Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits

Motley Fool2022-06-06

Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

109

Report

Comment（16）

Remotecam
·2022-06-06
I believe the Sing gov will step in before Sea Ltd will ever get into real financial problems. They're already doing it for Grab, why not Sea? Will buy when it's super bottomed.
Reply
1
Report
YMCheah
·2022-06-06
Pls like, thks
Reply
1
Report
BenjiFuji
·2022-06-06
Good point
Reply
3
Report
ynwaben
·2022-06-06
Ye
Reply
1
Report
yyhwin
·2022-06-06
ji
Reply
1
Report
T0000024852
·2022-06-06
hhi
Reply
1
Report
hphoa
·2022-06-06
[Heart]
Reply
3
Report
ValuInvestor
·2022-06-06
Magical accounting
Reply
4
Report
Pumnky
·2022-06-06
Good insight
Reply
8
Report
latt
·2022-06-06
Ok
Reply
4
Report
lzh77
·2022-06-06
Please like
Reply
4
Report
Zel Lim
·2022-06-06
Nice read
Reply
5
Report
Rabbit63
·2022-06-06
Pls like
Reply
3
Report
Kelvin_Qiu
·2022-06-06
[Glance]
Reply
2
Report
TripleWin
·2022-06-05
[Like]
Reply
2
Report
TripleWin
·2022-06-05
[Like]
Reply
2
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2240622437","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SE","symbol_name":"Sea Ltd","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","article_id":"2240622437","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"translate_title":"Sea Limited为商店利润设定了令人困惑的新目标","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":1},"content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9053804498,"gmtCreate":1654509806814,"gmtModify":1676535459644,"author":{"id":"4093854476996450","authorId":"4093854476996450","name":"Remotecam","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f856a0a30bd0fa23a086fc678014e48b","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4093854476996450","authorIdStr":"4093854476996450"},"htmlText":"I believe the Sing gov&nbsp;will step in before Sea Ltd will ever get into real financial problems.&nbsp; They're already doing it for Grab, why not Sea?&nbsp;Will buy when it's super bottomed.&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"I believe the Sing gov&nbsp;will step in before Sea Ltd will ever get into real financial problems.&nbsp; They're already doing it for Grab, why not Sea?&nbsp;Will buy when it's super bottomed.&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"I believe the Sing gov will step in before Sea Ltd will ever get into real financial problems. They're already doing it for Grab, why not Sea? Will buy when it's super bottomed.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053804498","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053808675,"gmtCreate":1654508819297,"gmtModify":1676535459542,"author":{"id":"4093412032856690","authorId":"4093412032856690","name":"YMCheah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8c6bc88c9b9cd996e3220b4fce094f37","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4093412032856690","authorIdStr":"4093412032856690"},"htmlText":"Pls like, thks","listText":"Pls like, thks","text":"Pls like, thks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053808675","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053175219,"gmtCreate":1654507082931,"gmtModify":1676535459373,"author":{"id":"4110175785559852","authorId":"4110175785559852","name":"BenjiFuji","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/330f59d829009a2c318784ab2b5e6098","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4110175785559852","authorIdStr":"4110175785559852"},"htmlText":"Good point&nbsp;","listText":"Good point&nbsp;","text":"Good point","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053175219","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053144888,"gmtCreate":1654505425444,"gmtModify":1676535459085,"author":{"id":"3581725251810238","authorId":"3581725251810238","name":"ynwaben","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/617ad5bc55468a1b0d22683027adc1e0","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581725251810238","authorIdStr":"3581725251810238"},"htmlText":"Ye","listText":"Ye","text":"Ye","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053144888","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053153383,"gmtCreate":1654503030642,"gmtModify":1676535458675,"author":{"id":"3581931076615563","authorId":"3581931076615563","name":"yyhwin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78727032603c2751ac0b6b6cfb678920","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581931076615563","authorIdStr":"3581931076615563"},"htmlText":"ji","listText":"ji","text":"ji","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053153383","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053127554,"gmtCreate":1654502584678,"gmtModify":1676535458623,"author":{"id":"3586426272011868","authorId":"3586426272011868","name":"T0000024852","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/558c2124ff14f2c3586c97422ed4a346","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586426272011868","authorIdStr":"3586426272011868"},"htmlText":"hhi","listText":"hhi","text":"hhi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053127554","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053121098,"gmtCreate":1654501140014,"gmtModify":1676535458469,"author":{"id":"3578790486524477","authorId":"3578790486524477","name":"hphoa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/28a11e936497493af7ee5ccdc32238a3","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578790486524477","authorIdStr":"3578790486524477"},"htmlText":"[Heart]&nbsp;","listText":"[Heart]&nbsp;","text":"[Heart]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053121098","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053162752,"gmtCreate":1654500208176,"gmtModify":1676535458248,"author":{"id":"4087361572396550","authorId":"4087361572396550","name":"ValuInvestor","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a962911d3cd0763a9f0cb01392cacd9","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087361572396550","authorIdStr":"4087361572396550"},"htmlText":"Magical accounting","listText":"Magical accounting","text":"Magical accounting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053162752","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053169784,"gmtCreate":1654499113048,"gmtModify":1676535458136,"author":{"id":"3581610969083964","authorId":"3581610969083964","name":"Pumnky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/895ac40f6707bcf79bbf59f7b7b72d00","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581610969083964","authorIdStr":"3581610969083964"},"htmlText":"Good insight","listText":"Good insight","text":"Good insight","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053169784","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053185327,"gmtCreate":1654498195669,"gmtModify":1676535458021,"author":{"id":"3560122087256704","authorId":"3560122087256704","name":"latt","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70280afe51122ff1931559f2622b910e","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50a4c8d97279fa9f8f1fa9749a6bdff4","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3560122087256704","authorIdStr":"3560122087256704"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053185327","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053182576,"gmtCreate":1654498078895,"gmtModify":1676535458014,"author":{"id":"3581654499912172","authorId":"3581654499912172","name":"lzh77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37282f661827d98da9d277ecf852cb00","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581654499912172","authorIdStr":"3581654499912172"},"htmlText":"Please like","listText":"Please like","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053182576","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053186338,"gmtCreate":1654497901424,"gmtModify":1676535457972,"author":{"id":"4099285447763740","authorId":"4099285447763740","name":"Zel Lim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b101cc50a7f423e0f2a0e1f50035a3d2","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4099285447763740","authorIdStr":"4099285447763740"},"htmlText":"Nice read&nbsp;","listText":"Nice read&nbsp;","text":"Nice read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053186338","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053188511,"gmtCreate":1654497857833,"gmtModify":1676535457964,"author":{"id":"4091177787178090","authorId":"4091177787178090","name":"Rabbit63","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1d969e2baefe04cd38efc792e49e5d1","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4091177787178090","authorIdStr":"4091177787178090"},"htmlText":"Pls like","listText":"Pls like","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053188511","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9053115552,"gmtCreate":1654496460676,"gmtModify":1676535457810,"author":{"id":"3581638828642415","authorId":"3581638828642415","name":"Kelvin_Qiu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58df4d9e030a9766be7d0b65f5e798af","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581638828642415","authorIdStr":"3581638828642415"},"htmlText":"[Glance]&nbsp;","listText":"[Glance]&nbsp;","text":"[Glance]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053115552","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9059251736,"gmtCreate":1654389933225,"gmtModify":1676535439130,"author":{"id":"3577489740102994","authorId":"3577489740102994","name":"TripleWin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36f6d7690fd546416bd6f74b156c218f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577489740102994","authorIdStr":"3577489740102994"},"htmlText":"[Like]&nbsp;","listText":"[Like]&nbsp;","text":"[Like]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059251736","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9059251225,"gmtCreate":1654389923767,"gmtModify":1676535439123,"author":{"id":"3577489740102994","authorId":"3577489740102994","name":"TripleWin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36f6d7690fd546416bd6f74b156c218f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577489740102994","authorIdStr":"3577489740102994"},"htmlText":"[Like]&nbsp;","listText":"[Like]&nbsp;","text":"[Like]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059251225","repostId":2240622437,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2240622437","pubTimestamp":1654495792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240622437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-06 14:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240622437","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Sea says Shopee might turn profitable -- if you exclude a lot of expenses.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Sea Limited</b>&#39;s first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant&#39;s future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts&#39; expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.</p><p>I reviewed Sea&#39;s earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year&#39;s sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.</p><p>But today I&#39;d like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) &#34;before HQ costs&#34; in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.</p><p>I&#39;ll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea&#39;s emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee&#39;s future.</p><h2>Reviewing Shopee&#39;s staggering losses</h2><p>Over the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.</p><table border=\"1\" width=\"601\"><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr valign=\"TOP\"><th width=\"158\"><p>Period</p></th><th width=\"130\"><p>FY 2020</p></th><th width=\"128\"><p>FY 2021</p></th><th width=\"127\"><p>Q1 2022</p></th></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Revenue</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>$2.2 billion</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>$5.1 billion</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>$1.5 billion</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Operating Income</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.4 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.8 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($811 million)</p></td></tr><tr valign=\"TOP\"><td width=\"158\"><p><b>Adjusted EBITDA</b></p></td><td width=\"130\"><p>($1.3 billion)</p></td><td width=\"128\"><p>($2.6 billion)</p></td><td width=\"127\"><p>($743 million)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Sea Limited.</p><p>Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.</p><h2>What are Shopee&#39;s &#34;HQ costs&#34;?</h2><p>Shopee defines its &#34;HQ costs&#34; -- or &#34;headquarters&#39; common expenses&#34; -- as its &#34;staff cost&#34; along with &#34;general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.&#34; In other words, they&#39;re the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee&#39;s marketplace.</p><p>Those &#34;HQ costs&#34; should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain &#34;HQ&#34; expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.</p><p>But in reality, Shopee&#39;s &#34;adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs&#34; is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee&#39;s actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-time and variable expenses.</p><h2>Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?</h2><p>In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee&#39;s HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.</p><p>It also said Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was &#34;well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.&#34;</p><p>However, that &#34;region&#34; doesn&#39;t include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MELI\">MercadoLibre</a></b>.</p><p>Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee&#39;s<i> total</i> adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in <i>Southeast Asia and Taiwan</i> after excluding <i>HQ costs</i> -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee&#39;s growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.</p><h2>Should investors be concerned?</h2><p>This isn&#39;t the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an &#34;adjusted revenue&#34; metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee&#39;s growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term &#34;HQ costs&#34; over the next few quarters to see if it&#39;s actually masking some more serious problems.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited Sets a Baffling New Goal for Shopee's Profits\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-06 14:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/03/sea-limited-sets-baffling-new-goal-shopee-profit/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240622437","content_text":"Sea Limited's first-quarter earnings report on May 17 allayed some concerns about the Singapore-based tech giant's future. Its revenue rose 64% year over year to $2.9 billion, which beat analysts' expectations by $40 million. Its adjusted net loss widened from $320 million to $445 million, or $0.80 per share, but still topped estimates by $0.60.I reviewed Sea's earnings report last month and concluded that its stock would remain cheaply valued (at about three times this year's sales) until it meaningfully narrowed its net losses.But today I'd like to focus on a baffling new goal it set for Shopee, its unprofitable e-commerce unit. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Sea started to claim that Shopee would soon generate positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) \"before HQ costs\" in Southeast Asia and Taiwan.I'll explain why that statement is practically meaningless, and why Sea's emphasis on this new metric raises a few red flags for Shopee's future.Reviewing Shopee's staggering lossesOver the past five years, Shopee has become the top e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it became the market leader by relying heavily on aggressive promotions.PeriodFY 2020FY 2021Q1 2022Revenue$2.2 billion$5.1 billion$1.5 billionOperating Income($1.4 billion)($2.8 billion)($811 million)Adjusted EBITDA($1.3 billion)($2.6 billion)($743 million)Data source: Sea Limited.Those loss-leading strategies prevented Shopee from ever turning a profit. But instead of stabilizing its core Southeast Asian and Taiwanese markets first, Shopee started expanding into Latin America with even more aggressive subsidies and promotions over the past two years.What are Shopee's \"HQ costs\"?Shopee defines its \"HQ costs\" -- or \"headquarters' common expenses\" -- as its \"staff cost\" along with \"general and administrative expenses such as building facilities and server hosting expenses.\" In other words, they're the direct operating costs it incurs from expanding Shopee's marketplace.Those \"HQ costs\" should normally be categorized as operating expenses. However, Sea seems to believe that splitting certain \"HQ\" expenses from its other operating expenses (such as marketing costs) might give investors a clearer view of its underlying growth, since its HQ costs would presumably decline as it scales up its operations.But in reality, Shopee's \"adjusted EBITDA before HQ costs\" is merely a proprietary measure of profitability that conveniently excludes some of its biggest operating expenses. That makes it even more difficult for investors to gauge Shopee's actual profits, since its adjusted EBITDA already excludes significant one-time and variable expenses.Is Sea trying to muddy the waters?In the first quarter, Sea said that Shopee's HQ costs increased by $162 million year over year, which accounted for nearly half of the $330 million increase in its adjusted EBITDA loss.It also said Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order, after excluding HQ costs, improved year over year from $0.12 to $0.04 in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. During the conference call, CEO Forrest Li said that narrower loss indicated Shopee was \"well on track to achieve positive adjusted EBITDA before allocation of HQ costs in the region.\"However, that \"region\" doesn't include Brazil, where it incurred an adjusted EBITDA loss of $1.52 per order during the quarter as it took on entrenched e-commerce leaders like MercadoLibre.Sea also stopped disclosing Shopee's total adjusted EBITDA loss per order (including HQ costs) in the first quarter, which had previously widened by four cents year-over-year to $0.45 in the fourth quarter of 2021. That glaring omission -- along with its emphasis on achieving a positive adjusted EBITDA in Southeast Asia and Taiwan after excluding HQ costs -- suggests that Sea is trying to make Shopee's growth look more sustainable by cherry-picking its operating expenses and operating regions.Should investors be concerned?This isn't the first time Sea used proprietary growth metrics. When Sea went public in 2017, it initially used an \"adjusted revenue\" metric for its e-commerce and gaming units. It eventually stopped using that metric in 2020 after receiving inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Sea might believe that excluding its HQ costs and Latin American business from Shopee's adjusted EBITDA will give investors a clearer view of its core business in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. However, it arguably muddies the waters and makes it much more difficult to evaluate Shopee's growth as a global e-commerce platform. Investors should pay close attention to how Sea uses the term \"HQ costs\" over the next few quarters to see if it's actually masking some more serious problems.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":109,"commentSize":16,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":2,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}