Heemeng personal page - To The Moon

Heemeng

Heemeng

No personal profile

573Follow

6Followers

0Topic

0Badge

08-03

$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$

2023-01-21

$Dow30 Bear 3X ETF(SDOW)$

2022-12-09

Great

Amazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce

2022-12-09

Ok

Exxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year

2022-12-07

How about LCID?

7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December

2022-12-01

Ok

NIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch

2022-11-22

$Amazon.com(AMZN)$

2022-11-13

Ok

2022-11-09

Ok

SPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?

2022-11-09

Ok

Even At The 12-Month Low, Tesla Is Not A Compelling Buy

2022-11-05

Like

AMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?

2022-11-02

Ok

Tinder-Owner Match Group Beats Estimates for Quarterly Revenue

2022-11-01

$MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN FNGU(FNGU)$bearish

2022-10-28

Like

After-Hours Movers: Amazon Sinks on Lower Guidance, Pinterest Up on Beat

2022-10-27

[OK]

Apple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch

2022-10-26

Ok

The 10X Opportunity for Tesla Stock

2022-10-07

bullish$AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT$

2022-09-30

GOOG better

Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?

2022-09-28

$AMD(AMD)$bullish

2022-09-27

Like pls

Grab Expects 2026 Breakeven for Digital Bank Operations, Losses to Peak in 2023

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3580653303727490","uuid":"3580653303727490","gmtCreate":1617559279596,"gmtModify":1618452628705,"name":"Heemeng","pinyin":"heemeng","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","hatId":"award-c0e90532fb42ac6de18e25e95db73047","hatName":"2023新年头像框","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":573,"tweetSize":123,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.31","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.73%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.03.16","exceedPercentage":"93.80%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":334357837553920,"gmtCreate":1722663637590,"gmtModify":1722663643653,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ </a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ </a>&nbsp;","text":"$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8057dfe182ac020bc80ff11c4658beb1","width":"1080","height":"1946"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/334357837553920","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9952075524,"gmtCreate":1674298850468,"gmtModify":1676538936187,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SDOW\">$Dow30 Bear 3X ETF(SDOW)$ &nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SDOW\">$Dow30 Bear 3X ETF(SDOW)$ &nbsp;</a>","text":"$Dow30 Bear 3X ETF(SDOW)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/48100effc31462026f5b7dba78e12af8","width":"1080","height":"1889"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952075524","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":392,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920764282,"gmtCreate":1670550448846,"gmtModify":1676538391506,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920764282","repostId":"1173657922","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173657922","pubTimestamp":1670545565,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173657922?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-09 08:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173657922","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a cu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.</p><p>The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new feature, called Inspire, will roll out to select US customers in early December and go national in the next few months.</p><p>“In just a few taps, customers can discover new products or get inspiration on what to buy, all tailored to their interests, and then shop for those items on Amazon,” said Oliver Messenger, the director of Amazon Shopping.</p><p>Amazon, which has long used static product images and descriptions to create a uniform catalog, has been trying to make it easier for shoppers to discover products rather than simply search for specific items. Despite these efforts, most customers don’t linger on the sprawling online marketplace. More than one in four Amazon purchases take three minutes or less.</p><p>So-called social commerce has long been popular in China but has been slow to catch on in the US. However, with TikTok making inroads in e-commerce, Amazon, Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc.’s Facebook and Instagram have been adding social shopping features to their services — with mixed success.</p><p>Amazon’s new Inspire service, which will appear as a lightbulb-shaped icon on the app, will invite shoppers to select from more than 20 interests, including makeup, pets and gaming, which will then be used to tailor their feeds. Shoppers will be able to purchase merchandise posted by other customers, brands and influencers.</p><p>It’s not clear that Inspire will work. Amazon is known for introducing experimental features and quietly abandoning them if they fail to take off.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-09 08:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173657922","content_text":"Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new feature, called Inspire, will roll out to select US customers in early December and go national in the next few months.“In just a few taps, customers can discover new products or get inspiration on what to buy, all tailored to their interests, and then shop for those items on Amazon,” said Oliver Messenger, the director of Amazon Shopping.Amazon, which has long used static product images and descriptions to create a uniform catalog, has been trying to make it easier for shoppers to discover products rather than simply search for specific items. Despite these efforts, most customers don’t linger on the sprawling online marketplace. More than one in four Amazon purchases take three minutes or less.So-called social commerce has long been popular in China but has been slow to catch on in the US. However, with TikTok making inroads in e-commerce, Amazon, Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc.’s Facebook and Instagram have been adding social shopping features to their services — with mixed success.Amazon’s new Inspire service, which will appear as a lightbulb-shaped icon on the app, will invite shoppers to select from more than 20 interests, including makeup, pets and gaming, which will then be used to tailor their feeds. Shoppers will be able to purchase merchandise posted by other customers, brands and influencers.It’s not clear that Inspire will work. Amazon is known for introducing experimental features and quietly abandoning them if they fail to take off.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920762549,"gmtCreate":1670550305781,"gmtModify":1676538391442,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920762549","repostId":"2290447036","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290447036","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1670549824,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290447036?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-09 09:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Exxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290447036","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.</p><p>While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.</p><p>The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year&#39;s budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.</p><p>Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.</p><p>The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.</p><p>Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.</p><p>The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.</p><p>&#34;This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&amp;A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,&#34; said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.</p><p>U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.</p><p>The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-09 09:37</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.</p><p>While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.</p><p>The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year&#39;s budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.</p><p>Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.</p><p>The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.</p><p>Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.</p><p>The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.</p><p>&#34;This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&amp;A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,&#34; said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.</p><p>U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.</p><p>The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XOM":"埃克森美孚","CVX":"雪佛龙"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290447036","content_text":"(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year's budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.\"This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,\" said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":393,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920906861,"gmtCreate":1670410450353,"gmtModify":1676538362334,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How about LCID?","listText":"How about LCID?","text":"How about LCID?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920906861","repostId":"1196589201","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196589201","pubTimestamp":1670427016,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196589201?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-07 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196589201","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): ","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturn</li><li><b>Nikola</b>(<u><b>NKLA</b></u>): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burn</li><li><b>Hyzon Motors</b>(<u><b>HYZN</b></u>): Regulators have confirmed most of the scathing claims by short-seller Blue Orca</li><li><b>Rivian Automotive</b>(<b>RIVN</b>): Product recalls, safety concerns, and a lofty valuation makes it a stock to avoid</li><li><b>Electra</b> <b>Meccanica</b> <b>Vehicles</b>(<b>SOLO</b>): Three-wheeled approach is unlikely to gain mainstream traction</li><li><b>Workhorse</b>(<b>WKHS</b>): Burning cash at an incredible pace while meeting production levels at a minimum</li><li><b>Lordstown Motors</b>(<b>RIDE</b>): Has serious ground to make up as it struggles to grow its production levels</li><li><b>Arcimoto</b>(<b>FUV</b>): Cash burn has led to tremendous dilution as it continues to post lackluster operating results</li></ul><p>After all the excitement the sector garnered last year, it looks as if it’s time to consider which electric vehicle stocks to sell.</p><p>The year has exposed the weaknesses in multiple sectors, and the electric vehicle market is no exception. A significant market rout has seen stocks of prominent companies and startups suffer considerable losses in value.</p><p>Moreover, new EV companies are finding themselves in a much more competitive landscape now that legacy automakers entered the fray. Hence, there are multiple electric vehicle stocks to sell at this time.</p><p>Investing in the electric vehicle market can be very attractive, given the wide range of underlying businesses to choose from. These include car companies, battery manufacturers, charging providers, and others.</p><p>However, with the stock market experiencing significant dips recently, many of these companies are finding it increasingly difficult to attract investors. This puts immense pressure on already unstable businesses and causes long-term problems within the EV sphere. Hence, only EV companies with strong track records are worth investing in at this time.</p><p><b>Nikola (NKLA)</b></p><p>EV start-up <b>Nikola</b> (NASDAQ:<u><b>NKLA</b></u>) has witnessed a steep drop in its stock price over the past few months. Nikola may have to wait before scaling production levels of its flagship Nikola Tre truck for a while.</p><p>In its most recent quarter, Nikola reported negative free cash flows amounting to $237 million. A large part of that comes from the lack of capital required to scale production, especially withthe addition of ailing battery supplier Romeo Power, which will likely result in massive cash burn going forward.</p><p>Therefore, it doesn’t seem like this firm’s tribulations will end anytime soon as it looks to scale production of its battery electric (BEV) truck.</p><p><b>Hyzon Motors (HYZN)</b></p><p><b>Hyzon Motors</b> (NASDAQ:<u><b>HYZN</b></u>) has been nothing short of a disaster for investors. There have been reports of financial manipulation, and the company has also been accused of creating false customers.</p><p>These actions raise serious questions about its legitimacy and ability to remain solvent in an increasingly competitive EV marketplace.</p><p>Late last year, short-seller Blue Orca accused the companywas knowingly overstating its revenue outlookand drawing investors in with inflated promises of future profits.</p><p>The report stated that two of Hyzon’s largest customers weren’t real. Regulators have confirmed at least some of Blue Orca’s claims, leaving Hyzon facing serious scrutiny from the public and its shareholders. This news is a major blow to Hyzon Motors’ already tarnished reputation.</p><p><b>Rivian Automotive (RIVN)</b></p><p>Despite promising EV start-up <b>Rivian Automotive’s</b> (NASDAQ:<b>RIVN</b>) potential, it’s a remarkably rough outing this year.</p><p>Not only was it forced to cut the production target for 2022 by half, but it had to recall nearly all of its deliveries. If that wasn’t enough, its workers have recently complained about inadequate safety conditions at its plants. The triple whammy should have investors wary of investing in its stock in the current economic downturn.</p><p>Though it faces a myriad of challenges, RIVN stock still trades over 16 times forward sales, a lofty valuation. With production delays, a product recall, and safety concerns, its valuation is alarming. Hence, investors should proceed cautiously when considering RIVN stock and understand the risks associated with its business case.</p><p><b>ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (SOLO)</b></p><p><b>ElectraMeccanica</b> <b>Vehicles</b> (NASDAQ:<b>SOLO</b>) seems to have grand ambitions in the electric vehicle arena, but it faces an uphill battle in gaining consumer traction.</p><p>Its vehicles are by no means elegant designs, and itsthree-wheeled structure puts them at a distinct disadvantage in a market filled with sleek and sexy alternatives. Electric three-wheelers seem unlikely to find much appeal due to their odd, unsightly designs in a hotly competitive EV market.</p><p>Its success is further hindered by the numerous challenges already in place for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. EVs are expensive, and the scarcity of charging stations and range anxiety pose massive problems for the companies involved.</p><p>It seems unlikely that the unique three-wheeled designs presented by Electrameccanica will see any major consumer acceptance in the near future. At the same time, it continues to burn through its cash reserves at an accelerated pace.</p><p><b>Workhorse (WKHS)</b></p><p>Shares of budding EV player, <b>Workhorse</b> (NASDAQ:<b>WKHS</b>) have been plummeting in value, reflecting the company’s poor performance.</p><p>It’s been posting lackluster operating results over the past several quarters. Production levels are only meeting bare-minimum estimates, which suggests that its investors are in for a rough ride ahead. Though it has initially planned to deliver 150 to 250 vehicles this year, it will only be delivering 100 to 200 vehicles after revising estimates.</p><p>It recently posted its third quarter results, which missed estimates across both lines. It posted a hefty 73-cent loss per share, missing estimates by 45 cents.</p><p>To complicate matters further, it had to pay $35 million in settlement for its unsuccessful bid for a U.S. Postal Service contract. Hence, anybody on the fence about holding or selling this stock should opt for the latter option to avoid further losses.</p><p><b>Lordstown Motors (RIDE)</b></p><p><b>Lordstown Motors</b> (NASDAQ: <b>RIDE</b>) has finally started production after multiple delays. The firm promised to deliver its first EV in 2020, but it’s only getting started two years later.</p><p>Unfortunately, the company still faces many challenges that analysts believe will keep them lagging compared to others in the industry. With so much competition gunning for similar goals, Lordstown has some serious ground to make up; whether they can weather the headwinds remains to be seen.</p><p>The company’s facility in Ohio kicked-off production in September. However, production has been slow and will likely stay that way as supply-chain issues persist.</p><p>As things currently stand, there’s very little hope of significantly speeding up vehicle production any time soon. Therefore, avoiding a speculative stock such as RIDE amidst the current volatility is best.</p><p><b>Arcimoto (FUV)</b></p><p><b>Arcimoto</b> (NASDAQ: <b>FUV</b>) is on a dire trajectory as it continues to burn through its resources at excessive speeds while accumulating new capital incredibly slowly.</p><p>As with ElectraMeccanica, it boasts a unique lineup of fully electric three-wheeled pods, which faces the same consumer acceptance hurdles. As the company struggles to make headway in the market, it seems likely that unless changes are implemented soon, the fate of Arcimoto will remain uncertain for quite some time.</p><p>Arcimoto has seen quite a bit of turbulence in recent months. Its performance in the third quarter presents a picture that is less than ideal, with numerous obstacles still to be overcome for it to achieve success.</p><p>Third quarter results showed total revenues amounting to slightly more than $2 million, far below analysts’ projections, which nearly tripled that figure. To make matters worse, cash burn is leading to tremendous dilution.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-07 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","FUV":"Arcimoto, Inc.","HYZN":"Hyzon Motors Inc.","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","SOLO":"Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.","NKLA":"Nikola Corporation"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196589201","content_text":"These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): Regulators have confirmed most of the scathing claims by short-seller Blue OrcaRivian Automotive(RIVN): Product recalls, safety concerns, and a lofty valuation makes it a stock to avoidElectra Meccanica Vehicles(SOLO): Three-wheeled approach is unlikely to gain mainstream tractionWorkhorse(WKHS): Burning cash at an incredible pace while meeting production levels at a minimumLordstown Motors(RIDE): Has serious ground to make up as it struggles to grow its production levelsArcimoto(FUV): Cash burn has led to tremendous dilution as it continues to post lackluster operating resultsAfter all the excitement the sector garnered last year, it looks as if it’s time to consider which electric vehicle stocks to sell.The year has exposed the weaknesses in multiple sectors, and the electric vehicle market is no exception. A significant market rout has seen stocks of prominent companies and startups suffer considerable losses in value.Moreover, new EV companies are finding themselves in a much more competitive landscape now that legacy automakers entered the fray. Hence, there are multiple electric vehicle stocks to sell at this time.Investing in the electric vehicle market can be very attractive, given the wide range of underlying businesses to choose from. These include car companies, battery manufacturers, charging providers, and others.However, with the stock market experiencing significant dips recently, many of these companies are finding it increasingly difficult to attract investors. This puts immense pressure on already unstable businesses and causes long-term problems within the EV sphere. Hence, only EV companies with strong track records are worth investing in at this time.Nikola (NKLA)EV start-up Nikola (NASDAQ:NKLA) has witnessed a steep drop in its stock price over the past few months. Nikola may have to wait before scaling production levels of its flagship Nikola Tre truck for a while.In its most recent quarter, Nikola reported negative free cash flows amounting to $237 million. A large part of that comes from the lack of capital required to scale production, especially withthe addition of ailing battery supplier Romeo Power, which will likely result in massive cash burn going forward.Therefore, it doesn’t seem like this firm’s tribulations will end anytime soon as it looks to scale production of its battery electric (BEV) truck.Hyzon Motors (HYZN)Hyzon Motors (NASDAQ:HYZN) has been nothing short of a disaster for investors. There have been reports of financial manipulation, and the company has also been accused of creating false customers.These actions raise serious questions about its legitimacy and ability to remain solvent in an increasingly competitive EV marketplace.Late last year, short-seller Blue Orca accused the companywas knowingly overstating its revenue outlookand drawing investors in with inflated promises of future profits.The report stated that two of Hyzon’s largest customers weren’t real. Regulators have confirmed at least some of Blue Orca’s claims, leaving Hyzon facing serious scrutiny from the public and its shareholders. This news is a major blow to Hyzon Motors’ already tarnished reputation.Rivian Automotive (RIVN)Despite promising EV start-up Rivian Automotive’s (NASDAQ:RIVN) potential, it’s a remarkably rough outing this year.Not only was it forced to cut the production target for 2022 by half, but it had to recall nearly all of its deliveries. If that wasn’t enough, its workers have recently complained about inadequate safety conditions at its plants. The triple whammy should have investors wary of investing in its stock in the current economic downturn.Though it faces a myriad of challenges, RIVN stock still trades over 16 times forward sales, a lofty valuation. With production delays, a product recall, and safety concerns, its valuation is alarming. Hence, investors should proceed cautiously when considering RIVN stock and understand the risks associated with its business case.ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (SOLO)ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) seems to have grand ambitions in the electric vehicle arena, but it faces an uphill battle in gaining consumer traction.Its vehicles are by no means elegant designs, and itsthree-wheeled structure puts them at a distinct disadvantage in a market filled with sleek and sexy alternatives. Electric three-wheelers seem unlikely to find much appeal due to their odd, unsightly designs in a hotly competitive EV market.Its success is further hindered by the numerous challenges already in place for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. EVs are expensive, and the scarcity of charging stations and range anxiety pose massive problems for the companies involved.It seems unlikely that the unique three-wheeled designs presented by Electrameccanica will see any major consumer acceptance in the near future. At the same time, it continues to burn through its cash reserves at an accelerated pace.Workhorse (WKHS)Shares of budding EV player, Workhorse (NASDAQ:WKHS) have been plummeting in value, reflecting the company’s poor performance.It’s been posting lackluster operating results over the past several quarters. Production levels are only meeting bare-minimum estimates, which suggests that its investors are in for a rough ride ahead. Though it has initially planned to deliver 150 to 250 vehicles this year, it will only be delivering 100 to 200 vehicles after revising estimates.It recently posted its third quarter results, which missed estimates across both lines. It posted a hefty 73-cent loss per share, missing estimates by 45 cents.To complicate matters further, it had to pay $35 million in settlement for its unsuccessful bid for a U.S. Postal Service contract. Hence, anybody on the fence about holding or selling this stock should opt for the latter option to avoid further losses.Lordstown Motors (RIDE)Lordstown Motors (NASDAQ: RIDE) has finally started production after multiple delays. The firm promised to deliver its first EV in 2020, but it’s only getting started two years later.Unfortunately, the company still faces many challenges that analysts believe will keep them lagging compared to others in the industry. With so much competition gunning for similar goals, Lordstown has some serious ground to make up; whether they can weather the headwinds remains to be seen.The company’s facility in Ohio kicked-off production in September. However, production has been slow and will likely stay that way as supply-chain issues persist.As things currently stand, there’s very little hope of significantly speeding up vehicle production any time soon. Therefore, avoiding a speculative stock such as RIDE amidst the current volatility is best.Arcimoto (FUV)Arcimoto (NASDAQ: FUV) is on a dire trajectory as it continues to burn through its resources at excessive speeds while accumulating new capital incredibly slowly.As with ElectraMeccanica, it boasts a unique lineup of fully electric three-wheeled pods, which faces the same consumer acceptance hurdles. As the company struggles to make headway in the market, it seems likely that unless changes are implemented soon, the fate of Arcimoto will remain uncertain for quite some time.Arcimoto has seen quite a bit of turbulence in recent months. Its performance in the third quarter presents a picture that is less than ideal, with numerous obstacles still to be overcome for it to achieve success.Third quarter results showed total revenues amounting to slightly more than $2 million, far below analysts’ projections, which nearly tripled that figure. To make matters worse, cash burn is leading to tremendous dilution.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4131314249442152","authorId":"4131314249442152","name":"Chrissimo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4131314249442152","authorIdStr":"4131314249442152"},"content":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business.","text":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business.","html":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business."}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965303969,"gmtCreate":1669887898452,"gmtModify":1676538263576,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965303969","repostId":"1187286110","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187286110","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1669887543,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1187286110?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-01 17:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187286110","media":"Benzinga","summary":"With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may gra","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Data cloud company <b>Snowflake</b> on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Salesforce Inc</b> said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company&#39;s shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.</li></ul><ul><li><b>NIO</b> delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Li Auto, Inc.</b> reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>In November, <b>XPeng Inc.</b> delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>Dollar General Corporation</b> to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 million<i>before the opening</i>bell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li><b>Splunk Inc.</b> reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <b>The Kroger Co.</b> to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Five Below, Inc.</b> posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li>Analysts expect <b>Ulta Beauty, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-01 17:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Data cloud company <b>Snowflake</b> on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Salesforce Inc</b> said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company&#39;s shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.</li></ul><ul><li><b>NIO</b> delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Li Auto, Inc.</b> reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>In November, <b>XPeng Inc.</b> delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>Dollar General Corporation</b> to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 million<i>before the opening</i>bell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li><b>Splunk Inc.</b> reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <b>The Kroger Co.</b> to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Five Below, Inc.</b> posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li>Analysts expect <b>Ulta Beauty, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CRM":"赛富时","KR":"克罗格","FIVE":"Five Below","SNOW":"Snowflake","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","SPLK":"Splunk Inc","DG":"美国达乐公司","ULTA":"Ulta美容"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187286110","content_text":"With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:Data cloud company Snowflake on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.Salesforce Inc said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company's shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.NIO delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.Li Auto, Inc. reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.In November, XPeng Inc. delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.Wall Street expects Dollar General Corporation to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 millionbefore the openingbell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.Splunk Inc. reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.Analysts are expecting The Kroger Co. to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.Five Below, Inc. posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.Analysts expect Ulta Beauty, Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":462,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968055364,"gmtCreate":1669081409059,"gmtModify":1676538148697,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$ &nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMZN\">$Amazon.com(AMZN)$ &nbsp;</a>","text":"$Amazon.com(AMZN)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d88f1ef886c7ec2973437c6b7167548d","width":"1080","height":"1897"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968055364","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":416,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969957940,"gmtCreate":1668329308680,"gmtModify":1676538042080,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969957940","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987733766,"gmtCreate":1667988022255,"gmtModify":1676537995055,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987733766","repostId":"1168113903","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168113903","pubTimestamp":1668008209,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168113903?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-09 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168113903","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>A study of market returns over the past five bear markets.</li><li>We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.</li><li>Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one or two stand out.</li></ul><p>In this article I will look at five exchange-traded funds (&#34;ETFs&#34;) to find out which one is the best to invest in once this bear market is over. The five ETFs examined in this article are: SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY), Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). These are often referred to as &#34;risk on&#34; assets.</p><p>I will gather data from the last five bear markets - defined as drops in the S&amp;P 500 Futures (SPX) of 20% or more. We know from history when each of the last five bear markets ended. For the purposes of this article, I will consider the bear market to be over once the market as measured by SPX has closed above its 10-month exponential moving average. In each case, this will have occurred after the exact bottom of the five bear markets. I will then look at the performance of buying each of the five ETFs at the opening price the following month and then holding those ETFs for one-, two-, and three-year periods. Let’s see what we can find out.</p><p>The first bear market will be the Dot Com Bear Market. In this event, the market lost over 50%. The S&amp;P 500 Index reclaimed its 10-month EMA in April 2003, so according to my method, I would enter a position for each of the ETFs at the open of May’s trading. Table 1 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 1 – Dot Com Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6811d4e9082e48707e7514fe23481e33\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"288\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Table 1 shows the results of SPX in the second row with the one-year, two-year, and three-year results. All other results that beat SPX are highlighted in green. Results that underperform SPX are highlighted in yellow. The bottom two rows show the median and average results for all ETFs for that period.</p><p>The results show that QQQ performed best for the first year, returning 26.70%. XLI performed best for the two-year and three-year period. XLY underperformed the market for the two and three-year periods. These results surprised me, as I thought that technology stocks would have outperformed all others for the three years because technology stocks were so beaten down during the bear market.</p><p>The second bear market examined will be the Financial Crisis Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 57%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in July 2009, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of August’s trading. Table 2 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 2 – Financial Crisis Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64b9e606cc2ed2413b7e715ebb7f79b1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Looking at Table 2, Industrials were the one-year winner. They more than doubled the market’s gain for the first year. XLY also more than doubled the market in the first year. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed all others for the two-year and three-year periods. It’s interesting to me that Financials never got on track and were clear laggards.</p><p>The third bear market examined will be the European Debt Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 21%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in October 2011, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of November’s trading. Table 3 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 3 – European Debt Crisis</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60b78f5c93f1dc1987b7ce950f9f07b0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"291\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Table 3 shows that Financials led for the first year coming out of the bear market, more than doubling the market’s overall performance. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed for the first two years. Financial stocks outperformed all others over a three-year period. This table shows that all the ETFs studied outperformed the market for all three time periods.</p><p>The fourth bear market examined will be the Cryptocurrency Debt Bear Market. In case you’re wondering, I got this name fromWikipedia. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over just over 20% barely qualifying for bear market status. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in January 2019, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of February’s trading. Table 4 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 4 – Cryptocurrency Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d170899cac7e7fb8d0cc679e463d6c47\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"286\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Coming out of this bear market is where technology stocks show up. QQQ outperforms all the other ETFs for all three time periods. It does so in a big way. It’s two-year and three-year performance is 40 percentage points higher than its closest competitor. The time frame of the table overlaps Table 5 five below and therefore shows the COVID rally where technology stocks dominated. This bear market is also one where there were several ETFs that underperformed the market over all three time periods.</p><p>The last bear market covered is the COVID Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 35%. The COVID bear market was the shortest bear market in the study spanning just over a month. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in May 2020, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of June’s trading. Table 5 shows the results for two full years and to the end of October 2022 as there hasn’t been a full three years since this market reclaimed its 10-month EMA.</p><p><b>Table 5 – COVID Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a571324503f006a6fba5cdb8000c9044\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Coming out of the COVID Bear Market, Financial stocks led the way for the first year. This result surprised me. I was certain it was technology stocks that led the way. For the two-year period XLF outperformed all other ETFs while managing to lose money from the end of year one to the end of year two. The same situation happened with the return to the end of October 2022. XLF led all other ETFs for the total period, while losing money from the end of year two.</p><p>The last table will be the averages for all five ETFs compared to SPX for all five bear markets. This chart is difficult to read, and I apologize for that. When reading this chart, percentages highlighted in green are percentages that are above SPX returns for the same period of the bear market identified in the first column. Percentages highlighted in yellow are percentages that are below SPX returns for the period of the bear market identified in the first column. The cells highlighted in blue represent the best period return for that bear market.</p><p><b>Table 6 – Combined Results</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d17ce5d37e2cabb07dc35401b58ec67b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"132\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>What jumps out at me from Table 6 are three things. One, SPY outperformed the broad market in each bear market recovery in each time period. So, if you want to outperform the market, buy SPY. I think Warren Buffett gives that advice. The second observation is that QQQ outperformed the broad market for the first year in every instance. It outperformed SPY for the first year in every instance except the Euro Debt Bear Market, where QQQ returned 15.96% in the first year while SPY returned 18.31% in the first year. Both beat SPX during that time frame. Three, each ETF had its moment of outperformance and underperformance.</p><p>What I’ve learned from this study is that once the current bear market is over, meaning SPX closes above its 10-month moving average, I will put some of my money in SPY. I will put money in QQQ for the first year at least. XLY, XLF, and XLI all had their opportunities to shine. Looking at Table 6, I’m not sure I can make a blanket statement that one or more of those ETFs should be an automatic buy over SPY or QQQ coming out of a bear market over.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-09 23:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168113903","content_text":"SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one or two stand out.In this article I will look at five exchange-traded funds (\"ETFs\") to find out which one is the best to invest in once this bear market is over. The five ETFs examined in this article are: SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY), Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). These are often referred to as \"risk on\" assets.I will gather data from the last five bear markets - defined as drops in the S&P 500 Futures (SPX) of 20% or more. We know from history when each of the last five bear markets ended. For the purposes of this article, I will consider the bear market to be over once the market as measured by SPX has closed above its 10-month exponential moving average. In each case, this will have occurred after the exact bottom of the five bear markets. I will then look at the performance of buying each of the five ETFs at the opening price the following month and then holding those ETFs for one-, two-, and three-year periods. Let’s see what we can find out.The first bear market will be the Dot Com Bear Market. In this event, the market lost over 50%. The S&P 500 Index reclaimed its 10-month EMA in April 2003, so according to my method, I would enter a position for each of the ETFs at the open of May’s trading. Table 1 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 1 – Dot Com Bear MarketAuthorTable 1 shows the results of SPX in the second row with the one-year, two-year, and three-year results. All other results that beat SPX are highlighted in green. Results that underperform SPX are highlighted in yellow. The bottom two rows show the median and average results for all ETFs for that period.The results show that QQQ performed best for the first year, returning 26.70%. XLI performed best for the two-year and three-year period. XLY underperformed the market for the two and three-year periods. These results surprised me, as I thought that technology stocks would have outperformed all others for the three years because technology stocks were so beaten down during the bear market.The second bear market examined will be the Financial Crisis Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 57%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in July 2009, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of August’s trading. Table 2 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 2 – Financial Crisis Bear MarketAuthorLooking at Table 2, Industrials were the one-year winner. They more than doubled the market’s gain for the first year. XLY also more than doubled the market in the first year. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed all others for the two-year and three-year periods. It’s interesting to me that Financials never got on track and were clear laggards.The third bear market examined will be the European Debt Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 21%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in October 2011, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of November’s trading. Table 3 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 3 – European Debt CrisisAuthorTable 3 shows that Financials led for the first year coming out of the bear market, more than doubling the market’s overall performance. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed for the first two years. Financial stocks outperformed all others over a three-year period. This table shows that all the ETFs studied outperformed the market for all three time periods.The fourth bear market examined will be the Cryptocurrency Debt Bear Market. In case you’re wondering, I got this name fromWikipedia. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over just over 20% barely qualifying for bear market status. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in January 2019, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of February’s trading. Table 4 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 4 – Cryptocurrency Bear MarketAuthorComing out of this bear market is where technology stocks show up. QQQ outperforms all the other ETFs for all three time periods. It does so in a big way. It’s two-year and three-year performance is 40 percentage points higher than its closest competitor. The time frame of the table overlaps Table 5 five below and therefore shows the COVID rally where technology stocks dominated. This bear market is also one where there were several ETFs that underperformed the market over all three time periods.The last bear market covered is the COVID Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 35%. The COVID bear market was the shortest bear market in the study spanning just over a month. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in May 2020, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of June’s trading. Table 5 shows the results for two full years and to the end of October 2022 as there hasn’t been a full three years since this market reclaimed its 10-month EMA.Table 5 – COVID Bear MarketAuthorComing out of the COVID Bear Market, Financial stocks led the way for the first year. This result surprised me. I was certain it was technology stocks that led the way. For the two-year period XLF outperformed all other ETFs while managing to lose money from the end of year one to the end of year two. The same situation happened with the return to the end of October 2022. XLF led all other ETFs for the total period, while losing money from the end of year two.The last table will be the averages for all five ETFs compared to SPX for all five bear markets. This chart is difficult to read, and I apologize for that. When reading this chart, percentages highlighted in green are percentages that are above SPX returns for the same period of the bear market identified in the first column. Percentages highlighted in yellow are percentages that are below SPX returns for the period of the bear market identified in the first column. The cells highlighted in blue represent the best period return for that bear market.Table 6 – Combined ResultsAuthorWhat jumps out at me from Table 6 are three things. One, SPY outperformed the broad market in each bear market recovery in each time period. So, if you want to outperform the market, buy SPY. I think Warren Buffett gives that advice. The second observation is that QQQ outperformed the broad market for the first year in every instance. It outperformed SPY for the first year in every instance except the Euro Debt Bear Market, where QQQ returned 15.96% in the first year while SPY returned 18.31% in the first year. Both beat SPX during that time frame. Three, each ETF had its moment of outperformance and underperformance.What I’ve learned from this study is that once the current bear market is over, meaning SPX closes above its 10-month moving average, I will put some of my money in SPY. I will put money in QQQ for the first year at least. XLY, XLF, and XLI all had their opportunities to shine. Looking at Table 6, I’m not sure I can make a blanket statement that one or more of those ETFs should be an automatic buy over SPY or QQQ coming out of a bear market over.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":457,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987733505,"gmtCreate":1667987979807,"gmtModify":1676537995047,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987733505","repostId":"1157692624","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1157692624","pubTimestamp":1668008277,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1157692624?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-09 23:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Even At The 12-Month Low, Tesla Is Not A Compelling Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157692624","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryTSLA is trading at 12-month lows.Rising interest rates, Q3's revenue miss, and slowing sales ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>TSLA is trading at 12-month lows.</li><li>Rising interest rates, Q3&#39;s revenue miss, and slowing sales in China are immediate concerns.</li><li>The Wall Street consensus rating is a buy, with a consensus 12-month price target that is about 50% above the current share price.</li><li>The very high dispersion in the individual analyst price targets reduces confidence in the meaningfulness of the consensus.</li><li>The market-implied outlook (calculated from options prices) is slightly bullish through the end of 2022, but bearish to mid-2023.</li></ul><p>Shares of Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) have fallen by 15% from the closing price on October 31st and are down 51.6% from the 12-month high closing price of $399.93 on January 3rd. The shares are currently trading at 12-month lows. The drop in the share price since the end of October is largely attributable to declining vehicle sales in China for October, with the company cutting the prices of the Model 3 and Model Y by 9% to maintain demand. The market response to the China news was probably exacerbated by growing concerns after TSLA’s revenue miss for Q3(reported on October 19th).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed96ee922a9178151466be6bb913196e\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"382\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>12-Month price history and basic statistics for TSLA above.</p><p>Tesla’s valuation depends on continued rapid growth in revenues and earnings. This fact makes the share value quite sensitive to changes in interest rates. The theoretical value of a stock is the net present value of future earnings. The further into the future that these earnings are expected, the larger the compounded impact of increasing the discount rate, which depends on current interest rates. Rising interest rates are one of the factors driving TSLA down.</p><p>The prevailing view among Wall Street analysts is that TSLA can maintain recent years’ incredibly rapid growth rates. The consensus for the rate of EPS growth over the next 3 to 5 years is 31.6% per year. If the company fails to deliver earnings in line with this outlook, the share valuation is likely to decline.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bddbc4100fa6280bf6fcc0ef8b86d03a\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"418\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>ETrade</p><p>Trailing (3 years) and estimated future quarterly EPS for TSLA. Green (red) values are amounts by which EPS beat (missed) the consensus expected EPS above.</p><p>Tesla has generated growth rates that amply demonstrate the company’s exceptionalism. TSLA’s YoY revenue growth rate is59.8%, as compared to 4.5% for Toyota (TM), 6.6% for Mercedes-Benz Group (OTCPK: MBGAF), 12.4% for General Motors (GM), and 12.7% for Ford (F). TSLA also has gross profit margins that are higher than those of these competing firms. Given the massive difference in scale of production, TSLA’s higher profit margins are impressive. The question for investors is whether the current share valuation makes sense, given that this valuation is sensitive to interest rates and depends on maintaining heroic growth rates.</p><p>I last wrote about TSLA on May 25, 2022, about 5 ½ months ago, and I maintained a sell rating on the shares. At that time, the Wall Street consensus rating on TSLA was a buy and the consensus 12-month price target was almost 50% above the share price. One red flag from the analyst outlooks was the extremely high dispersion among the individual price targets. Research has shown that the consensus price target is a meaningful predictor only when the spread in individual price targets is quite low. In fact, a consensus price target that implies a high return is actually a bearish indicator when the spread in the individual price targets is high. The valuation, then as now, was a concern and required incredible growth rates to be justified. I also noted that rising interest rates put downward pressure on the shares. I also looked at the market-implied outlook, a probabilistic price forecast that represents the consensus view from the options market. The market-implied outlook to mid-January of 2023 was substantially bearish. In the 5 ½ months since this post, TSLA has returned -13.3% vs. -4.26% for the S&amp;P 500 (not including dividends).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c08822d1f3055ab12bf6e9e8a7ea386\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"186\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Previous analysis of TSLA and subsequent performance vs. the S&amp;P 500 above.</p><p>For readers who are unfamiliar with the market-implied outlook, a brief explanation is needed. The price of an option on a stock is largely determined by the market’s consensus estimate of the probability that the stock price will rise above (call option) or fall below (put option) a specific level (the option strike price) between now and when the option expires. By analyzing the prices of call and put options at a range of strike prices, all with the same expiration date, it is possible to calculate a probabilistic price forecast that reconciles the options prices. This is the market-implied outlook. For a deeper explanation and background, I recommend this monograph published by the CFA Institute.</p><p>With TSLA trading at 12-month lows, I have calculated updated market-implied outlooks and I have compared these with the Wall Street consensus outlook in revisiting my rating.</p><p><b>Wall Street Consensus Outlook for TSLA</b></p><p>ETrade calculates the Wall Street consensus outlook for TSLA using price targets and ratings from 29 ranked analysts who have published their views over the past 3 months. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price targets is 57.7% above the current share price. As in my post from May, there is an enormous spread among the individual price targets. As a rule of thumb, I discount the consensus price target when the ratio of the highest to lowest price target is greater than 2. In this case, the ratio is 10.4 ($760 / $73).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/615c8d0e04e8918e25b7385e2bad7c26\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"855\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>ETrade</p><p>Wall Street analyst consensus rating and 12-month price target for TSLA above.</p><p>Seeking Alpha’s version of the Wall Street consensus outlook is calculated using the views of 35 analysts who have published ratings and price targets within the last 90 days. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price target is 47.2% above the current share price. I don’t put much weight on this number, however, because of the very large spread among the individual price targets.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/797d6141699490e50d24fb2784e632e1\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"882\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Wall Street analyst consensus rating and 12-month price target for TSLA above.</p><p>In the current results, as in my previous posts on TSLA in May of 2022 and in April of 2021, the spread among the individual analyst price targets is extremely high. This, in turn, suggests that the consensus outlook is unlikely to have predictive value. The consensus price target that is about 50% above the current share price, along with the large spread in individual price targets, may actually be a bearish indicator.</p><p><b>Market-Implied Outlook for TSLA</b></p><p>I have calculated the market-implied outlook for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023 and for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023, using the prices of call and put options that expire on these dates. I selected these two expiration dates to provide a view through the end of 2022 and to the middle of 2023. In addition, options with expiration dates in January and June tend to be highly traded, increasing the confidence in the representativeness of the market-implied outlook.</p><p>The standard presentation of the market-implied outlook is a probability distribution of price return, with probability on the vertical axis and return on the horizontal.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/44f689bc8494e22307e8401f8fcc1ac2\" tg-width=\"966\" tg-height=\"557\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Geoff Considine</p><p>Market-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023, above.</p><p>The market-implied outlook to mid-January of 2023 is very symmetric, with probabilities of positive returns that are very close to those for negative returns of the same magnitude. The expected volatility calculated from this outlook is 62% (annualized). For comparison, ETrade calculates a 59% implied volatility for the January options.</p><p>To make it easier to compare the relative probabilities of positive and negative returns, I rotate the negative return side of the distribution about the vertical axis (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67eb2da8e00a45afb6a60092265c1c8c\" tg-width=\"897\" tg-height=\"557\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Geoff Considine</p><p>Market-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023. The negative return side of the distribution has been rotated about the vertical axis above.</p><p>This view shows just how closely the probabilities of positive and negative returns match up, across the entire range of possible outcomes (the solid blue line and the dashed red line are basically on top of one another). These results indicate a neutral outlook for the next 2.4 months.</p><p>Theory indicates that the market-implied outlook is expected to have a negative bias because investors, in aggregate, are risk averse and thus tend to pay more than fair value for downside protection. There is no way to measure the magnitude of this bias, or whether it is even present, however. The expectation of a negative bias shifts what would otherwise look like a neutral outlook to a slightly bullish view.</p><p>The market-implied outlook for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023 has probabilities of negative returns that are consistently higher than those for positive returns, across a wide range of possible outcomes (the dashed red line is consistently above the solid blue line over the left ⅔ of the chart below). The maximum probability corresponds to a price return of -21%. Even with consideration of a potential negative bias, I interpret this outlook as bearish. The expected volatility calculated from this distribution is 63% (annualized).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f17528781a49f411c10295d132d77cf\" tg-width=\"897\" tg-height=\"557\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Geoff Considine</p><p>Market-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023. The negative return side of the distribution has been rotated about the vertical axis above.</p><p>The market-implied outlook for TSLA is very slightly bullish to mid-January of 2023, but bearish from now until mid-June of 2023. This suggests that TSLA may have gotten a bit oversold in the current sell-off, so a bounce in the next couple of months would not be a surprise. Over the longer-term, however, the outlook is somewhat bearish. In my analysis in late May, the 7.9-month outlook to January 20, 2023 was much more bearish than the current 7.2-month outlook to June of 2023. The expected volatility calculated in late May, 74%, was notably higher than the current estimation for expected volatility. The current outlook to the middle of 2023 is bearish, with high volatility, but the probability of large declines in the share price is lower than it was in late May.</p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>Tesla has generated exceptional revenue growth in recent years, justifying a substantial premium on the share price as compared to other auto manufacturers and many successful tech companies, as well. That said, the value of a share of TSLA should be quite sensitive to prevailing interest rates as well as any shortfalls in the growth trajectory. With substantial gains in interest rates in 2022, along with concerns about slowing sales growth in China and Q3’s revenue miss, how does one evaluate TSLA? The Wall Street consensus outlook is of limited value because there is such a high level of disagreement between the analysts who follow the company. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price target implies a gain of around 50% from current levels, but I have little confidence in the usefulness of these metrics. If anything, the high consensus price target with high dispersion in the individual price targets is a somewhat bearish indicator. The market-implied outlook for TSLA is slightly bullish to mid-January of 2023 but moderately bearish to the middle of 2023. I am maintaining my sell rating on TSLA, although there is decent potential for some price recovery through the end of this year.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Even At The 12-Month Low, Tesla Is Not A Compelling Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEven At The 12-Month Low, Tesla Is Not A Compelling Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-09 23:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4555040-tesla-stock-not-compelling-buy-even-at-12-month-low><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryTSLA is trading at 12-month lows.Rising interest rates, Q3's revenue miss, and slowing sales in China are immediate concerns.The Wall Street consensus rating is a buy, with a consensus 12-month...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4555040-tesla-stock-not-compelling-buy-even-at-12-month-low\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4555040-tesla-stock-not-compelling-buy-even-at-12-month-low","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157692624","content_text":"SummaryTSLA is trading at 12-month lows.Rising interest rates, Q3's revenue miss, and slowing sales in China are immediate concerns.The Wall Street consensus rating is a buy, with a consensus 12-month price target that is about 50% above the current share price.The very high dispersion in the individual analyst price targets reduces confidence in the meaningfulness of the consensus.The market-implied outlook (calculated from options prices) is slightly bullish through the end of 2022, but bearish to mid-2023.Shares of Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) have fallen by 15% from the closing price on October 31st and are down 51.6% from the 12-month high closing price of $399.93 on January 3rd. The shares are currently trading at 12-month lows. The drop in the share price since the end of October is largely attributable to declining vehicle sales in China for October, with the company cutting the prices of the Model 3 and Model Y by 9% to maintain demand. The market response to the China news was probably exacerbated by growing concerns after TSLA’s revenue miss for Q3(reported on October 19th).Seeking Alpha12-Month price history and basic statistics for TSLA above.Tesla’s valuation depends on continued rapid growth in revenues and earnings. This fact makes the share value quite sensitive to changes in interest rates. The theoretical value of a stock is the net present value of future earnings. The further into the future that these earnings are expected, the larger the compounded impact of increasing the discount rate, which depends on current interest rates. Rising interest rates are one of the factors driving TSLA down.The prevailing view among Wall Street analysts is that TSLA can maintain recent years’ incredibly rapid growth rates. The consensus for the rate of EPS growth over the next 3 to 5 years is 31.6% per year. If the company fails to deliver earnings in line with this outlook, the share valuation is likely to decline.ETradeTrailing (3 years) and estimated future quarterly EPS for TSLA. Green (red) values are amounts by which EPS beat (missed) the consensus expected EPS above.Tesla has generated growth rates that amply demonstrate the company’s exceptionalism. TSLA’s YoY revenue growth rate is59.8%, as compared to 4.5% for Toyota (TM), 6.6% for Mercedes-Benz Group (OTCPK: MBGAF), 12.4% for General Motors (GM), and 12.7% for Ford (F). TSLA also has gross profit margins that are higher than those of these competing firms. Given the massive difference in scale of production, TSLA’s higher profit margins are impressive. The question for investors is whether the current share valuation makes sense, given that this valuation is sensitive to interest rates and depends on maintaining heroic growth rates.I last wrote about TSLA on May 25, 2022, about 5 ½ months ago, and I maintained a sell rating on the shares. At that time, the Wall Street consensus rating on TSLA was a buy and the consensus 12-month price target was almost 50% above the share price. One red flag from the analyst outlooks was the extremely high dispersion among the individual price targets. Research has shown that the consensus price target is a meaningful predictor only when the spread in individual price targets is quite low. In fact, a consensus price target that implies a high return is actually a bearish indicator when the spread in the individual price targets is high. The valuation, then as now, was a concern and required incredible growth rates to be justified. I also noted that rising interest rates put downward pressure on the shares. I also looked at the market-implied outlook, a probabilistic price forecast that represents the consensus view from the options market. The market-implied outlook to mid-January of 2023 was substantially bearish. In the 5 ½ months since this post, TSLA has returned -13.3% vs. -4.26% for the S&P 500 (not including dividends).Seeking AlphaPrevious analysis of TSLA and subsequent performance vs. the S&P 500 above.For readers who are unfamiliar with the market-implied outlook, a brief explanation is needed. The price of an option on a stock is largely determined by the market’s consensus estimate of the probability that the stock price will rise above (call option) or fall below (put option) a specific level (the option strike price) between now and when the option expires. By analyzing the prices of call and put options at a range of strike prices, all with the same expiration date, it is possible to calculate a probabilistic price forecast that reconciles the options prices. This is the market-implied outlook. For a deeper explanation and background, I recommend this monograph published by the CFA Institute.With TSLA trading at 12-month lows, I have calculated updated market-implied outlooks and I have compared these with the Wall Street consensus outlook in revisiting my rating.Wall Street Consensus Outlook for TSLAETrade calculates the Wall Street consensus outlook for TSLA using price targets and ratings from 29 ranked analysts who have published their views over the past 3 months. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price targets is 57.7% above the current share price. As in my post from May, there is an enormous spread among the individual price targets. As a rule of thumb, I discount the consensus price target when the ratio of the highest to lowest price target is greater than 2. In this case, the ratio is 10.4 ($760 / $73).ETradeWall Street analyst consensus rating and 12-month price target for TSLA above.Seeking Alpha’s version of the Wall Street consensus outlook is calculated using the views of 35 analysts who have published ratings and price targets within the last 90 days. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price target is 47.2% above the current share price. I don’t put much weight on this number, however, because of the very large spread among the individual price targets.Seeking AlphaWall Street analyst consensus rating and 12-month price target for TSLA above.In the current results, as in my previous posts on TSLA in May of 2022 and in April of 2021, the spread among the individual analyst price targets is extremely high. This, in turn, suggests that the consensus outlook is unlikely to have predictive value. The consensus price target that is about 50% above the current share price, along with the large spread in individual price targets, may actually be a bearish indicator.Market-Implied Outlook for TSLAI have calculated the market-implied outlook for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023 and for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023, using the prices of call and put options that expire on these dates. I selected these two expiration dates to provide a view through the end of 2022 and to the middle of 2023. In addition, options with expiration dates in January and June tend to be highly traded, increasing the confidence in the representativeness of the market-implied outlook.The standard presentation of the market-implied outlook is a probability distribution of price return, with probability on the vertical axis and return on the horizontal.Geoff ConsidineMarket-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023, above.The market-implied outlook to mid-January of 2023 is very symmetric, with probabilities of positive returns that are very close to those for negative returns of the same magnitude. The expected volatility calculated from this outlook is 62% (annualized). For comparison, ETrade calculates a 59% implied volatility for the January options.To make it easier to compare the relative probabilities of positive and negative returns, I rotate the negative return side of the distribution about the vertical axis (see chart below).Geoff ConsidineMarket-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 2.4-month period from now until January 20, 2023. The negative return side of the distribution has been rotated about the vertical axis above.This view shows just how closely the probabilities of positive and negative returns match up, across the entire range of possible outcomes (the solid blue line and the dashed red line are basically on top of one another). These results indicate a neutral outlook for the next 2.4 months.Theory indicates that the market-implied outlook is expected to have a negative bias because investors, in aggregate, are risk averse and thus tend to pay more than fair value for downside protection. There is no way to measure the magnitude of this bias, or whether it is even present, however. The expectation of a negative bias shifts what would otherwise look like a neutral outlook to a slightly bullish view.The market-implied outlook for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023 has probabilities of negative returns that are consistently higher than those for positive returns, across a wide range of possible outcomes (the dashed red line is consistently above the solid blue line over the left ⅔ of the chart below). The maximum probability corresponds to a price return of -21%. Even with consideration of a potential negative bias, I interpret this outlook as bearish. The expected volatility calculated from this distribution is 63% (annualized).Geoff ConsidineMarket-implied price return probabilities for TSLA for the 7.2-month period from now until June 16, 2023. The negative return side of the distribution has been rotated about the vertical axis above.The market-implied outlook for TSLA is very slightly bullish to mid-January of 2023, but bearish from now until mid-June of 2023. This suggests that TSLA may have gotten a bit oversold in the current sell-off, so a bounce in the next couple of months would not be a surprise. Over the longer-term, however, the outlook is somewhat bearish. In my analysis in late May, the 7.9-month outlook to January 20, 2023 was much more bearish than the current 7.2-month outlook to June of 2023. The expected volatility calculated in late May, 74%, was notably higher than the current estimation for expected volatility. The current outlook to the middle of 2023 is bearish, with high volatility, but the probability of large declines in the share price is lower than it was in late May.SummaryTesla has generated exceptional revenue growth in recent years, justifying a substantial premium on the share price as compared to other auto manufacturers and many successful tech companies, as well. That said, the value of a share of TSLA should be quite sensitive to prevailing interest rates as well as any shortfalls in the growth trajectory. With substantial gains in interest rates in 2022, along with concerns about slowing sales growth in China and Q3’s revenue miss, how does one evaluate TSLA? The Wall Street consensus outlook is of limited value because there is such a high level of disagreement between the analysts who follow the company. The consensus rating is a buy and the consensus 12-month price target implies a gain of around 50% from current levels, but I have little confidence in the usefulness of these metrics. If anything, the high consensus price target with high dispersion in the individual price targets is a somewhat bearish indicator. The market-implied outlook for TSLA is slightly bullish to mid-January of 2023 but moderately bearish to the middle of 2023. I am maintaining my sell rating on TSLA, although there is decent potential for some price recovery through the end of this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":501,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9984824991,"gmtCreate":1667607749813,"gmtModify":1676537942913,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9984824991","repostId":"2280464574","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2280464574","pubTimestamp":1667576239,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2280464574?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-04 23:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2280464574","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Investors seem to have ignored a significant slowdown in AMD's growth rate.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">Advanced Micro Devices </a> stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.</p><p>But despite that bad news, the semiconductor stock is on the rise following the report. Is that a reason to buy? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>AMD&#39;s earnings conundrum</h2><p>On the surface, AMD&#39;s results appear robust. Revenue for the third quarter of 2022 came in at $5.6 billion, climbing by 29% year over year. Non-GAAP net income of $1.1 billion rose 23%. A higher cost of goods sold reduced margins. AMD also spent heavily on both research and development and marketing, general, and administrative expenses.</p><p>Despite the increases, revenue fell short of expectations, since analysts expected revenue of $5.62 billion. Moreover, AMD increased its share count by 34% to over 1.6 billion to fund its Xilinx acquisition. Thus, non-GAAP earnings per share fell 8% to $0.67 per share, just below the $0.68 per share estimate.</p><p>AMD forecast 2022 revenue of $23.5 billion at the midpoint, which requires a considerable downward revision from the previously estimated $26.3 billion it predicted after the second quarter.</p><p>CEO Lisa Su blamed slowing PC sales, reflecting the struggles of <b>Intel</b>, which reported a similar decline in its Q3 earnings report. Lockdowns in China further pressured revenues.</p><p>Consequently, AMD stock has dropped by almost 65% since reaching an all-time high of nearly $165 per share almost one year ago. But that level of decline is not unusual, given the drop in its closest peers and the tech sector in general.</p><h2>Shifting perspectives</h2><p>Investors may have begun to adjust their perspective, returning to a pre-pandemic view of the PC market. Since the advent of <b>Apple</b>&#39;s iPhone, the smartphone has started to replace many functions performed by the PC. Hence, investors and companies had focused less on that market by the end of the last decade.</p><p>Admittedly, PC demand rose during the pandemic as many workers had to purchase a PC to work from home. But many of these workers have now returned to the office. And considering that PCs last up to 10 years, that market will likely remain sluggish for years to come.</p><p>AMD has also increasingly emphasized the data center and embedded segments. In these areas, AMD&#39;s sales remained robust.</p><p>In Q3, data center revenue came in at $1.6 billion, a 45% increase year over year. Embedded segment revenue jumped to $1.3 billion, up from $100 million in the year-ago quarter. The embedded segment&#39;s growth surged thanks to the acquisition of Xilinx in February.</p><p>Valuation could have also influenced the buying decision. Currently, AMD stock sells for about 25 times earnings. That exceeds the price-to-earnings ratios of rival Intel and one of its principal fabs, <b>Taiwan Semiconductor</b>.</p><p>However, that is the lowest P/E ratio for AMD since Su became CEO in 2014. Moreover, the valuation may have fallen too far, considering that Q3 non-GAAP income growth was 23% despite a slowdown in the business.</p><h2>Consider AMD</h2><p>At these levels, investors should consider adding AMD shares. From a macro perspective, investors should have expected the PC market to cool off following the end of lockdowns.</p><p>Growth numbers in the data center and embedded markets indicate those segments can carry AMD. Given the likelihood that the drop in AMD stock prices in its recent struggles, investors should feel safe adding shares at current levels.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-04 23:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Advanced Micro Devices  stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.But despite that bad news, the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2280464574","content_text":"Advanced Micro Devices  stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.But despite that bad news, the semiconductor stock is on the rise following the report. Is that a reason to buy? Let's take a closer look.AMD's earnings conundrumOn the surface, AMD's results appear robust. Revenue for the third quarter of 2022 came in at $5.6 billion, climbing by 29% year over year. Non-GAAP net income of $1.1 billion rose 23%. A higher cost of goods sold reduced margins. AMD also spent heavily on both research and development and marketing, general, and administrative expenses.Despite the increases, revenue fell short of expectations, since analysts expected revenue of $5.62 billion. Moreover, AMD increased its share count by 34% to over 1.6 billion to fund its Xilinx acquisition. Thus, non-GAAP earnings per share fell 8% to $0.67 per share, just below the $0.68 per share estimate.AMD forecast 2022 revenue of $23.5 billion at the midpoint, which requires a considerable downward revision from the previously estimated $26.3 billion it predicted after the second quarter.CEO Lisa Su blamed slowing PC sales, reflecting the struggles of Intel, which reported a similar decline in its Q3 earnings report. Lockdowns in China further pressured revenues.Consequently, AMD stock has dropped by almost 65% since reaching an all-time high of nearly $165 per share almost one year ago. But that level of decline is not unusual, given the drop in its closest peers and the tech sector in general.Shifting perspectivesInvestors may have begun to adjust their perspective, returning to a pre-pandemic view of the PC market. Since the advent of Apple's iPhone, the smartphone has started to replace many functions performed by the PC. Hence, investors and companies had focused less on that market by the end of the last decade.Admittedly, PC demand rose during the pandemic as many workers had to purchase a PC to work from home. But many of these workers have now returned to the office. And considering that PCs last up to 10 years, that market will likely remain sluggish for years to come.AMD has also increasingly emphasized the data center and embedded segments. In these areas, AMD's sales remained robust.In Q3, data center revenue came in at $1.6 billion, a 45% increase year over year. Embedded segment revenue jumped to $1.3 billion, up from $100 million in the year-ago quarter. The embedded segment's growth surged thanks to the acquisition of Xilinx in February.Valuation could have also influenced the buying decision. Currently, AMD stock sells for about 25 times earnings. That exceeds the price-to-earnings ratios of rival Intel and one of its principal fabs, Taiwan Semiconductor.However, that is the lowest P/E ratio for AMD since Su became CEO in 2014. Moreover, the valuation may have fallen too far, considering that Q3 non-GAAP income growth was 23% despite a slowdown in the business.Consider AMDAt these levels, investors should consider adding AMD shares. From a macro perspective, investors should have expected the PC market to cool off following the end of lockdowns.Growth numbers in the data center and embedded markets indicate those segments can carry AMD. Given the likelihood that the drop in AMD stock prices in its recent struggles, investors should feel safe adding shares at current levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":475,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9985145780,"gmtCreate":1667347265940,"gmtModify":1676537901180,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9985145780","repostId":"2280349154","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2280349154","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1667345678,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2280349154?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-02 07:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tinder-Owner Match Group Beats Estimates for Quarterly Revenue","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2280349154","media":"Reuters","summary":"Nov 1 (Reuters) - Match Group    beat estimates for third-quarter revenue on Tuesday as more paying ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nov 1 (Reuters) - Match Group    beat estimates for third-quarter revenue on Tuesday as more paying users, undeterred by decades-high inflation, signed up on its dating apps Tinder and Hinge.</p><p>The company&#39;s revenue rose 1% to $810 million. Analysts on average had expected about $793 million, according to Refinitiv data.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tinder-Owner Match Group Beats Estimates for Quarterly Revenue</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTinder-Owner Match Group Beats Estimates for Quarterly Revenue\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-11-02 07:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nov 1 (Reuters) - Match Group    beat estimates for third-quarter revenue on Tuesday as more paying users, undeterred by decades-high inflation, signed up on its dating apps Tinder and Hinge.</p><p>The company&#39;s revenue rose 1% to $810 million. Analysts on average had expected about $793 million, according to Refinitiv data.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MTCH":"Match Group, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2280349154","content_text":"Nov 1 (Reuters) - Match Group    beat estimates for third-quarter revenue on Tuesday as more paying users, undeterred by decades-high inflation, signed up on its dating apps Tinder and Hinge.The company's revenue rose 1% to $810 million. Analysts on average had expected about $793 million, according to Refinitiv data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9982784372,"gmtCreate":1667259079496,"gmtModify":1676537885169,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/FNGU\">$MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN FNGU(FNGU)$</a>bearish","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/FNGU\">$MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN FNGU(FNGU)$</a>bearish","text":"$MicroSectors FANG+ Index 3X Leveraged ETN FNGU(FNGU)$bearish","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/40705882b25bea2544c6b93982efb120","width":"1080","height":"1573"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9982784372","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":280,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9986128977,"gmtCreate":1666915061200,"gmtModify":1676537829048,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9986128977","repostId":"1116017099","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116017099","pubTimestamp":1666914063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116017099?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-28 07:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Movers: Amazon Sinks on Lower Guidance, Pinterest Up on Beat","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116017099","media":"Investing.com","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Amazon (AMZN)14% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.06 better than the ana","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>After-Hours Stock Movers:</b></p><p>Amazon (AMZN)14% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.06 better than the analyst estimate of $0.22. Revenue for the quarter came in at $127.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $127.76 billion. Amazon sees Q4 2022 revenue of $140-148 billion, versus the consensus of $155.1 billion.</p><p>Edwards Lifesciences (EW)11% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.61, $0.01 worse than the analyst estimate of $0.62. Revenue for the quarter came in at $1.32 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.33 billion. Edwards Lifesciences sees FY2022 EPS of $2.40-$2.50, versus the consensus of $2.52.</p><p>Pinterest (PINS)10% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.11, $0.05 better than the analyst estimate of $0.06. Revenue for the quarter came in at $685 million versus the consensus estimate of $665.54 million.</p><p>L3Harris Technologies (LHX)8% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $3.26, $0.15 worse than the analyst estimate of $3.41. Revenue for the quarter came in at $4.25 billion versus the consensus estimate of $4.41 billion. L3Harris Technologies sees FY2022 EPS of $12.75-$13.00, versus the consensus of $13.48. L3Harris Technologies sees FY2022 revenue of $16.8 million, versus the consensus of $17.39 million.</p><p>DexCom (DXCM)7% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $769.6 million versus the consensus estimate of $751.74 million. DexCom sees Q4 2022 revenue of $2.88-2.91 billion, versus the consensus of $2.89 billion.</p><p>Deckers Brands (DECK)6% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $3.80, $0.17 better than the analyst estimate of $3.63. Revenue for the quarter came in at $876 million versus the consensus estimate of $804.64 million. Deckers Brands sees FY2023 EPS of $17.50-$18.35, versus the consensus of $18.12.</p><p>Vertex Pharma (VRTX)5% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $4.01, $0.39 better than the analyst estimate of $3.62. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.33 billion versus the consensus estimate of $2.22 billion. Vertex Pharma sees FY2022 revenue of $8.8-8.9 billion, versus the prior of $8.6-$8.8 billion and the consensus of $8.77 billion.</p><p>Gilead Sciences (GILD)4% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $1.90, $0.38 better than the analyst estimate of $1.52. Revenue for the quarter came in at $7 billion versus the consensus estimate of $6.13 billion.</p><p>Intel (INTC)4% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.59, $0.25 better than the analyst estimate of $0.34. Revenue for the quarter came in at $15.3 billion versus the consensus estimate of $15.43 billion. Intel sees Q4 2022 EPS of $0.20, versus the consensus of $0.60. Intel sees Q4 2022 revenue of $14-15 billion, versus the consensus of $16.3 billion</p><p>T-Mobile (TMUS)3% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.40, $0.01 better than the analyst estimate of $0.39. Revenue for the quarter came in at $19.48 billion versus the consensus estimate of $20.02 billion.</p><p>Apple (AAPL)1% LOWER; reported Q4 EPS of $1.29, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $1.26. Revenue for the quarter came in at $90.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $88.76 billion.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Movers: Amazon Sinks on Lower Guidance, Pinterest Up on Beat</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Movers: Amazon Sinks on Lower Guidance, Pinterest Up on Beat\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-28 07:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://in.investing.com/news/afterhours-movers-amazon-sinks-on-lower-guidance-pinterest-up-on-beat-432SI-3394184><strong>Investing.com</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Amazon (AMZN)14% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.06 better than the analyst estimate of $0.22. Revenue for the quarter came in at $127.1 billion versus the consensus ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://in.investing.com/news/afterhours-movers-amazon-sinks-on-lower-guidance-pinterest-up-on-beat-432SI-3394184\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://in.investing.com/news/afterhours-movers-amazon-sinks-on-lower-guidance-pinterest-up-on-beat-432SI-3394184","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116017099","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Amazon (AMZN)14% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.06 better than the analyst estimate of $0.22. Revenue for the quarter came in at $127.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $127.76 billion. Amazon sees Q4 2022 revenue of $140-148 billion, versus the consensus of $155.1 billion.Edwards Lifesciences (EW)11% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.61, $0.01 worse than the analyst estimate of $0.62. Revenue for the quarter came in at $1.32 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.33 billion. Edwards Lifesciences sees FY2022 EPS of $2.40-$2.50, versus the consensus of $2.52.Pinterest (PINS)10% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.11, $0.05 better than the analyst estimate of $0.06. Revenue for the quarter came in at $685 million versus the consensus estimate of $665.54 million.L3Harris Technologies (LHX)8% LOWER; reported Q3 EPS of $3.26, $0.15 worse than the analyst estimate of $3.41. Revenue for the quarter came in at $4.25 billion versus the consensus estimate of $4.41 billion. L3Harris Technologies sees FY2022 EPS of $12.75-$13.00, versus the consensus of $13.48. L3Harris Technologies sees FY2022 revenue of $16.8 million, versus the consensus of $17.39 million.DexCom (DXCM)7% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.28, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $769.6 million versus the consensus estimate of $751.74 million. DexCom sees Q4 2022 revenue of $2.88-2.91 billion, versus the consensus of $2.89 billion.Deckers Brands (DECK)6% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $3.80, $0.17 better than the analyst estimate of $3.63. Revenue for the quarter came in at $876 million versus the consensus estimate of $804.64 million. Deckers Brands sees FY2023 EPS of $17.50-$18.35, versus the consensus of $18.12.Vertex Pharma (VRTX)5% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $4.01, $0.39 better than the analyst estimate of $3.62. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.33 billion versus the consensus estimate of $2.22 billion. Vertex Pharma sees FY2022 revenue of $8.8-8.9 billion, versus the prior of $8.6-$8.8 billion and the consensus of $8.77 billion.Gilead Sciences (GILD)4% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $1.90, $0.38 better than the analyst estimate of $1.52. Revenue for the quarter came in at $7 billion versus the consensus estimate of $6.13 billion.Intel (INTC)4% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.59, $0.25 better than the analyst estimate of $0.34. Revenue for the quarter came in at $15.3 billion versus the consensus estimate of $15.43 billion. Intel sees Q4 2022 EPS of $0.20, versus the consensus of $0.60. Intel sees Q4 2022 revenue of $14-15 billion, versus the consensus of $16.3 billionT-Mobile (TMUS)3% HIGHER; reported Q3 EPS of $0.40, $0.01 better than the analyst estimate of $0.39. Revenue for the quarter came in at $19.48 billion versus the consensus estimate of $20.02 billion.Apple (AAPL)1% LOWER; reported Q4 EPS of $1.29, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $1.26. Revenue for the quarter came in at $90.1 billion versus the consensus estimate of $88.76 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9986041316,"gmtCreate":1666864646035,"gmtModify":1676537819112,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[OK]&nbsp;","listText":"[OK]&nbsp;","text":"[OK]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9986041316","repostId":"1197787468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197787468","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1666861309,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197787468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-27 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197787468","media":"Benzinga","summary":"With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab inves","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAT\">Caterpillar Inc.</a> to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.</li><li>After the closing bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms, Inc.</a> reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald&#39;s Corporation</a>+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald&#39;s shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com, Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOW\">ServiceNow Inc</a> reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">Mastercard Incorporated</a> to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-27 17:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAT\">Caterpillar Inc.</a> to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.</li><li>After the closing bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms, Inc.</a> reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald&#39;s Corporation</a>+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald&#39;s shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com, Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOW\">ServiceNow Inc</a> reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">Mastercard Incorporated</a> to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NOW":"ServiceNow","MCD":"麦当劳","MA":"万事达","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197787468","content_text":"With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:Wall Street expects Caterpillar Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.After the closing bell, Apple Inc. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.Meta Platforms, Inc. reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts are expecting McDonald's Corporation+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald's shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.After the markets close, Amazon.com, Inc. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.ServiceNow Inc reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts expect Mastercard Incorporated to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988292879,"gmtCreate":1666752264591,"gmtModify":1676537800817,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988292879","repostId":"1116012550","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116012550","pubTimestamp":1666751341,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116012550?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-26 10:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The 10X Opportunity for Tesla Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116012550","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tesla(TSLA) stock has had difficult month and it isn’t over yet.However, Cathie Wood remains ever bu","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><b>Tesla</b>(<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) stock has had difficult month and it isn’t over yet.</li><li>However, Cathie Wood remains ever bullish on TSLA stock.</li><li>Wood sees a potential path toward extreme profitability for the electric vehicle (EV) leader.</li></ul><p>After a month marked by disappointing earnings, <b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) stock is back in the green today. It’s a generally positive day for markets so far, with the <b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b>and<b>S&amp;P 500</b>all trending upward. While Tesla doesn’t have any company-specific news pushing it upward today, Cathie Wood did recently give investors cause for optimism.</p><p>The founder of <b>Ark Invest</b>, Wood increased her TSLA stock holdings last week, adding66,190 shares. Evidently, Wood sees a path forward that could push the electric vehicle(EV) leader into a new sphere of profitability. In an email update to investors, Wood explained that“Tesla could expand its addressable market ten-fold by cutting the cost of an electric vehicle in half.”</p><p>Cathie Wood isn’t the first to raise this point. As Tesla’s EVs have soared in popularity, experts have raised questions about what more affordable EV models could mean for the company’s future. Let’s take a closer look.</p><p><b>What This Means for TSLA Stock</b></p><p>On the same day that Wood made her 10x prediction, Teslareduced its EV prices in China due to concerns over falling demand. The company cut the prices of the Model 3 Sedan and Model Y SUV by 5% and 9%, respectively.</p><p>Even in China, the world’s largest EV market, demand for Tesla’s vehicles may be declining amid increasing competition from domestic automakers like <b>Nio</b>(NYSE:<b><u>NIO</u></b>). However, with TSLA stock rising today, markets don’t seem to be reacting too badly to the price reduction news. This supports the idea that Tesla may be best served by offering less expensive vehicles.</p><p>While Tesla is one of the trendiest names in global EV markets, there’s no denying that its vehicles are costly. As <i>InvestorPlace</i> has reported, the company was unable to meet the moderate expectations set by Wall Street when reporting third-quarter deliveries. That strongly implies that demand for highly priced EVs may be waning as consumers face financial pressure. Per<i>Barron’</i>s:</p><blockquote>“Many Model 3 and Model Y vehicles sell for roughly $60,000. And EVs account for only about 5% of total U.S. car sales today. Cars priced at about $30,000 account for roughly half of the U.S. market.”</blockquote><p>In a market where demand fears are increasing, companies selling more affordable products are likely to benefit the most. Compared to Tesla, legacy automakers like <b>General Motors</b>(NYSE:<b><u>GM</u></b>), <b>Ford</b>(NYSE:<b><u>F</u></b>) and <b>Toyota</b>(NYSE:<b><u>TM</u></b>) offer much less expensive EVs. However, none of these companies have Tesla’s cache when it comes to electric vehicles. Therefore, Wood’s prediction — that Tesla will see a much larger addressable market once it perfects a less expensive model — is certainly plausible. And there has perhaps never been a better time for an affordable Tesla model than now.</p><p><b>Tesla’s Model-T</b></p><p>Everyone knows the story of the Ford Model-T — and how mass-producing the everyday car took Ford to new heights. There’s no reason that Tesla can’t accomplish such a feat, too. CEO Elon Musk has hinted at a Tesla model with a $25,000 price tag before. Although that project is on pause right now, Wood’s prediction may compel the company to shift gears.</p><p>This market is ideal for Tesla’s own affordable EV. If Musk gets behind the idea, TSLA stock could soar.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The 10X Opportunity for Tesla Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe 10X Opportunity for Tesla Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-26 10:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/10/the-10x-opportunity-for-tesla-tsla-stock/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla(TSLA) stock has had difficult month and it isn’t over yet.However, Cathie Wood remains ever bullish on TSLA stock.Wood sees a potential path toward extreme profitability for the electric vehicle...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/10/the-10x-opportunity-for-tesla-tsla-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/10/the-10x-opportunity-for-tesla-tsla-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116012550","content_text":"Tesla(TSLA) stock has had difficult month and it isn’t over yet.However, Cathie Wood remains ever bullish on TSLA stock.Wood sees a potential path toward extreme profitability for the electric vehicle (EV) leader.After a month marked by disappointing earnings, Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) stock is back in the green today. It’s a generally positive day for markets so far, with the Nasdaq Composite, Dow Jones Industrial AverageandS&P 500all trending upward. While Tesla doesn’t have any company-specific news pushing it upward today, Cathie Wood did recently give investors cause for optimism.The founder of Ark Invest, Wood increased her TSLA stock holdings last week, adding66,190 shares. Evidently, Wood sees a path forward that could push the electric vehicle(EV) leader into a new sphere of profitability. In an email update to investors, Wood explained that“Tesla could expand its addressable market ten-fold by cutting the cost of an electric vehicle in half.”Cathie Wood isn’t the first to raise this point. As Tesla’s EVs have soared in popularity, experts have raised questions about what more affordable EV models could mean for the company’s future. Let’s take a closer look.What This Means for TSLA StockOn the same day that Wood made her 10x prediction, Teslareduced its EV prices in China due to concerns over falling demand. The company cut the prices of the Model 3 Sedan and Model Y SUV by 5% and 9%, respectively.Even in China, the world’s largest EV market, demand for Tesla’s vehicles may be declining amid increasing competition from domestic automakers like Nio(NYSE:NIO). However, with TSLA stock rising today, markets don’t seem to be reacting too badly to the price reduction news. This supports the idea that Tesla may be best served by offering less expensive vehicles.While Tesla is one of the trendiest names in global EV markets, there’s no denying that its vehicles are costly. As InvestorPlace has reported, the company was unable to meet the moderate expectations set by Wall Street when reporting third-quarter deliveries. That strongly implies that demand for highly priced EVs may be waning as consumers face financial pressure. PerBarron’s:“Many Model 3 and Model Y vehicles sell for roughly $60,000. And EVs account for only about 5% of total U.S. car sales today. Cars priced at about $30,000 account for roughly half of the U.S. market.”In a market where demand fears are increasing, companies selling more affordable products are likely to benefit the most. Compared to Tesla, legacy automakers like General Motors(NYSE:GM), Ford(NYSE:F) and Toyota(NYSE:TM) offer much less expensive EVs. However, none of these companies have Tesla’s cache when it comes to electric vehicles. Therefore, Wood’s prediction — that Tesla will see a much larger addressable market once it perfects a less expensive model — is certainly plausible. And there has perhaps never been a better time for an affordable Tesla model than now.Tesla’s Model-TEveryone knows the story of the Ford Model-T — and how mass-producing the everyday car took Ford to new heights. There’s no reason that Tesla can’t accomplish such a feat, too. CEO Elon Musk has hinted at a Tesla model with a $25,000 price tag before. Although that project is on pause right now, Wood’s prediction may compel the company to shift gears.This market is ideal for Tesla’s own affordable EV. If Musk gets behind the idea, TSLA stock could soar.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":221,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914063759,"gmtCreate":1665134595171,"gmtModify":1676537562758,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"bullish<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT\">$AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT$</a>","listText":"bullish<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT\">$AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT$</a>","text":"bullish$AMD 20221021 60.0 PUT$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1fd4f975dac81da68679d9992814a3b4","width":"1080","height":"2046"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914063759","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916338941,"gmtCreate":1664507274183,"gmtModify":1676537468305,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"GOOG better","listText":"GOOG better","text":"GOOG better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916338941","repostId":"1121656018","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>JHVEPhoto</p><h2><b>Investment Thesis</b></h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2><b>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</b></h2><p>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.</p><p>Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.</p><p>The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.</p><p>Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.</p><h2><b>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</b></h2><p><b>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-Model</b></p><p>In terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.</p><p>My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Company Ticker</p></td><td><p>GOOG</p></td><td><p>META</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax Rate</p></td><td><p>15.7%</p></td><td><p>16.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Discount Rate [WACC]</p></td><td><p>7.75%</p></td><td><p>7.75%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Perpetual Growth Rate</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EV/EBITDA Multiple</p></td><td><p>12x</p></td><td><p>7.2x</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Current Price/Share</p></td><td><p>$99.17</p></td><td><p>$140.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Shares Outstanding</p></td><td><p>13,044</p></td><td><p>2,688</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Debt</p></td><td><p>$28,810</p></td><td><p>$16,679</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cash</p></td><td><p>$17,936</p></td><td><p>$12,681</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Capex</p></td><td><p>$29,816</p></td><td><p>$32,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p>Based on the above, I calculated the following results:</p><p><b>Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value</b></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Market Value</p></td><td><p>$99.17</p></td><td><p>$140.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Upside</p></td><td><p>42.90%</p></td><td><p>35.30%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Intrinsic Value</p></td><td><p>$141.71</p></td><td><p>$190.02</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet</b></p><p>TheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).</p><p>At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Purchase Price</b></p><p><b>of the Alphabet Stock</b></p></td><td><p><b>Internal Rate of Return</b></p><p><b>as according to my DCF Model</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$75.00</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$80.00</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$85.00</p></td><td><p>22%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$90.00</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$95.00</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>$99.17</b></p></td><td><p><b>18%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$100.00</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$105.00</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$110.00</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$115.00</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$120.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$125.00</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Internal Rate of Return for Meta</b></p><p>At Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Purchase Price</b></p><p><b>of the Meta Stock</b></p></td><td><p><b>Internal Rate of Return</b></p><p><b>as according to my DCF Model</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$120.00</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$125.00</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$130.00</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$135.00</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$140.00</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>$140.41</b></p></td><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$145.00</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$150.00</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$155.00</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$160.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$165.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$170.00</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Relative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and Meta</b></p><p>Alphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.</p><p>Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.</p><h2><b>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</b></h2><p>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).</p><p>Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).</p><p>In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.</p><p>Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.</p><p>This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>General Information</b></p></td><td><p>Ticker</p></td><td><p>GOOG</p></td><td><p>META</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sector</p></td><td><p>Communication Services</p></td><td><p>Communication Services</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Industry</p></td><td><p>Interactive Media and Services</p></td><td><p>Interactive Media and Services</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Market Cap</p></td><td><p>1.29T</p></td><td><p>377.36B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Profitability</b></p></td><td><p>EBIT Margin</p></td><td><p>29.65%</p></td><td><p>33.41%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>ROE</p></td><td><p>29.22%</p></td><td><p>25.48%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Valuation</b></p></td><td><p>P/E GAAP [FWD]</p></td><td><p>19.05</p></td><td><p>14.30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>P/E GAAP [TTM]</p></td><td><p>18.36</p></td><td><p>11.61</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Growth</b></p></td><td><p>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>23.32%</p></td><td><p>24.02%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>22.88%</p></td><td><p>29.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>33.92%</p></td><td><p>22.80%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</p></td><td><p>27.01%</p></td><td><p>3.12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Free Cash Flow</b></p></td><td><p>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</p></td><td><p>4.97%</p></td><td><p>9.27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</p></td><td><p>24.39%</p></td><td><p>4.23%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Dividends</b></p></td><td><p>Dividend Yield [FWD]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Frequency</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Income Statement</b></p></td><td><p>Revenue</p></td><td><p>278.14B</p></td><td><p>119.41B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBITDA</p></td><td><p>96.89B</p></td><td><p>48.03B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Balance Sheet</b></p></td><td><p>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</p></td><td><p>11.28%</p></td><td><p>13.26%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</b></h2><p>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.</p><p><b>Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard</b></p><p>&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: The Author</p><p>Although both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).</p><p>In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.</p><p>In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).</p><p>In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).</p><p>For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.</p><p>For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.</p><p>For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.</p><p><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades</b></p><p>When taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</b></h2><p>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</b></h2><p>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Risks</b></h2><p>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.</p><p>When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).</p><p>While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.</p><p>This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.</p><p>Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.</p><p>Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.</p><p>Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.</p><h2><b>The Bottom Line</b></h2><p>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.</p><p>My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).</p><p>When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.</p><p>The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.</p><p>Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918116980,"gmtCreate":1664332678541,"gmtModify":1676537435307,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMD\">$AMD(AMD)$</a>bullish","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMD\">$AMD(AMD)$</a>bullish","text":"$AMD(AMD)$bullish","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/580249572d6fbc81cec06baf8f199ead","width":"1080","height":"1565"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918116980","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911449540,"gmtCreate":1664248814080,"gmtModify":1676537418601,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911449540","repostId":"1131543278","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131543278","pubTimestamp":1664247637,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131543278?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-27 11:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Grab Expects 2026 Breakeven for Digital Bank Operations, Losses to Peak in 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131543278","media":"businesstimes","summary":"REGIONAL tech group Grab is targeting for its digital bank operations to turn profitable in 2026, ch","content":"<div>\n<p>REGIONAL tech group Grab is targeting for its digital bank operations to turn profitable in 2026, chief operating officer Alex Hungate said in an investor presentation on Tuesday (Sep 27).The company ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/garage/grab-expects-2026-breakeven-for-digital-bank-operations-losses-to-peak-in-2023\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Grab Expects 2026 Breakeven for Digital Bank Operations, Losses to Peak in 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGrab Expects 2026 Breakeven for Digital Bank Operations, Losses to Peak in 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-27 11:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/garage/grab-expects-2026-breakeven-for-digital-bank-operations-losses-to-peak-in-2023><strong>businesstimes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>REGIONAL tech group Grab is targeting for its digital bank operations to turn profitable in 2026, chief operating officer Alex Hungate said in an investor presentation on Tuesday (Sep 27).The company ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/garage/grab-expects-2026-breakeven-for-digital-bank-operations-losses-to-peak-in-2023\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GRAB":"Grab Holdings"},"source_url":"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/garage/grab-expects-2026-breakeven-for-digital-bank-operations-losses-to-peak-in-2023","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131543278","content_text":"REGIONAL tech group Grab is targeting for its digital bank operations to turn profitable in 2026, chief operating officer Alex Hungate said in an investor presentation on Tuesday (Sep 27).The company recently launched its Singapore digital bank, GXS Bank, in a joint venture with Singtel. Grab has also clinched a digital banking licence in Malaysia, and over in Indonesia, owns a stake in Bank Fama.The Malaysian and Indonesian digital banks are set to launch in 2023, Hungate said in his Tuesday presentation. With this, losses are expected to peak next year.“In 2023, we will spend more than we spent this year on digital bank build. But that will be the peak of the losses (for) investment of the digital bank. And thereafter this strategy will allow us, after the peak losses in 2023, to move to a breakeven position by 2026,” Hungate said.Growth will largely be driven by the growth of lending products with improved margins, he added.Nasdaq-listed Grab ended Monday at US$2.81, up 2.2 per cent.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":119,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":190801432,"gmtCreate":1620609110526,"gmtModify":1704345398764,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes. Good time to buy now.","listText":"Yes. Good time to buy now.","text":"Yes. Good time to buy now.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190801432","repostId":"1107149009","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107149009","pubTimestamp":1620608854,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1107149009?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 09:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Should you buy Nio stock? The company may be light on profits, but it’s heavy on momentum","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107149009","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"MarketWatch readers frequently search for news on Chinese electric vehicle upstart Nio Inc. — and fo","content":"<p>MarketWatch readers frequently search for news on Chinese electric vehicle upstart Nio Inc. — and for good reason. The dynamic company has been volatile in the last year or so, and each day seems to bring a new set of headlines that have potential to move the stock.</p><p>This quarterly review of NioNIO,+0.71%Inc.’sstock aims to look beyond the latest headlines. We will show comparisons of key metrics to watch and a summary of the company’s most important issues to help investors make better decisions.</p><p>These updates will also include comparisons of results to competitors. Keep in mind that no two companies are alike — even rivals don’t compete in every space. Any investor needs to do their own research to make informed long-term decisions.</p><p><b>Where Nio fits in</b></p><p>It’s undeniable that Nio is red hot lately, with a share price that has surged to almost $40 from $3 in early 2020. However, share price is only one reflection of a company’s health.</p><p>When you look at the landscape of the most widely traded automaker stocks right now, including traditional manufacturers such as General Motors Co.GM,+0.46%and the EV icon Tesla Inc.TSLA,+1.33%,Nio is decidedly smaller as an actual business. Though its nearly $70 billion in market value puts its stock on par with legacy companies like GM, balance-sheet statistics show the two companies aren’t even close.</p><p>This is the fundamental challenge for investors trying to value Nio’s shares. Do you place your emphasis on metrics such as revenue, manufacturing assets and total vehicles sold? Or are you betting on the future state of this dynamic company rather than cold statistics from last quarter that may already be out of date?</p><p><b>Key metrics</b></p><p>Growth is important for Nio investors, and it’s undeniable that the company is seeing an impressive expansion. That’s particularly true over the last year in what was otherwise a fairly hostile environment for car sales.</p><p>First, let’s look at operational metrics before we get to the much-followed growth rate in vehicles sold to illustrate how much smaller Nio is than legacy automakers that may be similarly valued by market cap.</p><p><b>Assets and cash</b></p><p>Consider that GM had $238 billion in assets at the end of 2020. Nio didn’t even have $10 billion!&nbsp;What’s more, lest you think this is all attributed to its extensive manufacturing facilities, over $29 billion of GM’s assets were cold, hard cash.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0a4f16a7dd24406c4b94b4746151ae7\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"218\"><span>(FACTSET)Sales growth</span></p><p>Similarly, the numbers of vehicles Nio has been selling haven’t even been close to those of larger rivals. The company sold just under 44,000 vehicles last year. That compares with nearly 3.4 million vehicles sold for GM and 10.7 million for Toyota Motor Corp.TM,+0.45%across all its brands.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9cca28fb993027bea9960aab59492590\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"233\"><span>(COMPANY FILINGS)</span></p><p>Of course, this lower base means more potential to many investors rather than a reason to be scared away from Nio’s stock. During the first quarter, Nio sold five times as many cars as it did in the same period a year earlier. That growth rate blows the doors off everyone, even Tesla.</p><p>And just as the total number of vehicles increased dramatically, so naturally did Nio’s top line. But as we will see, that uptick in revenue has yet to translate to significant profits.</p><p><b>Pricing power and profitability</b></p><p>The rapid expansion of vehicle sales naturally has resulted in soaring revenue. However, the Chinese EV upstart continues to operate at a loss.</p><p>Gross margins have admittedly improved, but profit forecasts for fiscal 2022 are still negative for Nio. And more importantly, when you look at peers including legacy automakers, it doesn’t appear realistic that Nio could see outsized improvement from its current gross margins that are in-line with the rest of the industry. That means as it continues to invest heavily in future growth, investors may have to make their peace with the fact that the company is trading current profit potential for that vision.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fac8320312f703cce2a0a6924f5f95ea\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"169\"><span>(FACTSET)Free cash flow</span></p><p>Free cash flow is another area where Nio has a bit of &nbsp;work to do, particularly if it wants to win over investors who care about this metric, which measures how much money is on hand at a company after it pays the bills for regular operations. Based on the last 12 months, free cash flow has firmed up but is still barely out of the red.</p><p>However, as a smaller company that is scaling up rapidly, it is reasonable to expect this kind of gap between Nio and its more mature peers as it comes into its own. By contrast, established firms like GM and Toyota that saw serious cash flow concerns over the last year don’t have the same excuse. Rather, these automakers seem to be burdened by structural challenges — including the specific costs associated with scaling up EV operations to evolve and meet the challenges and opportunities of a modern auto marketplace.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1db2ab979c31363ccd9a7592452866bf\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"193\"><span>(FACTSET)Stock valuation and performance</span></p><p>As you’ve no doubt determined on your own, there are really two different ways to value momentum stocks such as Nio. One involves a reliance on traditional metrics like sales and profitability, while the other is a more aspirational look at where the company could be headed in the future.</p><p>From a traditional perspective, Nio is worrisome because it has no profits to speak of. It’s also not exactly a hot stock lately, as shares have drawn back in recent months and are negative for the year so far. However, the shares have gains of more than 900% in the last 12 months.</p><p>In fact, for those who call Nio “the next Tesla,” it’s not an entirely unreasonable comparison — and considering Tesla’s three-year and five-year returns despite only recently moving into profitability, that could be music to investors’ ears.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d107af6471b7b06ee9f3d570961f2d7\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"248\"><span>(FACTSET)Wall Street’s opinion</span></p><p>The million-dollar question is whether Nio can keep up both its growth trends and its long-term appeal to investors who aren’t concerned with near-term numbers. Based on its most recent numbers, that trend could still be intact — but it is far from certain.</p><p>Analysts aren’t exactly bearish on Nio, with 63% of Wall Street experts rating the stock a buy and the implied 12-month upside on shares a juicy 59% based on consensus price targets.</p><p>However, it’s interesting to see that legacy automakers as a group are generally thought of better, with more “buy” ratings even if the upside isn’t as dramatic. Excluding Ford Motor Co.F,+0.68%,both GM and Toyota have better support among the analyst community.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef1f9e3753e120173a8c04b305ff7d14\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"287\"><span>(FACTSET)</span></p><p>The question for Nio investors is pretty simple: Do you want to bank on the less dynamic but more established automakers, or do you want to take on more risk in this Chinese upstart in pursuit of bigger potential gains?</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Should you buy Nio stock? The company may be light on profits, but it’s heavy on momentum</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Should you buy Nio stock? The company may be light on profits, but it’s heavy on momentum\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-10 09:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/should-you-buy-nio-stock-the-company-may-be-light-on-profits-but-its-heavy-on-momentum-11620408021?siteid=yhoof2><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>MarketWatch readers frequently search for news on Chinese electric vehicle upstart Nio Inc. — and for good reason. The dynamic company has been volatile in the last year or so, and each day seems to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/should-you-buy-nio-stock-the-company-may-be-light-on-profits-but-its-heavy-on-momentum-11620408021?siteid=yhoof2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/should-you-buy-nio-stock-the-company-may-be-light-on-profits-but-its-heavy-on-momentum-11620408021?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1107149009","content_text":"MarketWatch readers frequently search for news on Chinese electric vehicle upstart Nio Inc. — and for good reason. The dynamic company has been volatile in the last year or so, and each day seems to bring a new set of headlines that have potential to move the stock.This quarterly review of NioNIO,+0.71%Inc.’sstock aims to look beyond the latest headlines. We will show comparisons of key metrics to watch and a summary of the company’s most important issues to help investors make better decisions.These updates will also include comparisons of results to competitors. Keep in mind that no two companies are alike — even rivals don’t compete in every space. Any investor needs to do their own research to make informed long-term decisions.Where Nio fits inIt’s undeniable that Nio is red hot lately, with a share price that has surged to almost $40 from $3 in early 2020. However, share price is only one reflection of a company’s health.When you look at the landscape of the most widely traded automaker stocks right now, including traditional manufacturers such as General Motors Co.GM,+0.46%and the EV icon Tesla Inc.TSLA,+1.33%,Nio is decidedly smaller as an actual business. Though its nearly $70 billion in market value puts its stock on par with legacy companies like GM, balance-sheet statistics show the two companies aren’t even close.This is the fundamental challenge for investors trying to value Nio’s shares. Do you place your emphasis on metrics such as revenue, manufacturing assets and total vehicles sold? Or are you betting on the future state of this dynamic company rather than cold statistics from last quarter that may already be out of date?Key metricsGrowth is important for Nio investors, and it’s undeniable that the company is seeing an impressive expansion. That’s particularly true over the last year in what was otherwise a fairly hostile environment for car sales.First, let’s look at operational metrics before we get to the much-followed growth rate in vehicles sold to illustrate how much smaller Nio is than legacy automakers that may be similarly valued by market cap.Assets and cashConsider that GM had $238 billion in assets at the end of 2020. Nio didn’t even have $10 billion! What’s more, lest you think this is all attributed to its extensive manufacturing facilities, over $29 billion of GM’s assets were cold, hard cash.(FACTSET)Sales growthSimilarly, the numbers of vehicles Nio has been selling haven’t even been close to those of larger rivals. The company sold just under 44,000 vehicles last year. That compares with nearly 3.4 million vehicles sold for GM and 10.7 million for Toyota Motor Corp.TM,+0.45%across all its brands.(COMPANY FILINGS)Of course, this lower base means more potential to many investors rather than a reason to be scared away from Nio’s stock. During the first quarter, Nio sold five times as many cars as it did in the same period a year earlier. That growth rate blows the doors off everyone, even Tesla.And just as the total number of vehicles increased dramatically, so naturally did Nio’s top line. But as we will see, that uptick in revenue has yet to translate to significant profits.Pricing power and profitabilityThe rapid expansion of vehicle sales naturally has resulted in soaring revenue. However, the Chinese EV upstart continues to operate at a loss.Gross margins have admittedly improved, but profit forecasts for fiscal 2022 are still negative for Nio. And more importantly, when you look at peers including legacy automakers, it doesn’t appear realistic that Nio could see outsized improvement from its current gross margins that are in-line with the rest of the industry. That means as it continues to invest heavily in future growth, investors may have to make their peace with the fact that the company is trading current profit potential for that vision.(FACTSET)Free cash flowFree cash flow is another area where Nio has a bit of  work to do, particularly if it wants to win over investors who care about this metric, which measures how much money is on hand at a company after it pays the bills for regular operations. Based on the last 12 months, free cash flow has firmed up but is still barely out of the red.However, as a smaller company that is scaling up rapidly, it is reasonable to expect this kind of gap between Nio and its more mature peers as it comes into its own. By contrast, established firms like GM and Toyota that saw serious cash flow concerns over the last year don’t have the same excuse. Rather, these automakers seem to be burdened by structural challenges — including the specific costs associated with scaling up EV operations to evolve and meet the challenges and opportunities of a modern auto marketplace.(FACTSET)Stock valuation and performanceAs you’ve no doubt determined on your own, there are really two different ways to value momentum stocks such as Nio. One involves a reliance on traditional metrics like sales and profitability, while the other is a more aspirational look at where the company could be headed in the future.From a traditional perspective, Nio is worrisome because it has no profits to speak of. It’s also not exactly a hot stock lately, as shares have drawn back in recent months and are negative for the year so far. However, the shares have gains of more than 900% in the last 12 months.In fact, for those who call Nio “the next Tesla,” it’s not an entirely unreasonable comparison — and considering Tesla’s three-year and five-year returns despite only recently moving into profitability, that could be music to investors’ ears.(FACTSET)Wall Street’s opinionThe million-dollar question is whether Nio can keep up both its growth trends and its long-term appeal to investors who aren’t concerned with near-term numbers. Based on its most recent numbers, that trend could still be intact — but it is far from certain.Analysts aren’t exactly bearish on Nio, with 63% of Wall Street experts rating the stock a buy and the implied 12-month upside on shares a juicy 59% based on consensus price targets.However, it’s interesting to see that legacy automakers as a group are generally thought of better, with more “buy” ratings even if the upside isn’t as dramatic. Excluding Ford Motor Co.F,+0.68%,both GM and Toyota have better support among the analyst community.(FACTSET)The question for Nio investors is pretty simple: Do you want to bank on the less dynamic but more established automakers, or do you want to take on more risk in this Chinese upstart in pursuit of bigger potential gains?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":155,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920906861,"gmtCreate":1670410450353,"gmtModify":1676538362334,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How about LCID?","listText":"How about LCID?","text":"How about LCID?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920906861","repostId":"1196589201","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196589201","pubTimestamp":1670427016,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196589201?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-07 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196589201","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): ","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturn</li><li><b>Nikola</b>(<u><b>NKLA</b></u>): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burn</li><li><b>Hyzon Motors</b>(<u><b>HYZN</b></u>): Regulators have confirmed most of the scathing claims by short-seller Blue Orca</li><li><b>Rivian Automotive</b>(<b>RIVN</b>): Product recalls, safety concerns, and a lofty valuation makes it a stock to avoid</li><li><b>Electra</b> <b>Meccanica</b> <b>Vehicles</b>(<b>SOLO</b>): Three-wheeled approach is unlikely to gain mainstream traction</li><li><b>Workhorse</b>(<b>WKHS</b>): Burning cash at an incredible pace while meeting production levels at a minimum</li><li><b>Lordstown Motors</b>(<b>RIDE</b>): Has serious ground to make up as it struggles to grow its production levels</li><li><b>Arcimoto</b>(<b>FUV</b>): Cash burn has led to tremendous dilution as it continues to post lackluster operating results</li></ul><p>After all the excitement the sector garnered last year, it looks as if it’s time to consider which electric vehicle stocks to sell.</p><p>The year has exposed the weaknesses in multiple sectors, and the electric vehicle market is no exception. A significant market rout has seen stocks of prominent companies and startups suffer considerable losses in value.</p><p>Moreover, new EV companies are finding themselves in a much more competitive landscape now that legacy automakers entered the fray. Hence, there are multiple electric vehicle stocks to sell at this time.</p><p>Investing in the electric vehicle market can be very attractive, given the wide range of underlying businesses to choose from. These include car companies, battery manufacturers, charging providers, and others.</p><p>However, with the stock market experiencing significant dips recently, many of these companies are finding it increasingly difficult to attract investors. This puts immense pressure on already unstable businesses and causes long-term problems within the EV sphere. Hence, only EV companies with strong track records are worth investing in at this time.</p><p><b>Nikola (NKLA)</b></p><p>EV start-up <b>Nikola</b> (NASDAQ:<u><b>NKLA</b></u>) has witnessed a steep drop in its stock price over the past few months. Nikola may have to wait before scaling production levels of its flagship Nikola Tre truck for a while.</p><p>In its most recent quarter, Nikola reported negative free cash flows amounting to $237 million. A large part of that comes from the lack of capital required to scale production, especially withthe addition of ailing battery supplier Romeo Power, which will likely result in massive cash burn going forward.</p><p>Therefore, it doesn’t seem like this firm’s tribulations will end anytime soon as it looks to scale production of its battery electric (BEV) truck.</p><p><b>Hyzon Motors (HYZN)</b></p><p><b>Hyzon Motors</b> (NASDAQ:<u><b>HYZN</b></u>) has been nothing short of a disaster for investors. There have been reports of financial manipulation, and the company has also been accused of creating false customers.</p><p>These actions raise serious questions about its legitimacy and ability to remain solvent in an increasingly competitive EV marketplace.</p><p>Late last year, short-seller Blue Orca accused the companywas knowingly overstating its revenue outlookand drawing investors in with inflated promises of future profits.</p><p>The report stated that two of Hyzon’s largest customers weren’t real. Regulators have confirmed at least some of Blue Orca’s claims, leaving Hyzon facing serious scrutiny from the public and its shareholders. This news is a major blow to Hyzon Motors’ already tarnished reputation.</p><p><b>Rivian Automotive (RIVN)</b></p><p>Despite promising EV start-up <b>Rivian Automotive’s</b> (NASDAQ:<b>RIVN</b>) potential, it’s a remarkably rough outing this year.</p><p>Not only was it forced to cut the production target for 2022 by half, but it had to recall nearly all of its deliveries. If that wasn’t enough, its workers have recently complained about inadequate safety conditions at its plants. The triple whammy should have investors wary of investing in its stock in the current economic downturn.</p><p>Though it faces a myriad of challenges, RIVN stock still trades over 16 times forward sales, a lofty valuation. With production delays, a product recall, and safety concerns, its valuation is alarming. Hence, investors should proceed cautiously when considering RIVN stock and understand the risks associated with its business case.</p><p><b>ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (SOLO)</b></p><p><b>ElectraMeccanica</b> <b>Vehicles</b> (NASDAQ:<b>SOLO</b>) seems to have grand ambitions in the electric vehicle arena, but it faces an uphill battle in gaining consumer traction.</p><p>Its vehicles are by no means elegant designs, and itsthree-wheeled structure puts them at a distinct disadvantage in a market filled with sleek and sexy alternatives. Electric three-wheelers seem unlikely to find much appeal due to their odd, unsightly designs in a hotly competitive EV market.</p><p>Its success is further hindered by the numerous challenges already in place for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. EVs are expensive, and the scarcity of charging stations and range anxiety pose massive problems for the companies involved.</p><p>It seems unlikely that the unique three-wheeled designs presented by Electrameccanica will see any major consumer acceptance in the near future. At the same time, it continues to burn through its cash reserves at an accelerated pace.</p><p><b>Workhorse (WKHS)</b></p><p>Shares of budding EV player, <b>Workhorse</b> (NASDAQ:<b>WKHS</b>) have been plummeting in value, reflecting the company’s poor performance.</p><p>It’s been posting lackluster operating results over the past several quarters. Production levels are only meeting bare-minimum estimates, which suggests that its investors are in for a rough ride ahead. Though it has initially planned to deliver 150 to 250 vehicles this year, it will only be delivering 100 to 200 vehicles after revising estimates.</p><p>It recently posted its third quarter results, which missed estimates across both lines. It posted a hefty 73-cent loss per share, missing estimates by 45 cents.</p><p>To complicate matters further, it had to pay $35 million in settlement for its unsuccessful bid for a U.S. Postal Service contract. Hence, anybody on the fence about holding or selling this stock should opt for the latter option to avoid further losses.</p><p><b>Lordstown Motors (RIDE)</b></p><p><b>Lordstown Motors</b> (NASDAQ: <b>RIDE</b>) has finally started production after multiple delays. The firm promised to deliver its first EV in 2020, but it’s only getting started two years later.</p><p>Unfortunately, the company still faces many challenges that analysts believe will keep them lagging compared to others in the industry. With so much competition gunning for similar goals, Lordstown has some serious ground to make up; whether they can weather the headwinds remains to be seen.</p><p>The company’s facility in Ohio kicked-off production in September. However, production has been slow and will likely stay that way as supply-chain issues persist.</p><p>As things currently stand, there’s very little hope of significantly speeding up vehicle production any time soon. Therefore, avoiding a speculative stock such as RIDE amidst the current volatility is best.</p><p><b>Arcimoto (FUV)</b></p><p><b>Arcimoto</b> (NASDAQ: <b>FUV</b>) is on a dire trajectory as it continues to burn through its resources at excessive speeds while accumulating new capital incredibly slowly.</p><p>As with ElectraMeccanica, it boasts a unique lineup of fully electric three-wheeled pods, which faces the same consumer acceptance hurdles. As the company struggles to make headway in the market, it seems likely that unless changes are implemented soon, the fate of Arcimoto will remain uncertain for quite some time.</p><p>Arcimoto has seen quite a bit of turbulence in recent months. Its performance in the third quarter presents a picture that is less than ideal, with numerous obstacles still to be overcome for it to achieve success.</p><p>Third quarter results showed total revenues amounting to slightly more than $2 million, far below analysts’ projections, which nearly tripled that figure. To make matters worse, cash burn is leading to tremendous dilution.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Electric Vehicle Stocks to Sell in December\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-07 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","FUV":"Arcimoto, Inc.","HYZN":"Hyzon Motors Inc.","RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc.","SOLO":"Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.","NKLA":"Nikola Corporation"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/electric-vehicle-stocks-to-sell-ev/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196589201","content_text":"These electric vehicle stocks to sell will continue shedding value in the current market downturnNikola(NKLA): Unlikely to scale production anytime soon, with its massive cash burnHyzon Motors(HYZN): Regulators have confirmed most of the scathing claims by short-seller Blue OrcaRivian Automotive(RIVN): Product recalls, safety concerns, and a lofty valuation makes it a stock to avoidElectra Meccanica Vehicles(SOLO): Three-wheeled approach is unlikely to gain mainstream tractionWorkhorse(WKHS): Burning cash at an incredible pace while meeting production levels at a minimumLordstown Motors(RIDE): Has serious ground to make up as it struggles to grow its production levelsArcimoto(FUV): Cash burn has led to tremendous dilution as it continues to post lackluster operating resultsAfter all the excitement the sector garnered last year, it looks as if it’s time to consider which electric vehicle stocks to sell.The year has exposed the weaknesses in multiple sectors, and the electric vehicle market is no exception. A significant market rout has seen stocks of prominent companies and startups suffer considerable losses in value.Moreover, new EV companies are finding themselves in a much more competitive landscape now that legacy automakers entered the fray. Hence, there are multiple electric vehicle stocks to sell at this time.Investing in the electric vehicle market can be very attractive, given the wide range of underlying businesses to choose from. These include car companies, battery manufacturers, charging providers, and others.However, with the stock market experiencing significant dips recently, many of these companies are finding it increasingly difficult to attract investors. This puts immense pressure on already unstable businesses and causes long-term problems within the EV sphere. Hence, only EV companies with strong track records are worth investing in at this time.Nikola (NKLA)EV start-up Nikola (NASDAQ:NKLA) has witnessed a steep drop in its stock price over the past few months. Nikola may have to wait before scaling production levels of its flagship Nikola Tre truck for a while.In its most recent quarter, Nikola reported negative free cash flows amounting to $237 million. A large part of that comes from the lack of capital required to scale production, especially withthe addition of ailing battery supplier Romeo Power, which will likely result in massive cash burn going forward.Therefore, it doesn’t seem like this firm’s tribulations will end anytime soon as it looks to scale production of its battery electric (BEV) truck.Hyzon Motors (HYZN)Hyzon Motors (NASDAQ:HYZN) has been nothing short of a disaster for investors. There have been reports of financial manipulation, and the company has also been accused of creating false customers.These actions raise serious questions about its legitimacy and ability to remain solvent in an increasingly competitive EV marketplace.Late last year, short-seller Blue Orca accused the companywas knowingly overstating its revenue outlookand drawing investors in with inflated promises of future profits.The report stated that two of Hyzon’s largest customers weren’t real. Regulators have confirmed at least some of Blue Orca’s claims, leaving Hyzon facing serious scrutiny from the public and its shareholders. This news is a major blow to Hyzon Motors’ already tarnished reputation.Rivian Automotive (RIVN)Despite promising EV start-up Rivian Automotive’s (NASDAQ:RIVN) potential, it’s a remarkably rough outing this year.Not only was it forced to cut the production target for 2022 by half, but it had to recall nearly all of its deliveries. If that wasn’t enough, its workers have recently complained about inadequate safety conditions at its plants. The triple whammy should have investors wary of investing in its stock in the current economic downturn.Though it faces a myriad of challenges, RIVN stock still trades over 16 times forward sales, a lofty valuation. With production delays, a product recall, and safety concerns, its valuation is alarming. Hence, investors should proceed cautiously when considering RIVN stock and understand the risks associated with its business case.ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (SOLO)ElectraMeccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) seems to have grand ambitions in the electric vehicle arena, but it faces an uphill battle in gaining consumer traction.Its vehicles are by no means elegant designs, and itsthree-wheeled structure puts them at a distinct disadvantage in a market filled with sleek and sexy alternatives. Electric three-wheelers seem unlikely to find much appeal due to their odd, unsightly designs in a hotly competitive EV market.Its success is further hindered by the numerous challenges already in place for electric vehicle (EV) adoption. EVs are expensive, and the scarcity of charging stations and range anxiety pose massive problems for the companies involved.It seems unlikely that the unique three-wheeled designs presented by Electrameccanica will see any major consumer acceptance in the near future. At the same time, it continues to burn through its cash reserves at an accelerated pace.Workhorse (WKHS)Shares of budding EV player, Workhorse (NASDAQ:WKHS) have been plummeting in value, reflecting the company’s poor performance.It’s been posting lackluster operating results over the past several quarters. Production levels are only meeting bare-minimum estimates, which suggests that its investors are in for a rough ride ahead. Though it has initially planned to deliver 150 to 250 vehicles this year, it will only be delivering 100 to 200 vehicles after revising estimates.It recently posted its third quarter results, which missed estimates across both lines. It posted a hefty 73-cent loss per share, missing estimates by 45 cents.To complicate matters further, it had to pay $35 million in settlement for its unsuccessful bid for a U.S. Postal Service contract. Hence, anybody on the fence about holding or selling this stock should opt for the latter option to avoid further losses.Lordstown Motors (RIDE)Lordstown Motors (NASDAQ: RIDE) has finally started production after multiple delays. The firm promised to deliver its first EV in 2020, but it’s only getting started two years later.Unfortunately, the company still faces many challenges that analysts believe will keep them lagging compared to others in the industry. With so much competition gunning for similar goals, Lordstown has some serious ground to make up; whether they can weather the headwinds remains to be seen.The company’s facility in Ohio kicked-off production in September. However, production has been slow and will likely stay that way as supply-chain issues persist.As things currently stand, there’s very little hope of significantly speeding up vehicle production any time soon. Therefore, avoiding a speculative stock such as RIDE amidst the current volatility is best.Arcimoto (FUV)Arcimoto (NASDAQ: FUV) is on a dire trajectory as it continues to burn through its resources at excessive speeds while accumulating new capital incredibly slowly.As with ElectraMeccanica, it boasts a unique lineup of fully electric three-wheeled pods, which faces the same consumer acceptance hurdles. As the company struggles to make headway in the market, it seems likely that unless changes are implemented soon, the fate of Arcimoto will remain uncertain for quite some time.Arcimoto has seen quite a bit of turbulence in recent months. Its performance in the third quarter presents a picture that is less than ideal, with numerous obstacles still to be overcome for it to achieve success.Third quarter results showed total revenues amounting to slightly more than $2 million, far below analysts’ projections, which nearly tripled that figure. To make matters worse, cash burn is leading to tremendous dilution.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4131314249442152","authorId":"4131314249442152","name":"Chrissimo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4131314249442152","authorIdStr":"4131314249442152"},"content":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business.","text":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business.","html":"Lucid wont be able to scale even in 2023. it's going to be very tough in keeping the operations afloat, unless they change the way they build their cars and fund their business."}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920762549,"gmtCreate":1670550305781,"gmtModify":1676538391442,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920762549","repostId":"2290447036","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290447036","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1670549824,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290447036?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-09 09:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Exxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290447036","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.</p><p>While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.</p><p>The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year&#39;s budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.</p><p>Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.</p><p>The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.</p><p>Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.</p><p>The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.</p><p>&#34;This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&amp;A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,&#34; said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.</p><p>U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.</p><p>The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExxon, Chevron to Spend Billions More on Oil Projects Next Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-09 09:37</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.</p><p>While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.</p><p>The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year&#39;s budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.</p><p>Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.</p><p>The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.</p><p>Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.</p><p>The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.</p><p>&#34;This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&amp;A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,&#34; said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.</p><p>U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.</p><p>The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XOM":"埃克森美孚","CVX":"雪佛龙"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290447036","content_text":"(Reuters) - The two largest U.S. oil companies - Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp - disclosed plans to increase outlays on energy projects next year amid high oil demand and prices.While spending more, it will be less than half the combined $84 billion they spent in 2013, when oil prices often traded above $100 per barrel as it has this year. The two are awash in cash from those prices and past cost-cuts, and have sharply raised shareholder payouts.The focus on shareholder returns have led to pressure from the White House. The Biden administration has criticized oil companies for not raising their oil production to help lower prices to consumers. Still, next year's budgets remain within the ranges each set before the war in Ukraine fed a global shortage of energy.Exxon said it would increase project investments next year to between $23 billion to $25 billion, up from a projected $22 billion this year. Chevron said it plans to spend $17 billion, up from about $15 billion this year. Increases include new monies for emissions reduction projects and the impact of inflation.The higher spending will not immediately lead to more production. Exxon has said it expects output next year to be flat at about 3.7 million barrels of equivalent oil per day (boed), while Chevron has forecast a greater than 3% compound average annual increase through 2026.Exxon will miss its goal of pumping 1 million boed from its Permian operations by about two years, Exxon Chief Executive Darren Woods said on Thursday. It now aims to reach between 900,000-1 million boed in 2027.The biggest change will be the amount of cash earned. Exxon sees potential for $100 billion in surplus cash by 2027, assuming global oil prices of $60 per barrel. Chevron should generate about $34 billion in free cash flow next year, according to Jefferies equity research, twice its oil investments levels.\"This leaves ample room for opportunistic M&A, increases to the buyback or simply even lower leverage with an eye toward increasing buybacks at a lower share price,\" said Jefferies equity analysts Lloyd Byrne and Sam Burwell.U.S. and European producers have also been partially recovering project spending slashed during the pandemic. Shell this year increased capital spending 22% to between $23 billion to $27 billion. BP this year expanded project spending by 21% to $15.5 billion from last year.The five western majors posted record profits this year, and Exxon and Chevron shares have hit historical highs this quarter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":393,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916338941,"gmtCreate":1664507274183,"gmtModify":1676537468305,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"GOOG better","listText":"GOOG better","text":"GOOG better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916338941","repostId":"1121656018","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>JHVEPhoto</p><h2><b>Investment Thesis</b></h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2><b>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</b></h2><p>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.</p><p>Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.</p><p>The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.</p><p>Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.</p><h2><b>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</b></h2><p><b>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-Model</b></p><p>In terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.</p><p>My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Company Ticker</p></td><td><p>GOOG</p></td><td><p>META</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax Rate</p></td><td><p>15.7%</p></td><td><p>16.7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Discount Rate [WACC]</p></td><td><p>7.75%</p></td><td><p>7.75%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Perpetual Growth Rate</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EV/EBITDA Multiple</p></td><td><p>12x</p></td><td><p>7.2x</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Current Price/Share</p></td><td><p>$99.17</p></td><td><p>$140.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Shares Outstanding</p></td><td><p>13,044</p></td><td><p>2,688</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Debt</p></td><td><p>$28,810</p></td><td><p>$16,679</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cash</p></td><td><p>$17,936</p></td><td><p>$12,681</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Capex</p></td><td><p>$29,816</p></td><td><p>$32,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p>Based on the above, I calculated the following results:</p><p><b>Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value</b></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Market Value</p></td><td><p>$99.17</p></td><td><p>$140.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Upside</p></td><td><p>42.90%</p></td><td><p>35.30%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Intrinsic Value</p></td><td><p>$141.71</p></td><td><p>$190.02</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet</b></p><p>TheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).</p><p>At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Purchase Price</b></p><p><b>of the Alphabet Stock</b></p></td><td><p><b>Internal Rate of Return</b></p><p><b>as according to my DCF Model</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$75.00</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$80.00</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$85.00</p></td><td><p>22%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$90.00</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$95.00</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>$99.17</b></p></td><td><p><b>18%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$100.00</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$105.00</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$110.00</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$115.00</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$120.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$125.00</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Internal Rate of Return for Meta</b></p><p>At Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Purchase Price</b></p><p><b>of the Meta Stock</b></p></td><td><p><b>Internal Rate of Return</b></p><p><b>as according to my DCF Model</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$120.00</p></td><td><p>21%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$125.00</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$130.00</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$135.00</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$140.00</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>$140.41</b></p></td><td><p><b>16%</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$145.00</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$150.00</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$155.00</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$160.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$165.00</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>$170.00</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Relative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and Meta</b></p><p>Alphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.</p><p>Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.</p><h2><b>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</b></h2><p>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).</p><p>Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).</p><p>In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.</p><p>Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.</p><p>This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Alphabet</b></p></td><td><p><b>Meta</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>General Information</b></p></td><td><p>Ticker</p></td><td><p>GOOG</p></td><td><p>META</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sector</p></td><td><p>Communication Services</p></td><td><p>Communication Services</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Industry</p></td><td><p>Interactive Media and Services</p></td><td><p>Interactive Media and Services</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Market Cap</p></td><td><p>1.29T</p></td><td><p>377.36B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Profitability</b></p></td><td><p>EBIT Margin</p></td><td><p>29.65%</p></td><td><p>33.41%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>ROE</p></td><td><p>29.22%</p></td><td><p>25.48%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Valuation</b></p></td><td><p>P/E GAAP [FWD]</p></td><td><p>19.05</p></td><td><p>14.30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>P/E GAAP [TTM]</p></td><td><p>18.36</p></td><td><p>11.61</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Growth</b></p></td><td><p>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>23.32%</p></td><td><p>24.02%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>22.88%</p></td><td><p>29.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>33.92%</p></td><td><p>22.80%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</p></td><td><p>27.01%</p></td><td><p>3.12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Free Cash Flow</b></p></td><td><p>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</p></td><td><p>4.97%</p></td><td><p>9.27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</p></td><td><p>24.39%</p></td><td><p>4.23%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Dividends</b></p></td><td><p>Dividend Yield [FWD]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dividend Frequency</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Income Statement</b></p></td><td><p>Revenue</p></td><td><p>278.14B</p></td><td><p>119.41B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBITDA</p></td><td><p>96.89B</p></td><td><p>48.03B</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Balance Sheet</b></p></td><td><p>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</p></td><td><p>11.28%</p></td><td><p>13.26%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</b></h2><p>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.</p><p><b>Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard</b></p><p>&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: The Author</p><p><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: The Author</p><p>Although both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).</p><p>In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.</p><p>In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).</p><p>In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).</p><p>For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.</p><p>For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.</p><p>For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.</p><p><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades</b></p><p>When taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</b></h2><p>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</b></h2><p>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><h2><b>Risks</b></h2><p>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.</p><p>When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).</p><p>While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.</p><p>This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.</p><p>Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.</p><p>Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.</p><p>Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.</p><h2><b>The Bottom Line</b></h2><p>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).</p><p>Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.</p><p>My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).</p><p>When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.</p><p>The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.</p><p>Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":119067401,"gmtCreate":1622509467603,"gmtModify":1704185278971,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla is back.","listText":"Tesla is back.","text":"Tesla is back.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/119067401","repostId":"2140545174","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2140545174","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1622506410,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2140545174?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-01 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla's vehicle price increases due to supply chain pressure, Musk says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2140545174","media":"Reuters","summary":"May 31 (Reuters) - The price of Tesla vehicles is increasing due to supply chain pressures across th","content":"<p>May 31 (Reuters) - The price of Tesla vehicles is increasing due to supply chain pressures across the auto industry, particularly for raw materials, Elon Musk said on Monday in response to a tweet</p>\n<p>\"Prices increasing due to major supply chain price pressure industry-wide. Raw materials especially,\" Musk said in a tweet.</p>\n<p>He was responding to an unverified <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> account called @Ryanth3nerd, which said, \"I really don't like the direction @tesla is going raising prices of vehicles but removing features like lumbar for the Model Y...\"</p>\n<p>In May, Tesla increased its Model 3 and Model Y prices, the automaker's fifth incremental price increase for its vehicles in just a few months, the Electrek website reported</p>\n<p>During an an earnings conference call in April, Musk said Tesla had experienced \"some of the most difficult supply chain challenges,\" citing a chip shortage. \"We're mostly out of that particular problem,\" he added at the time.</p>\n<p>In response to the removal of lumbar support on the passenger side in Tesla's Model Y, Musk said, \"Moving lumbar was removed only in front passenger seat of 3/Y (obv not there in rear seats). Logs showed almost no usage. Not worth cost/mass for everyone when almost never used.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier on Monday, the Electrek reported</p>\n<p>that new Tesla Model Y owners are reporting that their electric SUVs are being delivered without lumbar support on the passenger side.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla's vehicle price increases due to supply chain pressure, Musk says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla's vehicle price increases due to supply chain pressure, Musk says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-01 08:13</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>May 31 (Reuters) - The price of Tesla vehicles is increasing due to supply chain pressures across the auto industry, particularly for raw materials, Elon Musk said on Monday in response to a tweet</p>\n<p>\"Prices increasing due to major supply chain price pressure industry-wide. Raw materials especially,\" Musk said in a tweet.</p>\n<p>He was responding to an unverified <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> account called @Ryanth3nerd, which said, \"I really don't like the direction @tesla is going raising prices of vehicles but removing features like lumbar for the Model Y...\"</p>\n<p>In May, Tesla increased its Model 3 and Model Y prices, the automaker's fifth incremental price increase for its vehicles in just a few months, the Electrek website reported</p>\n<p>During an an earnings conference call in April, Musk said Tesla had experienced \"some of the most difficult supply chain challenges,\" citing a chip shortage. \"We're mostly out of that particular problem,\" he added at the time.</p>\n<p>In response to the removal of lumbar support on the passenger side in Tesla's Model Y, Musk said, \"Moving lumbar was removed only in front passenger seat of 3/Y (obv not there in rear seats). Logs showed almost no usage. Not worth cost/mass for everyone when almost never used.\"</p>\n<p>Earlier on Monday, the Electrek reported</p>\n<p>that new Tesla Model Y owners are reporting that their electric SUVs are being delivered without lumbar support on the passenger side.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2140545174","content_text":"May 31 (Reuters) - The price of Tesla vehicles is increasing due to supply chain pressures across the auto industry, particularly for raw materials, Elon Musk said on Monday in response to a tweet\n\"Prices increasing due to major supply chain price pressure industry-wide. Raw materials especially,\" Musk said in a tweet.\nHe was responding to an unverified Twitter account called @Ryanth3nerd, which said, \"I really don't like the direction @tesla is going raising prices of vehicles but removing features like lumbar for the Model Y...\"\nIn May, Tesla increased its Model 3 and Model Y prices, the automaker's fifth incremental price increase for its vehicles in just a few months, the Electrek website reported\nDuring an an earnings conference call in April, Musk said Tesla had experienced \"some of the most difficult supply chain challenges,\" citing a chip shortage. \"We're mostly out of that particular problem,\" he added at the time.\nIn response to the removal of lumbar support on the passenger side in Tesla's Model Y, Musk said, \"Moving lumbar was removed only in front passenger seat of 3/Y (obv not there in rear seats). Logs showed almost no usage. Not worth cost/mass for everyone when almost never used.\"\nEarlier on Monday, the Electrek reported\nthat new Tesla Model Y owners are reporting that their electric SUVs are being delivered without lumbar support on the passenger side.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9903378385,"gmtCreate":1658975769347,"gmtModify":1676536238466,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9903378385","repostId":"2254362611","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2254362611","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1658961324,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2254362611?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-28 06:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Meta Posts First-Ever Revenue Drop As Inflation Throttles Ad Sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2254362611","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms Inc issued a gloomy forecast after recording its first ever quart","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>July 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms Inc issued a gloomy forecast after recording its first ever quarterly drop in revenue on Wednesday, with a global recession looming and competitive pressures weighing on its digital ads sales.</p><p>Shares of the Menlo Park, California-based company were down about 4.4% in extended trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c27fb4c72b7a9b3119977ddf064de9d\" tg-width=\"854\" tg-height=\"621\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The company said it expects third-quarter revenue of between $26 billion and $28.5 billion. Analysts were expecting $30.52 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>Total revenue, which consists almost entirely of ad sales, fell 1% to $28.8 billion in the second quarter ended June 30, from $29.1 billion last year. The figure slightly missed Wall Street&#39;s projections of $28.9 billion, according to Refinitiv.</p><p>The company reported mixed results for user growth.</p><p>Monthly active users on flagship social network Facebook came in slightly under analyst expectations at 2.93 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 1% year over year, while daily active users handily beat estimates at 1.97 billion.</p><p>Like many global companies, Meta is facing some revenue pressure from the strong dollar, as sales in foreign currencies amount to less in dollar terms. Meta said it expected a 6% revenue growth headwind in the third quarter, based on current exchange rates.</p><p>Still, the Meta results also come as fortunes in online ads sales appear to be diverging between search and social media players, with the latter impacted more severely as ad buyers reeling in spending.</p><p>Alphabet Inc, the world&#39;s largest digital ad platform, reported a rise in quarterly revenue on Tuesday, with sales from its biggest moneymaker - Google search - topping investor expectations.</p><p>Snap Inc and Twitter both missed sales expectations last week and warned of an ad market slowdown in coming quarters, sparking a broad sell-off across the sector.</p><p>The results shed light on the unique strain Meta&#39;s core social media business is experiencing, as it competes for users&#39; time with short video app TikTok and adjusts its ads business to privacy controls rolled out by Apple Inc last year.</p><p>Meta said Reels, a short video product it is increasingly inserting into users&#39; feeds to compete with TikTok, was now generating over $1 billion annually in revenue.</p><p>&#34;They are being greatly affected by everything, and I&#39;d probably give it a third, a third and a third,&#34; Bokeh Capital Partners&#39; Kim Forrest said, referring to the economy, global ad market slowdown and competition from TikTok and Apple.</p><p>&#34;Meta has a problem because they&#39;re chasing TikTok and if the Kardashians are talking about how they don&#39;t like Instagram ... Meta should really pay attention to that.&#34;</p><p>About 15% of content on Facebook and Instagram is recommended by AI and that percentage will double by the end of 2023, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said.</p><p>The world&#39;s biggest social media company is simultaneously carrying out several expensive overhauls to keep that core business pumping out profits, while also investing in a longer-term bet on &#34;metaverse&#34; hardware and software.</p><p>For now, at least, the metaverse part of the business remains largely theoretical. In the second quarter, Meta reported $218 million in non-ad revenue, which includes sales of devices like its Quest virtual reality headsets, down from $497 million last year.</p><p>Its Reality Labs unit, which is primarily responsible for developing metaverse-oriented technology like the VR headsets, reported sales of $452 million, down from $695 million in the first quarter.</p><p>Meta will release a mixed-reality headset called Project Cambria later this year focused on professionals.</p><p>Meta broke out the segment in its results for the first time earlier this year, when it revealed that Reality Labs had lost $10.2 billion in 2021.</p><p>Meta&#39;s second-quarter operating profit margin fell to 29% from 43% as costs rose sharply and revenue dipped.</p><p>In November, Chief Financial Officer David Wehner will become Meta&#39;s first chief strategy officer. Susan Li, Meta&#39;s current vice president of finance, will become CFO.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Meta Posts First-Ever Revenue Drop As Inflation Throttles Ad Sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMeta Posts First-Ever Revenue Drop As Inflation Throttles Ad Sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-28 06:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>July 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms Inc issued a gloomy forecast after recording its first ever quarterly drop in revenue on Wednesday, with a global recession looming and competitive pressures weighing on its digital ads sales.</p><p>Shares of the Menlo Park, California-based company were down about 4.4% in extended trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c27fb4c72b7a9b3119977ddf064de9d\" tg-width=\"854\" tg-height=\"621\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The company said it expects third-quarter revenue of between $26 billion and $28.5 billion. Analysts were expecting $30.52 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>Total revenue, which consists almost entirely of ad sales, fell 1% to $28.8 billion in the second quarter ended June 30, from $29.1 billion last year. The figure slightly missed Wall Street&#39;s projections of $28.9 billion, according to Refinitiv.</p><p>The company reported mixed results for user growth.</p><p>Monthly active users on flagship social network Facebook came in slightly under analyst expectations at 2.93 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 1% year over year, while daily active users handily beat estimates at 1.97 billion.</p><p>Like many global companies, Meta is facing some revenue pressure from the strong dollar, as sales in foreign currencies amount to less in dollar terms. Meta said it expected a 6% revenue growth headwind in the third quarter, based on current exchange rates.</p><p>Still, the Meta results also come as fortunes in online ads sales appear to be diverging between search and social media players, with the latter impacted more severely as ad buyers reeling in spending.</p><p>Alphabet Inc, the world&#39;s largest digital ad platform, reported a rise in quarterly revenue on Tuesday, with sales from its biggest moneymaker - Google search - topping investor expectations.</p><p>Snap Inc and Twitter both missed sales expectations last week and warned of an ad market slowdown in coming quarters, sparking a broad sell-off across the sector.</p><p>The results shed light on the unique strain Meta&#39;s core social media business is experiencing, as it competes for users&#39; time with short video app TikTok and adjusts its ads business to privacy controls rolled out by Apple Inc last year.</p><p>Meta said Reels, a short video product it is increasingly inserting into users&#39; feeds to compete with TikTok, was now generating over $1 billion annually in revenue.</p><p>&#34;They are being greatly affected by everything, and I&#39;d probably give it a third, a third and a third,&#34; Bokeh Capital Partners&#39; Kim Forrest said, referring to the economy, global ad market slowdown and competition from TikTok and Apple.</p><p>&#34;Meta has a problem because they&#39;re chasing TikTok and if the Kardashians are talking about how they don&#39;t like Instagram ... Meta should really pay attention to that.&#34;</p><p>About 15% of content on Facebook and Instagram is recommended by AI and that percentage will double by the end of 2023, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said.</p><p>The world&#39;s biggest social media company is simultaneously carrying out several expensive overhauls to keep that core business pumping out profits, while also investing in a longer-term bet on &#34;metaverse&#34; hardware and software.</p><p>For now, at least, the metaverse part of the business remains largely theoretical. In the second quarter, Meta reported $218 million in non-ad revenue, which includes sales of devices like its Quest virtual reality headsets, down from $497 million last year.</p><p>Its Reality Labs unit, which is primarily responsible for developing metaverse-oriented technology like the VR headsets, reported sales of $452 million, down from $695 million in the first quarter.</p><p>Meta will release a mixed-reality headset called Project Cambria later this year focused on professionals.</p><p>Meta broke out the segment in its results for the first time earlier this year, when it revealed that Reality Labs had lost $10.2 billion in 2021.</p><p>Meta&#39;s second-quarter operating profit margin fell to 29% from 43% as costs rose sharply and revenue dipped.</p><p>In November, Chief Financial Officer David Wehner will become Meta&#39;s first chief strategy officer. Susan Li, Meta&#39;s current vice president of finance, will become CFO.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2254362611","content_text":"July 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms Inc issued a gloomy forecast after recording its first ever quarterly drop in revenue on Wednesday, with a global recession looming and competitive pressures weighing on its digital ads sales.Shares of the Menlo Park, California-based company were down about 4.4% in extended trading.The company said it expects third-quarter revenue of between $26 billion and $28.5 billion. Analysts were expecting $30.52 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.Total revenue, which consists almost entirely of ad sales, fell 1% to $28.8 billion in the second quarter ended June 30, from $29.1 billion last year. The figure slightly missed Wall Street's projections of $28.9 billion, according to Refinitiv.The company reported mixed results for user growth.Monthly active users on flagship social network Facebook came in slightly under analyst expectations at 2.93 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 1% year over year, while daily active users handily beat estimates at 1.97 billion.Like many global companies, Meta is facing some revenue pressure from the strong dollar, as sales in foreign currencies amount to less in dollar terms. Meta said it expected a 6% revenue growth headwind in the third quarter, based on current exchange rates.Still, the Meta results also come as fortunes in online ads sales appear to be diverging between search and social media players, with the latter impacted more severely as ad buyers reeling in spending.Alphabet Inc, the world's largest digital ad platform, reported a rise in quarterly revenue on Tuesday, with sales from its biggest moneymaker - Google search - topping investor expectations.Snap Inc and Twitter both missed sales expectations last week and warned of an ad market slowdown in coming quarters, sparking a broad sell-off across the sector.The results shed light on the unique strain Meta's core social media business is experiencing, as it competes for users' time with short video app TikTok and adjusts its ads business to privacy controls rolled out by Apple Inc last year.Meta said Reels, a short video product it is increasingly inserting into users' feeds to compete with TikTok, was now generating over $1 billion annually in revenue.\"They are being greatly affected by everything, and I'd probably give it a third, a third and a third,\" Bokeh Capital Partners' Kim Forrest said, referring to the economy, global ad market slowdown and competition from TikTok and Apple.\"Meta has a problem because they're chasing TikTok and if the Kardashians are talking about how they don't like Instagram ... Meta should really pay attention to that.\"About 15% of content on Facebook and Instagram is recommended by AI and that percentage will double by the end of 2023, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said.The world's biggest social media company is simultaneously carrying out several expensive overhauls to keep that core business pumping out profits, while also investing in a longer-term bet on \"metaverse\" hardware and software.For now, at least, the metaverse part of the business remains largely theoretical. In the second quarter, Meta reported $218 million in non-ad revenue, which includes sales of devices like its Quest virtual reality headsets, down from $497 million last year.Its Reality Labs unit, which is primarily responsible for developing metaverse-oriented technology like the VR headsets, reported sales of $452 million, down from $695 million in the first quarter.Meta will release a mixed-reality headset called Project Cambria later this year focused on professionals.Meta broke out the segment in its results for the first time earlier this year, when it revealed that Reality Labs had lost $10.2 billion in 2021.Meta's second-quarter operating profit margin fell to 29% from 43% as costs rose sharply and revenue dipped.In November, Chief Financial Officer David Wehner will become Meta's first chief strategy officer. Susan Li, Meta's current vice president of finance, will become CFO.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":35,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":123177530,"gmtCreate":1624414006220,"gmtModify":1703835941953,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good.","listText":"Good.","text":"Good.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/123177530","repostId":"2145664330","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145664330","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1624403123,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145664330?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-23 07:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech leads way to Wall Street rebound as Powell promises steady hand","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145664330","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street rebounded Tuesday as Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Pow","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street rebounded Tuesday as Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell vowed not to raise rates too quickly as the dollar and oil gave up earlier gains.</p>\n<p>Led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , Wall Street closed Tuesday higher, bouncing back from a sell-off set off last week by a Fed policy update that suggested officials believed rates would rise more quickly to counter rising inflation.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq closed at another record high, as top-shelf tech companies resumed their growth trajectories.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 68.61 points, or 0.2% and the S&amp;P 500 gained 21.65 points, or 0.51%. to 4,246.44 and the Nasdaq Composite added 111.79 points, or 0.79 percent, to 14,253.27.</p>\n<p>The MSCI world equity index , which tracks shares in 45 nations, rose 4.4 points or 0.62%.</p>\n<p>\"I really think there's a realization that this is a ripe environment: rates are still low and for stock investors, this hits a 'just right' tone,\" said Patrick Leary, chief market strategist at Incapital. \"The market is concerned about rising inflation numbers and was getting more unnerved as the Fed dismissed them until last week’s meeting.\"</p>\n<p>Testifying before Congress, Powell vowed that the Fed will not raise rates out of fear of potential rising inflation, and instead will prioritize a \"broad and inclusive\" recovery of the job market. He said recent price increases do not suggest higher rates are needed, and instead can be attributed to categories directly impacted by economic reopening.</p>\n<p>\"After the FOMC took the wind out of the reflation trade at the end of last week, that’s started to reverse over the last two days. It seems last week’s price action went too far,\" said Stephanie Roth, senior markets economist for J.P. Morgan Private Bank.</p>\n<p>Powell's remarks pushed yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries lower, dipping to yield 1.4649% after clearing 1.5% earlier in the day.</p>\n<p>The dollar also dipped as Powell spoke, with the dollar index falling 0.20% to 91.733 . It is holding below a two-month high of 92.408 reached on Friday.</p>\n<p>Oil slid slightly after Brent rose above $75 a barrel for the first time in over two years, as OPEC+ discussed raising oil production.</p>\n<p>Brent crude futures settled down 9 cents to $74.81 a barrel after hitting a session high of $75.30 a barrel, the strongest since April 25, 2019.</p>\n<p>U.S. West Texas Intermediate <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WTI\">$(WTI)$</a> crude fell 60 cents, or 0.8%, to $73.06 a barrel.</p>\n<p>Bitcoin began making a comeback of sorts, climbing back above $30,000 after hitting lows not seen since January. The cryptocurrency last traded at $32,831, but has nearly halved in value over the last three months. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies came in for heavy selling on Monday, hurt by a tightening crackdown on trading and mining in China.</p>\n<p>Spot gold prices fell $4.8691 or 0.27%, to $1,778.08 an ounce.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech leads way to Wall Street rebound as Powell promises steady hand</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech leads way to Wall Street rebound as Powell promises steady hand\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-23 07:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street rebounded Tuesday as Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell vowed not to raise rates too quickly as the dollar and oil gave up earlier gains.</p>\n<p>Led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , Wall Street closed Tuesday higher, bouncing back from a sell-off set off last week by a Fed policy update that suggested officials believed rates would rise more quickly to counter rising inflation.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq closed at another record high, as top-shelf tech companies resumed their growth trajectories.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 68.61 points, or 0.2% and the S&amp;P 500 gained 21.65 points, or 0.51%. to 4,246.44 and the Nasdaq Composite added 111.79 points, or 0.79 percent, to 14,253.27.</p>\n<p>The MSCI world equity index , which tracks shares in 45 nations, rose 4.4 points or 0.62%.</p>\n<p>\"I really think there's a realization that this is a ripe environment: rates are still low and for stock investors, this hits a 'just right' tone,\" said Patrick Leary, chief market strategist at Incapital. \"The market is concerned about rising inflation numbers and was getting more unnerved as the Fed dismissed them until last week’s meeting.\"</p>\n<p>Testifying before Congress, Powell vowed that the Fed will not raise rates out of fear of potential rising inflation, and instead will prioritize a \"broad and inclusive\" recovery of the job market. He said recent price increases do not suggest higher rates are needed, and instead can be attributed to categories directly impacted by economic reopening.</p>\n<p>\"After the FOMC took the wind out of the reflation trade at the end of last week, that’s started to reverse over the last two days. It seems last week’s price action went too far,\" said Stephanie Roth, senior markets economist for J.P. Morgan Private Bank.</p>\n<p>Powell's remarks pushed yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries lower, dipping to yield 1.4649% after clearing 1.5% earlier in the day.</p>\n<p>The dollar also dipped as Powell spoke, with the dollar index falling 0.20% to 91.733 . It is holding below a two-month high of 92.408 reached on Friday.</p>\n<p>Oil slid slightly after Brent rose above $75 a barrel for the first time in over two years, as OPEC+ discussed raising oil production.</p>\n<p>Brent crude futures settled down 9 cents to $74.81 a barrel after hitting a session high of $75.30 a barrel, the strongest since April 25, 2019.</p>\n<p>U.S. West Texas Intermediate <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WTI\">$(WTI)$</a> crude fell 60 cents, or 0.8%, to $73.06 a barrel.</p>\n<p>Bitcoin began making a comeback of sorts, climbing back above $30,000 after hitting lows not seen since January. The cryptocurrency last traded at $32,831, but has nearly halved in value over the last three months. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies came in for heavy selling on Monday, hurt by a tightening crackdown on trading and mining in China.</p>\n<p>Spot gold prices fell $4.8691 or 0.27%, to $1,778.08 an ounce.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","POWL":"Powell Industries"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2145664330","content_text":"WASHINGTON, June 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street rebounded Tuesday as Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell vowed not to raise rates too quickly as the dollar and oil gave up earlier gains.\nLed by the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , Wall Street closed Tuesday higher, bouncing back from a sell-off set off last week by a Fed policy update that suggested officials believed rates would rise more quickly to counter rising inflation.\nThe Nasdaq closed at another record high, as top-shelf tech companies resumed their growth trajectories.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 68.61 points, or 0.2% and the S&P 500 gained 21.65 points, or 0.51%. to 4,246.44 and the Nasdaq Composite added 111.79 points, or 0.79 percent, to 14,253.27.\nThe MSCI world equity index , which tracks shares in 45 nations, rose 4.4 points or 0.62%.\n\"I really think there's a realization that this is a ripe environment: rates are still low and for stock investors, this hits a 'just right' tone,\" said Patrick Leary, chief market strategist at Incapital. \"The market is concerned about rising inflation numbers and was getting more unnerved as the Fed dismissed them until last week’s meeting.\"\nTestifying before Congress, Powell vowed that the Fed will not raise rates out of fear of potential rising inflation, and instead will prioritize a \"broad and inclusive\" recovery of the job market. He said recent price increases do not suggest higher rates are needed, and instead can be attributed to categories directly impacted by economic reopening.\n\"After the FOMC took the wind out of the reflation trade at the end of last week, that’s started to reverse over the last two days. It seems last week’s price action went too far,\" said Stephanie Roth, senior markets economist for J.P. Morgan Private Bank.\nPowell's remarks pushed yields on benchmark 10-year Treasuries lower, dipping to yield 1.4649% after clearing 1.5% earlier in the day.\nThe dollar also dipped as Powell spoke, with the dollar index falling 0.20% to 91.733 . It is holding below a two-month high of 92.408 reached on Friday.\nOil slid slightly after Brent rose above $75 a barrel for the first time in over two years, as OPEC+ discussed raising oil production.\nBrent crude futures settled down 9 cents to $74.81 a barrel after hitting a session high of $75.30 a barrel, the strongest since April 25, 2019.\nU.S. West Texas Intermediate $(WTI)$ crude fell 60 cents, or 0.8%, to $73.06 a barrel.\nBitcoin began making a comeback of sorts, climbing back above $30,000 after hitting lows not seen since January. The cryptocurrency last traded at $32,831, but has nearly halved in value over the last three months. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies came in for heavy selling on Monday, hurt by a tightening crackdown on trading and mining in China.\nSpot gold prices fell $4.8691 or 0.27%, to $1,778.08 an ounce.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":37,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9984824991,"gmtCreate":1667607749813,"gmtModify":1676537942913,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9984824991","repostId":"2280464574","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2280464574","pubTimestamp":1667576239,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2280464574?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-04 23:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2280464574","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Investors seem to have ignored a significant slowdown in AMD's growth rate.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">Advanced Micro Devices </a> stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.</p><p>But despite that bad news, the semiconductor stock is on the rise following the report. Is that a reason to buy? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>AMD&#39;s earnings conundrum</h2><p>On the surface, AMD&#39;s results appear robust. Revenue for the third quarter of 2022 came in at $5.6 billion, climbing by 29% year over year. Non-GAAP net income of $1.1 billion rose 23%. A higher cost of goods sold reduced margins. AMD also spent heavily on both research and development and marketing, general, and administrative expenses.</p><p>Despite the increases, revenue fell short of expectations, since analysts expected revenue of $5.62 billion. Moreover, AMD increased its share count by 34% to over 1.6 billion to fund its Xilinx acquisition. Thus, non-GAAP earnings per share fell 8% to $0.67 per share, just below the $0.68 per share estimate.</p><p>AMD forecast 2022 revenue of $23.5 billion at the midpoint, which requires a considerable downward revision from the previously estimated $26.3 billion it predicted after the second quarter.</p><p>CEO Lisa Su blamed slowing PC sales, reflecting the struggles of <b>Intel</b>, which reported a similar decline in its Q3 earnings report. Lockdowns in China further pressured revenues.</p><p>Consequently, AMD stock has dropped by almost 65% since reaching an all-time high of nearly $165 per share almost one year ago. But that level of decline is not unusual, given the drop in its closest peers and the tech sector in general.</p><h2>Shifting perspectives</h2><p>Investors may have begun to adjust their perspective, returning to a pre-pandemic view of the PC market. Since the advent of <b>Apple</b>&#39;s iPhone, the smartphone has started to replace many functions performed by the PC. Hence, investors and companies had focused less on that market by the end of the last decade.</p><p>Admittedly, PC demand rose during the pandemic as many workers had to purchase a PC to work from home. But many of these workers have now returned to the office. And considering that PCs last up to 10 years, that market will likely remain sluggish for years to come.</p><p>AMD has also increasingly emphasized the data center and embedded segments. In these areas, AMD&#39;s sales remained robust.</p><p>In Q3, data center revenue came in at $1.6 billion, a 45% increase year over year. Embedded segment revenue jumped to $1.3 billion, up from $100 million in the year-ago quarter. The embedded segment&#39;s growth surged thanks to the acquisition of Xilinx in February.</p><p>Valuation could have also influenced the buying decision. Currently, AMD stock sells for about 25 times earnings. That exceeds the price-to-earnings ratios of rival Intel and one of its principal fabs, <b>Taiwan Semiconductor</b>.</p><p>However, that is the lowest P/E ratio for AMD since Su became CEO in 2014. Moreover, the valuation may have fallen too far, considering that Q3 non-GAAP income growth was 23% despite a slowdown in the business.</p><h2>Consider AMD</h2><p>At these levels, investors should consider adding AMD shares. From a macro perspective, investors should have expected the PC market to cool off following the end of lockdowns.</p><p>Growth numbers in the data center and embedded markets indicate those segments can carry AMD. Given the likelihood that the drop in AMD stock prices in its recent struggles, investors should feel safe adding shares at current levels.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD Is On the Rise Despite Missing Earnings. Why?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-04 23:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Advanced Micro Devices  stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.But despite that bad news, the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/04/amd-is-on-the-rise-despite-missing-earnings-why/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2280464574","content_text":"Advanced Micro Devices  stock missed analyst estimates on revenue and earnings. Declines in the PC market have hit AMD hard as the stock suffers through a bear market.But despite that bad news, the semiconductor stock is on the rise following the report. Is that a reason to buy? Let's take a closer look.AMD's earnings conundrumOn the surface, AMD's results appear robust. Revenue for the third quarter of 2022 came in at $5.6 billion, climbing by 29% year over year. Non-GAAP net income of $1.1 billion rose 23%. A higher cost of goods sold reduced margins. AMD also spent heavily on both research and development and marketing, general, and administrative expenses.Despite the increases, revenue fell short of expectations, since analysts expected revenue of $5.62 billion. Moreover, AMD increased its share count by 34% to over 1.6 billion to fund its Xilinx acquisition. Thus, non-GAAP earnings per share fell 8% to $0.67 per share, just below the $0.68 per share estimate.AMD forecast 2022 revenue of $23.5 billion at the midpoint, which requires a considerable downward revision from the previously estimated $26.3 billion it predicted after the second quarter.CEO Lisa Su blamed slowing PC sales, reflecting the struggles of Intel, which reported a similar decline in its Q3 earnings report. Lockdowns in China further pressured revenues.Consequently, AMD stock has dropped by almost 65% since reaching an all-time high of nearly $165 per share almost one year ago. But that level of decline is not unusual, given the drop in its closest peers and the tech sector in general.Shifting perspectivesInvestors may have begun to adjust their perspective, returning to a pre-pandemic view of the PC market. Since the advent of Apple's iPhone, the smartphone has started to replace many functions performed by the PC. Hence, investors and companies had focused less on that market by the end of the last decade.Admittedly, PC demand rose during the pandemic as many workers had to purchase a PC to work from home. But many of these workers have now returned to the office. And considering that PCs last up to 10 years, that market will likely remain sluggish for years to come.AMD has also increasingly emphasized the data center and embedded segments. In these areas, AMD's sales remained robust.In Q3, data center revenue came in at $1.6 billion, a 45% increase year over year. Embedded segment revenue jumped to $1.3 billion, up from $100 million in the year-ago quarter. The embedded segment's growth surged thanks to the acquisition of Xilinx in February.Valuation could have also influenced the buying decision. Currently, AMD stock sells for about 25 times earnings. That exceeds the price-to-earnings ratios of rival Intel and one of its principal fabs, Taiwan Semiconductor.However, that is the lowest P/E ratio for AMD since Su became CEO in 2014. Moreover, the valuation may have fallen too far, considering that Q3 non-GAAP income growth was 23% despite a slowdown in the business.Consider AMDAt these levels, investors should consider adding AMD shares. From a macro perspective, investors should have expected the PC market to cool off following the end of lockdowns.Growth numbers in the data center and embedded markets indicate those segments can carry AMD. Given the likelihood that the drop in AMD stock prices in its recent struggles, investors should feel safe adding shares at current levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":475,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147708784,"gmtCreate":1626389807348,"gmtModify":1703759046669,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good time to go in.","listText":"Good time to go in.","text":"Good time to go in.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147708784","repostId":"1165176874","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165176874","pubTimestamp":1626387247,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165176874?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 06:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Expect a 10% or worse correction in U.S. stocks by mid-August, says this forecaster with a proven track record","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165176874","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Market breadth hasn’t been this poor since October 2018 and the start of a 20%-plus decline.Get ready for the most severe correction since the bull market began in March 2020.To be sure, predictions are a dime a dozen on Wall Street. But this one comes from Hayes Martin, president of investment advisory firmMarket Extremes. I was introduced to Martin’s work several years ago and since then I’ve found his predictions of market turning points to be impressive. . I devoted two columns to Martin’s f","content":"<blockquote>\n Market breadth hasn’t been this poor since October 2018 and the start of a 20%-plus decline.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Get ready for the most severe correction since the bull market began in March 2020.</p>\n<p>To be sure, predictions are a dime a dozen on Wall Street. But this one comes from Hayes Martin, president of investment advisory firmMarket Extremes. I was introduced to Martin’s work several years ago and since then I’ve found his predictions of market turning points to be impressive. (For the record: Martin does not have an investment newsletter; my newsletter-tracking firm does not audit his investment performance.)</p>\n<p>I devoted two columns to Martin’s forecasts over the past year, and both proved prescient. In May 2020, I concluded that “the stock market… is stronger than even the most bullish investors believe.” In January of this year, I wrote that the market was still “firing on all cylinders.”</p>\n<p>In an interview on July 14, Martin said the U.S. stock market today is most definitely not firing on all cylinders. In fact, he said, the market’s internal health is now worse than at any time since October 2018. That was the beginning of a 20% decline in the S&amp;P 500SPX,-0.33%and a 26% decline in the small-cap Russell 2000 IndexRUT,-0.55%.(Martin anticipated that decline as well; seemy Oct. 4, 2018, column.)</p>\n<p>Martin hastened to add that the market’s internal health is not as bad today as it was in 2018. This time around, he is forecasting a decline of 10% or more for the leading U.S. stock indexes. As for timing, he says that the decline could begin at any time, but he anticipates that it will begin no later than mid-August.</p>\n<p><b>The source of the market’s ill-health</b></p>\n<p>Martin bases his sobering forecast on the increasing divergences within the U.S. market, as indicated by fewer and fewer stocks participating in the headline-grabbing strength of the leading indices. One indicator of these divergences is the growing number of stocks hitting new lows, for example. On Wednesday of this week, for example, even as the Nasdaq 100NDX,-0.71%and the S&amp;P 100OEX,-0.37%indexes were hitting new highs, many sectors were registering a plurality of new lows.</p>\n<p>This was particularly evident in the small- and mid-cap sectors, as represented by the Russell 2000 index. On July 13 there were more new lows than new highs within that index for the second consecutive day. In Martin’s data for the Russell 2000’s new highs and new lows, which extends back to June 2000, what happened this week has happened only three other times — in September 2014, July 2015 and October 2018. In all three cases, three months later both the S&amp;P 500 and Russell 2000 were at least 10% lower.</p>\n<p>Martin reports that the only area of the market not showing dangerous divergences right now is the large-cap dominated S&amp;P 500. Except for that sector, he says that the “stock market’s current internals are some of the worst I’ve seen in decades.”</p>\n<p>Martin added that these severe divergences are occurring as equities are severely overvalued — with some stocks in bubble territory. This means that, when the market does decline, it’s likely to fall more than it would otherwise.</p>\n<p>Adding fuel to the fire, he continued, is the too-bullish investor sentiment that prevails right now. As contrarians remind us, such sentiment extremes mean that the path of least resistance for the market is down.</p>\n<p>To be sure, Martin concluded, stocks have been overvalued for some time now, and bullish sentiment has been at or close to extremes. The missing piece was market divergences. That piece is now in place.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Expect a 10% or worse correction in U.S. stocks by mid-August, says this forecaster with a proven track record</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExpect a 10% or worse correction in U.S. stocks by mid-August, says this forecaster with a proven track record\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-16 06:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/expect-a-10-correction-in-u-s-stocks-by-mid-august-says-this-forecaster-with-a-proven-track-record-11626380633?siteid=yhoof2><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Market breadth hasn’t been this poor since October 2018 and the start of a 20%-plus decline.\n\nGet ready for the most severe correction since the bull market began in March 2020.\nTo be sure, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/expect-a-10-correction-in-u-s-stocks-by-mid-august-says-this-forecaster-with-a-proven-track-record-11626380633?siteid=yhoof2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/expect-a-10-correction-in-u-s-stocks-by-mid-august-says-this-forecaster-with-a-proven-track-record-11626380633?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165176874","content_text":"Market breadth hasn’t been this poor since October 2018 and the start of a 20%-plus decline.\n\nGet ready for the most severe correction since the bull market began in March 2020.\nTo be sure, predictions are a dime a dozen on Wall Street. But this one comes from Hayes Martin, president of investment advisory firmMarket Extremes. I was introduced to Martin’s work several years ago and since then I’ve found his predictions of market turning points to be impressive. (For the record: Martin does not have an investment newsletter; my newsletter-tracking firm does not audit his investment performance.)\nI devoted two columns to Martin’s forecasts over the past year, and both proved prescient. In May 2020, I concluded that “the stock market… is stronger than even the most bullish investors believe.” In January of this year, I wrote that the market was still “firing on all cylinders.”\nIn an interview on July 14, Martin said the U.S. stock market today is most definitely not firing on all cylinders. In fact, he said, the market’s internal health is now worse than at any time since October 2018. That was the beginning of a 20% decline in the S&P 500SPX,-0.33%and a 26% decline in the small-cap Russell 2000 IndexRUT,-0.55%.(Martin anticipated that decline as well; seemy Oct. 4, 2018, column.)\nMartin hastened to add that the market’s internal health is not as bad today as it was in 2018. This time around, he is forecasting a decline of 10% or more for the leading U.S. stock indexes. As for timing, he says that the decline could begin at any time, but he anticipates that it will begin no later than mid-August.\nThe source of the market’s ill-health\nMartin bases his sobering forecast on the increasing divergences within the U.S. market, as indicated by fewer and fewer stocks participating in the headline-grabbing strength of the leading indices. One indicator of these divergences is the growing number of stocks hitting new lows, for example. On Wednesday of this week, for example, even as the Nasdaq 100NDX,-0.71%and the S&P 100OEX,-0.37%indexes were hitting new highs, many sectors were registering a plurality of new lows.\nThis was particularly evident in the small- and mid-cap sectors, as represented by the Russell 2000 index. On July 13 there were more new lows than new highs within that index for the second consecutive day. In Martin’s data for the Russell 2000’s new highs and new lows, which extends back to June 2000, what happened this week has happened only three other times — in September 2014, July 2015 and October 2018. In all three cases, three months later both the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 were at least 10% lower.\nMartin reports that the only area of the market not showing dangerous divergences right now is the large-cap dominated S&P 500. Except for that sector, he says that the “stock market’s current internals are some of the worst I’ve seen in decades.”\nMartin added that these severe divergences are occurring as equities are severely overvalued — with some stocks in bubble territory. This means that, when the market does decline, it’s likely to fall more than it would otherwise.\nAdding fuel to the fire, he continued, is the too-bullish investor sentiment that prevails right now. As contrarians remind us, such sentiment extremes mean that the path of least resistance for the market is down.\nTo be sure, Martin concluded, stocks have been overvalued for some time now, and bullish sentiment has been at or close to extremes. The missing piece was market divergences. That piece is now in place.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":182,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":157479811,"gmtCreate":1625613574033,"gmtModify":1703744770008,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"MRIN go to moon.","listText":"MRIN go to moon.","text":"MRIN go to moon.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/157479811","repostId":"1142221624","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142221624","pubTimestamp":1625585310,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142221624?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-06 23:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"MRIN Stock: Why Reddit Investors Are Sending Marin Software Higher Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142221624","media":"investorplace","summary":"Marin Software(NASDAQ:MRIN) stock is soaring higher on Tuesday as Reddit traders continue to pump up","content":"<p><b>Marin Software</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>MRIN</u></b>) stock is soaring higher on Tuesday as Reddit traders continue to pump up the company’s shares.</p>\n<p>So why exactly are Reddit investors taking such a liking to MRIN stock today? There’s no recent news that would result in increasing interest from investors. That includes from inside or outside the company.</p>\n<p>Even if we head over to Reddit, it doesn’t look like those traders know why shares of MRIN stock are on the move today. Here’s a few examples of what users are saying.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <ul>\n  <li>“How the hell do i get in on meme stocks BEFORE they rocket?! Lol #MRIN” —thejet6969</li>\n  <li>“When y’all gon hop on MRIN?? That shit been flying under the radar with crazy volume and well over 100% short interest.” —chizbejoe</li>\n  <li>“Full on FOMO let’s go MRIN! Idk why, I’ll do my DD later. I like green crayons.” —amandarawrr</li>\n  <li>“Is there any solid reason why MRIN &amp; BLIN are flying or are they meme stocks now lol.” —friedchicken4health</li>\n </ul>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Even without any solid news sending MRIN stock higher today, there’s heavy trading of shares that investors should be aware of. As of this writing, more than 25 million shares of the stock have changed hands. That’s a major jump in morning volatility compared to the company’s daily average trading volume of about 20.6 million shares.</p>\n<p>MRIN stock was up 18.5% as of Tuesday morning and is up 1,109.6% since the start of the year.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>MRIN Stock: Why Reddit Investors Are Sending Marin Software Higher Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMRIN Stock: Why Reddit Investors Are Sending Marin Software Higher Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-06 23:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/07/mrin-stock-why-reddit-investors-are-sending-marin-software-higher-today/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Marin Software(NASDAQ:MRIN) stock is soaring higher on Tuesday as Reddit traders continue to pump up the company’s shares.\nSo why exactly are Reddit investors taking such a liking to MRIN stock today?...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/07/mrin-stock-why-reddit-investors-are-sending-marin-software-higher-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRIN":"Marin Software Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/07/mrin-stock-why-reddit-investors-are-sending-marin-software-higher-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142221624","content_text":"Marin Software(NASDAQ:MRIN) stock is soaring higher on Tuesday as Reddit traders continue to pump up the company’s shares.\nSo why exactly are Reddit investors taking such a liking to MRIN stock today? There’s no recent news that would result in increasing interest from investors. That includes from inside or outside the company.\nEven if we head over to Reddit, it doesn’t look like those traders know why shares of MRIN stock are on the move today. Here’s a few examples of what users are saying.\n\n\n“How the hell do i get in on meme stocks BEFORE they rocket?! Lol #MRIN” —thejet6969\n“When y’all gon hop on MRIN?? That shit been flying under the radar with crazy volume and well over 100% short interest.” —chizbejoe\n“Full on FOMO let’s go MRIN! Idk why, I’ll do my DD later. I like green crayons.” —amandarawrr\n“Is there any solid reason why MRIN & BLIN are flying or are they meme stocks now lol.” —friedchicken4health\n\n\nEven without any solid news sending MRIN stock higher today, there’s heavy trading of shares that investors should be aware of. As of this writing, more than 25 million shares of the stock have changed hands. That’s a major jump in morning volatility compared to the company’s daily average trading volume of about 20.6 million shares.\nMRIN stock was up 18.5% as of Tuesday morning and is up 1,109.6% since the start of the year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":43,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":115003560,"gmtCreate":1622938365550,"gmtModify":1704193357298,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good to buy.","listText":"Good to buy.","text":"Good to buy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/115003560","repostId":"1158897173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158897173","pubTimestamp":1622813283,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1158897173?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-04 21:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should You Buy Apple Stock Before WWDC?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158897173","media":"TheStreet","summary":"On June 7, Apple will host its annual WWDC event – as a virtual conference, just like 2020. The Apple Maven looked back at recent history to see how AAPL stock behaved around these events.Apple’s WWDC is just around the corner. The Cupertino company will virtually host the 32nd Worldwide Developers Conference, starting June 7. Rumor has it that Apple will announce five new software updates, including iOS 15 and macOS 12. Also, new hardware could be unveiled, but these announcements tend to be ra","content":"<p>On June 7, Apple will host its annual WWDC event – as a virtual conference, just like 2020. The Apple Maven looked back at recent history to see how AAPL stock behaved around these events.</p>\n<p>Apple’s WWDC is just around the corner. The Cupertino company will virtually host the 32nd Worldwide Developers Conference, starting June 7. Rumor has it that Apple will announce five new software updates, including iOS 15 and macOS 12. Also, new hardware could be unveiled, but these announcements tend to be rare during the developers’ conference.</p>\n<p>Today, the Apple Maven looks back at the most recent WWDC events to check how the stock behaved prior to and immediately after the conference.</p>\n<p>Before we dive in…</p>\n<p>Keep in mind that the Apple Maven will cover the event via&nbsp;<b>live blog</b>, starting at 9:45 a.m. Cupertino time (PDT), on June 7. Tune in to follow our analysis of Apple's WWDC presentation!</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e4af607bdf7b93f038263f4c2d0575f3\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"697\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's 2021 WWDC.</span></p>\n<p><b>WWDC 2017: Apple stock hiccups</b></p>\n<p>The 2017 edition of WWDC took place between June 5 and June 9, 2017. At that time, three software updates were announced: the iOS 11, macOS High Sierra and tvOS. Also, hardware updates were unveiled, including the Mac, iPad and HomePod.</p>\n<p>Looking at the performance of Apple shares a week before until the end of the event, AAPL investors did not show much enthusiasm. The stock moved 3% lower, trading at that time at $37.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/186aecd588efc459ba0be3e423485612\" tg-width=\"818\" tg-height=\"281\"><span>Figure 2: AAPL 2017 chart.</span></p>\n<p><b>WWDC 2018: modest climb</b></p>\n<p>In 2018, WWDC was held from June 4 to June 8. iOS 12 was announced, and so were software updates for Mac and Watch. This time, there were no hardware announcements.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/01f8d4a6d1b8bb55730d84f348b32520\" tg-width=\"818\" tg-height=\"285\"><span>Figure 3: AAPL 2018 chart.</span></p>\n<p>From one week prior until the end of the event, WWDC 2018 may have brought optimism to investors, as shares climbed by 2%, trading at that time at nearly $48.</p>\n<p><b>WWDC 2019: the start of the ramp</b></p>\n<p>The 2019 conference was held from June 3 to June 7. iOS 13 and other software updates were announced for the Mac, Watch, TV and iPad. Apple also launched hardware updates on Mac.</p>\n<p>Apple stock behaved well, rising nearly 7% from a week before to the end of the event. In 2019, WWDC coincided with the beginning of a massive climb in AAPL share price that lasted until the end of the year.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8e261dd232ee1779ea1d89a8ebd4dd7\" tg-width=\"818\" tg-height=\"280\"><span>Figure 4: AAPL 2019 chart.</span></p>\n<p><b>WWDC 2020: riding the recovery</b></p>\n<p>For the first time, the 2020 version of WWDC was held online because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The conference happened from June 22 to June 26. At that time, iOS 14 was announced, alongside iPad, Watch, TV and Mac software updates.The highlight of the event&nbsp;was the announced transition to custom ARM processors for Mac.</p>\n<p>The stock was rebounding from the COVID-19 stock market crash at that time. Looking back at the period between a week prior to and the end of the event, shares were up 3%.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fa56b7f188ab147a30b9f13621f0024\" tg-width=\"814\" tg-height=\"281\"><span>Figure 5: AAPL 2020 chart.</span></p>\n<p><b>What history suggests</b></p>\n<p>It is hard to predict how Apple stock will behave in the near future. However, looking back at history, we can draw a few conclusions about AAPL share price behavior around WWDC in the last 5 years.</p>\n<p>Except for the 2017 conference, Apple caught an updraft around the WWDC weeks. Whether the performance is related to the event itself is a matter of interpretation.</p>\n<p><b>What to expect of WWDC 2021</b></p>\n<p>For this year’s WWDC, Apple will likely release the usual software updates. For investors, possible updates on the products and services front would be most meaningful.</p>\n<p>A possible successor for the M1 chip, a 27-inc Mac, a new MacBook Pro, updates on AR and VR technology and even hints about the Apple Car would certainly be highlights. Any of these potential developments, even if unlikely to happen, could give an extra impulse for Apple shares in the short- and mid-terms.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should You Buy Apple Stock Before WWDC?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould You Buy Apple Stock Before WWDC?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-04 21:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/should-you-buy-apple-stock-before-wwdc><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>On June 7, Apple will host its annual WWDC event – as a virtual conference, just like 2020. The Apple Maven looked back at recent history to see how AAPL stock behaved around these events.\nApple’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/should-you-buy-apple-stock-before-wwdc\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/should-you-buy-apple-stock-before-wwdc","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158897173","content_text":"On June 7, Apple will host its annual WWDC event – as a virtual conference, just like 2020. The Apple Maven looked back at recent history to see how AAPL stock behaved around these events.\nApple’s WWDC is just around the corner. The Cupertino company will virtually host the 32nd Worldwide Developers Conference, starting June 7. Rumor has it that Apple will announce five new software updates, including iOS 15 and macOS 12. Also, new hardware could be unveiled, but these announcements tend to be rare during the developers’ conference.\nToday, the Apple Maven looks back at the most recent WWDC events to check how the stock behaved prior to and immediately after the conference.\nBefore we dive in…\nKeep in mind that the Apple Maven will cover the event via live blog, starting at 9:45 a.m. Cupertino time (PDT), on June 7. Tune in to follow our analysis of Apple's WWDC presentation!\nFigure 1: Apple's 2021 WWDC.\nWWDC 2017: Apple stock hiccups\nThe 2017 edition of WWDC took place between June 5 and June 9, 2017. At that time, three software updates were announced: the iOS 11, macOS High Sierra and tvOS. Also, hardware updates were unveiled, including the Mac, iPad and HomePod.\nLooking at the performance of Apple shares a week before until the end of the event, AAPL investors did not show much enthusiasm. The stock moved 3% lower, trading at that time at $37.\nFigure 2: AAPL 2017 chart.\nWWDC 2018: modest climb\nIn 2018, WWDC was held from June 4 to June 8. iOS 12 was announced, and so were software updates for Mac and Watch. This time, there were no hardware announcements.\nFigure 3: AAPL 2018 chart.\nFrom one week prior until the end of the event, WWDC 2018 may have brought optimism to investors, as shares climbed by 2%, trading at that time at nearly $48.\nWWDC 2019: the start of the ramp\nThe 2019 conference was held from June 3 to June 7. iOS 13 and other software updates were announced for the Mac, Watch, TV and iPad. Apple also launched hardware updates on Mac.\nApple stock behaved well, rising nearly 7% from a week before to the end of the event. In 2019, WWDC coincided with the beginning of a massive climb in AAPL share price that lasted until the end of the year.\nFigure 4: AAPL 2019 chart.\nWWDC 2020: riding the recovery\nFor the first time, the 2020 version of WWDC was held online because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The conference happened from June 22 to June 26. At that time, iOS 14 was announced, alongside iPad, Watch, TV and Mac software updates.The highlight of the event was the announced transition to custom ARM processors for Mac.\nThe stock was rebounding from the COVID-19 stock market crash at that time. Looking back at the period between a week prior to and the end of the event, shares were up 3%.\nFigure 5: AAPL 2020 chart.\nWhat history suggests\nIt is hard to predict how Apple stock will behave in the near future. However, looking back at history, we can draw a few conclusions about AAPL share price behavior around WWDC in the last 5 years.\nExcept for the 2017 conference, Apple caught an updraft around the WWDC weeks. Whether the performance is related to the event itself is a matter of interpretation.\nWhat to expect of WWDC 2021\nFor this year’s WWDC, Apple will likely release the usual software updates. For investors, possible updates on the products and services front would be most meaningful.\nA possible successor for the M1 chip, a 27-inc Mac, a new MacBook Pro, updates on AR and VR technology and even hints about the Apple Car would certainly be highlights. Any of these potential developments, even if unlikely to happen, could give an extra impulse for Apple shares in the short- and mid-terms.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":24,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987733766,"gmtCreate":1667988022255,"gmtModify":1676537995055,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987733766","repostId":"1168113903","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168113903","pubTimestamp":1668008209,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168113903?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-09 23:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168113903","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>A study of market returns over the past five bear markets.</li><li>We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.</li><li>Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one or two stand out.</li></ul><p>In this article I will look at five exchange-traded funds (&#34;ETFs&#34;) to find out which one is the best to invest in once this bear market is over. The five ETFs examined in this article are: SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY), Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). These are often referred to as &#34;risk on&#34; assets.</p><p>I will gather data from the last five bear markets - defined as drops in the S&amp;P 500 Futures (SPX) of 20% or more. We know from history when each of the last five bear markets ended. For the purposes of this article, I will consider the bear market to be over once the market as measured by SPX has closed above its 10-month exponential moving average. In each case, this will have occurred after the exact bottom of the five bear markets. I will then look at the performance of buying each of the five ETFs at the opening price the following month and then holding those ETFs for one-, two-, and three-year periods. Let’s see what we can find out.</p><p>The first bear market will be the Dot Com Bear Market. In this event, the market lost over 50%. The S&amp;P 500 Index reclaimed its 10-month EMA in April 2003, so according to my method, I would enter a position for each of the ETFs at the open of May’s trading. Table 1 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 1 – Dot Com Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6811d4e9082e48707e7514fe23481e33\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"288\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Table 1 shows the results of SPX in the second row with the one-year, two-year, and three-year results. All other results that beat SPX are highlighted in green. Results that underperform SPX are highlighted in yellow. The bottom two rows show the median and average results for all ETFs for that period.</p><p>The results show that QQQ performed best for the first year, returning 26.70%. XLI performed best for the two-year and three-year period. XLY underperformed the market for the two and three-year periods. These results surprised me, as I thought that technology stocks would have outperformed all others for the three years because technology stocks were so beaten down during the bear market.</p><p>The second bear market examined will be the Financial Crisis Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 57%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in July 2009, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of August’s trading. Table 2 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 2 – Financial Crisis Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64b9e606cc2ed2413b7e715ebb7f79b1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Looking at Table 2, Industrials were the one-year winner. They more than doubled the market’s gain for the first year. XLY also more than doubled the market in the first year. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed all others for the two-year and three-year periods. It’s interesting to me that Financials never got on track and were clear laggards.</p><p>The third bear market examined will be the European Debt Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 21%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in October 2011, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of November’s trading. Table 3 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 3 – European Debt Crisis</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60b78f5c93f1dc1987b7ce950f9f07b0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"291\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Table 3 shows that Financials led for the first year coming out of the bear market, more than doubling the market’s overall performance. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed for the first two years. Financial stocks outperformed all others over a three-year period. This table shows that all the ETFs studied outperformed the market for all three time periods.</p><p>The fourth bear market examined will be the Cryptocurrency Debt Bear Market. In case you’re wondering, I got this name fromWikipedia. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over just over 20% barely qualifying for bear market status. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in January 2019, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of February’s trading. Table 4 shows the results of those for the next three years.</p><p><b>Table 4 – Cryptocurrency Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d170899cac7e7fb8d0cc679e463d6c47\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"286\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Coming out of this bear market is where technology stocks show up. QQQ outperforms all the other ETFs for all three time periods. It does so in a big way. It’s two-year and three-year performance is 40 percentage points higher than its closest competitor. The time frame of the table overlaps Table 5 five below and therefore shows the COVID rally where technology stocks dominated. This bear market is also one where there were several ETFs that underperformed the market over all three time periods.</p><p>The last bear market covered is the COVID Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 35%. The COVID bear market was the shortest bear market in the study spanning just over a month. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in May 2020, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of June’s trading. Table 5 shows the results for two full years and to the end of October 2022 as there hasn’t been a full three years since this market reclaimed its 10-month EMA.</p><p><b>Table 5 – COVID Bear Market</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a571324503f006a6fba5cdb8000c9044\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>Coming out of the COVID Bear Market, Financial stocks led the way for the first year. This result surprised me. I was certain it was technology stocks that led the way. For the two-year period XLF outperformed all other ETFs while managing to lose money from the end of year one to the end of year two. The same situation happened with the return to the end of October 2022. XLF led all other ETFs for the total period, while losing money from the end of year two.</p><p>The last table will be the averages for all five ETFs compared to SPX for all five bear markets. This chart is difficult to read, and I apologize for that. When reading this chart, percentages highlighted in green are percentages that are above SPX returns for the same period of the bear market identified in the first column. Percentages highlighted in yellow are percentages that are below SPX returns for the period of the bear market identified in the first column. The cells highlighted in blue represent the best period return for that bear market.</p><p><b>Table 6 – Combined Results</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d17ce5d37e2cabb07dc35401b58ec67b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"132\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p>What jumps out at me from Table 6 are three things. One, SPY outperformed the broad market in each bear market recovery in each time period. So, if you want to outperform the market, buy SPY. I think Warren Buffett gives that advice. The second observation is that QQQ outperformed the broad market for the first year in every instance. It outperformed SPY for the first year in every instance except the Euro Debt Bear Market, where QQQ returned 15.96% in the first year while SPY returned 18.31% in the first year. Both beat SPX during that time frame. Three, each ETF had its moment of outperformance and underperformance.</p><p>What I’ve learned from this study is that once the current bear market is over, meaning SPX closes above its 10-month moving average, I will put some of my money in SPY. I will put money in QQQ for the first year at least. XLY, XLF, and XLI all had their opportunities to shine. Looking at Table 6, I’m not sure I can make a blanket statement that one or more of those ETFs should be an automatic buy over SPY or QQQ coming out of a bear market over.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: When This Bear Is Over, Which ETF Should I Invest In (Technical Analysis)?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-09 23:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4554293-spy-when-this-bear-is-over-which-etf-should-i-invest-in-technical-analysis","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168113903","content_text":"SummaryA study of market returns over the past five bear markets.We look at five risk-on ETFs during these periods.Each ETF - SPY, QQQ, XLF, XLI, and XLY - had their moment of outperformance, but one or two stand out.In this article I will look at five exchange-traded funds (\"ETFs\") to find out which one is the best to invest in once this bear market is over. The five ETFs examined in this article are: SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY), Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY), Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF), and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). These are often referred to as \"risk on\" assets.I will gather data from the last five bear markets - defined as drops in the S&P 500 Futures (SPX) of 20% or more. We know from history when each of the last five bear markets ended. For the purposes of this article, I will consider the bear market to be over once the market as measured by SPX has closed above its 10-month exponential moving average. In each case, this will have occurred after the exact bottom of the five bear markets. I will then look at the performance of buying each of the five ETFs at the opening price the following month and then holding those ETFs for one-, two-, and three-year periods. Let’s see what we can find out.The first bear market will be the Dot Com Bear Market. In this event, the market lost over 50%. The S&P 500 Index reclaimed its 10-month EMA in April 2003, so according to my method, I would enter a position for each of the ETFs at the open of May’s trading. Table 1 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 1 – Dot Com Bear MarketAuthorTable 1 shows the results of SPX in the second row with the one-year, two-year, and three-year results. All other results that beat SPX are highlighted in green. Results that underperform SPX are highlighted in yellow. The bottom two rows show the median and average results for all ETFs for that period.The results show that QQQ performed best for the first year, returning 26.70%. XLI performed best for the two-year and three-year period. XLY underperformed the market for the two and three-year periods. These results surprised me, as I thought that technology stocks would have outperformed all others for the three years because technology stocks were so beaten down during the bear market.The second bear market examined will be the Financial Crisis Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 57%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in July 2009, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of August’s trading. Table 2 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 2 – Financial Crisis Bear MarketAuthorLooking at Table 2, Industrials were the one-year winner. They more than doubled the market’s gain for the first year. XLY also more than doubled the market in the first year. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed all others for the two-year and three-year periods. It’s interesting to me that Financials never got on track and were clear laggards.The third bear market examined will be the European Debt Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 21%. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in October 2011, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of November’s trading. Table 3 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 3 – European Debt CrisisAuthorTable 3 shows that Financials led for the first year coming out of the bear market, more than doubling the market’s overall performance. Consumer Discretionary stocks outperformed for the first two years. Financial stocks outperformed all others over a three-year period. This table shows that all the ETFs studied outperformed the market for all three time periods.The fourth bear market examined will be the Cryptocurrency Debt Bear Market. In case you’re wondering, I got this name fromWikipedia. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over just over 20% barely qualifying for bear market status. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in January 2019, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of February’s trading. Table 4 shows the results of those for the next three years.Table 4 – Cryptocurrency Bear MarketAuthorComing out of this bear market is where technology stocks show up. QQQ outperforms all the other ETFs for all three time periods. It does so in a big way. It’s two-year and three-year performance is 40 percentage points higher than its closest competitor. The time frame of the table overlaps Table 5 five below and therefore shows the COVID rally where technology stocks dominated. This bear market is also one where there were several ETFs that underperformed the market over all three time periods.The last bear market covered is the COVID Bear Market. In this event, the market as measured by the SP 500 lost over 35%. The COVID bear market was the shortest bear market in the study spanning just over a month. The SP 500 reclaimed its 10-month EMA in May 2020, so according to my method, I would enter a position at the open of June’s trading. Table 5 shows the results for two full years and to the end of October 2022 as there hasn’t been a full three years since this market reclaimed its 10-month EMA.Table 5 – COVID Bear MarketAuthorComing out of the COVID Bear Market, Financial stocks led the way for the first year. This result surprised me. I was certain it was technology stocks that led the way. For the two-year period XLF outperformed all other ETFs while managing to lose money from the end of year one to the end of year two. The same situation happened with the return to the end of October 2022. XLF led all other ETFs for the total period, while losing money from the end of year two.The last table will be the averages for all five ETFs compared to SPX for all five bear markets. This chart is difficult to read, and I apologize for that. When reading this chart, percentages highlighted in green are percentages that are above SPX returns for the same period of the bear market identified in the first column. Percentages highlighted in yellow are percentages that are below SPX returns for the period of the bear market identified in the first column. The cells highlighted in blue represent the best period return for that bear market.Table 6 – Combined ResultsAuthorWhat jumps out at me from Table 6 are three things. One, SPY outperformed the broad market in each bear market recovery in each time period. So, if you want to outperform the market, buy SPY. I think Warren Buffett gives that advice. The second observation is that QQQ outperformed the broad market for the first year in every instance. It outperformed SPY for the first year in every instance except the Euro Debt Bear Market, where QQQ returned 15.96% in the first year while SPY returned 18.31% in the first year. Both beat SPX during that time frame. Three, each ETF had its moment of outperformance and underperformance.What I’ve learned from this study is that once the current bear market is over, meaning SPX closes above its 10-month moving average, I will put some of my money in SPY. I will put money in QQQ for the first year at least. XLY, XLF, and XLI all had their opportunities to shine. Looking at Table 6, I’m not sure I can make a blanket statement that one or more of those ETFs should be an automatic buy over SPY or QQQ coming out of a bear market over.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":457,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179692197,"gmtCreate":1626513075119,"gmtModify":1703761345794,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179692197","repostId":"2152685133","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152685133","pubTimestamp":1626478140,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2152685133?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-17 07:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Red Cat Holdings, Inc. Announces Proposed Public Offering of Common Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152685133","media":"PR Newswire","summary":"HUMACAO, Puerto Rico, July 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) (\"Red Cat\"","content":"<div>\n<p>HUMACAO, Puerto Rico, July 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) (\"Red Cat\" or the \"Company\") a technology provider to the drone industry, today announced that it intends to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/red-cat-holdings-inc-announces-232900402.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Red Cat Holdings, Inc. Announces Proposed Public Offering of Common Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRed Cat Holdings, Inc. Announces Proposed Public Offering of Common Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-17 07:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/red-cat-holdings-inc-announces-232900402.html><strong>PR Newswire</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>HUMACAO, Puerto Rico, July 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) (\"Red Cat\" or the \"Company\") a technology provider to the drone industry, today announced that it intends to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/red-cat-holdings-inc-announces-232900402.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TERN":"Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","CRCT":"Cricut, Inc.","RCAT":"Red Cat Holdings Inc."},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/red-cat-holdings-inc-announces-232900402.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2152685133","content_text":"HUMACAO, Puerto Rico, July 16, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCAT) (\"Red Cat\" or the \"Company\") a technology provider to the drone industry, today announced that it intends to offer to sell shares of its common stock in an underwritten public offering. All of the shares of common stock are to be sold by the Company.\nThinkEquity, a division of Fordham Financial Management, Inc., is acting as the sole book-running manager for the offering.\nThe offering is subject to market conditions and there can be no assurance as to whether or when the offering may be completed, or as to the actual size or terms of the offering.\nThe Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering primarily for general corporate purposes.\nThe securities will be offered and sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-256216), including a base prospectus, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the \"SEC\") on May 17, 2021 and declared effective on June 14, 2021. The offering will be made only by means of a written prospectus. A preliminary prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus describing the terms of the offering has been or will be filed with the SEC on its website at www.sec.gov. Copies of the preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to the offering may also be obtained, when available from the offices of ThinkEquity, a division of Fordham Financial Management, Inc., 17 State Street, 22nd Floor, New York, New York 10004, by telephone at (877) 436-3673 or by email at prospectus@think-equity.com. Before investing in this offering, interested parties should read in their entirety the preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and the other documents that the Company has filed with the SEC that are incorporated by reference in such preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, which provide more information about the Company and such offering.\nThis press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.\nAbout Red Cat Holdings, Inc.\nRed Cat provides products, services and solutions to the drone industry. Spanning multiple industries and segments, the spectrum of companies in Red Cat's portfolio provides diverse and comprehensive reach into multiple markets including: enterprise remote flight technology; SaaS solutions for secure flight data storage; consumer hardware and communication technology; and consumer e-commerce and lifestyle brands. For more information on Annovis, please visit the company's website: https://www.redcatholdings.com/.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":124,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9965303969,"gmtCreate":1669887898452,"gmtModify":1676538263576,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9965303969","repostId":"1187286110","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187286110","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1669887543,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1187286110?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-01 17:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187286110","media":"Benzinga","summary":"With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may gra","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Data cloud company <b>Snowflake</b> on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Salesforce Inc</b> said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company&#39;s shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.</li></ul><ul><li><b>NIO</b> delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Li Auto, Inc.</b> reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>In November, <b>XPeng Inc.</b> delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>Dollar General Corporation</b> to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 million<i>before the opening</i>bell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li><b>Splunk Inc.</b> reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <b>The Kroger Co.</b> to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Five Below, Inc.</b> posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li>Analysts expect <b>Ulta Beauty, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO, Snowflake, Salesforce, Kroger And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-01 17:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Data cloud company <b>Snowflake</b> on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Salesforce Inc</b> said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company&#39;s shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.</li></ul><ul><li><b>NIO</b> delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Li Auto, Inc.</b> reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>In November, <b>XPeng Inc.</b> delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li>Wall Street expects <b>Dollar General Corporation</b> to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 million<i>before the opening</i>bell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li><b>Splunk Inc.</b> reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <b>The Kroger Co.</b> to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.</li></ul><ul><li><b>Five Below, Inc.</b> posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.</li><li>Analysts expect <b>Ulta Beauty, Inc.</b> to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CRM":"赛富时","KR":"克罗格","FIVE":"Five Below","SNOW":"Snowflake","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","SPLK":"Splunk Inc","DG":"美国达乐公司","ULTA":"Ulta美容"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187286110","content_text":"With US stock futures trading mostly flat this morning on Wednesday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:Data cloud company Snowflake on Wednesday posted a bigger quarterly loss, hit by a sharp jump in its research and development and marketing expenses. Shares of the company tumbled 13% in premarket trading Thursday after the company forecast fourth-quarter product revenue to increase between 49% to 50%, compared to the 67% growth in prior quarter.Salesforce Inc said on Wednesday that Bret Taylor would step down as co-chief executive officer in January and that co-founder Marc Benioff will become the sole CEO. The news sent the company's shares down 7% in premarket trading Thursday as investors shrugged off the annual profit raise.NIO delivered 14,178 vehicles in November 2022, a new record-high monthly delivery, representing an increase of 30.3% year-over-year. The deliveries consisted of 8,003 premium smart electric SUVs including 4,897 ES7s, and 6,175 premium smart electric sedans including 3,207 ET7s and 2,968 ET5s. Cumulative deliveries of NIO vehicles reached 273,741 as of November 30, 2022. NIO will further accelerate the production and delivery in December 2022. The shares fell 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday.Li Auto, Inc. reported Thursday record monthly deliveries, aided by strong reception for its Li L9 SUV. The Beijing-based electric vehicle maker reported November deliveries of 15,034 units, up 11.5% year-over-year and 50% higher than the previous month. The shares fell 4.7% in premarket trading Thursday.In November, XPeng Inc. delivered 5,811 Smart EVs to customers as it mitigated challenges brought by COVID-related restrictions and disruptions. As ofNovember 30, 2022, year-to-date deliveries reached 109,465, representing a 33% increase year-over-year. The shares fell 7.6% in premarket trading Thursday.Wall Street expects Dollar General Corporation to report quarterly earnings at $2.53 per share on revenue of $9.42 millionbefore the openingbell. Dollar General shares fell 0.9% to $253.50 in after-hours trading Wednesday.Splunk Inc. reported better-than-expected results for its third quarter and raised FY23 sales guidance. Splunk shares jumped 9.2% to $84.82 in premarket trading Thursday.Analysts are expecting The Kroger Co. to have earned $0.82 per share on revenue of $33.95 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. Kroger shares rose 0.6% to $49.50 in premarket trading Thursday.Five Below, Inc. posted upbeat results for its third quarter and issued strong forecast for FY22. Five Below shares gained 9.1% to $175.50 in the after-hours trading Wednesday.Analysts expect Ulta Beauty, Inc. to post quarterly earnings at $4.15 per share on revenue of $2.21 billion after the closing bell. Ulta Beauty shares gained 0.3% to $465.98 in after-hours trading Wednesday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":462,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9995991835,"gmtCreate":1661390616929,"gmtModify":1676536510063,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9995991835","repostId":"1172569376","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172569376","pubTimestamp":1661399948,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172569376?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-25 11:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia: Disaster Guidance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172569376","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNvidia reported its second quarter earnings, missing estimates.Nvidia's Q3 guidance is more i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Nvidia reported its second quarter earnings, missing estimates.</li><li>Nvidia&#39;s Q3 guidance is more important, however. Unfortunately, that guidance was horrendous.</li><li>Nvidia is a quality company and well-positioned in the long run. But near-term issues and a too-high valuation make me stay away for now.</li></ul><p><b>Article Thesis</b></p><p>Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) has just reported its most recent quarterly results. Profits were below expectations, but overall, results were more or less in line with what the market had anticipated, as Nvidia had pre-announced some of its results not too long ago.</p><p>The company&#39;s guidance for the current quarter is much worse than expected, however. Nvidia is clearly feeling hefty pressure from the current crypto winter, and it seems questionable to pay $170 or more per share of Nvidia in the current environment.</p><p><b>Q2 Was Worse Than Expected</b></p><p>Nvidia had pre-announced its revenue results for the second quarter earlier, thus there was no major surprise there - analysts adjusted their models accordingly, and Nvidia met the consensus estimate:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c716ed40d45d1089f6ca834756f1e12\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"123\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>But the company nevertheless missed estimates, as margin compression was worse than expected. In fact, Nvidia saw its gross margin drop massively, showcased by the following table:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7f7f877afef390846c2b1ff5b54cef9\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"430\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>The company&#39;s gross margin dropped from a very attractive 67% to a much less attractive 46% over the last year, almost being cut in half. A 46% gross margin isn&#39;t disastrous in absolute terms, but the hefty margin drop naturally has a huge impact on Nvidia&#39;s profitability.</p><p>Nvidia was widely regarded as a high-end semiconductor company that was able to generate very strong margins due to its excellent product quality. But at least for now, that has apparently ended, as its gross margin is far lower than what we have gotten used to in recent years.</p><p>At the same time, Nvidia also saw its operating expenses explode upwards. This includes research and development, sales, but also administrative costs. WhileNvidia was able to grow its revenue by 3% year over year, operating expenses somehow rose by almost 40% - or around<i>13x as much</i> as the company&#39;s revenue. That is pretty bad, and it is not clear why that happened. Higher R&amp;D expenses aren&#39;t bad per se, at least if those result in strong products that improve the longer-term growth outlook.</p><p>But for a growth company like Nvidia, investors generally want to see operating leverage, meaning operating expenses grow less than revenue and gross profit, as this allows a company to grow its profits faster than its sales. The complete opposite of that happened here, as gross margins dropped severely while operating costs rose much more than Nvidia&#39;s sales and gross profit. The steep profit decline of more than 50% is the logical consequence of that ill-timed increase in Nvidia&#39;s operating expenses.</p><p>With earnings per share at $0.50 for the quarter, Nvidia&#39;s EPS is running at a $2 annual rate. That will most likely drop even further in Q3, as indicated by the pretty weak forward guidance (more on that later). Profits are now back at the level seen in early 2020 when earnings per share were in the $0.50 range as well. It&#39;s important to note that Nvidia was trading at as low as $50 back then, whereas Nvidia is trading at $170 right here -- or more than 80x the Q2 earnings run rate.</p><p>These areNvidia&#39;s non-GAAP results, where items such as share-based compensation are already backed out. GAAP profitability was even worse, as GAAP earnings per share came in at $0.26 -- or around $1 annualized, for a 170x earnings multiple. That&#39;s quite expensive for a company with a 3% top-line growth rate.</p><p><b>Nvidia&#39;s Forward Guidance Is Horrendous</b></p><p>I want to note first that I do believe that Nvidia is a quality company with a positive long-term outlook, thanks to its strong position in growth markets such as AI, autonomous driving, etc. I also want to note that I have been a bull on Nvidia in the past, and shares are up since my last bullish article. But when the facts change and the underlying performance is much worse than previously thought, then it makes sense to reflect one&#39;s formerly bullish stance.</p><p>Nvidia&#39;s guidance for the current quarter, Q3, was very bad. The company is forecasting revenues of $5.9 billion for the period, which is not only $1 billion or 15% below the current consensus estimate, but which also indicates a revenue decline of 16.9% versus last year&#39;s Q3 revenue of $7.1 billion. That is comparable to Intel&#39;s (INTC) revenue decline during the most recent quarter, as Intel reported a drop of 17.3% in its top line for the period. In other words, Nvidia is forecasting a revenue drop that is comparable to the one Intel has just reported -- the huge difference is that Intel trades at 2.1x forward sales, whereas Nvidia trades at 15x forward sales, which is a 600% premium relative to how Intel is valued.</p><p>There are good arguments for Nvidia to trade at a premium versus Intel, such as its stronger position in the fast-growing data center market, where Nvidia saw its revenue rise by 60% in Q2, while Intel&#39;s data center dropped. But whether it makes sense for Nvidia to trade at a 600% premium on a sales basis, relative to Intel, while both are seeing their revenues drop, is highly questionable, I believe.</p><p>What&#39;s the explanation for the hefty revenue decline that Nvidia forecasts for the current quarter? It&#39;s not the overall semiconductor market, that&#39;s pretty clear, as the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics, or WSTS, has just announced that overall semiconductor revenues would climb 14% in 2022. WhenNvidia&#39;s revenues are falling by double-digits, while the broad semiconductor industry is growing by double-digits, then there must be other factors at work. In Nvidia&#39;s case, that&#39;s the current crypto winter. WhileNvidia&#39;s chips were useless for Bitcoin mining, they were excellent for Ethereum mining due to the algorithm Ethereum uses, which is very GPU-friendly. With crypto prices plunging in 2022, Nvidia is feeling pressure due to two reasons.</p><p>First, the company can sell fewer chips to crypto miners, as Ethereum mining has become less profitable, which is why demand dropped. At the same time, less demand by crypto miners results in a looser supply-demand picture, which leads to price declines for GPUs. This is further accelerated by the fact that some crypto miners are selling the GPUs they own on secondary markets, which further pressures pricing for new GPUs.</p><p>Due to the current crypto winter, Nvidia is thus feeling a double hit from lower sales volumes and lower average margins. That&#39;s luckily partially made up by the strong performance in other areas, such as data centers. But as the weak guidance for the current quarter shows, Nvidia is not able to fully offset the headwinds from the weak crypto environment. It thus looks like investors have to come to terms with the fact that Nvidia&#39;s strong underlying performance was at least partially driven by crypto enthusiasm. Now that crypto has been in a downtrend for some time, that former tailwind is turning into a headwind.</p><p><b>What&#39;s The Outlook?</b></p><p>In the very long term, Nvidia will still be a solid growth company, I believe. Data center demand will continue to grow. Autonomous driving is a long-term megatrend that will lead to rising demand for Nvidia&#39;s Hyperion platform and similar products. But in the near term, the outlook is far from great.</p><p>SinceNvidia is trading at a pretty high valuation of 46x forward earnings, even before those earnings estimates have declined due to the weaker-than-expected Q3 guidance, I do not believe that Nvidia is a great investment at current prices. There are other semiconductor companies with way better near-term growth outlooks that trade at less than halfNvidia&#39;s earnings multiple, such as AMD (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Qualcomm (QCOM), and so on. With those picks being available today, I do not see a great reason to buy Nvidia right now. The long-term outlook is positive, but the near-term issues and too-high valuation make me stay away for now.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia: Disaster Guidance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia: Disaster Guidance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-25 11:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536839-nvidia-disaster-guidance?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A1><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNvidia reported its second quarter earnings, missing estimates.Nvidia's Q3 guidance is more important, however. Unfortunately, that guidance was horrendous.Nvidia is a quality company and well-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536839-nvidia-disaster-guidance?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536839-nvidia-disaster-guidance?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Aportfolio%7Csection_asset%3Aheadlines%7Cline%3A1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172569376","content_text":"SummaryNvidia reported its second quarter earnings, missing estimates.Nvidia's Q3 guidance is more important, however. Unfortunately, that guidance was horrendous.Nvidia is a quality company and well-positioned in the long run. But near-term issues and a too-high valuation make me stay away for now.Article ThesisNvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) has just reported its most recent quarterly results. Profits were below expectations, but overall, results were more or less in line with what the market had anticipated, as Nvidia had pre-announced some of its results not too long ago.The company's guidance for the current quarter is much worse than expected, however. Nvidia is clearly feeling hefty pressure from the current crypto winter, and it seems questionable to pay $170 or more per share of Nvidia in the current environment.Q2 Was Worse Than ExpectedNvidia had pre-announced its revenue results for the second quarter earlier, thus there was no major surprise there - analysts adjusted their models accordingly, and Nvidia met the consensus estimate:Seeking AlphaBut the company nevertheless missed estimates, as margin compression was worse than expected. In fact, Nvidia saw its gross margin drop massively, showcased by the following table:Seeking AlphaThe company's gross margin dropped from a very attractive 67% to a much less attractive 46% over the last year, almost being cut in half. A 46% gross margin isn't disastrous in absolute terms, but the hefty margin drop naturally has a huge impact on Nvidia's profitability.Nvidia was widely regarded as a high-end semiconductor company that was able to generate very strong margins due to its excellent product quality. But at least for now, that has apparently ended, as its gross margin is far lower than what we have gotten used to in recent years.At the same time, Nvidia also saw its operating expenses explode upwards. This includes research and development, sales, but also administrative costs. WhileNvidia was able to grow its revenue by 3% year over year, operating expenses somehow rose by almost 40% - or around13x as much as the company's revenue. That is pretty bad, and it is not clear why that happened. Higher R&D expenses aren't bad per se, at least if those result in strong products that improve the longer-term growth outlook.But for a growth company like Nvidia, investors generally want to see operating leverage, meaning operating expenses grow less than revenue and gross profit, as this allows a company to grow its profits faster than its sales. The complete opposite of that happened here, as gross margins dropped severely while operating costs rose much more than Nvidia's sales and gross profit. The steep profit decline of more than 50% is the logical consequence of that ill-timed increase in Nvidia's operating expenses.With earnings per share at $0.50 for the quarter, Nvidia's EPS is running at a $2 annual rate. That will most likely drop even further in Q3, as indicated by the pretty weak forward guidance (more on that later). Profits are now back at the level seen in early 2020 when earnings per share were in the $0.50 range as well. It's important to note that Nvidia was trading at as low as $50 back then, whereas Nvidia is trading at $170 right here -- or more than 80x the Q2 earnings run rate.These areNvidia's non-GAAP results, where items such as share-based compensation are already backed out. GAAP profitability was even worse, as GAAP earnings per share came in at $0.26 -- or around $1 annualized, for a 170x earnings multiple. That's quite expensive for a company with a 3% top-line growth rate.Nvidia's Forward Guidance Is HorrendousI want to note first that I do believe that Nvidia is a quality company with a positive long-term outlook, thanks to its strong position in growth markets such as AI, autonomous driving, etc. I also want to note that I have been a bull on Nvidia in the past, and shares are up since my last bullish article. But when the facts change and the underlying performance is much worse than previously thought, then it makes sense to reflect one's formerly bullish stance.Nvidia's guidance for the current quarter, Q3, was very bad. The company is forecasting revenues of $5.9 billion for the period, which is not only $1 billion or 15% below the current consensus estimate, but which also indicates a revenue decline of 16.9% versus last year's Q3 revenue of $7.1 billion. That is comparable to Intel's (INTC) revenue decline during the most recent quarter, as Intel reported a drop of 17.3% in its top line for the period. In other words, Nvidia is forecasting a revenue drop that is comparable to the one Intel has just reported -- the huge difference is that Intel trades at 2.1x forward sales, whereas Nvidia trades at 15x forward sales, which is a 600% premium relative to how Intel is valued.There are good arguments for Nvidia to trade at a premium versus Intel, such as its stronger position in the fast-growing data center market, where Nvidia saw its revenue rise by 60% in Q2, while Intel's data center dropped. But whether it makes sense for Nvidia to trade at a 600% premium on a sales basis, relative to Intel, while both are seeing their revenues drop, is highly questionable, I believe.What's the explanation for the hefty revenue decline that Nvidia forecasts for the current quarter? It's not the overall semiconductor market, that's pretty clear, as the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics, or WSTS, has just announced that overall semiconductor revenues would climb 14% in 2022. WhenNvidia's revenues are falling by double-digits, while the broad semiconductor industry is growing by double-digits, then there must be other factors at work. In Nvidia's case, that's the current crypto winter. WhileNvidia's chips were useless for Bitcoin mining, they were excellent for Ethereum mining due to the algorithm Ethereum uses, which is very GPU-friendly. With crypto prices plunging in 2022, Nvidia is feeling pressure due to two reasons.First, the company can sell fewer chips to crypto miners, as Ethereum mining has become less profitable, which is why demand dropped. At the same time, less demand by crypto miners results in a looser supply-demand picture, which leads to price declines for GPUs. This is further accelerated by the fact that some crypto miners are selling the GPUs they own on secondary markets, which further pressures pricing for new GPUs.Due to the current crypto winter, Nvidia is thus feeling a double hit from lower sales volumes and lower average margins. That's luckily partially made up by the strong performance in other areas, such as data centers. But as the weak guidance for the current quarter shows, Nvidia is not able to fully offset the headwinds from the weak crypto environment. It thus looks like investors have to come to terms with the fact that Nvidia's strong underlying performance was at least partially driven by crypto enthusiasm. Now that crypto has been in a downtrend for some time, that former tailwind is turning into a headwind.What's The Outlook?In the very long term, Nvidia will still be a solid growth company, I believe. Data center demand will continue to grow. Autonomous driving is a long-term megatrend that will lead to rising demand for Nvidia's Hyperion platform and similar products. But in the near term, the outlook is far from great.SinceNvidia is trading at a pretty high valuation of 46x forward earnings, even before those earnings estimates have declined due to the weaker-than-expected Q3 guidance, I do not believe that Nvidia is a great investment at current prices. There are other semiconductor companies with way better near-term growth outlooks that trade at less than halfNvidia's earnings multiple, such as AMD (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Qualcomm (QCOM), and so on. With those picks being available today, I do not see a great reason to buy Nvidia right now. The long-term outlook is positive, but the near-term issues and too-high valuation make me stay away for now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9908593627,"gmtCreate":1659400213669,"gmtModify":1705979920407,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls like","listText":"Pls like","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9908593627","repostId":"2256264695","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2256264695","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1659394545,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2256264695?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-02 06:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends down after Biggest Month since 2020","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2256264695","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. manufacturing sector slows modestly* PerkinElmer rises on $2.45 billion divestmentWall Street","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. manufacturing sector slows modestly</p><p>* PerkinElmer rises on $2.45 billion divestment</p><p>Wall Street ended lower after a choppy session on Monday, with declines in energy companies weighing against gains in Boeing    as investors digested the U.S. stock market&#39;s biggest monthly gains in two years.</p><p>Stocks gave up some of a strong rally from last week that was driven by bets the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.</p><p>Also helped by stronger-than-expected second-quarter results, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq in July posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 bounced between gains and declines on Monday as some investors became more cautious in the wake of that recent rally.</p><p>The Federal Reserve says it aims to tame inflation and cool down demand with the interest rate hikes, but some investors and analysts worry that its aggressive moves could drive up unemployment and cripple the economy.</p><p>&#34;There are still a lot of questions about whether we are really out of the woods economically, and we probably aren&#39;t,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT Investments in Atlanta. &#34;We&#39;re not even close on the (economic) effects of the Fed raising interest rates.&#34;</p><p>U.S. manufacturing activity slowed-less-than-expected in July, with signs that supply constraints are easing, a report showed.</p><p>That data came on the heels of surveys indicating factories across Asia and Europe struggled for momentum in July as flagging global demand.</p><p>Oil prices fell on demand concerns, which in turn weighed on the energy sector. The S&amp;P 500 energy index    tumbled and was the deepest decliner among 11 sectors.</p><p>A monthly U.S. jobs report on Friday will be parsed for clues about the Fed&#39;s next moves in its fight against decades-high inflation.</p><p>The U.S. central bank has raised interest rates by 2.25 percentage points so far this year and has vowed to be data-driven in its approach toward future hikes.</p><p>Boeing Co    gained after Reuters reported the U.S. aviation regulator approved the planemaker&#39;s inspection and modification plan to resume deliveries of 787 Dreamliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is down about 14% in 2022, however the earnings season has showed companies were far more resilient in the second quarter than estimated. Of 283 S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported results, 78% have topped profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. The long-term average is 66%.</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500    lost 11.76 points, or 0.29%, to end at 4,118.53 points, while the Nasdaq Composite    lost 20.69 points, or 0.17%, to 12,370.00. The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 49.88 points, or 0.15%, to 32,795.25.</p><p>PerkinElmer Inc  jumped after the medical diagnostic firm said it will sell some of its businesses along with the brand name to private equity firm New Mountain Capital for up to $2.45 billion in cash.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends down after Biggest Month since 2020</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends down after Biggest Month since 2020\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-02 06:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. manufacturing sector slows modestly</p><p>* PerkinElmer rises on $2.45 billion divestment</p><p>Wall Street ended lower after a choppy session on Monday, with declines in energy companies weighing against gains in Boeing    as investors digested the U.S. stock market&#39;s biggest monthly gains in two years.</p><p>Stocks gave up some of a strong rally from last week that was driven by bets the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.</p><p>Also helped by stronger-than-expected second-quarter results, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq in July posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 bounced between gains and declines on Monday as some investors became more cautious in the wake of that recent rally.</p><p>The Federal Reserve says it aims to tame inflation and cool down demand with the interest rate hikes, but some investors and analysts worry that its aggressive moves could drive up unemployment and cripple the economy.</p><p>&#34;There are still a lot of questions about whether we are really out of the woods economically, and we probably aren&#39;t,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT Investments in Atlanta. &#34;We&#39;re not even close on the (economic) effects of the Fed raising interest rates.&#34;</p><p>U.S. manufacturing activity slowed-less-than-expected in July, with signs that supply constraints are easing, a report showed.</p><p>That data came on the heels of surveys indicating factories across Asia and Europe struggled for momentum in July as flagging global demand.</p><p>Oil prices fell on demand concerns, which in turn weighed on the energy sector. The S&amp;P 500 energy index    tumbled and was the deepest decliner among 11 sectors.</p><p>A monthly U.S. jobs report on Friday will be parsed for clues about the Fed&#39;s next moves in its fight against decades-high inflation.</p><p>The U.S. central bank has raised interest rates by 2.25 percentage points so far this year and has vowed to be data-driven in its approach toward future hikes.</p><p>Boeing Co    gained after Reuters reported the U.S. aviation regulator approved the planemaker&#39;s inspection and modification plan to resume deliveries of 787 Dreamliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is down about 14% in 2022, however the earnings season has showed companies were far more resilient in the second quarter than estimated. Of 283 S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported results, 78% have topped profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. The long-term average is 66%.</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500    lost 11.76 points, or 0.29%, to end at 4,118.53 points, while the Nasdaq Composite    lost 20.69 points, or 0.17%, to 12,370.00. The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 49.88 points, or 0.15%, to 32,795.25.</p><p>PerkinElmer Inc  jumped after the medical diagnostic firm said it will sell some of its businesses along with the brand name to private equity firm New Mountain Capital for up to $2.45 billion in cash.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","BK4201":"综合性石油与天然气企业","BA":"波音","BK4516":"特朗普概念","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares","BK4564":"太空概念","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","BK4187":"航天航空与国防","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","OEX":"标普100","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","DOG":"道指反向ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","XOM":"埃克森美孚","BK4504":"桥水持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2256264695","content_text":"* U.S. manufacturing sector slows modestly* PerkinElmer rises on $2.45 billion divestmentWall Street ended lower after a choppy session on Monday, with declines in energy companies weighing against gains in Boeing    as investors digested the U.S. stock market's biggest monthly gains in two years.Stocks gave up some of a strong rally from last week that was driven by bets the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.Also helped by stronger-than-expected second-quarter results, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq in July posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.The S&P 500 bounced between gains and declines on Monday as some investors became more cautious in the wake of that recent rally.The Federal Reserve says it aims to tame inflation and cool down demand with the interest rate hikes, but some investors and analysts worry that its aggressive moves could drive up unemployment and cripple the economy.\"There are still a lot of questions about whether we are really out of the woods economically, and we probably aren't,\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT Investments in Atlanta. \"We're not even close on the (economic) effects of the Fed raising interest rates.\"U.S. manufacturing activity slowed-less-than-expected in July, with signs that supply constraints are easing, a report showed.That data came on the heels of surveys indicating factories across Asia and Europe struggled for momentum in July as flagging global demand.Oil prices fell on demand concerns, which in turn weighed on the energy sector. The S&P 500 energy index    tumbled and was the deepest decliner among 11 sectors.A monthly U.S. jobs report on Friday will be parsed for clues about the Fed's next moves in its fight against decades-high inflation.The U.S. central bank has raised interest rates by 2.25 percentage points so far this year and has vowed to be data-driven in its approach toward future hikes.Boeing Co    gained after Reuters reported the U.S. aviation regulator approved the planemaker's inspection and modification plan to resume deliveries of 787 Dreamliners.The S&P 500 is down about 14% in 2022, however the earnings season has showed companies were far more resilient in the second quarter than estimated. Of 283 S&P 500 companies that have reported results, 78% have topped profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. The long-term average is 66%.According to preliminary data, the S&P 500    lost 11.76 points, or 0.29%, to end at 4,118.53 points, while the Nasdaq Composite    lost 20.69 points, or 0.17%, to 12,370.00. The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 49.88 points, or 0.15%, to 32,795.25.PerkinElmer Inc  jumped after the medical diagnostic firm said it will sell some of its businesses along with the brand name to private equity firm New Mountain Capital for up to $2.45 billion in cash.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":76,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920764282,"gmtCreate":1670550448846,"gmtModify":1676538391506,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920764282","repostId":"1173657922","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173657922","pubTimestamp":1670545565,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173657922?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-09 08:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173657922","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a cu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.</p><p>The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new feature, called Inspire, will roll out to select US customers in early December and go national in the next few months.</p><p>“In just a few taps, customers can discover new products or get inspiration on what to buy, all tailored to their interests, and then shop for those items on Amazon,” said Oliver Messenger, the director of Amazon Shopping.</p><p>Amazon, which has long used static product images and descriptions to create a uniform catalog, has been trying to make it easier for shoppers to discover products rather than simply search for specific items. Despite these efforts, most customers don’t linger on the sprawling online marketplace. More than one in four Amazon purchases take three minutes or less.</p><p>So-called social commerce has long been popular in China but has been slow to catch on in the US. However, with TikTok making inroads in e-commerce, Amazon, Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc.’s Facebook and Instagram have been adding social shopping features to their services — with mixed success.</p><p>Amazon’s new Inspire service, which will appear as a lightbulb-shaped icon on the app, will invite shoppers to select from more than 20 interests, including makeup, pets and gaming, which will then be used to tailor their feeds. Shoppers will be able to purchase merchandise posted by other customers, brands and influencers.</p><p>It’s not clear that Inspire will work. Amazon is known for introducing experimental features and quietly abandoning them if they fail to take off.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is Launching TikTok-Style Feed in Bet on Social Commerce\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-09 08:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-08/amazon-is-launching-tiktok-style-feed-in-bet-on-social-commerce","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173657922","content_text":"Amazon.com Inc. has launched a TikTok-style service that will let shoppers buy merchandise from a curated feed of photos and video.The world’s largest e-commerce company on Thursday said the new feature, called Inspire, will roll out to select US customers in early December and go national in the next few months.“In just a few taps, customers can discover new products or get inspiration on what to buy, all tailored to their interests, and then shop for those items on Amazon,” said Oliver Messenger, the director of Amazon Shopping.Amazon, which has long used static product images and descriptions to create a uniform catalog, has been trying to make it easier for shoppers to discover products rather than simply search for specific items. Despite these efforts, most customers don’t linger on the sprawling online marketplace. More than one in four Amazon purchases take three minutes or less.So-called social commerce has long been popular in China but has been slow to catch on in the US. However, with TikTok making inroads in e-commerce, Amazon, Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc.’s Facebook and Instagram have been adding social shopping features to their services — with mixed success.Amazon’s new Inspire service, which will appear as a lightbulb-shaped icon on the app, will invite shoppers to select from more than 20 interests, including makeup, pets and gaming, which will then be used to tailor their feeds. Shoppers will be able to purchase merchandise posted by other customers, brands and influencers.It’s not clear that Inspire will work. Amazon is known for introducing experimental features and quietly abandoning them if they fail to take off.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9986128977,"gmtCreate":1666915061200,"gmtModify":1676537829048,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9986128977","repostId":"1116017099","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9986041316,"gmtCreate":1666864646035,"gmtModify":1676537819112,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580653303727490","authorIdStr":"3580653303727490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[OK]&nbsp;","listText":"[OK]&nbsp;","text":"[OK]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9986041316","repostId":"1197787468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197787468","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1666861309,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197787468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-27 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197787468","media":"Benzinga","summary":"With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab inves","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAT\">Caterpillar Inc.</a> to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.</li><li>After the closing bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms, Inc.</a> reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald&#39;s Corporation</a>+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald&#39;s shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com, Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOW\">ServiceNow Inc</a> reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">Mastercard Incorporated</a> to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple, Amazon, Meta And More: U.S. Stocks To Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-27 17:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:</p><ul><li>Wall Street expects <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAT\">Caterpillar Inc.</a> to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.</li><li>After the closing bell, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms, Inc.</a> reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts are expecting <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald&#39;s Corporation</a>+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald&#39;s shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.</li></ul><ul><li>After the markets close, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com, Inc.</a> is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NOW\">ServiceNow Inc</a> reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.</li><li>Analysts expect <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MA\">Mastercard Incorporated</a> to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NOW":"ServiceNow","MCD":"麦当劳","MA":"万事达","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197787468","content_text":"With US stock futures trading lower this morning on Thursday, some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are as follows:Wall Street expects Caterpillar Inc. to report quarterly earnings at $3.27 per share on revenue of $14.85 billion before the opening bell. Caterpillar shares fell 0.7% to $195.51 in after-hours trading.After the closing bell, Apple Inc. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $1.26 per share on revenue of $88.74 billion. Apple shares gained 0.3% to $149.80 in after-hours trading.Meta Platforms, Inc. reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter, while sales topped estimates. The company reported 1.98 billion daily active users for Facebook, up 3% year-over-year. Meta shares dipped 19.7% to $104.30 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts are expecting McDonald's Corporation+0.03% to have earned $2.60 per share on revenue of $5.72 billion for the latest quarter. The company will release earnings before the markets open. McDonald's shares gained 0.4% to $257.50 in after-hours trading.After the markets close, Amazon.com, Inc. is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.22 per share on revenue of $127.84 billion. Amazon shares gained 0.1% to $115.82 in after-hours trading.ServiceNow Inc reported better-than-expected earnings results for its third quarter. ServiceNow shares jumped 13.1% to $414.50 in the after-hours trading session.Analysts expect Mastercard Incorporated to post quarterly earnings at $2.57 per share on revenue of $5.66 billion before the opening bell. Mastercard shares rose 0.4% to $320.89 in after-hours trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}