows Nike to drive significant margin expansion. It’s also what allowed the company to recover more quickly than most apparel makers and apparel retailers in the early days of the novel coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>With its DTC business, Nike can sell right to its customers. In turn, that allows it to build better analytics and improve its target marketing. It also allows it to cut out the middleman. Last quarter,overall revenue increased 4.9%year-over-year (YOY). However, its DTC business climbed 17% on a currency-neutral basis. So, clearly, that’s where the momentum is at.</p><p>Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL)<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47861f1381d07e74ccba8ded13159044\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: rvlsoft / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) is one of the best companies in the entire market, and there are three simple reasons why: Assets, growth and its balance sheet. Let’s go in that order.</p><p>The company commands a market capitalization of about $1.9 trillion, so of course, it has many assets. However, its main assets are Google.com and YouTube.com. Not only are these the two most popular websites in the world — akin to owning Boardwalk and Park Place in the game<i>Monopoly</i> — but they also boast strong growth.</p><p>That leads us to our second point. In combination with its cloud unit and other divisions, Alphabet continues to churn out impressive growth. Last quarter, revenue climbedmore than 32% YOY. This year, analysts expectsales growth of 16.7%. And for 2023, those estimates sit at 15.6%. Meanwhile, earnings growth forecasts are similar.</p><p>When it comes to free cash flow, Alphabet generated $67<i>billion</i>inFCF last year. That was up more than 55% from the prior year, while this figure grew more than 35% in each of the prior two years as well.</p><p>All of this growth is doing just one thing, which is growing the balance sheet. As of its latest quarter, Alphabet has $188 billion in current assets, almost $140 billion of which are in cash and short-term securities. The company also carries $14.8 billion in long-term debt, or a quarter of that when we exclude capitalized leases.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/364a2cb8d2afac18372e4783b1019bd1\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: WeDesing / Shutterstock.com</p><p>I refer to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple </a> as having one of the best business models in the world. It runs the razor/razor blade model, but at an incredible premium.</p><p>The razor/razor blade model is premised on the idea of getting the razor into customer’s hands — even if that means giving it away at cost (or less) — so that they will continue to buy razors from you, which is the real money maker.</p><p>Rather than give away its razors though — in this case, that’s iPhones, iPads, Macs, etc. — Apple charges a hefty premium. They mark these devices up in price to the point where they alone generate an enormous business for Apple.</p><p>So, what then is the razor blade portion of the business? Services.</p><p>Last quarter, overall revenue grew 11%, whileServicesrevenuegrew almost 24%YOY. Not only is it outpacing the company’s Products revenue in terms of growth, and overall revenue growth, but Apple’s Services unit is more than twice as profitable as its Products business. And that is the main catalyst that people need to understand.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/806d1eadbf86df2e3594da052318aa3a\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Kikinunchi / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Outside of the tech space, these next two companies have been some of the best performers over the last decade. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V\">Visa</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard</a> run what I like to call a “toll booth” on transactions.</p><p>There’s a secular trend that’s been underway for years, as consumers transition from cash and check to credit and debit. Additionally, the rise of online and digital sales has only fueled this move, as consumers obviously find it easy to shop.</p><p>Specifically, with these two businesses, investors have been quick to critique the valuation by pointing out that Visa stock trades at more than 17 times its trailing 12-month revenue. In the past, this valuation has also been an issue.Even during generous market periods, that’s a rich valuation for many growth stocks.However, in those instances, investors aren’t taking profits into account for the growth stocks, because many don’t have any. And in the case of Visa, it’s incredibly profitable.</p><p>Overall, the company sports gross profit margins of almost 80% and net profit margins of 51.6%. These metrics aren’t back to the pre-pandemic highs just yet, but they are inching in that direction now. Therefore, it makes a great option among the top blue-chip stocks to buy.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">MasterCard </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4ceebd503c5e934c82f5af4c8e4a01c\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Alexander Yakimov / Shutterstock.com</p><p>MasterCard is very similar to Visa. Like the latter, MasterCard also tends to trade at a high price-sales (P/S) ratio. While many will glance at this metric and dismiss these stocks, it’s a foolish way to evaluate them. Admittedly the valuations have crept higher, but from this standpoint, they have almost always been elevated. And yet, investors have reaped enormous rewards by staying long Visa and MasterCard.</p><p>In fact, 76% of revenue is converted into gross profit and almost <i>half</i> of revenue falls to the bottom line. In turn, MasterCard boasts a net profit margin of 46%. Of course, like Visa, these margins are not back to pre-pandemic levels; But they do continue to climb.</p><p>Collectively, the major risk to these businesses isn’t digital sales, cryptocurrencies or otherwise. It’s a recession, either globally or domestically. Lower consumer spending will be a big net negative to these stocks specifically since spending is what drives the top and bottom line.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04874462381e4ee3fb7f89da1b0d0b6f\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Hairem / Shutterstock.com</p><p>As one of the greatest companies in the market as well, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> caters to multiple end-markets that are enjoying long-term secular growth. Some of those end markets include:</p><p>Datacenter, cloud computing, supercomputing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, graphics, gaming, autonomous driving and automotive, drones, robotics, the metaverse and more.</p><p>Moreover, when you look at those markets, it’s pretty clear to see the trends. Do customers want faster computers, better graphics, and more responsive gaming and control (for drones, robotics, autonomous driving)? Do they want faster cloud-based applications and are they generating more data?</p><p>The answers to these questions all point to more demand for Nvidia’s products In turn, it’s the main reason I believe this firm will eventually command a $1 trillion market cap.</p><p>Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks </a><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb5693448bc0842fb18328a21a9c78ed\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Grand Warszawski / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Last but not least, we have a dominant food- and drinks-based retailer with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">Starbucks</a>. Aside from routinely landing among the top spots in the<i>Piper Sandler</i>teen survey, Starbucks remains a go-to “third place” for consumers of all ages.</p><p>The company may be out of its strong growth days, but Starbucks still generates impressive cash flow and growth. With that in mind, analysts expectabout 13% revenue growth this year, then a steady 8% to 9% growth ineach of the next three years.On the earnings front, analysts expect roughly 18% earnings growth this year, followed by more than 17% growth next year.</p><p>Furthermore, the recent dip in the stock has driven Starbucks’ dividend yield up above 2%.While it’s not winning many income investors over at that rate, it’s not bad for those of us with a long-term horizon that isn’t necessarily focused solely on dividend income. However, the company has made this yield a priority.</p><p>Starbucks has grown its dividend for 11 years now, with afive-year average growth rateof about 15.9%. So, clearly, it’s a focus.</p><p>Thus, as long as the world is drinking coffee, Starbucks will be a winner.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy for April 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-02 10:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.Apple: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","SBUX":"星巴克","MA":"万事达","GOOGL":"谷歌A","NKE":"耐克","NVDA":"英伟达","V":"Visa","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/7-blue-chip-stocks-to-buy-for-april-2022/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123130739","content_text":"Nike: Best-of-breed apparel maker and a leader in sports apparel.Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG): Owns the top two websites in the world.Apple: Unrivaled business model with its Products and Services businesses.Visa: Runs a near-duopoly on the credit card market.MasterCard: Like Visa, operates with impressive margins and cash flow.Nvidia: Best-of-breed tech juggernaut catering to multiple end-markets enjoying strong secular growth.Starbucks: A leader in the consumer/retail business and has a strong focus on shareholder returns.Early in my investing career, I saw something that really piqued my interest: blue-chip stocks. But not just blue-chip stocks of that era. Instead, I was after future blue chips; And thus, the Future Blue Chips idea had dawned on me.Since then, I have been hunting tomorrow’s shining stars of today, sniffing out the best stocks I can find with strong fundamentals, solid leadership and reasonable valuations.These are long-term, theme-oriented stocks that are relying on high-quality businesses and secular trends. Years ago — perhaps a decade — I would get people that would reach out to me and say, “Hey! These are already well-known companies. Find something new, would ya!”Well, it’s hard to be a future blue chips stock if the company isn’t already a good one. At the time, it included many of the names you see above, minus Nvidia unfortunately. On the plus side, the rest of these companies have continued to deliver the goods. And now, we’re going to go one-by-one through them to see why.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: NikeSource: TY Lim / Shutterstock.comOne of the largest apparel companies in the world isNike(NYSE:NKE). It operates a wonderful blend between being a wholesale apparel maker and a high-end athletic retailer. By running its own locations, as well as selling to other retailers, Nike diversifies its revenue and is able to drive incremental margin growth to its bottom line.In a nutshell, it can drive sales at its own locations, while relying on the size of other retailers to generate revenue. But Nike’s real crown jewel is its direct-to-consumer (DTC) business.Referred to by the company as its DTC unit, this business is what allows Nike to drive significant margin expansion. It’s also what allowed the company to recover more quickly than most apparel makers and apparel retailers in the early days of the novel coronavirus pandemic.With its DTC business, Nike can sell right to its customers. In turn, that allows it to build better analytics and improve its target marketing. It also allows it to cut out the middleman. Last quarter,overall revenue increased 4.9%year-over-year (YOY). However, its DTC business climbed 17% on a currency-neutral basis. So, clearly, that’s where the momentum is at.Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL)Source: rvlsoft / Shutterstock.comAlphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) is one of the best companies in the entire market, and there are three simple reasons why: Assets, growth and its balance sheet. Let’s go in that order.The company commands a market capitalization of about $1.9 trillion, so of course, it has many assets. However, its main assets are Google.com and YouTube.com. Not only are these the two most popular websites in the world — akin to owning Boardwalk and Park Place in the gameMonopoly — but they also boast strong growth.That leads us to our second point. In combination with its cloud unit and other divisions, Alphabet continues to churn out impressive growth. Last quarter, revenue climbedmore than 32% YOY. This year, analysts expectsales growth of 16.7%. And for 2023, those estimates sit at 15.6%. Meanwhile, earnings growth forecasts are similar.When it comes to free cash flow, Alphabet generated $67billioninFCF last year. That was up more than 55% from the prior year, while this figure grew more than 35% in each of the prior two years as well.All of this growth is doing just one thing, which is growing the balance sheet. As of its latest quarter, Alphabet has $188 billion in current assets, almost $140 billion of which are in cash and short-term securities. The company also carries $14.8 billion in long-term debt, or a quarter of that when we exclude capitalized leases.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: Apple Source: WeDesing / Shutterstock.comI refer to Apple  as having one of the best business models in the world. It runs the razor/razor blade model, but at an incredible premium.The razor/razor blade model is premised on the idea of getting the razor into customer’s hands — even if that means giving it away at cost (or less) — so that they will continue to buy razors from you, which is the real money maker.Rather than give away its razors though — in this case, that’s iPhones, iPads, Macs, etc. — Apple charges a hefty premium. They mark these devices up in price to the point where they alone generate an enormous business for Apple.So, what then is the razor blade portion of the business? Services.Last quarter, overall revenue grew 11%, whileServicesrevenuegrew almost 24%YOY. Not only is it outpacing the company’s Products revenue in terms of growth, and overall revenue growth, but Apple’s Services unit is more than twice as profitable as its Products business. And that is the main catalyst that people need to understand.Visa Source: Kikinunchi / Shutterstock.comOutside of the tech space, these next two companies have been some of the best performers over the last decade. Visa and MasterCard run what I like to call a “toll booth” on transactions.There’s a secular trend that’s been underway for years, as consumers transition from cash and check to credit and debit. Additionally, the rise of online and digital sales has only fueled this move, as consumers obviously find it easy to shop.Specifically, with these two businesses, investors have been quick to critique the valuation by pointing out that Visa stock trades at more than 17 times its trailing 12-month revenue. In the past, this valuation has also been an issue.Even during generous market periods, that’s a rich valuation for many growth stocks.However, in those instances, investors aren’t taking profits into account for the growth stocks, because many don’t have any. And in the case of Visa, it’s incredibly profitable.Overall, the company sports gross profit margins of almost 80% and net profit margins of 51.6%. These metrics aren’t back to the pre-pandemic highs just yet, but they are inching in that direction now. Therefore, it makes a great option among the top blue-chip stocks to buy.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: MasterCard Source: Alexander Yakimov / Shutterstock.comMasterCard is very similar to Visa. Like the latter, MasterCard also tends to trade at a high price-sales (P/S) ratio. While many will glance at this metric and dismiss these stocks, it’s a foolish way to evaluate them. Admittedly the valuations have crept higher, but from this standpoint, they have almost always been elevated. And yet, investors have reaped enormous rewards by staying long Visa and MasterCard.In fact, 76% of revenue is converted into gross profit and almost half of revenue falls to the bottom line. In turn, MasterCard boasts a net profit margin of 46%. Of course, like Visa, these margins are not back to pre-pandemic levels; But they do continue to climb.Collectively, the major risk to these businesses isn’t digital sales, cryptocurrencies or otherwise. It’s a recession, either globally or domestically. Lower consumer spending will be a big net negative to these stocks specifically since spending is what drives the top and bottom line.NvidiaSource: Hairem / Shutterstock.comAs one of the greatest companies in the market as well, Nvidia caters to multiple end-markets that are enjoying long-term secular growth. Some of those end markets include:Datacenter, cloud computing, supercomputing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, graphics, gaming, autonomous driving and automotive, drones, robotics, the metaverse and more.Moreover, when you look at those markets, it’s pretty clear to see the trends. Do customers want faster computers, better graphics, and more responsive gaming and control (for drones, robotics, autonomous driving)? Do they want faster cloud-based applications and are they generating more data?The answers to these questions all point to more demand for Nvidia’s products In turn, it’s the main reason I believe this firm will eventually command a $1 trillion market cap.Blue-Chip Stocks to Buy: Starbucks Source: Grand Warszawski / Shutterstock.comLast but not least, we have a dominant food- and drinks-based retailer with Starbucks. Aside from routinely landing among the top spots in thePiper Sandlerteen survey, Starbucks remains a go-to “third place” for consumers of all ages.The company may be out of its strong growth days, but Starbucks still generates impressive cash flow and growth. With that in mind, analysts expectabout 13% revenue growth this year, then a steady 8% to 9% growth ineach of the next three years.On the earnings front, analysts expect roughly 18% earnings growth this year, followed by more than 17% growth next year.Furthermore, the recent dip in the stock has driven Starbucks’ dividend yield up above 2%.While it’s not winning many income investors over at that rate, it’s not bad for those of us with a long-term horizon that isn’t necessarily focused solely on dividend income. However, the company has made this yield a priority.Starbucks has grown its dividend for 11 years now, with afive-year average growth rateof about 15.9%. So, clearly, it’s a focus.Thus, as long as the world is drinking coffee, Starbucks will be a winner.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":353,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095884945,"gmtCreate":1644882165374,"gmtModify":1676533970790,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tks&nbsp;","listText":"Tks&nbsp;","text":"Tks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095884945","repostId":"1170333360","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170333360","pubTimestamp":1644881495,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170333360?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-15 07:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Big Options Trade Hedges S&P 500 Plunge of Up to 20% by April","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170333360","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"As the S&P 500 spent Monday struggling to rebound from last week’s loss, one options trader took on ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>As the S&amp;P 500 spent Monday struggling to rebound from last week’s loss, one options trader took on a big position that profits should the pain get much worse.</p><p>Through a series of trades, someone established a wager that the largest exchange-traded fund tracking the S&amp;P 500 Index will fall below $370 by April 22, or down 16% from Friday’s close. It could fall further, the wager held, but not lower than $350, or almost 21% below Friday’s close. The trader spent about $2 million for 40,000 contracts in a strategy known as a put butterfly spread.</p><p>The trades, done shortly before 11 a.m. New York time, are more likely a hedge than a directional bet, two traders said. Yet between rising geopolitical uncertainty and concern that the Federal Reserve will raise rates at every meeting this year, the trades don’t seem too shocking. Strategists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. see policy makers raising interest rates seven times this year.</p><p>“With a potential negative outcome from extra Fed hikes, as well as other potential negative catalysts, this trade could be someone preparing for a gradual move significantly lower in the S&amp;P,” said Michael Beth, director of equity and derivatives trading at WallachBeth Capital.</p><p>The trader bought the $350/$370 put spread, which was partly financed by the sale of a $350/$330 put spread. The trades marked the biggest put butterfly spread of the day. All told, about 5 million put contracts on the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust traded on Monday.</p><p>Stocks faced another session of wild swings as traders assessed the latest geopolitical developments amid worries about a Fed policy mistake. The S&amp;P 500 ended the day 0.4% lower, falling for the third straight session but closing off its intraday low.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Big Options Trade Hedges S&P 500 Plunge of Up to 20% by April</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBig Options Trade Hedges S&P 500 Plunge of Up to 20% by April\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-15 07:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-options-trade-hedges-p-213856279.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As the S&P 500 spent Monday struggling to rebound from last week’s loss, one options trader took on a big position that profits should the pain get much worse.Through a series of trades, someone ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-options-trade-hedges-p-213856279.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-options-trade-hedges-p-213856279.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170333360","content_text":"As the S&P 500 spent Monday struggling to rebound from last week’s loss, one options trader took on a big position that profits should the pain get much worse.Through a series of trades, someone established a wager that the largest exchange-traded fund tracking the S&P 500 Index will fall below $370 by April 22, or down 16% from Friday’s close. It could fall further, the wager held, but not lower than $350, or almost 21% below Friday’s close. The trader spent about $2 million for 40,000 contracts in a strategy known as a put butterfly spread.The trades, done shortly before 11 a.m. New York time, are more likely a hedge than a directional bet, two traders said. Yet between rising geopolitical uncertainty and concern that the Federal Reserve will raise rates at every meeting this year, the trades don’t seem too shocking. Strategists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. see policy makers raising interest rates seven times this year.“With a potential negative outcome from extra Fed hikes, as well as other potential negative catalysts, this trade could be someone preparing for a gradual move significantly lower in the S&P,” said Michael Beth, director of equity and derivatives trading at WallachBeth Capital.The trader bought the $350/$370 put spread, which was partly financed by the sale of a $350/$330 put spread. The trades marked the biggest put butterfly spread of the day. All told, about 5 million put contracts on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust traded on Monday.Stocks faced another session of wild swings as traders assessed the latest geopolitical developments amid worries about a Fed policy mistake. The S&P 500 ended the day 0.4% lower, falling for the third straight session but closing off its intraday low.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":109,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089630836,"gmtCreate":1649986295631,"gmtModify":1676534622181,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌","listText":"👌","text":"👌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089630836","repostId":"1170859152","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170859152","pubTimestamp":1649982551,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170859152?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-15 08:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170859152","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilie","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: Shaoul</li><li>Economic activity and consumer resilience remain robust</li></ul><p>War, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of dip-buying bulls. But none of that has yet to completely break it.</p><p>While this week saw the hottest readings on inflation in four decades, it also featured conspicuous signs of resilience, including a bounce on Wednesday that pushed the S&amp;P 500 up the most since last month. Two-year Treasury yields eased in three of four sessions, while industrial stocks held firm and volatility benchmarks were unmoved.</p><p>The buoyancy is notable coming amid an escalating campaign of hawkishness by Federal Reserve speakers ahead of a policy decision on May 4. Even inflation that is exceeding earlier forecasts by “a ludicrous degree” is being taken in stride  -- mostly -- by traders, who consider it already baked into asset prices, according to fund manager Michael Shaoul.</p><p>“We were not surprised either by the data released or the market’s reaction,” Shaoul, chief executive officer at Marketfield Asset Management, said in a note. “Most investors and advisers probably feel that they have already made a very large adjustment to their expectations in recent weeks, and felt no need to react further.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d911c1bc3ed7c91bb5b5885d7fea279a\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Over the four days, the S&amp;P 500 slipped 2.1% for a second straight weekly retreat. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.8%, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3%. The CBOE Volatility Index edged up to 22.65. U.S. markets are closed Friday for a holiday.</p><p>Investors entered the week awaiting readings on inflation that marked the last big data points before the Fed’s meeting. U.S. consumer prices in March surged by the most since 1981, according to data Tuesday, reinforcing pressure on the Fed to hike rates. Stocks rallied for several hours afterward, buoyed by lower-than-forecast readings on core components that omit food and energy. Treasury two-year yields -- sensitive to monetary policy and inflation expectations -- eased sharply after the report.</p><p>Prices paid to U.S. producers, meanwhile, also climbed in March from a year ago, beating all estimates, the government said Wednesday. Stocks jumped and short-dated Treasury yields slipped again as investors clung to hopes that reading marked the peak in inflation.</p><p>“If I had told you in advance that we would receive worse-than-expected CPI and PPI readings in rapid succession, both to levels that haven’t been seen in decades, would you have predicted that rates would pull back sharply and stocks would rally?” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers LLC.</p><p>To be sure, not everyone found the news reason to rest easy. Bank of America, for its part, warned clients not to be fooled by the softer reading, calling it a “head-fake.”</p><p>“It is a mistake to focus on the traditional measure of core inflation that excludes food and energy,” economists led by Ethan Harris said in a note. “The problem with this approach is that, depending on what you pluck out, you can come up with almost any number.”</p><p>For John Lynch, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, the two primary boosters for stocks these past years -- the Fed and low consumer price inflation -- are now serving as headwinds that will eventually pressure margins and valuations.</p><p>“The persistent inflationary pressures may continue to weigh on investor sentiment,” Lynch said in a note. “We continue to favor value and cyclical sectors and suspect more active strategies will outperform passive as companies, and investors, adjust to these changes.”</p><p>Favor cyclicals is what investors did in the past week. Billions were poured into exchange-traded funds focused on semiconductor stocks as they wagered the industry will rebound from the supply-chain snags and chip shortages. Materials producers and industrial stocks led gains in the period.</p><p>Semiconductor ETFs saw roughly $1.7 billion of inflows, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Since the beginning of the year, the funds have collected $7.8 billion, about as much as the past two years combined. The influx of cash into semiconductors, a cyclical sector that typically does well when the economy is doing well, highlights the faith of investors that the industry will recover from the supply-chain turmoil exacerbated by the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c0cd2119ec7ce31f546f69e388e9773\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Other economic reports were friendlier to bulls, among them U.S. retail sales, which ticked higher in March thanks to an 8.9% jump in spending for gasoline. The data offered a glimmer of optimism that Americans are still willing to spend despite the rising prices of goods and services, even as calls for recession grow louder in the near-term. Even if one does arrive, timing an economic downturn is difficult.</p><p>“Recession is more likely than a soft landing. That doesn’t mean that imminently the market goes down,” Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab &amp; Co., said by phone. “But assuming risk of recession continues to go up and doesn’t come back down, you can at least assume there’s going to be more volatility in the market.”</p><p>At Jefferies LLC, chief economist Aneta Markowska monitors a proprietary U.S. economic activity index made of up components including restaurant bookings, retail web traffic and transit data, among others. Her gauge has risen above levels seen a month ago, and Markowska notes consumption and movement factors have made notable gains, though she says housing has weakened.</p><p>“So, although the economy appears to be treading water on the surface, there are continued signs of normalization under the hood,” she wrote in a note. “Consumer activity continues to be very resilient in the face of higher energy costs.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-and-Bond Bottom Feeders Hold on Tight Amid Fed Bullying\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-15 08:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilience remain robustWar, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-14/stock-and-bond-bottom-feeders-hold-on-tight-amid-fed-bullying?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170859152","content_text":"Not surprised by data released or by market’s reaction: ShaoulEconomic activity and consumer resilience remain robustWar, soaring energy prices and central-bank badgering may be testing the resolve of dip-buying bulls. But none of that has yet to completely break it.While this week saw the hottest readings on inflation in four decades, it also featured conspicuous signs of resilience, including a bounce on Wednesday that pushed the S&P 500 up the most since last month. Two-year Treasury yields eased in three of four sessions, while industrial stocks held firm and volatility benchmarks were unmoved.The buoyancy is notable coming amid an escalating campaign of hawkishness by Federal Reserve speakers ahead of a policy decision on May 4. Even inflation that is exceeding earlier forecasts by “a ludicrous degree” is being taken in stride  -- mostly -- by traders, who consider it already baked into asset prices, according to fund manager Michael Shaoul.“We were not surprised either by the data released or the market’s reaction,” Shaoul, chief executive officer at Marketfield Asset Management, said in a note. “Most investors and advisers probably feel that they have already made a very large adjustment to their expectations in recent weeks, and felt no need to react further.”Over the four days, the S&P 500 slipped 2.1% for a second straight weekly retreat. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.8%, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3%. The CBOE Volatility Index edged up to 22.65. U.S. markets are closed Friday for a holiday.Investors entered the week awaiting readings on inflation that marked the last big data points before the Fed’s meeting. U.S. consumer prices in March surged by the most since 1981, according to data Tuesday, reinforcing pressure on the Fed to hike rates. Stocks rallied for several hours afterward, buoyed by lower-than-forecast readings on core components that omit food and energy. Treasury two-year yields -- sensitive to monetary policy and inflation expectations -- eased sharply after the report.Prices paid to U.S. producers, meanwhile, also climbed in March from a year ago, beating all estimates, the government said Wednesday. Stocks jumped and short-dated Treasury yields slipped again as investors clung to hopes that reading marked the peak in inflation.“If I had told you in advance that we would receive worse-than-expected CPI and PPI readings in rapid succession, both to levels that haven’t been seen in decades, would you have predicted that rates would pull back sharply and stocks would rally?” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers LLC.To be sure, not everyone found the news reason to rest easy. Bank of America, for its part, warned clients not to be fooled by the softer reading, calling it a “head-fake.”“It is a mistake to focus on the traditional measure of core inflation that excludes food and energy,” economists led by Ethan Harris said in a note. “The problem with this approach is that, depending on what you pluck out, you can come up with almost any number.”For John Lynch, chief investment officer at Comerica Wealth Management, the two primary boosters for stocks these past years -- the Fed and low consumer price inflation -- are now serving as headwinds that will eventually pressure margins and valuations.“The persistent inflationary pressures may continue to weigh on investor sentiment,” Lynch said in a note. “We continue to favor value and cyclical sectors and suspect more active strategies will outperform passive as companies, and investors, adjust to these changes.”Favor cyclicals is what investors did in the past week. Billions were poured into exchange-traded funds focused on semiconductor stocks as they wagered the industry will rebound from the supply-chain snags and chip shortages. Materials producers and industrial stocks led gains in the period.Semiconductor ETFs saw roughly $1.7 billion of inflows, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Since the beginning of the year, the funds have collected $7.8 billion, about as much as the past two years combined. The influx of cash into semiconductors, a cyclical sector that typically does well when the economy is doing well, highlights the faith of investors that the industry will recover from the supply-chain turmoil exacerbated by the pandemic.Other economic reports were friendlier to bulls, among them U.S. retail sales, which ticked higher in March thanks to an 8.9% jump in spending for gasoline. The data offered a glimmer of optimism that Americans are still willing to spend despite the rising prices of goods and services, even as calls for recession grow louder in the near-term. Even if one does arrive, timing an economic downturn is difficult.“Recession is more likely than a soft landing. That doesn’t mean that imminently the market goes down,” Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist for Charles Schwab & Co., said by phone. “But assuming risk of recession continues to go up and doesn’t come back down, you can at least assume there’s going to be more volatility in the market.”At Jefferies LLC, chief economist Aneta Markowska monitors a proprietary U.S. economic activity index made of up components including restaurant bookings, retail web traffic and transit data, among others. Her gauge has risen above levels seen a month ago, and Markowska notes consumption and movement factors have made notable gains, though she says housing has weakened.“So, although the economy appears to be treading water on the surface, there are continued signs of normalization under the hood,” she wrote in a note. “Consumer activity continues to be very resilient in the face of higher energy costs.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":649,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011639854,"gmtCreate":1648860377238,"gmtModify":1676534411722,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011639854","repostId":"1196338021","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196338021","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648821865,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196338021?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 22:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Solar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196338021","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian S","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66f389ef161456c3127c23c026fe022b\" tg-width=\"413\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Solar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSolar Stocks Climbed in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-01 22:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66f389ef161456c3127c23c026fe022b\" tg-width=\"413\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CSIQ":"阿特斯太阳能","DQ":"大全新能源","JKS":"晶科能源","SEDG":"SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.","NOVA":"Sunnova Energy International Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196338021","content_text":"Solar stocks climbed in morning trading. Daqo New, JinkoSolar, Sunnova Energy, SolarEdge, Canadian Solar, SunPower, Sunrun, Maxeon Solar Technologies, ReneSola and Enphase Energy climbed between 1% and 7%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":500,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011630809,"gmtCreate":1648860335099,"gmtModify":1676534411690,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"😌","listText":"😌","text":"😌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011630809","repostId":"1104213580","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104213580","pubTimestamp":1648825218,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1104213580?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104213580","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><b>Bionano</b>(<b><u>BNGO</u></b>) made solid progress with its business last year.</li><li>It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.</li><li>Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58679caedd79fca29fb59459e895b2f1\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"900\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Dennis Diatel / Shutterstock.com</span></p><p><b>Bionano Genomics</b> (NASDAQ:<b><u>BNGO</u></b>) stock has taken its shareholders on a rollercoaster ride over the past couple of years. Right now, BNGO stock trades at around the same price as it did before its massive break out to begin 2021. In turn, with this incredible performance last year and its massive potential in genomic analysis, it could be a multi-bagger in the future. Nevertheless, the stock isn’t for the faint of heart and is perhaps best suited for risk-taking investors — and here’s why.</p><p>The healthcare diagnostics firm has attracted a slew of conflicting opinions from market experts and investors. And while some believe in the long-term value of its pioneering genome analysis technology, others might see the enormous risks associated with its business.</p><p>Of course, investing in firms such as Bionano will always come with a ton of risks. However, the upside potential of its business is immense — and with a debt-free capital structure, it can turn on the afterburners with its expansion plans.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><b><u>BNGO</u></b></td><td>Bionano Genomics</td><td>$2.58</td></tr></tbody></table><p><b>Another Impressive Quarter</b></p><p>Bionano wrapped up another solid quarter after posting double-digit top-line growth in its third quarter. Its fourth-quarter sales of $6.3 million grew by 58% from the prior-year period. Moreover, they comfortably surpassed analyst estimates of $5.6 million for the quarter and the company’s preliminary projections in January. And its genome-mapping tool called Saphyr saw a 69% bump in installations last year compared to 2020.</p><p>Furthermore, for full-year 2021, the company’s sales shot up 111% from 2020 to $18 million, beating average analyst estimates of $17.3 million. Also, for 2022, the company predicts another 33% to 50% increase in sales.</p><p>However, perhaps the most exciting bit about the company is its business model, which can effectively lead to massive recurring income over time. In turn, the additional revenues can be used to develop new products and add to its competitive advantages. Saphyr can be used for various research and clinical niches, and the data output presented by the device is irreplicable, according to Bionano’s management. Therefore, Saphyr offers major competitive advantages at this time, giving it an edge over its competition.</p><p>Additionally, the company wants to build a sticky ecosystem of consumable products for its devices. In turn, preparation kits and sample chips are necessary for use with Saphyr, and these consumables will be an ongoing purchase for users. Thus, these essential tools can become a huge source of recurring revenue for Bionano in the future.</p><p><b>Shoring Up Finances</b></p><p>Bionano did well to cash in on its meme stock popularity and raise capital through issuing new shares. Its equity offerings diluted its stock by almost two-fold in 2021. But, the capital allowed the company to pay off debts and subsequently invest in its research and development (R&amp;D) efforts.</p><p>Before the pandemic, Bionano had a relatively decent balance sheet, with $17.3 million in its cash till. However, it wasn’t nearly enough to fund its lofty development plans. Hence, it was left with no option but to dilute its shareholding from 28 million shares in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 289.6 million. This represents a share dilution by tenfolds in a span of just a couple of years.</p><p>Nevertheless, it paid off $14.9 million in debt by the first half of 2021 and completed several acquisitions. Hence, Bionano had a sizeable cash balance of $24.6 million and $226 million in saleable securities after the fourth quarter. Its internal funds will come in handy in catering to its rising R&amp;D and other expenses, which widened its net loss by 76.2% in 2021.</p><p><b>Bottom Line On BNGO Stock</b></p><p>Overall, Bionano has been experiencing healthy momentum in its business in the past few quarters and has put forward highly encouraging guidance for this year. The company has immense potential to establish a leading position in genomic sequencing, assuming a more widespread adoption in the coming years.</p><p>Nevertheless, the risks are evident with the stock. Particularly, the firm’s penchant for diluting its shares is worrying for long-term investors. And given that profitability is still years away, it will continue diluting its shares further to fund future growth. Therefore, if you’re looking for a stock with healthy upside potential and could tolerate share dilution moving forward, BNGO stock could be an interesting bet for you.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bionano Genomics Stock Is Risky, but a Good Bet\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-01 23:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BNGO":"Bionano Genomics"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/bionano-genomics-bngo-stock-risky-but-good-bet/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104213580","content_text":"Bionano(BNGO) made solid progress with its business last year.It is building a robust ecosystem with a recurring revenue outlook.Potential risks remain, but BNGO stock still has upside potential.Source: Dennis Diatel / Shutterstock.comBionano Genomics (NASDAQ:BNGO) stock has taken its shareholders on a rollercoaster ride over the past couple of years. Right now, BNGO stock trades at around the same price as it did before its massive break out to begin 2021. In turn, with this incredible performance last year and its massive potential in genomic analysis, it could be a multi-bagger in the future. Nevertheless, the stock isn’t for the faint of heart and is perhaps best suited for risk-taking investors — and here’s why.The healthcare diagnostics firm has attracted a slew of conflicting opinions from market experts and investors. And while some believe in the long-term value of its pioneering genome analysis technology, others might see the enormous risks associated with its business.Of course, investing in firms such as Bionano will always come with a ton of risks. However, the upside potential of its business is immense — and with a debt-free capital structure, it can turn on the afterburners with its expansion plans.BNGOBionano Genomics$2.58Another Impressive QuarterBionano wrapped up another solid quarter after posting double-digit top-line growth in its third quarter. Its fourth-quarter sales of $6.3 million grew by 58% from the prior-year period. Moreover, they comfortably surpassed analyst estimates of $5.6 million for the quarter and the company’s preliminary projections in January. And its genome-mapping tool called Saphyr saw a 69% bump in installations last year compared to 2020.Furthermore, for full-year 2021, the company’s sales shot up 111% from 2020 to $18 million, beating average analyst estimates of $17.3 million. Also, for 2022, the company predicts another 33% to 50% increase in sales.However, perhaps the most exciting bit about the company is its business model, which can effectively lead to massive recurring income over time. In turn, the additional revenues can be used to develop new products and add to its competitive advantages. Saphyr can be used for various research and clinical niches, and the data output presented by the device is irreplicable, according to Bionano’s management. Therefore, Saphyr offers major competitive advantages at this time, giving it an edge over its competition.Additionally, the company wants to build a sticky ecosystem of consumable products for its devices. In turn, preparation kits and sample chips are necessary for use with Saphyr, and these consumables will be an ongoing purchase for users. Thus, these essential tools can become a huge source of recurring revenue for Bionano in the future.Shoring Up FinancesBionano did well to cash in on its meme stock popularity and raise capital through issuing new shares. Its equity offerings diluted its stock by almost two-fold in 2021. But, the capital allowed the company to pay off debts and subsequently invest in its research and development (R&D) efforts.Before the pandemic, Bionano had a relatively decent balance sheet, with $17.3 million in its cash till. However, it wasn’t nearly enough to fund its lofty development plans. Hence, it was left with no option but to dilute its shareholding from 28 million shares in the fourth quarter of 2019 to 289.6 million. This represents a share dilution by tenfolds in a span of just a couple of years.Nevertheless, it paid off $14.9 million in debt by the first half of 2021 and completed several acquisitions. Hence, Bionano had a sizeable cash balance of $24.6 million and $226 million in saleable securities after the fourth quarter. Its internal funds will come in handy in catering to its rising R&D and other expenses, which widened its net loss by 76.2% in 2021.Bottom Line On BNGO StockOverall, Bionano has been experiencing healthy momentum in its business in the past few quarters and has put forward highly encouraging guidance for this year. The company has immense potential to establish a leading position in genomic sequencing, assuming a more widespread adoption in the coming years.Nevertheless, the risks are evident with the stock. Particularly, the firm’s penchant for diluting its shares is worrying for long-term investors. And given that profitability is still years away, it will continue diluting its shares further to fund future growth. Therefore, if you’re looking for a stock with healthy upside potential and could tolerate share dilution moving forward, BNGO stock could be an interesting bet for you.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":248,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013707360,"gmtCreate":1648773232620,"gmtModify":1676534395053,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013707360","repostId":"1182000136","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1182000136","pubTimestamp":1648740552,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1182000136?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-31 23:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1182000136","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fall</li><li>Putin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not made</li></ul><p>U.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear market while Treasuries pared the worst losses in at least five decades. Oil slumped, but held above $100 a barrel in New York.</p><p>Moves in most financial markets were muted on the final day of a quarter that brought the twin threats of hawkish central banks bent on tamping down runaway inflation and the war in Ukraine. The S&amp;P 500 edged lower, taking its loss in the three months to 3.6%, the most since March 2020. The two-year Treasury yield was steady after its 150 basis-point surge that is the most since 1984. Ten-year rates slipped, narrowing the spread to shorter tenors, as investors remain on edge over the threat a restrictive Federal Reserve will cause a recession.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a411aebae77dba86342c2d808e747fa\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Stocks, sovereign bonds and corporate credit all got hammered in the year’s first months amid concerns about a growth slowdown as central banks move to tackle inflation by withdrawing stimulus. Investors who piled into commodities fared best, riding massive gains in everything from oil to nickel and wheat. Yet the increases have exacerbated price concerns and may lead to a sharper response from central banks.</p><p>“The recent rally has masked a lot of pain over the past three months,” wrote Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.</p><p>A decline Thursday would mark the S&amp;P 500’s 35th down day this year, the greatest number of first-quarter drawdowns since 1984, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p>Oil slid as the U.S. said it will release roughly a million barrels of oil a day from its reserves for six months, reversing an earlier price rebound ahead of an OPEC+ supply meeting. Meanwhile, stocks fell as U.S. inflation-adjusted spending declined last month as prices tempered demand.</p><p>Brent and West Texas Intermediate prices dropped about 4%, and European natural gas fell as Russia said it would halt gas contracts if buyers don’t pay in rubles.</p><p>“Aside from quarter-end considerations, oil is very much the center of attention,” Simon Ballard, chief economist at First Abu Dhabi Bank, wrote in a note to investors. Still, “all the usual suspects are still in play, keeping the market in check, including the specter of the Fed pursuing an aggressive path of monetary policy normalization over the coming months.”</p><p>Markets now see a strong chance the Federal Reserve will lift rates by a half point at its May meeting. The U.S. 2-year yield briefly exceeded the 10-year for the first time since 2019 on Tuesday, inverting yet another segment of the Treasury curve and reinforcing the view that Fed rate increases may cause a recession.</p><p>“This week’s brief inversion in the U.S. bond market, combined with elevated volatility on Treasury options, is a warning that the risk of U.S. recession should not be ignored,” wrote Lewis Grant, a senior portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. “U.S. bond markets are showing signs of stress. This is not mirrored in equities, where the VIX remains subdued and U.S. indexes trade above their pre-war levels. The bond market would appear to have a better handle on the potential risks.”</p><p>Some key events to watch this week:</p><ul><li>U.S. jobs report, Friday</li></ul><p>Some of the main moves in markets:</p><p><b>Stocks</b></p><ul><li>The S&amp;P 500 fell 0.1% as of 11:13 a.m. New York time</li><li>The Nasdaq 100 fell 0.2%</li><li>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.3%</li><li>The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.7%</li><li>The MSCI World index fell 0.4%</li></ul><p><b>Currencies</b></p><ul><li>The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changed</li><li>The euro fell 0.4% to $1.1116</li><li>The British pound rose 0.2% to $1.3161</li><li>The Japanese yen rose 0.3% to 121.42 per dollar</li></ul><p><b>Bonds</b></p><ul><li>The yield on 10-year Treasuries declined two basis points to 2.33%</li><li>Germany’s 10-year yield declined 10 basis points to 0.54%</li><li>Britain’s 10-year yield declined four basis points to 1.62%</li></ul><p><b>Commodities</b></p><ul><li>West Texas Intermediate crude fell 4.2% to $103.32 a barrel</li><li>Gold futures rose 0.4% to $1,946.10 an ounce</li></ul></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks Set for First Losing Quarter in Two Years: Markets Wrap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-31 23:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not madeU.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIA":"道琼斯ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-30/asia-stocks-set-for-cautious-start-on-war-concern-markets-wrap","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1182000136","content_text":"S&P 500 declines, Treasuries pare losses as oil prices fallPutin says gas exports will halt if ruble payments not madeU.S. stocks stumbled toward the first losing quarter since the pandemic bear market while Treasuries pared the worst losses in at least five decades. Oil slumped, but held above $100 a barrel in New York.Moves in most financial markets were muted on the final day of a quarter that brought the twin threats of hawkish central banks bent on tamping down runaway inflation and the war in Ukraine. The S&P 500 edged lower, taking its loss in the three months to 3.6%, the most since March 2020. The two-year Treasury yield was steady after its 150 basis-point surge that is the most since 1984. Ten-year rates slipped, narrowing the spread to shorter tenors, as investors remain on edge over the threat a restrictive Federal Reserve will cause a recession.Stocks, sovereign bonds and corporate credit all got hammered in the year’s first months amid concerns about a growth slowdown as central banks move to tackle inflation by withdrawing stimulus. Investors who piled into commodities fared best, riding massive gains in everything from oil to nickel and wheat. Yet the increases have exacerbated price concerns and may lead to a sharper response from central banks.“The recent rally has masked a lot of pain over the past three months,” wrote Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co.A decline Thursday would mark the S&P 500’s 35th down day this year, the greatest number of first-quarter drawdowns since 1984, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Oil slid as the U.S. said it will release roughly a million barrels of oil a day from its reserves for six months, reversing an earlier price rebound ahead of an OPEC+ supply meeting. Meanwhile, stocks fell as U.S. inflation-adjusted spending declined last month as prices tempered demand.Brent and West Texas Intermediate prices dropped about 4%, and European natural gas fell as Russia said it would halt gas contracts if buyers don’t pay in rubles.“Aside from quarter-end considerations, oil is very much the center of attention,” Simon Ballard, chief economist at First Abu Dhabi Bank, wrote in a note to investors. Still, “all the usual suspects are still in play, keeping the market in check, including the specter of the Fed pursuing an aggressive path of monetary policy normalization over the coming months.”Markets now see a strong chance the Federal Reserve will lift rates by a half point at its May meeting. The U.S. 2-year yield briefly exceeded the 10-year for the first time since 2019 on Tuesday, inverting yet another segment of the Treasury curve and reinforcing the view that Fed rate increases may cause a recession.“This week’s brief inversion in the U.S. bond market, combined with elevated volatility on Treasury options, is a warning that the risk of U.S. recession should not be ignored,” wrote Lewis Grant, a senior portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. “U.S. bond markets are showing signs of stress. This is not mirrored in equities, where the VIX remains subdued and U.S. indexes trade above their pre-war levels. The bond market would appear to have a better handle on the potential risks.”Some key events to watch this week:U.S. jobs report, FridaySome of the main moves in markets:StocksThe S&P 500 fell 0.1% as of 11:13 a.m. New York timeThe Nasdaq 100 fell 0.2%The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.3%The Stoxx Europe 600 fell 0.7%The MSCI World index fell 0.4%CurrenciesThe Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index was little changedThe euro fell 0.4% to $1.1116The British pound rose 0.2% to $1.3161The Japanese yen rose 0.3% to 121.42 per dollarBondsThe yield on 10-year Treasuries declined two basis points to 2.33%Germany’s 10-year yield declined 10 basis points to 0.54%Britain’s 10-year yield declined four basis points to 1.62%CommoditiesWest Texas Intermediate crude fell 4.2% to $103.32 a barrelGold futures rose 0.4% to $1,946.10 an ounce","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":688,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013321849,"gmtCreate":1648686107807,"gmtModify":1676534378148,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013321849","repostId":"2223369103","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2223369103","pubTimestamp":1648682686,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2223369103?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-31 07:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2223369103","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the con","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After-Hours Stock Movers:</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PATH\">UiPath</a> Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $283.03 million. Looking for Q1 2023 revenue of $223-225 million, below the consensus of $243.1 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXFY\">Expensify</a>, Inc. 13% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of ($0.82), below the consensus of $0.08. Revenue for the quarter came in at $40.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $38.79 million. The company guided Q1 2022 revenue to $38.6-39.6 million, versus the consensus of $40.34 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OEG\">Orbital Energy Group</a>, Inc. 15% HIGHER; Q4 revenue rose 65% to $41 million versus the consensus estimate of $45.02 million.  It also reported a record backlog of $523.7 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MASI\">Masimo Corporation </a> 10% LOWER; sees product revenue for the first quarter between $285 million to $315 million, below the consensus of $329.7 million. They cited shortages of critical components and other supply chain issues.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRG\">PROG Holdings Inc. </a> 6% HIGHER; to replace <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FRGI\">Fiesta Restaurant Group</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI) in the S&amp;P SmallCap 600.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CORT\">Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated </a> 3% HIGHER; announced overall survival data from Phase 2 study of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, showing 33% reduction in risk of death.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AFMD\">Affimed Therapeutics</a> (NASDAQ: AFMD) 2% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiates the stock with an Overweight rating and $7 price target.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCJ\">Cameco Corp</a>. (NYSE: CCJ) 1% HIGHER; BMO Capital upgraded shares to Outperform with a price target of C$42, saying the stock should continue to benefit from momentum for low carbon nuclear generation.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CDXS\">Codexis</a>, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDXS) 1% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a price target of $35.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers 03/30: OEG, PRG, CORT Higher; PATH, EXFY, MASI Lower\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-31 07:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PRG":"PROG Holdings, Inc.","BK4129":"建筑与工程","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","MASI":"麦斯莫医疗","BK4082":"医疗保健设备","EXFY":"Expensify","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4166":"消费信贷","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4539":"次新股","BK4023":"应用软件","PATH":"UiPath","CORT":"Corcept医疗","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4007":"制药"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19848874","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2223369103","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:UiPath Inc. 17% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of $0.05, versus the consensus of $0.03. Revenue for the quarter came in at $289 million versus the consensus estimate of $283.03 million. Looking for Q1 2023 revenue of $223-225 million, below the consensus of $243.1 million.Expensify, Inc. 13% LOWER; reported fourth-quarter EPS of ($0.82), below the consensus of $0.08. Revenue for the quarter came in at $40.4 million versus the consensus estimate of $38.79 million. The company guided Q1 2022 revenue to $38.6-39.6 million, versus the consensus of $40.34 million.Orbital Energy Group, Inc. 15% HIGHER; Q4 revenue rose 65% to $41 million versus the consensus estimate of $45.02 million.  It also reported a record backlog of $523.7 million.Masimo Corporation  10% LOWER; sees product revenue for the first quarter between $285 million to $315 million, below the consensus of $329.7 million. They cited shortages of critical components and other supply chain issues.PROG Holdings Inc.  6% HIGHER; to replace Fiesta Restaurant Group Inc. (NASDAQ: FRGI) in the S&P SmallCap 600.Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated  3% HIGHER; announced overall survival data from Phase 2 study of relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, showing 33% reduction in risk of death.Affimed Therapeutics (NASDAQ: AFMD) 2% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiates the stock with an Overweight rating and $7 price target.Cameco Corp. (NYSE: CCJ) 1% HIGHER; BMO Capital upgraded shares to Outperform with a price target of C$42, saying the stock should continue to benefit from momentum for low carbon nuclear generation.Codexis, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDXS) 1% HIGHER; Piper Sandler initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a price target of $35.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":574,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096448390,"gmtCreate":1644453405616,"gmtModify":1676533927996,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096448390","repostId":"1130322814","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130322814","pubTimestamp":1644451316,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1130322814?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 08:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130322814","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislation</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91c8252a279cce7f1aaaef70eb15c510\" tg-width=\"860\" tg-height=\"573\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and Amazon.com, among others.</span></p><p>WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she expected Democrats to reach consensus on restricting stock trading by members of Congress and called for new rules for federal judges, as proposals competed for bipartisan support.</p><p>“It’s complicated, but members will figure it out,” she said. “I assume they’ll have it pretty soon,” the California Democrat said, referring to the House Administration Committee tasked with reviewing the proposals. She also wanted any legislation to also require financial disclosures from the judiciary, including Supreme Court justices. “It has to be governmentwide,” she said.</p><p>Republicans have shown interest in new rules, even though some rank-and-file GOP lawmakers have balked. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) is considering backing new limits on lawmaker stock ownership, according to an aide. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), who said he holds his investments in a mutual fund and advises colleagues to do the same, said he would need to examine the issue.</p><p>The comments by Mrs. Pelosi show how quickly momentum has grown for new rules. In mid-December, she had rejected further regulations, telling reporters that “we’re a free-market economy,” in reference to lawmakers’ trades. Last month, Mrs. Pelosi shifted her position, saying “I’m OK with that,” if lawmakers wanted to tighten restrictions on trading.</p><p>The developments come amid greater scrutiny of trading by top government figures. Late last year, the Federal Reserve imposed restrictions on senior officials in a bid to address a stock-trading controversy that prompted the resignation of two reserve bank presidents. Also, a Wall Street Journal investigative series found more than 100federal judges violated federal lawby hearing lawsuits involving companies in which they reported owning stock.</p><p>That was on top of scrutiny of stock trades by lawmakers, as they attended closed-door briefings in early 2020 about the threat of the coronavirus pandemic. Investigators later closed probes without action.</p><p>The issue featured in a pair of Senate races in Georgia, where Democratic challengers criticized Republican incumbents over their trading. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D., Ga.), who won his seat in one of those races, told reporters Wednesday that “we’ve changed the conversation on this issue in Congress.”</p><p>Currently, lawmakers are barred from trading on nonpublic information derived from their position and must publicly file and disclose any financial transaction involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures and other securities within 45 days. Lawmakers and their immediate families bought $267.4 million of assets and sold $363.5 million last year, according to Capitol Trades, with both figures down from the prior year. The value of trading in stock options roughly doubled in 2021, to $25.9 million from $12.8 million a year earlier.</p><p>Administration Committee Chairman Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)—an ally of Mrs. Pelosi—has begun evaluating different bills to review the merits of different approaches, an aide said. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said he asked Democratic colleagues to unify around a single bill, calling the issue an important one for Congress to address.</p><p>One bill, led by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D., Va.) and Chip Roy (R., Texas), would require lawmakers, their spouses and dependents to put stocks, futures and derivatives into blind trusts managed by outside advisers. Another, led by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.), would ban lawmakers and senior staffers, but not spouses, from trading in stocks and other investments.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0589a1205677f198f0c8a9075cce130a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) is one of the lawmakers looking at how to regulate spouses of legislators who trade stocks.</span></p><p>Other issues to be ironed out include the treatment of capital gains, if lawmakers were forced to sell investments.</p><p>“The American public thinks that members of Congress are self-dealing, and the American public deserves to trust us more,” Ms. Spanberger said. She raised concerns that the bill could be delayed by negotiations over its scope.</p><p>“Should we be talking about the judicial branch? Should we be talking about staff?” she said. “We are the ones who are elected.”</p><p>As one gauge of the growing support, Ms. Spanberger’s measure has 46 sponsors, including more than a half-dozen Republicans. Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s has 50 sponsors, including three Republicans. In the Senate, Mr. Ossoff unveiled a companion bill to require lawmakers to put stock into blind trusts. And Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are advancing a measure to ban trades, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.</p><p>One of the issues involves how to regulate spouses who trade stocks. Several lawmakers, including Mrs. Pelosi, have spouses who regularly buy and sell investments. Mrs. Pelosi is one of the wealthiest members of Congress and for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple Inc., Salesforce.com Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.,among others.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2792879f533fffa4528ddd23f6d55f2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) is backing a measure to ban trades by members of Congress, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.</span></p><p>Several Democratic lawmakers argued that the trading by spouses must be included in any new law.</p><p>“If you were using classified information you had access to or privileged information, and you yourself weren’t trading, but your spouse was going back and forth?” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.), a sponsor of both House bills. “It just contributes to a perception that Congress can enrich themselves off these jobs.”</p><p>According to a recent poll by the Trafalgar Group and Convention of States Action, 76% of voters think members of Congress should be barred from trading stocks while in office.</p><p>Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D., Pa.), who sits on the House Administration Committee, said that she thinks it ultimately will be important to ensure that congressional spouses cannot directly trade in individual stocks.</p><p>“I suspect it is because otherwise it’s too easy to evade,” said Ms. Scanlon, who is currently signed on as a co-sponsor of Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s bill. “But obviously, there’s all the problems that you start running into, say, for example, if one spouse trades stocks for a living.”</p><p>The executive branch bars cabinet members and other government appointees from owning individual shares. However, they are allowed to put off paying capital-gains taxes on sales as long as they reinvest their gains into other holdings such as mutual funds and Treasury bonds.</p><p>Not all lawmakers are on board with the idea of further regulating trades.</p><p>“I think there’s a free market out there, and I’ve never seen any instances myself of insider trading,” said Rep. Doug Lamborn (R., Colo.). “I don’t think that’s very likely because we do so much out in the open.”</p><p>Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R., Okla.) drew a distinction between members who served on committees relevant to their stock trades and those who didn’t. He also said that investment portfolios amassed before coming to Congress were different from positions built up during service in the legislature.</p><p>“You have to have the ability to invest like anybody else would in retirement, so we’ve got to be careful about where we move with it.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-Trading Ban for Members of Congress Gains Traction\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 08:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/stock-trading-ban-gains-traction-in-congress-11644439246?mod=hp_lead_pos7","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130322814","content_text":"Pelosi says she expects consensus to emerge pretty soon on legislationHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple, Salesforce.com and Amazon.com, among others.WASHINGTON—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she expected Democrats to reach consensus on restricting stock trading by members of Congress and called for new rules for federal judges, as proposals competed for bipartisan support.“It’s complicated, but members will figure it out,” she said. “I assume they’ll have it pretty soon,” the California Democrat said, referring to the House Administration Committee tasked with reviewing the proposals. She also wanted any legislation to also require financial disclosures from the judiciary, including Supreme Court justices. “It has to be governmentwide,” she said.Republicans have shown interest in new rules, even though some rank-and-file GOP lawmakers have balked. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) is considering backing new limits on lawmaker stock ownership, according to an aide. And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), who said he holds his investments in a mutual fund and advises colleagues to do the same, said he would need to examine the issue.The comments by Mrs. Pelosi show how quickly momentum has grown for new rules. In mid-December, she had rejected further regulations, telling reporters that “we’re a free-market economy,” in reference to lawmakers’ trades. Last month, Mrs. Pelosi shifted her position, saying “I’m OK with that,” if lawmakers wanted to tighten restrictions on trading.The developments come amid greater scrutiny of trading by top government figures. Late last year, the Federal Reserve imposed restrictions on senior officials in a bid to address a stock-trading controversy that prompted the resignation of two reserve bank presidents. Also, a Wall Street Journal investigative series found more than 100federal judges violated federal lawby hearing lawsuits involving companies in which they reported owning stock.That was on top of scrutiny of stock trades by lawmakers, as they attended closed-door briefings in early 2020 about the threat of the coronavirus pandemic. Investigators later closed probes without action.The issue featured in a pair of Senate races in Georgia, where Democratic challengers criticized Republican incumbents over their trading. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D., Ga.), who won his seat in one of those races, told reporters Wednesday that “we’ve changed the conversation on this issue in Congress.”Currently, lawmakers are barred from trading on nonpublic information derived from their position and must publicly file and disclose any financial transaction involving stocks, bonds, commodities futures and other securities within 45 days. Lawmakers and their immediate families bought $267.4 million of assets and sold $363.5 million last year, according to Capitol Trades, with both figures down from the prior year. The value of trading in stock options roughly doubled in 2021, to $25.9 million from $12.8 million a year earlier.Administration Committee Chairman Zoe Lofgren (D., Calif.)—an ally of Mrs. Pelosi—has begun evaluating different bills to review the merits of different approaches, an aide said. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said he asked Democratic colleagues to unify around a single bill, calling the issue an important one for Congress to address.One bill, led by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D., Va.) and Chip Roy (R., Texas), would require lawmakers, their spouses and dependents to put stocks, futures and derivatives into blind trusts managed by outside advisers. Another, led by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.), would ban lawmakers and senior staffers, but not spouses, from trading in stocks and other investments.Sen. Steve Daines (R., Mont.) is one of the lawmakers looking at how to regulate spouses of legislators who trade stocks.Other issues to be ironed out include the treatment of capital gains, if lawmakers were forced to sell investments.“The American public thinks that members of Congress are self-dealing, and the American public deserves to trust us more,” Ms. Spanberger said. She raised concerns that the bill could be delayed by negotiations over its scope.“Should we be talking about the judicial branch? Should we be talking about staff?” she said. “We are the ones who are elected.”As one gauge of the growing support, Ms. Spanberger’s measure has 46 sponsors, including more than a half-dozen Republicans. Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s has 50 sponsors, including three Republicans. In the Senate, Mr. Ossoff unveiled a companion bill to require lawmakers to put stock into blind trusts. And Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) and Steve Daines (R., Mont.) are advancing a measure to ban trades, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.One of the issues involves how to regulate spouses who trade stocks. Several lawmakers, including Mrs. Pelosi, have spouses who regularly buy and sell investments. Mrs. Pelosi is one of the wealthiest members of Congress and for 2021 disclosed dozens of trades made by her husband in shares of Apple Inc., Salesforce.com Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.,among others.Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) is backing a measure to ban trades by members of Congress, including by spouses of senators and House lawmakers.Several Democratic lawmakers argued that the trading by spouses must be included in any new law.“If you were using classified information you had access to or privileged information, and you yourself weren’t trading, but your spouse was going back and forth?” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.), a sponsor of both House bills. “It just contributes to a perception that Congress can enrich themselves off these jobs.”According to a recent poll by the Trafalgar Group and Convention of States Action, 76% of voters think members of Congress should be barred from trading stocks while in office.Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D., Pa.), who sits on the House Administration Committee, said that she thinks it ultimately will be important to ensure that congressional spouses cannot directly trade in individual stocks.“I suspect it is because otherwise it’s too easy to evade,” said Ms. Scanlon, who is currently signed on as a co-sponsor of Mr. Krishnamoorthi’s bill. “But obviously, there’s all the problems that you start running into, say, for example, if one spouse trades stocks for a living.”The executive branch bars cabinet members and other government appointees from owning individual shares. However, they are allowed to put off paying capital-gains taxes on sales as long as they reinvest their gains into other holdings such as mutual funds and Treasury bonds.Not all lawmakers are on board with the idea of further regulating trades.“I think there’s a free market out there, and I’ve never seen any instances myself of insider trading,” said Rep. Doug Lamborn (R., Colo.). “I don’t think that’s very likely because we do so much out in the open.”Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R., Okla.) drew a distinction between members who served on committees relevant to their stock trades and those who didn’t. He also said that investment portfolios amassed before coming to Congress were different from positions built up during service in the legislature.“You have to have the ability to invest like anybody else would in retirement, so we’ve got to be careful about where we move with it.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028366075,"gmtCreate":1653177347497,"gmtModify":1676535233538,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028366075","repostId":"1123511669","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123511669","pubTimestamp":1653096638,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123511669?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123511669","media":"Barrons","summary":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&amp;P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.</p><p>But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&amp;P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.</p><p>For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.</p><p>“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”</p><p>That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&amp;P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.</p><p>“Historically, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&amp;P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”</p><p>That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.</p><p>“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&amp;P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”</p><p>The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.</p><p>“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&amp;P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&amp;P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&amp;P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.</p><p>The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.</p><p>The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&amp;P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.</p><p>“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.</p><p>It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheer Up. Even a Bear Market Has a Silver Lining. Or 2. Or 3.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/sp500-stock-bear-market-silver-lining-51653070472?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123511669","content_text":"Rising interest rates, sky-high inflation, lackluster economic growth, pressure on corporate profit margins: It isn’t hard to come up with reasons to be bearish on the stock market right now—or see the S&P 500 down 20% and be full of doom and gloom.But there are reasons to be optimistic, too. After the S&P 500 traded in bear-market territory and notched its seventh straight week of losses, now seems like a good time to bring them up.For starters, a recession isn’t a done deal. Sky-high inflation and the Federal Reserve’s hawkish moves to bring it down, plus the long-running supply chain and Covid-19 drags on growth, are the best-known forces that risk tipping the U.S. and global economies into contraction. On the other hand, Americans have significant savings from the past two years that could help cushion the blow of those rising prices, and an ultra-strong job market is another positive for households. And while interest rates are certainly going up, they remain low by historical standards and won’t rise above neutral for some time.“U.S. economic surprises remain in positive territory,” wrote RBC Capital Markets head of U.S. equity strategy Lori Calvasina. “High frequency economic indicators like dining, flying, back to work, and same store sales remain stable. Freight rates have come down sharply from their highs. Inflation expectations are retreating.”That hasn’t stopped stocks from largely pricing in a recession since the start of the year. The S&P 500 pared its losses to end near break-even Friday, putting its loss to more than 18% from the index’s Jan. 3 record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has lost 15%, and the Nasdaq Composite has tumbled nearly 30%.“Historically, the S&P 500 has fallen an average of 29% around recession (median of 24%),” wrote Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner on Friday. “With the S&P 500 currently showing a peak-to-trough decline of almost 19%, the market is effectively already pricing in a 60%-75% chance of recession based on the average and median.”That means typical downside of another 7% to 13% if a recession does in fact arrive, according to Lerner. If it doesn’t, there’s a rally on its way.“When equity market odds of recession have moved to current levels, 12-month forward returns have been binary,” wrote Keith Parker, head of U.S. equity strategy at UBS, earlier this week. “The S&P 500 fell by -9% on average when a recession materialized but rallied +12% if it did not.”The entirety of the correction this year has been in the market’s valuation multiple, with analysts not pricing an earnings recession into their models. That could be a miscalculation, and suggest that estimates will have to decline. Or it could mean that the individual-company view is rosier than the macro picture.“At face value, this year’s decline in the S&P 500 looks a bit unusual,” wrote Thomas Mathews, markets economist at Capital Economics. “Previous large falls, such as in 2007-09 and 2020, have often come alongside big downward revisions to earnings expectations …By contrast, aggregate earnings forecasts for S&P 500 companies have been revised up this year, even as stock prices have tumbled.”The S&P 500 now trades for less than 17 times its expected earnings over the next four quarters, down from nearly 22 times at the beginning of the year. The multiple is elevated due to the pricey Big Tech stocks at the top of the index, which is weighted by market value. The equal-weight S&P 500, meanwhile, trades for a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just over 14 times.The optimist’s view is that’s a reasonable valuation that sets the market up for a potential rebound. Measures of investor sentiment, fund flows, and positioning have become significantly more bearish and negative as the market has sold off. Those contrarian indicators historically have been followed by rebounds. The past seven weeks have been painful, but the upshot is a much more attractive starting point for stock investors today.The entry into a bear market has been the pivot point in the past. The S&P 500 has been higher one month later 83% of the time since 1950, according to Dow Jones Market Data, with an average gain of 3.7%. And a year after entering a bear market, returns have been positive 75% of the time—averaging 17%.“Equities stand to recover if a recession doesn’t come through, given already substantial multiple de-rating, reduced positioning, and downbeat sentiment,” wrote Marko Kolanovic, J.P. Morgan’s chief global markets strategist.It’s impossible to call a trough in real time, and a near-term bounce may be followed by further declines. But it isn’t all bad out there. And with stocks pricing in a near worst-case scenario, it wouldn’t take a lot of good news to get the market rising again.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":333,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096918723,"gmtCreate":1644280502328,"gmtModify":1676533907548,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice. Thank you.","listText":"Nice. Thank you.","text":"Nice. Thank you.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096918723","repostId":"1142873559","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142873559","pubTimestamp":1644279607,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142873559?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-08 08:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142873559","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustr","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? </p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65f98bd10117e83090323ce1050443ed\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"487\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphoto</span></p><p>Perhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth darlings Netflix and Facebook.</p><p>Netflix was the first to flop, plunging in the wake of earnings to a new 52-week low of around $351 on Jan. 26 – its lowest level since the first half of 2020 and down about 50% from its 52-week high. It has since recovered somewhat, to around $400.</p><p>Then came Facebook parent Meta Platforms.After its own challenging earnings report, it lost a staggering $230 billion or so in market value in a single session. It, too, dropped back to early 2020 levels, though it “only” has fallen about 40% from its 52-week high. Unlike Netflix, it hasn’t had a bounce.</p><p>It’s theoretically possible to “catch a falling knife,” as the old Wall Street saying goes. But it’s also very likely you’ll get your fingers cut off if you plow cash into stocks that have fallen hard and fallen for good reason. On the other hand, both Netflix and Facebook stocks have fallen hard before … and ended up making investors a lot of money.</p><p>If you’re wondering whether this is another one of those lucrative buying opportunities, here’s a look at where these stocks are now – and which one is “less bad” than the other.</p><p>Just be warned that you’d be living dangerously.</p><p><b>Netflix</b></p><p>Shares in the streaming video were hammered in large part because of the slowing subscriber growth disclosed in its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company added just under 8.3 million worldwide subs, significantly fewer than the 8.5 million subscribers added in the fourth quarter of 2020. Even worse, Netflix offered a “borderline catastrophic” forecast of just 2.5 million subscriber adds for the current quarter – a huge drop from 3.98 million it added in its 2021 first quarter. Analysts had been hoping for 6.93 million adds – almost three times what Netflix is now forecasting. So it’s no surprise we saw such a violent reaction.</p><p>Now, it wasn’t all bad or all unexpected. Netflix added more subscribers than the 8.19 million that analysts had forecast. Earnings per share blew away expectations at $1.33 vs. forecasts of just 82 cents.</p><p>But for a long time, we’ve been talking about the threat of market saturation and competition taking a toll on Netflix’s growth metrics. Yet while the big multiples on future earnings and sales have come down a bit since the stock’s plunge, the numbers are still stunning. Look at that forward P/E of 36.9 and a forward price/sales of about 5.5. Larger media rival Walt Disney Co. is about 30.4 and 3.6 on both those metrics, by way of example.</p><p>What’s more, Disney has theatrical releases and theme parks and merchandising to fall back on. Netflix remains a one-trick pony: streaming.</p><p>The major levers it can pull here are adding new viewers or increasing subscription costs (which it did a month ago, ahead of earnings). Of course, higher costs make the service a harder sell, especially when there are so many alternatives.</p><p>It makes you wonder what, if anything, Netflix can do to right the ship.</p><p>To its credit, Netflix continues to release high-performing content such as “Don’t Look Up,” which has been widely praised.</p><p>But Wall Street remains skeptical of whether a few new good shows on the currently dominant streaming platform is enough. For a stock that has long been defined by constant growth, it could be a rough awakening for investors if Netflix instead has become a mature company that simply depends on what it already has.</p><p><b>Facebook</b></p><p>Meta Platforms is no picnic for investors either. It was slammed after a disastrous fourth-quarter earnings report sent shares tumbling more than 20% in a single day.</p><p>In simplest terms, daily active user metrics on the flagship Facebook network were the bad news. For starters, they increased just 5% from a year ago to 1.93 billion, short of targets for 1.95 billion. Plus they actually declined from last quarter.</p><p>Bullish investors may point to other details in the social media giant’s results that weren’t quite so miserable. It posted a modest beat on revenue, as measured by the consensus target of $33.4 billion for sales, thanks in part to exceeding expectations on revenue per user estimates. Longtime watchers of this stock will know that this long-term uptrend in revenue per user has largely been driving results; total users in the key North America and European Union markets have been flatlining for a while.</p><p>But before you take a flyer on Facebook, let’s get to the additional risks, which, frankly, don’t come from any hard numbers and thus may be harder to pin down.</p><p>The company is struggling to deal with users creating multiple Facebook accounts. That makes many wonder if its user numbers are artificially inflated and the disappointing numbers are in fact much, much worse.</p><p>On top of that, privacy concerns may be coming home to roost at long last. After the earnings announcement, there have been reports that something as simple as a change in iPhone privacy settings can wipe $10 billion off earnings this year.</p><p>Then there is now chatter that Meta is “threatening” to pulling out of the European Union with its flagship Facebook and Instagram platforms because of local internet privacy rules. Talk about an empty threat. Abandon one of your largest markets just like that because you don’t like changes in the law? That kind of talk won’t make regulators or legislators back down.</p><p>There is always a chance that some of these dark clouds part and the sun shines again for Meta in the months ahead. However, unlike Netflix and its series of more practical concerns, Meta has made a habit of making terrible headlines when it comes to privacy concerns and bad actors on its platform.</p><p>From documented 2016 election interference by Russia to the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal to a $5 billion fine from the FTC in 2019 over privacy violations to chronic misinformation about COVID-19 in the last year or two… this is clearly a pattern.</p><p>It is not an exaggeration to say that Meta is dealing what could be existential threats to its Facebook platform. Even employees know this, and talented engineers are reportedly demanding a “brand tax” to go work at Meta in the current environment for fear they will have a black mark on their resume.</p><p><b>So which one is ‘less bad?’</b></p><p>Netflix may not be perfect. But given the big-picture threats to Meta Platforms, I would be more inclined to grant the streaming giant the benefit of the doubt over a social-media platform that may be just one more bad headline away from obsolescence.</p><p>Both platforms are facing serious challenges to growth because of user issues. But Netflix still seems to at least be the same basic platform, albeit one that’s facing the pressures of market saturation and fierce competition.</p><p>The jury is out on whether Facebook’s current model will even survive, either from consumer backlash or regulatory intervention. That’s a much greater level of uncertainty, so on that reason alone I’d personally steer clear of Meta’s stock at all costs.</p><p>Though honestly, the safest option is to forgo both stocks altogether.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings? </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix vs. Facebook: Which is the better stock after those shocking earnings? \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-08 08:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphotoPerhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-vs-facebook-which-is-the-better-stock-after-those-shocking-earnings-11644270425?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142873559","content_text":"Both have recovered from steep declines in the past. Can they do it again? MarketWatch photo illustration/iStockphotoPerhaps no two stocks have made more headlines in recent weeks than one-time growth darlings Netflix and Facebook.Netflix was the first to flop, plunging in the wake of earnings to a new 52-week low of around $351 on Jan. 26 – its lowest level since the first half of 2020 and down about 50% from its 52-week high. It has since recovered somewhat, to around $400.Then came Facebook parent Meta Platforms.After its own challenging earnings report, it lost a staggering $230 billion or so in market value in a single session. It, too, dropped back to early 2020 levels, though it “only” has fallen about 40% from its 52-week high. Unlike Netflix, it hasn’t had a bounce.It’s theoretically possible to “catch a falling knife,” as the old Wall Street saying goes. But it’s also very likely you’ll get your fingers cut off if you plow cash into stocks that have fallen hard and fallen for good reason. On the other hand, both Netflix and Facebook stocks have fallen hard before … and ended up making investors a lot of money.If you’re wondering whether this is another one of those lucrative buying opportunities, here’s a look at where these stocks are now – and which one is “less bad” than the other.Just be warned that you’d be living dangerously.NetflixShares in the streaming video were hammered in large part because of the slowing subscriber growth disclosed in its fourth-quarter earnings report. The company added just under 8.3 million worldwide subs, significantly fewer than the 8.5 million subscribers added in the fourth quarter of 2020. Even worse, Netflix offered a “borderline catastrophic” forecast of just 2.5 million subscriber adds for the current quarter – a huge drop from 3.98 million it added in its 2021 first quarter. Analysts had been hoping for 6.93 million adds – almost three times what Netflix is now forecasting. So it’s no surprise we saw such a violent reaction.Now, it wasn’t all bad or all unexpected. Netflix added more subscribers than the 8.19 million that analysts had forecast. Earnings per share blew away expectations at $1.33 vs. forecasts of just 82 cents.But for a long time, we’ve been talking about the threat of market saturation and competition taking a toll on Netflix’s growth metrics. Yet while the big multiples on future earnings and sales have come down a bit since the stock’s plunge, the numbers are still stunning. Look at that forward P/E of 36.9 and a forward price/sales of about 5.5. Larger media rival Walt Disney Co. is about 30.4 and 3.6 on both those metrics, by way of example.What’s more, Disney has theatrical releases and theme parks and merchandising to fall back on. Netflix remains a one-trick pony: streaming.The major levers it can pull here are adding new viewers or increasing subscription costs (which it did a month ago, ahead of earnings). Of course, higher costs make the service a harder sell, especially when there are so many alternatives.It makes you wonder what, if anything, Netflix can do to right the ship.To its credit, Netflix continues to release high-performing content such as “Don’t Look Up,” which has been widely praised.But Wall Street remains skeptical of whether a few new good shows on the currently dominant streaming platform is enough. For a stock that has long been defined by constant growth, it could be a rough awakening for investors if Netflix instead has become a mature company that simply depends on what it already has.FacebookMeta Platforms is no picnic for investors either. It was slammed after a disastrous fourth-quarter earnings report sent shares tumbling more than 20% in a single day.In simplest terms, daily active user metrics on the flagship Facebook network were the bad news. For starters, they increased just 5% from a year ago to 1.93 billion, short of targets for 1.95 billion. Plus they actually declined from last quarter.Bullish investors may point to other details in the social media giant’s results that weren’t quite so miserable. It posted a modest beat on revenue, as measured by the consensus target of $33.4 billion for sales, thanks in part to exceeding expectations on revenue per user estimates. Longtime watchers of this stock will know that this long-term uptrend in revenue per user has largely been driving results; total users in the key North America and European Union markets have been flatlining for a while.But before you take a flyer on Facebook, let’s get to the additional risks, which, frankly, don’t come from any hard numbers and thus may be harder to pin down.The company is struggling to deal with users creating multiple Facebook accounts. That makes many wonder if its user numbers are artificially inflated and the disappointing numbers are in fact much, much worse.On top of that, privacy concerns may be coming home to roost at long last. After the earnings announcement, there have been reports that something as simple as a change in iPhone privacy settings can wipe $10 billion off earnings this year.Then there is now chatter that Meta is “threatening” to pulling out of the European Union with its flagship Facebook and Instagram platforms because of local internet privacy rules. Talk about an empty threat. Abandon one of your largest markets just like that because you don’t like changes in the law? That kind of talk won’t make regulators or legislators back down.There is always a chance that some of these dark clouds part and the sun shines again for Meta in the months ahead. However, unlike Netflix and its series of more practical concerns, Meta has made a habit of making terrible headlines when it comes to privacy concerns and bad actors on its platform.From documented 2016 election interference by Russia to the 2018 Cambridge Analytica scandal to a $5 billion fine from the FTC in 2019 over privacy violations to chronic misinformation about COVID-19 in the last year or two… this is clearly a pattern.It is not an exaggeration to say that Meta is dealing what could be existential threats to its Facebook platform. Even employees know this, and talented engineers are reportedly demanding a “brand tax” to go work at Meta in the current environment for fear they will have a black mark on their resume.So which one is ‘less bad?’Netflix may not be perfect. But given the big-picture threats to Meta Platforms, I would be more inclined to grant the streaming giant the benefit of the doubt over a social-media platform that may be just one more bad headline away from obsolescence.Both platforms are facing serious challenges to growth because of user issues. But Netflix still seems to at least be the same basic platform, albeit one that’s facing the pressures of market saturation and fierce competition.The jury is out on whether Facebook’s current model will even survive, either from consumer backlash or regulatory intervention. That’s a much greater level of uncertainty, so on that reason alone I’d personally steer clear of Meta’s stock at all costs.Though honestly, the safest option is to forgo both stocks altogether.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":279,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069749494,"gmtCreate":1651367458992,"gmtModify":1676534895198,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069749494","repostId":"1119163908","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119163908","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1651330677,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119163908?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-30 22:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119163908","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.</p><p>Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.</p><p>Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.</p><p>From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&amp;P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.</p><p>While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&amp;P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuffett Says Berkshire Is \"Better Than the Banks\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-30 22:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.</p><p>Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.</p><p>Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.</p><p>From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&amp;P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.</p><p>While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&amp;P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119163908","content_text":"Warren Buffett has a long history of teasing investment bankers and their institutions – saying that they encourage mergers and spinoffs to reap fees, rather than improve companies.Today, he noted that Berkshire Hathaway would always be cash-rich, and in times of need, would be “better than the banks” at extending credit lines to companies in need.Warren Buffett’s career has been a testament to that the fact that, over the long-term, value investing can produce major gains.From the start of 1965 through the end of 2021, the per-share market value of Berkshire Hathaway had an average compound annual gain of 20.1%, according to the firm’s annual letter. That is nearly double the S&P 500′s 10.5%, including dividends.While Buffett has built a big lead over many decades, he has had continued success in recent years. Since 2010, Berkshire has outpaced the S&P 500 in eight calendar years. That is on track to happen again in 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":686,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019291702,"gmtCreate":1648599476966,"gmtModify":1676534360905,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019291702","repostId":"1145232829","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145232829","pubTimestamp":1648567847,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145232829?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-29 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145232829","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectation","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soon</li><li>Says he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmoored</li></ul><p>Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a series of “deliberate, methodical” increases in the benchmark federal funds rate this year while reduction in the U.S. central bank’s holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities will begin soon.</p><p>“The bottom line is that generous fiscal policies, supply chain disruptions, and accommodative monetary policy have pushed inflation far higher than I -- and my colleagues on the FOMC -- are comfortable with,” Harker said Tuesday, referring to the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee. “I’m also worried that inflation expectations could become unmoored,” he added in remarks prepared for an event hosted by the Center for Financial Stability in New York.</p><p>Harker is voting as an alternative member of the FOMC in the place of the Boston Fed, which is currently without a president. Its new leader, University of Michigan economist Susan Collins, will take up the post on July 1.</p><p>Fed officials raised their benchmark lending rate off zero this month with a quarter-point increase. Since then, several policy makers have said they are open to hiking by a more aggressive half point at their May 3-4 meeting, including Chair Jerome Powell, if necessary to bring price pressures under control.</p><p>Investors have subsequently increased their bets on the pace of policy tightening, with interest-rate futures pricing in more than eight additional quarter-point increases over the remaining six policy meetings this year, implying that some will be half-point moves.</p><p>Harker implied that he was not currently in favor of front-loading rate increases, noting that he expects “a series of deliberate, methodical hikes as the year continues and the data evolve.”</p><p>He said the economy will post another above-trend growth rate of around 3% to 3.5% this year before falling back to trend of around 2% to 2.5% in the next few years. He said inflation will rise 4% this year before falling back toward the 2% target over the next two years.</p><p>U.S. central bankers have pivoted to a more aggressive posture on raising interest rates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which is putting upward pressure on food and energy costs at a time when inflation is already at a 40-year high. The Fed’s preferred price measure rose 6.1% for the 12-month period ending January, triple its 2% target.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed’s Harker Says He Is Looking For ‘Methodical’ Hikes This Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-29 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmooredPhiladelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-29/fed-s-harker-says-he-is-looking-for-methodical-hikes-this-year?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145232829","content_text":"Philadelphia Fed chief sees asset holdings being reduced soonSays he’s worried inflation expectations could become unmooredPhiladelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Patrick Harker said he expects a series of “deliberate, methodical” increases in the benchmark federal funds rate this year while reduction in the U.S. central bank’s holdings of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities will begin soon.“The bottom line is that generous fiscal policies, supply chain disruptions, and accommodative monetary policy have pushed inflation far higher than I -- and my colleagues on the FOMC -- are comfortable with,” Harker said Tuesday, referring to the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee. “I’m also worried that inflation expectations could become unmoored,” he added in remarks prepared for an event hosted by the Center for Financial Stability in New York.Harker is voting as an alternative member of the FOMC in the place of the Boston Fed, which is currently without a president. Its new leader, University of Michigan economist Susan Collins, will take up the post on July 1.Fed officials raised their benchmark lending rate off zero this month with a quarter-point increase. Since then, several policy makers have said they are open to hiking by a more aggressive half point at their May 3-4 meeting, including Chair Jerome Powell, if necessary to bring price pressures under control.Investors have subsequently increased their bets on the pace of policy tightening, with interest-rate futures pricing in more than eight additional quarter-point increases over the remaining six policy meetings this year, implying that some will be half-point moves.Harker implied that he was not currently in favor of front-loading rate increases, noting that he expects “a series of deliberate, methodical hikes as the year continues and the data evolve.”He said the economy will post another above-trend growth rate of around 3% to 3.5% this year before falling back to trend of around 2% to 2.5% in the next few years. He said inflation will rise 4% this year before falling back toward the 2% target over the next two years.U.S. central bankers have pivoted to a more aggressive posture on raising interest rates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which is putting upward pressure on food and energy costs at a time when inflation is already at a 40-year high. The Fed’s preferred price measure rose 6.1% for the 12-month period ending January, triple its 2% target.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":362,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098562047,"gmtCreate":1644190768085,"gmtModify":1676533896936,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool stuff. Thanks","listText":"Cool stuff. Thanks","text":"Cool stuff. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098562047","repostId":"1108894266","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108894266","pubTimestamp":1644024937,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108894266?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-05 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"For Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108894266","media":"Barrons","summary":"Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal resul","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market capitalization, some $250 billion. It was the largest single-day loss of corporate value in U.S. history.</p><p>And the value destruction might not be over. For Facebook, this is different than the privacy scandals and political controversies that have surrounded the company. This time, the problems are with the business itself.</p><p>Meta (ticker: FB) offered a first-quarter outlook that reveals slowing usage of its social media apps and troubling trends in advertising sales. Fixing the problems will take multiple quarters, and potentially years. Meanwhile, the repairs will have to be made as the company pivots to the metaverse, a significant gamble on an unproven technology.</p><p>By the end of a long week of tech earnings (see this week’s Tech Trader), it became clear that Meta’s problems are unique, and not part of a broader industry downturn. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) posted strong results driven by demand for advertising space on Google Search and YouTube. And on Thursday afternoon—one day after Meta’s nightmarish report—smaller rivals Snap (SNAP) and Pinterest (PINS) surprised investors with better-than-expected numbers, including Snap’s first-ever profit.</p><p>Amazon.com (AMZN) rounded out the big week of earnings with its own impressive results—including 32% growth in its advertising business. Those reports helped tech stocks snap back on Friday: The Nasdaq Composite rallied 2%, but Meta shares were flat.</p><p>The lack of buying on the dip reflects the serious issues Meta raised with its earnings. For the first quarter, the company sees revenue of $27 billion to $29 billion, up between 3% and 11% from a year ago. That would be a sharp deceleration from 48% growth a year ago. Meta said results would be affected by “headwinds” to both the number of ad impressions generated by its platforms and by pressures on ad pricing.</p><p>The forecast came as a shock to Facebook investors who have grown used to reliable growth, even amid controversy. Meta by its own admission is now dealing with multiple issues: slowing usage of the company’s core social media apps, tough earnings comparisons, decelerating spending by advertisers that are facing labor and product shortages, and intensified competition from TikTok, the short-form video app owned by China-based ByteDance.</p><p>Meta’s mention of weaker ad impressions was the real shocker. The company said its core Facebook business had one million fewer daily average users in the December quarter versus the previous three months. That has never happened before. The slowdown could reflect people spending more time out of the house after two years of severe pandemic restrictions. Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, it could be that people are simply growing a little tired of social media, and using the platforms a little less.</p><p>On its post-earnings call with investors, Meta repeatedly pointed to competition from TikTok. Meta is going after TikTok with a competitive service called Reels, which have been pushed across Facebook feeds. But it is going to take time for Facebook to catch up to TikTok’s popularity, if it ever does. Meanwhile, the issue is cutting into Meta’s revenues.</p><p>“On the impressions side, we expect continued headwinds from both increased competition for people’s time and a shift of engagement within our apps toward video surfaces like Reels, which monetize at lower rates than Feed and Stories,” the company said. In other words, competition from TikTok is forcing Facebook to push users into less profitable parts of its platform.</p><p>On ad pricing, meanwhile, Meta continues to deal with Apple’s (AAPL) adoption of tough new rules that limit advertisers’ ability to track consumer behavior on iOS devices. Those changes weren’t yet in place a year ago, so the comparison will be felt again in the first quarter. “We anticipate modestly increasing ad targeting and measurement headwinds from platform and regulatory changes,” Meta said.</p><p>The company has previously expressed confidence that it could develop workarounds for Apple’s changes, which affect ad targeting along with knowing when ads trigger purchases or other consumer behaviors. But Meta now sounds less confident about a near-term fix, saying the Apple changes will trim its revenue by $10 billion this year.</p><p>Perhaps most worrisome for Facebook is that Snap and Pinterest, rivals that in theory should be suffering a similar slowdown from Apple’s changes, didn’t report the same issues in the quarter.</p><p><b>Falling Hard</b></p><p>Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market value on Thursday. It’s the largest single-day loss of corporate value ever.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aefbd1011b68d6770961169b97d76d54\" tg-width=\"1059\" tg-height=\"492\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>To be sure, the Meta story still has investor appeal, most notably a cheap stock. After the selloff, Meta trades at a discount to the S&amp;P 500—19.3 times versus 20.3 times, respectively. Meta has also been aggressively buying back stock—$33 billion over the past two quarters. While those purchases look ill-timed, the buybacks suggest that the Meta board considers the stock cheap. That doesn’t mean it can’t get cheaper.</p><p>Meta’s risks are growing and they’re no longer just about Facebook&#39;s legacy business. The company is spending aggressively on its metaverse build out—capital spending this year is expected to be between $29 billion and $34 billion, up from $19.2 billion last year. No one really knows if the plan will work: How many people want to attend concerts, parties, and meetings in an imaginary world while wearing a virtual reality headset? The metaverse has become CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest bet—and it gives the company a quickly changing risk profile, one that looks uncomfortable even with a cheap stock.</p><p>Meta’s user base is mammoth—3.6 billion monthly active users, or close to half the Earth’s population. But growth is finally slowing, the advertising business is in trouble, regulators are circling, and the metaverse is in its infancy. For Meta, it’s a mega set of risks.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>For Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFor Meta, a Cheap Stock Isn’t Enough\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-05 09:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/buy-sell-facebook-meta-stock-51644023283?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108894266","content_text":"Suddenly, investors are giving Facebook a big thumbs down. Within 24 hours of reporting dismal results on Wednesday night, Facebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market capitalization, some $250 billion. It was the largest single-day loss of corporate value in U.S. history.And the value destruction might not be over. For Facebook, this is different than the privacy scandals and political controversies that have surrounded the company. This time, the problems are with the business itself.Meta (ticker: FB) offered a first-quarter outlook that reveals slowing usage of its social media apps and troubling trends in advertising sales. Fixing the problems will take multiple quarters, and potentially years. Meanwhile, the repairs will have to be made as the company pivots to the metaverse, a significant gamble on an unproven technology.By the end of a long week of tech earnings (see this week’s Tech Trader), it became clear that Meta’s problems are unique, and not part of a broader industry downturn. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) posted strong results driven by demand for advertising space on Google Search and YouTube. And on Thursday afternoon—one day after Meta’s nightmarish report—smaller rivals Snap (SNAP) and Pinterest (PINS) surprised investors with better-than-expected numbers, including Snap’s first-ever profit.Amazon.com (AMZN) rounded out the big week of earnings with its own impressive results—including 32% growth in its advertising business. Those reports helped tech stocks snap back on Friday: The Nasdaq Composite rallied 2%, but Meta shares were flat.The lack of buying on the dip reflects the serious issues Meta raised with its earnings. For the first quarter, the company sees revenue of $27 billion to $29 billion, up between 3% and 11% from a year ago. That would be a sharp deceleration from 48% growth a year ago. Meta said results would be affected by “headwinds” to both the number of ad impressions generated by its platforms and by pressures on ad pricing.The forecast came as a shock to Facebook investors who have grown used to reliable growth, even amid controversy. Meta by its own admission is now dealing with multiple issues: slowing usage of the company’s core social media apps, tough earnings comparisons, decelerating spending by advertisers that are facing labor and product shortages, and intensified competition from TikTok, the short-form video app owned by China-based ByteDance.Meta’s mention of weaker ad impressions was the real shocker. The company said its core Facebook business had one million fewer daily average users in the December quarter versus the previous three months. That has never happened before. The slowdown could reflect people spending more time out of the house after two years of severe pandemic restrictions. Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, it could be that people are simply growing a little tired of social media, and using the platforms a little less.On its post-earnings call with investors, Meta repeatedly pointed to competition from TikTok. Meta is going after TikTok with a competitive service called Reels, which have been pushed across Facebook feeds. But it is going to take time for Facebook to catch up to TikTok’s popularity, if it ever does. Meanwhile, the issue is cutting into Meta’s revenues.“On the impressions side, we expect continued headwinds from both increased competition for people’s time and a shift of engagement within our apps toward video surfaces like Reels, which monetize at lower rates than Feed and Stories,” the company said. In other words, competition from TikTok is forcing Facebook to push users into less profitable parts of its platform.On ad pricing, meanwhile, Meta continues to deal with Apple’s (AAPL) adoption of tough new rules that limit advertisers’ ability to track consumer behavior on iOS devices. Those changes weren’t yet in place a year ago, so the comparison will be felt again in the first quarter. “We anticipate modestly increasing ad targeting and measurement headwinds from platform and regulatory changes,” Meta said.The company has previously expressed confidence that it could develop workarounds for Apple’s changes, which affect ad targeting along with knowing when ads trigger purchases or other consumer behaviors. But Meta now sounds less confident about a near-term fix, saying the Apple changes will trim its revenue by $10 billion this year.Perhaps most worrisome for Facebook is that Snap and Pinterest, rivals that in theory should be suffering a similar slowdown from Apple’s changes, didn’t report the same issues in the quarter.Falling HardFacebook parent Meta Platforms lost more than a quarter of its market value on Thursday. It’s the largest single-day loss of corporate value ever.To be sure, the Meta story still has investor appeal, most notably a cheap stock. After the selloff, Meta trades at a discount to the S&P 500—19.3 times versus 20.3 times, respectively. Meta has also been aggressively buying back stock—$33 billion over the past two quarters. While those purchases look ill-timed, the buybacks suggest that the Meta board considers the stock cheap. That doesn’t mean it can’t get cheaper.Meta’s risks are growing and they’re no longer just about Facebook's legacy business. The company is spending aggressively on its metaverse build out—capital spending this year is expected to be between $29 billion and $34 billion, up from $19.2 billion last year. No one really knows if the plan will work: How many people want to attend concerts, parties, and meetings in an imaginary world while wearing a virtual reality headset? The metaverse has become CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s biggest bet—and it gives the company a quickly changing risk profile, one that looks uncomfortable even with a cheap stock.Meta’s user base is mammoth—3.6 billion monthly active users, or close to half the Earth’s population. But growth is finally slowing, the advertising business is in trouble, regulators are circling, and the metaverse is in its infancy. For Meta, it’s a mega set of risks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092329336,"gmtCreate":1644539934328,"gmtModify":1676533938554,"author":{"id":"4098849970602690","authorId":"4098849970602690","name":"Harvard","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/361b34be7ff8215d2576e75766693396","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4098849970602690","idStr":"4098849970602690"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092329336","repostId":"2210515163","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210515163","pubTimestamp":1644538578,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210515163?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 08:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210515163","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrests</li><li>Car rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claims</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cadd8ffd90d667e7d67c7e879e203bca\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1334\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Photographer: Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg</span></p><p>Hertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds of car renters who say they were falsely arrested for auto theft, files thousands of related criminal complaints each year against customers, according to claims in newly released court documents.</p><p>In one four-year period, the company filed nearly 8,000 theft reports annually, advocates for the falsely arrested customers said in a federal court filing in Wilmington, Delaware Thursday. The advocates cited internal data from Hertz that a judge ordered the company to release.</p><p>A breakdown of the theft reports isn’t public, so it’s not yet possible to know how many complaints were against customers and how many were for other types of theft. Under certain circumstances, Hertz will tell police that a customer may have stolen a car. Many of those people turn out to have valid contracts and allegedly have been falsely arrested, according to the lawsuits.</p><p>Messages left for Hertz representatives weren’t immediately returned. CBS, which hired lawyers to help get the documents unsealed, previously reported Hertz said the “vast majority” of cases involve renters who were weeks or months overdue on returns and authorities are brought in only after “exhaustive attempts” to reach a customer.</p><p><b>Court Order</b></p><p>In a court hearing Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath ordered the annual theft numbers to be made public, siding with advocates for 220 people suing Hertz who argued that more details about Hertz’s internal anti-theft program should be public.</p><p>Court documents show that some of the customers who rented cars were jailed, some years after they rented and returned the cars. At least one allegedly was held at gunpoint just hours after paying for a rental.</p><p>“Hertz now admits that it reports thousands of its own customers for auto theft each year,” lawyers for the people suing said in court papers. The problem can be traced to company-wide, systemic problems, they allege.</p><p><b>Bankruptcy Claims</b></p><p>The false arrest claims often involve long-term rentals, some set up directly by the customer, others through an auto insurance company, according to court documents.</p><p>Those who claim Hertz had them wrongly arrested have filed claims in bankruptcy court demanding to be paid like other creditors of the company. Walrath oversaw Hertz’s Chapter 11 reorganization, which ended last year with a plan to pay creditors in full.</p><p>The case is Hertz Corp. 20-11218, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHertz Accuses Thousands of Car Renters of Theft, Court Papers Show\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-11 08:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claimsPhotographer: Luke Sharrett/BloombergHertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HTZ":"赫兹租车"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-10/hertz-accuses-thousands-of-renters-for-theft-court-papers-show?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210515163","content_text":"Tally of criminal reports disclosed amid suit on false arrestsCar rental company faces more than 200 false arrest claimsPhotographer: Luke Sharrett/BloombergHertz Corp., facing lawsuits from hundreds of car renters who say they were falsely arrested for auto theft, files thousands of related criminal complaints each year against customers, according to claims in newly released court documents.In one four-year period, the company filed nearly 8,000 theft reports annually, advocates for the falsely arrested customers said in a federal court filing in Wilmington, Delaware Thursday. The advocates cited internal data from Hertz that a judge ordered the company to release.A breakdown of the theft reports isn’t public, so it’s not yet possible to know how many complaints were against customers and how many were for other types of theft. Under certain circumstances, Hertz will tell police that a customer may have stolen a car. Many of those people turn out to have valid contracts and allegedly have been falsely arrested, according to the lawsuits.Messages left for Hertz representatives weren’t immediately returned. CBS, which hired lawyers to help get the documents unsealed, previously reported Hertz said the “vast majority” of cases involve renters who were weeks or months overdue on returns and authorities are brought in only after “exhaustive attempts” to reach a customer.Court OrderIn a court hearing Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary Walrath ordered the annual theft numbers to be made public, siding with advocates for 220 people suing Hertz who argued that more details about Hertz’s internal anti-theft program should be public.Court documents show that some of the customers who rented cars were jailed, some years after they rented and returned the cars. At least one allegedly was held at gunpoint just hours after paying for a rental.“Hertz now admits that it reports thousands of its own customers for auto theft each year,” lawyers for the people suing said in court papers. The problem can be traced to company-wide, systemic problems, they allege.Bankruptcy ClaimsThe false arrest claims often involve long-term rentals, some set up directly by the customer, others through an auto insurance company, according to court documents.Those who claim Hertz had them wrongly arrested have filed claims in bankruptcy court demanding to be paid like other creditors of the company. Walrath oversaw Hertz’s Chapter 11 reorganization, which ended last year with a plan to pay creditors in full.The case is Hertz Corp. 20-11218, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}