Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months

96
18
Favorite

Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months

zerohedge2021-05-24

Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（18）

ChunHui
·2021-05-24
Help me comment and like!!
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Huathk:
  K
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
Bkbucks
·2021-05-24
?
Reply
1
Report
chandra
·2021-05-24
Please like
Reply
2
Report
Trader0505
·2021-05-24
Ok
Reply
Like
Report
Lim89
·2021-05-24
All in
Reply
1
Report
ping23
·2021-05-24
pls comment back
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- OldCat:
  Done. please reply back, thanks
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- ProsperTTM:
  Alright
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- ProsperTTM:
  Done
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
HoldTheDoor
·2021-05-24
Comment
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- ping23:
  sure
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
Leim
·2021-05-24
Gogogo
Reply
5
Report
YeeYen
·2021-05-24
Like and commment pls
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- szueyann:
  ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
szueyann
·2021-05-24
Please like and comment. Thanks
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- JaydenSeeReplying toszueyann:
  welcome
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- szueyann:
  thanks
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- YeeYen:
  Done
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
Annalz
·2021-05-24
Good
Reply
3
Report
UNCLEUNCLE
·2021-05-24
I see
Reply
2
Report
Kenang
·2021-05-24
Pls like & comment TQ
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- matcha_latte:
  ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- szueyann:
  sure
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
AhKeong91
·2021-05-24
Comment and like tq
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- szueyann:
  ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- Kenang:
  Ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
DKim
·2021-05-24
Gd news as oil took a tumble last year. Pls like and comment tks
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- szueyann:
  done
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- Kenang:
  Ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
ACCY
·2021-05-24
Pls comment and like. Thank you
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- szueyann:
  ✅
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
- Kenang:
  Ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
Attica88
·2021-05-24
Great!
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Kenang:
  Ok
  2021-05-24
  Reply
  Report
Todkie
·2021-05-24
Like like ??
Reply
1
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1199368870","market":"fut","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FT_SY_BZ","symbol_name":"布油现金","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","article_id":"1199368870","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"高盛对伊朗石油产量的担忧，预计原油价格将在几个月内触及80美元","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"BZmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9},"content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":131196099,"gmtCreate":1621832893611,"gmtModify":1704363009451,"author":{"id":"3581852672614632","authorId":"3581852672614632","name":"ChunHui","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bc47341688d5ff26c7994db9a3a6f6ac","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581852672614632","authorIdStr":"3581852672614632"},"htmlText":"Help me comment and like!!","listText":"Help me comment and like!!","text":"Help me comment and like!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131196099","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4429345,"gmtCreate":1621833565735,"gmtModify":1680790603320,"authorId":3573472992263411,"author":{"id":3573472992263411,"idStr":"3573472992263411","authorId":3573472992263411,"name":"Huathk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43c7168c646d9ea6805194ed0003f1cc","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131196099,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"K","text":"K","html":"K"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131198742,"gmtCreate":1621832892686,"gmtModify":1704363009290,"author":{"id":"3573472916506839","authorId":"3573472916506839","name":"Bkbucks","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af6955b3082bd304d81bc458c72827cc","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573472916506839","authorIdStr":"3573472916506839"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131198742","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131106098,"gmtCreate":1621832006514,"gmtModify":1704362995833,"author":{"id":"3578706888157658","authorId":"3578706888157658","name":"chandra","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9aa38a10b67f170337a83ecf01dc8b2","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578706888157658","authorIdStr":"3578706888157658"},"htmlText":"Please like","listText":"Please like","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131106098","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131103559,"gmtCreate":1621831850471,"gmtModify":1704362992551,"author":{"id":"3573216396035636","authorId":"3573216396035636","name":"Trader0505","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c50c5243fd8dd1cf060cabef7bcbb550","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573216396035636","authorIdStr":"3573216396035636"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131103559","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131345915,"gmtCreate":1621830929737,"gmtModify":1704362970397,"author":{"id":"3527303552443900","authorId":"3527303552443900","name":"Lim89","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f21e4020ff962f4d66f99662b584ec1c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3527303552443900","authorIdStr":"3527303552443900"},"htmlText":"All in","listText":"All in","text":"All in","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131345915","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131341470,"gmtCreate":1621830792990,"gmtModify":1704362965538,"author":{"id":"3574521189147374","authorId":"3574521189147374","name":"ping23","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c38fda829a130d716804cbae538a7cb8","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574521189147374","authorIdStr":"3574521189147374"},"htmlText":"pls comment back","listText":"pls comment back","text":"pls comment back","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131341470","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4429071,"gmtCreate":1621831733370,"gmtModify":1680790602344,"authorId":3573733606753390,"author":{"id":3573733606753390,"idStr":"3573733606753390","authorId":3573733606753390,"name":"OldCat","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131341470,"type":1,"supId":4429056,"prevId":0,"content":"Done. please reply back, thanks","text":"Done. please reply back, thanks","html":"Done. please reply back, thanks"},{"id":4429118,"gmtCreate":1621831950184,"gmtModify":1680790599241,"authorId":3575786148063178,"author":{"id":3575786148063178,"idStr":"3575786148063178","authorId":3575786148063178,"name":"ProsperTTM","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/57fd122a583a47c5cae777f5f57537ea","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.63%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131341470,"type":1,"supId":4429056,"prevId":0,"content":"Alright ","text":"Alright ","html":"Alright "},{"id":4429056,"gmtCreate":1621831669419,"gmtModify":1680790596094,"authorId":3575786148063178,"author":{"id":3575786148063178,"idStr":"3575786148063178","authorId":3575786148063178,"name":"ProsperTTM","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/57fd122a583a47c5cae777f5f57537ea","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.63%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131341470,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done","text":"Done","html":"Done"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131343926,"gmtCreate":1621830726865,"gmtModify":1704362962952,"author":{"id":"3580469278772937","authorId":"3580469278772937","name":"HoldTheDoor","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/635db0f1af7cd6ef4ce184b75309a7b0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3580469278772937","authorIdStr":"3580469278772937"},"htmlText":"Comment&nbsp;","listText":"Comment&nbsp;","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131343926","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428862,"gmtCreate":1621830779707,"gmtModify":1680790602203,"authorId":3574521189147374,"author":{"id":3574521189147374,"idStr":"3574521189147374","authorId":3574521189147374,"name":"ping23","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c38fda829a130d716804cbae538a7cb8","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131343926,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>sure</u>","text":"<u>sure</u>","html":"<u>sure</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131353152,"gmtCreate":1621830038076,"gmtModify":1704362948056,"author":{"id":"3583374007613971","authorId":"3583374007613971","name":"Leim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a62262caddc9ae2ff845ffb42fa1866d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583374007613971","authorIdStr":"3583374007613971"},"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131353152","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131326319,"gmtCreate":1621829613531,"gmtModify":1704362937517,"author":{"id":"3583571765550095","authorId":"3583571765550095","name":"YeeYen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7fc7a5493cb04486fac45783a2b3e8a6","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583571765550095","authorIdStr":"3583571765550095"},"htmlText":"Like and commment pls&nbsp;","listText":"Like and commment pls&nbsp;","text":"Like and commment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131326319","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428679,"gmtCreate":1621829783910,"gmtModify":1680790592571,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131326319,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131323966,"gmtCreate":1621829375055,"gmtModify":1704362932822,"author":{"id":"3573721781255613","authorId":"3573721781255613","name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorIdStr":"3573721781255613"},"htmlText":"Please like and comment. Thanks","listText":"Please like and comment. Thanks","text":"Please like and comment. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131323966","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4432591,"gmtCreate":1621861748506,"gmtModify":1680790659879,"authorId":3571546243427161,"author":{"id":3571546243427161,"idStr":"3571546243427161","authorId":3571546243427161,"name":"JaydenSee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f81b1d1b9ef76e9028b0f68e5a5d3553","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":3573721781255613,"repliedAuthor":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"objectId":131323966,"type":1,"supId":4428642,"prevId":4428669,"content":"welcome","text":"welcome","html":"welcome"},{"id":4428669,"gmtCreate":1621829760056,"gmtModify":1680790592438,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131323966,"type":1,"supId":4428642,"prevId":0,"content":"thanks","text":"thanks","html":"thanks"},{"id":4428642,"gmtCreate":1621829601485,"gmtModify":1680790589221,"authorId":3583571765550095,"author":{"id":3583571765550095,"idStr":"3583571765550095","authorId":3583571765550095,"name":"YeeYen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7fc7a5493cb04486fac45783a2b3e8a6","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131323966,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done ","text":"Done ","html":"Done "}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131366396,"gmtCreate":1621828958315,"gmtModify":1704362922761,"author":{"id":"3577089953267281","authorId":"3577089953267281","name":"Annalz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffd285ab6189bb61da4b48c3e149eedc","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577089953267281","authorIdStr":"3577089953267281"},"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131366396","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131368296,"gmtCreate":1621828931915,"gmtModify":1704362921956,"author":{"id":"3578454236921942","authorId":"3578454236921942","name":"UNCLEUNCLE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39d9ac757e81155e380be67c7f350841","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3578454236921942","authorIdStr":"3578454236921942"},"htmlText":"I see","listText":"I see","text":"I see","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131368296","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131382834,"gmtCreate":1621828286728,"gmtModify":1704362911098,"author":{"id":"3578783239633074","authorId":"3578783239633074","name":"Kenang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9b932623d314153a412ec6160f17873c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578783239633074","authorIdStr":"3578783239633074"},"htmlText":"Pls like &amp; comment TQ","listText":"Pls like &amp; comment TQ","text":"Pls like & comment TQ","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131382834","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428434,"gmtCreate":1621828701626,"gmtModify":1680790590724,"authorId":3581766638376505,"author":{"id":3581766638376505,"idStr":"3581766638376505","authorId":3581766638376505,"name":"matcha_latte","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131382834,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":4428592,"gmtCreate":1621829391877,"gmtModify":1680790589271,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131382834,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>sure</u>","text":"<u>sure</u>","html":"<u>sure</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131386650,"gmtCreate":1621828178970,"gmtModify":1704362909801,"author":{"id":"3582521635826566","authorId":"3582521635826566","name":"AhKeong91","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1cd86f26ec2a27b3a145626d23416fa4","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582521635826566","authorIdStr":"3582521635826566"},"htmlText":"Comment and like tq","listText":"Comment and like tq","text":"Comment and like tq","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131386650","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428588,"gmtCreate":1621829386230,"gmtModify":1680790587132,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131386650,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":4428363,"gmtCreate":1621828303159,"gmtModify":1680790583944,"authorId":3578783239633074,"author":{"id":3578783239633074,"idStr":"3578783239633074","authorId":3578783239633074,"name":"Kenang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9b932623d314153a412ec6160f17873c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131386650,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131386929,"gmtCreate":1621828160461,"gmtModify":1704362909155,"author":{"id":"3572428109068921","authorId":"3572428109068921","name":"DKim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bcfaaf6da9577d8a6da421538592a0e","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3572428109068921","authorIdStr":"3572428109068921"},"htmlText":"Gd news as oil took a tumble last year. Pls like and comment tks","listText":"Gd news as oil took a tumble last year. Pls like and comment tks","text":"Gd news as oil took a tumble last year. Pls like and comment tks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131386929","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428594,"gmtCreate":1621829398924,"gmtModify":1680790590105,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131386929,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>done</u>","text":"<u>done</u>","html":"<u>done</u>"},{"id":4428365,"gmtCreate":1621828315472,"gmtModify":1680790583974,"authorId":3578783239633074,"author":{"id":3578783239633074,"idStr":"3578783239633074","authorId":3578783239633074,"name":"Kenang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9b932623d314153a412ec6160f17873c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131386929,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131312158,"gmtCreate":1621827286674,"gmtModify":1704362896533,"author":{"id":"3579758808989513","authorId":"3579758808989513","name":"ACCY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a44626552831eb06aa01cf85dcaf7422","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579758808989513","authorIdStr":"3579758808989513"},"htmlText":"Pls comment and like. Thank you","listText":"Pls comment and like. Thank you","text":"Pls comment and like. Thank you","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131312158","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428599,"gmtCreate":1621829405090,"gmtModify":1680790591777,"authorId":3573721781255613,"author":{"id":3573721781255613,"idStr":"3573721781255613","authorId":3573721781255613,"name":"szueyann","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cba9c6b1e785a9cf7301a7e6a2ff2354","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131312158,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"✅","text":"✅","html":"✅"},{"id":4428368,"gmtCreate":1621828337451,"gmtModify":1680790586052,"authorId":3578783239633074,"author":{"id":3578783239633074,"idStr":"3578783239633074","authorId":3578783239633074,"name":"Kenang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9b932623d314153a412ec6160f17873c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131312158,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131318726,"gmtCreate":1621827115365,"gmtModify":1704362894751,"author":{"id":"3577182787260052","authorId":"3577182787260052","name":"Attica88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25f5fb94ec59d52eafaa236c989b1b2b","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577182787260052","authorIdStr":"3577182787260052"},"htmlText":"Great!","listText":"Great!","text":"Great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131318726","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4428372,"gmtCreate":1621828347300,"gmtModify":1680790584021,"authorId":3578783239633074,"author":{"id":3578783239633074,"idStr":"3578783239633074","authorId":3578783239633074,"name":"Kenang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9b932623d314153a412ec6160f17873c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":131318726,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":131319619,"gmtCreate":1621826845931,"gmtModify":1704362890188,"author":{"id":"3584090913879250","authorId":"3584090913879250","name":"Todkie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68110d1283e1fd53c9c0fe6ec6bccb7e","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50a4c8d97279fa9f8f1fa9749a6bdff4","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3584090913879250","authorIdStr":"3584090913879250"},"htmlText":"Like like ??","listText":"Like like ??","text":"Like like ??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131319619","repostId":1199368870,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199368870","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621826077,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199368870?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-24 11:14","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199368870","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil ","content":"<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"<i>last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"</i></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ad98e1c2bbd76dc7d104b59d236463\" tg-width=\"1083\" tg-height=\"446\"></p>\n<p>After such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.</p>\n<p>Anyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>On Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/116a624e53cf834bce98bbf71e6c293b\" tg-width=\"1070\" tg-height=\"465\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5f2c1ddc6802d76a8e11402229d10d9\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"481\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>On supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43f8cf811660170ea5733181df1e0dd\" tg-width=\"1072\" tg-height=\"476\"></p>\n<ul>\n <li>... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/431baf40b560c2b55a5d317ddc3ed34a\" tg-width=\"1060\" tg-height=\"550\"></p>\n<p>Putting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"</p>\n<p>Assuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:<b>\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55186d7f62ff05e54791f9cf19b97fab\" tg-width=\"1063\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p>Goldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,<b>we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f34f36e31dbb8bdd4e52fcb1f2c83c45\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"460\"></p>\n<p>To be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Steamrolls Iran Oil Output Fears, Sees Crude Hitting $80 In Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-24 11:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steamrolls-iran-oil-output-fears-sees-crude-hitting-80-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199368870","content_text":"Toward the end of Q1, Goldman Sachs along with virtually every other major bank, predicted that oil had nowhere else to go but up, with bank after bank hiking their oil forecast. It also top-ticked the market, as Goldman's Damien Courvalin writes in a note published on Sunday discussing \"the path to higher oil prices\", in which he admits that despite the bank's \"balls to the wall\" bullish stance on crude, \"the oil rally has given way to sideways volatility since March, due to concerns over vaccination pace, EM Covid waves and the return of Iranian barrels, with the latter pushing Brent prices down from $70 to $65/bbl last week.\" Or, as the bank calculates, \"last week’s large sell-off was equivalent to bringing forward by 3 months a 1 mb/d increase in global production, leaving the market likely pricing the return of Iranian barrels by late summer.\"\n\nAfter such a retracement, the Goldman commodities strategist predicts that while the market is now \"pricing a return of Iranian barrels by late summer\" it is again \"underestimating the upcoming demand rebound, too pessimistic a view on both accounts.\" Which, of course, is someone that is bullish on oil would say.\nAnyway, here is Courvalin's math explaining why the market is too pessimistic in his view:\n\nOn Iran, while comments suggest significant progress has indeed been made, the timelinen is still uncertain asaccording to press reports, negotiations appear focused on an agreement on the conditions for reinstating the JCPOA, implying a lag (or potential impasse) in lifting US secondary oil sanctions, or conditions that could limit the size of such a restart.\n\n\n\nOn demand, Goldman says that the recovery in DM mobility and travel is on track to exceed its expectations, helping offset the recent hit to South Asia and Latin America demand: \"Mobility is rapidly increasing in the US and Europe, as vaccinations accelerate and lockdowns are lifted, with freight and industrial activity also surging. This DM recovery is in fact larger than we had assumed, helping offset the recent hit to demand and the likely slower recovery in South Asia and Latin America.\"\n\n\n\nOn supply, Goldman is lowering its non-OPEC+ production forecasts to account for still depressed activity levels and a slower expected rebound from shale. Given the current global deficit of 1.8 mb/d in 2Q21, Goldman believes that this demand impulse will not only absorb remaining excess inventories and a potential July ramp-up in Iran supply...\n\n\n\n... but still require a cumulative additional 2.8 mb/d increase in OPEC+ production by Dec-21 (requiring an early exit from their April 2020 agreement).\n\n\nPutting these three together, Goldman assures its clients that the \"case for higher oil prices therefore remains intact given the large vaccine-driven increase in demand in the face of inelastic supply.\"\nAssuming this is accurate, Courvalin's next argument is that the path to higher prices is the key uncertainty and to address this, he runs scenarios on Goldman's updated supply-demand balance, adjusting the OPEC+ and shale responses to various timings of Iran's potential export recovery:\"Even aggressively assuming a restart in July, we estimate that Brent prices would still reach $80/bbl in 4Q21, with our new base case for an October restart still supporting our $80/bbl forecast for this summer.\"\n\nGoldman's conclusion is some humble... \" despite the global market deficit coming in line with our forecasts in recent months, we under-estimated the weight of such demand and Iran uncertainties, keeping prices trading below our $75/bbl 2Q21 fair value\" before trying to convince the market that it will be right, damn it: \"With growing evidence of the demand rebound, and imminent clarification on the likelihood of an Iranian return,we now see a clearer path for the next leg higher in oil prices, with the sell-off offering opportunities to position for the rally to $80/bbl.\"\n\nTo be sure, this is not the first time Goldman has had outrageous predictions about oil prices, with the current forecast nowhere near Goldman's $200/bbl prediction from the summer of 2008. On the other hand, with prices across all goods and services already surging, there will be nobody more relieved if Goldman is wrong on this one, than Joe Biden...","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":96,"commentSize":18,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}