SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling

seekingalpha2023-06-06

SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment（3）

Theme
·2023-06-06
Like your sensible easy but people are still crazy and not rational in investing.
Reply
Like
Report
drandy
·2023-06-06
Whatever that's happening right now just goes to reinforcing the fact that the stock market is irrational. I'm still watching on the sidelines and not buying - will sell if I'm in profit but not otherwise. Staying away from greed will help us to avoid a bear trap disguised as a bull run.
Reply
9
Report
Guavaxf30
·2023-06-06
I too have been wrong in caling for a general sell. But I think it is only a temporary wrong. Which means, when the bubble does burst, it will be a mega burst not unlike the dot-come burst back in 1999/20. And the Nasdaq, being the one holding up the market, will be leading the stampede down. This is what I think anyway. DYOD.
Reply
60
Report
Fold Replies
- CYKuan:
  thanks for sharing
  2023-06-06
  Reply
  Report
- CYKuan:
  thanks for sharing
  2023-06-06
  Reply
  Report
- Nagoken:
  Ok
  2023-06-06
  Reply
  Report
View more 2 comments

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2341902339?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2023-06-06 13:59","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"2341902339","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling","media":"seekingalpha","content":"<div>\nSummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-06-06 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling>seekingalpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SPY","symbol_name":"标普500ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling","article_id":"2341902339","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2341902339","pubTimestamp":1686031196,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-d","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"translate_title":"SPDR标普500指数ETF：泡沫一直在膨胀","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":1},"content_text":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing another bubble in equities.A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment.I Was Wrong On SPX So FarThe S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I've written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.Data by YChartsHowever, the S&P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today's tech sector.Statista, Verdict.co.ukUpdated ThesisYes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today's rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.Why Do I Think So?Let me note that I'm not a \"permanent bear\" on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&P 500 Index can be great \"Buys\" (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term \"Buy-and-Holds\" because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I'm obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.Seeking Alpha, Market data, author's notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a \"return to normal\". The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih's data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say \"bubble\", I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn't make sense to take the average technology share of the S&P 500 of 8% and say that it's fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn't the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today's investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn't be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers' concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they're most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a \"job-full recession,\" where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn't look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs' Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China's property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don't support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let's focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It's important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed's own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn't yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:Data by YChartsAnd that's against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it's now this time around? I doubt it.Crescat Capital's NewsletterThe Bottom LineIn my article, I've tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I'm not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I'm just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I'm not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn't occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of \"contrarian protection\" for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as \"Sell\" again today.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":184404298145832,"gmtCreate":1686044961277,"gmtModify":1686045095378,"author":{"id":"3581549237814895","authorId":"3581549237814895","name":"Theme","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d589f20e0a3a44c380a2aacfda4272b","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3581549237814895","authorIdStr":"3581549237814895"},"htmlText":"Like your sensible easy but people are still crazy and not rational in investing.&nbsp;","listText":"Like your sensible easy but people are still crazy and not rational in investing.&nbsp;","text":"Like your sensible easy but people are still crazy and not rational in investing.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184404298145832","repostId":2341902339,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2341902339","pubTimestamp":1686031196,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2341902339?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-06-06 13:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2341902339","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-d","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The S&amp;P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.</li><li>The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we&#39;re facing another bubble in equities.</li><li>A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.</li><li>I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment.</li></ul><h2>I Was Wrong On SPX So Far</h2>The S&amp;P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I&#39;ve written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ddda00e80579dc1c26f64d0076a8fec\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsHowever, the S&amp;P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2f0e5702e9aa3e35f1326019ce2e92\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today&#39;s tech sector.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97bea140e2a53bbeca278c9438af18f3\" alt=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" title=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"252\"/>Statista, Verdict.co.uk<h2>Updated Thesis</h2>Yes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today&#39;s rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.<h2>Why Do I Think So?</h2>Let me note that I&#39;m not a &#34;permanent bear&#34; on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&amp;P 500 Index can be great &#34;Buys&#34; (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term &#34;Buy-and-Holds&#34; because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I&#39;m obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f047a289d8296ea8fa1018cb41c548aa\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\"/>Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a &#34;return to normal&#34;. The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ab4b925ddf729a54e0aee1c1af2a7d6\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"400\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbb63aeb2c7aa7deaf982d899d1ed59\" alt=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" title=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"338\"/>Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say &#34;bubble&#34;, I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn&#39;t make sense to take the average technology share of the S&amp;P 500 of 8% and say that it&#39;s fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn&#39;t the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today&#39;s investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn&#39;t be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff1115592db1bed146b13cd7638b9e5d\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers&#39; concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efe0aad8939a807023b94b41a5296726\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a32a7d943b90b03f9e011f3e428c4266\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"197\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they&#39;re most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981c9d50ba607e01c4107e838f8ed7a2\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"364\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5539ad963b15ffde8814f1dae4660da\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"408\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0647f03946ccf34512176c054787f925\" alt=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" title=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"345\"/>Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a &#34;job-full recession,&#34; where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn&#39;t look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs&#39; Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China&#39;s property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c95178288df65874c457065d076dd82a\" alt=\"Investing.com data\" title=\"Investing.com data\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"644\"/>Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5eedaaaa80a040b48ec75bcb75acf898\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha News\" title=\"Seeking Alpha News\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"254\"/>Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don&#39;t support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let&#39;s focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It&#39;s important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed&#39;s own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6b88252cc5ab26a5cd53879715f5c1\" alt=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" title=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"347\"/>Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn&#39;t yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ae5ca52adc7e23d4b90de91686cbcd4\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\"/>Data by YChartsAnd that&#39;s against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it&#39;s now this time around? I doubt it.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5ffe25cca692a3c42908914836a1335\" alt=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" title=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\"/>Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>In my article, I&#39;ve tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I&#39;m not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I&#39;m just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I&#39;m not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn&#39;t occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of &#34;contrarian protection&#34; for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as &#34;Sell&#34; again today.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-06-06 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling>seekingalpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2341902339","content_text":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing another bubble in equities.A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment.I Was Wrong On SPX So FarThe S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I've written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.Data by YChartsHowever, the S&P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today's tech sector.Statista, Verdict.co.ukUpdated ThesisYes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today's rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.Why Do I Think So?Let me note that I'm not a \"permanent bear\" on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&P 500 Index can be great \"Buys\" (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term \"Buy-and-Holds\" because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I'm obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.Seeking Alpha, Market data, author's notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a \"return to normal\". The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih's data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say \"bubble\", I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn't make sense to take the average technology share of the S&P 500 of 8% and say that it's fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn't the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today's investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn't be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers' concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they're most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a \"job-full recession,\" where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn't look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs' Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China's property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don't support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let's focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It's important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed's own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn't yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:Data by YChartsAnd that's against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it's now this time around? I doubt it.Crescat Capital's NewsletterThe Bottom LineIn my article, I've tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I'm not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I'm just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I'm not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn't occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of \"contrarian protection\" for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as \"Sell\" again today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":184422346707096,"gmtCreate":1686033958337,"gmtModify":1686033963131,"author":{"id":"4095290035440230","authorId":"4095290035440230","name":"drandy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c3b0d3ef013fc8f24f03b7e33f60e76","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4095290035440230","authorIdStr":"4095290035440230"},"htmlText":"Whatever that's happening right now just goes to reinforcing the fact that the stock market is irrational. I'm still watching on the sidelines and not buying - will sell if I'm in profit but not otherwise. Staying away from greed will help us to avoid&nbsp;a bear trap disguised as a bull run.","listText":"Whatever that's happening right now just goes to reinforcing the fact that the stock market is irrational. I'm still watching on the sidelines and not buying - will sell if I'm in profit but not otherwise. Staying away from greed will help us to avoid&nbsp;a bear trap disguised as a bull run.","text":"Whatever that's happening right now just goes to reinforcing the fact that the stock market is irrational. I'm still watching on the sidelines and not buying - will sell if I'm in profit but not otherwise. Staying away from greed will help us to avoid a bear trap disguised as a bull run.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184422346707096","repostId":2341902339,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2341902339","pubTimestamp":1686031196,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2341902339?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-06-06 13:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2341902339","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-d","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The S&amp;P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.</li><li>The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we&#39;re facing another bubble in equities.</li><li>A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.</li><li>I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment.</li></ul><h2>I Was Wrong On SPX So Far</h2>The S&amp;P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I&#39;ve written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ddda00e80579dc1c26f64d0076a8fec\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsHowever, the S&amp;P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2f0e5702e9aa3e35f1326019ce2e92\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today&#39;s tech sector.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97bea140e2a53bbeca278c9438af18f3\" alt=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" title=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"252\"/>Statista, Verdict.co.uk<h2>Updated Thesis</h2>Yes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today&#39;s rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.<h2>Why Do I Think So?</h2>Let me note that I&#39;m not a &#34;permanent bear&#34; on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&amp;P 500 Index can be great &#34;Buys&#34; (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term &#34;Buy-and-Holds&#34; because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I&#39;m obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f047a289d8296ea8fa1018cb41c548aa\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\"/>Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a &#34;return to normal&#34;. The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ab4b925ddf729a54e0aee1c1af2a7d6\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"400\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbb63aeb2c7aa7deaf982d899d1ed59\" alt=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" title=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"338\"/>Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say &#34;bubble&#34;, I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn&#39;t make sense to take the average technology share of the S&amp;P 500 of 8% and say that it&#39;s fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn&#39;t the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today&#39;s investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn&#39;t be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff1115592db1bed146b13cd7638b9e5d\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers&#39; concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efe0aad8939a807023b94b41a5296726\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a32a7d943b90b03f9e011f3e428c4266\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"197\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they&#39;re most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981c9d50ba607e01c4107e838f8ed7a2\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"364\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5539ad963b15ffde8814f1dae4660da\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"408\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0647f03946ccf34512176c054787f925\" alt=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" title=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"345\"/>Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a &#34;job-full recession,&#34; where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn&#39;t look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs&#39; Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China&#39;s property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c95178288df65874c457065d076dd82a\" alt=\"Investing.com data\" title=\"Investing.com data\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"644\"/>Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5eedaaaa80a040b48ec75bcb75acf898\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha News\" title=\"Seeking Alpha News\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"254\"/>Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don&#39;t support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let&#39;s focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It&#39;s important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed&#39;s own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6b88252cc5ab26a5cd53879715f5c1\" alt=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" title=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"347\"/>Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn&#39;t yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ae5ca52adc7e23d4b90de91686cbcd4\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\"/>Data by YChartsAnd that&#39;s against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it&#39;s now this time around? I doubt it.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5ffe25cca692a3c42908914836a1335\" alt=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" title=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\"/>Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>In my article, I&#39;ve tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I&#39;m not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I&#39;m just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I&#39;m not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn&#39;t occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of &#34;contrarian protection&#34; for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as &#34;Sell&#34; again today.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-06-06 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling>seekingalpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2341902339","content_text":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing another bubble in equities.A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment.I Was Wrong On SPX So FarThe S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I've written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.Data by YChartsHowever, the S&P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today's tech sector.Statista, Verdict.co.ukUpdated ThesisYes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today's rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.Why Do I Think So?Let me note that I'm not a \"permanent bear\" on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&P 500 Index can be great \"Buys\" (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term \"Buy-and-Holds\" because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I'm obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.Seeking Alpha, Market data, author's notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a \"return to normal\". The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih's data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say \"bubble\", I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn't make sense to take the average technology share of the S&P 500 of 8% and say that it's fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn't the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today's investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn't be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers' concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they're most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a \"job-full recession,\" where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn't look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs' Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China's property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don't support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let's focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It's important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed's own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn't yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:Data by YChartsAnd that's against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it's now this time around? I doubt it.Crescat Capital's NewsletterThe Bottom LineIn my article, I've tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I'm not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I'm just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I'm not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn't occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of \"contrarian protection\" for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as \"Sell\" again today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":184420702957648,"gmtCreate":1686033267042,"gmtModify":1686033271606,"author":{"id":"3576140222331577","authorId":"3576140222331577","name":"Guavaxf30","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ff15ff6aa254c9130f9af922f7e2447","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3576140222331577","authorIdStr":"3576140222331577"},"htmlText":"I too have been wrong in caling for a general sell. But I think it is only a temporary wrong. Which means, when the bubble does burst, it will be a mega burst not unlike the dot-come burst back in 1999/20. And the Nasdaq, being the one holding up the market, will be leading the stampede down.&nbsp; This is what I think anyway. DYOD.","listText":"I too have been wrong in caling for a general sell. But I think it is only a temporary wrong. Which means, when the bubble does burst, it will be a mega burst not unlike the dot-come burst back in 1999/20. And the Nasdaq, being the one holding up the market, will be leading the stampede down.&nbsp; This is what I think anyway. DYOD.","text":"I too have been wrong in caling for a general sell. But I think it is only a temporary wrong. Which means, when the bubble does burst, it will be a mega burst not unlike the dot-come burst back in 1999/20. And the Nasdaq, being the one holding up the market, will be leading the stampede down. This is what I think anyway. DYOD.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":60,"commentSize":11,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184420702957648","repostId":2341902339,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2341902339","pubTimestamp":1686031196,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2341902339?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-06-06 13:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2341902339","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-d","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The S&amp;P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.</li><li>The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we&#39;re facing another bubble in equities.</li><li>A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.</li><li>I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment.</li></ul><h2>I Was Wrong On SPX So Far</h2>The S&amp;P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I&#39;ve written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ddda00e80579dc1c26f64d0076a8fec\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsHowever, the S&amp;P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c2f0e5702e9aa3e35f1326019ce2e92\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today&#39;s tech sector.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97bea140e2a53bbeca278c9438af18f3\" alt=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" title=\"Statista, Verdict.co.uk\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"252\"/>Statista, Verdict.co.uk<h2>Updated Thesis</h2>Yes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today&#39;s rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.<h2>Why Do I Think So?</h2>Let me note that I&#39;m not a &#34;permanent bear&#34; on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&amp;P 500 Index can be great &#34;Buys&#34; (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term &#34;Buy-and-Holds&#34; because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I&#39;m obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f047a289d8296ea8fa1018cb41c548aa\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\"/>Seeking Alpha, Market data, author&#39;s notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a &#34;return to normal&#34;. The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ab4b925ddf729a54e0aee1c1af2a7d6\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"400\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fbb63aeb2c7aa7deaf982d899d1ed59\" alt=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" title=\"Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"338\"/>Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih&#39;s data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say &#34;bubble&#34;, I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn&#39;t make sense to take the average technology share of the S&amp;P 500 of 8% and say that it&#39;s fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn&#39;t the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today&#39;s investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn&#39;t be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff1115592db1bed146b13cd7638b9e5d\" alt=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" title=\"The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie Bilello\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\"/>The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers&#39; concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efe0aad8939a807023b94b41a5296726\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a32a7d943b90b03f9e011f3e428c4266\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"197\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they&#39;re most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981c9d50ba607e01c4107e838f8ed7a2\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"364\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5539ad963b15ffde8814f1dae4660da\" alt=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" title=\"May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"408\"/>May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley&#39;s AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0647f03946ccf34512176c054787f925\" alt=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" title=\"Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"345\"/>Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a &#34;job-full recession,&#34; where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn&#39;t look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs&#39; Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China&#39;s property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c95178288df65874c457065d076dd82a\" alt=\"Investing.com data\" title=\"Investing.com data\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"644\"/>Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5eedaaaa80a040b48ec75bcb75acf898\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha News\" title=\"Seeking Alpha News\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"254\"/>Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don&#39;t support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let&#39;s focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It&#39;s important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed&#39;s own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6b88252cc5ab26a5cd53879715f5c1\" alt=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" title=\"Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"347\"/>Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn&#39;t yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ae5ca52adc7e23d4b90de91686cbcd4\" alt=\"Data by YCharts\" title=\"Data by YCharts\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\"/>Data by YChartsAnd that&#39;s against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it&#39;s now this time around? I doubt it.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5ffe25cca692a3c42908914836a1335\" alt=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" title=\"Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\"/>Crescat Capital&#39;s Newsletter<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>In my article, I&#39;ve tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I&#39;m not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I&#39;m just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I&#39;m not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn&#39;t occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of &#34;contrarian protection&#34; for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I&#39;m mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they&#39;re the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn&#39;t bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as &#34;Sell&#34; again today.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSPY: The Bubble Keeps Swelling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-06-06 13:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling>seekingalpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4609395-spy-bubble-keeps-swelling","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2341902339","content_text":"SummaryThe S&P 500 Index has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. NASDAQ 100 added over 34% YTD.The breadth of the gain shows obvious signs that we're facing another bubble in equities.A galaxy of fundamental indicators points to a sell-off that cannot be timed because of the identified bubble.I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment.I Was Wrong On SPX So FarThe S&P 500 Index (NYSEARCA:SPY) (SP500) has taught all the bears like me a lesson as it has gained 12.32% year-to-date. The deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, which I've written about more than once, mainly affected the ex-tech sectors, and accordingly, the SPY and the Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ) exceeded all my expectations due to the high weighting of technology stocks in their structures.Data by YChartsHowever, the S&P and NASDAQ ex-tech indices gained only 3.72% and 6.74% YTD, respectively:Data by YChartsThe market has continued to ignore fundamentals that in the past were clear and visible signs of an approaching economic peak - all because of the AI craze that started with the Big Tech companies and eventually spread far beyond today's tech sector.Statista, Verdict.co.ukUpdated ThesisYes, I was wrong when turned bearish on SPY in late March 2023. But I never suggested shorting the index - it was always about reducing positions or getting out temporarily. As I analyzed the new facts that emerged in the market over time, I revised some of my views. However, one thing remained unchanged - today's rally looks like an absolutely unstable phenomenon in terms of fundamental indicators.Why Do I Think So?Let me note that I'm not a \"permanent bear\" on the stock market. I admit that some companies in the S&P 500 Index can be great \"Buys\" (and even more so from other smaller capitalized indexes), and almost all FANGMAN stocks are great long-term \"Buy-and-Holds\" because of their wide moats. However, a constructive look at current events raises some troubling questions that I cannot answer bullishly with certainty.Firstly, like many others, I'm obviously confused about the breadth of the market rally we have seen over the last year. The SP500 has 11 sectors in its structure, but only 1/3 has driven the entire rally so far, while the other sectors have been very weak.Seeking Alpha, Market data, author's notesThe growth of the three driving sectors - Technology (XLK), Communication Services (XLC), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) - was the result of a \"return to normal\". The market simply began to favor the sectors that fell the most in 2022 and dump those that grew the most over the same period. Just take a look at Energy (XLE):The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloNothing wrong with subsiding fears - however, the repricing that took place proved to be too large, resulting in the share of the fastest recovering sector [tech] rising to the highest share of the SP500:Goldman Sachs [updated by the author], Ken Shih's data [shared on LinkedIn]The main conclusion I draw from the current situation is that the SP500 and other tech-rich indices have formed a kind of bubble with their structure, which, after not having time to deflate in 2022, has been re-inflated thanks to the new trendy investment theme [AI]. When I say \"bubble\", I mean that the share of a single sector is far above its historical norm.And here I need to make a very important point right away. The structure of the economy and the structure of consumption have changed dramatically since 2000. Technology plays a much more important role in the world today than it did 20-25 years ago. So it just doesn't make sense to take the average technology share of the S&P 500 of 8% and say that it's fair to expect a return to that level.But the share of the top 5 companies inside SP500 [all come from tech] with more than 24% isn't the norm. Think about how much your daily life depends on using the products of all technology companies. Do they really take up 24% of your consumption [or manufacturing]? I highly doubt it. Undoubtedly, their share should be large - the same chips are everywhere today, from space rockets to writing pens - but everything should have a limit, in my opinion.The question I think today's investors should be asking is, what will ensure these incredibly widespread AI-related efficiency gains [margin expansions, cost optimization, new growth areas]? We need to look at the consumer to see how manufacturing activity is changing under the influence of demand. And here I see some unresolved issues.First, it seems clear to me that most of the U.S. population is financially strapped in some way-otherwise credit card usage wouldn't be increasing so rapidly against a backdrop of rising interest rates.The Week- in Charts (6/1/23) by Charlie BilelloRising credit card balances should eventually lead to a decline in consumer spending. As individuals devote a larger share of their income to debt service, their ability to spend on discretionary and non-essential goods and services declines. As a result, the overall consumer spending decreases.Second, the negative impact on consumer spending is already evident from various surveys, such as the one I cited last month. Now we have more new data confirming the earlier findings. On May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source] released the following key points that we should all be aware of:Increasing Job Concern: Consumers' concerns about job loss increased from the previous month, with 28% expressing more concern. Nearly 1/5 of consumers (66%) cited job loss as their top concern for this year.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Spending outlook is deteriorating: Consumers expect to spend less on discretionary categories like electronics, home appliances, and dining-out:May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Travel and live entertainment are high-risk categories for spending cuts: Consumers cited travel (airfare and lodging) and live entertainment as the categories where they're most likely to cut back on spending. Apparel and restaurants were seen as more resistant categories.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Dwindling confidence in the U.S. economy and household finances: Consumer confidence in the U.S. economy is deteriorating, with 54% expecting the economy to worsen over the next six months, compared to 25% who expect it to improve. Confidence in household finances is also on a downward trend: 26% expect finances to deteriorate in the next six months.May 30, 2023, Morgan Stanley's AlphaWise U.S. Consumer Pulse Survey [Wave 43, proprietary source]Third, manufacturing activity is struggling as a result of the weak demand [I suppose]. The ISM data provides a forward-looking measure of growth that aligns with the equity market and usually leads them, which is now not the case:Richard Excell from Stay Vigilant [06/05/2023]This disconnect is likely due to a few influential stocks driving the market while the majority of stocks are pricing in a slowdown. The ISM New Orders Data and the New Orders to Inventory ratio tend to anticipate economic trends. And the new orders have weakened recently, causing the new orders to inventory ratio to decline, indicating potential challenges ahead. The regional Fed data, including the Dallas Fed data and the MNI Chicago PMI data, also suggest that the bottom of the ISM has not yet been reached, according to Richard Excell from the Stay Vigilant newsletter. He thinks that the surprisingly strong jobs numbers may lead to a \"job-full recession,\" where the majority of people do well while the top earners struggle.Be that as it may, what we see in commodity prices doesn't look like healthy corporate demand. Goldman Sachs' Commodities Research team revised down its previous demand projections for iron ore citing challenges in global steel demand caused by China's property contraction and manufacturing headwinds [June 4, 2023 - proprietary source]. Copper at the same time keeps rolling down:Investing.com dataThe Saudis have decided to cut production by another 1 million barrels per day in July in light of developments in China and the global economy. Bloomberg writes that global oil demand will hit a record high this year - maybe, but then why is Saudi Arabia cutting output to its lowest level since June 2021, when production was still recovering from the depths of the Covid-19 pandemic?Seeking Alpha NewsSo the commodities markets and actual manufacturing activity don't support the rally in stocks we see right now.Fourth, let's focus on Fed now. Imagine that a recession does not occur in 2H 2023 as I expect. The sustained wage growth and negative productivity could force the Fed to deal with the inevitable consequences of pushing inflation back to 2%, which would require raising the funds rate to 6.5% and pushing unemployment to 4.5% - this is what Steve Blitz from TS Lombard writes in his recent note [June 2, 2023 - proprietary source]. It's important to note that the real funds rate has not yet contracted, according to the Fed's own standard. Richard Excell also mentions that Fed Chair Jay Powell intends to slow inflation through the labor channel, and the recent strong jobs data complicates this approach. The market has adjusted the odds of an interest rate hike in June and July slightly lower based on the data.Reuters Graphics [June 2, 2023]I think the Fed should continue to send negative signals to the market because its work isn't yet complete.Now a few words about liquidity. The recent suspension of the US debt ceiling allows the country to accumulate new debt on a net basis. So the US Treasury is expected to issue a large number of bills in the coming weeks and months to raise funds quickly. This strategy has been used in the past when the debt ceiling was lifted or suspended, Andreas Steno Larsen writes in his most recent newsletter. However, the duration of the new debt will be gradually extended over the next few quarters to minimize its impact on the markets. But under some specified assumptions, there should be a net reduction of global liquidity of roughly $1.2 trillion for the rest of FY2023, SA fellow Pragmatic Value Investing writes in his recent article on the subject. All in all, such an outflow is a very negative premise for the SP500, which now seems grossly overvalued in terms of its ability to generate inflation-adjusted EPS figures:Data by YChartsAnd that's against the backdrop of a probable peak cycle in EPS growth, where changes in EPS typically precede changes in revenue growth by about a quarter. Recent reports show that corporate earnings are down 13%. Comparing this trend to previous slump scenarios such as the tech bust and the global financial crisis, Crescat Capital notes that profits have fallen 71% and 54%, respectively. May AI hype hold the sales growth where it's now this time around? I doubt it.Crescat Capital's NewsletterThe Bottom LineIn my article, I've tried to look at leading indicators that give an indication of the future macroeconomic situation. I'm not trying to time the market as many have suggested in the comments under my last macro article. I'm just pointing out things that could cause big problems with your long positions in the foreseeable future. I'm not calling for shorting the bubble that has been created - that is too dangerous. But to scale positions in such a market environment I think is absolutely crazy.Of course, I could be wrong again with my updated sell thesis, as has been the case the last few times. The history of the various bubbles in the history of the stock market shows that the burst doesn't occur when everyone expects it but at the most unexpected moment. The approaching recession has been called the most anticipated in history - perhaps the resulting positioning will become a kind of \"contrarian protection\" for the bulls for many months forward.But looking at the fundamental picture, I see no evidence that we should be buying now. I'm mostly concerned about consumer behavior and their spending plans - they're the main driver of the economy, the state of which doesn't bode well at the moment. So I rate the broader stock market as \"Sell\" again today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":106389557,"gmtCreate":1686044217961,"gmtModify":1686044224128,"authorId":4087829320241190,"author":{"id":4087829320241190,"idStr":"4087829320241190","authorId":4087829320241190,"name":"CYKuan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a600e1308bcb427dcbe9716594333839","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":184420702957648,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"thanks for sharing","text":"thanks for sharing","html":"thanks for sharing"},{"id":106389556,"gmtCreate":1686044194165,"gmtModify":1686044200682,"authorId":4087829320241190,"author":{"id":4087829320241190,"idStr":"4087829320241190","authorId":4087829320241190,"name":"CYKuan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a600e1308bcb427dcbe9716594333839","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":184420702957648,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"thanks for sharing","text":"thanks for sharing","html":"thanks for sharing"},{"id":106389531,"gmtCreate":1686042962611,"gmtModify":1686042968834,"authorId":3576560237263785,"author":{"id":3576560237263785,"idStr":"3576560237263785","authorId":3576560237263785,"name":"Nagoken","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caac3ac5db4b0d37985b9f55a62d569f","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":184420702957648,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":106389500,"gmtCreate":1686041030536,"gmtModify":1686041036784,"authorId":4089527924629590,"author":{"id":4089527924629590,"idStr":"4089527924629590","authorId":4089527924629590,"name":"HengHuat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5854d1323f59ffe9e66dca6d58fd6af8","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":184420702957648,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"burst dreams","text":"burst dreams","html":"burst dreams"},{"id":106389484,"gmtCreate":1686039473340,"gmtModify":1686039479803,"authorId":4096385451836270,"author":{"id":4096385451836270,"idStr":"4096385451836270","authorId":4096385451836270,"name":"mcb","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ca1d743be919baa2ffb35890895956b6","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.12","exceedPercentage":"93.17%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":184420702957648,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":12,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":2,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}