這是甚麼東西
02-05 16:10

This is a profound shift in narrative from a major institutional player. Goldman's upgrade isn't just a price target revision; it's a strategic reassessment of gold's role in a changing global monetary system. Let's dissect the key points.


1. Is Gold Being Repriced for a Post-Dollar World?

Yes, but it's more accurate to call it a "multi-polar reserve world" repricing. We are not witnessing the dollar's imminent demise, but rather the accelerating erosion of its unipolar dominance.

The evidence for this structural repricing is compelling:

Central Bank Demand: This is the new, non-negotiable floor for gold. Buying from EM central banks (China, India, Turkey, Poland) is strategic, price-insensitive, and persistent. It's driven by a desire to diversify away from USD/G7 bond exposure, a trend that is geopolitical and irreversible.

"Stocks + Gold" Barbell: This is the critical tactical shift. For decades, the classic portfolio was "Stocks + Bonds" (60/40). Goldman is now arguing that gold is replacing bonds as the primary hedge. Why? Because bonds have failed as a hedge in an inflation-prone, fiscally expansive world, while gold has demonstrated its resilience.

Western Flow-Driven Rally: Goldman correctly identifies that the recent volatility was driven by Western futures and ETF flows, not just Asian physical buying. This is crucial. It means institutional capital in the West is now participating in this "de-dollarization hedge," adding a powerful new source of demand on top of the Eastern central bank bid.


2. Could Gold Reclaim $5,400 This Year? (Goldman's Target)

Goldman's $5,400/oz target for December 2026 now has "meaningful upside risk." This implies a potential path to $5,400 or higher sooner than 2026.

Path to $5,400 in 2024 is aggressive but not impossible. It would require a specific convergence of catalysts:

Accelerating De-Dollarization Shock: A geopolitical or financial event that forces a rapid, visible shift out of USD reserves by a major bloc.

U.S. Fiscal Dominance Clarity: Markets confronting the reality of unchecked U.S. deficit spending, leading to a loss of confidence in the long-term real value of Treasuries. This is the "bond hedge failure" thesis playing out violently.

Coordained Central Bank Buying: Public, large-scale coordination among BRICS+ nations on gold accumulation, making the strategic intent undeniable.

A Fed Policy Mistake: The Fed is forced to cut rates aggressively due to a sharp economic slowdown while inflation remains stubbornly above target—a scenario of stagflation-lite that is perfect for gold.

A more probable 2024 path is a grind higher with volatility, setting the stage for a potential explosive move in 2025/26. The recent correction to ~$4,800 is a healthy consolidation within this new, higher paradigm.


3. The "Bubble" Debate: Goldman's Bullish Case

Goldman argues this is not a bubble, and the data supports it:

Limited Speculative Positioning: Unlike previous parabolic moves, COMEX futures positioning (the "paper gold" market) is not at extreme highs. The rally has been driven more by physical and strategic buying, which is "stickier."

Structural vs. Cyclical Demand: Central bank buying is structural. Investment demand for a de-dollarization hedge is structural. This is different from a bubble driven purely by retail speculation on rising prices.

Liquidity Dynamics: The tight London silver liquidity (which spilled into gold) shows this is a physical market story, not just a paper derivative one. When physical metal is scarce, price moves become more volatile and pronounced.

Investment Implications: The New Barbell

Goldman's "Stocks + Gold" barbell is a direct challenge to traditional portfolio construction. It implies:

Underweight Traditional Bonds: View long-duration bonds as a source of risk (duration, inflation, fiscal), not safety.

Gold as the Core Hedge: Allocate a strategic, non-trivial percentage (e.g., 5-15%) to gold as a monetary and geopolitical hedge.

Stocks for Growth: Rely on equities for growth, but recognize they will be more volatile in a world of higher macro uncertainty.


Bottom Line:

Gold is undergoing a fundamental regime change. It is transitioning from a cyclical commodity/inflation hedge to a strategic, monetary asset in a fragmenting global order. Goldman's call is a validation of this thesis from the heart of the traditional financial establishment.

$5,400 is a symbol of this repricing. Whether it happens in 2024 or 2026, the direction is clear. The pullbacks will be sharp, but they are likely to be buying opportunities in a secular bull market, not the end of the trend. The primary risk to this view is a sudden return to US fiscal discipline and global geopolitical harmony—a scenario that appears increasingly remote

Goldman Upside Alert: Could Gold Reclaim $5,400 This Year?
Goldman Sachs says its $5,400/oz gold target for December 2026 now carries meaningful upside risk, arguing January’s violent gold–silver swings were driven by Western capital flows, not Asian speculation. The bank highlights tight London liquidity in silver, structurally rising central-bank demand, and limited speculative positioning as signs this rally isn’t a bubble. With reserve diversification away from the dollar accelerating, Goldman is promoting an upgraded “stocks + gold” barbell, favoring precious metals over bonds as the primary hedge. Is gold being repriced for a post-dollar world?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment