These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year

15
9
Favorite

These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year

marketwatch2021-02-04

Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（9）

T1213121
·2021-02-05
Nice
Reply
Like
Report
MARCC
·2021-02-04
Wow
Reply
Like
Report
Marcussngzy
·2021-02-04
Nice lah
Reply
Like
Report
Jeromeee
·2021-02-04
Haha
Reply
Like
Report
jietson
·2021-02-04
Nice
Reply
1
Report
Darrenong
·2021-02-04
Good
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Jeromeee:
  Yes good
  2021-02-04
  Reply
  Report
Joker29
·2021-02-04
Yes
Reply
1
Report
Diamondhand6
·2021-02-04
Bullish!
Reply
2
Report
BabyGuinness
·2021-02-04
Been following most of them on my watchlist!
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- BabyGuinness:
  indeed, how about you?
  2021-02-05
  Reply
  Report
- MARCC:
  Great to follow!
  2021-02-04
  Reply
  Report
- beankim:
  amazing. good for you
  2021-02-04
  Reply
  Report
View more 1 comments

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1140015602","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","media":"marketwatch","content":"<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1603348471595","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","article_id":"1140015602","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1603348471595","name":"MarketWatch"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"marketwatch.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"这些标普500指数成份股的“买入”评级今年以来涨幅最大","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{},"content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":317717349,"gmtCreate":1612485636681,"gmtModify":1704871800204,"author":{"id":"3574854488928895","authorId":"3574854488928895","name":"T1213121","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5b4df11ae370aa4dd766241576d6f7b0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574854488928895","authorIdStr":"3574854488928895"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317717349","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317341036,"gmtCreate":1612421651025,"gmtModify":1704870931982,"author":{"id":"3558340642160988","authorId":"3558340642160988","name":"MARCC","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5d2032c0e6cc39e667e6c80eaaedc251","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3558340642160988","authorIdStr":"3558340642160988"},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317341036","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317328508,"gmtCreate":1612419708904,"gmtModify":1704870905684,"author":{"id":"3564913308476794","authorId":"3564913308476794","name":"Marcussngzy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4adb22942006f700c8b36271f5111fbd","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3564913308476794","authorIdStr":"3564913308476794"},"htmlText":"Nice lah","listText":"Nice lah","text":"Nice lah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317328508","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317301276,"gmtCreate":1612412905895,"gmtModify":1704870820707,"author":{"id":"3568799766306568","authorId":"3568799766306568","name":"Jeromeee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bebf990a014b83dc5b2aee37979e20e9","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3568799766306568","authorIdStr":"3568799766306568"},"htmlText":"Haha","listText":"Haha","text":"Haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317301276","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317976128,"gmtCreate":1612412007664,"gmtModify":1704870810645,"author":{"id":"3573697037978602","authorId":"3573697037978602","name":"jietson","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573697037978602","authorIdStr":"3573697037978602"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317976128","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317926965,"gmtCreate":1612408681157,"gmtModify":1704870770130,"author":{"id":"3569896414932432","authorId":"3569896414932432","name":"Darrenong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92e9323694266c875ade57031797916d","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3569896414932432","authorIdStr":"3569896414932432"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317926965","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3484621,"gmtCreate":1612412912573,"gmtModify":1680775597307,"authorId":3568799766306568,"author":{"id":3568799766306568,"idStr":"3568799766306568","authorId":3568799766306568,"name":"Jeromeee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bebf990a014b83dc5b2aee37979e20e9","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.16","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":317926965,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Yes good ","text":"Yes good ","html":"Yes good "}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317964378,"gmtCreate":1612407973594,"gmtModify":1704870760554,"author":{"id":"3559394255429643","authorId":"3559394255429643","name":"Joker29","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2252dcce9479280592bde6bd29150cdc","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3559394255429643","authorIdStr":"3559394255429643"},"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317964378","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317968924,"gmtCreate":1612407649068,"gmtModify":1704870754541,"author":{"id":"3568696694714874","authorId":"3568696694714874","name":"Diamondhand6","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d95004a1d764b1b82eacaa7b9537269","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3568696694714874","authorIdStr":"3568696694714874"},"htmlText":"Bullish!","listText":"Bullish!","text":"Bullish!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317968924","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":317985669,"gmtCreate":1612407071451,"gmtModify":1704870745166,"author":{"id":"3566430460623704","authorId":"3566430460623704","name":"BabyGuinness","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5344a9c73cbe4089d07b00bd68a652d4","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3566430460623704","authorIdStr":"3566430460623704"},"htmlText":"Been following most of them on my watchlist!","listText":"Been following most of them on my watchlist!","text":"Been following most of them on my watchlist!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317985669","repostId":1140015602,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140015602","pubTimestamp":1612406760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140015602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-04 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140015602","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and moment","content":"<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of stocks among the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.</p>\n<p>A focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.</p>\n<p>Among the S&amp;P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.</p>\n<p>An increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.</p>\n<p>Biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 22 companies among the S&amp;P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CONOCOPHILLIPS</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chevron Corp.</td>\n   <td>CVX</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>68%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>40</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PayPal Holdings Inc.</td>\n   <td>PYPL</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>WestRock Co.</td>\n   <td>WRK</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</td>\n   <td>WFC</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CenterPoint Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>CNP</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.</td>\n   <td>REGN</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Dominion Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>D</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>PPG Industries Inc.</td>\n   <td>PPG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>63%</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NOV Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOV</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>58%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>8</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc.</td>\n   <td>CMG</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Emerson Electric Co.</td>\n   <td>EMR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Expedia Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>EXPE</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Marathon Oil Corp.</td>\n   <td>MRO</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>13</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Exxon Mobil Corp.</td>\n   <td>XOM</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>7</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Equity Residential</td>\n   <td>EQR</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Illinois Tool Works Inc.</td>\n   <td>ITW</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.</p>\n<p>So ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”</p>\n<p>The second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”</p>\n<p>Third on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.</p>\n<p>Highest percentage ‘buy’ ratings</p>\n<p>Here’s a list of 21 S&amp;P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>% BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>BUY RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - NOW</th>\n   <th>TOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ASSURANT INC.</td>\n   <td>AIZ</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>TDY</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ConocoPhillips</td>\n   <td>COP</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>5</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Amazon.com Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMZN</td>\n   <td>96%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>46</td>\n   <td>48</td>\n   <td>49</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Phillips 66</td>\n   <td>PSX</td>\n   <td>95%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n   <td>22</td>\n   <td>20</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Pioneer Natural Resources Co.</td>\n   <td>PXD</td>\n   <td>94%</td>\n   <td>3</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.</td>\n   <td>ARE</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex Inc.</td>\n   <td>TFX</td>\n   <td>92%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n   <td>12</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Diamondback Energy Inc.</td>\n   <td>FANG</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>GOOGL</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>39</td>\n   <td>38</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n   <td>43</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microsoft Corp.</td>\n   <td>MSFT</td>\n   <td>91%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>30</td>\n   <td>34</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>T-Mobile US Inc.</td>\n   <td>TMUS</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n   <td>25</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Howmet Aerospace Inc.</td>\n   <td>HWM</td>\n   <td>90%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>9</td>\n   <td>10</td>\n   <td>11</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>31</td>\n   <td>37</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Motors Co.</td>\n   <td>GM</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>18</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings</td>\n   <td>LH</td>\n   <td>89%</td>\n   <td>1</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n   <td>19</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>ServiceNow Inc.</td>\n   <td>NOW</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>2</td>\n   <td>29</td>\n   <td>27</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nike Inc. Class B</td>\n   <td>NKE</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>28</td>\n   <td>32</td>\n   <td>33</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Etsy Inc.</td>\n   <td>ETSY</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>14</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.</td>\n   <td>J</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-1</td>\n   <td>15</td>\n   <td>16</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n   <td>17</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cigna Corp.</td>\n   <td>CI</td>\n   <td>88%</td>\n   <td>-2</td>\n   <td>21</td>\n   <td>23</td>\n   <td>24</td>\n   <td>26</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>The bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.</p>\n<p>The first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.</p>\n<p>There are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese S&P 500 stocks have had the biggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings so far this year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-04 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/these-s-p-500-stocks-have-had-the-biggest-increases-in-buy-ratings-so-far-this-year-11612367383?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1140015602","content_text":"Traders in the stock market can take advantage of special situations to exploit sentiment and momentum and make quick profits — if they are quick enough or lucky enough. But over the long haul, investors have profited by holding shares of companies that increase sales, earnings and cash flow. And the resulting increases in analysts’ ratings can help lift stock prices.\nBelow is a list of stocks among the S&P 500SPX,+0.10%that have had the biggest increases in “buy” or equivalent ratings this year among analysts polled by FactSet. An upgrade may mean a stock has fallen enough so that an analyst believes it has become a compelling value. Or it may mean that something has changed for the better in the company’s business or industry. Or it could be a combination these and other factors.\nA focus on the positive side of the ratings action makes sense. Analysts working for brokerage firms — those that provide recommendations to investor clients — are separated from the firms’ business groups that generate fees by providing various services to some of the same companies the analysts cover. But there is still a far greater tendency for these so-called sell-side analysts to assign “buy” or equivalent “overweight” ratings than “sell” or equivalent “underweight” ratings.\nAmong the S&P 500, 270 companies have majority “buy” or equivalent ratings among analysts polled by FactSet, but only two (American Airlines Group Inc.AAL,+6.09%and Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,+2.44%) have majority “sell” or equivalent ratings.\nAn increase in the number of “buy” ratings doesn’t necessarily mean all the new “buys” resulted from upgrades. The number of analysts covering any one company often changes. An analyst might initiate coverage with a “buy” rating. Brokerage firms often add or drop coverage of companies or even entire industries because of staff changes or reallocation of resources.\nBiggest increases in ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 22 companies among the S&P 500 that now have at least three more “buy” ratings than they did at the end of 2020:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\n% BUY RATINGS\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\nCHANGE IN TOTAL RATINGS\n\n\n\n\nCONOCOPHILLIPS\nCOP\n5\n27\n22\n96%\n28\n24\n4\n\n\nChevron Corp.\nCVX\n5\n19\n14\n68%\n28\n25\n3\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n5\n15\n10\n38%\n40\n38\n2\n\n\nPayPal Holdings Inc.\nPYPL\n4\n39\n35\n81%\n48\n45\n3\n\n\nWestRock Co.\nWRK\n4\n12\n8\n71%\n17\n13\n4\n\n\nWells Fargo & Co.\nWFC\n4\n17\n13\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nCenterPoint Energy Inc.\nCNP\n4\n11\n7\n61%\n18\n17\n1\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n3\n32\n29\n94%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n3\n28\n25\n82%\n34\n31\n3\n\n\nRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.\nREGN\n3\n18\n15\n67%\n27\n26\n1\n\n\nDominion Energy Inc.\nD\n3\n11\n8\n65%\n17\n17\n0\n\n\nPPG Industries Inc.\nPPG\n3\n17\n14\n63%\n27\n27\n0\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n3\n20\n17\n63%\n32\n28\n4\n\n\nNOV Inc.\nNOV\n3\n14\n11\n58%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nCorning Inc\nGLW\n3\n8\n5\n57%\n14\n13\n1\n\n\nChipotle Mexican Grill Inc.\nCMG\n3\n19\n16\n54%\n35\n33\n2\n\n\nEmerson Electric Co.\nEMR\n3\n13\n10\n54%\n24\n25\n-1\n\n\nExpedia Group Inc.\nEXPE\n3\n14\n11\n45%\n31\n32\n-1\n\n\nMarathon Oil Corp.\nMRO\n3\n13\n10\n45%\n29\n30\n-1\n\n\nExxon Mobil Corp.\nXOM\n3\n10\n7\n36%\n28\n26\n2\n\n\nEquity Residential\nEQR\n3\n6\n3\n27%\n22\n21\n1\n\n\nIllinois Tool Works Inc.\nITW\n3\n5\n2\n23%\n22\n22\n0\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe table is sorted in two ways — first by the increase in the number of “buy” ratings, but then by the current percentage of “buy” ratings. You will need to scroll the table to see all the data.\nSo ConocoPhillipsCOP,+5.47%tops the list because it has five more “buy” ratings than it did on Dec. 31 and because 96% of analysts polled by FactSet currently rate the shares a “buy.”\nThe second company on the list, Chevron Corp.CVX,+2.18%,has also had its number of “buy” ratings increase by five, but 68% of the analysts rate the stock a “buy.”\nThird on the list is Intel Corp.INTC,-0.55%,also with five additional “buy” ratings but with only 38% of analysts having a positive rating on the shares.\nHighest percentage ‘buy’ ratings\nHere’s a list of 21 S&P 500 companies with the highest percentage of “buy” ratings among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\n% BUY RATINGS\nCHANGE IN NUMBER OF BUY RATINGS\nBUY RATINGS - NOW\nBUY RATINGS - DEC. 31\nTOTAL RATINGS - NOW\nTOTAL RATINGS - DEC. 31\n\n\n\n\nASSURANT INC.\nAIZ\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n5\n\n\nTeledyne Technologies Inc.\nTDY\n100%\n0\n5\n5\n5\n6\n\n\nConocoPhillips\nCOP\n96%\n5\n27\n22\n28\n24\n\n\nAmazon.com Inc.\nAMZN\n96%\n0\n46\n46\n48\n49\n\n\nPhillips 66\nPSX\n95%\n1\n21\n20\n22\n20\n\n\nPioneer Natural Resources Co.\nPXD\n94%\n3\n32\n29\n34\n31\n\n\nAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc.\nARE\n92%\n1\n11\n10\n12\n12\n\n\nTeleflex Inc.\nTFX\n92%\n0\n11\n11\n12\n12\n\n\nDiamondback Energy Inc.\nFANG\n91%\n2\n30\n28\n33\n31\n\n\nAlphabet Inc. Class A\nGOOGL\n91%\n1\n39\n38\n43\n43\n\n\nMicrosoft Corp.\nMSFT\n91%\n1\n31\n30\n34\n32\n\n\nT-Mobile US Inc.\nTMUS\n90%\n1\n26\n25\n29\n28\n\n\nHowmet Aerospace Inc.\nHWM\n90%\n0\n9\n9\n10\n11\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n89%\n2\n33\n31\n37\n35\n\n\nGeneral Motors Co.\nGM\n89%\n1\n16\n15\n18\n17\n\n\nLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings\nLH\n89%\n1\n17\n16\n19\n19\n\n\nServiceNow Inc.\nNOW\n88%\n2\n29\n27\n33\n32\n\n\nNike Inc. Class B\nNKE\n88%\n0\n28\n28\n32\n33\n\n\nEtsy Inc.\nETSY\n88%\n-1\n14\n15\n16\n17\n\n\nJacobs Engineering Group Inc.\nJ\n88%\n-1\n15\n16\n17\n17\n\n\nCigna Corp.\nCI\n88%\n-2\n21\n23\n24\n26\n\n\n\nFactSet\nThe bottom two, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.J,+0.51%and Cigna Corp.CI,+0.74%are tied at 88%.\nThe first two companies, Assurant Inc.AIZ,-0.19%and Teledyne Technologies Inc.TDY,-1.37%,haven’t gained any “buy” ratings since the end of 2020, however, Teledyne has one fewer total ratings, which is why it is now 100% buy-rated according to FactSet’s data.\nThere are six companies involved with oil production or distribution on the first list and four on the second, showing analysts’ growing confidence in the oil price recovery.\nAmazon.com Inc.AMZN,-2.00%is fourth on the second list, with 96% “buy” ratings. The internet retail pioneer’s founder, Jeff Bezos, announced on Feb. 2 that he wouldstep down as CEOduring the third quarter, while remaining executive chair. Here’s a look athow well Amazon’s stock has performedsince it went public in May 1997.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3495540,"gmtCreate":1612493814848,"gmtModify":1680775774442,"authorId":3566430460623704,"author":{"id":3566430460623704,"idStr":"3566430460623704","authorId":3566430460623704,"name":"BabyGuinness","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5344a9c73cbe4089d07b00bd68a652d4","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":317985669,"type":1,"supId":3485801,"prevId":0,"content":"indeed, how about you?","text":"indeed, how about you?","html":"indeed, how about you?"},{"id":3485801,"gmtCreate":1612421712295,"gmtModify":1680775626611,"authorId":3558340642160988,"author":{"id":3558340642160988,"idStr":"3558340642160988","authorId":3558340642160988,"name":"MARCC","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5d2032c0e6cc39e667e6c80eaaedc251","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":317985669,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Great to follow!","text":"Great to follow!","html":"Great to follow!"},{"id":3484000,"gmtCreate":1612407301194,"gmtModify":1680775592402,"authorId":3568042901804000,"author":{"id":3568042901804000,"idStr":"3568042901804000","authorId":3568042901804000,"name":"beankim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7e86bf0ae7dd84473464d6af842304eb","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.23","exceedPercentage":"60.55%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":317985669,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"amazing. good for you","text":"amazing. good for you","html":"amazing. good for you"},{"id":3484039,"gmtCreate":1612407594392,"gmtModify":1680775589813,"authorId":3566430460623704,"author":{"id":3566430460623704,"idStr":"3566430460623704","authorId":3566430460623704,"name":"BabyGuinness","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5344a9c73cbe4089d07b00bd68a652d4","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":317985669,"type":1,"supId":3484000,"prevId":0,"content":"thanks...just wished I could own them ha ha","text":"thanks...just wished I could own them ha ha","html":"thanks...just wished I could own them ha ha"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":15,"commentSize":9,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}