This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market

11
5
Favorite

This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market

zerohedge2021-03-16

Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights... The classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（5）

Richard1988
·2021-03-16
Set
Reply
1
Report
TeeNyKoH
·2021-03-16
N
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- TeeNyKoH:
  Bu
  2021-03-20
  Reply
  Report
Dummy_Inv
·2021-03-16
[財迷] [財迷] [財迷] [財迷] [財迷]
Reply
Like
Report
Yenky
·2021-03-16
Agreed
Reply
Like
Report
erickuekpc
·2021-03-16
Sure okok
Reply
1
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1199153511","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","article_id":"1199153511","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"这不是你父亲高估的市场","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{},"content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":325285221,"gmtCreate":1615902439363,"gmtModify":1704788201760,"author":{"id":"3574225416500857","authorId":"3574225416500857","authorIdStr":"3574225416500857","name":"Richard1988","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/173ae37a246f2772d4e645668e9833c4","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3574225416500857"},"htmlText":"Set","listText":"Set","text":"Set","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325285221","repostId":1199153511,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","content":"<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...</p>\n<p>The classic&nbsp;<b>“Buffett Indicator”</b>&nbsp;certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84ead1c8048f2f837b1f849fee01d477\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>Then there is the ever-popular&nbsp;<b>price-to-earnings ratio</b>. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad62168f364b6064cebd61dcdba23c5b\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\"></p>\n<p><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>This next one is unusual:&nbsp;<b>valuation as measured by mean reversion</b>.&nbsp;Mean reversion&nbsp;is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"</p>\n<p>While the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.</p>\n<p>This isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.</p>\n<p><b>What's Different Now</b></p>\n<p>This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.</p>\n<p>There are two major differences…</p>\n<p>First, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.</p>\n<p>We had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.</p>\n<p>And now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but&nbsp;its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.</p>\n<p><b>Overvalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced</b></p>\n<p>Jerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>Powell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment,&nbsp;which is indeed a real problem.</p>\n<p>The Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.</p>\n<p>What they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>If they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.</p>\n<p>It also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an&nbsp;ever-increasing federal deficit.</p>\n<p>But persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cef10f8c196ce434aeffb1b04642aa49\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Look at this chart showing S&amp;P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.</p>\n<p>That suggests that the S&amp;P 500 may not be so overpriced.</p>\n<p>While valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.</p>\n<p>That being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.</p>\n<p><b>The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History</b></p>\n<p><i>New York Times</i>&nbsp;best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.&nbsp;</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199153511","content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":325285017,"gmtCreate":1615902427939,"gmtModify":1704788201433,"author":{"id":"3573227795342863","authorId":"3573227795342863","authorIdStr":"3573227795342863","name":"TeeNyKoH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4bdaa509575379c4224d28e97e3cdf9e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573227795342863"},"htmlText":"N","listText":"N","text":"N","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325285017","repostId":1199153511,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","content":"<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...</p>\n<p>The classic&nbsp;<b>“Buffett Indicator”</b>&nbsp;certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84ead1c8048f2f837b1f849fee01d477\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>Then there is the ever-popular&nbsp;<b>price-to-earnings ratio</b>. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad62168f364b6064cebd61dcdba23c5b\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\"></p>\n<p><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>This next one is unusual:&nbsp;<b>valuation as measured by mean reversion</b>.&nbsp;Mean reversion&nbsp;is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"</p>\n<p>While the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.</p>\n<p>This isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.</p>\n<p><b>What's Different Now</b></p>\n<p>This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.</p>\n<p>There are two major differences…</p>\n<p>First, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.</p>\n<p>We had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.</p>\n<p>And now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but&nbsp;its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.</p>\n<p><b>Overvalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced</b></p>\n<p>Jerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>Powell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment,&nbsp;which is indeed a real problem.</p>\n<p>The Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.</p>\n<p>What they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>If they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.</p>\n<p>It also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an&nbsp;ever-increasing federal deficit.</p>\n<p>But persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cef10f8c196ce434aeffb1b04642aa49\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Look at this chart showing S&amp;P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.</p>\n<p>That suggests that the S&amp;P 500 may not be so overpriced.</p>\n<p>While valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.</p>\n<p>That being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.</p>\n<p><b>The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History</b></p>\n<p><i>New York Times</i>&nbsp;best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.&nbsp;</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199153511","content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3838299,"gmtCreate":1616185315925,"gmtModify":1680781036936,"authorId":3573227795342863,"author":{"id":3573227795342863,"authorId":3573227795342863,"name":"TeeNyKoH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4bdaa509575379c4224d28e97e3cdf9e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":325285017,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Bu","text":"Bu","html":"Bu"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":325292105,"gmtCreate":1615900658907,"gmtModify":1704788158467,"author":{"id":"3567542871143851","authorId":"3567542871143851","authorIdStr":"3567542871143851","name":"Dummy_Inv","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f850aa031c5786464c443d2cd7ff5a1d","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3567542871143851"},"htmlText":"[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;","listText":"[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;[財迷]&nbsp;","text":"[財迷] [財迷] [財迷] [財迷] [財迷]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325292105","repostId":1199153511,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","content":"<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...</p>\n<p>The classic&nbsp;<b>“Buffett Indicator”</b>&nbsp;certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84ead1c8048f2f837b1f849fee01d477\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>Then there is the ever-popular&nbsp;<b>price-to-earnings ratio</b>. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad62168f364b6064cebd61dcdba23c5b\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\"></p>\n<p><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>This next one is unusual:&nbsp;<b>valuation as measured by mean reversion</b>.&nbsp;Mean reversion&nbsp;is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"</p>\n<p>While the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.</p>\n<p>This isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.</p>\n<p><b>What's Different Now</b></p>\n<p>This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.</p>\n<p>There are two major differences…</p>\n<p>First, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.</p>\n<p>We had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.</p>\n<p>And now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but&nbsp;its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.</p>\n<p><b>Overvalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced</b></p>\n<p>Jerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>Powell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment,&nbsp;which is indeed a real problem.</p>\n<p>The Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.</p>\n<p>What they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>If they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.</p>\n<p>It also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an&nbsp;ever-increasing federal deficit.</p>\n<p>But persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cef10f8c196ce434aeffb1b04642aa49\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Look at this chart showing S&amp;P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.</p>\n<p>That suggests that the S&amp;P 500 may not be so overpriced.</p>\n<p>While valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.</p>\n<p>That being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.</p>\n<p><b>The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History</b></p>\n<p><i>New York Times</i>&nbsp;best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.&nbsp;</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199153511","content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":325204636,"gmtCreate":1615900142225,"gmtModify":1704788148578,"author":{"id":"3573373141883201","authorId":"3573373141883201","authorIdStr":"3573373141883201","name":"Yenky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ffb3663a54fbe65c3779cfb8aecc6ff","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573373141883201"},"htmlText":"Agreed","listText":"Agreed","text":"Agreed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325204636","repostId":1199153511,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","content":"<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...</p>\n<p>The classic&nbsp;<b>“Buffett Indicator”</b>&nbsp;certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84ead1c8048f2f837b1f849fee01d477\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>Then there is the ever-popular&nbsp;<b>price-to-earnings ratio</b>. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad62168f364b6064cebd61dcdba23c5b\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\"></p>\n<p><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>This next one is unusual:&nbsp;<b>valuation as measured by mean reversion</b>.&nbsp;Mean reversion&nbsp;is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"</p>\n<p>While the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.</p>\n<p>This isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.</p>\n<p><b>What's Different Now</b></p>\n<p>This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.</p>\n<p>There are two major differences…</p>\n<p>First, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.</p>\n<p>We had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.</p>\n<p>And now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but&nbsp;its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.</p>\n<p><b>Overvalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced</b></p>\n<p>Jerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>Powell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment,&nbsp;which is indeed a real problem.</p>\n<p>The Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.</p>\n<p>What they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>If they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.</p>\n<p>It also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an&nbsp;ever-increasing federal deficit.</p>\n<p>But persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cef10f8c196ce434aeffb1b04642aa49\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Look at this chart showing S&amp;P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.</p>\n<p>That suggests that the S&amp;P 500 may not be so overpriced.</p>\n<p>While valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.</p>\n<p>That being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.</p>\n<p><b>The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History</b></p>\n<p><i>New York Times</i>&nbsp;best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.&nbsp;</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199153511","content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":325208271,"gmtCreate":1615899855393,"gmtModify":1704788143210,"author":{"id":"3575857561859418","authorId":"3575857561859418","authorIdStr":"3575857561859418","name":"erickuekpc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5710f82872e068b3d00f4adc9d97768f","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575857561859418"},"htmlText":"Sure okok","listText":"Sure okok","text":"Sure okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325208271","repostId":1199153511,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199153511","pubTimestamp":1615898909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199153511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199153511","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually ","content":"<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...</p>\n<p>The classic&nbsp;<b>“Buffett Indicator”</b>&nbsp;certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84ead1c8048f2f837b1f849fee01d477\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"592\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>Then there is the ever-popular&nbsp;<b>price-to-earnings ratio</b>. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad62168f364b6064cebd61dcdba23c5b\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\"></p>\n<p><i>Source: CurrentMarketValuation.com</i></p>\n<p>This next one is unusual:&nbsp;<b>valuation as measured by mean reversion</b>.&nbsp;Mean reversion&nbsp;is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"</p>\n<p>While the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.</p>\n<p>This isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.</p>\n<p><b>What's Different Now</b></p>\n<p>This is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.</p>\n<p>There are two major differences…</p>\n<p>First, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.</p>\n<p>We had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.</p>\n<p>And now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but&nbsp;its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.</p>\n<p><b>Overvalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced</b></p>\n<p>Jerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.</p>\n<p>Powell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment,&nbsp;which is indeed a real problem.</p>\n<p>The Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.</p>\n<p>What they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>If they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.</p>\n<p>It also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an&nbsp;ever-increasing federal deficit.</p>\n<p>But persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cef10f8c196ce434aeffb1b04642aa49\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Look at this chart showing S&amp;P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.</p>\n<p>That suggests that the S&amp;P 500 may not be so overpriced.</p>\n<p>While valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.</p>\n<p>That being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.</p>\n<p><b>The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History</b></p>\n<p><i>New York Times</i>&nbsp;best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.&nbsp;</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Isn't Your Father's Overvalued Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-03-15/isnt-your-fathers-overvalued-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199153511","content_text":"Many analysts contend that currentstock valuationsresemble the dot-com era. You can see it visually at CurrentMarketValuation.com. Some highlights...\nThe classic “Buffett Indicator” certainly seems to be in nosebleed territory. Notice that the valuations in 1966, the beginning of a long-term bear market, were also high.\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThen there is the ever-popular price-to-earnings ratio. Notice by this measure that valuations were not all that stretched in 1966. Yet there still followed a 17-year bear market, as measured from the peak back to where it started.\n\nSource: CurrentMarketValuation.com\nThis next one is unusual: valuation as measured by mean reversion. Mean reversion is the fairly unsophisticated concept that \"what goes up must come down.\"\nWhile the market’s day-to-day movements are chaotic, long-term stockmarket returnstend to follow somewhat predictable upward trends. But they can also deviate from the trend for years or even decades.\nThis isn’t a trading strategy. But it's still a useful indicator of overall market valuation relative to the past.\nWhat's Different Now\nThis is not your father’s or your grandfather’s (if he was alive in 1929) overvalued market.\nThere are two major differences…\nFirst, in the dot-com era, the Federal Reserve had let loose the dogs of easymonetary policygoing into the Y2K event. That was appropriate given the uncertainty, but it clearly helped send already overvalued markets to extremes.\nWe had day traders piling into anything that looked like an internet stock, speculations, really easy money, and so forth. Then after January 1 passed uneventfully, Greenspan appropriately reversed the Fed’s monetary policy. Oops.\nAnd now we have enormous federal government stimulus, soon to be about 25% of GDP in less than a year. That money ends up somewhere, but its impact is still unclear. There is no historical parallel to consider.\nOvervalued Market... But Perhaps Not Overpriced\nJerome Powell is not Alan Greenspan.\nPowell and his colleagues have made it very clear they will keep monetary policy loose and rates low for a very long time.Inflationis well down their worry list. Their top concern is unemployment, which is indeed a real problem.\nThe Fed is telling us it will let inflation get to 3% or more. They are looking at the average inflation over time, which means they can justify doing anything they want.\nWhat they want is lowrates, even if it overheats the economy, until unemployment returns to where it was before the pandemic.\nIf they really mean that, then we are going to have low rates for a very long time, as unemployment is a bigger problem than most people think.\nIt also means, maybe not coincidentally, the US Treasury will find it easier to refinance an ever-increasing federal deficit.\nBut persistent low rates might mean stock market valuations are actually in the fair value range.\n\nLook at this chart showing S&P 500 value relative to interest rates. Interest rates are 1.6 standard deviations below the trendline.\nThat suggests that the S&P 500 may not be so overpriced.\nWhile valuations tell us nothing about short-term market moves, they are actually pretty good at longer-term returns.\nThat being said, some smart people I follow see pockets of undervaluation (at least relative to the US) in more than a few places. If you're looking forvalue, you might want to start there.\nThe Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History\nNew York Times best seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could be triggered in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":11,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}