aramis personal page - To The Moon

aramis

aramis

No personal profile

11Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-11-07

I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!

2023-09-11

$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$

2023-09-05

Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!

"Magnificent 7" Give Markets Hope for Strong September

2023-04-09

Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy. Example, sell put covered call. Any recommends?

2023-03-23

Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.

Fed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained

2022-10-25

Whats this?

2022-09-11

Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house after election. Current Incumbent is democrats.

A Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4117112726958172","uuid":"4117112726958172","gmtCreate":1654058852426,"gmtModify":1662870508916,"name":"aramis","pinyin":"aramis","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":11,"tweetSize":7,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.01","exceedPercentage":"80.65%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.56%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":238866492686456,"gmtCreate":1699346608308,"gmtModify":1699346612933,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!&nbsp;","listText":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!&nbsp;","text":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6f39e106b01f949f31734d7ff4edd4af","width":"750","height":"1334"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/238866492686456","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":218541531771016,"gmtCreate":1694389663802,"gmtModify":1694389666643,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/218541531771016","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":199,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":216289806471296,"gmtCreate":1693880490826,"gmtModify":1693880495717,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!&nbsp;","listText":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!&nbsp;","text":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/216289806471296","repostId":"2364391771","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2364391771","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1693869438,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2364391771?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-09-05 07:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2364391771","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Nvidia stock rose 5.4% last week and is now 232% up so far in 2023.              Getty Images               It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fas","content":"<html><head></head><body><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/711315050fd34eed9aa3fd68c6eeecce\" tg-width=\"639\" tg-height=\"426\"/></p><p>It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.</p><p>Investors probably don’t need to be reminded that September is historically the worst month for stocks—the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average 1.1% during that month since 1928.</p><p>But enough of that. Several stocks had a great week heading into the typically terrible month, and investors will be hoping the momentum can continue.</p><p>Nvidia (ticker: NVDA) stock had another impressive week, climbing 5.4% to 485.09 and reaching a record closing high of $493.55 Thursday. The chip maker’s stock rallied into its hotly anticipated earnings on Aug. 23 but fell 2.3% in the two trading days after. </p><p>But normal service resumed last week for the stock, which is now up 232% so far in 2023. Wall Street thinks the shares can keep moving higher into uncharted territory—analysts have an average price target of $645.29, implying a 31% upside to Friday’s closing price, according to FactSet data.</p><p>Alongside Nvidia, the other members of the so-called ‘Magnificent 7’ also performed well. Apple (AAPL) rose 6.1% over the week, Netflix (NFLX) jumped 5.7%, and Google’s Alphabet (GOOGL) was 4.5% higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> (META) gained 3.8%, Amazon (AMZN) climbed 3.6%, while Tesla (TSLA) stock rose 2.7%.</p><p>Chip stocks in general had a strong week as Micron Technology (MU) jumped 10.5% and Intel Corp (INTC) rose 10.1%. The best-performing stock in the S&amp;P 500 was disk-drive and flash-memory chip company Western Digital (WDC), which rose 16.4%, followed by data storage company Seagate Technology’s (STX) 14.4% jump.</p><p>It was a bad week for retailers, particularly of the discount variety. Dollar General (DG) was the sharpest faller, tumbling 16% after its earnings disappointed and it cut guidance. Dollar Tree also fell 3.7%. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> was the second-worst performer, dropping 7.2% as the healthcare giant announced its CEO Rosalind Brewer is stepping down.</p></body></html>","source":"mwatch_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-09-05 07:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.Investors probably don’t need to be ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","AAPL":"苹果","NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2364391771","content_text":"It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.Investors probably don’t need to be reminded that September is historically the worst month for stocks—the S&P 500 has fallen an average 1.1% during that month since 1928.But enough of that. Several stocks had a great week heading into the typically terrible month, and investors will be hoping the momentum can continue.Nvidia (ticker: NVDA) stock had another impressive week, climbing 5.4% to 485.09 and reaching a record closing high of $493.55 Thursday. The chip maker’s stock rallied into its hotly anticipated earnings on Aug. 23 but fell 2.3% in the two trading days after. But normal service resumed last week for the stock, which is now up 232% so far in 2023. Wall Street thinks the shares can keep moving higher into uncharted territory—analysts have an average price target of $645.29, implying a 31% upside to Friday’s closing price, according to FactSet data.Alongside Nvidia, the other members of the so-called ‘Magnificent 7’ also performed well. Apple (AAPL) rose 6.1% over the week, Netflix (NFLX) jumped 5.7%, and Google’s Alphabet (GOOGL) was 4.5% higher. Meta Platforms (META) gained 3.8%, Amazon (AMZN) climbed 3.6%, while Tesla (TSLA) stock rose 2.7%.Chip stocks in general had a strong week as Micron Technology (MU) jumped 10.5% and Intel Corp (INTC) rose 10.1%. The best-performing stock in the S&P 500 was disk-drive and flash-memory chip company Western Digital (WDC), which rose 16.4%, followed by data storage company Seagate Technology’s (STX) 14.4% jump.It was a bad week for retailers, particularly of the discount variety. Dollar General (DG) was the sharpest faller, tumbling 16% after its earnings disappointed and it cut guidance. Dollar Tree also fell 3.7%. Walgreens Boots Alliance was the second-worst performer, dropping 7.2% as the healthcare giant announced its CEO Rosalind Brewer is stepping down.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9946423577,"gmtCreate":1681027870899,"gmtModify":1681031742673,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy.&nbsp; Example,&nbsp;sell put covered call.&nbsp;Any recommends?&nbsp;","listText":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy.&nbsp; Example,&nbsp;sell put covered call.&nbsp;Any recommends?&nbsp;","text":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy. Example, sell put covered call. Any recommends?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9946423577","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":258,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943596909,"gmtCreate":1679535289802,"gmtModify":1679535411669,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.&nbsp;","listText":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.&nbsp;","text":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943596909","repostId":"1150004780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150004780","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1679533261,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150004780?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-23 09:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150004780","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerom","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.</p><p>The Fed chief advised that more Fed tightening may be in store after Wednesday’s interest-rate hike, and that the central bank will raise rates higher than expected if needed. In a press briefing, he also said officials don’t expect to be cutting rates this year — even as the bond market showed traders doubling down on that outcome.</p><p>Officials are making a calculated risk that, while the recent banking turmoil will likely slow the economy, it won’t mushroom into a broader financial meltdown. While their predecessors got a similar calculation wrong in 2007, regulators are counting on higher capital and liquidity standards, and a more muscular response, to ring-fence problems today.</p><p>“They think they have the tools in place to contain the turmoil in the banking system,” Wells Fargo Chief Economist Jay Bryson said. “There certainly is a risk that this could be a bad decision.”</p><p>Powell, during the press conference Wednesday, repeatedly noted uncertainty about the spillover effects from the banking-sector problems on lending. He also shared his impression of the speed at which events unfolded, with “a very fast run” on Silicon Valley Bank that left regulators asking themselves, two weekends back, “How did this happen?”</p><p>The Fed at that time declared “unusual and exigent” circumstances in launching an emergency cash facility for banks to help limit contagion from SVB’s downfall. Fast forward to Wednesday, and Powell assured that regulators’ actions demonstrated “all depositors’ savings are safe,” as is the banking system more broadly.</p><p>One complication emerged, however: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a Senate hearing the same time as Powell’s press conference said that regulators aren’t looking to provide “blanket” deposit insurance.</p><p>Those comments contributed to a selloff in equities, with the KBW Bank Index sliding after a two-day rally — showcasing continued nervousness about financial risks.</p><p>What Bloomberg Economics Says...</p><p>The Fed weighed the pros and cons of a wait-and-see approach against a continuation of hikes, and chose the latter. That signals an unconditional commitment to the price-stability leg of the Fed’s dual mandate. We think they made the right decision.</p><p>— Anna Wong, Stuart Paul and Eliza Winger (economists)</p><p>Powell reflected that same uncertainty. “It is possible this will have very modest effects on the economy and inflation will continue to be strong,” he said — in which case the Fed might raise rates beyond a range of 5% to 5.25%, officials’ current median estimate for the peak.</p><p>It is also possible, he said, that a pullback in lending contributes to lower consumption and demand. “That means monetary policy may have less work to do.”</p><p>What’s missing from the coin-toss outlook is a third scenario: unemployment starts to rise amid an already-fragile financial system, triggering defaults on loans by newly income-constrained households, amplifying stress inside banks.</p><p>“This has been the most aggressive monetary policy tightening cycle for 40 years and by going harder and faster into restrictive territory you naturally have less control over the outcome,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. “This heightens the chances of economic and financial stress.”</p><p>The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to increase its target for the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point to a range of 4.75% to 5%, the highest since September 2007, when rates were at their peak on the eve of the financial crisis.</p><p>“A key takeaway was how uncertain Powell and the FOMC seem to be on the extent, duration and impact of tightening of bank lending standards,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Life Insurance Co.</p><p>Bostjancic said Wednesday’s rate increase could have been influenced by markets having mostly priced it in. Powell revealed that officials had considered a pause “in the days running up to the meeting.”</p><p>It’s the second straight increase of 25 basis points following a string of aggressive moves starting in March 2022, when rates were near zero.</p><p>“What we know is inflation is too high,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist at Federated Hermes. “This Powell Fed in our view has quite literally ripped a page from Paul Volcker’s playbook 40 years ago and they are going to do what they need to do to get inflation back to target.”</p><p>The aggressive yearlong campaign is partly the result of the Fed’s own failing to get ahead of inflation when price gains began to accelerate in 2021. By last year, it had jumped to 40-year highs.</p><p>Inflation reports for the first two months of the year were still hot, with the consumer price index rising 6.4% and 6% in January and February on an annual basis.</p><p>Hiring also continued at a blistering pace with payrolls rising by more than 800,000 in the first two months.</p><p>For all that, though, futures markets forecast the Fed will start cutting rates as soon as this year — which is to say they see something close to a recession.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-23 09:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.The Fed chief advised that more...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150004780","content_text":"Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.The Fed chief advised that more Fed tightening may be in store after Wednesday’s interest-rate hike, and that the central bank will raise rates higher than expected if needed. In a press briefing, he also said officials don’t expect to be cutting rates this year — even as the bond market showed traders doubling down on that outcome.Officials are making a calculated risk that, while the recent banking turmoil will likely slow the economy, it won’t mushroom into a broader financial meltdown. While their predecessors got a similar calculation wrong in 2007, regulators are counting on higher capital and liquidity standards, and a more muscular response, to ring-fence problems today.“They think they have the tools in place to contain the turmoil in the banking system,” Wells Fargo Chief Economist Jay Bryson said. “There certainly is a risk that this could be a bad decision.”Powell, during the press conference Wednesday, repeatedly noted uncertainty about the spillover effects from the banking-sector problems on lending. He also shared his impression of the speed at which events unfolded, with “a very fast run” on Silicon Valley Bank that left regulators asking themselves, two weekends back, “How did this happen?”The Fed at that time declared “unusual and exigent” circumstances in launching an emergency cash facility for banks to help limit contagion from SVB’s downfall. Fast forward to Wednesday, and Powell assured that regulators’ actions demonstrated “all depositors’ savings are safe,” as is the banking system more broadly.One complication emerged, however: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a Senate hearing the same time as Powell’s press conference said that regulators aren’t looking to provide “blanket” deposit insurance.Those comments contributed to a selloff in equities, with the KBW Bank Index sliding after a two-day rally — showcasing continued nervousness about financial risks.What Bloomberg Economics Says...The Fed weighed the pros and cons of a wait-and-see approach against a continuation of hikes, and chose the latter. That signals an unconditional commitment to the price-stability leg of the Fed’s dual mandate. We think they made the right decision.— Anna Wong, Stuart Paul and Eliza Winger (economists)Powell reflected that same uncertainty. “It is possible this will have very modest effects on the economy and inflation will continue to be strong,” he said — in which case the Fed might raise rates beyond a range of 5% to 5.25%, officials’ current median estimate for the peak.It is also possible, he said, that a pullback in lending contributes to lower consumption and demand. “That means monetary policy may have less work to do.”What’s missing from the coin-toss outlook is a third scenario: unemployment starts to rise amid an already-fragile financial system, triggering defaults on loans by newly income-constrained households, amplifying stress inside banks.“This has been the most aggressive monetary policy tightening cycle for 40 years and by going harder and faster into restrictive territory you naturally have less control over the outcome,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. “This heightens the chances of economic and financial stress.”The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to increase its target for the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point to a range of 4.75% to 5%, the highest since September 2007, when rates were at their peak on the eve of the financial crisis.“A key takeaway was how uncertain Powell and the FOMC seem to be on the extent, duration and impact of tightening of bank lending standards,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Life Insurance Co.Bostjancic said Wednesday’s rate increase could have been influenced by markets having mostly priced it in. Powell revealed that officials had considered a pause “in the days running up to the meeting.”It’s the second straight increase of 25 basis points following a string of aggressive moves starting in March 2022, when rates were near zero.“What we know is inflation is too high,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist at Federated Hermes. “This Powell Fed in our view has quite literally ripped a page from Paul Volcker’s playbook 40 years ago and they are going to do what they need to do to get inflation back to target.”The aggressive yearlong campaign is partly the result of the Fed’s own failing to get ahead of inflation when price gains began to accelerate in 2021. By last year, it had jumped to 40-year highs.Inflation reports for the first two months of the year were still hot, with the consumer price index rising 6.4% and 6% in January and February on an annual basis.Hiring also continued at a blistering pace with payrolls rising by more than 800,000 in the first two months.For all that, though, futures markets forecast the Fed will start cutting rates as soon as this year — which is to say they see something close to a recession.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988183521,"gmtCreate":1666694957364,"gmtModify":1676537791145,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whats this?&nbsp;","listText":"Whats this?&nbsp;","text":"Whats this?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5db30167fc93da85ad8a0690e24b73d","width":"1080","height":"1450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988183521","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932902432,"gmtCreate":1662860672926,"gmtModify":1676537151985,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house&nbsp; after election. Current&nbsp;Incumbent is democrats.&nbsp;","listText":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house&nbsp; after election. Current&nbsp;Incumbent is democrats.&nbsp;","text":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house after election. Current Incumbent is democrats.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932902432","repostId":"2266398293","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266398293","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662857059,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266398293?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-11 08:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266398293","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.</p><p>That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.</p><p>I&#39;m referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8db8dce7f85a1b3a6cc790f3a79ff21a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.</p><p>It&#39;s always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn&#39;t be inconsistent with the historical record for this year&#39;s low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&amp;P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.</p><p>It&#39;s worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.</p><p>This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the &#34;Halloween Indicator,&#34; according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.</p><p>The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/200d68de48ef106579622d3fc32df9ff\" tg-width=\"945\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won&#39;t have another chance until the 2026 midterms.</p><p>Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.</p><p>The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor&#39;s political preferences.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-11 08:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.</p><p>That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.</p><p>I&#39;m referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8db8dce7f85a1b3a6cc790f3a79ff21a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.</p><p>It&#39;s always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn&#39;t be inconsistent with the historical record for this year&#39;s low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&amp;P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.</p><p>It&#39;s worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.</p><p>This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the &#34;Halloween Indicator,&#34; according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.</p><p>The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/200d68de48ef106579622d3fc32df9ff\" tg-width=\"945\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won&#39;t have another chance until the 2026 midterms.</p><p>Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.</p><p>The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor&#39;s political preferences.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266398293","content_text":"If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.I'm referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.It's always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn't be inconsistent with the historical record for this year's low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.It's worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the \"Halloween Indicator,\" according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won't have another chance until the 2026 midterms.Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor's political preferences.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":399,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"9000000000000554","authorId":"9000000000000554","name":"IrmaBurke","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5d8c2eb1c079c85b43879eb951e8684","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"9000000000000554","authorIdStr":"9000000000000554"},"content":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies.","text":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies.","html":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies."}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9943596909,"gmtCreate":1679535289802,"gmtModify":1679535411669,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.&nbsp;","listText":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.&nbsp;","text":"Fed's statement is so predictable and market has anticipated QT to stop with a more dovish statement from Fed. Fed needs more data to proof that inflation and employment has gone down. Unless we have a recession right away, talking about QE is just off grid.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943596909","repostId":"1150004780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150004780","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1679533261,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150004780?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-23 09:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150004780","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerom","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.</p><p>The Fed chief advised that more Fed tightening may be in store after Wednesday’s interest-rate hike, and that the central bank will raise rates higher than expected if needed. In a press briefing, he also said officials don’t expect to be cutting rates this year — even as the bond market showed traders doubling down on that outcome.</p><p>Officials are making a calculated risk that, while the recent banking turmoil will likely slow the economy, it won’t mushroom into a broader financial meltdown. While their predecessors got a similar calculation wrong in 2007, regulators are counting on higher capital and liquidity standards, and a more muscular response, to ring-fence problems today.</p><p>“They think they have the tools in place to contain the turmoil in the banking system,” Wells Fargo Chief Economist Jay Bryson said. “There certainly is a risk that this could be a bad decision.”</p><p>Powell, during the press conference Wednesday, repeatedly noted uncertainty about the spillover effects from the banking-sector problems on lending. He also shared his impression of the speed at which events unfolded, with “a very fast run” on Silicon Valley Bank that left regulators asking themselves, two weekends back, “How did this happen?”</p><p>The Fed at that time declared “unusual and exigent” circumstances in launching an emergency cash facility for banks to help limit contagion from SVB’s downfall. Fast forward to Wednesday, and Powell assured that regulators’ actions demonstrated “all depositors’ savings are safe,” as is the banking system more broadly.</p><p>One complication emerged, however: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a Senate hearing the same time as Powell’s press conference said that regulators aren’t looking to provide “blanket” deposit insurance.</p><p>Those comments contributed to a selloff in equities, with the KBW Bank Index sliding after a two-day rally — showcasing continued nervousness about financial risks.</p><p>What Bloomberg Economics Says...</p><p>The Fed weighed the pros and cons of a wait-and-see approach against a continuation of hikes, and chose the latter. That signals an unconditional commitment to the price-stability leg of the Fed’s dual mandate. We think they made the right decision.</p><p>— Anna Wong, Stuart Paul and Eliza Winger (economists)</p><p>Powell reflected that same uncertainty. “It is possible this will have very modest effects on the economy and inflation will continue to be strong,” he said — in which case the Fed might raise rates beyond a range of 5% to 5.25%, officials’ current median estimate for the peak.</p><p>It is also possible, he said, that a pullback in lending contributes to lower consumption and demand. “That means monetary policy may have less work to do.”</p><p>What’s missing from the coin-toss outlook is a third scenario: unemployment starts to rise amid an already-fragile financial system, triggering defaults on loans by newly income-constrained households, amplifying stress inside banks.</p><p>“This has been the most aggressive monetary policy tightening cycle for 40 years and by going harder and faster into restrictive territory you naturally have less control over the outcome,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. “This heightens the chances of economic and financial stress.”</p><p>The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to increase its target for the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point to a range of 4.75% to 5%, the highest since September 2007, when rates were at their peak on the eve of the financial crisis.</p><p>“A key takeaway was how uncertain Powell and the FOMC seem to be on the extent, duration and impact of tightening of bank lending standards,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Life Insurance Co.</p><p>Bostjancic said Wednesday’s rate increase could have been influenced by markets having mostly priced it in. Powell revealed that officials had considered a pause “in the days running up to the meeting.”</p><p>It’s the second straight increase of 25 basis points following a string of aggressive moves starting in March 2022, when rates were near zero.</p><p>“What we know is inflation is too high,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist at Federated Hermes. “This Powell Fed in our view has quite literally ripped a page from Paul Volcker’s playbook 40 years ago and they are going to do what they need to do to get inflation back to target.”</p><p>The aggressive yearlong campaign is partly the result of the Fed’s own failing to get ahead of inflation when price gains began to accelerate in 2021. By last year, it had jumped to 40-year highs.</p><p>Inflation reports for the first two months of the year were still hot, with the consumer price index rising 6.4% and 6% in January and February on an annual basis.</p><p>Hiring also continued at a blistering pace with payrolls rising by more than 800,000 in the first two months.</p><p>For all that, though, futures markets forecast the Fed will start cutting rates as soon as this year — which is to say they see something close to a recession.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Opts for Hike-and-See in Gamble That Crisis Will Stay Contained\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-23 09:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.The Fed chief advised that more...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-opts-hike-see-gamble-224156796.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150004780","content_text":"Less than two weeks after the second-biggest bank failure in US history, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell made clear that inflation remains policymakers’ top concern.The Fed chief advised that more Fed tightening may be in store after Wednesday’s interest-rate hike, and that the central bank will raise rates higher than expected if needed. In a press briefing, he also said officials don’t expect to be cutting rates this year — even as the bond market showed traders doubling down on that outcome.Officials are making a calculated risk that, while the recent banking turmoil will likely slow the economy, it won’t mushroom into a broader financial meltdown. While their predecessors got a similar calculation wrong in 2007, regulators are counting on higher capital and liquidity standards, and a more muscular response, to ring-fence problems today.“They think they have the tools in place to contain the turmoil in the banking system,” Wells Fargo Chief Economist Jay Bryson said. “There certainly is a risk that this could be a bad decision.”Powell, during the press conference Wednesday, repeatedly noted uncertainty about the spillover effects from the banking-sector problems on lending. He also shared his impression of the speed at which events unfolded, with “a very fast run” on Silicon Valley Bank that left regulators asking themselves, two weekends back, “How did this happen?”The Fed at that time declared “unusual and exigent” circumstances in launching an emergency cash facility for banks to help limit contagion from SVB’s downfall. Fast forward to Wednesday, and Powell assured that regulators’ actions demonstrated “all depositors’ savings are safe,” as is the banking system more broadly.One complication emerged, however: Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen in a Senate hearing the same time as Powell’s press conference said that regulators aren’t looking to provide “blanket” deposit insurance.Those comments contributed to a selloff in equities, with the KBW Bank Index sliding after a two-day rally — showcasing continued nervousness about financial risks.What Bloomberg Economics Says...The Fed weighed the pros and cons of a wait-and-see approach against a continuation of hikes, and chose the latter. That signals an unconditional commitment to the price-stability leg of the Fed’s dual mandate. We think they made the right decision.— Anna Wong, Stuart Paul and Eliza Winger (economists)Powell reflected that same uncertainty. “It is possible this will have very modest effects on the economy and inflation will continue to be strong,” he said — in which case the Fed might raise rates beyond a range of 5% to 5.25%, officials’ current median estimate for the peak.It is also possible, he said, that a pullback in lending contributes to lower consumption and demand. “That means monetary policy may have less work to do.”What’s missing from the coin-toss outlook is a third scenario: unemployment starts to rise amid an already-fragile financial system, triggering defaults on loans by newly income-constrained households, amplifying stress inside banks.“This has been the most aggressive monetary policy tightening cycle for 40 years and by going harder and faster into restrictive territory you naturally have less control over the outcome,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. “This heightens the chances of economic and financial stress.”The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to increase its target for the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point to a range of 4.75% to 5%, the highest since September 2007, when rates were at their peak on the eve of the financial crisis.“A key takeaway was how uncertain Powell and the FOMC seem to be on the extent, duration and impact of tightening of bank lending standards,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide Life Insurance Co.Bostjancic said Wednesday’s rate increase could have been influenced by markets having mostly priced it in. Powell revealed that officials had considered a pause “in the days running up to the meeting.”It’s the second straight increase of 25 basis points following a string of aggressive moves starting in March 2022, when rates were near zero.“What we know is inflation is too high,” said Phil Orlando, chief equity strategist at Federated Hermes. “This Powell Fed in our view has quite literally ripped a page from Paul Volcker’s playbook 40 years ago and they are going to do what they need to do to get inflation back to target.”The aggressive yearlong campaign is partly the result of the Fed’s own failing to get ahead of inflation when price gains began to accelerate in 2021. By last year, it had jumped to 40-year highs.Inflation reports for the first two months of the year were still hot, with the consumer price index rising 6.4% and 6% in January and February on an annual basis.Hiring also continued at a blistering pace with payrolls rising by more than 800,000 in the first two months.For all that, though, futures markets forecast the Fed will start cutting rates as soon as this year — which is to say they see something close to a recession.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932902432,"gmtCreate":1662860672926,"gmtModify":1676537151985,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house&nbsp; after election. Current&nbsp;Incumbent is democrats.&nbsp;","listText":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house&nbsp; after election. Current&nbsp;Incumbent is democrats.&nbsp;","text":"Nice analysis! Much depends which party is in control of the lower and upp house after election. Current Incumbent is democrats.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932902432","repostId":"2266398293","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266398293","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662857059,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266398293?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-11 08:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266398293","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.</p><p>That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.</p><p>I&#39;m referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8db8dce7f85a1b3a6cc790f3a79ff21a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.</p><p>It&#39;s always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn&#39;t be inconsistent with the historical record for this year&#39;s low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&amp;P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.</p><p>It&#39;s worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.</p><p>This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the &#34;Halloween Indicator,&#34; according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.</p><p>The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/200d68de48ef106579622d3fc32df9ff\" tg-width=\"945\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won&#39;t have another chance until the 2026 midterms.</p><p>Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.</p><p>The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor&#39;s political preferences.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA Strong Market Rally Could Be Just Weeks Away If the U.S. Midterm Elections Can Put Anxious Stock Investors at Ease\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-11 08:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.</p><p>That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.</p><p>I&#39;m referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8db8dce7f85a1b3a6cc790f3a79ff21a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.</p><p>It&#39;s always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn&#39;t be inconsistent with the historical record for this year&#39;s low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&amp;P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.</p><p>It&#39;s worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.</p><p>This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the &#34;Halloween Indicator,&#34; according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.</p><p>The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/200d68de48ef106579622d3fc32df9ff\" tg-width=\"945\" tg-height=\"302\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won&#39;t have another chance until the 2026 midterms.</p><p>Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.</p><p>The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor&#39;s political preferences.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266398293","content_text":"If the U.S. midterm election cycle this year is like past ones, the stock market will carve out an important low right around Election Day in November.That should give some hope to beleaguered investors whose stock holdings have suffered double-digit losses so far this year. A meaningful rally could be just a few weeks away.I'm referring to the historical pattern in the stock market of pre-midterm weakness and post-midterm strength. This pattern is plotted in the chart below, which is based on the average July-December performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average  in the last 17 midterm election years (since 1954).Though the date of the average in this chart is in October, the actual lows in the historical record can come earlier or later. Much depends on when the stock market begins to anticipate the outcome of the midterms and therefore discounts it. A good guess is that the low this year will be later, given the uncertainty about the election outcome -- especially in the U.S. Senate.It's always possible that the pre-midterm low will occur in advance of Election Day. It wouldn't be inconsistent with the historical record for this year's low to have occurred the day after Labor Day, in fact. As of Sept. 9, the S&P 500   was more than 4% higher than that low.It's worth noting how remarkable it is for any pattern to emerge when averaging together many years worth of stock market gyrations. Though each year carves out a unique path, the highs and lows usually cancel each other out, leaving the average to be a gradual upward-sloping line. A pattern has to be quite pronounced in the historical data for a deviation to appear that is as stark as the one in the accompanying chart.This pre- and post-midterm pattern is so pronounced that it is the source of the famous seasonal pattern known as the \"Halloween Indicator,\" according to which the stock market is strongest between Oct. 31 and May 1 and weakest the other six months of the year. Yet take away the six months before- and after mid-term elections and the Halloween Indicator disappears.The underlying data appear in the table below. The cell marked with a single asterisk (*) refers to the current six-month period, while the cell marked with a double asterisk (**) corresponds to the six-month period that begins at the end of October 2022.So if you are tempted to bet on the Halloween Indicator, your time is fast approaching. If you miss it, you won't have another chance until the 2026 midterms.Credit for discovering that the Halloween Indicator traces to the months prior to and subsequent to the midterms goes to Terry Marsh, an emeritus finance professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and CEO of Quantal International, and Kam Fong Chan, a senior lecturer in finance at the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research into this pattern appeared in July 2021 in the Journal of Financial Economics.The likely source of the pattern, according to the researchers, is the uncertainty that exists prior to the midterms and the resolution of that uncertainty after the election. They note that it appears not to matter which party dominates Congress prior to the midterms and which becomes the majority party afterwards. The pattern exists, they believe, because the stock market craves certainty, even when the source of that certainty may not be in accord with every investor's political preferences.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":399,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"9000000000000554","authorId":"9000000000000554","name":"IrmaBurke","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5d8c2eb1c079c85b43879eb951e8684","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"9000000000000554","authorIdStr":"9000000000000554"},"content":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies.","text":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies.","html":"I agree with you. Let's wait and see! Different political parties will adopt totally different policies."}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":216289806471296,"gmtCreate":1693880490826,"gmtModify":1693880495717,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!&nbsp;","listText":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!&nbsp;","text":"Historically Sep is a bad month for stocks. Tech already had a correction in AUG. Hope we see more upside before Oct comes. Then Christmas is a rally!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/216289806471296","repostId":"2364391771","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2364391771","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1693869438,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2364391771?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-09-05 07:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2364391771","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Nvidia stock rose 5.4% last week and is now 232% up so far in 2023.              Getty Images               It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fas","content":"<html><head></head><body><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/711315050fd34eed9aa3fd68c6eeecce\" tg-width=\"639\" tg-height=\"426\"/></p><p>It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.</p><p>Investors probably don’t need to be reminded that September is historically the worst month for stocks—the S&amp;P 500 has fallen an average 1.1% during that month since 1928.</p><p>But enough of that. Several stocks had a great week heading into the typically terrible month, and investors will be hoping the momentum can continue.</p><p>Nvidia (ticker: NVDA) stock had another impressive week, climbing 5.4% to 485.09 and reaching a record closing high of $493.55 Thursday. The chip maker’s stock rallied into its hotly anticipated earnings on Aug. 23 but fell 2.3% in the two trading days after. </p><p>But normal service resumed last week for the stock, which is now up 232% so far in 2023. Wall Street thinks the shares can keep moving higher into uncharted territory—analysts have an average price target of $645.29, implying a 31% upside to Friday’s closing price, according to FactSet data.</p><p>Alongside Nvidia, the other members of the so-called ‘Magnificent 7’ also performed well. Apple (AAPL) rose 6.1% over the week, Netflix (NFLX) jumped 5.7%, and Google’s Alphabet (GOOGL) was 4.5% higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> (META) gained 3.8%, Amazon (AMZN) climbed 3.6%, while Tesla (TSLA) stock rose 2.7%.</p><p>Chip stocks in general had a strong week as Micron Technology (MU) jumped 10.5% and Intel Corp (INTC) rose 10.1%. The best-performing stock in the S&amp;P 500 was disk-drive and flash-memory chip company Western Digital (WDC), which rose 16.4%, followed by data storage company Seagate Technology’s (STX) 14.4% jump.</p><p>It was a bad week for retailers, particularly of the discount variety. Dollar General (DG) was the sharpest faller, tumbling 16% after its earnings disappointed and it cut guidance. Dollar Tree also fell 3.7%. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> was the second-worst performer, dropping 7.2% as the healthcare giant announced its CEO Rosalind Brewer is stepping down.</p></body></html>","source":"mwatch_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"Magnificent 7\" Give Markets Hope for Strong September\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-09-05 07:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.Investors probably don’t need to be ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","AAPL":"苹果","NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/nvidia-tesla-apple-stock-market-movers-september-80edcfaf?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2364391771","content_text":"It was a good week for the stock market heading into Labor Day as August ended in strong fashion and Friday’s jobs report ensured a solid start to September.Investors probably don’t need to be reminded that September is historically the worst month for stocks—the S&P 500 has fallen an average 1.1% during that month since 1928.But enough of that. Several stocks had a great week heading into the typically terrible month, and investors will be hoping the momentum can continue.Nvidia (ticker: NVDA) stock had another impressive week, climbing 5.4% to 485.09 and reaching a record closing high of $493.55 Thursday. The chip maker’s stock rallied into its hotly anticipated earnings on Aug. 23 but fell 2.3% in the two trading days after. But normal service resumed last week for the stock, which is now up 232% so far in 2023. Wall Street thinks the shares can keep moving higher into uncharted territory—analysts have an average price target of $645.29, implying a 31% upside to Friday’s closing price, according to FactSet data.Alongside Nvidia, the other members of the so-called ‘Magnificent 7’ also performed well. Apple (AAPL) rose 6.1% over the week, Netflix (NFLX) jumped 5.7%, and Google’s Alphabet (GOOGL) was 4.5% higher. Meta Platforms (META) gained 3.8%, Amazon (AMZN) climbed 3.6%, while Tesla (TSLA) stock rose 2.7%.Chip stocks in general had a strong week as Micron Technology (MU) jumped 10.5% and Intel Corp (INTC) rose 10.1%. The best-performing stock in the S&P 500 was disk-drive and flash-memory chip company Western Digital (WDC), which rose 16.4%, followed by data storage company Seagate Technology’s (STX) 14.4% jump.It was a bad week for retailers, particularly of the discount variety. Dollar General (DG) was the sharpest faller, tumbling 16% after its earnings disappointed and it cut guidance. Dollar Tree also fell 3.7%. Walgreens Boots Alliance was the second-worst performer, dropping 7.2% as the healthcare giant announced its CEO Rosalind Brewer is stepping down.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":238866492686456,"gmtCreate":1699346608308,"gmtModify":1699346612933,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!&nbsp;","listText":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!&nbsp;","text":"I was falling asleep at office. Then there is this game!","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6f39e106b01f949f31734d7ff4edd4af","width":"750","height":"1334"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/238866492686456","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":218541531771016,"gmtCreate":1694389663802,"gmtModify":1694389666643,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/218541531771016","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":199,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9946423577,"gmtCreate":1681027870899,"gmtModify":1681031742673,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy.&nbsp; Example,&nbsp;sell put covered call.&nbsp;Any recommends?&nbsp;","listText":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy.&nbsp; Example,&nbsp;sell put covered call.&nbsp;Any recommends?&nbsp;","text":"Hi community, I have been trading CFD for some times. I would like to learn trading options strategy. Example, sell put covered call. Any recommends?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9946423577","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":258,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988183521,"gmtCreate":1666694957364,"gmtModify":1676537791145,"author":{"id":"4117112726958172","authorId":"4117112726958172","name":"aramis","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1bcc3e41f730b83c36c171afe55d9dd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4117112726958172","authorIdStr":"4117112726958172"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whats this?&nbsp;","listText":"Whats this?&nbsp;","text":"Whats this?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5db30167fc93da85ad8a0690e24b73d","width":"1080","height":"1450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988183521","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}