7f1c4e97 personal page - To The Moon

7f1c4e97

No personal profile

4Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-03-10

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-03-10

Thtsgud

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-03-10

Oic

Shell Faces $400 mln Writedown on Russian Downstream Assets

2022-03-10

Wow

Warren Buffett Is Netting Between a 20% and 54% Yield Annually From These Stocks

2022-03-10

Interesting

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-03-03

V informative

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4107161820881570","uuid":"4107161820881570","gmtCreate":1645801794467,"gmtModify":1645801794467,"name":"7f1c4e97","pinyin":"7f1c4e97","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":1,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9038720155,"gmtCreate":1646921039786,"gmtModify":1676534177216,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038720155","repostId":"2218236991","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":520,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038767492,"gmtCreate":1646920934055,"gmtModify":1676534177208,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thtsgud","listText":"Thtsgud","text":"Thtsgud","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038767492","repostId":"1123292078","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":634,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038767360,"gmtCreate":1646920849846,"gmtModify":1676534177185,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oic","listText":"Oic","text":"Oic","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038767360","repostId":"2218257818","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2218257818","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1646907170,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2218257818?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 18:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shell Faces $400 mln Writedown on Russian Downstream Assets","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2218257818","media":"Reuters","summary":"LONDON, March 10 (Reuters) - Shell    faces writedowns on $400 million in Russian downstream assets,","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>LONDON, March 10 (Reuters) - Shell    faces writedowns on $400 million in Russian downstream assets, it said on Thursday, having announced $3 billion worth of other projects previously.</p><p>The oil major announced on Feb. 28 that it would quit its ventures in Russia with Gazprom    and related entities including the flagship Sakhalin 2 liquefied natural gas <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LNG.AU\">$(LNG.AU)$</a> plant and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project.</p><p>&#34;It is expected that these decisions ...will impact the carrying value of the related assets and lead to recognition of impairments in 2022,&#34; Shell said in its annual report on Thursday.</p><p>The downstream assets come on top of $3 billion mentioned in its Feb. 28 announcement, a company spokesperson said.</p><p>Shell&#39;s looming writedowns come amid a mass exodus of western oil majors, which includes BP    facing a $25 billion writedown for its planned divestment of Russian assets.</p><p>France&#39;s TotalEnergies    has said it is sticking with its Russian investments.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shell Faces $400 mln Writedown on Russian Downstream Assets</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShell Faces $400 mln Writedown on Russian Downstream Assets\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-10 18:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>LONDON, March 10 (Reuters) - Shell    faces writedowns on $400 million in Russian downstream assets, it said on Thursday, having announced $3 billion worth of other projects previously.</p><p>The oil major announced on Feb. 28 that it would quit its ventures in Russia with Gazprom    and related entities including the flagship Sakhalin 2 liquefied natural gas <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LNG.AU\">$(LNG.AU)$</a> plant and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project.</p><p>&#34;It is expected that these decisions ...will impact the carrying value of the related assets and lead to recognition of impairments in 2022,&#34; Shell said in its annual report on Thursday.</p><p>The downstream assets come on top of $3 billion mentioned in its Feb. 28 announcement, a company spokesperson said.</p><p>Shell&#39;s looming writedowns come amid a mass exodus of western oil majors, which includes BP    facing a $25 billion writedown for its planned divestment of Russian assets.</p><p>France&#39;s TotalEnergies    has said it is sticking with its Russian investments.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LNG":"Cheniere Energy Inc","BK4144":"石油与天然气的储存和运输","RYDAF":"SHELL PLC"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2218257818","content_text":"LONDON, March 10 (Reuters) - Shell    faces writedowns on $400 million in Russian downstream assets, it said on Thursday, having announced $3 billion worth of other projects previously.The oil major announced on Feb. 28 that it would quit its ventures in Russia with Gazprom    and related entities including the flagship Sakhalin 2 liquefied natural gas $(LNG.AU)$ plant and the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project.\"It is expected that these decisions ...will impact the carrying value of the related assets and lead to recognition of impairments in 2022,\" Shell said in its annual report on Thursday.The downstream assets come on top of $3 billion mentioned in its Feb. 28 announcement, a company spokesperson said.Shell's looming writedowns come amid a mass exodus of western oil majors, which includes BP    facing a $25 billion writedown for its planned divestment of Russian assets.France's TotalEnergies    has said it is sticking with its Russian investments.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":661,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038764608,"gmtCreate":1646920759140,"gmtModify":1676534177177,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038764608","repostId":"2218257158","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2218257158","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1646912728,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2218257158?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 19:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett Is Netting Between a 20% and 54% Yield Annually From These Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2218257158","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Patience has literally paid dividends for the Oracle of Omaha.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Few investors have a knack for making money quite like <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B) CEO Warren Buffett. Since becoming CEO in 1965, the Oracle of Omaha has created more than $710 billion in shareholder value and led the company&#39;s Class A shares (BRK.A) to a gain of more than 3,900,000%.</p><p>One of the many reasons Buffett is so successful is his willingness to let his investment theses play out over long periods of time. Being patient has allowed Buffett&#39;s holdings to appreciate in value along with the U.S. and global economy over many decades.</p><p><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F669259%2F14115074914_9de461fe44_k.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. Image source: The Motley Fool.</p><p>Additionally, this patience has allowed the dividend stocks in which Berkshire Hathaway holds stakes to increase their payouts significantly. When income stocks are held for decades, their yields, relative to cost basis, can skyrocket. That&#39;s exactly what&#39;s happened to three of Warren Buffett&#39;s stocks.</p><p>Thanks to the Oracle of Omaha&#39;s long-term mindset, the following stocks are now yielding between 20% and 54% annually for Berkshire Hathaway.</p><h2>American Express: 20.3% annual yield, relative to cost basis</h2><p>Credit-services company <b>American Express </b>(NYSE:AXP) is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of Berkshire Hathaway&#39;s longest continuous holdings. It&#39;s been a fixture in Buffett&#39;s portfolio since 1993, with a cost basis of $8.49 per share.</p><p>However, AmEx has substantially grown its quarterly payout over the past three decades. Even though its current yield is slightly below 1%, the company&#39;s $1.72 base annual payout works out to a 20.3% annual yield on cost for Berkshire Hathaway.</p><p>There are two reasons American Express has been such a successful long-term holding for Buffett. First of all, it&#39;s a cyclical company that benefits immensely when the U.S. and global economy are firing on all cylinders.</p><p>Even though Buffett is well aware that recessions are inevitable, he also understands that periods of economic expansion last considerably longer than contractions. This allows AmEx to benefit from an increase in consumer and business spending over long periods of time.</p><p>To build on this point, AmEx acts as both a payment processor and lender. By lending, the company is able to generate fee and interest-based revenue during these long-winded periods of economic expansion. Essentially, the company can double-dip when the U.S. and global economy are growing.</p><p>The second factor working in American Express&#39; favor is its ability to court affluent cardholders. Well-to-do people are less inclined to alter their spending habits when economic contractions or recessions arise. This makes it less likely that AmEx will deal with a surge in loan or credit delinquencies.</p><p><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F669259%2Fbusiness-meeting-tablets-laptops-graphs-charts-advertising-getty.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>Moody&#39;s: 27.9% annual yield, relative to cost basis</h2><p>Interestingly, AmEx isn&#39;t the highest-yielding financial stock in Warren Buffett&#39;s portfolio. That honor belongs to credit-ratings agency <b>Moody&#39;s</b> (NYSE:MCO), which has been a continuous holding since being spun off from <b>Dun &amp; Bradstreet</b> in 2000.</p><p>According to Berkshire Hathaway&#39;s recently filed annual shareholder letter, Buffett&#39;s cost basis on Moody&#39;s is about $10.05 per share. Despite Moody&#39;s current yield totaling a meager 0.86%, the company&#39;s base annual payout of $2.80 works out to a nearly 28% yield, relative to Buffett&#39;s cost basis.</p><p>There are two catalysts that really make Moody&#39;s tick. To begin with, the company&#39;s debt-rating division has benefited from historically low lending rates over the past decade. With lending rates pushing lower, Moody&#39;s was tasked with reviewing and rating an increasing number of corporate-bond offerings. Even now, with the Federal Reserve set to begin raising rates next week, rates remain low enough that Moody&#39;s ratings division should remain busy.</p><p>But perhaps the bigger growth opportunity moving forward stems from Moody&#39;s analytics segment. This is a division that helps businesses maintain regulatory compliance, as well as assess a variety of economic and credit risks.</p><p>Over just the past couple of years, we&#39;ve witnessed a trade war between the U.S. and China, a global pandemic unlike anything we&#39;ve seen over the past century, and now, a conflict between Russia and Ukraine. These represent some of the many examples where Moody&#39;s Analytics segment will be relied on to help businesses navigate uncertain economic situations.</p><p>Considering that Moody&#39;s has increased its quarterly payout by 600% since 2010, there&#39;s a good chance Buffett&#39;s annual yield on cost of 28% will head substantially higher in the years to come.</p><p><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F669259%2Fko-drink-bottle.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Coca-Cola.</p><h2>Coca-Cola: 54.2% annual yield, relative to cost basis</h2><p>The highest-yielding stock in Warren Buffett&#39;s portfolio, relative to cost basis, is beverage-giant <b>Coca-Cola</b> (NYSE:KO). Coke also happens to be Berkshire Hathaway&#39;s longest-held stock, with a continuous position since 1988.</p><p>The latest Berkshire shareholder letter shows a cost basis of $1.299 billion on the company&#39;s 400,000,000 Coke shares. This works out to a cost basis of $3.2475 per share. With Coca-Cola recently increasing its base annual dividend for a 60th consecutive year, the $1.76 paid yearly equates to a whopping 54% yield on cost. Effectively, Buffett is more than doubling his money on Coke every two years from its dividend alone.</p><p>Among the nearly four dozen securities in Berkshire Hathaway&#39;s portfolio, Coca-Cola might generate the most predictable sales growth and cash flow. That&#39;s because the company has a presence in all but two countries worldwide (North Korea and Cuba). It also controls approximately 20% of the cold beverage market share in developed countries and 10% of the cold beverage share in emerging markets. This helps Coke bring in predictable cash flow from developed markets while benefiting from faster organic growth opportunities in emerging markets.</p><p>Coca-Cola&#39;s marketing is another reason the company has performed so well over the very long run. Coke is one of the most well-known brands in the world. The company utilizes everything from its holiday tie-ins and point-of-sale advertising to digital marketing campaigns with recognizable ambassadors to connect with consumers.</p><p>Taking into account the stability of Coca-Cola&#39;s operating model and the incredible yield Berkshire Hathaway is netting annually on its stake, it&#39;s unlikely Warren Buffett will ever part with this position, as long as he&#39;s in charge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett Is Netting Between a 20% and 54% Yield Annually From These Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett Is Netting Between a 20% and 54% Yield Annually From These Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-10 19:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/10/warren-buffett-yielding-20-to-54-from-these-stocks/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Few investors have a knack for making money quite like Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B) CEO Warren Buffett. Since becoming CEO in 1965, the Oracle of Omaha has created more than $710 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/10/warren-buffett-yielding-20-to-54-from-these-stocks/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4166":"消费信贷","BK4538":"云计算","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","MCO":"穆迪","ORCL":"甲骨文","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4112":"金融交易所和数据","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4176":"多领域控股","KO":"可口可乐","BK4528":"SaaS概念","AXP":"美国运通","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4177":"软饮料","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/10/warren-buffett-yielding-20-to-54-from-these-stocks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2218257158","content_text":"Few investors have a knack for making money quite like Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B) CEO Warren Buffett. Since becoming CEO in 1965, the Oracle of Omaha has created more than $710 billion in shareholder value and led the company's Class A shares (BRK.A) to a gain of more than 3,900,000%.One of the many reasons Buffett is so successful is his willingness to let his investment theses play out over long periods of time. Being patient has allowed Buffett's holdings to appreciate in value along with the U.S. and global economy over many decades.Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett. Image source: The Motley Fool.Additionally, this patience has allowed the dividend stocks in which Berkshire Hathaway holds stakes to increase their payouts significantly. When income stocks are held for decades, their yields, relative to cost basis, can skyrocket. That's exactly what's happened to three of Warren Buffett's stocks.Thanks to the Oracle of Omaha's long-term mindset, the following stocks are now yielding between 20% and 54% annually for Berkshire Hathaway.American Express: 20.3% annual yield, relative to cost basisCredit-services company American Express (NYSE:AXP) is one of Berkshire Hathaway's longest continuous holdings. It's been a fixture in Buffett's portfolio since 1993, with a cost basis of $8.49 per share.However, AmEx has substantially grown its quarterly payout over the past three decades. Even though its current yield is slightly below 1%, the company's $1.72 base annual payout works out to a 20.3% annual yield on cost for Berkshire Hathaway.There are two reasons American Express has been such a successful long-term holding for Buffett. First of all, it's a cyclical company that benefits immensely when the U.S. and global economy are firing on all cylinders.Even though Buffett is well aware that recessions are inevitable, he also understands that periods of economic expansion last considerably longer than contractions. This allows AmEx to benefit from an increase in consumer and business spending over long periods of time.To build on this point, AmEx acts as both a payment processor and lender. By lending, the company is able to generate fee and interest-based revenue during these long-winded periods of economic expansion. Essentially, the company can double-dip when the U.S. and global economy are growing.The second factor working in American Express' favor is its ability to court affluent cardholders. Well-to-do people are less inclined to alter their spending habits when economic contractions or recessions arise. This makes it less likely that AmEx will deal with a surge in loan or credit delinquencies.Image source: Getty Images.Moody's: 27.9% annual yield, relative to cost basisInterestingly, AmEx isn't the highest-yielding financial stock in Warren Buffett's portfolio. That honor belongs to credit-ratings agency Moody's (NYSE:MCO), which has been a continuous holding since being spun off from Dun & Bradstreet in 2000.According to Berkshire Hathaway's recently filed annual shareholder letter, Buffett's cost basis on Moody's is about $10.05 per share. Despite Moody's current yield totaling a meager 0.86%, the company's base annual payout of $2.80 works out to a nearly 28% yield, relative to Buffett's cost basis.There are two catalysts that really make Moody's tick. To begin with, the company's debt-rating division has benefited from historically low lending rates over the past decade. With lending rates pushing lower, Moody's was tasked with reviewing and rating an increasing number of corporate-bond offerings. Even now, with the Federal Reserve set to begin raising rates next week, rates remain low enough that Moody's ratings division should remain busy.But perhaps the bigger growth opportunity moving forward stems from Moody's analytics segment. This is a division that helps businesses maintain regulatory compliance, as well as assess a variety of economic and credit risks.Over just the past couple of years, we've witnessed a trade war between the U.S. and China, a global pandemic unlike anything we've seen over the past century, and now, a conflict between Russia and Ukraine. These represent some of the many examples where Moody's Analytics segment will be relied on to help businesses navigate uncertain economic situations.Considering that Moody's has increased its quarterly payout by 600% since 2010, there's a good chance Buffett's annual yield on cost of 28% will head substantially higher in the years to come.Image source: Coca-Cola.Coca-Cola: 54.2% annual yield, relative to cost basisThe highest-yielding stock in Warren Buffett's portfolio, relative to cost basis, is beverage-giant Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO). Coke also happens to be Berkshire Hathaway's longest-held stock, with a continuous position since 1988.The latest Berkshire shareholder letter shows a cost basis of $1.299 billion on the company's 400,000,000 Coke shares. This works out to a cost basis of $3.2475 per share. With Coca-Cola recently increasing its base annual dividend for a 60th consecutive year, the $1.76 paid yearly equates to a whopping 54% yield on cost. Effectively, Buffett is more than doubling his money on Coke every two years from its dividend alone.Among the nearly four dozen securities in Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio, Coca-Cola might generate the most predictable sales growth and cash flow. That's because the company has a presence in all but two countries worldwide (North Korea and Cuba). It also controls approximately 20% of the cold beverage market share in developed countries and 10% of the cold beverage share in emerging markets. This helps Coke bring in predictable cash flow from developed markets while benefiting from faster organic growth opportunities in emerging markets.Coca-Cola's marketing is another reason the company has performed so well over the very long run. Coke is one of the most well-known brands in the world. The company utilizes everything from its holiday tie-ins and point-of-sale advertising to digital marketing campaigns with recognizable ambassadors to connect with consumers.Taking into account the stability of Coca-Cola's operating model and the incredible yield Berkshire Hathaway is netting annually on its stake, it's unlikely Warren Buffett will ever part with this position, as long as he's in charge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038764077,"gmtCreate":1646920659956,"gmtModify":1676534177161,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting","listText":"Interesting","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038764077","repostId":"1199587686","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":649,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033272505,"gmtCreate":1646300968006,"gmtModify":1676534114507,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"V informative","listText":"V informative","text":"V informative","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033272505","repostId":"1161345461","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9038767492,"gmtCreate":1646920934055,"gmtModify":1676534177208,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thtsgud","listText":"Thtsgud","text":"Thtsgud","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038767492","repostId":"1123292078","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123292078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646906774,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123292078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 18:06","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks Extend Gains on Thursday as Asia Rebounds; STI up 1.4%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123292078","media":"businesstimes","summary":"THE Straits Times Index (STI) rose 1.4 per cent or 45.35 points to close at 3,240.73 points on Thurs","content":"<div>\n<p>THE Straits Times Index (STI) rose 1.4 per cent or 45.35 points to close at 3,240.73 points on Thursday (Mar 10), buoyed by a rebound in key Asian markets.Japan's Nikkei jumped 3.9 per cent - its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/singapore-stocks-extend-gains-on-thursday-as-asia-rebounds-sti-up-14\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks Extend Gains on Thursday as Asia Rebounds; STI up 1.4%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks Extend Gains on Thursday as Asia Rebounds; STI up 1.4%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-10 18:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/singapore-stocks-extend-gains-on-thursday-as-asia-rebounds-sti-up-14><strong>businesstimes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>THE Straits Times Index (STI) rose 1.4 per cent or 45.35 points to close at 3,240.73 points on Thursday (Mar 10), buoyed by a rebound in key Asian markets.Japan's Nikkei jumped 3.9 per cent - its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/singapore-stocks-extend-gains-on-thursday-as-asia-rebounds-sti-up-14\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/stocks/singapore-stocks-extend-gains-on-thursday-as-asia-rebounds-sti-up-14","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123292078","content_text":"THE Straits Times Index (STI) rose 1.4 per cent or 45.35 points to close at 3,240.73 points on Thursday (Mar 10), buoyed by a rebound in key Asian markets.Japan's Nikkei jumped 3.9 per cent - its biggest increase in nearly 21 months. South Korea's Kospi climbed 2.2 per cent, Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 1.3 per cent, and the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI added 1.2 per cent.IG market strategist Yeap Jun Rong said: \"The rebound in global equities is clearly playing out into today's Asia session as well, riding on a relief rally brought about by hopes of conflict de-escalation.\"Tensions between Russia and the West will clearly remain high, which brings into question whether this may translate further from a military war to an economic war,\" he added. \"But for now, it seems that markets are in need of a breather, with the recent heavy sell-off and any small steps pointing to the potential end of war will be cheered by markets in the meantime.\"In the wider Singapore market, gainers outnumbered losers 286 to 198, with 1.43 billion shares worth S$1.61 billion changing hands.The top performer on the blue-chip index was Dairy Farm International (DFI), which clawed back from heavy losses earlier in the week. The counter rose 4.2 per cent or US$0.10 to close at US$2.51.At the bottom of the table was Sembcorp Industries, which fell 2.6 per cent or S$0.07 to S$2.66.Singapore Telecommunications (Singtel) was the most heavily traded counter on the STI for the second straight day, with 29.6 million shares traded. The counter climbed 1.6 per cent or S$0.04 to S$2.56.The trio of local banks all registered gains. DBS rose 2 per cent or S$0.63 to S$32.89, UOB gained 2.2 per cent or S$0.65 to S$29.96 and OCBC added 2.1 per cent or S$0.24 to S$11.72.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":634,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038764608,"gmtCreate":1646920759140,"gmtModify":1676534177177,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038764608","repostId":"2218257158","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038764077,"gmtCreate":1646920659956,"gmtModify":1676534177161,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting","listText":"Interesting","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038764077","repostId":"1199587686","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199587686","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1646913221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199587686?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 19:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq 100 Futures Fell 1.48%, Dow Jones Futures Fell 1.02, S&P 500 Futures Fell 1.03%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199587686","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Nasdaq 100 futures fell 1.48%, Dow Jones futures fell 1.02%, S&P 500 futures fell 1.03%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq 100 futures fell 1.48%, Dow Jones futures fell 1.02%, S&amp;P 500 futures fell 1.03%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f498743d59943d5455c25cd8a762db1\" tg-width=\"488\" tg-height=\"184\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq 100 Futures Fell 1.48%, Dow Jones Futures Fell 1.02, S&P 500 Futures Fell 1.03%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq 100 Futures Fell 1.48%, Dow Jones Futures Fell 1.02, S&P 500 Futures Fell 1.03%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-10 19:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq 100 futures fell 1.48%, Dow Jones futures fell 1.02%, S&amp;P 500 futures fell 1.03%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f498743d59943d5455c25cd8a762db1\" tg-width=\"488\" tg-height=\"184\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199587686","content_text":"Nasdaq 100 futures fell 1.48%, Dow Jones futures fell 1.02%, S&P 500 futures fell 1.03%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":649,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033272505,"gmtCreate":1646300968006,"gmtModify":1676534114507,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"V informative","listText":"V informative","text":"V informative","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033272505","repostId":"1161345461","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161345461","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646295991,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161345461?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-03 16:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How the Stock Market has Historically Reacted to War and Other Crises","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161345461","media":"Barrons","summary":"When Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine on Feb. 24, beginning the largest land war in Europe since Ge","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine on Feb. 24, beginning the largest land war in Europe since Germany invaded France in May 1940, they also sent shock waves through the markets.</p><p>The Russian economy is hemorrhaging. European stocks have fallen into technical-correction territory. And whipsawed U.S. markets—still in the black, for now—face spiking energy prices that may signal recession. What happens next is anyone’s guess, with no end in sight to the invasion and the fate of the entire word seemingly in the hands of one man, Russian President Vladimir Putin.</p><p>“The market hates uncertainty,” says Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research. But Clissold also delivered some good news: After an initial bout of uncertainty from crisis events such as war and economic shocks, investors tend to quickly regain their footing.</p><p>NDR examined the effect on stocks of more than 50 crisis events since the turn of the 20th century—from the Panic of 1907 to the Covid-19 crash of 2020—and found a pattern. After falling an average of 7% in the immediate aftermath of a crisis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 4.2% over the next three weeks. Nine weeks later, it had gained 6%, and after 18 weeks it was up an average of 9.6%, according to NDR.</p><p>Not every event followed the pattern precisely, and all were subject to larger economic forces. Yet the study shows a remarkable symmetry in market reaction.</p><p>Germany’s invasion of France 82 years ago didn’t come as a surprise—a state of war had existed since Germany’s invasion of Poland the previous year—but it still sent stocks reeling. The Dow dropped 17.1% in the immediate aftermath, and dipped another 0.5% over the next three weeks, according to NDR data. But nine weeks later it had gained 8.4%, and it was still up 7% after 18 weeks.</p><p>More recently, Russia’s stealth invasion of Crimea in 2014 caused an initial 2.4% drop in the Dow. It then gained 1.2% after three weeks, 4.4% after nine, and 5.7% after 18, according to NDR.</p><p>Does this mean it’s time to pile into stocks? Not necessarily. To take another 21st century event, Russia’s 2008 invasion of Georgia: An initial 2.2% decline in the Dow only got larger with time, as the gauge fell 4% over the next three weeks, 26% after nine, and 34.2% after 18. Of course, that was happening during the depths of the subprime mortgage crisis, which surely weighed more heavily on stocks than a distant foreign war.</p><p>What happens next depends largely on three factors, according to Clissold. One, “this is a negative for European economic growth,” he says, citing the many interconnections between the economies of the combatants and the other nations of Europe. That could be a drag on the whole global economy.</p><p>Two, according to Clissold, will be the effect on energy markets, with Russia being one of the major oil, gas, and coal suppliers to Europe and elsewhere. Germany, for instance, has moved to suspend the certification of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia.</p><p>The third key factor, according to Clissold, “is how the Fed reacts.” Any plans to aggressively raise the federal-funds rate are likely off the table, he says, not to mention suggestions of a half-point hike this month.</p><p>Another factor in today’s crisis is the involvement of nuclear superpower as a combatant. Putin has threatened to retaliate against anyone who interferes in his Ukraine putsch. Could that include the use of nuclear weapons?</p><p>Perhaps the closest historical comparison to this is the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962, when the U.S. and USSR engaged in a stare-down over ballistic-missile deployments in Cuba and Turkey.</p><p>The fear of nuclear war was very real at the time, with duck-and-cover drills a regular classroom feature, and the novel <i>Fail-Safe</i>—about the accidental dropping of a U.S. nuclear warhead on Moscow—being serialized in the Saturday Evening Post.</p><p>The Dow’s initial reaction to the crisis was a 1.1% gain, which nevertheless represented a slowing down of a raging bull market that followed the recession of 1960-61. Three weeks later, the Dow rose 12.1%, and it would continue soaring—up 24.2% in nine weeks and 30.4% in 18, according to NDR.</p><p>The resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis hardly ended the Cold War. But it at least brought some semblance of certainty to investors, even amid the risk that World War III could break out at any time. It might be the best we can ask for now, as well.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How the Stock Market has Historically Reacted to War and Other Crises</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow the Stock Market has Historically Reacted to War and Other Crises\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-03 16:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-reaction-war-crises-history-51646269650?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine on Feb. 24, beginning the largest land war in Europe since Germany invaded France in May 1940, they also sent shock waves through the markets.The Russian economy...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-reaction-war-crises-history-51646269650?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-reaction-war-crises-history-51646269650?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161345461","content_text":"When Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine on Feb. 24, beginning the largest land war in Europe since Germany invaded France in May 1940, they also sent shock waves through the markets.The Russian economy is hemorrhaging. European stocks have fallen into technical-correction territory. And whipsawed U.S. markets—still in the black, for now—face spiking energy prices that may signal recession. What happens next is anyone’s guess, with no end in sight to the invasion and the fate of the entire word seemingly in the hands of one man, Russian President Vladimir Putin.“The market hates uncertainty,” says Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research. But Clissold also delivered some good news: After an initial bout of uncertainty from crisis events such as war and economic shocks, investors tend to quickly regain their footing.NDR examined the effect on stocks of more than 50 crisis events since the turn of the 20th century—from the Panic of 1907 to the Covid-19 crash of 2020—and found a pattern. After falling an average of 7% in the immediate aftermath of a crisis, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 4.2% over the next three weeks. Nine weeks later, it had gained 6%, and after 18 weeks it was up an average of 9.6%, according to NDR.Not every event followed the pattern precisely, and all were subject to larger economic forces. Yet the study shows a remarkable symmetry in market reaction.Germany’s invasion of France 82 years ago didn’t come as a surprise—a state of war had existed since Germany’s invasion of Poland the previous year—but it still sent stocks reeling. The Dow dropped 17.1% in the immediate aftermath, and dipped another 0.5% over the next three weeks, according to NDR data. But nine weeks later it had gained 8.4%, and it was still up 7% after 18 weeks.More recently, Russia’s stealth invasion of Crimea in 2014 caused an initial 2.4% drop in the Dow. It then gained 1.2% after three weeks, 4.4% after nine, and 5.7% after 18, according to NDR.Does this mean it’s time to pile into stocks? Not necessarily. To take another 21st century event, Russia’s 2008 invasion of Georgia: An initial 2.2% decline in the Dow only got larger with time, as the gauge fell 4% over the next three weeks, 26% after nine, and 34.2% after 18. Of course, that was happening during the depths of the subprime mortgage crisis, which surely weighed more heavily on stocks than a distant foreign war.What happens next depends largely on three factors, according to Clissold. One, “this is a negative for European economic growth,” he says, citing the many interconnections between the economies of the combatants and the other nations of Europe. That could be a drag on the whole global economy.Two, according to Clissold, will be the effect on energy markets, with Russia being one of the major oil, gas, and coal suppliers to Europe and elsewhere. Germany, for instance, has moved to suspend the certification of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia.The third key factor, according to Clissold, “is how the Fed reacts.” Any plans to aggressively raise the federal-funds rate are likely off the table, he says, not to mention suggestions of a half-point hike this month.Another factor in today’s crisis is the involvement of nuclear superpower as a combatant. Putin has threatened to retaliate against anyone who interferes in his Ukraine putsch. Could that include the use of nuclear weapons?Perhaps the closest historical comparison to this is the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962, when the U.S. and USSR engaged in a stare-down over ballistic-missile deployments in Cuba and Turkey.The fear of nuclear war was very real at the time, with duck-and-cover drills a regular classroom feature, and the novel Fail-Safe—about the accidental dropping of a U.S. nuclear warhead on Moscow—being serialized in the Saturday Evening Post.The Dow’s initial reaction to the crisis was a 1.1% gain, which nevertheless represented a slowing down of a raging bull market that followed the recession of 1960-61. Three weeks later, the Dow rose 12.1%, and it would continue soaring—up 24.2% in nine weeks and 30.4% in 18, according to NDR.The resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis hardly ended the Cold War. But it at least brought some semblance of certainty to investors, even amid the risk that World War III could break out at any time. It might be the best we can ask for now, as well.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038767360,"gmtCreate":1646920849846,"gmtModify":1676534177185,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oic","listText":"Oic","text":"Oic","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038767360","repostId":"2218257818","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":661,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038720155,"gmtCreate":1646921039786,"gmtModify":1676534177216,"author":{"id":"4107161820881570","authorId":"4107161820881570","name":"7f1c4e97","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4107161820881570","authorIdStr":"4107161820881570"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038720155","repostId":"2218236991","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2218236991","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646905232,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2218236991?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 17:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Even The Batman May Not Be Strong Enough to Save AMC Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2218236991","media":"TipRanks","summary":"From Thursday through Sunday, the new \"The Batman\" feature film exploded onto screens, delivering th","content":"<div>\n<p>From Thursday through Sunday, the new \"The Batman\" feature film exploded onto screens, delivering the third highest attended movie weekend of the past two years for AMC Theatres (AMC), with more than ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/even-the-batman-may-not-be-strong-enough-to-save-amc-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Even The Batman May Not Be Strong Enough to Save AMC Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEven The Batman May Not Be Strong Enough to Save AMC Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-10 17:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/even-the-batman-may-not-be-strong-enough-to-save-amc-stock/><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>From Thursday through Sunday, the new \"The Batman\" feature film exploded onto screens, delivering the third highest attended movie weekend of the past two years for AMC Theatres (AMC), with more than ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/even-the-batman-may-not-be-strong-enough-to-save-amc-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4108":"电影和娱乐","AMC":"AMC院线","BK4547":"WSB热门概念"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/even-the-batman-may-not-be-strong-enough-to-save-amc-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2218236991","content_text":"From Thursday through Sunday, the new \"The Batman\" feature film exploded onto screens, delivering the third highest attended movie weekend of the past two years for AMC Theatres (AMC), with more than four million tickets sold globally. It didn't hurt that, with $128.5 million it box office revenue booked over four days, \"The Batman\" easily delivered \"the most successful opening weekend of all the first installments in the Batman series of films\" (according to Quartz.com).And yet, by the evening of the Tuesday after this boffo Batman weekend, AMC's share price had fallen a stunning 17% from the share price it enjoyed on the day before the caped crusader's arrival. So did investors simply not get the memo? Are they making a mistake in not realizing that \"The Batman\" has saved the day, and AMC stock is now a \"buy?\"Not necessarily -- at least not according to Barrington's James Goss. The analyst explained that -- with Batman or without him -- AMC stock remains a pretty \"speculative\" investment, and is no sure thing.In Q4, notes Goss, AMC's revenues approached $1.2 billion, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization were $159.2 million. CEO Adam Aron is being \"diligent\" about keeping costs in check, \"operating at relatively constrained hours... offering fewer showings [to] limit the impact of labor and supply challenges, while maximizing the utilization of the footprint,\" and \"negotiate[ing] with landlords, vendors and creditors [to free] up liquidity,\" the analyst opined.Aron has refinanced AMC's debt to lower interest payments and give the company some measure of \"additional flexibility.\" And he's succeeded in \"limit[ing] cash burn,\" and even managed to generate some positive operating cash flow in Q4. Combined will well-timed sales of stock to raise cash, Aron has amassed $1.5 billion in cash on the company's balance sheet (alongside, admittedly, nearly $10.8 billion in debt).All these steps, admits Goss, have resulted in \"improved... ability to sustain operations despite the challenging financial markets.\" Nevertheless, the company's financial situation remains tenuous, and the best rating Goss can bring himself to give the stock is Market Perform (i.e. Hold) -- without making any promises on the stock's price target.What might AMC do to turn that \"market perform\" rating into a \"market outperform?\" The analyst notes that the CEO has \"outlined a number of initiatives designed to create a more diverse business model beyond its core theatrical exhibition operations.\" The company might, for example, issue co-branded credit cards to create new revenue streams and bolster customer loyalty to AMC. Or it might create its own cryptocurrency. (AMC has already introduced a series of Non Fungible Tokens for sale). AMC might even sell \"AMC branded popcorn\" in grocery stores \"in packaged or microwavable forms.\" (Don't laugh. Goss says that could actually be \"a substantial business.\")As the analyst muses hopefully, \"there is always a possibility that one or more [of these ideas] may gain traction.\" In the meantime, however, investors should probably expect AMC to keep losing money while it seeks such traction. In Goss's estimation, the earliest AMC might conceivably turn profitable again is... 2025.Looking at the consensus breakdown, the bears have it. Based on 3 Holds and 2 Sells received in the last three months, the word on the Street is that AMC is a Moderate Sell. At $9.83, the average price target suggests shares will be changing hands at ~38% discount a year from now. To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":520,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}