Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?

293
22
Favorite

Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?

Motley Fool2022-09-18

KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

293

Report

Comment（22）

BennyTay
·2022-09-19
👍
Reply
Like
Report
Iamboon
·2022-09-19
Sure
Reply
Like
Report
ZenInv
·2022-09-19
The big tick and the omega
Reply
Like
Report
Williamw
·2022-09-19
Ok
Reply
Like
Report
YauDK
·2022-09-19
Ye
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- YauDK:
  Ye
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
Botak Tur
·2022-09-19
Ok
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Botak Tur:
  K
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
Chitz
·2022-09-19
Like
Reply
1
Report
WJ77
·2022-09-19
👍👍
Reply
1
Report
xiaobaii
·2022-09-19
like & comment
Reply
1
Report
AnT
·2022-09-19
Ok
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- AnT:
  ok
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
Singmeamelodyy
·2022-09-18
Llululemon
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Chitz:
  yes
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
Oyh
·2022-09-18
Ok
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- xiaobaii:
  like & comment
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
- Oyh:
  Ok
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
NP_YT
·2022-09-18
Ok
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- ZEROHERO:
  Done
  2022-09-19
  Reply
  Report
LEESIMON
·2022-09-18
ok
Reply
3
Report
kevinlaisq
·2022-09-18
Pls oike
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- Jermaine.T:
  ok
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
- NewbieEP:
  Done [Grin]
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
jiunnnnn
·2022-09-18
Always Nike
Reply
3
Report
V.lye
·2022-09-18
Ok
Reply
2
Report
EY12
·2022-09-18
Like
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- rogerl:
  ok
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
- DL97:
  Likezzz
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
- EY12:
  hi
  2022-09-18
  Reply
  Report
Andrewinho
·2022-09-18
Nike!! 🚀🚀🚀
Reply
3
Report
TaiWoeiHaur
·2022-09-18
Good morning
Reply
5
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1110055265","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"LULU","symbol_name":"lululemon athletica","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","article_id":"1110055265","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"translate_title":"成长性较好的股票：耐克还是露露柠檬？","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"LULU":0.9,"NKE":0.9},"content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9910999364,"gmtCreate":1663545333558,"gmtModify":1676537285875,"author":{"id":"3578378737544841","authorId":"3578378737544841","name":"BennyTay","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b2811d2536960cbba454a3f5f37fe4c5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3578378737544841","idStr":"3578378737544841"},"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910999364","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910073865,"gmtCreate":1663544079658,"gmtModify":1676537285346,"author":{"id":"3582785870889468","authorId":"3582785870889468","name":"Iamboon","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582785870889468","idStr":"3582785870889468"},"htmlText":"Sure","listText":"Sure","text":"Sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910073865","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910051437,"gmtCreate":1663542814829,"gmtModify":1676537284736,"author":{"id":"4098783902581330","authorId":"4098783902581330","name":"ZenInv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/033bd47e3df1977aaef462f53997e9f1","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4098783902581330","idStr":"4098783902581330"},"htmlText":"The big tick and the omega","listText":"The big tick and the omega","text":"The big tick and the omega","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910051437","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910027097,"gmtCreate":1663542543519,"gmtModify":1676537284548,"author":{"id":"3572240910775763","authorId":"3572240910775763","name":"Williamw","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ecafced5a6c16b176940098e09cf69b6","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3572240910775763","idStr":"3572240910775763"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910027097","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910022570,"gmtCreate":1663542416991,"gmtModify":1676537284477,"author":{"id":"3580072870029753","authorId":"3580072870029753","name":"YauDK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e00c10df4000c04392220903422d15f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3580072870029753","idStr":"3580072870029753"},"htmlText":"Ye&nbsp;","listText":"Ye&nbsp;","text":"Ye","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910022570","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103988125,"gmtCreate":1663542427737,"gmtModify":1663542431597,"authorId":3580072870029753,"author":{"id":3580072870029753,"idStr":"3580072870029753","authorId":3580072870029753,"name":"YauDK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e00c10df4000c04392220903422d15f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9910022570,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Ye</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Ye</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Ye</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910026800,"gmtCreate":1663542315500,"gmtModify":1676537284445,"author":{"id":"3578990746736424","authorId":"3578990746736424","name":"Botak Tur","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad2db38166c18b512749a83019596279","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3578990746736424","idStr":"3578990746736424"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910026800","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103988081,"gmtCreate":1663542325645,"gmtModify":1663542329068,"authorId":3578990746736424,"author":{"id":3578990746736424,"idStr":"3578990746736424","authorId":3578990746736424,"name":"Botak Tur","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad2db38166c18b512749a83019596279","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9910026800,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910021273,"gmtCreate":1663542150392,"gmtModify":1676537284399,"author":{"id":"3574934277926519","authorId":"3574934277926519","name":"Chitz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/988984eee397d7e772b978815d9b162e","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574934277926519","idStr":"3574934277926519"},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910021273","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910088370,"gmtCreate":1663540532190,"gmtModify":1676537283678,"author":{"id":"3573616695330925","authorId":"3573616695330925","name":"WJ77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/56bf6bd5b462948ac1028ecaabdba952","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3573616695330925","idStr":"3573616695330925"},"htmlText":"👍👍","listText":"👍👍","text":"👍👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910088370","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910037287,"gmtCreate":1663539305150,"gmtModify":1676537283199,"author":{"id":"3571345352614779","authorId":"3571345352614779","name":"xiaobaii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3571345352614779","idStr":"3571345352614779"},"htmlText":"like &amp; comment","listText":"like &amp; comment","text":"like & comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910037287","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9910039826,"gmtCreate":1663537762565,"gmtModify":1676537282976,"author":{"id":"3578200234343382","authorId":"3578200234343382","name":"AnT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a777c54118c03953e7be94b2700b9768","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3578200234343382","idStr":"3578200234343382"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9910039826","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103987118,"gmtCreate":1663537775227,"gmtModify":1663537778831,"authorId":3578200234343382,"author":{"id":3578200234343382,"idStr":"3578200234343382","authorId":3578200234343382,"name":"AnT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a777c54118c03953e7be94b2700b9768","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9910039826,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937745723,"gmtCreate":1663515302762,"gmtModify":1676537281916,"author":{"id":"4112236528991632","authorId":"4112236528991632","name":"Singmeamelodyy","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bd6f4b2042c573a893dce45a93a107fb","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4112236528991632","idStr":"4112236528991632"},"htmlText":"Llululemon&nbsp;","listText":"Llululemon&nbsp;","text":"Llululemon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937745723","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103988029,"gmtCreate":1663542169482,"gmtModify":1663542172882,"authorId":3574934277926519,"author":{"id":3574934277926519,"idStr":"3574934277926519","authorId":3574934277926519,"name":"Chitz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/988984eee397d7e772b978815d9b162e","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937745723,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>yes</u>","text":"<u>yes</u>","html":"<u>yes</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937733566,"gmtCreate":1663501005356,"gmtModify":1676537279957,"author":{"id":"3561459567222461","authorId":"3561459567222461","name":"Oyh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6efe76978b8678e18a4d96fd589746dd","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3561459567222461","idStr":"3561459567222461"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937733566","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103987301,"gmtCreate":1663539311794,"gmtModify":1663539315074,"authorId":3571345352614779,"author":{"id":3571345352614779,"idStr":"3571345352614779","authorId":3571345352614779,"name":"xiaobaii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937733566,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">like &amp; comment</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">like &amp; comment</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">like &amp; comment</span>"},{"id":103984481,"gmtCreate":1663501014890,"gmtModify":1663501018286,"authorId":3561459567222461,"author":{"id":3561459567222461,"idStr":"3561459567222461","authorId":3561459567222461,"name":"Oyh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6efe76978b8678e18a4d96fd589746dd","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937733566,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937442771,"gmtCreate":1663491233293,"gmtModify":1676537278828,"author":{"id":"3572043809285615","authorId":"3572043809285615","name":"NP_YT","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/fad9f70abb174e3e09e4caf3f9c0c13a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3572043809285615","idStr":"3572043809285615"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937442771","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103986470,"gmtCreate":1663516997712,"gmtModify":1663517000901,"authorId":3566532164444643,"author":{"id":3566532164444643,"idStr":"3566532164444643","authorId":3566532164444643,"name":"ZEROHERO","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62813b6df1c4722e559d112fadd5486a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.02.05","exceedPercentage":"93.41%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[{"badgeId":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8-1","templateUuid":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8","name":"Star Contributor","description":"Have published 3 or more picked posts, and have published at least one picked post and participated in comments within 30 days","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1866dcf97a73be1c330f85862546aedc","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f5c5fa8e2c7683bb5a7fce8753ee456","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/activity/market/2023/star-contributors/","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.22","individualDisplayEnabled":1,"backgroundColor":{"dark":"#675a37","tint":"#f9ebc2"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#ffffff","tint":"#ab7a0e"},"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2007}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937442771,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Done</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Done</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Done</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937419072,"gmtCreate":1663478591196,"gmtModify":1676537277098,"author":{"id":"3579044609497336","authorId":"3579044609497336","name":"LEESIMON","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3579044609497336","idStr":"3579044609497336"},"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937419072","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937577680,"gmtCreate":1663473760640,"gmtModify":1676537276082,"author":{"id":"3572874548548490","authorId":"3572874548548490","name":"kevinlaisq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/329de1199f764a89b7cadf50308e183d","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3572874548548490","idStr":"3572874548548490"},"htmlText":"Pls oike","listText":"Pls oike","text":"Pls oike","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937577680","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103986420,"gmtCreate":1663516388004,"gmtModify":1663516391402,"authorId":4112408266251122,"author":{"id":4112408266251122,"idStr":"4112408266251122","authorId":4112408266251122,"name":"Jermaine.T","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2a5b19a781c12e6b97665fe5aa19dca7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937577680,"type":1,"supId":103983089,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":103983089,"gmtCreate":1663489304627,"gmtModify":1663489307975,"authorId":4105574787449210,"author":{"id":4105574787449210,"idStr":"4105574787449210","authorId":4105574787449210,"name":"NewbieEP","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.06.23","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937577680,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Done [Grin]</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Done [Grin]</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Done [Grin]</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937546926,"gmtCreate":1663471714665,"gmtModify":1676537275636,"author":{"id":"4088132666965010","authorId":"4088132666965010","name":"jiunnnnn","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/24f28c4d762ae6f62b32956f1633ebdf","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4088132666965010","idStr":"4088132666965010"},"htmlText":"Always Nike","listText":"Always Nike","text":"Always Nike","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937546926","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937540089,"gmtCreate":1663471206641,"gmtModify":1676537275503,"author":{"id":"4088902048392220","authorId":"4088902048392220","name":"V.lye","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7233306780623a2802ebfc0893c0cc52","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4088902048392220","idStr":"4088902048392220"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937540089","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937524014,"gmtCreate":1663469845738,"gmtModify":1676537275112,"author":{"id":"3569935580474431","authorId":"3569935580474431","name":"EY12","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/103e86782b34598ff73873d5f9259adb","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3569935580474431","idStr":"3569935580474431"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937524014","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":103980223,"gmtCreate":1663471053086,"gmtModify":1663471057727,"authorId":3572005079747641,"author":{"id":3572005079747641,"idStr":"3572005079747641","authorId":3572005079747641,"name":"rogerl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70a75678cb06207361b08aa8e42a9ecd","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937524014,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"},{"id":103980177,"gmtCreate":1663470654991,"gmtModify":1663470659348,"authorId":3581595210484952,"author":{"id":3581595210484952,"idStr":"3581595210484952","authorId":3581595210484952,"name":"DL97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5df17e476ae735a64e7017b160d3935","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937524014,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>"},{"id":103980031,"gmtCreate":1663469855083,"gmtModify":1663469859850,"authorId":3569935580474431,"author":{"id":3569935580474431,"idStr":"3569935580474431","authorId":3569935580474431,"name":"EY12","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/103e86782b34598ff73873d5f9259adb","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9937524014,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>hi</u>","text":"<u>hi</u>","html":"<u>hi</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937523854,"gmtCreate":1663469199279,"gmtModify":1676537274967,"author":{"id":"3581563418944392","authorId":"3581563418944392","name":"Andrewinho","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3127e2bc40ab23064a5187a00a63e19b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581563418944392","idStr":"3581563418944392"},"htmlText":"Nike!! 🚀🚀🚀","listText":"Nike!! 🚀🚀🚀","text":"Nike!! 🚀🚀🚀","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937523854","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9937589757,"gmtCreate":1663466903580,"gmtModify":1676537274332,"author":{"id":"3563667765668803","authorId":"3563667765668803","name":"TaiWoeiHaur","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4573ecee7a4a891ace3e5566a59069d5","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3563667765668803","idStr":"3563667765668803"},"htmlText":"Good morning&nbsp;","listText":"Good morning&nbsp;","text":"Good morning","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937589757","repostId":1110055265,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110055265","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663464620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110055265?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110055265","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The prominent retailers both look promising despite a few tough quarters possibly ahead for sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Lululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.</li><li>Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.</li></ul><p>Sportswear companies <b>Nike</b> and <b>Lululemon Athletica</b> both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there&#39;s a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.</p><p>If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Better sales: Lululemon</h2><p>Lululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .</p><p>Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren&#39;t as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.</p><p>Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.</p><h2>Lower risk: Nike</h2><p>Nike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant&#39;s larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls &#34;demand creation&#34; expenses. That&#39;s more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .</p><p>Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.</p><h2>The better growth stock</h2><p>But Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike&#39;s 46% rate.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6acee30a592058215445399b21e08d5\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"482\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p>The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike&#39;s nearly $50 billion.</p><p>Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Growth Stock: Nike or Lululemon?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LULU":"lululemon athletica","NKE":"耐克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/17/better-growth-stock-nike-or-lululemon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110055265","content_text":"KEY POINTSLululemon has a more classic growth-stock posture.Nike is less risky and might ride through a recession more easily.Sportswear companies Nike and Lululemon Athletica both face big risks over the next few quarters. The stocks have declined in 2022 on fears about slowing spending in the apparel space. Rising costs could pressure earnings, too, and there's a good chance that weaker demand will show up at just the wrong time around the core holiday shopping season.If investors can look past these short-term issues, though, they could benefit from unusually low valuations for these two successful athletic apparel specialists. But which stock is the better buy right now? Let's take a closer look.Better sales: LululemonLululemon has all the characteristics of an attractive growth stock today. Sales gains accelerated to 29% in the most recent quarter and are being lifted by a combination of rising traffic and an expanding store footprint. The company posted a 28% revenue spike in the core U.S. geography last quarter, along with a 35% spike in the international segment .Nike is more established, especially in China, and so its growth trends aren't as head-turning. Revenue for the fourth-quarter period that ended in late May rose just 3%. That figure will likely improve significantly when the company reports fiscal Q1 results in late September because pandemic lockdowns eased in many parts of China.Yet, investors prioritizing sales growth will likely still be drawn to Lululemon, which has a legitimate shot at expanding its geographic presence while pushing into new categories like footwear, outerwear, and menswear.Lower risk: NikeNike, on the other hand, will likely appeal to more risk-averse investors. The blue-chip giant's larger footprint should cushion the business against a recession if one should develop in 2022 and 2023. Nike also has the resources to continue pouring cash into marketing and advertising through any type of selling environment. The company spent $1.1 billion on these channels, which management calls \"demand creation\" expenses. That's more than half of the $1.9 billion in total sales that Lululemon reported in the most recent quarter .Nike is also less risky from a valuation perspective. Investors are paying 3.8 times annual earnings to own the stock today compared to 6.4 for Lululemon. Sure, both of those valuations are far lower than they were a year ago. But Nike still seems like a relative bargain, especially if you think a prolonged demand slowdown is on the way.The better growth stockBut Lululemon is the purer growth stock in this matchup. That fact shows up in metrics like sales growth, but also in gross profit margin, which has been steadily climbing and sits a full 10 percentage points above Nike's 46% rate.LULU GROSS PROFIT MARGIN DATA BY YCHARTS.The athleisure specialist has a good shot at pushing profitability further toward 60% of sales, too, as it releases more premium products in attractive niches like footwear. Its annual sales footprint has lots of room to expand from the current level of around $7 billion, on the way toward Nike's nearly $50 billion.Sure, there are major risks to that bullish outlook, including a recession in the athleisure industry. But growth-stock investors have to be comfortable with volatility as they wait for market-beating returns to accrue over many years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":293,"commentSize":22,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}