Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?

Motley Fool2022-09-09

Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（3）

tig2021
·2022-09-10
Ok
Reply
2
Report
BlueBear
·2022-09-09
Nobody can tell
Reply
1
Report
湖中有虎
·2022-09-09
K
Reply
2
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2265862852?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-09-09 09:58","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2265862852","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-09 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"GOOG","symbol_name":"谷歌","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/","article_id":"2265862852","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2265862852","pubTimestamp":1662688723,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Could this growing ad tech company challenge Google?","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4538":"云计算","BK4023":"应用软件","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","CTV":"Innovid","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4576":"AR","DSP":"Viant Technology Inc.","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4009":"广告","BK4524":"宅经济概念","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4527":"明星科技股"},"translate_title":"到2030年，贸易部门的价值会超过Alphabet吗？","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"DSP":1,"CTV":1,"NFLX":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"QNETCN":0.6},"content_text":"Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.Image source: Getty Images.Google's advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk's revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it's also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don't want to tether themselves to Google's sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet's market cap by the end of the decade?The Trade Desk's long-term planThe Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it's been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like Comcast's Peacock, Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max, and Disney+. Even Netflix, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.During The Trade Desk's latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix's decision to avoid Google and tap Microsoft's ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a \"strong indication\" that companies were recognizing the \"dangers and limitations of walled gardens.\"Google also owns YouTube, the world's largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn't make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an \"open internet\" for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.Can The Trade Desk keep growing?The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn't been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won't be immune to those headwinds.For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk's revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.Furthermore, Apple's privacy changes on iOS and Google's decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple's changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts' sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.But it could still be a better growth stock than AlphabetYet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet's revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn't cheap at 18 times this year's sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year's sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet's stock to triple within the same period.That's all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don't expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet's market cap within the next decade.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9936445678,"gmtCreate":1662816089994,"gmtModify":1676537145356,"author":{"id":"3587008457873110","authorId":"3587008457873110","name":"tig2021","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86558e2c1be0fae967630b306994ef5a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3587008457873110","authorIdStr":"3587008457873110"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936445678","repostId":2265862852,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2265862852","pubTimestamp":1662688723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2265862852?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-09 09:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2265862852","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this growing ad tech company challenge Google?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Alphabet</b>&#39;s Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet <b>The Trade Desk</b>, which operates the world&#39;s largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.</p><p>DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbb9de76eeb50baa737274ef71de7db1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"459\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><p>Google&#39;s advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.</p><p>The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it&#39;s also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don&#39;t want to tether themselves to Google&#39;s sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet&#39;s market cap by the end of the decade?</p><h2>The Trade Desk&#39;s long-term plan</h2><p>The Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it&#39;s been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like <b>Comcast</b>&#39;s Peacock, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBD\">Warner Bros. Discovery</a></b>&#39;s HBO Max, and <b>Disney</b>+. Even <b>Netflix</b>, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.</p><p>During The Trade Desk&#39;s latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix&#39;s decision to avoid Google and tap <b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a &#34;strong indication&#34; that companies were recognizing the &#34;dangers and limitations of walled gardens.&#34;</p><p>Google also owns YouTube, the world&#39;s largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn&#39;t make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an &#34;open internet&#34; for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.</p><h2>Can The Trade Desk keep growing?</h2><p>The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn&#39;t been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won&#39;t be immune to those headwinds.</p><p>For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.</p><p>Furthermore, <b>Apple</b>&#39;s privacy changes on iOS and Google&#39;s decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple&#39;s changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.</p><p>Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts&#39; sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.</p><h2>But it could still be a better growth stock than Alphabet</h2><p>Yet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet&#39;s revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.</p><p>With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn&#39;t cheap at 18 times this year&#39;s sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year&#39;s sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet&#39;s stock to triple within the same period.</p><p>That&#39;s all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don&#39;t expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet&#39;s market cap within the next decade.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-09 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DSP":"Viant Technology Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4009":"广告","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","CTV":"Innovid","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4574":"无人驾驶","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2265862852","content_text":"Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.Image source: Getty Images.Google's advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk's revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it's also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don't want to tether themselves to Google's sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet's market cap by the end of the decade?The Trade Desk's long-term planThe Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it's been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like Comcast's Peacock, Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max, and Disney+. Even Netflix, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.During The Trade Desk's latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix's decision to avoid Google and tap Microsoft's ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a \"strong indication\" that companies were recognizing the \"dangers and limitations of walled gardens.\"Google also owns YouTube, the world's largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn't make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an \"open internet\" for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.Can The Trade Desk keep growing?The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn't been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won't be immune to those headwinds.For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk's revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.Furthermore, Apple's privacy changes on iOS and Google's decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple's changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts' sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.But it could still be a better growth stock than AlphabetYet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet's revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn't cheap at 18 times this year's sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year's sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet's stock to triple within the same period.That's all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don't expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet's market cap within the next decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9936947273,"gmtCreate":1662697266093,"gmtModify":1676537121781,"author":{"id":"4088558046227310","authorId":"4088558046227310","name":"BlueBear","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c78e4c05c47b817a29daef055b1378","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae1f49570794979e009a5efdeb6f4789","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4088558046227310","authorIdStr":"4088558046227310"},"htmlText":"Nobody can tell","listText":"Nobody can tell","text":"Nobody can tell","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936947273","repostId":2265862852,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2265862852","pubTimestamp":1662688723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2265862852?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-09 09:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2265862852","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this growing ad tech company challenge Google?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Alphabet</b>&#39;s Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet <b>The Trade Desk</b>, which operates the world&#39;s largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.</p><p>DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbb9de76eeb50baa737274ef71de7db1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"459\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><p>Google&#39;s advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.</p><p>The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it&#39;s also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don&#39;t want to tether themselves to Google&#39;s sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet&#39;s market cap by the end of the decade?</p><h2>The Trade Desk&#39;s long-term plan</h2><p>The Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it&#39;s been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like <b>Comcast</b>&#39;s Peacock, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBD\">Warner Bros. Discovery</a></b>&#39;s HBO Max, and <b>Disney</b>+. Even <b>Netflix</b>, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.</p><p>During The Trade Desk&#39;s latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix&#39;s decision to avoid Google and tap <b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a &#34;strong indication&#34; that companies were recognizing the &#34;dangers and limitations of walled gardens.&#34;</p><p>Google also owns YouTube, the world&#39;s largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn&#39;t make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an &#34;open internet&#34; for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.</p><h2>Can The Trade Desk keep growing?</h2><p>The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn&#39;t been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won&#39;t be immune to those headwinds.</p><p>For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.</p><p>Furthermore, <b>Apple</b>&#39;s privacy changes on iOS and Google&#39;s decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple&#39;s changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.</p><p>Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts&#39; sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.</p><h2>But it could still be a better growth stock than Alphabet</h2><p>Yet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet&#39;s revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.</p><p>With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn&#39;t cheap at 18 times this year&#39;s sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year&#39;s sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet&#39;s stock to triple within the same period.</p><p>That&#39;s all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don&#39;t expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet&#39;s market cap within the next decade.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-09 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DSP":"Viant Technology Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4009":"广告","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","CTV":"Innovid","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4574":"无人驾驶","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2265862852","content_text":"Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.Image source: Getty Images.Google's advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk's revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it's also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don't want to tether themselves to Google's sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet's market cap by the end of the decade?The Trade Desk's long-term planThe Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it's been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like Comcast's Peacock, Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max, and Disney+. Even Netflix, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.During The Trade Desk's latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix's decision to avoid Google and tap Microsoft's ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a \"strong indication\" that companies were recognizing the \"dangers and limitations of walled gardens.\"Google also owns YouTube, the world's largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn't make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an \"open internet\" for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.Can The Trade Desk keep growing?The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn't been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won't be immune to those headwinds.For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk's revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.Furthermore, Apple's privacy changes on iOS and Google's decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple's changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts' sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.But it could still be a better growth stock than AlphabetYet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet's revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn't cheap at 18 times this year's sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year's sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet's stock to triple within the same period.That's all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don't expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet's market cap within the next decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9936995059,"gmtCreate":1662689063671,"gmtModify":1676537119212,"author":{"id":"3581998808524359","authorId":"3581998808524359","name":"湖中有虎","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581998808524359","authorIdStr":"3581998808524359"},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936995059","repostId":2265862852,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2265862852","pubTimestamp":1662688723,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2265862852?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-09 09:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2265862852","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could this growing ad tech company challenge Google?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Alphabet</b>&#39;s Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet <b>The Trade Desk</b>, which operates the world&#39;s largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.</p><p>DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbb9de76eeb50baa737274ef71de7db1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"459\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><p>Google&#39;s advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.</p><p>The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it&#39;s also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don&#39;t want to tether themselves to Google&#39;s sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet&#39;s market cap by the end of the decade?</p><h2>The Trade Desk&#39;s long-term plan</h2><p>The Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it&#39;s been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like <b>Comcast</b>&#39;s Peacock, <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBD\">Warner Bros. Discovery</a></b>&#39;s HBO Max, and <b>Disney</b>+. Even <b>Netflix</b>, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.</p><p>During The Trade Desk&#39;s latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix&#39;s decision to avoid Google and tap <b>Microsoft</b>&#39;s ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a &#34;strong indication&#34; that companies were recognizing the &#34;dangers and limitations of walled gardens.&#34;</p><p>Google also owns YouTube, the world&#39;s largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn&#39;t make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an &#34;open internet&#34; for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.</p><h2>Can The Trade Desk keep growing?</h2><p>The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn&#39;t been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won&#39;t be immune to those headwinds.</p><p>For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk&#39;s revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.</p><p>Furthermore, <b>Apple</b>&#39;s privacy changes on iOS and Google&#39;s decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple&#39;s changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.</p><p>Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts&#39; sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.</p><h2>But it could still be a better growth stock than Alphabet</h2><p>Yet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet&#39;s revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.</p><p>With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn&#39;t cheap at 18 times this year&#39;s sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year&#39;s sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet&#39;s stock to triple within the same period.</p><p>That&#39;s all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don&#39;t expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet&#39;s market cap within the next decade.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill The Trade Desk Be Worth More Than Alphabet by 2030?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-09 09:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DSP":"Viant Technology Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4009":"广告","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","CTV":"Innovid","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4574":"无人驾驶","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/08/will-the-trade-desk-be-worth-more-than-alphabet-by/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2265862852","content_text":"Alphabet's Google has crushed many digital advertising platforms over the past two decades. Yet The Trade Desk, which operates the world's largest independent demand-side platform (DSP) for digital ads, withstood that competition.DSPs help marketers buy programmatic (automated) ad space across multiple platforms. They sit on the opposite end of the advertising supply chain as sell-side platforms (SSPs), which help publishers sell their own ad inventories.Image source: Getty Images.Google's advertising platform already bundles together a DSP, SSP, and other digital advertising services. But instead of going head-to-head against Google in its core desktop and mobile advertising markets, The Trade Desk has carved out a growing niche by focusing on streaming audio and video platforms.The secular growth of those streaming media platforms, which accelerated throughout the pandemic as more people stayed at home, boosted The Trade Desk's revenue from $203 million in 2016 to $1.2 billion in 2021, which represented a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 43%. The Trade Desk is still tiny compared to Alphabet, but it's also growing a lot faster and attracting advertisers that don't want to tether themselves to Google's sprawling ecosystem. Could it grow significantly larger and eclipse Alphabet's market cap by the end of the decade?The Trade Desk's long-term planThe Trade Desk currently serves more than 1,000 customers. It provides ad space across mobile, desktop, and connected TV (CTV) platforms, but it's been generating most of its growth from the CTV market, which consists of ad-supported platforms like Comcast's Peacock, Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max, and Disney+. Even Netflix, which had shunned ads for years, plans to launch a cheaper ad-supported tier in the near future.During The Trade Desk's latest conference call, CEO Jeff Green said Netflix's decision to avoid Google and tap Microsoft's ad tech platform Xandr (which is already partnered with The Trade Desk) to build its upcoming ad-supported tier was a \"strong indication\" that companies were recognizing the \"dangers and limitations of walled gardens.\"Google also owns YouTube, the world's largest ad-supported streaming video platform, so it doesn't make sense for most streaming video companies like Disney or Netflix to tether themselves to a major competitor. Green believes that desire to avoid walled gardens will drive the growth of an \"open internet\" for independent ad platforms like The Trade Desk.Can The Trade Desk keep growing?The Trade Desk has grown like a weed since its IPO in 2016, and its stock has more than tripled from its IPO price of $18. But besides the pandemic, which actually generated tailwinds for its CTV business, it hasn't been tested by a major recession yet. Many advertising companies have already reined in their near-term expectations to deal with inflation, rising interest rates, and unpredictable geopolitical tensions, and The Trade Desk probably won't be immune to those headwinds.For now, analysts expect The Trade Desk's revenue to rise 33% to $1.59 billion this year, grow another 24% to $1.98 billion in 2023, and increase 27% to $2.53 billion in 2024. Those growth rates look healthy, but they might not fully account for a painful recession or intense competition from other independent or bundled DSPs.Furthermore, Apple's privacy changes on iOS and Google's decision to stamp out third-party cookies could also cause unexpected problems. However, The Trade Desk is already countering those changes with its new platform Solimar, which insulates advertisers from Apple's changes by accumulating more first-party data for ads, and a newer technology known as Unified ID (UID) 2.0 that eliminates the need for third-party cookies.Assuming The Trade Desk matches analysts' sales expectations for the next two years and continues to grow at a CAGR of 25% through 2030, it could generate nearly $10 billion in revenue by the final year. But that would still make it an ant compared to Alphabet, which generated a whopping $257.6 billion in revenue last year. So unless Alphabet gets chopped up into tiny pieces by antitrust regulators, it will still be worth a lot more than The Trade Desk.But it could still be a better growth stock than AlphabetYet The Trade Desk could still generate bigger gains than Alphabet over the next eight years. Analysts only expect Alphabet's revenue to grow in the low-teens through 2024, and it will likely maintain those mature growth rates through 2030.With a market cap of $29.3 billion, The Trade Desk isn't cheap at 18 times this year's sales. Alphabet, which is worth $1.4 trillion, trades at five times this year's sales. But if The Trade Desk generates $10 billion in revenue in 2030 and its price-to-sales ratio cools off to ten, it could still be worth $100 billion -- which would be more than triple its current valuation. It would arguably be much more difficult for Alphabet's stock to triple within the same period.That's all speculation for now, but I still believe The Trade Desk is a rock-solid growth stock for long-term investors. Just don't expect it to come anywhere close to matching Alphabet's market cap within the next decade.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":54,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}