• Like
  • Comment
  • Favorite

The S&P 500 is too tech-heavy. This alternative ETF keeps beating it.

Dow Jones10-05

MW The S&P 500 is too tech-heavy. This alternative ETF keeps beating it.

By Philip van Doorn

The various stock indexing and weighting schemes will shine at different times, but some approaches are designed to be immune from market cycles

Investors love index funds with good reason. They allow for easy diversification and typically feature low expenses. For patient investors, broad index funds might perform better than most actively managed funds because that management is more expensive and because it is so difficult to select index-beating portfolios consistently.

But with the S&P 500 SPX having returned 36.4% over the past year through Sept. 30, warnings to investors typically center on two subjects.

The first is valuation. The index trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 21.6, based on Monday's closing prices and weighted consensus earnings-per-share estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. That is up from a forward P/E of 18 a year ago, and well above the 10-year average forward P/E of 18.3, according to data provided by FactSet.

The second warning is about the concentration of the large-cap U.S. benchmark index. The S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization. On Monday, the portfolio of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY, the oldest and largest exchange-traded fund tracking the index, was 20% allocated to three companies: Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$, Microsoft Corp. $(MSFT)$ and Nvidia Corp. $(NVDA)$. These were its top five holdings, which made up 26% of the portfolio:

   Company               Ticker   % of SPY portfolio  One-year total return through Sept. 30 
   Apple Inc.             AAPL                  7.3%                                     37% 
   Microsoft Corp.        MSFT                  6.6%                                     37% 
   Nvidia Corp.           NVDA                  6.1%                                    179% 
   Amazon.com Inc.        AMZN                  3.6%                                     47% 
   Meta Platforms Inc.    META                  2.6%                                     91% 
                                                                             Source: FactSet 

SPY was established in January 1993 and has $591 billion in assets under management.

All total returns in this article include reinvested dividends and are net of expenses.

The S&P 500's weighting by market cap rewards success, but it can also lead to an index fund's investors having more of their money concentrated in a handful of stocks than they might realize.

Different weighting and selection within the S&P 500

One obvious way to counter a cap-weighted index is to allocate equally. Since share prices move daily, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP is rebalanced quarterly. The equal weighting leads to more of a value tilt, as the technology giants at the top of the index, with such strong sales growth for a company such as Nvidia, all have equal weighting, even to companies that are growing at a snail's pace. This makes for differentiated performance. For example, in 2022, when SPY was down 18.2%, RSP fell only 11.6%. But when SPY roared back with a 26.2% return in 2023, RSP rose 13.7%.

Invesco has several other methods for alternative weightings to the S&P 500, and factor-based strategies to track indexes that select from within the index.

For a comparison of long-term performance, we limited the list to Invesco S&P 500 Factor ETFs that were established more than five years ago. In addition to comparing the factor ETFs' performance with SPY, we compared them with the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO, which was established in September 2010 and has $509 billion in assets under management. SPY's annual expenses come to s 0.0945% of average assets under management, while VOO's expense ratio is 0.05%.

The following tables have performance comparisons for SPY, VOO and nine of Invesco's factor funds that have existed for more than five years. The first table shows total returns and the second table shows average annual returns.

The two broad S&P 500 index funds are at the top of each table. Then the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF is listed next because it is the only one of the factor ETFs that has existed for more than 15 years. After that, the list is sorted by five-year returns.

Any bolded number for the factor ETFs means its return for that period was higher than those of SPY and VOO.

First, total returns:

   ETF                                                  1-year return  3-year return  5-year return  10-year return  15-year return 
   SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust                                       36.0%          39.8%         109.0%          247.7%            618% 
   Vanguard S&P 500 ETF                                         36.3%          40.1%         109.4%          249.8%             N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF                                  36.2%          45.1%         117.3%          269.7%            710% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF                                 59.1%          56.4%         138.4%             N/A             N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF                                     16.4%          24.9%          97.3%          267.1%             N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF                                  27.5%          41.4%          98.3%          204.3%            557% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF                             28.5%          25.8%          81.1%          180.4%            514% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF                              30.9%           4.4%          71.3%          170.7%            587% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF                           24.8%          25.9%          37.9%          154.8%             N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF             34.4%          34.8%          46.8%          146.3%             N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF                               23.7%          25.9%          54.8%          110.9%            422% 
                                                                                                                    Source: FactSet 

And now, the average annual returns:

   ETF                                                  1-year return  3-year avg. return  5-year avg. return  10-year avg. return  15-year avg. return 
   SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust                                       36.0%               11.8%               15.9%                13.3%                14.0% 
   Vanguard S&P 500 ETF                                         36.3%               11.9%               15.9%                13.3%                  N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF                                  36.2%               13.2%               16.8%                14.0%                15.0% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF                                 59.1%               16.1%               19.0%                  N/A                  N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF                                     16.4%                7.7%               14.6%                13.9%                  N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF                                  27.5%               12.3%               14.7%                11.8%                13.4% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF                             28.5%                7.9%               12.6%                10.9%                12.9% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF                              30.9%                1.5%               11.4%                10.5%                13.7% 
   Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF                           24.8%                8.0%                6.6%                 9.8%                  N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF             34.4%               10.5%                8.0%                 9.4%                  N/A 
   Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF                               23.7%                8.0%                9.1%                 7.7%                11.6% 
                                                                                                                                        Source: FactSet 

It is no surprise that VOO has beaten SPY slightly for all periods going back to 10 years, because of VOO's lower expenses.

For the full 15-year period, the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF SPHQ has been the best performer. It has beaten SPY for all periods on the tables and has beaten VOO for all periods except for the one-year period through Sept. 30. SPHQ holds the 100 stocks among the S&P 500 that rank highest according to a quality score that combines returns on equity, debt to book value and an "accruals ratio" of operating assets to total assets. The indexes for all of these ETFs are maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices. The index tracked by this fund is rebalanced twice a year, with other adjustments made immediately after spinoffs or if a company is removed from the S&P 500. Each stock is weighted by the product of its quality score and its market capitalization. SPHQ is rated five stars (the highest rating) within Morningstar's "U.S. Blend Large Fund" category. Its expense ratio is 0.15%.

The other notable outperformer among these S&P 500 factor ETFs has been the Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF SPMO, which was established in October 2015. It outperformed SPY and VOO for the one-, three- and five-year periods through Sept. 30. This fund currently holds 99 stocks of companies within the highest "momentum scores." Twice a year, the components of the S&P 500 are ranked by how much their prices have risen over the previous 12 months, then scored to take volatility into account. The portfolio is made up of the 20% of companies in the S&P 500 that score highest, then weighted by a combination of the momentum score and market capitalization. This fund also has a five-star rating from Morningstar, within the investment information provider's "U.S. Fund Large Growth" category. It has a 0.13% expense ratio.

(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires

October 05, 2024 07:00 ET (11:00 GMT)

MW The S&P 500 is too tech-heavy. This -2-

These factor ETFs "will shine most brightly during different parts of the economic cycle," according to Nick Kalivas, who heads Invesco's factor strategy for exchange-traded funds.

During an interview with MarketWatch, he said a particular advantage of the S&P 500 Momentum ETF was that it could be less affected by broad market cycles, because of its weighting toward stocks that have performed well recently.

He added that a combination of approaches to indexing "can be helpful for portfolio management because they work at different times" within market and economy cycles.

Here's a summary of the other seven listed Invesco factor funds, leaving them in the same order as on the tables:

-- The Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF SPGP holds 76 stocks as it tracks the S&P 500 Growth at a Reasonable Price Index. It was established in June 2011 and has annual expenses of 0.36% of average assets under management.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF RWL holds all 500 stocks but weights the companies by revenue, rather than by market cap. It was established in February 2008 and has an expense ratio of 0.39%.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF RSP was established in April 2023. Its expense ratio is 0.20%.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF RPG currently holds 67 stocks. It tracks the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, which scores companies by growth of sales and earnings, along with price momentum. The index is reconstituted once a year and weighted by Pure Growth Score. This means none of the companies in the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index overlap those in the S&P 500 Pure Value Index. This is in contrast to the Russell 1000 Growth RLG and Russell 1000 Value RLV indexes, which have hundreds of companies straddling them. RPG was established in March 2006 and its expense ratio is 0.35%.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF SPLV holds 100 stocks among the S&P 500 that have shown the least price volatility during the preceding 12 months when it is reconstituted quarterly. The portfolio is weighted based on the inverse of each stock's price volatility. The fund was established in May 2011. Its expense ratio is 0.25%.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF SPHD is reconstituted twice a year. The first cut is to reduce the S&P 500 to the 75 stocks with the highest dividend yields over the previous 12 months. Then the list is trimmed to 50 showing the least price volatility over the previous 252 trading days. Those 50 stocks are then weighted by dividend yield. This fund was established in October 2012. Its expense ratio is 0.30%.

-- The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF RPV currently holds 94 stocks as it tracks the S&P 500 Pure Value Index, which scores companies by ratios of book value, earnings and sales to price. The index is reconstituted once a year and weighted by Pure Growth Score. RPV was established in March 2006 and has an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Don't miss: 14 energy stocks whose ample cash flow might benefit shareholders

-Philip van Doorn

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

October 05, 2024 07:00 ET (11:00 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

empty
No comments yet
 
 
 
 

Most Discussed

 
 
 
 
 

7x24

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email:uservice@ttm.financial