JerrT personal page - To The Moon

JerrT

JerrT

No personal profile

41Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-03-17

Ok

@lolmei:AI Is Not Hopium, It's Here To Stay, And Nvidia Is Going To 'Serve' It

2022-08-19

Ok

Qualcomm Is Plotting a Return to Server Market With New Chip

2022-08-19

Ok

Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise

2022-08-19

Ok

Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4114475362537482","uuid":"4114475362537482","gmtCreate":1651417866097,"gmtModify":1660875555268,"name":"JerrT","pinyin":"jerrt","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":41,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9943955737,"gmtCreate":1679062791329,"gmtModify":1679062989540,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943955737","repostId":"9943956586","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9943956586,"gmtCreate":1679062150445,"gmtModify":1679062165497,"author":{"id":"3479274765649363","authorId":"3479274765649363","name":"lolmei","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68b6583f2225af9e47d6576367702edb","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3479274765649363","authorIdStr":"3479274765649363"},"themes":[],"title":"AI Is Not Hopium, It's Here To Stay, And Nvidia Is Going To 'Serve' It","htmlText":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","listText":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","text":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943956586","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":301,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991400384,"gmtCreate":1660867751950,"gmtModify":1676536413334,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991400384","repostId":"2260359886","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991575827,"gmtCreate":1660867646370,"gmtModify":1676536413254,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991575827","repostId":"2260357839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260357839","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660866281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260357839?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260357839","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support fo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-19 07:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260357839","content_text":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank's policy meeting next month and added he isn't ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.\"We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation\" and \"I don't really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,\" Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.When it comes to the Fed's next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month's Federal Open Market Committee meeting that \"I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we've got relatively good reads on the economy, and we've got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.\"Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.Mr. Bullard said he isn't ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed's 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, \"We've got a long way to go to get inflation under control.\"\"The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it's not statistically really in the data at this point,\" Mr. Bullard said. \"I'm hopeful\" the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation \"to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.\"What's more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.\"There's just a lot to like about the labor market\" and it's possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is \"definitely premature\" and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.Mr. Bullard said it's possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.\"One thing about financial conditions that I'm steadfast about is, I don't like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,\" and company shares aren't a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed's current policy path.\"I don't think we're in a recession right now,\" he said. \"But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":524,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991572862,"gmtCreate":1660867567559,"gmtModify":1676536413228,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991572862","repostId":"2260357839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260357839","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660866281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260357839?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260357839","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support fo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-19 07:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260357839","content_text":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank's policy meeting next month and added he isn't ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.\"We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation\" and \"I don't really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,\" Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.When it comes to the Fed's next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month's Federal Open Market Committee meeting that \"I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we've got relatively good reads on the economy, and we've got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.\"Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.Mr. Bullard said he isn't ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed's 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, \"We've got a long way to go to get inflation under control.\"\"The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it's not statistically really in the data at this point,\" Mr. Bullard said. \"I'm hopeful\" the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation \"to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.\"What's more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.\"There's just a lot to like about the labor market\" and it's possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is \"definitely premature\" and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.Mr. Bullard said it's possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.\"One thing about financial conditions that I'm steadfast about is, I don't like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,\" and company shares aren't a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed's current policy path.\"I don't think we're in a recession right now,\" he said. \"But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":494,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9943955737,"gmtCreate":1679062791329,"gmtModify":1679062989540,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943955737","repostId":"9943956586","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9943956586,"gmtCreate":1679062150445,"gmtModify":1679062165497,"author":{"id":"3479274765649363","authorId":"3479274765649363","name":"lolmei","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68b6583f2225af9e47d6576367702edb","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3479274765649363","authorIdStr":"3479274765649363"},"themes":[],"title":"AI Is Not Hopium, It's Here To Stay, And Nvidia Is Going To 'Serve' It","htmlText":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","listText":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","text":"A lot of people think because they can't \"see\" AI, it's not real or not worth talking about. However, not \"seeing\" AI is not a knock against AI and the stage we're at. AI, by its nature, will not be seen most of the time, even in the future. Buteven if you could see AI out in the open, what difference would it make to the investment case? If AI was thriving to the naked eye, but semiconductors and AI software companies were just bumbling along, what difference would it make if you couldseeAI? The investment case only matters if there's serious heavy lifting going on behind the scenes to support the journey and inroads of AI. And not only is it becoming a true force of technological breakthrough - not hopium or a fad - but every major techcompany is recognizing it through tens of billions o","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943956586","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":301,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991400384,"gmtCreate":1660867751950,"gmtModify":1676536413334,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991400384","repostId":"2260359886","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260359886","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1660866704,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260359886?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Qualcomm Is Plotting a Return to Server Market With New Chip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260359886","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Qualcomm Inc. is taking another run at the market for server processors, according to","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Bloomberg) -- <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm Inc.</a> is taking another run at the market for server processors, according to people familiar with its plans, betting it can tap a fast-growing industry and decrease its reliance on smartphones.</p><p>The company is seeking customers for a product stemming from last year’s purchase of chip startup Nuvia, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private. Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS business, one of the biggest server chip buyers, has agreed to take a look at Qualcomm’s offerings, they said.</p><p>Representatives for Qualcomm and Amazon declined to comment.</p><p>Qualcomm gained as much as 2.9% to $152.91 in New York trading after Bloomberg reported the news. The shares had been down 19% this year through Wednesday, part of a broader slide for chip stocks.</p><p>Chief Executive Officer Cristiano Amon is trying to turn Qualcomm into a broader provider of semiconductors, rather than just the top maker of smartphone chips. But an earlier push into the server market was abandoned four years ago under his predecessor. At the time, the company was trying to cut costs and placate investors after fending off a hostile takeover by Broadcom Inc.</p><p>This time around, Qualcomm has Nuvia, staffed with chip designers from companies such as Apple Inc. Amon, who acquired the business for about $1.4 billion in 2021, has said that its work will help revitalize Qualcomm’s high-end offerings for smartphones. But Nuvia was founded as a provider of technology for the server industry.</p><p>The market for cloud computing infrastructure -- the kind of equipment that Amazon, Google and Microsoft Corp. use to whisk data around the world -- generated $73.9 billion last year, according to research firm IDC. That was up 8.8% from 2020.</p><p>The owners of giant cloud data centers have long relied on Intel Corp.’s chip technology for their servers. But they’re increasingly embracing processors that use designs from Arm Ltd., a key partner in phone chips for San Diego-based Qualcomm.</p><p>Arm designs are already dominant in mobile phones, where they’re prized for not draining battery life. Now power consumption has become a more pressing issue in the data center world as well. As server farms spread -- and suck up staggering amounts of electricity -- companies want more efficient chips.</p><p>Amazon has addressed this need by building its own chips based on Arm designs. The e-commerce giant has created multiple generations of its Graviton processor line and touts its performance to customers.</p><p>But Amazon also still uses chips from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Nvidia Corp. -- and Qualcomm sees an opportunity to carve out a niche among those suppliers.</p><p>The last time it made such an attempt was 2017, when Qualcomm began selling an Arm-based server chip called the Centriq 2400. It relied on Samsung Electronics Co. to manufacture the products and said they outperformed Intel’s Xeon processors in energy efficiency and cost. At the public introduction of the server chip line in November of that year, potential customers such as Microsoft took to the stage to voice their interest in the offering.</p><p>But less than a year later, the company’s leadership began shuttering the project. Former Intel executive Anand Chandrasekher, who had led the effort, left Qualcomm.</p><p>For Intel, Qualcomm’s latest move would bring yet more competition to an industry it once dominated. The company has been racing to bolster its technology and manufacturing after losing market share to AMD and homegrown chips like Amazon’s.</p><p>For Qualcomm, a successful push into server chips would mean it has a much bigger-ticket item to sell. The company’s phone offerings are typically priced in the tens of dollars. Server processors can cost hundreds of dollars.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Qualcomm Is Plotting a Return to Server Market With New Chip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQualcomm Is Plotting a Return to Server Market With New Chip\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-19 07:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-18/qualcomm-is-plotting-a-return-to-server-market-with-new-chip><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Qualcomm Inc. is taking another run at the market for server processors, according to people familiar with its plans, betting it can tap a fast-growing industry and decrease its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-18/qualcomm-is-plotting-a-return-to-server-market-with-new-chip\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QCOM":"高通"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-18/qualcomm-is-plotting-a-return-to-server-market-with-new-chip","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260359886","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Qualcomm Inc. is taking another run at the market for server processors, according to people familiar with its plans, betting it can tap a fast-growing industry and decrease its reliance on smartphones.The company is seeking customers for a product stemming from last year’s purchase of chip startup Nuvia, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the discussions are private. Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS business, one of the biggest server chip buyers, has agreed to take a look at Qualcomm’s offerings, they said.Representatives for Qualcomm and Amazon declined to comment.Qualcomm gained as much as 2.9% to $152.91 in New York trading after Bloomberg reported the news. The shares had been down 19% this year through Wednesday, part of a broader slide for chip stocks.Chief Executive Officer Cristiano Amon is trying to turn Qualcomm into a broader provider of semiconductors, rather than just the top maker of smartphone chips. But an earlier push into the server market was abandoned four years ago under his predecessor. At the time, the company was trying to cut costs and placate investors after fending off a hostile takeover by Broadcom Inc.This time around, Qualcomm has Nuvia, staffed with chip designers from companies such as Apple Inc. Amon, who acquired the business for about $1.4 billion in 2021, has said that its work will help revitalize Qualcomm’s high-end offerings for smartphones. But Nuvia was founded as a provider of technology for the server industry.The market for cloud computing infrastructure -- the kind of equipment that Amazon, Google and Microsoft Corp. use to whisk data around the world -- generated $73.9 billion last year, according to research firm IDC. That was up 8.8% from 2020.The owners of giant cloud data centers have long relied on Intel Corp.’s chip technology for their servers. But they’re increasingly embracing processors that use designs from Arm Ltd., a key partner in phone chips for San Diego-based Qualcomm.Arm designs are already dominant in mobile phones, where they’re prized for not draining battery life. Now power consumption has become a more pressing issue in the data center world as well. As server farms spread -- and suck up staggering amounts of electricity -- companies want more efficient chips.Amazon has addressed this need by building its own chips based on Arm designs. The e-commerce giant has created multiple generations of its Graviton processor line and touts its performance to customers.But Amazon also still uses chips from Intel, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and Nvidia Corp. -- and Qualcomm sees an opportunity to carve out a niche among those suppliers.The last time it made such an attempt was 2017, when Qualcomm began selling an Arm-based server chip called the Centriq 2400. It relied on Samsung Electronics Co. to manufacture the products and said they outperformed Intel’s Xeon processors in energy efficiency and cost. At the public introduction of the server chip line in November of that year, potential customers such as Microsoft took to the stage to voice their interest in the offering.But less than a year later, the company’s leadership began shuttering the project. Former Intel executive Anand Chandrasekher, who had led the effort, left Qualcomm.For Intel, Qualcomm’s latest move would bring yet more competition to an industry it once dominated. The company has been racing to bolster its technology and manufacturing after losing market share to AMD and homegrown chips like Amazon’s.For Qualcomm, a successful push into server chips would mean it has a much bigger-ticket item to sell. The company’s phone offerings are typically priced in the tens of dollars. Server processors can cost hundreds of dollars.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991575827,"gmtCreate":1660867646370,"gmtModify":1676536413254,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991575827","repostId":"2260357839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260357839","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660866281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260357839?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260357839","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support fo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-19 07:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260357839","content_text":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank's policy meeting next month and added he isn't ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.\"We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation\" and \"I don't really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,\" Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.When it comes to the Fed's next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month's Federal Open Market Committee meeting that \"I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we've got relatively good reads on the economy, and we've got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.\"Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.Mr. Bullard said he isn't ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed's 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, \"We've got a long way to go to get inflation under control.\"\"The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it's not statistically really in the data at this point,\" Mr. Bullard said. \"I'm hopeful\" the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation \"to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.\"What's more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.\"There's just a lot to like about the labor market\" and it's possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is \"definitely premature\" and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.Mr. Bullard said it's possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.\"One thing about financial conditions that I'm steadfast about is, I don't like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,\" and company shares aren't a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed's current policy path.\"I don't think we're in a recession right now,\" he said. \"But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":524,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991572862,"gmtCreate":1660867567559,"gmtModify":1676536413228,"author":{"id":"4114475362537482","authorId":"4114475362537482","name":"JerrT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c5e610555c868bf40707ae6ed771650","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114475362537482","authorIdStr":"4114475362537482"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991572862","repostId":"2260357839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260357839","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660866281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260357839?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260357839","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support fo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-19 07:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260357839","content_text":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank's policy meeting next month and added he isn't ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.\"We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation\" and \"I don't really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,\" Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.When it comes to the Fed's next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month's Federal Open Market Committee meeting that \"I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we've got relatively good reads on the economy, and we've got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.\"Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.Mr. Bullard said he isn't ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed's 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, \"We've got a long way to go to get inflation under control.\"\"The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it's not statistically really in the data at this point,\" Mr. Bullard said. \"I'm hopeful\" the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation \"to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.\"What's more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.\"There's just a lot to like about the labor market\" and it's possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is \"definitely premature\" and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.Mr. Bullard said it's possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.\"One thing about financial conditions that I'm steadfast about is, I don't like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,\" and company shares aren't a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed's current policy path.\"I don't think we're in a recession right now,\" he said. \"But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":494,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}