Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion

110
10
Favorite

Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion

zerohedge2021-07-12

U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit. According to the ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

110

Report

Comment（10）

Linh2
·2021-07-12
ok
Reply
Like
Report
MT103
·2021-07-12
Let’s get back to $50 oil lol
Reply
Like
Report
Glenn101
·2021-07-12
Like this!
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Jl0987:
  [Smile]
  2021-07-12
  Reply
  Report
- Glenn101:
  Haha
  2021-07-12
  Reply
  Report
Srikanth
·2021-07-12
Good luck
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Glenn101:
  Ok!
  2021-07-12
  Reply
  Report
annyeonggg
·2021-07-12
Agree
Reply
1
Report
kel0508
·2021-07-12
Wow. Pls like
Reply
Like
Report
JaiVenky
·2021-07-12
Nice!
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- babypink:
  cool
  2021-07-12
  Reply
  Report
limhuileong
·2021-07-12
Good luck
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- flyingfish28:
  NiCe
  2021-07-12
  Reply
  Report
limhuileong
·2021-07-12
Good luck
Reply
2
Report
Seaside
·2021-07-12
Watchful
Reply
Like
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1131667592","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FT_SY_BZ","symbol_name":"布油现金","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","article_id":"1131667592","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"糟糕的对冲可能使美国页岩油损失200亿美元","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"BZmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9,"MCLmain":0.9},"content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":146801834,"gmtCreate":1626063278628,"gmtModify":1703752629539,"author":{"id":"3585965868931213","authorId":"3585965868931213","authorIdStr":"3585965868931213","name":"Linh2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d101c32296230bd77b11c7e24be3ea58","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3585965868931213"},"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146801834","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146183160,"gmtCreate":1626058886550,"gmtModify":1703752540221,"author":{"id":"3582627680210298","authorId":"3582627680210298","authorIdStr":"3582627680210298","name":"MT103","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0444eb80cd59e967bc90239dbe923661","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582627680210298"},"htmlText":"Let’s get back to $50 oil lol","listText":"Let’s get back to $50 oil lol","text":"Let’s get back to $50 oil lol","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146183160","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146353607,"gmtCreate":1626055230909,"gmtModify":1703752439970,"author":{"id":"3575528814174823","authorId":"3575528814174823","authorIdStr":"3575528814174823","name":"Glenn101","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a6dce55b58bcea0be9143c1569dc7bd","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3575528814174823"},"htmlText":"Like this!","listText":"Like this!","text":"Like this!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146353607","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5192300,"gmtCreate":1626055574610,"gmtModify":1663230849028,"authorId":3580650452587879,"author":{"id":3580650452587879,"authorId":3580650452587879,"name":"Jl0987","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":146353607,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[Smile]","text":"[Smile]","html":"[Smile]"},{"id":5192186,"gmtCreate":1626055240151,"gmtModify":1663230845051,"authorId":3575528814174823,"author":{"id":3575528814174823,"authorId":3575528814174823,"name":"Glenn101","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a6dce55b58bcea0be9143c1569dc7bd","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.42%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":146353607,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Haha","text":"Haha","html":"Haha"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146324747,"gmtCreate":1626055067089,"gmtModify":1703752434208,"author":{"id":"4087821855695230","authorId":"4087821855695230","authorIdStr":"4087821855695230","name":"Srikanth","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b3ea20f2e2f984cdc111f2c5e42e603","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087821855695230"},"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146324747","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5192188,"gmtCreate":1626055245706,"gmtModify":1663230843932,"authorId":3575528814174823,"author":{"id":3575528814174823,"authorId":3575528814174823,"name":"Glenn101","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a6dce55b58bcea0be9143c1569dc7bd","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.42%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":146324747,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok!","text":"Ok!","html":"Ok!"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146323444,"gmtCreate":1626054822388,"gmtModify":1703752425902,"author":{"id":"3582883940430405","authorId":"3582883940430405","authorIdStr":"3582883940430405","name":"annyeonggg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a24793800dbc5c64a06fb4d43641145","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582883940430405"},"htmlText":"Agree","listText":"Agree","text":"Agree","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146323444","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146362120,"gmtCreate":1626054491560,"gmtModify":1703752416818,"author":{"id":"3581934736299674","authorId":"3581934736299674","authorIdStr":"3581934736299674","name":"kel0508","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/893b8204be964dc6d17ba74e699e3c2a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581934736299674"},"htmlText":"Wow. Pls like","listText":"Wow. Pls like","text":"Wow. Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146362120","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146361902,"gmtCreate":1626054326106,"gmtModify":1703752412545,"author":{"id":"3585210617348402","authorId":"3585210617348402","authorIdStr":"3585210617348402","name":"JaiVenky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/097793f3135b5fb8cb3f03847d72bf1a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3585210617348402"},"htmlText":"Nice!","listText":"Nice!","text":"Nice!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146361902","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5192033,"gmtCreate":1626054370913,"gmtModify":1663230843230,"authorId":3576747179382758,"author":{"id":3576747179382758,"authorId":3576747179382758,"name":"babypink","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ee4cf851d4f9f94c6c4ad03de99840c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":146361902,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"cool","text":"cool","html":"cool"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146317084,"gmtCreate":1626053735148,"gmtModify":1703752391207,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574150988172179"},"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146317084","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5191945,"gmtCreate":1626053907438,"gmtModify":1663230844044,"authorId":3559187437759047,"author":{"id":3559187437759047,"authorId":3559187437759047,"name":"flyingfish28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75507aa8ddf5c1cc85f50faf9c40aa31","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":146317084,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"NiCe","text":"NiCe","html":"NiCe"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146314360,"gmtCreate":1626053685450,"gmtModify":1703752390214,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574150988172179"},"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146314360","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":146313019,"gmtCreate":1626053369531,"gmtModify":1703752381563,"author":{"id":"3570963409805949","authorId":"3570963409805949","authorIdStr":"3570963409805949","name":"Seaside","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b094e0cc1e06886145a19173ee763445","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3570963409805949"},"htmlText":"Watchful","listText":"Watchful","text":"Watchful","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146313019","repostId":1131667592,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported&nbsp;today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters&nbsp;report&nbsp;from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":110,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}