Definitely shooting… my thinking 🤔 mine only, the market will continue to party till SpaceX listing… I suspect its price will shot higher even if the starting price was already super high. It will suck up those euphoria to ironically end all parties… the big whales 🐋 will leave the party 🎉 first, leaving the retailers to continue chasing the shadow of money 💰. Then, it will all come crashing down when there is no one left to pass the buck to. This is not a popular opinion… yup, just an opinion of mine, and mine only. The partygoers obviously want the party to go on forever… with war still unsettled, US fiscal debts still growing strongly, AI investment going crazy 🤪, this does not look your normal market. It’s obviously at its melt up phase… and bubble bursting could be anywhere around th

This is really going to end bad… smart money knows… it’s all the retailers who would suffer as usual… just look at SpaceX IPO, Elon sure knows how gullible the retailers are, reserving a big portion of worthless shares for them (yup, you can’t even vote against him). He has learnt from Tesla…//@a4xrbj1:Circle jerk - I hope this shit isn't blowing up. While there's a lot of money to be made from OpenAI's IPO (and SpaceX, as Musk fanboys will still buy this POS company with made up future opportunities like Terafab and Microhard, that aren't even legally binding to happen, nor have they started. They are just Musk's ideas that he coincidentally announced 1 respective 2 months before SpaceX S-1. What a surprise, the Ponzi scheme goes on).

Hi, thank you for your kind sharing. I just started noticing you sharing a number of hot AI related companies a couple of days ago and have decided to stick around a little. I am just curious, what is the basis for the target price? Is it via fundamental analysis, technical analysis, or is it more of a gut feel or wishlist? I mean I love all those target prices. I have a couple of the companies you listed, but frankly, I see potential in many of them. They might fulfill their promises, they might not. Another thing is what kind of timeframe are we looking at to fulfill those target prices? This is another thing that is important in investing or even speculating. Thank you once again for your nice sharing and looking forward to read more of those…

I have AGQ for sometime now, so I know the strange feeling… but this is something we have to accept if we are holding rather than trading… my better bets are in the gold and silver miners and even better, royalties… they capture the upsides nicely, as long as the uptrend is intact, or the price of silver or gold stays stagnant but at a higher price than the previous years, this would translate to a higher selling price for these royalties. With higher profit margins, obviously the share price would move up. Do consider those royalties for the long haul if that is what the interest lies. Just for transparency sake, I have substantial holdings in $Wheaton Precious Metals(WPM)$. I also have a little interest in $

You can’t compare the two timeframe. AGQ is daily compute, meaning it resets itself every day. When the price of silver rises, it doubles itself, obviously the same applies for the drop. However, if you reset daily, it changes the logic. If you have stronger down days than up days, we will end up having a much lower AGQ price in a long run. So, it all depends on the number of up days vs down days and strength of up vs down days. This is something that you have to bear in mind when going for leveraged bets like AGQ. It is not simply leveraging that moves along with the silver price. That is the misconception many market participants have. Last point, might be obvious but all the same to emphasise, AGQ is good for catching the up-moves of silver, but it is not something to keep for the long

I don’t like this (space occupation)… the advanced nations destroyed trees when they are developing their nations. Now they are destroying the near space. To be clear, I don’t mind Elon’s idea of going to Mars. However by crowding the near space, like Starlink and Amazon’s LEO. That’s only US… don’t forget China’s players… and just imagine all those nations that become more developed and decided to launch their own satellites 🛰️. The same thing that happened to earth when the developed countries started the destruction and “requested” others not to do the same! When more players come on board, and the near space becomes so crowded that crashes will happen, no matter how good those sensors are. The crash will trigger more crashes. I am not sure if we will see “showers” going back into earth

This is old news... why kept repeating itself 

5% in 30 years US treasury yield is no longer enough to entice investors given the ever-increasing fiscal debts. 5.5% looks attainable in the short term or are we looking at the magical 6% to break the horse’s back? The world needs a reset, even the new Fed can’t stop the train 🚆 that has moved beyond the station, unless they forcely derailed it! Bubble would have truly burst then… the question is when… thanks for sharing your insights!

@Shernice軒嬣 2000 Besides $Fluence Energy, Inc.(FLNC)$ , what's your take about the rest?