awzh personal page - To The Moon

awzh

No personal profile

6Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-02-16

Hoora $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-02-12

Pure hype

Wall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict

2022-02-09

all in

Down 27% to 85%: 2 Buffett Stocks to Buy for 2022 and Beyond

2022-02-18

Elon musk foundation：）

Elon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation

2022-02-16

The competition from intel is growingand the failure of arm deal cause the share price drop

Why Nvidia Stock Popped Ahead of Earnings

2022-02-14

I do not think the war will come, just bluff.

Russia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week

2022-02-11

3M is promising

2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows

2022-02-16

I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo

Rivian Stock Alert: 5 Big Investors That Are Making a Bet on RIVN

2022-02-11

Strange world

Elon Musk's US tax bill: $11 billion. Tesla's: $0

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4101101662246600","uuid":"4101101662246600","gmtCreate":1638003433867,"gmtModify":1638003433867,"name":"awzh","pinyin":"awzh","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":6,"tweetSize":9,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9094553930,"gmtCreate":1645191969702,"gmtModify":1676534007339,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Elon musk foundation：）","listText":"Elon musk foundation：）","text":"Elon musk foundation：）","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9094553930","repostId":"2212694949","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2212694949","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1645174320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2212694949?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-18 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2212694949","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a 'fundamental matter of public interest,' says on","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a &#39;fundamental matter of public interest,&#39; says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> observer.</p><p>Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he&#39;s quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There&#39;s a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> stock Musk donated in 2021.</p><p>While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it&#39;s legal for them to do so.</p><p>Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn&#39;t send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn&#39;t typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there&#39;s no contact information listed on Musk&#39;s foundation&#39;s bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift &#34;to charity,&#34; but didn&#39;t specify which one.</p><p>One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would &#34;solve world hunger.&#34; A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn&#39;t disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP&#39;s executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that &#34;I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.&#34;</p><p>At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk&#39;s donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.</p><p>&#34;Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving &amp; complete non-disclosure,&#34; wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk&#39;s stock donation. &#34;If not, we&#39;re gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving &amp; anonymity.&#34;</p><p>Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, &#34;If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.&#34;</p><p><b>How the public could find out where Musk&#39;s donation went</b></p><p>The recipients of Musk&#39;s donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.</p><p>The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University &#34;for COVID-19 scientific research,&#34; made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.</p><p><b>Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secret</b></p><p>There are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk&#39;s largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there&#39;s no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.</p><p>DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there&#39;s no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.</p><p>&#34;The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,&#34; wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. &#34;Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.&#34;</p><p>DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended &#34;a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.&#34; The report also noted that &#34;donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.&#34;</p><p>A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.</p><p>Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">$(FB)$</a>) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren&#39;t required to publicly disclose their spending.</p><p>If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn&#39;t be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.</p><p>&#34;There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,&#34; Takagi siad. &#34; In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.&#34;</p><p>Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private &#34;enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,&#34; wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn&#39;t have to disclose their donors if they&#39;re involved in &#34;issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,&#34; the group said.</p><p><b>Other billionaires have been more public about recent giving</b></p><p>Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn&#39;t want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she&#39;ll be putting together a public database showing who&#39;s received the more than $8.5 billion she&#39;s handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.</p><p>Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSR\">$(FSR)$</a> donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.</p><p>In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZR\">$(LAZR)$</a> and considered the world&#39;s youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-18 16:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a &#39;fundamental matter of public interest,&#39; says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> observer.</p><p>Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he&#39;s quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There&#39;s a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> stock Musk donated in 2021.</p><p>While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it&#39;s legal for them to do so.</p><p>Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn&#39;t send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn&#39;t typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there&#39;s no contact information listed on Musk&#39;s foundation&#39;s bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift &#34;to charity,&#34; but didn&#39;t specify which one.</p><p>One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would &#34;solve world hunger.&#34; A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn&#39;t disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP&#39;s executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that &#34;I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.&#34;</p><p>At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk&#39;s donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.</p><p>&#34;Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving &amp; complete non-disclosure,&#34; wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk&#39;s stock donation. &#34;If not, we&#39;re gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving &amp; anonymity.&#34;</p><p>Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, &#34;If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.&#34;</p><p><b>How the public could find out where Musk&#39;s donation went</b></p><p>The recipients of Musk&#39;s donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.</p><p>The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University &#34;for COVID-19 scientific research,&#34; made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.</p><p><b>Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secret</b></p><p>There are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk&#39;s largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there&#39;s no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.</p><p>DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there&#39;s no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.</p><p>&#34;The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,&#34; wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. &#34;Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.&#34;</p><p>DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended &#34;a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.&#34; The report also noted that &#34;donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.&#34;</p><p>A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.</p><p>Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">$(FB)$</a>) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren&#39;t required to publicly disclose their spending.</p><p>If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn&#39;t be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.</p><p>&#34;There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,&#34; Takagi siad. &#34; In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.&#34;</p><p>Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private &#34;enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,&#34; wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn&#39;t have to disclose their donors if they&#39;re involved in &#34;issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,&#34; the group said.</p><p><b>Other billionaires have been more public about recent giving</b></p><p>Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn&#39;t want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she&#39;ll be putting together a public database showing who&#39;s received the more than $8.5 billion she&#39;s handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.</p><p>Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSR\">$(FSR)$</a> donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.</p><p>In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZR\">$(LAZR)$</a> and considered the world&#39;s youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4099":"汽车制造商"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2212694949","content_text":"Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a 'fundamental matter of public interest,' says one observer.Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he's quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There's a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla $(TSLA)$ stock Musk donated in 2021.While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it's legal for them to do so.Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn't send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn't typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there's no contact information listed on Musk's foundation's bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift \"to charity,\" but didn't specify which one.One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public Twitter spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would \"solve world hunger.\" A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn't disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP's executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that \"I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.\"At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk's donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.\"Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving & complete non-disclosure,\" wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk's stock donation. \"If not, we're gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving & anonymity.\"Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, \"If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.\"How the public could find out where Musk's donation wentThe recipients of Musk's donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University \"for COVID-19 scientific research,\" made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secretThere are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk's largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there's no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there's no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.\"The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,\" wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. \"Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.\"DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended \"a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.\" The report also noted that \"donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.\"A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook $(FB)$) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft $(MSFT)$ founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren't required to publicly disclose their spending.If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn't be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.\"There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,\" Takagi siad. \" In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.\"Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private \"enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,\" wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn't have to disclose their donors if they're involved in \"issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,\" the group said.Other billionaires have been more public about recent givingBillionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon $(AMZN)$ founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn't want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she'll be putting together a public database showing who's received the more than $8.5 billion she's handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. $(FSR)$ donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies $(LAZR)$ and considered the world's youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":310,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095711733,"gmtCreate":1644989142312,"gmtModify":1676533984208,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hoora <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>","listText":"Hoora <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>","text":"Hoora $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095711733","repostId":"1178565287","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178565287","pubTimestamp":1644975168,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178565287?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-16 09:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TSLA Stock Just Popped Despite Hedge Fund Diss. Here’s Why.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178565287","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tesla’s(NASDAQ:TSLA) recent winning streak continued today. It seems the electric vehicle (EV) producer is determined to maintain its place at the front of the pack. In fact, Tesla seems so determined","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Tesla’s</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) recent winning streak continued today. It seems the electric vehicle (EV) producer is determined to maintain its place at the front of the pack. In fact, Tesla seems so determined that it is shaking off bad news. Even a diss from a well-respected name on Wall Street hasn’t held TSLA stock back today.</p><p>What’s Happening With TSLA Stock</p><p><b>Renaissance Technologies</b>(RenTech) recently trimmed its position in TSLA. Founded by financial sector icon Jim Simons, RenTech is one of the best-performing hedge funds in history. It is credited with revolutionizing the way Wall Street trades through quantitative methods.</p><p>This news doesn’t sound good, but it hasn’t hurt TSLA stock. In fact, shares closed higher by more than 5% today.</p><p>Why It Matters</p><p>Renaissance’s reduced stake in Tesla was confirmed by a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)filing earlier this week. Quantitative-driven hedge funds like Renaissance allow algorithms to dictate many of their trades, often making significant changes to their portfolios each quarter.</p><p>And importantly, RenTech and its algorithms have been bullish on TSLA before. The third quarter of 2021 saw the fund quadruple its stake in the EV leader before reducing it in Q4. Renaissance also only reduced its Tesla stake by 9%, leaving it still with 743,000 shares, according to <i>Markets Insider</i>. For investors, this creates room for positive analysis. RenTech clearly still has faith in the company, it’s likely just looking to explore other opportunities.</p><p>What Comes Next for Tesla</p><p>Today should be reassuring for investors who remain bullish on TSLA stock. The company stood strong as Wall Street learned that one of the sector’s most important hedge funds cut its stake. Now, the stock may really be ready for a V-shaped bump, as predicted by<i>InvestorPlace</i>contributor Chris Lau.</p><p>Today is also a good reminder that Tesla can withstand seemingly every bearish update. Smaller and weaker stocks would have been pushed down by this type of news.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TSLA Stock Just Popped Despite Hedge Fund Diss. Here’s Why.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTSLA Stock Just Popped Despite Hedge Fund Diss. Here’s Why.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-16 09:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/02/tsla-stock-just-popped-despite-hedge-fund-diss-heres-why/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla’s(NASDAQ:TSLA) recent winning streak continued today. It seems the electric vehicle (EV) producer is determined to maintain its place at the front of the pack. In fact, Tesla seems so determined...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/tsla-stock-just-popped-despite-hedge-fund-diss-heres-why/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/tsla-stock-just-popped-despite-hedge-fund-diss-heres-why/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178565287","content_text":"Tesla’s(NASDAQ:TSLA) recent winning streak continued today. It seems the electric vehicle (EV) producer is determined to maintain its place at the front of the pack. In fact, Tesla seems so determined that it is shaking off bad news. Even a diss from a well-respected name on Wall Street hasn’t held TSLA stock back today.What’s Happening With TSLA StockRenaissance Technologies(RenTech) recently trimmed its position in TSLA. Founded by financial sector icon Jim Simons, RenTech is one of the best-performing hedge funds in history. It is credited with revolutionizing the way Wall Street trades through quantitative methods.This news doesn’t sound good, but it hasn’t hurt TSLA stock. In fact, shares closed higher by more than 5% today.Why It MattersRenaissance’s reduced stake in Tesla was confirmed by a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)filing earlier this week. Quantitative-driven hedge funds like Renaissance allow algorithms to dictate many of their trades, often making significant changes to their portfolios each quarter.And importantly, RenTech and its algorithms have been bullish on TSLA before. The third quarter of 2021 saw the fund quadruple its stake in the EV leader before reducing it in Q4. Renaissance also only reduced its Tesla stake by 9%, leaving it still with 743,000 shares, according to Markets Insider. For investors, this creates room for positive analysis. RenTech clearly still has faith in the company, it’s likely just looking to explore other opportunities.What Comes Next for TeslaToday should be reassuring for investors who remain bullish on TSLA stock. The company stood strong as Wall Street learned that one of the sector’s most important hedge funds cut its stake. Now, the stock may really be ready for a V-shaped bump, as predicted byInvestorPlacecontributor Chris Lau.Today is also a good reminder that Tesla can withstand seemingly every bearish update. Smaller and weaker stocks would have been pushed down by this type of news.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095713709,"gmtCreate":1644988810816,"gmtModify":1676533984194,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of&nbsp;arm deal cause the share price drop","listText":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of&nbsp;arm deal cause the share price drop","text":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of arm deal cause the share price drop","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095713709","repostId":"1152782505","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095713264,"gmtCreate":1644988688049,"gmtModify":1676533984185,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","listText":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","text":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095713264","repostId":"1113291337","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095948486,"gmtCreate":1644809687528,"gmtModify":1676533963897,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","listText":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","text":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095948486","repostId":"2211209385","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2211209385","pubTimestamp":1644793624,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2211209385?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-14 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Russia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2211209385","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a new read on retail sales will be released Wednesday giving investors more insights into consumer spending.</p><p>Concerns over military action by the Kremlin have created a new headwind for investors, particularly after the White House warned on Friday that a possible invasion of Ukraine by Russia could come within days. The statement dealt a fresh blow to markets.</p><p>“The Russia-Ukraine tensions have hovered over already shaky investor sentiment,” Comerica Wealth Management Chief Investment Officer John Lynch said in a note. “Investors have been counting on a diplomatic resolution, but recent developments indicate this may be wishful thinking and therefore, not fully priced into the markets.”</p><p>The geopolitical tensions add to the uncertainty around central bank policy that has dominated market sentiment in recent months. Friday’s warning by the Biden administration weighed on stocks and sent oil prices soaring to a seven-year high.</p><p>“By pushing energy prices even higher, a Russian invasion would likely exacerbate inflation and redouble pressure on the Fed to raise interest rates,” Comerica Bank Chief Economist Bill Adams said in a note. “From the Fed’s perspective, the inflationary effects of a Russian invasion and higher energy prices would likely outweigh the shock’s negative implications for global growth.”</p><p>The Fed is already under pressure to act on the fastest increase in prices in 40 years. Wall Street was rattled last week by a highly-anticipated fresh print on the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), which notched a steeper-than-expected 7.5% increase over the year ended January to mark the largest annual jump since 1982. The surge heightened calls for the Federal Reserve to intervene more aggressively than anticipated to rein in soaring price levels, even raising the possibility of an emergency hike before the bank’s next policy meeting in March.</p><p>“As the inflation fire burns even hotter, the Federal Reserve will have to bring an even bigger firehose to put it out,” FWDBONDS Chief Economist Chris Rupkey said in a note.</p><p>Worries over above-estimated inflation have raised questions about whether or not the central bank might deliver on a 50 basis point move in mid-March. The Fed has not executed a “double” rate increase in a single policy decision since May 2000.</p><p>Fed watchers including Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank had ramped up their calls on how many times policymakers will increase rates. Goldman now sees the Federal Reserve hiking short-term borrowing costs seven times this year rather than the five it had expected earlier, while Deutsche Bank projects a 50 basis point rate hike in March and five more 25 basis point increases in the year.</p><p>CME Group&#39;s FedWatch tool showed investors were pricing in a 99% chance Fed policymakers will raise rates by 50 basis points in March as of Friday, a jump of 24% from the probability reflected two days earlier.</p><p>Some experts say the projections are greatly exaggerated.</p><p>“Even with elevated levels of inflation, we expect the Federal Reserve to tighten less than the market expects in 2022,” Treasury Partners Chief Investment Officer Richard Saperstein said in a note.</p><p>“We do not expect the Federal Reserve to announce rate hikes at every meeting and such extreme tightening scenarios suggest that we’re currently witnessing peak Fed mania,” he wrote, adding a moderate tightening process through a combination of rate hikes and the implementation of quantitative tightening starting this summer were likely.</p><p>On the geopolitical front, LPL Financial’s Ryan Detrick also appeared to temper the notion that a move by Russia into Ukraine would crash the stock market, pointing out that, historically, the great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II did not put much of a dent in equities and losses were typically recovered quickly.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/874e40dd031fe2fadf0415f24e036dcc\" tg-width=\"5500\" tg-height=\"3667\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>U.S. President Joe Biden holds virtual talks with Russia&#39;s President Vladimir Putin amid Western fears that Moscow plans to attack Ukraine, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens with other officials during a secure video call from the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 7, 2021. The White House/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAYHandout . / reuters</p><p>“You can’t minimize what today’s news could mean on that part of the world and the people impacted, but from an investment point of view we need to remember that major geopolitical events historically haven’t moved stocks much,” Detrick said.</p><p>As an example, Detrick cited <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the best six-month runs in U.S. stocks ever following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November 1963.</p><p>“The truth is a solid economy can make up for a lot of sins,” Detrick added.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e7861525c30cb94872b9893fdecc17e\" tg-width=\"1631\" tg-height=\"1130\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>The great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II didn’t put much of a dent in stocks, with any losses made up quite quickly, according to Ryan Detrick, hief Market Strategist for LPL Financial.LPL Financial,</p><h2><b>Retail sales</b></h2><p>Consensus economists are expecting to see retail sales, released by the U.S. Census Bureau, rise by 2% in January compared to December&#39;s decrease of 1.9%, but sales excluding autos, gasoline, building materials and food services is expected to rise at a softer 0.8%, according to Bloomberg data. This would compare to December&#39;s decline of 2.3%.</p><p>&#34;The mom [month-over-month] gain in retail ex auto was negatively impacted by restaurants and gas spending, which were down 1.7% and 3.8% mom, respectively. As a result, the core control group, which nets out auto, gas, building and restaurants showed a strong 1.9% mom gain,&#34; said BofA Securities in a research note last week. &#34;Keep in mind that the Census retail sales report does not capture services spending other than restaurants spending so the impact on Census Bureau data from the Omicron distortions will be fairly muted.&#34;</p><p>Although earnings season is slowly winding down, another docket of corporate results remains underway for investors to weigh against monetary and geopolitical conditions this week.</p><p>Retail giant Walmart (WMT) will report fiscal fourth quarter 2021 earnings Thursday before the bell which will provide a fresh look into supply-chain issues as well as consumer spending. Walmart is expected to report adjusted earnings of $1.50 per share on revenue of $151.51 billion for the quarter, according to Bloomberg consensus. U.S. same-store sales is expected to increase 6.1%, ahead of guidance of 5%, for the holiday shopping quarter, according to Bloomberg.</p><p>&#34;We believe WMT&#39;s core business remained strong in F4Q following a strong F3Q (US comps were +9.2%, with transactions +5.7%), and given strong inventory positioning (supported by more favorable port access, long-term container shipping agreements and chartered vessel capacity) that likely supported share gains vs. smaller competitors this holiday.&#34; said BofA Securities in a research note on Feb. 10.</p><p>Other big-name companies to report earnings through Friday include ViacomCBS (VIAC), Airbnb (ABNB), Cisco Systems (CSCO), and Roku (ROKU).</p><p>On Capitol Hill, the fate of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and a lineup of central bank nominees including Fed governor and vice chair pick Lael Brainard will be in focus as the Senate Banking Committee readies to hold a series of confirmation votes this week.</p><h2><b>Economic calendar</b></h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday:</b> <i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> Producer Price Index (PPI) final demand, month-over-month, January (0.5% expected, 0.2% in December, upwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.5% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.4% in December, downwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI year-over-year, January (9.0% expected, 9.7% in December); PPI, year-over-year, January (7.8% expected, 8.3% in December); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); Empire Manufacturing, February (11.0 expected, -0.7 during prior month); Net Long-Term TIC Outflows, December ($137.4 billion during prior month); Total Net TIC Outflows, December ($223.9 billion during prior month)</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday:</b> MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Feb. 11 (-8.1% during prior week); Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, January (2.0% expected, -1.9% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos, month-over-month, January (0.8% expected, -2.3% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, January (1.0% expected, -2.5% in December); Import Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -0.2% in December); Import Price Index excluding petroleum, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.3% in December); Import Price Endex, year-over-year, January (9.8% expected, 10.4% in December); Export Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -1.8% in December); Export Price Index, year-over-year, January (14.7% in December); Industrial Production, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, -0.1% in December); Capacity Utilization, January (76.8% expected, 76.5% in December); Manufacturing (SIC) Production, January (0.3% expected, -0.3% in December); Business Inventories, December (2.1% expected,1.3% in November); NAHB Housing Market Index, February (83 expected, 83 in January); FOMC Meeting Minutes, January 26</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday:</b> Building permits, January (1.750 million expected, 1.873 million in December, upwardly revised to 1.885 million); Building permits, month-over-month, January (-7.2% expected, 9.1% in December, upwardly revised to 9.8%); Housing starts, January (1.700 million expected, 1.702 million in December); Housing starts, month-over-month, January (-0.1% expected, 1.4% in December); Initial jobless claims, week ended Feb. 12 (220,000 expected, 223,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Feb. 5 (1.621 million during prior week); Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, February (20.0 expected, 23.2 in January)</p></li><li><p><b>Friday: </b>Existing Home Sales, January (6.10 million expected, 6.18 million in December); Existing Home Sales, month-over-month, January (-1.3% expected, -4.6% in December); Leading Index, January (0.2% expected, 0.8% in December)</p></li></ul><h2><b>Earnings calendar</b></h2><p><b>Monday</b></p><p>Before market open: TreeHouse Foods (THS), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBR\">Weber Inc.</a> (WEBR)</p><p>After market close: $Vornado Realty Trust(VNO-N)$ (VNO), Avis Budget Group (CAR), Arista Networks (ANET), Advance Auto Parts (AAP)</p><p><b>Tuesday</b></p><p>Before market open: Marriott International (MAR)</p><p>After market close: ViacomCBS (VIAC), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Airbnb (ABNB), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Roblox (RBLX), Denny’s (DENN), La-Z-Boy (LZB), Wyndham Hotels &amp; Resorts Inc. (WH), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI)</p><p><b>Wednesday</b></p><p>Before market open: Kraft Heinz (KHC), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Analog Devices (ADI), Shopify (SHOP)</p><p>After market close: Cisco Systems (CSCO), Nvidia (NVDA), TripAdvisor (TRIP), AIG (AIG), DoorDash (DASH), Hyatt Hotels (H), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Marathon Oil (MRO), Energy Transfer (ET)</p><p><b>Thursday</b></p><p>Before market open: Nestlé (NSRGY) Walmart (WMT), US Foods (USFD), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AN\">AutoNation</a> (AN)</p><p>After market close: Shake Shack (SHAK), Roku (ROKU), Dropbox (DBX),Tanger Factory Outlet Centers (SKT)</p><p><b>Friday</b></p><p>Before market open: Deere (DE), DraftKings (DKNG), Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN), Allianz (ALIZY)</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Russia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRussia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-14 07:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WMT":"沃尔玛","XLF":"金融ETF","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2211209385","content_text":"Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a new read on retail sales will be released Wednesday giving investors more insights into consumer spending.Concerns over military action by the Kremlin have created a new headwind for investors, particularly after the White House warned on Friday that a possible invasion of Ukraine by Russia could come within days. The statement dealt a fresh blow to markets.“The Russia-Ukraine tensions have hovered over already shaky investor sentiment,” Comerica Wealth Management Chief Investment Officer John Lynch said in a note. “Investors have been counting on a diplomatic resolution, but recent developments indicate this may be wishful thinking and therefore, not fully priced into the markets.”The geopolitical tensions add to the uncertainty around central bank policy that has dominated market sentiment in recent months. Friday’s warning by the Biden administration weighed on stocks and sent oil prices soaring to a seven-year high.“By pushing energy prices even higher, a Russian invasion would likely exacerbate inflation and redouble pressure on the Fed to raise interest rates,” Comerica Bank Chief Economist Bill Adams said in a note. “From the Fed’s perspective, the inflationary effects of a Russian invasion and higher energy prices would likely outweigh the shock’s negative implications for global growth.”The Fed is already under pressure to act on the fastest increase in prices in 40 years. Wall Street was rattled last week by a highly-anticipated fresh print on the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), which notched a steeper-than-expected 7.5% increase over the year ended January to mark the largest annual jump since 1982. The surge heightened calls for the Federal Reserve to intervene more aggressively than anticipated to rein in soaring price levels, even raising the possibility of an emergency hike before the bank’s next policy meeting in March.“As the inflation fire burns even hotter, the Federal Reserve will have to bring an even bigger firehose to put it out,” FWDBONDS Chief Economist Chris Rupkey said in a note.Worries over above-estimated inflation have raised questions about whether or not the central bank might deliver on a 50 basis point move in mid-March. The Fed has not executed a “double” rate increase in a single policy decision since May 2000.Fed watchers including Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank had ramped up their calls on how many times policymakers will increase rates. Goldman now sees the Federal Reserve hiking short-term borrowing costs seven times this year rather than the five it had expected earlier, while Deutsche Bank projects a 50 basis point rate hike in March and five more 25 basis point increases in the year.CME Group's FedWatch tool showed investors were pricing in a 99% chance Fed policymakers will raise rates by 50 basis points in March as of Friday, a jump of 24% from the probability reflected two days earlier.Some experts say the projections are greatly exaggerated.“Even with elevated levels of inflation, we expect the Federal Reserve to tighten less than the market expects in 2022,” Treasury Partners Chief Investment Officer Richard Saperstein said in a note.“We do not expect the Federal Reserve to announce rate hikes at every meeting and such extreme tightening scenarios suggest that we’re currently witnessing peak Fed mania,” he wrote, adding a moderate tightening process through a combination of rate hikes and the implementation of quantitative tightening starting this summer were likely.On the geopolitical front, LPL Financial’s Ryan Detrick also appeared to temper the notion that a move by Russia into Ukraine would crash the stock market, pointing out that, historically, the great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II did not put much of a dent in equities and losses were typically recovered quickly.U.S. President Joe Biden holds virtual talks with Russia's President Vladimir Putin amid Western fears that Moscow plans to attack Ukraine, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens with other officials during a secure video call from the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 7, 2021. The White House/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAYHandout . / reuters“You can’t minimize what today’s news could mean on that part of the world and the people impacted, but from an investment point of view we need to remember that major geopolitical events historically haven’t moved stocks much,” Detrick said.As an example, Detrick cited one of the best six-month runs in U.S. stocks ever following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November 1963.“The truth is a solid economy can make up for a lot of sins,” Detrick added.The great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II didn’t put much of a dent in stocks, with any losses made up quite quickly, according to Ryan Detrick, hief Market Strategist for LPL Financial.LPL Financial,Retail salesConsensus economists are expecting to see retail sales, released by the U.S. Census Bureau, rise by 2% in January compared to December's decrease of 1.9%, but sales excluding autos, gasoline, building materials and food services is expected to rise at a softer 0.8%, according to Bloomberg data. This would compare to December's decline of 2.3%.\"The mom [month-over-month] gain in retail ex auto was negatively impacted by restaurants and gas spending, which were down 1.7% and 3.8% mom, respectively. As a result, the core control group, which nets out auto, gas, building and restaurants showed a strong 1.9% mom gain,\" said BofA Securities in a research note last week. \"Keep in mind that the Census retail sales report does not capture services spending other than restaurants spending so the impact on Census Bureau data from the Omicron distortions will be fairly muted.\"Although earnings season is slowly winding down, another docket of corporate results remains underway for investors to weigh against monetary and geopolitical conditions this week.Retail giant Walmart (WMT) will report fiscal fourth quarter 2021 earnings Thursday before the bell which will provide a fresh look into supply-chain issues as well as consumer spending. Walmart is expected to report adjusted earnings of $1.50 per share on revenue of $151.51 billion for the quarter, according to Bloomberg consensus. U.S. same-store sales is expected to increase 6.1%, ahead of guidance of 5%, for the holiday shopping quarter, according to Bloomberg.\"We believe WMT's core business remained strong in F4Q following a strong F3Q (US comps were +9.2%, with transactions +5.7%), and given strong inventory positioning (supported by more favorable port access, long-term container shipping agreements and chartered vessel capacity) that likely supported share gains vs. smaller competitors this holiday.\" said BofA Securities in a research note on Feb. 10.Other big-name companies to report earnings through Friday include ViacomCBS (VIAC), Airbnb (ABNB), Cisco Systems (CSCO), and Roku (ROKU).On Capitol Hill, the fate of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and a lineup of central bank nominees including Fed governor and vice chair pick Lael Brainard will be in focus as the Senate Banking Committee readies to hold a series of confirmation votes this week.Economic calendarMonday: No notable reports scheduled for releaseTuesday: Producer Price Index (PPI) final demand, month-over-month, January (0.5% expected, 0.2% in December, upwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.5% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.4% in December, downwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI year-over-year, January (9.0% expected, 9.7% in December); PPI, year-over-year, January (7.8% expected, 8.3% in December); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); Empire Manufacturing, February (11.0 expected, -0.7 during prior month); Net Long-Term TIC Outflows, December ($137.4 billion during prior month); Total Net TIC Outflows, December ($223.9 billion during prior month)Wednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Feb. 11 (-8.1% during prior week); Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, January (2.0% expected, -1.9% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos, month-over-month, January (0.8% expected, -2.3% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, January (1.0% expected, -2.5% in December); Import Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -0.2% in December); Import Price Index excluding petroleum, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.3% in December); Import Price Endex, year-over-year, January (9.8% expected, 10.4% in December); Export Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -1.8% in December); Export Price Index, year-over-year, January (14.7% in December); Industrial Production, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, -0.1% in December); Capacity Utilization, January (76.8% expected, 76.5% in December); Manufacturing (SIC) Production, January (0.3% expected, -0.3% in December); Business Inventories, December (2.1% expected,1.3% in November); NAHB Housing Market Index, February (83 expected, 83 in January); FOMC Meeting Minutes, January 26Thursday: Building permits, January (1.750 million expected, 1.873 million in December, upwardly revised to 1.885 million); Building permits, month-over-month, January (-7.2% expected, 9.1% in December, upwardly revised to 9.8%); Housing starts, January (1.700 million expected, 1.702 million in December); Housing starts, month-over-month, January (-0.1% expected, 1.4% in December); Initial jobless claims, week ended Feb. 12 (220,000 expected, 223,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Feb. 5 (1.621 million during prior week); Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, February (20.0 expected, 23.2 in January)Friday: Existing Home Sales, January (6.10 million expected, 6.18 million in December); Existing Home Sales, month-over-month, January (-1.3% expected, -4.6% in December); Leading Index, January (0.2% expected, 0.8% in December)Earnings calendarMondayBefore market open: TreeHouse Foods (THS), Weber Inc. (WEBR)After market close: $Vornado Realty Trust(VNO-N)$ (VNO), Avis Budget Group (CAR), Arista Networks (ANET), Advance Auto Parts (AAP)TuesdayBefore market open: Marriott International (MAR)After market close: ViacomCBS (VIAC), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Airbnb (ABNB), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Roblox (RBLX), Denny’s (DENN), La-Z-Boy (LZB), Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc. (WH), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI)WednesdayBefore market open: Kraft Heinz (KHC), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Analog Devices (ADI), Shopify (SHOP)After market close: Cisco Systems (CSCO), Nvidia (NVDA), TripAdvisor (TRIP), AIG (AIG), DoorDash (DASH), Hyatt Hotels (H), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Marathon Oil (MRO), Energy Transfer (ET)ThursdayBefore market open: Nestlé (NSRGY) Walmart (WMT), US Foods (USFD), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), AutoNation (AN)After market close: Shake Shack (SHAK), Roku (ROKU), Dropbox (DBX),Tanger Factory Outlet Centers (SKT)FridayBefore market open: Deere (DE), DraftKings (DKNG), Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN), Allianz (ALIZY)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092654868,"gmtCreate":1644625788850,"gmtModify":1676533947069,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pure hype","listText":"Pure hype","text":"Pure hype","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092654868","repostId":"2210652351","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210652351","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1644614344,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210652351?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-12 05:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210652351","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session,","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.</p><p>With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.</p><p>&#34;We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,&#34; said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. &#34;If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that&#39;s what the markets is worried about.&#34;</p><p>Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&amp;P 500&#39;s    decline.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.</p><p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.</p><p>U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Wall Street&#39;s latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.</p><p>Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.</p><p>&#34;If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,&#34; said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.</p><p>A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.</p><p>Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.</p><p>Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-12 05:19</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.</p><p>With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.</p><p>&#34;We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,&#34; said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. &#34;If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that&#39;s what the markets is worried about.&#34;</p><p>Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&amp;P 500&#39;s    decline.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.</p><p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.</p><p>U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Wall Street&#39;s latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.</p><p>Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.</p><p>&#34;If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,&#34; said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.</p><p>A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.</p><p>Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.</p><p>Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UAA":"安德玛公司A类股","APR":"Apria, Inc.","LABP":"Landos Biopharma, Inc.","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","LHDX":"Lucira Health, Inc.","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","SANA":"Sana Biotechnology, Inc.","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4139":"生物科技","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4007":"制药","BK4196":"保健护理服务","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4508":"社交媒体","AAPL":"苹果","BK4082":"医疗保健设备","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4501":"段永平概念","CGEM":"Cullinan Therapeutics","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","MSFT":"微软",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","ZG":"Zillow Class A","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4079":"房地产服务","BK4504":"桥水持仓","Z":"Zillow","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4202":"服装、服饰与奢侈品","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210652351","content_text":"Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.Nine of the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.\"We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,\" said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. \"If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that's what the markets is worried about.\"Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&P 500's    decline.The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.Wall Street's latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.For the week, the S&P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.\"If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,\" said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092818861,"gmtCreate":1644581470723,"gmtModify":1676533943254,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Strange world","listText":"Strange world","text":"Strange world","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092818861","repostId":"1116795342","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":495,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092811700,"gmtCreate":1644581366365,"gmtModify":1676533943232,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"3M is promising&nbsp;","listText":"3M is promising&nbsp;","text":"3M is promising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092811700","repostId":"2210159258","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":387,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096679578,"gmtCreate":1644383260518,"gmtModify":1676533919910,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"all in","listText":"all in","text":"all in","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096679578","repostId":"2209583511","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":598,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9095711733,"gmtCreate":1644989142312,"gmtModify":1676533984208,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hoora <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>","listText":"Hoora <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>","text":"Hoora $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095711733","repostId":"1178565287","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092654868,"gmtCreate":1644625788850,"gmtModify":1676533947069,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pure hype","listText":"Pure hype","text":"Pure hype","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092654868","repostId":"2210652351","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210652351","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1644614344,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210652351?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-12 05:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210652351","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session,","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.</p><p>With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.</p><p>&#34;We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,&#34; said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. &#34;If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that&#39;s what the markets is worried about.&#34;</p><p>Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&amp;P 500&#39;s    decline.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.</p><p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.</p><p>U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Wall Street&#39;s latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.</p><p>Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.</p><p>&#34;If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,&#34; said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.</p><p>A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.</p><p>Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.</p><p>Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ends down sharply on fears of Ukraine conflict\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-12 05:19</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major S&amp;P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.</p><p>With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.</p><p>&#34;We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,&#34; said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. &#34;If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that&#39;s what the markets is worried about.&#34;</p><p>Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&amp;P 500&#39;s    decline.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.</p><p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.</p><p>U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Wall Street&#39;s latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.</p><p>Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.</p><p>&#34;If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,&#34; said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.</p><p>A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.</p><p>The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.</p><p>Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.</p><p>Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UAA":"安德玛公司A类股","APR":"Apria, Inc.","LABP":"Landos Biopharma, Inc.","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","LHDX":"Lucira Health, Inc.","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","SANA":"Sana Biotechnology, Inc.","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4139":"生物科技","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4007":"制药","BK4196":"保健护理服务","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4508":"社交媒体","AAPL":"苹果","BK4082":"医疗保健设备","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4501":"段永平概念","CGEM":"Cullinan Therapeutics","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","MSFT":"微软",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","ZG":"Zillow Class A","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4079":"房地产服务","BK4504":"桥水持仓","Z":"Zillow","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4202":"服装、服饰与奢侈品","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210652351","content_text":"Feb 11 (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks ended sharply lower on Friday for the second straight session, as investors fretted about deepening tensions between Russia and Ukraine.Nine of the 11 major S&P 500 sector indexes declined, led by technology   , down 3.0%, and consumer discretionary, down 2.8%. The energy sector index    surged 2.8% as oil prices hit seven-year highs.With investors already fretting about inflation and rising interest rates, selling on Wall Street accelerated after Washington warned that Russia had massed enough troops near Ukraine to launch a major invasion, and that an attack could begin any day.\"We just have to see how this plays out over the weekend and whether or not international leadership can bring this under wraps,\" said Thomas Hayes, managing member at Great Hill Capital LLC in New York. \"If not, then the knock-on effects could be material, and that's what the markets is worried about.\"Nvidia Corp    tumbled 7.3%, Amazon.com Inc    dropped 3.6%, and Apple Inc    and Microsoft Corp    both lost over 2%. The four companies weighed more than any others on the S&P 500's    decline.The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 1.43% to end at 34,738.06 points, while the S&P 500    lost 1.90% at 4,418.64.The Nasdaq Composite    dropped 2.78% to 13,791.15.The Philadelphia Semiconductor index    sank 4.83%.U.S. exchanges were busy, with 13.4 billion shares changing hands, compared with a 12.6 billion average over the last 20 trading days.Wall Street's latest sell-off follows a slump on Thursday, when data showed consumer prices surged 7.5% in January, the biggest annual increase in 40 years. Comments from St. Louis Fed Bank President James Bullard about aggressive rate hikes have also rattled investor sentiment.For the week, the S&P 500 fell 1.8% and the Nasdaq shed 2.2%.Traders are pricing in a half-point rate hike in March with just a scant chance of a smaller quarter-point raise, and heavy bets for a policy path that would bring rates to a range of 1.75%-2.00% by the end of the year.\"If the Ukraine is attacked, it adds more credence to our view that the Fed will be more dovish than the market currently believes as the war would make the outlook even more uncertain,\" said Jay Hatfield, chief investment officer at Infrastructure Capital Management in New York.A University of Michigan survey showed U.S. consumer sentiment fell to its lowest in more than a decade in early February on expectations that inflation would continue to rise in the near term.The CBOE volatility index   , also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, was up for a second straight session and hit its highest level since the end of January.Online real-estate platform Zillow Group Inc    jumped 12.7% after beating Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales, boosted by an 11-fold revenue increase in its homes segment.Under Armour Inc    slumped 12.5% after warning that its profit margin would be under pressure in the current quarter.Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 2.40-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.54-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 15 new 52-week highs and 13 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 40 new highs and 208 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9096679578,"gmtCreate":1644383260518,"gmtModify":1676533919910,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"all in","listText":"all in","text":"all in","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9096679578","repostId":"2209583511","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2209583511","pubTimestamp":1644376649,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2209583511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-09 11:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Down 27% to 85%: 2 Buffett Stocks to Buy for 2022 and Beyond","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2209583511","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two stocks could be among the most explosive in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett is best known as a value-investing guru, but the fact that <b>Apple</b> is by far the largest stock holding in the <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) portfolio shows the famous investor doesn&#39;t maintain an overly strict dichotomy between &#34;value stocks&#34; and &#34;growth stocks.&#34;</p><p>Intelligent, long-term investing decisions have helped the investing conglomerate deliver returns of more than 5,200% over the last 30 years and go up more than 2,600,000% since Buffett took over the company in 1965. With that incredible performance in mind, read on for a look at two tech stocks in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio that have what it takes to be huge winners.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84932734b1592c7e2f9dae1a4f150489\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: The Motley Fool.</span></p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNOW\">Snowflake</a></h2><p>Sporting a market capitalization of roughly $78.5 billion and trading at approximately 39 times this year&#39;s expected sales, <b>Snowflake</b> (NYSE:SNOW) has one of the more unusual valuation profiles in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio. This is a growth stock through and through, and it&#39;s operating at the intersection of some powerful long-term trends that help put its valuation and support from the Berkshire team in context.</p><p>Snowflake provides data warehousing and analytics services, and it allows users to easily combine otherwise siloed information from <b>Amazon</b>&#39;s, <b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s, and <b>Alphabet</b>&#39;s respective cloud platforms. It also allows customers to share and monetize their data, and the business is on track to benefit from a powerful network effect as more clients take advantage of these services.</p><p>A recent market study found that 100% of surveyed Snowflake customers recommend the company&#39;s services, and the data specialist&#39;s highly regarded offerings are paving the way for rapid business growth. Existing customers increased their spending a whopping 73% year over year in the third quarter, and the company also grew its total customer count to 5,416 -- up roughly 52% year over year. The combination of increased client spending and new customer additions allowed the company to post 110% year-over-year sales growth in Q3, and there&#39;s still huge room for expansion over the long term.</p><p>With Snowflake&#39;s share price now down roughly 27% from its high, investors have an opportunity to build discounted positions in a company that&#39;s on track to play an influential role in the ongoing data analytics revolution.</p><h2>2. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STNE\">StoneCo</a></h2><p>The last year has been tough for fintech stocks. It&#39;s also generally been challenging for companies that primarily operate in the Latin American market. As such, it&#39;s not shocking that <b>StoneCo</b> (NASDAQ:STNE) stock has struggled across the stretch, but the extent of the sell-offs has been staggering.</p><p>StoneCo is a leading provider of payment processing and other fintech services in Brazil. Berkshire Hathaway made a significant investment in the company when StoneCo had its initial public offering in 2018. The investment conglomerate started out owning a roughly 11% stake in the company, but it trimmed its position after shares went on to post explosive gains. Berkshire&#39;s decision to reduce holdings in StoneCo stock has proven to be a wise one given recent trading, but there&#39;s big comeback potential here.</p><p>Amid waning investor appetite for risk, high inflation, and economic uncertainty in Latin America, StoneCo stock has gotten pummeled. Shares trade down a staggering 85% from the lifetime high they hit last February.</p><p>StoneCo&#39;s outlook has been dampened due to new credit regulations in Brazil that have disrupted one of the company&#39;s growth vehicles. On the other hand, the fintech actually posted a record net customer addition of 294,000 new merchant clients in the third quarter, and it also added more than 420,000 new digital banking accounts in the period.</p><p>The company ended the quarter with nearly 1.4 million active payment clients, and total revenue climbed roughly 57% year over year in the period. Meanwhile, total payment volume conducted through StoneCo&#39;s platform was up roughly 54% after backing out contributions from pandemic-related stimulus initiatives. The company&#39;s net income also slumped roughly 54% in the period, largely due to the collapse of its credit business, but there&#39;s still a core growth engine here that looks pretty strong.</p><p>The big sell-offs have pushed StoneCo&#39;s market capitalization down to roughly $4 billion, and the company is now valued at roughly 30.5 times this year&#39;s expected earnings and 2.7 times expected sales.I believe this is a situation in which can benefit from being &#34;greedy when others are fearful,&#34; as Buffett has famously said.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Down 27% to 85%: 2 Buffett Stocks to Buy for 2022 and Beyond</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDown 27% to 85%: 2 Buffett Stocks to Buy for 2022 and Beyond\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-09 11:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/08/down-27-to-85-2-buffett-stocks-to-buy-for-2022-and/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Warren Buffett is best known as a value-investing guru, but the fact that Apple is by far the largest stock holding in the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) portfolio shows the famous ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/08/down-27-to-85-2-buffett-stocks-to-buy-for-2022-and/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","STNE":"StoneCo","SNOW":"Snowflake","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4116":"互联网服务与基础架构","BK4176":"多领域控股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/08/down-27-to-85-2-buffett-stocks-to-buy-for-2022-and/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2209583511","content_text":"Warren Buffett is best known as a value-investing guru, but the fact that Apple is by far the largest stock holding in the Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) portfolio shows the famous investor doesn't maintain an overly strict dichotomy between \"value stocks\" and \"growth stocks.\"Intelligent, long-term investing decisions have helped the investing conglomerate deliver returns of more than 5,200% over the last 30 years and go up more than 2,600,000% since Buffett took over the company in 1965. With that incredible performance in mind, read on for a look at two tech stocks in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio that have what it takes to be huge winners.Image source: The Motley Fool.1. SnowflakeSporting a market capitalization of roughly $78.5 billion and trading at approximately 39 times this year's expected sales, Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) has one of the more unusual valuation profiles in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio. This is a growth stock through and through, and it's operating at the intersection of some powerful long-term trends that help put its valuation and support from the Berkshire team in context.Snowflake provides data warehousing and analytics services, and it allows users to easily combine otherwise siloed information from Amazon's, Microsoft's, and Alphabet's respective cloud platforms. It also allows customers to share and monetize their data, and the business is on track to benefit from a powerful network effect as more clients take advantage of these services.A recent market study found that 100% of surveyed Snowflake customers recommend the company's services, and the data specialist's highly regarded offerings are paving the way for rapid business growth. Existing customers increased their spending a whopping 73% year over year in the third quarter, and the company also grew its total customer count to 5,416 -- up roughly 52% year over year. The combination of increased client spending and new customer additions allowed the company to post 110% year-over-year sales growth in Q3, and there's still huge room for expansion over the long term.With Snowflake's share price now down roughly 27% from its high, investors have an opportunity to build discounted positions in a company that's on track to play an influential role in the ongoing data analytics revolution.2. StoneCoThe last year has been tough for fintech stocks. It's also generally been challenging for companies that primarily operate in the Latin American market. As such, it's not shocking that StoneCo (NASDAQ:STNE) stock has struggled across the stretch, but the extent of the sell-offs has been staggering.StoneCo is a leading provider of payment processing and other fintech services in Brazil. Berkshire Hathaway made a significant investment in the company when StoneCo had its initial public offering in 2018. The investment conglomerate started out owning a roughly 11% stake in the company, but it trimmed its position after shares went on to post explosive gains. Berkshire's decision to reduce holdings in StoneCo stock has proven to be a wise one given recent trading, but there's big comeback potential here.Amid waning investor appetite for risk, high inflation, and economic uncertainty in Latin America, StoneCo stock has gotten pummeled. Shares trade down a staggering 85% from the lifetime high they hit last February.StoneCo's outlook has been dampened due to new credit regulations in Brazil that have disrupted one of the company's growth vehicles. On the other hand, the fintech actually posted a record net customer addition of 294,000 new merchant clients in the third quarter, and it also added more than 420,000 new digital banking accounts in the period.The company ended the quarter with nearly 1.4 million active payment clients, and total revenue climbed roughly 57% year over year in the period. Meanwhile, total payment volume conducted through StoneCo's platform was up roughly 54% after backing out contributions from pandemic-related stimulus initiatives. The company's net income also slumped roughly 54% in the period, largely due to the collapse of its credit business, but there's still a core growth engine here that looks pretty strong.The big sell-offs have pushed StoneCo's market capitalization down to roughly $4 billion, and the company is now valued at roughly 30.5 times this year's expected earnings and 2.7 times expected sales.I believe this is a situation in which can benefit from being \"greedy when others are fearful,\" as Buffett has famously said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":598,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9094553930,"gmtCreate":1645191969702,"gmtModify":1676534007339,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Elon musk foundation：）","listText":"Elon musk foundation：）","text":"Elon musk foundation：）","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9094553930","repostId":"2212694949","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2212694949","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1645174320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2212694949?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-18 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2212694949","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a 'fundamental matter of public interest,' says on","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a &#39;fundamental matter of public interest,&#39; says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> observer.</p><p>Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he&#39;s quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There&#39;s a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> stock Musk donated in 2021.</p><p>While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it&#39;s legal for them to do so.</p><p>Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn&#39;t send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn&#39;t typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there&#39;s no contact information listed on Musk&#39;s foundation&#39;s bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift &#34;to charity,&#34; but didn&#39;t specify which one.</p><p>One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would &#34;solve world hunger.&#34; A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn&#39;t disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP&#39;s executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that &#34;I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.&#34;</p><p>At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk&#39;s donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.</p><p>&#34;Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving &amp; complete non-disclosure,&#34; wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk&#39;s stock donation. &#34;If not, we&#39;re gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving &amp; anonymity.&#34;</p><p>Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, &#34;If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.&#34;</p><p><b>How the public could find out where Musk&#39;s donation went</b></p><p>The recipients of Musk&#39;s donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.</p><p>The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University &#34;for COVID-19 scientific research,&#34; made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.</p><p><b>Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secret</b></p><p>There are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk&#39;s largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there&#39;s no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.</p><p>DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there&#39;s no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.</p><p>&#34;The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,&#34; wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. &#34;Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.&#34;</p><p>DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended &#34;a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.&#34; The report also noted that &#34;donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.&#34;</p><p>A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.</p><p>Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">$(FB)$</a>) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren&#39;t required to publicly disclose their spending.</p><p>If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn&#39;t be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.</p><p>&#34;There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,&#34; Takagi siad. &#34; In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.&#34;</p><p>Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private &#34;enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,&#34; wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn&#39;t have to disclose their donors if they&#39;re involved in &#34;issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,&#34; the group said.</p><p><b>Other billionaires have been more public about recent giving</b></p><p>Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn&#39;t want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she&#39;ll be putting together a public database showing who&#39;s received the more than $8.5 billion she&#39;s handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.</p><p>Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSR\">$(FSR)$</a> donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.</p><p>In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZR\">$(LAZR)$</a> and considered the world&#39;s youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk's $5.7 Billion Secret -- Why We May Never Find out Who Benefited from His Tesla Stock Donation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-18 16:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a &#39;fundamental matter of public interest,&#39; says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> observer.</p><p>Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he&#39;s quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There&#39;s a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> stock Musk donated in 2021.</p><p>While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it&#39;s legal for them to do so.</p><p>Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn&#39;t send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn&#39;t typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there&#39;s no contact information listed on Musk&#39;s foundation&#39;s bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift &#34;to charity,&#34; but didn&#39;t specify which one.</p><p>One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would &#34;solve world hunger.&#34; A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn&#39;t disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP&#39;s executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that &#34;I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.&#34;</p><p>At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk&#39;s donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.</p><p>&#34;Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving &amp; complete non-disclosure,&#34; wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk&#39;s stock donation. &#34;If not, we&#39;re gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving &amp; anonymity.&#34;</p><p>Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, &#34;If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.&#34;</p><p><b>How the public could find out where Musk&#39;s donation went</b></p><p>The recipients of Musk&#39;s donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.</p><p>The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University &#34;for COVID-19 scientific research,&#34; made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.</p><p><b>Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secret</b></p><p>There are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk&#39;s largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there&#39;s no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.</p><p>DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there&#39;s no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.</p><p>&#34;The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,&#34; wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. &#34;Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.&#34;</p><p>DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended &#34;a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.&#34; The report also noted that &#34;donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.&#34;</p><p>A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.</p><p>Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">$(FB)$</a>) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren&#39;t required to publicly disclose their spending.</p><p>If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn&#39;t be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.</p><p>&#34;There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,&#34; Takagi siad. &#34; In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.&#34;</p><p>Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private &#34;enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,&#34; wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn&#39;t have to disclose their donors if they&#39;re involved in &#34;issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,&#34; the group said.</p><p><b>Other billionaires have been more public about recent giving</b></p><p>Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn&#39;t want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she&#39;ll be putting together a public database showing who&#39;s received the more than $8.5 billion she&#39;s handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.</p><p>Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSR\">$(FSR)$</a> donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.</p><p>In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LAZR\">$(LAZR)$</a> and considered the world&#39;s youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4099":"汽车制造商"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2212694949","content_text":"Publicly announcing multi-billion-dollar gifts is a 'fundamental matter of public interest,' says one observer.Elon Musk will happily broadcast a few choice words about U.S. senators, but he's quieter when it comes to his philanthropy. There's a good chance the public may never know which charity or charities benefited from the approximately $5.7 billion in Tesla $(TSLA)$ stock Musk donated in 2021.While there are some public-disclosure laws in philanthropy, billionaire donors like Musk can easily keep the details of their giving under wraps, and it's legal for them to do so.Musk -- who signed the Giving Pledge in 2012, promising to give away most of his wealth -- doesn't send out press releases announcing his donations, though he occasionally tweets about them. Tesla doesn't typically respond to press inquiries (it did not for this story), and there's no contact information listed on Musk's foundation's bare-bones website. The Tesla stock donation was revealed in an SEC filing Monday that described the donated shares as a gift \"to charity,\" but didn't specify which one.One possible candidate is the United Nations World Food Program. Musk got into a public Twitter spat with the WFP shortly before he donated the stock, and said he would donate $6 billion to the hunger relief agency if it could show how the money would \"solve world hunger.\" A WFP spokesman initially told MarketWatch this week that it doesn't disclose donors, but allows donors to publicize their gifts themselves. The WFP's executive director later said that the group had not received any funds yet from Musk, and added that \"I am excited to hear that Elon is engaged. This is an amazing and great first step.\"At a time when billionaires are riding high and exerting growing influence over the public sphere, the lack of transparency around Musk's donation is the latest example of how elite philanthropists can evade scrutiny too easily, critics say.\"Come on. There has to be a middle-ground [between] preening, self-congratulatory mega-giving & complete non-disclosure,\" wrote philanthropy historian Ben Soskis on Twitter(TWTR) in response to the lack of information on Musk's stock donation. \"If not, we're gonna need a pretty radical overhaul of our [regulations] relating to individual giving & anonymity.\"Soskis, a senior research associate in the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at the Urban Institute, added, \"If you are giving a gift of over $5 [billion], you should publicly announce where the money is going to. As a fundamental matter of public interest.\"How the public could find out where Musk's donation wentThe recipients of Musk's donation could eventually come to light if Musk gave the stock to his private foundation and the foundation liquidated it and handed out the money as grants to nonprofits. In that case, the Musk Foundation would have to publicly list its major donors and the nonprofits that received the grants in a filing with the IRS. Foundations, which exist to hand out money for public benefit, are required to file that paperwork annually.The most recent IRS filing for the Musk Foundation shows that Musk donated 11,000 Tesla shares to it in 2019. The foundation gave a $1 million grant to George Mason University \"for COVID-19 scientific research,\" made several other grants to schools and other recipients, and gave a $20.7 million donation to Fidelity Charitable, where Musk appears to keep a donor-advised fund.Why the recipients of Musk stock donation could easily stay secretThere are several other scenarios where the recipients of Musk's largesse would never be revealed. Musk may have put the money into a donor-advised fund at Fidelity Charitable. DAFs, a type of charitable giving account, function as middlemen. They hold money the donor has earmarked for charity and then distribute it to nonprofits chosen by the donor. When the nonprofits receive the money, it comes from the DAF, not the donor, and there's no paper trail connecting the donor directly to the nonprofit.DAFs have come under fire because account holders get a tax break when they put money into a DAF, but there's no deadline for when donors must distribute the money to charities. A bill recently introduced in Congress would change some of the laws around DAFs with the aim of moving money more quickly into the hands of charities.\"The Musk donation serves as a reminder that current laws allow for donors to get a tax deduction up front without any requirement that $ ever gets to the community,\" wrote billionaire John Arnold, a supporter of the DAF reform legislation, on Twitter. \"Money can sit in DAF accounts forever.\"DAF providers say those criticisms are wrong. Fidelity Charitable released its 2022 giving report Tuesday, which showed that in 2021, its DAF account holders recommended \"a record $10.3 billion in grants, 41% more dollars than pre-pandemic giving in 2019.\" The report also noted that \"donors are recommending grants at a more rapid pace -- an average of 12.4 grants per account in 2021, compared to 7.4 a decade ago.\"A spokesman for Fidelity Charitable declined to comment on Musk.Musk could also fly under the radar with his stock donation if he put it into a charitable limited liability company, a type of giving vehicle used by philanthropists such as Meta (formerly Facebook $(FB)$) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, and Melinda French Gates, the former wife of Microsoft $(MSFT)$ founder Bill Gates. Charitable LLCs can make grants to nonprofits and invest in for-profit ventures, but they aren't required to publicly disclose their spending.If Musk gave the stock directly to a nonprofit, the group wouldn't be required to publicly disclose him as the donor. Nonprofits must disclose their major donors to the IRS, but they are not required to identify those donors publicly, said Gene Takagi, a lawyer specializing in nonprofit law at NEO Law Group in San Francisco.\"There are debates over the need for greater transparency, particularly with very large gifts that can shift public policy and possibly elections through permissible charity advocacy activities,\" Takagi siad. \" In my own personal opinion, the danger of less transparency, for example in the area of campaign finance, could seriously weaken our democracy.\"Others say that donors should be allowed to preserve their privacy. Keeping donor information private \"enables potentially controversial or less popular causes to receive financial support from individuals without posing a public risk to donors,\" wrote Independent Sector, a coalition of nonprofits and foundations. Organizations shouldn't have to disclose their donors if they're involved in \"issues for which donor disclosure would create a substantial likelihood of personal harm to donors,\" the group said.Other billionaires have been more public about recent givingBillionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, the former wife of Amazon $(AMZN)$ founder Jeff Bezos, drew criticism in December when she announced that she had made a round of donations, but didn't want to reveal the amounts she gave or the recipients. She later changed her tune and said she'll be putting together a public database showing who's received the more than $8.5 billion she's handed out since her divorce from Bezos. Some of the organizations that have received money from Scott have also gone public.Another SEC filing made public this week showed that Henrik Fisker, chief executive and chairman of electric-vehicle maker Fisker, Inc. $(FSR)$ donated $4 million in stock to establish a foundation in the name of him and his wife, and directed $1.9 million to a donor-advised fund. Fisker, Inc. also issued a news release outlining where the money was going.In another recent SEC filing, Austin Russell, chief executive of self-driving software company Luminar Technologies $(LAZR)$ and considered the world's youngest self-made billionaire, disclosed that he donated 4,500,000 shares of Luminar to Central Florida Foundation, an Orlando-based community foundation. The foundation announced the $70 million gift in a press release, and the Orlando Sentinel covered the gift","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":310,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095713709,"gmtCreate":1644988810816,"gmtModify":1676533984194,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of&nbsp;arm deal cause the share price drop","listText":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of&nbsp;arm deal cause the share price drop","text":"The competition from intel is growingand the failure of arm deal cause the share price drop","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095713709","repostId":"1152782505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152782505","pubTimestamp":1644976378,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152782505?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-16 09:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Nvidia Stock Popped Ahead of Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152782505","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Piper Sandler starts the cheering early.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Semiconductor stock <b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ:NVDA) got another lift on Tuesday when investment bank <b>Piper Sandler</b> predicted -- on the day before fourth-quarter earnings arrive -- that Nvidia will deliver a &#34;significant beat and raise,&#34; asStreetInsider.comreported this morning.</p><p>As of closed Tuesday, shares jumped a solid 9.2% in response.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/424ccc4a9a1f336d549dba181beb845a\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1585\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>&#34;Overall, demand [for Nvidia&#39;s chips] continues to be strong for gaming given the adoption of RTX GPUs with ray tracing,&#34; Piper Sandler said this morning.</p><p>Even more important for long-term investors, Piper isn&#39;t just predicting a one-day pop in the stock price after earnings come out and beat expectations. The analyst said: &#34;In our eyes, this growth appears to be in the early-to-mid stages of the growth curve, and with no signs of supply alleviating in the near term, it provides a nice backdrop for the gaming segment. On the data center side, we have heard from several companies that data center trends are very strong, which should benefit Nvidia.&#34;</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>In short, Piper Sandler is predicting that Nvidia will exceed expectations for 48% quarterly revenue growth and 58% earnings growth in its fourth-quarter report. But it&#39;s also predicting that the company will continue growing over the long term because the cyclical semiconductors industry is only in the early stages (or at worst, the middle) of its cycle of rising demand for chips, a cycle that should keep on growing for a few more years.</p><p>Assuming Piper is right, Nvidia is likely to comment on this trend in its earnings report tomorrow afternoon, and probably will raise guidance right after reporting on earnings. Considering that analysts were already expecting that the chipmaker will earn $4.34 per share in 2022 -- delivering 74% more profit than in 2021, on 60% revenue growth -- any raise in guidance that it delivers will mean that 2022 is going to be a great year to own Nvidia stock.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Nvidia Stock Popped Ahead of Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Nvidia Stock Popped Ahead of Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-16 09:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/15/why-nvidia-stock-popped-ahead-of-earnings/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedSemiconductor stock Nvidia(NASDAQ:NVDA) got another lift on Tuesday when investment bank Piper Sandler predicted -- on the day before fourth-quarter earnings arrive -- that Nvidia will ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/15/why-nvidia-stock-popped-ahead-of-earnings/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/15/why-nvidia-stock-popped-ahead-of-earnings/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152782505","content_text":"What happenedSemiconductor stock Nvidia(NASDAQ:NVDA) got another lift on Tuesday when investment bank Piper Sandler predicted -- on the day before fourth-quarter earnings arrive -- that Nvidia will deliver a \"significant beat and raise,\" asStreetInsider.comreported this morning.As of closed Tuesday, shares jumped a solid 9.2% in response.IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.So what\"Overall, demand [for Nvidia's chips] continues to be strong for gaming given the adoption of RTX GPUs with ray tracing,\" Piper Sandler said this morning.Even more important for long-term investors, Piper isn't just predicting a one-day pop in the stock price after earnings come out and beat expectations. The analyst said: \"In our eyes, this growth appears to be in the early-to-mid stages of the growth curve, and with no signs of supply alleviating in the near term, it provides a nice backdrop for the gaming segment. On the data center side, we have heard from several companies that data center trends are very strong, which should benefit Nvidia.\"Now whatIn short, Piper Sandler is predicting that Nvidia will exceed expectations for 48% quarterly revenue growth and 58% earnings growth in its fourth-quarter report. But it's also predicting that the company will continue growing over the long term because the cyclical semiconductors industry is only in the early stages (or at worst, the middle) of its cycle of rising demand for chips, a cycle that should keep on growing for a few more years.Assuming Piper is right, Nvidia is likely to comment on this trend in its earnings report tomorrow afternoon, and probably will raise guidance right after reporting on earnings. Considering that analysts were already expecting that the chipmaker will earn $4.34 per share in 2022 -- delivering 74% more profit than in 2021, on 60% revenue growth -- any raise in guidance that it delivers will mean that 2022 is going to be a great year to own Nvidia stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095948486,"gmtCreate":1644809687528,"gmtModify":1676533963897,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","listText":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","text":"I do not think the war will come, just bluff.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095948486","repostId":"2211209385","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2211209385","pubTimestamp":1644793624,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2211209385?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-14 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Russia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2211209385","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a new read on retail sales will be released Wednesday giving investors more insights into consumer spending.</p><p>Concerns over military action by the Kremlin have created a new headwind for investors, particularly after the White House warned on Friday that a possible invasion of Ukraine by Russia could come within days. The statement dealt a fresh blow to markets.</p><p>“The Russia-Ukraine tensions have hovered over already shaky investor sentiment,” Comerica Wealth Management Chief Investment Officer John Lynch said in a note. “Investors have been counting on a diplomatic resolution, but recent developments indicate this may be wishful thinking and therefore, not fully priced into the markets.”</p><p>The geopolitical tensions add to the uncertainty around central bank policy that has dominated market sentiment in recent months. Friday’s warning by the Biden administration weighed on stocks and sent oil prices soaring to a seven-year high.</p><p>“By pushing energy prices even higher, a Russian invasion would likely exacerbate inflation and redouble pressure on the Fed to raise interest rates,” Comerica Bank Chief Economist Bill Adams said in a note. “From the Fed’s perspective, the inflationary effects of a Russian invasion and higher energy prices would likely outweigh the shock’s negative implications for global growth.”</p><p>The Fed is already under pressure to act on the fastest increase in prices in 40 years. Wall Street was rattled last week by a highly-anticipated fresh print on the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), which notched a steeper-than-expected 7.5% increase over the year ended January to mark the largest annual jump since 1982. The surge heightened calls for the Federal Reserve to intervene more aggressively than anticipated to rein in soaring price levels, even raising the possibility of an emergency hike before the bank’s next policy meeting in March.</p><p>“As the inflation fire burns even hotter, the Federal Reserve will have to bring an even bigger firehose to put it out,” FWDBONDS Chief Economist Chris Rupkey said in a note.</p><p>Worries over above-estimated inflation have raised questions about whether or not the central bank might deliver on a 50 basis point move in mid-March. The Fed has not executed a “double” rate increase in a single policy decision since May 2000.</p><p>Fed watchers including Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank had ramped up their calls on how many times policymakers will increase rates. Goldman now sees the Federal Reserve hiking short-term borrowing costs seven times this year rather than the five it had expected earlier, while Deutsche Bank projects a 50 basis point rate hike in March and five more 25 basis point increases in the year.</p><p>CME Group&#39;s FedWatch tool showed investors were pricing in a 99% chance Fed policymakers will raise rates by 50 basis points in March as of Friday, a jump of 24% from the probability reflected two days earlier.</p><p>Some experts say the projections are greatly exaggerated.</p><p>“Even with elevated levels of inflation, we expect the Federal Reserve to tighten less than the market expects in 2022,” Treasury Partners Chief Investment Officer Richard Saperstein said in a note.</p><p>“We do not expect the Federal Reserve to announce rate hikes at every meeting and such extreme tightening scenarios suggest that we’re currently witnessing peak Fed mania,” he wrote, adding a moderate tightening process through a combination of rate hikes and the implementation of quantitative tightening starting this summer were likely.</p><p>On the geopolitical front, LPL Financial’s Ryan Detrick also appeared to temper the notion that a move by Russia into Ukraine would crash the stock market, pointing out that, historically, the great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II did not put much of a dent in equities and losses were typically recovered quickly.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/874e40dd031fe2fadf0415f24e036dcc\" tg-width=\"5500\" tg-height=\"3667\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>U.S. President Joe Biden holds virtual talks with Russia&#39;s President Vladimir Putin amid Western fears that Moscow plans to attack Ukraine, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens with other officials during a secure video call from the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 7, 2021. The White House/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAYHandout . / reuters</p><p>“You can’t minimize what today’s news could mean on that part of the world and the people impacted, but from an investment point of view we need to remember that major geopolitical events historically haven’t moved stocks much,” Detrick said.</p><p>As an example, Detrick cited <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the best six-month runs in U.S. stocks ever following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November 1963.</p><p>“The truth is a solid economy can make up for a lot of sins,” Detrick added.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e7861525c30cb94872b9893fdecc17e\" tg-width=\"1631\" tg-height=\"1130\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>The great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II didn’t put much of a dent in stocks, with any losses made up quite quickly, according to Ryan Detrick, hief Market Strategist for LPL Financial.LPL Financial,</p><h2><b>Retail sales</b></h2><p>Consensus economists are expecting to see retail sales, released by the U.S. Census Bureau, rise by 2% in January compared to December&#39;s decrease of 1.9%, but sales excluding autos, gasoline, building materials and food services is expected to rise at a softer 0.8%, according to Bloomberg data. This would compare to December&#39;s decline of 2.3%.</p><p>&#34;The mom [month-over-month] gain in retail ex auto was negatively impacted by restaurants and gas spending, which were down 1.7% and 3.8% mom, respectively. As a result, the core control group, which nets out auto, gas, building and restaurants showed a strong 1.9% mom gain,&#34; said BofA Securities in a research note last week. &#34;Keep in mind that the Census retail sales report does not capture services spending other than restaurants spending so the impact on Census Bureau data from the Omicron distortions will be fairly muted.&#34;</p><p>Although earnings season is slowly winding down, another docket of corporate results remains underway for investors to weigh against monetary and geopolitical conditions this week.</p><p>Retail giant Walmart (WMT) will report fiscal fourth quarter 2021 earnings Thursday before the bell which will provide a fresh look into supply-chain issues as well as consumer spending. Walmart is expected to report adjusted earnings of $1.50 per share on revenue of $151.51 billion for the quarter, according to Bloomberg consensus. U.S. same-store sales is expected to increase 6.1%, ahead of guidance of 5%, for the holiday shopping quarter, according to Bloomberg.</p><p>&#34;We believe WMT&#39;s core business remained strong in F4Q following a strong F3Q (US comps were +9.2%, with transactions +5.7%), and given strong inventory positioning (supported by more favorable port access, long-term container shipping agreements and chartered vessel capacity) that likely supported share gains vs. smaller competitors this holiday.&#34; said BofA Securities in a research note on Feb. 10.</p><p>Other big-name companies to report earnings through Friday include ViacomCBS (VIAC), Airbnb (ABNB), Cisco Systems (CSCO), and Roku (ROKU).</p><p>On Capitol Hill, the fate of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and a lineup of central bank nominees including Fed governor and vice chair pick Lael Brainard will be in focus as the Senate Banking Committee readies to hold a series of confirmation votes this week.</p><h2><b>Economic calendar</b></h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday:</b> <i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday:</b> Producer Price Index (PPI) final demand, month-over-month, January (0.5% expected, 0.2% in December, upwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.5% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.4% in December, downwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI year-over-year, January (9.0% expected, 9.7% in December); PPI, year-over-year, January (7.8% expected, 8.3% in December); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); Empire Manufacturing, February (11.0 expected, -0.7 during prior month); Net Long-Term TIC Outflows, December ($137.4 billion during prior month); Total Net TIC Outflows, December ($223.9 billion during prior month)</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday:</b> MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Feb. 11 (-8.1% during prior week); Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, January (2.0% expected, -1.9% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos, month-over-month, January (0.8% expected, -2.3% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, January (1.0% expected, -2.5% in December); Import Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -0.2% in December); Import Price Index excluding petroleum, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.3% in December); Import Price Endex, year-over-year, January (9.8% expected, 10.4% in December); Export Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -1.8% in December); Export Price Index, year-over-year, January (14.7% in December); Industrial Production, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, -0.1% in December); Capacity Utilization, January (76.8% expected, 76.5% in December); Manufacturing (SIC) Production, January (0.3% expected, -0.3% in December); Business Inventories, December (2.1% expected,1.3% in November); NAHB Housing Market Index, February (83 expected, 83 in January); FOMC Meeting Minutes, January 26</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday:</b> Building permits, January (1.750 million expected, 1.873 million in December, upwardly revised to 1.885 million); Building permits, month-over-month, January (-7.2% expected, 9.1% in December, upwardly revised to 9.8%); Housing starts, January (1.700 million expected, 1.702 million in December); Housing starts, month-over-month, January (-0.1% expected, 1.4% in December); Initial jobless claims, week ended Feb. 12 (220,000 expected, 223,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Feb. 5 (1.621 million during prior week); Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, February (20.0 expected, 23.2 in January)</p></li><li><p><b>Friday: </b>Existing Home Sales, January (6.10 million expected, 6.18 million in December); Existing Home Sales, month-over-month, January (-1.3% expected, -4.6% in December); Leading Index, January (0.2% expected, 0.8% in December)</p></li></ul><h2><b>Earnings calendar</b></h2><p><b>Monday</b></p><p>Before market open: TreeHouse Foods (THS), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEBR\">Weber Inc.</a> (WEBR)</p><p>After market close: $Vornado Realty Trust(VNO-N)$ (VNO), Avis Budget Group (CAR), Arista Networks (ANET), Advance Auto Parts (AAP)</p><p><b>Tuesday</b></p><p>Before market open: Marriott International (MAR)</p><p>After market close: ViacomCBS (VIAC), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Airbnb (ABNB), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Roblox (RBLX), Denny’s (DENN), La-Z-Boy (LZB), Wyndham Hotels &amp; Resorts Inc. (WH), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI)</p><p><b>Wednesday</b></p><p>Before market open: Kraft Heinz (KHC), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Analog Devices (ADI), Shopify (SHOP)</p><p>After market close: Cisco Systems (CSCO), Nvidia (NVDA), TripAdvisor (TRIP), AIG (AIG), DoorDash (DASH), Hyatt Hotels (H), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Marathon Oil (MRO), Energy Transfer (ET)</p><p><b>Thursday</b></p><p>Before market open: Nestlé (NSRGY) Walmart (WMT), US Foods (USFD), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AN\">AutoNation</a> (AN)</p><p>After market close: Shake Shack (SHAK), Roku (ROKU), Dropbox (DBX),Tanger Factory Outlet Centers (SKT)</p><p><b>Friday</b></p><p>Before market open: Deere (DE), DraftKings (DKNG), Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN), Allianz (ALIZY)</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Russia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRussia-Ukraine Tensions, Retail Sales, Walmart Earnings: What to Know This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-14 07:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WMT":"沃尔玛","XLF":"金融ETF","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/double-rate-increases-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-what-to-know-this-week-200245001.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2211209385","content_text":"Choppiness in U.S. stocks is expected to persist this week as investors grapple with the prospect of swifter monetary tightening and escalating geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. And a new read on retail sales will be released Wednesday giving investors more insights into consumer spending.Concerns over military action by the Kremlin have created a new headwind for investors, particularly after the White House warned on Friday that a possible invasion of Ukraine by Russia could come within days. The statement dealt a fresh blow to markets.“The Russia-Ukraine tensions have hovered over already shaky investor sentiment,” Comerica Wealth Management Chief Investment Officer John Lynch said in a note. “Investors have been counting on a diplomatic resolution, but recent developments indicate this may be wishful thinking and therefore, not fully priced into the markets.”The geopolitical tensions add to the uncertainty around central bank policy that has dominated market sentiment in recent months. Friday’s warning by the Biden administration weighed on stocks and sent oil prices soaring to a seven-year high.“By pushing energy prices even higher, a Russian invasion would likely exacerbate inflation and redouble pressure on the Fed to raise interest rates,” Comerica Bank Chief Economist Bill Adams said in a note. “From the Fed’s perspective, the inflationary effects of a Russian invasion and higher energy prices would likely outweigh the shock’s negative implications for global growth.”The Fed is already under pressure to act on the fastest increase in prices in 40 years. Wall Street was rattled last week by a highly-anticipated fresh print on the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), which notched a steeper-than-expected 7.5% increase over the year ended January to mark the largest annual jump since 1982. The surge heightened calls for the Federal Reserve to intervene more aggressively than anticipated to rein in soaring price levels, even raising the possibility of an emergency hike before the bank’s next policy meeting in March.“As the inflation fire burns even hotter, the Federal Reserve will have to bring an even bigger firehose to put it out,” FWDBONDS Chief Economist Chris Rupkey said in a note.Worries over above-estimated inflation have raised questions about whether or not the central bank might deliver on a 50 basis point move in mid-March. The Fed has not executed a “double” rate increase in a single policy decision since May 2000.Fed watchers including Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank had ramped up their calls on how many times policymakers will increase rates. Goldman now sees the Federal Reserve hiking short-term borrowing costs seven times this year rather than the five it had expected earlier, while Deutsche Bank projects a 50 basis point rate hike in March and five more 25 basis point increases in the year.CME Group's FedWatch tool showed investors were pricing in a 99% chance Fed policymakers will raise rates by 50 basis points in March as of Friday, a jump of 24% from the probability reflected two days earlier.Some experts say the projections are greatly exaggerated.“Even with elevated levels of inflation, we expect the Federal Reserve to tighten less than the market expects in 2022,” Treasury Partners Chief Investment Officer Richard Saperstein said in a note.“We do not expect the Federal Reserve to announce rate hikes at every meeting and such extreme tightening scenarios suggest that we’re currently witnessing peak Fed mania,” he wrote, adding a moderate tightening process through a combination of rate hikes and the implementation of quantitative tightening starting this summer were likely.On the geopolitical front, LPL Financial’s Ryan Detrick also appeared to temper the notion that a move by Russia into Ukraine would crash the stock market, pointing out that, historically, the great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II did not put much of a dent in equities and losses were typically recovered quickly.U.S. President Joe Biden holds virtual talks with Russia's President Vladimir Putin amid Western fears that Moscow plans to attack Ukraine, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens with other officials during a secure video call from the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 7, 2021. The White House/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAYHandout . / reuters“You can’t minimize what today’s news could mean on that part of the world and the people impacted, but from an investment point of view we need to remember that major geopolitical events historically haven’t moved stocks much,” Detrick said.As an example, Detrick cited one of the best six-month runs in U.S. stocks ever following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in November 1963.“The truth is a solid economy can make up for a lot of sins,” Detrick added.The great majority of geopolitical events going back to World War II didn’t put much of a dent in stocks, with any losses made up quite quickly, according to Ryan Detrick, hief Market Strategist for LPL Financial.LPL Financial,Retail salesConsensus economists are expecting to see retail sales, released by the U.S. Census Bureau, rise by 2% in January compared to December's decrease of 1.9%, but sales excluding autos, gasoline, building materials and food services is expected to rise at a softer 0.8%, according to Bloomberg data. This would compare to December's decline of 2.3%.\"The mom [month-over-month] gain in retail ex auto was negatively impacted by restaurants and gas spending, which were down 1.7% and 3.8% mom, respectively. As a result, the core control group, which nets out auto, gas, building and restaurants showed a strong 1.9% mom gain,\" said BofA Securities in a research note last week. \"Keep in mind that the Census retail sales report does not capture services spending other than restaurants spending so the impact on Census Bureau data from the Omicron distortions will be fairly muted.\"Although earnings season is slowly winding down, another docket of corporate results remains underway for investors to weigh against monetary and geopolitical conditions this week.Retail giant Walmart (WMT) will report fiscal fourth quarter 2021 earnings Thursday before the bell which will provide a fresh look into supply-chain issues as well as consumer spending. Walmart is expected to report adjusted earnings of $1.50 per share on revenue of $151.51 billion for the quarter, according to Bloomberg consensus. U.S. same-store sales is expected to increase 6.1%, ahead of guidance of 5%, for the holiday shopping quarter, according to Bloomberg.\"We believe WMT's core business remained strong in F4Q following a strong F3Q (US comps were +9.2%, with transactions +5.7%), and given strong inventory positioning (supported by more favorable port access, long-term container shipping agreements and chartered vessel capacity) that likely supported share gains vs. smaller competitors this holiday.\" said BofA Securities in a research note on Feb. 10.Other big-name companies to report earnings through Friday include ViacomCBS (VIAC), Airbnb (ABNB), Cisco Systems (CSCO), and Roku (ROKU).On Capitol Hill, the fate of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and a lineup of central bank nominees including Fed governor and vice chair pick Lael Brainard will be in focus as the Senate Banking Committee readies to hold a series of confirmation votes this week.Economic calendarMonday: No notable reports scheduled for releaseTuesday: Producer Price Index (PPI) final demand, month-over-month, January (0.5% expected, 0.2% in December, upwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI excluding food and energy, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.5% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.4% in December, downwardly revised to 0.3%); PPI year-over-year, January (9.0% expected, 9.7% in December); PPI, year-over-year, January (7.8% expected, 8.3% in December); PPI excluding food and energy, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); PPI excluding food, energy, and trade, year-over-year, January (6.3% expected, 6.9% in December); Empire Manufacturing, February (11.0 expected, -0.7 during prior month); Net Long-Term TIC Outflows, December ($137.4 billion during prior month); Total Net TIC Outflows, December ($223.9 billion during prior month)Wednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended Feb. 11 (-8.1% during prior week); Retail Sales Advance, month-over-month, January (2.0% expected, -1.9% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos, month-over-month, January (0.8% expected, -2.3% in December); Retail Sales excluding autos and gas, month-over-month, January (1.0% expected, -2.5% in December); Import Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -0.2% in December); Import Price Index excluding petroleum, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, 0.3% in December); Import Price Endex, year-over-year, January (9.8% expected, 10.4% in December); Export Price Index, month-over-month, January (1.3% expected, -1.8% in December); Export Price Index, year-over-year, January (14.7% in December); Industrial Production, month-over-month, January (0.4% expected, -0.1% in December); Capacity Utilization, January (76.8% expected, 76.5% in December); Manufacturing (SIC) Production, January (0.3% expected, -0.3% in December); Business Inventories, December (2.1% expected,1.3% in November); NAHB Housing Market Index, February (83 expected, 83 in January); FOMC Meeting Minutes, January 26Thursday: Building permits, January (1.750 million expected, 1.873 million in December, upwardly revised to 1.885 million); Building permits, month-over-month, January (-7.2% expected, 9.1% in December, upwardly revised to 9.8%); Housing starts, January (1.700 million expected, 1.702 million in December); Housing starts, month-over-month, January (-0.1% expected, 1.4% in December); Initial jobless claims, week ended Feb. 12 (220,000 expected, 223,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Feb. 5 (1.621 million during prior week); Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Index, February (20.0 expected, 23.2 in January)Friday: Existing Home Sales, January (6.10 million expected, 6.18 million in December); Existing Home Sales, month-over-month, January (-1.3% expected, -4.6% in December); Leading Index, January (0.2% expected, 0.8% in December)Earnings calendarMondayBefore market open: TreeHouse Foods (THS), Weber Inc. (WEBR)After market close: $Vornado Realty Trust(VNO-N)$ (VNO), Avis Budget Group (CAR), Arista Networks (ANET), Advance Auto Parts (AAP)TuesdayBefore market open: Marriott International (MAR)After market close: ViacomCBS (VIAC), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), Airbnb (ABNB), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Roblox (RBLX), Denny’s (DENN), La-Z-Boy (LZB), Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc. (WH), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI)WednesdayBefore market open: Kraft Heinz (KHC), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Analog Devices (ADI), Shopify (SHOP)After market close: Cisco Systems (CSCO), Nvidia (NVDA), TripAdvisor (TRIP), AIG (AIG), DoorDash (DASH), Hyatt Hotels (H), Cheesecake Factory (CAKE), Marathon Oil (MRO), Energy Transfer (ET)ThursdayBefore market open: Nestlé (NSRGY) Walmart (WMT), US Foods (USFD), Palantir Technologies (PLTR), AutoNation (AN)After market close: Shake Shack (SHAK), Roku (ROKU), Dropbox (DBX),Tanger Factory Outlet Centers (SKT)FridayBefore market open: Deere (DE), DraftKings (DKNG), Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN), Allianz (ALIZY)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092811700,"gmtCreate":1644581366365,"gmtModify":1676533943232,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"3M is promising&nbsp;","listText":"3M is promising&nbsp;","text":"3M is promising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092811700","repostId":"2210159258","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2210159258","pubTimestamp":1644592522,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2210159258?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 23:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2210159258","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Both offer yields more than twice what the S&P 500 provides.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When dividend stocks go on sale, it can be an opportunity for investors to lock in a higher-than-normal yield. The dividend yield, of course is a function of both quarterly payments and the share price; when the latter falls, the yield goes up.</p><p>A couple of already high-yielding stocks that are paying more than the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> average of 1.3% and have fallen near their 52-week lows are <b>Gilead Sciences</b> (NASDAQ:GILD) and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a></b> (NYSE:MMM). Here&#39;s why despite recent investor bearishness, these could be solid additions to your portfolios today.</p><h2>1. Gilead Sciences</h2><p>Drugmaker Gilead Sciences is trading at around $63 a share and has been inching closer to its 52-week low of $61.39. The stock nosedived after the company released its latest quarterly results on Feb. 1. Gilead&#39;s performance for the past three months of 2021 was underwhelming with the company&#39;s sales of $7.2 billion declining 2.4% from the same period a year ago. Net income of $376 million was also just a fraction of the $1.5 billion that it reported a year earlier; the healthcare company says the decline was largely due to a legal settlement of $625 million involving <b>Arcus Biosciences</b>.</p><p>For 2022, Gilead projects that its sales will come in between $23.8 billion and $24.3 billion; at the midpoint of $24 billion, that would be a decline of 12% from the $27.3 billion it recorded in 2021. The company expects diluted earnings per share (EPS) to be between $4.70 and $5.20 for the year, so it could still potentially come in better than the $4.93-per-share profit it reported this past year.</p><p>Even if there is a decline in profitability, those numbers will still be strong enough to support the company&#39;s dividend, which currently pays shareholders $2.92 per share a year. At the low point of its EPS estimate, Gilead&#39;s payout ratio would still be fairly modest at 62%; that would leave plenty of room for the company not only to support but also to grow its already high dividend, which currently yields 4.6%.</p><p>Although Gilead is facing some challenges, particularly from losses in exclusivity for some of its key products, the company is working on building out its pipeline. In oncology alone, there are over 30 clinical trials currently taking place.</p><p>Gilead remains in solid shape despite some risks, and investors are compensated for it as the stock trades at a lower forward price-to-earnings multiple than other drugmakers:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31d1231300ed8387737ca89664e91e9e\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>GILD PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.</span></p><h2>2. 3M</h2><p>Multinational conglomerate 3M hit a new 52-week low this week as it also fell out of favor with investors. The company, which makes healthcare masks and respirators, was a popular investment during the pandemic&#39;s early stages. And as COVID-19 case numbers began to subside last year and hopes about a return to normal rose, interest in the stock began to wane.</p><p>The company released fourth-quarter numbers on Jan. 25, reporting sales of $8.6 billion for the period ended Dec. 31, 2021. That was flat from the prior year. Meanwhile, net income declined by 4.7% to $1.3 billion. By contrast, sales rose 5.8% in 2020&#39;s fourth quarter. That was largely due to an increase in safety and industrial revenue (including personal hygiene products and masks). This time around, however, that segment of its business fell 2% to about $3.1 billion.</p><p>Other business units (healthcare, transportation and electronics) are smaller and also showed little or no growth. The lone exception and growth catalyst in Q4 was its consumer business (e.g. bandages, cleaning, and stationery products) which rose by 4% and helped keep the quarter&#39;s sales just slightly above the prior-year numbers. All this diversification makes the business resilient -- and as a whole, 3M continues to do well. For all of 2021, net sales rose 10% year over year to $35.4 billion.</p><p>For income investors, the company&#39;s payouts look more than safe even if the growth rate starts to falter. 3M is a Dividend King thanks to increasing its dividend payments for more than 60 years in a row. And there&#39;s little doubt that streak will continue; it paid out $5.92 per share in dividends for 2021. With an EPS of $10.12, that puts its payout ratio at just 58%. So there&#39;s plenty of room for the company to continue making and increasing payouts.</p><p>3M shares haven&#39;t been this low since the fall of 2020, and the stock&#39;s yield is currently at 3.7%. Now could be a great time to add this investment to your portfolio.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 High-Yield Dividend Stocks That Are Trading Near Their 52-Week Lows\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-11 23:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/10/2-high-yield-dividend-stocks-that-are-trading-near/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When dividend stocks go on sale, it can be an opportunity for investors to lock in a higher-than-normal yield. The dividend yield, of course is a function of both quarterly payments and the share ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/10/2-high-yield-dividend-stocks-that-are-trading-near/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MMM":"3M","BK4206":"工业集团企业","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4139":"生物科技","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","GILD":"吉利德科学","BK4568":"美国抗疫概念","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4566":"资本集团"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/10/2-high-yield-dividend-stocks-that-are-trading-near/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2210159258","content_text":"When dividend stocks go on sale, it can be an opportunity for investors to lock in a higher-than-normal yield. The dividend yield, of course is a function of both quarterly payments and the share price; when the latter falls, the yield goes up.A couple of already high-yielding stocks that are paying more than the S&P 500 average of 1.3% and have fallen near their 52-week lows are Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) and 3M (NYSE:MMM). Here's why despite recent investor bearishness, these could be solid additions to your portfolios today.1. Gilead SciencesDrugmaker Gilead Sciences is trading at around $63 a share and has been inching closer to its 52-week low of $61.39. The stock nosedived after the company released its latest quarterly results on Feb. 1. Gilead's performance for the past three months of 2021 was underwhelming with the company's sales of $7.2 billion declining 2.4% from the same period a year ago. Net income of $376 million was also just a fraction of the $1.5 billion that it reported a year earlier; the healthcare company says the decline was largely due to a legal settlement of $625 million involving Arcus Biosciences.For 2022, Gilead projects that its sales will come in between $23.8 billion and $24.3 billion; at the midpoint of $24 billion, that would be a decline of 12% from the $27.3 billion it recorded in 2021. The company expects diluted earnings per share (EPS) to be between $4.70 and $5.20 for the year, so it could still potentially come in better than the $4.93-per-share profit it reported this past year.Even if there is a decline in profitability, those numbers will still be strong enough to support the company's dividend, which currently pays shareholders $2.92 per share a year. At the low point of its EPS estimate, Gilead's payout ratio would still be fairly modest at 62%; that would leave plenty of room for the company not only to support but also to grow its already high dividend, which currently yields 4.6%.Although Gilead is facing some challenges, particularly from losses in exclusivity for some of its key products, the company is working on building out its pipeline. In oncology alone, there are over 30 clinical trials currently taking place.Gilead remains in solid shape despite some risks, and investors are compensated for it as the stock trades at a lower forward price-to-earnings multiple than other drugmakers:GILD PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.2. 3MMultinational conglomerate 3M hit a new 52-week low this week as it also fell out of favor with investors. The company, which makes healthcare masks and respirators, was a popular investment during the pandemic's early stages. And as COVID-19 case numbers began to subside last year and hopes about a return to normal rose, interest in the stock began to wane.The company released fourth-quarter numbers on Jan. 25, reporting sales of $8.6 billion for the period ended Dec. 31, 2021. That was flat from the prior year. Meanwhile, net income declined by 4.7% to $1.3 billion. By contrast, sales rose 5.8% in 2020's fourth quarter. That was largely due to an increase in safety and industrial revenue (including personal hygiene products and masks). This time around, however, that segment of its business fell 2% to about $3.1 billion.Other business units (healthcare, transportation and electronics) are smaller and also showed little or no growth. The lone exception and growth catalyst in Q4 was its consumer business (e.g. bandages, cleaning, and stationery products) which rose by 4% and helped keep the quarter's sales just slightly above the prior-year numbers. All this diversification makes the business resilient -- and as a whole, 3M continues to do well. For all of 2021, net sales rose 10% year over year to $35.4 billion.For income investors, the company's payouts look more than safe even if the growth rate starts to falter. 3M is a Dividend King thanks to increasing its dividend payments for more than 60 years in a row. And there's little doubt that streak will continue; it paid out $5.92 per share in dividends for 2021. With an EPS of $10.12, that puts its payout ratio at just 58%. So there's plenty of room for the company to continue making and increasing payouts.3M shares haven't been this low since the fall of 2020, and the stock's yield is currently at 3.7%. Now could be a great time to add this investment to your portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":387,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095713264,"gmtCreate":1644988688049,"gmtModify":1676533984185,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","listText":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","text":"I think current price is good as compared with the inflated price after ipo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095713264","repostId":"1113291337","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113291337","pubTimestamp":1644978129,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113291337?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-16 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Rivian Stock Alert: 5 Big Investors That Are Making a Bet on RIVN","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113291337","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Prominent buyers include George Soros and Philippe Laffont","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>It’s no secret that <b>Rivian</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>RIVN</u></b>) is a big name right now in the electric vehicle (EV) space. The EV manufacturer has been making headlines since its initial public offering (IPO), causing retail investors and institutional investors alike to dive head-first into RIVN stock.</p><p>Now, with the latest 13F deadline behind us, retail investors can take a glimpse into the portfolios of institutional investors as of Dec. 31 to see just how much they’ve been loving RIVN. The 13F is a form filed quarterly to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that is required for all institutional investors with at least $100 million in assets under management. In addition, the form discloses the U.S. public equity holdings of each fund and provides transparency to retail investors.</p><p>During Q4, Rivian was a hot commodity among several top performing institutional investors. Therefore, retail investors may be interested in who exactly is betting bit on the electric vehicle (EV) player. Let’s take a look at who bought into RIVN stock in Q4.</p><p><b>Which Institutional Investors Bought RIVN Stock During Q4?</b></p><ol><li><b>Coatue Management</b>: Philippe Laffont’s hedge fund purchased a whopping 35.2 million shares, making Rivian the fund’s largest position. Coatue Management now owns a 3.94% ownership stake in the electric vehicle (EV) maker.</li><li><b>Capital Research Global Investors</b>: The $452 billion investment firm purchased 25.7 million shares of RIVN stock during the quarter. Rivian accounts for just over half a percent of the firm’s portfolio, which now owns a 2.88% ownership stake.</li><li><b>Soros Fund Management</b>: Legendary investor George Soros picked up 19.8 million shares during Q4. Rivian is now Soros’ largest position with a 28% portfolio weighting. After the purchase, Soros Fund Management owns a 2.22% stake in the EV company.</li><li><b>D1 Capital Partners</b>: The fund, led by its founder Dan Sundheim, purchased 15.5 million shares. Rivian is now D1’s second-largest position with a 9.7% portfolio allocation. In addition, D1 now has a 1.7% stake in Rivian.</li><li><b>Dragoneer Investment Group</b>: Led by Harvard alum Marc Stad, Dragoneer purchased 5.2 million shares during Q4. After the purchase, Rivian became Dragoneer’s third-largest holding. Additionally, the fund owns a 0.58% ownership stake.</li></ol><p>Since Rivian had its IPO last November, no funds have sold RIVN stock. Investors will have to wait until the next quarterly 13F deadline on May 16 to see the trades of institutional investors as of March 31.</p><p>It should also be noted that any institutional investor who bought during Q4 is likely sitting on a loss. Compared to Dec. 31’s closing price of $103.69, Rivian is now trading near $66, representing a 36% loss. For example, George Soros bought roughly $2 billion worth of Rivian during Q4. As of last Friday’s close, that investment has almost been cut in half to $1.17 billion.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Rivian Stock Alert: 5 Big Investors That Are Making a Bet on RIVN</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRivian Stock Alert: 5 Big Investors That Are Making a Bet on RIVN\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-16 10:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/02/rivian-stock-alert-5-big-investors-that-are-making-a-bet-on-rivn/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s no secret that Rivian(NASDAQ:RIVN) is a big name right now in the electric vehicle (EV) space. The EV manufacturer has been making headlines since its initial public offering (IPO), causing ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/rivian-stock-alert-5-big-investors-that-are-making-a-bet-on-rivn/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIVN":"Rivian Automotive, Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/rivian-stock-alert-5-big-investors-that-are-making-a-bet-on-rivn/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113291337","content_text":"It’s no secret that Rivian(NASDAQ:RIVN) is a big name right now in the electric vehicle (EV) space. The EV manufacturer has been making headlines since its initial public offering (IPO), causing retail investors and institutional investors alike to dive head-first into RIVN stock.Now, with the latest 13F deadline behind us, retail investors can take a glimpse into the portfolios of institutional investors as of Dec. 31 to see just how much they’ve been loving RIVN. The 13F is a form filed quarterly to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that is required for all institutional investors with at least $100 million in assets under management. In addition, the form discloses the U.S. public equity holdings of each fund and provides transparency to retail investors.During Q4, Rivian was a hot commodity among several top performing institutional investors. Therefore, retail investors may be interested in who exactly is betting bit on the electric vehicle (EV) player. Let’s take a look at who bought into RIVN stock in Q4.Which Institutional Investors Bought RIVN Stock During Q4?Coatue Management: Philippe Laffont’s hedge fund purchased a whopping 35.2 million shares, making Rivian the fund’s largest position. Coatue Management now owns a 3.94% ownership stake in the electric vehicle (EV) maker.Capital Research Global Investors: The $452 billion investment firm purchased 25.7 million shares of RIVN stock during the quarter. Rivian accounts for just over half a percent of the firm’s portfolio, which now owns a 2.88% ownership stake.Soros Fund Management: Legendary investor George Soros picked up 19.8 million shares during Q4. Rivian is now Soros’ largest position with a 28% portfolio weighting. After the purchase, Soros Fund Management owns a 2.22% stake in the EV company.D1 Capital Partners: The fund, led by its founder Dan Sundheim, purchased 15.5 million shares. Rivian is now D1’s second-largest position with a 9.7% portfolio allocation. In addition, D1 now has a 1.7% stake in Rivian.Dragoneer Investment Group: Led by Harvard alum Marc Stad, Dragoneer purchased 5.2 million shares during Q4. After the purchase, Rivian became Dragoneer’s third-largest holding. Additionally, the fund owns a 0.58% ownership stake.Since Rivian had its IPO last November, no funds have sold RIVN stock. Investors will have to wait until the next quarterly 13F deadline on May 16 to see the trades of institutional investors as of March 31.It should also be noted that any institutional investor who bought during Q4 is likely sitting on a loss. Compared to Dec. 31’s closing price of $103.69, Rivian is now trading near $66, representing a 36% loss. For example, George Soros bought roughly $2 billion worth of Rivian during Q4. As of last Friday’s close, that investment has almost been cut in half to $1.17 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092818861,"gmtCreate":1644581470723,"gmtModify":1676533943254,"author":{"id":"4101101662246600","authorId":"4101101662246600","name":"awzh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4101101662246600","authorIdStr":"4101101662246600"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Strange world","listText":"Strange world","text":"Strange world","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092818861","repostId":"1116795342","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116795342","pubTimestamp":1644545191,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116795342?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-11 10:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk's US tax bill: $11 billion. Tesla's: $0","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116795342","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business)-Elon Musk has repeatedly bragged (or, perhaps, complained) that he'llpay more in federal taxesfor 2021 than anyone has ever paid —about $11 billion. But Tesla apparently won't ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>New York (CNN Business) -</b> Elon Musk has repeatedly bragged (or, perhaps, complained) that he&#39;ll pay more in federal taxes for 2021 than anyone has ever paid — about $11 billion. But Tesla apparently won&#39;t pay a cent.</p><p>Tesla may not plan to pay federal taxes any time in the foreseeable future -- even though the company just reported by far its most profitable year ever. In 2021, Tesla recorded net income of $5.5 billion, and adjusted income of $7.6 billion.</p><p>But buried in a footnote of its recent annual financial filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tesla reports that its US operations lost $130 million last year on a pre-tax basis. It claims that all of its pre-tax profits — more than $6 billion worth — came from overseas operations, even though 45% of its revenue came from US sales.</p><p>Although Tesla indicates its foreign tax bill came to $839 million, its state tax bill was only $9 million. And its federal tax bill was zero.</p><p>&#34;That defies common sense, but it does not defy the US tax code,&#34; said Martin Sullivan, chief economist for Tax Analysts, a nonprofit tax publisher, and an expert on US corporate tax practices.</p><p><b>Moving profits overseas — on paper</b></p><p>Sullivan said he believes the $130 million loss on its US operations is most likely due to a common practice for US multinational corporations: structuring their operations so that overseas subsidiaries are the ones reporting income, leaving the US operation to have little or no taxable income to report.</p><p>For example, a company can assign its intellectual property to one of those foreign entities, and charge its US unit a fee for using that property. And thus, the foreign operation is very profitable, while the US company — burdened with &#34;costs&#34; to the company itself — reports either a loss or very little income.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s a US multinational thing. It&#39;s very common. It&#39;s almost malpractice not to do that,&#34; said Sullivan.</p><p>A recent report from the US Department of the Treasury found 61% of the international profits ofUS multinational companies are booked in seven small countries -- Bermuda, the Caymans, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland -- known as tax havens. It&#39;s a practice that many elected officials and the Biden administration have vowed to crack down on.</p><p>&#34;Tesla and other giant corporations have long used scams and loopholes to help them get out of paying taxes -- that has to stop,&#34; said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a frequent critic of Musk. &#34;Democrats are working to end Republican tax cuts for corporations shifting profits and jobs overseas.&#34;</p><p>However, Congress has so far failed to take action to stop it.</p><p>The financial filing by Tesla doesn&#39;t spell out what it did exactly, though. For example, it doesn&#39;t say which country or countries it made its profit in while reporting a US loss. And Tesla declined to respond to a question about its filing.</p><p><b>Tesla doesn&#39;t expect to pay US taxes any time soon</b></p><p>Considering the substantial financial help that Tesla has long received from government support for its electric cars, the company doesn&#39;t have to use a shell game of offshoring its profits to avoid paying taxes. Instead, it could use past losses to shelter its current income from any tax bill.</p><p>Once again, this is a common practice for companies that lose money: losses result in a future tax break.</p><p>Tech companies that lose money for years before turning a profit — such as Amazon(AMZN) — have used this technique. So have old line companies that have financial problems, such as all US airlines, which will probably not have to pay taxes for years to come after recording billions of dollars in losses during the pandemic — despite receiving billions in federal help.</p><p>Similarly, Tesla&#39;s US automaking competitors lost so much money in the first decade of this century that General Motors (GM) and Chrysler needed government bailouts. Despite those bailouts, neither company paid taxes for several years once they were again profitable.</p><p>Past losses are a huge and very valuable future tax benefit known as &#34;net operating loss carry-forwards.&#34;</p><p>Tesla was losing money for more than a decade before it finally started reporting net income in 2020. Those were real losses, which occurred when the costs of developing and building its cars in its early years far outstripped the money it could sell them for. It did so with the expectation that it would turn a profit in the future as demand increased and costs declined. That&#39;s exactly what happened.</p><p>But, in running up billions of dollars in losses, Tesla was able to accumulate net operating loss carry-forwards that it could use in the future.</p><p>Still, Tesla disclosed in this week&#39;s financial filing that it did not use any of those past losses to shield current income from taxes. And it took a bookkeeping maneuver that suggests it doesn&#39;t know if it will ever have to use those past losses to shield its US income.</p><p>Tesla is rather bullish about its future, expecting annual sales growth of 50% for the foreseeable future. If it believed that its pre-tax losses in its domestic operations was temporary, it likely would not have not taken that step of reducing the value of those past losses as a way of eliminating future US taxes, according to Sullivan.</p><p><b>Is Tesla losing money at home?</b></p><p>There&#39;s another possible reason that Tesla might have reported a pre-tax loss on its US operations:—one that isn&#39;t as much an accounting maneuver designed to lower taxes as it is a warning sign about the viability of the company. Perhaps it still is losing money on the cars it is selling in the United States, and it can only make money using the lower costs of a relatively new factory in Shanghai, China.</p><p>That&#39;s what one of Tesla&#39;s most fervent critics and doubters believes. Gordon Johnson of GLJ Research, points out that Tesla was losing money overall until after it started producing cars in Shanghai in October 2019. He believes that investors are giving Tesla too much credit for profits in the US that he doesn&#39;t believe are real.</p><p>&#34;I think it&#39;s a massive deal,&#34; he said about Tesla&#39;s filing this week. &#34;They effectively said they don&#39;t plan on utilizing any of the net loss carry forwards. That means their US operations are losing money. It&#39;s an argument we&#39;ve made over and over again. Outside of China, Tesla loses money.&#34;</p><p>But other analysts who have examined its books insist Tesla&#39;s profits, both at home and overseas, are real, no matter what its US tax forms say.</p><p>Johnson said if he&#39;s wrong, it&#39;s up to Tesla to be more transparent.</p><p>&#34;The reality is, until they provide disclosure, both explanations could be right,&#34; he said.</p><p><b>Musk&#39;s rare big tax bill</b></p><p>Musk has a history of using the US tax code to pay little or no personal federal income taxes. A report from ProPublica shows that for 2018 Musk and many other Americans near the top of the world&#39;s richest people paid no income tax.</p><p>In Musk&#39;s case, he receives no salary from Tesla, only very valuable stock options, as a form of compensation. And under US tax code he doesn&#39;t have to pay taxes on those options until he exercises them to buy shares of stock at a fraction of their current value.</p><p>He also would have to pay taxes if he sells shares he already held because of his earlier investment in the company, which he has rarely done. But he did that last year as well.</p><p>Musk has not exercised most of the options that he holds. But he had options to buy 22.9 million shares that were due to expire in August 2022, and started exercising those options to buy additional shares late last year.</p><p>In total, he spent $142.6 million to purchase shares worth $23.6 billion, giving him $23.5 billion in in taxable income, taxable for 2021 at a federal rate of about 41%.</p><p>Musk also sold a small fraction of the additional shares he already owned, sales that fetched a taxable $5.8 billion at a lower capital gains rate.</p><p>Together those stock trades likely resulted in roughly an $11 billion federal tax bill, which he has tweeted about.</p><p>But that could well be the last time for years to come that he&#39;s paying a substantial federal tax,unless Congress passes one of the various proposals to tax the net worth of the nation&#39;s wealthiest individuals, rather than just their income. Several Democratic Senators, including Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden have proposed that, but so far it hasn&#39;t come close to passing.</p><p>Not surprisingly, Musk opposes such efforts, and has mocked all three senators on Twitter.</p><p>The options Musk exercised last year that produced the massive tax bill aren&#39;t the end of his options. This week&#39;s financial filing from Tesla discloses that Musk received another 8.4 million options, bringing his total to 67.5 million.</p><p>But none of those options expire until 2028. And thus it&#39;ll probably be five years before he starts to exercise those options, unless he leaves the company before then.</p><p>If he is once again paying zero federal taxes, chances are good that his tax bill and his primary company&#39;s tax bill will be the same during those five years.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk's US tax bill: $11 billion. Tesla's: $0</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk's US tax bill: $11 billion. Tesla's: $0\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-11 10:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/10/investing/elon-musk-tesla-zero-tax-bill/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business) - Elon Musk has repeatedly bragged (or, perhaps, complained) that he'll pay more in federal taxes for 2021 than anyone has ever paid — about $11 billion. But Tesla apparently ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/10/investing/elon-musk-tesla-zero-tax-bill/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/10/investing/elon-musk-tesla-zero-tax-bill/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116795342","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Elon Musk has repeatedly bragged (or, perhaps, complained) that he'll pay more in federal taxes for 2021 than anyone has ever paid — about $11 billion. But Tesla apparently won't pay a cent.Tesla may not plan to pay federal taxes any time in the foreseeable future -- even though the company just reported by far its most profitable year ever. In 2021, Tesla recorded net income of $5.5 billion, and adjusted income of $7.6 billion.But buried in a footnote of its recent annual financial filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Tesla reports that its US operations lost $130 million last year on a pre-tax basis. It claims that all of its pre-tax profits — more than $6 billion worth — came from overseas operations, even though 45% of its revenue came from US sales.Although Tesla indicates its foreign tax bill came to $839 million, its state tax bill was only $9 million. And its federal tax bill was zero.\"That defies common sense, but it does not defy the US tax code,\" said Martin Sullivan, chief economist for Tax Analysts, a nonprofit tax publisher, and an expert on US corporate tax practices.Moving profits overseas — on paperSullivan said he believes the $130 million loss on its US operations is most likely due to a common practice for US multinational corporations: structuring their operations so that overseas subsidiaries are the ones reporting income, leaving the US operation to have little or no taxable income to report.For example, a company can assign its intellectual property to one of those foreign entities, and charge its US unit a fee for using that property. And thus, the foreign operation is very profitable, while the US company — burdened with \"costs\" to the company itself — reports either a loss or very little income.\"It's a US multinational thing. It's very common. It's almost malpractice not to do that,\" said Sullivan.A recent report from the US Department of the Treasury found 61% of the international profits ofUS multinational companies are booked in seven small countries -- Bermuda, the Caymans, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland -- known as tax havens. It's a practice that many elected officials and the Biden administration have vowed to crack down on.\"Tesla and other giant corporations have long used scams and loopholes to help them get out of paying taxes -- that has to stop,\" said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a frequent critic of Musk. \"Democrats are working to end Republican tax cuts for corporations shifting profits and jobs overseas.\"However, Congress has so far failed to take action to stop it.The financial filing by Tesla doesn't spell out what it did exactly, though. For example, it doesn't say which country or countries it made its profit in while reporting a US loss. And Tesla declined to respond to a question about its filing.Tesla doesn't expect to pay US taxes any time soonConsidering the substantial financial help that Tesla has long received from government support for its electric cars, the company doesn't have to use a shell game of offshoring its profits to avoid paying taxes. Instead, it could use past losses to shelter its current income from any tax bill.Once again, this is a common practice for companies that lose money: losses result in a future tax break.Tech companies that lose money for years before turning a profit — such as Amazon(AMZN) — have used this technique. So have old line companies that have financial problems, such as all US airlines, which will probably not have to pay taxes for years to come after recording billions of dollars in losses during the pandemic — despite receiving billions in federal help.Similarly, Tesla's US automaking competitors lost so much money in the first decade of this century that General Motors (GM) and Chrysler needed government bailouts. Despite those bailouts, neither company paid taxes for several years once they were again profitable.Past losses are a huge and very valuable future tax benefit known as \"net operating loss carry-forwards.\"Tesla was losing money for more than a decade before it finally started reporting net income in 2020. Those were real losses, which occurred when the costs of developing and building its cars in its early years far outstripped the money it could sell them for. It did so with the expectation that it would turn a profit in the future as demand increased and costs declined. That's exactly what happened.But, in running up billions of dollars in losses, Tesla was able to accumulate net operating loss carry-forwards that it could use in the future.Still, Tesla disclosed in this week's financial filing that it did not use any of those past losses to shield current income from taxes. And it took a bookkeeping maneuver that suggests it doesn't know if it will ever have to use those past losses to shield its US income.Tesla is rather bullish about its future, expecting annual sales growth of 50% for the foreseeable future. If it believed that its pre-tax losses in its domestic operations was temporary, it likely would not have not taken that step of reducing the value of those past losses as a way of eliminating future US taxes, according to Sullivan.Is Tesla losing money at home?There's another possible reason that Tesla might have reported a pre-tax loss on its US operations:—one that isn't as much an accounting maneuver designed to lower taxes as it is a warning sign about the viability of the company. Perhaps it still is losing money on the cars it is selling in the United States, and it can only make money using the lower costs of a relatively new factory in Shanghai, China.That's what one of Tesla's most fervent critics and doubters believes. Gordon Johnson of GLJ Research, points out that Tesla was losing money overall until after it started producing cars in Shanghai in October 2019. He believes that investors are giving Tesla too much credit for profits in the US that he doesn't believe are real.\"I think it's a massive deal,\" he said about Tesla's filing this week. \"They effectively said they don't plan on utilizing any of the net loss carry forwards. That means their US operations are losing money. It's an argument we've made over and over again. Outside of China, Tesla loses money.\"But other analysts who have examined its books insist Tesla's profits, both at home and overseas, are real, no matter what its US tax forms say.Johnson said if he's wrong, it's up to Tesla to be more transparent.\"The reality is, until they provide disclosure, both explanations could be right,\" he said.Musk's rare big tax billMusk has a history of using the US tax code to pay little or no personal federal income taxes. A report from ProPublica shows that for 2018 Musk and many other Americans near the top of the world's richest people paid no income tax.In Musk's case, he receives no salary from Tesla, only very valuable stock options, as a form of compensation. And under US tax code he doesn't have to pay taxes on those options until he exercises them to buy shares of stock at a fraction of their current value.He also would have to pay taxes if he sells shares he already held because of his earlier investment in the company, which he has rarely done. But he did that last year as well.Musk has not exercised most of the options that he holds. But he had options to buy 22.9 million shares that were due to expire in August 2022, and started exercising those options to buy additional shares late last year.In total, he spent $142.6 million to purchase shares worth $23.6 billion, giving him $23.5 billion in in taxable income, taxable for 2021 at a federal rate of about 41%.Musk also sold a small fraction of the additional shares he already owned, sales that fetched a taxable $5.8 billion at a lower capital gains rate.Together those stock trades likely resulted in roughly an $11 billion federal tax bill, which he has tweeted about.But that could well be the last time for years to come that he's paying a substantial federal tax,unless Congress passes one of the various proposals to tax the net worth of the nation's wealthiest individuals, rather than just their income. Several Democratic Senators, including Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden have proposed that, but so far it hasn't come close to passing.Not surprisingly, Musk opposes such efforts, and has mocked all three senators on Twitter.The options Musk exercised last year that produced the massive tax bill aren't the end of his options. This week's financial filing from Tesla discloses that Musk received another 8.4 million options, bringing his total to 67.5 million.But none of those options expire until 2028. And thus it'll probably be five years before he starts to exercise those options, unless he leaves the company before then.If he is once again paying zero federal taxes, chances are good that his tax bill and his primary company's tax bill will be the same during those five years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":495,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}