Evirobie personal page - To The Moon

Evirobie

No personal profile

0Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-09-19

$Bilibili Inc.(BILI)$Going back up?

2022-09-05

$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$up and up~~~

2022-08-04

$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Up up and away.

2022-07-22

Like

QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs

2022-07-22

Like

QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs

2022-07-17

$Apple(AAPL)$Up up and away.

2022-07-14

$Amazon.com(AMZN)$Waiting for a chance to in more.

2022-07-12

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$What goes up, have to come down.

2022-07-07

Like

Why a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal "Peak" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed

2022-07-07

Like

Is Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?

2022-07-07

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up and up

2022-07-06

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Going down?

2022-06-27

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up up up. Let break 25

2022-06-24

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up up up

2022-06-21

Like

Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?

2022-06-21

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up a bit more

2022-06-19

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$up n up

2022-06-18

$NIO Inc.(NIO)$up up and away.

2022-06-11

Like

NIO Stock Is Getting Interesting

2022-05-31

Like

Alibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4103782000923400","uuid":"4103782000923400","gmtCreate":1640748154382,"gmtModify":1706620743953,"name":"Evirobie","pinyin":"evirobie","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":33,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.09.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9910824839,"gmtCreate":1663598880622,"gmtModify":1676537298850,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BILI\">$Bilibili Inc.(BILI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Going back up?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BILI\">$Bilibili Inc.(BILI)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Going back up?","text":"$Bilibili Inc.(BILI)$Going back up?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910824839","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":373,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9931969671,"gmtCreate":1662384428494,"gmtModify":1676537049410,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMC\">$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up and up~~~","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMC\">$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up and up~~~","text":"$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$up and up~~~","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9931969671","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":408,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9902981284,"gmtCreate":1659627013550,"gmtModify":1706000361103,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Up up and away.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9902981284","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077616666,"gmtCreate":1658503829255,"gmtModify":1676536169208,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077616666","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077618774,"gmtCreate":1658503796298,"gmtModify":1676536169185,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077618774","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":227,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072250394,"gmtCreate":1658044098818,"gmtModify":1676536098231,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$Up up and away.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072250394","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076126082,"gmtCreate":1657812759446,"gmtModify":1676536065858,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Waiting for a chance to in more.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Waiting for a chance to in more.","text":"$Amazon.com(AMZN)$Waiting for a chance to in more.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fb1333e078db5fcde50e7e115d103937","width":"1170","height":"2085"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076126082","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9078991625,"gmtCreate":1657608776367,"gmtModify":1676536034049,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>What goes up, have to come down.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>What goes up, have to come down.","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$What goes up, have to come down.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff4e3199c19b7de602f1b311b5a6df19","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9078991625","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":385,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079268480,"gmtCreate":1657205747240,"gmtModify":1676535969248,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079268480","repostId":"2249546463","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2249546463","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1657149693,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2249546463?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-07 07:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2249546463","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkish","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness,&#39; according to Sevens Report</p><p>Growth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.</p><p>Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.</p><p>&#34;While it&#39;s too early to declare the value outperformance &#39;over,&#39; we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,&#34; said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. &#34;If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness.&#39;&#34;</p><p>Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and &#34;a recession is a distinct possibility,&#34; said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.</p><p>The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.</p><p>That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.</p><p>Read:Fed&#39;s Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in July</p><p>But now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.</p><h2>Recession worries</h2><p>The yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.</p><p>In Graff&#39;s view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.</p><p>&#34;Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they&#39;ve been any time&#34; outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn&#39;t mean there&#39;s &#34;100% odds&#34; of an economic contraction, he said, &#34;but it&#39;s definitely clearly showing credit markets think there&#39;s a risk.&#34;</p><p>Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,&#34; said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. &#34;Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.&#34;</p><p>Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.</p><p>The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20.6%.</p><p>Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they&#39;ve recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.</p><p>Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.</p><p>Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a &#34;clearer picture&#34; of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,&#34; he said of the equities market. &#34;In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in &#39;23, that&#39;s probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.&#34;</p><p>In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&amp;P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock&#39;s chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.</p><p>&#34;We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,&#34; DeSpirito said in the note. &#34;The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to &#39;easy money&#39; policies,&#34; he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to &#34;erode household savings&#34; and &#34;inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.&#34;</p><p>All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed&#39;s last policy meeting. The S&amp;P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-07 07:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness,&#39; according to Sevens Report</p><p>Growth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.</p><p>Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.</p><p>&#34;While it&#39;s too early to declare the value outperformance &#39;over,&#39; we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,&#34; said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. &#34;If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness.&#39;&#34;</p><p>Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and &#34;a recession is a distinct possibility,&#34; said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.</p><p>The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.</p><p>That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.</p><p>Read:Fed&#39;s Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in July</p><p>But now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.</p><h2>Recession worries</h2><p>The yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.</p><p>In Graff&#39;s view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.</p><p>&#34;Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they&#39;ve been any time&#34; outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn&#39;t mean there&#39;s &#34;100% odds&#34; of an economic contraction, he said, &#34;but it&#39;s definitely clearly showing credit markets think there&#39;s a risk.&#34;</p><p>Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,&#34; said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. &#34;Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.&#34;</p><p>Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.</p><p>The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20.6%.</p><p>Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they&#39;ve recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.</p><p>Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.</p><p>Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a &#34;clearer picture&#34; of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,&#34; he said of the equities market. &#34;In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in &#39;23, that&#39;s probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.&#34;</p><p>In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&amp;P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock&#39;s chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.</p><p>&#34;We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,&#34; DeSpirito said in the note. &#34;The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to &#39;easy money&#39; policies,&#34; he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to &#34;erode household savings&#34; and &#34;inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.&#34;</p><p>All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed&#39;s last policy meeting. The S&amp;P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2249546463","content_text":"If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkishness,' according to Sevens ReportGrowth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.\"While it's too early to declare the value outperformance 'over,' we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,\" said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. \"If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkishness.'\"Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and \"a recession is a distinct possibility,\" said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.Read:Fed's Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in JulyBut now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.Recession worriesThe yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.In Graff's view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.\"Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they've been any time\" outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn't mean there's \"100% odds\" of an economic contraction, he said, \"but it's definitely clearly showing credit markets think there's a risk.\"Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.\"U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,\" said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. \"Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.\"Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&P 500 dropped 20.6%.Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they've recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a \"clearer picture\" of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.\"Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,\" he said of the equities market. \"In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in '23, that's probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.\"In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock's chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.\"We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,\" DeSpirito said in the note. \"The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to 'easy money' policies,\" he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to \"erode household savings\" and \"inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.\"All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed's last policy meeting. The S&P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079268838,"gmtCreate":1657205715524,"gmtModify":1676535969232,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079268838","repostId":"2249459423","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2249459423","pubTimestamp":1657208203,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2249459423?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-07 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2249459423","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by le","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>Nvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.</li><li>Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia&#39;s improving business fundamentals, there is a solid reason for it.</li><li>Unfortunately for shareholders who bought at the highs, the company&#39;s share price might not recover to its 2021 highs anytime soon.</li></ul><p>About ten months ago I took a deep dive into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA&#39;s</a> share price and laid out my thesis on why investors should be less concerned about the company&#39;s business fundamentals and laser focused on its momentum exposure.</p><p>Although thismight sound counterintuitive, since sooner or later fundamentals matter, Nvidia is still at the mercy of factors that have little to do with the company&#39;s actual performance. That is why, since September of last year, the company lost nearly 35% of its value, while at the same time the S&amp;P 500 fell by slightly less than 15%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdb65cce970f34d2aeacdfd2b31ac71d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Such a large drop relative to the broader market was disappointing even when adjusting for Nvidia&#39;s high beta of 1.6. Contrary to this abysmal share price performance, however, the company continued to grow its quarterly sales numbers at a nearly 50% rate.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39e15815bfc09727371b477bf89f4a94\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"264\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Not only that, but both gross and operating margins continued to improve over the past few quarters since I covered the company.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89db1405a7e4c9d299b65404553554a0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"262\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>A somehow slowing topline growth rate could be partially to blame, however, Nvidia&#39;s revenue forward growth rate is not very different now from what it was back in September of 2021.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/603bf1b08117128bd80fd3deae02c63f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>As a matter of fact, AMD (AMD) forward revenue growth rate is much higher now than it was back then and yet the company&#39;s share price performed remarkably similar to that of Nvidia, thus also significantly underperforming the S&amp;P 500 even on a risk adjusted basis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/feae396374468950c5e366af1e28a850\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><h3>So what happened?</h3><p>To put it briefly, the risk that I highlighted in September materialized. Although I will not go into the details again in this article, I will highlight that momentum exposure of Nvidia combined with the monetary tightening (or at least the expectations of it) were the main factors for the company&#39;s poor performance during the past 10-month period.</p><p>I also explained how the whole process works in my thought piece called &#39;The Cloud Space In Numbers: What Matters The Most&#39;, where I did a case study based on another high-growth sector.</p><p>Monetary tightening has a profound impact on high duration stocks and unfortunately, Nvidia is still one of the most heavily exposed companies to rising interest rates in the semiconductor space.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/06f73d8185b657e7c3045f0fdd9e39e1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"290\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Even though the relationship between forward revenue growth rate and forward P/E ratios has weakened significantly since September of last year, the flattening of the slope of the trend line above was what caused the companies at the top right-hand corner to perform so poorly even as their business fundamentals improved.</p><p>One of the reasons why Nvidia is still so far above the trend line above, is that in addition to its industry-leading growth rate, it also has one of the highest margins within the broader semiconductors peer group. The premium pricing of Nvidia&#39;s GPUs also sets it apart from AMD, which is valued at much lower multiples.</p><h3>Is Nvidia stock a bargain?</h3><p>Nvidia is arguably one of the highest quality semiconductor companies, with enormous growth opportunities in data centers and the automotive sector. However, it now trades at more than twice the industry average forward P/E ratio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7856a9f7e7b2dace82df33f3ec1bfc4e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"263\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Moreover, recent developments in the GPU market, resulted in never before seen premiums for Nvidia&#39;s products on the back of robust demand from consumers, data centers and cryptocurrency miners. All that propelled margins to levels far above its historical results and the sector median estimates.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ed63ee078dc5e43574939faba9caa43\" tg-width=\"494\" tg-height=\"188\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>This, however, does not mean that Nvidia is suddenly a bargain, simply because a high growth and highly profitable company is trading at forward Non-GAAP P/E ratio of below 30x.</p><p>The main reason why the absolute value of its forward P/E ratio could be misleading is that the semiconductor industry is highly cyclical. Therefore, during cycle peaks, P/E ratios tend to be low due to high profits and share prices reflecting the risk of slower future sales growth.</p><p>Although, the recent push towards digitalization has somehow dispelled the risk of semiconductors being cyclical, the industry remains closely related to the business cycle (see below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd24b3cbc9dfbd04a89a8c6cdb27818\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>More importantly for Nvidia&#39;s share price, however, is the fact that it still exhibits high correlation with the MTUM less VLUE index - an index that takes a long position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and a short position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8d575869822d2149a84ac8caea4fcf5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"262\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>As a result, Nvidia&#39;s share price will continue to be highly sensitive to the momentum trade and more specifically to the overall liquidity in the equity market. Having said that, should the current monetary tightening cycle continue, Nvidia will likely continue to underperform even in the case of the company&#39;s fundamentals remaining strong.</p><p>On the contrary, should the Federal Reserve reverse course and embark on yet another monetary loosening journey, then Nvidia could potentially return to its 2021&#39;s highs. Although such a scenario should not be ruled out, it remains highly uncertain. Moreover, if it does not occur, then it will take many years before Nvidia returns to its all-time highs, all that provided that the company retains its industry leadership.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-07 23:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia's improving ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2249459423","content_text":"SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia's improving business fundamentals, there is a solid reason for it.Unfortunately for shareholders who bought at the highs, the company's share price might not recover to its 2021 highs anytime soon.About ten months ago I took a deep dive into NVIDIA's share price and laid out my thesis on why investors should be less concerned about the company's business fundamentals and laser focused on its momentum exposure.Although thismight sound counterintuitive, since sooner or later fundamentals matter, Nvidia is still at the mercy of factors that have little to do with the company's actual performance. That is why, since September of last year, the company lost nearly 35% of its value, while at the same time the S&P 500 fell by slightly less than 15%.Such a large drop relative to the broader market was disappointing even when adjusting for Nvidia's high beta of 1.6. Contrary to this abysmal share price performance, however, the company continued to grow its quarterly sales numbers at a nearly 50% rate.Not only that, but both gross and operating margins continued to improve over the past few quarters since I covered the company.A somehow slowing topline growth rate could be partially to blame, however, Nvidia's revenue forward growth rate is not very different now from what it was back in September of 2021.As a matter of fact, AMD (AMD) forward revenue growth rate is much higher now than it was back then and yet the company's share price performed remarkably similar to that of Nvidia, thus also significantly underperforming the S&P 500 even on a risk adjusted basis.So what happened?To put it briefly, the risk that I highlighted in September materialized. Although I will not go into the details again in this article, I will highlight that momentum exposure of Nvidia combined with the monetary tightening (or at least the expectations of it) were the main factors for the company's poor performance during the past 10-month period.I also explained how the whole process works in my thought piece called 'The Cloud Space In Numbers: What Matters The Most', where I did a case study based on another high-growth sector.Monetary tightening has a profound impact on high duration stocks and unfortunately, Nvidia is still one of the most heavily exposed companies to rising interest rates in the semiconductor space.Even though the relationship between forward revenue growth rate and forward P/E ratios has weakened significantly since September of last year, the flattening of the slope of the trend line above was what caused the companies at the top right-hand corner to perform so poorly even as their business fundamentals improved.One of the reasons why Nvidia is still so far above the trend line above, is that in addition to its industry-leading growth rate, it also has one of the highest margins within the broader semiconductors peer group. The premium pricing of Nvidia's GPUs also sets it apart from AMD, which is valued at much lower multiples.Is Nvidia stock a bargain?Nvidia is arguably one of the highest quality semiconductor companies, with enormous growth opportunities in data centers and the automotive sector. However, it now trades at more than twice the industry average forward P/E ratio.Moreover, recent developments in the GPU market, resulted in never before seen premiums for Nvidia's products on the back of robust demand from consumers, data centers and cryptocurrency miners. All that propelled margins to levels far above its historical results and the sector median estimates.This, however, does not mean that Nvidia is suddenly a bargain, simply because a high growth and highly profitable company is trading at forward Non-GAAP P/E ratio of below 30x.The main reason why the absolute value of its forward P/E ratio could be misleading is that the semiconductor industry is highly cyclical. Therefore, during cycle peaks, P/E ratios tend to be low due to high profits and share prices reflecting the risk of slower future sales growth.Although, the recent push towards digitalization has somehow dispelled the risk of semiconductors being cyclical, the industry remains closely related to the business cycle (see below).More importantly for Nvidia's share price, however, is the fact that it still exhibits high correlation with the MTUM less VLUE index - an index that takes a long position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and a short position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE).As a result, Nvidia's share price will continue to be highly sensitive to the momentum trade and more specifically to the overall liquidity in the equity market. Having said that, should the current monetary tightening cycle continue, Nvidia will likely continue to underperform even in the case of the company's fundamentals remaining strong.On the contrary, should the Federal Reserve reverse course and embark on yet another monetary loosening journey, then Nvidia could potentially return to its 2021's highs. Although such a scenario should not be ruled out, it remains highly uncertain. Moreover, if it does not occur, then it will take many years before Nvidia returns to its all-time highs, all that provided that the company retains its industry leadership.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079268977,"gmtCreate":1657205688199,"gmtModify":1676535969224,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up and up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up and up","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up and up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079268977","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9070771217,"gmtCreate":1657115819639,"gmtModify":1676535951910,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Going down?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Going down?","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Going down?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e919af919da5ef430c131ab819c881f0","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070771217","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":44,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9046629763,"gmtCreate":1656341802952,"gmtModify":1676535809755,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up. Let break 25","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up. Let break 25","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up up up. Let break 25","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046629763","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9041548860,"gmtCreate":1656079696150,"gmtModify":1676535763828,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up up up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bcaf6efe591fe393e7f92f6cb1a93335","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9041548860","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9049414534,"gmtCreate":1655825911028,"gmtModify":1676535712834,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9049414534","repostId":"2245827432","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2245827432","pubTimestamp":1655825437,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2245827432?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-21 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2245827432","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Here's what Tesla's potential upcoming split means for investors.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p><ul><li>Tesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.</li><li>The stock&#39;s valuation continues to get more attractive.</li><li>A recession could hurt Tesla&#39;s young competition.</li></ul><p>Electric-vehicle company <b>Tesla</b> recently filed a document revealing plans for a 3-for-1 stock split.</p><p>The company last split its stock in August 2020, and shares have risen 30% since then. So if you&#39;re planning to invest in Tesla, should you buy the stock now or wait until the split takes place, which needs approval from shareholders at the company&#39;s annual shareholder meeting on August 4?</p><p>The answer may surprise you; roll up your sleeves and dive in.</p><p><b>What a stock split means for investors</b></p><p>First, it is essential to know what a stock split is and what it means for investors. A stock split is when a company increases its existing total share count by a specific ratio to lower its share price. The important thing to note is the company&#39;s total market capitalization remains unchanged strictly based on the stock split.</p><p>For example, Tesla&#39;s proposed 3-for-1 split means the automaker is tripling the number of outstanding shares on the market. After the split, investors will own three shares for every share they held before the split.</p><p>If all else remains equal, the share price will fall in proportion, so if Tesla trades at $999 per share before the split, investors will have three shares at $333 each after the split.</p><p>The crucial takeaway is that a stock split doesn&#39;t make the company any more valuable; nothing fundamentally changes about the stock. The one share trading at $999 is worth the same as three shares trading at $333.</p><p>Stock splits make shares more affordable, especially for retail investors. Companies sometimes split their stock to appeal to the retail crowd; adding more shares also boosts trading volume, meaning the stock is easier to buy and sell on a brokerage.</p><p>Asking whether to buy a stock before or after a stock split is a trick question: If a split doesn&#39;t fundamentally change a stock, it shouldn&#39;t matter whether you buy now or wait. However, you can base your buying or selling of Tesla on other factors.</p><p><b>The stock is near its lowest valuation</b></p><p>Tesla began turning a bottom-line profit in 2020, so investors can value the stock with the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Its P/E ratio started high when it first turned profitable, earnings per share (EPS) are now quickly growing, and the stock&#39;s valuation is coming down. The current P/E of 89 is its lowest on record.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ac0798b0c3ec9cfba2d43139124b6d4\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts.</span></p><p>Tesla still commands a considerable premium over legacy automotive companies like <b>Ford</b> and <b>General Motors</b>, which trade at a P/E of 4 and 5, respectively. However, Tesla&#39;s bottom line is swelling; analysts expect 30% annual EPS growth over the next three to five years, compared to just 3% for Ford and 10% for General Motors.</p><p>It seems that Tesla deserves the premium valuation it has, though the degree of that premium is up for debate. Nevertheless, if the company can grow like analysts believe it can, long-term investors could see the stock grow into its valuation over time.</p><p><b>A tough economy could hurt competitors</b></p><p>Tesla&#39;s profitability also comes at a crucial time; inflation is raging, supply chains are hurting manufacturers worldwide, and the economy could enter a recession. Mass-producing cars isn&#39;t easy, and Elon Musk has openly talked about how increasing Model 3 production nearly bankrupted his company.</p><p>A problematic economic backdrop could spell trouble for upstart competitors like <b>Lucid Group</b> and <b>Rivian Automotive</b>, which still burn significant amounts of cash. Meanwhile, Tesla is generating billions in free cash flow and sitting on $18 billion in cash on the balance sheet against just $3 billion in debt.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3025a3cedebec024cae445bbfcb48f55\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"545\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts.</span></p><p>Rivian has $16 billion in cash from IPO proceeds, while Lucid has $5 billion. This cash will buy them time, but both are trying to build more vehicles faster, which could worsen their cash burn.</p><p>A recession wouldn&#39;t help anyone, but harsh operating conditions can become a game of survival, and it&#39;s not clear that any automotive company is as financially sound right now as Tesla is.</p><p><b>Wrapping up</b></p><p>A stock split can grab headlines, but investors who buy Tesla stock should do so because of its growth and profitability. The stock could go lower over the short term, and nobody knows when a bottom might occur.</p><p>Approaching your investments with a long time horizon will give a company&#39;s fundamentals the best chance to dictate your investment returns. Good companies tend to perform well over time. You can also use a dollar-cost averaging strategy to slowly buy shares, blending your cost into an average that isn&#39;t too high or too low.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-21 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSTesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.The stock's valuation continues to get more attractive.A recession could hurt Tesla's young competition.Electric-vehicle company Tesla recently filed a...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2245827432","content_text":"KEY POINTSTesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.The stock's valuation continues to get more attractive.A recession could hurt Tesla's young competition.Electric-vehicle company Tesla recently filed a document revealing plans for a 3-for-1 stock split.The company last split its stock in August 2020, and shares have risen 30% since then. So if you're planning to invest in Tesla, should you buy the stock now or wait until the split takes place, which needs approval from shareholders at the company's annual shareholder meeting on August 4?The answer may surprise you; roll up your sleeves and dive in.What a stock split means for investorsFirst, it is essential to know what a stock split is and what it means for investors. A stock split is when a company increases its existing total share count by a specific ratio to lower its share price. The important thing to note is the company's total market capitalization remains unchanged strictly based on the stock split.For example, Tesla's proposed 3-for-1 split means the automaker is tripling the number of outstanding shares on the market. After the split, investors will own three shares for every share they held before the split.If all else remains equal, the share price will fall in proportion, so if Tesla trades at $999 per share before the split, investors will have three shares at $333 each after the split.The crucial takeaway is that a stock split doesn't make the company any more valuable; nothing fundamentally changes about the stock. The one share trading at $999 is worth the same as three shares trading at $333.Stock splits make shares more affordable, especially for retail investors. Companies sometimes split their stock to appeal to the retail crowd; adding more shares also boosts trading volume, meaning the stock is easier to buy and sell on a brokerage.Asking whether to buy a stock before or after a stock split is a trick question: If a split doesn't fundamentally change a stock, it shouldn't matter whether you buy now or wait. However, you can base your buying or selling of Tesla on other factors.The stock is near its lowest valuationTesla began turning a bottom-line profit in 2020, so investors can value the stock with the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Its P/E ratio started high when it first turned profitable, earnings per share (EPS) are now quickly growing, and the stock's valuation is coming down. The current P/E of 89 is its lowest on record.Data by YCharts.Tesla still commands a considerable premium over legacy automotive companies like Ford and General Motors, which trade at a P/E of 4 and 5, respectively. However, Tesla's bottom line is swelling; analysts expect 30% annual EPS growth over the next three to five years, compared to just 3% for Ford and 10% for General Motors.It seems that Tesla deserves the premium valuation it has, though the degree of that premium is up for debate. Nevertheless, if the company can grow like analysts believe it can, long-term investors could see the stock grow into its valuation over time.A tough economy could hurt competitorsTesla's profitability also comes at a crucial time; inflation is raging, supply chains are hurting manufacturers worldwide, and the economy could enter a recession. Mass-producing cars isn't easy, and Elon Musk has openly talked about how increasing Model 3 production nearly bankrupted his company.A problematic economic backdrop could spell trouble for upstart competitors like Lucid Group and Rivian Automotive, which still burn significant amounts of cash. Meanwhile, Tesla is generating billions in free cash flow and sitting on $18 billion in cash on the balance sheet against just $3 billion in debt.Data by YCharts.Rivian has $16 billion in cash from IPO proceeds, while Lucid has $5 billion. This cash will buy them time, but both are trying to build more vehicles faster, which could worsen their cash burn.A recession wouldn't help anyone, but harsh operating conditions can become a game of survival, and it's not clear that any automotive company is as financially sound right now as Tesla is.Wrapping upA stock split can grab headlines, but investors who buy Tesla stock should do so because of its growth and profitability. The stock could go lower over the short term, and nobody knows when a bottom might occur.Approaching your investments with a long time horizon will give a company's fundamentals the best chance to dictate your investment returns. Good companies tend to perform well over time. You can also use a dollar-cost averaging strategy to slowly buy shares, blending your cost into an average that isn't too high or too low.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":64,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9049414978,"gmtCreate":1655825794594,"gmtModify":1676535712826,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up a bit more","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up a bit more","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up a bit more","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/953f4da94d2560cbf752608725761532","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9049414978","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":85,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9040872694,"gmtCreate":1655648893618,"gmtModify":1676535677719,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up n up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up n up","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$up n up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8c4781aadaa245b9907d5615d2faa7d1","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9040872694","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":84,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9057639944,"gmtCreate":1655509899388,"gmtModify":1676535652317,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up up and away.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up up and away.","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$up up and away.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b81f9b6638957fb9ee2a216c6000c901","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9057639944","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056979802,"gmtCreate":1654930912406,"gmtModify":1676535536725,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056979802","repostId":"1179127588","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179127588","pubTimestamp":1654916262,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1179127588?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-11 10:57","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"NIO Stock Is Getting Interesting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179127588","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>NIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.</li><li>Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.</li><li>I&#39;m more optimistic toward NIO now than I was in the past because its price has come down while its revenue has grown.</li><li>I still assign it a &#39;hold&#39; rating, though, because I&#39;m not yet ready to recommend it to others due to the high-risk level.</li></ul><p><b>NIO</b>(NYSE:NIO) has never been my favorite Chinese stock. I&#39;ve generally rated it a &#39;hold&#39; in my articles, seeing it as a high-growth company with some major financial downsides. NIO grew revenue at 122% in the 12 months before the recent earnings release, which is certainly impressive. However, the company is also rapidly increasing its share count, making every shareholder&#39;s ownership claim smaller over time. NIO isn&#39;t the worst offender on earth when it comes to dilution; its share count popped dramatically in 2019 then slowed down afterward. The share count increase was significant enough to merit a mention though: it grew by 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022.</p><p>For me, this dilution was, until recently, enough of a concern to avoid NIO stock. NIO&#39;s revenue is growing faster than its share count, but the one offsets the other enough that the growth looks less impressive after adjusting for dilution.</p><p>That was pretty much the end of the story for me for a long time. As a fan of Chinese tech stocks, I had researched NIO and decided that it didn&#39;t have the financial soundness other Chinese companies have. It&#39;s issuing equity to fuel growth, and it still isn&#39;t profitable. Case closed.</p><p>Or so it seemed. While I was content to leave NIO alone for a good while, I started thinking about the success Warren Buffett had with his <b>BYD</b>(OTCPK:BYDDF) investment. Buffett bought the stock in 2008 for a mere $232 million, and the position grew to be worth $5.9 billion. I considered buying some BYD, but the stock looked overheated: it was rallying very hard on the day I considered buying it. NIO seemed like a company that could eventually go on to become &#34;the next BYD,&#34; so I snapped up a couple of shares. Representing far less than 1% of my portfolio, the shares I bought are almost nothing, but some developments occurred that made me feel that they would be worth a tiny portfolio allocation.</p><p>On Thursday, June 9, I noticed NIO stock falling on an earnings beat. That was when I bought. What intrigued me was how much cheaper the stock had gotten due to the combination of a lower price and higher revenue. The combination of these two factors brought NIO&#39;s price/sales ratio down to 5.6, which isn&#39;t exorbitantly high for a company with NIO&#39;s growth track record. In its most recent quarter, the company&#39;s sales grew at 25%, with a massive Chinese lockdown in the picture. If the company can avoid lockdowns and other political headwinds in the next year it should be able to accelerate its revenue growth considerably; a return to 100% growth would make its 5.6 sales multiple appear cheap. This combination of a moderate valuation and growth potential is enticing. Nevertheless, I still rate the stock a hold, as I wouldn&#39;t feel comfortable recommending it to a less risk-tolerant investor, nor would I give it a heavy weighting in my own portfolio.</p><p><b>Competitive Landscape</b></p><p>One of the reasons why I&#39;m maintaining my &#39;hold&#39; rating on NIO is because of the competitive landscape it finds itself in. EV is a very competitive space, with one company -<b>Tesla</b>(TSLA) -- having the most brand recognition, and another - BYD - having the biggest market share in China.</p><p>NIO, right now, can&#39;t touch the advantages that either of those companies has. It isn&#39;t selling as many cars as either, and it doesn&#39;t have as much name recognition. However, it has the potential to improve. Prior to the Q1 lockdowns, NIO had a 122% revenue growth rate. Even with the lockdowns, it managed 25% growth. The pre-lockdown growth rate was much higher than that of Tesla, yet NIO still has a far lower sales multiple than TSLA does. As a comparative valuation play, NIO looks like it has promise.</p><p>The comparison to BYD is less flattering. BYD is growing deliveries by250% year-over-year, which is a much faster growth rate than NIO. It&#39;s also doing a lot more deliveries to begin with: in 2021, it sold 593,743 cars. Recently, BYD made waves when it was revealed that it was selling batteries to Tesla. That was considered a big deal because it reversed what was once considered Tesla&#39;s big advantage over other EVs: battery production.</p><p>NIO is certainly no BYD-tier industry titan. However, it doesn&#39;t compete with BYD head-to-head. NIO mainly sells luxury cars, BYD sells a mix of cars and commercial vehicles. So, there is room for both companies in the Chinese EV market.</p><p><b>Financials</b></p><p>As we&#39;ve seen, NIO has an &#39;OK&#39; competitive position. It&#39;s no BYD or Tesla, but it&#39;s a real company selling ever growing numbers of cars every year. Viewed as a speculative small cap play, it has promise. As for whether NIO is fulfilling its promise, we need to look at the company&#39;s financials to see whether that&#39;s the case.</p><p>In its most recent quarter, NIO delivered:</p><ul><li><p>$1.56 billion in revenue, up 24.2%.</p></li><li><p>$228 million in gross profit, down 6.9%.</p></li><li><p>A $345 million operating loss, worsened by 640%.</p></li><li><p>A $281 million net loss, worsened by 295%.</p></li></ul><p>As you can see, most of the profit metrics got worse. Revenue grew, although it decelerated from previous quarters. It&#39;s not hard to see why NIO sold off after reporting these widening losses. When a company&#39;s losses increase in magnitude, it becomes worth less, assuming it was valued accurately prior to the losses. With that said, NIO&#39;s release beat on not only the top line but also the bottom line, so it&#39;s not clear why it sold off after earnings. It suggests that analysts covering the stock were not very confident in the appraisal of fair value they held prior to the release.</p><p>To be perfectly honest, even the fact that NIO had a strong top line showing was impressive. Lockdowns were in effect in much of China in the quarter just reported, and NIO factories were known to have been affected by them. Given the headwinds present at the time, the earnings release was relatively strong, although the possibility of future lockdowns certainly merits caution.</p><p><b>Balance Sheet</b></p><p>Having looked at NIO&#39;s most recent quarter, we can now turn to its balance sheet. According to Seeking Alpha Quant, NIO boasts the following balance sheet metrics:</p><ul><li><p>Assets: $13.7 billion.</p></li><li><p>Liabilities: $7.8 billion.</p></li><li><p>Equity: $5.3 billion.</p></li><li><p>Debt: $1.7 billion.</p></li><li><p>Current assets: $10 billion.</p></li><li><p>Current liabilities: $5 billion.</p></li><li><p>Cash: $2.5 billion.</p></li><li><p>Cash + short term securities: $7.7 billion</p></li></ul><p>From the figures above, we can calculate:</p><ul><li><p>A current ratio of 2, suggesting excellent liquidity.</p></li><li><p>A cash ratio of 1.54, again suggesting excellent liquidity.</p></li><li><p>A debt/equity ratio of 0.32, suggesting strong solvency.</p></li></ul><p>Put simply, NIO&#39;s balance sheet is very good. It scores well on both liquidity and solvency, and has enough cash to pay off ALL of its debt! The only caveat I&#39;d mention here is that much of this was achieved by selling equity instead of borrowing. In today&#39;s market conditions NIO won&#39;t be able to raise as much money by selling stock compared to what it was able to sell in the past, so it may have to borrow more in the future.</p><p><b>The Bullish Case</b></p><p>So far we&#39;ve seen that NIO recently delivered lackluster earnings, but has a strong balance sheet. Pretty mixed signals on the financials front. However, there is a bullish case to be made here. Assuming that we can avoid truly severe lockdowns in China over the next few years, then NIO should be able to ramp up its revenue growth considerably. Remember that the company was growing sales at 122% before the lockdown-induced deceleration to 25%. If operations at NIO&#39;s factories get back to normal, then it could experience revenue acceleration. If it can get back to 100% growth, then some of its valuation multiples will begin to look low. NIO currently trades at 5.6 times sales, 5.7 times book value, and 100 times operating cash flow. These multiples definitely look steep, but with sales growing at 100% year-over-year, they aren&#39;t impossible to justify. Notably, the sales multiple is far lower than Tesla&#39;s, and NIO&#39;s pre-Q1 growth was far higher than that company&#39;s. So there is significant potential here.</p><p><b>Risks &amp; Challenges</b></p><p>As we&#39;ve seen, NIO is a very fast growing company with a strong balance sheet. If it can get over its current COVID-induced woes, it may become a winner. However, there are many risks and challenges to be aware of here. Enough that I&#39;m still rating it a &#39;hold&#39; even though I did pick up a few shares myself. These risks and challenges include:</p><ul><li><p><b>Equity sales and debt issuance.</b>NIO&#39;s share count grew at 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022. It still has more share sales planned. If its stock keeps going down then it may have to borrow to finance operations, which will take a bite out of the healthy balance sheet metrics I mentioned earlier. To be frank, NIO really needs the COVID situation in China to moderate before it can truly take off. If that doesn&#39;t happen then dilution and/or borrowing will become necessary.</p></li><li><p><b>Competition.</b> Competition in the EV sector is fierce, and NIO is not China&#39;s market leader. It is far behind BYD on deliveries, and also on revenue. There are smaller competitors to contend with as well. NIO is a much smaller cap company than BYD is, so it has more potential to really soar in a best-case scenario. But it is definitely an underdog.</p></li><li><p><b>Regulatory issues.</b> Chinese stocks are currently facing regulatory pressure from the United States. The U.S. wants more ability to do on-site auditing before it will give Chinese companies the go-ahead to remain listed on the NYSE. NIO is one of the companies that has been identified as not meeting U.S. auditing requirements. If NIO has to list exclusively in Hong Kong, then U.S. investors may find it not worth the hassle to invest in. Potentially it could underperform relative to a U.S. company with identical fundamentals.</p></li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Stock Is Getting Interesting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Stock Is Getting Interesting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 10:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.I'm more optimistic ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","NIO.SI":"蔚来","09866":"蔚来-SW"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179127588","content_text":"SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.I'm more optimistic toward NIO now than I was in the past because its price has come down while its revenue has grown.I still assign it a 'hold' rating, though, because I'm not yet ready to recommend it to others due to the high-risk level.NIO(NYSE:NIO) has never been my favorite Chinese stock. I've generally rated it a 'hold' in my articles, seeing it as a high-growth company with some major financial downsides. NIO grew revenue at 122% in the 12 months before the recent earnings release, which is certainly impressive. However, the company is also rapidly increasing its share count, making every shareholder's ownership claim smaller over time. NIO isn't the worst offender on earth when it comes to dilution; its share count popped dramatically in 2019 then slowed down afterward. The share count increase was significant enough to merit a mention though: it grew by 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022.For me, this dilution was, until recently, enough of a concern to avoid NIO stock. NIO's revenue is growing faster than its share count, but the one offsets the other enough that the growth looks less impressive after adjusting for dilution.That was pretty much the end of the story for me for a long time. As a fan of Chinese tech stocks, I had researched NIO and decided that it didn't have the financial soundness other Chinese companies have. It's issuing equity to fuel growth, and it still isn't profitable. Case closed.Or so it seemed. While I was content to leave NIO alone for a good while, I started thinking about the success Warren Buffett had with his BYD(OTCPK:BYDDF) investment. Buffett bought the stock in 2008 for a mere $232 million, and the position grew to be worth $5.9 billion. I considered buying some BYD, but the stock looked overheated: it was rallying very hard on the day I considered buying it. NIO seemed like a company that could eventually go on to become \"the next BYD,\" so I snapped up a couple of shares. Representing far less than 1% of my portfolio, the shares I bought are almost nothing, but some developments occurred that made me feel that they would be worth a tiny portfolio allocation.On Thursday, June 9, I noticed NIO stock falling on an earnings beat. That was when I bought. What intrigued me was how much cheaper the stock had gotten due to the combination of a lower price and higher revenue. The combination of these two factors brought NIO's price/sales ratio down to 5.6, which isn't exorbitantly high for a company with NIO's growth track record. In its most recent quarter, the company's sales grew at 25%, with a massive Chinese lockdown in the picture. If the company can avoid lockdowns and other political headwinds in the next year it should be able to accelerate its revenue growth considerably; a return to 100% growth would make its 5.6 sales multiple appear cheap. This combination of a moderate valuation and growth potential is enticing. Nevertheless, I still rate the stock a hold, as I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending it to a less risk-tolerant investor, nor would I give it a heavy weighting in my own portfolio.Competitive LandscapeOne of the reasons why I'm maintaining my 'hold' rating on NIO is because of the competitive landscape it finds itself in. EV is a very competitive space, with one company -Tesla(TSLA) -- having the most brand recognition, and another - BYD - having the biggest market share in China.NIO, right now, can't touch the advantages that either of those companies has. It isn't selling as many cars as either, and it doesn't have as much name recognition. However, it has the potential to improve. Prior to the Q1 lockdowns, NIO had a 122% revenue growth rate. Even with the lockdowns, it managed 25% growth. The pre-lockdown growth rate was much higher than that of Tesla, yet NIO still has a far lower sales multiple than TSLA does. As a comparative valuation play, NIO looks like it has promise.The comparison to BYD is less flattering. BYD is growing deliveries by250% year-over-year, which is a much faster growth rate than NIO. It's also doing a lot more deliveries to begin with: in 2021, it sold 593,743 cars. Recently, BYD made waves when it was revealed that it was selling batteries to Tesla. That was considered a big deal because it reversed what was once considered Tesla's big advantage over other EVs: battery production.NIO is certainly no BYD-tier industry titan. However, it doesn't compete with BYD head-to-head. NIO mainly sells luxury cars, BYD sells a mix of cars and commercial vehicles. So, there is room for both companies in the Chinese EV market.FinancialsAs we've seen, NIO has an 'OK' competitive position. It's no BYD or Tesla, but it's a real company selling ever growing numbers of cars every year. Viewed as a speculative small cap play, it has promise. As for whether NIO is fulfilling its promise, we need to look at the company's financials to see whether that's the case.In its most recent quarter, NIO delivered:$1.56 billion in revenue, up 24.2%.$228 million in gross profit, down 6.9%.A $345 million operating loss, worsened by 640%.A $281 million net loss, worsened by 295%.As you can see, most of the profit metrics got worse. Revenue grew, although it decelerated from previous quarters. It's not hard to see why NIO sold off after reporting these widening losses. When a company's losses increase in magnitude, it becomes worth less, assuming it was valued accurately prior to the losses. With that said, NIO's release beat on not only the top line but also the bottom line, so it's not clear why it sold off after earnings. It suggests that analysts covering the stock were not very confident in the appraisal of fair value they held prior to the release.To be perfectly honest, even the fact that NIO had a strong top line showing was impressive. Lockdowns were in effect in much of China in the quarter just reported, and NIO factories were known to have been affected by them. Given the headwinds present at the time, the earnings release was relatively strong, although the possibility of future lockdowns certainly merits caution.Balance SheetHaving looked at NIO's most recent quarter, we can now turn to its balance sheet. According to Seeking Alpha Quant, NIO boasts the following balance sheet metrics:Assets: $13.7 billion.Liabilities: $7.8 billion.Equity: $5.3 billion.Debt: $1.7 billion.Current assets: $10 billion.Current liabilities: $5 billion.Cash: $2.5 billion.Cash + short term securities: $7.7 billionFrom the figures above, we can calculate:A current ratio of 2, suggesting excellent liquidity.A cash ratio of 1.54, again suggesting excellent liquidity.A debt/equity ratio of 0.32, suggesting strong solvency.Put simply, NIO's balance sheet is very good. It scores well on both liquidity and solvency, and has enough cash to pay off ALL of its debt! The only caveat I'd mention here is that much of this was achieved by selling equity instead of borrowing. In today's market conditions NIO won't be able to raise as much money by selling stock compared to what it was able to sell in the past, so it may have to borrow more in the future.The Bullish CaseSo far we've seen that NIO recently delivered lackluster earnings, but has a strong balance sheet. Pretty mixed signals on the financials front. However, there is a bullish case to be made here. Assuming that we can avoid truly severe lockdowns in China over the next few years, then NIO should be able to ramp up its revenue growth considerably. Remember that the company was growing sales at 122% before the lockdown-induced deceleration to 25%. If operations at NIO's factories get back to normal, then it could experience revenue acceleration. If it can get back to 100% growth, then some of its valuation multiples will begin to look low. NIO currently trades at 5.6 times sales, 5.7 times book value, and 100 times operating cash flow. These multiples definitely look steep, but with sales growing at 100% year-over-year, they aren't impossible to justify. Notably, the sales multiple is far lower than Tesla's, and NIO's pre-Q1 growth was far higher than that company's. So there is significant potential here.Risks & ChallengesAs we've seen, NIO is a very fast growing company with a strong balance sheet. If it can get over its current COVID-induced woes, it may become a winner. However, there are many risks and challenges to be aware of here. Enough that I'm still rating it a 'hold' even though I did pick up a few shares myself. These risks and challenges include:Equity sales and debt issuance.NIO's share count grew at 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022. It still has more share sales planned. If its stock keeps going down then it may have to borrow to finance operations, which will take a bite out of the healthy balance sheet metrics I mentioned earlier. To be frank, NIO really needs the COVID situation in China to moderate before it can truly take off. If that doesn't happen then dilution and/or borrowing will become necessary.Competition. Competition in the EV sector is fierce, and NIO is not China's market leader. It is far behind BYD on deliveries, and also on revenue. There are smaller competitors to contend with as well. NIO is a much smaller cap company than BYD is, so it has more potential to really soar in a best-case scenario. But it is definitely an underdog.Regulatory issues. Chinese stocks are currently facing regulatory pressure from the United States. The U.S. wants more ability to do on-site auditing before it will give Chinese companies the go-ahead to remain listed on the NYSE. NIO is one of the companies that has been identified as not meeting U.S. auditing requirements. If NIO has to list exclusively in Hong Kong, then U.S. investors may find it not worth the hassle to invest in. Potentially it could underperform relative to a U.S. company with identical fundamentals.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9027160784,"gmtCreate":1653991796748,"gmtModify":1676535374950,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9027160784","repostId":"1181522045","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181522045","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653986304,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181522045?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-31 16:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181522045","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Hot Chinese ADRs jumped in premarket tradi","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><ul><li><b>Hot Chinese ADRs</b> jumped in premarket trading. <b>Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto</b> climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Gold Fields</b> shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>HP Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts are expecting <b>Salesforce, Inc.</b> to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Natuzzi S.p.A.</b> reported an operating profit of &amp;euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &amp;euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &amp;euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.</li></ul><ul><li>After the closing bell,<b>Victoria&#39;s Secret &amp; Co.</b> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria&#39;s Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts expect <b>KE Holdings Inc.</b> to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Unilever</b> said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.</li></ul><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-31 16:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><ul><li><b>Hot Chinese ADRs</b> jumped in premarket trading. <b>Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto</b> climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Gold Fields</b> shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>HP Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts are expecting <b>Salesforce, Inc.</b> to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Natuzzi S.p.A.</b> reported an operating profit of &amp;euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &amp;euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &amp;euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.</li></ul><ul><li>After the closing bell,<b>Victoria&#39;s Secret &amp; Co.</b> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria&#39;s Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts expect <b>KE Holdings Inc.</b> to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Unilever</b> said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.</li></ul><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","HPQ":"惠普","BIDU":"百度","PDD":"拼多多","CRM":"赛富时","UL":"联合利华(英国)","BEKE":"贝壳","NTZ":"纳图兹家具","GFI":"金田","JD":"京东","VSCO":"维多利亚的秘密"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181522045","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Hot Chinese ADRs jumped in premarket trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.Gold Fields shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.Wall Street expects HP Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.Analysts are expecting Salesforce, Inc. to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.Natuzzi S.p.A. reported an operating profit of &euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.After the closing bell,Victoria's Secret & Co. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria's Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.Analysts expect KE Holdings Inc. to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.Unilever said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":94,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9086936427,"gmtCreate":1650410489159,"gmtModify":1676534715404,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment. Thanks.","listText":"Like and comment. Thanks.","text":"Like and comment. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9086936427","repostId":"2228911690","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2228911690","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1650409611,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2228911690?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-20 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix Shares Fell 25%, Losing Subscribers Amid Growing Competition, Account Sharing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2228911690","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Netflix Inc. lost subscribers globally in the first quarter and expects to lose even more this sprin","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix Inc. lost subscribers globally in the first quarter and expects to lose even more this spring, as the streaming giant grapples with stiffer competition from rival services and rampant account sharing among its customers.</p><p>The company ended the first quarter with 200,000 fewer subscribers than it had in the fourth, missing on its own projection of adding 2.5 million customers in the period. Netflix said it expected to lose two million global subscribers in the current quarter.</p><p>Netflix shares fell 25% in after-hours trading. Through Tuesday&#39;s close, the stock was off more than 40% for the year so far.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf86a748550d7075a6b27a2aa1497efe\" tg-width=\"857\" tg-height=\"826\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Netflix blamed password sharing among its members and increased streaming competition for creating what it called &#34;revenue growth headwinds.&#34; Netflix estimated that besides its almost 222 million paying households, the service is being shared with an additional 100 million homes including 30 million in the U.S. and Canada.</p><p>In its letter to investors, Netflix said it is testing password-sharing subscription models that it believes will allow it to monetize sharing and build revenue. The company said the portion of its members who share accounts hasn&#39;t changed much over the years, but as its overall subscriber base continues to expand, account sharing is hampering future growth in many markets.</p><p>The streaming giant said revenue growth has slowed considerably after years of 20%-plus gains. Revenue in the first quarter rose roughly 10% to $7.87 billion, below analysts&#39; projections of $7.93 billion.</p><p>Netflix also warned that gains made during the Covid-19 pandemic hid the fault lines that have emerged in its business over the past few years. &#34;Covid clouded the picture by significantly increasing our growth in 2020, leading us to believe that most of our slowing growth in 2021 was due to the Covid pull forward,&#34; the company said in its letter.</p><p>The subscription decline brought Netflix&#39;s paid global subscriber base to 221.6 million, down from 221.8 million in the prior quarter. Net profit was $1.6 billion, down from $1.71 billion a year earlier.</p><p>Besides competition and password sharing, Netflix said slowing growth reflected such factors as the rate of adoption of smart TVs, data costs and world events including increasing inflation, Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine and continuing disruption from the pandemic.</p><p>Netflix said shutting down its service in Russia resulted in the loss of 700,000 subscribers.</p><p>With a rate of growth that has been the envy of the industry for more than a decade, Netflix is seen as a barometer for streaming. As competition grew and programming costs rose, the company moved recently to raise the price for its monthly plans for the first time since 2020.</p><p>Netflix&#39;s approach contrasts with options presented by competitors. Walt Disney Co. announced last month that it would roll out a cheaper, ad-supported Disney+ subscription in the U.S. beginning in late 2022. The move would leave Netflix and Apple Inc. as the only major streaming services that don&#39;t offer a lower-cost, ad-supported option.</p><p>While Netflix has no stated plans to launch an advertiser-supported tier, during a recent investment conference its chief operating officer, Spencer Neumann, said: &#34;Never say never.&#34;</p><p>Netflix&#39;s first-quarter operating margin was 25.1%, down from 27.4% a year earlier. The company said it aims to keep its operating margin at 20% in the future.</p><p>Netflix said its plan to right itself will be heavily focused on improving the quality of its programming and the recommendations that platform provides to its customers to keep them engaged in the content and on the service. Netflix already spends more than any other entertainment provider, with a programming budget that is expected to surpass $20 billion this year.</p><p>Although Netflix has several hit shows including &#34;Stranger Things,&#34; &#34;Bridgerton&#34; and &#34;The Crown,&#34; the service has also had its fair share of expensive flops recently including shows such as &#34;Jupiter Ascending&#34; and &#34;Space Force.&#34;</p><p>World-wide, Netflix said its business in Central and Eastern Europe showed the effects of Russia&#39;s attack on Ukraine. Also down was Latin America, which lost 400,000 subscribers. In the U.S. and Canada, the company lost 600,000 subscribers, which it attributed to its recent price increase.</p><p>The company said it had grown in Japan, India, the Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan.</p><p>&#34;Over the longer term, much of our growth will come from outside the U.S.,&#34; Netflix said.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix Shares Fell 25%, Losing Subscribers Amid Growing Competition, Account Sharing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix Shares Fell 25%, Losing Subscribers Amid Growing Competition, Account Sharing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-20 07:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix Inc. lost subscribers globally in the first quarter and expects to lose even more this spring, as the streaming giant grapples with stiffer competition from rival services and rampant account sharing among its customers.</p><p>The company ended the first quarter with 200,000 fewer subscribers than it had in the fourth, missing on its own projection of adding 2.5 million customers in the period. Netflix said it expected to lose two million global subscribers in the current quarter.</p><p>Netflix shares fell 25% in after-hours trading. Through Tuesday&#39;s close, the stock was off more than 40% for the year so far.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf86a748550d7075a6b27a2aa1497efe\" tg-width=\"857\" tg-height=\"826\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Netflix blamed password sharing among its members and increased streaming competition for creating what it called &#34;revenue growth headwinds.&#34; Netflix estimated that besides its almost 222 million paying households, the service is being shared with an additional 100 million homes including 30 million in the U.S. and Canada.</p><p>In its letter to investors, Netflix said it is testing password-sharing subscription models that it believes will allow it to monetize sharing and build revenue. The company said the portion of its members who share accounts hasn&#39;t changed much over the years, but as its overall subscriber base continues to expand, account sharing is hampering future growth in many markets.</p><p>The streaming giant said revenue growth has slowed considerably after years of 20%-plus gains. Revenue in the first quarter rose roughly 10% to $7.87 billion, below analysts&#39; projections of $7.93 billion.</p><p>Netflix also warned that gains made during the Covid-19 pandemic hid the fault lines that have emerged in its business over the past few years. &#34;Covid clouded the picture by significantly increasing our growth in 2020, leading us to believe that most of our slowing growth in 2021 was due to the Covid pull forward,&#34; the company said in its letter.</p><p>The subscription decline brought Netflix&#39;s paid global subscriber base to 221.6 million, down from 221.8 million in the prior quarter. Net profit was $1.6 billion, down from $1.71 billion a year earlier.</p><p>Besides competition and password sharing, Netflix said slowing growth reflected such factors as the rate of adoption of smart TVs, data costs and world events including increasing inflation, Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine and continuing disruption from the pandemic.</p><p>Netflix said shutting down its service in Russia resulted in the loss of 700,000 subscribers.</p><p>With a rate of growth that has been the envy of the industry for more than a decade, Netflix is seen as a barometer for streaming. As competition grew and programming costs rose, the company moved recently to raise the price for its monthly plans for the first time since 2020.</p><p>Netflix&#39;s approach contrasts with options presented by competitors. Walt Disney Co. announced last month that it would roll out a cheaper, ad-supported Disney+ subscription in the U.S. beginning in late 2022. The move would leave Netflix and Apple Inc. as the only major streaming services that don&#39;t offer a lower-cost, ad-supported option.</p><p>While Netflix has no stated plans to launch an advertiser-supported tier, during a recent investment conference its chief operating officer, Spencer Neumann, said: &#34;Never say never.&#34;</p><p>Netflix&#39;s first-quarter operating margin was 25.1%, down from 27.4% a year earlier. The company said it aims to keep its operating margin at 20% in the future.</p><p>Netflix said its plan to right itself will be heavily focused on improving the quality of its programming and the recommendations that platform provides to its customers to keep them engaged in the content and on the service. Netflix already spends more than any other entertainment provider, with a programming budget that is expected to surpass $20 billion this year.</p><p>Although Netflix has several hit shows including &#34;Stranger Things,&#34; &#34;Bridgerton&#34; and &#34;The Crown,&#34; the service has also had its fair share of expensive flops recently including shows such as &#34;Jupiter Ascending&#34; and &#34;Space Force.&#34;</p><p>World-wide, Netflix said its business in Central and Eastern Europe showed the effects of Russia&#39;s attack on Ukraine. Also down was Latin America, which lost 400,000 subscribers. In the U.S. and Canada, the company lost 600,000 subscribers, which it attributed to its recent price increase.</p><p>The company said it had grown in Japan, India, the Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan.</p><p>&#34;Over the longer term, much of our growth will come from outside the U.S.,&#34; Netflix said.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4108":"电影和娱乐"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2228911690","content_text":"Netflix Inc. lost subscribers globally in the first quarter and expects to lose even more this spring, as the streaming giant grapples with stiffer competition from rival services and rampant account sharing among its customers.The company ended the first quarter with 200,000 fewer subscribers than it had in the fourth, missing on its own projection of adding 2.5 million customers in the period. Netflix said it expected to lose two million global subscribers in the current quarter.Netflix shares fell 25% in after-hours trading. Through Tuesday's close, the stock was off more than 40% for the year so far.Netflix blamed password sharing among its members and increased streaming competition for creating what it called \"revenue growth headwinds.\" Netflix estimated that besides its almost 222 million paying households, the service is being shared with an additional 100 million homes including 30 million in the U.S. and Canada.In its letter to investors, Netflix said it is testing password-sharing subscription models that it believes will allow it to monetize sharing and build revenue. The company said the portion of its members who share accounts hasn't changed much over the years, but as its overall subscriber base continues to expand, account sharing is hampering future growth in many markets.The streaming giant said revenue growth has slowed considerably after years of 20%-plus gains. Revenue in the first quarter rose roughly 10% to $7.87 billion, below analysts' projections of $7.93 billion.Netflix also warned that gains made during the Covid-19 pandemic hid the fault lines that have emerged in its business over the past few years. \"Covid clouded the picture by significantly increasing our growth in 2020, leading us to believe that most of our slowing growth in 2021 was due to the Covid pull forward,\" the company said in its letter.The subscription decline brought Netflix's paid global subscriber base to 221.6 million, down from 221.8 million in the prior quarter. Net profit was $1.6 billion, down from $1.71 billion a year earlier.Besides competition and password sharing, Netflix said slowing growth reflected such factors as the rate of adoption of smart TVs, data costs and world events including increasing inflation, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and continuing disruption from the pandemic.Netflix said shutting down its service in Russia resulted in the loss of 700,000 subscribers.With a rate of growth that has been the envy of the industry for more than a decade, Netflix is seen as a barometer for streaming. As competition grew and programming costs rose, the company moved recently to raise the price for its monthly plans for the first time since 2020.Netflix's approach contrasts with options presented by competitors. Walt Disney Co. announced last month that it would roll out a cheaper, ad-supported Disney+ subscription in the U.S. beginning in late 2022. The move would leave Netflix and Apple Inc. as the only major streaming services that don't offer a lower-cost, ad-supported option.While Netflix has no stated plans to launch an advertiser-supported tier, during a recent investment conference its chief operating officer, Spencer Neumann, said: \"Never say never.\"Netflix's first-quarter operating margin was 25.1%, down from 27.4% a year earlier. The company said it aims to keep its operating margin at 20% in the future.Netflix said its plan to right itself will be heavily focused on improving the quality of its programming and the recommendations that platform provides to its customers to keep them engaged in the content and on the service. Netflix already spends more than any other entertainment provider, with a programming budget that is expected to surpass $20 billion this year.Although Netflix has several hit shows including \"Stranger Things,\" \"Bridgerton\" and \"The Crown,\" the service has also had its fair share of expensive flops recently including shows such as \"Jupiter Ascending\" and \"Space Force.\"World-wide, Netflix said its business in Central and Eastern Europe showed the effects of Russia's attack on Ukraine. Also down was Latin America, which lost 400,000 subscribers. In the U.S. and Canada, the company lost 600,000 subscribers, which it attributed to its recent price increase.The company said it had grown in Japan, India, the Philippines, Thailand and Taiwan.\"Over the longer term, much of our growth will come from outside the U.S.,\" Netflix said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3575443999456708","authorId":"3575443999456708","name":"ponyinvestor","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/138d1ebc8820019726a687f0ffe45994","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575443999456708","authorIdStr":"3575443999456708"},"content":"Comment back pls","text":"Comment back pls","html":"Comment back pls"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038768043,"gmtCreate":1646920148997,"gmtModify":1676534177062,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038768043","repostId":"1177505554","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177505554","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1646919115,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177505554?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Inflation Rose 7.9% in Feb, as Food&Energy Costs Push Prices to Highest in 40 Years","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177505554","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Inflation grew worse in February amid the escalating crisis in Ukraine and price pressures that beca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Inflation grew worse in February amid the escalating crisis in Ukraine and price pressures that became more entrenched.</p><p>The consumer price index, which measures a wide-ranging basket of goods and services, increased 7.9% over the past 12 months, a fresh 40-year high for the closely followed gauge.</p><p>The February acceleration was the fastest pace since January1982, back when the U.S. economy confronted the twin threat of higher inflation and reduced economic growth.</p><p>On a month-over-month basis, the CPI gain was 0.8%. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had expected headline inflation to increase 7.8% for the year and 0.7% for the month.</p><p>Food prices rose 1% and food at home jumped 1.4%, both the fastest monthly gains since April 2020, in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p>Energy also was at the forefront of ballooning prices, up 3.5% for February and accounting for about one-third of the headline gain. Shelter costs, which account for about one-third of the CPI weighting, accelerated another 0.5%, for a 12-month gain of 4.7%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, so-called core inflation rose 6.4%, in line with estimates and the highest since August 1982. On a monthly basis, core CPI was up 0.5, also consistent with Wall Street expectations.</p><p>The inflation surge is in keeping with price gains over the past year. Inflation has roared higher amid an unprecedented government spending blitz coupled with persistent supply-chain disruptions that have been unable to keep up with stimulus-fueled demand, particularly for goods over services.</p><p>Vehicle costs have been a powerful force, but showed signs of easing in February. Used car and truck prices actually declined 0.2%, their first negative showing since September, but are still up 41.2% over the past year. New car prices rise 0.3% for the month and 12.4% over the 12-month period.</p><p>A raging crisis in Europe has only fed into the price pressures, as sanctions against Russia have coincided with surging gasoline costs. Prices at the pump are up about 24% over just the past month and 53% in the past year, according to AAA.</p><p>Moreover, business are raising costs to keep up with the price of raw goods and increasing pay in a historically tight labor market in which there are about 4.8 million more job openings than there are available workers.</p><p>Recent surveys, including one this week from the National Federation for Independent Business, show a record level of smaller companies are raising prices to cope with surging costs.</p><p>To try to stem the trend, the Federal Reserve is expected next week to announce the first of a series of interest rate hikes aimed at slowing inflation. It will be the first time the central bank has raised rates in more than three years, and mark a reversal of a zero-interest-rate policy and unprecedented levels of cash injections for an economy that in 2021 grew at its fastest pace in 37 years.</p><p>However, inflation is not a U.S.-centric story.</p><p>Global prices are subject to many of the same factors hitting the domestic economy, and central banks are responding in kind. On Thursday, the European Central Bank said it was not moving its benchmark interest rate but would end its own asset purchase program sooner than planned.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Inflation Rose 7.9% in Feb, as Food&Energy Costs Push Prices to Highest in 40 Years</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInflation Rose 7.9% in Feb, as Food&Energy Costs Push Prices to Highest in 40 Years\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-10 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Inflation grew worse in February amid the escalating crisis in Ukraine and price pressures that became more entrenched.</p><p>The consumer price index, which measures a wide-ranging basket of goods and services, increased 7.9% over the past 12 months, a fresh 40-year high for the closely followed gauge.</p><p>The February acceleration was the fastest pace since January1982, back when the U.S. economy confronted the twin threat of higher inflation and reduced economic growth.</p><p>On a month-over-month basis, the CPI gain was 0.8%. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had expected headline inflation to increase 7.8% for the year and 0.7% for the month.</p><p>Food prices rose 1% and food at home jumped 1.4%, both the fastest monthly gains since April 2020, in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p>Energy also was at the forefront of ballooning prices, up 3.5% for February and accounting for about one-third of the headline gain. Shelter costs, which account for about one-third of the CPI weighting, accelerated another 0.5%, for a 12-month gain of 4.7%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, so-called core inflation rose 6.4%, in line with estimates and the highest since August 1982. On a monthly basis, core CPI was up 0.5, also consistent with Wall Street expectations.</p><p>The inflation surge is in keeping with price gains over the past year. Inflation has roared higher amid an unprecedented government spending blitz coupled with persistent supply-chain disruptions that have been unable to keep up with stimulus-fueled demand, particularly for goods over services.</p><p>Vehicle costs have been a powerful force, but showed signs of easing in February. Used car and truck prices actually declined 0.2%, their first negative showing since September, but are still up 41.2% over the past year. New car prices rise 0.3% for the month and 12.4% over the 12-month period.</p><p>A raging crisis in Europe has only fed into the price pressures, as sanctions against Russia have coincided with surging gasoline costs. Prices at the pump are up about 24% over just the past month and 53% in the past year, according to AAA.</p><p>Moreover, business are raising costs to keep up with the price of raw goods and increasing pay in a historically tight labor market in which there are about 4.8 million more job openings than there are available workers.</p><p>Recent surveys, including one this week from the National Federation for Independent Business, show a record level of smaller companies are raising prices to cope with surging costs.</p><p>To try to stem the trend, the Federal Reserve is expected next week to announce the first of a series of interest rate hikes aimed at slowing inflation. It will be the first time the central bank has raised rates in more than three years, and mark a reversal of a zero-interest-rate policy and unprecedented levels of cash injections for an economy that in 2021 grew at its fastest pace in 37 years.</p><p>However, inflation is not a U.S.-centric story.</p><p>Global prices are subject to many of the same factors hitting the domestic economy, and central banks are responding in kind. On Thursday, the European Central Bank said it was not moving its benchmark interest rate but would end its own asset purchase program sooner than planned.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177505554","content_text":"Inflation grew worse in February amid the escalating crisis in Ukraine and price pressures that became more entrenched.The consumer price index, which measures a wide-ranging basket of goods and services, increased 7.9% over the past 12 months, a fresh 40-year high for the closely followed gauge.The February acceleration was the fastest pace since January1982, back when the U.S. economy confronted the twin threat of higher inflation and reduced economic growth.On a month-over-month basis, the CPI gain was 0.8%. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had expected headline inflation to increase 7.8% for the year and 0.7% for the month.Food prices rose 1% and food at home jumped 1.4%, both the fastest monthly gains since April 2020, in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.Energy also was at the forefront of ballooning prices, up 3.5% for February and accounting for about one-third of the headline gain. Shelter costs, which account for about one-third of the CPI weighting, accelerated another 0.5%, for a 12-month gain of 4.7%.Excluding volatile food and energy prices, so-called core inflation rose 6.4%, in line with estimates and the highest since August 1982. On a monthly basis, core CPI was up 0.5, also consistent with Wall Street expectations.The inflation surge is in keeping with price gains over the past year. Inflation has roared higher amid an unprecedented government spending blitz coupled with persistent supply-chain disruptions that have been unable to keep up with stimulus-fueled demand, particularly for goods over services.Vehicle costs have been a powerful force, but showed signs of easing in February. Used car and truck prices actually declined 0.2%, their first negative showing since September, but are still up 41.2% over the past year. New car prices rise 0.3% for the month and 12.4% over the 12-month period.A raging crisis in Europe has only fed into the price pressures, as sanctions against Russia have coincided with surging gasoline costs. Prices at the pump are up about 24% over just the past month and 53% in the past year, according to AAA.Moreover, business are raising costs to keep up with the price of raw goods and increasing pay in a historically tight labor market in which there are about 4.8 million more job openings than there are available workers.Recent surveys, including one this week from the National Federation for Independent Business, show a record level of smaller companies are raising prices to cope with surging costs.To try to stem the trend, the Federal Reserve is expected next week to announce the first of a series of interest rate hikes aimed at slowing inflation. It will be the first time the central bank has raised rates in more than three years, and mark a reversal of a zero-interest-rate policy and unprecedented levels of cash injections for an economy that in 2021 grew at its fastest pace in 37 years.However, inflation is not a U.S.-centric story.Global prices are subject to many of the same factors hitting the domestic economy, and central banks are responding in kind. On Thursday, the European Central Bank said it was not moving its benchmark interest rate but would end its own asset purchase program sooner than planned.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":113,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9087124837,"gmtCreate":1650979252352,"gmtModify":1676534826182,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and pls like","listText":"Like and pls like","text":"Like and pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9087124837","repostId":"1129911066","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129911066","pubTimestamp":1650965722,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129911066?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-26 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Eight Questions about Twitter's Future Now That Elon Musk Is Taking Over","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129911066","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) - Three of the most honest words in journalism are \"I don't know.\" The words","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>New York (CNN Business) -</b> Three of the most honest words in journalism are &#34;I don&#39;t know.&#34; The words are mighty useful right now, as the entire tech and media universe digests the ever-unpredictable Elon Musk&#39;s uncanny deal to take Twitter private. What will Musk do? What will Twitter become? I don&#39;t know. No one knows. I suspect Musk doesn&#39;t even know.</p><p>So whether the best era of Twitter is about to begin, or whether this is the beginning of the end of the service, let&#39;s be honest, no one knows. Here&#39;s what we do know, in tweet-length bursts:</p><p>&gt;&gt; This deal &#34;puts the world&#39;s richest man in charge of one of the most influential social networks,&#34; as CNN&#39;s Clare Duffy and Donie O&#39;Sullivan wrote.</p><p>&gt;&gt; It would &#34;mark one of the biggest acquisitions of a tech company and will likely affect the direction of social media,&#34; the Wall Street Journal&#39;s team wrote.</p><p>&gt;&gt; Musk said his initial bid, $54.20 per share, was his &#34;best and final offer,&#34; and sure enough, that&#39;s exactly what the Twitter board accepted 11 days later.</p><p>&gt;&gt; Nothing changes in the short term. The deal process will take several months. Musk may not take control of Twitter until the fall.</p><p>&gt;&gt; Musk has made certain pledges to users, including &#34;making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans.&#34; Now he will be held to those.</p><p>&gt;&gt; In the US, ideological reactions to the deal broke largely along predictable lines. A headline on the Wall Street Journal homepage put it this way: &#34;Republicans Cheer Deal; Democrats See Perils.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; Regarding questions about whether Musk will reinstate Donald Trump&#39;s account, CEO Parag Agrawal told staffers, &#34;Once the deal closes, we will know what direction the platform will go.&#34;</p><p><b>Eight questions</b></p><p>&gt;&gt; How was Twitter&#39;s first quarter? The company will still report Q1 earnings on Thursday, but in light of the deal, there will not be a conference call for analysts.</p><p>&gt;&gt; &#34;What does Musk think Twitter is for?&#34; That&#39;s what Casey Newton asked in his Platformer newsletter Monday night. &#34;All we have to go on is a series of cryptic tweets and statements that are short enough to allow for wide interpretation.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; So: When will Musk elaborate on his plans? Will he do it through Twitter or through methods that allow for more detail and nuance?</p><p>&gt;&gt; Will Twitter employees want to work for Musk? Some reacted to Musk&#39;s takeover &#34;with shock and dismay,&#34; The Washington Post&#39;s Elizabeth Dwoskin reported. &#34;Some tweeted tear-filled emoji and memes of people having emotional breakdowns, while others told The Post they were too in shock to speak.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; What will happen to Twitter&#39;s current leadership team? At an all-hands meeting on Monday, Agrawal said he was &#34;optimistic&#34; about the future of the company, saying Musk &#34;wants Twitter to be a powerful, positive force in the world, just like all of us.&#34; But it is hard to imagine Agrawal staying put.</p><p>&gt;&gt; What will Jack Dorsey&#39;s role be? On Monday night he tweeted that &#34;Elon&#39;s goal of creating a platform that is &#39;maximally trusted and broadly inclusive&#39; is the right one. This is also [Agrawal&#39;s] goal, and why I chose him. Thank you both for getting the company out of an impossible situation. This is the right path... I believe it with all my heart.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; What about Twitter&#39;s HQ? The SF Chronicle&#39;s Roland Li flagged the potential ramifications for the city since Musk has expressed &#34;skepticism around remote work.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; How contentious will Musk v. Jeff Bezos become? As The Verge&#39;s Richard Lawler noted, &#34;Jeff Bezos is already testing Elon Musk&#39;s commitment to free speech by trolling&#34; Musk with some Monday night tweets...</p><p><b>Further reading</b></p><p>-- &#34;Here&#39;s a timeline of how this unfolded in a matter of about 20 days...&#34; (CNN)</p><p>-- Researcher Ethan Zuckerman: &#34;I have no idea what Twitter will be like under Elon&#39;s leadership and neither do you. But that&#39;s the point.&#34;Read his thread... (Twitter)</p><p>-- &#34;What can Elon do to make Twitter more valuable?&#34; Peter Kafka sized up a number of suggestions... (Recode)</p><p>-- Charlie Warzel sketched out three potential scenarios for Musk&#39;s Twitter, including the &#34;darkest timeline...&#34; (The Atlantic)</p><p>-- Katie Notopoulos wrote a letter to fellow Twitter addicts: &#34;We crave the bad tweets, the bad takes, the ratios, the pile-ons, the quote tweet dunks.&#34; She says &#34;the truth is, it doesn&#39;t matter what Musk does to Twitter. We&#39;ll all still be here like the foul little goblins we know we are...&#34; (BuzzFeed News)</p><p>-- It&#39;s hard to top <i>that</i>, but NBC compiled some of the day&#39;s best memes... (NBC)</p><p>-- &#34;Liberals absolutely lose their minds about Musk&#39;s Twitter takeover...&#34; (Daily Caller)</p><p>-- Matt Egan notes that the Trump SPAC is down 44% since Musk disclosed his stake in Twitter... (CNN)</p><p><b>Will Trump be back?</b></p><p><i>BY OLIVER DARCY:</i></p><p>The short answer is that it is too soon to tell. Trump himself insisted to Fox in a story published Monday that even if he were permitted back onto the platform, he would not return and will opt to use his own Truth Social app. But it&#39;s hard to see the former president, someone plainly addicted to Twitter, refusing an opportunity to use the platform if he were allowed. The question really is this: Will Twitter, under Musk&#39;s ownership, reverse its decision to ban him? When it comes to free speech, Musk has made it pretty clear what direction he wants to take the platform...</p><p>&gt;&gt;<i>Brian Lowry adds:</i>&#34;For what it&#39;s worth, put me in the column of people who think that for conservatives who have been railing about being discriminated against on social media, Musk acquiring Twitter might wind up being a &#39;Be careful what you wish for&#39; moment. And because there&#39;s a marketing aspect to that concept of being victimized by Big Tech, it might be hard to let go of it, regardless of what changes the new ownership brings to the platform....&#34;</p><p><b>Crunching the #&#39;s</b></p><p><i>BY HARRY ENTEN:</i></p><p>Musk&#39;s purchase of Twitter put a man best liked by Republicans in charge of a platform disproportionately used by Democrats. Musk&#39;s net favorability (i.e. how much higher his favorable than unfavorable rating is) score in recent polling is about +50 points among Republicans compared to -10 points among Democrats. This is very different from earlier polling on the subject that showed little partisan gap in Musk&#39;s appeal.</p><p>No doubt that Musk&#39;s recent statements on loads of subjects (including negative comments about Biden) have caused a partisan rift.</p><p>The shifting opinions come just as Musk is about to take over the predominantly Dem-leaning Twitter. A Pew poll from last summer reveals that 67% of Twitter users lean Democratic compared to 30% who lean Republican. We&#39;ll see if Musk&#39;s purchase changes the #&#39;s. Regardless, it&#39;s important to keep in mind two things. One, Musk remains fairly popular overall with positive sentiments amongst those who hold an opinion outrunning negative by a 3:2 margin. Two, only 23% of Americans use Twitter, which makes it tiny compared to the 66% who use Facebook...</p><p><b>Food for thought</b></p><p>&gt;&gt; WH press secretary Jen Psaki: &#34;As a general matter, no matter who owns or runs Twitter,the president has long been concerned about the power of large social media platforms...&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; Columbia professor Emily Bell: &#34;Taking a moment to think about how utterly crazy it is that in 2022 a company with a significant dataset of private and public communications, that has municipalities, companies and governments on the platform, can switch ownership with pretty much zero scrutiny.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; Twitter employee Edward Perez: &#34;Most of us believe deeply that Twitter is much more than a tech platform; we have a deep responsibility to society. I hope our new owner gets that.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; New York Times columnist Kara Swisher: &#34;The real story here amid all the ⁦Elon Musk of it all is how badly the business and also its stock has fared for such a high profile product. Musk simply saw that and took his shot.&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; Analyst Michael Nathanson: &#34;Twitter&#39;s sale for $54.20 is final evidence that the idea of Twitter has been far more valuable than the actual long-run operations of Twitter!&#34;</p><p>&gt;&gt; THR&#39;s Alex Weprin recalls Musk saying that &#34;when I was a kid, my favorite book was The Lord of the Rings.&#34; Weprin says &#34;Twitter may be the closest thing to magic when it comes to the flow of information, with all the world&#39;s greatest minds, its most high-profile figures, and a cesspool of trolls, all sharing the same stage. Now Musk gets to be its wizard.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Eight Questions about Twitter's Future Now That Elon Musk Is Taking Over</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEight Questions about Twitter's Future Now That Elon Musk Is Taking Over\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-26 17:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/26/media/twitter-elon-musk-reliable-sources/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business) - Three of the most honest words in journalism are \"I don't know.\" The words are mighty useful right now, as the entire tech and media universe digests the ever-unpredictable ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/26/media/twitter-elon-musk-reliable-sources/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","TWTR":"Twitter"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/26/media/twitter-elon-musk-reliable-sources/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129911066","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Three of the most honest words in journalism are \"I don't know.\" The words are mighty useful right now, as the entire tech and media universe digests the ever-unpredictable Elon Musk's uncanny deal to take Twitter private. What will Musk do? What will Twitter become? I don't know. No one knows. I suspect Musk doesn't even know.So whether the best era of Twitter is about to begin, or whether this is the beginning of the end of the service, let's be honest, no one knows. Here's what we do know, in tweet-length bursts:>> This deal \"puts the world's richest man in charge of one of the most influential social networks,\" as CNN's Clare Duffy and Donie O'Sullivan wrote.>> It would \"mark one of the biggest acquisitions of a tech company and will likely affect the direction of social media,\" the Wall Street Journal's team wrote.>> Musk said his initial bid, $54.20 per share, was his \"best and final offer,\" and sure enough, that's exactly what the Twitter board accepted 11 days later.>> Nothing changes in the short term. The deal process will take several months. Musk may not take control of Twitter until the fall.>> Musk has made certain pledges to users, including \"making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans.\" Now he will be held to those.>> In the US, ideological reactions to the deal broke largely along predictable lines. A headline on the Wall Street Journal homepage put it this way: \"Republicans Cheer Deal; Democrats See Perils.\">> Regarding questions about whether Musk will reinstate Donald Trump's account, CEO Parag Agrawal told staffers, \"Once the deal closes, we will know what direction the platform will go.\"Eight questions>> How was Twitter's first quarter? The company will still report Q1 earnings on Thursday, but in light of the deal, there will not be a conference call for analysts.>> \"What does Musk think Twitter is for?\" That's what Casey Newton asked in his Platformer newsletter Monday night. \"All we have to go on is a series of cryptic tweets and statements that are short enough to allow for wide interpretation.\">> So: When will Musk elaborate on his plans? Will he do it through Twitter or through methods that allow for more detail and nuance?>> Will Twitter employees want to work for Musk? Some reacted to Musk's takeover \"with shock and dismay,\" The Washington Post's Elizabeth Dwoskin reported. \"Some tweeted tear-filled emoji and memes of people having emotional breakdowns, while others told The Post they were too in shock to speak.\">> What will happen to Twitter's current leadership team? At an all-hands meeting on Monday, Agrawal said he was \"optimistic\" about the future of the company, saying Musk \"wants Twitter to be a powerful, positive force in the world, just like all of us.\" But it is hard to imagine Agrawal staying put.>> What will Jack Dorsey's role be? On Monday night he tweeted that \"Elon's goal of creating a platform that is 'maximally trusted and broadly inclusive' is the right one. This is also [Agrawal's] goal, and why I chose him. Thank you both for getting the company out of an impossible situation. This is the right path... I believe it with all my heart.\">> What about Twitter's HQ? The SF Chronicle's Roland Li flagged the potential ramifications for the city since Musk has expressed \"skepticism around remote work.\">> How contentious will Musk v. Jeff Bezos become? As The Verge's Richard Lawler noted, \"Jeff Bezos is already testing Elon Musk's commitment to free speech by trolling\" Musk with some Monday night tweets...Further reading-- \"Here's a timeline of how this unfolded in a matter of about 20 days...\" (CNN)-- Researcher Ethan Zuckerman: \"I have no idea what Twitter will be like under Elon's leadership and neither do you. But that's the point.\"Read his thread... (Twitter)-- \"What can Elon do to make Twitter more valuable?\" Peter Kafka sized up a number of suggestions... (Recode)-- Charlie Warzel sketched out three potential scenarios for Musk's Twitter, including the \"darkest timeline...\" (The Atlantic)-- Katie Notopoulos wrote a letter to fellow Twitter addicts: \"We crave the bad tweets, the bad takes, the ratios, the pile-ons, the quote tweet dunks.\" She says \"the truth is, it doesn't matter what Musk does to Twitter. We'll all still be here like the foul little goblins we know we are...\" (BuzzFeed News)-- It's hard to top that, but NBC compiled some of the day's best memes... (NBC)-- \"Liberals absolutely lose their minds about Musk's Twitter takeover...\" (Daily Caller)-- Matt Egan notes that the Trump SPAC is down 44% since Musk disclosed his stake in Twitter... (CNN)Will Trump be back?BY OLIVER DARCY:The short answer is that it is too soon to tell. Trump himself insisted to Fox in a story published Monday that even if he were permitted back onto the platform, he would not return and will opt to use his own Truth Social app. But it's hard to see the former president, someone plainly addicted to Twitter, refusing an opportunity to use the platform if he were allowed. The question really is this: Will Twitter, under Musk's ownership, reverse its decision to ban him? When it comes to free speech, Musk has made it pretty clear what direction he wants to take the platform...>>Brian Lowry adds:\"For what it's worth, put me in the column of people who think that for conservatives who have been railing about being discriminated against on social media, Musk acquiring Twitter might wind up being a 'Be careful what you wish for' moment. And because there's a marketing aspect to that concept of being victimized by Big Tech, it might be hard to let go of it, regardless of what changes the new ownership brings to the platform....\"Crunching the #'sBY HARRY ENTEN:Musk's purchase of Twitter put a man best liked by Republicans in charge of a platform disproportionately used by Democrats. Musk's net favorability (i.e. how much higher his favorable than unfavorable rating is) score in recent polling is about +50 points among Republicans compared to -10 points among Democrats. This is very different from earlier polling on the subject that showed little partisan gap in Musk's appeal.No doubt that Musk's recent statements on loads of subjects (including negative comments about Biden) have caused a partisan rift.The shifting opinions come just as Musk is about to take over the predominantly Dem-leaning Twitter. A Pew poll from last summer reveals that 67% of Twitter users lean Democratic compared to 30% who lean Republican. We'll see if Musk's purchase changes the #'s. Regardless, it's important to keep in mind two things. One, Musk remains fairly popular overall with positive sentiments amongst those who hold an opinion outrunning negative by a 3:2 margin. Two, only 23% of Americans use Twitter, which makes it tiny compared to the 66% who use Facebook...Food for thought>> WH press secretary Jen Psaki: \"As a general matter, no matter who owns or runs Twitter,the president has long been concerned about the power of large social media platforms...\">> Columbia professor Emily Bell: \"Taking a moment to think about how utterly crazy it is that in 2022 a company with a significant dataset of private and public communications, that has municipalities, companies and governments on the platform, can switch ownership with pretty much zero scrutiny.\">> Twitter employee Edward Perez: \"Most of us believe deeply that Twitter is much more than a tech platform; we have a deep responsibility to society. I hope our new owner gets that.\">> New York Times columnist Kara Swisher: \"The real story here amid all the ⁦Elon Musk of it all is how badly the business and also its stock has fared for such a high profile product. Musk simply saw that and took his shot.\">> Analyst Michael Nathanson: \"Twitter's sale for $54.20 is final evidence that the idea of Twitter has been far more valuable than the actual long-run operations of Twitter!\">> THR's Alex Weprin recalls Musk saying that \"when I was a kid, my favorite book was The Lord of the Rings.\" Weprin says \"Twitter may be the closest thing to magic when it comes to the flow of information, with all the world's greatest minds, its most high-profile figures, and a cesspool of trolls, all sharing the same stage. Now Musk gets to be its wizard.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":225,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084390221,"gmtCreate":1650806147392,"gmtModify":1676534795982,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and please like. Thanks.","listText":"Like and please like. Thanks.","text":"Like and please like. Thanks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084390221","repostId":"2229599011","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2229599011","pubTimestamp":1650691800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2229599011?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-23 13:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Nvidia Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2229599011","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The chipmaker nearly joined the twelve-zero club last year, but it could be awhile before it gets back there.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Nvidia</b>&#39;s stock closed at an all-time high of $333.76 on Nov. 29, 2021, which gave the chipmaker a market cap of $834 billion. At the time, Nvidia seemed destined to become a trillion-dollar company.</p><p>But after hitting its all-time high, Nvidia&#39;s stock shed over a third of its value and its market cap dropped to less than $550 billion. The bulls fled amid concerns about a post-COVID-lockdown slowdown in PC sales, while rising interest rates exacerbated that pain by sparking a sell-off in higher-growth stocks.</p><p>Can Nvidia regain its momentum and finally join the twelve-zero club by 2025? Let&#39;s examine its upcoming catalysts and challenges to find out.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F675321%2Frtx-platform-diagram.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Nvidia.</span></p><h2>Nvidia could face a cyclical slowdown</h2><p>Nvidia&#39;s stock hit an all-time high last year as its gaming and data center GPU business generated dazzling growth throughout the pandemic.</p><p>In the 2022 fiscal year, which ended this January, Nvidia&#39;s revenue surged 61% to $26.91 billion as its adjusted earnings per share (EPS) grew 78%. Its adjusted operating margin jumped 640 basis points to 47.2%. It attributed most of that growth to its robust sales of gaming and data center GPUs.</p><p>But over the next three fiscal years, analysts expect Nvidia&#39;s revenue growth to decelerate as that upgrade cycle cools off. On the bright side, they expect its adjusted operating margin to consistently rise as it benefits from improved scale and pricing power in the GPU market.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"598\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"239\"><p>Metric</p></th><th width=\"104\"><p>FY 2023 Estimate</p></th><th width=\"94\"><p>FY 2024 Estimate</p></th><th width=\"103\"><p>FY 2025 Estimate</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"239\"><p><b>Revenue Growth</b></p></td><td width=\"104\"><p>29%</p></td><td width=\"94\"><p>17%</p></td><td width=\"103\"><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"239\"><p><b>Adjusted operating margin</b></p></td><td width=\"104\"><p>48.3%</p></td><td width=\"94\"><p>49.4%</p></td><td width=\"103\"><p>51%</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"239\"><p><b>Adjusted EPS growth </b></p></td><td width=\"104\"><p>15%</p></td><td width=\"94\"><p>34%</p></td><td width=\"103\"><p>11%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence.</p><p>If those expectations are met, Nvidia would generate $45.64 billion in revenue with an adjusted EPS of $6.59 in fiscal 2025.</p><p>Nvidia currently trades at 16 times its revenue and about 50 times its EPS estimate for fiscal 2023. If Nvidia still trades at those forward valuations at the end of fiscal 2024 and hits the estimates, it would have a market cap of about $730 billion.</p><p>However, those valuations would still be too rich for a company that&#39;s growing its revenue and earnings in the low teens. Therefore, I think Nvidia&#39;s market cap might stay between $500 billion and $700 billion over the next three years as it grapples with a cyclical slowdown in the GPU market.</p><h2>The near-term headwinds</h2><p>Investors should take analysts&#39; estimates with a grain of salt, but Nvidia stock likely needs to take a breather after its big growth spurt over the past few years.</p><p>In <b>HP</b>&#39;s (NYSE: HPQ) latest earnings report, it said its sales of consumer PCs fell 1% year-over-year as it faced tough comparisons to the boost it got from remote work and gaming upgrades during the pandemic. That slowdown doesn&#39;t bode well for Nvidia and other PC chipmakers.</p><p>Meanwhile, data center operators might buy fewer Nvidia GPUs for AI tasks as the usage of cloud-based services decelerates in a post-lockdown market. Waning interest in cryptocurrencies, many of which have lost value this year as investors have rotated out of riskier assets, will also curb sales of its gaming GPUs and dedicated mining chips.</p><p>To make matters worse, <b>Intel</b> (NASDAQ: INTC) plans to disrupt Nvidia and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a></b>&#39;s (NASDAQ: AMD) duopoly in discrete GPUs with its own chips. These new GPUs, which Intel is bundling with its own CPUs, could cause more headaches for Nvidia and AMD as the broader gaming market slows down.</p><h2>The long-term tailwinds</h2><p>Those challenges seem daunting, but Nvidia has weathered plenty of cyclical downturns and competitive threats since its public debut in 1999. It also remains the dominant discrete GPU maker with an 81% market share, according to JPR&#39;s fourth-quarter numbers, compared to AMD&#39;s 19% share.</p><p>The gaming and data center markets should also keep expanding over the next few years. The gaming PC market could expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% between 2021 and 2027, according to Report Ocean, while Research and Markets expects the data center accelerator market to grow at a CAGR of 36.7% between 2021 and 2026.</p><p>If Nvidia continues to dominate both of those growing markets, its cyclical slowdown could end a lot sooner than expected. Its oft-overlooked automotive chip business -- which generated just 2% of revenue in its latest quarter -- could also gain more traction as the automotive sector gradually recovers and develops new connected and autonomous vehicles.</p><h2>Look beyond Nvidia&#39;s market cap</h2><p>Nvidia probably won&#39;t become a trillion-dollar company by 2025, and investors who were spoiled by its 380% rally over the past three years might be a bit disappointed. However, it&#39;s arguably better for Nvidia&#39;s stock to cool off now and reset the market&#39;s expectations instead of flying off the rails with runaway valuations.</p><p>Nvidia&#39;s stock might generate much lower returns over the next three years, but investors shouldn&#39;t abandon the chipmaker yet. Long-term secular tailwinds could still propel its stock to new all-time highs.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Nvidia Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Nvidia Be a Trillion-Dollar Stock by 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-23 13:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/22/will-nvidia-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2025/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nvidia's stock closed at an all-time high of $333.76 on Nov. 29, 2021, which gave the chipmaker a market cap of $834 billion. At the time, Nvidia seemed destined to become a trillion-dollar company....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/22/will-nvidia-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2025/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4529":"IDC概念","BK4543":"AI","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4581":"高盛持仓","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4141":"半导体产品"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/22/will-nvidia-be-a-trillion-dollar-stock-by-2025/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2229599011","content_text":"Nvidia's stock closed at an all-time high of $333.76 on Nov. 29, 2021, which gave the chipmaker a market cap of $834 billion. At the time, Nvidia seemed destined to become a trillion-dollar company.But after hitting its all-time high, Nvidia's stock shed over a third of its value and its market cap dropped to less than $550 billion. The bulls fled amid concerns about a post-COVID-lockdown slowdown in PC sales, while rising interest rates exacerbated that pain by sparking a sell-off in higher-growth stocks.Can Nvidia regain its momentum and finally join the twelve-zero club by 2025? Let's examine its upcoming catalysts and challenges to find out.Image source: Nvidia.Nvidia could face a cyclical slowdownNvidia's stock hit an all-time high last year as its gaming and data center GPU business generated dazzling growth throughout the pandemic.In the 2022 fiscal year, which ended this January, Nvidia's revenue surged 61% to $26.91 billion as its adjusted earnings per share (EPS) grew 78%. Its adjusted operating margin jumped 640 basis points to 47.2%. It attributed most of that growth to its robust sales of gaming and data center GPUs.But over the next three fiscal years, analysts expect Nvidia's revenue growth to decelerate as that upgrade cycle cools off. On the bright side, they expect its adjusted operating margin to consistently rise as it benefits from improved scale and pricing power in the GPU market.MetricFY 2023 EstimateFY 2024 EstimateFY 2025 EstimateRevenue Growth29%17%12%Adjusted operating margin48.3%49.4%51%Adjusted EPS growth 15%34%11%Data source: S&P Global Market Intelligence.If those expectations are met, Nvidia would generate $45.64 billion in revenue with an adjusted EPS of $6.59 in fiscal 2025.Nvidia currently trades at 16 times its revenue and about 50 times its EPS estimate for fiscal 2023. If Nvidia still trades at those forward valuations at the end of fiscal 2024 and hits the estimates, it would have a market cap of about $730 billion.However, those valuations would still be too rich for a company that's growing its revenue and earnings in the low teens. Therefore, I think Nvidia's market cap might stay between $500 billion and $700 billion over the next three years as it grapples with a cyclical slowdown in the GPU market.The near-term headwindsInvestors should take analysts' estimates with a grain of salt, but Nvidia stock likely needs to take a breather after its big growth spurt over the past few years.In HP's (NYSE: HPQ) latest earnings report, it said its sales of consumer PCs fell 1% year-over-year as it faced tough comparisons to the boost it got from remote work and gaming upgrades during the pandemic. That slowdown doesn't bode well for Nvidia and other PC chipmakers.Meanwhile, data center operators might buy fewer Nvidia GPUs for AI tasks as the usage of cloud-based services decelerates in a post-lockdown market. Waning interest in cryptocurrencies, many of which have lost value this year as investors have rotated out of riskier assets, will also curb sales of its gaming GPUs and dedicated mining chips.To make matters worse, Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) plans to disrupt Nvidia and AMD's (NASDAQ: AMD) duopoly in discrete GPUs with its own chips. These new GPUs, which Intel is bundling with its own CPUs, could cause more headaches for Nvidia and AMD as the broader gaming market slows down.The long-term tailwindsThose challenges seem daunting, but Nvidia has weathered plenty of cyclical downturns and competitive threats since its public debut in 1999. It also remains the dominant discrete GPU maker with an 81% market share, according to JPR's fourth-quarter numbers, compared to AMD's 19% share.The gaming and data center markets should also keep expanding over the next few years. The gaming PC market could expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% between 2021 and 2027, according to Report Ocean, while Research and Markets expects the data center accelerator market to grow at a CAGR of 36.7% between 2021 and 2026.If Nvidia continues to dominate both of those growing markets, its cyclical slowdown could end a lot sooner than expected. Its oft-overlooked automotive chip business -- which generated just 2% of revenue in its latest quarter -- could also gain more traction as the automotive sector gradually recovers and develops new connected and autonomous vehicles.Look beyond Nvidia's market capNvidia probably won't become a trillion-dollar company by 2025, and investors who were spoiled by its 380% rally over the past three years might be a bit disappointed. However, it's arguably better for Nvidia's stock to cool off now and reset the market's expectations instead of flying off the rails with runaway valuations.Nvidia's stock might generate much lower returns over the next three years, but investors shouldn't abandon the chipmaker yet. Long-term secular tailwinds could still propel its stock to new all-time highs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9049414534,"gmtCreate":1655825911028,"gmtModify":1676535712834,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9049414534","repostId":"2245827432","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2245827432","pubTimestamp":1655825437,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2245827432?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-21 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2245827432","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Here's what Tesla's potential upcoming split means for investors.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p><ul><li>Tesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.</li><li>The stock&#39;s valuation continues to get more attractive.</li><li>A recession could hurt Tesla&#39;s young competition.</li></ul><p>Electric-vehicle company <b>Tesla</b> recently filed a document revealing plans for a 3-for-1 stock split.</p><p>The company last split its stock in August 2020, and shares have risen 30% since then. So if you&#39;re planning to invest in Tesla, should you buy the stock now or wait until the split takes place, which needs approval from shareholders at the company&#39;s annual shareholder meeting on August 4?</p><p>The answer may surprise you; roll up your sleeves and dive in.</p><p><b>What a stock split means for investors</b></p><p>First, it is essential to know what a stock split is and what it means for investors. A stock split is when a company increases its existing total share count by a specific ratio to lower its share price. The important thing to note is the company&#39;s total market capitalization remains unchanged strictly based on the stock split.</p><p>For example, Tesla&#39;s proposed 3-for-1 split means the automaker is tripling the number of outstanding shares on the market. After the split, investors will own three shares for every share they held before the split.</p><p>If all else remains equal, the share price will fall in proportion, so if Tesla trades at $999 per share before the split, investors will have three shares at $333 each after the split.</p><p>The crucial takeaway is that a stock split doesn&#39;t make the company any more valuable; nothing fundamentally changes about the stock. The one share trading at $999 is worth the same as three shares trading at $333.</p><p>Stock splits make shares more affordable, especially for retail investors. Companies sometimes split their stock to appeal to the retail crowd; adding more shares also boosts trading volume, meaning the stock is easier to buy and sell on a brokerage.</p><p>Asking whether to buy a stock before or after a stock split is a trick question: If a split doesn&#39;t fundamentally change a stock, it shouldn&#39;t matter whether you buy now or wait. However, you can base your buying or selling of Tesla on other factors.</p><p><b>The stock is near its lowest valuation</b></p><p>Tesla began turning a bottom-line profit in 2020, so investors can value the stock with the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Its P/E ratio started high when it first turned profitable, earnings per share (EPS) are now quickly growing, and the stock&#39;s valuation is coming down. The current P/E of 89 is its lowest on record.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ac0798b0c3ec9cfba2d43139124b6d4\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts.</span></p><p>Tesla still commands a considerable premium over legacy automotive companies like <b>Ford</b> and <b>General Motors</b>, which trade at a P/E of 4 and 5, respectively. However, Tesla&#39;s bottom line is swelling; analysts expect 30% annual EPS growth over the next three to five years, compared to just 3% for Ford and 10% for General Motors.</p><p>It seems that Tesla deserves the premium valuation it has, though the degree of that premium is up for debate. Nevertheless, if the company can grow like analysts believe it can, long-term investors could see the stock grow into its valuation over time.</p><p><b>A tough economy could hurt competitors</b></p><p>Tesla&#39;s profitability also comes at a crucial time; inflation is raging, supply chains are hurting manufacturers worldwide, and the economy could enter a recession. Mass-producing cars isn&#39;t easy, and Elon Musk has openly talked about how increasing Model 3 production nearly bankrupted his company.</p><p>A problematic economic backdrop could spell trouble for upstart competitors like <b>Lucid Group</b> and <b>Rivian Automotive</b>, which still burn significant amounts of cash. Meanwhile, Tesla is generating billions in free cash flow and sitting on $18 billion in cash on the balance sheet against just $3 billion in debt.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3025a3cedebec024cae445bbfcb48f55\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"545\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Data by YCharts.</span></p><p>Rivian has $16 billion in cash from IPO proceeds, while Lucid has $5 billion. This cash will buy them time, but both are trying to build more vehicles faster, which could worsen their cash burn.</p><p>A recession wouldn&#39;t help anyone, but harsh operating conditions can become a game of survival, and it&#39;s not clear that any automotive company is as financially sound right now as Tesla is.</p><p><b>Wrapping up</b></p><p>A stock split can grab headlines, but investors who buy Tesla stock should do so because of its growth and profitability. The stock could go lower over the short term, and nobody knows when a bottom might occur.</p><p>Approaching your investments with a long time horizon will give a company&#39;s fundamentals the best chance to dictate your investment returns. Good companies tend to perform well over time. You can also use a dollar-cost averaging strategy to slowly buy shares, blending your cost into an average that isn&#39;t too high or too low.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-21 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSTesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.The stock's valuation continues to get more attractive.A recession could hurt Tesla's young competition.Electric-vehicle company Tesla recently filed a...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/21/should-you-buy-tesla-now-or-wait-until-after-the-s/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2245827432","content_text":"KEY POINTSTesla wants to split its stock 3-for-1.The stock's valuation continues to get more attractive.A recession could hurt Tesla's young competition.Electric-vehicle company Tesla recently filed a document revealing plans for a 3-for-1 stock split.The company last split its stock in August 2020, and shares have risen 30% since then. So if you're planning to invest in Tesla, should you buy the stock now or wait until the split takes place, which needs approval from shareholders at the company's annual shareholder meeting on August 4?The answer may surprise you; roll up your sleeves and dive in.What a stock split means for investorsFirst, it is essential to know what a stock split is and what it means for investors. A stock split is when a company increases its existing total share count by a specific ratio to lower its share price. The important thing to note is the company's total market capitalization remains unchanged strictly based on the stock split.For example, Tesla's proposed 3-for-1 split means the automaker is tripling the number of outstanding shares on the market. After the split, investors will own three shares for every share they held before the split.If all else remains equal, the share price will fall in proportion, so if Tesla trades at $999 per share before the split, investors will have three shares at $333 each after the split.The crucial takeaway is that a stock split doesn't make the company any more valuable; nothing fundamentally changes about the stock. The one share trading at $999 is worth the same as three shares trading at $333.Stock splits make shares more affordable, especially for retail investors. Companies sometimes split their stock to appeal to the retail crowd; adding more shares also boosts trading volume, meaning the stock is easier to buy and sell on a brokerage.Asking whether to buy a stock before or after a stock split is a trick question: If a split doesn't fundamentally change a stock, it shouldn't matter whether you buy now or wait. However, you can base your buying or selling of Tesla on other factors.The stock is near its lowest valuationTesla began turning a bottom-line profit in 2020, so investors can value the stock with the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Its P/E ratio started high when it first turned profitable, earnings per share (EPS) are now quickly growing, and the stock's valuation is coming down. The current P/E of 89 is its lowest on record.Data by YCharts.Tesla still commands a considerable premium over legacy automotive companies like Ford and General Motors, which trade at a P/E of 4 and 5, respectively. However, Tesla's bottom line is swelling; analysts expect 30% annual EPS growth over the next three to five years, compared to just 3% for Ford and 10% for General Motors.It seems that Tesla deserves the premium valuation it has, though the degree of that premium is up for debate. Nevertheless, if the company can grow like analysts believe it can, long-term investors could see the stock grow into its valuation over time.A tough economy could hurt competitorsTesla's profitability also comes at a crucial time; inflation is raging, supply chains are hurting manufacturers worldwide, and the economy could enter a recession. Mass-producing cars isn't easy, and Elon Musk has openly talked about how increasing Model 3 production nearly bankrupted his company.A problematic economic backdrop could spell trouble for upstart competitors like Lucid Group and Rivian Automotive, which still burn significant amounts of cash. Meanwhile, Tesla is generating billions in free cash flow and sitting on $18 billion in cash on the balance sheet against just $3 billion in debt.Data by YCharts.Rivian has $16 billion in cash from IPO proceeds, while Lucid has $5 billion. This cash will buy them time, but both are trying to build more vehicles faster, which could worsen their cash burn.A recession wouldn't help anyone, but harsh operating conditions can become a game of survival, and it's not clear that any automotive company is as financially sound right now as Tesla is.Wrapping upA stock split can grab headlines, but investors who buy Tesla stock should do so because of its growth and profitability. The stock could go lower over the short term, and nobody knows when a bottom might occur.Approaching your investments with a long time horizon will give a company's fundamentals the best chance to dictate your investment returns. Good companies tend to perform well over time. You can also use a dollar-cost averaging strategy to slowly buy shares, blending your cost into an average that isn't too high or too low.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":64,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001515273,"gmtCreate":1641272362345,"gmtModify":1676533591726,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>fly to the moon?","listText":"Will <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>fly to the moon?","text":"Will $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$fly to the moon?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001515273","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077616666,"gmtCreate":1658503829255,"gmtModify":1676536169208,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077616666","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079268480,"gmtCreate":1657205747240,"gmtModify":1676535969248,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079268480","repostId":"2249546463","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2249546463","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1657149693,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2249546463?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-07 07:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2249546463","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkish","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness,&#39; according to Sevens Report</p><p>Growth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.</p><p>Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.</p><p>&#34;While it&#39;s too early to declare the value outperformance &#39;over,&#39; we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,&#34; said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. &#34;If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness.&#39;&#34;</p><p>Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and &#34;a recession is a distinct possibility,&#34; said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.</p><p>The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.</p><p>That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.</p><p>Read:Fed&#39;s Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in July</p><p>But now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.</p><h2>Recession worries</h2><p>The yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.</p><p>In Graff&#39;s view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.</p><p>&#34;Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they&#39;ve been any time&#34; outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn&#39;t mean there&#39;s &#34;100% odds&#34; of an economic contraction, he said, &#34;but it&#39;s definitely clearly showing credit markets think there&#39;s a risk.&#34;</p><p>Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,&#34; said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. &#34;Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.&#34;</p><p>Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.</p><p>The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20.6%.</p><p>Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they&#39;ve recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.</p><p>Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.</p><p>Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a &#34;clearer picture&#34; of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,&#34; he said of the equities market. &#34;In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in &#39;23, that&#39;s probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.&#34;</p><p>In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&amp;P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock&#39;s chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.</p><p>&#34;We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,&#34; DeSpirito said in the note. &#34;The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to &#39;easy money&#39; policies,&#34; he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to &#34;erode household savings&#34; and &#34;inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.&#34;</p><p>All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed&#39;s last policy meeting. The S&amp;P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy a Rally in Growth Stocks Could Signal \"Peak\" Fed Hawkishness Has Passed\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-07 07:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness,&#39; according to Sevens Report</p><p>Growth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.</p><p>Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.</p><p>&#34;While it&#39;s too early to declare the value outperformance &#39;over,&#39; we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,&#34; said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. &#34;If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed &#39;peak hawkishness.&#39;&#34;</p><p>Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and &#34;a recession is a distinct possibility,&#34; said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.</p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.</p><p>The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.</p><p>That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.</p><p>Read:Fed&#39;s Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in July</p><p>But now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.</p><h2>Recession worries</h2><p>The yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.</p><p>In Graff&#39;s view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.</p><p>&#34;Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they&#39;ve been any time&#34; outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn&#39;t mean there&#39;s &#34;100% odds&#34; of an economic contraction, he said, &#34;but it&#39;s definitely clearly showing credit markets think there&#39;s a risk.&#34;</p><p>Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,&#34; said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. &#34;Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.&#34;</p><p>Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.</p><p>The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&amp;P 500 dropped 20.6%.</p><p>Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they&#39;ve recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.</p><p>Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.</p><p>Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a &#34;clearer picture&#34; of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.</p><p>&#34;Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,&#34; he said of the equities market. &#34;In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in &#39;23, that&#39;s probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.&#34;</p><p>In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&amp;P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock&#39;s chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.</p><p>&#34;We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,&#34; DeSpirito said in the note. &#34;The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to &#39;easy money&#39; policies,&#34; he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to &#34;erode household savings&#34; and &#34;inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.&#34;</p><p>All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed&#39;s last policy meeting. The S&amp;P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2249546463","content_text":"If tech can sustain outperformance that will mean the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkishness,' according to Sevens ReportGrowth stocks have outperformed value equities recently as investors begin to question if the Federal Reserve has passed peak hawkishness already with its plans to raise rates to combat high inflation.Recent bets on fed-funds futures have pointed toward a potential pivot back to rate cuts at some point next year, while 10-year yields on U.S. government debt have fallen below 3%. Corporate bond spreads have widened as recession worries bubble up. But thedecline in Treasury yields appears to be giving a lift to technology and other growth stocks over value-oriented equities.\"While it's too early to declare the value outperformance 'over,' we do think the outperformance of tech recently is notable, because if it continues that will be a strong signal that the market is now looking past future rates hikes towards eventual rate cuts in 2023,\" said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a note Wednesday. \"If tech can mount sustained outperformance that will tell us the market thinks the Fed has passed 'peak hawkishness.'\"Long-term Treasury yields have been falling recently because investors are worried that the U.S. economy is slowing and \"a recession is a distinct possibility,\" said Tom Graff, head of investments at Facet Wealth, by phone.The yield on the 10-year Treasury note jumped as high as about 3.482% in June, before falling Tuesday to 2.808%--the lowest since May 27 based on 3 p.m. Eastern Time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That compares with a yield of about 1.5% at the end of 2021, when investors were anticipating that the Fed was gearing up to hike its benchmark rate to curb hot inflation.The Fed raised its benchmark rate in March for the first time since 2018, lifting it a quarter percentage point from near zero while laying out plans for further increases as inflation was running at the hottest pace in 40 years. Since then, the central bank has become more hawkish, announcing larger rate hikes as the cost of living has remained stubbornly high.That has made investors anxious that the Fed risks causing a recession by potentially being too aggressive to bring runaway inflation under control.Read:Fed's Waller backs another jumbo 75 bp interest-rate hike in JulyBut now slowing growth has some investors questioning how long the Fed will continue on an aggressive path of monetary tightening, even though it began hiking rates just this year.Recession worriesThe yield curve spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury rates briefly inverted on July 5 for the first time since mid-June, another sign that the U.S. may be facing a recession, although this time against a backdrop of declining rates, according to Graff. The yield curve was inverted on Wednesday afternoon, with two-year yields  slightly higher than 10-year rates , FactSet data show.In Graff's view, the corporate bond market also has been flashing recession concerns.\"Investment-grade corporate spreads are about as wide as they've been any time\" outside of a  recession in the last 25 years, said Graff. That doesn't mean there's \"100% odds\" of an economic contraction, he said, \"but it's definitely clearly showing credit markets think there's a risk.\"Spreads over Treasurys for high-yield debt, or junk bonds, have similarly increased, according to Graff.\"U.S. corporate bond spreads continue to move higher even though 10-year Treasury yields peaked 3 weeks ago,\" said Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a note emailed July 6. \"Spreads tend to rise when markets are increasingly uncertain about future corporate cash flows, and that has been the case most of this year.\"Investors worry about cash flows drying up in an economic slowdown as that may hinder companies from reinvesting in their businesses, or make it more difficult for cash-strapped borrowers to meet their financial obligations.The U.S. stock market has sunk this year after a repricing of valuations that looked stretched as rates rose. Growth stocks, including shares of technology-related companies, have taken a steep drop in 2022.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 29.5% during the first half of this year, while the S&P 500 dropped 20.6%.Growth stocks are particularly sensitive to rising rates as their anticipated cash flow streams are far out into the future. But with rates recently falling amid recession concerns, they've recently been gaining ground after being trounced by value-style bets over a stretch that began late last year.Since June 10, the Russell 1000 Growth Index  has eked out a gain of 0.5% through Wednesday,  while the Russell 1000 Value Index  dropped about 3.7% over the same period, FactSet data show.Upcoming company earnings reports for the second quarter should give investors a \"clearer picture\" of what companies expect in terms of demand for their goods and services in the second half of 2022, as well as which direction stocks will be headed, according to Graff.\"Some amount of earnings slowdown is priced in,\" he said of the equities market. \"In our view, if earnings are mildly lower in the second half but companies see them rebounding in '23, that's probably a pretty good outcome for stocks.\"In prior recessions, the average earnings drop for the S&P 500 was 13%, with the global financial crisis, or GFC, skewing the results, according to Tony DeSpirito, BlackRock's chief investment officer for U.S. fundamental equities. A chart in his third-quarter outlook report illustrates this finding.\"We are not calling for a recession, but we are cognizant that the risks of a recession are rising,\" DeSpirito said in the note. \"The Fed is tightening monetary policy, bringing an end to 'easy money' policies,\" he said, while 30-year mortgage rates have about doubled since last year to nearly 6% today, inflation is starting to \"erode household savings\" and \"inventories of goods are elevated as both pandemic-induced supply shortages and voracious demand ease.\"All three major U.S. stock benchmarks ended Wednesday higher after the release of minutes of the Fed's last policy meeting. The S&P 500  gained 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite  rose 0.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  edged up 0.2%, according to Dow Jones Market Data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9067809071,"gmtCreate":1652434127593,"gmtModify":1676535099903,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9067809071","repostId":"2235816563","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2235816563","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652432382,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2235816563?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-13 16:59","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2235816563","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, af","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.</p><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968</li><li>Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886</li><li>Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8248cd57838fb525e2233deac716914f\" tg-width=\"489\" tg-height=\"239\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.</p><p>Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.</p><p>But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.</p><p>Down 4.6%, the S&amp;P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&amp;P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-13 16:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.</p><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968</li><li>Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886</li><li>Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8248cd57838fb525e2233deac716914f\" tg-width=\"489\" tg-height=\"239\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.</p><p>Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.</p><p>But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.</p><p>Down 4.6%, the S&amp;P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&amp;P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2235816563","content_text":"U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.S&P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.Down 4.6%, the S&P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":54,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9079268838,"gmtCreate":1657205715524,"gmtModify":1676535969232,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9079268838","repostId":"2249459423","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2249459423","pubTimestamp":1657208203,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2249459423?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-07 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2249459423","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by le","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>Nvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.</li><li>Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia&#39;s improving business fundamentals, there is a solid reason for it.</li><li>Unfortunately for shareholders who bought at the highs, the company&#39;s share price might not recover to its 2021 highs anytime soon.</li></ul><p>About ten months ago I took a deep dive into <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA&#39;s</a> share price and laid out my thesis on why investors should be less concerned about the company&#39;s business fundamentals and laser focused on its momentum exposure.</p><p>Although thismight sound counterintuitive, since sooner or later fundamentals matter, Nvidia is still at the mercy of factors that have little to do with the company&#39;s actual performance. That is why, since September of last year, the company lost nearly 35% of its value, while at the same time the S&amp;P 500 fell by slightly less than 15%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdb65cce970f34d2aeacdfd2b31ac71d\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Such a large drop relative to the broader market was disappointing even when adjusting for Nvidia&#39;s high beta of 1.6. Contrary to this abysmal share price performance, however, the company continued to grow its quarterly sales numbers at a nearly 50% rate.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39e15815bfc09727371b477bf89f4a94\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"264\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Not only that, but both gross and operating margins continued to improve over the past few quarters since I covered the company.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89db1405a7e4c9d299b65404553554a0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"262\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>A somehow slowing topline growth rate could be partially to blame, however, Nvidia&#39;s revenue forward growth rate is not very different now from what it was back in September of 2021.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/603bf1b08117128bd80fd3deae02c63f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>As a matter of fact, AMD (AMD) forward revenue growth rate is much higher now than it was back then and yet the company&#39;s share price performed remarkably similar to that of Nvidia, thus also significantly underperforming the S&amp;P 500 even on a risk adjusted basis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/feae396374468950c5e366af1e28a850\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><h3>So what happened?</h3><p>To put it briefly, the risk that I highlighted in September materialized. Although I will not go into the details again in this article, I will highlight that momentum exposure of Nvidia combined with the monetary tightening (or at least the expectations of it) were the main factors for the company&#39;s poor performance during the past 10-month period.</p><p>I also explained how the whole process works in my thought piece called &#39;The Cloud Space In Numbers: What Matters The Most&#39;, where I did a case study based on another high-growth sector.</p><p>Monetary tightening has a profound impact on high duration stocks and unfortunately, Nvidia is still one of the most heavily exposed companies to rising interest rates in the semiconductor space.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/06f73d8185b657e7c3045f0fdd9e39e1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"290\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Even though the relationship between forward revenue growth rate and forward P/E ratios has weakened significantly since September of last year, the flattening of the slope of the trend line above was what caused the companies at the top right-hand corner to perform so poorly even as their business fundamentals improved.</p><p>One of the reasons why Nvidia is still so far above the trend line above, is that in addition to its industry-leading growth rate, it also has one of the highest margins within the broader semiconductors peer group. The premium pricing of Nvidia&#39;s GPUs also sets it apart from AMD, which is valued at much lower multiples.</p><h3>Is Nvidia stock a bargain?</h3><p>Nvidia is arguably one of the highest quality semiconductor companies, with enormous growth opportunities in data centers and the automotive sector. However, it now trades at more than twice the industry average forward P/E ratio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7856a9f7e7b2dace82df33f3ec1bfc4e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"263\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Moreover, recent developments in the GPU market, resulted in never before seen premiums for Nvidia&#39;s products on the back of robust demand from consumers, data centers and cryptocurrency miners. All that propelled margins to levels far above its historical results and the sector median estimates.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ed63ee078dc5e43574939faba9caa43\" tg-width=\"494\" tg-height=\"188\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>This, however, does not mean that Nvidia is suddenly a bargain, simply because a high growth and highly profitable company is trading at forward Non-GAAP P/E ratio of below 30x.</p><p>The main reason why the absolute value of its forward P/E ratio could be misleading is that the semiconductor industry is highly cyclical. Therefore, during cycle peaks, P/E ratios tend to be low due to high profits and share prices reflecting the risk of slower future sales growth.</p><p>Although, the recent push towards digitalization has somehow dispelled the risk of semiconductors being cyclical, the industry remains closely related to the business cycle (see below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd24b3cbc9dfbd04a89a8c6cdb27818\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>More importantly for Nvidia&#39;s share price, however, is the fact that it still exhibits high correlation with the MTUM less VLUE index - an index that takes a long position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and a short position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8d575869822d2149a84ac8caea4fcf5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"262\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>As a result, Nvidia&#39;s share price will continue to be highly sensitive to the momentum trade and more specifically to the overall liquidity in the equity market. Having said that, should the current monetary tightening cycle continue, Nvidia will likely continue to underperform even in the case of the company&#39;s fundamentals remaining strong.</p><p>On the contrary, should the Federal Reserve reverse course and embark on yet another monetary loosening journey, then Nvidia could potentially return to its 2021&#39;s highs. Although such a scenario should not be ruled out, it remains highly uncertain. Moreover, if it does not occur, then it will take many years before Nvidia returns to its all-time highs, all that provided that the company retains its industry leadership.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Nvidia Really A Bargain Or Is There More Pain Ahead?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-07 23:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia's improving ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4521864-is-nvidia-bargain-or-is-there-pain-ahead","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2249459423","content_text":"SummaryNvidia lost nearly 35% of its value in a matter of months, when the broader market fell by less than 15% during the same period.Although this dynamic is counterintuitive to Nvidia's improving business fundamentals, there is a solid reason for it.Unfortunately for shareholders who bought at the highs, the company's share price might not recover to its 2021 highs anytime soon.About ten months ago I took a deep dive into NVIDIA's share price and laid out my thesis on why investors should be less concerned about the company's business fundamentals and laser focused on its momentum exposure.Although thismight sound counterintuitive, since sooner or later fundamentals matter, Nvidia is still at the mercy of factors that have little to do with the company's actual performance. That is why, since September of last year, the company lost nearly 35% of its value, while at the same time the S&P 500 fell by slightly less than 15%.Such a large drop relative to the broader market was disappointing even when adjusting for Nvidia's high beta of 1.6. Contrary to this abysmal share price performance, however, the company continued to grow its quarterly sales numbers at a nearly 50% rate.Not only that, but both gross and operating margins continued to improve over the past few quarters since I covered the company.A somehow slowing topline growth rate could be partially to blame, however, Nvidia's revenue forward growth rate is not very different now from what it was back in September of 2021.As a matter of fact, AMD (AMD) forward revenue growth rate is much higher now than it was back then and yet the company's share price performed remarkably similar to that of Nvidia, thus also significantly underperforming the S&P 500 even on a risk adjusted basis.So what happened?To put it briefly, the risk that I highlighted in September materialized. Although I will not go into the details again in this article, I will highlight that momentum exposure of Nvidia combined with the monetary tightening (or at least the expectations of it) were the main factors for the company's poor performance during the past 10-month period.I also explained how the whole process works in my thought piece called 'The Cloud Space In Numbers: What Matters The Most', where I did a case study based on another high-growth sector.Monetary tightening has a profound impact on high duration stocks and unfortunately, Nvidia is still one of the most heavily exposed companies to rising interest rates in the semiconductor space.Even though the relationship between forward revenue growth rate and forward P/E ratios has weakened significantly since September of last year, the flattening of the slope of the trend line above was what caused the companies at the top right-hand corner to perform so poorly even as their business fundamentals improved.One of the reasons why Nvidia is still so far above the trend line above, is that in addition to its industry-leading growth rate, it also has one of the highest margins within the broader semiconductors peer group. The premium pricing of Nvidia's GPUs also sets it apart from AMD, which is valued at much lower multiples.Is Nvidia stock a bargain?Nvidia is arguably one of the highest quality semiconductor companies, with enormous growth opportunities in data centers and the automotive sector. However, it now trades at more than twice the industry average forward P/E ratio.Moreover, recent developments in the GPU market, resulted in never before seen premiums for Nvidia's products on the back of robust demand from consumers, data centers and cryptocurrency miners. All that propelled margins to levels far above its historical results and the sector median estimates.This, however, does not mean that Nvidia is suddenly a bargain, simply because a high growth and highly profitable company is trading at forward Non-GAAP P/E ratio of below 30x.The main reason why the absolute value of its forward P/E ratio could be misleading is that the semiconductor industry is highly cyclical. Therefore, during cycle peaks, P/E ratios tend to be low due to high profits and share prices reflecting the risk of slower future sales growth.Although, the recent push towards digitalization has somehow dispelled the risk of semiconductors being cyclical, the industry remains closely related to the business cycle (see below).More importantly for Nvidia's share price, however, is the fact that it still exhibits high correlation with the MTUM less VLUE index - an index that takes a long position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and a short position in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE).As a result, Nvidia's share price will continue to be highly sensitive to the momentum trade and more specifically to the overall liquidity in the equity market. Having said that, should the current monetary tightening cycle continue, Nvidia will likely continue to underperform even in the case of the company's fundamentals remaining strong.On the contrary, should the Federal Reserve reverse course and embark on yet another monetary loosening journey, then Nvidia could potentially return to its 2021's highs. Although such a scenario should not be ruled out, it remains highly uncertain. Moreover, if it does not occur, then it will take many years before Nvidia returns to its all-time highs, all that provided that the company retains its industry leadership.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9049414978,"gmtCreate":1655825794594,"gmtModify":1676535712826,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up a bit more","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up a bit more","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up a bit more","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/953f4da94d2560cbf752608725761532","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9049414978","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":85,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9027160784,"gmtCreate":1653991796748,"gmtModify":1676535374950,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9027160784","repostId":"1181522045","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181522045","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653986304,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181522045?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-31 16:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181522045","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Hot Chinese ADRs jumped in premarket tradi","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><ul><li><b>Hot Chinese ADRs</b> jumped in premarket trading. <b>Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto</b> climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Gold Fields</b> shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>HP Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts are expecting <b>Salesforce, Inc.</b> to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Natuzzi S.p.A.</b> reported an operating profit of &amp;euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &amp;euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &amp;euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.</li></ul><ul><li>After the closing bell,<b>Victoria&#39;s Secret &amp; Co.</b> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria&#39;s Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts expect <b>KE Holdings Inc.</b> to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Unilever</b> said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.</li></ul><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba, Salesforce, HP, Unilever, Gold Fields: U.S. Stocks to Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-31 16:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:</p><ul><li><b>Hot Chinese ADRs</b> jumped in premarket trading. <b>Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto</b> climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Gold Fields</b> shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>HP Inc.</b> to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts are expecting <b>Salesforce, Inc.</b> to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Natuzzi S.p.A.</b> reported an operating profit of &amp;euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &amp;euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &amp;euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.</li></ul><ul><li>After the closing bell,<b>Victoria&#39;s Secret &amp; Co.</b> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria&#39;s Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>Analysts expect <b>KE Holdings Inc.</b> to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Unilever</b> said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.</li></ul><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","HPQ":"惠普","BIDU":"百度","PDD":"拼多多","CRM":"赛富时","UL":"联合利华(英国)","BEKE":"贝壳","NTZ":"纳图兹家具","GFI":"金田","JD":"京东","VSCO":"维多利亚的秘密"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181522045","content_text":"Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:Hot Chinese ADRs jumped in premarket trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, iQIYI, Nio, Xpeng Motors and Li Auto climbed between 4% and 8%. China unveiled a package of 33 measures covering fiscal, financial, investment and industrial policies on Tuesday to revive a pandemic-ravaged economy. To revive investment and consumption, China will promote healthy development of platform companies, which are expected to play a role in stabilising jobs, according to the measures.Gold Fields shares plunged 10% in premarket trading as the company will acquire Yamana Gold. Transaction creates a top-4 global gold major. All-share offer by Gold Fields at an Exchange Ratio of 0.6 Gold Fields Consideration Shares for each Yamana share implying a valuation for Yamana of US$6.7 billion.Wall Street expects HP Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $1.05 per share on revenue of $16.17 billion after the closing bell. HP shares rose 1.1% to $39.16 in premarket trading.Analysts are expecting Salesforce, Inc. to have earned $0.94 per share on revenue of $7.38 billion. The company will release earnings after the markets clsoe. Salesforce shares rose 1.5% to $167.59 in premarket trading.Natuzzi S.p.A. reported an operating profit of &euro;1.5 million for the first quarter, down from &euro;3.3 Million in the year-ago period. Its consolidated revenue rose 16.8% to &euro;118.5 million. Natuzzi shares jumped 8.6% to close at $10.39 on Friday.After the closing bell,Victoria's Secret & Co. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.84 per share on revenue of $1.48 billion. Victoria's Secret shares gained 1.2% to $43.20 in after-hours trading.Analysts expect KE Holdings Inc. to post a quarterly loss at $0.05 per share on revenue of $1.82 billion before the opening bell. KE Holdings shares rose 5.5% to $12.12 in premarket trading.Unilever said it appointed Nelson Peltz as a non-executive director and confirmed his TrianFund Management holds a roughly 1.5% stake in the consumer products company. Unilever shares traded in NYSE rose more than 7% in premarket trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":94,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056979802,"gmtCreate":1654930912406,"gmtModify":1676535536725,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056979802","repostId":"1179127588","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179127588","pubTimestamp":1654916262,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1179127588?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-11 10:57","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"NIO Stock Is Getting Interesting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179127588","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>NIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.</li><li>Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.</li><li>I&#39;m more optimistic toward NIO now than I was in the past because its price has come down while its revenue has grown.</li><li>I still assign it a &#39;hold&#39; rating, though, because I&#39;m not yet ready to recommend it to others due to the high-risk level.</li></ul><p><b>NIO</b>(NYSE:NIO) has never been my favorite Chinese stock. I&#39;ve generally rated it a &#39;hold&#39; in my articles, seeing it as a high-growth company with some major financial downsides. NIO grew revenue at 122% in the 12 months before the recent earnings release, which is certainly impressive. However, the company is also rapidly increasing its share count, making every shareholder&#39;s ownership claim smaller over time. NIO isn&#39;t the worst offender on earth when it comes to dilution; its share count popped dramatically in 2019 then slowed down afterward. The share count increase was significant enough to merit a mention though: it grew by 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022.</p><p>For me, this dilution was, until recently, enough of a concern to avoid NIO stock. NIO&#39;s revenue is growing faster than its share count, but the one offsets the other enough that the growth looks less impressive after adjusting for dilution.</p><p>That was pretty much the end of the story for me for a long time. As a fan of Chinese tech stocks, I had researched NIO and decided that it didn&#39;t have the financial soundness other Chinese companies have. It&#39;s issuing equity to fuel growth, and it still isn&#39;t profitable. Case closed.</p><p>Or so it seemed. While I was content to leave NIO alone for a good while, I started thinking about the success Warren Buffett had with his <b>BYD</b>(OTCPK:BYDDF) investment. Buffett bought the stock in 2008 for a mere $232 million, and the position grew to be worth $5.9 billion. I considered buying some BYD, but the stock looked overheated: it was rallying very hard on the day I considered buying it. NIO seemed like a company that could eventually go on to become &#34;the next BYD,&#34; so I snapped up a couple of shares. Representing far less than 1% of my portfolio, the shares I bought are almost nothing, but some developments occurred that made me feel that they would be worth a tiny portfolio allocation.</p><p>On Thursday, June 9, I noticed NIO stock falling on an earnings beat. That was when I bought. What intrigued me was how much cheaper the stock had gotten due to the combination of a lower price and higher revenue. The combination of these two factors brought NIO&#39;s price/sales ratio down to 5.6, which isn&#39;t exorbitantly high for a company with NIO&#39;s growth track record. In its most recent quarter, the company&#39;s sales grew at 25%, with a massive Chinese lockdown in the picture. If the company can avoid lockdowns and other political headwinds in the next year it should be able to accelerate its revenue growth considerably; a return to 100% growth would make its 5.6 sales multiple appear cheap. This combination of a moderate valuation and growth potential is enticing. Nevertheless, I still rate the stock a hold, as I wouldn&#39;t feel comfortable recommending it to a less risk-tolerant investor, nor would I give it a heavy weighting in my own portfolio.</p><p><b>Competitive Landscape</b></p><p>One of the reasons why I&#39;m maintaining my &#39;hold&#39; rating on NIO is because of the competitive landscape it finds itself in. EV is a very competitive space, with one company -<b>Tesla</b>(TSLA) -- having the most brand recognition, and another - BYD - having the biggest market share in China.</p><p>NIO, right now, can&#39;t touch the advantages that either of those companies has. It isn&#39;t selling as many cars as either, and it doesn&#39;t have as much name recognition. However, it has the potential to improve. Prior to the Q1 lockdowns, NIO had a 122% revenue growth rate. Even with the lockdowns, it managed 25% growth. The pre-lockdown growth rate was much higher than that of Tesla, yet NIO still has a far lower sales multiple than TSLA does. As a comparative valuation play, NIO looks like it has promise.</p><p>The comparison to BYD is less flattering. BYD is growing deliveries by250% year-over-year, which is a much faster growth rate than NIO. It&#39;s also doing a lot more deliveries to begin with: in 2021, it sold 593,743 cars. Recently, BYD made waves when it was revealed that it was selling batteries to Tesla. That was considered a big deal because it reversed what was once considered Tesla&#39;s big advantage over other EVs: battery production.</p><p>NIO is certainly no BYD-tier industry titan. However, it doesn&#39;t compete with BYD head-to-head. NIO mainly sells luxury cars, BYD sells a mix of cars and commercial vehicles. So, there is room for both companies in the Chinese EV market.</p><p><b>Financials</b></p><p>As we&#39;ve seen, NIO has an &#39;OK&#39; competitive position. It&#39;s no BYD or Tesla, but it&#39;s a real company selling ever growing numbers of cars every year. Viewed as a speculative small cap play, it has promise. As for whether NIO is fulfilling its promise, we need to look at the company&#39;s financials to see whether that&#39;s the case.</p><p>In its most recent quarter, NIO delivered:</p><ul><li><p>$1.56 billion in revenue, up 24.2%.</p></li><li><p>$228 million in gross profit, down 6.9%.</p></li><li><p>A $345 million operating loss, worsened by 640%.</p></li><li><p>A $281 million net loss, worsened by 295%.</p></li></ul><p>As you can see, most of the profit metrics got worse. Revenue grew, although it decelerated from previous quarters. It&#39;s not hard to see why NIO sold off after reporting these widening losses. When a company&#39;s losses increase in magnitude, it becomes worth less, assuming it was valued accurately prior to the losses. With that said, NIO&#39;s release beat on not only the top line but also the bottom line, so it&#39;s not clear why it sold off after earnings. It suggests that analysts covering the stock were not very confident in the appraisal of fair value they held prior to the release.</p><p>To be perfectly honest, even the fact that NIO had a strong top line showing was impressive. Lockdowns were in effect in much of China in the quarter just reported, and NIO factories were known to have been affected by them. Given the headwinds present at the time, the earnings release was relatively strong, although the possibility of future lockdowns certainly merits caution.</p><p><b>Balance Sheet</b></p><p>Having looked at NIO&#39;s most recent quarter, we can now turn to its balance sheet. According to Seeking Alpha Quant, NIO boasts the following balance sheet metrics:</p><ul><li><p>Assets: $13.7 billion.</p></li><li><p>Liabilities: $7.8 billion.</p></li><li><p>Equity: $5.3 billion.</p></li><li><p>Debt: $1.7 billion.</p></li><li><p>Current assets: $10 billion.</p></li><li><p>Current liabilities: $5 billion.</p></li><li><p>Cash: $2.5 billion.</p></li><li><p>Cash + short term securities: $7.7 billion</p></li></ul><p>From the figures above, we can calculate:</p><ul><li><p>A current ratio of 2, suggesting excellent liquidity.</p></li><li><p>A cash ratio of 1.54, again suggesting excellent liquidity.</p></li><li><p>A debt/equity ratio of 0.32, suggesting strong solvency.</p></li></ul><p>Put simply, NIO&#39;s balance sheet is very good. It scores well on both liquidity and solvency, and has enough cash to pay off ALL of its debt! The only caveat I&#39;d mention here is that much of this was achieved by selling equity instead of borrowing. In today&#39;s market conditions NIO won&#39;t be able to raise as much money by selling stock compared to what it was able to sell in the past, so it may have to borrow more in the future.</p><p><b>The Bullish Case</b></p><p>So far we&#39;ve seen that NIO recently delivered lackluster earnings, but has a strong balance sheet. Pretty mixed signals on the financials front. However, there is a bullish case to be made here. Assuming that we can avoid truly severe lockdowns in China over the next few years, then NIO should be able to ramp up its revenue growth considerably. Remember that the company was growing sales at 122% before the lockdown-induced deceleration to 25%. If operations at NIO&#39;s factories get back to normal, then it could experience revenue acceleration. If it can get back to 100% growth, then some of its valuation multiples will begin to look low. NIO currently trades at 5.6 times sales, 5.7 times book value, and 100 times operating cash flow. These multiples definitely look steep, but with sales growing at 100% year-over-year, they aren&#39;t impossible to justify. Notably, the sales multiple is far lower than Tesla&#39;s, and NIO&#39;s pre-Q1 growth was far higher than that company&#39;s. So there is significant potential here.</p><p><b>Risks &amp; Challenges</b></p><p>As we&#39;ve seen, NIO is a very fast growing company with a strong balance sheet. If it can get over its current COVID-induced woes, it may become a winner. However, there are many risks and challenges to be aware of here. Enough that I&#39;m still rating it a &#39;hold&#39; even though I did pick up a few shares myself. These risks and challenges include:</p><ul><li><p><b>Equity sales and debt issuance.</b>NIO&#39;s share count grew at 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022. It still has more share sales planned. If its stock keeps going down then it may have to borrow to finance operations, which will take a bite out of the healthy balance sheet metrics I mentioned earlier. To be frank, NIO really needs the COVID situation in China to moderate before it can truly take off. If that doesn&#39;t happen then dilution and/or borrowing will become necessary.</p></li><li><p><b>Competition.</b> Competition in the EV sector is fierce, and NIO is not China&#39;s market leader. It is far behind BYD on deliveries, and also on revenue. There are smaller competitors to contend with as well. NIO is a much smaller cap company than BYD is, so it has more potential to really soar in a best-case scenario. But it is definitely an underdog.</p></li><li><p><b>Regulatory issues.</b> Chinese stocks are currently facing regulatory pressure from the United States. The U.S. wants more ability to do on-site auditing before it will give Chinese companies the go-ahead to remain listed on the NYSE. NIO is one of the companies that has been identified as not meeting U.S. auditing requirements. If NIO has to list exclusively in Hong Kong, then U.S. investors may find it not worth the hassle to invest in. Potentially it could underperform relative to a U.S. company with identical fundamentals.</p></li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Stock Is Getting Interesting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Stock Is Getting Interesting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 10:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.I'm more optimistic ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","NIO.SI":"蔚来","09866":"蔚来-SW"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517787-nio-stock-is-getting-interesting","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179127588","content_text":"SummaryNIO stock recently fell 7% in one trading day after its Q1 earnings release.Earnings exceeded what analysts expected but were bad in absolute terms, as the net loss widened.I'm more optimistic toward NIO now than I was in the past because its price has come down while its revenue has grown.I still assign it a 'hold' rating, though, because I'm not yet ready to recommend it to others due to the high-risk level.NIO(NYSE:NIO) has never been my favorite Chinese stock. I've generally rated it a 'hold' in my articles, seeing it as a high-growth company with some major financial downsides. NIO grew revenue at 122% in the 12 months before the recent earnings release, which is certainly impressive. However, the company is also rapidly increasing its share count, making every shareholder's ownership claim smaller over time. NIO isn't the worst offender on earth when it comes to dilution; its share count popped dramatically in 2019 then slowed down afterward. The share count increase was significant enough to merit a mention though: it grew by 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022.For me, this dilution was, until recently, enough of a concern to avoid NIO stock. NIO's revenue is growing faster than its share count, but the one offsets the other enough that the growth looks less impressive after adjusting for dilution.That was pretty much the end of the story for me for a long time. As a fan of Chinese tech stocks, I had researched NIO and decided that it didn't have the financial soundness other Chinese companies have. It's issuing equity to fuel growth, and it still isn't profitable. Case closed.Or so it seemed. While I was content to leave NIO alone for a good while, I started thinking about the success Warren Buffett had with his BYD(OTCPK:BYDDF) investment. Buffett bought the stock in 2008 for a mere $232 million, and the position grew to be worth $5.9 billion. I considered buying some BYD, but the stock looked overheated: it was rallying very hard on the day I considered buying it. NIO seemed like a company that could eventually go on to become \"the next BYD,\" so I snapped up a couple of shares. Representing far less than 1% of my portfolio, the shares I bought are almost nothing, but some developments occurred that made me feel that they would be worth a tiny portfolio allocation.On Thursday, June 9, I noticed NIO stock falling on an earnings beat. That was when I bought. What intrigued me was how much cheaper the stock had gotten due to the combination of a lower price and higher revenue. The combination of these two factors brought NIO's price/sales ratio down to 5.6, which isn't exorbitantly high for a company with NIO's growth track record. In its most recent quarter, the company's sales grew at 25%, with a massive Chinese lockdown in the picture. If the company can avoid lockdowns and other political headwinds in the next year it should be able to accelerate its revenue growth considerably; a return to 100% growth would make its 5.6 sales multiple appear cheap. This combination of a moderate valuation and growth potential is enticing. Nevertheless, I still rate the stock a hold, as I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending it to a less risk-tolerant investor, nor would I give it a heavy weighting in my own portfolio.Competitive LandscapeOne of the reasons why I'm maintaining my 'hold' rating on NIO is because of the competitive landscape it finds itself in. EV is a very competitive space, with one company -Tesla(TSLA) -- having the most brand recognition, and another - BYD - having the biggest market share in China.NIO, right now, can't touch the advantages that either of those companies has. It isn't selling as many cars as either, and it doesn't have as much name recognition. However, it has the potential to improve. Prior to the Q1 lockdowns, NIO had a 122% revenue growth rate. Even with the lockdowns, it managed 25% growth. The pre-lockdown growth rate was much higher than that of Tesla, yet NIO still has a far lower sales multiple than TSLA does. As a comparative valuation play, NIO looks like it has promise.The comparison to BYD is less flattering. BYD is growing deliveries by250% year-over-year, which is a much faster growth rate than NIO. It's also doing a lot more deliveries to begin with: in 2021, it sold 593,743 cars. Recently, BYD made waves when it was revealed that it was selling batteries to Tesla. That was considered a big deal because it reversed what was once considered Tesla's big advantage over other EVs: battery production.NIO is certainly no BYD-tier industry titan. However, it doesn't compete with BYD head-to-head. NIO mainly sells luxury cars, BYD sells a mix of cars and commercial vehicles. So, there is room for both companies in the Chinese EV market.FinancialsAs we've seen, NIO has an 'OK' competitive position. It's no BYD or Tesla, but it's a real company selling ever growing numbers of cars every year. Viewed as a speculative small cap play, it has promise. As for whether NIO is fulfilling its promise, we need to look at the company's financials to see whether that's the case.In its most recent quarter, NIO delivered:$1.56 billion in revenue, up 24.2%.$228 million in gross profit, down 6.9%.A $345 million operating loss, worsened by 640%.A $281 million net loss, worsened by 295%.As you can see, most of the profit metrics got worse. Revenue grew, although it decelerated from previous quarters. It's not hard to see why NIO sold off after reporting these widening losses. When a company's losses increase in magnitude, it becomes worth less, assuming it was valued accurately prior to the losses. With that said, NIO's release beat on not only the top line but also the bottom line, so it's not clear why it sold off after earnings. It suggests that analysts covering the stock were not very confident in the appraisal of fair value they held prior to the release.To be perfectly honest, even the fact that NIO had a strong top line showing was impressive. Lockdowns were in effect in much of China in the quarter just reported, and NIO factories were known to have been affected by them. Given the headwinds present at the time, the earnings release was relatively strong, although the possibility of future lockdowns certainly merits caution.Balance SheetHaving looked at NIO's most recent quarter, we can now turn to its balance sheet. According to Seeking Alpha Quant, NIO boasts the following balance sheet metrics:Assets: $13.7 billion.Liabilities: $7.8 billion.Equity: $5.3 billion.Debt: $1.7 billion.Current assets: $10 billion.Current liabilities: $5 billion.Cash: $2.5 billion.Cash + short term securities: $7.7 billionFrom the figures above, we can calculate:A current ratio of 2, suggesting excellent liquidity.A cash ratio of 1.54, again suggesting excellent liquidity.A debt/equity ratio of 0.32, suggesting strong solvency.Put simply, NIO's balance sheet is very good. It scores well on both liquidity and solvency, and has enough cash to pay off ALL of its debt! The only caveat I'd mention here is that much of this was achieved by selling equity instead of borrowing. In today's market conditions NIO won't be able to raise as much money by selling stock compared to what it was able to sell in the past, so it may have to borrow more in the future.The Bullish CaseSo far we've seen that NIO recently delivered lackluster earnings, but has a strong balance sheet. Pretty mixed signals on the financials front. However, there is a bullish case to be made here. Assuming that we can avoid truly severe lockdowns in China over the next few years, then NIO should be able to ramp up its revenue growth considerably. Remember that the company was growing sales at 122% before the lockdown-induced deceleration to 25%. If operations at NIO's factories get back to normal, then it could experience revenue acceleration. If it can get back to 100% growth, then some of its valuation multiples will begin to look low. NIO currently trades at 5.6 times sales, 5.7 times book value, and 100 times operating cash flow. These multiples definitely look steep, but with sales growing at 100% year-over-year, they aren't impossible to justify. Notably, the sales multiple is far lower than Tesla's, and NIO's pre-Q1 growth was far higher than that company's. So there is significant potential here.Risks & ChallengesAs we've seen, NIO is a very fast growing company with a strong balance sheet. If it can get over its current COVID-induced woes, it may become a winner. However, there are many risks and challenges to be aware of here. Enough that I'm still rating it a 'hold' even though I did pick up a few shares myself. These risks and challenges include:Equity sales and debt issuance.NIO's share count grew at 67% CAGR between 2018 and 2022. It still has more share sales planned. If its stock keeps going down then it may have to borrow to finance operations, which will take a bite out of the healthy balance sheet metrics I mentioned earlier. To be frank, NIO really needs the COVID situation in China to moderate before it can truly take off. If that doesn't happen then dilution and/or borrowing will become necessary.Competition. Competition in the EV sector is fierce, and NIO is not China's market leader. It is far behind BYD on deliveries, and also on revenue. There are smaller competitors to contend with as well. NIO is a much smaller cap company than BYD is, so it has more potential to really soar in a best-case scenario. But it is definitely an underdog.Regulatory issues. Chinese stocks are currently facing regulatory pressure from the United States. The U.S. wants more ability to do on-site auditing before it will give Chinese companies the go-ahead to remain listed on the NYSE. NIO is one of the companies that has been identified as not meeting U.S. auditing requirements. If NIO has to list exclusively in Hong Kong, then U.S. investors may find it not worth the hassle to invest in. Potentially it could underperform relative to a U.S. company with identical fundamentals.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9931969671,"gmtCreate":1662384428494,"gmtModify":1676537049410,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMC\">$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up and up~~~","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMC\">$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>up and up~~~","text":"$AMC Entertainment(AMC)$up and up~~~","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9931969671","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":408,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9902981284,"gmtCreate":1659627013550,"gmtModify":1706000361103,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up and away.","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Up up and away.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9902981284","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077618774,"gmtCreate":1658503796298,"gmtModify":1676536169185,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077618774","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":227,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9078991625,"gmtCreate":1657608776367,"gmtModify":1676536034049,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>What goes up, have to come down.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>What goes up, have to come down.","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$What goes up, have to come down.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff4e3199c19b7de602f1b311b5a6df19","width":"1170","height":"2325"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9078991625","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":385,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9046629763,"gmtCreate":1656341802952,"gmtModify":1676535809755,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up. Let break 25","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NIO\">$NIO Inc.(NIO)$</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>Up up up. Let break 25","text":"$NIO Inc.(NIO)$Up up up. Let break 25","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046629763","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9067809975,"gmtCreate":1652434147697,"gmtModify":1676535099920,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9067809975","repostId":"2235816563","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2235816563","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652432382,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2235816563?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-13 16:59","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2235816563","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, af","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.</p><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968</li><li>Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886</li><li>Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8248cd57838fb525e2233deac716914f\" tg-width=\"489\" tg-height=\"239\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.</p><p>Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.</p><p>But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.</p><p>Down 4.6%, the S&amp;P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&amp;P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stock Futures Swing Higher As S&P 500 Fights off Bear Market Territory\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-13 16:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.</p><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968</li><li>Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886</li><li>Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8248cd57838fb525e2233deac716914f\" tg-width=\"489\" tg-height=\"239\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.</p><p>Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.</p><p>But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.</p><p>Down 4.6%, the S&amp;P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&amp;P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2235816563","content_text":"U.S. stock futures were pointing to a higher start for Wall Street at the end of a volatile week, after Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell cooled speculation over the potential for 75-basis point rate hikes.S&P 500 futures rose 1.04% to 3,968Dow Jones Industrial Average futures rose 0.74%, to 31,886Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 1.65% to 12,144The Fed is not “actively considering” a 75-basis point interest rate increase, Fed Chairman Powell told Marketplace after the market close on Thursday, though he also said the central bank may not be able to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy.Stocks pared losses on Thursday after the Senate confirmed Powell him to a second term.But even if equities can manage a win on Friday, all three indexes are headed for sizable weekly losses, led by the Nasdaq, down 6.3% as of Thursday. That would mark the battered tech index’s sixth straight weekly loss, with the Dow industrials set to mark its seventh consecutive weekly loss, off 3.5%.Down 4.6%, the S&P 500 is also poised to mark a sixth-straight weekly fall, as it also skirts bear market territory, defined as a drop of 20% from a recent peak. Off 18.1% from a Jan. 3 record high, the S&P would only need to close at or below 3,837.24 to enter a bear market.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076126082,"gmtCreate":1657812759446,"gmtModify":1676536065858,"author":{"id":"4103782000923400","authorId":"4103782000923400","name":"Evirobie","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4103782000923400","authorIdStr":"4103782000923400"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Waiting for a chance to in more.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>Waiting for a chance to in more.","text":"$Amazon.com(AMZN)$Waiting for a chance to in more.","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fb1333e078db5fcde50e7e115d103937","width":"1170","height":"2085"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076126082","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}