jojoc personal page - To The Moon

jojoc

jojoc

No personal profile

17Follow

32Followers

0Topic

0Badge

06-01

$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable

08-31

I open $MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$

06-01

$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!

2023-09-09

ChargePoint Holding $ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good

01-23

$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ good

2022-06-25

$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy

2022-07-06

$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy

2022-01-20

Buy

Microsoft Shares Jumped More Than 3% in Morning Trading

2022-05-08

When other EV companies started to catch up, Tesla stock will not be so valuable. Diversify your stock portfolio is important.

Tesla: Overvalued By 85.26% And Not A Technology Company

2022-06-06

$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy

2022-01-22

Ok

2 Reasons Activision Shareholders Shouldn't Be Quick to Sell Ahead of a Microsoft Deal

2022-01-18

Ok

My Best Metaverse Stock for 2022

2022-01-21

Ok

Walmart’s Top U.S. E-Commerce Executive Is Leaving

2022-01-22

Ok

3 Top Mid-Cap Stocks That Are Wildly Undervalued Right Now

2022-01-21

Ok

Netflix could be Activision’s Plan B

2022-05-21

Ok

It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?

2022-04-28

Ok

Tiger Chart｜Return on Investment of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway

2022-01-26

Ok

Better Buy: Nvidia vs. Digital Realty

2022-01-23

Ok

EV Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading

2022-01-23

Ok

Why I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4099442649801160","uuid":"4099442649801160","gmtCreate":1636706635474,"gmtModify":1704447505606,"name":"jojoc","pinyin":"jojoc","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","hatId":"ca_profile_frame_DWr5S1","hatName":"","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":32,"headSize":17,"tweetSize":682,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"3e5a625780d3411098f7e72115f69f0a-1","templateUuid":"3e5a625780d3411098f7e72115f69f0a","name":"Total trades","description":"Cumulative for 100 trades","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f6040a65e0c6e125e4dcfe0101de45ee","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f803dba33fef1aa87b64be09f4f064ee","grayImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5dfa45d4a1e98a2d8c2e1b4253ddd916","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2023/stock-contest?adcode=StockContest2023","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":5100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.03.23","exceedPercentage":"80.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"f00de38e20574ad1abf55a15966547c8-1","templateUuid":"f00de38e20574ad1abf55a15966547c8","name":"Average winning trade","description":"Top 50%","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f53cdecfbff6499d133bad354ae10ff1","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2554f84686bbcccc035b93fe29308e43","grayImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/84c66bc70ac1cf09f4e89b1d4ca9d017","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2023/stock-contest?adcode=StockContest2023","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.09","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":5200},{"badgeId":"23f878ed27704312ae41c7f17e73b319-1","templateUuid":"23f878ed27704312ae41c7f17e73b319","name":"Annualised return","description":"Top 50%","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ffa0ed2850aef35663a435f4fb24f40c","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f67f095c241bed7b45d41ed5b78dd58","grayImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/01339d2a5c822a77e0c581ef8f959d81","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2023/stock-contest?adcode=StockContest2023","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":5300},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":7,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":3,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":366084776681728,"gmtCreate":1730416278530,"gmtModify":1730447335024,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MPW 20241115 5.0 CALL\">$MPW 20241115 5.0 CALL$ </a> I closed this Call options 1 week before expiry and collected premium profits[Happy]&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MPW 20241115 5.0 CALL\">$MPW 20241115 5.0 CALL$ </a> I closed this Call options 1 week before expiry and collected premium profits[Happy]&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"$MPW 20241115 5.0 CALL$ I closed this Call options 1 week before expiry and collected premium profits[Happy]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e4780b96dccdf5ce7b7d793faa6439cb","width":"870","height":"1772"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/366084776681728","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":142,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":366245669601512,"gmtCreate":1730416119765,"gmtModify":1730447401527,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20241101 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20241101 17.5 CALL$ </a> I closed this Call options 1 day before expiry and collected my premium profits","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20241101 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20241101 17.5 CALL$ </a> I closed this Call options 1 day before expiry and collected my premium profits","text":"$MARA 20241101 17.5 CALL$ I closed this Call options 1 day before expiry and collected my premium profits","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/299fa10846de575e41fb0624b22337a1","width":"870","height":"1772"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/366245669601512","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344369657401368,"gmtCreate":1725067493782,"gmtModify":1725067497890,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I open&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ </a> call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a>","listText":"I open&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ </a> call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a>","text":"I open $MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1dedc95169a1cce372506e5022467d29","width":"1080","height":"2812"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":21,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":3,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/344369657401368","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":339553714155736,"gmtCreate":1723939689050,"gmtModify":1724052384691,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a> good, time to cash out the premium, just ah !!","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a> good, time to cash out the premium, just ah !!","text":"$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ good, time to cash out the premium, just ah !!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0b0bc2b3a0f3bab79c187fe93642d3aa","width":"870","height":"1772"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/339553714155736","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":422,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":339553396670688,"gmtCreate":1723939612569,"gmtModify":1723939616643,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MARA\">$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ </a> time to sell covered calls $$$","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MARA\">$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ </a> time to sell covered calls $$$","text":"$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ time to sell covered calls $$$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/88a48b03676ca73f722c78f271391246","width":"870","height":"1772"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/339553396670688","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":183,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321514218999816,"gmtCreate":1719524914232,"gmtModify":1719524917840,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/QYLD 20241115 16.0 PUT\">$QYLD 20241115 16.0 PUT$ </a> good","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/QYLD 20241115 16.0 PUT\">$QYLD 20241115 16.0 PUT$ </a> good","text":"$QYLD 20241115 16.0 PUT$ good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bb70b69f289db94678d3b102c4e63635","width":"882","height":"1668"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321514218999816","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312040677343552,"gmtCreate":1717207620283,"gmtModify":1717482337662,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","text":"$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/369a474f325f27511f037c430a657d1c","width":"882","height":"1668"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312040677343552","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312039835984056,"gmtCreate":1717207369590,"gmtModify":1717207372464,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT\">$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ </a> I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT\">$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ </a> I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","text":"$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":50,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":103,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312039835984056","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":266022437064784,"gmtCreate":1705967316180,"gmtModify":1705980790406,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL\">$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ </a> good","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL\">$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ </a> good","text":"$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/53e6edf800b3b9745d0088ebc41b7cea","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/266022437064784","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":375,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":252165551165720,"gmtCreate":1702597725329,"gmtModify":1702597729344,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ </a> good ,, 👍👍👍","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ </a> good ,, 👍👍👍","text":"$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ good ,, 👍👍👍","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7016ffcbfccdbd50e85c395189aebd84","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/252165551165720","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":538,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":251785768321320,"gmtCreate":1702514390510,"gmtModify":1702514392632,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ </a> good","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ </a> good","text":"$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/74cf708cbe17a16d08d9a7c58811c8d6","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/251785768321320","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":590,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":251655196131456,"gmtCreate":1702482508375,"gmtModify":1702482510823,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> good","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> good","text":"$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/04e98511ac272d27aba68d3652c8c13d","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/251655196131456","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":341,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":235170632237104,"gmtCreate":1698447395383,"gmtModify":1698447399342,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$ &nbsp;</a>Apple is doing well !!","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$ &nbsp;</a>Apple is doing well !!","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$ Apple is doing well !!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/875f650206d92a6fad5ba6b5606d4f08","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/235170632237104","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":677,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":222934309212160,"gmtCreate":1695454713795,"gmtModify":1695454718471,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"title":"Palantir Technologies Inc","htmlText":"‌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ &nbsp;</a>‌ Palantir Technologies Inc (Palantir) is a software company that develops data fusion platforms. The company facilitates machine-assisted and human-driven data analysis. Its product platform includes Palantir Gotham, Plantir Apollo and Palantir Foundry. Palantir Gotham integrates, manages, secures, and analyzes user’s enterprise data, Plantir Apollo is a software, which powers the company's SaaS platforms. Its Palantir Foundry allows users to create various tables, applications, reports and presentations. The company provides solutions for automotive, cyber, financial compliance, insurance analytics, law enforcement, case management, defense, insider threat and legal intelligence among others. It serves vari","listText":"‌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ &nbsp;</a>‌ Palantir Technologies Inc (Palantir) is a software company that develops data fusion platforms. The company facilitates machine-assisted and human-driven data analysis. Its product platform includes Palantir Gotham, Plantir Apollo and Palantir Foundry. Palantir Gotham integrates, manages, secures, and analyzes user’s enterprise data, Plantir Apollo is a software, which powers the company's SaaS platforms. Its Palantir Foundry allows users to create various tables, applications, reports and presentations. The company provides solutions for automotive, cyber, financial compliance, insurance analytics, law enforcement, case management, defense, insider threat and legal intelligence among others. It serves vari","text":"‌$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ ‌ Palantir Technologies Inc (Palantir) is a software company that develops data fusion platforms. The company facilitates machine-assisted and human-driven data analysis. Its product platform includes Palantir Gotham, Plantir Apollo and Palantir Foundry. Palantir Gotham integrates, manages, secures, and analyzes user’s enterprise data, Plantir Apollo is a software, which powers the company's SaaS platforms. Its Palantir Foundry allows users to create various tables, applications, reports and presentations. The company provides solutions for automotive, cyber, financial compliance, insurance analytics, law enforcement, case management, defense, insider threat and legal intelligence among others. It serves vari","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/222934309212160","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":531,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":222895450152968,"gmtCreate":1695445345572,"gmtModify":1695445351900,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"title":"Sirius XM Holdings (SIRI)","htmlText":"‌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ &nbsp;</a>‌A decade ago, Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ:SIRI) wasn’t that good of an investment. However, the business has improved since then.Sirius investors only gained a 19% total return over the past ten years. The S&amp;P 500 tripled in value in that time frame while the Nasdaq 100 grew five-fold. So why buy Sirius now? Shares are down 30% YTD on fears of ad revenue drying up and a recession taking a toll on new vehicle sales. First, the automotive industry is coming out of its slump from Covid19 pandemic. New car sales surged 15% higher in August year over year, which should increase new subscription sales where they actually makes most of its money. Q2 revenue was $2.25 billion with subscriptions accounting for $1.73 billion worth.","listText":"‌<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIRI\">$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ &nbsp;</a>‌A decade ago, Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ:SIRI) wasn’t that good of an investment. However, the business has improved since then.Sirius investors only gained a 19% total return over the past ten years. The S&amp;P 500 tripled in value in that time frame while the Nasdaq 100 grew five-fold. So why buy Sirius now? Shares are down 30% YTD on fears of ad revenue drying up and a recession taking a toll on new vehicle sales. First, the automotive industry is coming out of its slump from Covid19 pandemic. New car sales surged 15% higher in August year over year, which should increase new subscription sales where they actually makes most of its money. Q2 revenue was $2.25 billion with subscriptions accounting for $1.73 billion worth.","text":"‌$Sirius XM(SIRI)$ ‌A decade ago, Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ:SIRI) wasn’t that good of an investment. However, the business has improved since then.Sirius investors only gained a 19% total return over the past ten years. The S&P 500 tripled in value in that time frame while the Nasdaq 100 grew five-fold. So why buy Sirius now? Shares are down 30% YTD on fears of ad revenue drying up and a recession taking a toll on new vehicle sales. First, the automotive industry is coming out of its slump from Covid19 pandemic. New car sales surged 15% higher in August year over year, which should increase new subscription sales where they actually makes most of its money. Q2 revenue was $2.25 billion with subscriptions accounting for $1.73 billion worth.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/222895450152968","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":494,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":217863280398536,"gmtCreate":1694224076304,"gmtModify":1694224079934,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ChargePoint Holding <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CHPT\">$ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ &nbsp;</a> This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","listText":"ChargePoint Holding <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CHPT\">$ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ &nbsp;</a> This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","text":"ChargePoint Holding $ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/304271575b7240b272dff366ca28faf8","width":"1080","height":"2400"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/217863280398536","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":564,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9941417403,"gmtCreate":1680530553502,"gmtModify":1680530557214,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941417403","repostId":"9941417072","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9941417072,"gmtCreate":1680530043696,"gmtModify":1680530048635,"author":{"id":"4102123614530830","authorId":"4102123614530830","name":"nerdbull1669","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8ac2db9ff7976dac4aa567ce14027bd6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4102123614530830","authorIdStr":"4102123614530830"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MARA\">$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ </a>moving upwards as BTC cross $28K, BTC should be staying in 28K range for a while. BTC is testing $30K. Holding for it to break $9.50.","listText":"<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MARA\">$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ </a>moving upwards as BTC cross $28K, BTC should be staying in 28K range for a while. BTC is testing $30K. Holding for it to break $9.50.","text":"$Marathon Digital Holdings Inc(MARA)$ moving upwards as BTC cross $28K, BTC should be staying in 28K range for a while. BTC is testing $30K. Holding for it to break $9.50.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d992dbefe337ea344ef0ed9419a641ca","width":"762","height":"77"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941417072","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949716476,"gmtCreate":1678889429996,"gmtModify":1678889433575,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949716476","repostId":"9949737899","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9949737899,"gmtCreate":1678886756511,"gmtModify":1678887124524,"author":{"id":"9000000000000183","authorId":"9000000000000183","name":"tinkie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba8aa4cb116251d941ecb460f20f465b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"9000000000000183","authorIdStr":"9000000000000183"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RIOT\">$Riot Blockchain, Inc.(RIOT)$</a> <v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;RIOT is also the beneficiary of the big declining top that jumped from 5.15 to 7.27, closing up 54 cents, or 10 1/4%, to 6.89, on 30.3 million shares traded. The next target is at key resistance at 7 3/4.&nbsp;We can hope that this banking crisis is leading to massive adoption of bitcoin. Along with shorts closing due to reduced margin allowances and long-term put capitulation, RIOT could see a very massive short-term catalyst (as if 5.5 to 7.30 wasn't already) but then also a sustained increase in Price per Share.Future is bright (I hope).","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RIOT\">$Riot Blockchain, Inc.(RIOT)$</a> <v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;RIOT is also the beneficiary of the big declining top that jumped from 5.15 to 7.27, closing up 54 cents, or 10 1/4%, to 6.89, on 30.3 million shares traded. The next target is at key resistance at 7 3/4.&nbsp;We can hope that this banking crisis is leading to massive adoption of bitcoin. Along with shorts closing due to reduced margin allowances and long-term put capitulation, RIOT could see a very massive short-term catalyst (as if 5.5 to 7.30 wasn't already) but then also a sustained increase in Price per Share.Future is bright (I hope).","text":"$Riot Blockchain, Inc.(RIOT)$ RIOT is also the beneficiary of the big declining top that jumped from 5.15 to 7.27, closing up 54 cents, or 10 1/4%, to 6.89, on 30.3 million shares traded. The next target is at key resistance at 7 3/4. We can hope that this banking crisis is leading to massive adoption of bitcoin. Along with shorts closing due to reduced margin allowances and long-term put capitulation, RIOT could see a very massive short-term catalyst (as if 5.5 to 7.30 wasn't already) but then also a sustained increase in Price per Share.Future is bright (I hope).","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c6c5dc2901635452c2841944472f2554","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949737899","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":317,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949716556,"gmtCreate":1678889417075,"gmtModify":1678889421242,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949716556","repostId":"9949719567","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9949719567,"gmtCreate":1678887612159,"gmtModify":1678887615650,"author":{"id":"9000000000000713","authorId":"9000000000000713","name":"AmyMacaulay","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a24bcc27dc29a6d8ea2018519aa88251","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"9000000000000713","authorIdStr":"9000000000000713"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Here is what I see, excellent business model, strong fundamentals, huge amounts of cash just sitting in the bank account, new business deals closing all the time, a company with the great history and stability, China opened up its borders, the world is going towards globalization which means shipping containers have huge potential for catalysts, dividends pretty much for life as long as I hold long, high dividends yield, market cap is lower than book value, market cap is lower then cash balance in hand at the moment, recently had earnings beat, and there were several other elements I found online which I didn’t mention because it’s to much for a text message, overall in my opinion this should be valued at about $60-$80 a share and in the future possibly higher.","listText":"Here is what I see, excellent business model, strong fundamentals, huge amounts of cash just sitting in the bank account, new business deals closing all the time, a company with the great history and stability, China opened up its borders, the world is going towards globalization which means shipping containers have huge potential for catalysts, dividends pretty much for life as long as I hold long, high dividends yield, market cap is lower than book value, market cap is lower then cash balance in hand at the moment, recently had earnings beat, and there were several other elements I found online which I didn’t mention because it’s to much for a text message, overall in my opinion this should be valued at about $60-$80 a share and in the future possibly higher.","text":"Here is what I see, excellent business model, strong fundamentals, huge amounts of cash just sitting in the bank account, new business deals closing all the time, a company with the great history and stability, China opened up its borders, the world is going towards globalization which means shipping containers have huge potential for catalysts, dividends pretty much for life as long as I hold long, high dividends yield, market cap is lower than book value, market cap is lower then cash balance in hand at the moment, recently had earnings beat, and there were several other elements I found online which I didn’t mention because it’s to much for a text message, overall in my opinion this should be valued at about $60-$80 a share and in the future possibly higher.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949719567","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949716208,"gmtCreate":1678889399904,"gmtModify":1678889403728,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949716208","repostId":"650313632","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":650313632,"gmtCreate":1678887660000,"gmtModify":1678888005456,"author":{"id":"3574917796328560","authorId":"3574917796328560","name":"钛媒体APP","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72948639b39fd795a430fcaa2772851c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574917796328560","authorIdStr":"3574917796328560"},"themes":[],"title":"CATL and BAIC Group Join Hands to Develop Power Batteries","htmlText":"Image Source : China Visual BEIJING, March 15 (TMTPOST) —— CATL has signed a strategic cooperation agreement on business cooperation and advanced technology empowerment with BAIC Group, according to its announcement made on Tuesday. The two companies plan to jointly develop power battery products and explore the new energy vehicle market. Han Wei, the co-president of CATL Market System, and Liu Yu, the vice president of BAIC Group and chairman of BAIC New Energy, signed the agreement on behalf of their companies. Zeng Yuqun, the chairman of CATL, and Jiang Deyi, the chairman of BAIC Group witnessed the signing. According to the agreement, CATL will be deeply integrated into the vehicle development and production of the self-owned brand-new energy vehicle enterprises under BAIC Group, and p","listText":"Image Source : China Visual BEIJING, March 15 (TMTPOST) —— CATL has signed a strategic cooperation agreement on business cooperation and advanced technology empowerment with BAIC Group, according to its announcement made on Tuesday. The two companies plan to jointly develop power battery products and explore the new energy vehicle market. Han Wei, the co-president of CATL Market System, and Liu Yu, the vice president of BAIC Group and chairman of BAIC New Energy, signed the agreement on behalf of their companies. Zeng Yuqun, the chairman of CATL, and Jiang Deyi, the chairman of BAIC Group witnessed the signing. According to the agreement, CATL will be deeply integrated into the vehicle development and production of the self-owned brand-new energy vehicle enterprises under BAIC Group, and p","text":"Image Source : China Visual BEIJING, March 15 (TMTPOST) —— CATL has signed a strategic cooperation agreement on business cooperation and advanced technology empowerment with BAIC Group, according to its announcement made on Tuesday. The two companies plan to jointly develop power battery products and explore the new energy vehicle market. Han Wei, the co-president of CATL Market System, and Liu Yu, the vice president of BAIC Group and chairman of BAIC New Energy, signed the agreement on behalf of their companies. Zeng Yuqun, the chairman of CATL, and Jiang Deyi, the chairman of BAIC Group witnessed the signing. According to the agreement, CATL will be deeply integrated into the vehicle development and production of the self-owned brand-new energy vehicle enterprises under BAIC Group, and p","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/075f3c4d89b443f599ecb52fde72f5bc"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/650313632","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":215,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":312039835984056,"gmtCreate":1717207369590,"gmtModify":1717207372464,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT\">$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ </a> I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT\">$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ </a> I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","text":"$MARA 20240705 15.0 PUT$ I opened new PUT option on Marathon Digital. Trading options is still more profitable","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":50,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":103,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312039835984056","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4762,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344369657401368,"gmtCreate":1725067493782,"gmtModify":1725067497890,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I open&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ </a> call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a>","listText":"I open&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL\">$MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ </a> call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT\">$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$ </a>","text":"I open $MARA 20240913 17.5 CALL$ call options and collected good premiums with expiry of about 3 weeks.$PLTR 20241018 19.0 PUT$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1dedc95169a1cce372506e5022467d29","width":"1080","height":"2812"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":21,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":3,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/344369657401368","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312040677343552,"gmtCreate":1717207620283,"gmtModify":1717482337662,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/JPM\">$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ </a> My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","text":"$JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ My position in JP Morgan up about 30%, Huat Ah!!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/369a474f325f27511f037c430a657d1c","width":"882","height":"1668"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312040677343552","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":217863280398536,"gmtCreate":1694224076304,"gmtModify":1694224079934,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ChargePoint Holding <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CHPT\">$ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ &nbsp;</a> This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","listText":"ChargePoint Holding <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CHPT\">$ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ &nbsp;</a> This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","text":"ChargePoint Holding $ChargePoint Holdings Inc.(CHPT)$ This EV business stock is currently trending bearish. Is good time to sell put to earn premium. Option trade volume is high, thus premium return is good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/304271575b7240b272dff366ca28faf8","width":"1080","height":"2400"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/217863280398536","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":564,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":266022437064784,"gmtCreate":1705967316180,"gmtModify":1705980790406,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL\">$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ </a> good","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL\">$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ </a> good","text":"$SIRI 20240216 6.0 CALL$ good","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/53e6edf800b3b9745d0088ebc41b7cea","width":"882","height":"1608"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/266022437064784","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":375,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9048348407,"gmtCreate":1656149095509,"gmtModify":1676535776804,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/78f32faa0f1dd676ae6c9f3ec4b8e49b","width":"1080","height":"3509"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9048348407","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":198,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9070848276,"gmtCreate":1657058456095,"gmtModify":1676535938442,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1c355f50f6b692d643f0bd7043d540df","width":"1080","height":"3509"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070848276","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004258492,"gmtCreate":1642631023015,"gmtModify":1676533728524,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy","listText":"Buy","text":"Buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004258492","repostId":"1134349143","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134349143","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1642604133,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1134349143?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-19 22:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft Shares Jumped More Than 3% in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134349143","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Microsoft shares jumped more than 3% in morning trading.Microsoft announced plans to acquire Activis","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Microsoft shares jumped more than 3% in morning trading.Microsoft announced plans to acquire Activision Blizzard in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion yesterday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af084be8aba50aedfb33889f497865b7\" tg-width=\"843\" tg-height=\"622\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft Shares Jumped More Than 3% in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft Shares Jumped More Than 3% in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-19 22:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Microsoft shares jumped more than 3% in morning trading.Microsoft announced plans to acquire Activision Blizzard in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion yesterday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af084be8aba50aedfb33889f497865b7\" tg-width=\"843\" tg-height=\"622\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134349143","content_text":"Microsoft shares jumped more than 3% in morning trading.Microsoft announced plans to acquire Activision Blizzard in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion yesterday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9062930332,"gmtCreate":1651984440426,"gmtModify":1676535009180,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When other&nbsp;EV companies started to catch up, Tesla stock will not be so valuable. Diversify your stock portfolio is important.","listText":"When other&nbsp;EV companies started to catch up, Tesla stock will not be so valuable. Diversify your stock portfolio is important.","text":"When other EV companies started to catch up, Tesla stock will not be so valuable. Diversify your stock portfolio is important.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9062930332","repostId":"1131831539","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131831539","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1651980653,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131831539?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-08 11:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla: Overvalued By 85.26% And Not A Technology Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131831539","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryMake no mistake, Tesla is a phenomenal company that has accomplished the unthinkable as it broke through extreme barriers of entry to disrupt the auto industry.Just because Tesla is a successfu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>Make no mistake, Tesla is a phenomenal company that has accomplished the unthinkable as it broke through extreme barriers of entry to disrupt the auto industry.</li><li>Just because Tesla is a successful company that is causing automotive titans to change from combustible engines to EVs doesn&#39;t mean Tesla&#39;s stock is a good investment today.</li><li>100% of gross profit and net income is generated from the automotive sector as Tesla&#39;s other businesses lose money, making them an automobile manufacturing company, not a technology company.</li><li>I compared Tesla&#39;s metrics to the auto industry and big tech and the results are the same, Tesla&#39;s valuation is egregious.</li></ul><p>It&#39;s rare to find companies that have cult-like followings with loyalists willing to pay any price for its stock. The debate regarding Tesla, Inc.&#39;s (NASDAQ:TSLA) valuation continues to be a topic of conversation between the bulls and the bears. Oneside argues that TSLA&#39;s financial growth and future prospects, including FSD, insurance, and robotaxis, justify the current $902.12 billion valuations, while others argue that the current financials and cult-like following have led to a massive overvaluation in TSLA&#39;s stock.</p><p>I tip my hat to Elon Musk, as his accomplishments are second to none. When others called him crazy, Mr. Musk chose one of the hardest industries to compete in, started TSLA from the ground up, went to battle against the auto manufacturers, and succeeded. TSLA is one of the rare success stories that has truly shaped an industry, and the barriers of entry that were overcome are astonishing. TSLA didn&#39;t have the capital, manufacturing, credibility, or the infrastructure that its competitors did, yet they found a way to succeed. If the odds weren&#39;t enough which TSLA faced, they accomplished their goals without a combustible engine and pioneered an entirely new sector within the automotive industry.</p><p>Just because TSLA is a great company, it doesn&#39;t mean TSLA has a great stock, or it isn&#39;t overvalued. I am not bearish on TSLA the company because I believe they still have a long runway of growth ahead of them, but I am bearish on the valuation. Prior to leaving a comment on why I am wrong, please read the article and think about the metrics I am citing; then, I will happily discuss any viewpoints about the analysis.</p><p><b>Tesla Vs. The World In The Automotive Sector</b></p><p>It feels like TSLA vs. the world whenever TSLA is discussed. Discussing who makes a better automobile is a matter of opinion, and everyone is correct because it&#39;s their opinion. If person A thinks TSLA makes the best car and person B thinks Mercedes Benz makes the best car, they are both correct. Debating over this is pointless, so let&#39;s look at the raw numbers.</p><p>TSLA has a larger market cap than the combination ofToyota(TM),Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY),Daimler(OTCPK:DDAIF),BMW(OTCPK:BMWYY),General Motors(GM),Ford(F),Honda(HMC),Ferrari(RACE),Nissan(OTCPK:NSANY),Subaru(OTCPK:FUJHY),Volvo(OTCPK:VOLAF), andMazda(OTCPK:MZDAY). TSLA&#39;s market cap is currently $986.92 billion, while the combination of these 12 companies is $777.41 billion.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff930d2442bf282c1bd880cca408eb94\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo</p><p>The P/S ratio is often cited to justify the valuation. The combination of TM, VWAGY, DDAIF, BMWYY, GM, F, HMC, RACE, NSANY, FUJHY, VOLAF, and MZDAY has generated $1.38 trillion in revenue over the TTM, putting their P/S at 0.56, while TSLA has generated $62.19 billion in revenue and has a 15.87 P/S.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9b9661fde232925a758c38fd2e93f36\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>As a combined entity, these 12 companies have generated $118.29 billion in net income, while TSLA has produced $8.4 billion.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d25806eb839eb9ca2b4ef3c24218048c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>TSLA is a great company, but its current valuation has become overly inflated. TSLA&#39;s market cap is $209.52 billion larger than these 12 auto manufacturers, yet the combination of the 12 auto manufacturers generates $1.32 trillion more in revenue and $109.89 billion more in net income.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1b686de4009ca733ff9651ce0d9fcaf\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>Looking at the market caps, one would assume that TSLA has a dominant majority over its competitors in auto sales within the U.S. According to the2021 data, TSLA sold 2.02% of all vehicles in the U.S. TSLA&#39;s market cap reflects a level of dominance that is non-existent.</p><p>Realistically, TSLA will have a hard time disrupting the sector further due to the price point of their vehicles. The reality is that, unless TSLA can sell a car that rivals a Honda or Toyota, doubling its market share is going to be a daunting task. It&#39;s just math. TSLA doesn&#39;t have a product for the masses, and while it may continue to grow in the luxury segment, the amount of growth that can be achieved is limited due to the pricing power of the consumer.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/442ffe151dd83bc524785857925f9797\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"227\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>www.goodcarbadcar.net</p><p><b>Tesla Isn&#39;t A Technology Company And Shouldn&#39;t Be Valued As One</b></p><p>The valuation rebuttal has always been that TSLA isn&#39;t an automobile company, rather, it&#39;s a technology company.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbc9ccb2cb8a0e7d40804db24e183214\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla</p><p>Page 23 ofTSLA&#39;s Q1 2022 slide deck from their earnings call is their statement of operations. Once again, 100% of TSLA&#39;s gross profit and net income are derived from automobiles. Energy generation and storage lose money as it generates $616 million in revenue while the cost of this revenue is $688 million. The same goes for Services and others, as this segment generates $1.279 billion in revenue while the cost of this revenue is $1.286 billion. This doesn&#39;t even factor in operating expenses.</p><p>TSLA manufacturers state of the art automobiles, but this doesn&#39;t classify them as a technology company, nor should they be classified as one. Since this is always the rebuttal and technology companies trade at larger earnings multiples, I will compare TSLA to Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL), and Meta Platforms (FB) and illustrate why TSLA is still drastically overvalued if the market was still to provide it with a tech multiple.</p><p>Prior to the comparisons, I want to frame the analysis by providing each company&#39;s market cap:</p><ul><li>AAPL $2.69 Trillion</li><li>MSFT $2.17 Trillion</li><li>GOOGL $1.62 Trillion</li><li>AMZN $1.28 Trillion</li><li>TSLA $986.92 Billion</li><li>FB $604.62 Billion</li></ul><p>I am going to start with growth because this is always the key metric bulls point out. Since the close of 2018, which is 3.25 fiscal years, TSLA has grown its revenue from $21.46 billion to $62.19 billion.</p><p>This is absolutely remarkable, but it doesn&#39;t place TSLA in the upper epsilon of technology companies. Over the same period, FB grew its revenue by $63.83 billion, which is more than what TSLA produced in the TTM. FB grew its revenue by more than what TSLA produces and generates just about double the revenue ($119.67 billion), yet TSLA has a larger market cap. For everyone who has used growth as their investment premise, FB having a market cap that&#39;s $382.30 less than TSLA nullifies that aspect of the bull thesis. AMZN&#39;s market cap is only $294.33 billion larger than TSLA, yet they generated $477.75 billion in revenue and grew their revenue by $341.76 billion in this period. Using revenue growth for TSLA doesn&#39;t support the valuation.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c0fbd4eb93f026c4575ee8f77f53e4b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>Next, I will turn to profits because, at the end of the day, businesses are in the business of making money. Once again, TSLA has done a fantastic job of monetizing its business and, in 3.25 short years, has gone from losing -$976 million to make $8.4 billion in the TTM for an increase of $9.38 billion. FB has produced $37.34 billion in profit in the TTM, and its net income grew by $15.23 billion over this period. Using growth doesn&#39;t support the valuation when FB has a market cap that&#39;s $382.30 less than TSLA and grew its profits in this period by almost double what TSLA has generated in the TTM.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9716477607711ee0b6d4f77eb24c890\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"382\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>The new metric bulls are using in their thesis is TSLA&#39;s free cash flow (FCF). Once again, TSLA has done an excellent job, going from -$221 million of FCF in 2018 to $6.93 billion of FCF in the TTM. Many companies would love to grow their annual FCF by $7.15 billion over a 3.25-year period, and this should be applauded.</p><p>Let&#39;s look at FB once again, since TSLA&#39;s valuation isn&#39;t based on its core segment as an automobile manufacturer. FB has grown its FCF over the previous 3.25 years by $23.45 billion, more than 3x TSLA&#39;s growth, and has generated $39.81 billion of FCF in the TTM. FB generated roughly 5.75x more FCF than TSLA and grew its FCF by more than 3x what TSLA produces, yet FB has a market cap that&#39;s almost $400 billion less than TSLA. Growth within the financials does not support TSLA&#39;s valuation, which is a breath away from $1 trillion.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/902a7074eda9e8f2f2765e0833423d2c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"373\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Steven Fiorillo, Seeking Alpha</p><p>Today you&#39;re paying a 113.81 P/E for TSLA. Paying a larger multiple for a company that&#39;s growing its earnings quickly is normal, but TSLA isn&#39;t growing by larger amounts than FB, and FB trades at a 16.66 P/E. I have seen TSLA bulls justify the P/E because of TSLA&#39;s growth factor, but this doesn&#39;t hold up when FB has grown by larger amounts from larger starting positions and has a P/E that&#39;s a fraction of TSLA. Look at AAPL, which is the largest company in the world. AAPL has grown its net income by $56.25 billion and its FCF by $52.3 billion over the past 3.25 years, and its P/E is 26.78. People are blindly paying any multiple the market places on TSLA.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75168f6e39ced721cf0c53d78481a983\" tg-width=\"614\" tg-height=\"335\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>TSLA is trading at a 15.38 P/S. The justification for this multiple is difficult to defend while AMZN trades at a P/S of 11.31. AMZN&#39;s revenue grew by $341.76 billion over the past 3.25 years while TSLA grew their revenue by $40.73 billion. Instead of an absolute basis, looking at this from a percentage aspect, TSLA grew its revenue by 189.78%, while AMZN&#39;s grew by 251.32%. The P/S ratio is not a supporting valuation metric as TSLA is trading at a larger multiple than AMZN yet produced $301.03 billion less in revenue growth compared to AMZN. At the very least, TSLA should trade at a lower P/S multiple than AMZN considering their revenue growth was a fraction of AMZN&#39;s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aad00a6c490808962705a1a2dae45cfe\" tg-width=\"608\" tg-height=\"338\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>TSLA has done an excellent job monetizing its revenue, delivering exceptional margins, and generating FCF. Now that TSLA is generating billions in FCF, it&#39;s been inserted into the bull thesis. FCF is a measure of profitability that excludes the non-cash expenses of the income statement and includes spending on equipment and assets as well as changes in working capital from the balance sheet. FCF could be the most underrated and most important financial metric to look at, as this is the pool of capital that companies can utilize to repay debt, pay dividends, buy back shares, make acquisitions, or reinvest in the business.</p><p>Every investment is the present value of all future cash flow. This is why investors look at the price to FCF valuation. Investors want to pay the cheapest multiple for a company&#39;s FCF. Today, you&#39;re paying 142.52x TSLA&#39;s FCF. Going back to the FCF section, TSLA grew its FCF by $7.15 billion over the past 3.25 years. FB generated $23.45 billion of FCF in this period, which is 3x the amount TSLA grew, yet FB is trading at a 15.19x multiple on price to FCF.</p><p>Why on earth would you want to pay 142.52x for TSLA&#39;s FCF when you could pay 15.19x for FB, which is growing their FCF by more than 3x the amount that TSLA is growing by? How about AAPL? AAPL grew its FCF by $52.3 billion and trades at a 25.4x price to FCF. If I exclude FB for a moment, should TSLA trade at a larger FCF multiple than GOOGL, which has grown its FCF by $46.15 billion over the past 3.25 years? My answer is no because there is no guarantee that TSLA will ever generate $46.15 billion in annual FCF, let alone the $68.99 billion in FCF that GOOGL generates.</p><p>So what is a fair price to FCF multiple for TSLA? I don&#39;t believe TSLA has earned the right to trade at the same multiples as the rest of big tech considering the levels of FCF they produce. If I stick with the methodology that FB is egregiously undervalued, then TSLA should trade above 15.19x its FCF but lower than the 23.42x multiple GOOGL trades at.</p><p>I don&#39;t want to be overly bearish, so I will place a 21x multiple on TSLA&#39;s FCF, which is more than fair considering big tech metrics. A 21x multiple on TSLA&#39;s FCF puts its market cap at $145.43 billion, which is -85.26% from its current market cap of $986.92 billion. It&#39;s just math, and if TSLA is going to be valued as a technology company, it needs to be compared to the technology companies with similar market caps.</p><p>At the very least, there isn&#39;t a single reason why TSLA&#39;s market cap is larger than FB&#39;s. There isn&#39;t a single metric that TSLA beats FB in. Based on FB&#39;s valuation, if TSLA traded at the same FCF multiple, it would have a market cap of $105.19 billion.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b81a61d60d9ec098276569cc4a501da0\" tg-width=\"627\" tg-height=\"341\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>TSLA has a gross profit margin of 27.1% ($16.85b / $62.19b) and a profit margin of 13.51% ($8.4b / $62.19b). FB has a gross profit margin of 80.34% ($96.14b / $119.67b) and a profit margin of 31.2% ($37.34b / $119.67b). FB has much wider margins and is growing its revenue by larger amounts. This reinforces my methodology as to why TSLA is grossly overvalued. GOOGL has a gross profit margin of 56.93% ($153.9b / $270.33b) and a profit margin of 27.57% ($74.54b / $270.33b).</p><p>The chances are incredibly slim that TSLA can double its profit margin to be within striking distance of GOOGL&#39;s. TSLA should not trade at a larger FCF, P/E, or P/S multiple than FB or GOOGL. While the market would indicate that I am wrong today, eventually, the hype will wear off, and TSLA will trade at a realistic valuation.</p><p><b>TSLA&#39;s Future Catalysts Have A Long Way To Go Before Impacting Its Bottom Line</b></p><p>There are three main catalysts people discuss, which include insurance, robotaxis, and FSD.TSLA offers insurance using real-time driving behavior. This is currently available to all Model S, Model 3, Model X, and Model Y owners. The catch is that it&#39;s only available in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia as of now.</p><p>TSLA uses a safety rating score to determine the monthly premium for its vehicles. At the largest premium of $130/mo, this would be $1,560 per year. If TSLA converted 100% of their U.S sales in 2021 as an insurance customer, which I think could be possible if TSLA insurance was available in every state, it would have generated $471.12 million in revenue.</p><p>We have no idea what the margins would have been, but if the margin was 50%, it would have been an additional $235.56 million in net income in 2021. While this is nothing to sneeze at, an additional $235.56 million in net income hardly moves the needle. This could be a $1 billion top-line revenue segment in the future, but with availability in only 7 states, insurance&#39;s $1 billion revenue mark is a long way away.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e86de6232b9abf7cee46a9607eb09741\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"326\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla</p><p>Next,FSD, for which TSLA has created two subscription models, a $99/mo price point and a $199/mo price point. The problem with FSD is that it doesn&#39;t make the vehicle fully autonomous, and you still need a driver to be attentive and alert. While I am not arguing that TSLA&#39;s FSD isn&#39;t leaps and bounds ahead of the competition, the problem is that it&#39;s not exactly a self-driving car.</p><p>The questions around legality and where you can use it pop into my head, and how many of TSLA&#39;s drivers opt for this upgrade. Until there is clear legislation and the technology advances to where vehicles can fully drive a person from point A to B while that person takes a nap or reads, I have a hard time believing enough TSLA owners will spend the extra $199/mo on FSD. If there is somewhere where TSLA produces the numbers about how many owners opt for this package, please let me know, and I will crunch the numbers.</p><p>Which Features Come With My Subscription?</p><blockquote>The FSD capability features you receive are based on your configuration and location. Not all features are available in all markets, and features are subject to change.Learn more about Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capability features.</blockquote><blockquote><i>Note: These features are designed to become more capable over time; however the currently enabled features do not make the vehicle autonomous. The currently enabled features require a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.</i></blockquote><p>The last catalyst is Robotaxis which many have commented on in my articles before. We&#39;re so far off on Robotaxis that this can&#39;t be considered in TSLA&#39;s upcoming revenue. I would think major legislation would be needed for Robotaxis to exist, and there is no telling how many years away we are from this.</p><p>Also, what is the percentage of TSLA owners that would actually allow their vehicle to be used as a Robotaxi? Depending on what the profitability is, I can see people buying TSLAs to enroll them in this program, but, once again, we need to see the economics behind it. I know I am just one opinion, but I would never enroll one of my cars into a robotaxi program because I don&#39;t want other people that I don&#39;t know in my car. I would think there are many others that have similar viewpoints.</p><p>The real upcoming catalysts are future revenue growth and entering the Chinese market. In 2021 TSLA grew its YoY revenue by 70.67%, and their off to a great start after Q1 2022. Only time will tell what type of growth rate TSLA can maintain, but too many people are assuming that TSLA will obliterate the competition. Over the next several years, we could see TSLA&#39;s growth rate become significantly reduced as more luxury operators put EVs on the road.</p><p>At TSLA&#39;s current margins, they would need to increase their revenue by 444.55% to $276.47 billion to produce the same amount of net income ($37.34b) that FB produces today at their current 13.51% profit margin. Maybe TSLA can get there in the future, but why should TSLA be valued at almost $1 trillion today, considering not a single metric of theirs is similar to FB or GOOGL, and TSLA&#39;s growth across any of the sectors isn&#39;t larger than FB or GOOGL?</p><p><b>Tesla Continues To Dilute Shareholders, And Almost No Shareholders Care</b></p><p>Dilution kills shareholder value. Look, I am a shareholder of TSLA, and I hate that my shares continue to be diluted. These numbers are split-adjusted that I am using. Over the past decade,TSLA has diluted its shares by 80.93%. This is horrible compared to big tech, yet investors can&#39;t buy enough TSLA shares. TSLA finished 2012 with 572.6 million shares and, as of its last filing, had increased its outstanding shares to 1.036 billion shares.</p><p>This is the equivalent of me taking a pizza, and instead of giving you a slice, cutting another 6.5 slices, then giving you one. The pizza represents TSLA, the company, and they basically turned an 8-slice pie into a 14.5-slice pie, reducing shareholder&#39;s ownership and the amount of equity, revenue, and EPS our shares represent.</p><p>If you want to see what a true shepherd of shareholder value looks like, turn to AAPL. In 2012 AAPL had 26.3 billion shares outstanding. Over the past decade, AAPL has repurchased 10.09 billion shares, reducing its outstanding shares by 38.37%. Every quarter, AAPL is buying back shares and increasing the ownership its shares represent. TSLA, on the other hand, continues to dilute shareholders by increasing shares YOY.</p><p><b>I Could Be Completely Wrong, And Tesla Could Continue Growing At These Rates</b></p><p>TSLA&#39;s vehicle deliveries continue to outpace its growing production. YoY TSLA&#39;s deliveries increased by 68% in Q1, adding 125,171 delivered vehicles to its customers. TSLA just began Model Y deliveries from the Austin facility, and production at the Gigafactory in Berlin started in March of 2022. TSLA&#39;s Shanghai facility had strong production rates prior to the spike in COVID that resulted in temporary shutdowns. TSLA isn&#39;t just focusing on the U.S, they have Europe and China in their sights.</p><p>EVs accounted for 488,000 sales in the U.S for 2021, and the previous projection was that EVs would account for 670,000 units sold in 2022. Oil has hovered around $100 per barrel and could render the previous projections of 37% increased EV sales domestically for 2022 conservative. TSLA is in a prime position to capitalize on this trend. In 2021 TSLA vehicles accounted for 61.89% of EVs sold in the U.S (301,998 / 488,000).</p><p>Hypothetically, if the previous projection of 670,000 EV sales for 2022 is accurate and TSLA maintains its current margin, they would sell 414,628 vehicles throughout the U.S in 2022. If gas prices do alter the decision-making process when deciding between a combustible engine or an EV, then TSLA could continue surprising the market with QoQ earnings beats.</p><p>The U.S has a national goal of reaching 50% of domestic auto sales coming from EVs. In 2021, EVs accounted for 3.26% of total sales in the U.S auto market. Based on U.S auto sales in 2021, annual EV sales would need to grow by 6,989,403 to reach a 50% EV to combustible engine ratio. Hypothetically if U.S auto sales stayed flat but EVs reached 50% of the market in 2030 they would sell 7,477,403 vehicles. If TSLA&#39;s dominance in the EV sector was to drop from 61.89% to 15% due to increased competition, they would generate 1,121,610 in sales compared to 301,998 in 2021. When you add in Europe and China, TSLA certainly has the ability to become a top auto manufacturer by sales next decade.</p><p>Bulls aren&#39;t incorrect to be excited about TSLA. The world is moving toward EVs, and TSLA is the crème de la crème. As I said in the beginning, I am bullish about TSLA&#39;s future prospects, but I think the valuation today is overinflated. Nobody can predict the future, but I have no doubt that TSLA will continue to grow its sales YoY.</p><p>The question becomes, how much growth will they be able to achieve YoY? In 2021, TM generated $226.48 billion of revenue and, based on the future of EVs, TSLA certainly could achieve this level of revenue in the future. Based on TSLA&#39;s current 13.51% profit margin, if they achieved TM&#39;s level of revenue, they would generate $30.59 billion of net income, which would definitely make today&#39;s valuation look more realistic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93c9176fa9bebc2c940e038cafd23229\" tg-width=\"603\" tg-height=\"631\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>You&#39;re probably wondering how I can be a shareholder and be a bear on TSLA&#39;s valuation at the same time. It&#39;s simple; my wife bought shares of TSLA, which makes me a shareholder. My stance has always been bullish on the company and bearish on the valuation. What Elon Musk and the team at TSLA has accomplished is astonishing, and they deserve nothing but respect.</p><p>Keep in mind a company and a company&#39;s stock are two separate things. TSLA continues to dilute shareholders, and they and the market are valuing TSLA as if it&#39;s FB or GOOGL. TSLA is not a technology company; it&#39;s an automobile company, as the automotive segments drive 100% of its gross revenue and net income.</p><p>TSLA is trading at a P/E of 113.81, a P/S of 15.38, and a 142.52x multiple on its FCF. The numbers are drastically inflated as TSLA has no business trading at a larger P/S multiple than AMZN, which trades at 11.31 P/S when it has grown its revenue by $341.76 billion over the previous 3.25 years compared to TSLA&#39;s $40.73 billion of revenue growth. TSLA has generated $6.93 billion in FCF over the TTM, while Mr. Market has placed a 142.52x multiple on TSLA due to $7.15 billion FCF growth over the past 3.25 years. FB trades at a 15.19x FCF multiple while growing FCF by $23.45 billion over this period which is more than 3x what TSLA has generated in the TTM.</p><p>With FB trading at 15.19x FCF, GOOGL at 23.42x FCF, and AAPL at 25.4x FCF, it&#39;s hard to justify any number above 20x for TSLA. I think a 21x FCF multiple is generous and that places TSLA at a market cap of $145.43 billion, which is -85.26% from its current market cap of $986.92 billion.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla: Overvalued By 85.26% And Not A Technology Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla: Overvalued By 85.26% And Not A Technology Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-08 11:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507535-tesla-overvalued-by-85-26-percent-and-not-a-technology-company><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMake no mistake, Tesla is a phenomenal company that has accomplished the unthinkable as it broke through extreme barriers of entry to disrupt the auto industry.Just because Tesla is a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507535-tesla-overvalued-by-85-26-percent-and-not-a-technology-company\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507535-tesla-overvalued-by-85-26-percent-and-not-a-technology-company","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131831539","content_text":"SummaryMake no mistake, Tesla is a phenomenal company that has accomplished the unthinkable as it broke through extreme barriers of entry to disrupt the auto industry.Just because Tesla is a successful company that is causing automotive titans to change from combustible engines to EVs doesn't mean Tesla's stock is a good investment today.100% of gross profit and net income is generated from the automotive sector as Tesla's other businesses lose money, making them an automobile manufacturing company, not a technology company.I compared Tesla's metrics to the auto industry and big tech and the results are the same, Tesla's valuation is egregious.It's rare to find companies that have cult-like followings with loyalists willing to pay any price for its stock. The debate regarding Tesla, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TSLA) valuation continues to be a topic of conversation between the bulls and the bears. Oneside argues that TSLA's financial growth and future prospects, including FSD, insurance, and robotaxis, justify the current $902.12 billion valuations, while others argue that the current financials and cult-like following have led to a massive overvaluation in TSLA's stock.I tip my hat to Elon Musk, as his accomplishments are second to none. When others called him crazy, Mr. Musk chose one of the hardest industries to compete in, started TSLA from the ground up, went to battle against the auto manufacturers, and succeeded. TSLA is one of the rare success stories that has truly shaped an industry, and the barriers of entry that were overcome are astonishing. TSLA didn't have the capital, manufacturing, credibility, or the infrastructure that its competitors did, yet they found a way to succeed. If the odds weren't enough which TSLA faced, they accomplished their goals without a combustible engine and pioneered an entirely new sector within the automotive industry.Just because TSLA is a great company, it doesn't mean TSLA has a great stock, or it isn't overvalued. I am not bearish on TSLA the company because I believe they still have a long runway of growth ahead of them, but I am bearish on the valuation. Prior to leaving a comment on why I am wrong, please read the article and think about the metrics I am citing; then, I will happily discuss any viewpoints about the analysis.Tesla Vs. The World In The Automotive SectorIt feels like TSLA vs. the world whenever TSLA is discussed. Discussing who makes a better automobile is a matter of opinion, and everyone is correct because it's their opinion. If person A thinks TSLA makes the best car and person B thinks Mercedes Benz makes the best car, they are both correct. Debating over this is pointless, so let's look at the raw numbers.TSLA has a larger market cap than the combination ofToyota(TM),Volkswagen(OTCPK:VWAGY),Daimler(OTCPK:DDAIF),BMW(OTCPK:BMWYY),General Motors(GM),Ford(F),Honda(HMC),Ferrari(RACE),Nissan(OTCPK:NSANY),Subaru(OTCPK:FUJHY),Volvo(OTCPK:VOLAF), andMazda(OTCPK:MZDAY). TSLA's market cap is currently $986.92 billion, while the combination of these 12 companies is $777.41 billion.Steven FiorilloThe P/S ratio is often cited to justify the valuation. The combination of TM, VWAGY, DDAIF, BMWYY, GM, F, HMC, RACE, NSANY, FUJHY, VOLAF, and MZDAY has generated $1.38 trillion in revenue over the TTM, putting their P/S at 0.56, while TSLA has generated $62.19 billion in revenue and has a 15.87 P/S.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaAs a combined entity, these 12 companies have generated $118.29 billion in net income, while TSLA has produced $8.4 billion.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaTSLA is a great company, but its current valuation has become overly inflated. TSLA's market cap is $209.52 billion larger than these 12 auto manufacturers, yet the combination of the 12 auto manufacturers generates $1.32 trillion more in revenue and $109.89 billion more in net income.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaLooking at the market caps, one would assume that TSLA has a dominant majority over its competitors in auto sales within the U.S. According to the2021 data, TSLA sold 2.02% of all vehicles in the U.S. TSLA's market cap reflects a level of dominance that is non-existent.Realistically, TSLA will have a hard time disrupting the sector further due to the price point of their vehicles. The reality is that, unless TSLA can sell a car that rivals a Honda or Toyota, doubling its market share is going to be a daunting task. It's just math. TSLA doesn't have a product for the masses, and while it may continue to grow in the luxury segment, the amount of growth that can be achieved is limited due to the pricing power of the consumer.www.goodcarbadcar.netTesla Isn't A Technology Company And Shouldn't Be Valued As OneThe valuation rebuttal has always been that TSLA isn't an automobile company, rather, it's a technology company.TeslaPage 23 ofTSLA's Q1 2022 slide deck from their earnings call is their statement of operations. Once again, 100% of TSLA's gross profit and net income are derived from automobiles. Energy generation and storage lose money as it generates $616 million in revenue while the cost of this revenue is $688 million. The same goes for Services and others, as this segment generates $1.279 billion in revenue while the cost of this revenue is $1.286 billion. This doesn't even factor in operating expenses.TSLA manufacturers state of the art automobiles, but this doesn't classify them as a technology company, nor should they be classified as one. Since this is always the rebuttal and technology companies trade at larger earnings multiples, I will compare TSLA to Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL), and Meta Platforms (FB) and illustrate why TSLA is still drastically overvalued if the market was still to provide it with a tech multiple.Prior to the comparisons, I want to frame the analysis by providing each company's market cap:AAPL $2.69 TrillionMSFT $2.17 TrillionGOOGL $1.62 TrillionAMZN $1.28 TrillionTSLA $986.92 BillionFB $604.62 BillionI am going to start with growth because this is always the key metric bulls point out. Since the close of 2018, which is 3.25 fiscal years, TSLA has grown its revenue from $21.46 billion to $62.19 billion.This is absolutely remarkable, but it doesn't place TSLA in the upper epsilon of technology companies. Over the same period, FB grew its revenue by $63.83 billion, which is more than what TSLA produced in the TTM. FB grew its revenue by more than what TSLA produces and generates just about double the revenue ($119.67 billion), yet TSLA has a larger market cap. For everyone who has used growth as their investment premise, FB having a market cap that's $382.30 less than TSLA nullifies that aspect of the bull thesis. AMZN's market cap is only $294.33 billion larger than TSLA, yet they generated $477.75 billion in revenue and grew their revenue by $341.76 billion in this period. Using revenue growth for TSLA doesn't support the valuation.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaNext, I will turn to profits because, at the end of the day, businesses are in the business of making money. Once again, TSLA has done a fantastic job of monetizing its business and, in 3.25 short years, has gone from losing -$976 million to make $8.4 billion in the TTM for an increase of $9.38 billion. FB has produced $37.34 billion in profit in the TTM, and its net income grew by $15.23 billion over this period. Using growth doesn't support the valuation when FB has a market cap that's $382.30 less than TSLA and grew its profits in this period by almost double what TSLA has generated in the TTM.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaThe new metric bulls are using in their thesis is TSLA's free cash flow (FCF). Once again, TSLA has done an excellent job, going from -$221 million of FCF in 2018 to $6.93 billion of FCF in the TTM. Many companies would love to grow their annual FCF by $7.15 billion over a 3.25-year period, and this should be applauded.Let's look at FB once again, since TSLA's valuation isn't based on its core segment as an automobile manufacturer. FB has grown its FCF over the previous 3.25 years by $23.45 billion, more than 3x TSLA's growth, and has generated $39.81 billion of FCF in the TTM. FB generated roughly 5.75x more FCF than TSLA and grew its FCF by more than 3x what TSLA produces, yet FB has a market cap that's almost $400 billion less than TSLA. Growth within the financials does not support TSLA's valuation, which is a breath away from $1 trillion.Steven Fiorillo, Seeking AlphaToday you're paying a 113.81 P/E for TSLA. Paying a larger multiple for a company that's growing its earnings quickly is normal, but TSLA isn't growing by larger amounts than FB, and FB trades at a 16.66 P/E. I have seen TSLA bulls justify the P/E because of TSLA's growth factor, but this doesn't hold up when FB has grown by larger amounts from larger starting positions and has a P/E that's a fraction of TSLA. Look at AAPL, which is the largest company in the world. AAPL has grown its net income by $56.25 billion and its FCF by $52.3 billion over the past 3.25 years, and its P/E is 26.78. People are blindly paying any multiple the market places on TSLA.TSLA is trading at a 15.38 P/S. The justification for this multiple is difficult to defend while AMZN trades at a P/S of 11.31. AMZN's revenue grew by $341.76 billion over the past 3.25 years while TSLA grew their revenue by $40.73 billion. Instead of an absolute basis, looking at this from a percentage aspect, TSLA grew its revenue by 189.78%, while AMZN's grew by 251.32%. The P/S ratio is not a supporting valuation metric as TSLA is trading at a larger multiple than AMZN yet produced $301.03 billion less in revenue growth compared to AMZN. At the very least, TSLA should trade at a lower P/S multiple than AMZN considering their revenue growth was a fraction of AMZN's.TSLA has done an excellent job monetizing its revenue, delivering exceptional margins, and generating FCF. Now that TSLA is generating billions in FCF, it's been inserted into the bull thesis. FCF is a measure of profitability that excludes the non-cash expenses of the income statement and includes spending on equipment and assets as well as changes in working capital from the balance sheet. FCF could be the most underrated and most important financial metric to look at, as this is the pool of capital that companies can utilize to repay debt, pay dividends, buy back shares, make acquisitions, or reinvest in the business.Every investment is the present value of all future cash flow. This is why investors look at the price to FCF valuation. Investors want to pay the cheapest multiple for a company's FCF. Today, you're paying 142.52x TSLA's FCF. Going back to the FCF section, TSLA grew its FCF by $7.15 billion over the past 3.25 years. FB generated $23.45 billion of FCF in this period, which is 3x the amount TSLA grew, yet FB is trading at a 15.19x multiple on price to FCF.Why on earth would you want to pay 142.52x for TSLA's FCF when you could pay 15.19x for FB, which is growing their FCF by more than 3x the amount that TSLA is growing by? How about AAPL? AAPL grew its FCF by $52.3 billion and trades at a 25.4x price to FCF. If I exclude FB for a moment, should TSLA trade at a larger FCF multiple than GOOGL, which has grown its FCF by $46.15 billion over the past 3.25 years? My answer is no because there is no guarantee that TSLA will ever generate $46.15 billion in annual FCF, let alone the $68.99 billion in FCF that GOOGL generates.So what is a fair price to FCF multiple for TSLA? I don't believe TSLA has earned the right to trade at the same multiples as the rest of big tech considering the levels of FCF they produce. If I stick with the methodology that FB is egregiously undervalued, then TSLA should trade above 15.19x its FCF but lower than the 23.42x multiple GOOGL trades at.I don't want to be overly bearish, so I will place a 21x multiple on TSLA's FCF, which is more than fair considering big tech metrics. A 21x multiple on TSLA's FCF puts its market cap at $145.43 billion, which is -85.26% from its current market cap of $986.92 billion. It's just math, and if TSLA is going to be valued as a technology company, it needs to be compared to the technology companies with similar market caps.At the very least, there isn't a single reason why TSLA's market cap is larger than FB's. There isn't a single metric that TSLA beats FB in. Based on FB's valuation, if TSLA traded at the same FCF multiple, it would have a market cap of $105.19 billion.TSLA has a gross profit margin of 27.1% ($16.85b / $62.19b) and a profit margin of 13.51% ($8.4b / $62.19b). FB has a gross profit margin of 80.34% ($96.14b / $119.67b) and a profit margin of 31.2% ($37.34b / $119.67b). FB has much wider margins and is growing its revenue by larger amounts. This reinforces my methodology as to why TSLA is grossly overvalued. GOOGL has a gross profit margin of 56.93% ($153.9b / $270.33b) and a profit margin of 27.57% ($74.54b / $270.33b).The chances are incredibly slim that TSLA can double its profit margin to be within striking distance of GOOGL's. TSLA should not trade at a larger FCF, P/E, or P/S multiple than FB or GOOGL. While the market would indicate that I am wrong today, eventually, the hype will wear off, and TSLA will trade at a realistic valuation.TSLA's Future Catalysts Have A Long Way To Go Before Impacting Its Bottom LineThere are three main catalysts people discuss, which include insurance, robotaxis, and FSD.TSLA offers insurance using real-time driving behavior. This is currently available to all Model S, Model 3, Model X, and Model Y owners. The catch is that it's only available in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Virginia as of now.TSLA uses a safety rating score to determine the monthly premium for its vehicles. At the largest premium of $130/mo, this would be $1,560 per year. If TSLA converted 100% of their U.S sales in 2021 as an insurance customer, which I think could be possible if TSLA insurance was available in every state, it would have generated $471.12 million in revenue.We have no idea what the margins would have been, but if the margin was 50%, it would have been an additional $235.56 million in net income in 2021. While this is nothing to sneeze at, an additional $235.56 million in net income hardly moves the needle. This could be a $1 billion top-line revenue segment in the future, but with availability in only 7 states, insurance's $1 billion revenue mark is a long way away.TeslaNext,FSD, for which TSLA has created two subscription models, a $99/mo price point and a $199/mo price point. The problem with FSD is that it doesn't make the vehicle fully autonomous, and you still need a driver to be attentive and alert. While I am not arguing that TSLA's FSD isn't leaps and bounds ahead of the competition, the problem is that it's not exactly a self-driving car.The questions around legality and where you can use it pop into my head, and how many of TSLA's drivers opt for this upgrade. Until there is clear legislation and the technology advances to where vehicles can fully drive a person from point A to B while that person takes a nap or reads, I have a hard time believing enough TSLA owners will spend the extra $199/mo on FSD. If there is somewhere where TSLA produces the numbers about how many owners opt for this package, please let me know, and I will crunch the numbers.Which Features Come With My Subscription?The FSD capability features you receive are based on your configuration and location. Not all features are available in all markets, and features are subject to change.Learn more about Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capability features.Note: These features are designed to become more capable over time; however the currently enabled features do not make the vehicle autonomous. The currently enabled features require a fully attentive driver, who has their hands on the wheel and is prepared to take over at any moment.The last catalyst is Robotaxis which many have commented on in my articles before. We're so far off on Robotaxis that this can't be considered in TSLA's upcoming revenue. I would think major legislation would be needed for Robotaxis to exist, and there is no telling how many years away we are from this.Also, what is the percentage of TSLA owners that would actually allow their vehicle to be used as a Robotaxi? Depending on what the profitability is, I can see people buying TSLAs to enroll them in this program, but, once again, we need to see the economics behind it. I know I am just one opinion, but I would never enroll one of my cars into a robotaxi program because I don't want other people that I don't know in my car. I would think there are many others that have similar viewpoints.The real upcoming catalysts are future revenue growth and entering the Chinese market. In 2021 TSLA grew its YoY revenue by 70.67%, and their off to a great start after Q1 2022. Only time will tell what type of growth rate TSLA can maintain, but too many people are assuming that TSLA will obliterate the competition. Over the next several years, we could see TSLA's growth rate become significantly reduced as more luxury operators put EVs on the road.At TSLA's current margins, they would need to increase their revenue by 444.55% to $276.47 billion to produce the same amount of net income ($37.34b) that FB produces today at their current 13.51% profit margin. Maybe TSLA can get there in the future, but why should TSLA be valued at almost $1 trillion today, considering not a single metric of theirs is similar to FB or GOOGL, and TSLA's growth across any of the sectors isn't larger than FB or GOOGL?Tesla Continues To Dilute Shareholders, And Almost No Shareholders CareDilution kills shareholder value. Look, I am a shareholder of TSLA, and I hate that my shares continue to be diluted. These numbers are split-adjusted that I am using. Over the past decade,TSLA has diluted its shares by 80.93%. This is horrible compared to big tech, yet investors can't buy enough TSLA shares. TSLA finished 2012 with 572.6 million shares and, as of its last filing, had increased its outstanding shares to 1.036 billion shares.This is the equivalent of me taking a pizza, and instead of giving you a slice, cutting another 6.5 slices, then giving you one. The pizza represents TSLA, the company, and they basically turned an 8-slice pie into a 14.5-slice pie, reducing shareholder's ownership and the amount of equity, revenue, and EPS our shares represent.If you want to see what a true shepherd of shareholder value looks like, turn to AAPL. In 2012 AAPL had 26.3 billion shares outstanding. Over the past decade, AAPL has repurchased 10.09 billion shares, reducing its outstanding shares by 38.37%. Every quarter, AAPL is buying back shares and increasing the ownership its shares represent. TSLA, on the other hand, continues to dilute shareholders by increasing shares YOY.I Could Be Completely Wrong, And Tesla Could Continue Growing At These RatesTSLA's vehicle deliveries continue to outpace its growing production. YoY TSLA's deliveries increased by 68% in Q1, adding 125,171 delivered vehicles to its customers. TSLA just began Model Y deliveries from the Austin facility, and production at the Gigafactory in Berlin started in March of 2022. TSLA's Shanghai facility had strong production rates prior to the spike in COVID that resulted in temporary shutdowns. TSLA isn't just focusing on the U.S, they have Europe and China in their sights.EVs accounted for 488,000 sales in the U.S for 2021, and the previous projection was that EVs would account for 670,000 units sold in 2022. Oil has hovered around $100 per barrel and could render the previous projections of 37% increased EV sales domestically for 2022 conservative. TSLA is in a prime position to capitalize on this trend. In 2021 TSLA vehicles accounted for 61.89% of EVs sold in the U.S (301,998 / 488,000).Hypothetically, if the previous projection of 670,000 EV sales for 2022 is accurate and TSLA maintains its current margin, they would sell 414,628 vehicles throughout the U.S in 2022. If gas prices do alter the decision-making process when deciding between a combustible engine or an EV, then TSLA could continue surprising the market with QoQ earnings beats.The U.S has a national goal of reaching 50% of domestic auto sales coming from EVs. In 2021, EVs accounted for 3.26% of total sales in the U.S auto market. Based on U.S auto sales in 2021, annual EV sales would need to grow by 6,989,403 to reach a 50% EV to combustible engine ratio. Hypothetically if U.S auto sales stayed flat but EVs reached 50% of the market in 2030 they would sell 7,477,403 vehicles. If TSLA's dominance in the EV sector was to drop from 61.89% to 15% due to increased competition, they would generate 1,121,610 in sales compared to 301,998 in 2021. When you add in Europe and China, TSLA certainly has the ability to become a top auto manufacturer by sales next decade.Bulls aren't incorrect to be excited about TSLA. The world is moving toward EVs, and TSLA is the crème de la crème. As I said in the beginning, I am bullish about TSLA's future prospects, but I think the valuation today is overinflated. Nobody can predict the future, but I have no doubt that TSLA will continue to grow its sales YoY.The question becomes, how much growth will they be able to achieve YoY? In 2021, TM generated $226.48 billion of revenue and, based on the future of EVs, TSLA certainly could achieve this level of revenue in the future. Based on TSLA's current 13.51% profit margin, if they achieved TM's level of revenue, they would generate $30.59 billion of net income, which would definitely make today's valuation look more realistic.TeslaConclusionYou're probably wondering how I can be a shareholder and be a bear on TSLA's valuation at the same time. It's simple; my wife bought shares of TSLA, which makes me a shareholder. My stance has always been bullish on the company and bearish on the valuation. What Elon Musk and the team at TSLA has accomplished is astonishing, and they deserve nothing but respect.Keep in mind a company and a company's stock are two separate things. TSLA continues to dilute shareholders, and they and the market are valuing TSLA as if it's FB or GOOGL. TSLA is not a technology company; it's an automobile company, as the automotive segments drive 100% of its gross revenue and net income.TSLA is trading at a P/E of 113.81, a P/S of 15.38, and a 142.52x multiple on its FCF. The numbers are drastically inflated as TSLA has no business trading at a larger P/S multiple than AMZN, which trades at 11.31 P/S when it has grown its revenue by $341.76 billion over the previous 3.25 years compared to TSLA's $40.73 billion of revenue growth. TSLA has generated $6.93 billion in FCF over the TTM, while Mr. Market has placed a 142.52x multiple on TSLA due to $7.15 billion FCF growth over the past 3.25 years. FB trades at a 15.19x FCF multiple while growing FCF by $23.45 billion over this period which is more than 3x what TSLA has generated in the TTM.With FB trading at 15.19x FCF, GOOGL at 23.42x FCF, and AAPL at 25.4x FCF, it's hard to justify any number above 20x for TSLA. I think a 21x FCF multiple is generous and that places TSLA at a market cap of $145.43 billion, which is -85.26% from its current market cap of $986.92 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9053086358,"gmtCreate":1654468073874,"gmtModify":1676535449806,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CFA.SI\">$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$</a>buy","text":"$NikkoAM-STC Asia REIT(CFA.SI)$buy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6ec3c4586923f5085ff93ce68c3a5feb","width":"1080","height":"2431"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053086358","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":196,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007834072,"gmtCreate":1642820595030,"gmtModify":1676533750305,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007834072","repostId":"2205804220","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205804220","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642780053,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205804220?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-21 23:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Reasons Activision Shareholders Shouldn't Be Quick to Sell Ahead of a Microsoft Deal","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205804220","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Locking in a quick gain is tempting, but there are good reasons to hold your Activision Blizzard shares until the deal is finalized.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s (NASDAQ:MSFT) proposal to buy top game publisher <b>Activision Blizzard</b> (NASDAQ:ATVI) is far from a done deal. On Tuesday, the software giant agreed to pay $68.7 billion, or $95 per share, in an all-cash deal to buy Activision.</p><p>However, Activision stock closed Tuesday&#39;s trading session at $82.31, which suggests market participants are placing 50/50 odds on the deal being approved by regulators. The deal is expected to close sometime in Microsoft&#39;s fiscal 2023 (which begins July 1, 2022).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F661973%2Fwoman-playing-video-game.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>Big tech hasn&#39;t gotten an easy pass from regulators in recent years, and Microsoft&#39;s bid for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the world&#39;s top video game publishers will certainly be put under the microscope by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>I bought shares of Activision Blizzard when the stock was trading in the $60s, but deal or no deal, there are two reasons I&#39;m not planning to cash out anytime soon.</p><h2>Reason 1: It&#39;s easy money</h2><p>Microsoft&#39;s buyout offer was 15% above Tuesday&#39;s closing price. Investors can earn another 15% gain by simply holding their Activision shares until the deal is finalized, which will look like a smart move if the market declines in 2022. But first, the deal has to be approved. Here&#39;s why that should happen.</p><p>The video game industry is bigger than movies and is estimated to be worth $175 billion by market researcher Newzoo. But the combined revenue of the top three U.S.-based game companies -- Activision, <b>Electronic Arts</b> (NASDAQ:EA), and <b>Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> Interactive</b> (NASDAQ:TTWO) -- makes up just 11% of the entire industry.</p><p>By itself, Activision&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue is only 5% of annual video game sales.</p><p>Microsoft&#39;s gaming business generated $15 billion in revenue in fiscal 2021,  so with Activision&#39;s $9 billion, Microsoft would control only 14% of the industry. From that perspective, there shouldn&#39;t be competition concerns, but there&#39;s more to it.</p><h2>Reason 2: The deal might not happen</h2><p>One reason the deal won&#39;t receive approval is that it would fuel more industry consolidation and, in turn, give big tech the green light to make more deals and dominate a large and growing entertainment market.</p><p>Last year, Microsoft scooped up one of the largest privately-held game companies by paying $7.5 billion for ZeniMax Media, owner of Bethesda Softworks, which makes the classic <i>Elder Scrolls</i> franchise, among others.</p><p>Just about all the big tech companies are investing in video games in some form, but if Microsoft&#39;s deal is approved, I would keep my eye on <b>Alphabet</b> (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL), which is trying to grow the Google Stadia cloud gaming service.</p><p>Google Stadia is a direct competitor with Microsoft&#39;s Xbox Game Pass subscription service. The addition of Activision&#39;s nearly 400 million monthly active users to the Xbox ecosystem would essentially push Game Pass way out in the lead in cloud gaming, where Game Pass already has 25 million subscribers.</p><p>If Google Stadia wants to remain relevant, Alphabet might make a move to acquire another top gaming studio to shore up its exclusive game catalog and win more subscribers.</p><p>Another thing to remember is that Microsoft cited the metaverse as a reason for its interest in buying Activision. Facebook parent <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a></b> (NASDAQ:FB) is already investing heavily in virtual reality and also plans to invest in the metaverse over the next several years. All said, if Microsoft lands Activision, Electronic Arts, and Take-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA\">Two</a> will become prime takeover targets as tech companies race to stack up a talented roster of software programmers to build the future of gaming.</p><p>But the prospects of a few tech platforms consolidating control over an increasingly important market for consumers is a reason this deal may not happen. The Biden administration has taken a strong stance on enforcing antitrust and competition policy at the DOJ, so it&#39;s doubtful that regulators would give the big tech giants a thumbs-up to go forth and conquer a $175 billion industry. Keep in mind, the combined cash sitting on the books at Alphabet and Meta Platforms is $195 billion, or 1.1 times the size of the gaming industry.</p><h2>It&#39;s a win-win</h2><p>If Microsoft&#39;s acquisition attempt fails, Activision shareholders would still own a highly profitable game company that is well-positioned to ride the future growth of the industry, with top franchises under its belt, and interests in esports and consumer products to boot. Plus, Microsoft&#39;s offer validates that Activision&#39;s intrinsic value is higher than what the stock has been trading for in the last few months.</p><p>Either way, investors will lock in a 15% gain over Tuesday&#39;s closing price, or the deal won&#39;t happen, and shareholders can continue holding a top video game stock that will likely be worth more than $95 a share in another five years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Reasons Activision Shareholders Shouldn't Be Quick to Sell Ahead of a Microsoft Deal</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Reasons Activision Shareholders Shouldn't Be Quick to Sell Ahead of a Microsoft Deal\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-21 23:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/reasons-activision-shareholders-sell-microsoft/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Microsoft's (NASDAQ:MSFT) proposal to buy top game publisher Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) is far from a done deal. On Tuesday, the software giant agreed to pay $68.7 billion, or $95 per share, in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/reasons-activision-shareholders-sell-microsoft/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","MSFT":"微软","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","ATVI":"动视暴雪","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4085":"互动家庭娱乐","BK4504":"桥水持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/reasons-activision-shareholders-sell-microsoft/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205804220","content_text":"Microsoft's (NASDAQ:MSFT) proposal to buy top game publisher Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) is far from a done deal. On Tuesday, the software giant agreed to pay $68.7 billion, or $95 per share, in an all-cash deal to buy Activision.However, Activision stock closed Tuesday's trading session at $82.31, which suggests market participants are placing 50/50 odds on the deal being approved by regulators. The deal is expected to close sometime in Microsoft's fiscal 2023 (which begins July 1, 2022).Image source: Getty Images.Big tech hasn't gotten an easy pass from regulators in recent years, and Microsoft's bid for one of the world's top video game publishers will certainly be put under the microscope by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission.I bought shares of Activision Blizzard when the stock was trading in the $60s, but deal or no deal, there are two reasons I'm not planning to cash out anytime soon.Reason 1: It's easy moneyMicrosoft's buyout offer was 15% above Tuesday's closing price. Investors can earn another 15% gain by simply holding their Activision shares until the deal is finalized, which will look like a smart move if the market declines in 2022. But first, the deal has to be approved. Here's why that should happen.The video game industry is bigger than movies and is estimated to be worth $175 billion by market researcher Newzoo. But the combined revenue of the top three U.S.-based game companies -- Activision, Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA), and Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:TTWO) -- makes up just 11% of the entire industry.By itself, Activision's trailing-12-month revenue is only 5% of annual video game sales.Microsoft's gaming business generated $15 billion in revenue in fiscal 2021,  so with Activision's $9 billion, Microsoft would control only 14% of the industry. From that perspective, there shouldn't be competition concerns, but there's more to it.Reason 2: The deal might not happenOne reason the deal won't receive approval is that it would fuel more industry consolidation and, in turn, give big tech the green light to make more deals and dominate a large and growing entertainment market.Last year, Microsoft scooped up one of the largest privately-held game companies by paying $7.5 billion for ZeniMax Media, owner of Bethesda Softworks, which makes the classic Elder Scrolls franchise, among others.Just about all the big tech companies are investing in video games in some form, but if Microsoft's deal is approved, I would keep my eye on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL), which is trying to grow the Google Stadia cloud gaming service.Google Stadia is a direct competitor with Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass subscription service. The addition of Activision's nearly 400 million monthly active users to the Xbox ecosystem would essentially push Game Pass way out in the lead in cloud gaming, where Game Pass already has 25 million subscribers.If Google Stadia wants to remain relevant, Alphabet might make a move to acquire another top gaming studio to shore up its exclusive game catalog and win more subscribers.Another thing to remember is that Microsoft cited the metaverse as a reason for its interest in buying Activision. Facebook parent Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:FB) is already investing heavily in virtual reality and also plans to invest in the metaverse over the next several years. All said, if Microsoft lands Activision, Electronic Arts, and Take-Two will become prime takeover targets as tech companies race to stack up a talented roster of software programmers to build the future of gaming.But the prospects of a few tech platforms consolidating control over an increasingly important market for consumers is a reason this deal may not happen. The Biden administration has taken a strong stance on enforcing antitrust and competition policy at the DOJ, so it's doubtful that regulators would give the big tech giants a thumbs-up to go forth and conquer a $175 billion industry. Keep in mind, the combined cash sitting on the books at Alphabet and Meta Platforms is $195 billion, or 1.1 times the size of the gaming industry.It's a win-winIf Microsoft's acquisition attempt fails, Activision shareholders would still own a highly profitable game company that is well-positioned to ride the future growth of the industry, with top franchises under its belt, and interests in esports and consumer products to boot. Plus, Microsoft's offer validates that Activision's intrinsic value is higher than what the stock has been trading for in the last few months.Either way, investors will lock in a 15% gain over Tuesday's closing price, or the deal won't happen, and shareholders can continue holding a top video game stock that will likely be worth more than $95 a share in another five years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":57,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004906242,"gmtCreate":1642466270978,"gmtModify":1676533712935,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004906242","repostId":"2204077940","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2204077940","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642465613,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2204077940?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-18 08:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"My Best Metaverse Stock for 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2204077940","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"This cheap tech stock could help build the metaverse.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of <b>Micron Technology</b> (NASDAQ:MU) have rallied impressively over the past three months as investors and Wall Street have warmed up to the fact that the demand for memory chips is going to remain strong in 2022 and beyond, thanks to several applications ranging from computers to consoles to data centers.</p><p>However, there&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> more catalyst for Micron Technology that investors may have overlooked -- the metaverse. Let&#39;s see how this hot tech trend could give Micron a nice boost in 2022 -- and in the long run -- and amplify the company&#39;s growth prospects.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5df4a93c8be1aeda13b7d2b5f593028b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>The metaverse can boost memory demand</h2><p>Wall Street sees the metaverse creating the need for more storage. Lee Seung-woo of South Korea-based securities firm Eugene Investment &amp; Securities in a note to investors  said that &#34;memory chips constitute a core infrastructure of [the] metaverse.&#34; Jeff Kim, an analyst at South Korean investment bank KB Securities, also points out that memory demand would increase as companies building the metaverse spend money to upgrade data center servers.</p><p>As it turns out, the metaverse would require more hyperscale data centers and edge data centers, as huge amounts of data will be shared between several end points in real-time. Imagine that you&#39;re in a virtual office inside the metaverse along with your colleagues. The data center will have to process the activities taking place inside that virtual office and deliver the same in real-time to all the users to ensure a seamless experience.</p><p>This would create a massive load on the data centers that are currently geared to tackle meetings conducted through methods such as videoconferencing, where the users simply look at a screen to interact. Simply put, the metaverse needs accelerated computing to cater to the needs of this emerging tech trend, which would create the demand for more DRAM (dynamic random-access memory).</p><p>That&#39;s because DRAM plays a critical role in enabling high-performance computing (HPC) as it reduces latency and allows the server processors to quickly access the data flowing into the data center. DRAM will help improve the computing power of data centers as well as the deployment of metaverse applications.</p><p>As a result, don&#39;t be surprised to see the DRAM market grow at a faster pace than what analysts are currently estimating right now. According to third-party estimates, the global DRAM market could generate $173 billion in revenue by 2026, as compared to $105 billion in 2020, indicating that Micron is sitting on a secular growth opportunity.</p><h2>Why Micron Technology is a top metaverse stock to buy right now</h2><p>Micron Technology has been delivering outstanding results consistently thanks to this healthy memory demand and pricing environment.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fefd85d8ed1545a84308f5f9b93d0b1a\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>MU data by YCharts</p><p>Things are about to get better for Micron on account of the memory boom, and the metaverse is going to add to the company&#39;s existing growth drivers. Not surprisingly, analysts are upbeat about Micron&#39;s future. Estimates compiled by Yahoo! Finance project that Micron&#39;s revenue could grow at a faster pace of 20% in the next fiscal year, as compared to the current fiscal 2022&#39;s estimated growth of 16%.</p><p>The bottom-line forecasts also paint a rosy picture, with fiscal 2022 earnings expected to increase 47% over last year, while fiscal 2023 earnings are expected to jump nearly 30%. It is also worth noting that 23 of the 30 analysts covering Micron stock have raised their fiscal 2022 earnings estimates over the past month, while 23 of the 29 analysts covering the stock for fiscal 2023 have made a similar move.</p><p>What&#39;s more, the company&#39;s long-term earnings growth forecast is also quite robust, at 23.8%. Given Micron&#39;s impressive growth so far and its bright prospects, buying this tech stock looks like a no-brainer, as it is trading at just 16 times trailing earnings and 9 times forward earnings. This makes it cheaper than the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>, which has an earnings multiple of 28.8.</p><p>Throw in a potential catalyst such as the metaverse, and investors looking to buy a dirt-cheap growth stock have more reasons to load up on shares of Micron Technology.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>My Best Metaverse Stock for 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMy Best Metaverse Stock for 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-18 08:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/17/my-best-metaverse-stock-for-2022/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares of Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) have rallied impressively over the past three months as investors and Wall Street have warmed up to the fact that the demand for memory chips is going to remain...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/17/my-best-metaverse-stock-for-2022/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/17/my-best-metaverse-stock-for-2022/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2204077940","content_text":"Shares of Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) have rallied impressively over the past three months as investors and Wall Street have warmed up to the fact that the demand for memory chips is going to remain strong in 2022 and beyond, thanks to several applications ranging from computers to consoles to data centers.However, there's one more catalyst for Micron Technology that investors may have overlooked -- the metaverse. Let's see how this hot tech trend could give Micron a nice boost in 2022 -- and in the long run -- and amplify the company's growth prospects.Image source: Getty Images.The metaverse can boost memory demandWall Street sees the metaverse creating the need for more storage. Lee Seung-woo of South Korea-based securities firm Eugene Investment & Securities in a note to investors  said that \"memory chips constitute a core infrastructure of [the] metaverse.\" Jeff Kim, an analyst at South Korean investment bank KB Securities, also points out that memory demand would increase as companies building the metaverse spend money to upgrade data center servers.As it turns out, the metaverse would require more hyperscale data centers and edge data centers, as huge amounts of data will be shared between several end points in real-time. Imagine that you're in a virtual office inside the metaverse along with your colleagues. The data center will have to process the activities taking place inside that virtual office and deliver the same in real-time to all the users to ensure a seamless experience.This would create a massive load on the data centers that are currently geared to tackle meetings conducted through methods such as videoconferencing, where the users simply look at a screen to interact. Simply put, the metaverse needs accelerated computing to cater to the needs of this emerging tech trend, which would create the demand for more DRAM (dynamic random-access memory).That's because DRAM plays a critical role in enabling high-performance computing (HPC) as it reduces latency and allows the server processors to quickly access the data flowing into the data center. DRAM will help improve the computing power of data centers as well as the deployment of metaverse applications.As a result, don't be surprised to see the DRAM market grow at a faster pace than what analysts are currently estimating right now. According to third-party estimates, the global DRAM market could generate $173 billion in revenue by 2026, as compared to $105 billion in 2020, indicating that Micron is sitting on a secular growth opportunity.Why Micron Technology is a top metaverse stock to buy right nowMicron Technology has been delivering outstanding results consistently thanks to this healthy memory demand and pricing environment.MU data by YChartsThings are about to get better for Micron on account of the memory boom, and the metaverse is going to add to the company's existing growth drivers. Not surprisingly, analysts are upbeat about Micron's future. Estimates compiled by Yahoo! Finance project that Micron's revenue could grow at a faster pace of 20% in the next fiscal year, as compared to the current fiscal 2022's estimated growth of 16%.The bottom-line forecasts also paint a rosy picture, with fiscal 2022 earnings expected to increase 47% over last year, while fiscal 2023 earnings are expected to jump nearly 30%. It is also worth noting that 23 of the 30 analysts covering Micron stock have raised their fiscal 2022 earnings estimates over the past month, while 23 of the 29 analysts covering the stock for fiscal 2023 have made a similar move.What's more, the company's long-term earnings growth forecast is also quite robust, at 23.8%. Given Micron's impressive growth so far and its bright prospects, buying this tech stock looks like a no-brainer, as it is trading at just 16 times trailing earnings and 9 times forward earnings. This makes it cheaper than the S&P 500, which has an earnings multiple of 28.8.Throw in a potential catalyst such as the metaverse, and investors looking to buy a dirt-cheap growth stock have more reasons to load up on shares of Micron Technology.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004776705,"gmtCreate":1642715666093,"gmtModify":1676533737823,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004776705","repostId":"2204091157","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2204091157","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642696518,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2204091157?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-21 00:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Walmart’s Top U.S. E-Commerce Executive Is Leaving","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2204091157","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Casey Carl to depart after less than two years at Walmart; latest in a postholiday executive shuffle","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Casey Carl to depart after less than two years at Walmart; latest in a postholiday executive shuffle</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a12675dda0838bcae3ab37338145f5c\" tg-width=\"860\" tg-height=\"573\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>A Houston Walmart store on Black Friday.</span></p><p>Walmart Inc.’s top U.S. e-commerce executive Casey Carl is leaving the retailer, according to an internal memo, adding to a string of recent executive shifts at the company.</p><p>Tom Ward, a senior vice president who has led Walmart’s efforts to use its stores as hubs for online pickup and delivery orders, will become the company’s new head of U.S. e-commerce, according to the memo sent Thursday and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.</p><p>Mr. Carl will leave at the end of February, the memo said. The former Target Corp. executive was named Walmart’s executive vice president and chief e-commerce officer last year after joining the company in the fall of 2020.</p><p>Mr. Carl took Walmart’s top U.S. e-commerce job in the wake of the departure of Marc Lore, the founder of e-commerce startup Jet.com Inc., which Walmart purchased for $3.3 billion in 2016. In recent years, Walmart has worked to more quickly grow its digital sales and profits as the Covid-19 pandemic pushed more shoppers online to buy goods. Before joining Walmart, he was a venture capitalist and spent two decades at Target.</p><p>“He’s created a solid foundation for our e-commerce business and strong team that is positioned to accelerate growth across the business and he’s ready for his next challenge,” said a Walmart spokeswoman.</p><p>Walmart’s global e-commerce sales increased around 17% to $46.3 billion during the nine months ended Oct. 31 compared with the same period the prior year. In the U.S., online sales grew near the same pace, hitting $33.6 billion during the period but lagged behind the growth of rival Amazon.com Inc.</p><p>“Continuing the growth of our e-commerce business is critical to our long-term success,” said Walmart’s U.S. Chief Executive John Furner in Thursday’s memo.</p><p>Last week, Walmart said its chief merchandising officer was retiring and its chief customer officer was leaving. Walmart often announces executive changes in January, after the holidays and near the end of the company’s fiscal year on Jan. 31.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Walmart’s Top U.S. E-Commerce Executive Is Leaving</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWalmart’s Top U.S. E-Commerce Executive Is Leaving\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-21 00:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/walmarts-top-u-s-e-commerce-executive-is-leaving-11642689116?mod=hp_lista_pos2><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Casey Carl to depart after less than two years at Walmart; latest in a postholiday executive shuffleA Houston Walmart store on Black Friday.Walmart Inc.’s top U.S. e-commerce executive Casey Carl is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/walmarts-top-u-s-e-commerce-executive-is-leaving-11642689116?mod=hp_lista_pos2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WMT":"沃尔玛","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4155":"大卖场与超市","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/walmarts-top-u-s-e-commerce-executive-is-leaving-11642689116?mod=hp_lista_pos2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2204091157","content_text":"Casey Carl to depart after less than two years at Walmart; latest in a postholiday executive shuffleA Houston Walmart store on Black Friday.Walmart Inc.’s top U.S. e-commerce executive Casey Carl is leaving the retailer, according to an internal memo, adding to a string of recent executive shifts at the company.Tom Ward, a senior vice president who has led Walmart’s efforts to use its stores as hubs for online pickup and delivery orders, will become the company’s new head of U.S. e-commerce, according to the memo sent Thursday and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.Mr. Carl will leave at the end of February, the memo said. The former Target Corp. executive was named Walmart’s executive vice president and chief e-commerce officer last year after joining the company in the fall of 2020.Mr. Carl took Walmart’s top U.S. e-commerce job in the wake of the departure of Marc Lore, the founder of e-commerce startup Jet.com Inc., which Walmart purchased for $3.3 billion in 2016. In recent years, Walmart has worked to more quickly grow its digital sales and profits as the Covid-19 pandemic pushed more shoppers online to buy goods. Before joining Walmart, he was a venture capitalist and spent two decades at Target.“He’s created a solid foundation for our e-commerce business and strong team that is positioned to accelerate growth across the business and he’s ready for his next challenge,” said a Walmart spokeswoman.Walmart’s global e-commerce sales increased around 17% to $46.3 billion during the nine months ended Oct. 31 compared with the same period the prior year. In the U.S., online sales grew near the same pace, hitting $33.6 billion during the period but lagged behind the growth of rival Amazon.com Inc.“Continuing the growth of our e-commerce business is critical to our long-term success,” said Walmart’s U.S. Chief Executive John Furner in Thursday’s memo.Last week, Walmart said its chief merchandising officer was retiring and its chief customer officer was leaving. Walmart often announces executive changes in January, after the holidays and near the end of the company’s fiscal year on Jan. 31.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":36,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007833299,"gmtCreate":1642819649789,"gmtModify":1676533750175,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007833299","repostId":"2205042784","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205042784","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642807833,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205042784?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-22 07:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Top Mid-Cap Stocks That Are Wildly Undervalued Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205042784","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These small-ish companies look like deals given their expected growth rates.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>While the market overall had a pretty good year in 2021 (the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>, slanted toward large-cap stocks, was up 27%), the performance of small- and mid-cap stocks was mixed. Some tech stocks suffered sharp pullbacks after skyrocketing earlier on in the pandemic, even though the businesses themselves continue to grow at a healthy pace.</p><p>After a wild year, <b>Magnite </b>(NASDAQ:MGNI), <b>Redfin </b>(NASDAQ:RDFN), and <b>Crocs </b>(NASDAQ:CROX) look way undervalued right now based on their future potential. Here&#39;s why these three mid-cap stocks are worth a closer look.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13b42bccb0c636f436c818b5b3d7813f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>1. Magnite: Steadily expanding with streaming TV</h2><p>Magnite stock hasn&#39;t been able to catch a break since quickly doubling in value in the first couple months of 2021. Share prices are down 77% from their all-time high posted nearly a year ago, valuing the software company at a mere $2.4 billion (as measured by enterprise value).</p><p>In hindsight, Magnite was way overpriced 12 months ago. Over-optimism had set in, driven by the company&#39;s fast-growing platform, which helps video publishers sell advertising slots. Connected TV (CTV) is taking over the at-home entertainment space as a myriad of new streaming services pick up subscribers and traditional video moves to an internet-delivered format. Magnite is the largest independent CTV software company. Hundreds of publishers rely on it to automate the selling of ads and maximize value for their content.</p><p>But a company that expects to grow sales at an average of 25% per year in each of the next five years didn&#39;t deserve to trade at a trailing 12-month sales multiple of over 20 (which is where Magnite was early in 2021). Now shares trade for a mere 4.5 times trailing 12-month sales, which seems incredibly cheap considering this is a highly profitable <i>and </i>growing business. Adjusted EBITDA profit margin was 35% in Q3 2021, and management expects it to be at over 40% in the coming years.</p><p>Of course, the digital ad software space is highly competitive, and Magnite has a lot of debt due to a couple of acquisitions ($719 million as of the end of September 2021). But Magnite generates plenty of cash to service its debt, and is poised to continue expanding with the CTV industry in the coming years. Even management thinks its stock is a pretty good deal right now. It announced a $50 million share repurchase program in December. I like this CTV ad stock at these levels too.</p><h2>2. Redfin: A full-service tech-powered brokerage firm</h2><p>The real estate brokerage business is a cyclical <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>, and Redfin&#39;s stock has been suffering on fears of a too-hot residential housing market. Supply of homes available for sale has been thin during the pandemic as Americans relocate en masse, and now with interest rates set to rise this year, there&#39;s another reason to worry. Redfin stock is down nearly 60% in the last year, giving it an enterprise value of $4.2 billion.</p><p>Redfin won&#39;t be an appropriate stock for every investor. The company is spending heavily to maximize sales growth right now, and generated negative free cash flow of $429 million over the last 12-month stretch. But at just 2.2 times trailing 12-month sales, a substantial amount of negativity has been priced in at this point.</p><p>After all, Redfin is still steadily winning market share (1.16% of U.S. existing home value in Q3 2021, compared to 1.04% the year prior). It&#39;s still expanding its services into new cities, acquired an online rental listing site last spring, and recently announced it&#39;s purchasing Bay Equity Home Loans to expand on its mortgage services. Redfin has a full-service technology stack to help home buyers and sellers, and it has lots of potential avenues for growth ahead -- regardless of where the real estate market goes next.</p><p>Management had said to expect year-over-year revenue growth of as much as 148% in Q4 2021, a torrid pace that is unlikely to continue in the new year. Nevertheless, with shares depressed in value and Redfin still making progress in the residential real estate market, now looks like a pretty good time to nibble on this tech stock.</p><h2>3. Crocs: Comfort and utility for the win</h2><p>Crocs sales have been soaring during the pandemic, bucking the trend of overall declines elsewhere in the apparel and clothing department. In 2021 alone, the company stated it&#39;s expecting record full-year sales topping $2.3 billion, growth of 67% over 2020. In spite of this, share prices have dropped a third in value in recent months. Crocs has an enterprise value of $7.2 billion.</p><p>Comfort and utility are in vogue as the pandemic reshapes consumer behavior. As a result of this and a push into new markets in Asia, Crocs thinks it will remain a fast-growing shoe company for years. Management&#39;s goal is to reach $5 billion in annual sales by 2026. 2022 is off to a good start working toward that milestone. Excluding the recent acquisition of small casual shoe brand Hey Dude, Crocs expects sales growth to exceed 20%, all while maintaining an adjusted operating profit margin of about 28%. That makes this quirky shoe business one of the most profitable in the industry.</p><p>When Crocs announced it was acquiring Hey Dude last month for $2.5 billion, I was initially skeptical. However, it was revealed the small casual brand should bring in as much as $750 million in sales in 2022, with an adjusted operating margin of 26%. Plugged into Crocs&#39; existing distribution channels, this could be a new growth lever for Crocs in the years ahead.</p><p>Considering Crocs&#39; 2022 outlook, shares currently trade for just 7 times adjusted operating income (assuming Crocs generates that 28% margin, and Hey Dude 26%). Of course, Crocs will need to prove it&#39;s the real deal and deliver the goods. But if it does, this looks like one overlooked cheap shoe stock right now.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Top Mid-Cap Stocks That Are Wildly Undervalued Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Top Mid-Cap Stocks That Are Wildly Undervalued Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-22 07:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/mid-cap-stocks-wildly-undervalued-magnite-redfin/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While the market overall had a pretty good year in 2021 (the S&P 500, slanted toward large-cap stocks, was up 27%), the performance of small- and mid-cap stocks was mixed. Some tech stocks suffered ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/mid-cap-stocks-wildly-undervalued-magnite-redfin/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4079":"房地产服务","CTV":"Innovid","CROX":"卡骆驰","BK4146":"鞋类","BK4009":"广告","MGNI":"Magnite, Inc.","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","RDFN":"Redfin Corp"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/mid-cap-stocks-wildly-undervalued-magnite-redfin/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205042784","content_text":"While the market overall had a pretty good year in 2021 (the S&P 500, slanted toward large-cap stocks, was up 27%), the performance of small- and mid-cap stocks was mixed. Some tech stocks suffered sharp pullbacks after skyrocketing earlier on in the pandemic, even though the businesses themselves continue to grow at a healthy pace.After a wild year, Magnite (NASDAQ:MGNI), Redfin (NASDAQ:RDFN), and Crocs (NASDAQ:CROX) look way undervalued right now based on their future potential. Here's why these three mid-cap stocks are worth a closer look.Image source: Getty Images.1. Magnite: Steadily expanding with streaming TVMagnite stock hasn't been able to catch a break since quickly doubling in value in the first couple months of 2021. Share prices are down 77% from their all-time high posted nearly a year ago, valuing the software company at a mere $2.4 billion (as measured by enterprise value).In hindsight, Magnite was way overpriced 12 months ago. Over-optimism had set in, driven by the company's fast-growing platform, which helps video publishers sell advertising slots. Connected TV (CTV) is taking over the at-home entertainment space as a myriad of new streaming services pick up subscribers and traditional video moves to an internet-delivered format. Magnite is the largest independent CTV software company. Hundreds of publishers rely on it to automate the selling of ads and maximize value for their content.But a company that expects to grow sales at an average of 25% per year in each of the next five years didn't deserve to trade at a trailing 12-month sales multiple of over 20 (which is where Magnite was early in 2021). Now shares trade for a mere 4.5 times trailing 12-month sales, which seems incredibly cheap considering this is a highly profitable and growing business. Adjusted EBITDA profit margin was 35% in Q3 2021, and management expects it to be at over 40% in the coming years.Of course, the digital ad software space is highly competitive, and Magnite has a lot of debt due to a couple of acquisitions ($719 million as of the end of September 2021). But Magnite generates plenty of cash to service its debt, and is poised to continue expanding with the CTV industry in the coming years. Even management thinks its stock is a pretty good deal right now. It announced a $50 million share repurchase program in December. I like this CTV ad stock at these levels too.2. Redfin: A full-service tech-powered brokerage firmThe real estate brokerage business is a cyclical one, and Redfin's stock has been suffering on fears of a too-hot residential housing market. Supply of homes available for sale has been thin during the pandemic as Americans relocate en masse, and now with interest rates set to rise this year, there's another reason to worry. Redfin stock is down nearly 60% in the last year, giving it an enterprise value of $4.2 billion.Redfin won't be an appropriate stock for every investor. The company is spending heavily to maximize sales growth right now, and generated negative free cash flow of $429 million over the last 12-month stretch. But at just 2.2 times trailing 12-month sales, a substantial amount of negativity has been priced in at this point.After all, Redfin is still steadily winning market share (1.16% of U.S. existing home value in Q3 2021, compared to 1.04% the year prior). It's still expanding its services into new cities, acquired an online rental listing site last spring, and recently announced it's purchasing Bay Equity Home Loans to expand on its mortgage services. Redfin has a full-service technology stack to help home buyers and sellers, and it has lots of potential avenues for growth ahead -- regardless of where the real estate market goes next.Management had said to expect year-over-year revenue growth of as much as 148% in Q4 2021, a torrid pace that is unlikely to continue in the new year. Nevertheless, with shares depressed in value and Redfin still making progress in the residential real estate market, now looks like a pretty good time to nibble on this tech stock.3. Crocs: Comfort and utility for the winCrocs sales have been soaring during the pandemic, bucking the trend of overall declines elsewhere in the apparel and clothing department. In 2021 alone, the company stated it's expecting record full-year sales topping $2.3 billion, growth of 67% over 2020. In spite of this, share prices have dropped a third in value in recent months. Crocs has an enterprise value of $7.2 billion.Comfort and utility are in vogue as the pandemic reshapes consumer behavior. As a result of this and a push into new markets in Asia, Crocs thinks it will remain a fast-growing shoe company for years. Management's goal is to reach $5 billion in annual sales by 2026. 2022 is off to a good start working toward that milestone. Excluding the recent acquisition of small casual shoe brand Hey Dude, Crocs expects sales growth to exceed 20%, all while maintaining an adjusted operating profit margin of about 28%. That makes this quirky shoe business one of the most profitable in the industry.When Crocs announced it was acquiring Hey Dude last month for $2.5 billion, I was initially skeptical. However, it was revealed the small casual brand should bring in as much as $750 million in sales in 2022, with an adjusted operating margin of 26%. Plugged into Crocs' existing distribution channels, this could be a new growth lever for Crocs in the years ahead.Considering Crocs' 2022 outlook, shares currently trade for just 7 times adjusted operating income (assuming Crocs generates that 28% margin, and Hey Dude 26%). Of course, Crocs will need to prove it's the real deal and deliver the goods. But if it does, this looks like one overlooked cheap shoe stock right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":17,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004772326,"gmtCreate":1642715806573,"gmtModify":1676533737831,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004772326","repostId":"1141140061","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141140061","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1642696063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1141140061?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-21 00:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix could be Activision’s Plan B","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141140061","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) - If Microsoft has kicked off the game of who could buy Act","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) - If Microsoft has kicked off the game of who could buy Activision Blizzard, Netflix could be a surprise winner. The software giant’s $69 billion bid for the maker of “Call of Duty” is likely to run into trouble in Washington, which opens up the fray to rival bidders – particularly those who covet video game assets, and don’t face Microsoft’s high risk of regulatory challenges.</p><p>Microsoft agreed on Tuesday to pay Activision $95 per share in cash. That would be the Windows creator’s biggest dealread moreever. Yet investors are already telegraphing trouble ahead. Activision’s stock was trading at about a 15% discount to the offer price on Wednesday. Throw in a hefty break fee of up to $3 billion and it suggests regulatory risks are on the horizon.</p><p>While Microsoft hasn’t come in for scrutiny in the way Amazon.com , Google’s parent Alphabet, Facebook owner Meta Platforms or Apple have, it’s reasonable to think a $69 billion acquisition will raise hackles. At $2.3 trillion, Microsoft is second only in market value to Apple. The Department of Justice’s Jonathan Kanter and the Federal Trade Commission’s Lina Khan are moving away from traditional models of concentration, and are likely to testread moretheir theories in court.</p><p>That raises the possibility that another bidderread morecould turn investors’ heads, by offering a price similar to Microsoft’s, but with less risk of arduous antitrust battles. Netflix fits the bill. Its leaders Reed Hastings and Ted Sarandos have already highlighted gaming as a priority, and singled out Epic Games’ Fortnite as a rival for viewers’ attention. Netflix recently launched mobile games around franchises including “Stranger Things.” Unlike Microsoft, it currently doesn’t have a full-fledged gaming business.</p><p>True, the streaming firm has huge cash obligations to fund movies like “Don’t Look Up,” and is forecast to spend more than $18 billion this year according to MoffettNathanson estimates. But with a market value of $226 billion, it could always throw in a slug of stock. Though Netflix shares have sagged recently, they’ve delivered an annual return of 30% over the past five years, almost twice the return on Activision shares.</p><p>Part of that is precisely because Netflix has shunned splashy value-destructive acquisitions. Nonetheless, Hastings and Sarandos are right to worry about the competitive threat from Activision, Epic and their peers. And the only way to win is to play the game.</p><p><b>CONTEXT NEWS</b></p><p>- Microsoft said on Jan. 18 it plans to acquire Activision Blizzard for $95 a share in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion, inclusive of Activision’s net cash.</p><p>- The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission said on the same day that they had begun the process of revising the agencies’ merger guidelines.</p><p>- Netflix will report fourth-quarter earnings on Jan. 20.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix could be Activision’s Plan B</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix could be Activision’s Plan B\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-21 00:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) - If Microsoft has kicked off the game of who could buy Activision Blizzard, Netflix could be a surprise winner. The software giant’s $69 billion bid for the maker of “Call of Duty” is likely to run into trouble in Washington, which opens up the fray to rival bidders – particularly those who covet video game assets, and don’t face Microsoft’s high risk of regulatory challenges.</p><p>Microsoft agreed on Tuesday to pay Activision $95 per share in cash. That would be the Windows creator’s biggest dealread moreever. Yet investors are already telegraphing trouble ahead. Activision’s stock was trading at about a 15% discount to the offer price on Wednesday. Throw in a hefty break fee of up to $3 billion and it suggests regulatory risks are on the horizon.</p><p>While Microsoft hasn’t come in for scrutiny in the way Amazon.com , Google’s parent Alphabet, Facebook owner Meta Platforms or Apple have, it’s reasonable to think a $69 billion acquisition will raise hackles. At $2.3 trillion, Microsoft is second only in market value to Apple. The Department of Justice’s Jonathan Kanter and the Federal Trade Commission’s Lina Khan are moving away from traditional models of concentration, and are likely to testread moretheir theories in court.</p><p>That raises the possibility that another bidderread morecould turn investors’ heads, by offering a price similar to Microsoft’s, but with less risk of arduous antitrust battles. Netflix fits the bill. Its leaders Reed Hastings and Ted Sarandos have already highlighted gaming as a priority, and singled out Epic Games’ Fortnite as a rival for viewers’ attention. Netflix recently launched mobile games around franchises including “Stranger Things.” Unlike Microsoft, it currently doesn’t have a full-fledged gaming business.</p><p>True, the streaming firm has huge cash obligations to fund movies like “Don’t Look Up,” and is forecast to spend more than $18 billion this year according to MoffettNathanson estimates. But with a market value of $226 billion, it could always throw in a slug of stock. Though Netflix shares have sagged recently, they’ve delivered an annual return of 30% over the past five years, almost twice the return on Activision shares.</p><p>Part of that is precisely because Netflix has shunned splashy value-destructive acquisitions. Nonetheless, Hastings and Sarandos are right to worry about the competitive threat from Activision, Epic and their peers. And the only way to win is to play the game.</p><p><b>CONTEXT NEWS</b></p><p>- Microsoft said on Jan. 18 it plans to acquire Activision Blizzard for $95 a share in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion, inclusive of Activision’s net cash.</p><p>- The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission said on the same day that they had begun the process of revising the agencies’ merger guidelines.</p><p>- Netflix will report fourth-quarter earnings on Jan. 20.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141140061","content_text":"NEW YORK, Jan 20 (Reuters Breakingviews) - If Microsoft has kicked off the game of who could buy Activision Blizzard, Netflix could be a surprise winner. The software giant’s $69 billion bid for the maker of “Call of Duty” is likely to run into trouble in Washington, which opens up the fray to rival bidders – particularly those who covet video game assets, and don’t face Microsoft’s high risk of regulatory challenges.Microsoft agreed on Tuesday to pay Activision $95 per share in cash. That would be the Windows creator’s biggest dealread moreever. Yet investors are already telegraphing trouble ahead. Activision’s stock was trading at about a 15% discount to the offer price on Wednesday. Throw in a hefty break fee of up to $3 billion and it suggests regulatory risks are on the horizon.While Microsoft hasn’t come in for scrutiny in the way Amazon.com , Google’s parent Alphabet, Facebook owner Meta Platforms or Apple have, it’s reasonable to think a $69 billion acquisition will raise hackles. At $2.3 trillion, Microsoft is second only in market value to Apple. The Department of Justice’s Jonathan Kanter and the Federal Trade Commission’s Lina Khan are moving away from traditional models of concentration, and are likely to testread moretheir theories in court.That raises the possibility that another bidderread morecould turn investors’ heads, by offering a price similar to Microsoft’s, but with less risk of arduous antitrust battles. Netflix fits the bill. Its leaders Reed Hastings and Ted Sarandos have already highlighted gaming as a priority, and singled out Epic Games’ Fortnite as a rival for viewers’ attention. Netflix recently launched mobile games around franchises including “Stranger Things.” Unlike Microsoft, it currently doesn’t have a full-fledged gaming business.True, the streaming firm has huge cash obligations to fund movies like “Don’t Look Up,” and is forecast to spend more than $18 billion this year according to MoffettNathanson estimates. But with a market value of $226 billion, it could always throw in a slug of stock. Though Netflix shares have sagged recently, they’ve delivered an annual return of 30% over the past five years, almost twice the return on Activision shares.Part of that is precisely because Netflix has shunned splashy value-destructive acquisitions. Nonetheless, Hastings and Sarandos are right to worry about the competitive threat from Activision, Epic and their peers. And the only way to win is to play the game.CONTEXT NEWS- Microsoft said on Jan. 18 it plans to acquire Activision Blizzard for $95 a share in an all-cash transaction valued at $68.7 billion, inclusive of Activision’s net cash.- The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission said on the same day that they had begun the process of revising the agencies’ merger guidelines.- Netflix will report fourth-quarter earnings on Jan. 20.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021733371,"gmtCreate":1653100233893,"gmtModify":1676535224504,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021733371","repostId":"2236012808","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236012808","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1653089869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236012808?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236012808","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"As the broader market continues to fall, some investors may view the EV leader's stock slump as a buying opportunity. Are they right?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut <b>Tesla</b> have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed&#39;s consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.</p><p>Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk&#39;s move to potentially acquire <b>Twitter</b> certainly hasn&#39;t aided the company&#39;s case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.</p><p>But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ecb47944e9c0966d2182e999d9a81cba\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Fundamentals aren&#39;t the problem</h2><p>In a quarter when investors weren&#39;t sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company&#39;s $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.</p><p>To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management&#39;s guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.</p><p>Amid such incredible growth, the company&#39;s balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the &#34;cash is king&#34; mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.</p><h2>Tesla&#39;s valuation is still high</h2><p>Even without context, though, Tesla&#39;s valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.</p><p>Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors <b>General Motors </b>(GM 0.81%), <b>Ford</b> (F 0.55%), and <b>Toyota </b>(TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it&#39;s rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4664e23d164238b9ae09f5957b8e89b9\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>TSLA PE Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><h2>Should investors buy the stock now?</h2><p>Tesla&#39;s pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company&#39;s valuation isn&#39;t exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there&#39;s surely a chance it&#39;ll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.</p><p>While it&#39;s a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don&#39;t suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236012808","content_text":"After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed's consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk's move to potentially acquire Twitter certainly hasn't aided the company's case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?Image source: Getty Images.Fundamentals aren't the problemIn a quarter when investors weren't sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla's Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company's $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management's guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.Amid such incredible growth, the company's balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the \"cash is king\" mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.Tesla's valuation is still highEven without context, though, Tesla's valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors General Motors (GM 0.81%), Ford (F 0.55%), and Toyota (TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it's rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.TSLA PE Ratio data by YChartsShould investors buy the stock now?Tesla's pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company's valuation isn't exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there's surely a chance it'll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.While it's a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don't suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060859282,"gmtCreate":1651126108227,"gmtModify":1676534855505,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060859282","repostId":"1156590907","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156590907","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1651122291,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156590907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-28 13:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tiger Chart｜Return on Investment of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156590907","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway delivered a 24.4% annualized return on investment between 1965 and 2021","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Buffett&#39;s Berkshire Hathaway delivered a 24.4% annualized return on investment between 1965 and 2021.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fea489401b507bd82d8e884a6dc81f14\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1700\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Chart｜Return on Investment of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Chart｜Return on Investment of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-28 13:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Buffett&#39;s Berkshire Hathaway delivered a 24.4% annualized return on investment between 1965 and 2021.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fea489401b507bd82d8e884a6dc81f14\" tg-width=\"1500\" tg-height=\"1700\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156590907","content_text":"Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway delivered a 24.4% annualized return on investment between 1965 and 2021.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":55,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090805940,"gmtCreate":1643146125207,"gmtModify":1676533777347,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090805940","repostId":"2206831526","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2206831526","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1643121838,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2206831526?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-25 22:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Nvidia vs. Digital Realty","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2206831526","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The chipmaker and the REIT have a lot more in common than you might think.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Nvidia</b> (NASDAQ:NVDA) and <b>Digital Realty</b> (NYSE:DLR) might not seem comparable tech stocks (or in the real estate investment trust&#39;s case, a tech stock at all), but both are poised to take advantage of massive trends in the industry that are right in their wheelhouse.</p><p>Each might have a different focus, but they&#39;re on a comparable footing, which actually makes choosing between them a difficult task. So let&#39;s see whether the chipmaker or the data center REIT is the better buy in January.</p><h2>The case for Nvidia</h2><p>Although the lockdown portion of the pandemic recharged Nvidia&#39;s business as gamers poured back into the market -- and millions more joined them because of all the time on their hands and having nothing to do -- Nvidia was already a phenomenally successful company, generating tens of thousands of percent returns for longer-term investors.</p><p>The cryptocurrency market collapse in 2018 caused Nvidia&#39;s stock to lose half its value as pundits worried whether the semiconductor stock could return to form, which it did in fine fashion. But now there&#39;s a vortex of opportunity swirling around its operations and Nvidia is ready to take it all on.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be6513de9dc82b841222a04a5d8f7ad5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NVDA data by YCharts</p><p>While graphics processing units (GPUs) for gaming generated 45% of third-quarter total revenue, hitting a record $3.2 billion, Nvidia also has its finger on the pulse of data centers, artificial intelligence, healthcare, networking, automobiles, and the just-emerging metaverse.</p><p>Data center revenue soared 55% year over year in the third quarter and should become Nvidia&#39;s largest segment by 2025. Its BlueField zero-trust platform fully protects data centers by requiring all users to be authenticated, authorized, and validated before gaining access to applications and data, whether they are working locally, in the cloud, or in hybrid situations.</p><p>Also, Nvidia&#39;s acquisition of Mellanox a few years ago positions the chipmaker to be a top supplier for networking hardware while its Nvidia Drive AV platform builds on the computational power the company developed for gaming to apply it to autonomous vehicles (hence the &#34;AV&#34; in the name).</p><p>Nvidia is also deeply involved in developing software solutions where its Morpheus platform uses AI to allow for cybersecurity protection of data.</p><p>In short, there are a lot of moving parts at Nvidia and they all point to enormous growth potential. Although its stock has lost a quarter of its value over the last two months, investors should consider that a buying opportunity.</p><h2>The case for Digital Realty</h2><p>As mentioned above, Digital Realty concentrates on the data center market, which as Nvidia&#39;s business shows, is growing rapidly and assuming ever greater importance in the day-to-day operations of all businesses.</p><p>Data centers are the backbone of the internet, the central core for every thing and every device that accesses a network, whether in the cloud or online. Because data needs a central depository, data centers serve as the secure warehouses for the servers and networking equipment that house the data.</p><p>Digital Realty owns 282 data centers that represent 35 million square feet of space, including 36 data centers held as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. It&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of only two remaining REITs that focus on the sector as merger and acquisition activity has caused their numbers to dwindle.</p><p>Third-quarter adjusted funds from operations (AFFO), a critical profitability metric for REITs, was $1.60 per share, up from $1.47 per share a year ago. That was primarily pushed higher by the expansion of Digital Realty&#39;s PlatformDIGITAL service, its global data center platform in the cloud that allows for scaling and hyperscaling for very large deployments.</p><p>Of course, what makes the data center REIT attractive for many investors is its dividend, which is currently yielding 3% annually. It&#39;s a good bet this payout is going to be safe for many years to come.</p><p>As more and more businesses move their information to the cloud, the importance of data centers becomes increasingly critical. This ensures that Digital Realty will have a steady stream of business, particularly as it counts among its customers industry titans like <b>AT&amp;T</b>, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a></b>, and <b>Verizon</b>, all of which are copious generators of data.</p><p>Digital Realty&#39;s stock has also dropped over the past two months, though not as steeply as Nvidia&#39;s, even as it carries valuation metrics every bit as dear as the chipmaker&#39;s. It still looks like a solid long-term pick, particularly if an investor wants to juice their returns with a dividend kicker.</p><h2>The verdict</h2><p>Both stocks are buys in my book and I don&#39;t think an investor will go wrong picking up either one (or both) for their portfolio, if they&#39;re holding around two dozen stocks and not planning on selling any of them for at least five years, preferably decades.</p><p>If forced to choose, however, I&#39;d say it depends on the type of investor you are. For the more risk tolerant, Nvidia is likely to see greater volatility but also likely to generate greater returns. For obvious reasons, an income investor would be better off going with Digital Realty, even though the chipmaker also makes a nominal payout.</p><p>In short, it&#39;s an excess of riches that won&#39;t steer you wrong over the long haul.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Nvidia vs. Digital Realty</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Nvidia vs. Digital Realty\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-25 22:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/25/better-buy-nvidia-vs-digital-realty/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Digital Realty (NYSE:DLR) might not seem comparable tech stocks (or in the real estate investment trust's case, a tech stock at all), but both are poised to take advantage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/25/better-buy-nvidia-vs-digital-realty/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4529":"IDC概念","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","DLR":"数字房地产信托公司","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4543":"AI","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4084":"特种房地产投资信托"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/25/better-buy-nvidia-vs-digital-realty/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2206831526","content_text":"Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Digital Realty (NYSE:DLR) might not seem comparable tech stocks (or in the real estate investment trust's case, a tech stock at all), but both are poised to take advantage of massive trends in the industry that are right in their wheelhouse.Each might have a different focus, but they're on a comparable footing, which actually makes choosing between them a difficult task. So let's see whether the chipmaker or the data center REIT is the better buy in January.The case for NvidiaAlthough the lockdown portion of the pandemic recharged Nvidia's business as gamers poured back into the market -- and millions more joined them because of all the time on their hands and having nothing to do -- Nvidia was already a phenomenally successful company, generating tens of thousands of percent returns for longer-term investors.The cryptocurrency market collapse in 2018 caused Nvidia's stock to lose half its value as pundits worried whether the semiconductor stock could return to form, which it did in fine fashion. But now there's a vortex of opportunity swirling around its operations and Nvidia is ready to take it all on.NVDA data by YChartsWhile graphics processing units (GPUs) for gaming generated 45% of third-quarter total revenue, hitting a record $3.2 billion, Nvidia also has its finger on the pulse of data centers, artificial intelligence, healthcare, networking, automobiles, and the just-emerging metaverse.Data center revenue soared 55% year over year in the third quarter and should become Nvidia's largest segment by 2025. Its BlueField zero-trust platform fully protects data centers by requiring all users to be authenticated, authorized, and validated before gaining access to applications and data, whether they are working locally, in the cloud, or in hybrid situations.Also, Nvidia's acquisition of Mellanox a few years ago positions the chipmaker to be a top supplier for networking hardware while its Nvidia Drive AV platform builds on the computational power the company developed for gaming to apply it to autonomous vehicles (hence the \"AV\" in the name).Nvidia is also deeply involved in developing software solutions where its Morpheus platform uses AI to allow for cybersecurity protection of data.In short, there are a lot of moving parts at Nvidia and they all point to enormous growth potential. Although its stock has lost a quarter of its value over the last two months, investors should consider that a buying opportunity.The case for Digital RealtyAs mentioned above, Digital Realty concentrates on the data center market, which as Nvidia's business shows, is growing rapidly and assuming ever greater importance in the day-to-day operations of all businesses.Data centers are the backbone of the internet, the central core for every thing and every device that accesses a network, whether in the cloud or online. Because data needs a central depository, data centers serve as the secure warehouses for the servers and networking equipment that house the data.Digital Realty owns 282 data centers that represent 35 million square feet of space, including 36 data centers held as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. It's one of only two remaining REITs that focus on the sector as merger and acquisition activity has caused their numbers to dwindle.Third-quarter adjusted funds from operations (AFFO), a critical profitability metric for REITs, was $1.60 per share, up from $1.47 per share a year ago. That was primarily pushed higher by the expansion of Digital Realty's PlatformDIGITAL service, its global data center platform in the cloud that allows for scaling and hyperscaling for very large deployments.Of course, what makes the data center REIT attractive for many investors is its dividend, which is currently yielding 3% annually. It's a good bet this payout is going to be safe for many years to come.As more and more businesses move their information to the cloud, the importance of data centers becomes increasingly critical. This ensures that Digital Realty will have a steady stream of business, particularly as it counts among its customers industry titans like AT&T, Meta Platforms, and Verizon, all of which are copious generators of data.Digital Realty's stock has also dropped over the past two months, though not as steeply as Nvidia's, even as it carries valuation metrics every bit as dear as the chipmaker's. It still looks like a solid long-term pick, particularly if an investor wants to juice their returns with a dividend kicker.The verdictBoth stocks are buys in my book and I don't think an investor will go wrong picking up either one (or both) for their portfolio, if they're holding around two dozen stocks and not planning on selling any of them for at least five years, preferably decades.If forced to choose, however, I'd say it depends on the type of investor you are. For the more risk tolerant, Nvidia is likely to see greater volatility but also likely to generate greater returns. For obvious reasons, an income investor would be better off going with Digital Realty, even though the chipmaker also makes a nominal payout.In short, it's an excess of riches that won't steer you wrong over the long haul.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":177,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007651585,"gmtCreate":1642895607021,"gmtModify":1676533754746,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007651585","repostId":"1171639118","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171639118","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1642776318,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1171639118?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-21 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171639118","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Arrival, Fisker, Nikola, Workh","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Arrival, Fisker, Nikola, Workhorse, Lordstown and Sono Group fell more than 2% and 10%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1650abb2bdedb7f94bad938753be9a4\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"721\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Dropped in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-21 22:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Arrival, Fisker, Nikola, Workhorse, Lordstown and Sono Group fell more than 2% and 10%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1650abb2bdedb7f94bad938753be9a4\" tg-width=\"412\" tg-height=\"721\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SONO":"搜诺思公司","NKLA":"Nikola Corporation","TSLA":"特斯拉","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","FSR":"菲斯克","LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171639118","content_text":"EV stocks dropped in morning trading.Tesla,Nio,Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, Arrival, Fisker, Nikola, Workhorse, Lordstown and Sono Group fell more than 2% and 10%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":123,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007651350,"gmtCreate":1642895556297,"gmtModify":1676533754722,"author":{"id":"4099442649801160","authorId":"4099442649801160","name":"jojoc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ccc8519a0bdc4ba6b43a9aa8afa0e63c","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4099442649801160","authorIdStr":"4099442649801160"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007651350","repostId":"2205441860","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205441860","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642808308,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205441860?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-22 07:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205441860","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"I recently sold my shares of Snap, Palantir, and Bumble. Let's explore the reasons I pulled the trigger on the sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company&#39;s future revenue and earnings, while higher interest rates boost borrowing costs for unprofitable companies.</p><p>Like many investors, I reduced my exposure to that shift by selling some of my higher-growth tech stocks and rotating toward more conservative investments. Specifically, I took profits from my investments in <b>Snap</b> (NYSE:SNAP) and <b>Palantir</b> (NYSE:PLTR), but I took a net loss on <b>Bumble</b> (NASDAQ:BMBL).</p><p>Investors should do their own due diligence instead of following my example, but let me explain my logic for selling these three high-growth tech stocks.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/869992e71713ee11433514b27cb91bce\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>1. Snap</h2><p>Snap was once my favorite social media stock. It generated robust growth in daily active users and revenue, it remained a top app for teen users, and its profitability was gradually improving.</p><p>But over the past year, several red flags appeared. It vastly underestimated the impact of<b> Apple</b>&#39;s privacy update on iOS, set unrealistic growth targets at its investor day last February, and failed to outshine <b>ByteDance</b>&#39;s TikTok with Spotlight&#39;s short videos.</p><p>Snap&#39;s third-quarter numbers and fourth-quarter guidance last October strongly suggested it couldn&#39;t achieve its investor day target for 50% annual revenue growth over the next few years. But Snap didn&#39;t withdraw that guidance -- even after directly being questioned about it during its conference call -- and said it could retool its ads to overcome Apple&#39;s iOS changes.</p><p>Over the past three months, Snap&#39;s insiders still sold 22 times as many shares as they bought -- even as the stock price dropped more than 50%. That lack of confidence indicates its iOS headaches won&#39;t end anytime soon.</p><p>Snap might seem reasonably valued now at 10 times next year&#39;s sales, especially if it meets analysts&#39; estimates for 60% revenue growth in 2021 and 38% growth in 2022. Unfortunately, I think Snap could continue to struggle over the next few quarters and ultimately withdraw its 50% revenue growth guidance. When that happens, the stock will likely plummet to new lows.</p><h2>2. Palantir</h2><p>Palantir, the data analytics firm which serves the U.S. government and large enterprise customers, also has ambitious growth plans. It believes it can generate at least 30% annual revenue growth from 2021 to 2025.</p><p>At first glance, Palantir seems like a solid investment. The U.S. Army reportedly used its Gotham platform to hunt down Osama Bin Laden in 2011. That battle-hardened reputation enables it to promote its enterprise-facing Foundry platform to large companies. Its ability to gather data from disparate sources can help government agencies and companies make better data-driven decisions to streamline their operations.</p><p>But Palantir also has some glaring problems. It&#39;s deeply unprofitable but still trades at 15 times next year&#39;s sales, which leaves it highly exposed to rising inflation and higher interest rates. It&#39;s also constantly diluting its shares with big stock bonuses -- in the first nine months of 2021, its number of weighted-average shares jumped 165% year over year.</p><p>The growth of Gotham is also decelerating as the U.S. government quietly develops in-house alternatives. Enterprise customers could also gravitate toward other analytics services, such as <b>Alteryx</b> or <b>Splunk, </b>instead of its Foundry platform.</p><p>Instead of sticking with this speculative and unprofitable company, it might be smarter for investors to rotate back toward firmly profitable blue-chip tech stocks which will benefit from the same data-mining tailwinds.</p><h2>3. Bumble</h2><p>After defending Bumble for nearly a year, I finally realized that the online dating company&#39;s weaknesses outweighed its strengths. The growth of Bumble&#39;s namesake app, which lets women make the first move, is decelerating. Its secondary app, Badoo, continues to lose paid users.</p><p>Last quarter, Bumble&#39;s total number of paid users across both apps grew 20% year over year to 1.53 million, but that marked a deceleration from its 36% growth in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, <b>Match Group</b>&#39;s (NASDAQ:MTCH) total number of paying users, 64% of whom use Tinder, increased 16% year over year to 16.3 million in its latest quarter. The company actually accelerated from its 15% growth in the previous quarter.</p><p>Bumble also remains unprofitable, and it&#39;s shouldering <i>more than twice</i> as much debt as its total cash and equivalents. At the same time, it&#39;s pursuing scattershot strategies -- including opening a restaurant in New York City, selling branded apparel and products through an online store, and rebooting its BFF feature (for platonic friendships) as a vaguely defined metaverse platform.</p><p>Those plans probably won&#39;t widen Bumble&#39;s moat against Match&#39;s portfolio of over a dozen dating apps. After listening to its latest conference call, it became painfully clear that Bumble overestimated its own brand appeal while underestimating the competition.</p><p>Bumble expects its revenue to grow 31% to 32% this fiscal year, but that&#39;s only a bit faster than Match&#39;s projected revenue growth rate of 25%. Bumble&#39;s stock might seem reasonably valued at six times next year&#39;s sales, but it probably won&#39;t command a higher premium until it stabilizes its user growth and significantly narrows its net losses. Until that happens, Match will probably be the better overall investment.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-22 07:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company's future revenue and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","SNAP":"Snap Inc","BK4547":"WSB热门概念","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BMBL":"Bumble Inc.","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","MTCH":"Match Group, Inc.","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","AAPL":"苹果","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4543":"AI"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205441860","content_text":"Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company's future revenue and earnings, while higher interest rates boost borrowing costs for unprofitable companies.Like many investors, I reduced my exposure to that shift by selling some of my higher-growth tech stocks and rotating toward more conservative investments. Specifically, I took profits from my investments in Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Palantir (NYSE:PLTR), but I took a net loss on Bumble (NASDAQ:BMBL).Investors should do their own due diligence instead of following my example, but let me explain my logic for selling these three high-growth tech stocks.Image source: Getty Images.1. SnapSnap was once my favorite social media stock. It generated robust growth in daily active users and revenue, it remained a top app for teen users, and its profitability was gradually improving.But over the past year, several red flags appeared. It vastly underestimated the impact of Apple's privacy update on iOS, set unrealistic growth targets at its investor day last February, and failed to outshine ByteDance's TikTok with Spotlight's short videos.Snap's third-quarter numbers and fourth-quarter guidance last October strongly suggested it couldn't achieve its investor day target for 50% annual revenue growth over the next few years. But Snap didn't withdraw that guidance -- even after directly being questioned about it during its conference call -- and said it could retool its ads to overcome Apple's iOS changes.Over the past three months, Snap's insiders still sold 22 times as many shares as they bought -- even as the stock price dropped more than 50%. That lack of confidence indicates its iOS headaches won't end anytime soon.Snap might seem reasonably valued now at 10 times next year's sales, especially if it meets analysts' estimates for 60% revenue growth in 2021 and 38% growth in 2022. Unfortunately, I think Snap could continue to struggle over the next few quarters and ultimately withdraw its 50% revenue growth guidance. When that happens, the stock will likely plummet to new lows.2. PalantirPalantir, the data analytics firm which serves the U.S. government and large enterprise customers, also has ambitious growth plans. It believes it can generate at least 30% annual revenue growth from 2021 to 2025.At first glance, Palantir seems like a solid investment. The U.S. Army reportedly used its Gotham platform to hunt down Osama Bin Laden in 2011. That battle-hardened reputation enables it to promote its enterprise-facing Foundry platform to large companies. Its ability to gather data from disparate sources can help government agencies and companies make better data-driven decisions to streamline their operations.But Palantir also has some glaring problems. It's deeply unprofitable but still trades at 15 times next year's sales, which leaves it highly exposed to rising inflation and higher interest rates. It's also constantly diluting its shares with big stock bonuses -- in the first nine months of 2021, its number of weighted-average shares jumped 165% year over year.The growth of Gotham is also decelerating as the U.S. government quietly develops in-house alternatives. Enterprise customers could also gravitate toward other analytics services, such as Alteryx or Splunk, instead of its Foundry platform.Instead of sticking with this speculative and unprofitable company, it might be smarter for investors to rotate back toward firmly profitable blue-chip tech stocks which will benefit from the same data-mining tailwinds.3. BumbleAfter defending Bumble for nearly a year, I finally realized that the online dating company's weaknesses outweighed its strengths. The growth of Bumble's namesake app, which lets women make the first move, is decelerating. Its secondary app, Badoo, continues to lose paid users.Last quarter, Bumble's total number of paid users across both apps grew 20% year over year to 1.53 million, but that marked a deceleration from its 36% growth in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, Match Group's (NASDAQ:MTCH) total number of paying users, 64% of whom use Tinder, increased 16% year over year to 16.3 million in its latest quarter. The company actually accelerated from its 15% growth in the previous quarter.Bumble also remains unprofitable, and it's shouldering more than twice as much debt as its total cash and equivalents. At the same time, it's pursuing scattershot strategies -- including opening a restaurant in New York City, selling branded apparel and products through an online store, and rebooting its BFF feature (for platonic friendships) as a vaguely defined metaverse platform.Those plans probably won't widen Bumble's moat against Match's portfolio of over a dozen dating apps. After listening to its latest conference call, it became painfully clear that Bumble overestimated its own brand appeal while underestimating the competition.Bumble expects its revenue to grow 31% to 32% this fiscal year, but that's only a bit faster than Match's projected revenue growth rate of 25%. Bumble's stock might seem reasonably valued at six times next year's sales, but it probably won't command a higher premium until it stabilizes its user growth and significantly narrows its net losses. Until that happens, Match will probably be the better overall investment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":45,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}