Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream

21
8
Favorite

Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream

Motley Fool2021-06-14

Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（8）

michka90
·2021-06-15
Covid twisting the business landscape again
Reply
Like
Report
waihustle
·2021-06-14
Sad truth
Reply
1
Report
ricebowl
·2021-06-14
Like pls
Reply
1
Report
LJV
·2021-06-14
[What]
Reply
3
Report
Dsd
·2021-06-14
I prefer Airbus plane
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- BigMoneyBoi:
  hi
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
- Matt_cjx:
  Ah
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
- Tatsuya:
  aame
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
小小爆米花
·2021-06-14
[微笑]
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- ENAHSHANE:
  Lets go
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
- aazbhsj:
  .
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
Maximus88
·2021-06-14
Can’t fly… :(
Reply
2
Report
Benedict_cyh
·2021-06-14
NiceOk
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- ENAHSHANE:
  Nice brO
  2021-06-14
  Reply
  Report
- Benedict_cyh:
  Thanksghanks
  2021-06-16
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2143782907","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"01126","symbol_name":"德林国际","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","article_id":"2143782907","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"translate_title":"波音CEO梦想飞机复苏预测是白日梦","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"01126":0.9,"BA":0.9},"content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":184184833,"gmtCreate":1623689003522,"gmtModify":1704208857685,"author":{"id":"3586596076852926","authorId":"3586596076852926","name":"michka90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b9eda6dfe5a38cc35282c528b9eb49","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586596076852926","authorIdStr":"3586596076852926"},"htmlText":"Covid twisting the business landscape again","listText":"Covid twisting the business landscape again","text":"Covid twisting the business landscape again","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184184833","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":184318154,"gmtCreate":1623684024078,"gmtModify":1704208700056,"author":{"id":"3574772025886423","authorId":"3574772025886423","name":"waihustle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff00b015a4bdda521053764de04de141","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3574772025886423","authorIdStr":"3574772025886423"},"htmlText":"Sad truth&nbsp;","listText":"Sad truth&nbsp;","text":"Sad truth","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184318154","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":184905475,"gmtCreate":1623679792397,"gmtModify":1704208522886,"author":{"id":"3578561901514206","authorId":"3578561901514206","name":"ricebowl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9ec802718dde5068862a7df929de4ed","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578561901514206","authorIdStr":"3578561901514206"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184905475","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":184045613,"gmtCreate":1623679232232,"gmtModify":1704208495395,"author":{"id":"3575778217059059","authorId":"3575778217059059","name":"LJV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45d6b322d40f73112e6e267746448542","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575778217059059","authorIdStr":"3575778217059059"},"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184045613","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":185726981,"gmtCreate":1623674617943,"gmtModify":1704208332382,"author":{"id":"3581036261146444","authorId":"3581036261146444","name":"Dsd","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a1957746498df0232ae53ac81018443","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581036261146444","authorIdStr":"3581036261146444"},"htmlText":"I prefer Airbus plane","listText":"I prefer Airbus plane","text":"I prefer Airbus plane","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/185726981","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4749208,"gmtCreate":1623677061593,"gmtModify":1663228753328,"authorId":3573763073298164,"author":{"id":3573763073298164,"idStr":"3573763073298164","authorId":3573763073298164,"name":"BigMoneyBoi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83603bceed7b624ede9f57eb2ae6f993","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185726981,"type":1,"supId":4748531,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>hi</u>","text":"<u>hi</u>","html":"<u>hi</u>"},{"id":4748896,"gmtCreate":1623675836030,"gmtModify":1663228752243,"authorId":3579775660085519,"author":{"id":3579775660085519,"idStr":"3579775660085519","authorId":3579775660085519,"name":"Matt_cjx","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caca73862e27552f1ed9c206de3aedd3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185726981,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ah ","text":"Ah ","html":"Ah "},{"id":4748531,"gmtCreate":1623674727411,"gmtModify":1663228750129,"authorId":3580746005297647,"author":{"id":3580746005297647,"idStr":"3580746005297647","authorId":3580746005297647,"name":"Tatsuya","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e704bb3e3180783f322dc964a67d550","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"60.01%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185726981,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"aame","text":"aame","html":"aame"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":185711137,"gmtCreate":1623673063329,"gmtModify":1704208285295,"author":{"id":"3560144122940430","authorId":"3560144122940430","name":"小小爆米花","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8901eea0205335d02f752d9b13e1f65","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3560144122940430","authorIdStr":"3560144122940430"},"htmlText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/185711137","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4748382,"gmtCreate":1623674328931,"gmtModify":1663228749429,"authorId":3570938778601887,"author":{"id":3570938778601887,"idStr":"3570938778601887","authorId":3570938778601887,"name":"ENAHSHANE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4826b7f9114514b02002820348f8e822","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185711137,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Lets go","text":"Lets go","html":"Lets go"},{"id":4748249,"gmtCreate":1623673930268,"gmtModify":1663228746835,"authorId":3552739656093163,"author":{"id":3552739656093163,"idStr":"3552739656093163","authorId":3552739656093163,"name":"aazbhsj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25780cc59d031cb888067c1e4030ed8e","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185711137,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":".","text":".","html":"."}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":185734735,"gmtCreate":1623672890927,"gmtModify":1704208279801,"author":{"id":"3580265488164620","authorId":"3580265488164620","name":"Maximus88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86d19effbbdd9cc5898210cf7c326349","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3580265488164620","authorIdStr":"3580265488164620"},"htmlText":"Can’t fly… :(","listText":"Can’t fly… :(","text":"Can’t fly… :(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/185734735","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":185738252,"gmtCreate":1623672630776,"gmtModify":1704208273811,"author":{"id":"3581667328055955","authorId":"3581667328055955","name":"Benedict_cyh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/216a5cf2e56f81472309860a063b75a6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581667328055955","authorIdStr":"3581667328055955"},"htmlText":"NiceOk&nbsp;","listText":"NiceOk&nbsp;","text":"NiceOk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/185738252","repostId":2143782907,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143782907","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623671760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143782907?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 19:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143782907","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Demand for Boeing's most popular wide-body jet will never be the same as it was a few years ago.","content":"<p>Just two years ago, <b>Boeing </b>(NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.</p>\n<p>At a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.</p>\n<h2>Planning for an incredible production recovery</h2>\n<p>Before the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.</p>\n<p>Many investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> final assembly plant.</p>\n<p>The Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.</p>\n<h2>Replacement demand won't cut it</h2>\n<p>Factory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)</p>\n<p>Even if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to <b>Airbus</b>, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.</p>\n<h2>Slower long-haul growth</h2>\n<p>A few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.</p>\n<p>This retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.</p>\n<p>Long-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.</p>\n<h2>Narrow-body jets will gain share</h2>\n<p>Lastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.</p>\n<p>A number of global airlines like <b>American Airlines</b> and <b>United Airlines</b> have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.</p>\n<p>In short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing CEO's Dreamliner Recovery Prediction Is a Pipe Dream\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 19:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01126":"德林国际","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/14/boeing-ceos-dreamliner-recovery-prediction-is-a-pi/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143782907","content_text":"Just two years ago, Boeing (NYSE:BA) was building 14 787 Dreamliner jets per month: a record pace for a wide-body jet. However, the COVID-19 pandemic crushed demand, forcing the aerospace giant to slash output to just five per month.\nAt a recent conference, CEO Dave Calhoun suggested that Boeing will eventually return to its pre-pandemic Dreamliner production rate. This prediction is unlikely to come true, though, as long-haul travel will recover slowly from the pandemic and narrow-body jets are poised to serve a growing proportion of long-haul demand.\nPlanning for an incredible production recovery\nBefore the pandemic, 787 Dreamliner production was split evenly between factories in Everett, Washington, and North Charleston, South Carolina. Because of the sharp drop in production, Boeing decided to stop building the 787 in Everett. As of March, it has moved all final assembly to its North Charleston facility.\nMany investors wondered what this move meant for future production plans. After all, the North Charleston plant built just seven 787s per month at its peak. At a recent conference hosted by Bernstein Research, Calhoun said that Boeing would get Dreamliner production back to previous rates even with only one final assembly plant.\nThe Boeing CEO did caution that it will take years to get there. However, he emphasized that -- with careful planning -- the South Carolina factory has enough space to accommodate production of 14 Dreamliners per month in the future.\nReplacement demand won't cut it\nFactory space won't be Boeing's biggest problem in getting back to a 14-per-month Dreamliner production rate. Demand simply won't support that level of output anytime in the next decade.\nFor one thing, Boeing can't rely on replacement demand to drive a rebound in 787 production. Between 1995 and 2011, Boeing delivered fewer than 1,600 passenger wide-body jets: an average of about 93 per year. (These production years roughly correspond to the wide-bodies due for retirement over the next 15 years.)\nEven if Boeing doesn't lose any of this wide-body replacement business to Airbus, it would only support production of about five 787s per month on average. (This assumes that the 777X would capture up to a third of Boeing's replacement volume.) Thus, getting back to a production rate of 14 per month -- or anywhere close -- requires airlines to purchase a lot of wide-body jets for growth.\nSlower long-haul growth\nA few years ago, airlines used most of their new 787s to grow on long-haul routes. This included a lot of unsustainable growth. For example, Norwegian Air built up a fleet of more than three dozen Dreamliners over the past decade. It never made a profit on long-haul flights and recently got rid of all of its 787s. Many other Dreamliner customers have scaled back their long-haul growth ambitions.\nThis retrenchment began before the pandemic hit. As a result, by January 2020, Boeing had announced two Dreamliner production cuts, which would have reduced output from 14 per month to 10 per month by early 2021. Of course, the pandemic forced even deeper cuts.\nLong-haul travel will eventually return to growth and should surpass pre-pandemic levels within three years or so. Nevertheless, it will grow at a slower pace than the pace of a few years ago, as airlines place more emphasis on profitability rather than growth. The top global airline industry trade group estimates that the pandemic permanently wiped out two years of industry growth.\nNarrow-body jets will gain share\nLastly, the Airbus A321XLR -- and a potential new Boeing jet -- will cannibalize both growth and replacement demand for wide-bodies like the 787 over the next decade. The A321XLR will be able to serve a huge swath of markets that were only viable with wide-bodies previously, but with much lower trip costs.\nA number of global airlines like American Airlines and United Airlines have placed big orders for the A321XLR. Many of those jets will replace Boeing 757 narrow-bodies used on longer routes, but some will replace small wide-bodies like the 767. Others could open up new routes. Either way, the A321XLR will steal sales from next-generation small wide-bodies like the 787 Dreamliner.\nIn short, the replacement market can only support today's depressed level of 787 production. And with airlines likely to grow their wide-body fleets at a modest pace over the next decade, that leaves Boeing virtually no chance of sustaining a 14-per-month 787 production rate anytime in the coming decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4748389,"gmtCreate":1623674347042,"gmtModify":1663228748748,"authorId":3570938778601887,"author":{"id":3570938778601887,"idStr":"3570938778601887","authorId":3570938778601887,"name":"ENAHSHANE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4826b7f9114514b02002820348f8e822","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185738252,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Nice brO","text":"Nice brO","html":"Nice brO"},{"id":4800989,"gmtCreate":1623814661899,"gmtModify":1635317205631,"authorId":3581667328055955,"author":{"id":3581667328055955,"idStr":"3581667328055955","authorId":3581667328055955,"name":"Benedict_cyh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/216a5cf2e56f81472309860a063b75a6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":185738252,"type":1,"supId":4748389,"prevId":0,"content":"Thanksghanks","text":"Thanksghanks","html":"Thanksghanks"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":21,"commentSize":8,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}