Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday

Motley Fool2022-03-08

What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

278

Report

Comment（37）

Beli
·2022-03-09
Can wait till end of week before buying?
Reply
1
Report
newiak
·2022-03-09
Thanks
Reply
2
Report
Gtung
·2022-03-09
Agreed
Reply
2
Report
我i168
·2022-03-09
[Smile]
Reply
3
Report
SK19
·2022-03-08
Let's wait a while longer
Reply
2
Report
来人
·2022-03-08
Wait
Reply
1
Report
Questions
·2022-03-08
Don't buy first. Wait... if it dips below $200 .. huat.
Reply
2
Report
Questions
·2022-03-08
No such thing as too expensive for tech. All these losers most of the time writing nonsense. Pick a good company like NVDA, buy and hold for 3-5.
Reply
1
Report
SmartHunter
·2022-03-08
Time to buy the dip fkers.... and hold for 5 years sitback and watch it growww. Fk the too expensive shit
Reply
2
Report
LimLS
·2022-03-08
Bad market environment with lots of uncertainty like Ukraine war, Fed hike/QT. In this type of market, company earnings and forecast will take a backseat. What's more of a factor will be the mood of the market. All stocks, even the good will fall during these times. But the article is also true. The PE for NVDA is too high even though it's a wonderful company
Reply
1
Report
vic78
·2022-03-08
👍👍
Reply
3
Report
breAkdaWn
·2022-03-08
Nvidia is wooing the gaming guys. So they have LHR GPUs Not good for sales!
Reply
1
Report
Ericlam
·2022-03-08
Ready to add some😊
Reply
4
Report
xiaobaii
·2022-03-08
like & comment please
Reply
6
Report
Marcus0168
·2022-03-08
like
Reply
5
Report
romanc9
·2022-03-08
US mkt is unpredictable. Some counters reported good result but being dumped, some report losses but being bought up.. Don't contra but invest in good counters, long run you see gain
Reply
5
Report
StingWolf
·2022-03-08
$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$will be a long term hold.
Reply
5
Report
LuckyLee
·2022-03-08
ok
Reply
5
Report
WilKoh
·2022-03-08
Like
Reply
3
Report
WilKoh
·2022-03-08
Like
Reply
3
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101694670?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1101694670","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"NVDA","symbol_name":"英伟达","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","article_id":"1101694670","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"translate_title":"为什么英伟达的股票周一暴跌","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9},"content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9038651362,"gmtCreate":1646823459340,"gmtModify":1676534166444,"author":{"id":"4092138473478360","authorId":"4092138473478360","name":"Beli","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12287da3d64d63968897c06e82fb422b","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a8758340a08196056f8bc1e54805193","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Can wait till end of week before buying?&nbsp;","listText":"Can wait till end of week before buying?&nbsp;","text":"Can wait till end of week before buying?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038651362","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038870649,"gmtCreate":1646798840446,"gmtModify":1676534164057,"author":{"id":"3579362076394577","authorId":"3579362076394577","name":"newiak","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038870649","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038826924,"gmtCreate":1646792952260,"gmtModify":1676534163213,"author":{"id":"4107909598029120","authorId":"4107909598029120","name":"Gtung","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/a1ff99cf2d2097f017e4ed0ed956f65e","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Agreed","listText":"Agreed","text":"Agreed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038826924","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038126869,"gmtCreate":1646780654309,"gmtModify":1676534160423,"author":{"id":"3563873670221480","authorId":"3563873670221480","name":"我i168","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34b2d0551b5ab028c13ab35747c4df8c","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038126869","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038364371,"gmtCreate":1646746533524,"gmtModify":1676534157466,"author":{"id":"3577755293052640","authorId":"3577755293052640","name":"SK19","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ee6b25332525b16399562f21677fa1cd","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Let's wait a while longer","listText":"Let's wait a while longer","text":"Let's wait a while longer","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038364371","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038389390,"gmtCreate":1646742846158,"gmtModify":1676534156974,"author":{"id":"3575544575320394","authorId":"3575544575320394","name":"来人","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0af89587decbb8a1d3e1596adc29cb98","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Wait","listText":"Wait","text":"Wait","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038389390","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038331502,"gmtCreate":1646736726130,"gmtModify":1676534156475,"author":{"id":"3575934289940082","authorId":"3575934289940082","name":"Questions","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0190152f0bd2b9f9e6d1f153fc35114","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Don't buy first. Wait... if it dips below $200 .. huat.&nbsp;","listText":"Don't buy first. Wait... if it dips below $200 .. huat.&nbsp;","text":"Don't buy first. Wait... if it dips below $200 .. huat.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038331502","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038333711,"gmtCreate":1646736474970,"gmtModify":1676534156457,"author":{"id":"3575934289940082","authorId":"3575934289940082","name":"Questions","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0190152f0bd2b9f9e6d1f153fc35114","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"No such thing as too expensive for tech. All these losers most of the time writing nonsense. Pick a good company like NVDA, buy and hold for 3-5.","listText":"No such thing as too expensive for tech. All these losers most of the time writing nonsense. Pick a good company like NVDA, buy and hold for 3-5.","text":"No such thing as too expensive for tech. All these losers most of the time writing nonsense. Pick a good company like NVDA, buy and hold for 3-5.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038333711","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038982164,"gmtCreate":1646713267095,"gmtModify":1676534154263,"author":{"id":"3586907191866715","authorId":"3586907191866715","name":"SmartHunter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69402f0b380884d842e640f724fb7467","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Time to buy the dip fkers.... and hold for 5 years sitback and watch it growww. Fk the too expensive shit","listText":"Time to buy the dip fkers.... and hold for 5 years sitback and watch it growww. Fk the too expensive shit","text":"Time to buy the dip fkers.... and hold for 5 years sitback and watch it growww. Fk the too expensive shit","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038982164","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038980880,"gmtCreate":1646712129597,"gmtModify":1676534154131,"author":{"id":"3572923586954779","authorId":"3572923586954779","name":"LimLS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/217b03b0c4808fb537070ba4e8f9d83f","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Bad market environment with lots of uncertainty like Ukraine war, Fed hike/QT. In this type of market, company earnings and forecast will take a backseat. What's more of a factor will be the mood of the market. All stocks, even the good will fall during these times. But the article is also true. The PE for NVDA is too high even though it's a wonderful company","listText":"Bad market environment with lots of uncertainty like Ukraine war, Fed hike/QT. In this type of market, company earnings and forecast will take a backseat. What's more of a factor will be the mood of the market. All stocks, even the good will fall during these times. But the article is also true. The PE for NVDA is too high even though it's a wonderful company","text":"Bad market environment with lots of uncertainty like Ukraine war, Fed hike/QT. In this type of market, company earnings and forecast will take a backseat. What's more of a factor will be the mood of the market. All stocks, even the good will fall during these times. But the article is also true. The PE for NVDA is too high even though it's a wonderful company","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038980880","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038910526,"gmtCreate":1646709703233,"gmtModify":1676534153895,"author":{"id":"3584874174562489","authorId":"3584874174562489","name":"vic78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d4dc3bd30cec435b0345175f72eeb4dc","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038910526","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038932772,"gmtCreate":1646709216144,"gmtModify":1676534153798,"author":{"id":"3569809505691000","authorId":"3569809505691000","name":"breAkdaWn","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4c3676c14de9bfcd6f45bcf7ba4ddb6c","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Nvidia is wooing the gaming guys. So they have LHR GPUs&nbsp;Not good for sales!","listText":"Nvidia is wooing the gaming guys. So they have LHR GPUs&nbsp;Not good for sales!","text":"Nvidia is wooing the gaming guys. So they have LHR GPUs Not good for sales!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038932772","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038995787,"gmtCreate":1646707562492,"gmtModify":1676534153439,"author":{"id":"3559787818034959","authorId":"3559787818034959","name":"Ericlam","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2154f4bb8afd22f8e6fde60b57acb69","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Ready to add some😊","listText":"Ready to add some😊","text":"Ready to add some😊","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038995787","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038996085,"gmtCreate":1646706919547,"gmtModify":1676534153375,"author":{"id":"3571345352614779","authorId":"3571345352614779","name":"xiaobaii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like &amp; comment please&nbsp;","listText":"like &amp; comment please&nbsp;","text":"like & comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038996085","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038991512,"gmtCreate":1646706811980,"gmtModify":1676534153343,"author":{"id":"3579731150117851","authorId":"3579731150117851","name":"Marcus0168","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8306535f31b23cae8f41676bb045aaa3","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038991512","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038991065,"gmtCreate":1646706754583,"gmtModify":1676534153325,"author":{"id":"4102495020619380","authorId":"4102495020619380","name":"romanc9","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76bfe37245defa055adfff7453f1520f","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"US mkt is unpredictable. Some counters reported good result but being dumped, some report losses but being bought up..&nbsp;Don't contra but invest in good counters, long run you see gain","listText":"US mkt is unpredictable. Some counters reported good result but being dumped, some report losses but being bought up..&nbsp;Don't contra but invest in good counters, long run you see gain","text":"US mkt is unpredictable. Some counters reported good result but being dumped, some report losses but being bought up.. Don't contra but invest in good counters, long run you see gain","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038991065","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038993060,"gmtCreate":1646706579596,"gmtModify":1676534153306,"author":{"id":"4102052910513430","authorId":"4102052910513430","name":"StingWolf","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/052620f6f5a7118e9df1fa3d90ed5549","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>will be a long term hold.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>will be a long term hold.","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$will be a long term hold.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038993060","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038999256,"gmtCreate":1646706527897,"gmtModify":1676534153290,"author":{"id":"4096965820982980","authorId":"4096965820982980","name":"LuckyLee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb5a2335048503ac3477b0e1acc9432d","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038999256","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038990706,"gmtCreate":1646706381947,"gmtModify":1676534153273,"author":{"id":"3581476554875043","authorId":"3581476554875043","name":"WilKoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361eba2ae11ac6c3003fa8380c9f0705","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038990706","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9038990238,"gmtCreate":1646706349630,"gmtModify":1676534153267,"author":{"id":"3581476554875043","authorId":"3581476554875043","name":"WilKoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361eba2ae11ac6c3003fa8380c9f0705","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038990238","repostId":1101694670,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101694670","pubTimestamp":1646705337,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101694670?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-08 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101694670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Goldman Sachs kind of likes Nvidia -- but can't recommend buying it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of <b>Nvidia</b> stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That&#39;s actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:</p><p><b>Goldman Sachs</b> just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c759aee336113c9ba1fe6119f13159fb\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>What&#39;s more, Goldman Sachs didn&#39;t even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.</p><p>&#34;We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,&#34; said the analyst, &#34;and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.&#34;</p><p>Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible &#34;positive catalyst for the stock&#34; in Nvidia&#39;s upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. &#34;We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,&#34; said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>All that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, &#34;risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.&#34;</p><p>For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn&#39;t give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, &#34;We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.&#34;</p><p>And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it&#39;s true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.</p><p>Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Did Nvidia's Stock Plummet on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-08 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/07/why-nvidia-stock-tanked-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101694670","content_text":"What happenedShares of Nvidia stock fell off a cliff Monday morning, tumbling 6.9% by closed. That's actually a bit surprising though, given the news today:Goldman Sachs just reinitiated coverage of Nvidia.Image source: Getty Images.So whatWhat's more, Goldman Sachs didn't even diss the stock -- to the contrary, Goldman kind of likes Nvidia.\"We continue to view Nvidia as an industry leader in accelerated computing,\" said the analyst, \"and expect the proliferation of [artificial intelligence and machine learning] to drive earnings growth and a valuation multiple that exceeds the industry average over the long-run.\"Furthermore, Goldman sees a possible \"positive catalyst for the stock\" in Nvidia's upcoming annual Graphics Technology Conference (GTC 2022) to be held from March 21 to March 24. \"We expect management to unveil new products and provide more detail on its expanding SAM,\" said Goldman in a note covered by StreetInsider.com.Now whatAll that being said, Goldman Sachs warned that that at its current share price of $219 and change, \"risk/reward on the stock is fairly balanced on a 12-month basis.\"For this reason, Goldman declined to recommend the semiconductors star, assigning Nvidia only a $245 price target and a neutral rating. Moreover, the company didn't give even a hint of being interested in changing its mind (or its rating) on Nvidia in the near future, saying instead, \"We await normalization in consumer GPU demand and/or a better entry point before turning more constructive on the stock.\"And sad to say, I have to agree with Goldman Sachs on this one. Although it's true that Nvidia stock has gotten a lot cheaper -- losing about a third of its value over the last three months -- at a stock price currently 63 times trailing earnings, Nvidia still looks too expensive based on its projected 21% long-term annual earnings growth rate.Simply put: A price-to-earnings growth ratio of 3 is too high a price to pay -- even for Nvidia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":278,"commentSize":37,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}