Kerop personal page - To The Moon

Kerop

No personal profile

4Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

03-23

time to buy

Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce

03-11

Trump should be checked for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.

Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%

02-15

what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.

OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer

02-11

The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.

NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January

02-09

time to invest in Crypto..

Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.

01-27

most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point

Sorry, the original content has been removed

01-09

too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem

Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'

01-09

appropriate answer!

Sorry, the original content has been removed

01-08

a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2024-12-28

giving money to banks? No thank you

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

Invest in Global Markets with Tiger Brokers!

Open App

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4179269729720672","uuid":"4179269729720672","gmtCreate":1716166591347,"gmtModify":1716172257838,"name":"Kerop","pinyin":"kerop","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":11,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":1,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.20","exceedPercentage":"80.89%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.07","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":416784397529512,"gmtCreate":1742762160919,"gmtModify":1742762165065,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"time to buy","listText":"time to buy","text":"time to buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/416784397529512","repostId":"2521659219","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2521659219","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1742691657,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2521659219?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-03-23 09:00","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2521659219","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto  traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metri","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-23 09:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSTR":"Strategy","NCTY":"第九城市","FBTC":"Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund","BK4601":"加密货币现货ETF","BITB":"Bitwise Bitcoin ETF","CLSK":"CleanSpark, Inc.","BITO":"ProShares Bitcoin ETF","CAN":"嘉楠科技","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4594":"比特币ETF概念","BK1611":"加密货币现货ETF","BRRR":"Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund","SOS":"SOS Limited","IBIT":"iShares Bitcoin Trust","BTCO":"Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BK4588":"碎股","BTCW":"WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund","ARKB":"ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","DEFI":"Hashdex Bitcoin ETF","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc.","EZBC":"Franklin Bitcoin ETF","BTM":"Bitcoin Depot Inc.","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","BTCM":"BIT Mining","HODL":"VanEck Bitcoin Trust ETF","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2521659219","content_text":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.Fears around the uncertainty of Trump's tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn't appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.\"The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,\" he said.Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump's policy announcements, which \"creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,\" Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin's network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":412663614689712,"gmtCreate":1741718853668,"gmtModify":1741730861854,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","listText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","text":"Trump should be checked for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/412663614689712","repostId":"1150425526","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150425526","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1741702723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150425526?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-03-11 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150425526","media":"Reuters","summary":"President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total tariff on those products to 50%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-11 22:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150425526","content_text":"President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.\"Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,\" Trump wrote.He also threatened to \"substantially increase\" tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 \"if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403691449000128,"gmtCreate":1739581990114,"gmtModify":1739581993278,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","listText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","text":"what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403691449000128","repostId":"2511461008","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2511461008","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739576981,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2511461008?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-02-15 07:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2511461008","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Mu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-15 07:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250214:nL4N3P51LZ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2511461008","content_text":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Musk's latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.\"OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk's latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,\" OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a \"no thank you\" on X, prompting Musk to retort: \"swindler.\"The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI's non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire's lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.\"Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients' much publicized 'bid' is in fact not a bid at all,\" the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk's lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.After Musk's departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":402305318322864,"gmtCreate":1739246667822,"gmtModify":1739264360112,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","listText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","text":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/402305318322864","repostId":"2510608298","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2510608298","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739206811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2510608298?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-02-11 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2510608298","media":"Reuters","summary":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby","content":"<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-11 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0211331839.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL GLB DISCOVERY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","BK4588":"碎股","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4580":"工业 4.0","PH":"汉尼汾","BK4161":"工业机械"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250210:nL1N3P10RQ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2510608298","content_text":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby\nNEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable softening in future spending plans. The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found a very sharp rise in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. The New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda features a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. In a separate report on Monday, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci) ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4195362055063892","authorId":"4195362055063892","name":"Tigerous","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1cc88e6e01866542324985e4c7ce6394","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4195362055063892","authorIdStr":"4195362055063892"},"content":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","text":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","html":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":401658709819680,"gmtCreate":1739088520545,"gmtModify":1739088525028,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"time to invest in Crypto..","listText":"time to invest in Crypto..","text":"time to invest in Crypto..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/401658709819680","repostId":"2509037372","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2509037372","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1739066193,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2509037372?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-02-09 09:56","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2509037372","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'. As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out?That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\". Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-09 09:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2509037372","content_text":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It's fine, it's OK, but it would have been very much better,\" Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\"Similarly, Trump's nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country \"had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.\" In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an \"all-tariff policy\" that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country's improving standing wasn't primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was \"certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,\" said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that's not what Trump said, the professor added. \"He said that we were at our richest. That's not true,\" Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it's much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita \"sounds fancy,\" it basically shows the average household's income.Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.Senik said it's possible that because there's such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are \"economically destructive,\" Trump has looked for \"other outside sources of validation.\"\"He seems to believe he's found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,\" Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it's odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs \"pretty much from the country's founding.\" A federal income tax didn't come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and \"very few protections for workers,\" Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.\"The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can't run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,\" the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.It wasn't the tariffsTrump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America's strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.\"That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,\" said Robert W. Merry, the author of \"President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.\"Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state's John B. Allen - is instructive.\"He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn't the end-all and be-all,\" Merry told MarketWatch. \"I think that's one of the things that Trump doesn't quite understand.\"\"There were a lot of causes to America's rise. Tariffs were not the reason,\" added UC Davis's Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. \"To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.\"Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.\"It's worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,\" he said. \"If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we'll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.\"Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union's products.On Monday, China's retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump's new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.Supporters of Trump's tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they're an \"essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":289,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":397113565024416,"gmtCreate":1737976857810,"gmtModify":1737976861676,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","listText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","text":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/397113565024416","repostId":"1175396672","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":460,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390718798852184,"gmtCreate":1736419263602,"gmtModify":1736421004287,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","listText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","text":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390718798852184","repostId":"2502542083","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2502542083","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1736394619,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2502542083?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-01-09 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2502542083","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for g","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-09 11:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","LUNR":"Intuitive Machines","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","AMC":"AMC院线","LU2083900584.USD":"HSBC GIF US INCOME FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","NVDA":"英伟达","IBKR":"盈透证券","RGTI":"Rigetti Computing","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","ENVX":"Enovix Corporation","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","NNE":"NANO Nuclear Energy Inc","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","ACHR":"Archer Aviation Inc.","MSTR":"Strategy","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","BK4182":"重型电气设备","QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","LU0225283273.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4591":"室温超导概念","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","SMR":"NuScale Power","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2502542083","content_text":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. $(NVDA)$ chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like Rigetti Computing Inc. and IonQ Inc. $(IONQ)$Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including Quantum Computing Inc., saw similarly severe declines.But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. $(IBKR)$ founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group $(GS)$.\"The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,\" Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. \"They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that's starting to unwind.\"A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation $(ACHR)$ down nearly 6%.Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. $(NNE)$ fell more than 11%, while NuScale Power Corp. $(SMR.AU)$ was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. $(XTIA)$ got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho's Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn't as active on Wednesday.According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.\"This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,\" he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. $(GME)$ and AMC Entertainment Holdings $(AMC)$ soar in early 2021.Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump's victory appeared to unleash \"animal spirits\" in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.Recent froth in markets hasn't been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him & Hers Inc. $(HIMS)$, SEALSQ Corp. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. $(ENVX)$ soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.\"There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,\" Klymochko at Accelerate said.The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.\"Rising rates may have changed the overall market's calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren't a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,\" Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.\"Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.\"To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, MicroStrategy Inc. $(MSTR.AU)$ has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market's speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump's electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.The S&P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390536069038424,"gmtCreate":1736390688414,"gmtModify":1736391868999,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"appropriate answer!","listText":"appropriate answer!","text":"appropriate answer!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390536069038424","repostId":"2502600701","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":427,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390562892755072,"gmtCreate":1736370848938,"gmtModify":1736374420748,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","listText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","text":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390562892755072","repostId":"1154525879","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":891,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386475574419968,"gmtCreate":1735395032956,"gmtModify":1735443166836,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","listText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","text":"giving money to banks? No thank you","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/386475574419968","repostId":"1175058181","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":928,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":402305318322864,"gmtCreate":1739246667822,"gmtModify":1739264360112,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","listText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","text":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/402305318322864","repostId":"2510608298","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2510608298","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739206811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2510608298?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-02-11 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2510608298","media":"Reuters","summary":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby","content":"<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-11 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0211331839.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL GLB DISCOVERY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","BK4588":"碎股","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4580":"工业 4.0","PH":"汉尼汾","BK4161":"工业机械"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250210:nL1N3P10RQ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2510608298","content_text":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby\nNEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable softening in future spending plans. The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found a very sharp rise in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. The New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda features a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. In a separate report on Monday, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci) ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4195362055063892","authorId":"4195362055063892","name":"Tigerous","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1cc88e6e01866542324985e4c7ce6394","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4195362055063892","authorIdStr":"4195362055063892"},"content":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","text":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","html":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390562892755072,"gmtCreate":1736370848938,"gmtModify":1736374420748,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","listText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","text":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390562892755072","repostId":"1154525879","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":891,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403691449000128,"gmtCreate":1739581990114,"gmtModify":1739581993278,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","listText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","text":"what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403691449000128","repostId":"2511461008","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":401658709819680,"gmtCreate":1739088520545,"gmtModify":1739088525028,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"time to invest in Crypto..","listText":"time to invest in Crypto..","text":"time to invest in Crypto..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/401658709819680","repostId":"2509037372","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2509037372","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1739066193,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2509037372?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-02-09 09:56","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2509037372","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'. As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out?That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\". Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-09 09:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2509037372","content_text":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It's fine, it's OK, but it would have been very much better,\" Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\"Similarly, Trump's nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country \"had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.\" In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an \"all-tariff policy\" that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country's improving standing wasn't primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was \"certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,\" said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that's not what Trump said, the professor added. \"He said that we were at our richest. That's not true,\" Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it's much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita \"sounds fancy,\" it basically shows the average household's income.Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.Senik said it's possible that because there's such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are \"economically destructive,\" Trump has looked for \"other outside sources of validation.\"\"He seems to believe he's found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,\" Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it's odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs \"pretty much from the country's founding.\" A federal income tax didn't come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and \"very few protections for workers,\" Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.\"The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can't run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,\" the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.It wasn't the tariffsTrump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America's strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.\"That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,\" said Robert W. Merry, the author of \"President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.\"Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state's John B. Allen - is instructive.\"He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn't the end-all and be-all,\" Merry told MarketWatch. \"I think that's one of the things that Trump doesn't quite understand.\"\"There were a lot of causes to America's rise. Tariffs were not the reason,\" added UC Davis's Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. \"To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.\"Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.\"It's worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,\" he said. \"If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we'll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.\"Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union's products.On Monday, China's retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump's new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.Supporters of Trump's tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they're an \"essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":289,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":397113565024416,"gmtCreate":1737976857810,"gmtModify":1737976861676,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","listText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","text":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/397113565024416","repostId":"1175396672","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":460,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386475574419968,"gmtCreate":1735395032956,"gmtModify":1735443166836,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","listText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","text":"giving money to banks? No thank you","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/386475574419968","repostId":"1175058181","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":928,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":416784397529512,"gmtCreate":1742762160919,"gmtModify":1742762165065,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"time to buy","listText":"time to buy","text":"time to buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/416784397529512","repostId":"2521659219","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2521659219","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1742691657,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2521659219?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-03-23 09:00","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2521659219","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto  traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metri","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-23 09:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSTR":"Strategy","NCTY":"第九城市","FBTC":"Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund","BK4601":"加密货币现货ETF","BITB":"Bitwise Bitcoin ETF","CLSK":"CleanSpark, Inc.","BITO":"ProShares Bitcoin ETF","CAN":"嘉楠科技","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4594":"比特币ETF概念","BK1611":"加密货币现货ETF","BRRR":"Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund","SOS":"SOS Limited","IBIT":"iShares Bitcoin Trust","BTCO":"Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF","MARA":"MARA Holdings","EBON":"亿邦国际","BK4588":"碎股","BTCW":"WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund","ARKB":"ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","DEFI":"Hashdex Bitcoin ETF","BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc.","EZBC":"Franklin Bitcoin ETF","BTM":"Bitcoin Depot Inc.","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","BTCM":"BIT Mining","HODL":"VanEck Bitcoin Trust ETF","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2521659219","content_text":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.Fears around the uncertainty of Trump's tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn't appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.\"The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,\" he said.Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump's policy announcements, which \"creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,\" Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin's network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390536069038424,"gmtCreate":1736390688414,"gmtModify":1736391868999,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"appropriate answer!","listText":"appropriate answer!","text":"appropriate answer!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390536069038424","repostId":"2502600701","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":427,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":412663614689712,"gmtCreate":1741718853668,"gmtModify":1741730861854,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","listText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","text":"Trump should be checked for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/412663614689712","repostId":"1150425526","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150425526","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1741702723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150425526?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-03-11 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150425526","media":"Reuters","summary":"President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total tariff on those products to 50%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-11 22:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150425526","content_text":"President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.\"Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,\" Trump wrote.He also threatened to \"substantially increase\" tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 \"if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":60,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390718798852184,"gmtCreate":1736419263602,"gmtModify":1736421004287,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","listText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","text":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390718798852184","repostId":"2502542083","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2502542083","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1736394619,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2502542083?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2025-01-09 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2502542083","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for g","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-09 11:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","LUNR":"Intuitive Machines","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","AMC":"AMC院线","LU2083900584.USD":"HSBC GIF US INCOME FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","NVDA":"英伟达","IBKR":"盈透证券","RGTI":"Rigetti Computing","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","ENVX":"Enovix Corporation","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","NNE":"NANO Nuclear Energy Inc","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","ACHR":"Archer Aviation Inc.","MSTR":"Strategy","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","BK4182":"重型电气设备","QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","LU0225283273.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4591":"室温超导概念","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","SMR":"NuScale Power","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2502542083","content_text":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. $(NVDA)$ chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like Rigetti Computing Inc. and IonQ Inc. $(IONQ)$Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including Quantum Computing Inc., saw similarly severe declines.But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. $(IBKR)$ founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group $(GS)$.\"The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,\" Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. \"They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that's starting to unwind.\"A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation $(ACHR)$ down nearly 6%.Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. $(NNE)$ fell more than 11%, while NuScale Power Corp. $(SMR.AU)$ was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. $(XTIA)$ got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho's Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn't as active on Wednesday.According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.\"This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,\" he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. $(GME)$ and AMC Entertainment Holdings $(AMC)$ soar in early 2021.Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump's victory appeared to unleash \"animal spirits\" in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.Recent froth in markets hasn't been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him & Hers Inc. $(HIMS)$, SEALSQ Corp. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. $(ENVX)$ soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.\"There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,\" Klymochko at Accelerate said.The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.\"Rising rates may have changed the overall market's calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren't a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,\" Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.\"Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.\"To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, MicroStrategy Inc. $(MSTR.AU)$ has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market's speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump's electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.The S&P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":681,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}