• 158
  • 22
  • Favorite

Musk arrives at trial over Tesla's $2.6 bln deal for SolarCity

Reuters2021-07-12

WILMINGTON, Del., July 12 (Reuters) - Elon Musk arrived at court on Monday to defend Tesla Inc's 2016 acquisition of SolarCity against a lawsuit by shareholders seeking to recoup the $2.6 billion the company paid for the ailing solar panel maker.

Musk is slated to take the witness stand this morning, kicking off a two-week trial in Wilmington, Delaware, before Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights, who will decide whether the SolarCity deal was fair to Tesla stockholders.

The lawsuit by union pension funds and asset managers alleges the celebrity CEO strong-armed Tesla's board to buy SolarCity, just as it was about to run out of cash. Musk owned a 22% stake in SolarCity, which was founded by his cousins.

Shareholders asked the court to order Musk, one of world's richest people, to repay to Telsa what it spent on the deal, which would represent one of the largest judgments ever against an individual. However, even if the judge finds the deal was unfair, he could award a much lower amount of damages.

Musk has argued the deal was fair and that it was negotiated by the Tesla board free of his influence and approved by fully informed stockholders.

He touted the deal at the time as central to his "Master Plan, Part Deux," which aims to reshape transportation by using sustainable energy to power fleets of self-driving electric vehicles.

Legal experts said the judge will be looking for evidence that Musk threatened board members or that directors felt they could not stand up to him.

The shareholders' lawsuit accuses Musk of dominating deal discussions, pushing Tesla to pay more for SolarCity and misleading shareholders about the deteriorating financial health of the solar panel maker.

Central to the case will be allegations that Musk, who had a 22% stake in Tesla at the time of the deal, was nonetheless a controlling shareholder. If he was, it would impose a tougher legal standard and increase the likelihood the deal was unfair to shareholders.

"It would be a surprise to most people if the court were to come out and say that he doesn't control here," said Brian Quinn, a professor at Boston College Law School. "Because he certainly acts like he does."

Musk is expected to be questioned by shareholder attorney Randy Baron, who Musk called "reprehensible" at a testy 2019 deposition during which he also accused Baron of attacking sustainable energy, according to a transcript.

When Baron asked if Musk bailed out SolarCity, Musk replied: "You are a shameful person."

Tesla's directors settled allegations from the same lawsuit last year for $60 million, paid by insurance, without admitting fault.

Slights will likely take months before he issues a ruling.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment22

  • Srav
    ·2021-07-12
    Finally ???
    Reply
    Report
  • RB88
    ·2021-07-12
    [得意] [賤笑] Wow
    Reply
    Report
  • Shirron
    ·2021-07-12
    Interesting 
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Shirron
      to see the verdict
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
  • Lebowskii
    ·2021-07-12
    Tesla is a dead company walking
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Balloony
      xd
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
  • CygnuSupreme
    ·2021-07-12
    Please like
    Reply
    Report
  • gingy
    ·2021-07-12
    Ok
    Reply
    Report
  • Cyndikan
    ·2021-07-12
    Great article
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • Jharsono
    ·2021-07-12
    Like and comment thanks 
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Jharsono
      Thank you
      2021-07-17
      Reply
      Report
    • 小红盛虎
      Done and reply pls
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
    • Joanne93
      Ok
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
  • Cyndikan
    ·2021-07-12
    Great article
    Reply
    Report
  • cgoh
    ·2021-07-12
    Okay 
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Baldy
      Help like ty
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
  • CK88
    ·2021-07-12
    Wow
    Reply
    Report
  • Llz
    ·2021-07-12
    Fine
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Llz
      Ok
      2021-08-23
      Reply
      Report
    • Llz
      ok
      2021-08-09
      Reply
      Report
  • Fungicide
    ·2021-07-12
    Ok
    Reply
    Report
  • SimaWuqin
    ·2021-07-12
    omggg
    Reply
    Report
  • JYhengheng
    ·2021-07-12
    Nice
    Reply
    Report
  • NgYH
    ·2021-07-12
    Oh oh..
    Reply
    Report
  • JYhengheng
    ·2021-07-12
    Great
    Reply
    Report
  • MATRIXTAY99
    ·2021-07-12
    There must be a proper acquisition and approval processes within the directors board, its an obvious case of opportunitits seeking to exploit loops holes of the US juridiciary system to sue for anything, anyone for the greenbill???
    Reply
    Report
  • wen_pp
    ·2021-07-12
    Fair is a subjective word :D
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • choya
    ·2021-07-12
    Oh no...
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Noober
      WEw
      2021-07-12
      Reply
      Report
 
 
 
 

Most Discussed

 
 
 
 
 

7x24

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email:uservice@ttm.financial