3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom

42
2
Favorite

3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom

Bloomberg2023-04-01

Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（2）

jiunnnnn
·2023-04-01
Be greedy when others are fearful
Reply
3
Report
nick220
·2023-04-01
[Miser]
Reply
1
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131212233?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2023-04-01 08:34","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1131212233","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom","media":"Bloomberg","content":"<div>\n<p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-01 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"MMM","symbol_name":"3M","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp","article_id":"1131212233","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131212233","pubTimestamp":1680309276,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1584095487587","name":"Bloomberg"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record va","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"bloomberg.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"MMM":"3M"},"translate_title":"300万是表现最差的道琼斯股票，数十亿美元的法律费用迫在眉睫","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"MMM":0.9},"content_text":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg3M Co.’s first-quarter plunge is scaring off even the bravest of dip buyers as its crippling legal troubles continue to haunt the century-old industrial giant.  Shares of the company — whose products encompass everything from auto parts to Post-it notes — are down 12.4% in the first quarter, making them the biggest decliners in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. And only 51 of the 503 companies in the S&P 500 Index have had worse performances than 3M this year.“This stock is currently uninvestable,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray said in a phone interview. “It is going to be a really difficult year for the company.” Litigation risk is the biggest threat facing 3M, Dray said. The company is fighting legal challenges on two major issues: chemical contaminants and defective combat earplugs. Dray noted that the US Congress is likely to take more stringent measures to tackle pollution from the so-called forever chemicals, or PFAS — polyfluoroalkyl substances — some time later this year. 3M is one of the makers of the pollutant, along with DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co. and others.    “The PFAS liability is the main reason to avoid 3M,” said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer at SPEAR Invest. “PFAS has been weighing on the company’s shares since late 2019; but what started as few cases disclosed in the regulatory filing, could now end up being a $100 billion liability.”Earlier this month, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new rules for lowering the maximum contaminant levels of PFAS chemicals in drinking water — a move that, if passed, can lead to even more lawsuits for the companies involved. Meanwhile, 3M’s core business has also hit a rough patch. Stubbornly high inflation and fears of a recession are hitting the company’s consumer-facing lines. In January, 3M said it would cut about 2,500 manufacturing jobs due to persistent economic hurdles and forecast an annual profit that came in shy of expectations.  The company has implemented “strict control” over its discretionary spending, Chief Executive Officer Mike Roman said during during 3M’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 24, noting that it planned to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. 3M declined to comment beyond that.Dark Mood   The company’s shares reflect this darkening mood. The stock is trading at around 12 times its forward earnings, compared with the Dow’s price-to-earnings multiple of about 17 and the S&P 500’s 18. The spread of p/e ratios between 3M and the S&P is at the widest since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. While estimates about the financial ramifications of the PFAS and the earplug suits vary widely, most put the total above tens of billions, albeit spread over several years. Bloomberg Intelligence’s litigation analyst Holly Froum said that for the chemicals cases, remediation may cost about $30 billion to $35 billion, payable over 30 years, while for the earplugs suits she expects around $5.5 billion to $9.5 billion in costs.  Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts’ average profit estimate for 3M has dropped 17% over the past three months, while their revenue expectations have retreated 6% over the same period. BI industrials analyst Karen Ubelhart said the lack of clarity around the legal issues make it hard to calculate their possible impact on earnings, leading to further uncertainty.With everything swirling around the company, analysts have largely moved to the sidelines, with 14 recommending holding the stock, six advocating selling, and just one suggesting investors buy it. That would be Morningstar’s Joshua Aguilar, whose estimates for legal costs are below the Street average. But while Aguilar believes the shares are pricing in a much-bigger impact from litigation risk, he says there are better investments in the industrials sector. “What you can’t have is litigation risks as well as poor operating results, and unfortunately they have both,” Aguilar said. “Fear has taken over the narrative.”","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9941248682,"gmtCreate":1680323004046,"gmtModify":1680323007890,"author":{"id":"4088132666965010","authorId":"4088132666965010","name":"jiunnnnn","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/24f28c4d762ae6f62b32956f1633ebdf","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4088132666965010","authorIdStr":"4088132666965010"},"htmlText":"Be greedy when others are fearful&nbsp;","listText":"Be greedy when others are fearful&nbsp;","text":"Be greedy when others are fearful","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941248682","repostId":1131212233,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131212233","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1680309276,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131212233?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-01 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131212233","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record va","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIA</p></li><li><p>Legal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&amp;P</p></li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72dcab706260e603c46841288fb44736\" title=\"3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"667\"/><span>3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg</span></p><p>3M Co.’s first-quarter plunge is scaring off even the bravest of dip buyers as its crippling legal troubles continue to haunt the century-old industrial giant.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Shares of the company — whose products encompass everything from auto parts to Post-it notes — are down 12.4% in the first quarter, making them the biggest decliners in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. And only 51 of the 503 companies in the S&amp;P 500 Index have had worse performances than 3M this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“This stock is currently uninvestable,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray said in a phone interview. “It is going to be a really difficult year for the company.” </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Litigation risk is the biggest threat facing 3M, Dray said. The company is fighting legal challenges on two major issues: chemical contaminants and defective combat earplugs. Dray noted that the US Congress is likely to take more stringent measures to tackle pollution from the so-called forever chemicals, or PFAS — polyfluoroalkyl<em> </em>substances — some time later this year. 3M is one of the makers of the pollutant, along with DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co. and others.  </p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c6b3490a1b9c67e1fb9d2b2296d18e3\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"/></p><p> </p><p><em> </em>“The PFAS liability is the main reason to avoid 3M,” said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer at SPEAR Invest. “PFAS has been weighing on the company’s shares since late 2019; but what started as few cases disclosed in the regulatory filing, could now end up being a $100 billion liability.”</p><p>Earlier this month, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new rules for lowering the maximum contaminant levels of PFAS chemicals in drinking water — a move that, if passed, can lead to even more lawsuits for the companies involved. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Meanwhile, 3M’s core business has also hit a rough patch. Stubbornly high inflation and fears of a recession are hitting the company’s consumer-facing lines. In January, 3M said it would cut about 2,500 manufacturing jobs due to persistent economic hurdles and forecast an annual profit that came in shy of expectations.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The company has implemented “strict control” over its discretionary spending, Chief Executive Officer Mike Roman said during during 3M’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 24, noting that it planned to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. 3M declined to comment beyond that.</p><h3 style=\"text-align: start;\">Dark Mood   </h3><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The company’s shares reflect this darkening mood. The stock is trading at around 12 times its forward earnings, compared with the Dow’s price-to-earnings multiple of about 17 and the S&amp;P 500’s 18. The spread of p/e ratios between 3M and the S&amp;P is at the widest since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While estimates about the financial ramifications of the PFAS and the earplug suits vary widely, most put the total above tens of billions, albeit spread over several years. Bloomberg Intelligence’s litigation analyst Holly Froum said that for the chemicals cases, remediation may cost about $30 billion to $35 billion, payable over 30 years, while for the earplugs suits she expects around $5.5 billion to $9.5 billion in costs.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts’ average profit estimate for 3M has dropped 17% over the past three months, while their revenue expectations have retreated 6% over the same period. BI industrials analyst Karen Ubelhart said the lack of clarity around the legal issues make it hard to calculate their possible impact on earnings, leading to further uncertainty.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">With everything swirling around the company, analysts have largely moved to the sidelines, with 14 recommending holding the stock, six advocating selling, and just one suggesting investors buy it. That would be Morningstar’s Joshua Aguilar, whose estimates for legal costs are below the Street average. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But while Aguilar believes the shares are pricing in a much-bigger impact from litigation risk, he says there are better investments in the industrials sector. </p><p>“What you can’t have is litigation risks as well as poor operating results, and unfortunately they have both,” Aguilar said. “Fear has taken over the narrative.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-01 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MMM":"3M"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131212233","content_text":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg3M Co.’s first-quarter plunge is scaring off even the bravest of dip buyers as its crippling legal troubles continue to haunt the century-old industrial giant.  Shares of the company — whose products encompass everything from auto parts to Post-it notes — are down 12.4% in the first quarter, making them the biggest decliners in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. And only 51 of the 503 companies in the S&P 500 Index have had worse performances than 3M this year.“This stock is currently uninvestable,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray said in a phone interview. “It is going to be a really difficult year for the company.” Litigation risk is the biggest threat facing 3M, Dray said. The company is fighting legal challenges on two major issues: chemical contaminants and defective combat earplugs. Dray noted that the US Congress is likely to take more stringent measures to tackle pollution from the so-called forever chemicals, or PFAS — polyfluoroalkyl substances — some time later this year. 3M is one of the makers of the pollutant, along with DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co. and others.    “The PFAS liability is the main reason to avoid 3M,” said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer at SPEAR Invest. “PFAS has been weighing on the company’s shares since late 2019; but what started as few cases disclosed in the regulatory filing, could now end up being a $100 billion liability.”Earlier this month, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new rules for lowering the maximum contaminant levels of PFAS chemicals in drinking water — a move that, if passed, can lead to even more lawsuits for the companies involved. Meanwhile, 3M’s core business has also hit a rough patch. Stubbornly high inflation and fears of a recession are hitting the company’s consumer-facing lines. In January, 3M said it would cut about 2,500 manufacturing jobs due to persistent economic hurdles and forecast an annual profit that came in shy of expectations.  The company has implemented “strict control” over its discretionary spending, Chief Executive Officer Mike Roman said during during 3M’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 24, noting that it planned to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. 3M declined to comment beyond that.Dark Mood   The company’s shares reflect this darkening mood. The stock is trading at around 12 times its forward earnings, compared with the Dow’s price-to-earnings multiple of about 17 and the S&P 500’s 18. The spread of p/e ratios between 3M and the S&P is at the widest since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. While estimates about the financial ramifications of the PFAS and the earplug suits vary widely, most put the total above tens of billions, albeit spread over several years. Bloomberg Intelligence’s litigation analyst Holly Froum said that for the chemicals cases, remediation may cost about $30 billion to $35 billion, payable over 30 years, while for the earplugs suits she expects around $5.5 billion to $9.5 billion in costs.  Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts’ average profit estimate for 3M has dropped 17% over the past three months, while their revenue expectations have retreated 6% over the same period. BI industrials analyst Karen Ubelhart said the lack of clarity around the legal issues make it hard to calculate their possible impact on earnings, leading to further uncertainty.With everything swirling around the company, analysts have largely moved to the sidelines, with 14 recommending holding the stock, six advocating selling, and just one suggesting investors buy it. That would be Morningstar’s Joshua Aguilar, whose estimates for legal costs are below the Street average. But while Aguilar believes the shares are pricing in a much-bigger impact from litigation risk, he says there are better investments in the industrials sector. “What you can’t have is litigation risks as well as poor operating results, and unfortunately they have both,” Aguilar said. “Fear has taken over the narrative.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9941259322,"gmtCreate":1680310269367,"gmtModify":1680310272782,"author":{"id":"4090813896055390","authorId":"4090813896055390","name":"nick220","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/4c8c9da1778793cc3dc2df31c2ed64ab","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090813896055390","authorIdStr":"4090813896055390"},"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941259322","repostId":1131212233,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131212233","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1680309276,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131212233?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-01 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131212233","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record va","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIA</p></li><li><p>Legal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&amp;P</p></li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72dcab706260e603c46841288fb44736\" title=\"3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"1000\" tg-height=\"667\"/><span>3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg</span></p><p>3M Co.’s first-quarter plunge is scaring off even the bravest of dip buyers as its crippling legal troubles continue to haunt the century-old industrial giant.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Shares of the company — whose products encompass everything from auto parts to Post-it notes — are down 12.4% in the first quarter, making them the biggest decliners in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. And only 51 of the 503 companies in the S&amp;P 500 Index have had worse performances than 3M this year.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“This stock is currently uninvestable,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray said in a phone interview. “It is going to be a really difficult year for the company.” </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Litigation risk is the biggest threat facing 3M, Dray said. The company is fighting legal challenges on two major issues: chemical contaminants and defective combat earplugs. Dray noted that the US Congress is likely to take more stringent measures to tackle pollution from the so-called forever chemicals, or PFAS — polyfluoroalkyl<em> </em>substances — some time later this year. 3M is one of the makers of the pollutant, along with DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co. and others.  </p><p></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c6b3490a1b9c67e1fb9d2b2296d18e3\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"/></p><p> </p><p><em> </em>“The PFAS liability is the main reason to avoid 3M,” said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer at SPEAR Invest. “PFAS has been weighing on the company’s shares since late 2019; but what started as few cases disclosed in the regulatory filing, could now end up being a $100 billion liability.”</p><p>Earlier this month, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new rules for lowering the maximum contaminant levels of PFAS chemicals in drinking water — a move that, if passed, can lead to even more lawsuits for the companies involved. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Meanwhile, 3M’s core business has also hit a rough patch. Stubbornly high inflation and fears of a recession are hitting the company’s consumer-facing lines. In January, 3M said it would cut about 2,500 manufacturing jobs due to persistent economic hurdles and forecast an annual profit that came in shy of expectations.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The company has implemented “strict control” over its discretionary spending, Chief Executive Officer Mike Roman said during during 3M’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 24, noting that it planned to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. 3M declined to comment beyond that.</p><h3 style=\"text-align: start;\">Dark Mood   </h3><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The company’s shares reflect this darkening mood. The stock is trading at around 12 times its forward earnings, compared with the Dow’s price-to-earnings multiple of about 17 and the S&amp;P 500’s 18. The spread of p/e ratios between 3M and the S&amp;P is at the widest since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">While estimates about the financial ramifications of the PFAS and the earplug suits vary widely, most put the total above tens of billions, albeit spread over several years. Bloomberg Intelligence’s litigation analyst Holly Froum said that for the chemicals cases, remediation may cost about $30 billion to $35 billion, payable over 30 years, while for the earplugs suits she expects around $5.5 billion to $9.5 billion in costs.  </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts’ average profit estimate for 3M has dropped 17% over the past three months, while their revenue expectations have retreated 6% over the same period. BI industrials analyst Karen Ubelhart said the lack of clarity around the legal issues make it hard to calculate their possible impact on earnings, leading to further uncertainty.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">With everything swirling around the company, analysts have largely moved to the sidelines, with 14 recommending holding the stock, six advocating selling, and just one suggesting investors buy it. That would be Morningstar’s Joshua Aguilar, whose estimates for legal costs are below the Street average. </p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But while Aguilar believes the shares are pricing in a much-bigger impact from litigation risk, he says there are better investments in the industrials sector. </p><p>“What you can’t have is litigation risks as well as poor operating results, and unfortunately they have both,” Aguilar said. “Fear has taken over the narrative.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3M Is Worst-Performing Dow Stock as Billions in Legal Costs Loom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-01 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MMM":"3M"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-31/3m-plumbs-the-depths-of-the-dow-as-billions-in-legal-costs-loom?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131212233","content_text":"Stock’s 12.4% first-quarter drop is biggest decline in the DJIALegal woes, weak view drive record valuation spread with S&P3M Global Headquarters in Maplewood, Minnesota.Photographer: Ben Brewer/Bloomberg3M Co.’s first-quarter plunge is scaring off even the bravest of dip buyers as its crippling legal troubles continue to haunt the century-old industrial giant.  Shares of the company — whose products encompass everything from auto parts to Post-it notes — are down 12.4% in the first quarter, making them the biggest decliners in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. And only 51 of the 503 companies in the S&P 500 Index have had worse performances than 3M this year.“This stock is currently uninvestable,” RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray said in a phone interview. “It is going to be a really difficult year for the company.” Litigation risk is the biggest threat facing 3M, Dray said. The company is fighting legal challenges on two major issues: chemical contaminants and defective combat earplugs. Dray noted that the US Congress is likely to take more stringent measures to tackle pollution from the so-called forever chemicals, or PFAS — polyfluoroalkyl substances — some time later this year. 3M is one of the makers of the pollutant, along with DuPont de Nemours Inc., Chemours Co. and others.    “The PFAS liability is the main reason to avoid 3M,” said Ivana Delevska, chief investment officer at SPEAR Invest. “PFAS has been weighing on the company’s shares since late 2019; but what started as few cases disclosed in the regulatory filing, could now end up being a $100 billion liability.”Earlier this month, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed new rules for lowering the maximum contaminant levels of PFAS chemicals in drinking water — a move that, if passed, can lead to even more lawsuits for the companies involved. Meanwhile, 3M’s core business has also hit a rough patch. Stubbornly high inflation and fears of a recession are hitting the company’s consumer-facing lines. In January, 3M said it would cut about 2,500 manufacturing jobs due to persistent economic hurdles and forecast an annual profit that came in shy of expectations.  The company has implemented “strict control” over its discretionary spending, Chief Executive Officer Mike Roman said during during 3M’s fourth-quarter earnings call on Jan. 24, noting that it planned to exit all PFAS manufacturing by the end of 2025. 3M declined to comment beyond that.Dark Mood   The company’s shares reflect this darkening mood. The stock is trading at around 12 times its forward earnings, compared with the Dow’s price-to-earnings multiple of about 17 and the S&P 500’s 18. The spread of p/e ratios between 3M and the S&P is at the widest since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. While estimates about the financial ramifications of the PFAS and the earplug suits vary widely, most put the total above tens of billions, albeit spread over several years. Bloomberg Intelligence’s litigation analyst Holly Froum said that for the chemicals cases, remediation may cost about $30 billion to $35 billion, payable over 30 years, while for the earplugs suits she expects around $5.5 billion to $9.5 billion in costs.  Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts’ average profit estimate for 3M has dropped 17% over the past three months, while their revenue expectations have retreated 6% over the same period. BI industrials analyst Karen Ubelhart said the lack of clarity around the legal issues make it hard to calculate their possible impact on earnings, leading to further uncertainty.With everything swirling around the company, analysts have largely moved to the sidelines, with 14 recommending holding the stock, six advocating selling, and just one suggesting investors buy it. That would be Morningstar’s Joshua Aguilar, whose estimates for legal costs are below the Street average. But while Aguilar believes the shares are pricing in a much-bigger impact from litigation risk, he says there are better investments in the industrials sector. “What you can’t have is litigation risks as well as poor operating results, and unfortunately they have both,” Aguilar said. “Fear has taken over the narrative.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":42,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}