Junee922 personal page - To The Moon

Junee922

Junee922

No personal profile

16Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-03-09

ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-23

👍🏻

QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs

2023-03-10

ok

7 Stocks to Avoid Like the Plague as Market Heads Down from Here

2022-07-17

ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-17

ok

Why Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday

2023-03-08

ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2023-03-11

ok

Roku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4121071060669522","uuid":"4121071060669522","gmtCreate":1657967978003,"gmtModify":1706620745939,"name":"Junee922","pinyin":"junee922","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":16,"tweetSize":7,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.27","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9949690355,"gmtCreate":1678549254578,"gmtModify":1678549257426,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949690355","repostId":"2318756317","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2318756317","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678504230,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2318756317?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-11 11:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Roku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2318756317","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash a","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ROKU\">Roku</a> stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/516d1d9757defc851236a69c62cfcbec\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"630\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Roku has total cash and equivalents of $1.9B, of which $487M was held at SVB - deposits that are &#34;largely uninsured.&#34;</p><p>&#34;At this time, the Company does not know to what extent the Company will be able to recover its cash on deposit at SVB,&#34; Roku said.</p><p>The FDIC was appointed as receiver for SVB, and as for uninsured depositors like Roku, they&#39;re expected to get an advance dividend within the next week, the company said, with the prospect of future dividends.</p><p>Despite the bank&#39;s closure, Roku &#34;continues to believe that its existing cash and cash equivalents balance and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet its working capital, capital expenditures, and material cash requirements from known contractual obligations&#34; for the next year and beyond.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Roku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRoku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-11 11:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.Roku ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ROKU":"Roku Inc"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2318756317","content_text":"Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.Roku has total cash and equivalents of $1.9B, of which $487M was held at SVB - deposits that are \"largely uninsured.\"\"At this time, the Company does not know to what extent the Company will be able to recover its cash on deposit at SVB,\" Roku said.The FDIC was appointed as receiver for SVB, and as for uninsured depositors like Roku, they're expected to get an advance dividend within the next week, the company said, with the prospect of future dividends.Despite the bank's closure, Roku \"continues to believe that its existing cash and cash equivalents balance and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet its working capital, capital expenditures, and material cash requirements from known contractual obligations\" for the next year and beyond.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":392,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949322149,"gmtCreate":1678378608282,"gmtModify":1678378610969,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949322149","repostId":"1167788846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949934141,"gmtCreate":1678292734084,"gmtModify":1678292737879,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949934141","repostId":"1145781355","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145781355","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1678289320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145781355?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-08 23:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Top Calls on Wall Street: Apple, Tesla, Google, Meta, Paypal and More","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145781355","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Here are Wednesday’s biggest calls on Wall Street:Canaccord initiates Bowlero as buyCanaccord said t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Here are Wednesday’s biggest calls on Wall Street:</p><p><b>Canaccord initiates Bowlero as buy</b></p><p>Canaccord said the bowling company has a “unique growth and profitability story.”</p><blockquote>“Bowlero has evolved from a single location to become the world’s largest bowling operator over the past 26 years, developing a repeatable playbook that it uses to transform the operations of acquired centers, delivering industry-leading margins and cash flow that is then re-deployed to fund acquisitions, renovations, and new builds in a virtuous growth cycle.”</blockquote><h2>Berenberg downgrades Tesla to hold from buy</h2><p>Berenberg said it sees less upside for the EV maker.</p><blockquote>“Tesla’snew plants offer multi-year opportunity in capital and labour efficiency. However, we downgrade our rating to Hold now that our Buy thesis – based on misplaced fears of a price war – appears to have been accepted by the market.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America reiterates Meta as buy</h2><p>Bank of America said Meta is well positioned for “revenue acceleration.”</p><blockquote>“According to various press reports, Meta is preparing for another round of layoffs and could cut thousands of jobs as soon as next week.”</blockquote><h2>Morgan Stanley reiterates Carvana as not rated</h2><p>The firm saidCarvanastill needs too much capital.</p><blockquote>“While we think the business still needs capital, a smaller footprint into a growing used car market offers more time to execute.”</blockquote><h2>Baird names Comerica a fresh pick</h2><p>Baird said it sees a compelling risk/reward outlook for the regional bank.</p><blockquote>“Investor sentiment toward the regional bank group has deteriorated significantly in recent days, creating what we think are better long opportunities and we find CMA to be one of the better risk/reward trade-offs in the group.”</blockquote><h2>Deutsche Bank reiterates Adobe as buy</h2><p>Deutsche said it sees Adobe as an AI beneficiary.</p><blockquote>“We believe generativeAIwill be a powerful tool in the belt of creative professionals, communicators, and consumers going forward, enabling Adobe to more deeply penetrate its existing TAM by making Adobe products not just essential to creative pros, but to further involve other stakeholders in the content-creation process.”</blockquote><h2>Deutsche Bank reiterates Ulta as buy</h2><p>Deutsche called Ulta“resilient.”</p><blockquote>“The beauty category’s momentum carried forward into February, albeit slightly moderated (according to Nielsen data through 2/25), but cosmetics and skincare saw an acceleration in 3YR growth.”</blockquote><h2>Oppenheimer reiterates PayPal as outperform</h2><p>Oppenheimer said it sees PayPal as a “15% [earnings per share] compounder.”</p><blockquote>“Investor sentiment on PYPL isn’t great and that could lead to opportunity. PYPL’s not a safety trade if the market/payment stocks continue correcting.”</blockquote><h2>JPMorgan initiates Scorpio Tankers as overweight</h2><p>JPMorgan said it sees a strong upside for the tanker stock.</p><blockquote>“We initiate coverage on Scorpio Tankers, an operator of product tanker ships used to transport refined oil products globally, with an Overweight recommendation and with our Dec-24 target price of $87 implying c. 50% upside potential.”</blockquote><h2>Goldman Sachs initiates Axon as buy</h2><p>Goldman called the Taser company a “leading vertical technology and hardware platform;.”</p><blockquote>“AXON’s market leadership with TASER has resulted in deep customer relationships with state and local law enforcement (e.g.,17k of 18k US law enforcement agencies) and a highly valuable installed base of law enforcement personnel.”</blockquote><h2>Wedbush reiterates Apple as outperform</h2><p>Wedbush said it’s standing by the tech giant.</p><blockquote>“We are raising our price target on Apple from $180 to $190 reflecting positive Asia checks on iPhone demand thus far this quarter while maintaining our OUTPERFORM rating and Wedbush Best Idea List name.”</blockquote><h2>Bernstein reiterates Domino’s Pizza as underperform</h2><p>Bernstein said Domino’s is in “growth purgatory.”</p><blockquote>“The pizza category is challenged and no longer consolidating, making market share gains look difficult in a zero-sum game.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America upgrades Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure to buy from neutral</h2><p>Bank of America said the renewables infrastructure company a healthy growth profile.</p><blockquote>“Even still, we highlight the growing renewable opportunity forAYahead, with 2.0 GW of renewable assets and 5.6 GWh of energy storage development expected, which is concentrated in North America.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America reiterates On Semiconductor as a top pick</h2><p>Bank of America said the semiconductor company is a top autos pick that has the “right execution.”</p><blockquote>“We reiterate Buy ononsemi(ON), a top autos pick following management’s confident presentation at a broker event earlier today and yesterday’s news of an EV win with BMW.”</blockquote><h2>UBS reiterates Micron as buy</h2><p>UBS said Micron is a key beneficiary of AI.</p><blockquote>“Despite some potential ‘shock value’ when MU reports FQ2 bits are growing again and MU should be a major beneficiary from generative AI as memory is &gt;40% of the total data center semis TAM - a number that is likely going even higher as AI servers have &gt;2x memory content of light load servers in the cloud and &gt;3x memory content of traditional enterprise servers.”</blockquote><h2>Argus upgrades Nordstrom to buy from hold</h2><p>Argus said it sees supply chains improving for the retailer.</p><blockquote>“Nordstrom has divested unprofitable businesses and reduced unwanted inventory through discounts and promotions. It has also strengthened its supply chain, lowering SG&amp;A expense as a percentage of sales. The company continues to repurchase stock and pay down debt.”</blockquote><h2>Needham reiterates Alphabet as buy</h2><p>Needham said investors shouldn’t be concerned about any legislative risks for Alphabet.</p><blockquote>“Our top investment conclusion from our meetings in Washington DC last week is that nothing bad will happen to GOOGL on the legislative, regulatory or litigation fronts during 2023. Based on our conversations, we perceive that headline risks are bigger than substantive risks.”</blockquote></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Top Calls on Wall Street: Apple, Tesla, Google, Meta, Paypal and More</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTop Calls on Wall Street: Apple, Tesla, Google, Meta, Paypal and More\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-08 23:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Here are Wednesday’s biggest calls on Wall Street:</p><p><b>Canaccord initiates Bowlero as buy</b></p><p>Canaccord said the bowling company has a “unique growth and profitability story.”</p><blockquote>“Bowlero has evolved from a single location to become the world’s largest bowling operator over the past 26 years, developing a repeatable playbook that it uses to transform the operations of acquired centers, delivering industry-leading margins and cash flow that is then re-deployed to fund acquisitions, renovations, and new builds in a virtuous growth cycle.”</blockquote><h2>Berenberg downgrades Tesla to hold from buy</h2><p>Berenberg said it sees less upside for the EV maker.</p><blockquote>“Tesla’snew plants offer multi-year opportunity in capital and labour efficiency. However, we downgrade our rating to Hold now that our Buy thesis – based on misplaced fears of a price war – appears to have been accepted by the market.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America reiterates Meta as buy</h2><p>Bank of America said Meta is well positioned for “revenue acceleration.”</p><blockquote>“According to various press reports, Meta is preparing for another round of layoffs and could cut thousands of jobs as soon as next week.”</blockquote><h2>Morgan Stanley reiterates Carvana as not rated</h2><p>The firm saidCarvanastill needs too much capital.</p><blockquote>“While we think the business still needs capital, a smaller footprint into a growing used car market offers more time to execute.”</blockquote><h2>Baird names Comerica a fresh pick</h2><p>Baird said it sees a compelling risk/reward outlook for the regional bank.</p><blockquote>“Investor sentiment toward the regional bank group has deteriorated significantly in recent days, creating what we think are better long opportunities and we find CMA to be one of the better risk/reward trade-offs in the group.”</blockquote><h2>Deutsche Bank reiterates Adobe as buy</h2><p>Deutsche said it sees Adobe as an AI beneficiary.</p><blockquote>“We believe generativeAIwill be a powerful tool in the belt of creative professionals, communicators, and consumers going forward, enabling Adobe to more deeply penetrate its existing TAM by making Adobe products not just essential to creative pros, but to further involve other stakeholders in the content-creation process.”</blockquote><h2>Deutsche Bank reiterates Ulta as buy</h2><p>Deutsche called Ulta“resilient.”</p><blockquote>“The beauty category’s momentum carried forward into February, albeit slightly moderated (according to Nielsen data through 2/25), but cosmetics and skincare saw an acceleration in 3YR growth.”</blockquote><h2>Oppenheimer reiterates PayPal as outperform</h2><p>Oppenheimer said it sees PayPal as a “15% [earnings per share] compounder.”</p><blockquote>“Investor sentiment on PYPL isn’t great and that could lead to opportunity. PYPL’s not a safety trade if the market/payment stocks continue correcting.”</blockquote><h2>JPMorgan initiates Scorpio Tankers as overweight</h2><p>JPMorgan said it sees a strong upside for the tanker stock.</p><blockquote>“We initiate coverage on Scorpio Tankers, an operator of product tanker ships used to transport refined oil products globally, with an Overweight recommendation and with our Dec-24 target price of $87 implying c. 50% upside potential.”</blockquote><h2>Goldman Sachs initiates Axon as buy</h2><p>Goldman called the Taser company a “leading vertical technology and hardware platform;.”</p><blockquote>“AXON’s market leadership with TASER has resulted in deep customer relationships with state and local law enforcement (e.g.,17k of 18k US law enforcement agencies) and a highly valuable installed base of law enforcement personnel.”</blockquote><h2>Wedbush reiterates Apple as outperform</h2><p>Wedbush said it’s standing by the tech giant.</p><blockquote>“We are raising our price target on Apple from $180 to $190 reflecting positive Asia checks on iPhone demand thus far this quarter while maintaining our OUTPERFORM rating and Wedbush Best Idea List name.”</blockquote><h2>Bernstein reiterates Domino’s Pizza as underperform</h2><p>Bernstein said Domino’s is in “growth purgatory.”</p><blockquote>“The pizza category is challenged and no longer consolidating, making market share gains look difficult in a zero-sum game.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America upgrades Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure to buy from neutral</h2><p>Bank of America said the renewables infrastructure company a healthy growth profile.</p><blockquote>“Even still, we highlight the growing renewable opportunity forAYahead, with 2.0 GW of renewable assets and 5.6 GWh of energy storage development expected, which is concentrated in North America.”</blockquote><h2>Bank of America reiterates On Semiconductor as a top pick</h2><p>Bank of America said the semiconductor company is a top autos pick that has the “right execution.”</p><blockquote>“We reiterate Buy ononsemi(ON), a top autos pick following management’s confident presentation at a broker event earlier today and yesterday’s news of an EV win with BMW.”</blockquote><h2>UBS reiterates Micron as buy</h2><p>UBS said Micron is a key beneficiary of AI.</p><blockquote>“Despite some potential ‘shock value’ when MU reports FQ2 bits are growing again and MU should be a major beneficiary from generative AI as memory is &gt;40% of the total data center semis TAM - a number that is likely going even higher as AI servers have &gt;2x memory content of light load servers in the cloud and &gt;3x memory content of traditional enterprise servers.”</blockquote><h2>Argus upgrades Nordstrom to buy from hold</h2><p>Argus said it sees supply chains improving for the retailer.</p><blockquote>“Nordstrom has divested unprofitable businesses and reduced unwanted inventory through discounts and promotions. It has also strengthened its supply chain, lowering SG&amp;A expense as a percentage of sales. The company continues to repurchase stock and pay down debt.”</blockquote><h2>Needham reiterates Alphabet as buy</h2><p>Needham said investors shouldn’t be concerned about any legislative risks for Alphabet.</p><blockquote>“Our top investment conclusion from our meetings in Washington DC last week is that nothing bad will happen to GOOGL on the legislative, regulatory or litigation fronts during 2023. Based on our conversations, we perceive that headline risks are bigger than substantive risks.”</blockquote></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STNG":"Scorpio Tankers","JWN":"诺德斯特龙","ADBE":"Adobe","ULTA":"Ulta美容","ON":"安森美半导体","CVNA":"Carvana Co.","MU":"美光科技","CMA":"联信银行","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","PYPL":"PayPal","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AXON":"Axon Enterprise, Inc.","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","DPZ":"达美乐比萨","AAME":"美国大西洋"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145781355","content_text":"Here are Wednesday’s biggest calls on Wall Street:Canaccord initiates Bowlero as buyCanaccord said the bowling company has a “unique growth and profitability story.”“Bowlero has evolved from a single location to become the world’s largest bowling operator over the past 26 years, developing a repeatable playbook that it uses to transform the operations of acquired centers, delivering industry-leading margins and cash flow that is then re-deployed to fund acquisitions, renovations, and new builds in a virtuous growth cycle.”Berenberg downgrades Tesla to hold from buyBerenberg said it sees less upside for the EV maker.“Tesla’snew plants offer multi-year opportunity in capital and labour efficiency. However, we downgrade our rating to Hold now that our Buy thesis – based on misplaced fears of a price war – appears to have been accepted by the market.”Bank of America reiterates Meta as buyBank of America said Meta is well positioned for “revenue acceleration.”“According to various press reports, Meta is preparing for another round of layoffs and could cut thousands of jobs as soon as next week.”Morgan Stanley reiterates Carvana as not ratedThe firm saidCarvanastill needs too much capital.“While we think the business still needs capital, a smaller footprint into a growing used car market offers more time to execute.”Baird names Comerica a fresh pickBaird said it sees a compelling risk/reward outlook for the regional bank.“Investor sentiment toward the regional bank group has deteriorated significantly in recent days, creating what we think are better long opportunities and we find CMA to be one of the better risk/reward trade-offs in the group.”Deutsche Bank reiterates Adobe as buyDeutsche said it sees Adobe as an AI beneficiary.“We believe generativeAIwill be a powerful tool in the belt of creative professionals, communicators, and consumers going forward, enabling Adobe to more deeply penetrate its existing TAM by making Adobe products not just essential to creative pros, but to further involve other stakeholders in the content-creation process.”Deutsche Bank reiterates Ulta as buyDeutsche called Ulta“resilient.”“The beauty category’s momentum carried forward into February, albeit slightly moderated (according to Nielsen data through 2/25), but cosmetics and skincare saw an acceleration in 3YR growth.”Oppenheimer reiterates PayPal as outperformOppenheimer said it sees PayPal as a “15% [earnings per share] compounder.”“Investor sentiment on PYPL isn’t great and that could lead to opportunity. PYPL’s not a safety trade if the market/payment stocks continue correcting.”JPMorgan initiates Scorpio Tankers as overweightJPMorgan said it sees a strong upside for the tanker stock.“We initiate coverage on Scorpio Tankers, an operator of product tanker ships used to transport refined oil products globally, with an Overweight recommendation and with our Dec-24 target price of $87 implying c. 50% upside potential.”Goldman Sachs initiates Axon as buyGoldman called the Taser company a “leading vertical technology and hardware platform;.”“AXON’s market leadership with TASER has resulted in deep customer relationships with state and local law enforcement (e.g.,17k of 18k US law enforcement agencies) and a highly valuable installed base of law enforcement personnel.”Wedbush reiterates Apple as outperformWedbush said it’s standing by the tech giant.“We are raising our price target on Apple from $180 to $190 reflecting positive Asia checks on iPhone demand thus far this quarter while maintaining our OUTPERFORM rating and Wedbush Best Idea List name.”Bernstein reiterates Domino’s Pizza as underperformBernstein said Domino’s is in “growth purgatory.”“The pizza category is challenged and no longer consolidating, making market share gains look difficult in a zero-sum game.”Bank of America upgrades Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure to buy from neutralBank of America said the renewables infrastructure company a healthy growth profile.“Even still, we highlight the growing renewable opportunity forAYahead, with 2.0 GW of renewable assets and 5.6 GWh of energy storage development expected, which is concentrated in North America.”Bank of America reiterates On Semiconductor as a top pickBank of America said the semiconductor company is a top autos pick that has the “right execution.”“We reiterate Buy ononsemi(ON), a top autos pick following management’s confident presentation at a broker event earlier today and yesterday’s news of an EV win with BMW.”UBS reiterates Micron as buyUBS said Micron is a key beneficiary of AI.“Despite some potential ‘shock value’ when MU reports FQ2 bits are growing again and MU should be a major beneficiary from generative AI as memory is >40% of the total data center semis TAM - a number that is likely going even higher as AI servers have >2x memory content of light load servers in the cloud and >3x memory content of traditional enterprise servers.”Argus upgrades Nordstrom to buy from holdArgus said it sees supply chains improving for the retailer.“Nordstrom has divested unprofitable businesses and reduced unwanted inventory through discounts and promotions. It has also strengthened its supply chain, lowering SG&A expense as a percentage of sales. The company continues to repurchase stock and pay down debt.”Needham reiterates Alphabet as buyNeedham said investors shouldn’t be concerned about any legislative risks for Alphabet.“Our top investment conclusion from our meetings in Washington DC last week is that nothing bad will happen to GOOGL on the legislative, regulatory or litigation fronts during 2023. Based on our conversations, we perceive that headline risks are bigger than substantive risks.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940747068,"gmtCreate":1678204861055,"gmtModify":1678205605922,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940747068","repostId":"2317812168","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2317812168","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678203978,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2317812168?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-07 23:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq Bear Market: 3 Unstoppable Stocks Still Down 37% or More That You'll Regret Not Buying on the Dip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2317812168","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These tech giants won't stay beaten down forever.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>There&#39;s been plenty of speculation that a new bull market could be on the way. The <b>Nasdaq Composite Index</b> came tantalizingly close to reaching bull market levels only a few weeks ago.</p><p>For now, though, we&#39;re still entrenched in a Nasdaq bear market. But the good news for investors is that there are quite a few great stocks to buy at discounted prices. Here are three unstoppable stocks still down 38% or more to buy on the dip.</p><h2>1. Alphabet</h2><p><b>Alphabet</b> is the least beaten-down of these three stocks. However, shares of the tech giant are still down more than 37% from the high set in late 2021.</p><p>One reason behind Alphabet&#39;s steep decline is that the advertising market has slowed down considerably. The company generates most of its revenue from advertising on its various platforms, including Google Search and YouTube. Alphabet stock has also taken a hit recently because of concerns that it could be hurt by OpenAI&#39;s ChatGPT and <b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s integration of the chatbot with its Bing search engine.</p><p>I&#39;m not worried about either of these factors. The advertising slowdown will only be temporary. I wouldn&#39;t be surprised if Microsoft actually sets up Alphabet for a huge win once Google launches its Bard generative AI app. Even if not, my view is that the doom-and-gloom predictions about ChatGPT&#39;s impact on Google Search&#39;s business are way overblown.</p><p>Alphabet should continue to make a lot of money with its search apps. Its Google Cloud business has a huge growth runway. The company&#39;s Waymo self-driving car unit could become a major growth driver over the next decade. Alphabet also has a massive opportunity in quantum computing. This stock won&#39;t remain this cheap for too much longer.</p><h2>2. Amazon</h2><p>Another FAANG stock has been hit even harder than Alphabet. <b>Amazon</b>&#39;s share price is roughly 49% below its previous peak reached in the fourth quarter of 2021.</p><p>Macroeconomic headwinds have weighed heavily on the stock. High inflation has caused consumers and companies to watch their spending more closely. It has also contributed to the strong U.S. dollar, which creates unfavorable foreign exchange rates for companies such as Amazon with significant international sales.</p><p>These issues could continue to plague Amazon over the short term. Inflation remains stubbornly high. The Federal Reserve&#39;s efforts to fight inflation by raising interest rates could even lead to a recession. However, inflation will decline and the macroeconomic headwinds subside sooner or later. Amazon&#39;s financial position is certainly strong enough to weather the storm.</p><p>More importantly, the company&#39;s long-term prospects are bright. E-commerce still has plenty of room to grow. Amazon Web Services could realistically generate more revenue within the next 10 to 15 years than Amazon&#39;s entire business does today. Amazon also has tremendous potential in digital advertising, healthcare, and other new markets. I think right now could be a once-in-a-generation buying opportunity with Amazon stock.</p><h2>3. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a></h2><p>Like Amazon, <b>Adobe</b> has seen its share price plunge close to 50% since Q4 of 2021. Also like Amazon, the big software company seems to have lost its recent momentum after beginning a solid rebound.</p><p>Overall economic uncertainty has definitely played a major role in Adobe&#39;s dismal stock performance. In September 2022, the company announced plans to acquire collaborative design platform Figma for $20 billion. Investors felt the price tag for the deal was too high, causing Adobe&#39;s shares to sink further.</p><p>But the stock nosedived yet again just a few days ago on news that regulators oppose Adobe&#39;s acquisition of Figma. Adobe almost seems to be in a no-win scenario where investors hate it if it buys Figma but also hate it if the deal falls through.</p><p>I think all of this is simply noise. Adobe&#39;s business remains strong. It has great opportunities in extending the AI capabilities of its Creative Cloud platform. Every time in the past when Adobe&#39;s shares have fallen as much as they have over the last year or so, the stock has roared back. I expect that history will repeat itself.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq Bear Market: 3 Unstoppable Stocks Still Down 37% or More That You'll Regret Not Buying on the Dip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq Bear Market: 3 Unstoppable Stocks Still Down 37% or More That You'll Regret Not Buying on the Dip\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-07 23:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/06/nasdaq-bear-market-unstoppable-stocks-buy-on-dip/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There's been plenty of speculation that a new bull market could be on the way. The Nasdaq Composite Index came tantalizingly close to reaching bull market levels only a few weeks ago.For now, though, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/06/nasdaq-bear-market-unstoppable-stocks-buy-on-dip/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADBE":"Adobe","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/06/nasdaq-bear-market-unstoppable-stocks-buy-on-dip/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2317812168","content_text":"There's been plenty of speculation that a new bull market could be on the way. The Nasdaq Composite Index came tantalizingly close to reaching bull market levels only a few weeks ago.For now, though, we're still entrenched in a Nasdaq bear market. But the good news for investors is that there are quite a few great stocks to buy at discounted prices. Here are three unstoppable stocks still down 38% or more to buy on the dip.1. AlphabetAlphabet is the least beaten-down of these three stocks. However, shares of the tech giant are still down more than 37% from the high set in late 2021.One reason behind Alphabet's steep decline is that the advertising market has slowed down considerably. The company generates most of its revenue from advertising on its various platforms, including Google Search and YouTube. Alphabet stock has also taken a hit recently because of concerns that it could be hurt by OpenAI's ChatGPT and Microsoft's integration of the chatbot with its Bing search engine.I'm not worried about either of these factors. The advertising slowdown will only be temporary. I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft actually sets up Alphabet for a huge win once Google launches its Bard generative AI app. Even if not, my view is that the doom-and-gloom predictions about ChatGPT's impact on Google Search's business are way overblown.Alphabet should continue to make a lot of money with its search apps. Its Google Cloud business has a huge growth runway. The company's Waymo self-driving car unit could become a major growth driver over the next decade. Alphabet also has a massive opportunity in quantum computing. This stock won't remain this cheap for too much longer.2. AmazonAnother FAANG stock has been hit even harder than Alphabet. Amazon's share price is roughly 49% below its previous peak reached in the fourth quarter of 2021.Macroeconomic headwinds have weighed heavily on the stock. High inflation has caused consumers and companies to watch their spending more closely. It has also contributed to the strong U.S. dollar, which creates unfavorable foreign exchange rates for companies such as Amazon with significant international sales.These issues could continue to plague Amazon over the short term. Inflation remains stubbornly high. The Federal Reserve's efforts to fight inflation by raising interest rates could even lead to a recession. However, inflation will decline and the macroeconomic headwinds subside sooner or later. Amazon's financial position is certainly strong enough to weather the storm.More importantly, the company's long-term prospects are bright. E-commerce still has plenty of room to grow. Amazon Web Services could realistically generate more revenue within the next 10 to 15 years than Amazon's entire business does today. Amazon also has tremendous potential in digital advertising, healthcare, and other new markets. I think right now could be a once-in-a-generation buying opportunity with Amazon stock.3. AdobeLike Amazon, Adobe has seen its share price plunge close to 50% since Q4 of 2021. Also like Amazon, the big software company seems to have lost its recent momentum after beginning a solid rebound.Overall economic uncertainty has definitely played a major role in Adobe's dismal stock performance. In September 2022, the company announced plans to acquire collaborative design platform Figma for $20 billion. Investors felt the price tag for the deal was too high, causing Adobe's shares to sink further.But the stock nosedived yet again just a few days ago on news that regulators oppose Adobe's acquisition of Figma. Adobe almost seems to be in a no-win scenario where investors hate it if it buys Figma but also hate it if the deal falls through.I think all of this is simply noise. Adobe's business remains strong. It has great opportunities in extending the AI capabilities of its Creative Cloud platform. Every time in the past when Adobe's shares have fallen as much as they have over the last year or so, the stock has roared back. I expect that history will repeat itself.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":291,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077685232,"gmtCreate":1658506098226,"gmtModify":1676536169470,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏻","listText":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077685232","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":703,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072882097,"gmtCreate":1658016740619,"gmtModify":1676536092926,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072882097","repostId":"1144090895","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144090895","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1657936858,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144090895?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-16 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144090895","media":"VettaFi","summary":"After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets ag","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with bearish or inverse strategies.</p><p>According to JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.’s analysis of futures tracking major stock indexes, asset managers and hedge funds raised bets against U.S. stocks to the highest level since 2016 on fears over a global slowdown, theWall Street Journalreported.</p><p>Additionally, according to a survey by the National Association of Active Investment Managers, the average active investor pared back stock exposure this year and reduced equity allocations to the lowest levels since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>“Everybody’s focused on recession risk,” Parag Thatte, a strategist at Deutsche Bank, told the WSJ.</p><p>Adding to bets of a recession, the bond market’s recession indicator, an inverted yield curve, recently reached its widest level in two decades—the majority of past recessions were preceded by an inverted yield curve or when yields on later-dated bonds dip below yields of short-term debt.</p><p>Meanwhile, many market observers have raised bets that the Federal Reserve will hike interest rates by a full percentage point at the next meeting, something that hasn’t happened in decades, which further added to the belief that policymakers would drag the economy into a slowdown.</p><p>According to Deutsche Bank estimates, investors have now steadily diminished their exposure to stocks to some of the lowest levels of the past 12 years. In addition, bullish bets in the options market among traders slipped to the lowest level since April 2020.</p><p>“We’ve now determined that it’s better to be slightly short rather than long,” Martin Bergin, president at Dunn Capital Management, told the WSJ. “If there’s a bounce, we’ll start to take on more long exposure.”</p><p>ETF traders who are looking to protect their portfolios from potential pullbacks ahead may consider some exposure to bearish or inverse ETFs to hedge against further falls.</p><p>For example, the <b>ProShares Short S&amp;P500 (SH)</b> takes a simple inverse or -100% daily performance of the S&amp;P 500 index. Alternatively, for the more aggressive trader, leveraged options include the<b>ProShares UltraShort S&amp;P500 ETF (SDS)</b>, which tries to reflect -2x or -200% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500, the<b>Direxion Daily S&amp;P 500 Bear 3x Shares (SPXS)</b>, which takes -3x or -300% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500, and the<b>ProShares UltraPro Short S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPXU)</b>, which also takes -300% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Those who want to hedge against risk in the Dow Jones Industrial Average can use inverse ETFs to bolster their long equities positions. The <b>ProShares Short Dow 30 ETF(DOG)</b> tries to reflect -100% of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For more aggressive traders, the <b>ProShares UltraShort Dow 30 ETF (DXD)</b> takes the -200% of the Dow Jones, and the <b>ProShares UltraPro Short Dow 30 (SDOW)</b> reflects the -300% of the Dow.</p><p>Lastly, investors can also hedge against a dipping Nasdaq through bearish options as well. For instance, the <b>ProShares Short QQQ ETF (PSQ)</b> takes the inverse or -100% daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. For the aggressive trader, the <b>ProShares UltraShort QQQ ETF (QID)</b> tracks the double inverse or -200% performance of the Nasdaq-100, and the <b>ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF (SQQQ)</b> reflects the triple inverse or -300% of the Nasdaq-100.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1657246608114","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-16 10:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/><strong>VettaFi</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SH":"标普500反向ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SPXS":"Direxion每日三倍做空标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144090895","content_text":"After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with bearish or inverse strategies.According to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s analysis of futures tracking major stock indexes, asset managers and hedge funds raised bets against U.S. stocks to the highest level since 2016 on fears over a global slowdown, theWall Street Journalreported.Additionally, according to a survey by the National Association of Active Investment Managers, the average active investor pared back stock exposure this year and reduced equity allocations to the lowest levels since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.“Everybody’s focused on recession risk,” Parag Thatte, a strategist at Deutsche Bank, told the WSJ.Adding to bets of a recession, the bond market’s recession indicator, an inverted yield curve, recently reached its widest level in two decades—the majority of past recessions were preceded by an inverted yield curve or when yields on later-dated bonds dip below yields of short-term debt.Meanwhile, many market observers have raised bets that the Federal Reserve will hike interest rates by a full percentage point at the next meeting, something that hasn’t happened in decades, which further added to the belief that policymakers would drag the economy into a slowdown.According to Deutsche Bank estimates, investors have now steadily diminished their exposure to stocks to some of the lowest levels of the past 12 years. In addition, bullish bets in the options market among traders slipped to the lowest level since April 2020.“We’ve now determined that it’s better to be slightly short rather than long,” Martin Bergin, president at Dunn Capital Management, told the WSJ. “If there’s a bounce, we’ll start to take on more long exposure.”ETF traders who are looking to protect their portfolios from potential pullbacks ahead may consider some exposure to bearish or inverse ETFs to hedge against further falls.For example, the ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) takes a simple inverse or -100% daily performance of the S&P 500 index. Alternatively, for the more aggressive trader, leveraged options include theProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF (SDS), which tries to reflect -2x or -200% of the daily performance of the S&P 500, theDirexion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3x Shares (SPXS), which takes -3x or -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500, and theProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 ETF (SPXU), which also takes -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500.Those who want to hedge against risk in the Dow Jones Industrial Average can use inverse ETFs to bolster their long equities positions. The ProShares Short Dow 30 ETF(DOG) tries to reflect -100% of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For more aggressive traders, the ProShares UltraShort Dow 30 ETF (DXD) takes the -200% of the Dow Jones, and the ProShares UltraPro Short Dow 30 (SDOW) reflects the -300% of the Dow.Lastly, investors can also hedge against a dipping Nasdaq through bearish options as well. For instance, the ProShares Short QQQ ETF (PSQ) takes the inverse or -100% daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. For the aggressive trader, the ProShares UltraShort QQQ ETF (QID) tracks the double inverse or -200% performance of the Nasdaq-100, and the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF (SQQQ) reflects the triple inverse or -300% of the Nasdaq-100.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":719,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072888624,"gmtCreate":1658016624368,"gmtModify":1676536092894,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072888624","repostId":"2251641354","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2251641354","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1657930682,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2251641354?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-16 08:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2251641354","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The stocks rallied after large banks reported strong earnings this morning.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>What happened</h2><p>Many large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.</p><p>Shares of the largest bank in the U.S. by assets, <b>JPMorgan Chase</b> (JPM 4.58%), rose more than 4.5% on Friday. Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (MS 4.50%) rose 4.5%, and <b>Goldman Sachs</b> (GS 4.36%) was up 4.3%.</p><h2>So what</h2><p>JPMorgan Chase reported earnings for the second quarter of the year on Thursday and saw its shares sell off after the bank missed analyst estimates for the quarter. Furthermore, JPMorgan said yesterday that it would suspend share repurchases for the time being as it builds capital to prepare for higher regulatory capital requirements in 2023 and 2024.</p><p>Morgan Stanley also reported earnings yesterday and struggled as investment-banking revenue came in lighter than expected. Investors hadn&#39;t been expecting a good quarter, considering that events such as initial public offerings have been very limited all year due to market volatility and uncertainty. Still, the bank missed estimates for investment-banking revenue.</p><p>For this reason, I don&#39;t think investors have had super-high expectations for Goldman Sachs, as it prepares for earnings Monday, considering its large investment banking business.</p><p>But today, investors seemed to reverse course. First, large banks, including <b>Wells Fargo</b> and <b>Citigroup</b>, reported earnings that seemed to please the market, sending shares of both banks surging. Citigroup in particular smashed estimates thanks to a strong performance from its Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) business, which reported its best quarter in a decade. Shares of Citigroup rose more than 13% today.</p><p>Another thing that likely helped bank stocks today was the fact that Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, two of the more-hawkish members of the board, said they supported a 75-basis-point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s next meeting later this month. That seemed to catch the market off-guard in a positive way, because it had been thinking that the Fed could raise interest rates by a full percentage point.</p><p>Earlier this week, new data showed that the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the prices of many consumer goods and services, had risen 9.1% in June on a year-over-year basis, which is more than economists had expected. Investors use the CPI to track inflation, so the extra-hot reading had some on edge about a full-percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Banks benefit from inflation because it is usually accompanied by rising interest rates. But too much inflation hurts consumer finances and slows business activity, which naturally hurts banks because they are linked to the economy.</p><h2>Now what</h2><p>The more aggressive the rate hikes, the greater the likelihood of a recession. Rising rates are also likely to slow consumer and business spending, so the market seemed to be relieved by the 75-basis-point news.</p><p>Bank earnings reports also showed that consumers and businesses remained in solid financial shape in the second quarter.</p><p>I am generally bullish on bank stocks right now after they have been heavily sold off this year. They will benefit from the rising interest rates, have enough capital to withstand a modest recession, and are still seeing strength in the economy -- and even though that last point could change soon, I still like the set-up.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-16 08:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedMany large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.Shares of the largest bank in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","JPM":"摩根大通","BK4581":"高盛持仓","MS":"摩根士丹利","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4504":"桥水持仓","GS":"高盛","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","BK4207":"综合性银行","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2251641354","content_text":"What happenedMany large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.Shares of the largest bank in the U.S. by assets, JPMorgan Chase (JPM 4.58%), rose more than 4.5% on Friday. Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS 4.50%) rose 4.5%, and Goldman Sachs (GS 4.36%) was up 4.3%.So whatJPMorgan Chase reported earnings for the second quarter of the year on Thursday and saw its shares sell off after the bank missed analyst estimates for the quarter. Furthermore, JPMorgan said yesterday that it would suspend share repurchases for the time being as it builds capital to prepare for higher regulatory capital requirements in 2023 and 2024.Morgan Stanley also reported earnings yesterday and struggled as investment-banking revenue came in lighter than expected. Investors hadn't been expecting a good quarter, considering that events such as initial public offerings have been very limited all year due to market volatility and uncertainty. Still, the bank missed estimates for investment-banking revenue.For this reason, I don't think investors have had super-high expectations for Goldman Sachs, as it prepares for earnings Monday, considering its large investment banking business.But today, investors seemed to reverse course. First, large banks, including Wells Fargo and Citigroup, reported earnings that seemed to please the market, sending shares of both banks surging. Citigroup in particular smashed estimates thanks to a strong performance from its Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) business, which reported its best quarter in a decade. Shares of Citigroup rose more than 13% today.Another thing that likely helped bank stocks today was the fact that Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, two of the more-hawkish members of the board, said they supported a 75-basis-point rate hike at the Fed's next meeting later this month. That seemed to catch the market off-guard in a positive way, because it had been thinking that the Fed could raise interest rates by a full percentage point.Earlier this week, new data showed that the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the prices of many consumer goods and services, had risen 9.1% in June on a year-over-year basis, which is more than economists had expected. Investors use the CPI to track inflation, so the extra-hot reading had some on edge about a full-percentage-point rate hike.Banks benefit from inflation because it is usually accompanied by rising interest rates. But too much inflation hurts consumer finances and slows business activity, which naturally hurts banks because they are linked to the economy.Now whatThe more aggressive the rate hikes, the greater the likelihood of a recession. Rising rates are also likely to slow consumer and business spending, so the market seemed to be relieved by the 75-basis-point news.Bank earnings reports also showed that consumers and businesses remained in solid financial shape in the second quarter.I am generally bullish on bank stocks right now after they have been heavily sold off this year. They will benefit from the rising interest rates, have enough capital to withstand a modest recession, and are still seeing strength in the economy -- and even though that last point could change soon, I still like the set-up.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":623,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4113904591642392","authorId":"4113904591642392","name":"LMSunshine","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0ad636f2490d8428fcee9da6d669e46c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4113904591642392","authorIdStr":"4113904591642392"},"content":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app","text":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app","html":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9949934141,"gmtCreate":1678292734084,"gmtModify":1678292737879,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949934141","repostId":"1145781355","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077685232,"gmtCreate":1658506098226,"gmtModify":1676536169470,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏻","listText":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077685232","repostId":"1149295629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149295629","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658478336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149295629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 16:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149295629","media":"thestreet.","summary":"How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn&#39;t entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it&#39;s safe to say that this is one to consider if you&#39;re a risk seeker.</p><p>If you&#39;re looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the <b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b>, the <b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b> and the <b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b>.</p><p>QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It&#39;s currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn&#39;t focused on the S&amp;P 500 or total U.S. stock market.</p><p>QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they&#39;re both the same? We&#39;ll get to that in a minute.</p><p>QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.</p><p>How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let&#39;s break down each of them one by one.</p><p><b>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)</b></p><p>QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It&#39;s been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219e726ef5be4b35e0e31aae57497599\" tg-width=\"1093\" tg-height=\"554\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Profile</span></p><p>I won&#39;t spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it&#39;s relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.</p><p>Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)</b></p><p>QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f741ce0e7dbf24ef416656d1dc5f97a\" tg-width=\"1091\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) Profile</span></p><p>If you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you&#39;re reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There&#39;s no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.</p><p>So, what&#39;s the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.</p><p>You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn&#39;t it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It&#39;s a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it&#39;s already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?</p><p>Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.</p><p>If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.</p><p>The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.</p><p>QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/727505633b58d73a8cadf935bc750c0b\" tg-width=\"444\" tg-height=\"236\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading Spreads</span></p><p>The &#34;average spread&#34; column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it&#39;s so large. QQQM&#39;s spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It&#39;s not nothing, but it&#39;s still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.</p><p>From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.</p><p>That doesn&#39;t mean QQQ can&#39;t still be useful. If you&#39;re trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you&#39;d be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you&#39;re a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.</p><p>QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.</p><p><b>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)</b></p><p>QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abebf8cdb3f7f17d52effc3483ebdc85\" tg-width=\"1092\" tg-height=\"586\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) Profile</span></p><p>The idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you&#39;d be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.</p><p>History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&amp;D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.</p><p>Obviously, there&#39;s no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they&#39;re getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I&#39;ll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don&#39;t have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.</p><p><b>QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset Allocation</b></p><p>Both ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/09389c158258b0176e571b36630c4c5f\" tg-width=\"805\" tg-height=\"406\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Those three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund&#39;s overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b56e3aa118cdcf7f7ef3ac5af8d6248\" tg-width=\"804\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQJ Asset Allocation</span></p><p>Outside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there&#39;s virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>So, what are our investment choices overall?</p><p>QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It&#39;s more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it&#39;s a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.</p><p>QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you&#39;re going to use it for.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e53d4385f3fef5f2017a97962348a9b\" tg-width=\"721\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense Ratios</span></p><p>If you&#39;re a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you&#39;re going to be in and out relatively quickly, it&#39;s better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.</p><p>Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won&#39;t be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.</p><p>Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ: What To Expect From The Big 3 Nasdaq ETFs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 16:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs><strong>thestreet.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","QQQJ":"Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF","QQQM":"Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/qqq-qqqm-qqqj-what-to-expect-big-3-nasdaq-etfs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149295629","content_text":"The Nasdaq was become synonymous with the tech sector, although that comparison isn't entirely fair. About half of the index is dedicated to technology stocks, but with more than 80% of the Nasdaq Composite composed of the big three growth sectors - tech, consumer discretionary and communication services - it's safe to say that this is one to consider if you're a risk seeker.If you're looking to add Nasdaq exposure to your portfolio, there are three primary ETFs that you should consider - the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ), the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) and the Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ).QQQ is the big one that everybody is familiar with. It's currently the 5th largest ETF in the marketplace with more than $150 billion in assets and is the largest that isn't focused on the S&P 500 or total U.S. stock market.QQQM is essentially the same as the QQQ, but with a lower expense ratio. Why would you choose one over the other if they're both the same? We'll get to that in a minute.QQQJ targets the next 100 names below the Nasdaq 100, which QQQ and QQQM are based on. They offer exposure a little different than the others, but have bigger growth potential.How should an investor decide between QQQ, QQQM and QQQJ? Let's break down each of them one by one.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 index. It's been around for more than 20 years and consists of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) ProfileI won't spend any more time talking about the tech-heavy nature of QQQ because most are familiar with it already, but the one thing worth noting for the purpose of this comparison is its expense ratio. At 0.20%, it's relatively inexpensive, but not nearly as cheap as many of the broad market ETFs from the likes of Vanguard and BlackRock, which often have expense ratios of 0.05% or less.Keep that in mind as we take a look at the next ETF on the list.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM)QQQM also tracks the Nasdaq 100 index.Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQM) ProfileIf you just did a double-take reading that last sentence, yes, you're reading it correctly. Invesco operates TWO ETFs that both track the Nasdaq 100. There's no gimmicks, no frills, no hidden fine print. Just two Nasdaq 100 ETFs.So, what's the difference between QQQ and QQQM exactly? The answer is the expense ratio. QQQ charges 0.20% and QQQM charges 0.15%.You may be asking yourself: if Invesco wanted to charge 0.15% for an ETF that tracks the Nasdaq 100, why didn't it just lower the expense ratio on QQQ? It's a good question and the answer, quite simply, is money. Just 0.05%, the difference between the two expense ratios, on a $150 billion asset base is about $75 million in revenue annually. Invesco may not come right out and say it, but why in the world would they give up that kind of revenue when it's already the 5th largest ETF around even with the higher expense ratio?Launching QQQM with a lower expense ratio gives investors the opportunity to achieve the same exposure with a lower cost.If QQQM is available for cheaper than QQQ, does that make QQQ irrelevant? Not exactly.The answer to the question of which ETF you should choose comes down to a couple of things. First, while the expense ratio of QQQM is lower, you have to consider the total cost of ownership. By that, I mean you have to look at the expense ratio as well as the spread. The spread is essentially a measure of liquidity and is the cost of trading shares. Generally speaking, the larger a fund is and the more people it has trading shares, the lower the spread.QQQM has more than $4 billion in assets, which represents strong and consistent growth of assets over time, but QQQ has more than $150 billion. Not surprisingly, its trading costs are lower, but only by a hair.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Trading SpreadsThe \"average spread\" column is the one we want to look at. The spread on QQQ is virtually nothing because it's so large. QQQM's spread, while larger, is still just 2 basis points. It's not nothing, but it's still a very small number. When tallied together, the total cost of ownership for QQQM is 0.17% (the 0.15% expense ratio plus the 0.02% spread) vs. 0.21% for QQQ.From a total cost of ownership perspective, QQQM edges out QQQ.That doesn't mean QQQ can't still be useful. If you're trading a very large block of shares, the liquidity of QQQ could make it the better choice, but you'd be talking a huge block of shares. For most retail investors, it will be a non-issue. If you're a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM holds a slight advantage over QQQ.QQQJ, however, is a whole different story.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ)QQQJ tracks the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 index. It also eliminates financial stocks from consideration and targets the next 100 companies that would potentially be eligible for inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 if they manage to grow large enough.Invesco Nasdaq Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) ProfileThe idea behind buying QQQJ would involve the same logic for why you'd be buying small-caps. You want to get ahead of the curve by buying them before they become large-caps.History shows that about 1/3 of Next Gen 100 members do indeed go on to become eventual members of the Nasdaq 100. These components have historically delivered higher revenue growth, higher dividend growth rates and greater commitments to R&D spending that those of the Nasdaq 100, according to Invesco research.Obviously, there's no overlap between QQQ and QQQJ, but investors should know that they're getting substantially similar sector exposure (with one notable exception, which I'll get into in a moment). Because QQQJ is less than 2 years old, we don't have a lot of history to go off of, but shorter-term volatility measures suggest that the fund is about 20% more volatile than QQQ.QQQ vs. QQQJ Asset AllocationBoth ETFs come in with a heavy tech and growth tilt, but QQQJ finds a lot of bubbling under stocks in the healthcare sector.As mentioned earlier, there is very little in the Nasdaq 100 that falls outside of one of the big three growth sectors.QQQ Asset AllocationThose three sectors are well-represented in QQQJ as well, but it triples the exposure of healthcare to roughly 20% of the fund's overall allocation compared to just over 6% in QQQ.QQQJ Asset AllocationOutside of an 9% weighting to industrials, there's virtually nothing outside of the top 5 sectors. The success of QQQJ will be heavily dependent on growth stocks continuing to perform well, but the sizable allocation to healthcare gives it a bit of a different profile.ConclusionSo, what are our investment choices overall?QQQJ is obviously a different product than the other two, so we can consider that separately. It's more of a classic mid-cap growth ETF with a heavy tech tilt, so this would be appropriate for anyone looking to augment existing tech exposure in their portfolios or someone looking to add a punch of growth to more conservative portfolio. The success of the Next Gen 100 stocks has been proven over time and it's a nice way to be invested in the emerging up-and-comers.QQQ vs. QQQM is a little more nuanced and the choice of which is better really depends on what you're going to use it for.QQQ vs. QQQM vs. QQQJ Expense RatiosIf you're a short-term trader and someone looking for a lot of liquidity in the market, QQQ is probably the better choice. If you're going to be in and out relatively quickly, it's better to go with the ETF with virtually no trading costs instead of taking a chance that you get hit with a higher spread.Longer-term investors would probably benefit from QQQM. The difference between 0.20% and 0.15% is pretty small and we won't be talking a big difference in performance even over the long-term, but why not take advantage of the lower fee if you can get it.Overall, these are three solid ETFs that are all worthy of consideration for your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":703,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949322149,"gmtCreate":1678378608282,"gmtModify":1678378610969,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949322149","repostId":"1167788846","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167788846","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678375382,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167788846?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-09 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Stocks to Avoid Like the Plague as Market Heads Down from Here","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167788846","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"While it’s nice to think that every market idea we buy will become profitable, the harsh reality is ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>While it’s nice to think that every market idea we buy will become profitable, the harsh reality is that we’ll eventually come face-to-face with the concept of stocks to avoid. That’s not a bad thing. Much like our bodies take in the nutrients it needs and discards the stuff it doesn’t, so it is with stocks to sell.</p><p>Basically, you don’t want to hold onto highly risky enterprises indefinitely because of the resultant opportunity cost. In other words, rather than wait around for a low-probability business to turn itself around, you can direct funds toward viable opportunities. Ideally, you shouldn’t burn your cash with troubled enterprises; hence, it’s always good to pay attention to stocks to avoid. Failing that, you should make the tough decision to target going-nowhere stocks to sell.</p><p>Granted, this is a difficult topic so I’ve enlisted the help of investment resourceGurufocus.com. Specifically, I used one filter to narrow down these stocks to avoid – the probability of financial distress. Each of the names below features a distress probability of at least 90%. So, if you’re ready, here are the stocks to sell (or just not bother diving into right now).</p><p><b>Stocks to Avoid: Riot Platforms (RIOT)</b></p><p>A cryptocurrency mining company, <b>Riot Platforms</b>(NASDAQ: <b>RIOT</b>) undoubtedly attracts significant attention. However, it’s time for investors to be realistic about the underlying sector. With digital assets struggling against the Federal Reserve’s commitment to control inflation through interest rate hikes, RIOT faces huge risks. Therefore, it’s one of the stocks to avoid.</p><p>It’s not just about the broader narrative. As Gurufocus.com warns, RIOT may be a possible value trap. Some “paper” metrics might look appealing based on RIOT’s trailing-year loss of over 57%. And to be fair, the company does post impressive stats, such as a cash-rich balance sheet. In addition, its three-year revenue growth rate stands at 57.4%. However, its operating margin fell 9.18% below parity. Right now, Gurufocus.com shows that its net margin plummeted to 133.39% below breakeven. Even the growth rate is questionable. In the fourth quarter of 2022, Riot only posted revenue of $60.1 million, down 34% from the year-ago quarter. Thus, it’s a candidate for stocks to sell.</p><p><b>Stocks to Avoid: Bit Brother (BTB)</b></p><p>As you might imagine from its corporate name, <b>Bit Brother</b>(NASDAQ: <b>BTB</b>) is a digital asset management group. Per its website, Bit Brother talks about fuel transformation with financial technology (fintech) and this and that. However, with various cryptos and blockchain projects imploding over the past year, BTB suffers from a credibility crisis.</p><p>I know it’s not Bit Brother’s fault what happens in its underlying sector. Unfortunately, as an investor, you can’t ignore the threat of public reputational loss. Therefore, if you don’t already have it in your portfolio, BTB represents one of the stocks to avoid. Yes, it’s down 89% in the new year alone. It could still fall more, given its 13% loss in the trailing week. If you need more confirmation, Gurufocus.com warns Bit Brother may be a possible value trap. In fairness, the company features a strong balance sheet. However, its three-year revenue growth rate sits at 64.9% below breakeven. As well, its operating and net margins rate horribly into negative territory. It’s just one of the stocks to sell.</p><p><b>Stocks to Avoid: Canoo (GOEV)</b></p><p>Similar to many other electric vehicle upstarts, <b>Canoo</b>(NASDAQ: <b>GOEV</b>) features a loyal fanbase. If I may be a little bit politically incorrect, if spouses were committed to each other like Canoo shareholders are committed to struggling enterprises, our country would probably be much happier. As it stands, it’s an upside-down world. GOEV gets sustained love, committed partnerships do not.</p><p>While some public securities received a speculative boost in the new year, GOEV did not. In fact, as of this writing, GOEV plunged nearly 44%. And in the past 365 days, it gave up a staggering 86% of equity value. I suppose that speculative fervor could lift GOEV out of the blue. However, no one knows when such an event would materialize. Thus, it’s one of the stocks to avoid. For further confirmation, Canoo effectively represents a pre-revenue enterprise that continues to bleed cash. As well, both its return on equity (ROE) and return on asset (ROA) sit deep in negative territory. Plus, it’s a literal penny stock, making it an all-around troubled entity.</p><p><b>Satellogic (SATL)</b></p><p>Specializing in Earth-observation satellites, <b>Satellogic</b>(NASDAQ: <b>SATL</b>) seems a compelling enterprise. After all, Morgan Stanley analysts reminded us that the underlying space economy could generate revenue of $1 trillion or more in 2040. But as with any new endeavor, there will be winners and there will be losers. Sadly, I believe SATL symbolizes one of the stocks to avoid.</p><p>Let’s look at the chart for starters. Since the beginning of the new year, SATL gave up 21% of its equity value. Not enjoying the positive sentiment rippling throughout the equities sector early in 2023 imposes a bad look for Satellogic. Moreover, in the past 365 days, SATL cratered to the tune of almost 59%.</p><p>To be fair, from a financial perspective, Satellogic offers some positives, such as a strong cash-to-debt ratio. Then again, its Altman Z-Score sits 20.95 below parity, indicating substantial distress. Further, both its operating and net margins fell into the abyss. If that wasn’t enough, the market prices SATL at a trailing multiple of 37.56, which ranks as extremely overvalued. Therefore, it’s one of the stocks to sell.</p><p><b>Cazoo Group (CZOO)</b></p><p>An enterprise that many Americans may not be familiar with, <b>Cazoo Group</b>(NYSE: <b>CZOO</b>) is an online car retailer. Based in London, England, Cazoo’s customers suffer from a familiar headwind: blisteringly high inflation. Further, with the Bank of England raising interest rates, households struggle mightily across the Atlantic. So, that’s one reason CZOO dropped nearly 37% of equity value since the start of the year.</p><p>Another comes down to cost structures. Basically, it’s cheaper to buy a used car via private-party transactions. Further, the convenience of online car shopping invariably carries a premium. Unfortunately, consumers aren’t looking to pay anything more than they must. Fundamentally, this dynamic makes CZOO one of the stocks to avoid.</p><p>Making matters worse, Cazoo features a weak, distressed balance sheet. As well, its operating margin and net margin sit 58% and 66.43% below parity, respectively. That’s just not going to cut it. No wonder, then, why CZOO hemorrhaged 96% over the trailing year. Respectfully, it’s one of the stocks to sell.</p><p><b>Bird Global (BRDS)</b></p><p>Based in Miami, Florida, <b>Bird Global</b>(NYSE: <b>BRDS</b>) represents a micro-mobility company. Specifically, Bird specializes in distributing electric scooters designed for short-term rentals. It has the right idea in terms of implications for climate change and the electrification of movement. Sadly, though, the business doesn’t have any traction.</p><p>About the one positive I can say regarding its price chart is this: on a year-to-date basis, BRDS only slipped less than 1%. However, in the past 365 days, the security plunged by almost 95%. Since its first day trading in the public arena, BRDS fell nearly 98%. Also, it’s a literal penny stock, trading at 20 cents a pop at the time of writing. Unfortunately, a delisting will be in the cards unless Bird does something dramatic. Outside of a reverse split, I just don’t know what else substantively can be done. For one thing, Bird features a distressed balance sheet. And its profit (operating and net) margins sank deep into negative territory. You gotta call it like it is – it’s one of the stocks to avoid.</p><p><b>Advanced Health Intelligence (AHI)</b></p><p>On the surface, <b>Advanced Health Intelligence</b>(NASDAQ: <b>AHI</b>) initially seems like a compelling enterprise. Per its website, Advanced Health offers biometric-enabled, data-driven health solutions. Then it goes on to say something about acceleration and platforms and cohort risk modeling. Bluntly, when a company can’t explain what it does in simple terms right off the bat, I get annoyed.</p><p>Having said that, it appears quite a lot of investors are annoyed with AHI as well. True, since the Jan. opener, it gained almost 5% of its equity value. However, that won’t make up for the trailing-year loss exceeding 49%. And since making its public market debut, AHI plunged over 89%. Just from that, it’s one of the stocks to avoid.</p><p>Financially, AHI is a mess. For instance, its Altman Z-Score of 8.78 below parity reflects significant distress. In addition, it features a three-year EBITDA growth rate of 35% below breakeven. Not surprisingly, both its operating and net margins fell into basically incalculable magnitudes of negativity. It’s facing a delisting and therefore, it’s one of the stocks to sell.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Stocks to Avoid Like the Plague as Market Heads Down from Here</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Stocks to Avoid Like the Plague as Market Heads Down from Here\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-09 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2023/03/7-stocks-to-avoid-like-the-plague-as-market-heads-down-from-here/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While it’s nice to think that every market idea we buy will become profitable, the harsh reality is that we’ll eventually come face-to-face with the concept of stocks to avoid. That’s not a bad thing....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/7-stocks-to-avoid-like-the-plague-as-market-heads-down-from-here/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIOT":"Riot Platforms","BRDS":"Bird Global","GOEV":"Canoo Inc.","SATL":"Satellogic","CZOO":"Cazoo","AHI":"ADVANCED HEALTH INTELLIGENCE LTD SPON ADS EACH REP 7 ORD SHS"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/7-stocks-to-avoid-like-the-plague-as-market-heads-down-from-here/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167788846","content_text":"While it’s nice to think that every market idea we buy will become profitable, the harsh reality is that we’ll eventually come face-to-face with the concept of stocks to avoid. That’s not a bad thing. Much like our bodies take in the nutrients it needs and discards the stuff it doesn’t, so it is with stocks to sell.Basically, you don’t want to hold onto highly risky enterprises indefinitely because of the resultant opportunity cost. In other words, rather than wait around for a low-probability business to turn itself around, you can direct funds toward viable opportunities. Ideally, you shouldn’t burn your cash with troubled enterprises; hence, it’s always good to pay attention to stocks to avoid. Failing that, you should make the tough decision to target going-nowhere stocks to sell.Granted, this is a difficult topic so I’ve enlisted the help of investment resourceGurufocus.com. Specifically, I used one filter to narrow down these stocks to avoid – the probability of financial distress. Each of the names below features a distress probability of at least 90%. So, if you’re ready, here are the stocks to sell (or just not bother diving into right now).Stocks to Avoid: Riot Platforms (RIOT)A cryptocurrency mining company, Riot Platforms(NASDAQ: RIOT) undoubtedly attracts significant attention. However, it’s time for investors to be realistic about the underlying sector. With digital assets struggling against the Federal Reserve’s commitment to control inflation through interest rate hikes, RIOT faces huge risks. Therefore, it’s one of the stocks to avoid.It’s not just about the broader narrative. As Gurufocus.com warns, RIOT may be a possible value trap. Some “paper” metrics might look appealing based on RIOT’s trailing-year loss of over 57%. And to be fair, the company does post impressive stats, such as a cash-rich balance sheet. In addition, its three-year revenue growth rate stands at 57.4%. However, its operating margin fell 9.18% below parity. Right now, Gurufocus.com shows that its net margin plummeted to 133.39% below breakeven. Even the growth rate is questionable. In the fourth quarter of 2022, Riot only posted revenue of $60.1 million, down 34% from the year-ago quarter. Thus, it’s a candidate for stocks to sell.Stocks to Avoid: Bit Brother (BTB)As you might imagine from its corporate name, Bit Brother(NASDAQ: BTB) is a digital asset management group. Per its website, Bit Brother talks about fuel transformation with financial technology (fintech) and this and that. However, with various cryptos and blockchain projects imploding over the past year, BTB suffers from a credibility crisis.I know it’s not Bit Brother’s fault what happens in its underlying sector. Unfortunately, as an investor, you can’t ignore the threat of public reputational loss. Therefore, if you don’t already have it in your portfolio, BTB represents one of the stocks to avoid. Yes, it’s down 89% in the new year alone. It could still fall more, given its 13% loss in the trailing week. If you need more confirmation, Gurufocus.com warns Bit Brother may be a possible value trap. In fairness, the company features a strong balance sheet. However, its three-year revenue growth rate sits at 64.9% below breakeven. As well, its operating and net margins rate horribly into negative territory. It’s just one of the stocks to sell.Stocks to Avoid: Canoo (GOEV)Similar to many other electric vehicle upstarts, Canoo(NASDAQ: GOEV) features a loyal fanbase. If I may be a little bit politically incorrect, if spouses were committed to each other like Canoo shareholders are committed to struggling enterprises, our country would probably be much happier. As it stands, it’s an upside-down world. GOEV gets sustained love, committed partnerships do not.While some public securities received a speculative boost in the new year, GOEV did not. In fact, as of this writing, GOEV plunged nearly 44%. And in the past 365 days, it gave up a staggering 86% of equity value. I suppose that speculative fervor could lift GOEV out of the blue. However, no one knows when such an event would materialize. Thus, it’s one of the stocks to avoid. For further confirmation, Canoo effectively represents a pre-revenue enterprise that continues to bleed cash. As well, both its return on equity (ROE) and return on asset (ROA) sit deep in negative territory. Plus, it’s a literal penny stock, making it an all-around troubled entity.Satellogic (SATL)Specializing in Earth-observation satellites, Satellogic(NASDAQ: SATL) seems a compelling enterprise. After all, Morgan Stanley analysts reminded us that the underlying space economy could generate revenue of $1 trillion or more in 2040. But as with any new endeavor, there will be winners and there will be losers. Sadly, I believe SATL symbolizes one of the stocks to avoid.Let’s look at the chart for starters. Since the beginning of the new year, SATL gave up 21% of its equity value. Not enjoying the positive sentiment rippling throughout the equities sector early in 2023 imposes a bad look for Satellogic. Moreover, in the past 365 days, SATL cratered to the tune of almost 59%.To be fair, from a financial perspective, Satellogic offers some positives, such as a strong cash-to-debt ratio. Then again, its Altman Z-Score sits 20.95 below parity, indicating substantial distress. Further, both its operating and net margins fell into the abyss. If that wasn’t enough, the market prices SATL at a trailing multiple of 37.56, which ranks as extremely overvalued. Therefore, it’s one of the stocks to sell.Cazoo Group (CZOO)An enterprise that many Americans may not be familiar with, Cazoo Group(NYSE: CZOO) is an online car retailer. Based in London, England, Cazoo’s customers suffer from a familiar headwind: blisteringly high inflation. Further, with the Bank of England raising interest rates, households struggle mightily across the Atlantic. So, that’s one reason CZOO dropped nearly 37% of equity value since the start of the year.Another comes down to cost structures. Basically, it’s cheaper to buy a used car via private-party transactions. Further, the convenience of online car shopping invariably carries a premium. Unfortunately, consumers aren’t looking to pay anything more than they must. Fundamentally, this dynamic makes CZOO one of the stocks to avoid.Making matters worse, Cazoo features a weak, distressed balance sheet. As well, its operating margin and net margin sit 58% and 66.43% below parity, respectively. That’s just not going to cut it. No wonder, then, why CZOO hemorrhaged 96% over the trailing year. Respectfully, it’s one of the stocks to sell.Bird Global (BRDS)Based in Miami, Florida, Bird Global(NYSE: BRDS) represents a micro-mobility company. Specifically, Bird specializes in distributing electric scooters designed for short-term rentals. It has the right idea in terms of implications for climate change and the electrification of movement. Sadly, though, the business doesn’t have any traction.About the one positive I can say regarding its price chart is this: on a year-to-date basis, BRDS only slipped less than 1%. However, in the past 365 days, the security plunged by almost 95%. Since its first day trading in the public arena, BRDS fell nearly 98%. Also, it’s a literal penny stock, trading at 20 cents a pop at the time of writing. Unfortunately, a delisting will be in the cards unless Bird does something dramatic. Outside of a reverse split, I just don’t know what else substantively can be done. For one thing, Bird features a distressed balance sheet. And its profit (operating and net) margins sank deep into negative territory. You gotta call it like it is – it’s one of the stocks to avoid.Advanced Health Intelligence (AHI)On the surface, Advanced Health Intelligence(NASDAQ: AHI) initially seems like a compelling enterprise. Per its website, Advanced Health offers biometric-enabled, data-driven health solutions. Then it goes on to say something about acceleration and platforms and cohort risk modeling. Bluntly, when a company can’t explain what it does in simple terms right off the bat, I get annoyed.Having said that, it appears quite a lot of investors are annoyed with AHI as well. True, since the Jan. opener, it gained almost 5% of its equity value. However, that won’t make up for the trailing-year loss exceeding 49%. And since making its public market debut, AHI plunged over 89%. Just from that, it’s one of the stocks to avoid.Financially, AHI is a mess. For instance, its Altman Z-Score of 8.78 below parity reflects significant distress. In addition, it features a three-year EBITDA growth rate of 35% below breakeven. Not surprisingly, both its operating and net margins fell into basically incalculable magnitudes of negativity. It’s facing a delisting and therefore, it’s one of the stocks to sell.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072882097,"gmtCreate":1658016740619,"gmtModify":1676536092926,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072882097","repostId":"1144090895","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":719,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072888624,"gmtCreate":1658016624368,"gmtModify":1676536092894,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072888624","repostId":"2251641354","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2251641354","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1657930682,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2251641354?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-16 08:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2251641354","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The stocks rallied after large banks reported strong earnings this morning.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>What happened</h2><p>Many large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.</p><p>Shares of the largest bank in the U.S. by assets, <b>JPMorgan Chase</b> (JPM 4.58%), rose more than 4.5% on Friday. Shares of <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a></b> (MS 4.50%) rose 4.5%, and <b>Goldman Sachs</b> (GS 4.36%) was up 4.3%.</p><h2>So what</h2><p>JPMorgan Chase reported earnings for the second quarter of the year on Thursday and saw its shares sell off after the bank missed analyst estimates for the quarter. Furthermore, JPMorgan said yesterday that it would suspend share repurchases for the time being as it builds capital to prepare for higher regulatory capital requirements in 2023 and 2024.</p><p>Morgan Stanley also reported earnings yesterday and struggled as investment-banking revenue came in lighter than expected. Investors hadn&#39;t been expecting a good quarter, considering that events such as initial public offerings have been very limited all year due to market volatility and uncertainty. Still, the bank missed estimates for investment-banking revenue.</p><p>For this reason, I don&#39;t think investors have had super-high expectations for Goldman Sachs, as it prepares for earnings Monday, considering its large investment banking business.</p><p>But today, investors seemed to reverse course. First, large banks, including <b>Wells Fargo</b> and <b>Citigroup</b>, reported earnings that seemed to please the market, sending shares of both banks surging. Citigroup in particular smashed estimates thanks to a strong performance from its Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) business, which reported its best quarter in a decade. Shares of Citigroup rose more than 13% today.</p><p>Another thing that likely helped bank stocks today was the fact that Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, two of the more-hawkish members of the board, said they supported a 75-basis-point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s next meeting later this month. That seemed to catch the market off-guard in a positive way, because it had been thinking that the Fed could raise interest rates by a full percentage point.</p><p>Earlier this week, new data showed that the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the prices of many consumer goods and services, had risen 9.1% in June on a year-over-year basis, which is more than economists had expected. Investors use the CPI to track inflation, so the extra-hot reading had some on edge about a full-percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Banks benefit from inflation because it is usually accompanied by rising interest rates. But too much inflation hurts consumer finances and slows business activity, which naturally hurts banks because they are linked to the economy.</p><h2>Now what</h2><p>The more aggressive the rate hikes, the greater the likelihood of a recession. Rising rates are also likely to slow consumer and business spending, so the market seemed to be relieved by the 75-basis-point news.</p><p>Bank earnings reports also showed that consumers and businesses remained in solid financial shape in the second quarter.</p><p>I am generally bullish on bank stocks right now after they have been heavily sold off this year. They will benefit from the rising interest rates, have enough capital to withstand a modest recession, and are still seeing strength in the economy -- and even though that last point could change soon, I still like the set-up.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Shares of JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs Rose on Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-16 08:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedMany large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.Shares of the largest bank in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","JPM":"摩根大通","BK4581":"高盛持仓","MS":"摩根士丹利","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4504":"桥水持仓","GS":"高盛","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","BK4207":"综合性银行","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/15/why-shares-of-jpmorgan-chase-morgan-stanley-and-go/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2251641354","content_text":"What happenedMany large bank stocks rose today after several banks presented strong earnings reports this morning, and as the market got some good news on interest rates.Shares of the largest bank in the U.S. by assets, JPMorgan Chase (JPM 4.58%), rose more than 4.5% on Friday. Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS 4.50%) rose 4.5%, and Goldman Sachs (GS 4.36%) was up 4.3%.So whatJPMorgan Chase reported earnings for the second quarter of the year on Thursday and saw its shares sell off after the bank missed analyst estimates for the quarter. Furthermore, JPMorgan said yesterday that it would suspend share repurchases for the time being as it builds capital to prepare for higher regulatory capital requirements in 2023 and 2024.Morgan Stanley also reported earnings yesterday and struggled as investment-banking revenue came in lighter than expected. Investors hadn't been expecting a good quarter, considering that events such as initial public offerings have been very limited all year due to market volatility and uncertainty. Still, the bank missed estimates for investment-banking revenue.For this reason, I don't think investors have had super-high expectations for Goldman Sachs, as it prepares for earnings Monday, considering its large investment banking business.But today, investors seemed to reverse course. First, large banks, including Wells Fargo and Citigroup, reported earnings that seemed to please the market, sending shares of both banks surging. Citigroup in particular smashed estimates thanks to a strong performance from its Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) business, which reported its best quarter in a decade. Shares of Citigroup rose more than 13% today.Another thing that likely helped bank stocks today was the fact that Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, two of the more-hawkish members of the board, said they supported a 75-basis-point rate hike at the Fed's next meeting later this month. That seemed to catch the market off-guard in a positive way, because it had been thinking that the Fed could raise interest rates by a full percentage point.Earlier this week, new data showed that the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which tracks the prices of many consumer goods and services, had risen 9.1% in June on a year-over-year basis, which is more than economists had expected. Investors use the CPI to track inflation, so the extra-hot reading had some on edge about a full-percentage-point rate hike.Banks benefit from inflation because it is usually accompanied by rising interest rates. But too much inflation hurts consumer finances and slows business activity, which naturally hurts banks because they are linked to the economy.Now whatThe more aggressive the rate hikes, the greater the likelihood of a recession. Rising rates are also likely to slow consumer and business spending, so the market seemed to be relieved by the 75-basis-point news.Bank earnings reports also showed that consumers and businesses remained in solid financial shape in the second quarter.I am generally bullish on bank stocks right now after they have been heavily sold off this year. They will benefit from the rising interest rates, have enough capital to withstand a modest recession, and are still seeing strength in the economy -- and even though that last point could change soon, I still like the set-up.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":623,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4113904591642392","authorId":"4113904591642392","name":"LMSunshine","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0ad636f2490d8428fcee9da6d669e46c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4113904591642392","authorIdStr":"4113904591642392"},"content":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app","text":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app","html":"Thx for sharing 🤗 Wrote a few posts on US stocks & ETF, u can check them out. Hope they help with your investments 🤓 U can follow me too & my new posts will appear in your “follow” tab in the app"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940747068,"gmtCreate":1678204861055,"gmtModify":1678205605922,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940747068","repostId":"2317812168","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":291,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949690355,"gmtCreate":1678549254578,"gmtModify":1678549257426,"author":{"id":"4121071060669522","authorId":"4121071060669522","name":"Junee922","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6fcfdf2823133dca439d02084c599f96","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4121071060669522","authorIdStr":"4121071060669522"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949690355","repostId":"2318756317","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2318756317","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1678504230,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2318756317?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-11 11:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Roku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2318756317","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash a","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ROKU\">Roku</a> stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/516d1d9757defc851236a69c62cfcbec\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"630\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Roku has total cash and equivalents of $1.9B, of which $487M was held at SVB - deposits that are &#34;largely uninsured.&#34;</p><p>&#34;At this time, the Company does not know to what extent the Company will be able to recover its cash on deposit at SVB,&#34; Roku said.</p><p>The FDIC was appointed as receiver for SVB, and as for uninsured depositors like Roku, they&#39;re expected to get an advance dividend within the next week, the company said, with the prospect of future dividends.</p><p>Despite the bank&#39;s closure, Roku &#34;continues to believe that its existing cash and cash equivalents balance and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet its working capital, capital expenditures, and material cash requirements from known contractual obligations&#34; for the next year and beyond.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Roku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRoku Slips As It Discloses 26% of Cash Was Held at Failed Silicon Valley Bank\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-11 11:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.Roku ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ROKU":"Roku Inc"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3946619-roku-slips-as-it-discloses-26-of-cash-was-held-at-failed-silicon-valley-bank","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2318756317","content_text":"Roku stock turned 3% lower after hours after the company stated that it held about 26% of its cash and equivalents at Silicon Valley Bank, which failed Friday and was closed down by California.Roku has total cash and equivalents of $1.9B, of which $487M was held at SVB - deposits that are \"largely uninsured.\"\"At this time, the Company does not know to what extent the Company will be able to recover its cash on deposit at SVB,\" Roku said.The FDIC was appointed as receiver for SVB, and as for uninsured depositors like Roku, they're expected to get an advance dividend within the next week, the company said, with the prospect of future dividends.Despite the bank's closure, Roku \"continues to believe that its existing cash and cash equivalents balance and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet its working capital, capital expenditures, and material cash requirements from known contractual obligations\" for the next year and beyond.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":392,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}