Investing Lessons for 2023

The Smart Investor2023-01-14

It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

215

Report

Comment（5）

Uasbau
·2023-01-14
Good infos. Tqs
Reply
3
Report
Shahfarid
·2023-01-14
Thanks good information
Reply
3
Report
Zeenath
·2023-01-14
Nice 👌👌👌👌
Reply
5
Report
Toby_Chua
·2023-01-14
Well said good information
Reply
3
Report
happy87
·2023-01-14
for
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- JC12341234:
  ok
  2023-01-14
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1169403828","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","media":"The Smart Investor","content":"<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1602567310727","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","article_id":"1169403828","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1602567310727","name":"The Smart Investor"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"thesmartinvestor.com.sg","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"2023年的投资经验","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{},"content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9958804598,"gmtCreate":1673673024214,"gmtModify":1676538873837,"author":{"id":"3581724772671504","authorId":"3581724772671504","name":"Uasbau","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67cdf409f2239595269918513a5faac9","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581724772671504","authorIdStr":"3581724772671504"},"htmlText":"Good infos. Tqs","listText":"Good infos. Tqs","text":"Good infos. Tqs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9958804598","repostId":1169403828,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169403828","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","content":"<html><head></head><body>It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&amp;P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&amp;P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&amp;P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.</body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169403828","content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9958159892,"gmtCreate":1673663822916,"gmtModify":1676538872552,"author":{"id":"4097058432007810","authorId":"4097058432007810","name":"Shahfarid","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f2b82742973385f8cc959480d03504d","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4097058432007810","authorIdStr":"4097058432007810"},"htmlText":"Thanks good information&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks good information&nbsp;","text":"Thanks good information","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9958159892","repostId":1169403828,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169403828","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","content":"<html><head></head><body>It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&amp;P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&amp;P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&amp;P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.</body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169403828","content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9958125665,"gmtCreate":1673663245257,"gmtModify":1676538872419,"author":{"id":"4087558986443620","authorId":"4087558986443620","name":"Zeenath","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/efb40ace076cc80a062f6ff3a5e1ca58","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087558986443620","authorIdStr":"4087558986443620"},"htmlText":"Nice 👌👌👌👌","listText":"Nice 👌👌👌👌","text":"Nice 👌👌👌👌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9958125665","repostId":1169403828,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169403828","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","content":"<html><head></head><body>It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&amp;P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&amp;P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&amp;P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.</body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169403828","content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9958122458,"gmtCreate":1673663150475,"gmtModify":1676538872377,"author":{"id":"3576326749731922","authorId":"3576326749731922","name":"Toby_Chua","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/82ec063fd73ccbceee82eab015cdf3fd","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3576326749731922","authorIdStr":"3576326749731922"},"htmlText":"Well said good information&nbsp;","listText":"Well said good information&nbsp;","text":"Well said good information","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9958122458","repostId":1169403828,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169403828","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","content":"<html><head></head><body>It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&amp;P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&amp;P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&amp;P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.</body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169403828","content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9958123077,"gmtCreate":1673662456299,"gmtModify":1676538872112,"author":{"id":"4088946622416580","authorId":"4088946622416580","name":"happy87","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4088946622416580","authorIdStr":"4088946622416580"},"htmlText":"&nbsp;for","listText":"&nbsp;for","text":"for","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9958123077","repostId":1169403828,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169403828","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1673658980,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169403828?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-01-14 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Investing Lessons for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169403828","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you start","content":"<html><head></head><body>It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&amp;P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&amp;P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&amp;P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.</body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investing Lessons for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvesting Lessons for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-14 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/>The Smart Investor</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nIt’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008...\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/investing-lessons-for-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169403828","content_text":"It’s either been a terrible time or a great time to be owning stocks.A lot depends on when you started investing.Last year, the S&P 500Index sank 19.4 percent, marking its worst performance since 2008. Investors who put in their money at the start of 2022 would understandably be distraught.Yet, if you lengthen your time horizon, the returns look vastly different.Between 2018 and 2022, the S&P 500 rose by a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.5 percent per year, fairly close to the index’s long-term average return of 10 percent per year.Similarly, the lessons you learn from the past 12 months are very different from the conclusions you draw from events that happened years or decades ago.The best lessons, I would argue, come from the latter, and not the former.Livin’ on the edgeWhen confronted with unfamiliar situations, humans have a tendency to dwell on the extremes.For instance, visits to Singapore’s shopping malls were severely curtailed during the 2020 circuit breaker.During that time, Frasers Centrepoint Trust(SGX: J69U), one of Singapore’s largest mall owners, reported that foot traffic fell below 40 percent of its 2019 pre-COVID average, causing it to lose 60 percent of tenant sales.Worryingly, at around the same time, online sales as a percentage of Singapore’s total retail had more than quadrupled from 5.8 percent in January to 24.5 percent in May.This sharp shift in consumer spending prompted analysts and commentators to suggest that the offline retail landscape had forever been altered and will face a long road to recovery, if at all.Yet, today, 30 months later, these scenarios have been revealed to be overly pessimistic.While it’s true that the percentage of online sales within Singapore has remained at over two times its pre-pandemic levels, it is nowhere near the doomsday scenarios where shopping malls are rendered completely irrelevant.In fact, tenant sales at Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s malls had already exceeded 2019 levels by November 2021 and have remained above the benchmark since then.Likewise, the onset of the pandemic normalised the idea of working from home; in the process, raising questions over the role of physical offices in the future.There is some merit to these concerns. But it depends on where you work.As recently as September 2022, physical occupancy rates in North America were still at half of pre-pandemic levels, according to the World Economic Forum.The same cannot be said for Singapore offices.According to JLL research, monthly gross rentals in our island nation are close to the pre-pandemic peak and are expected to be sustained at higher levels over the medium term.The two examples above are a reminder that we have just lived through a period of extremes.As investors, we should recognise that the huge shift online in 2020 followed by the massive move back offline in 2022 are abnormalities and unlikely to recur every year.Considering these two extremes as the norm for the future would be a mistake, in my view.Learn the right lessonsIf there was a single villain that caused the 2022 market crash, most would point their finger at rising interest rates.But not everyone may be learning the right lesson here.In particular, the market crash last year may have persuaded some investors to equate rising interest rates with falling stock prices. This way of thinking may cause them to sell at the next sign of a US Federal Reserve rate hike.However, such a conclusion ignores how unusual last year’s interest rate increases have been.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months in 2022, its fastest increase in more than three decades.That’s abnormal, to say the least.In comparison, the US central bank took as many as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.Furthermore, avoiding stocks within this three year period would be a mistake.For example, owning in shares such as Amazon(NASDAQ: AMZN) and iFAST Corporation(SGX: AIY) would have netted investors returns of 164 per cent and 349 per cent, respectively, if both shares were held from the start of 2016 till the end of 2022.Missing out on the basis of misguided beliefs would be detrimental to investors.Thinking in probabilitiesFinally, investors have a tendency of putting too much weight on recent events.This bias could be especially egregious after last year’s market crash. Given the beating that investors have taken while holding stocks, some may end up waiting on the sidelines.Instead of holding back, investors may want to consider the odds of a market downturn.For context, wealth manager Ben Carlson pointed out that 2022’s S&P 500 performance ranks as among its worst years ever in history.Last year’s near-20 percent decline is only exceeded by the major market crashes in the past such as the Great Depression in 1930s, the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, and the 2002 Dot-Com crash.That, in my eyes, is the definition of an abnormality.To be clear, it’s not to say that another 20 percent decline is completely out of the question. But what we can say is with every passing year, the odds of a positive outcome increases, based on historical data stretching back to the 1920s.Considering the probabilities, I would argue, would be a better way to think about the future, compared to reacting to the stock market’s performance over the past 12 months.Get Smart: Life-long learningAs the saying goes, the stock market is the Great Humiliator.Investors who were over-optimistic two years ago have been left with egg on their faces when 2022 came along. By the same token, I suspect that investors that are over-pessimistic today will also be proven wrong.We can’t prove it now, but given time, we may come to see these two contrasting periods for what they are: two extreme periods by historical standards.For investors, it’s best not to conclude too early.As a lifelong student of investing, I submit that your interest is best served by exercising patience in holding your stocks and learning the right investment lessons.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105564074,"gmtCreate":1673685249885,"gmtModify":1673685263923,"authorId":3576890065678742,"author":{"id":3576890065678742,"idStr":"3576890065678742","authorId":3576890065678742,"name":"JC12341234","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b0a2ed473c0072cb1937345f4736657","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9958123077,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":215,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":2,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}