Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community

56
18
Favorite

Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report

SmarterAnalyst2021-06-18

Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（18）

Popcornn
·2021-06-21
Great
Reply
Like
Report
Eldorado
·2021-06-21
Scary, will it bounce back?
Reply
Like
Report
Fold Replies
- Popcornn:
  Wow
  2021-06-21
  Reply
  Report
Terranova
·2021-06-20
Wow
Reply
Like
Report
DZJ1976
·2021-06-19
This company won't make it
Reply
Like
Report
Fold Replies
- Baldy:
  Ok
  2021-06-20
  Reply
  Report
Pekpek
·2021-06-19
Nice
Reply
Like
Report
Fold Replies
- Nd:
  Nice
  2021-06-21
  Reply
  Report
TellMeMore
·2021-06-19
Nice
Reply
Like
Report
kayden
·2021-06-18
coollll....
Reply
Like
Report
flyingdiver
·2021-06-18
stick to your plan on the stock
Reply
Like
Report
BBY
·2021-06-18
Scam!
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- geraldsohsg:
  yes
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
BigBalls
·2021-06-18
I read but no letter
Reply
Like
Report
JKLah
·2021-06-18
Like and comment
Reply
Like
Report
Lawnwc
·2021-06-18
Pls like and share
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- fysx49:
  ok pls like and comment back tq
  2021-06-21
  Reply
  Report
- Sittk:
  sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
Lawnwc
·2021-06-18
Pls like and share
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- BBY:
  done! reply this comment pls!
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
boonk
·2021-06-18
Short ride but tesla
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- boonk:
  Buy
  2021-06-20
  Reply
  Report
- boonk:
  Buy tesla
  2021-06-19
  Reply
  Report
Alloyshears
·2021-06-18
can this comment get featured? for daily coins
Reply
8
Report
Fold Replies
- gamerxyj:
  GooD :)
  2021-06-20
  Reply
  Report
- rooot:
  ??
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
- Sittk:
  sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
View more 2 comments
Samsonn
·2021-06-18
Like n comment thanku!
Reply
6
Report
Fold Replies
- Sittk:
  sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
- AudreyTan:
  Like
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
- Joshualoh:
  There u go Pls reply Thanks
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
Joshualoh
·2021-06-18
Pls like n comment. Thanks!
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- Samsonn:
  yey
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
- Sittk:
  sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_
  2021-06-18
  Reply
  Report
MamaT
·2021-06-18
Jdjdjdjud
Reply
3
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","id":"2144779346","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","media":"SmarterAnalyst","content":"<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","article_id":"2144779346","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"yahoofinance","name":"雅虎金融"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"yahoo.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"Lordstown坚持车辆购买协议不具约束力-报告","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"RIDE":0.9},"content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":164591212,"gmtCreate":1624226742236,"gmtModify":1703830762099,"author":{"id":"3574394359789498","authorId":"3574394359789498","name":"Popcornn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9963e628c84bc7aa6308556a38d7360","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574394359789498","idStr":"3574394359789498"},"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164591212","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":164218310,"gmtCreate":1624206749130,"gmtModify":1703830659746,"author":{"id":"3585685148367552","authorId":"3585685148367552","name":"Eldorado","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3585685148367552","idStr":"3585685148367552"},"htmlText":"Scary, will it bounce back?","listText":"Scary, will it bounce back?","text":"Scary, will it bounce back?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164218310","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4917071,"gmtCreate":1624226750712,"gmtModify":1663229529043,"authorId":3574394359789498,"author":{"id":3574394359789498,"idStr":"3574394359789498","authorId":3574394359789498,"name":"Popcornn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9963e628c84bc7aa6308556a38d7360","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.20","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":164218310,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Wow","text":"Wow","html":"Wow"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":164948486,"gmtCreate":1624168421545,"gmtModify":1703830045766,"author":{"id":"3575792578736370","authorId":"3575792578736370","name":"Terranova","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575792578736370","idStr":"3575792578736370"},"htmlText":"Wow&nbsp;","listText":"Wow&nbsp;","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164948486","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":165317046,"gmtCreate":1624095517285,"gmtModify":1703828748706,"author":{"id":"3577722120895602","authorId":"3577722120895602","name":"DZJ1976","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0cb3bd8146604a31cbb6b27cf53752e","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577722120895602","idStr":"3577722120895602"},"htmlText":"This company won't make it&nbsp;","listText":"This company won't make it&nbsp;","text":"This company won't make it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165317046","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4901202,"gmtCreate":1624153615143,"gmtModify":1663229452542,"authorId":3561609447157373,"author":{"id":3561609447157373,"idStr":"3561609447157373","authorId":3561609447157373,"name":"Baldy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b4d7e96779a5120811e1a603b358e54","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.06.19","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":165317046,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":162622441,"gmtCreate":1624062300583,"gmtModify":1703827803591,"author":{"id":"3575416888765502","authorId":"3575416888765502","name":"Pekpek","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/110722b83391bdb392e8fd906cf3ea98","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3575416888765502","idStr":"3575416888765502"},"htmlText":"&nbsp;Nice","listText":"&nbsp;Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/162622441","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4916641,"gmtCreate":1624216912672,"gmtModify":1663229526939,"authorId":3569880313637172,"author":{"id":3569880313637172,"idStr":"3569880313637172","authorId":3569880313637172,"name":"Nd","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":162622441,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Nice","text":"Nice","html":"Nice"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":162155074,"gmtCreate":1624048835898,"gmtModify":1703827539210,"author":{"id":"3561078354105669","authorId":"3561078354105669","name":"TellMeMore","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3561078354105669","idStr":"3561078354105669"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/162155074","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":162000782,"gmtCreate":1624026682946,"gmtModify":1703827015837,"author":{"id":"3555242378875453","authorId":"3555242378875453","name":"kayden","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f5d57789a229511fba5301ddb2f22f2","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3555242378875453","idStr":"3555242378875453"},"htmlText":"coollll....","listText":"coollll....","text":"coollll....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/162000782","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166754529,"gmtCreate":1624026125161,"gmtModify":1703826983584,"author":{"id":"3585978829545962","authorId":"3585978829545962","name":"flyingdiver","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3047b8c9e7cce845d31a2df0a51db656","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3585978829545962","idStr":"3585978829545962"},"htmlText":"stick to your plan on the stock","listText":"stick to your plan on the stock","text":"stick to your plan on the stock","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166754529","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166416983,"gmtCreate":1624022311842,"gmtModify":1703826782832,"author":{"id":"3581989037273630","authorId":"3581989037273630","name":"BBY","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581989037273630","idStr":"3581989037273630"},"htmlText":"Scam!&nbsp;","listText":"Scam!&nbsp;","text":"Scam!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166416983","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4871221,"gmtCreate":1624022683163,"gmtModify":1635310689154,"authorId":3573763633608588,"author":{"id":3573763633608588,"idStr":"3573763633608588","authorId":3573763633608588,"name":"geraldsohsg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5ed6243d428bdde0ff2710c5f44b2b3","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166416983,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>yes</u>","text":"<u>yes</u>","html":"<u>yes</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166435207,"gmtCreate":1624021946809,"gmtModify":1703826772124,"author":{"id":"3568584602754149","authorId":"3568584602754149","name":"BigBalls","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3568584602754149","idStr":"3568584602754149"},"htmlText":"I read but no letter","listText":"I read but no letter","text":"I read but no letter","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166435207","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166430481,"gmtCreate":1624021621643,"gmtModify":1703826761823,"author":{"id":"3573174104481531","authorId":"3573174104481531","name":"JKLah","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3573174104481531","idStr":"3573174104481531"},"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166430481","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166493340,"gmtCreate":1624021163280,"gmtModify":1703826749326,"author":{"id":"3574742958671212","authorId":"3574742958671212","name":"Lawnwc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d9498775e843f1f703f984d3554cc5e","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574742958671212","idStr":"3574742958671212"},"htmlText":"Pls like and share","listText":"Pls like and share","text":"Pls like and share","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166493340","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4921821,"gmtCreate":1624238277370,"gmtModify":1663229553538,"authorId":3577580458147788,"author":{"id":3577580458147788,"idStr":"3577580458147788","authorId":3577580458147788,"name":"fysx49","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe5937c0ada861e9603ef8a12ae3e445","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166493340,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok pls like and comment back tq","text":"ok pls like and comment back tq","html":"ok pls like and comment back tq"},{"id":4870942,"gmtCreate":1624021877572,"gmtModify":1663229307540,"authorId":3581813478273697,"author":{"id":3581813478273697,"idStr":"3581813478273697","authorId":3581813478273697,"name":"Sittk","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166493340,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","text":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","html":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166490273,"gmtCreate":1624021098992,"gmtModify":1703826747374,"author":{"id":"3574742958671212","authorId":"3574742958671212","name":"Lawnwc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d9498775e843f1f703f984d3554cc5e","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574742958671212","idStr":"3574742958671212"},"htmlText":"Pls like and share","listText":"Pls like and share","text":"Pls like and share","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166490273","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4871108,"gmtCreate":1624022326194,"gmtModify":1663229305929,"authorId":3581989037273630,"author":{"id":3581989037273630,"idStr":"3581989037273630","authorId":3581989037273630,"name":"BBY","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166490273,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"done! reply this comment pls!","text":"done! reply this comment pls!","html":"done! reply this comment pls!"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166407094,"gmtCreate":1624021003318,"gmtModify":1703826745253,"author":{"id":"3580955744929134","authorId":"3580955744929134","name":"boonk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e58310c6a80ddfbcb69e0989cda7858","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3580955744929134","idStr":"3580955744929134"},"htmlText":"Short ride but tesla&nbsp;","listText":"Short ride but tesla&nbsp;","text":"Short ride but tesla","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166407094","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4896861,"gmtCreate":1624127764983,"gmtModify":1663229430849,"authorId":3580955744929134,"author":{"id":3580955744929134,"idStr":"3580955744929134","authorId":3580955744929134,"name":"boonk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e58310c6a80ddfbcb69e0989cda7858","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166407094,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Buy</u>","text":"<u>Buy</u>","html":"<u>Buy</u>"},{"id":4881580,"gmtCreate":1624062470392,"gmtModify":1663229357433,"authorId":3580955744929134,"author":{"id":3580955744929134,"idStr":"3580955744929134","authorId":3580955744929134,"name":"boonk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e58310c6a80ddfbcb69e0989cda7858","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166407094,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Buy tesla","text":"Buy tesla","html":"Buy tesla"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166404712,"gmtCreate":1624020993136,"gmtModify":1703826744894,"author":{"id":"3584087143555927","authorId":"3584087143555927","name":"Alloyshears","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9155760af1e2f0e0d33c0065c5109459","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3584087143555927","idStr":"3584087143555927"},"htmlText":"can this comment get featured? for daily coins&nbsp;","listText":"can this comment get featured? for daily coins&nbsp;","text":"can this comment get featured? for daily coins","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166404712","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4896913,"gmtCreate":1624128327995,"gmtModify":1663229430929,"authorId":3555000456336821,"author":{"id":3555000456336821,"idStr":"3555000456336821","authorId":3555000456336821,"name":"gamerxyj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca581741e24428089f21c4e11ff275c","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.22","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166404712,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"GooD :) ","text":"GooD :) ","html":"GooD :) "},{"id":4870726,"gmtCreate":1624021064236,"gmtModify":1663229307631,"authorId":3562271456608357,"author":{"id":3562271456608357,"idStr":"3562271456608357","authorId":3562271456608357,"name":"rooot","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166404712,"type":1,"supId":4870717,"prevId":0,"content":"??","text":"??","html":"??"},{"id":4870948,"gmtCreate":1624021885153,"gmtModify":1663229305929,"authorId":3581813478273697,"author":{"id":3581813478273697,"idStr":"3581813478273697","authorId":3581813478273697,"name":"Sittk","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166404712,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","text":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","html":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_"},{"id":4870723,"gmtCreate":1624021050068,"gmtModify":1663229303329,"authorId":3580955744929134,"author":{"id":3580955744929134,"idStr":"3580955744929134","authorId":3580955744929134,"name":"boonk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e58310c6a80ddfbcb69e0989cda7858","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166404712,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Good. I comment u n comments mine. Help each other","text":"Good. I comment u n comments mine. Help each other","html":"Good. I comment u n comments mine. Help each other"},{"id":4870717,"gmtCreate":1624021032988,"gmtModify":1663229303327,"authorId":3581542385429790,"author":{"id":3581542385429790,"idStr":"3581542385429790","authorId":3581542385429790,"name":"Joshualoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c58fbad5a58ad5a9a8238280ce7e9a39","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166404712,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Pls reply  Thanks","text":"Pls reply  Thanks","html":"Pls reply  Thanks"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166405511,"gmtCreate":1624020924833,"gmtModify":1703826742938,"author":{"id":"3583055835109040","authorId":"3583055835109040","name":"Samsonn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83d50aad662460d0d773f3a4b82018e2","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3583055835109040","idStr":"3583055835109040"},"htmlText":"Like n comment thanku!","listText":"Like n comment thanku!","text":"Like n comment thanku!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166405511","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4870952,"gmtCreate":1624021891985,"gmtModify":1663229307329,"authorId":3581813478273697,"author":{"id":3581813478273697,"idStr":"3581813478273697","authorId":3581813478273697,"name":"Sittk","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166405511,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","text":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","html":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_"},{"id":4870785,"gmtCreate":1624021222932,"gmtModify":1663229306843,"authorId":3577446331932642,"author":{"id":3577446331932642,"idStr":"3577446331932642","authorId":3577446331932642,"name":"AudreyTan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166405511,"type":1,"supId":4870710,"prevId":0,"content":"Like","text":"Like","html":"Like"},{"id":4870710,"gmtCreate":1624021020477,"gmtModify":1663229303546,"authorId":3581542385429790,"author":{"id":3581542385429790,"idStr":"3581542385429790","authorId":3581542385429790,"name":"Joshualoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c58fbad5a58ad5a9a8238280ce7e9a39","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166405511,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"There u go  Pls reply  Thanks","text":"There u go  Pls reply  Thanks","html":"There u go  Pls reply  Thanks"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166402216,"gmtCreate":1624020881835,"gmtModify":1703826741475,"author":{"id":"3581542385429790","authorId":"3581542385429790","name":"Joshualoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c58fbad5a58ad5a9a8238280ce7e9a39","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581542385429790","idStr":"3581542385429790"},"htmlText":"Pls like n comment. Thanks!","listText":"Pls like n comment. Thanks!","text":"Pls like n comment. Thanks!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166402216","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4870677,"gmtCreate":1624020931302,"gmtModify":1663229305830,"authorId":3583055835109040,"author":{"id":3583055835109040,"idStr":"3583055835109040","authorId":3583055835109040,"name":"Samsonn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83d50aad662460d0d773f3a4b82018e2","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8-1","templateUuid":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8","name":"Star Contributor","description":"Have published 3 or more picked posts, and have published at least one picked post and participated in comments within 30 days","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1866dcf97a73be1c330f85862546aedc","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f5c5fa8e2c7683bb5a7fce8753ee456","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/activity/market/2023/star-contributors/","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.02","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2007},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166402216,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yey","text":"yey","html":"yey"},{"id":4870670,"gmtCreate":1624020911822,"gmtModify":1663229304633,"authorId":3581813478273697,"author":{"id":3581813478273697,"idStr":"3581813478273697","authorId":3581813478273697,"name":"Sittk","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":166402216,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","text":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_","html":"sure, could you pls share my post from my profile? thanks alot https://www.laohu8.com/m/post/168279065?lang=en_"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":166402363,"gmtCreate":1624020874752,"gmtModify":1703826740825,"author":{"id":"3586849052179357","authorId":"3586849052179357","name":"MamaT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d79313d9588ac037fa08248951d51ab6","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3586849052179357","idStr":"3586849052179357"},"htmlText":"Jdjdjdjud","listText":"Jdjdjdjud","text":"Jdjdjdjud","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166402363","repostId":2144779346,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144779346","pubTimestamp":1624020610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144779346?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144779346","media":"SmarterAnalyst","summary":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according","content":"<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (<b>RIDE</b>). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the <i>Wall Street Journal</i>.</p>\n<p>The vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.</p>\n<p>Lordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.</p>\n<p>Amid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"</p>\n<p>The analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>Consensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.</p>\n<p>RIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdc71c24833b1f062f8ce7dd04c7a3c0\" tg-width=\"870\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLordstown Insists Vehicle Purchase Agreements are Not Binding – Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html><strong>SmarterAnalyst</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lordstown-insists-vehicle-purchase-agreements-122210593.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2144779346","content_text":"Vehicle purchase agreements struck with fleet management companies are not binding orders, according to a regulatory filing submitted by Lordstown Motors (RIDE). The filing came just a day after the company’s President stated it had “pretty binding” preorders to sustain its operations through 2022, reports the Wall Street Journal.\nThe vehicle purchase agreements are valid for about 3 to 5 years and include Lordstown as the preferred supplier. They also come with down payment terms. According to the embattled electric truck company, the purchase orders only act as an indicator of demand in the market.\nLordstown has seen its prospects turn sour in recent months, having already warned that it does not have sufficient capital to oversee commercial production, let alone operate for another year. Top leaders resigning unexpectedly following inaccuracies on the company’s truck preorders have only continued to arouse concerns.\nAmid the uncertainty around Lordstown's long-term prospects, R.F. Lafferty analyst Jaime Perez has downgraded the stock to a Sell from a Hold. Perez commented, \"With the level of uncertainty increasing in the future of Lordstown, we find it prudent to lower our rating to Sell. In addition, we reduced our price target by $6 to $3 per share.\"\nThe analyst's revised price target implies 70.9% downside potential to current levels.\nConsensus among analysts is a Moderate Sell based on 1 Buy, 3 Holds, and 4 Sells. The Lordstown average analyst price target of $9 implies 12.71% downside potential to current levels.\nRIDE scores a 1 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, suggesting that the stock is likely to underperform market averages.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":56,"commentSize":18,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}