Kerop personal page - To The Moon

Kerop

No personal profile

5Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2025-02-11

The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.

NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January

2025-04-05

great article

Trump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser

2025-01-09

a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues

Quantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%

06-19

Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel."Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment." — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..

Intel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production

2025-04-12

this shows how China is much smarter than US

Texas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips

2025-02-15

what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.

OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer

2025-02-09

time to invest in Crypto..

Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.

2025-01-27

most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point

Nasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%

2024-12-28

giving money to banks? No thank you

Wall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points

2025-11-13

She said everyone should buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.

Cathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4179269729720672","uuid":"4179269729720672","gmtCreate":1716166591347,"gmtModify":1716172257838,"name":"Kerop","pinyin":"kerop","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":5,"tweetSize":18,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":1,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.05.13","exceedPercentage":"93.84%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":1},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":"60.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":2},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.07","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":3},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.05.13","exceedPercentage":"93.05%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":1},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":576693234184848,"gmtCreate":1781819052007,"gmtModify":1781820409287,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","listText":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","text":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/576693234184848","repostId":"2644748387","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2644748387","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1781775354,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2644748387?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-06-18 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2644748387","media":"Reuters","summary":"June 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth ‌Social post on Thursday that Apple had agreed to work with Intel to design and build its chips in the ⁠United States.Intel shares...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d782a60f7d1804b32736c8a9fa3f879a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"615\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has agreed to work with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c2e4611565eb783c390ebabdced5b3a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"1065\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters&#39; request for comments outside regular business hours.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world&#39;s largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump previously said he &#34;should have asked for more&#34; of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government&#39;s Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-06-18 17:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d782a60f7d1804b32736c8a9fa3f879a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"615\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has agreed to work with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c2e4611565eb783c390ebabdced5b3a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"1065\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters&#39; request for comments outside regular business hours.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world&#39;s largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump previously said he &#34;should have asked for more&#34; of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government&#39;s Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","LU2430703251.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (USD) INC","LU0314106906.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL EQUITY \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2756315318.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (SGDHDG) INC A","SG9999017495.SGD":"UGDP UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"B\" (SGD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","SG9999014914.USD":"UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH (USDHDG) INC","LU1003077747.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A6\" (HKDHDG) INC","SG9999015341.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Acc SGD-H","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","LU0314104364.USD":"MANULIFE GF AMERICAN GROWTH \"AA\" (USD) INC","IE00B3SWFQ91.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"E\" (USD) INC","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2242649171.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1066051811.HKD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM2\" (HKD) INC","LU2361044949.HKD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (HKD) ACC","SG9999014880.SGD":"大华全球优质成长基金Acc SGD","LU2361044865.SGD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","LU2087621335.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4598":"佩洛西持仓","LU2417539215.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMF\" (USD) INC","LU2361045086.USD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BYXW3230.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"AA\" (USD) ACC","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00BN29S564.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A3\" (USD) INC","IE00B775H168.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A5M\" (HKD) INC","IE0004445015.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1066053197.SGD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM3\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4602":"量子计算概念","IE0004086264.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2028103732.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU2065170008.USD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC","LU0985320562.USD":"NORDEA 1 GLOBAL STARS EQUITY \"BP\" (USD) ACC","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD","LU1267930730.SGD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金AS Acc SGD (CPF)","LU1582987324.SGD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","MACW.SI":"APPLE 3xLongSG261006","LU2461242641.AUD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0545039389.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A2\" ACC","LU1582987597.SGD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4605":"半导体精选","LU2456880835.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AT\" (USD) ACC","INTC":"英特尔","IE0001KFT4U8.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE GLOBAL GROWTH LEADERS \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0466842654.USD":"HSBC ISLAMIC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009G5SDU7.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (USD) INC","LU1674673428.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","IE000ITXATA3.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (USD) ACC","LU1674673691.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE000YTNTUN2.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG)INC","LU2592432038.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1642822529.SGD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU2602419157.SGD":"HSBC ISLAMIC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"AC\" (SGD) ACC","IE00BDCRKT87.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC","LU0444973449.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"DU\" (USD) ACC","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","LU1496350171.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED BALANCED \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4576":"AR","LU2505996681.GBP":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (GBPHDG) INC","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","LU0320765059.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD","LU0158827948.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD","LU1914381329.SGD":"Allianz Best Styles Global Equity Cl ET Acc H2-SGD","LU2023250843.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AT Acc H2-SGD","LU2420271590.USD":"ALLIANZ SELECT INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU2505996509.AUD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (AUDHDG) INC","LU2065171311.SGD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0868494708.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) INC","LU1839511570.USD":"WELLS FARGO GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2065171402.SGD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (SGD) INC","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0096362180.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL FOCUS \"DU\" (USD)","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4612":"AI芯片","LU2552382058.USD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4579":"人工智能","LU2552382132.HKD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0029864427.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00B19Z8X17.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH  \"AG\" (USD) ACC","BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU2720916845.USD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0861579265.USD":"联博低波幅策略股票基金A","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0003U64NQ7.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1935042215.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (USD) INC A","BK4573":"虚拟现实","LU0096364046.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"DU\" (USD) ACC","IE00BFSS7M15.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD-H","LU2458330169.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0820562030.AUD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMH2\" (AUDHDG) H2 INC","IE000KEQY171.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0109392836.USD":"富兰克林科技股A","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LINT":"Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF","SG9999015945.SGD":"LionGlobal Disruptive Innovation Fund A SGD","HK0000914686.HKD":"GFI Global Select Equity Fund Class A (HKD)","LU0965509010.AUD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (AUDHDG) INC","HK0000914660.USD":"GFI Global Select Equity Fund Class A (USD)","LU0345770308.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4141":"半导体产品","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1582986359.USD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (USDHDG) ACC","SG9999014898.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fund Dis SGD","LU0444971666.USD":"天利全球科技基金","SG9999018865.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fd Cl Dist SGD-H","LU1267930490.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"AS\" (SGD) INC A","LU0057025933.USD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (USD) ACC","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU0889565833.HKD":"FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0965509101.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2065169927.USD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999018857.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fd Cl Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","AAPB":"2倍做多AAPL ETF-GraniteShares","LU1935042488.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU0251132253.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","AAPD":"1倍做空AAPL ETF-Direxion","IE000W1ABFV2.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"R\" (USD) INC","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","LU0203202063.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A2X\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","AAPU":"2倍做多AAPL ETF-Direxion","LU1066051225.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU0203201768.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (USD) INC","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2023250330.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (USD) INC","AAPW":"AAPL周配息ETF-Roundhill","AAPX":"2倍做多Apple ETF-T-Rex","LU1629891620.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG2\" (H2-HKD) INC","LU1804176565.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1699723380.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"AP\" (USD) ACC","AAPY":"AAPL收益溢价策略ETF-Kurv","LU0553294199.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A5G\" (USD) INC","LU0069063385.USD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999014542.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Acc SGD","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","LU0964807845.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME & GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BQXX3D17.EUR":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (EUR) ACC","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU0784385170.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI ASSET INCOME \"A6\" (HKDHGD) INC","IE00BQXX3C00.GBP":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (GBP) ACC","IE00BQXX3F31.USD":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (USD) ACC","HK0000306685.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU2108987350.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV GLOBAL OPPORTUNITY SUSTAINABLE (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2213496289.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0345768153.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC MANAGED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1066051498.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","LU1037948897.HKD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","LU0265550359.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU2764262908.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU1934455277.USD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"AD\" (USD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","SG9999000418.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard Global Technology SGD","LU1037948541.HKD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","HK0000306701.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","IE00BDRTCR15.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC A","LU1934455194.USD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU2054465674.USD":"UBS (LUX) KEY SELEC SICAV DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION T \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","LU2265009873.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Growth Equity AS SGD-H","LU2403377893.USD":"ALLIANZ SELECT INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (USD) INC","SG9999001424.SGD":"United E-Commerce Fund SGD","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0267386448.USD":"FIDELITY FIRST ALL COUNTRY WORLD \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","LU2250418816.HKD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJTD4V19.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LONG SHORT EQUITY \"A1\" (USD) ACC","LU2111349929.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU2236285917.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU0310800379.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global A Acc SGD","LU0724617625.USD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0788109477.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A2\" (HKDHGD) ACC","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","LU0942090050.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD)  INC","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","LU2286300806.USD":"Allianz Cyber Security AT Acc USD","LU0154236417.USD":"BGF US FLEXIBLE EQUITY \"A2\" ACC","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","LU0080751232.USD":"富达环球多元动力基金A","LU0345769128.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2430703178.SGD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","LU0128525929.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU2764263039.SGD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0345769631.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4543":"AI","LU0124676726.USD":"AB SICAV I - SUSTAINABLE US THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","LU2764263203.CNY":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (CNYHDG) ACC","LU0345770993.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0683600562.USD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2087625088.SGD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0061474960.USD":"天利环球焦点基金AU Acc","LU1267930573.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"AA\" (SGD) ACC A","IE000F7OJYX1.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","IE0000B7K699.USD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (USD) INC","LU2462157665.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","IE000BZT7R73.USD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2756315664.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC","SG9999014906.USD":"大华全球优质成长基金Acc USD","IE000MB6IJN5.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU0957791311.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL FOCUS \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","HK0000320223.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BN8TJ469.HKD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1815333072.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL FOCUS \"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","IE00B4JS1V06.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU1935043023.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME \"AA\" (USD) INC A","IE00B775SV38.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US MULTICAP OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1291159041.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Silver Age A2 Acc SGD-H","HK0000320264.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) ACC","APLY":"AAPL期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","LU0345768740.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC MANAGED \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU1582986433.USD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (USDHDG) INC","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU2089985449.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR OPPORTUNITIES \"AA\" (USD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU0795875169.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (div) SGD-H","LU2931357623.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR OPPORTUNITIES \"AA\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2746668461.USD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (USD) ACC","LU2746668974.SGD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0949170772.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 SGD-H","SG9999002232.USD":"Allianz Global High Payout USD","IE000WAW04H5.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGD) INC A","IE0004091025.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"B\" (USD) ACC","LU0265550946.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A5\" (USD) INC","IE000SO60NU8.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGDHDG) ACC A","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","LU2083900584.USD":"HSBC GIF US INCOME FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","SG9999002224.SGD":"Allianz Global High Payout SGD","LU0738911758.USD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 USD","LU1934455863.HKD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2360032135.SGD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1127390331.HKD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU0472753341.HKD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BK4W5L77.USD":"HSBC GLOBAL FUNDS ICAV US EQUITY INDEX \"HC\" (USD) ACC","LU1244550494.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) ACC","IE00BK4W5M84.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL FUNDS ICAV US EQUITY INDEX \"HC\" (HKD) ACC","LU0949170426.SGD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A6 SGD-H","LU0868494617.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1046421795.USD":"富达环球科技A-ACC","LU0784384876.USD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A6 USD","LU1974910355.USD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS USD","HK0000304805.HKD":"PICTET 战略收益基金 P类港元","IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","HK0000304797.USD":"PICTET 战略收益基金 P类 美元","LU2125154935.USD":"ALLSPRING (LUX) WF GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"I\" (USD) INC","SGXZ31699556.SGD":"UGDP UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"C\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2237443382.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA USD","LU2237443549.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA SGD-H","LU1366333091.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL FOCUS \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2237443622.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc USD","LU0965508806.USD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU2237443978.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc SGD-H","LU0528227936.USD":"富达环球人口趋势基金A-ACC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","LU2381873111.SGD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL EQUITY HIGH INCOME \"A6\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0661504455.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A5 SGD-H","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","LU1366192091.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY PLUS \"AM\" (USD) INC","LU0011850046.USD":"贝莱德全球长线股票 A2 USD","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","LU0048584097.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2089284900.SGD":"Allianz Global Sustainability Cl AM Dis H2-SGD","LU2860962120.EUR":"CPR INVEST - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"A2\" (EUR) ACC A","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","LU1280957306.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQUITIES \"AUP\" (USD) INC","HK0000819398.USD":"BLACKROCK PREMIER SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL EQUITY HIGH INCOME FUND A10 (USD)INC","LU0456855351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Global Equity A (acc) SGD","LU2148611432.USD":"AZ ALLOCATION BALANCED BRAVE \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU1232071149.USD":"AZ FUND 1 GLOBAL GROWTH SELECTOR \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU2237438978.USD":"Amundi Funds US Pioneer A2 (C) USD","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU0274383776.USD":"MANULIFE GF US SMALL CAP EQUITY \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU2191332357.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (HKDHDG) INC","04335":"英特尔-T","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","LU0157215616.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL FOCUS \"A\" INC","LU0795875086.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (div) SGD","LU0708994859.HKD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","HK0000532082.HKD":"ALLIANZ SELECTION INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU0511384066.AUD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","LU0210536198.USD":"JPM US GROWTH \"A\" ACC","LU0823434583.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) ACC","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","LU0354030511.USD":"ALLSPRING  U.S. LARGE CAP GROWTH \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2896262040.SGD":"JPM US GROWTH FUND \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU2023251221.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AM\" (USD) INC","LU1732800096.USD":"摩根大通环球收益基金A (irc)","LU0354030438.USD":"富国美国大盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU0143551892.USD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU2462591277.SGD":"TRP GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"AN\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU2954938101.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A8P\" (SGD) INC","LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2487616109.SGD":"JPM AMERICA EQUITY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0912757837.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (mth) SGD-H","LU2999663052.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A4P\" (SGD) INC","LU0787776722.HKD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","INTW":"2倍做多INTC ETF-GraniteShares","LU2089283258.USD":"安联环球可持续基金Cl AM Dis","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU0210528500.USD":"JPM AMERICA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU1506573853.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL EQUITY \"AA\" (SGD) INC","LU0859254822.USD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00B4YYXB79.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"E\" (USD) ACC","LU2357627491.SGD":"TRP GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"AH\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2047632596.USD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0689626769.HKD":"AB SICAV I - SUSTAINABLE US THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0321505439.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Acc SGD","LU2100268510.USD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"AX\" (USD) INC","LU3102509885.SGD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"A8P\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1935042991.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1778281490.HKD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (HKD) INC","SG9999015986.USD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0077335932.USD":"FIDELITY AMERICAN GROWTH \"A\" INC","LU2168564149.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"BAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU0476273544.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"BU\" (USD) ACC","LU1732799900.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (irc) SGD-H","LU2168563687.JPY":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (JPYHDG) ACC","LU0158827781.USD":" ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","LU2168564065.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","LU2168564222.USD":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU2242650005.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL MULTI ASSET DYNAMIC \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU2168564495.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AI\" (EUR) ACC","LU2452424414.USD":"BGF ESG MULTI-ASSET \"A10\" (USDHDG) INC","BK4507":"流媒体概念","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","LU1989771016.USD":"东方汇理环球老龄化投资基金 A2 Acc","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","LU0133085943.USD":"T ROWE PRICE US BLUE CHIP EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0784385840.USD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A2 USD","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0174119429.USD":"T ROWE PRICE US LARGE CAP GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU2063271972.USD":"富兰克林创新领域基金","BK4501":"段永平概念","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","LU2462591350.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE US LARGE CAP GROWTH EQUITY \"AN\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1935043536.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC A","LU2750360997.AUD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (AUDHDG) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0784383803.USD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME FUND \"A\" (USD) INC A","LU2237443895.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1989764748.USD":"东方汇理环球颠覆性机遇A2 Acc","LU2750360641.GBP":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (GBPHDG) INC","LU2023250504.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS H2-SGD","LU0557290698.USD":"施罗德环球可持续增长基金","LU1815336760.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU2471134796.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0081259029.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - TECH OPPORTUNITY \"P\" (USD) ACC","SG9999014575.USD":"UOB UNITED INCOME FOCUS TRUST FUND (USDHDG) INC","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0323591593.USD":"SCHRODER ISF QEP GLOBAL QUALITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","LU2471134523.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1791710582.SGD":"Fidelity Global Demographics A-ACC-SGD (SGD/USD hedged)","LU1116320737.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (USD) INC","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2471134879.HKD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1791710400.SGD":"Fidelity Global Demographics A-ACC-SGD","IE00B19Z8W00.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH \"A\" INC","IE0034235303.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US RESEARCH ENHANCED CORE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU2637965513.SGD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A10\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU2471134952.CNY":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (CNYHDG) INC","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","LU2543165471.USD":"E FUND (HK) GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0215105999.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","LU1116320901.HKD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (HKD) INC","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","LU2092937148.SGD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A8 SGD-H","LU2092627202.USD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A8 USD-H","SG9999014559.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Dis SGD","IE0005OL40V9.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A6M\" (USD) INC","LU2077746001.SGD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A2 SGD-H","SG9999014567.USD":"UOB UNITED INCOME FOCUS TRUST FUND (USD) ACC","LU1496350502.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED DYNAMIC \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2237443465.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU0210533765.USD":"JPM GLOBAL GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJLML261.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"HCH\" (HKD) ACC","LU1301847155.USD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME FUND \"A4G\" (USD) INC","SG9999015358.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Dis SGD-H","LU1718418525.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Select Equity A (acc) SGD","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU0726765562.USD":"JPM GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD HEDGED) INC","LU2133065610.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Dividend A (mth) SGD","LU1235294995.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU0289739343.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU2125154778.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2347655073.USD":"JPM GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) INC A","LU2097344431.USD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","LU1206712785.SGD":"Aviva Investors - Multi-Strategy Target Return Ah SGD","IE000M9KFDE8.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LARGE CAP VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE000Q6AESB8.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0070217475.USD":"JPM GLOBAL SELECT EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU2097344357.USD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU0957808578.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","LU1244550577.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Global Multi-Asset Income A (Mdis) SGD-H1","BK4512":"苹果概念","LU1206713676.USD":"Aviva Investors - Multi-Strategy Target Return Ah USD","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU1868837300.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"9\" (USD) ACC","LU1814569148.SGD":"WELLINGTON GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"D\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BLSP4239.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis USD Plus","AAPL":"苹果","LU0672654240.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD-H1","LU0965509283.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1868836914.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"3\" (USD) ACC","LU0494093205.USD":"贝莱德ESG灵活多元资产A2 USD-H","SG9999015952.SGD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU1868837136.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"8\" (USD) ACC","BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","BK4515":"5G概念","LU1868836591.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"1U\"(USD) ACC","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU1868836757.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"2\" (USD) ACC","LU2347655156.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (icdiv) SGD-H","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU2430703095.HKD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (HKD) INC","LU2271345857.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","IE00B5949003.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A\" (HKD) ACC"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20260618:nL4N42Q0BC:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2644748387","content_text":"Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that Apple has agreed to work with Intel to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on TSMC, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠Nvidia and AMD.Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comments outside regular business hours.An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world's largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.Trump previously said he \"should have asked for more\" of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government's Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MACW.SI":0.6,"AAPX":0.6,"04335":1.95,"INTW":0.6,"AAPL":1.96,"AAPB":0.6,"INTC":2.1,"APLY":0.6,"AAPU":0.6,"AAPY":0.6,"AAPW":0.6,"LINT":0.6,"AAPD":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":499631608726408,"gmtCreate":1763005434562,"gmtModify":1763005438987,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"She said everyone should&nbsp;buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","listText":"She said everyone should&nbsp;buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","text":"She said everyone should buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/499631608726408","repostId":"2583681535","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2583681535","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1763003542,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2583681535?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-11-13 11:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2583681535","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"On Wednesday, Cathie Wood-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving Circle Internet Group Inc. (NYSE:CRCL), Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>On Wednesday, <strong>Cathie Wood</strong>-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRCL\">Circle</a></strong>, <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba Group</a></strong>, and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a></strong>. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.</p><h2 id=\"id_1400706566\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The TSLA Trade: </h2><p>Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla<strong> </strong>by selling 70,474 shares through <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKW\">ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</a></strong>. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.</p><p>This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.</p><p>Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.</p><h2 id=\"id_1801452050\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Circle Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.</p><p>Despite the <strong>USDC</strong> issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.</p><h2 id=\"id_2486105261\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Alibaba Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.</p><p>The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.</p><p>On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_249147130\" style=\"text-align: start;\">Other Key Trades</h2><ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\"><li><p>Sold 205,524 shares of <strong>Iridium Communications Inc</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>, 53,954 shares through <strong>AKRQ</strong> and 15,897 shares via <strong>ARKX</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 43,940 shares of <strong>SoFi Technologies Inc</strong> via <strong>ARKF</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Purchased 50,084 shares of <strong>Twist Bioscience Corp</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 84,515 shares of <strong>Exact Sciences Corp</strong> via <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-11-13 11:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>On Wednesday, <strong>Cathie Wood</strong>-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRCL\">Circle</a></strong>, <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba Group</a></strong>, and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a></strong>. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.</p><h2 id=\"id_1400706566\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The TSLA Trade: </h2><p>Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla<strong> </strong>by selling 70,474 shares through <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKW\">ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</a></strong>. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.</p><p>This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.</p><p>Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.</p><h2 id=\"id_1801452050\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Circle Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.</p><p>Despite the <strong>USDC</strong> issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.</p><h2 id=\"id_2486105261\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Alibaba Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.</p><p>The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.</p><p>On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_249147130\" style=\"text-align: start;\">Other Key Trades</h2><ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\"><li><p>Sold 205,524 shares of <strong>Iridium Communications Inc</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>, 53,954 shares through <strong>AKRQ</strong> and 15,897 shares via <strong>ARKX</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 43,940 shares of <strong>SoFi Technologies Inc</strong> via <strong>ARKF</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Purchased 50,084 shares of <strong>Twist Bioscience Corp</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 84,515 shares of <strong>Exact Sciences Corp</strong> via <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLL":"2倍做多TSLA ETF-Direxion","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","BABA":"阿里巴巴","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/11/48824168/cathie-wood-dumps-30-million-worth-of-tesla-stock-amid-china-sales-slump-loads-up-circle-and-this-hot-chinese-ai-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2583681535","content_text":"On Wednesday, Cathie Wood-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving Circle, Alibaba Group, and Tesla. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.The TSLA Trade: Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla by selling 70,474 shares through ARK Innovation ETF and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla's Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.The Circle TradeArk Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.Despite the USDC issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.The Alibaba TradeArk Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through ARK Fintech Innovation ETF, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.Other Key TradesSold 205,524 shares of Iridium Communications Inc through ARKK, 53,954 shares through AKRQ and 15,897 shares via ARKX.Sold 43,940 shares of SoFi Technologies Inc via ARKF.Purchased 50,084 shares of Twist Bioscience Corp through ARKK.Sold 84,515 shares of Exact Sciences Corp via ARKK.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLL":1.5,"ARKK":1.5,"BABA":2,"TSLA":1.5}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2695,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":462305565946360,"gmtCreate":1753885758640,"gmtModify":1753887359478,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Economy is still growing only because companies are still absorbing&nbsp;the cost of tariffs instead&nbsp;of passing it on to consumers. But for how long can they continue to do so?","listText":"Economy is still growing only because companies are still absorbing&nbsp;the cost of tariffs instead&nbsp;of passing it on to consumers. But for how long can they continue to do so?","text":"Economy is still growing only because companies are still absorbing the cost of tariffs instead of passing it on to consumers. But for how long can they continue to do so?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/462305565946360","repostId":"1152627741","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152627741","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1753878618,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152627741?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-07-30 20:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Economy Grew at a 3% Rate in Q2, a Better-Than-Expected Pace","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152627741","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"US Q2 GDP Growth Rate QoQ Adv. +3.0% (Est. +2.4%, Prior -0.5%)","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The U.S. economy grew at a much better than expected pace in the second quarter, powered by a turnaround in exports and renewed consumer strength, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Gross domestic product, a sum of goods and services activity across the sprawling U.S. economy, jumped 3% for the April-through-June period, according to figures adjusted for seasonality and inflation.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">That topped the estimate of 2.4% and helped reverse a decline of 0.5% for the first quarter that came largely due to a surge imports, which subtract from the total, as well as a weak consumer spending amid tariff concerns.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The period reported Wednesday includes President Donald Trump’s April 2 “liberation day” tariff announcement. Imports had jumped in the first quarters as companies sought to get ahead of the announcement.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Over the past three months, Trump has been engaged in multiple rounds of saber rattling and often intense negotiations with U.S. trading partners that have jangled nerves but nonetheless coincided with a subdued but solid pace of economic growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The talks have largely resulted in tariffs well above where they were at the beginning of the year but not as severe as initially proposed.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Economy Grew at a 3% Rate in Q2, a Better-Than-Expected Pace</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Economy Grew at a 3% Rate in Q2, a Better-Than-Expected Pace\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-07-30 20:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The U.S. economy grew at a much better than expected pace in the second quarter, powered by a turnaround in exports and renewed consumer strength, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Gross domestic product, a sum of goods and services activity across the sprawling U.S. economy, jumped 3% for the April-through-June period, according to figures adjusted for seasonality and inflation.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">That topped the estimate of 2.4% and helped reverse a decline of 0.5% for the first quarter that came largely due to a surge imports, which subtract from the total, as well as a weak consumer spending amid tariff concerns.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The period reported Wednesday includes President Donald Trump’s April 2 “liberation day” tariff announcement. Imports had jumped in the first quarters as companies sought to get ahead of the announcement.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Over the past three months, Trump has been engaged in multiple rounds of saber rattling and often intense negotiations with U.S. trading partners that have jangled nerves but nonetheless coincided with a subdued but solid pace of economic growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The talks have largely resulted in tariffs well above where they were at the beginning of the year but not as severe as initially proposed.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152627741","content_text":"The U.S. economy grew at a much better than expected pace in the second quarter, powered by a turnaround in exports and renewed consumer strength, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday.Gross domestic product, a sum of goods and services activity across the sprawling U.S. economy, jumped 3% for the April-through-June period, according to figures adjusted for seasonality and inflation.That topped the estimate of 2.4% and helped reverse a decline of 0.5% for the first quarter that came largely due to a surge imports, which subtract from the total, as well as a weak consumer spending amid tariff concerns.The period reported Wednesday includes President Donald Trump’s April 2 “liberation day” tariff announcement. Imports had jumped in the first quarters as companies sought to get ahead of the announcement.Over the past three months, Trump has been engaged in multiple rounds of saber rattling and often intense negotiations with U.S. trading partners that have jangled nerves but nonetheless coincided with a subdued but solid pace of economic growth.The talks have largely resulted in tariffs well above where they were at the beginning of the year but not as severe as initially proposed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1,"SQQQ":1,"NQmain":1,"QQQ":1,".IXIC":1,"TQQQ":1,"ESmain":1,"YMmain":1,"SPY":1,".DJI":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2687,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":429279707385912,"gmtCreate":1745827717512,"gmtModify":1745828201811,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Unfortunately the company also heavily contributes to health problems due to its high-sugar products and funding misleading research. It is one of the largest plastic polluters, causing significant environmental damage through single-use bottles. It also faced accusations of depleting water resources in vulnerable communities and engaging in unethical business practices...","listText":"Unfortunately the company also heavily contributes to health problems due to its high-sugar products and funding misleading research. It is one of the largest plastic polluters, causing significant environmental damage through single-use bottles. It also faced accusations of depleting water resources in vulnerable communities and engaging in unethical business practices...","text":"Unfortunately the company also heavily contributes to health problems due to its high-sugar products and funding misleading research. It is one of the largest plastic polluters, causing significant environmental damage through single-use bottles. It also faced accusations of depleting water resources in vulnerable communities and engaging in unethical business practices...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/429279707385912","repostId":"2530482447","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3629,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":423527604117928,"gmtCreate":1744408138454,"gmtModify":1744408142099,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","listText":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","text":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/423527604117928","repostId":"1103384421","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103384421","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1744382999,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1103384421?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-11 22:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Texas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103384421","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading th","content":"<div>\n<p>Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Texas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTexas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2025-04-11 22:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UCTT":"超科林半导体","NVDA":"英伟达","AMAT":"应用材料","AVGO":"博通","SMCI":"超微电脑","ASML":"阿斯麦","MRVL":"迈威尔科技","NXPI":"恩智浦","ON":"安森美半导体","MU":"美光科技","GFS":"GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.","STM":"意法半导体","UMC":"联电","QCOM":"高通","SOX":"费城半导体指数","MCHP":"微芯科技","AMD":"美国超微公司","INTC":"英特尔","ARM":"ARM Holdings","TXN":"德州仪器","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103384421","content_text":"Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading the China Semiconductor Industry Association to issue an emergency notice, which stated that customs determines the origin of imports by where chips are manufactured, not the home country of origin.The news put particular pressure on Texas Instruments Inc. and Intel Corp., which have semiconductor plants located in the US. TI shares fell 8.3%, while On Semi fell 6%, Intel and Microchip sank 5% and GlobalFoundries Inc. dropped 2.9%.“This is an incredibly uncertain time for chipmakers, and this is certainly not going to help,” said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. “Anything that hurts semis more than they’ve already been hit is bad for the general market,” he said.Analog Devices Inc. and Microchip Technology Inc. are also trading lower, along with Skyworks Solutions Inc. and Qorvo Inc., with the latter two notable suppliers to Apple Inc.The tariffs exclude companies that design chips but don’t manufacture them in the US, resulting in shares of some chipmakers to outperform on the day. Nvidia Corp. gained 2.2%, while US-listed shares of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. rose 3.4%.The tariffs will likely be “very good” for TSMC, and also act as a positive for Qualcomm Inc. and Advanced Devices Inc., said Jordan Klein, a tech-sector specialist at Mizuho Securities.“All my feedback suggests US-China trade deal is ALL THAT MATTERS RIGHT NOW for semi stocks and equity markets recovering,” Klein wrote in a note, with the emphasis included. “Very few I speak with believe a China deal will be struck anytime soon.”He sees positioning in semis as “very light” given the uncertainty.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":1.1,"NVDA":1.1,"STM":1.1,"QCOM":1.1,"ON":1.1,"UMC":1.1,"ARM":1.1,"TXN":1.1,"AMD":1.1,"MCHP":1.1,"SMCI":1.1,"MRVL":1.1,"SOX":1.1,"MU":1.1,"TSM":1.1,"GFS":1.1,"NXPI":1.1,"AMAT":1.1,"AVGO":1.1,"ASML":1.1,"UCTT":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3100,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":421107024097792,"gmtCreate":1743840328836,"gmtModify":1743840332601,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"great article&nbsp;","listText":"great article&nbsp;","text":"great article","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/421107024097792","repostId":"2525734974","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2525734974","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1743826500,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2525734974?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-05 12:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2525734974","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.On Friday, China announ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5cbd67d757d6360790b5bf65a1435d1\" alt=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" title=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" tg-width=\"923\" tg-height=\"614\"/><span>On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.</p><p>While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.</p><p>A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&amp;P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.</p><p>“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&amp;P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.</p><p>Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&amp;P 500 up for a great 2019.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”</p><p>It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.</p><p>“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&amp;P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&amp;P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&amp;P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&amp;P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">We’ll be waiting for armistice day.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-04-05 12:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5cbd67d757d6360790b5bf65a1435d1\" alt=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" title=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" tg-width=\"923\" tg-height=\"614\"/><span>On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.</p><p>While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.</p><p>A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&amp;P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.</p><p>“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&amp;P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.</p><p>Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&amp;P 500 up for a great 2019.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”</p><p>It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.</p><p>“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&amp;P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&amp;P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&amp;P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&amp;P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">We’ll be waiting for armistice day.</p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念",".DJI":"道琼斯","LU1064927863.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Europe Dynamic A (acc) SGD-H"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2525734974","content_text":"Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&P 500 up for a great 2019.The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”We’ll be waiting for armistice day.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"US7Y.BOND":0.9,"US30Y.BOND":0.9,"US10Y.BOND":0.9,"US12M.BOND":0.9,"US2Y.BOND":0.9,"US3Y.BOND":0.9,".IXIC":1.1,".SPX":1.1,"US5Y.BOND":0.9,"US6M.BOND":0.9,".DJI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3530,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":420936054890688,"gmtCreate":1743798512154,"gmtModify":1743821767464,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"what was Trump expecting ?","listText":"what was Trump expecting ?","text":"what was Trump expecting ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/420936054890688","repostId":"1132817259","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1132817259","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1743764400,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1132817259?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-04 19:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"China to Impose Tariffs of 34% on All US Goods from April 10","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1132817259","media":"Reuters","summary":"China to Impose 34% Tariff on All U.S. Imports Starting From April 10, 12:01 pm. US Stock Index Futures Extend Losses After China to Impose Additional 34% Tariffs of on U.S. Goods.U.S. S&P 500 E-Minis Down 1.52%, Nasdaq 100 E-Minis Down 1.56%, Dow E-Minis Down 1.66%.Big tech stocks sank in premarket trading. Tesla fell 4%; Apple fell 3%; Nvidia fell 2%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, April 4 (Reuters) - China on Friday announced a slew of countermeasures against tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, including additional tariffs of 34% on all U.S. goods and curbs on export of some rare earths, deepening an escalating trade war.</p><p>China&#39;s finance ministry said the additional tariffs would be imposed from April 10.</p><p>Trump on Wednesday announced that China would be hit with a 34% tariff, on top of the 20% he imposed earlier this year, bringing the total new levies to 54%.</p><p>Agriculture trade took another hit as Chinese customs imposed an immediate suspension on imports of sorghums from grain exporter C&amp;D (USA) Inc., as well as poultry and bonemeal from three U.S. firms.</p><p>Beijing also announced controls on exports of medium and heavy rare-earths, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium to the United States, effective April 4.</p><p>&#34;The purpose of the Chinese government&#39;s implementation of export controls on relevant items in accordance with the law is to better safeguard national security and interests, and to fulfil international obligations such as non-proliferation,&#34; the commerce ministry said in a statement.</p><p>It also added 16 U.S entities to its export control list, which prohibits the export of dual-use items to affected firms.</p><p>Another 11 U.S. firms were added to the &#34;unreliable entities&#34; list, which allows Beijing to take punitive action against foreign entities. The targeted firms includes Skydio Inc. and BRINC Drones over arms sales to democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as part of its territory.</p><p>The commerce ministry said the targeted companies seriously &#34;undermined&#34; China&#39;s national sovereignty, security and development interests and would be prohibited from new investments, import and export activities in China.</p><p>It also launched an anti-dumping probe into imports of certain medical CT tubes from the U.S. and India, and a wider industry competitiveness investigation into imports of medical CT tubes.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China to Impose Tariffs of 34% on All US Goods from April 10</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina to Impose Tariffs of 34% on All US Goods from April 10\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-04-04 19:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, April 4 (Reuters) - China on Friday announced a slew of countermeasures against tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, including additional tariffs of 34% on all U.S. goods and curbs on export of some rare earths, deepening an escalating trade war.</p><p>China&#39;s finance ministry said the additional tariffs would be imposed from April 10.</p><p>Trump on Wednesday announced that China would be hit with a 34% tariff, on top of the 20% he imposed earlier this year, bringing the total new levies to 54%.</p><p>Agriculture trade took another hit as Chinese customs imposed an immediate suspension on imports of sorghums from grain exporter C&amp;D (USA) Inc., as well as poultry and bonemeal from three U.S. firms.</p><p>Beijing also announced controls on exports of medium and heavy rare-earths, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium to the United States, effective April 4.</p><p>&#34;The purpose of the Chinese government&#39;s implementation of export controls on relevant items in accordance with the law is to better safeguard national security and interests, and to fulfil international obligations such as non-proliferation,&#34; the commerce ministry said in a statement.</p><p>It also added 16 U.S entities to its export control list, which prohibits the export of dual-use items to affected firms.</p><p>Another 11 U.S. firms were added to the &#34;unreliable entities&#34; list, which allows Beijing to take punitive action against foreign entities. The targeted firms includes Skydio Inc. and BRINC Drones over arms sales to democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as part of its territory.</p><p>The commerce ministry said the targeted companies seriously &#34;undermined&#34; China&#39;s national sovereignty, security and development interests and would be prohibited from new investments, import and export activities in China.</p><p>It also launched an anti-dumping probe into imports of certain medical CT tubes from the U.S. and India, and a wider industry competitiveness investigation into imports of medical CT tubes.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WB":"微博","XPEV":"小鹏集团",".DJI":"道琼斯","AAPL":"苹果","TME":"腾讯音乐","EDU":"新东方","IQ":"爱奇艺",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NTES":"网易","GOTU":"高途",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","NIO":"蔚来","LI":"理想汽车","RLX":"雾芯科技","PDD":"拼多多","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","NVDA":"英伟达","GOOG":"谷歌","VIPS":"唯品会","JD":"京东","BILI":"哔哩哔哩","BEKE":"贝壳","MSFT":"微软","BIDU":"百度","AMZN":"亚马逊","TSLA":"特斯拉","TCOM":"携程网","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1132817259","content_text":"BEIJING, April 4 (Reuters) - China on Friday announced a slew of countermeasures against tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, including additional tariffs of 34% on all U.S. goods and curbs on export of some rare earths, deepening an escalating trade war.China's finance ministry said the additional tariffs would be imposed from April 10.Trump on Wednesday announced that China would be hit with a 34% tariff, on top of the 20% he imposed earlier this year, bringing the total new levies to 54%.Agriculture trade took another hit as Chinese customs imposed an immediate suspension on imports of sorghums from grain exporter C&D (USA) Inc., as well as poultry and bonemeal from three U.S. firms.Beijing also announced controls on exports of medium and heavy rare-earths, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium to the United States, effective April 4.\"The purpose of the Chinese government's implementation of export controls on relevant items in accordance with the law is to better safeguard national security and interests, and to fulfil international obligations such as non-proliferation,\" the commerce ministry said in a statement.It also added 16 U.S entities to its export control list, which prohibits the export of dual-use items to affected firms.Another 11 U.S. firms were added to the \"unreliable entities\" list, which allows Beijing to take punitive action against foreign entities. The targeted firms includes Skydio Inc. and BRINC Drones over arms sales to democratically governed Taiwan, which China claims as part of its territory.The commerce ministry said the targeted companies seriously \"undermined\" China's national sovereignty, security and development interests and would be prohibited from new investments, import and export activities in China.It also launched an anti-dumping probe into imports of certain medical CT tubes from the U.S. and India, and a wider industry competitiveness investigation into imports of medical CT tubes.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"EDU":1.1,"RLX":1.1,"BABA":1.1,"TCOM":1.1,".DJI":1.1,"AAPL":1.1,"IQ":1.1,"NVDA":1.1,"XPEV":1.1,"BEKE":1.1,"GOTU":1.1,"PDD":1.1,"WB":1.1,"LI":1.1,"NIO":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,"AMZN":1.1,"JD":1.1,"TSLA":1.1,".SPX":1.1,"NTES":1.1,"BILI":1.1,"MSFT":1.1,"GOOG":1.1,"META":1.1,"YY":1.1,"BIDU":1.1,"TME":1.1,"VIPS":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3742,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":420854993997904,"gmtCreate":1743747608583,"gmtModify":1743747612679,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"the only BOOM he will hear is implosion&nbsp;","listText":"the only BOOM he will hear is implosion&nbsp;","text":"the only BOOM he will hear is implosion","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/420854993997904","repostId":"1186680662","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1186680662","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"1012688067","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1743737153,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186680662?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-04 11:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Says Things Are \"Going Very Well\" After Market Plunges, and That He's Open to Deals on Tariffs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186680662","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"President Donald Trump offered a rosy assessment after thestock market dropped sharplyThursday over his tariffs, saying, “I think it’s going very well.”“The markets are going to boom, the stock is goi","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump offered a rosy assessment after the stock market dropped sharply Thursday over his tariffs, saying, “I think it’s going very well.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“The markets are going to boom, the stock is going to boom, the country is going to boom,” he said when asked about the market as he left the White House to fly to one of his Florida golf clubs.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,600 points on Thursday as U.S. stocks led a worldwide selloff after the Republican president’s announcement of tariffs against much of the world ignited a shock like none seen since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>Trump on Wednesday announced a minimum tariff of 10% on imports, with the tax rate running much higher on products from certain countries like China and those from the European Union.</p><p>The announcement jolted markets worldwide, but Trump said that was to be expected. He compared the United States to a sick patient in need of surgery when asked by a reporter for his reaction to the worst stock market drop in years.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I think it’s going very well. We have an operation, like when a patient gets operated on and it’s a big thing. I said this would exactly be the way it is,” he said, an apparent reference to the selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">He talked about trillions of dollars in investment that is “coming into our country” from companies that want to make their products in the U.S. to avoid tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“The rest of the world wants to see is there any way they can make a deal,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Later, speaking with the reporters on aboard Air Force One, Trump said that he’d be open to using tariffs to negotiate with other countries and that it would depend on whether they had something “phenomenal” to offer in return.</p><p>He maintains that other countries have been taking advantage of the U.S. for a long time and he wants it to stop.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“For many years, we’ve been at the wrong side of the ball and I’ll tell you what, I think it’s going to be unbelievable,” Trump said as he left the White House to attend a Saudi-backed golf tournament at his club in Doral, Florida.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says Things Are \"Going Very Well\" After Market Plunges, and That He's Open to Deals on Tariffs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says Things Are \"Going Very Well\" After Market Plunges, and That He's Open to Deals on Tariffs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1012688067\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-04-04 11:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump offered a rosy assessment after the stock market dropped sharply Thursday over his tariffs, saying, “I think it’s going very well.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“The markets are going to boom, the stock is going to boom, the country is going to boom,” he said when asked about the market as he left the White House to fly to one of his Florida golf clubs.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,600 points on Thursday as U.S. stocks led a worldwide selloff after the Republican president’s announcement of tariffs against much of the world ignited a shock like none seen since the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>Trump on Wednesday announced a minimum tariff of 10% on imports, with the tax rate running much higher on products from certain countries like China and those from the European Union.</p><p>The announcement jolted markets worldwide, but Trump said that was to be expected. He compared the United States to a sick patient in need of surgery when asked by a reporter for his reaction to the worst stock market drop in years.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I think it’s going very well. We have an operation, like when a patient gets operated on and it’s a big thing. I said this would exactly be the way it is,” he said, an apparent reference to the selloff.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">He talked about trillions of dollars in investment that is “coming into our country” from companies that want to make their products in the U.S. to avoid tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“The rest of the world wants to see is there any way they can make a deal,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Later, speaking with the reporters on aboard Air Force One, Trump said that he’d be open to using tariffs to negotiate with other countries and that it would depend on whether they had something “phenomenal” to offer in return.</p><p>He maintains that other countries have been taking advantage of the U.S. for a long time and he wants it to stop.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“For many years, we’ve been at the wrong side of the ball and I’ll tell you what, I think it’s going to be unbelievable,” Trump said as he left the White House to attend a Saudi-backed golf tournament at his club in Doral, Florida.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186680662","content_text":"President Donald Trump offered a rosy assessment after the stock market dropped sharply Thursday over his tariffs, saying, “I think it’s going very well.”“The markets are going to boom, the stock is going to boom, the country is going to boom,” he said when asked about the market as he left the White House to fly to one of his Florida golf clubs.The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,600 points on Thursday as U.S. stocks led a worldwide selloff after the Republican president’s announcement of tariffs against much of the world ignited a shock like none seen since the COVID-19 pandemic.Trump on Wednesday announced a minimum tariff of 10% on imports, with the tax rate running much higher on products from certain countries like China and those from the European Union.The announcement jolted markets worldwide, but Trump said that was to be expected. He compared the United States to a sick patient in need of surgery when asked by a reporter for his reaction to the worst stock market drop in years.“I think it’s going very well. We have an operation, like when a patient gets operated on and it’s a big thing. I said this would exactly be the way it is,” he said, an apparent reference to the selloff.He talked about trillions of dollars in investment that is “coming into our country” from companies that want to make their products in the U.S. to avoid tariffs.“The rest of the world wants to see is there any way they can make a deal,” he said.Later, speaking with the reporters on aboard Air Force One, Trump said that he’d be open to using tariffs to negotiate with other countries and that it would depend on whether they had something “phenomenal” to offer in return.He maintains that other countries have been taking advantage of the U.S. for a long time and he wants it to stop.“For many years, we’ve been at the wrong side of the ball and I’ll tell you what, I think it’s going to be unbelievable,” Trump said as he left the White House to attend a Saudi-backed golf tournament at his club in Doral, Florida.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1.1,".DJI":1.1,".IXIC":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3613,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":416784397529512,"gmtCreate":1742762160919,"gmtModify":1742762165065,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"time to buy","listText":"time to buy","text":"time to buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/416784397529512","repostId":"2521659219","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2521659219","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1742691657,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2521659219?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-03-23 09:00","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2521659219","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto  traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metri","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Bitcoin's Plunge Could Have Further to Go Despite Its Recent Bounce\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-23 09:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.</p><p>The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump&#39;s inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9710b0a7b0e55866c5a02d9419ca7fcc\" tg-width=\"579\" tg-height=\"396\"/></p><p>Concerns around Trump&#39;s tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve&#39;s meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed&#39;s decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.</p><p>A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.</p><p>Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.</p><p>It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.</p><p>Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.</p><p>Fears around the uncertainty of Trump&#39;s tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn&#39;t appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.</p><p>&#34;The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,&#34; he said.</p><p>Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.</p><p>From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset&#39;s peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.</p><p>A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump&#39;s policy announcements, which &#34;creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,&#34; Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.</p><p>In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin&#39;s network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/197e1847d27a97ef55f49da5d760fe5f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"153\"/></p><p>If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.</p><p>Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/635c45d93aea0e5774daddc1b5e287e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"159\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BTBT":"Bit Digital, Inc.","BITO":"比特币期货ETF-ProShares","CLSK":"CleanSpark, Inc.","BRRR":"比特币ETF-CoinShares","IBIT":"比特币ETF-iShares","EBON":"亿邦国际","EZBC":"比特币ETF-Franklin","CAN":"嘉楠科技","FBTC":"比特币ETF-Fidelity","BTCO":"比特币ETF-Invesco Galaxy","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK1611":"加密货币现货ETF","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","ARKB":"比特币ETF-21Shares","MARA":"MARA Holdings","DEFI":"比特币期货ETF-Hashdex","BTM":"Bitcoin Depot Inc.","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","SOS":"SOS Limited","BTCW":"比特币ETF-Wisdom Tree","HODL":"比特币ETF-VanEck","BITB":"比特币ETF-Bitwise","MSTR":"Strategy","NCTY":"第九城市","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale","BK4588":"碎股","BK4594":"比特币ETF概念","BK4601":"加密货币现货ETF"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2521659219","content_text":"Bitcoin has already has plunged more than 20% from its record high two months ago, but the fall may not be over yet, according to analysts.The largest crypto (BTCUSD) traded at around $84,353 Friday afternoon, roughly 23% below its record high at $109,225 reached on Jan. 20, the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Concerns around Trump's tariff policies sent bitcoin to as low as under $80,000 on March 11, the lowest level since November. However, after the Federal Reserve's meeting on Wednesday, bitcoin bounced - rising over 5% to above $87,000 briefly, from below $83,000 - as traders cheered the Fed's decision to slow the pace of shrinking its balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening.A slowdown in quantitative tightening may lead to increased liquidity and, in turn, benefit risk assets like cryptocurrencies, according to Shubh Varma, chief executive and co-founder at crypto research platform Hyblock Capital.Options-market positioning for bitcoin also has normalized, with the so-called skew - or the difference in pricing or implied volatility between put options and call options - shifting toward calls, noted analysts at crypto trading firm QCP Capital.It shows that traders are becoming more bullish after the Fed meeting, as call options are becoming more expensive or appearing in higher demand than put options. This stands in contrast to earlier in the week, the QCP analysts wrote in a Thursday note.Put options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to sell an underlying security at a specified price within a set time frame, while call options give traders the right to buy such assets.Still, bitcoin faces further downside risks as macroeconomic conditions remain unclear, according to Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata. The options skew may soon shift in favor of puts again, he noted.Fears around the uncertainty of Trump's tariff policies have been weighing on both stocks and crypto for the past few weeks, and it doesn't appear that such assets have found their bottom yet, Magadini said in a phone interview.\"The markets still need to understand how tariffs are going to affect global trade and global growth, and then we still need to see how tariffs are going to affect inflation and how rates will respond in reaction to that,\" he said.Fed-funds futures were pricing in an 89.1% chance that the U.S. central bank will cut its key interest rate at least twice this year, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.From a technical perspective, bitcoin may fall toward $70,000 before it resumes its rally, Magadini said. While a bear market is typically defined as a fall of at least 20% from an asset's peak, crypto proponents have been reluctant to apply that metric to less established sectors like digital assets.A major factor has been the unpredictability of Trump's policy announcements, which \"creates an environment where he could post something market-moving at any time. Crypto, as a reflexive asset class dependent on trend-following flows, is especially vulnerable in such a skittish environment,\" Sean Farrell, head of digital-asset strategy at Fundstrat, wrote in a Friday note.In addition, CryptoQuant, a research firm that tracks blockchain data, said its Bull Score Index - which measures bullish metrics out of a total of 10 key indicators that track Bitcoin's network activity, investor behavior, demand and market liquidity - stands at 20, the lowest level since January 2023.If the index remains below 40 for a prolonged period, it may indicate a continuation of bearish market conditions, according to analysts at CryptoQuant.Bitcoin has historically only seen sustained major price rallies when the bull score is above 60, the analysts wrote in a Thursday note.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"US2Y.BOND":0.84,"US12M.BOND":0.84,"SOS":1.1,"US10Y.BOND":0.84,"DEFI":1.1,"US3Y.BOND":0.84,"BTCW":1.1,"EBON":1.1,"BTCM":1.1,"HODL":1.1,"US30Y.BOND":0.84,"EZBC":1.1,"IBIT":1.1,"BITB":1.1,"US6M.BOND":0.84,"MSTR":1.1,"BTCO":1.1,"BTM":1.1,"RIOT":1.1,"ARKB":1.1,"CLSK":1.1,"BITO":1.1,"GBTC":1.1,"CAN":1.1,"BTBT":1.1,"US7Y.BOND":0.84,"FBTC":1.1,"COIN":1.1,"US5Y.BOND":0.84,"BRRR":1.1,"NCTY":1.1,"MARA":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3406,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":412663614689712,"gmtCreate":1741718853668,"gmtModify":1741730861854,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","listText":"Trump should be checked&nbsp;for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","text":"Trump should be checked for mental fitness. He's acting like a grumpy old man who is losing the plot.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/412663614689712","repostId":"1150425526","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150425526","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1741702723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150425526?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-03-11 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150425526","media":"Reuters","summary":"President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total tariff on those products to 50%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says He Will Raise Tariffs On Canada Metals To 50%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-03-11 22:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.</p><p>Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.</p><p>&#34;Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,&#34; Trump wrote.</p><p>He also threatened to &#34;substantially increase&#34; tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 &#34;if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150425526","content_text":"President Donald Trump on Tuesday doubled his planned tariff on all steel and aluminum products coming into the United States from Canada, bringing the total to 50%, in response to the province of Ontario placing a 25% tariff on electricity coming into the U.S.Trump said in a post on Truth Social he has instructed his commerce secretary to add an additional 25% tariff on the products that will go into effect on Wednesday morning.\"Also, Canada must immediately drop their Anti-American Farmer Tariff of 250% to 390% on various U.S. dairy products, which has long been considered outrageous. I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,\" Trump wrote.He also threatened to \"substantially increase\" tariffs on cars coming into the United States on April 2 \"if other egregious, long time Tariffs are not likewise dropped by Canada.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":1.1,".DJI":1.1,".SPX":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4057,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403691449000128,"gmtCreate":1739581990114,"gmtModify":1739581993278,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","listText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","text":"what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403691449000128","repostId":"2511461008","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2511461008","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739576981,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2511461008?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-15 07:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2511461008","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Mu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-15 07:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250214:nL4N3P51LZ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2511461008","content_text":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Musk's latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.\"OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk's latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,\" OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a \"no thank you\" on X, prompting Musk to retort: \"swindler.\"The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI's non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire's lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.\"Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients' much publicized 'bid' is in fact not a bid at all,\" the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk's lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.After Musk's departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MSFT":1.1,"TSLA":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":402305318322864,"gmtCreate":1739246667822,"gmtModify":1739264360112,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","listText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","text":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/402305318322864","repostId":"2510608298","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2510608298","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739206811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2510608298?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-11 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2510608298","media":"Reuters","summary":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby","content":"<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-11 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","PH":"汉尼汾","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","BK4161":"工业机械","LU0211331839.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL GLB DISCOVERY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4580":"工业 4.0","BK4588":"碎股"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250210:nL1N3P10RQ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2510608298","content_text":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby\nNEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable softening in future spending plans. The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found a very sharp rise in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. The New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda features a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. In a separate report on Monday, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci) ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3736,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4195362055063892","authorId":"4195362055063892","name":"YONG11123","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1cc88e6e01866542324985e4c7ce6394","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4195362055063892","authorIdStr":"4195362055063892"},"content":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","text":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","html":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":401658709819680,"gmtCreate":1739088520545,"gmtModify":1739088525028,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"time to invest in Crypto..","listText":"time to invest in Crypto..","text":"time to invest in Crypto..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/401658709819680","repostId":"2509037372","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2509037372","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1739066193,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2509037372?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-09 09:56","market":"nz","language":"en","title":"Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2509037372","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'. As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out?That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\". Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-09 09:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2509037372","content_text":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It's fine, it's OK, but it would have been very much better,\" Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\"Similarly, Trump's nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country \"had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.\" In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an \"all-tariff policy\" that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country's improving standing wasn't primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was \"certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,\" said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that's not what Trump said, the professor added. \"He said that we were at our richest. That's not true,\" Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it's much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita \"sounds fancy,\" it basically shows the average household's income.Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.Senik said it's possible that because there's such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are \"economically destructive,\" Trump has looked for \"other outside sources of validation.\"\"He seems to believe he's found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,\" Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it's odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs \"pretty much from the country's founding.\" A federal income tax didn't come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and \"very few protections for workers,\" Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.\"The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can't run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,\" the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.It wasn't the tariffsTrump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America's strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.\"That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,\" said Robert W. Merry, the author of \"President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.\"Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state's John B. Allen - is instructive.\"He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn't the end-all and be-all,\" Merry told MarketWatch. \"I think that's one of the things that Trump doesn't quite understand.\"\"There were a lot of causes to America's rise. Tariffs were not the reason,\" added UC Davis's Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. \"To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.\"Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.\"It's worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,\" he said. \"If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we'll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.\"Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union's products.On Monday, China's retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump's new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.Supporters of Trump's tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they're an \"essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,".DJI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":397113565024416,"gmtCreate":1737976857810,"gmtModify":1737976861676,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","listText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","text":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/397113565024416","repostId":"1175396672","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1175396672","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1737976099,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175396672?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-27 19:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175396672","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China's DeepSeek. $Nvidia$ fell 13%; $Microsoft$, $Amazon$ slid over 6%; $Meta Platforms$, $Tesla$, $Alphabet$ fell around 5%.Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.Buzz grew over th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&amp;P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e2ad0b0d13419edfdb8b6c1738c3ea9f\" tg-width=\"486\" tg-height=\"249\"/></p><p>Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China&#39;s DeepSeek. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> fell 13%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a> slid over 6%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> fell around 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/52292516e3350ef99782f4b2d6179f2b\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"487\" tg-height=\"448\"/></p><p>Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-27 19:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&amp;P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e2ad0b0d13419edfdb8b6c1738c3ea9f\" tg-width=\"486\" tg-height=\"249\"/></p><p>Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China&#39;s DeepSeek. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> fell 13%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a> slid over 6%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> fell around 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/52292516e3350ef99782f4b2d6179f2b\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"487\" tg-height=\"448\"/></p><p>Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","GOOG":"谷歌","NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175396672","content_text":"Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China's DeepSeek. Nvidia fell 13%; Microsoft, Amazon slid over 6%; Meta Platforms, Tesla, Alphabet fell around 5%.Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":1.1,"ESmain":1.1,"META":1.1,"AAPL":1.1,"TSLA":1.1,"MSFT":1.1,"NQmain":1.1,"YMmain":1.1,"AMZN":1.1,"GOOG":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390718798852184,"gmtCreate":1736419263602,"gmtModify":1736421004287,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","listText":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","text":"too many overvalued stock out there, that's the problem","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390718798852184","repostId":"2502542083","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2502542083","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1736394619,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2502542083?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-09 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2502542083","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for g","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street's Riskiest Stocks Are Melting Down as Retail Traders Face 'Day of Reckoning'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-09 11:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-up</p></li></ul><p>Retail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.</p><p>The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RGTI\">Rigetti Computing</a> Inc. and IonQ Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">$(IONQ)$</a></p><p>Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>, saw similarly severe declines.</p><p>But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.</p><p>After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.</p><p>In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBKR\">$(IBKR)$</a> founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">$(GS)$</a>.</p><p>&#34;The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,&#34; Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. &#34;They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that&#39;s starting to unwind.&#34;</p><p>A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.</p><p>Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUNR\">Intuitive Machines</a> Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACHR\">$(ACHR)$</a> down nearly 6%.</p><p>Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NANO\">NANO Nuclear Energy Inc.</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NNE\">$(NNE)$</a> fell more than 11%, while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR\">NuScale Power</a> Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMR.AU\">$(SMR.AU)$</a> was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.</p><p>And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XTIA\">$(XTIA)$</a> got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.</p><p>Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho&#39;s Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.</p><p>Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn&#39;t as active on Wednesday.</p><p>According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.</p><p>&#34;This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,&#34; he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a> and AMC Entertainment Holdings <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a> soar in early 2021.</p><p>Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.</p><p>Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump&#39;s victory appeared to unleash &#34;animal spirits&#34; in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.</p><p>Recent froth in markets hasn&#39;t been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.</p><p>Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him &amp; Hers Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HIMS\">$(HIMS)$</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a>. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ENVX\">$(ENVX)$</a> soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.</p><p>&#34;There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,&#34; Klymochko at Accelerate said.</p><p>The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&amp;P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.</p><p>For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.</p><p>&#34;Rising rates may have changed the overall market&#39;s calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren&#39;t a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,&#34; Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.</p><p>&#34;Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.&#34;</p><p>To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR\">MicroStrategy</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTR.AU\">$(MSTR.AU)$</a> has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market&#39;s speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump&#39;s electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.</p><p>Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.</p><p>The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4591":"室温超导概念","NNE":"NANO Nuclear Energy Inc","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","RGTI":"Rigetti Computing","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2083900584.USD":"HSBC GIF US INCOME FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","ACHR":"Archer Aviation Inc.","BK4182":"重型电气设备","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","NVDA":"英伟达","SMR":"NuScale Power","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","LU0225283273.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","ENVX":"Enovix Corporation","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","AMC":"AMC院线","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LUNR":"Intuitive Machines","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","IBKR":"盈透证券","MSTR":"Strategy","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2502542083","content_text":"Quantum-computing, nuclear-power, cryptocurrency, cannabis and heavily-shorted stocks all got hammered on Wednesday, putting the brakes on a recent run-upRetail traders who had developed a taste for gambling on speculative stocks were facing a day of reckoning on Wednesday as many of their favorite trades suffered a startling meltdown.The carnage began with a comment from Nvidia Corp. $(NVDA)$ chief executive Jensen Huang at a CES tech conference in Las Vegas about how quantum computers could still be 20 years away. That helped trigger a punishing selloff in shares of quantum-computing stocks like Rigetti Computing Inc. and IonQ Inc. $(IONQ)$Both of those stocks were soon down as much as 50% on the day, eventually tallying their biggest daily declines on record, FactSet data showed. Other popular quantum names, including Quantum Computing Inc., saw similarly severe declines.But the pressure soon spread to other stocks popular with the retail crowd as individual speculators rushed to meet margin calls, said Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA.After helping to magnify gains on the way up, the rampant use of leverage by traders appeared to help exacerbate losses on the way down, as it often does.In December, Interactive Brokers Group Inc. $(IBKR)$ founder and Chairman Thomas Peterffy said that margin loans on his platform had risen 16% over the previous three months. He made the remark during an appearance at a conference hosted by Goldman Sachs Group $(GS)$.\"The retail crowd is facing a day of reckoning today,\" Azarm at Mizuho told MarketWatch in an interview. \"They had been buying into these extremely speculative names, but now that's starting to unwind.\"A FTSE-Russell index of heavily-shorted U.S. stocks, which had otherwise seen its strongest start to a year since the meme-stock madness of 2021, dropped more than 5% on Wednesday, according to LSEG data.Aerospace and space-exploration stocks were swept up in the selling, with shares of Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) down more than 5% and Archer Aviation $(ACHR)$ down nearly 6%.Nuclear-power stocks also suffered. NANO Nuclear Energy Inc. $(NNE)$ fell more than 11%, while NuScale Power Corp. $(SMR.AU)$ was down more than 9%. Other themes popular with retail traders, from cryptocurrency, to cannabis to autonomous driving, also took a hit.And, of course, penny stocks like XTI Aerospace Inc. $(XTIA)$ got hammered. Shares were trading at just 5 cents a pop, off more than 50% on the day, after surging 30% one day earlier.Retail traders have been particularly active in the market lately, Mizuho's Azarm said, which suggests that they were responsible for much of the action in these more speculative names.Trading volume in the U.S. equity market exploded earlier this week. Nasdaq Composite trading volume rose to nearly 14 billion shares on Tuesday, the highest level on record going back to 1995, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The market wasn't as active on Wednesday.According to data tracked by Azarm, roughly 55% of activity in the U.S. market over the past two weeks has been tied to platforms typically used by individual investors.\"This is massive. Even during the 2021 meltup, we hardly saw anything this elevated,\" he said, referring to the meme-stock frenzy that saw shares of GameStop Corp. $(GME)$ and AMC Entertainment Holdings $(AMC)$ soar in early 2021.Some of the recent surge in trading volume across the U.S. market appeared to be tied to penny stocks, Joe Saluzzi, partner and co-founder of Themis Trading, told MarketWatch. Volume in shares of companies trading at $1 or less has been unusually high lately, he said.Quantum-computing stocks, heavily-shorted names, and other popular speculative bets have soared since the election as President-elect Donald Trump's victory appeared to unleash \"animal spirits\" in the equity market, said Julian Klymochko, CEO and chief investment officer at Accelerate, an alternative-investment firm that offers several exchange-traded funds.Recent froth in markets hasn't been limited to stocks. It also has been evident in the cryptocurrency market, with the price of a bitcoin rising north of $100,000, while the market capitalization of Fartcoin, a popular meme token, recently surpassed $1 billion, making it worth more than some publicly traded companies.Shares of heavily-shorted companies like Him & Hers Inc. $(HIMS)$, SEALSQ Corp. (LAES), and Enovix Corp. $(ENVX)$ soared late last year. But they ran into trouble this week.\"There has been a massive speculative bid in the market that is keeping these heavily-shorted stocks elevated. In the business, we call them profitless junk stocks,\" Klymochko at Accelerate said.The selloff in these speculative names has coincided with weakness in the broader market. The S&P 500 index, Nasdaq Composite Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average have fallen this week as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y approached its highest level since late 2023, according to FactSet data.For retail traders who bought into these more speculative names, rising yields appeared to be less of a concern, said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers, a platform popular with retail traders.\"Rising rates may have changed the overall market's calculus of risk vs. reward, which may temper speculation, but they weren't a consideration in their valuation and performance prior to today,\" Sosnick told MarketWatch via email.\"Frankly, I think that those who went heavily into speculative quantum stocks are getting clobbered, which is now spilling into other speculative names.\"To be sure, plenty of froth remained in the market as of Wednesday afternoon. According to Klymochko, MicroStrategy Inc. $(MSTR.AU)$ has become, in his view, the posterchild for the market's speculative excesses. The software company has transformed itself into a vehicle for buying bitcoin, and its shares soared in the wake of Trump's electoral victory as bitcoin prices climbed to a record high.Shares of the company have pulled back from their November peak. But MicroStrategy has continued to trade at a sizable premium to its net asset value, which mostly consists of the value of its bitcoin holdings.The S&P 500 SPX had shrugged off earlier losses to finish higher on Wednesday, as did the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA. The Nasdaq Composite COMP was down 0.1% at 19,478.88.The U.S. stock market will be closed on Thursday as the U.S. observes a national day of mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, who died in late December.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LUNR":0.9,"MSTR":0.9,"IBKR":0.9,"ACHR":0.9,"AMC":0.9,"ENVX":0.9,"QUBT":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"IONQ":0.9,"NNE":0.9,"RGTI":0.9,"SMR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2054,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390536069038424,"gmtCreate":1736390688414,"gmtModify":1736391868999,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"appropriate answer!","listText":"appropriate answer!","text":"appropriate answer!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390536069038424","repostId":"2502600701","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2502600701","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1736382511,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2502600701?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-09 08:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"D-Wave Quantum CEO Says Nvidia CEO \"Dead Wrong\" with Quantum Comments","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2502600701","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"$D-Wave Quantum$ CEO Alan Baratz says $Nvidia$ CEO Jensen Huang is an authority on many areas of computing, but not all areas and not on quantum computing. Huang is “dead wrong” with his comments on the usefulness of quantum applications being years away, argues Baratz, who says that his company is “commercial today” and its services are being used by companies like Mastercard  today, “not 30 years from now, today.”","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QBTS\">D-Wave Quantum</a> CEO Alan Baratz says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> CEO Jensen Huang is an authority on many areas of computing, but not all areas and not on quantum computing. Huang is “dead wrong” with his comments on the usefulness of quantum applications being years away, argues Baratz, who says that his company is “commercial today” and its services are being used by companies like Mastercard (MA) today, “not 30 years from now, today.”</p><p>Quantum shares rebounded in after-hours trading.  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a> rose 16% after sinking 26% in prior session.  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QMCO\">Quantum Corp</a> rose 7%;  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">IONQ Inc.</a> rose 5.7%;  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>,  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QBTS\">D-Wave Quantum Inc.</a> rose over 3%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f8ad6b4f41982dfdb224443e74c17db\" tg-width=\"498\" tg-height=\"445\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>D-Wave Quantum CEO Says Nvidia CEO \"Dead Wrong\" with Quantum Comments</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nD-Wave Quantum CEO Says Nvidia CEO \"Dead Wrong\" with Quantum Comments\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-09 08:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QBTS\">D-Wave Quantum</a> CEO Alan Baratz says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> CEO Jensen Huang is an authority on many areas of computing, but not all areas and not on quantum computing. Huang is “dead wrong” with his comments on the usefulness of quantum applications being years away, argues Baratz, who says that his company is “commercial today” and its services are being used by companies like Mastercard (MA) today, “not 30 years from now, today.”</p><p>Quantum shares rebounded in after-hours trading.  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAES\">SEALSQ Corp</a> rose 16% after sinking 26% in prior session.  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QMCO\">Quantum Corp</a> rose 7%;  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IONQ\">IONQ Inc.</a> rose 5.7%;  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QUBT\">Quantum Computing Inc.</a>,  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QBTS\">D-Wave Quantum Inc.</a> rose over 3%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f8ad6b4f41982dfdb224443e74c17db\" tg-width=\"498\" tg-height=\"445\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RGTI":"Rigetti Computing","QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","QMCO":"昆腾","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","LAES":"SEALSQ Corp","QBTS":"D-Wave Quantum Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/the-fly/d-wave-quantum-ceo-says-nvidia-ceo-dead-wrong-with-quantum-comments?utm_source=itigerup.com&utm_medium=referral","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2502600701","content_text":"D-Wave Quantum CEO Alan Baratz says Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is an authority on many areas of computing, but not all areas and not on quantum computing. Huang is “dead wrong” with his comments on the usefulness of quantum applications being years away, argues Baratz, who says that his company is “commercial today” and its services are being used by companies like Mastercard (MA) today, “not 30 years from now, today.”Quantum shares rebounded in after-hours trading.  SEALSQ Corp rose 16% after sinking 26% in prior session.  Quantum Corp rose 7%;  IONQ Inc. rose 5.7%;  Quantum Computing Inc.,  D-Wave Quantum Inc. rose over 3%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QUBT":1.1,"LAES":1.1,"QMCO":1.1,"RGTI":1.1,"QBTS":1.1,"IONQ":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2444,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390562892755072,"gmtCreate":1736370848938,"gmtModify":1736374420748,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","listText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","text":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390562892755072","repostId":"1154525879","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1154525879","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1736347500,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154525879?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-08 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Quantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154525879","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Quantum computing stocks fell in premarket trading on Wednesday after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.QUBT fell 18%; Rigetti Computing, QMCO fell 16%; D-Wave Quantum fell 15%; IONQ fell 11%.“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “I","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ecbbcd8e249e9b02279db0402ec1a437\" tg-width=\"395\" tg-height=\"242\"/></p><p>“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”</p><p>The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.</p><p></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Quantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQuantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-08 22:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ecbbcd8e249e9b02279db0402ec1a437\" tg-width=\"395\" tg-height=\"242\"/></p><p>“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”</p><p>The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.</p><p></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","ARQQ":"Arqit Quantum Inc.","QMCO":"昆腾","QBTS":"D-Wave Quantum Inc.","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","RGTI":"Rigetti Computing"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154525879","content_text":"Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QUBT":1.1,"IONQ":1.1,"QMCO":1.1,"QBTS":1.1,"ARQQ":1.1,"RGTI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2206,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386475574419968,"gmtCreate":1735395032956,"gmtModify":1735443166836,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","listText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","text":"giving money to banks? No thank you","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/386475574419968","repostId":"1175058181","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1175058181","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1735351200,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175058181?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-12-28 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175058181","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&amp;P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.</p><p>Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e1b5aa259bf24dc02c0463b0c3f2ceee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1080\"/></p><h2 id=\"id_4119342542\">Wells Fargo: 7,007</h2><p>A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">By the end of next December, the S&amp;P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.</p><p>This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&amp;P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_3359074262\">Deutsche Bank: 7,000</h2><p>Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&amp;P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&amp;P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings.</p><p> &#34;We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&amp;A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,&#34; Reid wrote in a note.</p><h2 id=\"id_1118312437\">Bank of America: 6,666</h2><p>Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.</p><p>“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.</p><p>In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.</p><h2 id=\"id_2979679817\">Morgan Stanley: 6,500</h2><p>The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.</p><p>Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.</p><h2 id=\"id_899646885\">JPMorgan Chase: 6,500</h2><p>JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&amp;P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.</p><h2 id=\"id_3740395280\">Goldman Sachs: 6,500</h2><p>The S&amp;P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy&#39;s growth and higher corporate earnings.12</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm&#39;s forecast reflects a &#34;12% total return with dividends&#34; by the end of next year, &#34;predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.&#34; The index has been on a tear this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from &#34;Phase 3&#34; of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. </p><h2 id=\"id_285638129\">Citigroup: 6,500</h2><p>The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&amp;P 500 for 2025 as its base case.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2024-12-28 10:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&amp;P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.</p><p>Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e1b5aa259bf24dc02c0463b0c3f2ceee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1080\"/></p><h2 id=\"id_4119342542\">Wells Fargo: 7,007</h2><p>A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">By the end of next December, the S&amp;P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.</p><p>This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&amp;P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_3359074262\">Deutsche Bank: 7,000</h2><p>Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&amp;P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&amp;P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings.</p><p> &#34;We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&amp;A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,&#34; Reid wrote in a note.</p><h2 id=\"id_1118312437\">Bank of America: 6,666</h2><p>Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.</p><p>“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.</p><p>In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.</p><h2 id=\"id_2979679817\">Morgan Stanley: 6,500</h2><p>The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.</p><p>Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.</p><h2 id=\"id_899646885\">JPMorgan Chase: 6,500</h2><p>JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&amp;P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.</p><h2 id=\"id_3740395280\">Goldman Sachs: 6,500</h2><p>The S&amp;P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy&#39;s growth and higher corporate earnings.12</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm&#39;s forecast reflects a &#34;12% total return with dividends&#34; by the end of next year, &#34;predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.&#34; The index has been on a tear this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from &#34;Phase 3&#34; of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. </p><h2 id=\"id_285638129\">Citigroup: 6,500</h2><p>The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&amp;P 500 for 2025 as its base case.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175058181","content_text":"Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:Wells Fargo: 7,007A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.By the end of next December, the S&P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.Deutsche Bank: 7,000Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings. \"We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,\" Reid wrote in a note.Bank of America: 6,666Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.Morgan Stanley: 6,500The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.JPMorgan Chase: 6,500JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.Goldman Sachs: 6,500The S&P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy's growth and higher corporate earnings.12Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm's forecast reflects a \"12% total return with dividends\" by the end of next year, \"predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.\" The index has been on a tear this year.The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from \"Phase 3\" of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. Citigroup: 6,500The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&P 500 for 2025 as its base case.Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ESmain":1.1,"UPRO":1.1,".SPX":1.1,"IVV":1.1,".DJI":1.1,"SPXU":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,"VOO":1.1,"SPY":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2182,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":402305318322864,"gmtCreate":1739246667822,"gmtModify":1739264360112,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","listText":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly&nbsp;bankers)&nbsp;deciding for a huge Country.","text":"The feds should be working with citizen oversight committees before making any decision and be forced to also consider wage growth and wealth distribution alongside inflation and employment rates. They're 12 people (mostly bankers) deciding for a huge Country.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/402305318322864","repostId":"2510608298","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2510608298","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739206811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2510608298?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-11 01:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2510608298","media":"Reuters","summary":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby","content":"<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-11 01:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\"><head><title>UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in January</title></head><body><div><p>NY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in January</p><p>NY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spending</p><p>NY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situation</p></div><p>Adds chart, details on survey</p><p>By Michael S. Derby</p><p>\n<span>NEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters)</span><span> - </span>The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable <span>softening in </span>future spending <span>plans</span>. </p><p>The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. </p><p>The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found <span>a very sharp rise</span> in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. </p><p>T<span>he New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. </span></p><p>Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda <span>features</span> a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. </p><p>Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. </p><p>In a separate report <span>on Monday</span>, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. </p><p>The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. </p><p>The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.</p><div><p><span>NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF</span></p></div><p> (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci)</p><p> ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","PH":"汉尼汾","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","BK4161":"工业机械","LU0211331839.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL GLB DISCOVERY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4580":"工业 4.0","BK4588":"碎股"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250210:nL1N3P10RQ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2510608298","content_text":"UPDATE 1-NY Fed finds mostly stable inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed finds stable near-term inflation expectations in JanuaryNY Fed notes public expects to moderate future spendingNY Fed finds more concern over personal financial situationAdds chart, details on surveyBy Michael S. Derby\nNEW YORK, Feb 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. public’s near-term inflation expectations were largely stable in January, a Federal Reserve Bank of New York report found, as respondents to the survey also predicted a notable softening in future spending plans. The expected level of inflation at both the one-year and three-year ahead horizons was unchanged at 3% last month, the bank said in its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations released on Monday, while the expected level of inflation five years from now moved to 3% from 2.7% in December. January also saw the public predict bigger future price rises for food, gasoline, rent, college and medical costs, while home price expectations increased to 3.2% from December’s 3.1%. The New York Fed report's relatively benign view on the future path of inflation comes just after a report on Friday from the University of Michigan that found a very sharp rise in year-ahead expected inflation, which rose from 3.3% in January to 4.3% in February, amid a broader drop in overall consumer sentiment levels for the month. The New York Fed survey data was collected through the month of January whereas the Michigan survey period moved into early February. Overall rates of inflation have been slowly coming down for some time amid relatively stable inflation expectations, but there is considerable uncertainty about what lies ahead. President Donald Trump’s economic agenda features a call for strong trade tariffs and deportation of undocumented workers, a combination that most economists believe will cause higher inflation over time, although they are not sure how much. Fed officials believe the expected level of inflation has a strong influence on actual price pressures and have flagged stable expectations as part of their confidence inflation will ultimately return to the 2% target. In a separate report on Monday, the Cleveland Fed said that in the first quarter top business executives expected weaker inflation pressures over the next year, with the predicted change in the consumer price index falling to 3.2% from 3.8% in the final quarter of 2024. The New York Fed report found a bit of a mixed bag on the consumer front. In January, the expected change in future household spending moved down to 4.4% from December’s 4.8%, for its lowest reading since January 2021. The report noted, however, that reading was still above where it was before the COVID-19 pandemic. The New York Fed said that as of last month people's perception of their financial situation had slipped relative to December, while perceptions of access to credit improved.NY Fed finds inflation expectations hovering around 3% https://reut.rs/4g2cvpF (Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci) ((Michael.Derby@thomsonreuters.com;))","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3736,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4195362055063892","authorId":"4195362055063892","name":"YONG11123","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1cc88e6e01866542324985e4c7ce6394","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4195362055063892","authorIdStr":"4195362055063892"},"content":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","text":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]","html":"Good idea. Can send this suggestion to Elon on X [Happy][LOL]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":421107024097792,"gmtCreate":1743840328836,"gmtModify":1743840332601,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"great article&nbsp;","listText":"great article&nbsp;","text":"great article","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/421107024097792","repostId":"2525734974","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2525734974","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1743826500,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2525734974?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-05 12:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Trump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2525734974","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.On Friday, China announ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5cbd67d757d6360790b5bf65a1435d1\" alt=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" title=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" tg-width=\"923\" tg-height=\"614\"/><span>On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.</p><p>While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.</p><p>A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&amp;P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.</p><p>“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&amp;P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.</p><p>Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&amp;P 500 up for a great 2019.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”</p><p>It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.</p><p>“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&amp;P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&amp;P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&amp;P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&amp;P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">We’ll be waiting for armistice day.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Is Fighting a Trade War He Can’t Win. The Stock Market Is the Loser\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-04-05 12:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f5cbd67d757d6360790b5bf65a1435d1\" alt=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" title=\"On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.\" tg-width=\"923\" tg-height=\"614\"/><span>On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.</p><p>While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.</p><p>A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&amp;P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.</p><p>“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&amp;P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.</p><p>Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&amp;P 500 up for a great 2019.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”</p><p>It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.</p><p>“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&amp;P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&amp;P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&amp;P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&amp;P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">We’ll be waiting for armistice day.</p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念",".DJI":"道琼斯","LU1064927863.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Europe Dynamic A (acc) SGD-H"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2525734974","content_text":"Forget economics. It’s the rules of battle investors should pay attention to now that President Donald Trump has launched a full-bore trade war against enemies and allies alike.On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower.“Liberation Day,” as Trump dubbed the announcement of broad tariffs on U.S. trading partners, was the moment skirmishes morphed into a full-blown conflict. The U.S. has set a baseline levy of 10% on all trading partners, with higher penalties on countries deemed the worst offenders by the administration. The final numbers aren’t based on tariff levels other countries have placed on the U.S., but on a formula involving Greek letters, trade balances, and lots of make-believe.While trade wars don’t involve armies and bloodshed, some of the same rules apply—especially when it’s a war of choice. Strengths need to be assessed, allies cajoled, goals set, and preparations made. When done right, victory can be reached with relative ease and result in an increase in standing. When poorly planned, strengths turn into weakness, quick victories become battles of attrition, and unintended consequences can last for years. The worst defeats come when a country overestimates its own strength and its opponents’ weakness—think Napoleon invading Russia while engaged with the United Kingdom—and finds itself overstretched and outmatched.A trade war isn’t much different. Targeting a country for unfair practices in a unified front with allies makes sense, and the tariffs placed on China during Trump’s first term, though imperfect, fall into that category. Liberation Day, however, was akin to launching an attack on everyone all at once. Now the U.S. is fighting a trade war on all fronts, while its opponents are only fighting the U.S. The risks far outweigh the rewards—and the risk for the stock market remains to the downside, even with the S&P 500 index already down 17% from its Feb. 19 high.“When you engage in a global fight, where the other countries are only engaged in a fight against you, it’s much more asymmetric,” writes BCA Research strategist Peter Berezin, who set a 4450 target on the S&P 500 at the end of last year, the lowest on the Street.Many observers point to the possibility of negotiations that bring the tariffs down—and end the selling—even though it’s unclear whether the president is even willing to do so. (He also posted a video on Truth Social saying he’s intentionally crashing the market.) U.S. trading partners might not want to negotiate either, particularly given how popular going up against Trump seems to be. From France’s President Emmanuel Macron, who called for suspending investment in the U.S. by European companies, to Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, bashing Trump has been good politics. What’s more, negotiations won’t favor the U.S., even if Trump wants to engage, explains 22V strategist Dennis DeBusschere. “We are not geopolitical game theorists, but the design of the U.S. tariffs is so poor that it puts the U.S. in a weak negotiating position,” he writes.The counterattacks have already started. On Friday, China announced 34% tariffs on the U.S., causing a stock market already reeling from Trump’s announcement to take another leg lower. Former allies, too, are acknowledging that what existed before has ceased to exist. Canada’s Carney, who has already matched Trump’s tariffs on cars, said 80 years of U.S. global economic leadership is over. “While this is a tragedy, it is also the new reality,” he said.It’s at moments like these that investors look for outside help to shore up markets. When stocks cratered due to the lockdowns imposed because of Covid-19, the Federal Reserve stepped in by cutting rates and making sure financial institutions wouldn’t face a liquidity squeeze. The ensuing rally was breathtaking and, coupled with generous spending by the federal government, prolonged. Similarly, a near bear market in 2018 caused Fed Chair Jerome Powell to blink—and set the S&P 500 up for a great 2019.The market is already pricing in more Fed cuts this year than it was just a week ago, including a 100% chance of one at the June Federal Open Market Committee meeting. If the stock market continues to fall like this, the Fed could even decide to lower interest rates before its May meeting, says James Stack, founder of InvesTech Research.The only problem: While cuts could cause the market to bounce in the short term, it isn’t unprecedented for them to have little impact in the medium term. Stack points to the 2008-09 financial crisis, which occurred even though the Fed started lowering rates in September 2007. “If the market slides too fast, I wouldn’t rule out an emergency pre-emptive cut,” he says. “I wouldn’t count on that stabilizing the market.”It didn’t have to be this way. While the economy wasn’t perfect, it was holding up well heading into the New Year. And Friday’s payrolls report, which showed an increase of 228,000 jobs in March, suggests that the activity is still in a good place.Few expect it to remain there. The latest numbers don’t capture the latest tariffs—or companies’ response to them—but souring sentiment suggests that executives were locked and loaded and ready to act. On Thursday, Chrysler parent Stellantis temporarily laid off workers in U.S. plants that assemble cars from parts made in Mexico and Canada, and other car makers could follow suit.“It’s a pity to see the administration take a perfectly good economy and hit it with a wrecking ball,” says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.And what a wrecking ball it is. The moves will bring tariffs up from 2.5% at the end of 2024 to more than 20% when they go into effect. That is the highest levels since the 1930s, when the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act helped turned a recession into the Great Depression.The UBS economics team believes that U.S. gross domestic product could take a 1.5-to-two percentage-point hit due to U.S. tariffs, while inflation could rise to near 5%. “The magnitude of damage they could cause to the U.S. economy makes one’s rational mind regard the possibility of them sticking as low,” UBS strategist Bhanu Baweja writes of the tariffs.While President Donald Trump called it Liberation Day, others have dubbed it “Hibernation Day,” “Ruination Day,” or even “Obliteration Day.” We’ll just call it the next step on the way to a bear market, which is almost surely on its way. It’s already arrived for the small-cap Russell 2000 index, down 25% since hitting a 52-week high on Nov. 25, fell into one on Thursday, while theNasdaq Composite, off 22% since Dec. 16, joined it on Friday. The S&P 500, at 5238, would need to drop another 3.9% to 4915 to reach the 20% decline needed to call it a bear market. At this rate, it could get there next week.The problem with bear markets, at least the ones that aren’t immediately headed off with massive Fed action and government spending, is that they can be long and arduous. If what is happening now is like the pandemic selloff, the rebound could start in days. But the average bear market lasts nine months and can be even longer if the conditions are ripe. The S&P 500, for instance, didn’t bottom until March 2003 after peaking in March 2000. “If it’s a bear market in the Russell, it will be a bear market in the other indexes,” InvestTech’s Stack says. Other metrics, too, suggest that investors haven’t gotten risk-averse enough just yet. The S&P 500, at 19.5 times 12-month forward earnings, is down three points from its February peak, but is only back to where it was in January 2024. Earnings estimates for 2025 have started coming down, but still suggest double-digit growth this year. Technical indicators, too, point to more selling to come: Twenty-seven percent of the stocks in the S&P 500 continue to trade above their 200-day moving average, above the 20%-or-lower level that would signal a washout.Options markets are getting closer to sending a buy signal, but are not quite there yet. The Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, hit nearly 46 on Friday but is still below the 66 peak it reached during last August’s Japan-inspired selloff. Implied correlation—a measure of stocks’ propensity to trade in sync with each other—has also risen but could rise even more, suggesting that even defensive sectors like staples and healthcare, which have held up so far, could drop as well, says 22V’s DeBusschere. “It’s just safer to reduce risk and be on the sidelines,” he writes.In other words, it’s time for risk management, not panic. Stack, who had moved his clients into portfolios consisting heavily of cash, healthcare, dividend payers, and staples before the tariff announcement, recommends making changes if the idea of another 10% decline in the stock market makes an investor uncomfortable. “Don’t put cash under a mattress and hide,” he says. “Reduce exposure so you can sleep at night.”And it will be tempting for investors, conditioned to buy the dip, to jump in at the first sign of a bounce. But unless something changes materially, investors should fight the temptation to chase the market higher. “Everyone says buy the dip, but not now,” says Bill Strazzullo, chief market strategist at Bell Curve Trading. “This isn’t the time for it.”We’ll be waiting for armistice day.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"US7Y.BOND":0.9,"US30Y.BOND":0.9,"US10Y.BOND":0.9,"US12M.BOND":0.9,"US2Y.BOND":0.9,"US3Y.BOND":0.9,".IXIC":1.1,".SPX":1.1,"US5Y.BOND":0.9,"US6M.BOND":0.9,".DJI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3530,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":390562892755072,"gmtCreate":1736370848938,"gmtModify":1736374420748,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","listText":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues&nbsp;","text":"a reminder to only invest in companies with current revenues","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/390562892755072","repostId":"1154525879","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1154525879","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1736347500,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154525879?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-08 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Quantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154525879","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Quantum computing stocks fell in premarket trading on Wednesday after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.QUBT fell 18%; Rigetti Computing, QMCO fell 16%; D-Wave Quantum fell 15%; IONQ fell 11%.“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “I","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ecbbcd8e249e9b02279db0402ec1a437\" tg-width=\"395\" tg-height=\"242\"/></p><p>“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”</p><p>The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.</p><p></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Quantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQuantum Computing Stocks Tumble as Nvidia CEO Sees Use Years Away; Rigetti Down 41%; QUBT Drops 38%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-08 22:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.</p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ecbbcd8e249e9b02279db0402ec1a437\" tg-width=\"395\" tg-height=\"242\"/></p><p>“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”</p><p>The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.</p><p></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QUBT":"Quantum Computing Inc.","ARQQ":"Arqit Quantum Inc.","QMCO":"昆腾","QBTS":"D-Wave Quantum Inc.","IONQ":"IONQ Inc.","RGTI":"Rigetti Computing"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154525879","content_text":"Quantum computing stocks fell in Wednesday trading after Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang said “very useful” quantum computers are likely decades away.Rigetti Computing fell 41%; D-Wave Quantum fell 40%; QUBT fell 38%; IONQ fell 36%; QMCO fell 31%.“If you kind of said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it’s probably on the late side,” Huang said in a question-and-answer session during Nvidia’s analyst day. “If you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it.”The stocks have soared in recent months amid excitement about the potential of the technology, which was heightened last month following a quantum computing breakthrough by Alphabet Inc.Quantum Computing shares had gained more than 1,800% over the past 12 months to $17.49 through Tuesday’s close. Rigetti rose more than 1,500% to $18.39 over the same span while D-Wave advanced nearly 1,000% to $9.55 and IonQ more than 300% to $49.59.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QUBT":1.1,"IONQ":1.1,"QMCO":1.1,"QBTS":1.1,"ARQQ":1.1,"RGTI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2206,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":576693234184848,"gmtCreate":1781819052007,"gmtModify":1781820409287,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","listText":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","text":"Federico Faggin invented the microprocessor and Intel.\"Intel tried to erase his name from the history of the microprocessor... and boycotted any recognition to him. Only after many interventions by Faggin and his wife did Intel give limited acknowledgment.\" — Historical record from the Intel 4004 project archive. It took decades of fierce pushback from historians, tech journalists, and Faggin himself to correct the record. Today, he is widely recognized globally—and was even awarded the National Medal of Technology by the US government—as the true father of the microprocessor..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/576693234184848","repostId":"2644748387","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2644748387","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1781775354,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2644748387?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-06-18 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2644748387","media":"Reuters","summary":"June 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth ‌Social post on Thursday that Apple had agreed to work with Intel to design and build its chips in the ⁠United States.Intel shares...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d782a60f7d1804b32736c8a9fa3f879a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"615\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has agreed to work with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c2e4611565eb783c390ebabdced5b3a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"1065\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters&#39; request for comments outside regular business hours.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world&#39;s largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump previously said he &#34;should have asked for more&#34; of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government&#39;s Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Extends Rally to 9%. Trump Says Apple to Partner with Intel on US Chip Design, Production\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-06-18 17:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d782a60f7d1804b32736c8a9fa3f879a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"615\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> has agreed to work with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a> to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c2e4611565eb783c390ebabdced5b3a\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"1065\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\"></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters&#39; request for comments outside regular business hours.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world&#39;s largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump previously said he &#34;should have asked for more&#34; of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government&#39;s Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","LU2430703251.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (USD) INC","LU0314106906.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL EQUITY \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","LU2756315318.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (SGDHDG) INC A","SG9999017495.SGD":"UGDP UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"B\" (SGD) ACC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","SG9999014914.USD":"UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH (USDHDG) INC","LU1003077747.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A6\" (HKDHDG) INC","SG9999015341.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Acc SGD-H","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","LU0314104364.USD":"MANULIFE GF AMERICAN GROWTH \"AA\" (USD) INC","IE00B3SWFQ91.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"E\" (USD) INC","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU2242649171.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1066051811.HKD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM2\" (HKD) INC","LU2361044949.HKD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (HKD) ACC","SG9999014880.SGD":"大华全球优质成长基金Acc SGD","LU2361044865.SGD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","LU2087621335.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4598":"佩洛西持仓","LU2417539215.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMF\" (USD) INC","LU2361045086.USD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BYXW3230.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"AA\" (USD) ACC","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00BN29S564.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A3\" (USD) INC","IE00B775H168.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A5M\" (HKD) INC","IE0004445015.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1066053197.SGD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM3\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4602":"量子计算概念","IE0004086264.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2028103732.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU2065170008.USD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC","LU0985320562.USD":"NORDEA 1 GLOBAL STARS EQUITY \"BP\" (USD) ACC","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD","LU1267930730.SGD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金AS Acc SGD (CPF)","LU1582987324.SGD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","MACW.SI":"APPLE 3xLongSG261006","LU2461242641.AUD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0545039389.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A2\" ACC","LU1582987597.SGD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4605":"半导体精选","LU2456880835.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AT\" (USD) ACC","INTC":"英特尔","IE0001KFT4U8.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE GLOBAL GROWTH LEADERS \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0466842654.USD":"HSBC ISLAMIC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0009G5SDU7.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (USD) INC","LU1674673428.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","IE000ITXATA3.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (USD) ACC","LU1674673691.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (USD) INC","IE000YTNTUN2.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG)INC","LU2592432038.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1642822529.SGD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU2602419157.SGD":"HSBC ISLAMIC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"AC\" (SGD) ACC","IE00BDCRKT87.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC","LU0444973449.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"DU\" (USD) ACC","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","LU1496350171.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED BALANCED \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4576":"AR","LU2505996681.GBP":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (GBPHDG) INC","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","LU0320765059.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD","LU0158827948.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD","LU1914381329.SGD":"Allianz Best Styles Global Equity Cl ET Acc H2-SGD","LU2023250843.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AT Acc H2-SGD","LU2420271590.USD":"ALLIANZ SELECT INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU2505996509.AUD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (AUDHDG) INC","LU2065171311.SGD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0868494708.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) INC","LU1839511570.USD":"WELLS FARGO GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2065171402.SGD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (SGD) INC","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0096362180.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL FOCUS \"DU\" (USD)","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4612":"AI芯片","LU2552382058.USD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4579":"人工智能","LU2552382132.HKD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0029864427.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00B19Z8X17.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH  \"AG\" (USD) ACC","BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU2720916845.USD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0861579265.USD":"联博低波幅策略股票基金A","LU2247934214.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS SUSTAINABLE FUTURE CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0003U64NQ7.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1935042215.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (USD) INC A","BK4573":"虚拟现实","LU0096364046.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"DU\" (USD) ACC","IE00BFSS7M15.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD-H","LU2458330169.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0820562030.AUD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMH2\" (AUDHDG) H2 INC","IE000KEQY171.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"M\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0109392836.USD":"富兰克林科技股A","LU2458330243.SGD":"FRANKLIN SHARIAH TECHNOLOGY \"A-H1\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LINT":"Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF","SG9999015945.SGD":"LionGlobal Disruptive Innovation Fund A SGD","HK0000914686.HKD":"GFI Global Select Equity Fund Class A (HKD)","LU0965509010.AUD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (AUDHDG) INC","HK0000914660.USD":"GFI Global Select Equity Fund Class A (USD)","LU0345770308.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4141":"半导体产品","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1582986359.USD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (USDHDG) ACC","SG9999014898.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fund Dis SGD","LU0444971666.USD":"天利全球科技基金","SG9999018865.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fd Cl Dist SGD-H","LU1267930490.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"AS\" (SGD) INC A","LU0057025933.USD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (USD) ACC","LU2106854487.HKD":"ALLIANZ THEMATICA \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU0889565833.HKD":"FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0965509101.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2065169927.USD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL MAXIMA \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999018857.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fd Cl Acc SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","AAPB":"2倍做多AAPL ETF-GraniteShares","LU1935042488.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU0251132253.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","AAPD":"1倍做空AAPL ETF-Direxion","IE000W1ABFV2.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"R\" (USD) INC","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","LU0203202063.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A2X\" (USD) ACC","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","AAPU":"2倍做多AAPL ETF-Direxion","LU1066051225.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU0203201768.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (USD) INC","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2023250330.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG\" (USD) INC","AAPW":"AAPL周配息ETF-Roundhill","AAPX":"2倍做多Apple ETF-T-Rex","LU1629891620.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMG2\" (H2-HKD) INC","LU1804176565.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1699723380.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"AP\" (USD) ACC","AAPY":"AAPL收益溢价策略ETF-Kurv","LU0553294199.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A5G\" (USD) INC","LU0069063385.USD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999014542.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Acc SGD","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","LU0964807845.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME & GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BQXX3D17.EUR":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (EUR) ACC","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU0784385170.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI ASSET INCOME \"A6\" (HKDHGD) INC","IE00BQXX3C00.GBP":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (GBP) ACC","IE00BQXX3F31.USD":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (USD) ACC","HK0000306685.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU2108987350.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV GLOBAL OPPORTUNITY SUSTAINABLE (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2213496289.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0345768153.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC MANAGED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1066051498.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","LU1037948897.HKD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","LU0265550359.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU2764262908.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU1934455277.USD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"AD\" (USD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","SG9999000418.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard Global Technology SGD","LU1037948541.HKD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","HK0000306701.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0823421416.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) INC","IE00BDRTCR15.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"ADC\" (USD) INC A","LU1934455194.USD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU2054465674.USD":"UBS (LUX) KEY SELEC SICAV DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION T \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","LU2265009873.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Growth Equity AS SGD-H","LU2403377893.USD":"ALLIANZ SELECT INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (USD) INC","SG9999001424.SGD":"United E-Commerce Fund SGD","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0267386448.USD":"FIDELITY FIRST ALL COUNTRY WORLD \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","LU2250418816.HKD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJTD4V19.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LONG SHORT EQUITY \"A1\" (USD) ACC","LU2111349929.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU2236285917.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU0310800379.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global A Acc SGD","LU0724617625.USD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0788109477.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A2\" (HKDHGD) ACC","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","LU0942090050.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD)  INC","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","LU2286300806.USD":"Allianz Cyber Security AT Acc USD","LU0154236417.USD":"BGF US FLEXIBLE EQUITY \"A2\" ACC","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","LU0080751232.USD":"富达环球多元动力基金A","LU0345769128.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2430703178.SGD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","LU0128525929.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU2764263039.SGD":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0345769631.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","BK4543":"AI","LU0124676726.USD":"AB SICAV I - SUSTAINABLE US THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","LU2764263203.CNY":"BGF GLOBAL UNCONSTRAINED EQUITY \"A2\" (CNYHDG) ACC","LU0345770993.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0683600562.USD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2087625088.SGD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0061474960.USD":"天利环球焦点基金AU Acc","LU1267930573.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"AA\" (SGD) ACC A","IE000F7OJYX1.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","IE0000B7K699.USD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (USD) INC","LU2462157665.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","IE000BZT7R73.USD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2756315664.SGD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC","SG9999014906.USD":"大华全球优质成长基金Acc USD","IE000MB6IJN5.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU0957791311.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL FOCUS \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","HK0000320223.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BN8TJ469.HKD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1815333072.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL FOCUS \"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","IE00B4JS1V06.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU1935043023.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME \"AA\" (USD) INC A","IE00B775SV38.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US MULTICAP OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1291159041.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Silver Age A2 Acc SGD-H","HK0000320264.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) ACC","APLY":"AAPL期权收益策略ETF-YieldMax","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","LU0345768740.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC MANAGED \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU1582986433.USD":"M&G (LUX) INCOME ALLOCATION \"A-H\" (USDHDG) INC","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","LU2360106780.USD":"BGF WORLD TECHNOLOGY \"A4\" (USD) INC","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU2089985449.USD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR OPPORTUNITIES \"AA\" (USD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU0795875169.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (div) SGD-H","LU2931357623.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL SEMICONDUCTOR OPPORTUNITIES \"AA\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2746668461.USD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (USD) ACC","LU2746668974.SGD":"MANULIFE DYNAMIC LEADERS \"AA\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0949170772.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 SGD-H","SG9999002232.USD":"Allianz Global High Payout USD","IE000WAW04H5.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGD) INC A","IE0004091025.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"B\" (USD) ACC","LU0265550946.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A5\" (USD) INC","IE000SO60NU8.SGD":"RQI GLOBAL \"I\" (SGDHDG) ACC A","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","LU2083900584.USD":"HSBC GIF US INCOME FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","SG9999002224.SGD":"Allianz Global High Payout SGD","LU0738911758.USD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 USD","LU1934455863.HKD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2360032135.SGD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1127390331.HKD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU0472753341.HKD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BK4W5L77.USD":"HSBC GLOBAL FUNDS ICAV US EQUITY INDEX \"HC\" (USD) ACC","LU1244550494.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) ACC","IE00BK4W5M84.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL FUNDS ICAV US EQUITY INDEX \"HC\" (HKD) ACC","LU0949170426.SGD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A6 SGD-H","LU0868494617.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1046421795.USD":"富达环球科技A-ACC","LU0784384876.USD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A6 USD","LU1974910355.USD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS USD","HK0000304805.HKD":"PICTET 战略收益基金 P类港元","IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","HK0000304797.USD":"PICTET 战略收益基金 P类 美元","LU2125154935.USD":"ALLSPRING (LUX) WF GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"I\" (USD) INC","SGXZ31699556.SGD":"UGDP UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"C\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2237443382.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA USD","LU2237443549.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA SGD-H","LU1366333091.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL FOCUS \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2237443622.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc USD","LU0965508806.USD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4529":"IDC概念","LU2237443978.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc SGD-H","LU0528227936.USD":"富达环球人口趋势基金A-ACC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","LU0238689110.USD":"贝莱德环球动力股票基金","LU2381873111.SGD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL EQUITY HIGH INCOME \"A6\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0661504455.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A5 SGD-H","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","LU1366192091.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY PLUS \"AM\" (USD) INC","LU0011850046.USD":"贝莱德全球长线股票 A2 USD","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","LU0048584097.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  GLOBAL THEMATIC OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2089284900.SGD":"Allianz Global Sustainability Cl AM Dis H2-SGD","LU2860962120.EUR":"CPR INVEST - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"A2\" (EUR) ACC A","LU0308772762.SGD":"Blackrock Global Allocation A2 SGD-H","LU1280957306.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQUITIES \"AUP\" (USD) INC","HK0000819398.USD":"BLACKROCK PREMIER SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL EQUITY HIGH INCOME FUND A10 (USD)INC","LU0456855351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Global Equity A (acc) SGD","LU2148611432.USD":"AZ ALLOCATION BALANCED BRAVE \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU1232071149.USD":"AZ FUND 1 GLOBAL GROWTH SELECTOR \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU2237438978.USD":"Amundi Funds US Pioneer A2 (C) USD","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU0274383776.USD":"MANULIFE GF US SMALL CAP EQUITY \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU2191332357.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (HKDHDG) INC","04335":"英特尔-T","LU1145028129.USD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AQ\" (USD) INC","LU0157215616.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL FOCUS \"A\" INC","LU0795875086.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (div) SGD","LU0708994859.HKD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","HK0000532082.HKD":"ALLIANZ SELECTION INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU0511384066.AUD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","LU0210536198.USD":"JPM US GROWTH \"A\" ACC","LU0823434583.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) ACC","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","LU0354030511.USD":"ALLSPRING  U.S. LARGE CAP GROWTH \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2896262040.SGD":"JPM US GROWTH FUND \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0823434740.USD":"BNP PARIBAS US GROWTH \"C\" (USD) INC","LU2023251221.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AM\" (USD) INC","LU1732800096.USD":"摩根大通环球收益基金A (irc)","LU0354030438.USD":"富国美国大盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU0143551892.USD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU2462591277.SGD":"TRP GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"AN\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU2954938101.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A8P\" (SGD) INC","LU1084165304.USD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2487616109.SGD":"JPM AMERICA EQUITY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0912757837.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (mth) SGD-H","LU2999663052.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL FOCUSED GROWTH EQUITY \"A4P\" (SGD) INC","LU0787776722.HKD":"AB SELECT US EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","INTW":"2倍做多INTC ETF-GraniteShares","LU2089283258.USD":"安联环球可持续基金Cl AM Dis","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU0210528500.USD":"JPM AMERICA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU1506573853.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL EQUITY \"AA\" (SGD) INC","LU0859254822.USD":"T ROWE PRICE GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00B4YYXB79.USD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"E\" (USD) ACC","LU2357627491.SGD":"TRP GLOBAL VALUE EQUITY \"AH\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2047632596.USD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0689626769.HKD":"AB SICAV I - SUSTAINABLE US THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0321505439.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Acc SGD","LU2100268510.USD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"AX\" (USD) INC","LU3102509885.SGD":"T.ROWE MULTI-ASSET GLOBAL INCOME \"A8P\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1935042991.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME  \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1778281490.HKD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (HKD) INC","SG9999015986.USD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0077335932.USD":"FIDELITY AMERICAN GROWTH \"A\" INC","LU2168564149.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"BAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU0476273544.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"BU\" (USD) ACC","LU1732799900.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (irc) SGD-H","LU2168563687.JPY":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (JPYHDG) ACC","LU0158827781.USD":" ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1917777945.USD":"安联专题基金Cl AT Acc","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","LU2168564065.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","LU2168564222.USD":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU2242650005.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS GLOBAL MULTI ASSET DYNAMIC \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU2168564495.EUR":"AZ ALLOCATION - TREND \"AI\" (EUR) ACC","LU2452424414.USD":"BGF ESG MULTI-ASSET \"A10\" (USDHDG) INC","BK4507":"流媒体概念","SG9999015978.USD":"利安颠覆性创新基金A","LU1989771016.USD":"东方汇理环球老龄化投资基金 A2 Acc","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","LU0133085943.USD":"T ROWE PRICE US BLUE CHIP EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0784385840.USD":"Blackrock Global Multi-Asset Income A2 USD","LU1989772840.SGD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0174119429.USD":"T ROWE PRICE US LARGE CAP GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU2063271972.USD":"富兰克林创新领域基金","BK4501":"段永平概念","LU1989772923.USD":"CPR Invest - Climate Action A2 Acc USD-H","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","LU2462591350.SGD":"T ROWE PRICE US LARGE CAP GROWTH EQUITY \"AN\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1935043536.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET DIVERSIFIED INCOME \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC A","LU2750360997.AUD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (AUDHDG) INC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU0784383803.USD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME FUND \"A\" (USD) INC A","LU2237443895.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1989764748.USD":"东方汇理环球颠覆性机遇A2 Acc","LU2750360641.GBP":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (GBPHDG) INC","LU2023250504.SGD":"Allianz Thematica Cl AMg DIS H2-SGD","LU0557290698.USD":"施罗德环球可持续增长基金","LU1815336760.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU2471134796.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0081259029.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - TECH OPPORTUNITY \"P\" (USD) ACC","SG9999014575.USD":"UOB UNITED INCOME FOCUS TRUST FUND (USDHDG) INC","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0323591593.USD":"SCHRODER ISF QEP GLOBAL QUALITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","LU2471134523.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1791710582.SGD":"Fidelity Global Demographics A-ACC-SGD (SGD/USD hedged)","LU1116320737.USD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (USD) INC","LU1119994496.HKD":"FIDELITY WORLD \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2471134879.HKD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1791710400.SGD":"Fidelity Global Demographics A-ACC-SGD","IE00B19Z8W00.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH \"A\" INC","IE0034235303.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US RESEARCH ENHANCED CORE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU2637965513.SGD":"BGF GLOBAL ALLOCATION \"A10\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU2471134952.CNY":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (CNYHDG) INC","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","LU2543165471.USD":"E FUND (HK) GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0215105999.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","LU1116320901.HKD":"BGF SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL ENHANCED EQUITY YIELD \"A6\" (HKD) INC","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","LU2092937148.SGD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A8 SGD-H","LU2092627202.USD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A8 USD-H","SG9999014559.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Dis SGD","IE0005OL40V9.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A6M\" (USD) INC","LU2077746001.SGD":"Blackrock ESG Multi-Asset A2 SGD-H","SG9999014567.USD":"UOB UNITED INCOME FOCUS TRUST FUND (USD) ACC","LU1496350502.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED DYNAMIC \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2237443465.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU0210533765.USD":"JPM GLOBAL GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJLML261.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL EQUITY INDEX \"HCH\" (HKD) ACC","LU1301847155.USD":"BGF GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME FUND \"A4G\" (USD) INC","SG9999015358.SGD":"United Income Focus Trust Dis SGD-H","LU1718418525.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Select Equity A (acc) SGD","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU0726765562.USD":"JPM GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD HEDGED) INC","LU2133065610.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Dividend A (mth) SGD","LU1235294995.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU0289739343.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU2125154778.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2347655073.USD":"JPM GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) INC A","LU2097344431.USD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","LU1206712785.SGD":"Aviva Investors - Multi-Strategy Target Return Ah SGD","IE000M9KFDE8.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LARGE CAP VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE000Q6AESB8.SGD":"PIMCO BALANCED INCOME AND GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0070217475.USD":"JPM GLOBAL SELECT EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU2097344357.USD":"SCHRODER ISF SUSTAINABLE MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU0957808578.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","LU1244550577.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Global Multi-Asset Income A (Mdis) SGD-H1","BK4512":"苹果概念","LU1206713676.USD":"Aviva Investors - Multi-Strategy Target Return Ah USD","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU1868837300.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"9\" (USD) ACC","LU1814569148.SGD":"WELLINGTON GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"D\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BLSP4239.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis USD Plus","AAPL":"苹果","LU0672654240.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD-H1","LU0965509283.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU1868836914.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"3\" (USD) ACC","LU0494093205.USD":"贝莱德ESG灵活多元资产A2 USD-H","SG9999015952.SGD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU1868837136.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"8\" (USD) ACC","BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","BK4515":"5G概念","LU1868836591.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"1U\"(USD) ACC","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU1868836757.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"2\" (USD) ACC","LU2347655156.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (icdiv) SGD-H","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU2430703095.HKD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (HKD) INC","LU2271345857.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","IE00B5949003.HKD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A\" (HKD) ACC"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20260618:nL4N42Q0BC:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2644748387","content_text":"Intel shares jumped 9.37% in premarket trading.U.S. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post on Thursday that Apple has agreed to work with Intel to ‌design and manufacture its chips in the United States.A partnership with Intel helps Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it seeks additional chip capacity. The iPhone maker relies heavily on TSMC, whose advanced production lines are in high demand from AI chipmakers such as ⁠Nvidia and AMD.Intel reached a preliminary deal to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of discussions, the Wall Street Journal reported in May.Apple and Intel did not immediately respond to a Reuters' request for comments outside regular business hours.An Apple contract gives Intel a steady demand from one of the world's largest consumer electronics companies, boosting both its reputation and a manufacturing business that has lagged TSMC ‌in ⁠recent years.Earlier this week, Intel said a new generation of its manufacturing tech 18A has entered its initial production, as the chipmaker sees strong demand for its central processors.Last year, the Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel ⁠and announced plans to invest roughly $10 billion in the chipmaker to build or expand U.S. factories.Trump previously said he \"should have asked for more\" of a stake ⁠in Intel, eight months after the government's Intel position grew to be worth more than $50 billion.The administration has been stepping up efforts to ⁠secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including taking equity stakes in companies to reduce reliance on China.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MACW.SI":0.6,"AAPX":0.6,"04335":1.95,"INTW":0.6,"AAPL":1.96,"AAPB":0.6,"INTC":2.1,"APLY":0.6,"AAPU":0.6,"AAPY":0.6,"AAPW":0.6,"LINT":0.6,"AAPD":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":423527604117928,"gmtCreate":1744408138454,"gmtModify":1744408142099,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","listText":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","text":"this shows how China is much smarter than US","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/423527604117928","repostId":"1103384421","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103384421","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1744382999,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1103384421?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-04-11 22:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Texas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103384421","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading th","content":"<div>\n<p>Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Texas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTexas Instruments, Intel Sink as China Tariffs Hit US-Made Chips\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2025-04-11 22:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UCTT":"超科林半导体","NVDA":"英伟达","AMAT":"应用材料","AVGO":"博通","SMCI":"超微电脑","ASML":"阿斯麦","MRVL":"迈威尔科技","NXPI":"恩智浦","ON":"安森美半导体","MU":"美光科技","GFS":"GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.","STM":"意法半导体","UMC":"联电","QCOM":"高通","SOX":"费城半导体指数","MCHP":"微芯科技","AMD":"美国超微公司","INTC":"英特尔","ARM":"ARM Holdings","TXN":"德州仪器","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-11/texas-instruments-intel-sink-as-china-tariffs-hit-us-made-chips?srnd=homepage-americas","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103384421","content_text":"Shares of chipmakers with US manufacturing plants fell Friday after China announced new tariffs, targeting semiconductor imports.Beijing will raise tariffs on all US goods from 84% to 125%, leading the China Semiconductor Industry Association to issue an emergency notice, which stated that customs determines the origin of imports by where chips are manufactured, not the home country of origin.The news put particular pressure on Texas Instruments Inc. and Intel Corp., which have semiconductor plants located in the US. TI shares fell 8.3%, while On Semi fell 6%, Intel and Microchip sank 5% and GlobalFoundries Inc. dropped 2.9%.“This is an incredibly uncertain time for chipmakers, and this is certainly not going to help,” said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. “Anything that hurts semis more than they’ve already been hit is bad for the general market,” he said.Analog Devices Inc. and Microchip Technology Inc. are also trading lower, along with Skyworks Solutions Inc. and Qorvo Inc., with the latter two notable suppliers to Apple Inc.The tariffs exclude companies that design chips but don’t manufacture them in the US, resulting in shares of some chipmakers to outperform on the day. Nvidia Corp. gained 2.2%, while US-listed shares of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. rose 3.4%.The tariffs will likely be “very good” for TSMC, and also act as a positive for Qualcomm Inc. and Advanced Devices Inc., said Jordan Klein, a tech-sector specialist at Mizuho Securities.“All my feedback suggests US-China trade deal is ALL THAT MATTERS RIGHT NOW for semi stocks and equity markets recovering,” Klein wrote in a note, with the emphasis included. “Very few I speak with believe a China deal will be struck anytime soon.”He sees positioning in semis as “very light” given the uncertainty.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":1.1,"NVDA":1.1,"STM":1.1,"QCOM":1.1,"ON":1.1,"UMC":1.1,"ARM":1.1,"TXN":1.1,"AMD":1.1,"MCHP":1.1,"SMCI":1.1,"MRVL":1.1,"SOX":1.1,"MU":1.1,"TSM":1.1,"GFS":1.1,"NXPI":1.1,"AMAT":1.1,"AVGO":1.1,"ASML":1.1,"UCTT":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3100,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403691449000128,"gmtCreate":1739581990114,"gmtModify":1739581993278,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","listText":"what a smart move from Musk to&nbsp;disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","text":"what a smart move from Musk to disrupt OpenAI's plans, delaying its restructuring and valuation growth, while giving his competing AI venture, xAI, more time to catch up.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403691449000128","repostId":"2511461008","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2511461008","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1032215980","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48"},"pubTimestamp":1739576981,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2511461008?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-15 07:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2511461008","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Mu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>OpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpenAI Board Rejects Musk's $97.4 Billion Offer\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1032215980\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4567337cbdf294b657b1fa87c5488b48);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-15 07:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.</p><p>The unsolicited approach is Musk&#39;s latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.</p><p>&#34;OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk&#39;s latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,&#34; OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.</p><p>On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a &#34;no thank you&#34; on X, prompting Musk to retort: &#34;swindler.&#34;</p><p>The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI&#39;s non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire&#39;s lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.</p><p>&#34;Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients&#39; much publicized &#39;bid&#39; is in fact not a bid at all,&#34; the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk&#39;s lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.</p><p>Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.</p><p>Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.</p><p>After Musk&#39;s departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.</p><p>Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.</p><p>In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://api.refinitiv.com/data/news/v1/stories/urn:newsml:reuters.com:20250214:nL4N3P51LZ:1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2511461008","content_text":"Feb 14 (Reuters) - OpenAI on Friday rejected a $97.4 billion bid from a consortium led by billionaire Elon Musk for the ChatGPT maker, saying the startup is not for sale.The unsolicited approach is Musk's latest attempt to block the startup he co-founded with CEO Sam Altman — but later left — from becoming a for-profit firm, as it looks to secure more capital and stay ahead in the AI race.\"OpenAI is not for sale, and the board has unanimously rejected Mr. Musk's latest attempt to disrupt his competition. Any potential reorganization of OpenAI will strengthen our nonprofit and its mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity,\" OpenAI said on X, quoting its Chairman Bret Taylor, on behalf of its board.On Tuesday, Altman told news website Axios that OpenAI was not for sale. He had rebuffed the offer on Monday with a \"no thank you\" on X, prompting Musk to retort: \"swindler.\"The consortium led by Musk, including his AI startup xAI, would withdraw its bid for OpenAI's non-profit arm if it drops plans to become a for-profit entity, the billionaire's lawyers said in a court filing on Wednesday.\"Two days ago, you filed a pleading in court adding new material conditions to the proposal. As a result of that filing, it is now apparent that your clients' much publicized 'bid' is in fact not a bid at all,\" the OpenAI board said, according to a letter signed by William Savitt, a lawyer representing the company, sent to Musk's lawyer Marc Toberof on Friday.Other investors in the consortium include Valor Equity Partners, Baron Capital and Hollywood power broker Ari Emanuel.Altman and Musk have been at loggerheads for years.After Musk's departure in 2019, OpenAI created a for-profit arm that has drawn billions of dollars in funding, sparking allegations from Musk that the startup breached its original mission by putting profit ahead of the larger public good.Musk sued Altman, OpenAI, and its biggest backer Microsoft in August last year for the alleged breach of contract.In November, Musk asked a U.S. district judge for a preliminary injunction to block OpenAI from moving to a for-profit structure.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MSFT":1.1,"TSLA":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3327,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":401658709819680,"gmtCreate":1739088520545,"gmtModify":1739088525028,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"time to invest in Crypto..","listText":"time to invest in Crypto..","text":"time to invest in Crypto..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/401658709819680","repostId":"2509037372","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2509037372","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1739066193,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2509037372?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-09 09:56","market":"nz","language":"en","title":"Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2509037372","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'. As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out?That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\". Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed t","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Trump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTrump Says America Was At Its Richest In The Late 1800s. Here Are The Facts.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-02-09 09:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The president recently said: &#39;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country.&#39;</p><p>As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.</p><p>&#34;We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That&#39;s when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It&#39;s fine, it&#39;s OK, but it would have been very much better,&#34; Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.</p><p>That&#39;s far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - &#34;made our country very rich through tariffs.&#34;</p><p>Similarly, Trump&#39;s nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country &#34;had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.&#34; In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an &#34;all-tariff policy&#34; that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.</p><p>The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.</p><p>Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country&#39;s improving standing wasn&#39;t primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.</p><p>Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was &#34;certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,&#34; said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that&#39;s not what Trump said, the professor added. &#34;He said that we were at our richest. That&#39;s not true,&#34; Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.</p><p>To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it&#39;s much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita &#34;sounds fancy,&#34; it basically shows the average household&#39;s income.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/58e4a4d2cee6f83b940464426e3919d5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"582\"/></p><p>Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner&#39;s view. It&#39;s &#34;just flatly incorrect&#34; to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.</p><p>Senik said it&#39;s possible that because there&#39;s such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are &#34;economically destructive,&#34; Trump has looked for &#34;other outside sources of validation.&#34;</p><p>&#34;He seems to believe he&#39;s found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,&#34; Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it&#39;s odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs &#34;pretty much from the country&#39;s founding.&#34; A federal income tax didn&#39;t come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.</p><p>For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and &#34;very few protections for workers,&#34; Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.</p><p>&#34;The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can&#39;t run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,&#34; the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.</p><h2 id=\"id_1446709016\">It wasn&#39;t the tariffs</h2><p>Trump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America&#39;s strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.</p><p>&#34;That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn&#39;t necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,&#34; said Robert W. Merry, the author of &#34;President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.&#34;</p><p>Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state&#39;s John B. Allen - is instructive.</p><p>&#34;He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn&#39;t the end-all and be-all,&#34; Merry told MarketWatch. &#34;I think that&#39;s one of the things that Trump doesn&#39;t quite understand.&#34;</p><p>&#34;There were a lot of causes to America&#39;s rise. Tariffs were not the reason,&#34; added UC Davis&#39;s Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. &#34;To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.&#34;</p><p>Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,&#34; he said. &#34;If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we&#39;ll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.&#34;</p><p>Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union&#39;s products.</p><p>On Monday, China&#39;s retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump&#39;s new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.</p><p>Supporters of Trump&#39;s tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they&#39;re an &#34;essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2509037372","content_text":"The president recently said: 'We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country.'As President Donald Trump promises that more tariffs will be coming, he has pointed to history to explain his fervor for imposing taxes on imports.\"We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913. That's when we were a tariff country, and then they went to an income-tax concept. And, you know, how did that work out? It's fine, it's OK, but it would have been very much better,\" Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Jan. 31, as he seemed to suggest tariffs were superior to income taxes.That's far from the only praise that Trump and his allies have heaped on tariffs, the Gilded Age and the periods just before or after it. In his inaugural address on Jan. 20, Trump said William McKinley - who was president from 1897 to 1901, and before that an influential congressman - \"made our country very rich through tariffs.\"Similarly, Trump's nominee for commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said at a Trump campaign rally in October that America was great about 125 years ago when the country \"had no income tax, and all we had was tariffs.\" In addition, Trump last summer floated the idea of imposing an \"all-tariff policy\" that could let the U.S. eliminate income taxes.The history lessons from Trump and his allies come as they look to bolster support for broad use of tariffs while facing skepticism from economists and some on Wall Street.Historians have a different view of the economy in the late-19th and early-20th century. They say the U.S. was ascendant from 1870 to 1913, but not at its richest. And the country's improving standing wasn't primarily due to tariffs - which are typically paid by companies doing the importing, and often passed on to American consumers.Around the time of the Gilded Age, the U.S. was \"certainly a rising power, and through a long-term process, it was becoming more and more prosperous and bigger, better and more productive,\" said Chris Meissner, an expert on economic history who teaches at the University of California, Davis. However, that's not what Trump said, the professor added. \"He said that we were at our richest. That's not true,\" Meissner told MarketWatch in an interview.To assess richness, Meissner recommended looking at how U.S. gross domestic product per capita has changed over time - and noted that it's much higher today. He said that while GDP per capita \"sounds fancy,\" it basically shows the average household's income.Troy Senik, the author of a biography of Grover Cleveland, who was U.S. president in the 1880s and 1890s, echoed Meissner's view. It's \"just flatly incorrect\" to say we were at our richest from 1870 to 1913, Senik said in an email. He pointed to the chart shown above, which indicates that U.S. GDP per capita - when adjusted for inflation - is around six times higher today than it was back then.Senik said it's possible that because there's such a strong consensus among economists that tariffs are \"economically destructive,\" Trump has looked for \"other outside sources of validation.\"\"He seems to believe he's found that in the Gilded Age, and William McKinley specifically,\" Senik said. The Cleveland biographer also said it's odd to characterize 1870-1913 as the period when we were a tariff country - because while that was a period when such protectionist levies were a major political issue, the federal government had been relying on tariffs \"pretty much from the country's founding.\" A federal income tax didn't come into effect for good until 1913, though one briefly existed around the time of the Civil War.For lower- and middle-class Americans, life was getting better during 1870-1913, but it was still more difficult than today - with no unemployment insurance, no minimum wages, no restrictions on working hours and \"very few protections for workers,\" Meissner said. There were also more financial crises and panics, with the Federal Reserve established in 1913 to prevent or diminish them.\"The fault line, if you want to put it that way, between those earlier years and modernity was the Great Depression. What we learned in the Great Depression was you can't run a modern economy like we used to run the 19th century,\" the UC Davis economist told MarketWatch.It wasn't the tariffsTrump is giving too much credit to tariffs as he talks about America's strengths in the late 1800s, according to historians.\"That was a period of great economic growth and prosperity, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was because we were funding our government through tariffs as opposed to income tax,\" said Robert W. Merry, the author of \"President McKinley: Architect of the American Century.\"Merry said a comment from one Republican senator from that period - Washington state's John B. Allen - is instructive.\"He said there have been prosperous times and bad economic times in high tariffs and low tariffs. In other words, the tariff isn't the end-all and be-all,\" Merry told MarketWatch. \"I think that's one of the things that Trump doesn't quite understand.\"\"There were a lot of causes to America's rise. Tariffs were not the reason,\" added UC Davis's Meissner. He said the key factors included growth in innovation, education and immigration. The incandescent light bulb, the telephone and the typewriter were among the major innovations of that era. \"To those, we could add resources and just our cities, which were engines of diffusion of information.\"Meissner also emphasized that tariffs were both criticized and promoted in the late 1800s, as well as throughout U.S. history.\"It's worthwhile thinking about who the winners and losers are from tariffs,\" he said. \"If we want an economy where lobbying is important - verging on corruption and favoritism and corporate welfare - we'll go for tariffs. But if we want efficiency and innovation, I think low tariffs is the winning combination.\"Trump on Jan. 31 said the additional upcoming tariffs could include ones on oil (CL00) (BRN00) and natural gas (NG00) that hit around Feb. 18. He also said there would be tariffs in the coming months on steel, copper (HG00), computer chips SOXX, pharmaceuticals PJP and the European Union's products.On Monday, China's retaliatory tariffs on certain American products are due to take effect, with those duties coming after Trump's new 10% levy on Chinese imports kicked in. Trump has agreed to a 30-day delay for new tariffs targeting imports from Canada and Mexico. He also has said he plans to announce reciprocal tariffs in the coming week.Supporters of Trump's tariffs include the Coalition for a Prosperous America, which maintains that they're an \"essential tool for rebuilding the U.S. industrial base, fostering long-term economic growth and reducing dependence on foreign imports.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,".DJI":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":397113565024416,"gmtCreate":1737976857810,"gmtModify":1737976861676,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","listText":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","text":"most of the stock is overvalued, and it was supposed to go down at some point","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/397113565024416","repostId":"1175396672","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1175396672","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1737976099,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175396672?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-01-27 19:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175396672","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China's DeepSeek. $Nvidia$ fell 13%; $Microsoft$, $Amazon$ slid over 6%; $Meta Platforms$, $Tesla$, $Alphabet$ fell around 5%.Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.Buzz grew over th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&amp;P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e2ad0b0d13419edfdb8b6c1738c3ea9f\" tg-width=\"486\" tg-height=\"249\"/></p><p>Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China&#39;s DeepSeek. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> fell 13%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a> slid over 6%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> fell around 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/52292516e3350ef99782f4b2d6179f2b\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"487\" tg-height=\"448\"/></p><p>Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq Futures Plunge over 4%; Nvidia Tumbles 13%; Microsoft, Amazon Fall over 6%; Tesla Sinks 5%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-01-27 19:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&amp;P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e2ad0b0d13419edfdb8b6c1738c3ea9f\" tg-width=\"486\" tg-height=\"249\"/></p><p>Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China&#39;s DeepSeek. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> fell 13%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a> slid over 6%; <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Alphabet</a> fell around 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/52292516e3350ef99782f4b2d6179f2b\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"487\" tg-height=\"448\"/></p><p>Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","GOOG":"谷歌","NVDA":"英伟达","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175396672","content_text":"Nasdaq futures tumbled 944.75 points, or 4.31%; Dow futures sank 378 points, or 0.85%; S&P 500 futures slid 147.25 points, or 2.40%.Most U.S. stocks fell in premarket trading amid concerns over AI progress from China's DeepSeek. Nvidia fell 13%; Microsoft, Amazon slid over 6%; Meta Platforms, Tesla, Alphabet fell around 5%.Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek rocked global technology stocks Monday, raising questions over America’s technological dominance.Buzz grew over the weekend about DeepSeek’s latest AI model being cost-effective while running on less-advanced chips, casting doubt on the validity of the sky-high valuations for companies like Nvidia Corp. Nvidia has led the global AI stock boom as its chips have been seen as essential to the technology.“DeepSeek shows that it is possible to develop powerful AI models that cost less,” said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee. “It can potentially derail the investment case for the entire AI supply chain, which is driven by high spending from a small handful of hyperscalers.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":1.1,"ESmain":1.1,"META":1.1,"AAPL":1.1,"TSLA":1.1,"MSFT":1.1,"NQmain":1.1,"YMmain":1.1,"AMZN":1.1,"GOOG":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386475574419968,"gmtCreate":1735395032956,"gmtModify":1735443166836,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","listText":"giving&nbsp;money to banks? No thank you","text":"giving money to banks? No thank you","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/386475574419968","repostId":"1175058181","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1175058181","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1735351200,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175058181?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-12-28 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175058181","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&amp;P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.</p><p>Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e1b5aa259bf24dc02c0463b0c3f2ceee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1080\"/></p><h2 id=\"id_4119342542\">Wells Fargo: 7,007</h2><p>A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">By the end of next December, the S&amp;P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.</p><p>This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&amp;P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_3359074262\">Deutsche Bank: 7,000</h2><p>Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&amp;P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&amp;P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings.</p><p> &#34;We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&amp;A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,&#34; Reid wrote in a note.</p><h2 id=\"id_1118312437\">Bank of America: 6,666</h2><p>Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.</p><p>“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.</p><p>In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.</p><h2 id=\"id_2979679817\">Morgan Stanley: 6,500</h2><p>The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.</p><p>Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.</p><h2 id=\"id_899646885\">JPMorgan Chase: 6,500</h2><p>JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&amp;P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.</p><h2 id=\"id_3740395280\">Goldman Sachs: 6,500</h2><p>The S&amp;P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy&#39;s growth and higher corporate earnings.12</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm&#39;s forecast reflects a &#34;12% total return with dividends&#34; by the end of next year, &#34;predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.&#34; The index has been on a tear this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from &#34;Phase 3&#34; of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. </p><h2 id=\"id_285638129\">Citigroup: 6,500</h2><p>The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&amp;P 500 for 2025 as its base case.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street’s Forecasts for 2025: S&P 500 May Jump Above 7,000 Points\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2024-12-28 10:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&amp;P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.</p><p>Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e1b5aa259bf24dc02c0463b0c3f2ceee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1080\"/></p><h2 id=\"id_4119342542\">Wells Fargo: 7,007</h2><p>A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">By the end of next December, the S&amp;P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.</p><p>This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&amp;P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_3359074262\">Deutsche Bank: 7,000</h2><p>Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&amp;P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&amp;P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings.</p><p> &#34;We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&amp;A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,&#34; Reid wrote in a note.</p><h2 id=\"id_1118312437\">Bank of America: 6,666</h2><p>Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.</p><p>“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.</p><p>In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.</p><h2 id=\"id_2979679817\">Morgan Stanley: 6,500</h2><p>The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&amp;P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.</p><p>Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.</p><h2 id=\"id_899646885\">JPMorgan Chase: 6,500</h2><p>JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&amp;P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.</p><h2 id=\"id_3740395280\">Goldman Sachs: 6,500</h2><p>The S&amp;P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy&#39;s growth and higher corporate earnings.12</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm&#39;s forecast reflects a &#34;12% total return with dividends&#34; by the end of next year, &#34;predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.&#34; The index has been on a tear this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from &#34;Phase 3&#34; of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. </p><h2 id=\"id_285638129\">Citigroup: 6,500</h2><p>The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&amp;P 500 for 2025 as its base case.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175058181","content_text":"Most major banks call for a third consecutive year of strong returns for the S&P 500, the benchmark stock index tracking 500 of the largest public American companies, offering a welcome bullish signal for investors already enjoying a historic bull market.Here are the current 2025 targets from top banks:Wells Fargo: 7,007A favorable macroeconomic backdrop and easing monetary policy will keep US equities soaring next year after banner performances in 2023 and 2024, according to Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.By the end of next December, the S&P 500 Index will be sitting at 7,007, the firm’s head of equity strategy Christopher Harvey wrote in a Dec. 3 note to clients.This leg of the rally is distinct from what’s come before in that Harvey isn’t suggesting investors pile into the Big Tech stocks that have dominated the market the past two years. Instead, he recommends a roughly 40% allocation to banks, 40% to communications services, and 20% to consumer staples. On an index level, he prefers the equal-weighted version of the S&P 500 over the regular market-capitalization version as breadth widens — plus, it offers more downside protection. And looking at size and style, he likes mid-cap growth shares.Deutsche Bank: 7,000Deutsche Bank set a target for the S&P 500, predicting the benchmark index will reach 7000 by the end of 2025.Jim Reid, Head of Global Economics and Thematic Research at Deutsche Bank, commented that this forecast hinges on a solid demand-supply backdrop for U.S. equities, with the bank expecting continued robust inflows into both equity and bond markets, albeit at a slightly slower pace.The new Street-high projection also factors in an anticipated increase in S&P 500 buybacks from an annual run rate of $1.1 trillion to about $1.3 trillion next year, rising in step with earnings. \"We see various aspects of the cycle still to come, including a move from de- to re-stocking; a pickup in capex outside Tech; a manufacturing recovery; rises in consumer and corporate confidence; a recovery in capital markets and M&A activity; a pickup in loan growth; and rest of the world growth,\" Reid wrote in a note.Bank of America: 6,666Bank of America believes the stock market could see another solid year with double-digit returns, and certain sectors are poised to enjoy outsized gains.“We see more opportunities in stocks than the index. In particular, we like companies with healthy cash return prospects and a tether to the US economy,” Savita Subramanian, BofA Securities head of U.S. equity and strategy, said in a note to clients.In particular, BofA said it is bullish on financials, discretionary, materials, real estate and utilities.Morgan Stanley: 6,500The new year is setting up to be a strong one thanks to lower Federal Reserve rates and a more business-friendly presidency in Washington, according to Morgan Stanley.Strategist Michael Wilson sees the S&P 500 reaching 6,500 in 2025. “The combination of the Fed rate cutting cycle with the election result has the potential to drive broad sentiment materially higher,” Wilson wrote.Wilson said the election results could lead to a “rise in corporate animal spirits” that may “catalyze a more balanced earnings profile across the market in 2025,” while an easier regulatory regime under President-elect Donald Trump boosts investor sentiment.JPMorgan Chase: 6,500JPMorgan set its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 index at 6,500, implying 8% upside potential from current levels.The target is driven by a projected earnings growth of 10% for the index, reaching $270 in earnings per share (EPS) next year. JPMorgan cites a combination of easing monetary policy, robust AI-driven capital spending, and improving market breadth as key catalysts for the expected growth.Smaller companies, particularly in the Russell 2000, are also projected to rebound strongly, delivering 40% earnings growth after consecutive years of decline.According to JPMorgan’s note, the US economy remains pivotal to this outlook.Goldman Sachs: 6,500The S&P 500 index could hit 6500 by the end of next year, according to Goldman Sachs, boosted by the U.S. economy's growth and higher corporate earnings.12Goldman Sachs chief equity strategist David Kostin wrote that the Wall Street firm's forecast reflects a \"12% total return with dividends\" by the end of next year, \"predicated on continued U.S. economic expansion, earnings growth of 11% in 2025.\" The index has been on a tear this year.The  Magnificent Seven stocks will continue to gain, Goldman said, but their margin of outperformance versus the other 493 stocks in the index will be smaller. Goldman also recommended buying mergers and acquisitions (M&A) candidates under a Donald Trump administration expected to ease regulation, as well as companies that gain from \"Phase 3\" of the AI evolution, like Apple and Snowflake. Citigroup: 6,500The stock market rally of 2024 shows no signs of slowing down in the new year, according to Citi.The bank set a 6,500 target for the S&P 500 for 2025 as its base case.Citi listed tailwinds from artificial intelligence, the continued expectation of an economic soft landing and President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration as potential catalysts for stocks heading into next year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ESmain":1.1,"UPRO":1.1,".SPX":1.1,"IVV":1.1,".DJI":1.1,"SPXU":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,"VOO":1.1,"SPY":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2182,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":499631608726408,"gmtCreate":1763005434562,"gmtModify":1763005438987,"author":{"id":"4179269729720672","authorId":"4179269729720672","name":"Kerop","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4179269729720672","authorIdStr":"4179269729720672"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"She said everyone should&nbsp;buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","listText":"She said everyone should&nbsp;buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","text":"She said everyone should buy Tesla stocks long term on Diary of a CEO only a few months ago. Now she's selling them off. So hypocritical.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/499631608726408","repostId":"2583681535","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2583681535","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1763003542,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2583681535?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-11-13 11:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2583681535","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"On Wednesday, Cathie Wood-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving Circle Internet Group Inc. (NYSE:CRCL), Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>On Wednesday, <strong>Cathie Wood</strong>-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRCL\">Circle</a></strong>, <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba Group</a></strong>, and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a></strong>. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.</p><h2 id=\"id_1400706566\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The TSLA Trade: </h2><p>Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla<strong> </strong>by selling 70,474 shares through <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKW\">ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</a></strong>. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.</p><p>This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.</p><p>Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.</p><h2 id=\"id_1801452050\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Circle Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.</p><p>Despite the <strong>USDC</strong> issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.</p><h2 id=\"id_2486105261\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Alibaba Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.</p><p>The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.</p><p>On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_249147130\" style=\"text-align: start;\">Other Key Trades</h2><ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\"><li><p>Sold 205,524 shares of <strong>Iridium Communications Inc</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>, 53,954 shares through <strong>AKRQ</strong> and 15,897 shares via <strong>ARKX</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 43,940 shares of <strong>SoFi Technologies Inc</strong> via <strong>ARKF</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Purchased 50,084 shares of <strong>Twist Bioscience Corp</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 84,515 shares of <strong>Exact Sciences Corp</strong> via <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Dumps $30 Million Worth of Tesla Stock Amid China Sales Slump, Loads up Circle and This Hot Chinese AI Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-11-13 11:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>On Wednesday, <strong>Cathie Wood</strong>-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRCL\">Circle</a></strong>, <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba Group</a></strong>, and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a></strong>. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.</p><h2 id=\"id_1400706566\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The TSLA Trade: </h2><p>Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla<strong> </strong>by selling 70,474 shares through <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a></strong> and <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKW\">ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</a></strong>. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.</p><p>This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.</p><p>Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.</p><h2 id=\"id_1801452050\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Circle Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.</p><p>Despite the <strong>USDC</strong> issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.</p><h2 id=\"id_2486105261\" style=\"text-align: start;\">The Alibaba Trade</h2><p>Ark Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.</p><p>The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.</p><p>On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.</p><h2 id=\"id_249147130\" style=\"text-align: start;\">Other Key Trades</h2><ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\"><li><p>Sold 205,524 shares of <strong>Iridium Communications Inc</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>, 53,954 shares through <strong>AKRQ</strong> and 15,897 shares via <strong>ARKX</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 43,940 shares of <strong>SoFi Technologies Inc</strong> via <strong>ARKF</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Purchased 50,084 shares of <strong>Twist Bioscience Corp</strong> through <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li><li><p>Sold 84,515 shares of <strong>Exact Sciences Corp</strong> via <strong>ARKK</strong>.</p></li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLL":"2倍做多TSLA ETF-Direxion","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","BABA":"阿里巴巴","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/25/11/48824168/cathie-wood-dumps-30-million-worth-of-tesla-stock-amid-china-sales-slump-loads-up-circle-and-this-hot-chinese-ai-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2583681535","content_text":"On Wednesday, Cathie Wood-led Ark Invest executed significant trades involving Circle, Alibaba Group, and Tesla. These trades reflect Ark’s strategic positioning in the market, with notable buys in Circle and Alibaba, and a sell-off in Tesla.The TSLA Trade: Ark Invest reduced its holdings in Tesla by selling 70,474 shares through ARK Innovation ETF and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. Tesla’s stock closed at $430.60 on Wednesday, marking a 2.05% decline. The trade is valued at approximately $30.3 million.This move comes amid reports of Tesla’s declining sales in China, where October deliveries fell by 36% year-over-year to 26,000 units. Year-to-date deliveries are down roughly 40,000 vehicles, putting the company at risk of its first annual decline in the market. Including exports, total deliveries from Tesla's Shanghai factory dropped 9.9% to 61,497 vehicles.Notably, Ark dumped $2.4 million worth of Tesla shares on Monday. The firm also sold 789 shares of the Elon Musk-headed automaker on Tuesday.The Circle TradeArk Invest made a substantial purchase of Circle shares, acquiring 245,830 shares via the ARKK ETF and 70,613 shares through ARKW. Circle’s stock closed at $86.30, down 12.21% on Wednesday, valuing the transaction at approximately $30.5 million.Despite the USDC issuer’s impressive 202% profit surge in the third quarter, the stock’s decline suggests investor skepticism about its long-term growth potential. Circle’s third-quarter net income reached $214 million, with total revenue and reserve income increasing by 66% to $740 million.The Alibaba TradeArk Invest also increased its stake in Alibaba, purchasing 4,878 shares via ARKK, 364 shares through ARK Fintech Innovation ETF, and 1,396 shares with ARKW. Alibaba’s stock closed at $157.91, down 1.8% on Wednesday, with the trade valued at approximately $1.05 million.The Jack Ma-founded company continues to attract investors with its focus on artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and instant-commerce delivery. The stock has surged 98% year-to-date, despite potential risks from U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips.On Tuesday, Ark Invest had purchased $25.36 million worth of Alibaba shares.Other Key TradesSold 205,524 shares of Iridium Communications Inc through ARKK, 53,954 shares through AKRQ and 15,897 shares via ARKX.Sold 43,940 shares of SoFi Technologies Inc via ARKF.Purchased 50,084 shares of Twist Bioscience Corp through ARKK.Sold 84,515 shares of Exact Sciences Corp via ARKK.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLL":1.5,"ARKK":1.5,"BABA":2,"TSLA":1.5}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2695,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}