Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade

112
18
Favorite

Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade

Bloomberg2021-06-24

(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

112

Report

Comment（18）

paxson
·2021-06-24
Ok
Reply
2
Report
paxson
·2021-06-24
Ok
Reply
Like
Report
Janenkea
·2021-06-24
?
Reply
Like
Report
Pigmonkey
·2021-06-24
Like n comment pls
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- cxseah:
  Comment
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
xnoobletx
·2021-06-24
Ok
Reply
1
Report
Frisbee
·2021-06-24
ok
Reply
4
Report
Nhu
·2021-06-24
What
Reply
1
Report
Natdns
·2021-06-24
Ok
Reply
Like
Report
TSLAtothemoon
·2021-06-24
Like and comment
Reply
Like
Report
2296c438
·2021-06-24
A good news from it as well more worries from it sustainability of abnormalies. Watch out adeath trap from uncertainties. Good luck. Please like and comment. Thank you!
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- TSLAtothemoon:
  agree
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
KAHHUAT
·2021-06-24
Wow.
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- KAHHUAT:
  Pls comment
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
SamuelNg
·2021-06-24
like and comment pls
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Mclye:
  ?
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
KH321
·2021-06-24
Good for the poor guys on the street
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- Enenen:
  Hg
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
DesmondChin
·2021-06-24
Ouch, really painful experience
Reply
3
Report
Cindy8989
·2021-06-24
Wow
Reply
4
Report
Kevin92
·2021-06-24
LiKe and comment
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- AdrinaChow:
  reply with like and comment pls
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
G12345
·2021-06-24
Anger!!!!
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Kevin92:
  LiKe and comment
  2021-06-24
  Reply
  Report
ZhiLing
·2021-06-24
wow
Reply
1
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1166311858","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","media":"Bloomberg","content":"<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1612507957220","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FMCC","symbol_name":"房地美","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","article_id":"1166311858","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1612507957220","name":"finance.yahoo"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"yahoo.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"FMCC":"房地美","FNMA":"房利美"},"translate_title":"“房利美-房地美”的裁决标志着对陷入困境的基金的最新打击","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FMCC":0.9,"FNMA":0.9},"content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":128997911,"gmtCreate":1624497428333,"gmtModify":1703838369597,"author":{"id":"3587023069153443","authorId":"3587023069153443","name":"paxson","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3587023069153443","authorIdStr":"3587023069153443"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128997911","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128992622,"gmtCreate":1624497362766,"gmtModify":1703838366024,"author":{"id":"3587023069153443","authorId":"3587023069153443","name":"paxson","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3587023069153443","authorIdStr":"3587023069153443"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128992622","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128993685,"gmtCreate":1624497279947,"gmtModify":1703838359876,"author":{"id":"3574751332519170","authorId":"3574751332519170","name":"Janenkea","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/328bf689e0e4be71a26c7d798d76b511","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574751332519170","authorIdStr":"3574751332519170"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128993685","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128063780,"gmtCreate":1624495605440,"gmtModify":1703838272023,"author":{"id":"3568071651427696","authorId":"3568071651427696","name":"Pigmonkey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3402225c0172781df7553e20722ebad7","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3568071651427696","authorIdStr":"3568071651427696"},"htmlText":"Like n comment pls","listText":"Like n comment pls","text":"Like n comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128063780","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4986526,"gmtCreate":1624498560021,"gmtModify":1663229869232,"authorId":3586519067840195,"author":{"id":3586519067840195,"idStr":"3586519067840195","authorId":3586519067840195,"name":"cxseah","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128063780,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment","text":"Comment","html":"Comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128063828,"gmtCreate":1624495592364,"gmtModify":1703838271054,"author":{"id":"3555275345264532","authorId":"3555275345264532","name":"xnoobletx","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3555275345264532","authorIdStr":"3555275345264532"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128063828","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128082223,"gmtCreate":1624495456062,"gmtModify":1703838262434,"author":{"id":"3586246426804465","authorId":"3586246426804465","name":"Frisbee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d1d7567b89f270a9a9c4d752dc00fa0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586246426804465","authorIdStr":"3586246426804465"},"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128082223","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128083172,"gmtCreate":1624495362696,"gmtModify":1703838256448,"author":{"id":"3586835307730222","authorId":"3586835307730222","name":"Nhu","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/affe66c99991cb57b5c6439c4b578c42","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586835307730222","authorIdStr":"3586835307730222"},"htmlText":"What","listText":"What","text":"What","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128083172","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128080779,"gmtCreate":1624495323091,"gmtModify":1703838254828,"author":{"id":"3576319038001885","authorId":"3576319038001885","name":"Natdns","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be6cb184b10d5e613602b38d396409cf","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576319038001885","authorIdStr":"3576319038001885"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128080779","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128012636,"gmtCreate":1624495207525,"gmtModify":1703838249317,"author":{"id":"3581496657430027","authorId":"3581496657430027","name":"TSLAtothemoon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7eb252b1bc52ab7567a6f6dbc62f92e","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50a4c8d97279fa9f8f1fa9749a6bdff4","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581496657430027","authorIdStr":"3581496657430027"},"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128012636","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128032323,"gmtCreate":1624494944362,"gmtModify":1703838233088,"author":{"id":"3583730432420730","authorId":"3583730432420730","name":"2296c438","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583730432420730","authorIdStr":"3583730432420730"},"htmlText":"A good news from it as well more worries from it sustainability of abnormalies. Watch out adeath trap from uncertainties. Good luck. Please like and comment. Thank you!","listText":"A good news from it as well more worries from it sustainability of abnormalies. Watch out adeath trap from uncertainties. Good luck. Please like and comment. Thank you!","text":"A good news from it as well more worries from it sustainability of abnormalies. Watch out adeath trap from uncertainties. Good luck. Please like and comment. Thank you!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128032323","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4985175,"gmtCreate":1624495220008,"gmtModify":1663229863039,"authorId":3581496657430027,"author":{"id":3581496657430027,"idStr":"3581496657430027","authorId":3581496657430027,"name":"TSLAtothemoon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7eb252b1bc52ab7567a6f6dbc62f92e","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.06.11","exceedPercentage":"93.32%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128032323,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agree","text":"agree","html":"agree"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128036666,"gmtCreate":1624494932355,"gmtModify":1703838232119,"author":{"id":"3581548947231431","authorId":"3581548947231431","name":"KAHHUAT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0142df644dd666ed7544324b3fa02898","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581548947231431","authorIdStr":"3581548947231431"},"htmlText":"Wow.&nbsp;","listText":"Wow.&nbsp;","text":"Wow.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128036666","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4985033,"gmtCreate":1624494943726,"gmtModify":1663229861938,"authorId":3581548947231431,"author":{"id":3581548947231431,"idStr":"3581548947231431","authorId":3581548947231431,"name":"KAHHUAT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0142df644dd666ed7544324b3fa02898","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128036666,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Pls comment","text":"Pls comment","html":"Pls comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128098269,"gmtCreate":1624494690251,"gmtModify":1703838216709,"author":{"id":"3572761324363640","authorId":"3572761324363640","name":"SamuelNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/758b132d63959927e156935f0c64d8e9","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572761324363640","authorIdStr":"3572761324363640"},"htmlText":"like and comment pls","listText":"like and comment pls","text":"like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128098269","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984939,"gmtCreate":1624494734454,"gmtModify":1663229859051,"authorId":3586592942167883,"author":{"id":3586592942167883,"idStr":"3586592942167883","authorId":3586592942167883,"name":"Mclye","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/fc367014307c9a0999b85a4a4cbd4c1b","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128098269,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"?","text":"?","html":"?"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128090874,"gmtCreate":1624494564398,"gmtModify":1703838210997,"author":{"id":"3586451610703869","authorId":"3586451610703869","name":"KH321","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1bb8bd7d6d5df5f9732871fe60999ea","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586451610703869","authorIdStr":"3586451610703869"},"htmlText":"Good for the poor guys on the street","listText":"Good for the poor guys on the street","text":"Good for the poor guys on the street","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128090874","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984972,"gmtCreate":1624494802963,"gmtModify":1663229859139,"authorId":3581919680057338,"author":{"id":3581919680057338,"idStr":"3581919680057338","authorId":3581919680057338,"name":"Enenen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e6b57054c54fb1e6337a362e002502ef","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128090874,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Hg</u>","text":"<u>Hg</u>","html":"<u>Hg</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128003007,"gmtCreate":1624494320209,"gmtModify":1703838199342,"author":{"id":"3578983795474363","authorId":"3578983795474363","name":"DesmondChin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b90cb6b6a6c328ac8d02a829e5e7c835","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46b6808e1ba3716fb9c53339adffa3c5","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3578983795474363","authorIdStr":"3578983795474363"},"htmlText":"Ouch, really painful experience","listText":"Ouch, really painful experience","text":"Ouch, really painful experience","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/128003007","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121777853,"gmtCreate":1624494253172,"gmtModify":1703838195459,"author":{"id":"3586429429180773","authorId":"3586429429180773","name":"Cindy8989","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/adcfce66b77ff6400844ec5d5e92ad3f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586429429180773","authorIdStr":"3586429429180773"},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/121777853","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121777053,"gmtCreate":1624494245072,"gmtModify":1703838194970,"author":{"id":"3576274545052910","authorId":"3576274545052910","name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576274545052910","authorIdStr":"3576274545052910"},"htmlText":"LiKe and comment","listText":"LiKe and comment","text":"LiKe and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/121777053","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984793,"gmtCreate":1624494315340,"gmtModify":1663229859054,"authorId":3583131237618472,"author":{"id":3583131237618472,"idStr":"3583131237618472","authorId":3583131237618472,"name":"AdrinaChow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1b867f4c2019d6ec313665b1af8431b","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":121777053,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"reply with like and comment pls","text":"reply with like and comment pls","html":"reply with like and comment pls"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121775556,"gmtCreate":1624494218275,"gmtModify":1703838193180,"author":{"id":"3586517651317278","authorId":"3586517651317278","name":"G12345","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586517651317278","authorIdStr":"3586517651317278"},"htmlText":"Anger!!!!","listText":"Anger!!!!","text":"Anger!!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/121775556","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984747,"gmtCreate":1624494239973,"gmtModify":1663229859927,"authorId":3576274545052910,"author":{"id":3576274545052910,"idStr":"3576274545052910","authorId":3576274545052910,"name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":121775556,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"LiKe and comment","text":"LiKe and comment","html":"LiKe and comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121776065,"gmtCreate":1624494137457,"gmtModify":1703838189107,"author":{"id":"3557823792637532","authorId":"3557823792637532","name":"ZhiLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40d052b9f7db59b50f72a3cbcbc99234","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3557823792637532","authorIdStr":"3557823792637532"},"htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/121776065","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166311858?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.</p>\n<p>Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.</p>\n<p>Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.</p>\n<p>Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.</p>\n<p>If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.</p>\n<p>A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.</p>\n<p>Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.</p>\n<p>Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.</p>\n<p>In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.</p>\n<p>For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.</p>\n<p>Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”</p>\n<p>While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.</p>\n<p>The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.</p>\n<p>In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.</p>\n<p>For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.</p>\n<p>Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":112,"commentSize":18,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}