How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock

152
31
Favorite

How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock

Motley Fool2021-07-30

The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

152

Report

Comment（31）

Pluto891
·2021-07-31
disruption otw
Reply
2
Report
Harmanbrar
·2021-07-31
Tell me your opinion about this news...
Reply
Like
Report
nayoowin
·2021-07-31
Nice
Reply
Like
Report
Andrewkang
·2021-07-31
yrs
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Andrewkang:
  y
  2021-08-06
  Reply
  Report
- Andrewkang:
  yes
  2021-08-05
  Reply
  Report
- Andrewkang:
  yes
  2021-08-02
  Reply
  Report
View more 1 comments
虎中之1虎
·2021-07-31
?
Reply
3
Report
AliPharma
·2021-07-31
to the moooon
Reply
4
Report
owen_6671
·2021-07-31
[Smile] [Smile]
Reply
Like
Report
Ila
·2021-07-31
?
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- nayoowin:
  nice
  2021-07-31
  Reply
  Report
- Nigelyhz:
  NIceeeee
  2021-07-31
  Reply
  Report
Klyy
·2021-07-31
Great!
Reply
Like
Report
Annalz
·2021-07-31
NFLX fly to the moon
Reply
6
Report
Fold Replies
- AliPharma:
  to the mooooon
  2021-07-31
  Reply
  Report
Ajinomoto
·2021-07-31
Might be better .
Reply
5
Report
PanaCota
·2021-07-31
Ok
Reply
3
Report
ngklvn03
·2021-07-30
[強] [強] [強] [強]
Reply
1
Report
woonws
·2021-07-30
A challenge but not insurmountable?
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- EAvenue:
  Hi
  2021-07-31
  Reply
  Report
- Krusagiz:
  I hope!
  2021-07-30
  Reply
  Report
Emilyl
·2021-07-30
??????
Reply
Like
Report
senggy
·2021-07-30
But its what sell
Reply
4
Report
JamesArthur
·2021-07-30
Like please
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- iamwkiat:
  ok
  2021-07-30
  Reply
  Report
MunYee531
·2021-07-30
Hello
Reply
4
Report
CaptainMiya
·2021-07-30
[Cool]
Reply
10
Report
Fold Replies
- KL123:
  Yes
  2021-07-30
  Reply
  Report
- CaptainMiya:
  [Strong]
  2021-07-30
  Reply
  Report
Khoogl
·2021-07-30
Like
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Anonymous2:
  Like
  2021-07-30
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2155015802","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"NFLX","symbol_name":"奈飞","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","article_id":"2155015802","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"translate_title":"同步观看如何毁掉Netflix,Inc.股票","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":0.9},"content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":802088277,"gmtCreate":1627699277799,"gmtModify":1703494908180,"author":{"id":"3581937910767045","authorId":"3581937910767045","name":"Pluto891","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9963f2ef3d3ad2aff28340461d3d6d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581937910767045","authorIdStr":"3581937910767045"},"htmlText":"disruption otw","listText":"disruption otw","text":"disruption otw","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802088277","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806576679,"gmtCreate":1627685936391,"gmtModify":1703494549826,"author":{"id":"3584178233917943","authorId":"3584178233917943","name":"Harmanbrar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8127b08c6c4dbb8c08c762f2f81a9bd","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3584178233917943","authorIdStr":"3584178233917943"},"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806576679","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806558413,"gmtCreate":1627683218132,"gmtModify":1703494519599,"author":{"id":"3555914646523682","authorId":"3555914646523682","name":"nayoowin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15f0b006a5a32255f437afc5e32b6b80","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3555914646523682","authorIdStr":"3555914646523682"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806558413","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806522006,"gmtCreate":1627682384305,"gmtModify":1703494509416,"author":{"id":"3586834968608355","authorId":"3586834968608355","name":"Andrewkang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c156835bf3f5665f5509ad93d83d1df2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586834968608355","authorIdStr":"3586834968608355"},"htmlText":"yrs","listText":"yrs","text":"yrs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806522006","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5439475,"gmtCreate":1628201413241,"gmtModify":1663231986440,"authorId":3586834968608355,"author":{"id":3586834968608355,"idStr":"3586834968608355","authorId":3586834968608355,"name":"Andrewkang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c156835bf3f5665f5509ad93d83d1df2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806522006,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"y","text":"y","html":"y"},{"id":5428469,"gmtCreate":1628113114554,"gmtModify":1663231938139,"authorId":3586834968608355,"author":{"id":3586834968608355,"idStr":"3586834968608355","authorId":3586834968608355,"name":"Andrewkang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c156835bf3f5665f5509ad93d83d1df2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806522006,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yes","text":"yes","html":"yes"},{"id":5396449,"gmtCreate":1627854987098,"gmtModify":1663231792325,"authorId":3586834968608355,"author":{"id":3586834968608355,"idStr":"3586834968608355","authorId":3586834968608355,"name":"Andrewkang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c156835bf3f5665f5509ad93d83d1df2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806522006,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yes","text":"yes","html":"yes"},{"id":5383025,"gmtCreate":1627683200649,"gmtModify":1663231732246,"authorId":3575882730419858,"author":{"id":3575882730419858,"idStr":"3575882730419858","authorId":3575882730419858,"name":"Kennyoscar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ae5bbd70eee00b69de3be27b8862938","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.33%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806522006,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Noce","text":"Noce","html":"Noce"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806581724,"gmtCreate":1627673727668,"gmtModify":1703494476240,"author":{"id":"4090535128953450","authorId":"4090535128953450","name":"虎中之1虎","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090535128953450","authorIdStr":"4090535128953450"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806581724","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806516643,"gmtCreate":1627669396782,"gmtModify":1703494464792,"author":{"id":"3586596744781365","authorId":"3586596744781365","name":"AliPharma","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ae50feeb2edce44d991e8e753fb37e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586596744781365","authorIdStr":"3586596744781365"},"htmlText":"to the moooon","listText":"to the moooon","text":"to the moooon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806516643","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806536757,"gmtCreate":1627665806679,"gmtModify":1703494452561,"author":{"id":"3572750939612723","authorId":"3572750939612723","name":"owen_6671","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/645b87814060f2e30161c10de2edf6b4","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3572750939612723","authorIdStr":"3572750939612723"},"htmlText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[Smile]&nbsp;[Smile]&nbsp;","text":"[Smile] [Smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806536757","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806533044,"gmtCreate":1627664969588,"gmtModify":1703494447240,"author":{"id":"4087269899936440","authorId":"4087269899936440","name":"Ila","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32af1e4c2b8f858b50b2e874760ab13d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087269899936440","authorIdStr":"4087269899936440"},"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806533044","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5383026,"gmtCreate":1627683207125,"gmtModify":1663231730826,"authorId":3555914646523682,"author":{"id":3555914646523682,"idStr":"3555914646523682","authorId":3555914646523682,"name":"nayoowin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15f0b006a5a32255f437afc5e32b6b80","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.01","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806533044,"type":1,"supId":5382516,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"},{"id":5382516,"gmtCreate":1627665731675,"gmtModify":1663231729245,"authorId":3586669922840487,"author":{"id":3586669922840487,"idStr":"3586669922840487","authorId":3586669922840487,"name":"Nigelyhz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5fb21d0809f57cdc597f61c1afb31d50","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806533044,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"NIceeeee","text":"NIceeeee","html":"NIceeeee"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806599380,"gmtCreate":1627663353840,"gmtModify":1703494432856,"author":{"id":"3582550643152901","authorId":"3582550643152901","name":"Klyy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/33ea9606913f634a1d83024cbc093cc7","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582550643152901","authorIdStr":"3582550643152901"},"htmlText":"Great!&nbsp;","listText":"Great!&nbsp;","text":"Great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806599380","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806503137,"gmtCreate":1627662464729,"gmtModify":1703494419802,"author":{"id":"3577089953267281","authorId":"3577089953267281","name":"Annalz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffd285ab6189bb61da4b48c3e149eedc","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577089953267281","authorIdStr":"3577089953267281"},"htmlText":"NFLX fly to the moon","listText":"NFLX fly to the moon","text":"NFLX fly to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806503137","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5382628,"gmtCreate":1627669388562,"gmtModify":1663231731233,"authorId":3586596744781365,"author":{"id":3586596744781365,"idStr":"3586596744781365","authorId":3586596744781365,"name":"AliPharma","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ae50feeb2edce44d991e8e753fb37e5","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806503137,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"to the mooooon","text":"to the mooooon","html":"to the mooooon"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806278778,"gmtCreate":1627661622194,"gmtModify":1703494409501,"author":{"id":"3577082443804507","authorId":"3577082443804507","name":"Ajinomoto","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2cf9b6c2dc1db3b2efff9a5448092468","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577082443804507","authorIdStr":"3577082443804507"},"htmlText":"Might be better .","listText":"Might be better .","text":"Might be better .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806278778","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806278608,"gmtCreate":1627661561804,"gmtModify":1703494409008,"author":{"id":"3581588474178431","authorId":"3581588474178431","name":"PanaCota","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581588474178431","authorIdStr":"3581588474178431"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806278608","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806227608,"gmtCreate":1627659472004,"gmtModify":1703494372301,"author":{"id":"4090501955947210","authorId":"4090501955947210","name":"ngklvn03","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090501955947210","authorIdStr":"4090501955947210"},"htmlText":"[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;","listText":"[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;[強]&nbsp;","text":"[強] [強] [強] [強]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806227608","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":806220885,"gmtCreate":1627658910847,"gmtModify":1703494360257,"author":{"id":"3581999478634265","authorId":"3581999478634265","name":"woonws","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f26ed1a10ee84ab97229aad191ef3133","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581999478634265","authorIdStr":"3581999478634265"},"htmlText":"A challenge but not insurmountable?","listText":"A challenge but not insurmountable?","text":"A challenge but not insurmountable?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806220885","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5382081,"gmtCreate":1627660886090,"gmtModify":1663231729335,"authorId":3584939916187250,"author":{"id":3584939916187250,"idStr":"3584939916187250","authorId":3584939916187250,"name":"EAvenue","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e3beb412a0aa565cfaac4f68f1721fd6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806220885,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Hi","text":"Hi","html":"Hi"},{"id":5381868,"gmtCreate":1627659769110,"gmtModify":1663231724431,"authorId":3577308236811681,"author":{"id":3577308236811681,"idStr":"3577308236811681","authorId":3577308236811681,"name":"Krusagiz","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806220885,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"I hope!","text":"I hope!","html":"I hope!"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806269414,"gmtCreate":1627658382538,"gmtModify":1703494348177,"author":{"id":"4090059925788860","authorId":"4090059925788860","name":"Emilyl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4c7387037b976bb60e42d2d78d382ff","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090059925788860","authorIdStr":"4090059925788860"},"htmlText":"??????","listText":"??????","text":"??????","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806269414","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806281520,"gmtCreate":1627657935960,"gmtModify":1703494335325,"author":{"id":"3582004017168259","authorId":"3582004017168259","name":"senggy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/850ce801d0041986389c91cc81473fca","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582004017168259","authorIdStr":"3582004017168259"},"htmlText":"But its what sell","listText":"But its what sell","text":"But its what sell","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806281520","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806214142,"gmtCreate":1627657586686,"gmtModify":1703494328009,"author":{"id":"3574122255023758","authorId":"3574122255023758","name":"JamesArthur","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0230d592c84aee6b78c6136a020bbb52","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574122255023758","authorIdStr":"3574122255023758"},"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806214142","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5381615,"gmtCreate":1627658410942,"gmtModify":1663231726740,"authorId":3561951430474749,"author":{"id":3561951430474749,"idStr":"3561951430474749","authorId":3561951430474749,"name":"iamwkiat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96d513b6a77bca71d512a115604fa931","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806214142,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806213088,"gmtCreate":1627657292744,"gmtModify":1703494319593,"author":{"id":"3585631130131196","authorId":"3585631130131196","name":"MunYee531","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a570dfe3bfa096d02d0a12bb44ec4b17","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3585631130131196","authorIdStr":"3585631130131196"},"htmlText":"Hello","listText":"Hello","text":"Hello","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806213088","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806294776,"gmtCreate":1627656525395,"gmtModify":1703494299597,"author":{"id":"3583738006388208","authorId":"3583738006388208","name":"CaptainMiya","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48b66794427d9d57f06bb85d96e46757","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583738006388208","authorIdStr":"3583738006388208"},"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806294776","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5381312,"gmtCreate":1627656629236,"gmtModify":1663231725526,"authorId":3574927733378333,"author":{"id":3574927733378333,"idStr":"3574927733378333","authorId":3574927733378333,"name":"KL123","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f8bc4b7315162dd405123160275321a4","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806294776,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Yes","text":"Yes","html":"Yes"},{"id":5381297,"gmtCreate":1627656538331,"gmtModify":1663231724633,"authorId":3583738006388208,"author":{"id":3583738006388208,"idStr":"3583738006388208","authorId":3583738006388208,"name":"CaptainMiya","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48b66794427d9d57f06bb85d96e46757","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806294776,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[Strong]","text":"[Strong]","html":"[Strong]"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":806292466,"gmtCreate":1627656426755,"gmtModify":1703494296623,"author":{"id":"3566032787349185","authorId":"3566032787349185","name":"Khoogl","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3566032787349185","authorIdStr":"3566032787349185"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806292466","repostId":2155015802,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155015802","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627655499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155015802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155015802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A new form of streaming is gaining momentum -- and that's not good for the iconic content company.","content":"<p>The king of streaming services,&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>'s 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Netflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.</p>\n<p> A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df63c30b571ad23f98676758ab77e6ea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>The devil in the detail&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Netflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. </p>\n<p>Some say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like <b>Walt</b> <b>Disney</b>'s Disney+&nbsp;or <b>Amazon</b> Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>The major risk ahead&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Over the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" </p>\n<p>It's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>There is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>At this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Synchronized Viewing Could Ruin Netflix Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 22:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/30/how-synchronized-viewing-can-ruin-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155015802","content_text":"The king of streaming services, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX), has been a top-performing tech stock over the past decade. Its gain of 1,266% during that period far outpaces the S&P 500's 240% return. But share prices have stalled as of late, as the stock has not moved much in the past 12 months and is down 4% in 2021. \nNetflix is becoming too big -- its market cap has already exceeded $220 billion. At that scale, innovation becomes harder to achieve, while the rise of competitors makes it easier for existing subscribers to flake. However, it's not just intense competition that is causing trouble.\n A new practice is rapidly revolutionizing the streaming world that potentially has stock price implications. Let's look at why investors should be cautious about investing in Netflix. \nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe devil in the detail \nNetflix had a pretty amazing second quarter; its revenue went up 19.4% year over year to $7.34 billion. Simultaneously, the company's net income increased by 88% in the same period to $1.35 billion. Those are superb results, but one metric has puzzled analysts and investors alike: the recent loss of 430,000 subscribers in the U.S. and Canada. \nSome say it's due to the popularity of other streaming services like Walt Disney's Disney+ or Amazon Prime taking market share. Some observe that as venues reopen following last year's lockdowns, people want to get out of the house and travel instead of sitting and home and watching movies. Others point to features like multi-device streaming that makes getting more than one subscription redundant. But I think there is another risk factor that investors aren't seeing. \nThe major risk ahead \nOver the past few years, a practice known as synchronized viewing (or screen sharing) has gained momentum. This allows individuals to stream movies or TV shows directly to their family and friends free of charge. Intellectual property laws and their enforcement are somewhat archaic -- they have not caught on to the practice, so the whole thing is a grey area. For example, a user on the popular social app Discord can stream Netflix content to as many as 50 people at the same time. These instances are commonly known as \"movie nights.\" \nIt's obvious why the practice is bad for the stock here. Only one person in the community needs a Netflix subscription to go live with the stream -- saving others a lot of money over the long run. One could realize additional savings by streaming in standard definition instead of high definition. Moreover, the rise of 5G will only make synchronized viewing more popular. Bored after a walk on the beach at a holiday resort? Just pull up an app that allows one to watch Netflix content together with friends -- anytime, anywhere. \nThere is no data on the phenomena per se as it is a fairly recent trend (but rapidly gaining in popularity). However, there are countless articles from major outlets regarding how to screen share and host virtual movie nights on services like Discord. By the way, that app has more than 150 million monthly active users and 19 million servers. Of course, the practice doesn't affect hard-line Netflix subscribers, but it does offer an enticing alternative for those who don't use it quite as often and can just \"limp in\" once a week to a stream with friends. Companies like Amazon have already caught on to the practice and have features that only allow Prime Members to join in on watch parties. But like Netflix, Amazon doesn't have the ability to prevent streams on third-party software.\nWhat's the verdict? \nAt this point, investors are still viewing Netflix stock as one that will achieve growth over an infinite horizon. It currently trades for 8.5 times sales and 53.4 times earnings. But be warned -- the widespread adoption of synchronized viewing has made it far more economical to cancel one's Netflix subscription and just watch the same content on the friend's stream. Until Netflix does something about the practice, such as lobbying politicians to update intellectual property laws (which would inevitably anger a lot of subscribers), investors should expect subscriber count in the U.S. and Canada to continue to decline or stagnate.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5381300,"gmtCreate":1627656561582,"gmtModify":1663231723447,"authorId":3560247957239615,"author":{"id":3560247957239615,"idStr":"3560247957239615","authorId":3560247957239615,"name":"Anonymous2","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":806292466,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Like","text":"Like","html":"Like"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":152,"commentSize":31,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}