Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts

11
10
Favorite

Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts

Barrons2021-03-25

In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（10）

eep
·2021-03-25
pls.give a like
Reply
Like
Report
JohnM
·2021-03-25
like
Reply
3
Report
Cop
·2021-03-25
Long term uptrend , good to watch
Reply
1
Report
wenns
·2021-03-25
??
Reply
1
Report
股王好
·2021-03-25
Intel.... good....
Reply
1
Report
KinKat
·2021-03-25
Putting AMAT on my watchlist [得意]
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- KinKat:
  Mentioned in article. $Applied Materials(AMAT)$ supplies FAB eqpt to both INTC & TSMC
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report
- kevinlaisq:
  good?
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report
Holla
·2021-03-25
Like my comment if u long Intel!
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- WoBuZhiDao:
  Comment done
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report
- WoBuZhiDao:
  Reply also thank yoU :)
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report
- Walker975:
  hmmm I'm not sure if intel is currently worth more than amd though
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report
Lala321
·2021-03-25
[開心]
Reply
3
Report
PTKH
·2021-03-25
Ok
Reply
6
Report
Alex77
·2021-03-25
Pls comment.. thks
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Holla:
  Ok
  2021-03-25
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1102618186?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1102618186","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","media":"Barrons","content":"<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1601382232898","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"INTC","symbol_name":"英特尔","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","article_id":"1102618186","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1601382232898","name":"Barrons"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"barrons.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"translate_title":"英特尔有新计划，华尔街存疑","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":0.9},"content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":358340043,"gmtCreate":1616666336382,"gmtModify":1704797116678,"author":{"id":"3577679006270829","authorId":"3577679006270829","name":"eep","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8fedcae7fde463247826d53acfe8614","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"pls.give a like","listText":"pls.give a like","text":"pls.give a like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358340043","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358975616,"gmtCreate":1616658374635,"gmtModify":1704797001972,"author":{"id":"3574985450542136","authorId":"3574985450542136","name":"JohnM","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2ba12f0b2765e8293d3b359b6e4b6d","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358975616","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358971632,"gmtCreate":1616657887026,"gmtModify":1704796996355,"author":{"id":"3578822894211763","authorId":"3578822894211763","name":"Cop","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/00a3596965031047cf17a3fc46a680fb","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Long term uptrend , good to watch&nbsp;","listText":"Long term uptrend , good to watch&nbsp;","text":"Long term uptrend , good to watch","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358971632","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358941294,"gmtCreate":1616656400818,"gmtModify":1704796982224,"author":{"id":"3573628867735517","authorId":"3573628867735517","name":"wenns","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/56a10a99293efcd3e1e25084a2bcecbf","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358941294","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358941875,"gmtCreate":1616656331297,"gmtModify":1704796982062,"author":{"id":"3578803128166492","authorId":"3578803128166492","name":"股王好","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d250e80d8d0ad86c90fc46db11af8f1e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Intel.... good....","listText":"Intel.... good....","text":"Intel.... good....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358941875","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358957443,"gmtCreate":1616655880082,"gmtModify":1704796977500,"author":{"id":"3577917165320806","authorId":"3577917165320806","name":"KinKat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/303a11363633244c53e6b67003899c74","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Putting AMAT on my watchlist&nbsp;[得意]&nbsp;","listText":"Putting AMAT on my watchlist&nbsp;[得意]&nbsp;","text":"Putting AMAT on my watchlist [得意]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358957443","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3879531,"gmtCreate":1616661164182,"gmtModify":1680781671287,"authorId":3577917165320806,"author":{"id":3577917165320806,"authorId":3577917165320806,"name":"KinKat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/303a11363633244c53e6b67003899c74","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358957443,"type":1,"supId":3879320,"prevId":0,"content":"Mentioned in article. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMAT\"> $Applied Materials(AMAT)$ </a>supplies FAB eqpt to both INTC &amp; TSMC","text":"Mentioned in article. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMAT\"> $Applied Materials(AMAT)$ </a>supplies FAB eqpt to both INTC &amp; TSMC","html":"Mentioned in article. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMAT\"> $Applied Materials(AMAT)$ </a>supplies FAB eqpt to both INTC &amp; TSMC"},{"id":3879320,"gmtCreate":1616659649015,"gmtModify":1680781664429,"authorId":3572874548548490,"author":{"id":3572874548548490,"authorId":3572874548548490,"name":"kevinlaisq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/329de1199f764a89b7cadf50308e183d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358957443,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"good?","text":"good?","html":"good?"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":358954595,"gmtCreate":1616655616417,"gmtModify":1704796975543,"author":{"id":"3565687171198207","authorId":"3565687171198207","name":"Holla","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c0b0e402ff8043410cc67ffccbfe2174","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like my comment if u long Intel!","listText":"Like my comment if u long Intel!","text":"Like my comment if u long Intel!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358954595","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3879008,"gmtCreate":1616656258302,"gmtModify":1680781664912,"authorId":3554887433065819,"author":{"id":3554887433065819,"authorId":3554887433065819,"name":"WoBuZhiDao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/979eba89f1c5251b4aa4e0f0f6c10daa","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358954595,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment done","text":"Comment done","html":"Comment done"},{"id":3879010,"gmtCreate":1616656280723,"gmtModify":1680781663837,"authorId":3554887433065819,"author":{"id":3554887433065819,"authorId":3554887433065819,"name":"WoBuZhiDao","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/979eba89f1c5251b4aa4e0f0f6c10daa","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358954595,"type":1,"supId":3879008,"prevId":0,"content":"Reply also thank yoU :)","text":"Reply also thank yoU :)","html":"Reply also thank yoU :)"},{"id":3878995,"gmtCreate":1616656104675,"gmtModify":1680781657387,"authorId":3572845868461823,"author":{"id":3572845868461823,"authorId":3572845868461823,"name":"Walker975","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47a7e91bc7c022014ade594c1f141089","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358954595,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hmmm I'm not sure if intel is currently worth more than amd <u>though</u>","text":"hmmm I'm not sure if intel is currently worth more than amd <u>though</u>","html":"hmmm I'm not sure if intel is currently worth more than amd <u>though</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358954675,"gmtCreate":1616655602997,"gmtModify":1704796975381,"author":{"id":"3575520242976099","authorId":"3575520242976099","name":"Lala321","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8c66fbbb27edbdf93dadc44688aeac6","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"[開心]&nbsp;","listText":"[開心]&nbsp;","text":"[開心]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358954675","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":358955754,"gmtCreate":1616655586978,"gmtModify":1704796974405,"author":{"id":"3554853770778714","authorId":"3554853770778714","name":"PTKH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/730b421e1cf14ed038cbcbbccd32253e","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358955754","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":358956476,"gmtCreate":1616655231095,"gmtModify":1704796971162,"author":{"id":"3560394851002481","authorId":"3560394851002481","name":"Alex77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da14fbb2adbae4651f74cd7d3331bc3a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Pls comment.. thks","listText":"Pls comment.. thks","text":"Pls comment.. thks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358956476","repostId":1102618186,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102618186","pubTimestamp":1616655177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102618186?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 14:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102618186","media":"Barrons","summary":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forwa","content":"<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.</p>\n<p>Shares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.</p>\n<p>Toreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.</p>\n<p>Only AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.</p>\n<p>Barclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the&nbsp;financial guidanceI&nbsp;ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely&nbsp;U.S. federal subsidies.</p>\n<p>Intelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.</p>\n<p>BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.</p>\n<p>Gelsinger told<i>Barron’s</i>Tuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.</p>\n<p>Despite Gelsinger’s statements to<i>Barron’s</i>and during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.</p>\n<p>In terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.</p>\n<p>Perhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.</p>\n<p>In a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as&nbsp;Applied Materials&nbsp;won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.</p>\n<p>“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”</p>\n<p><i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;took a&nbsp;positive view of Intel&nbsp;in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Intel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIntel Has a New Plan, and Wall Street Has Doubts\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 14:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/intel-has-a-new-plan-and-wall-street-has-doubts-51616615016?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102618186","content_text":"In an address late Tuesday, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out his vision for the company’s path forward, looking to its past manufacturing prowess to forge a future. Wall Street has started to weigh in on the plan, with a mixed verdict.\nShares of Intel (ticker: INTC) began Wednesday with a gain of more than 5%, but all that, and more, had vanished by the end of the afternoon. The stock was off 2.3% at $62.04.\nToreinvent Intel, Gelsinger laid out a straightforward plan. Intel will invest $20 billion to build two chip fabrication sites in Arizona, create a new division that offers chip manufacturing as a service—including licensing its coveted x86 chip architecture to third parties—and look more to partners such asTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM) to produce its most advanced microprocessors.\nOnly AMD and Intel have the intellectual property to allow them to make x86 chips, used in the central processing units of personal computers.\nBarclays analyst Blayne Curtis expressed skepticism in a Wednesday research note. Curtis wrote that the company’s pitch to investors contained little new in the way of product details, and said the financial guidanceI ntel offered was disappointing—especially given the new capital outlays for the Arizona plants, even when taking into account likely U.S. federal subsidies.\nIntelsaidit expected a full-year adjusted profit of $4.55 a share, on sales of $72 billion, excluding its flash memory business, which it agreed to sell last year. The deal has not yet closed.\nBofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a client note that his team has concerns with the company’s plan to return to manufacturing superiority. Arya said Gelsinger offered no evidence that Intel can match or exceed Taiwan Semi’s manufacturing capabilities for the most advanced chips.\nGelsinger toldBarron’sTuesday that Intel will speed up its chip-development process to catch rival manufacturers. “We’re doing double time to catch up,” Gelsinger said. “We’re moving from a two to three year processor cadence to a one year cycle,” slashing the time needed to design and produce a new generations of chips.\nDespite Gelsinger’s statements toBarron’sand during Tuesday’s press conference, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis wrote that the company didn’t directly address how it plans to catch up with Taiwan Semi. According to Lipacis’s research, Intel is at least 2½ years behind its Taiwan-based rival and will have difficulty closing the gap.\nIn terms of the new Arizona plants, Arya said, Taiwan Semi also plans to build additional manufacturing facilities there. They will begin large-scale production at roughly the same time as Intel’s developments.\nPerhaps one of the safest ways to play the semiconductor sector at the moment, says RBC Capital Markets analyst Mitch Steves, is to invest in the companies that make fabrication equipment and ignore the chip makers altogether.\nIn a note to clients Wednesday, Steves wrote that his team sees no risk that companies such as Applied Materials won’t be able to follow through on their goals, because they only provide the tools chip makers use as they fight to keep pace with their rivals.\n“Notably, we believe there is execution risk to both [Advanced Micro Devices] and Intel at this point which leads us to view semi-cap equipment as the easier investment plan in 2021,” Steves wrote. “The $20B investment likely creates more upside potential to financial models for Semi-cap equipment and we think the focus for AMD/INTC will circle around execution.”\nBarron’s took a positive view of Intel in November, arguing that the company would be ripe for a turnaround. Intel stock has gained 20% in the past year, as the Sox advanced 101%. The benchmark S&P 500 index rose 60% in the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3878958,"gmtCreate":1616655626927,"gmtModify":1680781658455,"authorId":3565687171198207,"author":{"id":3565687171198207,"authorId":3565687171198207,"name":"Holla","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c0b0e402ff8043410cc67ffccbfe2174","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":358956476,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":11,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}