Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?

77
15
Favorite

Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?

Motley Fool2021-08-11

Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（15）

sleepymoon
·2021-08-11
Like please
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Caliban:
  yes
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
Rickyt089
·2021-08-11
Like pls
Reply
1
Report
Ferocious
·2021-08-11
Ok
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Rickyt089:
  Ok
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
- Ferocious:
  Ok
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
Ferocious
·2021-08-11
Pretty hard to tell, both have equal potentials
Reply
Like
Report
james_l
·2021-08-11
Disney is expanding.
Reply
1
Report
手可摘棉花
·2021-08-11
Been holding Disney for quite some time. Jul is supposed to be good month for Disney but nothing happened! Come on! You can do it!
Reply
4
Report
Hehehaha0088
·2021-08-11
But i watch both netflix and disney haha
Reply
4
Report
Deonc
·2021-08-11
both are good companies and there were high demand in this industry now. Please like and comment, if agree.
Reply
2
Report
NewbieLeo
·2021-08-11
All for Disney! And netflix needs to pick up on their content. Remember the days of stranger things...
Reply
4
Report
Ermmmmmm
·2021-08-11
Really ???
Reply
3
Report
alexcsb
·2021-08-11
Very competitive
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- Ferocious:
  Thats right
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
BerryNat
·2021-08-11
Poor Netflix.
Reply
2
Report
shika
·2021-08-11
[微笑]
Reply
2
Report
sheenayam
·2021-08-11
Please like and comment
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- sleepymoon:
  No problem
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
ETF88
·2021-08-11
Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!
Reply
8
Report
Fold Replies
- Melvin888:
  Dis is a buy
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report
- pat123:
  Good morning
  2021-08-11
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2158343470?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2158343470","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"DIS","symbol_name":"迪士尼","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","article_id":"2158343470","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","NFLX":"奈飞","GOOG":"谷歌"},"translate_title":"迪斯尼每年可能在内容上花费150亿美元：Netflix,Inc.能竞争吗？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"DIS":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"NFLX":0.9},"content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":892676670,"gmtCreate":1628659735690,"gmtModify":1676529812372,"author":{"id":"3555884467896100","authorId":"3555884467896100","name":"sleepymoon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/017d47c34167b5c3d7accfb69274dd36","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like please&nbsp;","listText":"Like please&nbsp;","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892676670","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5494752,"gmtCreate":1628684009814,"gmtModify":1663232228336,"authorId":3576227403865205,"author":{"id":3576227403865205,"authorId":3576227403865205,"name":"Caliban","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9896cdd455a335ee2b9978f15da99e30","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892676670,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yes","text":"yes","html":"yes"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892664158,"gmtCreate":1628656432075,"gmtModify":1676529811442,"author":{"id":"3571612770300673","authorId":"3571612770300673","name":"Rickyt089","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e75fb09fa53aa8d7db329d6599d40c1","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892664158","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892615657,"gmtCreate":1628654448679,"gmtModify":1676529810801,"author":{"id":"3586857174644620","authorId":"3586857174644620","name":"Ferocious","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892615657","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5491547,"gmtCreate":1628656443209,"gmtModify":1663232214236,"authorId":3571612770300673,"author":{"id":3571612770300673,"authorId":3571612770300673,"name":"Rickyt089","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e75fb09fa53aa8d7db329d6599d40c1","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.01.06","exceedPercentage":"93.86%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892615657,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":5491287,"gmtCreate":1628654459065,"gmtModify":1663232211749,"authorId":3586857174644620,"author":{"id":3586857174644620,"authorId":3586857174644620,"name":"Ferocious","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892615657,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892616434,"gmtCreate":1628654380728,"gmtModify":1676529810741,"author":{"id":"3586857174644620","authorId":"3586857174644620","name":"Ferocious","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Pretty hard to tell, both have equal potentials","listText":"Pretty hard to tell, both have equal potentials","text":"Pretty hard to tell, both have equal potentials","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892616434","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892604538,"gmtCreate":1628652019024,"gmtModify":1676529810069,"author":{"id":"3563436875655076","authorId":"3563436875655076","name":"james_l","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7960ea5c640db331ff2de0da32f6a611","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Disney is expanding.","listText":"Disney is expanding.","text":"Disney is expanding.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892604538","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892608453,"gmtCreate":1628651773072,"gmtModify":1676529809976,"author":{"id":"3579342217954724","authorId":"3579342217954724","name":"手可摘棉花","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb5d81ca4420febc27175fcd21eb90b2","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Been holding Disney for quite some time. Jul is supposed to be good month for Disney but nothing happened! Come on! You can do it!","listText":"Been holding Disney for quite some time. Jul is supposed to be good month for Disney but nothing happened! Come on! You can do it!","text":"Been holding Disney for quite some time. Jul is supposed to be good month for Disney but nothing happened! Come on! You can do it!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892608453","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892600142,"gmtCreate":1628651527386,"gmtModify":1676529809728,"author":{"id":"4089495674612980","authorId":"4089495674612980","name":"Hehehaha0088","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1f5d328fb2801a4b62fb90386325a31","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"But i watch both netflix and disney haha","listText":"But i watch both netflix and disney haha","text":"But i watch both netflix and disney haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892600142","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892879905,"gmtCreate":1628650899507,"gmtModify":1676529809509,"author":{"id":"3569316529855154","authorId":"3569316529855154","name":"Deonc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9aa45dd2eb58357f6477dcfb99d1415","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"both are good companies and there were high demand in this industry now. Please like and comment, if agree.","listText":"both are good companies and there were high demand in this industry now. Please like and comment, if agree.","text":"both are good companies and there were high demand in this industry now. Please like and comment, if agree.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892879905","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892855261,"gmtCreate":1628650063453,"gmtModify":1676529809193,"author":{"id":"3582883416532133","authorId":"3582883416532133","name":"NewbieLeo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d67674084088d7a0f8f4d8152ba870e","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"All for Disney! And netflix needs to pick up on their content. Remember the days of stranger things...","listText":"All for Disney! And netflix needs to pick up on their content. Remember the days of stranger things...","text":"All for Disney! And netflix needs to pick up on their content. Remember the days of stranger things...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892855261","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892855133,"gmtCreate":1628650053922,"gmtModify":1676529809185,"author":{"id":"4087557783698070","authorId":"4087557783698070","name":"Ermmmmmm","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b89bbeb73fe9212f0b5efc7185ae8a51","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Really ???","listText":"Really ???","text":"Really ???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892855133","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892856829,"gmtCreate":1628649978461,"gmtModify":1676529809088,"author":{"id":"3586915072418371","authorId":"3586915072418371","name":"alexcsb","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b02b98b9a53bdc70b2b8955a1bb7db4f","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Very competitive&nbsp;","listText":"Very competitive&nbsp;","text":"Very competitive","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892856829","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5491281,"gmtCreate":1628654435851,"gmtModify":1635154563294,"authorId":3586857174644620,"author":{"id":3586857174644620,"authorId":3586857174644620,"name":"Ferocious","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892856829,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Thats right ","text":"Thats right ","html":"Thats right "}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892825850,"gmtCreate":1628649539670,"gmtModify":1676529808913,"author":{"id":"4087986020499840","authorId":"4087986020499840","name":"BerryNat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27333e490249edd9b1054f0311c8584c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Poor Netflix.","listText":"Poor Netflix.","text":"Poor Netflix.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892825850","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892826176,"gmtCreate":1628649400795,"gmtModify":1676529808860,"author":{"id":"4087439987071390","authorId":"4087439987071390","name":"shika","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2703029b3560eb0f973ab0afce30dedb","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892826176","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":892821300,"gmtCreate":1628649253700,"gmtModify":1676529808808,"author":{"id":"3579743164156658","authorId":"3579743164156658","name":"sheenayam","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe1b57a8371314fd64ce0840001df6b2","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Please like and comment","listText":"Please like and comment","text":"Please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892821300","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5491976,"gmtCreate":1628659729580,"gmtModify":1663232214429,"authorId":3555884467896100,"author":{"id":3555884467896100,"authorId":3555884467896100,"name":"sleepymoon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/017d47c34167b5c3d7accfb69274dd36","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892821300,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"No problem","text":"No problem","html":"No problem"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":892884129,"gmtCreate":1628648305061,"gmtModify":1676529808444,"author":{"id":"3577969053537569","authorId":"3577969053537569","name":"ETF88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eadc5d0f2e78722e94275fcb0b7df19a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","listText":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","text":"Disney is stock for life!! Pls like my post thanks!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892884129","repostId":2158343470,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2158343470","pubTimestamp":1628648163,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2158343470?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-11 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158343470","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most v","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>.</p>\n<p>The streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1de5c76002d44dccc3c77bd67917277\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h2>Content wars</h2>\n<p>Netflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to <b>Nielsen</b>, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.</p>\n<p>Netflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.</p>\n<p>Certainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like <i>Star Wars</i> and Marvel<i>,</i> will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.</p>\n<p>But Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.</p>\n<h2>What this could mean for investors</h2>\n<p>In the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.</p>\n<p>Disney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a>'s YouTube, and even <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a>. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.</p>\n<p>Therefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney Could Spend $15 Billion on Content Annually: Can Netflix Compete?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-11 10:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/10/disney-could-spend-15-billion-on-content-annually/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158343470","content_text":"Walt Disney is known for producing excellent content and being home to some of the industry's most valued media assets. The House of Mouse is making a push into streaming content, which could put pressure on Netflix.\nThe streaming pioneer has a multi-year head start against Disney and has already amassed a subscriber total of over 200 million. Disney is making up ground quickly. Disney+ launched in November 2019, and already has over 100 million subs. The initial success gave Disney's management confidence to push more chips to the table, committing to spending $15 billion at the midpoint on content in 2024. Can Netflix hold its own against the longtime media powerhouse?\nImage source: Getty Images.\nContent wars\nNetflix often says that competition from other streaming services is not hurting its own results. At first glance, that may not be easy to believe. The streaming market has exploded with fresh alternatives over the last couple of years. However, if you consider that the addition of several streaming service providers makes it more likely customers will cancel their cable TV or satellite service, Netflix's argument makes more sense. Indeed, according to Nielsen, streaming consists of just 27% of U.S. screen time, while linear TV holds a much larger time slice of 63%.\nNetflix's basic membership costs $8.99. Disney's bundle that includes Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ can be had for $13.99 per month. Given these low prices, there is room for a household to have multiple streaming subscriptions.\nCertainly, Disney's announcement that it will be spending $15 billion on content in 2024, combined with popular media assets like Star Wars and Marvel, will make it a formidable option for consumers. Indeed, of the all-time top 10 grossing films at the box office, seven of them are owned by Disney. Such is the popularity of Disney's assets.\nBut Netflix is no slouch in the content spending category, either. In 2019, Netflix spent $14.6 billion on content, and $12 billion in 2018. The streaming pioneer has 209 million subscribers and brought in revenue of $7.3 billion in the most recent quarter. This large base of revenue gives Netflix plenty of firepower in the competition. The difference will be that Netflix does not have as high a quality of media assets to build upon.\nWhat this could mean for investors\nIn the end, this battle between streaming giants should be great for viewers. More spending on content is likely to result in lots of great films and shows to watch. If that attracts more people to the services, then investors will win also. The goal of these streaming providers should not be to compete against each other. Rather, they should be competing against other entertainment options. There is room for several winners in this rapidly expanding market.\nDisney and Netflix would like to siphon attention from Alphabet's YouTube, and even Facebook. Folks only have a limited time they can spend on leisure, and if you are watching videos on YouTube, you're not on Netflix. Similarly, if you're browsing on Facebook, you're not watching Disney+.\nTherefore, investors looking at streaming providers boosting spending on content can think of it as a good thing for the industry as a whole.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5490319,"gmtCreate":1628648627156,"gmtModify":1663232209032,"authorId":3577938728188071,"author":{"id":3577938728188071,"authorId":3577938728188071,"name":"Melvin888","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f7e36200d6d8c6159f6d35c041d8e3e","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892884129,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Dis is a buy ","text":"Dis is a buy ","html":"Dis is a buy "},{"id":5490324,"gmtCreate":1628648660165,"gmtModify":1663232207243,"authorId":3583370865260963,"author":{"id":3583370865260963,"authorId":3583370865260963,"name":"pat123","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":892884129,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Good morning","text":"Good morning","html":"Good morning"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":77,"commentSize":15,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}