To The Moon

‌$英伟达(NVDA)$  ‌ VERA RUBIN SUPPLY CHAIN Rubin is becoming a system-level buildout with rising content across memory, packaging, networking, power and cooling pushing the opportunity well beyond the GPU: • Memory sits with‌$美光科技(MU)$  ‌,‌$SK海力士(SKHY)$  ‌& Samsung supplying the DRAM & HBM feeding Rubin accelerators while‌ $闪迪(SNDK)$  ‌adds exposure to storage layer around AI systems • Advanced packaging runs through‌$台积电(TSM)$  ‌，‌$艾马克技术公司(AMKR)$  ‌&‌$

Ask any funded prop trader or institutional desk manager what keeps them employed, and they won't point to a secret indicator or a 90% win-rate algorithm. They will point to a single survival constraint: The 1% Rule. Most retail traders trade based on conviction. When they "feel" a setup is guaranteed, they increase their risk to 5%, 10%, or even 20% of their account. A single unexpected news spike or liquidity sweep destroys weeks of progress. Trading isn't about being right on every trade it's about staying solvent long enough for your statistical edge to play out over hundreds of trades. The Power of Fixed-Percentage Sizing The core concept behind the 1% Rule is that your position size dynamically scales with your equity. As your account grows, your dollar risk increases. As your accoun

Most traders don't blow up their accounts because of bad entry setups. They blow up because they trade arbitrary position sizes. If your strategy is to buy "100 shares" or "1 full lot" on every single trade regardless of where your stop-loss sits, you aren't trading—you are running a high-variance casino strategy. The Retail Trap: Fixed Sizing vs. Fixed Risk Here is how 90% of retail traders position size: Pick an entry price. Pick an arbitrary number of shares or contracts (e.g., "$5,000 worth"). Set a stop-loss wherever the chart "looks good." Why this leads to account blowups: If Trade A has a 2% stop-loss distance and Trade B has a 10% stop-loss distance, taking $5,000 position sizes on both means you are risking 5x more dollar value on Trade B. One bad volatile trade erases five good

Welcome to another essential technical breakdown. We keep getting great questions about "textbook plays" and the influence of sophisticated algorithms (algos) in modern trading. While algorithms are certainly smarter today, they still operate based on mathematical rules of risk, probability, and market structure. The absolute foundational rule that lets you survive long enough to even compete against those algos is known as The Golden Rule of Survival: Master Your Position Size. If you cannot calculate exactly what you stand to lose before you execute a trade, you are not trading; you are gambling. Here is the technical breakdown of how to size your positions correctly, step-by-step, complete with a clean visual example. The Difference Between Risk and Position Value The biggest technical

Hey everyone 👋 Here’s this week’s list of the 40 strongest-moving stocks with market caps above $1 billion, grouped by industry. The standout theme is software and infrastructure, with cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure and application software accounting for a large share of the list. Capital markets and precious-metals names also made a strong showing. 🔥 💻 Software & Infrastructure Software · Application $Bending Spoons S.p.A.(BSP)$ $Webull Corp(BULL)$ $Salesforce.com(CRM)$ $Elastic N.V.(ESTC)$ $Figma(FIG)$ $FrogAds, Inc.(FROG)$

FT recently dropped an article showing the spend split between different Anthropic models (indexed back to June). What was interesting about this chart (below) was that the recent growth across July wasn’t driven by Fable, but by Opus 5. Many people asked questions about this. Why isn’t Fable 5 driving more adoption? The overwhelming response to the question of “why has Fable 5 seen more lackluster adoption” was zero data retention (or ZDR). This topic has been front and center this summer. OpenAI wrote a blog post about it a few weeks ago. In my opinion, it’s becoming increasingly clear that users have a preference when it comes to data retention policies, and if you believe the majority of responses to Martin’s tweet, the labs have some decisions to make! So what is Zero Data Retention?

In his first keynote address at the Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium, Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh delivered a hawkish tone centered heavily on price stability: Inflation Focus: Warsh stated that with the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge sitting at 3.7%, prices are running too far above the 2% target. He warned, “We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed. Otherwise, we have work to do.” Monetary Tool Reaffirmation: He clarified that short-term interest rates remain the Fed’s principal tool to combat price pressures, and noted he would be “hard pressed” to describe current financial conditions as restrictive. Limiting Forward Guidance: Warsh advocated for a “quieter” central bank that avoids overcommitting to futu

Hey Tigers 🐯 $S&P 500(.SPX)$ pushed into the key sell zone and was rejected, keeping the short-term bearish setup intact. The rebound retraced roughly 78.6% of the previous five-wave decline before forming a three-wave recovery into the Daily FVG resistance. Price has now reacted from that zone, leaving the bounce looking corrective rather than impulsive. The key level from here is 7,690. 📍 Daily close below 7,690 → bearish trigger If that level breaks on a closing basis, the setup points toward another leg lower, with the prior June all-time high acting as the first major downside reference. There is still room for one more push higher. The 7,750–7,775 area remains the main resistance zone, and another test could develop before sellers take c