Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question

85
30
Favorite

Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question

zerohedge2021-07-02

June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（30）

stormlee
·2021-07-02
Comment & like pls
Reply
1
Report
AliPharma
·2021-07-02
like and comment pls
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Jasjh:
  Done
  2021-07-03
  Reply
  Report
- stormlee:
  Comment & like pls
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
OldYee
·2021-07-02
Love the article ❤️. Happy to read "Gold will raise...." Comforting news... ??
Reply
2
Report
RobinStocks
·2021-07-02
Great
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- stormlee:
  Comment & like pls
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
Glades
·2021-07-02
Like thanks!
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- KopiLim:
  For me too
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
mijelle
·2021-07-02
like pls :)
Reply
6
Report
Fold Replies
- KopiLim:
  For me too
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
- Glades:
  liked!
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
lost0star
·2021-07-02
Okay
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- lost0star:
  okay
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
- ASCNMN:
  ok
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
- Mimi2021:
  Okay
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
TradeLegend
·2021-07-02
?
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- PandaTTM:
  Hi
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
romey
·2021-07-02
It’s great
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- mijelle:
  yes
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
Xwei9033
·2021-07-02
Lnc
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- llipinggg:
  yes
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
gh89
·2021-07-02
Pls like ty
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- TaroQ:
  Nice
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
Genes
·2021-07-02
Hmmmm
Reply
Like
Report
kaching31
·2021-07-02
Nice
Reply
3
Report
Kingoftrade
·2021-07-02
?
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- Genes:
  ?‍♂️
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
ChawKW
·2021-07-02
?
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- gh89:
  nice
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
JACE
·2021-07-02
Lnc
Reply
7
Report
Fold Replies
- JACE:
  [财迷]
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
romey
·2021-07-02
Good
Reply
4
Report
ThomasNg007
·2021-07-02
好
Reply
3
Report
Nue
·2021-07-02
Like
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- shaolin:
  like back lls
  2021-07-02
  Reply
  Report
Damien111
·2021-07-02
Like n comment
Reply
1
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1169508078","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SPY","symbol_name":"标普500ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","article_id":"1169508078","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"translate_title":"黄金&《巴塞尔协议III》的万亿美元问题","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9},"content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":156591189,"gmtCreate":1625228904041,"gmtModify":1703738852793,"author":{"id":"3571959390768435","authorId":"3571959390768435","name":"stormlee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80629ef9648273c0d6465aee66dbd98a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3571959390768435","authorIdStr":"3571959390768435"},"htmlText":"Comment &amp; like pls&nbsp;","listText":"Comment &amp; like pls&nbsp;","text":"Comment & like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156591189","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156242702,"gmtCreate":1625227566506,"gmtModify":1703738808822,"author":{"id":"3586596744781365","authorId":"3586596744781365","name":"AliPharma","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ae50feeb2edce44d991e8e753fb37e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586596744781365","authorIdStr":"3586596744781365"},"htmlText":"like and comment pls","listText":"like and comment pls","text":"like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156242702","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5110572,"gmtCreate":1625286772114,"gmtModify":1663230472837,"authorId":3575118967035228,"author":{"id":3575118967035228,"idStr":"3575118967035228","authorId":3575118967035228,"name":"Jasjh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e217292b79bf8debc0bcf58a5eb3fb06","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156242702,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done","text":"Done","html":"Done"},{"id":5102777,"gmtCreate":1625228915015,"gmtModify":1663230436726,"authorId":3571959390768435,"author":{"id":3571959390768435,"idStr":"3571959390768435","authorId":3571959390768435,"name":"stormlee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80629ef9648273c0d6465aee66dbd98a","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.07","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156242702,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment &amp; like pls","text":"Comment &amp; like pls","html":"Comment &amp; like pls"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156286833,"gmtCreate":1625225480322,"gmtModify":1703738744171,"author":{"id":"4087988953652370","authorId":"4087988953652370","name":"OldYee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c23051d333adc2bd3e4ab06bd2068ce","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087988953652370","authorIdStr":"4087988953652370"},"htmlText":"Love the article ❤️. Happy to read \"Gold will raise....\" Comforting news... ??","listText":"Love the article ❤️. Happy to read \"Gold will raise....\" Comforting news... ??","text":"Love the article ❤️. Happy to read \"Gold will raise....\" Comforting news... ??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156286833","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156289404,"gmtCreate":1625225166708,"gmtModify":1703738738556,"author":{"id":"3569725286202582","authorId":"3569725286202582","name":"RobinStocks","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/862fcac437d15852e70742ff075e80a9","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3569725286202582","authorIdStr":"3569725286202582"},"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156289404","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102781,"gmtCreate":1625228958808,"gmtModify":1663230436139,"authorId":3571959390768435,"author":{"id":3571959390768435,"idStr":"3571959390768435","authorId":3571959390768435,"name":"stormlee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80629ef9648273c0d6465aee66dbd98a","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.07","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156289404,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment &amp; like pls","text":"Comment &amp; like pls","html":"Comment &amp; like pls"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156213426,"gmtCreate":1625224413465,"gmtModify":1703738725232,"author":{"id":"3586249912208716","authorId":"3586249912208716","name":"Glades","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b97a0aca4160e0e33ce5ea6c8ee67d5e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586249912208716","authorIdStr":"3586249912208716"},"htmlText":"Like thanks!","listText":"Like thanks!","text":"Like thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156213426","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102125,"gmtCreate":1625224792775,"gmtModify":1663230433134,"authorId":3562886608344748,"author":{"id":3562886608344748,"idStr":"3562886608344748","authorId":3562886608344748,"name":"KopiLim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fcef53a2e715c173a40fafa14a7fe6","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156213426,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"For me too","text":"For me too","html":"For me too"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156234223,"gmtCreate":1625224099262,"gmtModify":1703738717269,"author":{"id":"3575963150980267","authorId":"3575963150980267","name":"mijelle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d67d43aa3ea49d19cd32c0916f7b43d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575963150980267","authorIdStr":"3575963150980267"},"htmlText":"like pls :)&nbsp;","listText":"like pls :)&nbsp;","text":"like pls :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156234223","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102126,"gmtCreate":1625224800111,"gmtModify":1663230433446,"authorId":3562886608344748,"author":{"id":3562886608344748,"idStr":"3562886608344748","authorId":3562886608344748,"name":"KopiLim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fcef53a2e715c173a40fafa14a7fe6","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156234223,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"For me too","text":"For me too","html":"For me too"},{"id":5102090,"gmtCreate":1625224404313,"gmtModify":1635238896152,"authorId":3586249912208716,"author":{"id":3586249912208716,"idStr":"3586249912208716","authorId":3586249912208716,"name":"Glades","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b97a0aca4160e0e33ce5ea6c8ee67d5e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156234223,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"liked!","text":"liked!","html":"liked!"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156232139,"gmtCreate":1625223963721,"gmtModify":1703738713631,"author":{"id":"3577931905567659","authorId":"3577931905567659","name":"lost0star","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577931905567659","authorIdStr":"3577931905567659"},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156232139","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102046,"gmtCreate":1625223969672,"gmtModify":1663230436951,"authorId":3577931905567659,"author":{"id":3577931905567659,"idStr":"3577931905567659","authorId":3577931905567659,"name":"lost0star","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156232139,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"okay","text":"okay","html":"okay"},{"id":5102062,"gmtCreate":1625224088075,"gmtModify":1663230436143,"authorId":3575240466494143,"author":{"id":3575240466494143,"idStr":"3575240466494143","authorId":3575240466494143,"name":"ASCNMN","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e7cbe60e92249aab78ace30dafa5d20","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156232139,"type":1,"supId":5102057,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"},{"id":5102057,"gmtCreate":1625224048204,"gmtModify":1663230432964,"authorId":3581731533242825,"author":{"id":3581731533242825,"idStr":"3581731533242825","authorId":3581731533242825,"name":"Mimi2021","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48f9c75cdba6166f0d0af40d99dd742c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156232139,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Okay","text":"Okay","html":"Okay"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156236891,"gmtCreate":1625223919913,"gmtModify":1703738711985,"author":{"id":"3565930395680990","authorId":"3565930395680990","name":"TradeLegend","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efcf72a8fc8d429f1da25c34e3db472a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3565930395680990","authorIdStr":"3565930395680990"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156236891","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102044,"gmtCreate":1625223952935,"gmtModify":1663230432964,"authorId":3582519445525168,"author":{"id":3582519445525168,"idStr":"3582519445525168","authorId":3582519445525168,"name":"PandaTTM","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156236891,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Hi","text":"Hi","html":"Hi"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156236335,"gmtCreate":1625223912327,"gmtModify":1703738710826,"author":{"id":"4087828289551060","authorId":"4087828289551060","name":"romey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d9772b5495ef56b1ea09c8bb2b9dbd","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087828289551060","authorIdStr":"4087828289551060"},"htmlText":"It’s great","listText":"It’s great","text":"It’s great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156236335","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102064,"gmtCreate":1625224111102,"gmtModify":1635238898064,"authorId":3575963150980267,"author":{"id":3575963150980267,"idStr":"3575963150980267","authorId":3575963150980267,"name":"mijelle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d67d43aa3ea49d19cd32c0916f7b43d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156236335,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yes","text":"yes","html":"yes"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156238098,"gmtCreate":1625223850614,"gmtModify":1703738709176,"author":{"id":"3582194515934567","authorId":"3582194515934567","name":"Xwei9033","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb8ea746ff8f83f37b3824d5d65cf16a","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582194515934567","authorIdStr":"3582194515934567"},"htmlText":"Lnc&nbsp;","listText":"Lnc&nbsp;","text":"Lnc","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156238098","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102034,"gmtCreate":1625223891628,"gmtModify":1663230431835,"authorId":3576377533433583,"author":{"id":3576377533433583,"idStr":"3576377533433583","authorId":3576377533433583,"name":"llipinggg","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156238098,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yes","text":"yes","html":"yes"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156231166,"gmtCreate":1625223814455,"gmtModify":1703738707846,"author":{"id":"3586140896386932","authorId":"3586140896386932","name":"gh89","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36173aa663e50cbffdf33c1b022caad1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586140896386932","authorIdStr":"3586140896386932"},"htmlText":"Pls like ty","listText":"Pls like ty","text":"Pls like ty","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156231166","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102071,"gmtCreate":1625224159360,"gmtModify":1663230437630,"authorId":3585013915019621,"author":{"id":3585013915019621,"idStr":"3585013915019621","authorId":3585013915019621,"name":"TaroQ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb2dde0e013af7cbb931ba6ccd0713ac","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156231166,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Nice","text":"Nice","html":"Nice"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156231091,"gmtCreate":1625223797713,"gmtModify":1703738707344,"author":{"id":"3574496739465198","authorId":"3574496739465198","name":"Genes","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574496739465198","authorIdStr":"3574496739465198"},"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156231091","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156233731,"gmtCreate":1625223795623,"gmtModify":1703738707512,"author":{"id":"3577659483470733","authorId":"3577659483470733","name":"kaching31","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/61a4b45a41124f509cfee186b2aaf644","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577659483470733","authorIdStr":"3577659483470733"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156233731","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156233003,"gmtCreate":1625223751302,"gmtModify":1703738705346,"author":{"id":"3578300377977006","authorId":"3578300377977006","name":"Kingoftrade","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3716438e8901825672ffa000f27e79cc","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578300377977006","authorIdStr":"3578300377977006"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156233003","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102014,"gmtCreate":1625223821972,"gmtModify":1663230433745,"authorId":3574496739465198,"author":{"id":3574496739465198,"idStr":"3574496739465198","authorId":3574496739465198,"name":"Genes","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156233003,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"?‍♂️","text":"?‍♂️","html":"?‍♂️"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156239556,"gmtCreate":1625223735075,"gmtModify":1703738705011,"author":{"id":"3577752520804349","authorId":"3577752520804349","name":"ChawKW","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ade0e4b15b15ce9d93b72d9bb81f36c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3577752520804349","authorIdStr":"3577752520804349"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156239556","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102005,"gmtCreate":1625223748565,"gmtModify":1631890090093,"authorId":3586140896386932,"author":{"id":3586140896386932,"idStr":"3586140896386932","authorId":3586140896386932,"name":"gh89","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36173aa663e50cbffdf33c1b022caad1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156239556,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156239366,"gmtCreate":1625223713155,"gmtModify":1703738704677,"author":{"id":"3559800623488788","authorId":"3559800623488788","name":"JACE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f9fd0b21f7f25b7db3d3232f2da4bcf","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3559800623488788","authorIdStr":"3559800623488788"},"htmlText":"Lnc","listText":"Lnc","text":"Lnc","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156239366","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5102008,"gmtCreate":1625223754926,"gmtModify":1663230430938,"authorId":3559800623488788,"author":{"id":3559800623488788,"idStr":"3559800623488788","authorId":3559800623488788,"name":"JACE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f9fd0b21f7f25b7db3d3232f2da4bcf","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156239366,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[财迷]","text":"[财迷]","html":"[财迷]"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156239928,"gmtCreate":1625223710264,"gmtModify":1703738704514,"author":{"id":"4087828289551060","authorId":"4087828289551060","name":"romey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d9772b5495ef56b1ea09c8bb2b9dbd","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087828289551060","authorIdStr":"4087828289551060"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156239928","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156230315,"gmtCreate":1625223644037,"gmtModify":1703738702692,"author":{"id":"3584773168332448","authorId":"3584773168332448","name":"ThomasNg007","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/484f9f97f8c61e79f232640eb2298c2f","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3584773168332448","authorIdStr":"3584773168332448"},"htmlText":"好","listText":"好","text":"好","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156230315","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":156297269,"gmtCreate":1625223612551,"gmtModify":1703738701549,"author":{"id":"3583038013988308","authorId":"3583038013988308","name":"Nue","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b8345100cc574b68844750cc9debaa37","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583038013988308","authorIdStr":"3583038013988308"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156297269","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5101998,"gmtCreate":1625223709533,"gmtModify":1635238903965,"authorId":3580419991871580,"author":{"id":3580419991871580,"idStr":"3580419991871580","authorId":3580419991871580,"name":"shaolin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c74390ccb038ee9cfa4cb471aae96ad","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":156297269,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like back lls","text":"like back lls","html":"like back lls"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":156297052,"gmtCreate":1625223577376,"gmtModify":1703738700898,"author":{"id":"3581590268956264","authorId":"3581590268956264","name":"Damien111","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/79328dd256df8bc25949678982e26fc3","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581590268956264","authorIdStr":"3581590268956264"},"htmlText":"Like n comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like n comment&nbsp;","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/156297052","repostId":1169508078,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169508078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625222328,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169508078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-02 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169508078","media":"zerohedge","summary":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation”","content":"June 28th&nbsp;has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:&nbsp; Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e.,&nbsp;levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more&nbsp;collateralized&nbsp;exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3&nbsp;paper&nbsp;gold with shiny new real,&nbsp;physical&nbsp;tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve&nbsp;said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility &amp; Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their&nbsp;vaulted&nbsp;positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal&nbsp;trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater&nbsp;price volatility&nbsp;in gold and silver, but ultimately far better&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e.,&nbsp;rising inflation,&nbsp;negative real rates,&nbsp;central bank loan guarantees,&nbsp;expanding money supply&nbsp;and a&nbsp;falling dollar)&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual&nbsp;price discovery&nbsp;as opposed to artificial&nbsp;price fixing&nbsp;by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and&nbsp;burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal&nbsp;investors&nbsp;and&nbsp;wealth preservation&nbsp;clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival&nbsp;today&nbsp;after so many false starts&nbsp;yesterday.\nIn other words, the very&nbsp;architects of the global financialcrisis&nbsp;(an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals&nbsp;outside&nbsp;of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in&nbsp;client&nbsp;names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative&nbsp;yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32f7086123d8f53ad709809b9beabf9f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"450\">\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe&nbsp;appear&nbsp;safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGold & Basel III's Trillion-Dollar Question\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-02 18:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nJune 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/gold-basel-iiis-trillion-dollar-question?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169508078","content_text":"June 28th has come and gone, which meansthe much-anticipated Basel III “macro prudential regulation” to make so-called “safe” banks “safer” has officially kicked off in the European Union(as it will on July 1 for U.S. banks and January 1, 2022 for UK banks).\nThe trillion-dollar question for gold investors is now obvious: What next?\nThe short answer is:  Gold will rise, but don’t expect a straight line or zero discomfort/volatility.\nThe longer answer, however, deserves a bit more context, unpacking and plain-speak;so, let’s roll up our sleeves and start from the beginning.\nWhat is Basel III?\nBasel III is essentially a long-delayed, controversial and internationally agreed-upon banking regulation which now, among other things, requires commercial banks to change their “net stable funding ratio” for gold held as a tier 1 asset on their balance sheet from 50% to 85% to make banks “stronger and more resilient in times of crisis.”\n(Hidden premise: Are the BIS and its regulated banks worried about another “crisis”?)\nTranslated into non-banker English, for each asset a bank buys, they have to insure “stable funding” (as opposed to repo money, demand deposits or excess leverage) to buy/lever more stuff…\nTranslated even more simply, banks can’t use as much “maturity transformation” or “duration mismatches”—i.e., leverage and short-term money for long-term speculation (arbitrage)—to buy and sell precious metals, among other things.\nBasel III, in essence, is requiring banks to engage in longer (rather than shorter-term) lending, and in a nutshell, this makes it far more expensive for banks to own “unallocated” gold, as most of the gold they owned in the past was just tier 3 paperlevered to the moon.\nGetting back to more banker-speak, Basel III is an open move that requires banks to de-lever (slow down) their trade in paper gold.\nThis is accomplished by requiring/regulating banks to classify their actual physical gold holdings (bars or coins) as tier-1 (real/safe) assets and their paper gold holdings as tier 3 (levered, unsafe) assets, against which greater reserves will be required.\nTranslated once again into actual practice, Basel III means there will be a lot less banking leverage of, say a 400-ounce bar of gold (200:1 in 2016, to just 3:1 today) in the COMEX market, which market is slowly being transformed from a derivative-supported (i.e., levered) speculators’ exchange to a far more collateralized exchange.\nIs Basel III Making the World Safer for Honest Banking?\nSeems like a good thing, right? Less margin, less tier 3 risk, more “stable” assets, more reserves, safer banking practices, stronger bank balance sheets to protect depositors and, hey, perhaps even some actual and honest price discovery for precious metals?\nWell…Yes and No.\nYes, the new regs will force greater liquidity requirements (“Net Stable Funding Ratios”) on banks, thereby preventing them from saying (falsely) that they have gold when in fact all they had was a lot of levered paper and more than one owner for the physical gold they did have.\nBut no, this will not lead to banks suddenly going on a forced buying spree (and skyrocketing price move) to replace all their old tier 3 paper gold with shiny new real, physical tier 1 gold to meet the new reserve requirements.\nDespite this, many have made hay online claiming such an instant price rise would follow, but as we’ve said before, banks may be greedy, levered and dishonest, but they aren’t stupid, unprotected or suicidal…\nThat is, they’ve known these regs were coming and weren’t in any hysterical panic to nervously collect their pennies and suddenly buy more tier 1 gold and silver to meet the new reg percentages.\nNot at all.\nWhat many on the pundit-circuit and YouTube universe failed to remind their audience was that well before Basel III’s “reserve requirements” went live, those very same banks were already sitting on plenty of excess reserves thanks to prior bailouts (think 2008…).\nIn the U.S. banking sector, for example, the big boys were already well positioned with over $1.6T in excess reserves, yet all that is needed to meet Basel III is another $400B.\nIn short, banks are not even close to worrying about a forced purchase of more gold to meet Basel III reserve percentages; instead, they can simply allocate a portion of their fat excess reserves (compliments of you the tax-payer and forced bailout sponsor) to meet the new regs.\nRe-Arranging (“Classifying”) the Deck Chairs on the Titanic\nBut what we do know from Basel III is that all that unallocated paper gold on the banks’ prior balance sheets needs to be re-considered, re-shuffled and re-classified.\nIn plain speak for non-bankers (i.e., the rest of us mortals), this means the banks need to make some decisions.\nThat is, will they set aside more money to buy physical gold to replace the paper gold, or will they simply reduce the size and scope of their old bullion business?\nTake a wild guess…\nAs noted above, if you were expecting banks like Citi Group and Morgan (JP or Stanley) to suddenly convert all their tier 3 paper gold into tier 1 physical gold to make the 85% quota, think again.\nInstead, they’ll be dumping a lot of the paper gold rather than spark some immediate price surge in the physical market.\nIn other words, banks will be reducing the size and scope of the precious metal trade, which adds to the cost of lending to every player in the gold and silver space–from coin shops to mining co’s.\nTrading will tighten and clearing costs will rise to match the wider bid-ask spreads as gold and silver becomes less liquid, which could make institutional investors less interested in precious metals for no other reason than liquidity will be harder and spreads wider.\nSuffice it to say, banks will always follow the path that is best for themselves and more onerous for gold in general and the rest of us little guys (i.e., anyone who isn’t a bank) in particular.\nIn short, expect a lot less bullion clearing services and hence much higher trading costs from the primary dealer banks.\nBut what does that have to do with the Trillion-dollar question—namely the future direction of gold and silver pricing?\nGood question.\nBasel III and Precious Metal PricingA. The Bearish/Cynical Take\nAs the traders say, buy the rumor and sell the news.\nFor the last three months, as Basel III rumors spread, gold saw a great deal of short covering and price upticks.\nBut once the so-called Basel III “news” approached the June 28 deadline, the selling kicked in on que and gold saw expected falls, which should be classic dip-buying signals for far-sighted investors.\nNear-term, the fact that banks are reducing their bullion trades (or re-arranging their unallocated/tier 3 gold and allocated tier 1 gold) is not exactly a bullish signal for gold.\nIn the UK, for example, the very perturbed LBMA banks live and breathe primarily in the clearing and settling of unallocated, “paper” gold and silver—i.e., the very tier 3 assets most impacted by Basel III.\nAs indicated above, the UK’s regulatory clock starts ticking in January, so we can expect some serious stress (i.e., lower volume) in the soon-to-be beleaguered LBMA market in 2022.\nFor true cynics, it’s tempting to simply see Basel III as a clever way for the BIS and their central and commercial bank minions (think Deutsche Bank) to create a tightened gold trade designed to stifle gold market activity/lending and hence shield their otherwise worthless fiat currencies, as nothing scares broke sovereigns and fake currencies more than rising gold prices.\nFurthermore, Basel III creates a convenient setting to push gold down and thus allow banks to front run the dip and buy more of the same at lower prices. Such cheating is nothing new from the big banks…\nFair point—from a cynic like myself.\nBut let’s stick to what we know in real time.\nIn particular, we can assert that the smaller players and traders in the gold space are about to feel a tight and painful pinch in everything from liquidity to loan terms.\nThus, for smaller enterprises in the gold sector (miners, mints, jewelers and refiners for example) who rely upon inexpensive and readily available liquidity (or loan terms), many will, as always, get priced out by the big players or loan-averse banks as more consolidation in this otherwise shrinking trading/lending universe takes place.\nAnd as for gold traders hoping to go long to actual delivery on futures contracts with tight spreads, they’ll quickly discover that thanks to Basel III, they won’t be able to afford/use leverage to take physical delivery, but will instead have to keep rolling their contracts at a much higher price and wider spread.\nWhy?\nBecause unlike banks, whose cost of capital is zero, normal traders won’t be given a margin account from those same (and newly regulated) banks to pay for actual delivery.\nThat’s why the big banks banks are natural gold shorts: They know most traders can’t go long to full delivery.\nIn other words, the cost (as well as widening bid-ask spreads) of clearing and settling precious metal trades, as well as the cost of borrowing (and hedging) for miners and refiners in this sector will rise considerably as banks push the rising costs down the food chain while making profits on what is effectively their own “insiders arbitrage.”\nSuch shrinkage in bank “precious metal departments” could make gold less attractive to certain parties (expect far less players in the LBMA pitch), and hence push precious metals downward.\nB. Some Volatility & Bullish Inevitability\nOn the bullish side, however, a smaller precious metals market combined with more demand and higher transactional costs can send prices higher, not lower.\nFurthermore, the fact that Basel III reclassifies physical, or allocated, gold as a tier 1, zero-risk asset, means more banks (commercial and central) are likely to increase their vaulted positions of gold and silver.\nThat’s bullish.\nBut as already noted, be it forward contracts in London or futures contracts on COMEX, banks will clearly be less encouraged or voluminous in the precious metal trade.\nFor this reason, I, and many others, expect greater price volatility in gold and silver, but ultimately far better price discovery when the myriad other gold tailwinds of which we’ve written (i.e., rising inflation, negative real rates, central bank loan guarantees, expanding money supply and a falling dollar) outside of Basel III send gold demand (and hence gold prices) naturally higher.\nWith the Basel III regs in place in such a macro tailwind environment for gold, there will be far less big-bank paper-shorts impacting silver and gold’s natural price rises going forward.\nThis means actual price discovery as opposed to artificial price fixing by the COMEX’s big banks.\nThus, if the BIS was hoping to discourage gold via Basel III, they may want to be careful what they ask for, as their plan is likely to backfire as the rest of the world’s currencies are already on fire and burning to ash.\nPutting It Together\nIn sum, there is a wide arc of opinions and possibilities as to the near-term and longer-term impact of Basel III on gold and silver pricing.\nAs stated above, we can expect increased price volatility, and even further declines in precious metals, but longer term, the arc of history, improved price discovery and the good ol’ natural laws of supply and demand make gold an undeniably critical asset going forward.\nAt Matterhorn Asset Management, we serve sophisticated precious metal investors and wealth preservation clients, not speculators, pattern traders or trend followers.\nAs such, near-term price moves on the backs of headline-making regulations never detract us, or our clients, from the blunt recognition that the global financial system in general, and global currencies in particular, are heading nowhere but downward.\nGold is insurance against a system already on fire.\nIronically, the very fact that the Basel III regs are making noise today is just further evidence of this ultimate direction.\nThat is, the fear (as well as unspoken realization) that the very financial system which the BIS and others have mis-managed for years is now at risk-levels never seen before in history precisely explains what prompted Basel III’s arrival today after so many false starts yesterday.\nIn other words, the very architects of the global financialcrisis (an unprecedented global debt disaster coupled with a risk-asset mega bubble) are worried about the catastrophe they alone created and which they can no longer pin on the COVID (fiasco).\nUnlike those “banking experts,” we in Zurich have always played the long game not the putting green.\nRegardless of whether Basel III brings near-term mayhem or calm to the gold markets, we have zero doubts that the only assets to bring individual calm to such global mayhem in this broken financial setting are the very same assets the big boys are currently doing their best to “regulate,” namely: Gold and silver.\nIronically, and despite even Basel III’s attempt to make allocated gold a risk-free priority over unallocated paper gold on their own balance sheets, we also know, and have know for decades, that even the “allocated” gold held by their bank customers is not in fact owned by the customers, but by the banks themselves.\nThat’s why we store our clients’ fully-insured precious metals outside of this fractured and band-aid regulated banking system in secured vaults where the gold is held and marked in client names, not ours.\nAlas: Zero counter-party risk, 100% ownership.\nStated otherwise, we’ve been thinking way ahead of the bankers and their regulators for years.\nAmidst all this noise are simple guideposts.\nWe knew physical gold was a “safe asset” long before Basel III made it tier 1 official; we also knew, like many other sophisticated investors, that “non-yielding” physical gold was a far superior asset thannegative yielding sovereign bonds (i.e., “return-free risk”)…\nHeck, even the central banks themselves can’t deny this, which is why they’ve been purchasing more gold than Treasuries.\n\nIn short, what banks do and what they say are very different things. Basel III is just another attempt to make the unsafe appear safe, whereas we’ve been safe (and more prepared) all along.\nFor serious precious metal investors seeking genuine wealth preservation and currency insurance managed by the global leader in premier gold and silver stored in the world’s most secure vault, we are a far better choice than the banks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":85,"commentSize":30,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}