4153476f personal page - To The Moon

4153476f

No personal profile

4Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-02-10

Wow

TotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business

2022-02-10

Wow

Is This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?

2022-02-10

Great

Want 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street

2022-02-09

Awesome

Is It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?

2022-02-09

Great

10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4107126244872750","uuid":"4107126244872750","gmtCreate":1644023176227,"gmtModify":1644023176227,"name":"4153476f","pinyin":"4153476f","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":1,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9092017471,"gmtCreate":1644489206643,"gmtModify":1676533932693,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092017471","repostId":"2209349195","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2209349195","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644416348,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2209349195?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-09 22:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2209349195","media":"LA Times","summary":"Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook'","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9fcd9ddd39b8d321f2284c828537362\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"280\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook&#39;s activities in April 2018. </p><p>  (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)</p><p>If there&#39;s a single immutable law in human biology, it&#39;s that no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> lives forever. The same goes for corporations.</p><p>The latest big company to confront the fact that the grim reaper spares no one and no thing is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a>, formerly known as Facebook.</p><p>Meta on Thursday suffered the largest one-day loss in U.S. stock market history, following an unexpectedly sour report of fourth-quarter earnings.</p><blockquote>We&#39;ve made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.</blockquote><p>Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg</p><p>The company&#39;s chairman and chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, tried to reassure employees and investors that he and his management team had matters in hand for the long term.</p><p>It&#39;s true that Meta remains a potent force in the tech space. The stock closed Friday at $237.09, about where it was as recently as July 30, 2020, and its current market capitalization of $896 billion is the sixth-largest among U.S. companies, just behind Tesla and ahead of Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway. Some market strategists say it may be undervalued at the current price.</p><p>But it&#39;s also possible that the company is facing an inflection point in its business model with existential implications.</p><p>Meta is braving what its chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, endearingly labeled &#34;headwinds&#34; during a conference call with investment analysts Wednesday.</p><p>Zuckerberg tried to calm investors&#39; nerves by noting that the company had overcome what at first appeared to be existential challenges in the past: &#34;We&#39;ve made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.&#34;</p><p>Yet Meta hasn&#39;t had to deal before with so many challenges coming together at once.</p><p>Even a short list seems daunting. Start with the immense popularity of TikTok, which established itself as the preferred platform for short-form videos before Facebook&#39;s copycat, Reels, could find its footing. There&#39;s Apple&#39;s new privacy options for iPhone users, which will cut deeply into Meta&#39;s access to advertising dollars, costing as much as $10 billion in revenue this year.</p><p>And a reinvigorated Federal Trade Commission, which last month won permission to pursue an antitrust lawsuit against the company from a federal judge, who found the FTC&#39;s allegations &#34;robust and detailed&#34; and rejected the company&#39;s attack on FTC Chair Lina Khan.</p><p>Add the perhaps inevitable aging of the company&#39;s platforms. Facebook, its core product, suffered the first drop in daily average users in its history, falling by about 1 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the previous quarter. That was the first such decline at least since the company went public in 2012.</p><p>Another difficulty is the company&#39;s deteriorating reputation for trustworthiness amid doubts about its social impacts.</p><p>It&#39;s blamed for undermining the health and self-image of teen girls through its Instagram photo-sharing app, as whistleblower Frances Haugen told a congressional committee in October. Its role in spreading political disinformation was documented in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.</p><p>The company&#39;s cavalier approach to its users&#39; privacy is well-established, which contributed to the recent collapse of its effort to create its own cryptocurrency.</p><p>Despite a corporate rebranding intended to distance the company from its scandals, Meta&#39;s corporate personality is inextricable from Zuckerberg, who continues to have supermajority control of the firm&#39;s stockholder vote.</p><p>As successful as he has been in capturing the social media zeitgeist with well-times acquisitions of emerging competitors such as WhatsApp or Instagram, he has so far had little success proving to investors that the company&#39;s forays into other business models represent a real future.</p><p>That&#39;s true of last year&#39;s rebranding as Meta Platforms. Zuckerberg offered a murky picture of the &#34;metaverse,&#34; the marketplace the company would henceforth be addressing: &#34;There’s a lot of ambiguity around what the metaverse means,&#34; he acknowledged on Ben Thompson&#39;s Stratechery podcast.</p><p>But his specific ideas seemed less than compelling. &#34;You’re going to be able to have a message thread going on when you’re in the middle of a meeting or doing something else and no one else is even going to notice,&#34; he posited.</p><p>The interview prompted Siva Vaidhyanathan, a long-time Zuckerberg critic, to observe that &#34;investing billions of dollars through thousands of highly trained experts to solve a problem no one seems to want solved is a bad way to deploy resources.&#34;</p><p>The most fundamental difficulty in Meta&#39;s future is the natural limit to the life span of even the most innovative companies. Examples of major enterprises that overcame changes in their core technologies or markets are thin on the ground.</p><p>That should strike a cautionary note in the executive suites of other companies that seem to hold impregnable positions at the summit of the business world, such as Alphabet (the parent of Google) and Amazon. (As the old English proverb warns, &#34;time and tide wait for no man.&#34;)</p><p>For many years, the quintessential industrial survivor was General Electric, which was an original component of the Dow Jones industrial average in 1896 and remained in the index continuously starting in Nov. 7, 1907.</p><p>That streak ended after more than 110 years in June 2018; the company, brought down by hubristic investments in financial services and forced to sell off its iconic manufacturing units, no longer resembled the strutting emperor of the U.S. economy of its heyday, and was unceremoniously kicked off the Dow.</p><p>Another company that had nimbly and serially remade itself to remain atop the roster of American corporations was <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>.</p><p>Over its long history, as Steven Cherry of the University of Pittsburgh observed last year on his podcast, &#34;Fixing the Future,&#34; IBM pivoted from manufacturing the tabulating machines for the 1890 census, to mainframe computers, to personal computers, to networking, and to artificial intelligence machines that beat chess grandmasters and &#34;Jeopardy!&#34; champions at their own games.</p><p>The company&#39;s ability to find and dominate every new technology seemed unlimited. Yet it began to run out its string over the last decade or so, unable to find purchase in the market for cloud-based business services or to financially exploit advances in quantum computing or AI.</p><p>Last month, IBM suffered the humiliation of selling off Watson Health, an AI platform launched in 2015 with the goal of helping doctors and hospitals analyze patient data on a vast scale. But the company&#39;s claims were shrouded in hype and the investment needed to keep it running in the face of losses was more than IBM considered worthwhile.</p><p>Some companies become prisoners of their own success. That was the case with Xerox, which collected majestic profits from its 914 office copier, which was introduced in 1959 and became the most successful industrial product in history up to that time.</p><p>Devised by an eccentric inventor named Chester Carlson, the 914 was so successful that the entire company was structured to serve and distribute the machine and its successors.</p><p>Yet Xerox &#34;was fundamentally cursed by the Chester Carlson vision,&#34; the company&#39;s former chief technology officer, Paul Strassmann, told me in 1998. &#34;This is the immaculate conception view that all you have to do is give us the right technology and the world will come to us. Unfortunately, when it happens like that, it&#39;s a fluke.&#34;</p><p>The limits of that vision came home to Xerox in the 1970s, when it built and staffed its legendary Palo Alto Research Center, or PARC, in Silicon Valley with the goal of finding the next big office technologies before others could do so and cut into its franchise.</p><p>PARC&#39;s scientists and engineers invented the personal computer, graphical displays, and other technologies we take for granted today, but Xerox couldn&#39;t bring them to market profitably.</p><p>&#34;Xerox could have owned the entire computer industry today,&#34; Apple&#39;s Steve Jobs declared in a 1996 documentary. &#34;Could have been the IBM of the ’90s. Could have been the Microsoft of the ’90s.&#34; At the time, of course, the stumbles of both companies lay unforeseen over the far horizon.</p><p>It&#39;s not unheard of for a corporation to face down a near-death experience and reestablish itself. Apple did so, having come close to extinction after Jobs himself was forced out of the company in 1985 by John Sculley, whom he had lured from Pepsi to bring traditional corporate standards to Apple as chief executive.</p><p>Jobs returned to the drifting and money-losing company in 1997 and set it on the path to spectacular profitability by introducing such new products as the iPod, iPad and iPhone.</p><p>Microsoft, too, shook off the torpor it was suffering earlier in this century when it missed out on the mobile computing revolution and allowed its operating systems to become stale. Under Satya Nadella, who became chief executive in 2014 and chairman last year, however, the company has staged a revival, its shares gaining a market-beating 52.5% in 2021.</p><p>It&#39;s possible that Zuckerberg can follow in the footsteps of Jobs and Nadella, and defeat his company&#39;s multiple challenges. Most executives facing even lesser challenges have failed, however.</p><p>Whether Zuckerberg can turn his vision of the metaverse into profits is a wide-open question. It will be a challenge he has never faced before, because it comes in an atmosphere of growing skepticism about his company among the public and among investors.</p><p>&#34;Zuckerberg has never received a signal from the marketplace that he should ever be more modest or change how he has always done things,&#34; Vaidhyanathan wrote last November, after the Meta rebranding. That signal is sounding now, loud and clear.</p><p>This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-09 22:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html><strong>LA Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook's activities in April 2018.   (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)If there's a single immutable law in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","IBM":"IBM","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2209349195","content_text":"Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook's activities in April 2018.   (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)If there's a single immutable law in human biology, it's that no one lives forever. The same goes for corporations.The latest big company to confront the fact that the grim reaper spares no one and no thing is Meta Platforms, formerly known as Facebook.Meta on Thursday suffered the largest one-day loss in U.S. stock market history, following an unexpectedly sour report of fourth-quarter earnings.We've made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark ZuckerbergThe company's chairman and chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, tried to reassure employees and investors that he and his management team had matters in hand for the long term.It's true that Meta remains a potent force in the tech space. The stock closed Friday at $237.09, about where it was as recently as July 30, 2020, and its current market capitalization of $896 billion is the sixth-largest among U.S. companies, just behind Tesla and ahead of Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway. Some market strategists say it may be undervalued at the current price.But it's also possible that the company is facing an inflection point in its business model with existential implications.Meta is braving what its chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, endearingly labeled \"headwinds\" during a conference call with investment analysts Wednesday.Zuckerberg tried to calm investors' nerves by noting that the company had overcome what at first appeared to be existential challenges in the past: \"We've made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.\"Yet Meta hasn't had to deal before with so many challenges coming together at once.Even a short list seems daunting. Start with the immense popularity of TikTok, which established itself as the preferred platform for short-form videos before Facebook's copycat, Reels, could find its footing. There's Apple's new privacy options for iPhone users, which will cut deeply into Meta's access to advertising dollars, costing as much as $10 billion in revenue this year.And a reinvigorated Federal Trade Commission, which last month won permission to pursue an antitrust lawsuit against the company from a federal judge, who found the FTC's allegations \"robust and detailed\" and rejected the company's attack on FTC Chair Lina Khan.Add the perhaps inevitable aging of the company's platforms. Facebook, its core product, suffered the first drop in daily average users in its history, falling by about 1 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the previous quarter. That was the first such decline at least since the company went public in 2012.Another difficulty is the company's deteriorating reputation for trustworthiness amid doubts about its social impacts.It's blamed for undermining the health and self-image of teen girls through its Instagram photo-sharing app, as whistleblower Frances Haugen told a congressional committee in October. Its role in spreading political disinformation was documented in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.The company's cavalier approach to its users' privacy is well-established, which contributed to the recent collapse of its effort to create its own cryptocurrency.Despite a corporate rebranding intended to distance the company from its scandals, Meta's corporate personality is inextricable from Zuckerberg, who continues to have supermajority control of the firm's stockholder vote.As successful as he has been in capturing the social media zeitgeist with well-times acquisitions of emerging competitors such as WhatsApp or Instagram, he has so far had little success proving to investors that the company's forays into other business models represent a real future.That's true of last year's rebranding as Meta Platforms. Zuckerberg offered a murky picture of the \"metaverse,\" the marketplace the company would henceforth be addressing: \"There’s a lot of ambiguity around what the metaverse means,\" he acknowledged on Ben Thompson's Stratechery podcast.But his specific ideas seemed less than compelling. \"You’re going to be able to have a message thread going on when you’re in the middle of a meeting or doing something else and no one else is even going to notice,\" he posited.The interview prompted Siva Vaidhyanathan, a long-time Zuckerberg critic, to observe that \"investing billions of dollars through thousands of highly trained experts to solve a problem no one seems to want solved is a bad way to deploy resources.\"The most fundamental difficulty in Meta's future is the natural limit to the life span of even the most innovative companies. Examples of major enterprises that overcame changes in their core technologies or markets are thin on the ground.That should strike a cautionary note in the executive suites of other companies that seem to hold impregnable positions at the summit of the business world, such as Alphabet (the parent of Google) and Amazon. (As the old English proverb warns, \"time and tide wait for no man.\")For many years, the quintessential industrial survivor was General Electric, which was an original component of the Dow Jones industrial average in 1896 and remained in the index continuously starting in Nov. 7, 1907.That streak ended after more than 110 years in June 2018; the company, brought down by hubristic investments in financial services and forced to sell off its iconic manufacturing units, no longer resembled the strutting emperor of the U.S. economy of its heyday, and was unceremoniously kicked off the Dow.Another company that had nimbly and serially remade itself to remain atop the roster of American corporations was IBM.Over its long history, as Steven Cherry of the University of Pittsburgh observed last year on his podcast, \"Fixing the Future,\" IBM pivoted from manufacturing the tabulating machines for the 1890 census, to mainframe computers, to personal computers, to networking, and to artificial intelligence machines that beat chess grandmasters and \"Jeopardy!\" champions at their own games.The company's ability to find and dominate every new technology seemed unlimited. Yet it began to run out its string over the last decade or so, unable to find purchase in the market for cloud-based business services or to financially exploit advances in quantum computing or AI.Last month, IBM suffered the humiliation of selling off Watson Health, an AI platform launched in 2015 with the goal of helping doctors and hospitals analyze patient data on a vast scale. But the company's claims were shrouded in hype and the investment needed to keep it running in the face of losses was more than IBM considered worthwhile.Some companies become prisoners of their own success. That was the case with Xerox, which collected majestic profits from its 914 office copier, which was introduced in 1959 and became the most successful industrial product in history up to that time.Devised by an eccentric inventor named Chester Carlson, the 914 was so successful that the entire company was structured to serve and distribute the machine and its successors.Yet Xerox \"was fundamentally cursed by the Chester Carlson vision,\" the company's former chief technology officer, Paul Strassmann, told me in 1998. \"This is the immaculate conception view that all you have to do is give us the right technology and the world will come to us. Unfortunately, when it happens like that, it's a fluke.\"The limits of that vision came home to Xerox in the 1970s, when it built and staffed its legendary Palo Alto Research Center, or PARC, in Silicon Valley with the goal of finding the next big office technologies before others could do so and cut into its franchise.PARC's scientists and engineers invented the personal computer, graphical displays, and other technologies we take for granted today, but Xerox couldn't bring them to market profitably.\"Xerox could have owned the entire computer industry today,\" Apple's Steve Jobs declared in a 1996 documentary. \"Could have been the IBM of the ’90s. Could have been the Microsoft of the ’90s.\" At the time, of course, the stumbles of both companies lay unforeseen over the far horizon.It's not unheard of for a corporation to face down a near-death experience and reestablish itself. Apple did so, having come close to extinction after Jobs himself was forced out of the company in 1985 by John Sculley, whom he had lured from Pepsi to bring traditional corporate standards to Apple as chief executive.Jobs returned to the drifting and money-losing company in 1997 and set it on the path to spectacular profitability by introducing such new products as the iPod, iPad and iPhone.Microsoft, too, shook off the torpor it was suffering earlier in this century when it missed out on the mobile computing revolution and allowed its operating systems to become stale. Under Satya Nadella, who became chief executive in 2014 and chairman last year, however, the company has staged a revival, its shares gaining a market-beating 52.5% in 2021.It's possible that Zuckerberg can follow in the footsteps of Jobs and Nadella, and defeat his company's multiple challenges. Most executives facing even lesser challenges have failed, however.Whether Zuckerberg can turn his vision of the metaverse into profits is a wide-open question. It will be a challenge he has never faced before, because it comes in an atmosphere of growing skepticism about his company among the public and among investors.\"Zuckerberg has never received a signal from the marketplace that he should ever be more modest or change how he has always done things,\" Vaidhyanathan wrote last November, after the Meta rebranding. That signal is sounding now, loud and clear.This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092017200,"gmtCreate":1644489180657,"gmtModify":1676533932659,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092017200","repostId":"2210556631","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210556631","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1644455674,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210556631?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 09:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Want 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210556631","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Despite a difficult macroeconomic environment, some analysts are bullish on these growth stocks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Despite the recent sell-off, the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left in the market, particularly when it comes to growth stocks, many of which have fallen sharply over the last few months.</p><p>For instance, Ark Invest currently has a price target of $3,000 on <b>Tesla</b> (NASDAQ:TSLA), implying 225% upside by 2025. And Credit Suisse raised its price target on <b>Snap</b> (NASDAQ:SNAP) to $93 after a strong fourth quarter, implying 140% upside in the next 12 months. Given the potential gains, is it time to add these growth stocks to your portfolio?</p><p>Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cbfb5c857f59d0573bd0296fb4a1d2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Tesla</span></p><h2>1. Tesla</h2><p>Semiconductor shortages weighed on the auto industry in 2021, but Tesla turned in another impressive performance. For the fourth consecutive year, it ranked as the world&#39;s leading electric vehicle (EV) brand, holding 14.4% market share. And the company grew its deliveries by 87%, outpacing all other high-volume manufacturers for the thirteenth consecutive quarter.</p><p>Perhaps more important, Tesla&#39;s efforts to make manufacturing more efficient -- boosting production in California and China, single-piece casting for the Model Y -- are paying off. In the third quarter, the company posted an industry-leading operating margin of 14.6%, and that figure ticked up to 14.7% in the fourth quarter. Additionally, the cost of goods per vehicle dropped to $36,000 in the fourth quarter, down from $38,000 in the first quarter and $84,000 in 2017.</p><p>For the full year, Tesla&#39;s revenue skyrocketed 71% to $53.8 billion, and the company posted a GAAP profit of $2.05 per diluted share -- in fact, the company has now achieved GAAP profitability for the last 10 consecutive quarters. And free cash flow jumped 49% to $2.8 billion. More importantly, the future looks bright for Tesla, as the company believes it can grow EV deliveries at least 50% per year over a multi-year horizon. And output should improve in 2022 as the new Gigafactories in Berlin and Texas start producing vehicles.</p><p>Perhaps more exciting, CEO Elon Musk noted that Tesla&#39;s full self-driving software would eventually be its greatest source of profitability, and he also said the company would &#34;achieve full self-driving this year.&#34; If that does indeed come to pass, Tesla would able to launch an autonomous ride-sharing platform, pioneering a market that ARK Invest values at $1.2 trillion by 2030.</p><p>Also noteworthy, Musk said Tesla&#39;s AI-powered humanoid robot (Optimus) may enter production in 2023 -- along with the Cybertruck and Semi -- and that Optimus could eventually be bigger than Tesla&#39;s automotive business.</p><p>So could Tesla reach $3,000 per share by 2025? Well, that would put its market cap at $3 trillion, which is no small task. But if Tesla continues to execute on EV production, while also delivering on its promise of an autonomous ride-sharing service, I think it could hit that price target. But even if that doesn&#39;t happen, Tesla still looks like a good stock to hold for the long term.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F664867%2Fcommunications-1.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>2. Snap</h2><p>Snap is a camera company that specializes in augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI). Its core product is Snapchat, a social platform designed for visual communication. Specifically, people can personalize photos and videos with AR lenses -- tools that add 3D objects and special effects -- then share that content with friends, families, and the broader Snapchat community.</p><p>Snap&#39;s camera also supports scanning, a feature that leans on AI to understand what the camera sees in the viewfinder. For instance, you can scan a car to learn more about the make and model, or you could scan a household product to purchase it on <b>Amazon</b>&#39;s marketplace. In short, Snap uses AR and AI to create an engaging social experience, and that strategy has made the mobile app particularly popular with younger generations.</p><p>In fact, 75% of 13-to-34-year-olds in the United States use Snapchat, and the same is true in geographies like the United Kingdom, France, and Australia. That demographic is particularly valuable to advertisers, as it gives them a chance to build long-lasting customer relationships. To that end, Snap monetizes its business by helping brands build, measure, and optimize targeted ad campaigns.</p><p>For the full year, the company delivered impressive financial results. Revenue soared 64% to $4.1 billion, and while Snap is still unprofitable on a GAAP basis, the loss narrowed to $488 million in 2021. Better yet, the company posted free cash flow of $223 million, marking the first time Snap has generated positive free cash flow on a full-year basis.</p><p>So could Snap hit $93 per share in the next 12 months? It&#39;s certainly possible, assuming the company continues to execute and Wall Street reacquires its taste for richly valued growth stocks. But even if that doesn&#39;t happen, I think this stock looks like a smart long-term investment, as it taps into high-growth industries like digital advertising and the metaverse.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Want 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWant 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 09:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Despite the recent sell-off, the S&P 500 is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SNAP":"Snap Inc","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4543":"AI","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4213":"石油与天然气的勘探与生产","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210556631","content_text":"Despite the recent sell-off, the S&P 500 is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left in the market, particularly when it comes to growth stocks, many of which have fallen sharply over the last few months.For instance, Ark Invest currently has a price target of $3,000 on Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), implying 225% upside by 2025. And Credit Suisse raised its price target on Snap (NASDAQ:SNAP) to $93 after a strong fourth quarter, implying 140% upside in the next 12 months. Given the potential gains, is it time to add these growth stocks to your portfolio?Let's take a closer look.Image source: Tesla1. TeslaSemiconductor shortages weighed on the auto industry in 2021, but Tesla turned in another impressive performance. For the fourth consecutive year, it ranked as the world's leading electric vehicle (EV) brand, holding 14.4% market share. And the company grew its deliveries by 87%, outpacing all other high-volume manufacturers for the thirteenth consecutive quarter.Perhaps more important, Tesla's efforts to make manufacturing more efficient -- boosting production in California and China, single-piece casting for the Model Y -- are paying off. In the third quarter, the company posted an industry-leading operating margin of 14.6%, and that figure ticked up to 14.7% in the fourth quarter. Additionally, the cost of goods per vehicle dropped to $36,000 in the fourth quarter, down from $38,000 in the first quarter and $84,000 in 2017.For the full year, Tesla's revenue skyrocketed 71% to $53.8 billion, and the company posted a GAAP profit of $2.05 per diluted share -- in fact, the company has now achieved GAAP profitability for the last 10 consecutive quarters. And free cash flow jumped 49% to $2.8 billion. More importantly, the future looks bright for Tesla, as the company believes it can grow EV deliveries at least 50% per year over a multi-year horizon. And output should improve in 2022 as the new Gigafactories in Berlin and Texas start producing vehicles.Perhaps more exciting, CEO Elon Musk noted that Tesla's full self-driving software would eventually be its greatest source of profitability, and he also said the company would \"achieve full self-driving this year.\" If that does indeed come to pass, Tesla would able to launch an autonomous ride-sharing platform, pioneering a market that ARK Invest values at $1.2 trillion by 2030.Also noteworthy, Musk said Tesla's AI-powered humanoid robot (Optimus) may enter production in 2023 -- along with the Cybertruck and Semi -- and that Optimus could eventually be bigger than Tesla's automotive business.So could Tesla reach $3,000 per share by 2025? Well, that would put its market cap at $3 trillion, which is no small task. But if Tesla continues to execute on EV production, while also delivering on its promise of an autonomous ride-sharing service, I think it could hit that price target. But even if that doesn't happen, Tesla still looks like a good stock to hold for the long term.Image source: Getty Images.2. SnapSnap is a camera company that specializes in augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI). Its core product is Snapchat, a social platform designed for visual communication. Specifically, people can personalize photos and videos with AR lenses -- tools that add 3D objects and special effects -- then share that content with friends, families, and the broader Snapchat community.Snap's camera also supports scanning, a feature that leans on AI to understand what the camera sees in the viewfinder. For instance, you can scan a car to learn more about the make and model, or you could scan a household product to purchase it on Amazon's marketplace. In short, Snap uses AR and AI to create an engaging social experience, and that strategy has made the mobile app particularly popular with younger generations.In fact, 75% of 13-to-34-year-olds in the United States use Snapchat, and the same is true in geographies like the United Kingdom, France, and Australia. That demographic is particularly valuable to advertisers, as it gives them a chance to build long-lasting customer relationships. To that end, Snap monetizes its business by helping brands build, measure, and optimize targeted ad campaigns.For the full year, the company delivered impressive financial results. Revenue soared 64% to $4.1 billion, and while Snap is still unprofitable on a GAAP basis, the loss narrowed to $488 million in 2021. Better yet, the company posted free cash flow of $223 million, marking the first time Snap has generated positive free cash flow on a full-year basis.So could Snap hit $93 per share in the next 12 months? It's certainly possible, assuming the company continues to execute and Wall Street reacquires its taste for richly valued growth stocks. But even if that doesn't happen, I think this stock looks like a smart long-term investment, as it taps into high-growth industries like digital advertising and the metaverse.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092014248,"gmtCreate":1644488755752,"gmtModify":1676533932578,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092014248","repostId":"2210297562","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210297562","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644485726,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210297562?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210297562","media":"PR Newswire","summary":"TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s ","content":"<div>\n<p>TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 17:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html><strong>PR Newswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4141":"半导体产品","SPWR":"SunPower","BK4519":"光伏太阳能","TTE":"道达尔"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2210297562","content_text":"TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, including $60 million of earn-out, subject to regulatory evolution. TotalEnergies is the majority shareholder of SunPower, a leading solar technology and energy services provider.This acquisition is another step in TotalEnergies' roadmap to develop its distributed generation business, currently accounting to close to 500 MW in operation worldwide. It will allow TotalEnergies to extend its distributed generation business footprint to the U.S. and to develop over 100 MW of additional capacity per year. Beyond, this activity will also create synergies with TotalEnergies' large-scale solar energy portfolio in the U.S and enable B2B customers to benefit from more comprehensive energy solutions and new capabilities in financing and project ownership.As for SunPower, this operation follows previous announcement to focus on its high-growth residential business, offering a superior customer experience with a growing ecosystem of innovative products and services, hence exploring strategic options for the CIS business.All in all, this win-win operation fully fits TotalEnergies and SunPower's respective strategies to better serve industrial, commercial and residential customers.\"With this acquisition, TotalEnergies is further investing to grow its distributed generation activity in the U.S. and support its B2B customers in meeting their sustainable development goals. It is a new milestone in our renewable development in the country, where we are targeting 4 gigawatts of solar capacity by 2025\", said Vincent Stoquart, senior vice president Renewables for TotalEnergies. \"This will also give SunPower additional resources to focus on the growing residential market. We look forward to welcoming the Commercial & Industrial teams and ensuring the continuity of TotalEnergies' commitment in this business as we integrate this high-quality portfolio of products and customers.\"\"TotalEnergies is the ideal partner for our CIS business to take advantage of the growing commercial market and opportunities like community solar and front-of-meter storage,\" said Peter Faricy, CEO of SunPower. \"The sale enables SunPower to focus on creating a superior residential experience, increase our investment in product and digital innovation, and reach more homeowners. The enhanced strategic clarity created by this transaction will help SunPower lead the industry and deliver maximum value to our investors, partners and customers.\"Following a thorough process involving discussions with a number of parties, and upon the unanimous recommendation of a special committee of SunPower's independent directors, the acquisition has been approved by both companies. The transaction is expected to close early Q2 subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. This operation is not expected to reduce TotalEnergies' majority ownership stake (50.83%) in SunPower.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096810965,"gmtCreate":1644360443785,"gmtModify":1676533915641,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome","listText":"Awesome","text":"Awesome","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096810965","repostId":"2208501310","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2208501310","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1644018270,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208501310?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-05 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208501310","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Two of the three tickers in question are tempting in that they were once among the market's most beloved names.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>January was a tough one for investors, with the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks plummeted as the COVID-19 pandemic was declared.</p><p>Many of the stocks that make up the index saw share prices fall much more. The worst of the worst were <b>Netflix</b> (NASDAQ:NFLX), <b>EPAM Systems</b> (NYSE:EPAM), and<b> Moderna</b> (NASDAQ:MRNA). The first two names tumbled 29% last month, while Moderna shares ended January more than 33% lower. The vaccine trade has clearly lost its luster.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/18e27fbd52a0474ccd72c75bb60af5db\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MRNA data by YCharts</span></p><p>Many discount investors are, of course, mulling purchases of these beaten-down names. Why pay full price when you can buy a stock on sale?</p><p>Before plowing into any of these stocks -- or any of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s other big January losers, for that matter -- take a step back and inspect your true motivation. Just because a ticker has lost a massive amount of value in a short period of time doesn&#39;t inherently mean it&#39;s ripe for a rapid recovery.</p><h2>The sell-offs make some sense</h2><p>Take Moderna as an example. While it was one of the most ballyhooed names in the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine, shares of the drugmaker overstepped their sustainable, justifiable long-term value in 2020 and 2021. With the initially created vaccines not quite as effective as hoped at curbing the spread of the omicron variant -- and even less effective against the new omicron subvariant -- the world is losing interest in what increasingly looks like a never-ending chase for immunity. Denmark and England have essentially dropped all pandemic-related restrictions.</p><p>Support for vaccine mandates is withering anyway. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the White House&#39;s effort to force all large companies to impose their own vaccination mandates on employees. Even without that ruling, many companies, including <b>Boeing</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>, were canceling their mandate policies.</p><p>Simply put, the world&#39;s losing interest in continuing to fight a coronavirus contagion that&#39;s already raced out of control.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1149d759f046abd160561d3662127108\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>Netflix is in a different but comparable situation. While plenty of supporters and shareholders see the recent subscriber growth lull as a temporary headwind linked to strong growth during the early days of the pandemic, that view overlooks a critical detail. That is, Netflix&#39;s biggest and best competition surfaced right before and during the rise of the coronavirus contagion.</p><p>The specifics: <b>Walt Disney</b>&#39;s Disney+ debuted in November of 2019, a month before COVID-19 was first detected in China. WarnerMedia&#39;s HBO Max launched in May of 2020. <b>Discovery</b> made Discovery+ available in early 2021, and it is already serving 20 million paying subscribers. <b>ViacomCBS</b> ramped up its streaming efforts in the middle of the pandemic as well. Its Pluto TV platform now serves 54.4 million viewers, doubling its headcount as of early 2020. Its total number of premium streaming subscribers also more than doubled during that period.</p><p>This isn&#39;t to suggest Netflix is doomed. It&#39;s still the most compelling brand in the streaming business. The recent streak of disappointing subscriber growth, however, may reflect an increasingly crowded market more than tougher comps. The former is a more permanent challenge.</p><h2>Heed the market&#39;s warning</h2><p>Just because a stock&#39;s been a poor performer of late doesn&#39;t mean it&#39;s destined to forever go lower due to demand issues, of course.</p><p>Take the aforementioned software company EPAM Systems, for instance. The stock&#39;s crashed since the end of last year, mostly thanks to an excessive run-up in 2021. The fundamental bullish argument hasn&#39;t changed for this growth name, though. Analysts are still calling for 30% sales growth this year, driving comparable earnings growth as a result. Companies still need help moving into the digital world, and EPAM is still well-positioned as the go-to solutions provider.</p><p>Of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s three biggest laggards in January, though, this one is the only one where the sell-off is clearly a mistake.</p><p>The thing is, this limited number of sharply sold-off stocks that are actually firm buys following their meltdowns is nothing new. There&#39;s always more to the story, and more often than not, the market&#39;s selling is a reasonable warning that a company is at least worth viewing through a lens of healthy doubt.</p><p>In simpler terms, big losses don&#39;t inherently make a stock a buy, even when that stock is a well-known ticker. Always look at the bigger picture.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-05 07:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>January was a tough one for investors, with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","EPAM":"Epam Systems","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2208501310","content_text":"January was a tough one for investors, with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks plummeted as the COVID-19 pandemic was declared.Many of the stocks that make up the index saw share prices fall much more. The worst of the worst were Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM), and Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA). The first two names tumbled 29% last month, while Moderna shares ended January more than 33% lower. The vaccine trade has clearly lost its luster.MRNA data by YChartsMany discount investors are, of course, mulling purchases of these beaten-down names. Why pay full price when you can buy a stock on sale?Before plowing into any of these stocks -- or any of the S&P 500's other big January losers, for that matter -- take a step back and inspect your true motivation. Just because a ticker has lost a massive amount of value in a short period of time doesn't inherently mean it's ripe for a rapid recovery.The sell-offs make some senseTake Moderna as an example. While it was one of the most ballyhooed names in the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine, shares of the drugmaker overstepped their sustainable, justifiable long-term value in 2020 and 2021. With the initially created vaccines not quite as effective as hoped at curbing the spread of the omicron variant -- and even less effective against the new omicron subvariant -- the world is losing interest in what increasingly looks like a never-ending chase for immunity. Denmark and England have essentially dropped all pandemic-related restrictions.Support for vaccine mandates is withering anyway. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the White House's effort to force all large companies to impose their own vaccination mandates on employees. Even without that ruling, many companies, including Boeing and Starbucks, were canceling their mandate policies.Simply put, the world's losing interest in continuing to fight a coronavirus contagion that's already raced out of control.Image source: Getty Images.Netflix is in a different but comparable situation. While plenty of supporters and shareholders see the recent subscriber growth lull as a temporary headwind linked to strong growth during the early days of the pandemic, that view overlooks a critical detail. That is, Netflix's biggest and best competition surfaced right before and during the rise of the coronavirus contagion.The specifics: Walt Disney's Disney+ debuted in November of 2019, a month before COVID-19 was first detected in China. WarnerMedia's HBO Max launched in May of 2020. Discovery made Discovery+ available in early 2021, and it is already serving 20 million paying subscribers. ViacomCBS ramped up its streaming efforts in the middle of the pandemic as well. Its Pluto TV platform now serves 54.4 million viewers, doubling its headcount as of early 2020. Its total number of premium streaming subscribers also more than doubled during that period.This isn't to suggest Netflix is doomed. It's still the most compelling brand in the streaming business. The recent streak of disappointing subscriber growth, however, may reflect an increasingly crowded market more than tougher comps. The former is a more permanent challenge.Heed the market's warningJust because a stock's been a poor performer of late doesn't mean it's destined to forever go lower due to demand issues, of course.Take the aforementioned software company EPAM Systems, for instance. The stock's crashed since the end of last year, mostly thanks to an excessive run-up in 2021. The fundamental bullish argument hasn't changed for this growth name, though. Analysts are still calling for 30% sales growth this year, driving comparable earnings growth as a result. Companies still need help moving into the digital world, and EPAM is still well-positioned as the go-to solutions provider.Of the S&P 500's three biggest laggards in January, though, this one is the only one where the sell-off is clearly a mistake.The thing is, this limited number of sharply sold-off stocks that are actually firm buys following their meltdowns is nothing new. There's always more to the story, and more often than not, the market's selling is a reasonable warning that a company is at least worth viewing through a lens of healthy doubt.In simpler terms, big losses don't inherently make a stock a buy, even when that stock is a well-known ticker. Always look at the bigger picture.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096835807,"gmtCreate":1644360156677,"gmtModify":1676533915574,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096835807","repostId":"1154503295","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154503295","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1644327196,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154503295?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-08 21:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154503295","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Keybanc raised Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Inte","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Keybanc raised <b>Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.</b>TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham lowered <b>Datadog, Inc.</b>DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.</p><p>Raymond James cut the price target for <b>Cerence Inc.</b>CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.</p><p>UBS boosted the price target on <b>McKesson Corporation</b>MCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Stephens &amp; Co. raised <b>Tyson Foods, Inc.</b>TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Oppenheimer lowered<b>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. cut the price target for <b>Westport Fuel Systems Inc.</b>WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham cut the price target on <b>Zebra Technologies Corporation</b>ZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.</p><p>Piper Sandler lowered <b>SelectQuote, Inc.</b>SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.</p><p>SVB Leerink reduced the price target on <b>Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.</b>ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-08 21:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Keybanc raised <b>Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.</b>TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham lowered <b>Datadog, Inc.</b>DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.</p><p>Raymond James cut the price target for <b>Cerence Inc.</b>CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.</p><p>UBS boosted the price target on <b>McKesson Corporation</b>MCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Stephens &amp; Co. raised <b>Tyson Foods, Inc.</b>TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Oppenheimer lowered<b>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. cut the price target for <b>Westport Fuel Systems Inc.</b>WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham cut the price target on <b>Zebra Technologies Corporation</b>ZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.</p><p>Piper Sandler lowered <b>SelectQuote, Inc.</b>SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.</p><p>SVB Leerink reduced the price target on <b>Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.</b>ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDOG":"Datadog","MCK":"麦克森药物批发","ZBRA":"斑马技术","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","TSN":"泰森食品","CRNC":"Cerence Inc.","SLQT":"SelectQuote, Inc.","WPRT":"西港燃料","REGN":"再生元制药公司","ZBH":"齐默巴奥米特控股"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154503295","content_text":"Keybanc raised Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.Needham lowered Datadog, Inc.DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.Raymond James cut the price target for Cerence Inc.CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.UBS boosted the price target on McKesson CorporationMCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.Stephens & Co. raised Tyson Foods, Inc.TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.Oppenheimer loweredRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.HC Wainwright & Co. cut the price target for Westport Fuel Systems Inc.WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.Needham cut the price target on Zebra Technologies CorporationZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.Piper Sandler lowered SelectQuote, Inc.SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.SVB Leerink reduced the price target on Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9092014248,"gmtCreate":1644488755752,"gmtModify":1676533932578,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092014248","repostId":"2210297562","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210297562","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644485726,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210297562?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210297562","media":"PR Newswire","summary":"TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s ","content":"<div>\n<p>TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTotalEnergies to Acquire SunPower's Commercial & Industrial Solar Business\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 17:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html><strong>PR Newswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4141":"半导体产品","SPWR":"SunPower","BK4519":"光伏太阳能","TTE":"道达尔"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/totalenergies-acquire-sunpowers-commercial-industrial-070000637.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2210297562","content_text":"TotalEnergies (NYSE:TTE) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement with SunPower Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SPWR) to purchase its Commercial & Industrial Solutions (CIS) business for $250 million, including $60 million of earn-out, subject to regulatory evolution. TotalEnergies is the majority shareholder of SunPower, a leading solar technology and energy services provider.This acquisition is another step in TotalEnergies' roadmap to develop its distributed generation business, currently accounting to close to 500 MW in operation worldwide. It will allow TotalEnergies to extend its distributed generation business footprint to the U.S. and to develop over 100 MW of additional capacity per year. Beyond, this activity will also create synergies with TotalEnergies' large-scale solar energy portfolio in the U.S and enable B2B customers to benefit from more comprehensive energy solutions and new capabilities in financing and project ownership.As for SunPower, this operation follows previous announcement to focus on its high-growth residential business, offering a superior customer experience with a growing ecosystem of innovative products and services, hence exploring strategic options for the CIS business.All in all, this win-win operation fully fits TotalEnergies and SunPower's respective strategies to better serve industrial, commercial and residential customers.\"With this acquisition, TotalEnergies is further investing to grow its distributed generation activity in the U.S. and support its B2B customers in meeting their sustainable development goals. It is a new milestone in our renewable development in the country, where we are targeting 4 gigawatts of solar capacity by 2025\", said Vincent Stoquart, senior vice president Renewables for TotalEnergies. \"This will also give SunPower additional resources to focus on the growing residential market. We look forward to welcoming the Commercial & Industrial teams and ensuring the continuity of TotalEnergies' commitment in this business as we integrate this high-quality portfolio of products and customers.\"\"TotalEnergies is the ideal partner for our CIS business to take advantage of the growing commercial market and opportunities like community solar and front-of-meter storage,\" said Peter Faricy, CEO of SunPower. \"The sale enables SunPower to focus on creating a superior residential experience, increase our investment in product and digital innovation, and reach more homeowners. The enhanced strategic clarity created by this transaction will help SunPower lead the industry and deliver maximum value to our investors, partners and customers.\"Following a thorough process involving discussions with a number of parties, and upon the unanimous recommendation of a special committee of SunPower's independent directors, the acquisition has been approved by both companies. The transaction is expected to close early Q2 subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions. This operation is not expected to reduce TotalEnergies' majority ownership stake (50.83%) in SunPower.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092017471,"gmtCreate":1644489206643,"gmtModify":1676533932693,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092017471","repostId":"2209349195","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2209349195","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644416348,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2209349195?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-09 22:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2209349195","media":"LA Times","summary":"Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook'","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9fcd9ddd39b8d321f2284c828537362\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"280\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook&#39;s activities in April 2018. </p><p>  (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)</p><p>If there&#39;s a single immutable law in human biology, it&#39;s that no <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> lives forever. The same goes for corporations.</p><p>The latest big company to confront the fact that the grim reaper spares no one and no thing is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a>, formerly known as Facebook.</p><p>Meta on Thursday suffered the largest one-day loss in U.S. stock market history, following an unexpectedly sour report of fourth-quarter earnings.</p><blockquote>We&#39;ve made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.</blockquote><p>Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg</p><p>The company&#39;s chairman and chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, tried to reassure employees and investors that he and his management team had matters in hand for the long term.</p><p>It&#39;s true that Meta remains a potent force in the tech space. The stock closed Friday at $237.09, about where it was as recently as July 30, 2020, and its current market capitalization of $896 billion is the sixth-largest among U.S. companies, just behind Tesla and ahead of Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway. Some market strategists say it may be undervalued at the current price.</p><p>But it&#39;s also possible that the company is facing an inflection point in its business model with existential implications.</p><p>Meta is braving what its chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, endearingly labeled &#34;headwinds&#34; during a conference call with investment analysts Wednesday.</p><p>Zuckerberg tried to calm investors&#39; nerves by noting that the company had overcome what at first appeared to be existential challenges in the past: &#34;We&#39;ve made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.&#34;</p><p>Yet Meta hasn&#39;t had to deal before with so many challenges coming together at once.</p><p>Even a short list seems daunting. Start with the immense popularity of TikTok, which established itself as the preferred platform for short-form videos before Facebook&#39;s copycat, Reels, could find its footing. There&#39;s Apple&#39;s new privacy options for iPhone users, which will cut deeply into Meta&#39;s access to advertising dollars, costing as much as $10 billion in revenue this year.</p><p>And a reinvigorated Federal Trade Commission, which last month won permission to pursue an antitrust lawsuit against the company from a federal judge, who found the FTC&#39;s allegations &#34;robust and detailed&#34; and rejected the company&#39;s attack on FTC Chair Lina Khan.</p><p>Add the perhaps inevitable aging of the company&#39;s platforms. Facebook, its core product, suffered the first drop in daily average users in its history, falling by about 1 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the previous quarter. That was the first such decline at least since the company went public in 2012.</p><p>Another difficulty is the company&#39;s deteriorating reputation for trustworthiness amid doubts about its social impacts.</p><p>It&#39;s blamed for undermining the health and self-image of teen girls through its Instagram photo-sharing app, as whistleblower Frances Haugen told a congressional committee in October. Its role in spreading political disinformation was documented in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.</p><p>The company&#39;s cavalier approach to its users&#39; privacy is well-established, which contributed to the recent collapse of its effort to create its own cryptocurrency.</p><p>Despite a corporate rebranding intended to distance the company from its scandals, Meta&#39;s corporate personality is inextricable from Zuckerberg, who continues to have supermajority control of the firm&#39;s stockholder vote.</p><p>As successful as he has been in capturing the social media zeitgeist with well-times acquisitions of emerging competitors such as WhatsApp or Instagram, he has so far had little success proving to investors that the company&#39;s forays into other business models represent a real future.</p><p>That&#39;s true of last year&#39;s rebranding as Meta Platforms. Zuckerberg offered a murky picture of the &#34;metaverse,&#34; the marketplace the company would henceforth be addressing: &#34;There’s a lot of ambiguity around what the metaverse means,&#34; he acknowledged on Ben Thompson&#39;s Stratechery podcast.</p><p>But his specific ideas seemed less than compelling. &#34;You’re going to be able to have a message thread going on when you’re in the middle of a meeting or doing something else and no one else is even going to notice,&#34; he posited.</p><p>The interview prompted Siva Vaidhyanathan, a long-time Zuckerberg critic, to observe that &#34;investing billions of dollars through thousands of highly trained experts to solve a problem no one seems to want solved is a bad way to deploy resources.&#34;</p><p>The most fundamental difficulty in Meta&#39;s future is the natural limit to the life span of even the most innovative companies. Examples of major enterprises that overcame changes in their core technologies or markets are thin on the ground.</p><p>That should strike a cautionary note in the executive suites of other companies that seem to hold impregnable positions at the summit of the business world, such as Alphabet (the parent of Google) and Amazon. (As the old English proverb warns, &#34;time and tide wait for no man.&#34;)</p><p>For many years, the quintessential industrial survivor was General Electric, which was an original component of the Dow Jones industrial average in 1896 and remained in the index continuously starting in Nov. 7, 1907.</p><p>That streak ended after more than 110 years in June 2018; the company, brought down by hubristic investments in financial services and forced to sell off its iconic manufacturing units, no longer resembled the strutting emperor of the U.S. economy of its heyday, and was unceremoniously kicked off the Dow.</p><p>Another company that had nimbly and serially remade itself to remain atop the roster of American corporations was <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>.</p><p>Over its long history, as Steven Cherry of the University of Pittsburgh observed last year on his podcast, &#34;Fixing the Future,&#34; IBM pivoted from manufacturing the tabulating machines for the 1890 census, to mainframe computers, to personal computers, to networking, and to artificial intelligence machines that beat chess grandmasters and &#34;Jeopardy!&#34; champions at their own games.</p><p>The company&#39;s ability to find and dominate every new technology seemed unlimited. Yet it began to run out its string over the last decade or so, unable to find purchase in the market for cloud-based business services or to financially exploit advances in quantum computing or AI.</p><p>Last month, IBM suffered the humiliation of selling off Watson Health, an AI platform launched in 2015 with the goal of helping doctors and hospitals analyze patient data on a vast scale. But the company&#39;s claims were shrouded in hype and the investment needed to keep it running in the face of losses was more than IBM considered worthwhile.</p><p>Some companies become prisoners of their own success. That was the case with Xerox, which collected majestic profits from its 914 office copier, which was introduced in 1959 and became the most successful industrial product in history up to that time.</p><p>Devised by an eccentric inventor named Chester Carlson, the 914 was so successful that the entire company was structured to serve and distribute the machine and its successors.</p><p>Yet Xerox &#34;was fundamentally cursed by the Chester Carlson vision,&#34; the company&#39;s former chief technology officer, Paul Strassmann, told me in 1998. &#34;This is the immaculate conception view that all you have to do is give us the right technology and the world will come to us. Unfortunately, when it happens like that, it&#39;s a fluke.&#34;</p><p>The limits of that vision came home to Xerox in the 1970s, when it built and staffed its legendary Palo Alto Research Center, or PARC, in Silicon Valley with the goal of finding the next big office technologies before others could do so and cut into its franchise.</p><p>PARC&#39;s scientists and engineers invented the personal computer, graphical displays, and other technologies we take for granted today, but Xerox couldn&#39;t bring them to market profitably.</p><p>&#34;Xerox could have owned the entire computer industry today,&#34; Apple&#39;s Steve Jobs declared in a 1996 documentary. &#34;Could have been the IBM of the ’90s. Could have been the Microsoft of the ’90s.&#34; At the time, of course, the stumbles of both companies lay unforeseen over the far horizon.</p><p>It&#39;s not unheard of for a corporation to face down a near-death experience and reestablish itself. Apple did so, having come close to extinction after Jobs himself was forced out of the company in 1985 by John Sculley, whom he had lured from Pepsi to bring traditional corporate standards to Apple as chief executive.</p><p>Jobs returned to the drifting and money-losing company in 1997 and set it on the path to spectacular profitability by introducing such new products as the iPod, iPad and iPhone.</p><p>Microsoft, too, shook off the torpor it was suffering earlier in this century when it missed out on the mobile computing revolution and allowed its operating systems to become stale. Under Satya Nadella, who became chief executive in 2014 and chairman last year, however, the company has staged a revival, its shares gaining a market-beating 52.5% in 2021.</p><p>It&#39;s possible that Zuckerberg can follow in the footsteps of Jobs and Nadella, and defeat his company&#39;s multiple challenges. Most executives facing even lesser challenges have failed, however.</p><p>Whether Zuckerberg can turn his vision of the metaverse into profits is a wide-open question. It will be a challenge he has never faced before, because it comes in an atmosphere of growing skepticism about his company among the public and among investors.</p><p>&#34;Zuckerberg has never received a signal from the marketplace that he should ever be more modest or change how he has always done things,&#34; Vaidhyanathan wrote last November, after the Meta rebranding. That signal is sounding now, loud and clear.</p><p>This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs This the Beginning of Facebook's Downfall?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-09 22:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html><strong>LA Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook's activities in April 2018.   (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)If there's a single immutable law in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","IBM":"IBM","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-beginning-facebooks-downfall-223343937.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2209349195","content_text":"Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg prepares to testify before a congressional committee about Facebook's activities in April 2018.   (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images)If there's a single immutable law in human biology, it's that no one lives forever. The same goes for corporations.The latest big company to confront the fact that the grim reaper spares no one and no thing is Meta Platforms, formerly known as Facebook.Meta on Thursday suffered the largest one-day loss in U.S. stock market history, following an unexpectedly sour report of fourth-quarter earnings.We've made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark ZuckerbergThe company's chairman and chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, tried to reassure employees and investors that he and his management team had matters in hand for the long term.It's true that Meta remains a potent force in the tech space. The stock closed Friday at $237.09, about where it was as recently as July 30, 2020, and its current market capitalization of $896 billion is the sixth-largest among U.S. companies, just behind Tesla and ahead of Warren Buffett-led Berkshire Hathaway. Some market strategists say it may be undervalued at the current price.But it's also possible that the company is facing an inflection point in its business model with existential implications.Meta is braving what its chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, endearingly labeled \"headwinds\" during a conference call with investment analysts Wednesday.Zuckerberg tried to calm investors' nerves by noting that the company had overcome what at first appeared to be existential challenges in the past: \"We've made these types of transitions before ... where we took on headwinds in the near term to align with important trends over the long term.\"Yet Meta hasn't had to deal before with so many challenges coming together at once.Even a short list seems daunting. Start with the immense popularity of TikTok, which established itself as the preferred platform for short-form videos before Facebook's copycat, Reels, could find its footing. There's Apple's new privacy options for iPhone users, which will cut deeply into Meta's access to advertising dollars, costing as much as $10 billion in revenue this year.And a reinvigorated Federal Trade Commission, which last month won permission to pursue an antitrust lawsuit against the company from a federal judge, who found the FTC's allegations \"robust and detailed\" and rejected the company's attack on FTC Chair Lina Khan.Add the perhaps inevitable aging of the company's platforms. Facebook, its core product, suffered the first drop in daily average users in its history, falling by about 1 million in the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the previous quarter. That was the first such decline at least since the company went public in 2012.Another difficulty is the company's deteriorating reputation for trustworthiness amid doubts about its social impacts.It's blamed for undermining the health and self-image of teen girls through its Instagram photo-sharing app, as whistleblower Frances Haugen told a congressional committee in October. Its role in spreading political disinformation was documented in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.The company's cavalier approach to its users' privacy is well-established, which contributed to the recent collapse of its effort to create its own cryptocurrency.Despite a corporate rebranding intended to distance the company from its scandals, Meta's corporate personality is inextricable from Zuckerberg, who continues to have supermajority control of the firm's stockholder vote.As successful as he has been in capturing the social media zeitgeist with well-times acquisitions of emerging competitors such as WhatsApp or Instagram, he has so far had little success proving to investors that the company's forays into other business models represent a real future.That's true of last year's rebranding as Meta Platforms. Zuckerberg offered a murky picture of the \"metaverse,\" the marketplace the company would henceforth be addressing: \"There’s a lot of ambiguity around what the metaverse means,\" he acknowledged on Ben Thompson's Stratechery podcast.But his specific ideas seemed less than compelling. \"You’re going to be able to have a message thread going on when you’re in the middle of a meeting or doing something else and no one else is even going to notice,\" he posited.The interview prompted Siva Vaidhyanathan, a long-time Zuckerberg critic, to observe that \"investing billions of dollars through thousands of highly trained experts to solve a problem no one seems to want solved is a bad way to deploy resources.\"The most fundamental difficulty in Meta's future is the natural limit to the life span of even the most innovative companies. Examples of major enterprises that overcame changes in their core technologies or markets are thin on the ground.That should strike a cautionary note in the executive suites of other companies that seem to hold impregnable positions at the summit of the business world, such as Alphabet (the parent of Google) and Amazon. (As the old English proverb warns, \"time and tide wait for no man.\")For many years, the quintessential industrial survivor was General Electric, which was an original component of the Dow Jones industrial average in 1896 and remained in the index continuously starting in Nov. 7, 1907.That streak ended after more than 110 years in June 2018; the company, brought down by hubristic investments in financial services and forced to sell off its iconic manufacturing units, no longer resembled the strutting emperor of the U.S. economy of its heyday, and was unceremoniously kicked off the Dow.Another company that had nimbly and serially remade itself to remain atop the roster of American corporations was IBM.Over its long history, as Steven Cherry of the University of Pittsburgh observed last year on his podcast, \"Fixing the Future,\" IBM pivoted from manufacturing the tabulating machines for the 1890 census, to mainframe computers, to personal computers, to networking, and to artificial intelligence machines that beat chess grandmasters and \"Jeopardy!\" champions at their own games.The company's ability to find and dominate every new technology seemed unlimited. Yet it began to run out its string over the last decade or so, unable to find purchase in the market for cloud-based business services or to financially exploit advances in quantum computing or AI.Last month, IBM suffered the humiliation of selling off Watson Health, an AI platform launched in 2015 with the goal of helping doctors and hospitals analyze patient data on a vast scale. But the company's claims were shrouded in hype and the investment needed to keep it running in the face of losses was more than IBM considered worthwhile.Some companies become prisoners of their own success. That was the case with Xerox, which collected majestic profits from its 914 office copier, which was introduced in 1959 and became the most successful industrial product in history up to that time.Devised by an eccentric inventor named Chester Carlson, the 914 was so successful that the entire company was structured to serve and distribute the machine and its successors.Yet Xerox \"was fundamentally cursed by the Chester Carlson vision,\" the company's former chief technology officer, Paul Strassmann, told me in 1998. \"This is the immaculate conception view that all you have to do is give us the right technology and the world will come to us. Unfortunately, when it happens like that, it's a fluke.\"The limits of that vision came home to Xerox in the 1970s, when it built and staffed its legendary Palo Alto Research Center, or PARC, in Silicon Valley with the goal of finding the next big office technologies before others could do so and cut into its franchise.PARC's scientists and engineers invented the personal computer, graphical displays, and other technologies we take for granted today, but Xerox couldn't bring them to market profitably.\"Xerox could have owned the entire computer industry today,\" Apple's Steve Jobs declared in a 1996 documentary. \"Could have been the IBM of the ’90s. Could have been the Microsoft of the ’90s.\" At the time, of course, the stumbles of both companies lay unforeseen over the far horizon.It's not unheard of for a corporation to face down a near-death experience and reestablish itself. Apple did so, having come close to extinction after Jobs himself was forced out of the company in 1985 by John Sculley, whom he had lured from Pepsi to bring traditional corporate standards to Apple as chief executive.Jobs returned to the drifting and money-losing company in 1997 and set it on the path to spectacular profitability by introducing such new products as the iPod, iPad and iPhone.Microsoft, too, shook off the torpor it was suffering earlier in this century when it missed out on the mobile computing revolution and allowed its operating systems to become stale. Under Satya Nadella, who became chief executive in 2014 and chairman last year, however, the company has staged a revival, its shares gaining a market-beating 52.5% in 2021.It's possible that Zuckerberg can follow in the footsteps of Jobs and Nadella, and defeat his company's multiple challenges. Most executives facing even lesser challenges have failed, however.Whether Zuckerberg can turn his vision of the metaverse into profits is a wide-open question. It will be a challenge he has never faced before, because it comes in an atmosphere of growing skepticism about his company among the public and among investors.\"Zuckerberg has never received a signal from the marketplace that he should ever be more modest or change how he has always done things,\" Vaidhyanathan wrote last November, after the Meta rebranding. That signal is sounding now, loud and clear.This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":233,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092017200,"gmtCreate":1644489180657,"gmtModify":1676533932659,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092017200","repostId":"2210556631","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210556631","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1644455674,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210556631?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-10 09:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Want 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210556631","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Despite a difficult macroeconomic environment, some analysts are bullish on these growth stocks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Despite the recent sell-off, the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left in the market, particularly when it comes to growth stocks, many of which have fallen sharply over the last few months.</p><p>For instance, Ark Invest currently has a price target of $3,000 on <b>Tesla</b> (NASDAQ:TSLA), implying 225% upside by 2025. And Credit Suisse raised its price target on <b>Snap</b> (NASDAQ:SNAP) to $93 after a strong fourth quarter, implying 140% upside in the next 12 months. Given the potential gains, is it time to add these growth stocks to your portfolio?</p><p>Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cbfb5c857f59d0573bd0296fb4a1d2\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Tesla</span></p><h2>1. Tesla</h2><p>Semiconductor shortages weighed on the auto industry in 2021, but Tesla turned in another impressive performance. For the fourth consecutive year, it ranked as the world&#39;s leading electric vehicle (EV) brand, holding 14.4% market share. And the company grew its deliveries by 87%, outpacing all other high-volume manufacturers for the thirteenth consecutive quarter.</p><p>Perhaps more important, Tesla&#39;s efforts to make manufacturing more efficient -- boosting production in California and China, single-piece casting for the Model Y -- are paying off. In the third quarter, the company posted an industry-leading operating margin of 14.6%, and that figure ticked up to 14.7% in the fourth quarter. Additionally, the cost of goods per vehicle dropped to $36,000 in the fourth quarter, down from $38,000 in the first quarter and $84,000 in 2017.</p><p>For the full year, Tesla&#39;s revenue skyrocketed 71% to $53.8 billion, and the company posted a GAAP profit of $2.05 per diluted share -- in fact, the company has now achieved GAAP profitability for the last 10 consecutive quarters. And free cash flow jumped 49% to $2.8 billion. More importantly, the future looks bright for Tesla, as the company believes it can grow EV deliveries at least 50% per year over a multi-year horizon. And output should improve in 2022 as the new Gigafactories in Berlin and Texas start producing vehicles.</p><p>Perhaps more exciting, CEO Elon Musk noted that Tesla&#39;s full self-driving software would eventually be its greatest source of profitability, and he also said the company would &#34;achieve full self-driving this year.&#34; If that does indeed come to pass, Tesla would able to launch an autonomous ride-sharing platform, pioneering a market that ARK Invest values at $1.2 trillion by 2030.</p><p>Also noteworthy, Musk said Tesla&#39;s AI-powered humanoid robot (Optimus) may enter production in 2023 -- along with the Cybertruck and Semi -- and that Optimus could eventually be bigger than Tesla&#39;s automotive business.</p><p>So could Tesla reach $3,000 per share by 2025? Well, that would put its market cap at $3 trillion, which is no small task. But if Tesla continues to execute on EV production, while also delivering on its promise of an autonomous ride-sharing service, I think it could hit that price target. But even if that doesn&#39;t happen, Tesla still looks like a good stock to hold for the long term.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F664867%2Fcommunications-1.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>2. Snap</h2><p>Snap is a camera company that specializes in augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI). Its core product is Snapchat, a social platform designed for visual communication. Specifically, people can personalize photos and videos with AR lenses -- tools that add 3D objects and special effects -- then share that content with friends, families, and the broader Snapchat community.</p><p>Snap&#39;s camera also supports scanning, a feature that leans on AI to understand what the camera sees in the viewfinder. For instance, you can scan a car to learn more about the make and model, or you could scan a household product to purchase it on <b>Amazon</b>&#39;s marketplace. In short, Snap uses AR and AI to create an engaging social experience, and that strategy has made the mobile app particularly popular with younger generations.</p><p>In fact, 75% of 13-to-34-year-olds in the United States use Snapchat, and the same is true in geographies like the United Kingdom, France, and Australia. That demographic is particularly valuable to advertisers, as it gives them a chance to build long-lasting customer relationships. To that end, Snap monetizes its business by helping brands build, measure, and optimize targeted ad campaigns.</p><p>For the full year, the company delivered impressive financial results. Revenue soared 64% to $4.1 billion, and while Snap is still unprofitable on a GAAP basis, the loss narrowed to $488 million in 2021. Better yet, the company posted free cash flow of $223 million, marking the first time Snap has generated positive free cash flow on a full-year basis.</p><p>So could Snap hit $93 per share in the next 12 months? It&#39;s certainly possible, assuming the company continues to execute and Wall Street reacquires its taste for richly valued growth stocks. But even if that doesn&#39;t happen, I think this stock looks like a smart long-term investment, as it taps into high-growth industries like digital advertising and the metaverse.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Want 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWant 140% to 225% Gains? 2 Growth Stocks to Buy, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-10 09:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Despite the recent sell-off, the S&P 500 is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SNAP":"Snap Inc","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4543":"AI","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4213":"石油与天然气的勘探与生产","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/09/want-140-to-225-gains-2-growth-stocks-to-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210556631","content_text":"Despite the recent sell-off, the S&P 500 is still up 18% over the past year, outpacing its own long-term average of 8% annualized growth. Even so, some Wall Street analysts see plenty of upside left in the market, particularly when it comes to growth stocks, many of which have fallen sharply over the last few months.For instance, Ark Invest currently has a price target of $3,000 on Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), implying 225% upside by 2025. And Credit Suisse raised its price target on Snap (NASDAQ:SNAP) to $93 after a strong fourth quarter, implying 140% upside in the next 12 months. Given the potential gains, is it time to add these growth stocks to your portfolio?Let's take a closer look.Image source: Tesla1. TeslaSemiconductor shortages weighed on the auto industry in 2021, but Tesla turned in another impressive performance. For the fourth consecutive year, it ranked as the world's leading electric vehicle (EV) brand, holding 14.4% market share. And the company grew its deliveries by 87%, outpacing all other high-volume manufacturers for the thirteenth consecutive quarter.Perhaps more important, Tesla's efforts to make manufacturing more efficient -- boosting production in California and China, single-piece casting for the Model Y -- are paying off. In the third quarter, the company posted an industry-leading operating margin of 14.6%, and that figure ticked up to 14.7% in the fourth quarter. Additionally, the cost of goods per vehicle dropped to $36,000 in the fourth quarter, down from $38,000 in the first quarter and $84,000 in 2017.For the full year, Tesla's revenue skyrocketed 71% to $53.8 billion, and the company posted a GAAP profit of $2.05 per diluted share -- in fact, the company has now achieved GAAP profitability for the last 10 consecutive quarters. And free cash flow jumped 49% to $2.8 billion. More importantly, the future looks bright for Tesla, as the company believes it can grow EV deliveries at least 50% per year over a multi-year horizon. And output should improve in 2022 as the new Gigafactories in Berlin and Texas start producing vehicles.Perhaps more exciting, CEO Elon Musk noted that Tesla's full self-driving software would eventually be its greatest source of profitability, and he also said the company would \"achieve full self-driving this year.\" If that does indeed come to pass, Tesla would able to launch an autonomous ride-sharing platform, pioneering a market that ARK Invest values at $1.2 trillion by 2030.Also noteworthy, Musk said Tesla's AI-powered humanoid robot (Optimus) may enter production in 2023 -- along with the Cybertruck and Semi -- and that Optimus could eventually be bigger than Tesla's automotive business.So could Tesla reach $3,000 per share by 2025? Well, that would put its market cap at $3 trillion, which is no small task. But if Tesla continues to execute on EV production, while also delivering on its promise of an autonomous ride-sharing service, I think it could hit that price target. But even if that doesn't happen, Tesla still looks like a good stock to hold for the long term.Image source: Getty Images.2. SnapSnap is a camera company that specializes in augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI). Its core product is Snapchat, a social platform designed for visual communication. Specifically, people can personalize photos and videos with AR lenses -- tools that add 3D objects and special effects -- then share that content with friends, families, and the broader Snapchat community.Snap's camera also supports scanning, a feature that leans on AI to understand what the camera sees in the viewfinder. For instance, you can scan a car to learn more about the make and model, or you could scan a household product to purchase it on Amazon's marketplace. In short, Snap uses AR and AI to create an engaging social experience, and that strategy has made the mobile app particularly popular with younger generations.In fact, 75% of 13-to-34-year-olds in the United States use Snapchat, and the same is true in geographies like the United Kingdom, France, and Australia. That demographic is particularly valuable to advertisers, as it gives them a chance to build long-lasting customer relationships. To that end, Snap monetizes its business by helping brands build, measure, and optimize targeted ad campaigns.For the full year, the company delivered impressive financial results. Revenue soared 64% to $4.1 billion, and while Snap is still unprofitable on a GAAP basis, the loss narrowed to $488 million in 2021. Better yet, the company posted free cash flow of $223 million, marking the first time Snap has generated positive free cash flow on a full-year basis.So could Snap hit $93 per share in the next 12 months? It's certainly possible, assuming the company continues to execute and Wall Street reacquires its taste for richly valued growth stocks. But even if that doesn't happen, I think this stock looks like a smart long-term investment, as it taps into high-growth industries like digital advertising and the metaverse.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096810965,"gmtCreate":1644360443785,"gmtModify":1676533915641,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome","listText":"Awesome","text":"Awesome","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096810965","repostId":"2208501310","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2208501310","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1644018270,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208501310?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-05 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208501310","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Two of the three tickers in question are tempting in that they were once among the market's most beloved names.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>January was a tough one for investors, with the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks plummeted as the COVID-19 pandemic was declared.</p><p>Many of the stocks that make up the index saw share prices fall much more. The worst of the worst were <b>Netflix</b> (NASDAQ:NFLX), <b>EPAM Systems</b> (NYSE:EPAM), and<b> Moderna</b> (NASDAQ:MRNA). The first two names tumbled 29% last month, while Moderna shares ended January more than 33% lower. The vaccine trade has clearly lost its luster.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/18e27fbd52a0474ccd72c75bb60af5db\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"483\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MRNA data by YCharts</span></p><p>Many discount investors are, of course, mulling purchases of these beaten-down names. Why pay full price when you can buy a stock on sale?</p><p>Before plowing into any of these stocks -- or any of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s other big January losers, for that matter -- take a step back and inspect your true motivation. Just because a ticker has lost a massive amount of value in a short period of time doesn&#39;t inherently mean it&#39;s ripe for a rapid recovery.</p><h2>The sell-offs make some sense</h2><p>Take Moderna as an example. While it was one of the most ballyhooed names in the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine, shares of the drugmaker overstepped their sustainable, justifiable long-term value in 2020 and 2021. With the initially created vaccines not quite as effective as hoped at curbing the spread of the omicron variant -- and even less effective against the new omicron subvariant -- the world is losing interest in what increasingly looks like a never-ending chase for immunity. Denmark and England have essentially dropped all pandemic-related restrictions.</p><p>Support for vaccine mandates is withering anyway. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the White House&#39;s effort to force all large companies to impose their own vaccination mandates on employees. Even without that ruling, many companies, including <b>Boeing</b> and <b>Starbucks</b>, were canceling their mandate policies.</p><p>Simply put, the world&#39;s losing interest in continuing to fight a coronavirus contagion that&#39;s already raced out of control.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1149d759f046abd160561d3662127108\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>Netflix is in a different but comparable situation. While plenty of supporters and shareholders see the recent subscriber growth lull as a temporary headwind linked to strong growth during the early days of the pandemic, that view overlooks a critical detail. That is, Netflix&#39;s biggest and best competition surfaced right before and during the rise of the coronavirus contagion.</p><p>The specifics: <b>Walt Disney</b>&#39;s Disney+ debuted in November of 2019, a month before COVID-19 was first detected in China. WarnerMedia&#39;s HBO Max launched in May of 2020. <b>Discovery</b> made Discovery+ available in early 2021, and it is already serving 20 million paying subscribers. <b>ViacomCBS</b> ramped up its streaming efforts in the middle of the pandemic as well. Its Pluto TV platform now serves 54.4 million viewers, doubling its headcount as of early 2020. Its total number of premium streaming subscribers also more than doubled during that period.</p><p>This isn&#39;t to suggest Netflix is doomed. It&#39;s still the most compelling brand in the streaming business. The recent streak of disappointing subscriber growth, however, may reflect an increasingly crowded market more than tougher comps. The former is a more permanent challenge.</p><h2>Heed the market&#39;s warning</h2><p>Just because a stock&#39;s been a poor performer of late doesn&#39;t mean it&#39;s destined to forever go lower due to demand issues, of course.</p><p>Take the aforementioned software company EPAM Systems, for instance. The stock&#39;s crashed since the end of last year, mostly thanks to an excessive run-up in 2021. The fundamental bullish argument hasn&#39;t changed for this growth name, though. Analysts are still calling for 30% sales growth this year, driving comparable earnings growth as a result. Companies still need help moving into the digital world, and EPAM is still well-positioned as the go-to solutions provider.</p><p>Of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s three biggest laggards in January, though, this one is the only one where the sell-off is clearly a mistake.</p><p>The thing is, this limited number of sharply sold-off stocks that are actually firm buys following their meltdowns is nothing new. There&#39;s always more to the story, and more often than not, the market&#39;s selling is a reasonable warning that a company is at least worth viewing through a lens of healthy doubt.</p><p>In simpler terms, big losses don&#39;t inherently make a stock a buy, even when that stock is a well-known ticker. Always look at the bigger picture.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs It Time to Buy the S&P 500's 3 Worst-Performing January Stocks?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-05 07:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>January was a tough one for investors, with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","EPAM":"Epam Systems","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/04/time-buy-sp-500-worst-performing-january-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2208501310","content_text":"January was a tough one for investors, with the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) losing a little more than 5.2% of its value. That sell-off marks the worst month for the market since March of 2020 when stocks plummeted as the COVID-19 pandemic was declared.Many of the stocks that make up the index saw share prices fall much more. The worst of the worst were Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM), and Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA). The first two names tumbled 29% last month, while Moderna shares ended January more than 33% lower. The vaccine trade has clearly lost its luster.MRNA data by YChartsMany discount investors are, of course, mulling purchases of these beaten-down names. Why pay full price when you can buy a stock on sale?Before plowing into any of these stocks -- or any of the S&P 500's other big January losers, for that matter -- take a step back and inspect your true motivation. Just because a ticker has lost a massive amount of value in a short period of time doesn't inherently mean it's ripe for a rapid recovery.The sell-offs make some senseTake Moderna as an example. While it was one of the most ballyhooed names in the race to create a COVID-19 vaccine, shares of the drugmaker overstepped their sustainable, justifiable long-term value in 2020 and 2021. With the initially created vaccines not quite as effective as hoped at curbing the spread of the omicron variant -- and even less effective against the new omicron subvariant -- the world is losing interest in what increasingly looks like a never-ending chase for immunity. Denmark and England have essentially dropped all pandemic-related restrictions.Support for vaccine mandates is withering anyway. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the White House's effort to force all large companies to impose their own vaccination mandates on employees. Even without that ruling, many companies, including Boeing and Starbucks, were canceling their mandate policies.Simply put, the world's losing interest in continuing to fight a coronavirus contagion that's already raced out of control.Image source: Getty Images.Netflix is in a different but comparable situation. While plenty of supporters and shareholders see the recent subscriber growth lull as a temporary headwind linked to strong growth during the early days of the pandemic, that view overlooks a critical detail. That is, Netflix's biggest and best competition surfaced right before and during the rise of the coronavirus contagion.The specifics: Walt Disney's Disney+ debuted in November of 2019, a month before COVID-19 was first detected in China. WarnerMedia's HBO Max launched in May of 2020. Discovery made Discovery+ available in early 2021, and it is already serving 20 million paying subscribers. ViacomCBS ramped up its streaming efforts in the middle of the pandemic as well. Its Pluto TV platform now serves 54.4 million viewers, doubling its headcount as of early 2020. Its total number of premium streaming subscribers also more than doubled during that period.This isn't to suggest Netflix is doomed. It's still the most compelling brand in the streaming business. The recent streak of disappointing subscriber growth, however, may reflect an increasingly crowded market more than tougher comps. The former is a more permanent challenge.Heed the market's warningJust because a stock's been a poor performer of late doesn't mean it's destined to forever go lower due to demand issues, of course.Take the aforementioned software company EPAM Systems, for instance. The stock's crashed since the end of last year, mostly thanks to an excessive run-up in 2021. The fundamental bullish argument hasn't changed for this growth name, though. Analysts are still calling for 30% sales growth this year, driving comparable earnings growth as a result. Companies still need help moving into the digital world, and EPAM is still well-positioned as the go-to solutions provider.Of the S&P 500's three biggest laggards in January, though, this one is the only one where the sell-off is clearly a mistake.The thing is, this limited number of sharply sold-off stocks that are actually firm buys following their meltdowns is nothing new. There's always more to the story, and more often than not, the market's selling is a reasonable warning that a company is at least worth viewing through a lens of healthy doubt.In simpler terms, big losses don't inherently make a stock a buy, even when that stock is a well-known ticker. Always look at the bigger picture.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096835807,"gmtCreate":1644360156677,"gmtModify":1676533915574,"author":{"id":"4107126244872750","authorId":"4107126244872750","name":"4153476f","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107126244872750","authorIdStr":"4107126244872750"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096835807","repostId":"1154503295","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154503295","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1644327196,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154503295?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-08 21:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154503295","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Keybanc raised Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Inte","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Keybanc raised <b>Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.</b>TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham lowered <b>Datadog, Inc.</b>DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.</p><p>Raymond James cut the price target for <b>Cerence Inc.</b>CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.</p><p>UBS boosted the price target on <b>McKesson Corporation</b>MCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Stephens &amp; Co. raised <b>Tyson Foods, Inc.</b>TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Oppenheimer lowered<b>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. cut the price target for <b>Westport Fuel Systems Inc.</b>WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham cut the price target on <b>Zebra Technologies Corporation</b>ZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.</p><p>Piper Sandler lowered <b>SelectQuote, Inc.</b>SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.</p><p>SVB Leerink reduced the price target on <b>Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.</b>ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n10 Biggest Price Target Changes For Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-08 21:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Keybanc raised <b>Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.</b>TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham lowered <b>Datadog, Inc.</b>DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.</p><p>Raymond James cut the price target for <b>Cerence Inc.</b>CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.</p><p>UBS boosted the price target on <b>McKesson Corporation</b>MCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Stephens &amp; Co. raised <b>Tyson Foods, Inc.</b>TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Oppenheimer lowered<b>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.</b>REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.</p><p>HC Wainwright &amp; Co. cut the price target for <b>Westport Fuel Systems Inc.</b>WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.</p><p>Needham cut the price target on <b>Zebra Technologies Corporation</b>ZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.</p><p>Piper Sandler lowered <b>SelectQuote, Inc.</b>SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.</p><p>SVB Leerink reduced the price target on <b>Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.</b>ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDOG":"Datadog","MCK":"麦克森药物批发","ZBRA":"斑马技术","TTWO":"Take-Two Interactive Software","TSN":"泰森食品","CRNC":"Cerence Inc.","SLQT":"SelectQuote, Inc.","WPRT":"西港燃料","REGN":"再生元制药公司","ZBH":"齐默巴奥米特控股"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154503295","content_text":"Keybanc raised Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.TTWO price target from $185 to $190. Take-Two Interactive shares fell 2.8% to $170.21 in pre-market trading.Needham lowered Datadog, Inc.DDOG price target from $236 to $190. Datadog shares gained 1.6% to close at $152.62 on Monday.Raymond James cut the price target for Cerence Inc.CRNC from $100 to $76. Cerence shares fell 4.8% to $41.52 in pre-market trading.UBS boosted the price target on McKesson CorporationMCK+0.03% from $245 to $303. McKesson shares rose 0.1% to $270.29 in pre-market trading.Stephens & Co. raised Tyson Foods, Inc.TSN-0.01% price target from $110 to $115. Tyson Foods shares fell 0.6% to $98.49 in pre-market trading.Oppenheimer loweredRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.REGN price target from $825 to $775. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals shares fell 0.9% to $617.00 in pre-market trading.HC Wainwright & Co. cut the price target for Westport Fuel Systems Inc.WPRT from $16 to $12. Westport Fuel Systems shares rose 2.1% to $1.96 in pre-market trading.Needham cut the price target on Zebra Technologies CorporationZBRA from $660 to $620. Zebra Technologies shares fell 0.9% to close at $498.34 on Monday.Piper Sandler lowered SelectQuote, Inc.SLQT price target from $20 to $4. SelectQuote shares dipped 49% to $3.33 in pre-market trading.SVB Leerink reduced the price target on Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.ZBH-0.12% from $150 to $135. Zimmer Biomet shares fell 3.1% to $108.22 in pre-market trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}