WeChats
08-14

📉 CoreWeave Bloodbath — Would You Step In Below $100? ⚡

Triple-digit growth meets a single-digit margin — and the market isn’t impressed.

CoreWeave ($CoreWeave, Inc.(CRWV)$  ) just posted +206% YoY revenue growth, jumping from $395M to $1.21B, largely on the back of massive demand from OpenAI and other AI workloads. Yet, instead of cheering, Wall Street sold hard — wiping billions off the company’s value.

The issue? Margins collapsed from 20% to just 2%. That’s the kind of squeeze that makes even the fastest-growing companies look fragile.

---

💡 The Numbers Behind the Pain

While the headline growth screams “AI boom,” a closer look tells a different story:

YoY Revenue: +206% ($1.21B)

Gross Margin: Down from 20% to 2%

Customer Concentration: Heavy reliance on OpenAI — a risk if contract terms shift

Operating Expenses: Up double digits, outpacing efficiency gains

The market’s reaction was swift because margin erosion cuts directly into long-term profitability, cash flow stability, and valuation multiples. You can grow 200% a year — but if you’re burning that growth on cost inflation, the music eventually stops.

---

📊 Why Margins Matter More Than Ever

In high-capex, high-demand industries like AI infrastructure, margins are the oxygen for reinvestment.

Narrow margins mean:

1. Less pricing flexibility if competition heats up.

2. Lower free cash flow to fund new data centers.

3. Greater vulnerability to cost shocks (energy, supply chain).

We’ve seen this before with early-stage cloud players in the 2010s — huge revenue growth often masked underlying fragility. The survivors were those that could scale profitably, not just quickly.

---

🔍 Market Context — AI Infrastructure Hype Cycle

CoreWeave’s setup isn’t unique. In the last 18 months, AI-adjacent stocks have seen:

A front-loaded demand spike from early AI adopters.

Intense competition from NVIDIA-aligned cloud providers.

Rising input costs from GPUs to electricity.

In short: the AI data center gold rush is real — but so are the costs of playing.

---

⚖️ Scenarios: Rebound or Breakdown?

Rebound Case 📈

Buyers step in near $105–$100 support (200-day moving average).

AI demand stays red-hot into Q4, with stronger guidance offsetting margin fears.

Any hint of improving cost discipline sparks short covering.

Breakdown Case 📉

Weak bounce attempts fail; break below $100 triggers stop-loss cascades.

Investors refocus on sustainable profitability over pure growth.

Sector rotation away from high-growth, low-margin AI plays accelerates.

---

🧩 Bigger Picture — The AI Infra Playbook

CoreWeave’s quarter reinforces a key AI investing lesson: growth without profitability can’t drive multiples forever.

For long-term holders, the question isn’t whether AI will keep growing — it’s which providers can serve that growth at healthy margins.

---

❓ Questions for Investors

Would you buy an AI growth leader with margins under 5% if revenue growth is still >200%?

Does OpenAI reliance make CoreWeave a leveraged AI bet or a concentration risk?

At what point do you demand profitability improvements before buying back in?

Is sub-$100 a technical buy zone, or just the next stop on the way lower?

---

🔮 Looking Ahead

Q4 guidance will be the next catalyst — if CoreWeave signals margin recovery or stronger contract diversity, sentiment could flip fast. On the flip side, another margin miss could cement the bear case.

The AI infrastructure market isn’t slowing down — but the winners won’t just be those who grow fastest. They’ll be the ones who can balance demand with disciplined cost control.


💡 Takeaway: Sub-$100 could be a gift for patient investors — or a trap for those betting on a quick rebound. In AI infra, profitability discipline is the new growth metric to watch.

@TigerWire  @TigerEvents  @Daily_Discussion  @Tiger_comments  @TigerStars  

CoreWeave Below $100?! Oversold on Lock-up Expiration?
CoreWeave will face its first major post-IPO share unlock on Friday, with approximately 84% of its Class A shares becoming tradable. These shares are primarily held by company insiders and key supplier Nvidia. The large influx of shares into the market could trigger further selling pressure. The stock fell below $100 yesterday and rebounded a little in the overnight trading. Questions: Is it oversold on lock-up expiration news? Is it a buy under $100?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • Athena Spenser
    08-15
    Athena Spenser
    Sub-$100 at 200% growth? Might nibble if 200-day holds.
  • Astrid Stephen
    08-15
    Astrid Stephen
    OpenAI reliance is risky,need client diversity before buying.
  • LeoIII.
    08-15
    LeoIII.
    High risk here
Leave a comment
3