JCZL personal page - To The Moon

JCZL

JCZL

No personal profile

0Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-08-31

Ok

Fed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise

2022-06-27

Noise

Tesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com

2022-04-24

The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?

Tesla's Elon Musk Turns on Bill Gates Over Tesla Short

2022-03-15

Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?

Tesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week

2022-03-03

Ford just dumb

Ford Tricked Tesla Over Model E

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4094656488239460","uuid":"4094656488239460","gmtCreate":1631554928228,"gmtModify":1661866006955,"name":"JCZL","pinyin":"jczl","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b7820dfed76481d8dc4de6ac5a7a136","hatId":"ca_profile_frame_fnv8ys","hatName":"","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.06.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.10.05","exceedPercentage":"93.71%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.13","exceedPercentage":"93.73%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9930820639,"gmtCreate":1661932553224,"gmtModify":1676536606314,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9930820639","repostId":"1113965751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113965751","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1661903685,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113965751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113965751","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tam","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demand</li><li>Strong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflation</li></ul><p>US jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to strength in household and labor demand that risks sustaining inflationary pressures and raises the prospects for a third straight 75 basis-point interest-rate hike by the Federal Reserve.</p><p>The Conference Board’s August index of sentiment rose to athree-month high, and the report also showed firmer buying plans for appliances and cars. Job vacancies, meanwhile, unexpectedly increased to11.2 millionin July, close to a record and underscoring persistent tightness in the labor market.</p><p>One job-market indicator scrutinized by Fed Chair Jerome Powell -- the number of jobs available per unemployed person in the country -- rose to about 2 in July.</p><p>Combined, the figures show rock-solid labor demand and resilient household demand even as US central bankers step harder on the monetary policy brakes. Without a commensurate slowdown in consumer spending and an easing of wage pressure, the Fed’s fight to bring inflation down from decades-high levels will be that much more difficult.</p><p>“The Fed’s efforts to temper demand for labor still have a long way to go,” Wells Fargo &amp; Co. economists Sarah House and Michael Pugliese said in a note. “The ratio of job openings per unemployed worker rebounded back up to 2.0 in another sign that the stark imbalances between the supply and demand for workers have yet to ease, let alone resolve.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9304bb5e71fbdfaa54762661a5c72e95\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Powell said in a speech Friday at the Kansas City Fed’s annual policy forum in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, that bringing price pressures down toward the Fed’s 2% target was the central bank’s “overarching focus right now.”</p><p>Fed officials lifted rates by 75 basis points at each of their last two meetings and Powell has said that another unusually large increase of this size could be on the table when they next meet Sept. 20-21. Policy makers have said the decision will be determined by economic data, including the monthly jobs report due Friday and another update on consumer prices that will be released in two weeks.</p><p>The surprise strength in Tuesday’s indicators suggests that labor demand isn’t likely to abate soon, in spite of the rising interest rates. The consumer confidence gauge showed that Americans are growing more optimistic about the economy amid falling gasoline prices -- even as the costs of other essential items including food continue to rise at a quick pace.</p><p>“That lends itself to the narrative that if consumers are more confident, they’ll keep on spending, and maybe that means inflationary pressures that will keep the Fed on their tightening path,” said Derek Holt, an economist at Scotiabank who expects the Fed to raise rates by 75 basis points in September.</p><p>Following hawkish comments from Powell and other policy makers in Jackson Hole, investors are leaning toward a 75-basis-point hike, according to prices of futures contracts linked to the US central bank’s benchmark rate.</p><p>On the job-market front, vacancies have exceeded 11 million for eight-straight months and the unemployment rate remains historically low.</p><p>Some of the largest increases in vacancies were in retail trade, and transportation, warehousing and utilities. Arts, entertainment and recreation also posted more openings from the prior month, and so did federal government and state and local government education.</p><blockquote>“Demand for labor shows no sign of cooling despite the Fed’s efforts to slow it down. Job openings failed to decline in July and the ratio of job openings per unemployed -- one of the Fed’s preferred measures of labor-market tightness -- remained near a record high. That suggests the central bank needs to keep on an aggressive rate-hike course, tipping the scale toward a 75-basis-point increase at the September FOMC meeting.”</blockquote><blockquote>-- Eliza Winger, economist</blockquote><p>Some measures did indicate a slight tempering of wage growth down the road. The share of Americans quitting their private-sector jobseased last monthto the lowest level since May 2021.</p><p>In the Conference Board report, the share of consumers who said jobs were “plentiful” decreased slightly to 48%. However, six months from now, more respondents expected business conditions to improve. They said they are slightly more positive about their short-term financial prospects.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-31 07:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflationUS jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113965751","content_text":"Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflationUS jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to strength in household and labor demand that risks sustaining inflationary pressures and raises the prospects for a third straight 75 basis-point interest-rate hike by the Federal Reserve.The Conference Board’s August index of sentiment rose to athree-month high, and the report also showed firmer buying plans for appliances and cars. Job vacancies, meanwhile, unexpectedly increased to11.2 millionin July, close to a record and underscoring persistent tightness in the labor market.One job-market indicator scrutinized by Fed Chair Jerome Powell -- the number of jobs available per unemployed person in the country -- rose to about 2 in July.Combined, the figures show rock-solid labor demand and resilient household demand even as US central bankers step harder on the monetary policy brakes. Without a commensurate slowdown in consumer spending and an easing of wage pressure, the Fed’s fight to bring inflation down from decades-high levels will be that much more difficult.“The Fed’s efforts to temper demand for labor still have a long way to go,” Wells Fargo & Co. economists Sarah House and Michael Pugliese said in a note. “The ratio of job openings per unemployed worker rebounded back up to 2.0 in another sign that the stark imbalances between the supply and demand for workers have yet to ease, let alone resolve.”Powell said in a speech Friday at the Kansas City Fed’s annual policy forum in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, that bringing price pressures down toward the Fed’s 2% target was the central bank’s “overarching focus right now.”Fed officials lifted rates by 75 basis points at each of their last two meetings and Powell has said that another unusually large increase of this size could be on the table when they next meet Sept. 20-21. Policy makers have said the decision will be determined by economic data, including the monthly jobs report due Friday and another update on consumer prices that will be released in two weeks.The surprise strength in Tuesday’s indicators suggests that labor demand isn’t likely to abate soon, in spite of the rising interest rates. The consumer confidence gauge showed that Americans are growing more optimistic about the economy amid falling gasoline prices -- even as the costs of other essential items including food continue to rise at a quick pace.“That lends itself to the narrative that if consumers are more confident, they’ll keep on spending, and maybe that means inflationary pressures that will keep the Fed on their tightening path,” said Derek Holt, an economist at Scotiabank who expects the Fed to raise rates by 75 basis points in September.Following hawkish comments from Powell and other policy makers in Jackson Hole, investors are leaning toward a 75-basis-point hike, according to prices of futures contracts linked to the US central bank’s benchmark rate.On the job-market front, vacancies have exceeded 11 million for eight-straight months and the unemployment rate remains historically low.Some of the largest increases in vacancies were in retail trade, and transportation, warehousing and utilities. Arts, entertainment and recreation also posted more openings from the prior month, and so did federal government and state and local government education.“Demand for labor shows no sign of cooling despite the Fed’s efforts to slow it down. Job openings failed to decline in July and the ratio of job openings per unemployed -- one of the Fed’s preferred measures of labor-market tightness -- remained near a record high. That suggests the central bank needs to keep on an aggressive rate-hike course, tipping the scale toward a 75-basis-point increase at the September FOMC meeting.”-- Eliza Winger, economistSome measures did indicate a slight tempering of wage growth down the road. The share of Americans quitting their private-sector jobseased last monthto the lowest level since May 2021.In the Conference Board report, the share of consumers who said jobs were “plentiful” decreased slightly to 48%. However, six months from now, more respondents expected business conditions to improve. They said they are slightly more positive about their short-term financial prospects.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9046619716,"gmtCreate":1656338817635,"gmtModify":1676535808972,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Noise","listText":"Noise","text":"Noise","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046619716","repostId":"2246975427","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2246975427","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1656336060,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2246975427?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-27 21:21","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2246975427","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Al Root \n\n\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, most","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nAl Root \n</pre>\n<p>\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n</p>\n<p>\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This past week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&amp;P 500 is about 58%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Corrections &amp; Amplifications \n</p>\n<p>\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-27 21:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nAl Root \n</pre>\n<p>\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n</p>\n<p>\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This past week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&amp;P 500 is about 58%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Corrections &amp; Amplifications \n</p>\n<p>\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TGT":"塔吉特","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4114":"综合货品商店","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4504":"桥水持仓","MFG":"瑞穗金融","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","MS":"摩根士丹利","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓"},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2246975427","content_text":"Al Root \n\n\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n\n\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n\n\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n\n\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n\n\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n\n\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n\n\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n\n\n     This past week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n\n\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n\n\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n\n\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n\n\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&P 500 is about 58%. \n\n\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n\n\n     Corrections & Amplifications \n\n\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n\n\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":110,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084995766,"gmtCreate":1650787984906,"gmtModify":1676534793340,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors&nbsp;pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?&nbsp;","listText":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors&nbsp;pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?&nbsp;","text":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084995766","repostId":"1149720000","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149720000","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1650772296,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149720000?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-24 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla's Elon Musk Turns on Bill Gates Over Tesla Short","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149720000","media":"JOE","summary":"Nice to see billionaires keeping their priorities straight, as usualA series of leaked texts reveal ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nice to see billionaires keeping their priorities straight, as usual</p><p>A series of leaked texts reveal how Elon Musk turned down working with Bill Gates over Tesla stocks. Just billionaire things.</p><p>As highlighted by the Whole Mars Catalog - a semi-parodical and comedic account seemingly dedicated to Mars colonisation and trolling - a number of texts exchanged between Musk and Gates appear to reveal how the former snubbed the fellow billionaire.</p><p>The most frustrating part is that the Microsoft founder apparently reached out to the Tesla CEO regarding &#34;philanthropy possibilities&#34;, but the latter turned it down due to Gates&#39; short position on his company.</p><p>The one time we&#39;d actually want them working together...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a41175d0325be62840ad4fdef0d866aa\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"774\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>As you can see, the pair are discussing the stock price of both Space X and Tesla when Musk asks, &#34;Do you still have a half a billion short position against Tesla?&#34;, at which point Gates confirms he hasn&#39;t yet &#34;closed it out&#34;.</p><p>Put in the simplest terms, a short-term position or &#39;shorting&#39; is when a trader sells a security (i.e. a stock or bond) first with the intention of repurchasing it or covering it later at a lower price - essentially betting against a company and banking on its value dropping to the investor&#39;s benefit.</p><p>Verified by Musk himself, it would seem the messages are indeed authentic and although he says he did not leak them - suggesting &#34;friends of friends&#34; got hold of them at the <i>New York Times</i> - he does suggest that he believed Gates was trying to short him by &#34;half a billion&#34;.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5f267cc46498c23c7032369151b179a\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"645\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Although it is unclear when the texts were originally sent, what this does highlight is how two of the world&#39;s richest men - who actually made money during the pandemic - apparently spurned the opportunity to do valuable philanthropic work over what looks like an increasingly petty business feud.</p><p>In fact, circling back to the <i>New York Times</i>, the outlet recently published a piece detailing how the world is &#34;at the whim&#34; of billionaires like Musk, Gates, Jeff Bezosand so on.</p><p>Homi Kharas, a senior fellow at Brookings think-tank, argues that  “for the first time in history, a small group of private individuals could, if they so choose, materially impact global development at a scale that has previously been the near-exclusive domain of governments” — the rub being that they habitually fall short of this mark.</p><p>Following the minor feud was dug back up, Musk responded in his usual fashion: by tweeting a meme mocking Gates before joking that the post was being reviewed by the &#34;shadow ban council&#34;.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/393cefe5b94373e3213be0dbfa18e187\" tg-width=\"748\" tg-height=\"730\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aead9bbc40256c5dd3ee2e2e3323499c\" tg-width=\"747\" tg-height=\"772\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Safe to say that despite once joking the pair were close but weren&#39;t &#34;lovers&#34;, the relationship between the two tech giants has soured over time. The pair have previously been at loggerheads over issues such as covid, electric vehicles and Musk&#39;s plans to colonise Mars.</p><p>Neither Tesla nor the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is yet to respond to the leaked messages.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1650771950902","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla's Elon Musk Turns on Bill Gates Over Tesla Short</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla's Elon Musk Turns on Bill Gates Over Tesla Short\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-24 11:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.joe.co.uk/life/elon-musks-leaked-texts-show-him-turn-down-work-with-bill-gates-over-tesla-drama-331426><strong>JOE</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nice to see billionaires keeping their priorities straight, as usualA series of leaked texts reveal how Elon Musk turned down working with Bill Gates over Tesla stocks. Just billionaire things.As ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.joe.co.uk/life/elon-musks-leaked-texts-show-him-turn-down-work-with-bill-gates-over-tesla-drama-331426\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.joe.co.uk/life/elon-musks-leaked-texts-show-him-turn-down-work-with-bill-gates-over-tesla-drama-331426","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149720000","content_text":"Nice to see billionaires keeping their priorities straight, as usualA series of leaked texts reveal how Elon Musk turned down working with Bill Gates over Tesla stocks. Just billionaire things.As highlighted by the Whole Mars Catalog - a semi-parodical and comedic account seemingly dedicated to Mars colonisation and trolling - a number of texts exchanged between Musk and Gates appear to reveal how the former snubbed the fellow billionaire.The most frustrating part is that the Microsoft founder apparently reached out to the Tesla CEO regarding \"philanthropy possibilities\", but the latter turned it down due to Gates' short position on his company.The one time we'd actually want them working together...As you can see, the pair are discussing the stock price of both Space X and Tesla when Musk asks, \"Do you still have a half a billion short position against Tesla?\", at which point Gates confirms he hasn't yet \"closed it out\".Put in the simplest terms, a short-term position or 'shorting' is when a trader sells a security (i.e. a stock or bond) first with the intention of repurchasing it or covering it later at a lower price - essentially betting against a company and banking on its value dropping to the investor's benefit.Verified by Musk himself, it would seem the messages are indeed authentic and although he says he did not leak them - suggesting \"friends of friends\" got hold of them at the New York Times - he does suggest that he believed Gates was trying to short him by \"half a billion\".Although it is unclear when the texts were originally sent, what this does highlight is how two of the world's richest men - who actually made money during the pandemic - apparently spurned the opportunity to do valuable philanthropic work over what looks like an increasingly petty business feud.In fact, circling back to the New York Times, the outlet recently published a piece detailing how the world is \"at the whim\" of billionaires like Musk, Gates, Jeff Bezosand so on.Homi Kharas, a senior fellow at Brookings think-tank, argues that  “for the first time in history, a small group of private individuals could, if they so choose, materially impact global development at a scale that has previously been the near-exclusive domain of governments” — the rub being that they habitually fall short of this mark.Following the minor feud was dug back up, Musk responded in his usual fashion: by tweeting a meme mocking Gates before joking that the post was being reviewed by the \"shadow ban council\".Safe to say that despite once joking the pair were close but weren't \"lovers\", the relationship between the two tech giants has soured over time. The pair have previously been at loggerheads over issues such as covid, electric vehicles and Musk's plans to colonise Mars.Neither Tesla nor the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is yet to respond to the leaked messages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":210,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9032855710,"gmtCreate":1647337626867,"gmtModify":1676534218061,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","listText":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","text":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9032855710","repostId":"2219978847","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2219978847","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1647321508,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2219978847?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-15 13:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2219978847","media":"Reuters","summary":"BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.</p><p>The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.</p><p>The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment.</p><p>After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.</p><p>The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday&#39;s increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.</p><p>($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-15 13:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.</p><p>The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.</p><p>The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment.</p><p>After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.</p><p>The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday&#39;s increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.</p><p>($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4124":"机动车零配件与设备","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2219978847","content_text":"BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.Tesla declined to comment.After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday's increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033273766,"gmtCreate":1646299823708,"gmtModify":1676534114436,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ford just dumb","listText":"Ford just dumb","text":"Ford just dumb","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033273766","repostId":"1183466445","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1183466445","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646297349,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183466445?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-03 16:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ford Tricked Tesla Over Model E","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183466445","media":"TheStreet","summary":"The premium electric vehicle maker wanted to name its entry-level car Model E.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.</p><p>The reorganization was obvious and expected. Both divisions will be headed by the Ford parent company.</p><p>Nothing interesting so far. But wait.</p><p>Things are about to take an interesting turn. The electric vehicle division will be called Ford e.</p><p>Does that ring a bell?  Let&#39;s say it this way: doesn&#39;t it remind you of a competitor? A very noisy and powerful competitor?</p><p>Yes, it is Tesla we are talking about. Apart from its very first model, the Roadster, the vehicles marketed by Elon Musk&#39;s company had names taken from the alphabet until Ford showed up.</p><p>Model S for the luxury sedan, and the Model X for the luxury SUV/crossover.</p><p>After the Model X, Tesla wanted to introduce an entry-level vehicle to the market.</p><p>&#34;We have the S and the X and then a friend asked me at a party &#39;hey what are you going to call the third-generation car?&#34; Musk told CNNMoney in 2014. &#34;Well we&#39;ve got the S and the X so we might as well make it the E.&#34;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca75b4fff71f7a67652ac61dcf60d86\" tg-width=\"900\" tg-height=\"506\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>&#39;Ford&#39;s Killing Sex&#39;</b></p><p>But this car will eventually be called Model 3, thus breaking with the letters.</p><p>So what went wrong?</p><p>When Tesla wanted to register the trademark, the firm encountered unexpected opposition: Ford. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker blocked the initiative.</p><p>We let Musk explain the rest</p><p>&#34;Ford gave us a call and said they&#39;re gonna sue us for using Model E. And we&#39;re like, Ford&#39;s killing SEX. I mean, that&#39;s terrible!&#39;&#34; Musk told CNNMoney.</p><p>To prevent Tesla from using the letter E, Jim Farley&#39;s company mentioned a 2010 agreement between the two companies according to which Tesla could not use the letter E as the name of vehicles,reported Automotive News.</p><p>Ford then explained that there was a risk of confusion between Model E and its iconic Model T vehicle, a mass marketed car introduced in 1908.</p><p>The Ford Model T was a small, lightweight vehicle that dominated sales in America until 1927. The Model T was initially offered as a touring car, a Tourabout and a Runabout.</p><p>Nicknamed the &#34;Tin Lizzie,&#34; the Model T had seating room for five people and had low, trim body lines.</p><p>The price for a Model T Touring vehicle was $290 or $580 for the Tudor sedan.</p><p>Drivers at the time could also enroll in a program called the “Ford Weekly Purchase Plan,” where the customer could make a deposit of five dollars at many authorized Ford Dealers across America to purchase a new Ford Model T.</p><p>The Model T made Ford Motor Company into an industrial powerhouse.</p><p>After 19 years and more than 15 million vehicles, production ended on the Model T on May 26, 1927.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ford Tricked Tesla Over Model E</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFord Tricked Tesla Over Model E\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-03 16:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","F":"福特汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183466445","content_text":"Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.The reorganization was obvious and expected. Both divisions will be headed by the Ford parent company.Nothing interesting so far. But wait.Things are about to take an interesting turn. The electric vehicle division will be called Ford e.Does that ring a bell?  Let's say it this way: doesn't it remind you of a competitor? A very noisy and powerful competitor?Yes, it is Tesla we are talking about. Apart from its very first model, the Roadster, the vehicles marketed by Elon Musk's company had names taken from the alphabet until Ford showed up.Model S for the luxury sedan, and the Model X for the luxury SUV/crossover.After the Model X, Tesla wanted to introduce an entry-level vehicle to the market.\"We have the S and the X and then a friend asked me at a party 'hey what are you going to call the third-generation car?\" Musk told CNNMoney in 2014. \"Well we've got the S and the X so we might as well make it the E.\"'Ford's Killing Sex'But this car will eventually be called Model 3, thus breaking with the letters.So what went wrong?When Tesla wanted to register the trademark, the firm encountered unexpected opposition: Ford. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker blocked the initiative.We let Musk explain the rest\"Ford gave us a call and said they're gonna sue us for using Model E. And we're like, Ford's killing SEX. I mean, that's terrible!'\" Musk told CNNMoney.To prevent Tesla from using the letter E, Jim Farley's company mentioned a 2010 agreement between the two companies according to which Tesla could not use the letter E as the name of vehicles,reported Automotive News.Ford then explained that there was a risk of confusion between Model E and its iconic Model T vehicle, a mass marketed car introduced in 1908.The Ford Model T was a small, lightweight vehicle that dominated sales in America until 1927. The Model T was initially offered as a touring car, a Tourabout and a Runabout.Nicknamed the \"Tin Lizzie,\" the Model T had seating room for five people and had low, trim body lines.The price for a Model T Touring vehicle was $290 or $580 for the Tudor sedan.Drivers at the time could also enroll in a program called the “Ford Weekly Purchase Plan,” where the customer could make a deposit of five dollars at many authorized Ford Dealers across America to purchase a new Ford Model T.The Model T made Ford Motor Company into an industrial powerhouse.After 19 years and more than 15 million vehicles, production ended on the Model T on May 26, 1927.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9032855710,"gmtCreate":1647337626867,"gmtModify":1676534218061,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","listText":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","text":"Tesla increase price make so much noises.LV, Chanel, Luxury goods increase but no media coverage BUT PEOPLE STILL BUYING ISNTIT?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9032855710","repostId":"2219978847","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2219978847","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1647321508,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2219978847?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-15 13:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2219978847","media":"Reuters","summary":"BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.</p><p>The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.</p><p>The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment.</p><p>After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.</p><p>The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday&#39;s increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.</p><p>($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Raises China, U.S. Prices for Second Time within a Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-15 13:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.</p><p>The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.</p><p>The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment.</p><p>After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.</p><p>The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday&#39;s increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.</p><p>($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4124":"机动车零配件与设备","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2219978847","content_text":"BEIJING, March 15 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc hiked prices in China and the United States on Tuesday for its second increase in less than a week, after founder Elon Musk said the U.S. maker of electric cars faced significant inflation pressure.The increases come as costs of raw materials surge, worsened by a crisis over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with Musk saying on Sunday that the carmaker and rocket company Space X faced the pressure in areas such as raw materials and logistics.The company raised prices for all its models in the United States, its website showed. In China, it raised prices of some China-made Model 3 and Model Y products by about 5%, soon after a hike on March 10.Tesla declined to comment.After the increases in China, the Model Y Long Range vehicle costs 375,900 yuan ($58,952.68), up 18,000 yuan from March 10, when its price went up by 10,000 yuan.The price tag of the Model 3 Performance unit was 367,900 yuan after Tuesday's increase of 18,000 yuan, which followed an increase of 10,000 yuan five days ago.($1=6.3763 Chinese yuan renminbi)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084995766,"gmtCreate":1650787984906,"gmtModify":1676534793340,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors&nbsp;pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?&nbsp;","listText":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors&nbsp;pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?&nbsp;","text":"The most Bill Gates short it. The more new retail investors pump it. Feels like all the billionaires are just ganking up to bring Elon Musk from being the richest man down to their level. #bullying ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084995766","repostId":"1149720000","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":210,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9930820639,"gmtCreate":1661932553224,"gmtModify":1676536606314,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9930820639","repostId":"1113965751","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113965751","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1661903685,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113965751?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-31 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113965751","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tam","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demand</li><li>Strong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflation</li></ul><p>US jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to strength in household and labor demand that risks sustaining inflationary pressures and raises the prospects for a third straight 75 basis-point interest-rate hike by the Federal Reserve.</p><p>The Conference Board’s August index of sentiment rose to athree-month high, and the report also showed firmer buying plans for appliances and cars. Job vacancies, meanwhile, unexpectedly increased to11.2 millionin July, close to a record and underscoring persistent tightness in the labor market.</p><p>One job-market indicator scrutinized by Fed Chair Jerome Powell -- the number of jobs available per unemployed person in the country -- rose to about 2 in July.</p><p>Combined, the figures show rock-solid labor demand and resilient household demand even as US central bankers step harder on the monetary policy brakes. Without a commensurate slowdown in consumer spending and an easing of wage pressure, the Fed’s fight to bring inflation down from decades-high levels will be that much more difficult.</p><p>“The Fed’s efforts to temper demand for labor still have a long way to go,” Wells Fargo &amp; Co. economists Sarah House and Michael Pugliese said in a note. “The ratio of job openings per unemployed worker rebounded back up to 2.0 in another sign that the stark imbalances between the supply and demand for workers have yet to ease, let alone resolve.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9304bb5e71fbdfaa54762661a5c72e95\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Powell said in a speech Friday at the Kansas City Fed’s annual policy forum in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, that bringing price pressures down toward the Fed’s 2% target was the central bank’s “overarching focus right now.”</p><p>Fed officials lifted rates by 75 basis points at each of their last two meetings and Powell has said that another unusually large increase of this size could be on the table when they next meet Sept. 20-21. Policy makers have said the decision will be determined by economic data, including the monthly jobs report due Friday and another update on consumer prices that will be released in two weeks.</p><p>The surprise strength in Tuesday’s indicators suggests that labor demand isn’t likely to abate soon, in spite of the rising interest rates. The consumer confidence gauge showed that Americans are growing more optimistic about the economy amid falling gasoline prices -- even as the costs of other essential items including food continue to rise at a quick pace.</p><p>“That lends itself to the narrative that if consumers are more confident, they’ll keep on spending, and maybe that means inflationary pressures that will keep the Fed on their tightening path,” said Derek Holt, an economist at Scotiabank who expects the Fed to raise rates by 75 basis points in September.</p><p>Following hawkish comments from Powell and other policy makers in Jackson Hole, investors are leaning toward a 75-basis-point hike, according to prices of futures contracts linked to the US central bank’s benchmark rate.</p><p>On the job-market front, vacancies have exceeded 11 million for eight-straight months and the unemployment rate remains historically low.</p><p>Some of the largest increases in vacancies were in retail trade, and transportation, warehousing and utilities. Arts, entertainment and recreation also posted more openings from the prior month, and so did federal government and state and local government education.</p><blockquote>“Demand for labor shows no sign of cooling despite the Fed’s efforts to slow it down. Job openings failed to decline in July and the ratio of job openings per unemployed -- one of the Fed’s preferred measures of labor-market tightness -- remained near a record high. That suggests the central bank needs to keep on an aggressive rate-hike course, tipping the scale toward a 75-basis-point increase at the September FOMC meeting.”</blockquote><blockquote>-- Eliza Winger, economist</blockquote><p>Some measures did indicate a slight tempering of wage growth down the road. The share of Americans quitting their private-sector jobseased last monthto the lowest level since May 2021.</p><p>In the Conference Board report, the share of consumers who said jobs were “plentiful” decreased slightly to 48%. However, six months from now, more respondents expected business conditions to improve. They said they are slightly more positive about their short-term financial prospects.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Gets New Path to Go Big as Job Openings, Confidence Surprise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-31 07:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflationUS jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-30/fed-gets-more-data-to-go-big-in-job-openings-confidence-reports","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113965751","content_text":"Two indicators top forecasts, pointing to strength in demandStrong data complicates Fed’s job to tamp down inflationUS jobs openings and a consumer confidence gauge both topped forecasts, pointing to strength in household and labor demand that risks sustaining inflationary pressures and raises the prospects for a third straight 75 basis-point interest-rate hike by the Federal Reserve.The Conference Board’s August index of sentiment rose to athree-month high, and the report also showed firmer buying plans for appliances and cars. Job vacancies, meanwhile, unexpectedly increased to11.2 millionin July, close to a record and underscoring persistent tightness in the labor market.One job-market indicator scrutinized by Fed Chair Jerome Powell -- the number of jobs available per unemployed person in the country -- rose to about 2 in July.Combined, the figures show rock-solid labor demand and resilient household demand even as US central bankers step harder on the monetary policy brakes. Without a commensurate slowdown in consumer spending and an easing of wage pressure, the Fed’s fight to bring inflation down from decades-high levels will be that much more difficult.“The Fed’s efforts to temper demand for labor still have a long way to go,” Wells Fargo & Co. economists Sarah House and Michael Pugliese said in a note. “The ratio of job openings per unemployed worker rebounded back up to 2.0 in another sign that the stark imbalances between the supply and demand for workers have yet to ease, let alone resolve.”Powell said in a speech Friday at the Kansas City Fed’s annual policy forum in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, that bringing price pressures down toward the Fed’s 2% target was the central bank’s “overarching focus right now.”Fed officials lifted rates by 75 basis points at each of their last two meetings and Powell has said that another unusually large increase of this size could be on the table when they next meet Sept. 20-21. Policy makers have said the decision will be determined by economic data, including the monthly jobs report due Friday and another update on consumer prices that will be released in two weeks.The surprise strength in Tuesday’s indicators suggests that labor demand isn’t likely to abate soon, in spite of the rising interest rates. The consumer confidence gauge showed that Americans are growing more optimistic about the economy amid falling gasoline prices -- even as the costs of other essential items including food continue to rise at a quick pace.“That lends itself to the narrative that if consumers are more confident, they’ll keep on spending, and maybe that means inflationary pressures that will keep the Fed on their tightening path,” said Derek Holt, an economist at Scotiabank who expects the Fed to raise rates by 75 basis points in September.Following hawkish comments from Powell and other policy makers in Jackson Hole, investors are leaning toward a 75-basis-point hike, according to prices of futures contracts linked to the US central bank’s benchmark rate.On the job-market front, vacancies have exceeded 11 million for eight-straight months and the unemployment rate remains historically low.Some of the largest increases in vacancies were in retail trade, and transportation, warehousing and utilities. Arts, entertainment and recreation also posted more openings from the prior month, and so did federal government and state and local government education.“Demand for labor shows no sign of cooling despite the Fed’s efforts to slow it down. Job openings failed to decline in July and the ratio of job openings per unemployed -- one of the Fed’s preferred measures of labor-market tightness -- remained near a record high. That suggests the central bank needs to keep on an aggressive rate-hike course, tipping the scale toward a 75-basis-point increase at the September FOMC meeting.”-- Eliza Winger, economistSome measures did indicate a slight tempering of wage growth down the road. The share of Americans quitting their private-sector jobseased last monthto the lowest level since May 2021.In the Conference Board report, the share of consumers who said jobs were “plentiful” decreased slightly to 48%. However, six months from now, more respondents expected business conditions to improve. They said they are slightly more positive about their short-term financial prospects.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":133,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033273766,"gmtCreate":1646299823708,"gmtModify":1676534114436,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ford just dumb","listText":"Ford just dumb","text":"Ford just dumb","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033273766","repostId":"1183466445","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1183466445","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646297349,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183466445?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-03 16:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ford Tricked Tesla Over Model E","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183466445","media":"TheStreet","summary":"The premium electric vehicle maker wanted to name its entry-level car Model E.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.</p><p>The reorganization was obvious and expected. Both divisions will be headed by the Ford parent company.</p><p>Nothing interesting so far. But wait.</p><p>Things are about to take an interesting turn. The electric vehicle division will be called Ford e.</p><p>Does that ring a bell?  Let&#39;s say it this way: doesn&#39;t it remind you of a competitor? A very noisy and powerful competitor?</p><p>Yes, it is Tesla we are talking about. Apart from its very first model, the Roadster, the vehicles marketed by Elon Musk&#39;s company had names taken from the alphabet until Ford showed up.</p><p>Model S for the luxury sedan, and the Model X for the luxury SUV/crossover.</p><p>After the Model X, Tesla wanted to introduce an entry-level vehicle to the market.</p><p>&#34;We have the S and the X and then a friend asked me at a party &#39;hey what are you going to call the third-generation car?&#34; Musk told CNNMoney in 2014. &#34;Well we&#39;ve got the S and the X so we might as well make it the E.&#34;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca75b4fff71f7a67652ac61dcf60d86\" tg-width=\"900\" tg-height=\"506\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>&#39;Ford&#39;s Killing Sex&#39;</b></p><p>But this car will eventually be called Model 3, thus breaking with the letters.</p><p>So what went wrong?</p><p>When Tesla wanted to register the trademark, the firm encountered unexpected opposition: Ford. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker blocked the initiative.</p><p>We let Musk explain the rest</p><p>&#34;Ford gave us a call and said they&#39;re gonna sue us for using Model E. And we&#39;re like, Ford&#39;s killing SEX. I mean, that&#39;s terrible!&#39;&#34; Musk told CNNMoney.</p><p>To prevent Tesla from using the letter E, Jim Farley&#39;s company mentioned a 2010 agreement between the two companies according to which Tesla could not use the letter E as the name of vehicles,reported Automotive News.</p><p>Ford then explained that there was a risk of confusion between Model E and its iconic Model T vehicle, a mass marketed car introduced in 1908.</p><p>The Ford Model T was a small, lightweight vehicle that dominated sales in America until 1927. The Model T was initially offered as a touring car, a Tourabout and a Runabout.</p><p>Nicknamed the &#34;Tin Lizzie,&#34; the Model T had seating room for five people and had low, trim body lines.</p><p>The price for a Model T Touring vehicle was $290 or $580 for the Tudor sedan.</p><p>Drivers at the time could also enroll in a program called the “Ford Weekly Purchase Plan,” where the customer could make a deposit of five dollars at many authorized Ford Dealers across America to purchase a new Ford Model T.</p><p>The Model T made Ford Motor Company into an industrial powerhouse.</p><p>After 19 years and more than 15 million vehicles, production ended on the Model T on May 26, 1927.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ford Tricked Tesla Over Model E</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFord Tricked Tesla Over Model E\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-03 16:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","F":"福特汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/ford-tricked-tesla-over-model-e","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183466445","content_text":"Ford has announced the separation of its electric vehicle (BEV) manufacturing activities from that of the production of internal combustion cars (ICE) or gasoline cars into two separate units.The reorganization was obvious and expected. Both divisions will be headed by the Ford parent company.Nothing interesting so far. But wait.Things are about to take an interesting turn. The electric vehicle division will be called Ford e.Does that ring a bell?  Let's say it this way: doesn't it remind you of a competitor? A very noisy and powerful competitor?Yes, it is Tesla we are talking about. Apart from its very first model, the Roadster, the vehicles marketed by Elon Musk's company had names taken from the alphabet until Ford showed up.Model S for the luxury sedan, and the Model X for the luxury SUV/crossover.After the Model X, Tesla wanted to introduce an entry-level vehicle to the market.\"We have the S and the X and then a friend asked me at a party 'hey what are you going to call the third-generation car?\" Musk told CNNMoney in 2014. \"Well we've got the S and the X so we might as well make it the E.\"'Ford's Killing Sex'But this car will eventually be called Model 3, thus breaking with the letters.So what went wrong?When Tesla wanted to register the trademark, the firm encountered unexpected opposition: Ford. The Dearborn, Michigan, automaker blocked the initiative.We let Musk explain the rest\"Ford gave us a call and said they're gonna sue us for using Model E. And we're like, Ford's killing SEX. I mean, that's terrible!'\" Musk told CNNMoney.To prevent Tesla from using the letter E, Jim Farley's company mentioned a 2010 agreement between the two companies according to which Tesla could not use the letter E as the name of vehicles,reported Automotive News.Ford then explained that there was a risk of confusion between Model E and its iconic Model T vehicle, a mass marketed car introduced in 1908.The Ford Model T was a small, lightweight vehicle that dominated sales in America until 1927. The Model T was initially offered as a touring car, a Tourabout and a Runabout.Nicknamed the \"Tin Lizzie,\" the Model T had seating room for five people and had low, trim body lines.The price for a Model T Touring vehicle was $290 or $580 for the Tudor sedan.Drivers at the time could also enroll in a program called the “Ford Weekly Purchase Plan,” where the customer could make a deposit of five dollars at many authorized Ford Dealers across America to purchase a new Ford Model T.The Model T made Ford Motor Company into an industrial powerhouse.After 19 years and more than 15 million vehicles, production ended on the Model T on May 26, 1927.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9046619716,"gmtCreate":1656338817635,"gmtModify":1676535808972,"author":{"id":"4094656488239460","authorId":"4094656488239460","name":"JCZL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/72049914cf6f04e9fe1634368dd1d395","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4094656488239460","authorIdStr":"4094656488239460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Noise","listText":"Noise","text":"Noise","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9046619716","repostId":"2246975427","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2246975427","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1656336060,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2246975427?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-27 21:21","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2246975427","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Al Root \n\n\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, most","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nAl Root \n</pre>\n<p>\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n</p>\n<p>\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This past week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&amp;P 500 is about 58%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Corrections &amp; Amplifications \n</p>\n<p>\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock Gets Another Price-Target Cut. This One Isn't Interest Rate-Related. -- Barrons.com\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-27 21:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nAl Root \n</pre>\n<p>\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n</p>\n<p>\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n</p>\n<p>\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     This past week, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n</p>\n<p>\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&amp;P 500 is about 58%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Corrections &amp; Amplifications \n</p>\n<p>\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TGT":"塔吉特","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4114":"综合货品商店","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4504":"桥水持仓","MFG":"瑞穗金融","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","MS":"摩根士丹利","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓"},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2246975427","content_text":"Al Root \n\n\n     Cuts to analysts' targets for Tesla's stock price have come fast and furiously, mostly due to concerns about macroeconomic factors such as rising interest rates. The latest target reduction is different. \n\n\n     Monday, Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh lowered his call for the share price, to $1,150 from $1,300, worrying that higher costs for parts and lower prices for cars will constrain future sales and earnings. \n\n\n     Tesla (ticker: TSLA) didn't react much to the cut. Shares closed down 0.3% after spending much of the day in the green. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. \n\n\n     Rakesh is now projecting that Tesla will deliver 232,000 cars in the second quarter, down from an earlier call for 296,000. Analysts across Wall Street have been scaling back their forecasts for deliveries -- no surprise, given that Tesla has been dealing with Covid-19 lockdowns in China for months. Production in the entire auto industry has taken a hit. \n\n\n     He now projects 2022 sales and earnings per share of $81.4 billion and $10.74, respectively. That is down from prior estimates for $85.7 billion and $13.14. For 2023, Rakesh is forecasting sales and EPS of $112 billion and $15.49 a share, down from $114.3 billion and $17.14. \n\n\n     His estimates for coming years are declining as supply-related issues, such as higher battery prices, persist. \n\n\n     Rakesh's target for the stock price, according to his report, is set relative to his call for sales in 2023, so his lower forecast for sales next year was behind at least part of the cut. Most of the other recent price-target reductions from analysts have been based on how higher interest rates will affect Tesla's valuation. \n\n\n     This past week, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas and Credit Suisse analyst Dan Levy both cut their target prices, citing higher rates. Higher interest rates reduce the current, discounted value of the earnings a company is expected to earn in coming years, so the amount investors are willing to pay for the shares can come down as well. The result is lower target prices among analysts. \n\n\n     Those cuts didn't seem to matter to investors either. Tesla stock rose 13.4% this past week as the Nasdaq Composite added 7.5%. The reason for the all three cuts, essentially, amount to old news. Investors are acutely aware of rising interest rates. The Nasdaq is still in bear-market territory, down more than 28% from its 52-week high. Investors are also aware that the second-quarter delivery and earnings figures will be volatile and near-impossible to predict. \n\n\n     As always the market is forward-looking, and with the second quarter done, investors are eyeing the second half of the year. \"Despite elevated macro risks, [battery electric vehicles] could see strong 2H ramps as China reopens and demand improves,\" wrote Rakesh in his Monday report. He believes global EV sales could rise more than 50% in the second half of 2022 compared with the first half of 2022. \n\n\n     With all the cuts accounted for, the average target price for Tesla stock has gone from about $1,000 to just above $900 a share since late April. \n\n\n     Despite their cuts, Rakesh, Jonas, and Levy all rate Tesla stock at Buy. Overall, just over 50% of analysts covering Tesla stock rate shares at Buy. The average Buy-rating ratio for stocks in the S&P 500 is about 58%. \n\n\n     Tesla should report Q2 deliveries at the end of the week. China's Covid-19 lockdowns are weighing on estimates. Wall Street expects roughly 240,000 to 250,000 vehicles to be delivered, down from about 310,000 in the first quarter. Peak estimates for the second quarter called for roughly 350,000 deliveries. \n\n\n     Corrections & Amplifications \n\n\n     Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh now projects 2022 earnings per share of $10.74 for Tesla. An earlier article said that he now expects 2022 EPS of $0.74. \n\n\n     Write to Al Root at allen.root@dowjones.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  June 27, 2022 17:20 ET (21:20 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":110,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}